Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Replacement Project. Noise and Vibration Analysis. East Bay Municipal Utility District

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Replacement Project. Noise and Vibration Analysis. East Bay Municipal Utility District"

Transcription

1 Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Replacement Project Noise and Vibration Analysis East Bay Municipal Utility District October 2012

2

3 Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Replacement Project Noise and Vibration Analysis East Bay Municipal Utility District October 2012

4

5 Noise and Vibration Analysis Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Replacement Project TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1.1 Project Overview Environmental Setting Key Construction activities and Equipment Noise Levels Noise and Vibration Analysis 2.1 Noise Level Analysis by Construction Phase Pumping Plant Operational Noise Level Analysis Vibration Analysis by Construction Phase Noise and Vibration Mitigation Measures 3.1 Noise and Vibration Mitigation Measures Tables 1 New Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Construction Phase Activities Existing Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Demolition Phase Activities Existing Leland Rate Control Station Demolition Phase Activities New Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Construction Phase Noise Level Analysis... A-1 5 Existing Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Demolition Phase Noise Level Analysis... A-1 6 Existing Leland Rate Control Station Demolition Phase Noise Level Analysis... A-1 7 Projected Pumping Plant Operational Noise Level at nearest Sensitive Receptors...B-1 8 Projected Transformer Operational Noise Level at nearest Sensitive Receptors...B-1 9 Total Projected Operational Noise Level at nearest Sensitive Receptor...B-1 10 New Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Construction Phase Vibration Analysis...C-1 11 Existing Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Demolition Phase Vibration Analysis...C-1 12 Existing Leland Rate Control Station Demolition Phase Vibration Analysis...C-1 13 Peak Particle Velocity for Major Construction Equipment at 25 feet...c-1 14 Reaction to People and Damage to Buildings from Continous or Frequent Intermittent Vibration Levels...C-1 Figures 1 Existing and New Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Sites Project Sites Aerial View Project Site Locations

6 Noise and Vibration Analysis Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Replacement Project 4 City of Lafayette Projected Noise Contour Map with Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Site Areas and Nearest Sensitive Receptors to each Site... D-1 Appendices A B C D Noise Level Analysis by Construction Phase Pumping Plant Operational Noise Level Analysis Vibration Analysis by Construction Phase City of Lafayette Projected Noise Contour Map with Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Site Areas and Nearest Sensitive Receptors to each Site

7 Noise and Vibration Analysis Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Replacement Project CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of the noise and vibration impact analysis for East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) s Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Replacement Project. Projected construction and operational noise levels at sensitive receptors near each of the three project site areas are analyzed. Sensitive receptors are defined as population groups more sensitive to noise that are associated with land uses such as residential areas, hospitals, schools, child care facilities, senior facilities, libraries, churches, and parks. The projected construction and operational noise levels at nearby sensitive receptors are compared against existing noise conditions. Potential construction related vibration impacts at structures near each project site area are also analyzed. Recommended mitigations to be implemented to reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level are also presented. 1.1 Project Overview The existing 12 million gallon per day (mgd) Diablo Vista Pumping will be replaced with a new 16 mgd pumping plant at the southwest corner of Mt. Diablo Boulevard and Mt. Diablo Court in the City of Lafayette. A transformer to provide power to the new pumping plant will be placed on the west side of the pumping plant structure. The existing Leland Rate Control Station will also be relocated to the new site as part of the project. Three new 30-inch water pipelines will connect the new pumping plant and rate control station to the existing water distribution system in Mt. Diablo Boulevard. Prior to the construction of the new pumping plant, the project will require the relocation of an existing 30-inch Reinforced Concrete Pipe (RCP) Storm Drain (SD) located at the new pumping plant project site. The 30-inch RCP SD will be replaced and relocated with approximately 240-feet of 24-inch High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) SD on the south side of Mt. Diablo Blvd and approximately 200 feet of 18-inch HDPE SD will be installed on the west side of Mt. Diablo Court. Upon construction completion and successful testing of the new facilities, the existing Diablo Vista Pumping Plant structure, located at 3305 Mt. Diablo Boulevard, Lafayette will be demolished. The existing Leland Rate Control Station vault, located on the north of Mt. Diablo Boulevard, approximately 850 feet west of Dolores Drive in the City of Lafayette will also be demolished. 1.2 Environmental Setting The new Diablo Vista Pumping Plant and new Leland Rate Control Station will be located on a 0.22 acre vacant parcel at the southwest corner of Mt. Diablo Boulevard and Mt. Diablo Court in the City of Lafayette. Highway 24 is located to the north of the parcel, the Lafayette Cemetery is located to the west, a commercial office building is 1-1

8 Noise and Vibration Analysis Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Replacement Project located to the east, and Blodgett s Abbey Carpet and Flooring is located to the south with 2 multi-family residential buildings south of the flooring store. The new pumping plant and rate control station will be constructed approximately 1,250 feet east of the existing pumping plant site as shown in Figure 1. The existing Diablo Vista Pumping Plant site, located on a 0.12 acre parcel at 3305 Mt. Diablo Boulevard in the City of Lafayette, is surrounded by commercial businesses. A hardware store is located to the west of the parcel and an automotive service shop is located to the east; south of the existing pumping plant property is a 2-story commercial building and parking area; and to the north is Mt. Diablo Boulevard and Highway 24. Source Google Maps/EBMUD Existing and New Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Sites Figure 1 The existing Leland Rate Control Station vault is located below grade under a portion of the parking/bike lane and sidewalk on the north side of Mt. Diablo Boulevard, approximately 850 feet west of Dolores Drive in the City of Lafayette. The access hatch structure to the underground vault is located on EBMUD property surrounded by open space. Approximately 100 feet east of the access hatch is a commercial office building. South of the personnel access hatch structure is Mt. Diablo Boulevard. Figure 2 shows an aerial view of the three project site areas. Figure 3 is a site map showing the three project site locations. 1-2

9 Noise and Vibration Analysis Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Replacement Project Source EBMUD Project Sites Aerial View Figure 2 Source EBMUD Project Site Locations Figure 3 1-3

10 Noise and Vibration Analysis Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Replacement Project 1.3 Key Construction Activities and Equipment Noise Levels Tables 1 through 3 provide a summary of key construction activities by project phase. Estimated durations, list of major equipment to be used along with associated reference equipment noise levels, and expected loudest construction noise level by activity are detailed in each project phase table. Summary of Key Construction Activities Table 1 - New Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Construction Phase Activities Estimated Duration (Weeks) 1 Major Construction Equipment & Reference Noise Levels 2 Loudest Noise Level Mobilization 1 Haul truck (84 dba), backhoe (80 dba) 84 Excavation/Site Work: *Clearing and grubbing *Excavate and remove onsite 30" RCP Storm Drain *Excavate and grade pumping plant pad, rate control station vault pad, and transformer pad HDPE Storm Drain Installations: *Installation of 24" HDPE Storm Drain on south side of Mt. Diablo Blvd *Installation of 18" HDPE Storm Drain in Mt. Diablo Ct. *Installation of two new Storm Drain Manholes and two new Drop Inlets. *Re-Pave Street after Storm Drain Installations Pumping Plant Construction (Concrete Work): *Construct Pumping Plant Foundation and Structure (i.e. walls, roof slab, etc.). *Construct Rate Control Station Vault *Construct Transformer Pad Pumping Plant Construction: *Roof construction, mechanical/electrical equipment installations, architectural elements Backfill: *Backfill around pumping plant Landscaping/Site Restoration: *Re-vegetation and planting *Site access and parking area pavement *Fence installation (dba 3 ) Crane (85 dba), excavator (85 dba), loader (80 dba), backhoe (80 dba), haul trucks (84 dba), chain saws (85 dba) 85 Crane (85 dba), excavator (85), loader (80 dba), backhoe (80 dba), haul trucks (84 dba), soil compactor (80 dba), roller (85 dba), asphalt paver (85 dba) 85 Crane (85 dba), concrete and shotcrete trucks (85 dba), excavator (85 dba), backhoe (80 dba), forklift (85 dba) 85 Crane (85 dba), excavator (85 dba), backhoe (80 dba), forklift (85 dba), material trucks (84 dba) Excavator (85 dba), loader (80 dba), soil compactor (80 dba), haul trucks (84 dba) Haul trucks (84 dba), backhoe (80 dba), soil compactor (80 dba), asphalt paver (85 dba), rollers (85 dba) Demobilization 1 Haul trucks (84 dba), backhoe (80 dba) 84 Total

11 Noise and Vibration Analysis Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Replacement Project Summary of Key Construction Activities Table 2 - Existing Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Demolition Phase Activities Estimated Duration (Weeks) 1 Remove/Demo Pumping Plant Equipment: *Removal of all plumbing, electrical and mechanical 1 components inside Pumping Plant Structure *Removal of Pumping Plant Roof Demolition of Pumping Plant Building/Foundation: *Demolition of structure and foundation 2 Removal and Demolition of Underground Piping: *Removal of all underground water pipelines and appurtenances to property line *Cap water pipelines at property line Backfill: -Backfill removed Pumping Plant structure foundation to existing grade -Backfill removed water pipeline trenches to existing grade Site Restoration: *Rough grade site to existing grade Total 1 6 Major Construction Equipment and Reference Noise Levels 2 Crane (85 dba), excavator (85 dba), haul trucks (84 dba) Excavator (85 dba), loader (80 dba), backhoe (80 dba), hoe ram (90 dba), concrete saw (90 dba) Excavator (85 dba), loader (80 dba), backhoe (80 dba) Excavator (85 dba), loader (80 dba), compactor (80 dba), haul trucks (84 dba) Soil compactor (80 dba), roller (85 dba), street sweeper (80 dba) Loudest Noise Level (dba 3 ) Summary of Key Construction Activities Table 3 - Existing Leland Rate Control Station Demolition Phase Activities Remove Equipment: *Remove/Demo concrete roof slab *Sidewalk and pavement removal *Remove internal vault components (24" valve, conical pipe sections, electrical conduits, ladder, etc.) Estimated Duration (Weeks) 1 1 Major Construction Equipment and Reference Noise Levels 2 Crane (85 dba), excavator (85 dba), backhoe (80 dba), concrete saw (90 dba) Loudest Noise Level (dba 3 ) 90 Demolition of Concrete Vault & Access Hatch: *Demo entire concrete vault and adjacent access hatch structure *Haul demolition material 1 Excavator (85 dba), backhoe (80 dba), hoe ram (90 dba), concrete saw (90 dba), haul trucks (84 dba) 90 Backfill: *Install pipe spool piece *Backfill with concrete or other backfill material *Backfill soil location where access vault was removed behind sidewalk Site Restoration: *Repave parking/bike lane *Restore Concrete Curb/Gutter and Sidewalk 1 1 Total 1 4 Crane (85 dba), haul truck (84 dba), concrete truck (85 dba), backhoe (80 dba), soil compactor (80 dba) 85 Soil compactor (80 dba), roller (85 dba), asphalt paver (85 dba), street sweeper (80 dba), backhoe (80 dba) 85 (1) Estimated duration does not include down time, mobilization/demobilization between project phases, submittal review, equipment/material procurement, pumping plant startup/testing, etc. nor reflect total duration. (2) Reference Noise Levels, shown in parentheses for each major piece of onsite construction equipment, are from the U.S. Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration: 2006 Typical Construction Equipment Reference Noise Levels. (3) dba, A-Weighted Sound Level: Sound pressure level in decibels measured on a sound level meter using A-weighting filter network. The A-weighting filter de-emphasizes the very low and very high frequency components of sound in a manner similar to the frequency of the human ear and correlates well with subjective reactions to noise 1-5

12 CHAPTER 2 NOISE AND VIBRATION ANALYSIS Noise and Vibration Analysis Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Replacement Project 2.1 Noise Level Analysis by Construction Phase The 2002 City of Lafayette General Plan produced a Projected Noise Contour Map with projected average day/night noise levels (dba L dn ) throughout the City of Lafayette. Based on the Noise Contour Map, the current average noise level at all project site areas are approximately 75 dba. The 75 dba sound level at each project site is reflective of each site s close proximity to Highway 24 and Mt. Diablo Boulevard. EBMUD s projected construction noise level analysis was conducted to determine the expected noise level at the nearest sensitive receptors to each project site during the loudest construction activity for each phase. Construction equipment reference noise levels for each project phase activity are detailed in Tables 1 through 3. The loudest projected noise levels at the nearest sensitive receptors would be 71 dba, 74 dba, and 68 dba for the new pumping plant construction, existing pumping plant demolition, and existing rate control station demolition phases. Based on the City of Lafayette s Noise Contour Map, the average noise levels at these sensitive receptor locations currently varies between dba. Noise levels diminish (attenuates) as the distance from a noise source increases. Other mitigating factors for noise attenuation are the presence of trees, vegetation, topography, and structures which would shield many receptors from direct line-of-sight noise transmission from specific construction activities, particularly receptors at lower elevations than the project sites. The construction phase noise level analysis conducted is a conservative approach as it does not take into account attenuation factors related to vegetation, topography, and structural obstructions between each project site and the nearest sensitive receptors to each site. Actual noise levels at sensitive receptors would likely be lower than estimated above, as actual attenuation would be greater than assumed. The project s short term exposure of persons to demolition and construction noise levels are therefore estimated to fall within the City of Lafayette s existing sounds levels at nearby sensitive receptors. Therefore, the project s impact related to a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project would be less than significant. Although EBMUD is not subject to local jurisdiction zoning ordinances for projects involving the transmission of water (Government Code section 53091), EBMUD strives to consider local noise ordinances during construction, where feasible and not contrary to its public purpose and responsibilities. By limiting work hours and implementing best management construction practices, noise resulting from the project is considered less than significant. Mitigation measures limiting planned construction work hours during the daytime, limiting the possibility of annoyance during typical periods of sleep or rest 2-1

13 Noise and Vibration Analysis Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Replacement Project are identified in Mitigation Measure NOI-1 in Section 3.1. Best Management Practices (BMPs) related to Noise Control and Noise Complaint Procedures are identified in Mitigation Measure NOI-2 and NOI-3 in Section 3.1, respectively. The projected noise levels at the nearest sensitive receptors by construction phase are detailed in Tables 4 through 6 in Appendix A. The City of Lafayette Projected Noise Contour Map with the Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Project site areas and nearest sensitive receptors to each site is shown in Figure 4 in Appendix D. 2.2 Pumping Plant & Transformer Operational Noise Level Analysis EBMUD s projected operational noise level analysis was conducted to determine the expected new pumping plant and transformer noise level at the nearest sensitive receptors to the new pumping plant site. The combined total pumping plant and transformer projected operational noise level at the nearest sensitive receptors will vary between dba. Based on the City of Lafayette s Noise Contour Map, shown in Appendix D, the average noise levels at these sensitive receptor locations currently varies between dba. The operational noise level analysis conducted is a conservative approach, similar to the construction phase noise level analysis, as it does not take into account attenuation factors related to vegetation, topography, and structural obstructions between the new pumping plant project site and the nearest sensitive receptors to the site. Actual noise levels at sensitive receptors would likely be lower than estimated above, as actual attenuation would be greater than assumed. The project s permanent operational noise level is therefore estimated to fall below the City of Lafayette s existing sound levels at nearby sensitive receptors. Therefore, there would be no impact related to a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project. The projected operational noise levels at the nearest sensitive receptors to the new pumping plant site are detailed in Tables 7 through 9 in Appendix B. 2-2

14 2.3 Vibration Analysis by Construction Phase Noise and Vibration Analysis Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Replacement Project The California Department of Transportation uses a vibration limit 0.5 inches per second (in/sec) peak particle velocity (PPV) for buildings designed to modern engineering standards. EBMUD has successfully applied the 0.5 in/sec standard criteria established to evaluate the risk for cosmetic or structural damage to buildings with no known adverse impacts. The new pumping plant construction, water pipeline installation, and existing rate control station demolition project phases would not result in exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground-borne vibration levels. Each of the above construction phases are at locations far enough away from any nearby structures to not approach the 0.5 in/sec PPV. The auto body shop building east of the existing Diablo Vista Pumping Plant structure is approximately 25 feet away. The hardware store building west of the existing pumping plant building is also approximately 25 feet away. PPV values at 25 feet would not exceed 0.21 in/sec. The demolition, back-filling, grading and compacting at the existing pumping plant site would occur at distances less than 25 feet from the nearby buildings. Equipment anticipated during project demolition includes: backhoes, excavators, cranes, dump trucks, front end loaders, concrete saw, hoe ram, vibratory compactor, water trucks, asphalt pavers, and various passenger vehicles. To not exceed the 0.5 in/sec PPV during the existing Diablo Vista Pumping Plant demolition phase work, implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-4 in Section 3.1 will lessen potential impacts to a less than significant level. While BMPs related to construction practices will limit vibrations and damage to adjacent structures is not anticipated, preconstruction building surveys will be offered and conducted if approved by nearby property owners to ensure that structures are maintained at their pre-construction condition (Mitigation Measure NOI-4 in Section 3.1). Two monitoring stations for project vibration level measurements will also be placed on the east and west sides of the existing Diablo Vista Pumping Plant site. Communication with the measurement system, including daily reports would be prepared. Vibration will be limited to no more than 0.5 in/sec PPV. The vibration analysis by construction phase is detailed in Tables 10 through 12 in Appendix C. Table 13 lists PPV values for major construction equipment and Table 14 lists the reaction of people and the potential damage to buildings at various vibration PPV levels. Table 13 and 14 are also in Appendix C. 2-3

15 Noise and Vibration Analysis Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Replacement Project CHAPTER 3 NOISE AND VIBRATION MITIGATION MEASURES 3.1 Noise and Vibration Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measure NOI-1: Day and Hours of Construction Operations a) Construction activities will be limited to between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. Trucks and personnel can arrive at the site for reporting, minor tasks, and meetings after 7:00 a.m. but no construction work that would be audible off-site by residents nearby can begin until 8:00 a.m. b) Extreme noise generating activities greater than 90 dba at 50 feet will be limited to between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. c) Any construction activity proposed outside of the standard hours of 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. (Monday through Friday), with the exception for emergencies, must be approved by EBMUD. EBMUD will also notify residents and businesses along Mt. Diablo Boulevard and Mt. Diablo Court by postcard. d) No extreme noise-generating activities would be allowed on Saturdays. e) No construction activity would take place on Sunday or Federal holidays. f) For clarification, construction activities include but are not limited to: truck idling, all moving equipment (including trucks, excavators, etc), stationary noise generating equipment such as generators or materials, deliveries, and construction meetings held on-site in a non-enclosed area. Mitigation Measure NOI-2. Noise Control a) Equipment and trucks used for project construction would utilize the best available noise control techniques (e.g., improved mufflers, equipment redesign, use of intake silencers, ducts, engine enclosures and acoustically-attenuating shields or shrouds, wherever feasible). b) Impact tools (e.g., jack hammers, pavement breakers, and rock drills) used for project construction would be hydraulically or electrically powered wherever possible to avoid noise associated with compressed air exhaust from pneumatically powered tools. However, where use of pneumatic tools is unavoidable, an exhaust muffler on the compressed air exhaust would be used; this muffler can lower noise levels from the exhaust by up to about 10 dba. External jackets on the tools themselves would be used where feasible, and this could achieve a reduction of 5 dba. Quieter procedures would be used, such as drills rather than impact equipment, whenever feasible. 3-1

16 Noise and Vibration Analysis Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Replacement Project c) Stationary noise sources would be located as far from adjacent residential or sensitive receptors as possible, and they would be muffled and enclosed within temporary sheds, incorporate insulation barriers, or other measures to the extent feasible. d) If feasible, the noisiest phases of construction (such as pavement saw cutting) will be limited to less than 10 days at a time. Mitigation Measure NOI-3. Noise Complaint Procedures a) Contractor would provide a procedure and phone numbers for notifying the EBMUD staff (during regular construction hours and off-hours); b) Install a sign posted on-site with permitted construction days and hours, and who to notify in the event of a problem; c) Notification of neighbors and occupants within 300 feet of the project construction area at least 30 days in advance of pile-driving activities and the estimated duration of the activity; and d) A preconstruction meeting would be held with EBMUD inspectors and the general contractor/on-site project manager to confirm that noise mitigation and practices (including construction hours, noise control, neighborhood notification, posted signs, etc.) are in place or completed. Mitigation Measure NOI-4. Vibration Control To prevent cosmetic or structural damage to adjacent or nearby structures, EBMUD will incorporate into contract specifications restrictions on equipment operation, whereby surface vibration will be limited to no more than 0.5 in/sec PPV, measured at the nearest structures. If vibration levels are found to exceed the 0.5 in/sec PPV threshold, construction will be halted immediately and alternative construction methods will be implemented to maintain vibration levels below this threshold. Preconstruction building surveys will be offered and conducted if approved by nearby property owners to ensure that structures are maintained at their preconstruction condition. Any new cracks or other changes in structures will be compared to preconstruction conditions and a determination made as to whether the proposed project could have caused such damage. In the event that the project is demonstrated to have caused the damage, EBMUD will have the damage repaired to the pre-existing condition. 3-2

17 Appendix A

18 Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Replacement Project - Noise Level Analysis by Construction Phase Table 4 - New Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Construction Phase Noise Level Analysis (Site Elevation = 310 ft) Sensitive Receptor 4 Projected Noise Level at nearest Sensitive Receptor during Key Construction Activities (dba) Receptor (Type) Construction Site to Distance Excavation & HDPE Storm Pumping Plant Pumping Plant Landscaping & Elev Sensitive Receptor Adjustment Mobilization Backfill Demobilization Site Work Drain Installation Concrete Work Construction Site Restoration (ft) Distance (ft) (dba) (84 dba) 5 (85 dba) 5 (85 dba) 5 (85 dba) 5 (85 dba) 5 (85 dba) 5 (85 dba) 5 (84 dba) 4 Lafayette Pointe Condos (Residential) Lafayette Commons Apartments (Residential) Lafayette Highlands Apartments (Residential) Lafayette Park Hotel & Spa (Hotel) Table 5 - Existing Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Demolition Phase Noise Level Analysis (Site Elevation = 305 ft) Sensitive Receptor 4 Projected Noise Level at nearest Sensitive Receptor during Key Construction Activities (dba) Receptor (Type) Elev (ft) Construction Site to Sensitive Receptor Distance (ft) Distance Adjustment (dba) Remove Equipment (85 dba) 5 Demo Building & Foundation (90 dba) 5 Demo/Remove Underground Piping (85 dba) 5 Backfill Site Restoration (85 dba) 5 (85 dba) 5 Lafayette Highlands Apartments (Residential) Residential Homes off of Carol Lane (Residential) Lafayette Park Hotel & Spa (Hotel) Lafayette Pointe Condos (Residential) Table 6 - Existing Leland Rate Control Station Demolition Phase Noise Level Analysis (Site Elevation = 340 ft) Sensitive Receptor 4 Projected Noise Level at nearest Sensitive Receptor during Key Construction Activities (dba) Receptor (Type) Elev Construction Site to Sensitive Receptor Distance (ft) Distance Adjustment (dba) Remove Equipment (90 dba) 5 Demo Vault and Access Hatch Structure (90 dba) 5 Backfill (85 dba) 5 Site Restoration (85 dba) 5 Residential Homes off of West Road (Residential) 325 Temple Isaiah (Church) (4) Sensitive Receptors: Are land uses regarded as being more sensitive to noise due to types of population groups (children, elderly) or activities involved and include residential areas, hospitals, schools, child care facilities, senior facilities, libraries, churches, and parks. (5) = Loudest projected construction equipment noise level at 50 feet for each construction activity. Major construction equipment noise level values listed in Tables 1-3. The maximum projected construction noise levels at the nearest sensitive receptors would be approximatley 71 dba, 74 dba, and 68 dba for the new pumping plant construction, existing pumping plant demolition, and existing rate control station demolition phases. Based on the City of Lafayette's Projected Noise Contour Map (see Figure 5 in Appendix D) the average day/night noise levels at these sensitive receptor locations currently varies between dba. The project's short term exposure of persons to demolition and construction noise levels are therefore estimated to fall within the City of Lafayette's existing sounds levels at nearby sensitive receptors. Note on Construction Noise Analysis Noise levels diminish (attenuates) as the distance from a noise source increases. Other mitigating factors for noise attenuation is the presence of trees, vegetation, topography, and structures which would shield many receptors from direct line-of-sight noise transmission from specific construction activities, particularly receptors at lower elevations than the project sites. The above analysis is a conservative approach as it does not take into account attenuation factors related to vegetation, topography, and structural obstructions between each project site and the nearest sensitive receptors to each site. Actual noise levels at sensitive receptors would likely be lower than estimated above, as actual attenuation would be greater than assumed. A-1 ]

19 Appendix B

20 Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Replacement Project - Pumping Plant Operational Noise Level Analysis Table 7 - Projected Pumping Plant Operational Noise Level at nearest Sensitive Receptors Enclosure Reduction Pumping Plant Ref Hourly L eq Distance between Facility and Distance Adjustment Adjusted L eq Projected Pumping Plant Noise Level Drop Sensitive Receptor in 50 feet 6 Sensitive Receptor (ft) (dba) (dba) (dba) 6 & 7 L eq (dba) Lafayette Pointe Condos (Residential) Lafayette Commons Apartments (Residential) Lafayette Highlands Apartments (Residential) Lafayette Park Hotel & Spa (Hotel) (6) East Bay Municipal Utility District, 2006 Water Treatment & Transmission Improvements Program - Pumping Plants Noise Analysis (7) Assumes Pumping Plant Building Louvers are on the north and south sides of building. East and west walls of building would have no Louvers. Louvered enclosures that block noise but allow for air circulation would reduce noise levels by 20 dba (North and south sides of building). Non Louvered sides of building (East and west walls) would reduce noise levels by 40 dba. Table 8 - Projected Transformer Operational Noise Level at nearest Sensitive Receptors Sensitive Receptor Transformer Ref Hourly L eq in 50 feet 8 Distance between Facility and Sensitive Receptor (ft) Distance Adjustment (dba) Adjusted L eq (dba) Transformer Enclosure Noise Reduction (dba) 9 Projected Transformer L eq (dba) Lafayette Pointe Condos (Residential) Lafayette Commons Apartments (Residential) Lafayette Highlands Apartments (Residential) Lafayette Park Hotel & Spa (Hotel) (8) East Bay Municipal Utility District, 2012 Estimated Sound Level for a 1500kVA Transformer (65 dba at 1-foot) (9) East Bay Municipal Utility District, 2006 Estimated Transformer Enclosure Noise Reduction. Table 9 - Total Projected Operational Noise Level at nearest Sensitive Receptor Sensitive Receptor Projected Pumping Plant L eq (dba) Projected Transformer L eq (dba) Lafayette Pointe Condos (Residential) 39 7 Lafayette Commons Apartments (Residential) 36 4 Lafayette Highlands Apartments (Residential) 34 2 Lafayette Park Hotel & Spa (Hotel) 10 0 (10) Source: 2002 City of Lafayette General Plan, Map VII-1 Projected Noise Contours (see Figure 1) Total Projected Operational L eq (dba) Average Day/Night Noise Level, L dn City of Lafayette 10 (dba) Equivalent Noise Level (Leq) - The average A-weighted noise level during a measurement period. L dn : The average A-weighted noise level during a 24-hour day, obtainined after additional 10 decibels to levels measured in the night between 10:00 PM and 7:00 AM. B-1

21 Appendix C

22 Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Replacement Project - Vibration Analysis by Construction Phase Nearest Structure Blodgetts Abbey Carpet & Flooring Distance to Project Site (ft) Table 10 - New Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Construction Phase Vibration Analysis Projected Peak Particle Velocity [PPV (in/sec)] Vibration Level at nearest Structure during Key Construction Activities Mobilization (Haul truck) 11 Excavation & Site Work (Excavator) 11 HDPE Storm Drain Installation (Roller) 11 Pumping Plant Concrete Work (Excavator) 11 Pumping Plant Construction (Excavator) 11 Backfill (Compactor) 11 Landscaping & Site Restoration (Roller) 11 Demobilization (Haul truck) Nearest Structure Table 11 - Existing Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Demolition Phase Vibration Analysis Projected PPV (in/sec) Vibration Level at nearest Structures during Key Construction Distance from Existing Pumping Plant Structure (ft) Remove Equipment (Excavator) 11 Demo Building & Foundation (Hoe Ram) 11 Demolition/Remove Underground Piping (Excavator) 11 Backfill (Compactor) 11 Site Restoration (Roller) 11 Svensson Automotive Ace Hardware Table 12 - Existing Leland Rate Control Station Demolition Phase Vibration Analysis Projected PPV (in/sec) Vibration Level at nearest Structure during Key Construction Activities Distance from Nearest Remove Existing Rate Control Demolition Vault and Access Hatch Structure Backfill Site Restoration Structure Equipment Station (ft) (Excavator) 11 (Hoe Ram) 11 (Compactor) 11 (Roller) 11 Office Building (11) Construction Equipment with highest Peak Particle Velocity [PPV (in/sec)] Vibration Level at 25 feet to be used during each specific construction activity. PPV values listed in Table 13. Table 13 - Peak Particle Velocity (PPV) for Major Construction Equipment at 25 feet 12 Equipment Haul Trucks Excavator Hoe Ram Compactor Roller PPV (in/sec) (12) 2006 Federal Transit Authority, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Table 14 - Reaction of People and Damage to Buildings From Continuous or Frequent Intermittent Vibration Levels 13 Vibration Level, PPV (in/sec) Human Reaction Effects on Buildings 0.01 Barley perceptible No effect 0.01 Distinctly perceptible Vibration unlikely to cause damage of any type to any structure 0.08 Distinctly to strongly perceptible Recommended upper level of the vibration to which ruins and ancient monuments should be subjected 0.10 Strongly perceptible Virtually no risk of damage to normal buildings 0.30 Strongly to Severe perceptible Threshold at which there is a risk of damage to older residential dwellings such as plastered walls or ceilings 0.50 Severe - Vibrations unpleasant Threshold at which there is a risk of damage to newer residential structures (13) 2004 California Department of Transportation, Transportation and Construction Induced Guidance Manual EBMUD has successfully applied the 0.5 in/sec standard criteria established to evaluate the risk for cosmetic or structural damage to buildings with no known adverse impacts. The new pumping plant construction, water pipeline installation, and existing rate control station demolition project phases are at locations far enough away from any nearby structures to not approach the 0.5 in/sec PPV. An auto body shop building east of the existing Diablo Vista Pumping Plant structure is approximately 25 feet away. A hardware store building west of the existing pumping plant building is also approximately 25 feet away. PPV values at 25 feet would not exceed 0.21 in/sec. The demolition, back-filling, grading, and compacting at the existing pumping plant site would occur at distances less than 25 feet from the nearby buildings. To not exceed the 0.5 in/sec PPV during the pumping plant demolition phase work, the following mitigations are recommended: a) Surface vibration will be limited to no more than 0.5 in/sec PPV, measured at the nearest structures. If vibration levels are found to exceed the 0.5 in/sec PPV threshold, construction will be halted immediately and alternative construction methods will be implemented to maintain vibration levels below this threshold. b) At the request of and with permission of building owners, EBMUD will conduct a preconstruction survey of adjacent structures for potential effects due to vibration-generating activities. Any new cracks or other changes in structures will be compared to preconstruction conditions and a determination made as to whether the proposed project could have caused such damage. In the event that the project is demonstrated to have caused the damage, the District will have the damage repaired to the pre-existing condition. W:\WSP\Oscar\Projects\Diablo Vista PP\MND Analysis\MND Sections\12 - Noise\ Krista_OH_Noise\ DVPP_Vibration Analysis.xls C-1

23 Appendix D

24 Moraga Rd Springhill Rd. Reliez Vall ey Rd. Pleasant Hill Rd. El Nido Ranch Rd. Acalanes Rd. 24 Upper Happy Valley Rd. 60 LAFAYETTE RESERVOIR Happy Valley Rd. Mt. Diablo Blvd Oak Hill Rd Hamlin Rd School St. Deer Hill Rd. Moraga Blvd. 60 Carol Ln. St. Mary's Rd. Glenside Dr. 24 Olympic Blvd Reliez Station Rd. Stanley Blvd Glenside Dr. Burton Dr. 55 St. Mary's Rd. Silverado Dr. Merriewood Rohrer Dr Feet for schematic purposes only Legend 60 Noise contour in decibels (dba Ldn) City Limits Reservoir Map VII-1 Projected Noise Contours City of Lafayette General Plan Source: City of Lafayette, 1998

Dos Osos Reservoir Replacement Project. Orinda - California. Noise and Vibration Analysis

Dos Osos Reservoir Replacement Project. Orinda - California. Noise and Vibration Analysis Dos Osos Reservoir Replacement Project Orinda - California Noise and Vibration Analysis East Bay Municipal Utility District January 2017 Table of Contents 1 Project Description... 1 1.1 Overview... 1 1.2

More information

O. NOISE. 1. Existing Conditions. 2. Future without the Proposed Project

O. NOISE. 1. Existing Conditions. 2. Future without the Proposed Project O. NOISE 1. Existing Conditions Existing ambient noise conditions at the Project Site reflect surrounding land uses. As described previously (see Chapter 3.A, Land Use, Zoning and Public Policy), predominant

More information

Section 4-7 Noise STUDY METHODS Acoustic Fundamentals Amplitude Frequency

Section 4-7 Noise STUDY METHODS Acoustic Fundamentals Amplitude Frequency Section 4-7 Noise This section includes a summary of applicable regulations, a description of ambient noise conditions, and an analysis of potential noise impacts of the proposed project. Traffic noise

More information

UC Press Building 2120 Berkeley Way Berkeley, CA

UC Press Building 2120 Berkeley Way Berkeley, CA CONSTRUCTION NOISE REDUCTION PROGRAM FOR: UC Press Building 2120 Berkeley Way Berkeley, CA RGD Project #: 17-057 PREPARED FOR: Berkeley Way, LLC 1958A University Ave. Berkeley, CA 94704 PREPARED BY: Harold

More information

Level of Significance after Mitigation Impacts would be less than significant.

Level of Significance after Mitigation Impacts would be less than significant. Level of Significance after Mitigation Impacts would be less than significant. 4.8 NOISE This section assesses noise impacts associated with the proposed project. It analyzes both potential noise impacts

More information

Appendix G New Bus Facility Noise Assessment September 2014

Appendix G New Bus Facility Noise Assessment September 2014 City of Albany Draft Environmental Assessment Multimodal Transit Center Appendix G New Bus Facility Noise Assessment September 2014 Parsons Brinckerhoff 75 Arlington Street Boston, MA 02116 Phone: 617-426-7330

More information

Noise Assessments for Construction Noise Impacts

Noise Assessments for Construction Noise Impacts Noise Assessments for Construction Noise Impacts Weixiong Wu a AKRF, Inc., 440 Park Avenue, 7th floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA. ABSTRACT Construction noise is one of the most disruptive noise sources

More information

Noise October 22, Noise Existing Conditions. Noise Characteristics

Noise October 22, Noise Existing Conditions. Noise Characteristics 3.7 3.7.1 Existing Conditions Characteristics The noise analysis contained in this section of the DEIS has been conducted in accordance with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

More information

1700 Webster Street Oakland, CA

1700 Webster Street Oakland, CA ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE STUDY FOR: 1700 Webster Street Oakland, CA RGDL Project #: 15-025 PREPARED FOR: Lamphier-Gregory 1944 Embarcadero Oakland, CA 94606 PREPARED BY: Harold Goldberg, P.E. Peter Huson, Ph.D.

More information

A. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS B. CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE

A. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS B. CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE Chapter 17: Construction A. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS This chapter discusses the various activities that would be involved in constructing Hamilton Green. The potential for significant adverse

More information

Chapter 4 Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation 4.6 NOISE Environmental Setting. Approach to Analysis

Chapter 4 Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation 4.6 NOISE Environmental Setting. Approach to Analysis 4.6 NOISE 4.6.1 Environmental Setting Approach to Analysis This section evaluates potential noise impacts associated with the construction and operation of the proposed LWRP upgrade and expansion within

More information

Peak noise levels during any time period can be characterized with statistical terms.

Peak noise levels during any time period can be characterized with statistical terms. 3.11 NOISE Introduction This Noise section provides a discussion of applicable noise policies and standards, the results of ambient noise measurements, an evaluation of the projects compatibility with

More information

3.10 Noise and Vibration

3.10 Noise and Vibration 3.10 Noise and Vibration 3.10.1 Approach to Analysis This analysis uses two approaches to evaluate temporary construction-phase noise impacts. To evaluate short-term effects of noise peaks, typical construction

More information

Noise Analysis for Latitude II City of Escondido, California

Noise Analysis for Latitude II City of Escondido, California Noise Analysis for Latitude II City of Escondido, California Project #560401-0100b June 23, 2015 Prepared For: NCA Developments 14 Corporate Plaza, Suite 100 Laguna Hills, CA 92660 Prepared By: Matt B.

More information

ROSEN GOLDBERG &DER Consultants in Acoustics

ROSEN GOLDBERG &DER Consultants in Acoustics ROSEN GOLDBERG &DER Consultants in Acoustics Environmental Noise Impact Study for the Chabot College Facilities Master Plan Hayward, CA SUBMITTED TO: DMJMH+N 515 South Flower Street, 4 th Floor Los Angeles,

More information

12 November Ms. Winnie Lam Project Manager L.F. George Properties 159 El Camino Real Millbrae, CA 94030

12 November Ms. Winnie Lam Project Manager L.F. George Properties 159 El Camino Real Millbrae, CA 94030 12 November 2014 Ms. Winnie Lam Project Manager L.F. George Properties 159 El Camino Real Millbrae, CA 94030 Subject: Preliminary Noise Assessment Study - DRAFT - Real Condominiums, San Mateo, California

More information

Leland Reservoir Replacement Project

Leland Reservoir Replacement Project Leland Reservoir Replacement Project Draft Environmental Impact Report Public Meeting The Meher Schools 6:30 8:30 pm Oscar Herrera, Project Manager February 8, 2018 Project Team EBMUD Oscar Herrera, PE,

More information

N-1(b) Vehicle and Equipment Idling. Construction vehicles and equipment shall not be left idling for longer than five minutes when not in use.

N-1(b) Vehicle and Equipment Idling. Construction vehicles and equipment shall not be left idling for longer than five minutes when not in use. 4.10 NOISE 4.10.1 Summary Table 4.10-1 summarizes the identified environmental impacts, proposed mitigation measures, and residual impacts of the proposed project with regard to noise. Additional detail

More information

CITY OF LA QUINTA GENERAL NOTES GENERAL NOTES

CITY OF LA QUINTA GENERAL NOTES GENERAL NOTES CITY OF LA QUINTA GENERAL NOTES GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE STANDARD PLANS OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, THE LATEST EDITION OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS

More information

Safeway Berkeley Renovation (0691) - Berkeley, California

Safeway Berkeley Renovation (0691) - Berkeley, California 11 March 2010 revised 6 July 2010 Mr. Todd Paradis Safeway, Inc. 5918 Stoneridge Mall Road Pleasanton, California 94588-3229 Subject: Safeway Berkeley Renovation (0691) - Berkeley, California Dear Mr.

More information

To: Hyoksang Kwon, COBE Construction From: Joshua Marcley, Mei Wu Acoustics

To: Hyoksang Kwon, COBE Construction From: Joshua Marcley, Mei Wu Acoustics Experts in acoustics, noise and vibration To: Hyoksang Kwon, COBE Construction hyoksang@cobeinc.com From: Joshua Marcley, josh@mei-wu.com Mei Wu, meiwu@mei-wu.com Date: May 24, 2016 Subject: Cal Water

More information

4.10 Noise Setting. a. Overview of Noise and Vibration Measurement

4.10 Noise Setting. a. Overview of Noise and Vibration Measurement Environmental Impact Analysis Noise 4.10 Noise This section evaluates the impacts of noise generated by future development under the proposed Specific Plan on nearby noise-sensitive land uses, as well

More information

ATTACHMENT C MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION AND MONITORING REPORTING PROGRAM

ATTACHMENT C MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION AND MONITORING REPORTING PROGRAM ATTACHMENT C MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION AND MONITORING REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF PASADENA 175 NORTH GARFIELD AVENUE PASADENA, CA 91109 PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT

More information

4.13 NOISE AND VIBRATION

4.13 NOISE AND VIBRATION 4.13 NOISE AND VIBRATION 4.13.1 INTRODUCTION This section describes and analyzes the current noise environment in the areas where project facilities will be located, and evaluates the potential impacts

More information

Background information on environmental acoustics, including definitions of terms commonly used in noise analysis, is provided below.

Background information on environmental acoustics, including definitions of terms commonly used in noise analysis, is provided below. This section describes the existing noise environment and the potential impacts associated with the implementation of the Kaiser Permanente OMC Project, and appropriate standard conditions of approval

More information

City of San Diego General Plan, Noise Element City of San Diego Municipal Code, Noise Ordinance City of Del Mar Noise Ordinance

City of San Diego General Plan, Noise Element City of San Diego Municipal Code, Noise Ordinance City of Del Mar Noise Ordinance 5.10 NOISE This section addresses the potential noise impacts associated with the project, specifically the potential for the proposed project to expose people to noise levels that exceed applicable noise

More information

This section discusses and analyzes the ambient noise characteristics of the proposed Cluster I Solar Power Project.

This section discusses and analyzes the ambient noise characteristics of the proposed Cluster I Solar Power Project. This section discusses and analyzes the ambient noise characteristics of the proposed Cluster I Solar Power Project. 3.11.1 Environmental Setting Concepts and Terminology Acoustic Fundamentals Noise is

More information

3.10 NOISE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING. Noise Characteristics

3.10 NOISE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING. Noise Characteristics 3.10 NOISE This section describes the existing noise levels in the Isla Vista project area, evaluates the potential noise related impacts of the Draft IVMP and catalyst projects, and recommends mitigation

More information

Appendix F. Environmental Noise Assessment

Appendix F. Environmental Noise Assessment Appendix F Environmental Noise Assessment TIERRA VILLAS RESIDENTIAL PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT ANTIOCH, CALIFORNIA September 8, 2009 Prepared for: John Cook CirclePoint 135 Main Street, Suite

More information

Noise Variance Review

Noise Variance Review Noise Variance #: NVAR17-0012 Noise Variance Review The noise variance (NVAR17-00012) request dated May 5, 2017 was evaluated based on the information provided in the variance submitted and any additional

More information

3.12 NOISE Regulatory Setting Environmental Setting EXISTING NOISE SOURCES AND SENSITIVE LAND USES

3.12 NOISE Regulatory Setting Environmental Setting EXISTING NOISE SOURCES AND SENSITIVE LAND USES 3.12 NOISE This section assesses the potential for implementation of the West Village Expansion component to result in impacts related to short-term construction, long-term operational noise sources, and

More information

ORACLE EDUCATIONAL FACILITY PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

ORACLE EDUCATIONAL FACILITY PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT ORACLE EDUCATIONAL FACILITY PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT Redwood City, California December 2, 2015 Prepared for: Shannon George David J. Powers & Associates, Inc. 1871 The Alameda, Suite 200

More information

APPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT

APPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT APPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT Noise Study Technical Report Watertown South Connector US 81 to 29 th Street SE Watertown, South Dakota HDR Project No. 39319 Prepared by 6300 So. Old Village Place

More information

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 8. NOISE

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 8. NOISE 4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 8. NOISE 4.8.1 INTRODUCTION This section evaluates the potential for noise and groundborne vibration impacts resulting from implementation of the Proposed Project, including

More information

ZAB Hearing May 14, 2015

ZAB Hearing May 14, 2015 ZAB Hearing May 14, 2015 Comments from April 23rd TOPICS Streamlined Environmental Review Protections for Berkeley High School Air Quality, Noise, and Traffic Project Alternatives Water Supply/Wastewater

More information

4.4 Vibration. Table 4.24 FTA and Swiss Standard SN a Construction Vibration Damage Criteria

4.4 Vibration. Table 4.24 FTA and Swiss Standard SN a Construction Vibration Damage Criteria 4.4 Vibration the Resist feature, as well as at discharge locations in Weehawken Cove. These types of non-typical related vibration assessment was performed for Resist structures because the construction

More information

David Balducci, Align Real Estate Doug Flaming, Doug Flaming Construction Management, Inc. Shari Libicki, Sarah Manzano, Kevin Warner

David Balducci, Align Real Estate Doug Flaming, Doug Flaming Construction Management, Inc. Shari Libicki, Sarah Manzano, Kevin Warner MEMO Date: 1/13/17 To From CC David Balducci, Align Real Estate Doug Flaming, Doug Flaming Construction Management, Inc. Shari Libicki, Sarah Manzano, Kevin Warner Amara Morrison, Wendel Rosen Black &

More information

Appendix C Noise Study

Appendix C Noise Study Appendix C Noise Study City of Long Beach Shoreline Gateway East Tower Project Noise Study August 2016 NOISE STUDY SHORELINE GATEWAY EAST TOWER PROJECT Prepared for: City of Long Beach Planning and Building

More information

Section XXV Preconstruction Assessments and Damage Mitigation Procedures

Section XXV Preconstruction Assessments and Damage Mitigation Procedures Section XXV Preconstruction Assessments and Damage Mitigation Procedures A. Introduction - In recent years, HRSD has received an increasing number of complaints from residents and locality staff regarding

More information

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS I. NOISE 1. INTRODUCTION

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS I. NOISE 1. INTRODUCTION IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 1. INTRODUCTION The following analysis of noise impacts is based primarily upon the Weddington Golf and Senior Housing Project Air Quality and Noise Impact Report, prepared

More information

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program The Infill Environmental Checklist identifies the applicable mitigation measures from the Downtown Area Plan Environmental

More information

This report assesses the outward noise and vibration impact of the proposed development on its surrounding environment.

This report assesses the outward noise and vibration impact of the proposed development on its surrounding environment. 8. NOISE AND VIBRATION 8.1 Introduction This report has been prepared by AWN to form part of an EIAR for the proposed residential development at Wonderful Barn, Barnhall, Leixlip. The chapter assesses

More information

NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS ESCONDIDO MARRIOTT HOTEL AND MIXED-USED PROJECT ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA

NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS ESCONDIDO MARRIOTT HOTEL AND MIXED-USED PROJECT ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS ESCONDIDO MARRIOTT HOTEL AND MIXED-USED PROJECT ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: CW Clark Inc. 4180 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 405 La Jolla, California 92037 Prepared by: EDAW,

More information

4.9 Noise Environmental Setting Impacts and Mitigation Measures References

4.9 Noise Environmental Setting Impacts and Mitigation Measures References TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.9 Noise...4.9-1 4.9.1 Environmental Setting...4.9-1 4.9.2 Impacts and Mitigation Measures...4.9-10 4.9.3 References...4.9-18 TABLES Table 4.9-1 Summary of Short-term Noise Measurement

More information

7.0 NOISE ELEMENT 7.1 INTRODUCTION

7.0 NOISE ELEMENT 7.1 INTRODUCTION 7.0 NOISE ELEMENT 7.1 INTRODUCTION The Noise Element of a general plan is a comprehensive program for including noise control in the planning process. It is a tool for local planners to use in achieving

More information

Attachment E2 Noise Technical Memorandum SR 520

Attachment E2 Noise Technical Memorandum SR 520 Attachment E2 Noise Technical Memorandum SR 520 Prepared for: Prepared by: Jodi Ketelsen Michael A. Minor Date: November 4, 2012 Subject: Project: Noise Modeling Results: NE 51st Street to NE 65th Street

More information

NOISE IMPACT STUDY - HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILLING FOR BLUEWATER RIVER CROSSING REPLACEMENT PROJECT

NOISE IMPACT STUDY - HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILLING FOR BLUEWATER RIVER CROSSING REPLACEMENT PROJECT Stantec Consulting Ltd. 300-675 Cochrane Drive West Tower Markham ON L3R 0B8 Tel: (905) 944-7777 Fax: (905) 474-9889 August 9, 2012 File: 160960699 NOISE IMPACT STUDY - HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILLING

More information

3.6 NOISE Affected Environment. Noise Level Terminology and Human Hearing

3.6 NOISE Affected Environment. Noise Level Terminology and Human Hearing 3.6 NOISE The following section provides a discussion of existing noise conditions on the BHTRP site and in the site vicinity, potential noise impacts from redevelopment under the Proposed Actions and

More information

A D M I N I S T R A T I V E U S E P E R M I T

A D M I N I S T R A T I V E U S E P E R M I T Planning and Development Department Land Use Planning Division A D M I N I S T R A T I V E U S E P E R M I T 901 Arlington Avenue Project Description: To construct a 726 square foot, one-story addition

More information

IV. ADVERSE IMPACTS THAT CANNOT BE AVOIDED

IV. ADVERSE IMPACTS THAT CANNOT BE AVOIDED IV. ADVERSE IMPACTS THAT CANNOT BE AVOIDED IV. ADVERSE IMPACTS THAT CANNOT BE AVOIDED All significant adverse impacts resulting from the development of the Proposed Site will be mitigated to the maximum

More information

El Dorado Avenue

El Dorado Avenue A t t a c h m e n t 1 F i n d i n g s a n d C o n d i t i o n s 1995-1999 El Dorado Avenue Use Permit #08-10000055 JULY 10, 2008 CEQA FINDINGS 1. The project is categorically exempt from the provisions

More information

Noise. Existing Setting. Fundamentals of Acoustics

Noise. Existing Setting. Fundamentals of Acoustics This section evaluates the potential impacts related to noise and vibration during construction and operation of the project. Existing Setting Fundamentals of Acoustics may be defined as unwanted sound.

More information

Appendix P. Construction Noise Assessment. (Prepared by Marshall Day Acoustics, November 2013)

Appendix P. Construction Noise Assessment. (Prepared by Marshall Day Acoustics, November 2013) Appendix P Construction Noise Assessment (Prepared by Marshall Day Acoustics, November 2013) WRIGHTS ROAD STORAGE PONDS Construction Noise Assessment Rp 001 R03 2013523C 5 December 2013 Project: Prepared

More information

3820 Chiles Road EIR

3820 Chiles Road EIR 3820 Chiles Road EIR City of Davis, California April 30, 2018 jcb Project # 2017-184 Prepared for: Attn: Mr. Nick Pappani 1501 Sports Drive Sacramento, CA 95834 Prepared by: j.c. brennan & associates,

More information

Chapter 21. Noise BACKGROUND

Chapter 21. Noise BACKGROUND Chapter 21. Noise BACKGROUND The major noise sources in the Planning Area are: roadway noise from traffic on Interstate 80, Highway 113 and arterial streets; railroad noise from the Union Pacific and California

More information

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS I. NOISE

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS I. NOISE IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS I. NOISE 1. INTRODUCTION This section analyzes potential noise and vibration impacts associated with construction and operation of the proposed project. The analysis describes

More information

3.3 NOISE Existing Setting Thresholds of Significance

3.3 NOISE Existing Setting Thresholds of Significance 3.3 NOISE 3.3.1 Existing Setting Noise is generally defined as unwanted or objectionable sound. Sound levels are expressed as decibels (db). The A-weighted noise level has been developed to correspond

More information

Noise measurement and mitigation for urban building foundation excavation

Noise measurement and mitigation for urban building foundation excavation PROCEEDINGS of the 22 nd International Congress on Acoustics Challenges and Solutions in Acoustical Measurement and Design: Paper ICA2016-552 Noise measurement and mitigation for urban building foundation

More information

Appendix E: Noise and Vibration Assessment

Appendix E: Noise and Vibration Assessment Appendix E: Noise and Vibration Assessment FIRE STATION 25 & BOREL PARK PROJECT NOISE AND VIBRATION ASSESSMENT San Mateo, California May 22, 2018 Prepared for: Julie Wright David J. Powers & Associates,

More information

5.5 NOISE NOISE SCALES AND DEFINITIONS. City of Long Beach Shoreline Gateway Project Environmental Impact Report

5.5 NOISE NOISE SCALES AND DEFINITIONS. City of Long Beach Shoreline Gateway Project Environmental Impact Report 5.5 NOISE The purpose of this Section is to analyze project-related noise source impacts on-site and to surrounding land uses. This Section evaluates short-term construction related impacts, as well as

More information

Attachment 1 Findings and Conditions

Attachment 1 Findings and Conditions 2451 Ridge Road Use Permit #04-10000066 Attachment 1 Findings and Conditions APRIL 10, 2008 CEQA FINDINGS 1. The project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality

More information

Impacts and Mitigation Measures

Impacts and Mitigation Measures means of reducing the effects of wind-generated noise at the microphone. Ambient noise level measurements may be performed when wind velocities at the proposed project site are sufficient to allow wind

More information

3.7 NOISE AND VIBRATION

3.7 NOISE AND VIBRATION 3.7 NOISE AND VIBRATION This section provides an overview of noise and vibration and evaluates the construction and operational impacts associated with the Proposed Project. The following discussion provides

More information

4.11 NOISE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Characteristics of Noise

4.11 NOISE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Characteristics of Noise 4.11 NOISE This section of the Draft EIR presents an analysis of the proposed project s effect on the existing environment with respect to the generation of noise. Information presented in the setting

More information

Exhibit G. Construction Mitigation Plan

Exhibit G. Construction Mitigation Plan Exhibit G Construction Mitigation Plan Construction Period Mitigation 1. A construction period mitigation plan shall be prepared by the applicant for approval by the Public Works Department prior to issuance

More information

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & PLANNING APPROVAL STAFF REPORT Date: February 7, 2013

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & PLANNING APPROVAL STAFF REPORT Date: February 7, 2013 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & PLANNING APPROVAL STAFF REPORT Date: February 7, 2013 NAME LOCATION MAWSS Shelton Beach Road East side of Shelton Beach Road Extension, 2/10± mile North of Moffett Road CITY

More information

Contra Costa County Tassajara Parks Project Recirculated Draft EIR

Contra Costa County Tassajara Parks Project Recirculated Draft EIR Contra Costa County Tassajara Parks Project Noise 3.10 Noise 3.10.1 Introduction This section describes the existing noise setting and potential environmental effects from Project implementation on the

More information

Attachment G: Environmental Noise Assessment

Attachment G: Environmental Noise Assessment Attachment G: Environmental Noise Assessment IN-N-OUT BURGER, NORTH MAIN STREET ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT PLEASANT HILL, CALIFORNIA June 10, 2010 Prepared for: Rebecca Gorton Lamphier-Gregory 1944

More information

MAIN STREET PRECISE PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE STUDY REDWOOD CITY, CALIFORNIA

MAIN STREET PRECISE PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE STUDY REDWOOD CITY, CALIFORNIA MAIN STREET PRECISE PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE STUDY REDWOOD CITY, CALIFORNIA January 9, 2007 Prepared for: Valerie Young City of Redwood City 1107 Middlefield Road Redwood City, CA 94063 Prepared by: Richard

More information

BAYFRONT CANAL AND ATHERTON CHANNEL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

BAYFRONT CANAL AND ATHERTON CHANNEL PROJECT DESCRIPTION APPENDIX I BAYFRONT CANAL AND ATHERTON CHANNEL PROJECT DESCRIPTION South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2015 Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Report 2185 N. California Blvd., Suite

More information

4.11 Noise and Vibration

4.11 Noise and Vibration 4.11 Noise and Vibration Noise is generally defined as unwanted sound. The degree to which noise can affect the human environment ranges from levels that interfere with speech and sleep (annoyance and

More information

4.9 NOISE 1. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 4.9 1

4.9 NOISE 1. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 4.9 1 4.9 NOISE This section analyzes potential impacts resulting from noise and vibration associated with construction and operation of the Project. The analysis describes the existing noise environment within

More information

Appendix F. Noise Worksheets

Appendix F. Noise Worksheets Appendix Appendix F. Noise Worksheets The Pinnacle at Serrano Highlands Initial Study City of Lake Forest Appendix F. Noise Background and Modeling Data Characteristics of Sound Sound is a pressure wave

More information

NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS 28-UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA

NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS 28-UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS 28-UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA Prepared by: Giroux & Associates 1800 E Garry St., #205 Santa Ana, CA 92705 Prepared for: Phil Martin & Associates Attn: Phil Martin

More information

Purple Line Extension. Beverly Hills Community Meeting August 22, 2016

Purple Line Extension. Beverly Hills Community Meeting August 22, 2016 Purple Line Extension Beverly Hills Community Meeting August 22, 2016 1 3 Purple Line Extension Project Alignment 2 Section 2 and 3 Status Under Construction Forecasted Schedule Section 1 Section 2 Section

More information

SECTION CONSTRUCTION FACILITIES AND TEMPORARY CONTROLS

SECTION CONSTRUCTION FACILITIES AND TEMPORARY CONTROLS PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 DESCRIPTION A. Temporary Utilities: Electricity, lighting, heating, cooling, ventilation, water, and sanitary facilities. B. Temporary Controls: Barriers, fencing, erosion control, exterior

More information

McDonald's NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF LA PALMA

McDonald's NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF LA PALMA McDonald's NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF LA PALMA PREPARED BY: Bill Lawson, PE, INCE blawson@urbanxroads.com (949) 660-1994 x203 Alex Wolfe awolfe@urbanxroads.com (949) 660-1994 x209 OCTOBER 7, 2014 ii

More information

SECTION 4 - NOISE INTRODUCTION

SECTION 4 - NOISE INTRODUCTION SECTION 4 - NOISE INTRODUCTION The Noise Element of the General Plan is a planning document, which is intended to provide a policy framework within which potential noise impacts may be addressed in the

More information

4.6 NOISE Introduction

4.6 NOISE Introduction 4.6 NOISE 4.6.1 Introduction The Noise section of the EIR discusses the existing noise environment in the immediate project vicinity and identifies potential noise-related impacts and mitigation measures

More information

NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS DEL VALLE RESIDENTIAL LA PUENTE, CALIFORNIA

NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS DEL VALLE RESIDENTIAL LA PUENTE, CALIFORNIA NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS DEL VALLE RESIDENTIAL LA PUENTE, CALIFORNIA Prepared by: Giroux & Associates 1800 E Garry St., #205 Santa Ana, CA 92705 Prepared for: Keeton Kreitzer Consulting Attn: Keeton Kreitzer

More information

WAIKATO POWER PLANT SH31, KAWHIA ROAD OTOROHANGA ASSESSMENT OF NOISE EFFECTS

WAIKATO POWER PLANT SH31, KAWHIA ROAD OTOROHANGA ASSESSMENT OF NOISE EFFECTS 1/355 Manukau Road Epsom, Auckland 1023 PO Box 26283 Epsom, Auckland 1344 T: 09 638 8414 E: hegley@acoustics.co.nz WAIKATO POWER PLANT SH31, KAWHIA ROAD OTOROHANGA ASSESSMENT OF NOISE EFFECTS Report No

More information

HAWKS RIDGE PROJECT NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS. November 6, 2015

HAWKS RIDGE PROJECT NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS. November 6, 2015 HAWKS RIDGE PROJECT NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS November 6, 2015 Kunzman Associates, Inc. HAWKS RIDGE PROJECT NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS November 6, 2015 Prepared by: Roma Stromberg, M.S./INCE Catherine Howe, M.S.

More information

A D M I N I S T R A T I V E U S E P E R M I T

A D M I N I S T R A T I V E U S E P E R M I T Planning and Development Department Land Use Planning Division A D M I N I S T R A T I V E U S E P E R M I T 1449 Oxford Street Administrative Use Permit #ZP2015-0075 Project Description: To install a

More information

Mitigation Monitoring Program Campus Master Plan 2015

Mitigation Monitoring Program Campus Master Plan 2015 Mitigation Program Campus Master Plan 2015 California State University, Sacramento May 2015 Environmental Mitigation Program Sacramento Campus Master Plan 2015 Project Section 1: Authority This Environmental

More information

4.5 Noise Environmental Setting. Noise Background. Noise Exposure and Community Noise

4.5 Noise Environmental Setting. Noise Background. Noise Exposure and Community Noise This section evaluates potential impacts on ambient noise levels from construction and operation of the proposed project. The analysis presented below is based on ambient noise measurements taken near

More information

4.10 NOISE Introduction

4.10 NOISE Introduction 4.10 NOISE 4.10.1 Introduction The Noise chapter of the Draft EIR discusses the existing noise environment in the immediate project vicinity and identifies potential noise-related impacts and mitigation

More information

CREATE. Noise and Vibration Assessment Methodology

CREATE. Noise and Vibration Assessment Methodology CREATE Noise and Assessment Methodology June 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION... 1 2. BACKGROUND... 1 3. OVERALL FTA IMPACT ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY... 2 4. KEY ELEMENTS OF NOISE ASSESSMENT... 4 4.1

More information

APPENDIX C NOISE ASSESSMENT STUDY

APPENDIX C NOISE ASSESSMENT STUDY APPENDIX C NOISE ASSESSMENT STUDY EDWARD L. PACK ASSOCIATES, INC. 1975 HAMILTON AVENUE Acoustical Consultants TEL: 408-371-1195 SUITE 26 FAX: 408-371-1196 SAN JOSE, CA 95125 www.packassociates.com REVISED

More information

Perris Circle 3 NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF PERRIS

Perris Circle 3 NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF PERRIS Perris Circle 3 NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF PERRIS PREPARED BY: Bill Lawson, PE, INCE blawson@urbanxroads.com (949) 336-5979 Alex Wolfe, INCE awolfe@urbanxroads.com (949) 336-5977 MARCH 2018 II TABLE

More information

COUNTY OF SUTTER ENCROACHMENT PERMIT

COUNTY OF SUTTER ENCROACHMENT PERMIT COUNTY OF SUTTER ENCROACHMENT PERMIT PERMIT No. Development Services Dept. Engineering Division 1130 Civic Center Blvd Yuba City, CA 95993 (530) 822-7400 Hours: 8 AM - 5 PM Upon completion, submit application

More information

Delaware Street

Delaware Street A t t a c h m e n t 1 F i n d i n g s a n d C o n d i t i o n s 2004-06 Delaware Street Use Permit #09-10000052 APRIL 22, 2010 CEQA FINDINGS 1. The project is categorically exempt from the provisions of

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF TABLES LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF TABLES LIST OF ATTACHMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.12 NOISE... 4.12-1 4.12.0 Introduction... 4.12-1 4.12.1 Methodology... 4.12-2 4.12.2 Existing Conditions... 4.12-2 4.12.3 Impacts... 4.12-16 4.12.4 Applicants-Proposed Measures... 4.12-22

More information

Ontario County Landfill Proposed Eastern and Wrap-Around Expansions Ontario County, Town of Stanley, New York. Operating Noise Impact Assessment

Ontario County Landfill Proposed Eastern and Wrap-Around Expansions Ontario County, Town of Stanley, New York. Operating Noise Impact Assessment Ontario County Landfill Proposed Eastern and Wrap-Around Expansions Ontario County, Town of Stanley, New York July 2012 Ontario County Landfill Proposed Eastern and Wrap-Around Expansions Ontario County,

More information

11.1 Affected Environment

11.1 Affected Environment Chapter 11 11.1 Affected Environment This section describes the regulatory and physical environmental setting for noise in the Plan Area. 11.1.1 Regulatory Setting Federal and State Local sources within

More information

Home2 Suites by Hilton

Home2 Suites by Hilton Home2 Suites by Hilton City of Tracy, California February 22, 2017 jcb Project # 2016-222 Prepared for: Attn: Elise Carroll 1020 Suncast Lane, Suite 106 El Dorado Hills, California 95762 Prepared by: j.c.

More information

SECTION A1 EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL GENERAL

SECTION A1 EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL GENERAL SECTION A1 EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL GENERAL The work under this section shall include all excavation to such width and depth as shown on the drawings, specified herein, or ordered by the Engineer. Such

More information

DEL MONTE FOREST PLAN MONTEREY COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

DEL MONTE FOREST PLAN MONTEREY COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT DEL MONTE FOREST PLAN MONTEREY COUNTY, CALIFORNIA BBA Report 10-013 PREPARED FOR PEBBLE BEACH COMPANY P.O. BOX 1767 PEBBLE BEACH, CALIFORNIA 93953 PREPARED BY BROWN-BUNTIN

More information

TH 100 Interchange & Auxiliary Lane from 36 th Street to Cedar Lake Road

TH 100 Interchange & Auxiliary Lane from 36 th Street to Cedar Lake Road TH 100 Interchange & Auxiliary Lane from 36 th Street to Cedar Lake Road Noise Advisory Committee Meeting Thursday October 27, 2011 6:00 7:30 p.m. Saint Louis Park City Hall 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard Saint

More information

San Joaquin Apartments and Precinct Improvements Project EIR Noise

San Joaquin Apartments and Precinct Improvements Project EIR Noise 5.7 NOISE This section evaluates the potential for the San Joaquin Apartments project to result in significant short- and long-term noise impacts. The evaluation includes an assessment of potential construction-related

More information

SECTION CS-2. TRENCH EXCAVATION CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS

SECTION CS-2. TRENCH EXCAVATION CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS SECTION CS-2. TRENCH EXCAVATION CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS CS-2-01. GENERAL: Trench excavation shall conform with the City Standard Specifications. In general a trench is defined as an excavation in which

More information