Comparative Study on Concentric Steel Braced Frame Structure due to Effect of Aspect Ratio using Pushover Analysis
|
|
- Alice Rose
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 247 Comparative Study on Concentric Steel Structure due to Effect of using Pushover Analysis Kiran Kamath 1, Shruthi 2, Shashikumar Rao 2 1 Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal, 2 Post Graduate Student, Structural Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal, ABSTRACT The present study focuses on the effect of different aspect i.e. H/B ratio, where H is the total height of the building frame and B is the base width of the building frame, on the seismic performance of the steel frame structures. Here, height of the building is kept constant and the base width is varied. In the present study, seven different aspect ranging from 1.0 to 3.75 have been considered for the ten storey steel frame building with concentric bracing i.e. X bracing and without bracing system. Two types of frames are considered for the study, one with similar steel sections for maximum strength required for beam and column and the other with varying steel sections conforming to the strength and serviceability requirements to withstand the specified loading. For this analytical study, ETABS is used and the comparison between the performances of bare frames with different aspect is made using pushover curves. Roof displacement, base shear carried and performance point are the parameters used to identify the seismic performance of the frames. It is inferred that provision of bracings to the frame structure increased the base shear carrying capacity, performance point and reduced the roof displacement for all types of aspect considered. Keywords -, Pushover analysis, Steel, X, Type 1 Section, I. INTRODUCTION In last decades Steel structure plays an important role in the construction industry. It is necessary to design a structure to perform well under seismic loads. Shear capacity of the structure can be improved by introducing Steel bracings in the structural system. Bracings can increase the energy absorption of structures or decrease the demand forced by earthquake loads. With the addition of bracings to the structures with amplified energy dissipation may safely resist forces and deformations triggered by robust ground waves. Bracings can be used as retrofit as well. Design of such structure should have good ductility property to perform well under seismic loads. To evaluate ductility and other properties for bracing Push over analysis is performed. In earthquake resistant design, structures are usually designed for lower levels of seismic forces and allowed to undergo nonlinear response under severe ground motion. Hence, a nonlinear static pushover analysis has become popular in recent years to determine parameters such as initial stiffness, yield load, yield displacement, maximum base shear and maximum displacement. Khan and Khan, (2014) studied on the typical 15 th storey regular steel frame building with different pattern of bracing system. This building is designed for various types of concentric bracings like V, X, Diagonal and Exterior X and performance of each frame is carried out through nonlinear pushover analysis. Three types of sections i.e. ISA, ISMC, ISMB are used to compare for same patterns of bracing and results are compared with roof displacement and performance point [1]. Kalibhat et al., (2014) studied on the effect of a provision of concentric bracings on the seismic performance of the steel frames with two different types of concentric bracings (viz. X and inverted-v type bracing) for the different storey levels. They found that inclusion of bracing increased the base shear capacity and decreased the roof displacement and also reduced the inter storey drift. The lateral storey displacements of the building are reduced by the use of inverted-v bracing in comparison to the X bracing system [2]. Vijayakumar and Babu, (2012) estimated the behavior of G+2 reinforced concrete bare frame subjected to earthquake forces in zone III. The reinforced concrete structures were analyzed by nonlinear static analysis using SAP2000 software. The results obtained in terms of pushover demand, capacity spectrum and plastic hinges gave an insight into the real behavior of structures. Most of the hinges have developed in the beams in the form of immediate occupancy, Life safety, Collapse prevention and few in the columns. The column hinges have limited the damage [3]. Poluraju and Rao, (2011) assessed the performance of G+3 building using pushover analysis. Observations showed that properly designed frame will perform well under seismic loads. It was found that the hinges developed more in the beams than the columns; thereby column had limited damage [4]. Kadid and Yahiaoui, (2011) examined the seismic behaviour of RC buildings strengthened with different types of steel braces, X-braced, inverted V braced, ZX braced, and Zipper braced and nonlinear pushover
2 248 II. analysis is carried out. For the analysis purpose they considered three and six story RC building with different patterns of bracing system with different cross sections as mentioned above. Conclusions showed that adding braces influenced the global capacity of the buildings in terms of strength, deformation and ductility in comparisons with bare frame. They found that the X and Zipper bracing systems performed better than other braces depending on the type and size of the cross section [5]. Inel and Ozmen, (2006) carried out push over analysis using SAP [2000] comparing the performance of the building for default hinge properties and user defined hinge properties. They have concluded that the result obtained from user defined hinge properties are more accurate than of default hinges [6]. Maheri and Hadjipour, (2003) conducted experiments on scaled models of ductile RC frames with steel X and knee bracing system. Experiment results signifies that the yield and strength capacity of a ductile RC frame can be increased and its global displacements can be reduced to the desired levels by directly adding either X or a knee bracing system to the frame. Both X and knee bracing systems may be used to design or retrofit for a damage-level earthquake, whenever designing or retrofitting for a collapse-level earthquake is considered knee bracing is a effective system [7]. From previous work we can observe that many experimental and analytical works have been done in the area of the pushover analysis of the RC frames and few works on steel frames with different types of bracing systems. Since no work is done on aspect of steel frames with different types of bracing systems. Hence, the present work is focused on the effect of different aspect on the seismic performance of the steel frames with X bracing systems using ETABS and results are analyzed through pushover analysis. PUSHOVER ANALYSIS Linear elastic analysis gives a good indication of elastic capacity of structures and indicates where the first yielding will occur but it cannot predict failure mechanisms and accounts for redistribution of forces due to progressive yielding. Among different approaches described in ATC-40, Nonlinear Static Pushover analysis is very popular because of its simplicity and ability to estimate component and system level deformation demands with acceptable accuracy without intensive computational and modeling effort as dynamic analysis. Pushover analysis is a static, nonlinear procedure in which the magnitude of the structural loading is incrementally increased in accordance with a certain predefined pattern. Pushover analysis may be categorized as displacement controlled pushover analysis when lateral movement is executed on the building and its equilibrium designates the forces. In the same way, when lateral forces are enforced, the analysis is termed as force-controlled pushover analysis. The target displacement or target force is projected to signify the III. maximum displacement or maximum force expected to be qualified by the structure during the design earthquake. Response of structure beyond full strength can be bent on only by displacement controlled pushover analysis. Hence, in the present study, displacement-controlled pushover method is used for analysis of structural steel frames. A plot of the total base shear versus top roof displacement in a building is attained by this analysis that would specify any early failure or weakness. The analysis is performed up to failure, thus it permits purpose of collapse load and ductility capacity. A typical pushover curve is shown in Figure 1. Force versus displacement is plotted for gradually increasing lateral loads till failure. Beyond elastic limit, different states such as Immediate Occupancy (IO), Life Safety (LS), Collapse prevention (CP), >E collapse are defined as per ATC 40 and FEMA 356. Figure 1: Typical pushover curve DESCRIPTION OF STEEL FRAME STRUCTURES (i) (ii) (iii) Figure 2: (i) Steel bare frame, (ii), (iii) for aspect ratio1.0 In the present study, a 2- bay two dimensional steel frame structures with one bay X braced frame, two bay X braced frame and structure without bracing with different aspect
3 249 has been modeled and analyzed using ETABS. Two types of frames are considered for the study, one with similar steel sections (Type 1) for maximum strength required for beam and column and the other with varying steel sections (Type 2) confirming to the strength and serviceability requirements to withstand the specified loading. Structural configuration of different types of framed structures of aspect ratio 1.0 is shown in the Figure 2. The building consists of G+9 stories. All columns in all models are assumed to be fixed at the base for simplicity. The height of each floor is 3.0m. Live load on floor is taken as 3kN/m 2 and on roof is 1.5kN/m 2. Floor finish on the floor is 1kN/m 2. Weathering course on roof is 2kN/m 2. In the seismic weight calculation only 25 of floor live load is considered. The unit weights of concrete and masonry are taken as 25kN/m3 and 20kN/m3 respectively. The building is steel moment resisting frame with concentric bracing considered to be situated in seismic zone III. The medium type of soil is considered and time period of the building in X-direction is considered based on base dimension of the building as per IS code The sizes used for beam is Girder Section1, column is Girder Section2 and that of X bracing is ISWB600 for Type 1 section. Beam and column sizes for Type 2 sections as per SP 6 (1) 1964 are tabulated in Table 1. Girder Section1: Web plate (800x12) mm, Flange angle (150x150x18) mm, Flange plates (400x40) mm Girder Section2: Web plate (800x12) mm, Flange angle (150x150x18) mm, Flange plates (500x32) mm Girder Section3: Web plate (800x12) mm, Flange angle (150x150x18) mm, Flange plates (400x16) mm IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Linear static and pushover analysis is conducted on all the models for seismic loads defined as per IS (Part-I) using ETABS. The pushover analysis provides an insight into the structural aspects, which controls the performance during earthquakes. It also provides data on the strength and ductility of a building. The results obtained from analysis are compared and discussed as follows. Figure 3: Pushover curves for bare frame and one bay X braced frame structures of Type 1 section with different aspect Table 1: Beam, column and bracing sizes of Type 2 section for different aspect Base Width B in m Beam Size Column Size X Brace Girder Section1 Girder Section2 ISWB Girder Section3 ISWB600 C.P 32mm ISMB ISMB550 C.P 40mm ISMB 600 C.P 25mm ISWB600 C.P 32mm ISWB400 C.P 32mm ISMB 500 ISMB ISMB 600 ISWB 600 ISMB ISMB 450 ISWB 600 ISMB ISMB 400 ISWB 550 ISMB 400 C.P: Cover Plate Figure 4: Pushover curves for bare frame and two bay X braced frame structures of Type 1 section with different aspect From Figures 3 and 4, Steel Bare, frame and braced frame of Type 1 section with aspect ratio 1.0 is showing 34, 49 and 49 better performance in terms of performance base force when compared to aspect ratio 3.75 respectively. It is also found that for aspect 1.5 and 1.25, performance base force has marginally increased when compared to aspect ratio 1.0
4 250 because of negligible variation in mass. As bracing is introduced to the bare frame structures it increased the performance of the base force and ductile behaviour of the structure. Figure 7: Pushover curves for bare frame, one bay X braced frame and two bay X braced frame structures of Type 1 section for aspect 1.0 Figure 5: Pushover curves for bare frame and one bay X braced frame structures of Type 2 section with different aspect Figure 6: Pushover curves for bare frame and two bay X braced frame structures of Type 2 section with different aspect From Figures 5 and 6, Steel Bare, frame and braced frame of Type 1 section with aspect ratio 1.0 is showing 92, 88 and 91 better performance in terms of performance base force when compared to aspect ratio 3.75 respectively. It is also found that higher the aspect lesser is the performance base force for all types of frame structures. Figure 8: Pushover curves for bare frame, one bay X braced frame and two bay X braced frame structures of Type 1 section for aspect 3.75 From Figures 7 and 8, it is found that as bracing is introduced to the structure maximum base force increased considerably for all aspect considered. It is also found that two bay X braced frame is showing higher performance base force than other types of structures. From Tables 2 and 3, it can be observed that as aspect ratio increased performance of base shear decreased considerably from aspect ratio 1.0 to 3.75 for both type of sections. As aspect ratio increased roof displacement decreased considerably from aspect ratio 1.0 to 3.75 for Type 1 section and that of Type 2 section increased considerably. It is also observed that bracing enhances the base shear carrying capacity and reduced the roof displacement. Two bay X braced frame is showing better performance than bare frame and one bay X braced frame structures.
5 251 Table 2: Base Shear for Linear Static Analysis of different frame structures for Type 1 and s Bare B.S in kn Type 1 Section B.S in kn Increa se B.S in kn Incre ase B.S: Base Shear Table 3: Roof Displacement for Linear Static Analysis of different frame structures for Type 1 and s Bare R.D in mm Type 1 Section R.D in mm Decre ase R.D in mm Decre ase Figure 9: Capacity and Demand spectrum curve for bare frame, one bay X braced frame and two bay X braced frame structures of Type 1 section for aspect 3.75 From Figure 9, it can be observed that as bracing is introduced to the structures the performance point increases considerably, where performance point is the intersection between the capacity curve and demand curve. This represents the performance of the building. Table 4: Base shear and roof displacement at performance point for Type 1 section Type 1 Section Performance Point(V(kN),d(mm)) Bare 1.00 (936.69, 35) ( ,23) ( , 14) 1.25 (881.28, 30) ( ,20) ( , 11) 1.50 (829.40, 27) ( ,17) ( , 09) 2.00 (735.60, 23) (839.74,14) (873.44, 7.4) 2.50 (651.09, 21) (669.40,12) (687.98, 7.2) 3.00 (569.07, 20) (557.44,12) (568.46, 7.4) 3.75 (457.63, 18) (448.75,12) (455.31, 8.3) R.D: Roof Displacement
6 252 Table 5: Base shear and roof displacement at performance point for Type 2 section Performance Point(V(kN),d(mm)) Bare 1.00 (936.69, 35) ( , 23) ( , 14) 1.25 (657.23, 38) (914.36,23) ( , 12) 1.50 (488.39, 41) (702.39,24) (821.94,13) 2.00 (372.16, 41) (563.84,27) (664.97,14) 2.50 (266.19, 43) (433.75,32) (551.69,17) 3.00 (175.48, 53) (316.89,36) (446.92,18) 3.75 (135.23, 55) (218.76,41) (322.14,24) From Tables 4 and 5, it can be observed that as aspect ratio increased base shear at performance point decreased considerably from aspect ratio 1.0 to 3.75 for both type of sections. As aspect ratio increased roof displacement at performance point decreased considerably from aspect ratio 1.0 to 3.75 for Type 1 section and that of Type 2 section increased considerably. Two bay X braced frame is showing better performance than bare frame and one bay X braced frame structures. V. CONCLUSIONS The following are the observations from present analysis. 1. As aspect ratio increases, base shear carrying capacity decreases for both type of section considered in the study. 2. As aspect ratio increases, roof displacement decreases for frames with Type 1 section and for Type 2 section it increases considerably. 3. The provision of bracing enhances the base shear carrying capacity of frames and reduces roof displacement undergone by the structures. 4. Steel frame with aspect ratio 1.0 and two bay X braced frame showed better performance in terms of performance base force and performance point when compared to other aspect and bare frame, one bay X braced frame structures considered in the study. REFERENCES [1] Khan M. I. and Khan K.N.,(2014), Seismic Analysis of Steel with Bracings using Pushover Analysis, International Journal of Advanced Technology in Engineering and Science, Volume No. 02, Issue No. 07, Page No [2] Kalibhat M.G., Kamath K., Prasad S. K. and Pai R.R., 2014, Seismic Performance of Concentric Steel s from Pushover Analysis, IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, Page No [3] Vijaykumar and Babu V. D.L., 2012, Pushover Analysis of Existing Reinforced Concrete d Structures, European Journal of Scientific Research, Volume No. 71, Issue No. 02, Page No [4] Poluraju.P. and Rao N. P.V.S., 2011, Pushover analysis of reinforced concrete frame structure using SAP 2000, International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Volume No. 04, Issue No. 06, Page No [5] Kadid A. and Yahiaoui D., 2011, Seismic Assessment of RC s, Procedia Engineering, Volume No. 14, Page No [6] Inel M. and Ozmen H.B., 2006, Effects of plastic hinge property in nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete buildings, Engineering Structure, Volume No. 28, Page No [7] Maheri M.R. and Hadjipour A., 2003, Experimental investigation and design of steel brace connection to RC frame, Engineering Structures, Volume No. 25, Page No [8] IS 800, 2007, General construction in steel, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. [9] IS 1893(part 1), 2002, Provision on seismic design of buildings, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. [10] FEMA 356, 2000, Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC. [11] ATC-40, 1996 Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, Applied Technical Council, California Seismic Safety Commission, Redwood City, California. [12] SP 6 (1), 1964, Hand book for Structural Engineer, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. VI. ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors would like to express their sincere thanks to The Director, and H.O.D, Civil engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal for providing necessary facilities required for the present study.
Application of Pushover Analysis for Evaluating Seismic Performance of RC Building
Application of Pushover Analysis for Evaluating Seismic Performance of RC Building Riza Ainul Hakim* MSc Student in Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Abdul-Aziz University, Jeddah, KSA Mohammed
More informationPerformance Based Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Building
Open Journal of Civil Engineering, 2016, 6, 188-194 Published Online March 2016 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojce http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2016.62017 Performance Based Seismic Design of
More informationPUSHOVER ANALYSIS FOR THE RC STRUCTURES WITH DIFFERENT ECCENTRICITY
PUSHOVER ANALYSIS FOR THE RC STRUCTURES WITH DIFFERENT ECCENTRICITY Sharmila H C 1, Prof. Mahadeva M 2 Assistant professor 1, Department of Civil Engineering, Dr. S M C E, Bangalore, (India) Assistant
More informationOPTIMUM POSITION OF OUTRIGGER SYSTEM FOR HIGH RAISED RC BUILDINGS USING ETABS (PUSH OVER ANALYSIS)
OPTIMUM POSITION OF OUTRIGGER SYSTEM FOR HIGH RAISED RC BUILDINGS USING ETABS 2013.1.5 (PUSH OVER ANALYSIS) Karthik.N.M 1, N.Jayaramappa 2 1 Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering Chikka Muniyappa
More informationPERFORMANCE BASED SEISMIC EVALUATION OF MULTI-STOREYED REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDINGS USING PUSHOVER ANALYSIS
PERFORMANCE BASED SEISMIC EVALUATION OF MULTI-STOREYED REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDINGS USING PUSHOVER ANALYSIS S.P. AKSHARA Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Federal Institute of Science
More informationEffect of Concentric Braces on the Behaviour of Steel Structure by Pushover Analysis
IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE) e-issn: 2278-1684,p-ISSN: 232-334X, Volume 11, Issue 1 Ver. II (Jan. 214), PP 23-28 Effect of Concentric Braces on the Behaviour of Steel Structure
More informationNonlinear Pushover Analysis of Steel Frame Structure Dahal, Purna P., Graduate Student Southern Illinois University, Carbondale
Nonlinear Pushover Analysis of Steel Frame Structure Dahal, Purna P., Graduate Student Southern Illinois University, Carbondale Abstract: The applicability of the SAP2000 software for the nonlinear pushover
More informationSeismic performance assessment of reinforced concrete buildings using pushover analysis
IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE) ISSN: 2278-1684 Volume 5, Issue 1 (Jan. - Feb. 2013), PP 44-49 Seismic performance assessment of reinforced concrete buildings using pushover
More informationSeismic Assessment of an RC Building Using Pushover Analysis
Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research Vol. 4, No. 3, 014, 631-635 631 Seismic Assessment of an RC Building Using Pushover Analysis Riza Ainul Hakim ainul7@yahoo.com Mohammed Sohaib Alama sohaib.alama@hotmail.com
More informationPushover analysis of RC frame structure using ETABS 9.7.1
IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE) e-issn: 2278-1684,p-ISSN: 2320-334X, Volume 11, Issue 1 Ver. V (Feb. 2014), PP 08-16 Pushover analysis of RC frame structure using ETABS 9.7.1
More informationPERFORMANCE STUDY OF RETROFITTED GRAVITY LOAD DESIGNED WALL FRAME STRUCTURES (SC-140)
PERFORMANCE STUDY OF RETROFITTED GRAVITY LOAD DESIGNED WALL FRAME STRUCTURES (SC-140) *A. Ahmed 1, K. H. Tan 1 1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering National University of Singapore, Singapore,
More informationStudy of Inelastic Behavior of Eccentrically Braced Frames under Non Linear Range
Study of Inelastic Behavior of Eccentrically Braced Frames under Non Linear Range Dr. S. N. Tande Professor & Head., Department of Applied Mechanics, Walchand college of Engineering, Sangli, Maharashtra,
More informationNON-LINEAR STATIC PUSHOVER ANALYSIS FOR MULTI-STORED BUILDING BY USING ETABS
NON-LINEAR STATIC PUSHOVER ANALYSIS FOR MULTI-STORED BUILDING BY USING ETABS Polupalli Victor Paul 1, K Sampath Kumar 2 1 PG Student, Dept of Civil Engineering, Nova College of Engineering & Technology,
More informationIJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development Vol. 4, Issue 05, 2016 ISSN (online):
IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development Vol. 4, Issue 05, 2016 ISSN (online): 2321-0613 Seismic analysis of RC Building Frame with Different Bracing Systems Mohammed Ali Khan
More informationINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PURE AND APPLIED RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PURE AND APPLIED RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY A PATH FOR HORIZING YOUR INNOVATIVE WORK SPECIAL ISSUE FOR NATIONAL LEVEL CONFERENCE "SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGIES IN CIVIL
More informationPushover Analysis of Steel Frame Structures with Different Types of Bracing System
IJSTE - International Journal of Science Technology & Engineering Volume 4 Issue 2 August 2017 ISSN (online): 2349-784X Pushover Analysis of Steel Frame Structures with Different Types of Bracing System
More informationNONLINEAR STATIC ANALYSIS OF R.C.C. FRAMES (Software Implementation ETABS 9.7)
NONLINEAR STATIC ANALYSIS OF R.C.C. FRAMES (Software Implementation ETABS 9.7) Mrugesh D. Shah M.E Structure student, B.V.M Engineering College Abstract:- Nonlinear static analysis is an iterative procedure
More information[Mohammed* et al., 5(8): August, 2016] ISSN: IC Value: 3.00 Impact Factor: 4.116
IJESRT INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES & RESEARCH TECHNOLOGY NON-LINEAR PUSHOVER ANALYSIS OF RCC BUILDING WITH BASE ISOLATION SYSTEM Asst Prof. Noor Mohammed, Mohammed Huzaifa Yaman, Shaik
More informationIJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development Vol. 3, Issue 11, 2016 ISSN (online):
IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development Vol. 3, Issue 11, 2016 ISSN (online): 2321-0613 Seismic Performance Study of R.C. Buildings having Plan Irregularity using Pushover Analysis
More informationSEISMIC VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT OF STEEL PIPE SUPPORT STRUCTURES
10NCEE Tenth U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering Frontiers of Earthquake Engineering July 21-25, 2014 Anchorage, Alaska SEISMIC VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT OF STEEL PIPE SUPPORT STRUCTURES
More informationPerformance Based Inelastic Seismic Analysis of Buildings
Performance Based Inelastic Seismic Analysis of Buildings Dr. S. N. Tande Associate Professor & Head., Department of Applied Mechanics, Walchand college of Engineering, Sangli, Maharashtra, India Reshama
More informationStudy of P-Delta Effect on Tall Steel Structure
International Journal of Allied Practice, Research and Review Website: www.ijaprr.com (ISSN 2350-1294) Study of P-Delta Effect on Tall Steel Structure Neeraj Kulkarni¹, S.M.Maheswerappa², Dr.J.K.Dattatraya³
More informationAnalytical Study on Seismic Performance of Hybrid (DUAL) Structural System Subjected To Earthquake
Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug. 2012 pp-2358-2363 ISSN: 2249-6645 Analytical Study on Seismic Performance of Hybrid (DUAL) Structural System Subjected To Earthquake Nabin Raj.C 1, S.Elavenil 2 Department of
More informationPUSHOVER ANALYSIS OF BUILDING WITH INFILL WALL
PUSHOVER ANALYSIS OF BUILDING WITH INFILL WALL 1 NMNikam, 2 LGKalurkar 1 PG student,, 2 Assistant Professor, Civil Engg Department, JNEC, Aurangabad, MS, India Abstract Due to its simplicity, the structural
More informationSeismic Performance Evaluation of Torsionally Asymmetric Buildings
International Journal of Science and Engineering Research, Volume 3, Issue 6, June 2012 1 Seismic Performance Evaluation of Torsionally Asymmetric Buildings Dr. B.G. Naresh Kumar* and Avinash Gornale**
More informationDescriptive Study of Pushover Analysis in RCC Structures of Rigid Joint
IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE) e-issn: 2278-1684,p-ISSN: 2320-334X, Volume 11, Issue 1 Ver. II (Jan. 2014), PP 60-68 Descriptive Study of Pushover Analysis in RCC Structures
More informationINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Volume 2, No 2, 2011
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Volume 2, No 2, 2011 Copyright 2010 All rights reserved Integrated Publishing services Research article ISSN 0976 4399 Solution of Shear Wall Location
More informationAnalysis of Various Steel Bracing Systems using Steel Sections for High Rise Structures
Analysis of Various Steel Bracing Systems using Steel Sections for High Rise Structures Y. U. Kulkarni 1 P. G. Chandak 1 M. K. Devtale 1 S.S. Sayyed 1 1 Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering,
More informationSEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF RC BUILDING FRAME WITH STEEL BRACING SYSTEM USING VARIOUS ARRANGEMENTS
SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF RC BUILDING FRAME WITH STEEL BRACING SYSTEM USING VARIOUS ARRANGEMENTS Shachindra Kumar Chadhar 1, Dr. Abhay Sharma 2 1 M.Tech. Student, Department of Civil Engineering, MANIT, Bhopal
More informationSEISMIC ANALYSIS OF SIX STOREYED RC FRAMED BUILDING WITH BRACING SYSTEMS
SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF SIX STOREYED RC FRAMED BUILDING WITH BRACING SYSTEMS ABSTRACT Megha Kalra Assistant Professor, The North Cap University, Gurgaon(India) Multistoreyed buildings are most affected by
More informationTitle. Author(s)ARDESHIR DEYLAMI; MOSTAFA FEGHHI. Issue Date Doc URL. Type. Note. File Information IRREGULARITY IN HEIGHT
Title THE COMPARISON OF THE SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF BRBF AN IRREGULARITY IN HEIGHT Author(s)ARDESHIR DEYLAMI; MOSTAFA FEGHHI Issue Date 2013-09-12 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/54342 Type proceedings
More informationComparative study of Performance of RCC Multi-Storey Building for Koyna and Bhuj Earthquakes
RESEARCH ARTICLE OPEN ACCESS Comparative study of Performance of RCC Multi-Storey Building for Koyna and Bhuj Earthquakes Atul N.Kolekar 1, Y.P.Pawar 2, Dr. C. P. Pise 3, D. D. Mohite 2, S. S. Kadam 2,
More informationPERFORMANCE- BASED SEISMIC DESIGN OF A BUILDING
PERFORMANCE- BASED SEISMIC DESIGN OF A BUILDING Jitendra Awasthi 1, Goutam Ghosh 2, P.K.Mehta 3 1 Ph.D. (Research Scholar) Civil Engineering Department, MNNIT Allahabad 2 Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering
More informationStability Analysis of Rigid Steel Frames With and Without Bracing Systems under the Effect of Seismic and Wind Loads
Stability Analysis of Rigid Steel Frames With and Without Bracing Systems under the Effect of Seismic and Wind Loads Hussain Imran K.M 1, Mrs.Sowjanya G.V 2 1 M.Tech student, Department of Civil Engineering,
More informationEARTHQUAKE ANALYSIS OF A G+12 STOREY BUILDING WITH AND WITHOUT INFILL FOR BHUJ AND KOYNA EARTHQUAKE FUNCTIONS
EARTHQUAKE ANALYSIS OF A G+12 STOREY BUILDING WITH AND WITHOUT INFILL FOR BHUJ AND KOYNA EARTHQUAKE FUNCTIONS Jyothi. C. Hawaldar, Dr. D. K. Kulkarni Student, 4 th sem, M.Tech(CADS), Department of Civil
More informationAssessment of P-Delta Effect on High Rise Buildings
Assessment of P-Delta Effect on High Rise Buildings Prashant Dhadve 1, Alok Rao 2, Atul Rupanvar 3, Deokate K. 4, Admile P.R 5, Dr. Nemade. P. D. 6 1,2,3,4 under graduate student, Civil Engineering S.B.
More informationNONLINEAR PERFORMANCE OF A TEN-STORY REINFORCED CONCRETE SPECIAL MOMENT RESISTING FRAME (SMRF)
NONLINEAR PERFORMANCE OF A TEN-STORY REINFORCED CONCRETE SPECIAL MOMENT RESISTING FRAME (SMRF) Houssam Mohammad Agha, Li Yingmin, Oday Asal Salih and A ssim Al-Jbori Doctoral Candidate, College of Civil
More informationIJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development Vol. 2, Issue 07, 2014 ISSN (online):
IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development Vol., Issue, ISSN (online): - Importance of ing of Masonry and Effect of Soft Storey on Seismic Performance of R.C High Rise Building
More informationPERFORMANCE OF ECCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES UNDER THE ACTION OF LATERAL LOAD
PERFORMANCE OF ECCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES UNDER THE ACTION OF LATERAL LOAD Ramya A 1, Muthumani K 2, Nafeez Ahmed L 3 1 M.Tech (Structural Engineering), School of Mechanical and Building Sciences, VIT
More informationSEISMIC EVALUATION OF HIGH RISE STEEL STRUCTURES WITH AND WITHOUT BRACING
SEISMIC EVALUATION OF HIGH RISE STEEL STRUCTURES WITH AND WITHOUT BRACING Ajay Mapari 1, Prof. Y. M. Ghugal 2 1 PG Student, Applied Mechanics Dept., GCE, Karad Dist. Satara, Maharashtra, (India) 2 HOD,
More informationSeismic Retrofitting of Building with Soft Storey and Floating Column
Seismic Retrofitting of Building with Soft Storey and Floating Column Ganesh Kumbhar 1, Anirudhha Banhatti 2 1Department of Civil Engineering, G. H. Raisoni College of Engineering and Management, Wagholi,
More informationSeismic Base Isolation of RC Frame Structures With and Without Infill
Seismic Base Isolation of RC Frame Structures With and Without Infill Sunil Shirol 1, Dr. Jagadish G. Kori 2 1PG student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Government Engineering College, Haveri, Karnataka,
More informationSeismic Performance Evaluation of Eccentrically Braced Frame Using PBPD Method
Seismic Performance Evaluation of Eccentrically Braced Frame Using PBPD Method Shreya S. Chintawar Asst. Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Sinhgad College of Engineering, Vadgaon(bk), Pune, India
More informationSeismic Analysis of Steel Frames with Different Bracings using ETSBS Software.
Seismic Analysis of Steel Frames with Different s using ETSBS Software. Muhammed Tahir Khaleel 1, Dileep Kumar U 2 1M.Tech Student, Dept of Civil Engg, SCEM, Karnataka, India 2Asst Professor, Dept of Civil
More informationSEISMIC BEHAVIOUR OF RC BUILDING RESTING ON PLAIN AND SLOPING GROUND WITH BRACINGS AND SHEAR WALL
SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR OF RC BUILDING RESTING ON PLAIN AND SLOPING GROUND WITH BRACINGS AND SHEAR WALL Yashaswini R 1, Dr. Mahesh Kumar G 2 1M.Tech Student, CAD Structures, Shridevi Institute of Engineering
More informationSeismic Behavior of High Rise Building for Soft Soil in All Seismic Zones Shaik Fayaz 1 Mrs. B.Ajitha 2
IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development Vol. 3, Issue 06, 2015 ISSN (online): 2321-0613 Seismic Behavior of High Rise Building for Soft Soil in All Seismic Zones Shaik Fayaz
More informationNon-Linear Static Analysis of RCC Frames
Non-Linear Static Analysis of RCC Frames 1 Unnati D. Bhagat, 2 Anuj K. Chandiwala, 3 Chirag M. Patel 1M.Tech Student, 2 Assistant Professor, 3 M.Tech Student Civil Engineering Department, Chhotubhai Gopalbhai
More informationEfficiency of bracing systems for seismic rehabilitation of steel structures
Efficiency of bracing systems for seismic rehabilitation of steel structures M. N. Chimeh & P. Homami Kharazmi (Tarbiat Moallem) University, Tehran, Iran SUMMARY: In most conventional cases, steel frame
More informationDetermine Seismic Coefficients of Structural Using Pushover Nonlinear Analysis
Journal of Civil Engineering Researchers 17 JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING RESEARCHERS Determine Seismic Coefficients of Structural Using Pushover Nonlinear Analysis Ashkan Masoomabdi a,*, Morteza Jamshidi
More informationDETERMINATION OF MOMENT RESISTING RC FRAMES OF RESPONSE REDUCTION FACTORS
DETERMINATION OF MOMENT RESISTING RC FRAMES OF RESPONSE REDUCTION FACTORS P.Ram Prasad 1, R. Rama Rao 2 1,2 Dept. of Civil, Pydah College of Engg. Visakhapatnam, (India) ABSTRACT Moment resisting frames
More informationDESIGN AND COMPARISON OF A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING (G+10) FOR SEISMIC FORCES USING THE CODES: IS1893, EURO CODE8, ASCE 7-10 AND BRITISH CODE
DESIGN AND COMPARISON OF A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING (G+10) FOR SEISMIC FORCES USING THE CODES: IS1893, EURO CODE8, ASCE 7-10 AND BRITISH CODE S.Karthiga 1, Hanna Elza Titus 2, Reetwiz Raj Hazarika 3, Mohamed
More informationWe are IntechOpen, the first native scientific publisher of Open Access books. International authors and editors. Our authors are among the TOP 1%
We are IntechOpen, the first native scientific publisher of Open Access books 3,350 108,000 1.7 M Open access books available International authors and editors Downloads Our authors are among the 151 Countries
More informationREHABILITATION OF RC BUILDINGS USING STRUCTURAL WALLS
REHABILITATION OF RC BUILDINGS USING STRUCTURAL WALLS Ahmed GHOBARAH 1 And Maged YOUSSEF 2 SUMMARY A developed macroscopic model is applied to the analysis of an example structure to demonstrate the use
More informationHYBRID MOMENT RESISTING STEEL FRAMES
HYBRID MOMENT RESISTING STEEL FRAMES Finley A. Charney 1 and Ozgur Atlayan 2 1 Associate Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 2461, USA 2 Graduate
More informationAn Investigation of Seismic Response Reduction Factor for Earthquake Resistant Design
An Investigation of Seismic Response Reduction Factor for Earthquake Resistant Design Dr. S. N. Tande H.O.D., Department of Applied Mechanics, Walchand college of Engineering, Sangli, Maharashtra, India
More informationEffect of Column Discontinuity on Base Shear and Displacement of Structure
Effect of Column Discontinuity on Base Shear and Displacement of Structure Kabade P P 1, Prof.Dr. Shinde D.N. 2 1 Student M.E. Civil structure,department of Civil Engineering, PVPIT Budhgaon, Maharashtra,India
More informationNonlinear Static Pushover Analysis of a Shear Wall Building in Madinah
Nonlinear Static Pushover Analysis of a Shear Wall Building in Madinah M. Ajmal,M.K. Rahman and M.H. Baluch King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals Dhahran Saudi Arabia Recent Seismic Activities in
More informationAvailable at ISSN
Page No.149 Available at www.ijcasonline.com ISSN 2349 0594 International Journal of Modern Chemistry and Applied Science International Journal of Modern Chemistry and Applied Science 2015, 2(3), 148-152
More informationPerformance based Displacement Limits for Reinforced Concrete Columns under Flexure
Performance based Displacement Limits for Reinforced Concrete Columns under Flexure Ahmet Yakut, Taylan Solmaz Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Middle East Technical University, Ankara,Turkey SUMMARY:
More informationEvaluation of Seismic Behavior for Low-Rise RC Moment Resisting Frame with Masonry Infill Walls
October 12-17, 28, Beijing, China Evaluation of Seismic Behavior for Low-Rise RC Moment Resisting Frame with Masonry Infill Walls Hyun Ko 1, Yong-Koo Park 2 and Dong-Guen Lee 3 1 Ph.D Candidate, Department
More informationON DRIFT LIMITS ASSOCIATED WITH DIFFERENT DAMAGE LEVELS. Ahmed GHOBARAH 1 ABSTRACT
ON DRIFT LIMITS ASSOCIATED WITH DIFFERENT DAMAGE LEVELS Ahmed GHOBARAH ABSTRACT Performance objectives in performance-based design procedures have been described in several ways according to the operational
More informationComparative Study On Seismic Behaviour Of Steel Knee Braced Frame With Eccentric Braced Frame
Comparative Study On Seismic Behaviour Of Steel Knee Braced Frame With Eccentric Braced Frame Anitha M 1, Divya K.K 2 1 M.Tech Scholar, Department of Civil Engineering, SN Gurukulam College of Engineering,
More informationSeismic Analysis and Design of Vertically Irregular RC Building Frames
Seismic Analysis and Design of Vertically Irregular RC Building Frames Himanshu Bansal 1, Gagandeep 2 1 Student (M.E.), PEC University of Technology, Civil Department, Chandigarh, India 2 Student (M.E.),
More informationEvaluation of Earthquake Risk Buildings with Masonry Infill Panels
Evaluation of Earthquake Risk Buildings with Masonry Infill Panels D.K. Bell Compusoft Engineering Ltd, Auckland B.J.Davidson Department of Civil & Resource Engineering, University of Auckland, Auckland
More informationCOST C26. Urban Habitat Constructions under Catastrophic Events EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE WG 2 Session, March 30th
COST C26 Urban Habitat Constructions under Catastrophic Events EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE WG 2 Session, March 30th Performance-based seismic retrofit of masonry and r.c. buildings by: A. Mandara, A.M. Avossa,
More informationSeismic Rehabilitation of Selby Condominium Complex, Montreal (Quebec), Canada
Seismic Rehabilitation of Selby Condominium Complex, Montreal (Quebec), Canada M. Zarrabi & R. Bartosh BCA Consultants, Montreal, Quebec, Canada A. Pall Pall Dynamics Limited, Montreal, Canada SUMMARY
More informationParametric Study of Dual Structural System using NLTH Analysis Ismaeel Mohammed 1 S. M. Hashmi 2
IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development Vol. 2, Issue 9, 214 ISSN (online): 2321-613 Ismaeel Mohammed 1 S. M. Hashmi 2 1 P.G. Student 2 Head of the Department 1,2 Department
More informationComparative Study of the Static and Dynamic Analysis of Multi-Storey Irregular Building
Comparative Study of the Static and Dynamic Analysis of Multi-Storey Irregular Building Bahador Bagheri, Ehsan Salimi Firoozabad, and Mohammadreza Yahyaei Abstract As the world move to the accomplishment
More informationPrediction of Initial Column Size for Reinforced Concrete Frame Buildings with Intermediate Drift
Prediction of Initial Column Size for Reinforced Concrete Frame Buildings with Intermediate Drift Sunil Singh Mayengbam National Institute of Technology, Silchar, India Satyabrata Choudhury National Institute
More informationDisplacement Based Damage Estimation of RC Bare Frame Subjected to Earthquake Loads: A Case Study on 4 Storey Building
Displacement Based Damage Estimation of RC Bare Frame Subjected to Earthquake Loads: A Case Study on 4 Storey Building Anthugari Vimala PhD Student, Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, International
More informationDamage-control Seismic Design of Moment-resisting RC Frame Buildings
Damage-control Seismic Design of Moment-resisting RC Frame Buildings Huanun Jiang* 1, Bo Fu 2 and Linzhi Chen 3 1 Professor, State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongi University,
More informationCAPACITY BASED DESIGN OF COLD FORMED STORAGE RACK STRUCTURES UNDER SEISMIC LOAD FOR RIGID AND SEMI RIGID CONNECTIONS
CAPACITY BASED DESIGN OF COLD FORMED STORAGE RACK STRUCTURES UNDER SEISMIC LOAD FOR RIGID AND SEMI RIGID CONNECTIONS K.M. Bajoria 1 and K.K. Sangle 2 1 Associate Professor Department of Civil Engineering,
More informationEFFECT OF PLACEMENT AND OPENINGS IN SHEAR WALL ON THE DISPLACEMENT AT VARIOUS LEVELS IN A BUILDING SUBJECTED TO EARTHQUAKE LOADS
EFFECT OF PLACEMENT AND OPENINGS IN SHEAR WALL ON THE DISPLACEMENT AT VARIOUS LEVELS IN A BUILDING SUBJECTED TO EARTHQUAKE LOADS 1 Pooja R. Gupta and 2 A.M. Pande 1 PG student, Department of Civil Engineering,
More informationBehaviour and design of innovative hybrid coupled shear walls for steel buildings in seismic areas
Behaviour and design of innovative hybrid coupled shear walls for steel buildings in seismic areas A. Zona, G. Leoni & A. Dall Asta University of Camerino, Italy C. Braham, T. Bogdan & H. Degée University
More informationEvaluation of Seismic Behavior of Buckling Restrained Braced Frames as Dual System in Combination with Special Moment Resisting Frames
Evaluation of Seismic Behavior of Buckling Restrained Braced Frames as Dual System in Combination with Special Moment Resisting Frames A. Mehdipanah, S.R. Mirghaderi & S.A. Razavi Faculty of Civil Engineering,
More informationDesign check of BRBF system according to Eurocode 8 Use of pushover analysis
2010 Design check of BRBF system according to Eurocode 8 Use of pushover analysis This report presents a simple computerbased push-over analysis for a steel structure with Buckling Restrained Braced Frame
More informationIJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development Vol. 4, Issue 10, 2016 ISSN (online):
IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development Vol. 4, Issue 10, 2016 ISSN (online): 2321-0613 Seismic Response of Tall Irregular Buildings under Influence of Torsion Lohith Kumar
More informationSTRENGTHENING OF REINFORCED CONCRETE AND STEEL STRUCTURE BY USING STEEL BRACING SYSTEMS
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-issn: 2395-56 Volume: 4 Issue: 9 Sep -217 www.irjet.net p-issn: 2395-72 STRENGTHENING OF REINFORCED CONCRETE AND STEEL STRUCTURE BY
More informationTHE EFFECTS OF P-DELTA AND CONSTRUCTION SEQUENTIAL ANALYSIS OF RCC AND STEEL BUILDING WITH RESPECT TO LINEAR STATIC ANALYSIS
THE EFFECTS OF P-DELTA AND CONSTRUCTION SEQUENTIAL ANALYSIS OF RCC AND STEEL BUILDING WITH RESPECT TO LINEAR STATIC ANALYSIS Tabassum G Shirhatti 1, Dr. S. B. Vanakudre 2 1Final year student (M.Tech-CAD
More informationSimi Aboobacker 1 and Nisha Varghese 2
Numerical Simulation of Special Concentrically Braced Frame Structure using OpenSEES Simi Aboobacker 1 and Nisha Varghese 2 PG Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Vidya Academy of Science and Technology,
More informationConcept of Earthquake Resistant Design
Concept of Earthquake Resistant Design Sudhir K Jain Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar November 2012 1 Bhuj Earthquake of 2001 Magnitude 7.7, ~13,805 persons dead Peak ground acceleration ~0.60g
More informationSeismic Performance and Design of Linked Column Frame System (LCF)
Seismic Performance and Design of Linked Column Frame System (LCF) M. Malakoutian & J.W. Berman Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA P. Dusicka
More informationComparative Study of R.C.C and Steel Concrete Composite Structures
RESEARCH ARTICLE OPEN ACCESS Comparative Study of R.C.C and Steel Concrete Composite Structures Shweta A. Wagh*, Dr. U. P. Waghe** *(Post Graduate Student in Structural Engineering, Y.C.C.E, Nagpur 441
More informationMULTI-LEVEL FORTIFICATION INTENSITIES SEISMIC PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAME- SHEAR WALL STRUCTURE WITH VISCOUS DAMPERS
MULTI-LEVEL FORTIFICATION INTENSITIES SEISMIC PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAME- SHEAR WALL STRUCTURE WITH VISCOUS DAMPERS Wenfeng Liu*, Jing Wang* * School of Civil Engineering, Qingdao
More informationResearch on the Influence of Infill Walls on Seismic Performance of Masonry Buildings with Bottom Frame-Shear Walls
AMSE JOURNALS-AMSE IIETA publication-7-series: Modelling B; Vol. 8; N ; pp - Submitted Jan. 7; Revised March, 7, Accepted April, 7 Research on the Influence of Infill Walls on Seismic Performance of Masonry
More informationExtreme Loading for Structures Version 3.1
Extreme Loading for Structures Version 3.1 Corrosion Effects Option April 2010 1. Introduction Corrosion of gusset plates was identified as one of the main causes for failure in the catastrophic collapse
More informationModelling of RC moment resisting frames with precast-prestressed flooring system
Modelling of RC moment resisting frames with precast-prestressed flooring system B.H.H. Peng, R.P. Dhakal, R.C. Fenwick & A.J. Carr Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch.
More informationSEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF CONCRETE TILT-UP BUILDINGS: CURRENT WALL-TO-SLAB CONNECTIONS
SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF CONCRETE TILT-UP BUILDINGS: CURRENT WALL-TO-SLAB CONNECTIONS Frank Devine, 1 Omri Olund, 2 Ken Elwood 3 and Perry Adebar 4 1 Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, University
More informationEXPLORATION OF DIFFERENT RETROFITTING OPTIONS FOR RC FRAME BUILDINGS IN KATHMANDU
EXPLORATION OF DIFFERENT RETROFITTING OPTIONS FOR RC FRAME BUILDINGS IN KATHMANDU Rajani PRAJAPATI 1, Hima SHRESTHA 2 and Ramesh GURAGAIN 3 1 Structural Engineer, National Society for Earthquake Technology-Nepal,
More informationctbuh.org/papers CTBUH Recommendations for the Seismic Design of High-Rise Buildings
ctbuh.org/papers Title: Author: Subject: CTBUH Recommendations for the Seismic Design of High-Rise Buildings Michael Willford, Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat Structural Engineering Publication
More informationSTUDY ON STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOUR OF HEXAGRID STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS IN MULTI STOREY BUILDINGS
Int. J. Chem. Sci.: 14(S1), 2016, 330-340 ISSN 0972-768X www.sadgurupublications.com STUDY ON STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOUR OF HEXAGRID STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS IN MULTI STOREY BUILDINGS DIYA SUSAN EBIN * and D. ARUL
More information3.5 Tier 1 Analysis Overview Seismic Shear Forces
Chapter 3.0 - Screening Phase (Tier ) 3.5 Tier Analysis 3.5. Overview Analyses performed as part of Tier of the Evaluation Process are limited to Quick Checks. Quick Checks shall be used to calculate the
More informationNONLINEAR DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF DISSIPATIVE DEVICES FOR SEISMIC RESISTANT STEEL FRAMES: EXPERIMENTAL BEHAVIOUR AND NUMERICAL SIMULATION
COMPDYN 211 III ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering M. Papadrakakis, M. Fragiadakis, V. Plevris (eds.) Corfu, Greece, 25 28 May 211 NONLINEAR
More informationSteel Rigid Frame Structural Behaviour at El Mayor Cucapah (Baja California) Earthquake April 4, 2010.
Steel Rigid Frame Structural Behaviour at El Mayor Cucapah (Baja California) Earthquake April 4, 2010. Perla R. Santa-Ana L. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de México, UNAM. Baez Santa Ana Ingenieros Consultores
More informationRE-CENTRING DUAL ECCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES WITH REMOVABLE LINKS
THE PUBLISHING HOUSE PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROMANIAN ACADEMY, Series A, OF THE ROMANIAN ACADEMY Volume 17, Number 2/2016, pp. 169 177 RE-CENTRING DUAL ECCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES WITH REMOVABLE LINKS Adriana
More informationNON-LINEAR STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ANALYSIS
NON-LINEAR STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ANALYSIS AHMAD RAHIMIAN, PhD, PE, SE Dr. Ahmad Rahimian., PE, SE is President of Cantor Seinuk Structural Engineers in New York City. An expert in the behaviour of steel
More informationSeismic evaluation of Hybrid steel frames with different patterns of semi-rigid connection
Seismic evaluation of Hybrid steel frames with different patterns of semi-rigid connection M. Ghassemieh 1) and N. Vahedi 2) 1) School of Civil Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran 2) MSc. Student
More informationBahram Marabi* & Abdul Kadir Marsono
Malaysian Journal of Civil Engineering 28 Special Issue (3):163-179(2016) SEPKA 2016 A NUMERICAL AND ANALYTICAL STUDY ON OPTIMIZATION AND EFFICIENCY OF STRUCTURAL FORMS BY TWO-OUTRIGGER IN TALL BUILDINGS
More informationSEISMIC CAPACITY EVALUATION OF POST-TENSIONED CONCRETE SLAB-COLUMN FRAME BUILDINGS BY PUSHOVER ANALYSIS
13 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August 1-6, 2004 Paper No. 827 SEISMIC CAPACITY EVALUATION OF POST-TENSIONED CONCRETE SLAB-COLUMN FRAME BUILDINGS BY PUSHOVER ANALYSIS
More informationSEISMIC RETROFITTING OF DORMITORY BUILDINGS WITH SOFT STOREY AND FLOATING COLUMNS
SEISMIC RETROFITTING OF DORMITORY BUILDINGS WITH SOFT STOREY AND FLOATING COLUMNS Nakul Singh 1, Vikram Singh Kashyap 2 1 M.Tech Scholar, Department of CE, Manipal University Jaipur 2 Assistant Professor,
More information