IH 635 (LBJ Freeway) Corridor Study Implementation Approach. Initial meeting held in June Updated August 2002.
|
|
- James Reeves
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 DNT IH 635 (LBJ Freeway) Corridor Study Initial meeting held in June 2001 Updated August 2002 How to move from three planning sections LBJ Corridor Study Study Sections I.H. 35E President George Bush Turnpike I.H. 635 (LBJ) LUNA BELT LINE WEST SECTION LOOP 12 I.H. 35E U.S. 75 / I.H. 635 Interchange in construction CBD I.H.30 U.S. 75 EAST SECTION RD GARLAND S.H. 78 BELT LINE I.H. 635 (LBJ) I.H. 30 Mesquite Section U.S. 80 Planning Phase To a series of compatible design projects LBJ Freeway Schematic The Recommended Alternative LUNA RD I.H. 635 I.H.35E Luna IH 35E Webb Chapel HOV/ Toll (HOT) Lane Access Locations DNT BELT LINE ROAD Midway LOOP 12 WEST SECTION I.H. 35E Preston US 75 CBD FR PGBT I.H.30 LBJ FREEWAY BELT LINE Updated August U.S. 75 TI Blvd. Skillman GARLAND ROAD Legend EAST SECTION Mainlane 8 Mainlanes +4/6 HOV/ Toll 10 Mainlanes + 4 HOV/Toll 10 Mainlanes + 2 Rev. HOV/Toll 10 Mainlanes DART Light Rail - Construction DART Light Rail - Planning HOV Lanes - Planning Garland S.H. 78 La Prada IH 30 N NTS I.H. 30 U.S. 80 Feb. 16, 2001
2 Index 1. Cover Sheet 1 sheet [Only change was the update component and minor slide edits] 2. Index 1 sheet [No change except to note changes] 3. A Basic Framework 4 sheets [Edited to reflect current work efforts, guidance and policies] 4. Current Project Planning Schedule 1 Sheet [Updated August 2002] 5. Project Listing Ancillary/Support & Design 1 sheet [Minor Edits] 6. Outsourcing Approach 1 sheet [Minor Edits Changes] 7. Long Term Project Listing in CSJ Format 3 sheets [New $ s for Construction Costs Updated in the fall of 2001] Updated August
3 A Basic Framework as applied to all Major Corridor type Projects The LBJ Freeway Corridor Study has been focused on developing the planning level documentation for three sections. These are the West, East and Mesquite Sections. All three sections, Mesquite, East and West sections are approaching the technical end of the planning phase. This is where a Public Hearing is held on each project to better gauge public support prior to moving into the design phase. The City of Mesquite felt so confident about the support for the Mesquite section that it provided the funding and hired the design consultant for the project. This work is proceeding well. In an effort to expedite the implementation process TxDOT is continuing to attempt to overlap the final review and approval process with procurement/selection of consultants for the East and West sections. Under our current financial constraints it is increasingly difficult to move large projects through the development process. TxDOT is undergoing a revision of the project selection process. A simple outline of the current process is listed below. The actual description of the new process will alter what is written, but not drastically change the logic steps. 1. An idea is generated for a project which results in a mini request/report to receive designation by Austin for Long Range Planning Status (LRP). Basically, TxDOT has permission to further develop the idea. This step will now be called Plan 2. A feasibility study, preliminary engineering study or Major Investment Study (MIS) is then performed. The results of these studies must be included in the Metropolitan Planning Organization s (MPO s) regional mobility plan and air quality conformity plans to proceed to planning. It is now customary practice to have these early studies be the precursor document to the planning documents which are the Categorical Exclusion (Cat/Ex.), Environmental Assessment (EA) or an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Updated August
4 Steps 3, 4 and 5 will undergo significant changes with the new Unified Transportation Plan (UTP) process being developed for use in FY To what effect the LBJ Corridor will be designated in the new process has not yet been determined. Since the actual environmental clearance date for the LBJ Corridor projects will be sometime in early 2003 by that time a clearer picture may have been developed. 3. A Planning study is then completed according to the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) process. This step is an extension of steps 1 and 2 as to be designated as PLAN status. This step is still in the planning process which is culminated by the successful completion of the schematic, environmental document and public involvement and participation 4. Upon receiving a Cat/Ex., FONSI or ROD the project can then move to DEVELOP (formally - Priority 2) status in the Unified Transportation Plan (UTP). Preliminary Design can then begin on designated projects. This is a 10-year financially constrained listing of projects (years 5-10) Some categories will be combined with step 5 for a complete 10-year window for construction funding. 5. After sufficient progress is made in design the project can move to CONSTRUCT (formally priority 1) status in the UTP and be included in the STIP/TIP a 4 year funding window. Final PS&E work is completed (years 1-4). Likely to be combined with some categories in step 4 for a complete 10-year window for construction funding. Updated August
5 6. The project gets selected for construction and is subsequently completed and open for use by the public. More attention is now going to be paid toward those projects that improve mobility, improve safety, minimize congestion and are sensitive to the environment. By having major projects be grouped in corridors there will be better logic applied to sequencing of projects. Updated August
6 A Basic Framework as applied to LBJ Freeway The three planing sections of LBJ; the Mesquite, East and West Sections, can be broken into reasonable design projects. However, some of these projects will need to be further broken into multiple PS&E construction projects. The actual implementation time frame for a corridor that is 21 miles long could easily approach 20 years. The complexities associated with a billion dollar plus project requires a more far reaching approach to ensure the most efficient allocation of resources occur. This can be best implemented if there is a focus on two types of projects; one being ancillary/support design and two being preliminary/final design. Depending on TxDOT resource allocations these can be contracted out or performed by in-house staff. The other challenge is how we work through the project development process as it relates to financial constraint, environmental clearance, public involvement, air quality conformity, design budgets, staffing, procurement of services, and work load assignments. The current State budget crunch is having an effect on TxDOT s ability to adequately predict, schedule and fund some of the engineering for our projects. Details of this situation will continue to be discussed and communicated with respect to the implementation process being described. The general philosophy does not change just the timing. The approach being proposed for the LBJ Freeway is that TxDOT take advantage of the Austin and FHWA environmental review time to begin the procurement process for professional services for design. In this way TxDOT will be prepared to begin design upon receiving environmental clearance without delay (Subject to selection and funding decisions). A listing of those design projects is included later in this report. TxDOT has already implemented this approach on a few projects as will be noted later in the report. Updated August
7 Planning Schedule & Status for the West, East & Mesquite Sections West Section: Complete 10 lane study Completed. Only 8 lanes are proposed o A wider left shoulder was provided for future flexibility Update schematic to incorporate results of 10 lane study - Completed Complete phase 2 traffic and revenue study Completed Finalize schematic and have ready for PH Completed Finalize EA submit to Austin & FHWA for approval Completed/Underway Receive approval to hold public hearing December 2002 (Goal) Hold Public Hearing February 2003 (Goal) Submit final EA documentation April 2003 (Goal) Receive FONSI July 2003 (Goal) East Section: Design Charette for I-30 and Town East Blvd. ramp issue Completed Submit Design Charette Recommendations for approval Completed Submit corrected Final EA to Austin & FHWA Completed Receive approval for Design Charette Recommendations Completed Make final Schematic and EA Corrections Completed Receive approval to hold a public hearing Completed Hold Public hearing October 2002 (Being scheduled for 10/10/20) Submit final EA documentation December 2002 (Goal) Receive FONSI April 2003 (Goal) Mesquite Section: Begin Design (Paid for by the City of Mesquite) Jan Move project to Districts UTP 2 status - Completed Austin/FHWA approval to conclude public involvement July 1 st, 2001 Offer an opportunity for a Public Hearing July/August 2001 Letters received requesting a Public Hearing Sep 2001 Incorporate Design Charette Recommendations Completed Hold Public Hearing, Process Results & Receive FONSI All by Sep 2002 Begin Phase I of project for construction January 2003 Updated August
8 Project Listing Ancillary/Support & Design Ancillary/Support: Right-of-Way: Map & Deed for East & West, Mesquite (Review Only) [Underway City] Right-of-Way: Appraisals for East & West, Mesquite (Review Only) [Future] Right-of-Way: Acquisition for East & West, Mesquite (Review Only) [Future] Sub Surface Utility Engineering: Existing and As-Builts (Initial work all completed) Mesquite Completed Existing SUE from I-30 to US 80 4 East Completed Existing SUE from McCree to I-30 4 East As-Built from McCree to US 80 4 East Existing & As-Built from US 75 to McCree 4 West Existing & As-Built from Webb Chapel to US 75 4 West Existing & As-Built for I-35E Interchange (Luna/Webb/Royal/Valwood) 4 Drainage Design: Hydraulic Study for East & West sections (Under Negotiations) Utility Coordination: East and West to ensure Utilities are clear (TBD Still Possible) Urban Design Theme Definition and Details (On hold due to budget constraints) Option 1 District Wide Approach to Include LBJ Freeway (Most Likely Choice) Option 2 LBJ Freeway to include District wide guidance Operational Schematic: Guidance and Details for East & West package (In-House) 1. Items to include: Lighting, Signals, ADA, Signing, Striping, ITS Project Controls: Scheduling and Tracking Assistance for project (TBD Still Possible) Design: West: 1. I-35E Interchange (Important NAFTA Considerations and Connections to HOT Lanes) 2. LBJ Managed Lanes Approach & Tunnels from Webb Chapel to US 75 (Next Priority) 3. LBJ Mainlanes & Ramps - Surface work between portals and at the DNT (Accelerate?) 4. Early Frontage Roads Hillcrest to Merit (PS&E Design at 15%) Letting Dec East: (First 6 projects could be combined in sets of 2) 1. Greenville to W. of Abrams 2. W. of Abrams to Skillman 3. Skillman to West of Plano Road 4. West of Plano Road to AT&SF RR 5. AT&SF RR to Centerville Road 6. Centerville Road to Oates 7. I-30 Interchange Mesquite: (Design Underway) 1. Phase 1 Towne Centre Drive & Ramps (PS&E Design at 100%) Letting in Oct Phase 2 Town East Blvd., FR and Ramps (PS&E Design at 30%) Letting in Oct Updated August
9 Outsourcing Approach Identify projects for outsourcing Ancillary/Support & Design Meet w/ the consultant community to discuss the approach Ongoing process of updates as needed Refine & Finalize Approach Scope, Costs, Packaging etc Ongoing process to meet schedule and resource demands Submit Request for Specific Professional Provider Services Form Consultant Selection Teams (CST) (As needed) Put out agreed upon NOI s for LOI s (possible Order) Urban Design (Ready to go subject to approval) Early Frontage Roads Hillcrest to Merit (Underway) Drainage Design (Under Negotiations) SUE (Initial effort complete by in-house & provider resources) Scheduling & Tracking (TBD) Operations (Most likely to be In-House) Right-Of-Way (Map & Deed, Appraisals, Acquisitions) Utility Relocation Coordination (TBD) LBJ Freeway Entire Corridor A, B, C (As Separate LOI s) A Tunnel and West Section between I-35E and US 75 B1 I-35E Interchange C - Surface, East 1-6 (In sets of 2 1&2, 3&4, 5&6) B2 I-30 Interchange Select and Negotiate as many as possible given fiscal constraints {Budget difficulties at TXDOT are making it hard to predict the timing} Updated August
10 Long Term Project Listing in CSJ Format (Page 1) West Section: 1. Keep existing CSJ : [West Leg of IH-35E Interchange] From: Luna Road (Mile Point 1.828) To: E. End of CRI&P RR (Mile Point 1.000) {Begin Section 07} Project Length = Miles Construction Cost: $30,662, CSJ [IH-35E Interchange Project] From: IH-35E (Mile Point ) {End Section 01} To: Webb Chapel (Mile Point ) Project Length = Miles Construction Cost: $239,966, CSJ [Early Frontage Road Project] From: E. of Hillcrest (Mile Point To: Merit Drive (Mile Point 7.043) Project Length = Miles Construction Cost: $24,500, CSJ [Tunnel and Transition Sections] From : Webb Chapel (Mile Point ) To : Park Central (Mile Point 7.043) Project Length = Miles Construction Cost: $587,911, CSJ [Surface work between portals] From: Midway (Mile Point ) To: Preston (Mile Point 8.850) Project Length = Miles Construction Cost: $77,657,119 Updated August
11 Long Term - Project Listing in CSJ Format (Page 2) East Section: 1. CSJ [East Section 1A] From: Greenville (Mile Point 5.530) To: W. of Abrams (Mile Point 4.650) Project Length = Mile Construction Cost: $33,393, CSJ [East Section 1B] From: W. of Abrams (Mile Point 4.650) To: Skillman (Mile Point 3.400) Project Length = Mile Construction Cost: $49,360, CSJ [East Section 2A] From: Skillman (Mile Point 3.400) To: W. of Plano (Mile Point 1.900) Project Length = Mile Construction Cost: $54,061, CSJ [East Section 2B] From: W. of Plano (Mile Point 1.900) To: AT&SF RR (Mile Point 0.000) Project Length = Mile Construction Cost: $70,515, CSJ [East Section 3A] From: AT&SF RR (Mile Point ) To: E. of Centerville (Mile Point ) Project Length = Mile Construction Cost: $69,958,983 Updated August
12 Long Term - Project Listing in CSJ Format (Page 3) 6. CSJ [East Section3B] From: E. of Centerville (Mile Point ) To: Oates Drive (Mile Point 9.900) Project Length = Mile Construction Cost: $46,426, CSJ [IH-30 Interchange] From: Oates Drive (Mile Point 9.900) To: N. of Town East (Mile Point 8.300) Project Length = Mile Construction Cost: $134,092,143 Mesquite Section 1. CSJ [Towne Centre Drive] From: N. of Town East (Mile Point 8.3) To: US 80 (Mile Point 6.9) Project Length = 1.4 Mile Construction Cost = $10,979,540 ROW Cost = $ 0 Utility Relocations = $1,050, CSJ [Town East Blvd.] From: N. of Town East (Mile Point 8.3) To: US 80 (Mile Point 6.9) Project Length = 1.4 Mile Construction Cost = $17,988,674 ROW Cost = $1,100,000 Utility Relocations = $4,00,000 Updated August
INTERSTATE HIGHWAY (IH) 635
INTERSTATE HIGHWAY (IH) 635 FROM: WEST OF GREENVILLE AVE TO: NORTH OF TOWN EAST BLVD DALLAS COUNTY CSJ: 2374-01-127 & 2374-02-053 ACCESS JUSTIFICATION IH 635 CORRIDOR EAST SECTION October 3, 2002 Texas
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. Background of Existing Facility 3. Proposed Work 4
TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Background of Existing Facility 3 Proposed Work 4 Objective of this Report 4 Required Data 4 Pavement Design Procedure 5 Other Data Requirements 7 Pavement Structures 8 Pavement
More informationIH 820 Corridor Improvement Study Randol Mill Road To North SH 121 Interchange. Public Meeting. Thursday April 4, 2013
IH 820 Corridor Improvement Study Randol Mill Road To North SH 121 Interchange Public Meeting Thursday April 4, 2013 1 Project Contacts: TxDOT-Fort Worth District John R. Tillinghast, P.E. IH 820 Project
More informationBlacklands Corridor Feasibility Study
Blacklands Corridor Feasibility Study Public Meeting May 13, 2014 The Atrium at the Granville Arts Center 300 N. Fifth Street, Garland, Texas 1 Overview Welcome and Public Involvement Efforts Amanda Wilson
More informationProject Delivery Process. Bruce Johnson, P.E. State Bridge Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation
Project Delivery Process Bruce Johnson, P.E. State Bridge Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation February 1, 2010 Outline Introduction 1. Planning 2. Design (through DAP) Break 3. Design (DAP through
More informationThe Metropolitan Transportation Plan for North Central Texas. Regional Transportation Council Chad McKeown, AICP January 14, 2016
The Metropolitan Transportation Plan for North Central Texas Regional Transportation Council Chad McKeown, AICP January 14, 2016 Mobility 2040 Guiding Principles Conduct comprehensive corridor evaluations
More informationAPPENDIX A Drainage Design Report for Farmers and Cooks Branches APPENDIX B Drainage Design Report for Jackson and Audelia Branches
Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION...1-1 1.1 PURPOSE...1-1 1.2 PROJECT LIMITS...1-1 1.3 SCOPE...1-2 CHAPTER 2 - DATA COLLECTION...2-1 2.1 AS-BUILT PLANS...2-1 2.2 EXISTING UTILITIES...2-1 2.3 SURVEY...2-1
More informationProject Consistency Guidance
Transit Systems Part B: Supplementary Information Document Maintaining Project Consistency throughout the Project Development Process Project 0-6758 Project Title: Maintaining Project Consistency with
More informationOuter Loop/Rail Bypass Study
Outer Loop/Rail Bypass Study Outer Loop Stakeholder Roundtable Southwest Segment Joshua City Hall April 16, 2008 North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department Stakeholder Roundtable
More informationThe Metropolitan Transportation Plan. Public Meetings January 2016
The Metropolitan Transportation Plan for North Central Texas Public Meetings January 2016 Presentation Agenda Mobility 2040 Draft Recommendations 2016 Transportation Conformity RTC Policy Bundle Concept
More informationIntroduction to the Proposed Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Transportation Planning and Programming
Introduction to the Proposed 2015-2018 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Transportation Planning and Programming Public Hearing August 19 th, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1
More informationDECEMBER P R O G R E S S R E P O R T
DECEMBER 201 2 P R O G R E S S R E P O R T The My 35 Plan is a dynamic document and will continue to be re-evaluated and updated by the Committee as needed. The My 35 Plan contains the ideas and recommendations
More informationNorth Central Texas Council of Governments. Workshop TxDOT Dallas
Workshop TxDOT Dallas July 10, 2015 1 CMP Workshop Overview Overview of the CMP CMP and Documentation Project Implementation Form CMP Corridor Analysis Fact Sheet CMP Roadway Deficiency Form Project Examples
More informationSpeed Up the Delivery of Transportation Projects
Speed Up the Delivery of Transportation Projects A Better Outcome in Half the Time through Integrated and Programmatic Approaches A typical highway project can take from 10 to 15 years to complete up to
More informationResearch Initiatives at TxDOT Related to Utilities and Right of Way
Research Initiatives at TxDOT Related to Utilities and Right of Way Transportation Research Board Workshop on Transportation Law, New Orleans, LA July 17, 2012 Overview 2 TxDOT utility/right of way research
More informationThe transportation needs described demonstrate that improvements are needed to meet the anticipated demands of travelers in the corridor and region.
traveling to jobs in the corridor and in downtown Dallas, and residents from elsewhere in the region traveling to jobs in the corridor (reverse commute). Improve Accessibility and Increase Economic Development
More informationAPPROVAL TO SUBMIT COMMENTS ON I-45 AND MORE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
TAC Agenda Item 09 Mailout 7/12/17 APPROVAL TO SUBMIT COMMENTS ON I-45 AND MORE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Background The Texas Department of Transportation, in cooperation with the Federal Highway
More informationBlacklands Corridor Feasibility Study. Public Meeting March 20, 2014 Fletcher Warren Civic Center Greenville, TX
Blacklands Corridor Feasibility Study Public Meeting March 20, 2014 Fletcher Warren Civic Center Greenville, TX 1 Overview Welcome, Overview, and Progress to Date Michael Morris Growth and Traffic Martin
More informationMobility 2025 Update: The Metropolitan Transportation Plan
Mobility 2025 Update: The Metropolitan Transportation Plan May, 2001 North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department MOBILITY 2025 UPDATE FINANCIAL SUMMARY Metropolitan Transportation
More informationPUBLIC HEARING LOOP 9
PUBLIC HEARING LOOP 9 From Interstate (I)-35E to I-45 Dallas and Ellis Counties, Texas CSJ: Loop 2964-10-005 9: I-35E to I-45 Tuesday, June 20, 20, 2017 2017 Public Hearing Introductions ELECTED & PUBLIC
More informationTxDOT Public-Private Partnerships Lessons Learned. OMW: Market, Communication, and Policy Trends in Tolling
OMW: Market, Communication, and Policy Trends in Tolling International Bridge, Tunnel and Turnpike Association Monday, June 18, 2012 Edward P. Pensock, Jr., P.E. Director, Strategic Projects Division Texas
More informationI-270 NORTH EA PERFORMANCE MEASURES IN NEPA
I-270 NORTH EA PERFORMANCE MEASURES IN NEPA Buddy Desai, PE CH2M St. Louis THE ISSUE US State Departments of Transportation continue to struggle with addressing current and emerging problems with increasingly
More informationPreparing a Reevaluation Using the Documented Reevaluation Checklist (DRC)
Guidance Preparing a Reevaluation Using the Documented This guidance outlines the TxDOT process for preparing a documented reevaluation as required by 43 TAC 2.85 and 23 CFR 771.129. TxDOT Environmental
More informationPLANNING FOR TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IN CARROLLTON
PLANNING FOR TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IN CARROLLTON Townscape Inc Angelou Economic Advisors Newman Jackson Bieberstein Parsons Transportation Group Bridgefarmer & Associates Carrollton Renaissance
More informationPhoto Source: LBJ Infrastructure Group. IH 635 LBJ East Project. Attachment 1: Project Narrative FY 2017 INFRA Grant Application
Photo Source: LBJ Infrastructure Group IH 635 LBJ East Project Attachment 1: Project Narrative FY 2017 INFRA Grant Application IH 635 LBJ East Project Was an INFRA application for this project previously
More informationFASTLANE Grant Project US-69 through Calera. Oklahoma Traffic Engineering Association 2017 Fall Meeting
FASTLANE Grant Project US-69 through Calera Oklahoma Traffic Engineering Association 2017 Fall Meeting October 17, 2017 US-69 through Calera Project Location Town of Calera City of Durant Project Location
More informationCity of Denton On-system Project Status Report Prepared by ITS
City of Denton On-system Project Status Report Prepared by ITS December 2017 PROJECTS FM 2181 North-South... page 2 US 377/Fort Worth Drive... page 3 FM 2499, Section 5... page 5 IH-35E/Mayhill/FM 2499
More informationSH 121: FM 423 TO SH 121 AT US 75 INTERCHANGE
SH 121: FM 423 TO SH 121 AT US 75 INTERCHANGE RE-EVALUATION FOR PROPOSED TOLL FACILITY PREVIOUSLY APPROVED ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS SH 121 FROM FM 423 TO US 75 CSJs: 0364-03-067, 0364-03-066, 0364-04-038,
More informationSession 10: Public-Private Partnerships, Tolling and the NEPA Process
Session 10: Public-Private Partnerships, Tolling and the NEPA Process Public-Private Partnerships and NEPA Public Involvement Permits Dianna F. Noble, P.E. Director, Environmental Affairs TxDOT Environment
More informationPRE-REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) MEETING GENERAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT (GEC) FOR I-2/I-69C INTERCHANGE PHARR DISTRICT
PRE-REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) MEETING GENERAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT (GEC) FOR I-2/I-69C INTERCHANGE PHARR DISTRICT RFQ No. 21-9SDP5001 601CT0000003698 November 19, 2018 Safety Minute Purpose of Meeting
More information2004 FEASIBILITY STUDY UPDATE
Austin-San Antonio Intermunicipal Commuter Rail District 2004 FEASIBILITY STUDY UPDATE December 2004 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Almost 3 million people in Central Texas, living and working between
More informationATTACHMENT 3. Background:
Colorado Tolling Enterprise (CTE) or High Performance Transportation Enterprise Additional Information Requirements for Amendment Submittals for the DRCOG Fiscally Constrained RTP Adopted by DRCOG Board
More informationLubbock Outer Route Feasibility Study Report Executive Summary
Lubbock Outer Route Feasibility Study Report Executive Summary Prepared for: Texas Department of Transportation Lubbock District Prepared by: MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. 6701 Aberdeen, Suite
More informationSunrise Project South I-205 Corridor Improvement Project
Sunrise Project South I-205 Corridor Improvement Project January 24, 2007 Sunrise and I-205 Project Summary Conclusions Sunrise Scoping Study Key Results South I-205 Scoping Study Key Results South I-205
More informationDRAFT UTP May Update - Funding Adjustments Summary EXHIBIT A. (Amounts in millions) Sum $10,000,000. Grand Total $10,000,000.
UTP May Update - Funding Adjustments Summary (Amounts in millions) District/Division//TMA s Fiscal Year Adjusted Amount Comments Houston 0598-02-092 12 CONSTRUCT 4 TOLL LANES FY $10,000,000 Adding $10M
More informationI-69 Angelina and Nacogdoches Counties Scoping Study Executive Summary
I-69 Angelina and Nacogdoches Counties Scoping Study Executive Summary November 2013 The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) is working to find the most appropriate means to develop the Interstate
More information: value pricing. application of the 10 criteria for the long-term consideration of 5.1 THE UNIVERSE OF FACILITIES IN THE DALLAS- FORT WORTH REGION
Re g i o n a l Va l u e P r i c i n g C o r r i d o r E v a l u at i o n a n d Fe a s i b i l i t y S t u d y N o r t h C e n t r a l T e x a s C o u n c i l o f G o v e r n m e n t s 5 application of
More informationCity of Denton On-system Project Status Report Prepared by ITS
City of Denton On-system Project Status Report Prepared by ITS September 2017 PROJECTS FM 2181 North-South... page 2 US 377/Fort Worth Drive... page 4 FM 2499, Section 5... page 6 IH-35E/Mayhill/FM 2499
More informationconnections 2040 the waco metropolitan transportation plan amendment 1
connections 2040 the waco metropolitan transportation plan amendment 1 developed by the waco metropolitan planning organization in cooperation with the following agencies: Adopted June 23, 2016 amendment
More informationDECEMBER UPDATE OF 2018 UTP. December Update of 2018 UTP
DECEMBER UPDATE OF 2018 UTP Critical Path Items for Dec 2018 UTP Update Planning reduction scenario Decision on Major Projects strategy Initiate discussion on category consolidation/realignment starting
More informationUS 75 Integrated Corridor Management System Using Technology and Partnership to Maximize Transportation System Capacity
US 75 Integrated Corridor Management System Using Technology and Partnership to Maximize Transportation System Capacity Ahmad Sadegh, Ph.D. Schneider Electric US 75 Corridor Networks Freeway with continuous
More informationMODERNIZE PORTFOLIO & PROJECT MANAGEMENT. Erika K. Kemp, PMP MPPM Project Director
MODERNIZE PORTFOLIO & PROJECT MANAGEMENT Erika K. Kemp, PMP MPPM Project Director 1 MPPM Business Case Vision of the Future State System capabilities Organizational capabilities Process design Decision
More informationProject Development Process Manual
Project Development Process Manual Revised June 2009 2009 by Texas Department of Transportation (512) 302-2453 all rights reserved Manual Notice 2009-1 From: Manual: Mark Marek, P.E. Project Development
More informationI-25 South Gap Project
I-25 South Gap Project Monument to Castle Rock I-25 Gap Coalition Meeting April 26, 2018 EA Schedule/Key Dates EA Release April 27, 2018 EA Comment Period = 30 days, ends May 28, 2018 Media Briefing April
More informationENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT and SECTION 4(f) EVALUATIONS for HIGHLAND LAKES PARK and USACE PROPERTY
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT and SECTION 4(f) EVALUATIONS for HIGHLAND LAKES PARK and USACE PROPERTY IH 35E: FROM PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH TURNPIKE TO FM 2181 CSJs: 0196-02-068, 0196-01-096, 0196-02-073, 0196-02-114,
More informationUS 75 Integrated Corridor Management
US 75 Integrated Corridor Management Koorosh Olyai,, P.E. Assistant Vice President Dallas Area Rapid Transit ITS Texas September 5, 2008 Why ICM is needed in the US 75 Corridor DFW 5 th most congested
More informationI-80/I-580/US 95 Reno Spaghetti Bowl. Presentation to NDOT Transportation Board June 6, 2016 John M. Terry, P.E.
I-80/I-580/US 95 Reno Spaghetti Bowl Presentation to NDOT Transportation Board June 6, 2016 John M. Terry, P.E. Long-term solutions to Reno Spaghetti Bowl Begin National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
More informationBenjamin G. Perez, AICP Parsons Brinckerhoff. TRB Conference on Surface Transportation Financing
SHRP2 C12 The Effects of Public-Private Partnerships and Non-Standard Procurements on Highway Planning, Environmental Review, and Collaborative Decision-Making Benjamin G. Perez, AICP Parsons Brinckerhoff
More informationPRACTITIONER S HANDBOOK
AASHTO PRACTITIONER S HANDBOOK 03 August 2016 MANAGING THE NEPA PROCESS FOR TOLL LANES AND TOLL ROADS This Handbook provides recommendations for conducting National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) studies
More informationAPPENDIX H NEPA TRANSITION REPORT
APPENDIX H NEPA TRANSITION REPORT BORDER HIGHWAY EAST STUDY CSJ: 0-0-00 EL PASO COUNTY, TEXAS TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION The environmental review, consultation, and other actions required by applicable
More informationTAMPA BAY NEXT MAJOR PROJECTS UPDATE
TAMPA BAY NEXT MAJOR PROJECTS UPDATE Marshall Hampton, FDOT District Seven Tampa Bay Next Program Manager January 18, 2019 1 2 Program Overview Funding Priorities Fiscal Year 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
More informationSH 34 Corridor Study & Environmental Assessment:
SH & Environmental Page 1 SH & Environmental : from Kaufman (SH 243) to Terrell (north of IH 20) Third Series TxDOT 80 557 80 The SH Corridor 20 20 175 SH Study Area Boundary 243 175 SH & Environmental
More informationAudit Plan for Fiscal Year 2014 TxDOT Audit Office
Exhibit A Audit Plan for Fiscal Year 2014 TxDOT Audit Office Introduction This is the proposed Audit Plan (the Plan) for FY 2014. It was developed by the Chief Audit Executive and audit staff. The Plan
More informationIrving Texas Transportation Hub Airports and Freeways. Transportation, Infrastructure, Logistics and Security in North America May 12, 2011
Irving Texas Transportation Hub Airports and Freeways Transportation, Infrastructure, Logistics and Security in North America May 12, 2011 Transportation The shapes and fates of cities have always been
More informationUS 70 Corridor James City Project Update. Craig Young, Three Oaks Engineering US 70 Corridor Commission May 21, 2015
US 70 Corridor James City Project Update Craig Young, Three Oaks Engineering US 70 Corridor Commission May 21, 2015 Presentation Overview Improving the US 70 Corridor The Project Team Where Are We Today?
More informationDESIGN BUILD LA 318 INTERCHANGE FUTURE I-49 SOUTH
DESIGN BUILD LA 318 INTERCHANGE FUTURE I-49 SOUTH Timothy Nickel, P.E. Project Management Administrator (225) 379-1110 Timothy.Nickel@la.gov Post Office Box 94245 Baton Rouge, LA 70804-9245 A Project within
More information1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED
1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED This chapter documents the need for transit improvements in the Northwest Corridor and the purposes that the proposed action (Build Alternative) is intended to serve. An overview of
More informationProposed SM Wright Project on I-45 / US 175 / SH 310
Proposed SM Wright Project on I-45 / US 175 / SH 310 Senator Royce West Town Hall Bill Hale, P.E. TxDOT Dallas District Matt Craig, P.E. Halff Associates, Inc. May 4, 2013 1 30 45 Proposed Trinity Parkway
More informationRoute 7 Corridor Improvements Project Reston Avenue to Jarrett Valley Drive Public Hearing
Project Reston Avenue to Jarrett Valley Drive Public Hearing Nicholas J. Roper, P.E. District Project Development Engineer Email: nicholas.roper@vdot.virginia.gov Phone: (703)259-1953 Agenda 7:00-7:15
More informationSECTION II CONTROLLED ACCESS FACILITIES
SECTION II CONTROLLED ACCESS FACILITIES SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION A critical component of the Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW) Metropolitan Transportation System is the regional freeway and tollway systems, which are
More informationArizona Association of County Engineers New Rules for Categorical Exclusions for FHWA Projects
Arizona Association of County Engineers New Rules for Categorical Exclusions for FHWA Projects Paul O Brien Manager, ADOT Environmental Planning Group June 19, 201 4 MAP-21 What are the new rules for Categorical
More informationIH 30/IH 35E Reconstruction Project Pegasus Final Technical Memorandum - Evaluation of Conceptual Alternatives Task 7.5
MEMO TO: Timothy Nesbitt, P.E. DATE: August 26, 2002 FROM: SUBJECT: Sandy Wesch-Schulze, P.E., AICP IH 30/IH 35E Reconstruction Project Pegasus Final Technical Memorandum - Evaluation of Conceptual Alternatives
More informationAlternatives Evaluation Methodology
Alternatives Evaluation Methodology www.vision54 56.com B 1 Phase 2 Alternatives Evaluation Methodology PASCO COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION 8731 Citizens Drive New Port Richey, FL 34654 Ph
More informationRichard Clarke Executive Director Program Management. Capital Program Management
Richard Clarke Executive Director Program Management Capital Program Management Department Overview > Transit, Highway Programs, and Regional Rail o Transit Deliver construction projects on-time and within
More informationROUTE FEASIBILITY STUDY. PUBLIC MEETING January 26, 2010
PHASE I - LUBBOCK OUTER ROUTE FEASIBILITY STUDY PUBLIC MEETING January 26, 2010 CONSTRUCTION SCHEMATIC DESIGN & ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY DETAILED DESIGN & RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION UTILITY ADJUSTMENTS ROUTE
More informationMANAGING CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULES. Kelly Selman, P.E. Dallas District. Date. Dallas District October 10, 2017
MANAGING CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULES Kelly Selman, P.E. Dallas District Dallas District October 10, 2017 Date Types of Schedules Contract Time Schedule A+B Bidding Lane Rental Preliminary Schedule Project Baseline
More informationPRE-RFQ MEETING SAN ANTONIO DISTRICT PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, & ESTIMATE (PS&E) DECEMBER 3, 4:00PM
PRE-RFQ MEETING SAN ANTONIO DISTRICT PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, & ESTIMATE (PS&E) DECEMBER 3, 2018 @ 4:00PM Procurement for: LP 1604 (from SH 16 to IH 35 North) PEPS Professional Engineering Procurement Services
More informationTable of Contents PERMIAN BASIN MPO TIP 2
Table of Contents Permian Basin MPO Membership and Structure... 3 Mission Statement... 3 Vision Statement... 3 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)... 4 Year of Expenditure (YOE) Trends... 4 Total
More informationThe Metropolitan Transportation Plan. Public Meetings February 2016
The Metropolitan Transportation Plan for North Central Texas Public Meetings February 2016 Presentation Agenda Mobility 2040 Draft Recommendations RTC Policy Bundle Concept Transportation Improvement Program
More informationDRAFT PURPOSE AND NEED STATEMENT
DRAFT PURPOSE AND NEED STATEMENT Cotton Belt Corridor Regional Rail Project July 2010 Version 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED... 2 1.1 Project Overview... 2 1.2 Goals and Objectives... 3 1.3 Relevant
More informationReview of Construction Costs and Time Schedules for Virginia Highway Projects
Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission of the Virginia General Assembly Review of Construction Costs and Time Schedules for Virginia Highway Projects JLARC Staff Briefing December 19, 2000 Introduction
More informationOverview of the Project Development Process. Brian Blanchard, PE Assistant Secretary for Engineering and Operations
Overview of the Project Development Process Brian Blanchard, PE Assistant Secretary for Engineering and Operations Overall Project Development Process The time it takes to produce a project varies significantly
More informationStatus of Freight Planning in the Alamo Area MPO
Status of Freight Planning in the Alamo Area MPO Transportation Policy Board December 5, 2016 The Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act is a five-year, $305 billion bill that reauthorizes
More informationI-64 Capacity Improvements Segment I Financial Plan Annual Update December 1, 2017
I-64 Capacity Improvements Segment I Financial Plan Annual Update December 1, 2017 State Project # 0064-965-264, P101, R201, C501, B616, B617, B618, B619, B620, B621, D601, D602 Federal # NHS-064-3(479),
More informationFederal Highway Administration FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT Interstate Highway 45 and Loop 197 Direct Connector Galveston County, Texas
Federal Highway Administration FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT Interstate Highway 45 and Loop 197 Direct Connector Galveston County, Texas Introduction The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has determined,
More informationCotton Belt Corridor. Open House Meetings September 2017
Cotton Belt Corridor Open House Meetings September 2017 0 Welcome Open House format with break for brief presentation and Question/Answer Allows for one-on-one discussions with staff Brief presentation
More informationTEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION. AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) October 7, 2016 Overview of Texas Freight Mobility Plan The Freight Plan is TxDOT's first multimodal transportation plan
More informationTravel Time Index: Why All the Fuss? Tim Lomax Texas A&M Transportation Institute
Travel Time Index: Why All the Fuss? Tim Lomax Texas A&M Transportation Institute http://mobility.tamu.edu/ Key Aspects of TTI s Performance Measurement Recommendations Goal: Help a range of audiences
More informationROGERSVILLE PROJECT FREEWAY: Progressive Right-of-Way and Partnering for Success
ROGERSVILLE PROJECT FREEWAY: Progressive Right-of-Way and Partnering for Success Speaker Introductions Need Mike s headshot James Shaw, PE Senior Project Manager RS&H Design Manager Overview of Project
More informationOrange County Transit
Orange County Transit Plan Progress Report Fiscal Year 2017 July 1, 2016 June 30, 2017 BACKGROUND Recognizing the benefits of transit for all, voters in 2012 approved a half-cent sales tax to support funding
More informationINLAND PORT TRANSPORTATION EVALUATION GUIDE
INLAND PORT TRANSPORTATION EVALUATION GUIDE by Robert Harrison, Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin; John P. McCray, The University of Texas at San Antonio; Russell Henk,
More informationAPPENDIX A SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS STUDIES REPORT
APPENDIX A SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS STUDIES REPORT BORDER HIGHWAY EAST STUDY CSJ: 0924-06-090 EL PASO COUNTY, TEXAS TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION The environmental review, consultation, and other actions
More informationDART LRT Rail Operating Facility Phase I Site Selection Study
DART LRT Rail Operating Facility Phase I Site Selection Study DRAFT Executive Summary May 2002 DART General Planning Consultant ES-1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Purpose of Report The purpose of this Northwest Rail
More informationTransportation Update
Transportation Update Projects Underway Norview Avenue About the Project: The Norview Avenue Interchange Improvement Project will eliminate the existing weave movement associated with the on- and off-ramps
More informationAppendix C Scoping Meeting Materials
Appendix C Scoping Meeting Materials Appendix C - Contents Sign-in Sheet for Agency Scoping Meeting Sign-in Sheet for Public Scoping Meeting Scoping Information Booklet Scoping Presentation Scoping Brochure/Comment
More informationCommonwealth Transportation Board I-66 Corridor Briefing Outside the Beltway Route 15 to I-495
Commonwealth Transportation Board I-66 Corridor Briefing Outside the Beltway Route 15 to I-495 January 13, 2015 1 Project Status Update Transit P3 Procurement I-66 Corridor Briefing Overview Major Project
More informationProgress Report Regional Express & Bus Rapid Transit Program
Progress Report Regional Express & Bus Rapid Transit Program ST Express Bus routes serve urban centers in Snohomish, King, and Pierce. March 2018 Prepared by Project Control & VE l Design, Engineering
More informationProject Budget And Schedule Status Report
Item 47 Project Budget And Schedule Status Report Presented by Brian Boudreau Executive Director, Program Management Construction Committee June 18, 2015 & Schedule Performance Summary Chart Slide # Project
More informationOn behalf of the Carolina Crossroads project team we thank you for taking the time to attend this meeting.
On behalf of the Carolina Crossroads project team we thank you for taking the time to attend this meeting. Located in the heart of South Carolina, the I-20/26/126 Corridor is the crossroads of the state
More informationSuccessful Partnerships in Innovative Project Delivery
Successful Partnerships in Innovative Project Delivery Introductions Eddie Valtier Director of Transportation Planning and Development (El Paso District) Ismael Hernandez ROW Supervisor, West ROW Project
More informationINDOT Planning Area Realignment - Integrated Transportation Planning Division
- 2008 INDOT Planning Area Realignment - Integrated Transportation Planning Division 2008 Road School Presentation David Holtz March 26, 2008 [Interrupt w/?s please] Old operational environment 1 2008
More informationStatus of Freight Planning in the Alamo Area MPO
Status of Freight Planning in the Alamo Area MPO Technical Advisory Committee March 10, 2017 Freight Planning at All Levels National Transportation and trade priorities National Strategic Freight Plan
More informationALTERNATIVE PROJECT DELIVERY
ALTERNATIVE PROJECT DELIVERY 2017 Educational Series ALTERNATIVE PROJECT DELIVERY OVERVIEW TxDOT uses comprehensive development agreements (CDAs) an umbrella term for public-private partnerships in order
More informationProject Planning and Development Process
Project Planning and Development Process The project development process (PDP) involves hundreds of tasks. Many of these are internal agency activities that help an agency follow a methodical process of
More informationMOBILITY AND ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
6 MOBILITY AND ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS BACK OF SECTION DIVIDER 6.0 Mobility and Alternatives Analysis Travel demand analysis provides a framework for the identification of transportation facilities and services
More informationLOOP 9 SOUTHEAST WELCOME TO THE LOOP 9 CORRIDOR/FEASIBILITY STUDY. Presentation 6:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.
1 WELCOME TO THE LOOP 9 CORRIDOR/FEASIBILITY STUDY PUBLIC MEETINGS Open House 5:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. Presentation 6:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. Open House 7:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. Tuesday, September 24, 2013 Thursday,
More informationRegional Mobility Authorities in Texas
Regional Mobility Authorities in Texas Testimony of Ginger Goodin, P.E., Senior Research Engineer and Director, TTI Transportation Policy Research Center John Overman, Research Scientist for Transit Mobility
More informationI-295/I-76/RT. 42 INTERCHANGE
Agency Coordination Meeting #4 I-295/I-76/RT. 42 INTERCHANGE History of Studies and Findings 1987-2003 March 26, 2003 PRESENTATION OVERVIEW! 1985 NJDOT Begins Design of Route 42 Widening! 1987 Preliminary
More informationIH 30/IH 35W Managed Lane Access Ramp. TIGER Discretionary Grant Application. April 2014
IH 30/IH 35W Managed Lane Access Ramp TIGER Discretionary Grant Application April 2014 The Transportation Policy Body for the North Central Texas Council of Governments (Metropolitan Planning Organization
More informationPublic Hearing 2. Highway/Limits SH 121: From IH 30 to FM 1187 CSJ
Public Hearing ( and Response to Comments Received at and Subsequent to the December 13, 2004 Public Hearing) District/County Fort Worth District/ Tarrant County Highway/Limits SH 121: From IH 30 to FM
More information