Architectural Review Board Report

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Architectural Review Board Report"

Transcription

1 Architectural Review Board Report To: From: Cc: Subject: Architectural Review Board Architectural Review Board Meeting: April 16, 2018 Agenda Item: 7.4 Michael Rocque, Associate Planner Stephanie Reich, AIA, LEED AP, Design & Historic Preservation Planner Rathar Duong, Associate Planner, ARB Liaison 18ARB-0130 to review building design, colors, and materials and landscape for an addition to the front building located on an existing 6-unit property containing three detached buildings. Address: Applicant: th Street Steven Nevills Recommended Action It is recommended that the Architectural Review Board approve application 18ARB-0130 based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained within this report. Executive Summary Proposed is a 1,081SF addition to an existing one-story single-family residential building located at the front of the property along 17 th street. The site contains three detached buildings comprised of six residential dwelling units. The three buildings include a detached single-family house in the front, a two-story, 2-unit building in the middle and a two-story 3-unit building located at the rear. The middle and rear two-story detached buildings will be maintained in their existing condition and the proposed addition will not increase the existing number of units on this site. The expansion introduces a contemporary design and modern finishes to an older traditional/vernacular style building. The proposed design merges an existing building and its design with a more contemporary design resulting in an eclectic building that enhances the neighborhood streetscape. Staff recommends approval of the proposed design, colors, and materials for the proposed addition with conditions and findings contained in this report. Background The parcel was originally developed in 1940 with a one-story single-family residence. A two-story, two-unit building was constructed in 1950, soon followed by another detached two-story three unit building constructed in 1957 for a total of six residential dwelling units on site. No Zoning Code modifications exist for the property and it is not listed on the Historic Resources Inventory (HRI). The property is legal nonconforming as it pertains to unit density and maximum number of units allowed. Under current Code, only four residential dwelling units are permitted and there are six residential units on site. While the building may be over the allowable density, an addition to the existing units is allowed. 1

2 Project / Site Information The following table provides a brief summary of project data: Zoning District / Design R2 (Multi-Unit Residential) Guidelines: Parcel Area (SF): 7,500 SF Parcel Dimensions: 50 x 150 Existing On-Site Single-unit in front (1940)-approx. 954 SF Improvements (Year Duplex in middle (1950) approx. 1,024 SF Built): Triplex in rear (1957) approx. 1,640 SF Historic Resources Inventory Status CEQA Adjacent Zoning & Use: Existing buildings are not listed on the HRI Exempt pursuant to Section (b)(3) North GC Multi-Unit Residential South R2 Multi-Unit Residential East R2 Multi-Unit Residential West R2 Multi-Unit Residential The site is located along 17 th Street within the R2 zoning district bounded by Santa Monica Boulevard to the north, Broadway to the south, and an alley (17 th Court) at the rear. The parcel is surrounded by one- and two-story single- and multi-family buildings. Analysis Site and Landscape Design The rectilinear site is currently developed with three detached residential buildings located along 17 th Street between Santa Monica Boulevard and Broadway Avenue. The rearmost building adjacent to the alley provides two un-enclosed parking spaces. There is an existing driveway approach from 17th Street that leads to a one-car garage and two unenclosed tandem parking spaces in front of the garage. The proposed first floor addition is situated at the rear of the building and will be replacing a portion of an existing rear patio area. Both the proposed first and second floor additions would not change the existing site configuration. No work is proposed for the other buildings or units on site. The property is enclosed on three sides with existing chain link fences with a low-lying CMU block wall along a portion of the front property line. Since the majority of the site is occupied by building footprint, driveway, and walkways, much of the existing landscape is located in the front and side setbacks towards the rear of the site. In an effort to enhance the front yard streetscape, limited landscape will be provided where possible. Proposed landscape is identified primarily in the front setback area as shown on Sheet A0 (Site Plan). The front setback area will consist of 328SF of new permeable pavers and planter walls along the front of the building and a small planter 2

3 wall located at the rear of the building along the side yard setback. Landscape proposed for the planters should be of low-lying drought-tolerant material and shall be provided for review and approval by staff to assess the appropriateness of the palette and how it complements the building design and site. Building Design/Architectural Concept The proposed building addition and façade remodel is a contemporary design that is enhanced by the simple material and color palette. The new design terminates in a flat roof consistent with a contemporary building. The new second floor offsets from the ground floor and is setback at the street elevation (west) and the proposed metal fascia trim helps control the volume of the second floor addition. This approach allows the first and second floors to appear shifted as seen on the west elevation. A visual connection is made on the front (west) and south elevations where the siding is extended along the second floor. Materials and colors serve to enhance the separate volumes. As described, the overall treatment is clean and allows the proposed design to exhibit a clear architectural concept. Mass and Scale The new second floor addition is modest in size and is setback from the street along the front elevation. The perceived mass and scale is addressed through the composition of various projecting and receding volumes along the elevations as well as the change of colors and placement of materials and second floor deck at the front elevation. This approach breaks down the massing of the building while providing a cohesive design and a three-dimensional quality. Additionally, the Hardi panel siding and Fry reglet trim appropriately highlights different forms, provides visual interest/variety in materials, and further minimizes the mass and scale. The increased mass and scale has been successfully addressed and is comparable to other (newer) buildings in the neighborhood. The design of the front building will be different, but is complementary to the rest of the buildings on the site. Design, Details and Materials The contemporary design will be further enhanced with a variety of finishes including Hardi horizontal panel siding and steel troweled smooth stucco in neutral color tones, metal fascia and canopies while the roof will be a flat roof design. As with the materials and their placement on the façade, the color palette is appropriate and complementary and helps express the design and various features of the building in a clear way. The corner treatment where the Hardi panel siding meets should be mitered to ensure a clean appearance as depicted on the elevations. The ground floor retains its existing smooth stucco finish while the new second floor will primarily consist of Hardi panel siding along both the west and south elevation and the new stair enclosure at the rear of the building will consist of a dark grey smooth steel trowel stucco finish. New windows are proposed throughout this unit and are identified as Marvin clad white color vinyl in a combination of fixed, hung, and sliding. This should be revised in color to be an earth tone or similar color to match the façade material and color. The alignment of these windows are sensible and provide for an attractive and thoughtful fenestration pattern. A few of the windows appear disproportionate, such as the window along the west elevation to the right of the entry next to the front entry. This should be revised in 3

4 size to match the other two double hung windows along the west elevation at the first floor for improved proportional relationships. The metal horizontal metal cable railing at the front balcony is simple/light and continues the horizontality of the adjoining Hardi panel siding. The material palette and color scheme are generally high quality and enhance the contemporary building design. DESIGN ELEMENTS PROPOSED EXTERIOR MATERIAL, FINISH AND COLOR Façade Smooth steel trowel finish stucco Hardiboard panel siding (grey) Windows Marvin Clad vinyl windows (Color: white ) Double Hung and fixed Doors Wood Roof N/A Mechanical Screened behind proposed parapet wall Screening Refuse Screening NA - existing Lighting Bronze outdoor wall light (see detail) Railing Metal cable railing system Gates NA - existing Fencing NA - existing Impact on Historic Resources The subject property is not listed on the City s Historic Resources Inventory (HRI). Code Compliance This application has only been preliminarily reviewed for compliance with the base district s development standards. A complete code-compliance review will not occur until the application is submitted for plan check. It is the applicant s responsibility to ensure that the plans comply fully with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. The applicant has been notified of any significant non-compliant aspects of their plans, and a condition has been added requiring full compliance with all applicable regulations prior to the issuance of a building permit. Any significant changes to the design subsequent to any ARB approval will require Board approval. CEQA Status The project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section (b)(3) in that it can be seen with certainty that the proposed project does not have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment in that the project involves the review of design-related issues associated with the proposed structure(s) in terms of general architectural design, proposed materials, colors, mechanical screening and/or landscape plans. 4

5 Summary The proposed project is an expansion of a new first and second floor addition and façade renovation of a one-story traditional/vernacular style building to a contemporary design while maintaining the existing six units on site. The proposal achieves a sensible mass and scale via breaks in the building plane, and in setting the new second floor away from the adjoining property. The contemporary design has a clear design concept and threedimensional quality. New colors, texture, and windows are proposed throughout the building to achieve consistency and design cohesiveness between the existing ground floor and new second level. FINDINGS: A. The plan for the proposed building or structure is expressive of good taste, good design, and in general contributes to the image of Santa Monica as a place of beauty, creativity and individuality in that the proposed expansion and façade renovation improve quality of the building and livability of the residential units. The new contemporary design expresses a clear architectural concept and adds to the eclectic quality found within the surrounding neighborhood. B. The proposed building or structure is not of inferior quality such as to cause the nature of the local neighborhood or environment to materially depreciate in appearance and value in that high quality materials such as Hardi panel siding, steel troweled stucco in neutral color tones, metal fascia trim and canopies, and metal cable railing appropriately placed to support a cohesive design will be incorporated into the building design as proposed in the application submittal and as presented to the Architectural Review Board. These finishes and associated color scheme support and enhance the contemporary building design and its threedimensional quality. C. The proposed design of the building or structure is compatible with developments on land in the general area in that the perceived mass and scale are addressed through various design techniques, including use of colors, materials, fenestration pattern, and building form. The proposed design is compatible with surrounding developments as other contemporary buildings exist in the neighborhood. As shown, the proposed addition will be compliant with the Zoning Ordinance in terms of setback and parcel coverage, and height and no deviation from Code is requested. D. The proposed development conforms to the effective guidelines and standards adopted pursuant to Chapter 9.55 Architectural Review Board, and all other applicable ordinances insofar as the location and appearance of the buildings and structures are involved. Specifically, the location and appearance of the buildings and structures comply with required findings set forth in Chapter 9.55, as documented by the Architectural Review Board, and as conditioned, the plans will fully comply with all applicable regulations prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5

6 CONDITIONS: 1. Landscape proposed for the planters should be provided for review and approval by staff for the appropriateness of the palette and how it complements the building design and site. 2. Revise the size and or design of the front window for improved proportions for review and approval by staff. 3. Color of vinyl scupper and downspouts shall not be white, but be a color that is earth tone or similar to match the façade. Scupper and downspout detail shall be provided for review and approval by staff 4. Color of vinyl windows shall not be white, but a color that is earth tone or similar to match the façade. Window detail shall be provided for review and approval by staff. 5. All stucco shall be smooth steel troweled stucco finish. 6. Existing landscape shall be retained and protected during construction. Protection barrier around impacted landscape areas shall be shown. 7. This approval shall expire when the administrative or discretionary entitlements, not including any Subdivision Map approvals, previously granted for the project have lapsed. If no such entitlements have been granted, this approval shall expire 24 months from its effective date, or 30 months if in the Coastal Zone unless appealed. 8. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate landscape and irrigation plan compliance with the City s Green Building Ordinance standards (SMMC 8.108) subject to staff approval. Modifications to the landscape plan that effect less than 150 square feet of area may be reviewed and approved by the Staff Liaison to the Board. 9. Prior to the issuance of a building permit a hydrozone matrix shall be included in the landscape and irrigation plans that describes for each hydrozone the following: the square footage, percentage of total landscaped area, plant type and plant form, hydrozone basis, hydrozone description, exposure or micro-climate, irrigation method, irrigation devices (including manufacturer, make and model), zone pressure, precipitation rates, zone gallons per minute and controller station numbers. 10. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that the plans comply with all applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. Significant changes to a project s design shall require review and approval of the Architectural Review Board. Minor changes may be approved administratively pursuant to all applicable guidelines. 6

7 The Architectural Review Board s approval, conditions of approval, or denial of this application may be appealed to the Planning Commission if the appeal is filed with the Zoning Administrator within ten consecutive days following the date of the Architectural Review Board s determination in the manner provided in SMMC Attachments Applicant s Submittal Material F:\CityPlanning\Share\ARB\STFRPT\SR18\18ARB-0130 ( th) Addition.doc 7

Architectural Review Board Report

Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Meeting: July 3, 2017 Agenda Item: 7.1 To: From: Cc: Subject: Architectural Review Board Rathar Duong, Associate Planner, ARB Liaison Stephanie

More information

Architectural Review Board Report

Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Report To: From: Cc: Subject: Architectural Review Board Meeting: October 16, 2017 Agenda Item: 7.2 Architectural Review Board Michael Rocque, Associate Planner Stephanie Reich,

More information

Architectural Review Board Report

Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Report To: From: Cc: Subject: Architectural Review Board Michael Rocque, Associate Planner Architectural Review Board Meeting: April 3, 2017 Agenda Item: 7.5 Stephanie Reich,

More information

Architectural Review Board Report

Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Report To: From: Cc: Subject: Architectural Review Board Architectural Review Board Meeting: July 31, 2017 Agenda Item: 7.8 Russell Bunim, Associate Planner Stephanie Reich,

More information

Architectural Review Board Report

Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Meeting: June 5, 2017 Agenda Item: 7.1 To: From: Cc: Subject: Architectural Review Board Rathar Duong, ARB Liaison Stephanie Reich, AIA, LEED

More information

Architectural Review Board Report

Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Report To: From: Cc: Subject: Architectural Review Board Meeting: February 6, 2017 Agenda Item: 7.7 Architectural Review Board Stephanie Reich, AIA, LEED AP, Design and Historic

More information

Architectural Review Board Report

Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Report To: From: Subject: Architectural Review Board Rathar Duong, ARB Liaison Architectural Review Board Meeting: October 17, 2016 Agenda Item: 8.2 16ARB-0322 to approve the

More information

Architectural Review Board Report

Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Report To: From: Subject: Architectural Review Board Architectural Review Board Meeting: January 20, 2016 Steve Traeger, Principal Urban Designer Grace Page, ARB Liaison Agenda

More information

Architectural Review Board Report

Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Report To: From: Subject: Architectural Review Board Meeting: November 21, 2016 Architectural Review Board Rathar Duong, ARB Liaison Agenda Item: 7.6 16ARB-0443 to approve the

More information

Architectural Review Board Report

Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Report To: From: Subject: Architectural Review Board Architectural Review Board Meeting: February 2, 2015 Steve Traeger, Principal Urban Designer Grace Page, ARB Liaison Agenda

More information

Architectural Review Board Report

Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Report To: From: Cc: Subject: Architectural Review Board Meeting: October 16, 2017 Agenda Item: 7.3 Architectural Review Board Rathar Duong, ARB Liaison Stephanie Reich, AIA,

More information

Architectural Review Board Report

Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Report To: From: Cc: Subject: Architectural Review Board Architectural Review Board Meeting: June 18, 2018 Agenda Item: 7.5 Rathar Duong, Associate Planner, ARB Liaison Stephanie

More information

Architectural Review Board Report

Architectural Review Board Report fa Architectural Review Board Report To: From: Subject: Architectural Review Board Steve Traeger, Principal Urban Designer Grace Page, ARB Liaison Architectural Review Board Meeting: May 18, 2015 Agenda

More information

Architectural Review Board Report

Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Meeting: December 18, 2017 Agenda Item: 7.2 To: From: Cc: Subject: Architectural Review Board Rathar Duong, ARB Liaison Stephanie Reich, AIA,

More information

Architectural Review Board Report

Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Meeting: December 15, 2014 Agenda Item: 7.5 To: From: Subject: Architectural Review Board Steve Traeger, Principal Urban Designer Grace Page,

More information

Architectural Review Board Report

Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Report To: From: Subject: Architectural Review Board Rathar Duong, ARB Liaison Architectural Review Board Meeting: January 23, 2017 Agenda Item: 7.11 16ARB-0605 to approve the

More information

Architectural Review Board Report

Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Meeting: June 1, 2015 Agenda Item: 7.6 To: From: Subject: Architectural Review Board Grace Page, ARB Liaison Steve Traeger, Principal Urban

More information

Architectural Review Board Report

Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Report To: From: Subject: Architectural Review Board Architectural Review Board Meeting: August 17, 2015 Steve Traeger, Principal Urban Designer Grace Page, ARB Liaison Agenda

More information

Architectural Review Board Report

Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Report To: From: Subject: Architectural Review Board Grace Page, ARB Liaison Architectural Review Board Meeting: June 20, 2016 Agenda Item: 7.4 16ARB-0046 to approve the building

More information

Architectural Review Board Report

Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Report To: From: Subject: Architectural Review Board Architectural Review Board Meeting: October 19, 2015 Steve Traeger, Principal Urban Designer Grace Page, ARB Liaison Agenda

More information

Architectural Review Board Report

Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Report To: From: Cc: Subject: Architectural Review Board Meeting: October 2, 2017 Agenda Item: 7.4 Architectural Review Board Rathar Duong, Associate Planner, ARB Liaison Stephanie

More information

Architectural Review Board Report

Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Report To: From: Subject: Architectural Review Board Steve Traeger, Principal Urban Designer Grace Page, ARB Liaison Architectural Review Board Meeting: April 6, 2015 Agenda

More information

Architectural Review Board Report

Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Report To: From: Subject: Architectural Review Board Architectural Review Board Meeting: March 17, 2014 Steve Traeger, Principal Urban Designer Grace Page, ARB Liaison Agenda

More information

Architectural Review Board Report

Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Report To: From: Subject: Architectural Review Board Architectural Review Board Meeting: April 20, 2015 Steve Traeger, Principal Urban Designer Grace Page, ARB Liaison Agenda

More information

Architectural Review Board Report

Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Meeting: June 4, 2018 Agenda Item: 7.2 To: From: Cc: Subject: Architectural Review Board Rathar Duong, ARB Liaison Stephanie Reich, AIA, LEED

More information

Architectural Review Board Report

Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Report To: From: Subject: Architectural Review Board Architectural Review Board Meeting: November 19, 2012 Steve Traeger, Principal Urban Designer Laura Beck, ARB Liaison Agenda

More information

REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento

REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento 915 I Street, Sacramento, 95814-2671 www.cityofsacramnto.org 9 PUBLIC HEARING November 17, 2016 To: Members of the Planning and Design Commission

More information

Architectural Review Board Report

Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Report To: From: Subject: Architectural Review Board Rathar Duong, ARB Liaison Architectural Review Board Meeting: October 17, 2016 Agenda Item: 8.5 16ARB-0462 to approve modification

More information

M E M O R A N D U M PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA PLANNING DIVISION

M E M O R A N D U M PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA PLANNING DIVISION 9-A M E M O R A N D U M PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA PLANNING DIVISION DATE: June 11, 2018 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: The Honorable Landmarks Commission Planning Staff 153

More information

Architectural Commission Report

Architectural Commission Report City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Architectural Commission Report Meeting Date: Wednesday, January 16, 2019 Subject:

More information

MEMORANDUM PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS

MEMORANDUM PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS MEMORANDUM PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS To: From: Salt Lake City Historic Landmark Commission Ashley Scarff, Planner (801) 535-7660 or ashley.scarff@slcgov.com Date: April 4 th, 2019 Re:

More information

Architectural Review Board Report

Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Report To: From: Subject: Architectural Review Board Architectural Review Board Meeting: June 15, 2015 Steve Traeger, Principal Urban Designer Grace Page, ARB Liaison Agenda

More information

Introduction. Massing and Overall Form. Catalina. Catalina is a 111 lot, single-family home community by Costain Arizona, Inc.

Introduction. Massing and Overall Form. Catalina. Catalina is a 111 lot, single-family home community by Costain Arizona, Inc. Introduction Catalina is a 111 lot, single-family home community by Costain Arizona, Inc. Massing and Overall Form This neighborhood comprises single-story, asymmetrical plan homes with asymmetrical facades.

More information

CITY of CARPINTERIA, CALIFORNIA

CITY of CARPINTERIA, CALIFORNIA CITY of CARPINTERIA, CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES SUB AREA 3 PURPOSE Architectural Review by its nature is a creative and largely subjective process. These Guidelines are intended to allow

More information

CITY OF ST. HELENA PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1480 MAIN STREET- ST. HELENA, CA PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 18, 2016

CITY OF ST. HELENA PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1480 MAIN STREET- ST. HELENA, CA PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 18, 2016 CITY OF ST. HELENA PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1480 MAIN STREET- ST. HELENA, CA 94574 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM: 7 FILE NUMBER: PL16-052 OCTOBER 18, 2016 SUBJECT: The applicant requests Design Review approval

More information

Proposed Amendments to Residential Zoning Draft Revised 06/27/2018

Proposed Amendments to Residential Zoning Draft Revised 06/27/2018 Proposed Amendments to Residential Zoning Draft Revised 06/27/2018 [Add the following new section to R-1A and R-1B (as 19.06.030 and 19.08.0925 respectively)] [19.06.030 / 19.08.025] Neighborhood Design

More information

Architectural Commission Report

Architectural Commission Report City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Architectural Commission Report Meeting Date: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 Subject:

More information

Architectural Commission Report

Architectural Commission Report City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Architectural Commission Report Meeting Date: Wednesday, September 12, 2018

More information

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707) Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA 94559-0660 (707) 257-9530 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MARCH 15, 2018 AGENDA ITEM 7.A File No. 18-0004 HARVEST

More information

Introduction. Massing and Overall Form. Ridgeview Estates. Ridgeview Estates is a 48 lot, single-family home community by Trammel Crow.

Introduction. Massing and Overall Form. Ridgeview Estates. Ridgeview Estates is a 48 lot, single-family home community by Trammel Crow. Introduction is a 48 lot, single-family home community by Trammel Crow. Massing and Overall Form consists of single and two-story, asymmetrically configured homes. Multi-level, staggered rooflines, red

More information

Architectural Commission Report

Architectural Commission Report City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Architectural Commission Report Meeting Date: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 Subject:

More information

City of Placerville Planning Commission AGENDA

City of Placerville Planning Commission AGENDA Item 4.2 Placerville, a Unique Historical Past Forging into a Golden Future City of Placerville Planning Commission AGENDA MEETING DATE: January 19, 2016 APPLICATION & NO: 2845 Pleasant Street - Site Plan

More information

5 February 12, 2014 Public Hearing APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER: ERIK HOMES, L.L.C.

5 February 12, 2014 Public Hearing APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER: ERIK HOMES, L.L.C. 5 February 12, 2014 Public Hearing APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER: ERIK HOMES, L.L.C. STAFF PLANNER: Kristine Gay REQUEST: Special Exception for Alternative Compliance to the Oceanfront Resort District Form-Based

More information

Design Review Commission Report

Design Review Commission Report City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Design Review Commission Report Meeting Date: Thursday, November 5, 2015 (continued

More information

Architectural Commission Report

Architectural Commission Report City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Architectural Commission Report Meeting Date: Wednesday, September 12, 2018

More information

ORDINANCE NO. _5063. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Cruz ordains as follows: SECTION I

ORDINANCE NO. _5063. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Cruz ordains as follows: SECTION I ORDINANCE NO. _5063 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SUBDIVISION (d) OF SECTION 13.10.170 AND SECTION 13.10.400, AND ADDING COUNTY CODE SECTIONS 13.10.444, 13.10.445, 13.10.446 AND 13.10.447, ESTABLISHING A PLEASURE

More information

Architectural Review Board Report

Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Report To: From: Cc: Subject: Architectural Review Board Architectural Review Board Meeting: October 15, 2018 Agenda Item: 8.2 Scott Albright, Senior Planner Stephanie Reich,

More information

Neighborhood Suburban Single-Family District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations

Neighborhood Suburban Single-Family District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations Section 16.20.020 - Neighborhood Suburban Single-Family Districts ( NS ) Sections: Typical Block in a Neighborhood Suburban District 16.20.020.1 History and Composition of Suburban Neighborhoods 16.20.020.2

More information

Proposed Amendments to Residential Zoning Final Draft Revised 08/29/2018

Proposed Amendments to Residential Zoning Final Draft Revised 08/29/2018 Proposed Amendments to Residential Zoning Final Draft Revised 08/29/2018 Drafting Notes: The 8/29/18 draft reflects the following changes from the 7/25/18 draft based on City Council and/or Planning Commission

More information

r e s i d e n t i a l o u t s i d e v i l l a g e c e n t e r

r e s i d e n t i a l o u t s i d e v i l l a g e c e n t e r N e w A l b a n y, O h i o r e s i d e n t i a l o u t s i d e v i l l a g e c e n t e r D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s & R e q u i r e m e n t s s e c t i o n 5 I. Overview This section applies to all

More information

Architectural Commission Report

Architectural Commission Report City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Architectural Commission Report Meeting Date: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 Subject:

More information

EASTERN SE & 750 CHERRY SE - REQUEST FOR NEW BUILDINGS

EASTERN SE & 750 CHERRY SE - REQUEST FOR NEW BUILDINGS Planning Staff Report Meeting Date: November 1, 2017 215-255 EASTERN SE & 750 CHERRY SE - REQUEST FOR NEW BUILDINGS BACKGROUND: The project in question is in regards to two new buildings previously approved

More information

CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT. Design Review Variance Categorically Exempt, Class 1

CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT. Design Review Variance Categorically Exempt, Class 1 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT HEARING DATE: TO: CASE: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: PREPARED BY: BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTIDESIGN REVIEW BOARD Design Review

More information

Residential Uses in the Historic Village Core

Residential Uses in the Historic Village Core BLACK DIAMOND DESIGN GUIDLINES for Residential Uses in the Historic Village Core Adopted June 18, 2009 Introduction and Purpose These guidelines are intended to guide infill development within the Historic

More information

Architectural Commission Report

Architectural Commission Report City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Architectural Commission Report Meeting Date: Wednesday, August 15, 2018 Subject:

More information

Architectural Commission Report

Architectural Commission Report City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Architectural Commission Report Meeting Date: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 Subject:

More information

TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. For the meeting of February 6, Agenda Item 5A

TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. For the meeting of February 6, Agenda Item 5A TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT For the meeting of February 6, 2017 Agenda Item 5A Owner: Todd & Bridget Maderis Design Professional: Pacific Design Group Project Address: 24 Scenic

More information

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM AGENDA DATE: MARCH 15, 2017 TO: THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: Chair Fox and Members of the Design Review Committee Anna Pehoushek, Assistant Community Development Director Monique

More information

With Illustrated Guidelines for Implementation

With Illustrated Guidelines for Implementation MESA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS HANDBOOK With Illustrated Guidelines for Implementation November 14, 2011 1 INDEX A. Purpose... 1 B. Applicability... 1 C. Design Standards... 2 1. Site

More information

RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR BENT TREE OF ROGERS

RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR BENT TREE OF ROGERS RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR BENT TREE OF ROGERS DATE: October 17, 2000 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR BENT TREE OF ROGERS INTRODUCTION These Residential Design Guidelines have been approved by

More information

R E V I E W B O A R D

R E V I E W B O A R D D E S I G N R E V I E W B O A R D S T A F F R E P O R T 11 Whiting Court FOR BOARD ACTION JUNE 27, 2016 Design Review (DRB 6-16) to Approve a 195 Square Foot Detached Pool House and Exterior Modifications

More information

Architectural Commission Report

Architectural Commission Report City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Architectural Commission Report Meeting Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 Subject:

More information

Architectural Commission Report

Architectural Commission Report City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Architectural Commission Report Meeting Date: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 Subject:

More information

Use Permit # to construct a new, 2,344-square-foot, two-story, four-bedroom, single-family house on an existing vacant lot.

Use Permit # to construct a new, 2,344-square-foot, two-story, four-bedroom, single-family house on an existing vacant lot. Z O N I N G A D J U S T M E N T S B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION DECEMBER 12, 2013 2749-A Acton Street Use Permit #2013-0041 to construct a new, 2,344-square-foot, two-story, four-bedroom,

More information

Architectural Commission Report

Architectural Commission Report City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Architectural Commission Report Meeting Date: Wednesday, August 15, 2018 Subject:

More information

Thomas Stewart, Cerberus Holding, LLC, owner and applicant Property Address. VR Village Residential, IP Island Preservation Overlay Existing Land Use

Thomas Stewart, Cerberus Holding, LLC, owner and applicant Property Address. VR Village Residential, IP Island Preservation Overlay Existing Land Use COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning and Zoning Division 1725 Reynolds Street, Suite 200, Brunswick, GA 31520 Phone: 912-554-7428/Fax: 1-888-252-3726 ISLANDS PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Meeting

More information

Village of Greendale. Building Board Principals and Standards of Review

Village of Greendale. Building Board Principals and Standards of Review December 4, 2006 Village of Greendale Building Board Principals and Standards of Review Principles and standards for architectural review shall be established and utilized by the Building Board in its

More information

HENSON FARMS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION BUILDER PACK

HENSON FARMS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION BUILDER PACK February 10, 2008 Updated 2015 HENSON FARMS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION BUILDER PACK APPLICATION APPLICATION TO SUBMIT A NEW CONSTRUCTION PLAN TO THE HENSON FARMS ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ARC), page

More information

STAFF BRIEF. Kristin Park

STAFF BRIEF. Kristin Park Community Planning and Development Denver Landmark Preservation 201 West Colfax, Dept. 205 Denver, CO 80202 p: 720.865.2709 f: 720.865.3050 www.denvergov.org/preservation STAFF BRIEF This document is the

More information

524 Arctic Court Property Development Feasibility Study

524 Arctic Court Property Development Feasibility Study Attachment D 524 Arctic Court Property Development Feasibility Study Prepared for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City November 2015 Prepared by VODA Landscape + Planning www.vodaplan.com TABLE OF

More information

4. GUIDELINES FOR NEW BUILDINGS & NON-CONTRIBUTING BUILDINGS

4. GUIDELINES FOR NEW BUILDINGS & NON-CONTRIBUTING BUILDINGS 4. GUIDELINES FOR NEW BUILDINGS & NON-CONTRIBUTING BUILDINGS Construction of New Buildings in Historic Districts and Alterations or Additions to Non-contributing Structures in Historic Districts This chapter

More information

Architectural Design Standards - Character

Architectural Design Standards - Character RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS - ALL BUILDINGS The design of individual residential buildings and groups of buildings shall employ a variety of design features. In addition to the design features used on

More information

Architectural Commission Report

Architectural Commission Report City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Architectural Commission Report Meeting Date: Wednesday, September 12, 2018

More information

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT MARCH 15, 2017

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT MARCH 15, 2017 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT MARCH 15, 2017 TO: FROM: Members of the Planning Commission Krystin Rice, Planner FILE NO.: 170001404 PROPOSAL: APPLICANT: RECOMMENDATION: A request for a Site Plan Review

More information

MENDOCINO HISTORICAL REVIEW BOARD 08/1/2016

MENDOCINO HISTORICAL REVIEW BOARD 08/1/2016 MENDOCINO HISTORICAL REVIEW BOARD 08/1/2016 STAFF REPORT MHRB_2016-0016 OWNER/APPLICANT: AGENT: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: LEEDS, ROBYN AND ERIC PO BOX 753 MENDOCINO, CA 95460 SCHLOSSER NEW BERGER ARCHITECTS

More information

MULTI FAMILY AND SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED DESIGN GUIDELINES CITY OF ROCK HILL, SOUTH CAROLINA

MULTI FAMILY AND SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED DESIGN GUIDELINES CITY OF ROCK HILL, SOUTH CAROLINA MULTI FAMILY AND SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED DESIGN GUIDELINES CITY OF ROCK HILL, SOUTH CAROLINA PURPOSE Applicability This section applies to all new multi family (including single family attached) development

More information

INTENT OBJECTIVES HISTORIC DESIGNATIONS

INTENT OBJECTIVES HISTORIC DESIGNATIONS TOWN OF LOS GATOS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR ALL SINGLE FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS IN ALL ZONES EXCEPT THE RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL ZONES INTENT These development

More information

NONCONFORMING STRUCTURES

NONCONFORMING STRUCTURES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION 701 Laurel Street Menlo Park, CA 94025 phone: (650) 330-6702 fax: (650) 327-1653 planning@menlopark.org http://www.menlopark.org NONCONFORMING STRUCTURES

More information

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. Terrace Falls Sun Deck PLNHLC East 3 rd Avenue February 5, 2015

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. Terrace Falls Sun Deck PLNHLC East 3 rd Avenue February 5, 2015 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Applicant: Fernando Silva Staff: Katia Pace (801) 535-6354 or katia.pace@slcgov.com Tax ID: 09-31-340-039 Current Zone: RMF-35 Moderate Density Multifamily Terrace

More information

Architectural Commission Report

Architectural Commission Report City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 458 1141 FAX. (310) 858 5966 Architectural Commission Report Meeting Date: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 Subject:

More information

Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations Riverton Community Association Architectural Review Board Rules and Regulations Revised October 25, 1991 Revised August 18, 2008 Revised February 16, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS ADDITIONS AIR CONDITIONERS/GENERATORS

More information

SALT LAKE CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION

SALT LAKE CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION SALT LAKE CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION REQUEST BY BRUCE MANKA, REPRESENTED BY ALLEN MILLO ASSOCIATES, TO MAKE IMPROVEMENTS TO MARMALADE SQUARE, AN EXISTING MULTI-FAMILY PROPERTY LOCATED AT 650 NORTH

More information

THE PRESERVE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES

THE PRESERVE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES THE PRESERVE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. Minimum square footage for any home shall be 1,200 square feet. Minimum square footage for the ground floor of any two-story home shall be 800 square feet.

More information

TOWN OF BRUNSWICK, MAINE

TOWN OF BRUNSWICK, MAINE TOWN OF BRUNSWICK, MAINE INCORPORATED 1739 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 85 UNION STREET, SUITE 216 BRUNSWICK, ME 04011 ANNA M. BREINICH, FAICP PHONE: 207-725-6660 DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT

More information

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM AGENDA DATE: MAY 7, 2014 TO: THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: Chair Imboden and Members of the Design Review Committee Leslie Aranda Roseberry, Planning Manager Marissa Moshier,

More information

BEVRLYRLY. Design Review Commission Report. City of Beverly Hills

BEVRLYRLY. Design Review Commission Report. City of Beverly Hills BEVRLYRLY City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Design Review Commission Report Meeting Date: Thursday, March 2, 2017

More information

Introduction. Massing and Overall Form. Andalusia I and II

Introduction. Massing and Overall Form. Andalusia I and II Introduction Built in 1984-1985, (67 lot) and II (53 lot) are singlefamily home communities by Dix Custom Homes. The average size of each residence is 3645 SF. Massing and Overall Form and II include single

More information

Architectural Commission Report

Architectural Commission Report City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Architectural Commission Report Meeting Date: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 Subject:

More information

Architectural Commission Report

Architectural Commission Report City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Architectural Commission Report Meeting Date: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 Subject:

More information

Residential Design Standards Draft 9 August 2013

Residential Design Standards Draft 9 August 2013 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS ORDINANCE DRAFT 9 AUGUST 2013 17.25 Residential Design Standards 17.25.010 Purpose The purpose of this chapter is to establish minimum design standards for new residential

More information

Architectural Commission Report

Architectural Commission Report City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Architectural Commission Report Meeting Date: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 Subject:

More information

Architectural Commission Report

Architectural Commission Report City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills. CA 90210 TEL (310) 458-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Architectural Commission Report Meeting Date: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 Subject:

More information

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA CITY OF SAN MARINO DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA Kevin Cheng, Chair www.cityofsanmarino.org Corinna Wong, Vice-Chair (626) 300-0711 Phone John Dustin City Hall Judy Johnson-Brody Council Chambers Chris

More information

Architectural Standards

Architectural Standards Page 1 PROJECT INFORMATION Project Name: Applicant/Agent: Date: File # OFFICIAL USE NON-RESIDENTIAL STANDARDS INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS Cohesive Design, Non-Residential Standards (cds) 1.00 Promote visually

More information

Holdener Farm Area P.U.D. Enumclaw,Washington DESIGN STANDARDS PHASE ONE

Holdener Farm Area P.U.D. Enumclaw,Washington DESIGN STANDARDS PHASE ONE Holdener Farm Area P.U.D. Enumclaw,Washington DESIGN STANDARDS PHASE ONE As approved by City Council June 24, 2002 City of Enumclaw Holdener Farm Area PUD Design Guidelines Phase One TABLE OF CONTENTS

More information

PISMO BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT

PISMO BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT PISMO BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT SUBJECT: 190 Cliff; Duke & Lori Sterling, Applicants: Project no. P15-000065 Minor Modification to Permit # P14-000145 for a new roof over stairs leading to

More information

Standards for Single Family Detached Lots

Standards for Single Family Detached Lots Standards for Single Family Detached Lots 1. Single-Family Detached Lots are a minimum of 4,000 sf. 2. The following standards apply to all structures on Single-Family Detached Lots o Maximum Height to

More information

BUILDING TYPES: SINGLE FAMILY: DETACHED INTRODUCTION GUIDELINES & OBJECTIVES DEFINITIONS LOT TYPES SITE CRITERIA ARCHITECTURAL REGULATIONS SITE

BUILDING TYPES: SINGLE FAMILY: DETACHED INTRODUCTION GUIDELINES & OBJECTIVES DEFINITIONS LOT TYPES SITE CRITERIA ARCHITECTURAL REGULATIONS SITE BUILDING TYPES: SINGLE FAMILY: DETACHED PAGE 21 MASS AND SCALE: ON SLOPED S, STEP THE STRUCTURES WITH THE NATURAL TERRAIN Design upper fl oors with smaller fl oor area and lower fl oors to be near grade.

More information

APPLICATION FOR Second Dwelling Unit

APPLICATION FOR Second Dwelling Unit PLANNING DIVISION 411 Main Street (530) 879-6800 P.O. Box 3420 Chico, CA 95927-3420 www.chicoca.gov Application No. APPLICATION FOR Second Dwelling Unit Applicant Information Applicant Name Applicant Street

More information

(d) Metal buildings used for industrial uses are not exempt from additional landscape standards as required in Section (e).

(d) Metal buildings used for industrial uses are not exempt from additional landscape standards as required in Section (e). 5.22. Non-Residential and Multifamily Design Standards. 5.22-1 Applicability of Non-Residential Design Standards. All non-residential and multifamily buildings, with the exception of those described in

More information