FRIABLE AND NON-FRIABLE ASBESTOS REMOVAL. Provisions of the General Conditions and Special Conditions are part of this Division.

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "FRIABLE AND NON-FRIABLE ASBESTOS REMOVAL. Provisions of the General Conditions and Special Conditions are part of this Division."

Transcription

1 SECTION FRIABLE AND NON-FRIABLE ASBESTOS REMOVAL PART 1 - GENERAL Provisions of the General Conditions and Special Conditions are part of this Division. 1.1 SCOPE OF WORK 1. General: The work specified herein shall be the abatement of asbestos containing materials by certified and registered persons who are knowledgeable, qualified and trained in the abatement, handling, and disposal of asbestos containing material, and subsequent cleaning of the affected environment. 2. The Contractor shall furnish all labor, material, equipment, testing, services, permits, insurance, notifications, necessary or required to perform the work in accordance with applicable local, state, and federal regulations for the abatement of asbestos containing materials and for other work as specified in this section or as indicated in associated drawings, sketches, or reports of the work. All fees required for notification requirements, renotifications, and/or inspections by the regulatory agencies shall be paid by the Contractor. Bulk sample analysis information required by the Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or local authority having jurisdiction in conjunction with the notification shall also be provided by the Contractor unless provided within this section. 3. The work shall include the following items. A breakdown of locations and quantities of materials can be found in the enclosed asbestos inspection reports. All quantities are estimated, and must be field verified by the contractor prior to bid opening. 1. The removal and disposal of friable asbestos: a. Boiler House: Note: The Boiler House will remain. Not all of the asbestos will be removed. See demolition drawings for the extent of the removal. i. Chimney Clean-Out Caulk 15 linear feet ii. Breeching Caulk () 30 linear feet iii. Breeching Insulation () 50 square feet DEMOLITION (limited) AT 2794 NORMANDY DRIVE AND 7700 FLORISSANT ROAD (#S7662) April 21, 2014

2 b. Laundry Facility: i. Door Caulk 2 doors ii. Window Glazing 11 windows iii. Window Caulk 11 windows iv. Expansion Joint Caulk 25 linear feet v. Pipe Insulation 100 linear feet vi. Mudded Fittings 75 fittings vii. Floor Tile / Mastic 725 square feet c. Parking and Transportation Building: i. Light Reflector 1 reflector previously removed by owner under separate contract. 2. The removal and disposal of non-friable asbestos: a. Boiler House: i. Incinerator Transite Roof 50 square feet b. Laundry Facility: No non-friable materials are scheduled for abatement in the Laundry Facility. c. Parking and Transportation Building: No non-friable materials are scheduled for abatement in the Parking and Transportation Building. DEMOLITION (limited) AT 2794 NORMANDY DRIVE AND 7700 FLORISSANT ROAD (#S7662) April 21, 2014

3 1.2 DEFINITIONS 1. Abatement - Procedures to decrease or eliminate the source of fiber release from asbestos containing building materials. Includes encapsulation, enclosure, and removal. 2. Adequately Wet - To sufficiently mix or penetrate with liquid to prevent the release of particulate. 3. Aggressive Air Sampling - Sweeping of floors, ceilings and walls and other surfaces with the exhaust of a minimum of one (1) horsepower leaf blower or equivalent immediately prior to air monitoring. 4. Approved Waste Disposal Site - A solid waste disposal area that is authorized by the Department of Natural Resources to receive asbestos containing solid wastes. 5. Asbestos - The asbestiform varieties of serpentine (chrysotile, antigorite), riebeckite (crocidolite), cummintonite-grumerite (amosite), anthophyllite, and actinolitetremolite. 6. Asbestos Abatement Supervisor - An individual who directs, controls, or supervises others in asbestos abatement projects. 7. Asbestos Containing Building Material (ACBM) - Surfacing ACM, thermal system insulation ACM, or miscellaneous ACM that is found in or on interior structural members or other parts of a building. 8. Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) - Any material containing more than 1 percent asbestos by weight. 9. Barrier - Any surface that seals off the work area to inhibit the movement of fibers. 10. Category I Nonfriable ACM - Asbestos-containing packings, gaskets, resilient floor covering and asphalt roofing products containing more than one percent (1%) asbestos as determined using the method specified in 40 CFR part 763, subpart F, Appendix A, section 1, Polarized Light Microscopy. 11. Category II Nonfriable ACM - Any material, excluding category I nonfriable ACM, containing more than one percent (1%) asbestos as determined using the methods specified in 40 CFR part 763, subpart F, Appendix A, section 1, Polarized Light Microscopy that, when dry, cannot be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure. 12. Containment - Area where asbestos abatement project is conducted. Area must be enclosed either by a glove bag or plastic sheeting barrier. DEMOLITION (limited) AT 2794 NORMANDY DRIVE AND 7700 FLORISSANT ROAD (#S7662) April 21, 2014

4 13. Contractor s Competent Person (Qualified Person) - One who is capable of identifying existing asbestos hazards in the workplace and selecting the appropriate control strategy for asbestos exposure, who has the authority to take prompt corrective measures to eliminate them, as specified in 29 CFR (f); in addition, for Class I, II, III, and IV work, who is specially trained in training courses which meet the criteria of EPA's Model Accreditation Plan (40 CFR Part 763) for project designer or supervisor, or its equivalent. 14. Decontamination Area - Enclosed area adjacent and connected to the regulated area which is used for decontamination of workers, materials, and equipment that are contaminated with asbestos. 15. Demolition - the wrecking or taking out of any load bearing structural member of a facility together with any related handling operations. 16. Disposal Bag - A properly labeled 6 mil. thick leak-tight plastic bag used for transporting asbestos waste from work area to disposal site. 17. Encapsulant (Sealant) - A liquid material which can be applied to asbestos-containing material and which prevents the release of asbestos fibers from the material either by creating a membrane over the surface or by penetrating into the material and binding its components together. 18. Encapsulation - Treatment of asbestos containing materials with an encapsulant. 19. Enclosure - The construction of an airtight, impermeable, permanent barrier around asbestos containing material to control the release of asbestos fibers into the air. 20. Friable Asbestos Material - Any material containing more than one percent asbestos as determined using the method specified in appendix A, subpart F, 40 CFR part 763 section 1, Polarized Light Microscopy, that, when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure. 21. Glove Bag - A manufactured or fabricated device, typically constructed of six (6) mil transparent polyethylene or polyvinyl chloride plastic. This device consist of two (2) inward projecting long sleeves, an internal tool pouch and an attached, labeled receptacle for asbestos waste. 22. Homogeneous Work Site - Continuous areas with the same type of ACM and in which one type of abatement process is performed. 23. Negative Initial Exposure Assessment - An assessment by a Competent Person in which it is concluded that employee exposures during the job are likely to be consistently below the Permissible Exposure Levels. DEMOLITION (limited) AT 2794 NORMANDY DRIVE AND 7700 FLORISSANT ROAD (#S7662) April 21, 2014

5 24. Outside Air Air outside of the containment. 25. Owner's Air Monitoring Firm A firm selected by the Owner to provide air monitoring and oversight of an asbestos abatement project who is not under the direct control of the person carrying out the asbestos abatement project. 26. Owner's Air Sampling Professional - An individual who holds a valid certification as an Air Sampling Professional from the State of Missouri. The individual shall conduct, oversee, or be responsible for air monitoring of asbestos abatement projects before, during, and after the project has been completed. 27. Owner s Air Sampling Technician - An individual who has been trained by and is under the supervision of an air sampling professional to do air monitoring before, during, and after the asbestos abatement project. The air sampling technician must hold a Missouri Asbestos Inspector license and be supervised by the Owner s Air Sampling Professional. 28. Personal Monitoring - Sampling of the asbestos fiber concentrations within the breathing zone. 29. Regulated Asbestos Containing Material (RACM) - Friable asbestos material; Category I nonfriable ACM that has become friable; Category I nonfriable ACM that will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading; Category II nonfriable ACM that has a high probability of becoming or has become crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by the forces expected to act on the material in the course of demolition or renovation operations. 30. Remove - To take out RACM or facility components that contain or are covered with RACM from any facility. 31. Renovation - Altering a facility or one or more facility components in any way, including the stripping or removal of RACM from a facility component. 32. Repair - The restoration of asbestos material that has been damaged. Repair consists of the application of rewettable glass cloth, canvas, cement or other suitable material. It may also involve filling damaged areas with non-asbestos substitutes and reencapsulating or painting previously encapsulated materials. 33. Strip - To take off RACM from any part of a facility or facility components. 34. Waste Shipment Record - The shipping document, required to be originated and signed by the waste generator, used to track and substantiate the disposition of asbestos containing waste material. DEMOLITION (limited) AT 2794 NORMANDY DRIVE AND 7700 FLORISSANT ROAD (#S7662) April 21, 2014

6 35. Work Area - A specific isolated area, other than the space enclosed within a glove bag, in which friable asbestos-containing materials is required to be handled. The area is designated as a work area from the time that the area is secured and access restrictions are in place. The area remains designated as a work area until the time that it has been cleaned in accordance with any requirements applicable to the operations conducted. 1.3 CODES AND REGULATIONS 1. General Applicability Of Codes, Regulations and Standards - All applicable codes, regulations, standards, statutes, laws, and rules have the same force and effect (and are made a part of the contract documents by reference) as if copied directly into the contract documents, or as if published copies are bound herewith. Where conflicts arise, the most stringent specification shall apply. 2. Contractor Responsibility - The Contractor shall assume full responsibility and liability for the compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local regulations pertaining to work practices, hauling, disposal and protection of workers, visitors to the site, and persons occupying areas adjacent to the site. The Contractor is responsible for providing medical examinations and maintaining medical records of personnel as required by the applicable federal, state, and local regulations. The Contractor shall hold the owner harmless for failure to comply with any applicable work, hauling, disposal, safety, health, or other regulations on the part of the contractor, contractor s employees, or contractor s subcontractors. 3. Federal and State requirements which govern asbestos abatement work or hauling and disposal of asbestos waste materials include but are not limited to the following: 1. U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) including but not limited to: 1. Title 29, Part 1910, Section 1001 and Part 1926, Section 1101 of the Code of Federal Regulations. 2. Respiratory Protection, Title 29, Part 1910, Section 134 of the Code of Federal Regulations. 3. Construction Industry, Title 29. Part 1926, of the Code of Federal Regulations. 4. Access to Employee Exposure and Medical Records, Title 29, Part 1910, Section 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations. 5. Hazard Communication, Title 29, Part 1910, Section 1200 of the Code of Federal Regulations. DEMOLITION (limited) AT 2794 NORMANDY DRIVE AND 7700 FLORISSANT ROAD (#S7662) April 21, 2014

7 6. Specifications for Accident Prevention Signs and Tags, Title 29, Part 1910, Section 145 of the Code of Federal Regulations. 2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) including but not limited to: 1. National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS) Title 40, Part 61, Subpart M, Code of Federal Regulations. 3. U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) including but not limited to: 1. Title 49, Part 172, Section 101 of the Code of Federal Regulations. 4. State of Missouri including but not limited to: 1. H.B. 77, 85th General Assembly. 2. Missouri Air Conservation Law Chapter Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Division 10, Chapter 6 of the Code of State Regulations as follows: (1) 10 CSR , Definitions (2) 10 CSR , Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (3) 10 CSR , Administrative Penalties (4) Volume 18, Missouri Register, Page 44 (5) 10 CSR , Asbestos Abatement Projects - Certification, Accreditation, and Business Exemption Requirements DEMOLITION (limited) AT 2794 NORMANDY DRIVE AND 7700 FLORISSANT ROAD (#S7662) April 21, 2014

8 1.4 NOTIFICATIONS 1. Notifications meeting the requirements of Volume 18, Missouri Register, page 44, shall be completed and sent by the Contractor not less than ten (10) days before the intended starting date of the project. Send notification to the following: 1. St. Louis County Department of Health Air Pollution Control Program 111 S. Meramec Ave. St. Louis, MO Department of Natural Resources Air Pollution Control Program (Asbestos) P.O. Box 176 Jefferson City, Missouri U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region VII Air & Toxic Division, Air Branch ATTN: Air Compliance 726 Minnesota Avenue Kansas City, Kansas Provide a copy to the Owner's Air Monitoring Firm. 1.5 SUBMITTALS 1. The following will be submitted by contractor prior to commencement of work for approval by the Owner s Air Monitoring Firm (six copies for the Owner's Representative). Owner's Air Monitoring Firm will return reviewed copies to contractor and Owner's Representative. 1. One copy of material safety data sheets (MSDS) for products to be used by the Contractor in the performance of his work. Contractor will also maintain copies of MSDS on site per OSHA. 2. One copy of the notification, notification amendment, and post-notification, and one copy of any correspondence with the regulatory agencies. Submit a listing of all prior regulatory violations. DEMOLITION (limited) AT 2794 NORMANDY DRIVE AND 7700 FLORISSANT ROAD (#S7662) April 21, 2014

9 2. Friable Abatement: 1. For each supervisor and worker submit current Missouri asbestos license, training certificate, physical examination report, certificate of worker s acknowledgement, and respirator fit test. List a summary of project personnel and contact phone numbers. 2. Name, address, and contact person's name of testing laboratory or laboratories to be utilized analyzing samples for bulk analysis or air samples. 3. Submit a detailed plan of the procedures proposed for use in complying with requirements of this specification and Volume 18, Missouri Register, page 44, and 29 CFR Include in the plan the layout and location of barriers, decontamination units, route of ingress and egress for work area, methods used to assure safety of building occupants and visitors, methods used to isolate or closing out of HVAC system, personal air monitoring strategy, method of removal of material, and engineering controls utilized to prevent emissions from the work area. 4. Provide a disposal plan to detail type of disposal container, method of transportation to disposal site, waste hauler (including license), and disposal site. 5. Name and address of asbestos waste disposal site. 6. Copy of notifications required as part of the emergency notification plan. 3. Non-Friable Abatement: 1. Submit a detailed plan of the procedures proposed to minimize emissions and to prevent the material from becoming friable during removal. 2. Copy of emergency protection plan to be used if the nonfriable material should become friable during removal. 3. Current Certificates of training and statement of qualifications for the Competent Person. 4. One copy of the Negative Initial Exposure Assessment. 4. Upon completion of the abatement work, the following information shall be submitted to the Owner's Representative. 1. Waste disposal receipts and waste shipment record on all asbestos waste removed from the project. DEMOLITION (limited) AT 2794 NORMANDY DRIVE AND 7700 FLORISSANT ROAD (#S7662) April 21, 2014

10 2. Contractor s daily logs 3. Contractor s post-notification 5. Upon completion of the abatement work, the following information shall be submitted by the Owner s Air Monitoring Firm to the Contractor. 1. Air sampling test results for personal (non-osha) and final clearance air samples taken under the supervision of Owner s Air Sampling Professional. Results must be in writing in final report form. 2. Written certification from the Owner s Air Monitoring Firm. PART 2 - PART 3 - PRODUCTS - NOT USED EXECUTION 3.1 SUPERVISION OF ABATEMENT 1. The Contractor shall designate a competent supervisor subject to the approval of the Owner s Air Monitoring Firm and the Owner s Representative. The supervisor shall be the Contractor's representative on the project and shall meet the requirements of all applicable regulations and perform the following minimum requirements. 1. Be Certified by the State of Missouri as an Asbestos Abatement Supervisor, a minimum of one year prior full time experience in asbestos abatement work and a minimum of two years experience as a supervisor, and be qualified as a Competent Person in accordance with OSHA regulation Be on site and supervise all abatement work in accordance with OSHA and Volume 18, Missouri Register, page Conduct all OSHA required air monitoring. 4. Maintain a daily log on the project documenting events, visitations, problems, equipment failures, accidents, and inspections. 5. Be responsible for implementation of first aid, safety training, respiratory protection, and ensuring all workers are trained in emergency procedures. 6. Be responsible for conducting a visual inspection of the work area prior to a visual inspection by the Owner s Air Monitoring Firm. Inspection shall be documented. DEMOLITION (limited) AT 2794 NORMANDY DRIVE AND 7700 FLORISSANT ROAD (#S7662) April 21, 2014

11 3.2 NEGATIVE INITIAL EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 1. The Contractor must conduct a Negative Initial Exposure Assessment (non-friable asbestos) prior to removal of the asbestos material. The Negative Initial Exposure Assessment shall be performed by a "Competent Person" to determine whether the material may be removed and maintained in a nonfriable condition. If the material cannot be removed without becoming friable then the contractor shall comply to the requirements in this specification at no additional cost to the Owner. 2. The method of removal is the Contractor's option. However, in the event of any of the following: 1. Visible emissions are observed 2. Sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading of the material 3. Air samples exceed 0.1 f/cc The contractor shall immediately stop work, implement corrective work practices, make any necessary notifications to all regulatory agencies of the changes in work practices and material conditions, and comply with the requirements as set forth in this specification. 3.3 WORKER PROTECTION & TRAINING 1. The Contractor shall be responsible for providing his employees with proper respiratory protection, respiratory training, written respirator program, medical examinations, maintaining medical records, and protective clothing and equipment to comply with OSHA requirements. 2. The Contractor shall be responsible for all testing and costs incurred for complying with requirements of OSHA regulations for Personal Air Sampling. 3. All workers shall be trained in the dangers inherent in handling asbestos and breathing asbestos dust and in proper work procedures and personal and protective measures. 4. All workers shall hold valid training certificates and Missouri Asbestos Abatement Worker licenses as required by 10 CSR INDEPENDENT TESTING LABORATORY DEMOLITION (limited) AT 2794 NORMANDY DRIVE AND 7700 FLORISSANT ROAD (#S7662) April 21, 2014

12 1. Testing Laboratories utilized by the Contractor for sample analysis during the project shall meet the following minimum requirements and be approved by the Owner s Air Monitoring Firm. This information shall be submitted to the Owner's Representative for review. 1. All air monitoring samples shall be analyzed by a testing laboratory accredited by the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) or by an individual who is currently on the Asbestos Analyst Registry. 2. All bulk samples shall be analyzed by a testing laboratory accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP). 3.5 OWNER S AIR SAMPLING PROFESSIONAL 1. It will be the Owner s responsibility to hire an Air Sampling Professional. The Air Sampling Professional will be required to perform the following duties as a minimum: 1. Approval of the Contractor's work plan and methods of abatement to meet regulatory requirements and ensure the health and safety of University faculty, staff, and students. 2. Verify that the contractor is satisfactorily performing personal air monitoring as directed by OSHA regulations. 3. Perform visual inspection of the work area and final clearance air monitoring. 4. Certify in writing that the Contractor's procedures, methods and practices were, to the best of their knowledge and belief, in compliance with current EPA, OSHA, State and/or applicable local regulations, and that the work areas meet the requirements for final clearance testing and account of any known deviations. 5. Issue final air clearance letter. 3.6 EMERGENCY PROTECTION PLAN 1. The contractor shall be responsible for developing a written Emergency Protection Plan and shall maintain this plan on site. The plan shall include considerations of asbestos leakage from the site, fire, explosion, toxic atmospheres, electrical hazards, slips, falls, and heat related injury. All employees shall be instructed and trained in the procedures. DEMOLITION (limited) AT 2794 NORMANDY DRIVE AND 7700 FLORISSANT ROAD (#S7662) April 21, 2014

13 2. Emergency protection plan shall also include written notification of police, fire and medical personnel of the planned abatement activities, work schedule, and layout of work area, particularly barriers that may affect response capabilities. 3.7 LOCAL AREA PROTECTION & SITE SECURITY 1. The contractor shall be responsible for all areas of the building used by him and/or subcontractors in the performance of the work. Contractor shall exert full control over the actions of all employees and other persons with respect to the use and preservation of the existing building, except such controls as may be specifically reserved to the owner. 2. Contractor has the right to exclude from the work area all persons who have no purpose related to the work or its inspection, and shall require all persons in the work area to observe the same regulations required of Contractor s employees. 3. The contractor shall have control of site security during abatement operations in order to protect work environment and equipment. Contractor shall have the owners assistance in notifying building occupants of impending activity and enforcement of restricted access by owners employees. 4. The contractor shall keep a minimum of two 10 lbs. type ABC fire extinguishers on site. One shall be maintained outside the work area and one inside the work area. The employees shall be trained in the operation of extinguishers. 5. Where areas cannot be isolated by existing walls and doors from employees, clients, or the public, barriers must be constructed of ½ plywood and 2"x4" framing 16" o.c. to isolate the area. The barriers must be installed in such a manner to prevent damage to existing walls, floors, or ceilings. Barrier may have a lockable door. 6. The contractor shall maintain the work area free from rubbish, debris, and dirt and keep a clean, safe working area. 7. The Contractor shall provide warning signage around the regulated area as required by OSHA. 8. The Contractor shall isolate any and all air supply and returns to the abatement space as required by OSHA. Contractor shall coordinate with the Owner's Representative. 9. The Contractor shall keep all areas where adhesive stripper is in use (such as mastic removal) under negative pressure and exhausted to the outside ambient air. 3.8 FINAL CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS (FRIABLE ASBESTOS) DEMOLITION (limited) AT 2794 NORMANDY DRIVE AND 7700 FLORISSANT ROAD (#S7662) April 21, 2014

14 1. Upon completion of the abatement work, the supervisor shall perform a visual inspection of the work area. If satisfactory, the supervisor shall then request the Owner s Air Sampling Professional or the Air Sampling Professional s air sampling technician to perform a visual inspection. When the Owner s Air Sampling Professional feels the area is ready based on the results of their visual inspection, the Contractor shall apply a lockdown encapsulant. Following application of lockdown encapsulant, the Owner s Air Sampling Professional or the Air Sampling Professional s air sampling technician shall perform the final clearance sampling for airborne fiber concentrations. 2. The Owner's Air Sampling Professional or air monitoring technician will perform final clearance testing per the following requirements: 1. Aggressive sampling shall be required for all areas where removal has taken place with the exception of glove bag projects where nonaggressive sampling is permitted. 2. The asbestos abatement area is cleared when the work area airborne fiber concentration is less than 0.01 fibers per cubic centimeter (f/cc) by Phase Contrast Microscopy (PCM). The number of samples collected shall be based upon the requirements of the St. Louis County Air Pollution Control Code paragraph P.C.M. samples shall be analyzed by an accredited registered microscopist. 4. The contractor may request clearance of the abatement area by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). All costs of TEM clearance shall be borne by the contractor 5. For areas specifically specified for clearance by Transmission Electron Microscopy, the method shall be NIOSH Any work areas failing to meet the clearance requirements of this section shall be recleaned and retested at the contractor's expense until satisfactory levels are obtained. 4. The Owner's Air Monitoring Firm shall provide a written report of the air monitoring activities to the contractor within 7 days after the final clearance testing. 3.9 REESTABLISHMENT OF THE WORK AREA AND SYSTEMS 1. Reestablishment of the work area shall only occur after the contractor has received final clearance in writing from the Owner's Air Monitoring Firm DEMOLITION (limited) AT 2794 NORMANDY DRIVE AND 7700 FLORISSANT ROAD (#S7662) April 21, 2014

15 2. The contractor shall remove all barriers and abatement equipment from the work area after the area has been cleared. 3. All damage to finishes, equipment, and/or the area affected by the abatement shall be repaired by the contractor to equal or better condition as it was prior to the work, at no cost to the owner WASTE DISPOSAL 1. All asbestos containing waste and/or asbestos contaminated debris shall as a minimum be double bagged in approved 6 mil. disposal bags. Each bag shall be tagged to meet requirements of NESHAPS with an asbestos caution label and a source identification label. 2. Transportation shall meet the requirements of all regulatory agencies for asbestos containing materials and shall be transported in an enclosed truck. 3. The waste disposal site shall be approved by the Missouri Department of Natural Resources for asbestos disposal. A chain of custody letter/waste shipment record and disposal receipts shall be provided to the owner for all materials disposed of DRAWINGS 1. Drawings, when provided, are not intended to be used for anything but a "reference" to the work area. Information is not specific to quantities or to exact location of ACM unless explicitly noted. Contractor will be required to field verify the conditions and quantities REPORTS 1. Reports, when provided, are intended to be used as a basis for the type and composition of the asbestos present for both bidding purposes and for the information required for the notifications to the governing agencies. Information is not specific to quantities or to exact location of ACM unless explicitly noted. The contractor will be required to field verify the conditions and quantities of materials, and indicate any discrepancies to the Owner s Representative prior to the bid opening. END OF SECTION DEMOLITION (limited) AT 2794 NORMANDY DRIVE AND 7700 FLORISSANT ROAD (#S7662) April 21, 2014

16 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

17 DIWBE CERTIFIED Environmental Consulting Services Asbestos and Limited Lead-Based Paint Inspection Report For: University of Missouri- St. Louis St. Louis, Missouri Normandie Complex Boiler House Prepared For: Mr. Tom Royster University of Missouri- St. Louis One University Boulevard St. Louis, Missouri Prepared By: United Infrastructure Corporation Environmental Consultants 8129 Delmar Blvd., Suite #204 St. Louis, Missouri United Project# April12, 2012

18 Table of Contents ASBESTOS Section I: Inspection Results 1. Introduction 2. Scope of Survey 3. Summary of Work 4. Conclusions and Recommendations 5. Assumptions and Limitations Section II: Building Inspection Survey Forms & Laboratory Results LEAD-BASED PAINT Section Ill: Inspection Results 1. Introduction 2. Scope of Survey 3. Summary of Work 4. Conclusions and Recommendations 5. Assumptions and Limitations Section IV: XRF Results GENERAL Section V: Floor Plans Section VI: Certificates University of Missouri- St. Louis 8224 Natural Bridge Road; St. Louis, MO Normandie Complex- Boiler House Project No

19 SECTION I ASBESTOS INSPECTION RESULTS University of Missouri- St. Louis 8224 Natural Bridge Road; St. Louis, MO Normandie Complex- Boiler House Project No

20 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

21 Asbestos- Section 1: Inspection Results 1. Introduction United Infrastructure Corporation (United) is pleased to present this repmt summarizing the results of the asbestos survey perfonned at the Normandie Complex - Boiler House; St. Louis, MO for the University of Missouri - St. Louis. United was contracted by the University of Missouri - St. Louis to perfonn this inspection. The Normandie Complex - Boiler House was inspected to detennine the location of asbestos-containing materials for the purpose of demolition. The inspectors conducting the inspection are accredited and licensed by the State of Missouri. 2. Scope of Survey On March 30 and April 2, 2012 John Benson, Katie Lyons and Leon Burke III of United conducted an asbestos inspection of the Normandie Complex - Boiler House; St. Louis, MO. Due to the impending building demolition, all suspect materials were addressed by the inspection. The suspected asbestos-containing materials (ACM) were identified and sampled to determine the asbestos content. 3. Summary of Work Based on a visual inspection, the following materials were identified as suspect ACM: 1. Mudded Fittings 2. Pipe Insulation 3. Window Glazing 4. Window Caulk 5. Pipe Gasket (Stored) 6. Chiller Insulation 7. Hot Water Tank Insulation 8. Door Caulk 9. Breeching Caulk (Interior) l 0. Boiler Gasket 11. Boiler Rope Gasket 12. Incinerator Fire Brick 13. Incinerator Transite Roof 14. Chimney Cleanout Caulk University of Missouri- St. Louis 8224 Natural Bridge Road; St. Louis, MO Normandie Complex- Boiler House Project No

22 15. Breeching Caulk () 16. Breeching Insulation () 17. Expansion Joint Caulk 18. Breeching Flue Insulation 19. Built-Up Roofing 20. Roof Flashing Caulk 21. Roof Flashing Tar All suspect materials were sampled according to EPA protocol and analyzed by an accredited laboratory. The following materials were found to be asbestos containing: 1. Mudded Joint Fittings: Total= 60 Fittings Room 2 ( 60 figs) 2. Pipe Insulation: Total = 800 Linear Feet Room 2 (800 If) Note: Y, of the pipe insulation is 8" and Y2 of the insulation is 4" 3. Window Glazing: Total= 13 Window Units Room2 (3 units), Room 101 (10 units) 4. Window Caulk: Total = 6 Window Openings (5 window openings), (1 vent) 5. Pipe Gasket (Stored): Total= 5 Gaskets Room 2 ( 5 gaskets) 6. Hot Water Tank Insulation: Total= 150 Square Feet Room 2 (!50 sf) 7. Door Caulk: Total= 4 Doors Room I 01 (I door), (3 doors) 8. Incinerator Transite Roof: Total= 50 Square Feet (50 sf) 9. Chimney Clean out Caulk: Total= 15 Linear Feet (15 If) 10. Breeching Caulk (): Total= 30 Linear Feet (30 If) University of Missouri- St. Louis 8224 Natural Bridge Road; St. Louis, MO Normandie Complex- Boiler House Project No

23 11. Breeching Insulation (): Total= 50 Square Feet (50 sf) 12. Roof Flashing Caulk: Total= 400 Linear Feet ( 400 lf) 13. Roof Flashing Tar: Total = 400 Square Feet ( 400 sf) 4. Conclusion and Recommendations United recommends that all asbestos-containing material (ACM), which may be disturbed by demolition activities be properly removed and disposed of prior to any demolition taking place. They must be properly removed by a Missouri licensed asbestos abatement contractor, in accordance with all applicable Federal, State, and Local regulations, prior to work taking place. Should any other suspect asbestos-containing materials be discovered during the demolition activities, work must cease until the material(s) have been properly sampled and determined if they contain asbestos. This must be done before any further activities may resume. If any materials are determined to be asbestos-containing, they must be properly removed and disposed of in accordance with all applicable Federal, State, and Local regulations. 5. Assumptions and Limitations The results, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in the report are based only on conditions that were noted during the inspection. The report is designed to aid the building owner, architect, construction manager, general contractors, and potential asbestos abatement contractors in locating ACM. Under!!Q circumstances is the report to be utilized as a bidding document or as a project specification document since it does not have all the components required to serve as an Asbestos Project Design document or an Abatement Work plan. Our professional services have been performed, our findings obtained, and our conclusions and recommendations prepared in accordance with customary principles and practices in the fields of environmental science and engineering. This statement is in lieu of other statements either expressed or implied. This report does not warrant against future operations or conditions, nor does it warrant against operations or conditions present of a type or at a location not investigated. This report is intended for the sole use of University of Missouri - St. Louis. The scope of services performed in execution of this evaluation may not be appropriate to satisfy the needs of other users, and use or re-use of this document or the findings, conclusions, or recommendations is at the risk of said user. University of Missouri- St. Louis 8224 Natural Bridge Road; St. Louis, MO Normandie Complex- Boiler House Project No

24 Thank you for the opportunity to provide environmental services to the University of Missouri - St. Louis. Please contact John Benson or Melissa Dmmelly at (314) if you have any questions regarding this report. Sincerely, UNITED INFRASTRUCTURE CORPORATION John A. Benson Senior Project Manager Missouri Accredited Asbestos Inspector # MOIR456 Katie Lyons Project Manager Missouri Accredited Asbestos Inspector # !2MOIRJ4606 l!.tr:l, ffvj -~MZ Project Manager Missouri Accredited Asbestos Inspector # MOIR6600 University of Missouri- St. Louis 8224 Natural Bridge Road; St. Louis, MO Normandie Complex- Boiler House Project No

25 SECTION II ASBESTOS BUILDING INSPECTION SURVEY FORMS & LAB ORA TORY RESULTS University of Missouri- St. Louis 8224 Natural Bridge Road; St. Louis, MO Normandie Complex- Boiler House Project No

26 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

27 ' ' ' '' ' ' ' '. ' ' '. ' ' ' ' United Infrastructure Corporation Environmental Consultants 8129 Delmar Blvd., Suite 204 St. Louis, MO Tel: (314) Fax: (314) Site Survey Form DIWBE CERTIFIED Project Name: Normandie Complex Client: UMSL Project No.: Date: Building: Page: 3/30/2012 Boiler House 1 of 1 Homogenous Area# 1 ' Material Description Mudded Fittings.' Location '.' Room2 Approx. Quantity 60 ftgs ACM yes/no YES 2.. Pipe Insulation RdorD 2 * 800 If YES 3 WindoW Gt'azing I 4 ' Window Caulk ' 5 Pipe Gasket(Stored) ', '' '... '.. Room 2 (3 Units)... Room 101 (10 Unils) ',.. Ro6m2 ' ' 13 Window Units 5 Openings + 1 Vent 5 Each YES YES YES 6 Chiller Insulation Room ' ' ' ' ' Hot.WaterTank.lnsillation.. '. ' '' '' Ro6m.2,'''' 8 9 I. ' ' Room101 (1 Door). Door Caulk ''..,(3. Doors) '' Breeching Caulk (Interior) Room 101 I 70 sf 150 sf 4 Doors 10 If N YES YES N 10 Boiler Gasket Room If N 11 Boiler Rope Gasket Room If N 12 Incinerator Fire Brick 200 sf N 13 ' Incinerator Trarlsite ~o6f.. ' ' J:Xlerior 50 sf' YES ' 16 '' 17 -' ' ' _'_ ~.. EXferior ' Chimney Cieanout caulk.,, ' ' Breeching Caulk () ~ '' Breaching Insulation ' Exieri6r,. Expansion Joint Caulk. 15 If 30 If 50 sf 30 If YES YES YES N 18 Breeching Flue Insulation Room 101 I 200 sf N 19 Built-Up Roofing 2000 sf N I '' ' Roof Flashing Caulk. '''' Roof Flashing Tar ' 400 If 400 sf YES YES 1/2 is 8" Pipe and 1/2 is 4" Pipe Notes: 1. Room 2 Quantities include Room 102 (No Floor Separating Floors) 2. Assume Interior Boiler Insulation Refractory I Gasket (Not Accessible) (2 Boilers in Room 2 and 3 Boilers in Room 1 01)

28 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

29 United lnfrrstructure Corporation Environmental Consultants 8129 Delmar Blvd., Suite 204 Sl Louis, MO Tel: (314) Fax: (314) Stop at 1st Positive Asbestos Bulk Sampling Form Project Number: Client: Address: UMSL 1 University Blvd. Taken By: Facility: Address: J. Benson I K. Lyons I L. Burke Date: 03/30/12 Normandie Complex Boiler House City/State: Contact: Results Needed By: St. Louis, MO Mr. Tom Royster 5 Day TAT City/State: Phone Number: Page: St. Louis,MO N/A 1 of 3 Sample Sample Sample No. Description Location 1-01 Mudded Fittings Room Mudded Fittings Room Mudded Fittings Room Pipe Insulation Room Pipe Insulation Room Pipe Insulation Room Window Glazing Room Window Glazing Room Window Glazing Room Window Caulk 4-02 Window Caulk 4-03 Window Caulk 5-01 Pipe Gasket (Stored) Room Pipe Gasket (Stored) Room Pipe Gasket (Stored) Room Chiller Insulation Room Chiller Insulation Room Chiller Insulation Room Hot Water Tank Insulation Room Hot Water Tank Insulation Room 2 Submitted by: Leon Burke Date/Time: 3:35 pm Received by: EMSL- St. Louis Shipped to: EMSL- St. Louis Via: United Date: 03/30/12

30 United Infrastructure Corporation Environmental Consultants 8129 Delmar Blvd., Suite 204 St. Louis, MO Tel: (314) Fax: (314) Asbestos Bulk Sampling Form Stop at 1st Positive Project Number: Taken By: Client: UMSL Facility: Address: 1 University Blvd. Address: City/State: St. Louis, MO City/State: Contact: Mr. Tom Royster Phone Number: Results Needed By: 5 Day TAT Page: J. Benson I K. Lyons/ L. Burke Normandie Complex Boiler House St. Louis, MO N/A 2 of 3 Date: 03/30/12 Sample Sample No. Description 7-03 Hot Water Tank Insulation 8-01 Door Caulk 8-02 Door Caulk 8-03 Door Caulk 9-01 Breaching Caulk (Interior) 9-02 Breaching Caulk (Interior) 9-03 Breaching Caulk (Interior) Boiler Gasket Boiler Gasket Boiler Gasket Boiler Rope Gasket Boiler Rope Gasket Boiler Rope Gasket Incinerator Fire Brick Incinerator Fire Brick Incinerator Fire Brick Incinerator Transite Roof Incinerator Transite Roof Incinerator Transite Roof Chimney Clean-Out Caulk Sample Location Room 2 Room 101 Room 101 Room 101 Room 101 Room 101 Room 101 Room 101 Room 101 Room 101 Submitted by: Leon Burke Dateffime: 3:35 pm Received by: EMSL- St. Louis Shipped to: EMSL - St. Louis Via: United Date:

31 United Infrastructure Corporation Environmental Consultants 8129 Delmar Blvd., Suite 204 St. Louis, MO Tel: (314) Fax: (314) Asbestos Bulk Sampling Form Stop at 1st Positive Project Number: Taken By: Client: UMSL Facility: Address: 1 University Blvd. Address: City/State: St. Louis, MO City/Slate: Contact: Mr. Tom Royster Phone Number: Results Needed By: 5 Day TAT Page: J. Benson I K. Lyons I L. Burke Normandie Complex Boiler House St. Louis, MO N/A 3 of3 Date: 03/30/12 Sample No. Sample Description Sample Location Chimney Clean-Out Caulk Chimney Clean-Out Caulk Breeching Caulk () Breeching Caulk () Breeching Caulk () Breeching Insulation () Breeching Insulation () Breeching Insulation () Expansion Joint Caulk Expansion Joint Caulk Expansion Joint Caulk Breeching Flue Insulation Breech\ng Flue Insulation Breeching Flue Insulation Room 101 Room 101 Room 101 Submitted by: Leon Burke Date/Time: 3:35 pm Received by: EMSL - St. Louis Shipped to: EMSL- St. Louis Via: United Date: 03/30/12

32 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

33 EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL Order: S. Jefferson, CustomeriD: Saint Louis, MO Phone/Fax (314) I (314) CustomerPO: ProjectiD: Attn: John Benson Phone: (314) United Infrastructure Corp. Fax: (314) Delmar Blvd. Received: St. Louis, MO Analysis Date: Collected: 03/ :35PM UNIT55 Project: Normandie Comp. Boiler House Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance 1-01-Wrap lnsulation fA 1-02-Wrap {)002 Various Fibrous Gray Various Fibrous Non-Asbestos Asbestos % Fibrous % Non Fibrous 11 /n Type 59% Fibrous (other) 39% Min. Wool 59% Fibrous (other) 41% Non-fibrous {other) 52% Non-fibrous {other) 41% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 9% Chrysotile None Detected 1-02-lnsulation A Cream 71% Non-fibrous {other) 29% Chrysotlle 1-03-Paint Gray 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 1 03 Wrap aG03A Cream Fibrous 89% Fibrous (other) 11% Non fibrous (other) None Detected 1-03-lnsulation White 71% Non-fibrous (other) 29% Amosite 2-01-Paint Gray 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Analyst(s) Sue Ferrario (87) Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced. except in full, without wrttten approv.:.l by EMSL EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection acli\.ities oc analytical method limitations_ Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, ~proval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government Non-friable organically l>ound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gra~metric reduction prior to analysis_ Samples received in good condition unless otherv11se noted_ Est ma\ed accuracy, precision and uncertainly data available upon request Unless requested by the client, building materials manllfactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum. wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. None Detected"' <1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc Saint Louis, MO NVLAP Lab Code ! lml!al report from 04/11/ Test Reoort PLM Printed: 4! :57:51 PM

34 Attn: EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL Order: 3029 S. Jefferson, Saint Louis, MO CustomerlD: Phone/Fax: (314) I (314) CustomerPO: ProjectiD: John Benson United Infrastructure Corp Delmar Blvd. St. Louis, MO Phone: (314) Fax: (314) Received: 03130/12 3:35PM Analysis Date: 4/11/2012 Collected: UNIT55 Project: Normandie Comp. Boiler House Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description ApPearance 2-01-Wrap A 2-01-lnsulation ()(!048 Cream Fibrous Gray Fibrous Non-Asbestos Asbestos % Fibrous % % Type 89% Fibrous (other) 11% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 2% Cellulose 29% Non-fibrous (other) 69% Chrysotile 2-02 Gray (1()5 Fibrous 2-03-Paint Wrap A Gray Cream Fibrous 2% Cellulose 89% Fibrous (other) 29% Non+fibrous (other) 69% Chrysotile 100% Non+fibrous (other) None Detected 11% Non+fibrous (other) None Detected 2-03-lnsulation Gray Fibrous 41% Non+fibrous (other) 59% Chrysotile 3-01 Gray Non Fibrous 3 02+Paint Brown Non Fibrous 4% Fibrous (other) 96% Non+fibrous (other) None Detected 100% Non+fibrous (other) None Detected Analyst(s) Sue Ferran o (87) Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be repro:luced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection acti,.;ties or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP. NIST or any agency of the federal government Non-friable orgarically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gra,.;metric reduction prior to analysis_ Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request Unless requested by lhe c11en~ building matenats manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. None Detected" <1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Saint LOUIS. MO NVLAP Lab Code [ lnltlalreportfrom04/11/ Test Reoort PLM Printed: 4/11/2012 4:57:51 PM 2

35 ' EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL Order: CustomeriD: 3029 S. Jefferson, Saint Louis, MO Phone/Fax {314) I (314) CustomerPO: ProjectiD: Attn: John Benson Phone: (314) United Infrastructure Corp. Fax: (314) Delmar Blvd. Received: St. Louis, MO Analysis Date: 4/11/2012 Collected: 03/30/12 3:35PM UNIT55 Project: Normandie Comp. Boiler House Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-B2-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance 3-02-Caulk BA 3-03-Paint Gray Brown % Non-Asbestos Asbestos Fibrous % %Type 96% Non-fibrous {other) 4% Chrysotile 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 3-03-Caulk A 4-01-Paint Caulk fOA 4-02-Paint {) Caulk fa 4-03-Paint Gray Brown Gray Non--Fibrous Various White Various 96% Non-fibrous (other) 4% Chrysotile 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 91% Non-fibrous (other) 9% Chrysotile 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Analyst(s) Sue Ferrario (87) Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be repro::luced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for samf)e collect10n acti\ities or analylical method limitations Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client This report must not be used by the client to claim product certificahon, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NlST or any agency of the federal government Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem malri:< and therefore EMSL recommends gra~metric reduction prior to analysis. Samples recei\oed in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.} are reported as a single sample. None Detected"' <1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc Saint Louis, MO NV LAP Lab Code / lntltal report from 04/11/ Test Reoort PLM Printed: 4/11/2012 4:57:51 PM 3

36 EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL Order: S. Jefferson, Saint Louis, MO CustomeriD: UNIT55 Phone/Fax (314) I (314) CustomerPO: saintlouislab@emsl.com Projec!ID: Attn: John Benson Phone: (314) United Infrastructure Corp. Fax: (314) Delmar Blvd. Received: 03130/12 3:35PM St. Louis, MO Analysis Date: 4/11/2012 Collected: Project: Normandie Comp. Boiler House Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance 4-03-Caulk Q012A 4-03-Caulk Gray White 5-01 Gray Gray Gray Non-Asbestos Asbestos % Abrous % % Type 91% Non-fibrous (other) 9% Chrysotile 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 51% Non-fibrous (other) 49% Chrysotile 51% Non-fibrous (other) 49% Chrysotile 51% Non-fibrous (other) 49% Chrysotlle 6-01-Wrap Various 39% Cellulose 61% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 6-01-lnsulation A Yell ON Fibrous 96% Min. Wool 4% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 6-02-Wrap Various 39% Cellulose 61% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Analyst(s) Sue Ferrario (87) Jeff Siria, Laboratory fv'lanager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis_ This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, elotept in full, without written approl'81 by EMSL EMSL bears no responsibility for sampe collection acb\aties or analytical method limitations_ Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to cla1m product certification. approval. or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gra~metrtc reduction prior to analysis Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainly data available upon request Unless requested by the clien~ building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard. etc_) are reported as a single sample. None Detected= <:I% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical. Inc. Saint Louis, MO NVLAP Lab Code [ lntttal report from 04! :57:51 Test Reoort PLM Printed: 4/11/2012 4:57:51 PM 4

37 EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL Order: S. Jefferson, CustomeriD: Saint Louis, MO Phone/Fax (314) I (314) CustomerPO: ProjecUD: Attn: John Benson Phone: (314) United Infrastructure Corp. Fax: (314) Received: 8129 Delmar Blvd. Analysis Date: 4/11/2012 St. Louis, MO Collected: 03/30/12 3:35 PM UNIT55 Project: Normandle Camp. Boiler House Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R and/or EPA 600/M4-B2-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance 6-02-lnsulation ()0flA Yella.v Fibrous % 96% Non-Asbestos Asbestos Fibrous % % Type Min. Wool 4% Non-fibrous {other) None Detected 6-03-Wrap Various 39% Cellulose 61% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 6-03-lnsuiation ()018A Yeii<>N Fibrous 96% Min. Wool 4% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 7-01-Paint ()019 Silver 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 7-01-Wrap A Cream Fibrous 89% Fibrous (other) 11% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected lnsulation Gray Fit:rous 11% Non-fibrous (other) 89% Chrysotile 7-02-Paint Silver 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 7-02-Wrap A Cream Fibrous 89% Fibrous (other) 11% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Analyst(s) Sue Ferrario (87) Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced. except1n full. without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection act1~ties or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibl1ity of the client This report must not be used by the Client to claim product certification. approval. or endorsement by NV LAP. NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gra\\metric reduction prior to analysis. Samples receivad in good condition unless otherwise noted Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unlass requested by the client, building matenals mar~ufactured with multiple layers (1.e linoleum. wallboard. etc.) are reported as a single sample. None Detected~ <1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical. Inc. Saint louis. MO NVLAP Lab Code I lntt1al report from 04/11/ Test Reoort PLM Printed: 4/11/2012 4:57:51 PM 5

38 Attn: EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL Order: 3029 S. Jefferson, Saint Louis, MO CustomerlD: Phone/Fax: (314) I (314) CustomerPO: ProjectiD: John Benson United Infrastructure Corp Delmar Blvd. St. Louis, MO Phone: (314) Fax: (314) Received: 03130/12 3:35PM Analysis Date: 4/11/2012 Collected: UNIT55 Project: Normandie Comp. Boiler House Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance 7-02-lnsulation Gray Fibrous Non-Asbestos % Abrous % Asbestos % Type 11% Non-fibrous (other) 89% Chrysotile 7-03-Wrap ()021 Various Fibrous 59% Fibrous (other) 41% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 7-03-lnsulation A Gray Fibrous 11% Non-fibrous (other) 89% Chrysotile 8-01-Paint Rose 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 8-01-Caulk A Gray 91% Non-fibrous (other) 9% Chrysotile 8-02 Gray % Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 8-03-Paint Caulk A Tan White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Analysl(s) Sue Ferrario (87) Jeff Sitia, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL ma1ntains liability limited to cost of analysis_ This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection acti~ties or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification. approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matri;:: and therefore EMSL recommends gra~metric reduction prior to analysis_ Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the ellen~ building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum. wallboard, etc ) are reported as a smgle sample. None Detected:: <1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical. Inc. Saint Louis. MO NVLAP lab Code [ lnlttal report from 04/11/ :57:51 Test Report PLM Printed: 4/11/2012 4:57:51 PM 6

39 EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL Order: S. Jefferson, Saint Lours, MO CustomeriD: UNIT55 Phone/Fax (314) I (314) CustomerPO: saintlouislab@emsl.com ProjectiD: Attn: John Benson Phone: (314) United Infrastructure Corp. Fax: (314) Delmar Blvd. Received: 03130/12 3:35 PM St. Louis, MO Analysis Date: 4/11/2012 Collected: Project: Norman die Camp. Boiler House Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance 9-01 Gray Gray Gray Non-Asbestos Asbestos % Fibrous % %Type 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 100 /o Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Cream Fibrous Homogeneous Cream Fibrous Homogeneous Cream Fibrous Homogeneous White Fibrous Homogeneous White Fibrous Homogeneous 100% Min. Wool 100% Min. Wool 100% Min. Wool 100% Glass 100% Glass 0% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 0% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 0% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 0% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 0% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Analyst(s) Sue Ferrario (87) Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. Til is report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproouced, except in full. without wntten approval by EMSL EMSL bears no responsibility for sampe collection activities or analytical method h'mitations. tnterpretalion and use Of test results are the responsibility of the cl1ent This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gra\imetric reduction prior to analysis Samples receiwd in good condition unless otherwise noted Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request Unless requested by the clien~ building materials manufactured with multiple layers {i.e. linoleum. wallboard. etc ) are reported as a single sample None Detected"' <1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical. Inc. Saint Louis. MO NVLAP Lab Code lntttal report from 04111/ :57:51 Test Reoort PLM Printed: 4/11/2012 4:57:51 PM 7

40 EMSL Order: EMSL Analytical, Inc. CustomeriD: UNIT S. Jefferson, Saint Louis, MO Phone/Fax (314) I {314) CustomerPO: saintlouislab@emsl.com ProjectiD: Attn: John Benson Phone: {314) United Infrastructure Corp. Fax: {314) Delmar Blvd. Received: 03/30/12 3:35PM St. Louis, MO Analysis Date: 4/11/2012 Collected: Project: Norman die Camp. Boiler House Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance White Fibrous Homogeneous Gray Gray Gray Various Gray Gray ' Cau!k ' Gray Non-Asbestos Asbestos % Fibrous % %Type 100% Glass 0% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 100% Non-fibrous {other) None Detected 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 81% Non-fibrous (other) 19% Chrysotile Inseparable coaling layer included in analysis 81% Non-fibrous (other) 19%:~ Chrysotile 81% Non-fibrous {other) 19% Chrysotile 91% Non-fibrous (other) 9% Chrysotile Analyst(s) Sue Ferrario (87) Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL mainta1ns liability limited to cost of analysis This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approv.ji by EMSL_ EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection acti\ities or analytical method limitations lnterpretatiorl and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approv.ll, or endorsemer~t by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal govemmenl Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends grmametric redi.!ction prior to analysis Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted_ Es~maled accuracy, precision ami uncertainty data av.jilable upon request Unless requested by lhe clienl building materials manufactured with multiple layers (I.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample None Detected= <1% Samples analyzed by EMSL AnalytiCal. Inc Saint Louis, MO NVLAP Lab Code ! lmt1al report from 04/11/ Test Reoort PLM Printed: 4/11/2012 4:57:51 PM 8

41 EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL Order: S. Jefferson, CustomerlD: UNIT55 Saint Louis, MO Phone/Fax: (314) I (314) CustomerPO: saintiquislab@emsl.com ProjectiD: Attn: John Benson Phone: (314) United Infrastructure Corp. Fax: (314) Received: 03130/12 3;35 PM 8129 Delmar Blvd. Analysis Date: 4/11/2012 St. Louis, MO Collected: Project: Normandie Comp. Boiler House Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance Rust A Caulk Brown Gray Non-Asbestos Asbestos % Fibrous % %Type 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 91% Non-fibrous (other) 9% Chrysotile Rust A Brown 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Tan % Non-fibrous (other) 19% Quartz None Detected Mortar Black 61% Non-fibrous (other) 39% Quartz None Detected lnsulation A White Fibrous Homogeneous 100% Glass 0% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Mortar Gray 61% Non-fibrous (other) 39% Quartz None Detected Fiashing Gray 61% Non-fibrous (other) 39% Chrysotile Analyst(s) Sue Ferrario (8 7) Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liat>ility limited to cost of analysis_ Ths report relates on!y to the samples reported and may not be reprcduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection ac!i~t1es or analytical method limitations Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client This report must not be used by the client to cia 1m product certification, approval. or endorsement by NVLAP. NIST or any agency of the federal government Non-friable organically bound materials prese11t a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gra~metric reduction prior to a11a1ysis. Samples recei...ed in good cond1tion unless otherw1se noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by \he clienl building materials manufactured with mult1ple layers (i e. linoleum, wallboard. etc.) are reported as a si11gle sample None Detected= <1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Saint Louis, MO NVLAP Lab Code ! lntttal report from 04/11/ Test Report PLM Printed: 4/11/2012 4:57:51 PM 9

42 EMSL Analytical, Inc S. Jefferson, Saint Louis, MO Phone/Fax: (314) I (314) saintlouislab@emsl.com EMSL Order: CustomerlD: CustomerPO: ProjectlD: UNIT55 Attn: John Benson United Infrastructure Corp Delmar Blvd. St. Louis, MO Phone: (314) Fax: (314) Received: 03/30/12 3:35PM Analysis Date: 4/11/2012 Collected: Project: Normandie Comp. Boiler House Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-B2-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance lnsulation B A Flashing () Mortar ()045A White Fibrous Homogeneous Gray Gray Gray ()046 Non-Asbestos Asbestos % Fibrous % % Type 100% Glass 0% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 61% Non-fibrous (other) 39% Chrysotile 61% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 39% Quartz 61% Non-fibrous (other) 39% Chrysotile Fiashing () Mortar A Fiashing Mortar A Gray Black Non-Fitrous Gray Gray 61% Non-fibrous (other) 39% Chrysotile 61% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 39% Quartz 61% Non-fibrous (other) 39%l Chrysotile 61% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 39% Quartz Analyst(s) Sue Ferrario (87) Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis_ This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced. except in lull. without written approval hy EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sampe collection acu\-1\ies or analytical method limitations_ lnlerpretauon and use of test results are the responsibility of the client This report must not be used by the client to daim product certification. approval, or endorsement by NV LAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government Non-friable orgalically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gra,;metric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. EsUmated accuracy, precision and uncertainly data available upon request Unless requested by the dienl building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e_ linoleum. wallboard. etc.} are reported as a single sample. None Detected= <1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc Saint Louis, MD NVLAP Lab Code / Initial report from 04/11/ Test Reoort PLM Printed: 4/11/2012 4:57:51 PM 10

43 3029 EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL Order: CustomeriD: s. Jefferson, Saint Lours, MO Phone/Fax: (314) f (314} CustomerPO: saintlouislab@~m:il QQ[J) Attn: John Benson Phone: (314) United Infrastructure Corp. Fax: (314) Delmar Blvd. Received: St. Louis, MO Analysis Date: Collected: '03/ :35PM ProjectiD: UNIT55 Project Normandie Comp. Boiler House Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance lnsulation White Fibrous Homogeneous Various {) Various Various Tan {) Tan Tan Non-Asbestos % Fibrous % 100% Glass 0% Non-fibrous (other) 100% Non-fibrous (other) Inseparable coaling layer included in analysis 100% Non-fibrous (other) Inseparable coating layer included in analysis. 100% Non-fibrous (other) Inseparable coating layer included in analysis. 71% Non-fibrous (other) 29% Mica 71% Non-fibrous (other) 29% Mica 71% Non-fibrous (other) 29% Mica Asbestos %Type None Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected Analyst(s) Sue Ferrario (87) Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liabllity limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, exj;ept in full. without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no respmsibitity for sample collection actilities or analytic at method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the clienllo claim product certification, approval. or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gralimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples recei>ed in good condition unless otherwise noted Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request Unless requested by the Clienl building materials manufactured with multiple layers {i.e. linoleum. wallboard. etc.) are reported as a single sample. None Detected= <1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc Saint Louis, MD NVLAP Lab Code / lmt1al report from 04111/ Test Report PLM Printed: 4/11/2012 4:57:51 PM THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT. 11

44 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

45 United Infrastructure Corporation Environmental Consultants 8129 Delmar Blvd., Suite 204 St. Louis, MO Tel: (314) Fax: (314) Stop at 1st Positive Asbestos Bulk Sampling Form Project Number: Client: Address: City/State: Contact: Results Needed By: UMSL 1 University Blvd. St. Louis, MO Mr. Tom Royster 3 Day TAT Taken By: Facility: Address: City/State: Phone Number: Page: J. Benson Normand\e Complex Boiler House St. Lou\s, MO N/A 1 of 1 Date: 04/02112 Sample Sample Sample No. Description Location Built Up Roofing Boiler House Roof Built-Up Roofing Boiler House Roof Built-Up Roofing Boiler House Roof Roof Flashing Caulk Boiler House Roof Roof Flashing Caulk Boiler House Roof Roof Flashing Caulk Boiler House Roof Roof Flashing Tar Boiler House Roof Roof Flashing Tar Boiler House Roof Roof Flashing Tar Boiler House Roof Submitted by: Leon Burke Date/Time: 04/02/12@ 12:35 pm Received by: EMSL St. Louis Shipped to: EMSL- St. Louis Via: United Date: 04/02/12

46 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

47 3029 Attn: EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL Order: S. Jefferson, Saint Louis, MO CustomeriD: Phone/Fax: (314) I (314) CustomerPO: John Benson United Infrastructure Corp Delmar Blvd. St. Louis, MO saintlouislab@emsl.com Phone: (314) Fax: (314) Received: Analysis Date: 4/9/2012 Collected: 04/02/1212:40 PM ProjectlD: UNIT55 Project: Boiler House Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance 1-01-Tar Felt A 1-02-Tar Felt ZA Tar Black Black Fibrous Black Brown Black Non-Asbestos Asbestos % Fibrous % %Type 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 29% Glass 71% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 29% Cellulose 71% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Felt JA Black 29% Glass 71% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Various J Various {)005 96% Non-fibrous (other) 4% Chrysotile Inseparable coating layer included in analysis 96% Non-fibrous (other) 4% Chrysotile Inseparable coating layer included in analysis Analyst(s) Sue Ferrario (13) Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. ThiS report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in lull, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility lor sample collection actl,.;ties or analytical method limitations. lnterprelation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report musl not be used by the client to cia 1m product certiffcalion, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal govemment Non-friable orgarically bound malerials present a problem malrix and therefore EMSL recommends gra,.;metlic reduction prior to analysis Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the clienl building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e linoleum, wallboard. etc.) are reported as a single sample. None Delected" <1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical. Inc. Saint louis, MO NVLAP Lab Code / ln1t1al report from 04/09/ Test Reoort PLM Printed: 4/9/2012 1:10:17 PM

48 3029 EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL Order: S. Jefferson, CustomeriD: Saint Louis, MO Phone/Fax: (314) f (314) CustomerPO: saintlouislab@emsl.coru ProjectiD: Attn: John Benson Phone: (314) United Infrastructure Corp. Fax: (314) Delmar Blvd. Received: 04/02/12 12:40 PM St. Louis, MO Analysis Date: 419/2012 Collected: UNIT55 Project: Boiler House Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance Various Fiashing Various Non--Fibrous Non-Asbestos Asbestos % Abrous % %Type 96% Non-fibrous (other) 4% Chrysotlle Inseparable coating layer included in analysis. 81% Non-fibrous (other) 19% Chrysotile Felt A Brown Fibrous 59% Cellulose 41% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Various Various % Non-fibrous (other) 19 1 lfo Chrysotile 81% Non-fibrous (other) 19% Chrysotile Analyst(s) Sue Ferrario (13) Jeff Siria, laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability ltmited to cost of analysis This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, e>a;ept in full, without wlitten approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sampe collection acti.,.;ties or analytical method limitations. lnterpretatton and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the cltenl to claim product certiftcalion, approval. or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal go>.emmenl Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matlixand therefore EMSL recommends gral.1metric reduction plior to analysis. Samples recei>.ed in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertatnty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample_ None Detected"' <1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical. Inc. Saint Louts, MO NV LAP Lab Code / lntttal report from 04/09/ Test Reoort PLM Printed: 4/9/2012 1:10:17 PM THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT. 2

49 SECTION III LIMITED LEAD-BASED PAINT INSPECTION RESULTS University of Missouri- St. Louis 8224 Natural Bridge Road; St. Louis, MO Normandie Complex- Boiler House Project No

50 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

51 Lead-Based Paint- Section III: Inspection Results 1. Introduction United Infrastructure Corporation (United) is pleased to present this report summarizing the results of the limited lead-based paint survey perfonned at the Normandie Complex - Boiler House; St. Louis, MO for the University of Missouri- St. Louis. United was contracted by the University of Missouri - St. Louis to perform this inspection. The Normandie Complex - Boiler House was inspected to determine the location of components containing lead-based paint for the purpose of demolition. The inspectors conducting the inspection are accredited and licensed by the State of Missouri. 2. Scope of Survey On March 30, 2012 John Benson and Katie Lyons of United conducted a limited lead-based paint inspection of the Normandie Complex- Boiler House; St. Louis, MO. Accessible painted components that may be disturbed by the demolition activities were tested. Components were tested utilizing the RMD XRF Lead Paint Analyzer LPA-1 (Serial# 1684, Missouri Registration# IRM-122). The XRF LBP survey form is enclosed. Any readings of 1.0 or greater are considered to be lead-based paint. Your XRF survey form is described the following way: Column 1: Column 2: Column 3: Column 4: Column 5: Column 6: Column 7: Column 8: the room number referenced by the drawing the direction: North, South, East or West the description of the surface the substrate of the surface: W = wood, M = metal, D = drywall, P = plaster, C = concrete, B = Brick, T = Transite, S = stone, CT = ceramic tile, CB = concrete block, CER =ceramic, FG = fiberglass, and V =vinyl. the condition of the surface: P =poor, F =fair, and G =good. the XRF Reading. Any reading 1.0 or greater is considered to be lead-based paint. whether or not the reading was P = positive for the presence of lead-based paint, or I = inconclusive. If the column is left blank, the reading was negative. the surveyor's notes. These notes may address visual observations of existing conditions and conditions which may impact Lead-Based Paint hazards. University of Missouri- St. Louis 8224 Natural Bridge Road; St. Louis, MO Normandie Complex- Boiler House Project No

52 3. Summary of Work The following areas were found to contain lead-based paint (LBP): LOCATION AREAS 1. Door Jamb to 1" Floor 2. Door Jamb and Door Casing to Basement 3. Back Door and Back Door Frame 4. Room2 Stair Tread and Yellow Boiler Drain Pipe 5. Room2 Door to Room Room 101 Back Door 7. Room 101 Window Frame 8. Room 101 Railing Please refer to the attached XRF Results sheets for exact locations of Lead-Based Paint. Note: The foundation walls were not painted 4. Conclusion and Recommendations The components which contain lead-based paint are not required to be removed prior to any demolition taking place. The demolition contractor should be made aware of the presence of lead-based paint so that they can take appropriate precautions as per OSHA regulations. If the University decides to remove the lead-based paint prior to demolition, the work should be conducted by a Missouri licensed lead abatement contractor, in accordance with all applicable Federal, State, and Local regulations. 5. Assumptions and Limitations The results, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in the report are based only on conditions that were noted during the inspection. The report is designed to aid the building owner, architect, construction manager, general contractors, and contractors in locating lead-based paint. Under!!Q circumstances is the report to be utilized as a bidding document or as a project specification document since it does not have all the components required to serve as a Lead Abatement Project Design document or an Abatement Work plan. Our professional services have been performed, our findings obtained, and our conclusions and recommendations prepared in accordance with customary principles and practices in the fields of environmental science and engineering. This statement is in lieu of other statements either expressed or implied. This report does not warrant against future operations or conditions, nor does it warrant against operations or conditions present of a type or at a location not investigated. University of Missouri- St. Louis 8224 Natural Bridge Road; St. Louis, MO Normandie Complex- Boiler House Project No

53 This report is intended fo1 the sole use of University of Missouri - St. Louis. The scope of services perfonned in execution of this evaluation may not be appropriate to satisfy the needs of other users, and use or re-use of this document or the findings, conclusions, or recommendations is at the risk of said user. Thank you for the opportunity to provide environmental services to the University of Missouri - St. Louis. Please contact John Benson or Melissa Donnelly at (314) if you have any questions regarding this report. Sincerely, UNITED INFRASTRUCTURE CORPORATION John A. Benson Senior Project Manager Missouri Lead Risk Assessor License# Katie Lyons Project Manager Missouri Lead Risk Assessor License# I University of Missouri- St. Louis 8224 Natural Bridge Road; St. Louis, MO Normandie Complex- Boiler House Project No

54 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

55 SECTION IV XRFRESULTS University of Missouri- St. Louis 8224 Natural Bridge Road; St. Louis, MO Normandie Complex- Boiler House Project No

56 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

57 I Room UNIT II Dir II Normandie Boiler House Surface Calibration Calibration Calibration Door to 1st Floor Door Jamb to 1st Floor Door Casing to 1st Floor Front= North II Substrate llconditionll Reading II P/1 Notes II I w p -0.1 Foundation Not Painted w p 1.2 p w p Door Lintel to 1st Floor Door to Basement Door Jamb to Basement Door Casing to Basement M F 0.4 w p 0.5 w p 1.4 p w p 1.0 p 11 Door Lintel to Basement M F Window Sash M F Gas Piping M p Decorative Wall Frame M F Chimney Clean-Out M p Window Sash Basement Door Basement Door Casing M F 0.0 w p 0.5 w p Basement Stair Railing M p Back Door M p 2.3 p 21 Back Door Frame M F 1.1 p 22 Back Door Lintel M F Window Frame M F Compressor Unit M F L Room 1 - Electric Panel M G 0.0 1

58 -- Surface UNIT I Room II Dir II n Normandie Boiler House II Substrate II Condition II Reading II P/1 II Notes I Room 2 N Wall C F -0.1 Room 2 S Wall C F 0.0 Room 2 Door to W F -0.1 Room 2 Door Jamb to W F -0.1 Room 2 Door Casing to W F 0.4 Room 2 Electric Panel M G -0.2 Room 2 Boiler M P -0.3 Room 2 Boiler Control M F -0.1 Room 2 Support Column C F -0.1 Room 2 Drain Piping M F -0.1 Room 2 Stair Stringer M F -0.4 Room 2 Stair Railing M F -0.5 Room 2 Stair Tread M F 1.7 P Room 2 Boiler Drain Pipe M F 2.8 P Yellow Pipe Room 2 Landing to 1st Floor C F -0.3 Room 2 Door to Room 103 W F 1.0 P Room 103 E Wall B F -0.4 Room 103 W Wall B F -0.2 Room 103 Door to W F 0.3 Room 101 Support Post M P -0.2 Room 101 Back Door M F 1.8 P Room 101 Electric Panel M F -0.2 Room 101 Floor C P -0.1 Room 101 Boiler M P 0.1 Room 101 Boiler Pad C P 0.1 2

59 1 Room I Room 101 II UNIT Normandie Boiler House Dir II Surface II Window Sash Substrate llconditionll Reading II P/1 II Notes I M F Room 101 Window Frame M F 2.0 p 3 Room 101 Railing M F 2.3 p 4 5 Room Pump Valve Calibration M F Calibration Calibration

60 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

61 SECTIONV FLOOR PLANS University of Missouri- St. Louis 8224 Natural Bridge Road; St. Louis, MO Normandie Complex- Boiler House Project No

62 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

63 1 D 2 D Basement t::j 7.'0 ~ w 0 FEET 25 NORTH ~ University of Missouri - Building No.Me IW Boiler RooM - St. Louis SS060 Lo.st \.Jalkthrough Verifico.tlon Du te Po.ge 1 of 2 118' : 1'0'

64 1 01 n II 102 II u l\j ~ First Floor ~ I 0 FEET 25 NORTH ~ ' University of Missouri - St. Louis Buitcling No.Me I'w' Boiler House - SS060. Lo.st \-/o.lkthrough Verification Du te Po.ge 2 of 2 ~ ~ 1/8' = 1' 0'

65 SECTION VI CERTIFICATES University of Missouri- St. Louis 8224 Natural Bridge Road; St. Louis, MO Normandie Complex- Boiler House Project No

66 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

67 Expiration Date Training Date: 11/3/ /26/2011 Certificate Number: Missouri State Certificate for Asbestos Related Occupations issued by Department of Natural Resources P.O. Box 176 Jefferson City, MO Phone (573) John A. Benson has successfully completed the requirements for certification as a INSPECTOR. This Missouri State Certification is subject to review and the director may deny, suspend or revoke the certification per RSMo chapter /4/2011 Date ~a x~ml Director of Air Pollution Control Program lrn1jj,.. ~.

68 Expiration Date Training Date: 4/2/2013 3/16/2012 Certificate Number: MOIR14606 Missouri State Certificate for Asbestos Related Occupations issued by Department of Natural Resources P.O. Box 176 Jefferson City, MO Phone(573)751-4B17 Katie Lyons has successfully completed the requirements for certification as a INSPECTOR. This Missouri State Certification is subject to review and the director may deny, suspend or revoke the certification per RSMo chapter /3/2012 Date

69 Expiration Date Training Date: Certificate Number: MOIR6600 Missouri State Certificate for Asbestos Related Occupations issued by Department of Natural Resources P.O. Box 176 Jefferson City, MO Phone (573) Leon Burke Ill has successfully completed the requirements for certification as a INSPECTOR. This Missouri State Certification is subject to review and the director may deny, suspend or revoke the certification per RSMo chapter /24/2012 Date Director of Air Pollution Control Program

70 STATE IIM/SSIIII DIPIITMIKT II HEALTH lid llbbcll i: i'; (_;,, I. L-' 1- ' '-!-.: Issuance Date: Ex_pif,a!iqn_Date: Lic~rise(Number:.. _,..-- _:~-.";,. +,.,,, -::. c:s -~: -~ ::?:'?"- 6/16/2010 -~./ - -n,~ 6/16/2012 h ooo616izoo17233s -~.: '.?; ;,~ ~~: ~:.,.,...,J.' ' Margaret T: Donnelly Director Department of Health and Senior Services Lead Licensing Program, PO Box 570, Jefferson City, MO 65102

71 ietjement This is to certify that John A. Benson United Infrastructure on the 3rd day of June 1999 successfully completed the factory training for RMD's LPA-1 Lead Paint Inspection System including, but not limited to, the topics of Radiation Safety and the Proper Use of the Instrument. I~.D~ ~. ----~- Jacob H. Paster, Vice President, RMD, Inc. Hunt St., Watertown, Massachusetts

72

73 D!WBE CERTIFIED Environmental Consulting Services Asbestos and Limited Lead-Based Paint Inspection Report For: University of Missouri- St. Louis St. Louis, Missouri Normandie Complex Laundry Facility Prepared For: Mr. Tom Royster University of Missouri - St. Louis One University Boulevard St. Louis, Missouri Prepared By: United Infrastructure Corporation Environmental Consultants 8129 Delmar Blvd., Suite #204 St. Louis, Missouri United Project# March 28, 2012

74 Table of Contents ASBESTOS Section 1: Inspection Results I. Introduction 2. Scope of Survey 3. Summary of Work 4. Conclusions and Recommendations 5. Assumptions and Limitations Section II: Building Inspection Survey Forms & Laboratory Results LEAD-BASED PAINT Section III: Inspection Results I. Introduction 2. Scope of Survey 3. Summary of Work 4. Conclusions and Recommendations 5. Assumptions and Limitations Section IV: XRF Results GENERAL Section V: Floor Plans Section VI: Certificates University of Missouri- St. Louis 8224 Natural Bridge Road; St. Louis, MO Normandic Complex- Laundry Facility Project No

75 SECTION I ASBESTOS INSPECTION RESULTS University of Missouri- St. Louis 8224 Natural Bridge Road; St. Louis, MO Normandie Complex- Laundry Facility Project No

76 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

77 Asbestos- Section 1: Inspection Results 1. Introduction United Infrastructure Corporation (United) is pleased to present this report summarizing the results of the asbestos survey performed at the Nonnandie Complex - Laundry Facility; St. Louis, MO for the University of Missouri - St. Louis. United was contracted by the University of Missouri - St. Louis to perform this inspection. The Nom1andie Complex - Laundry Facility was inspected to detetmine the location of asbestos-containing materials for the purpose of demolition. The inspectors conducting the inspection are accredited and licensed by the State of Missouri. 2. Scope of Survey John Benson and Ian St. John of United conducted an asbestos inspection of the Normandie Complex- Laundry Facility; St. Louis, MO in February of2012. Due to the impending building demolition, all suspect materials were addressed by the inspection. The suspected asbestoscontaining materials (ACM) were identified and sampled to determine the asbestos content. 3. Summary of Work Based on a visual inspection, the following materials were identified as suspect ACM: I. Roof Shingles 2. Door Caulk 3. Window Caulk 4. Window Glazing 5. Expansion Joint Caulk 6. Vermiculite Insulation 7. Pipe Insulation 8. Mudded Joint Fittings 9. Floor Tile I Mastic- 9" x 9" Green I 0. Drywall I Joint Compound 11. Vapor Barrier University of Missouri- St. Louis 8224 Natural Bridge Road; St. Louis, MO Normandie Complex- Laundry Facility Project No

78 All suspect materials were sampled according to EPA protocol and analyzed by an accredited laboratory. The following materials were found to be asbestos containing: 1. Door Caulk: Total= 2 Doors (2 doors) 2. Window Caulk: Total = 11 Windows (9 windows), Room 102 (2 windows) 3. Window Glazing: Total= 10 Windows (8 windows), Room 102 (2 windows) 4. Expansion Joint Caulk: Total= 25 Linear Feet (25 If) 5. Pipe Insulation: Total= 100 Linear Feet Room 101 (100 If) 6. Mudded Joint Fittings: Total= 75 Fittings Room 101 (75 figs) 7. Floor Tile I Mastic- 9" x 9" Green: Total= 725 Square Feet Room I 02 (700 sf), Room I 03 (25 sf) 4. Conclusion and Recommendations United recommends that all asbestos-containing material (ACM), which may be disturbed by demolition activities be properly removed and disposed of prior to any demolition taking place. They must be properly removed by a Missouri licensed asbestos abatement contractor, in accordance with all applicable Federal, State, and Local regulations, prior to work taking place. Should any other suspect asbestos-containing materials be discovered during the demolition activities, work must cease until the material(s) have been properly sampled and determined if they contain asbestos. This must be done before any further activities may resume. If any materials are determined to be asbestos-containing, they must be properly removed and disposed of in accordance with all applicable Federal, State, and Local regulations. 5. Assumptions and Limitations The results, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in the report are based only on conditions that were noted during the inspection. University of Missouri- St. Louis 8224 Natural Bridge Road; St. Louis, MO Normandie Complex- Laundry Facility Project No

79 The report is designed to aid the building owner, architect, construction manager, general contractors, and potential asbestos abatement contractors in locating ACM. Under!!!!. circumstances is the report to be ntilized as a bidding document or as a project specification document since it does not have all the components required to serve as an Asbestos Project Design document or an Abatement Work plan. Our professional services have been performed, our findings obtained, and our conclusions and recommendations prepared in accordance with customary principles and practices in the fields of environmental science and engineering. This statement is in lieu of other statements either expressed or implied. This report does not warrant against future operations or conditions, nor does it WatTant against operations or conditions present of a type or at a location not investigated. This report is intended for the sole use of University of Missouri - St. Louis. The scope of services performed in execution of this evaluation may not be appropriate to satisfy the needs of other users, and use or re-use of this document or the findings, conclusions, or recommendations is at the risk of said user. Thank you for the opportunity to provide environmental services to the University of Missouri - St. Louis. Please contact John Benson or Melissa Donnelly at (314) if you have any questions regarding this report. Sincerely, UNITED INFRASTRUCTURE CORPORATION John A. Benson Senior Project Manager Missouri Accredited Asbestos Inspector # MOIR456 ralluoh Project Man ger Missouri Accredited Asbestos Inspector # MOIR6626 University of Missouri- St. Louis 8224 Natural Bridge Road; St. Louis, MO Normandie Complex- Laundry Facility Project No

80 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

81 SECTION II ASBESTOS BUILDING INSPECTION SURVEY FORMS & LABORATORY RESULTS University of Missouri- St. Louis 8224 Natural Bridge Road; St. Louis, MO Normandie Complex- Laundry Facility Project No

82 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

83 United Infrastructure Corporation Environmental Consultants 8129 Delmar Blvd., Suite 204 St. Louis, MO Tel: (314) Fax: (314) Site Survey Form DIWBE CERTIFIED Project Name: Normadie Complex Client: UMSL Project No.: Date: Building: Page: 2/2/2012 Laundry 1 of 1 Homogenous Area# Material Description Location Approx. Quantity ACM yes/no 1 Roof Shingles Roof 200 sf N 2 Door Caulk 2 Doors YES 3 Window Caulk (9), Room 102 (2) 11 (10+Attic) YES 4 Window Glazing (8), Room 102 (2) 10 YES 5 Expansion Joint Caulk 2511 YES 6 Vermiculite Insulation Room sf+ Debris N 7 Pipe Insulation Room If YES 8 Mudded Joint Fittings Room fittings YES 9 Floor Tile I Mastic- 9"X9" Green Room 102 (700 sq, Room 103 (25 sq 725 sf YES 10 Drywall/ Joint Compound Room 102 (700 sq, Room 1 03 (25 sq 725 sf N 11 Vapor Barrier Inside Wall Between sf N Note: Flashing Caulk at Chimney- Not Accessible

84 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

85 United Infrastructure Corporation Environmental Consultants 8129 Delmar Blvd., Suite 204 St. Louis, MO Tel: (314) Fax: (314) Stop at 1st Positive Asbestos Bulk Sampling Form Project Number: Taken By: Client: UMSL Facility: Address: 1 University Blvd. Address: City/State: St. Louis, MO City/State: Contact: Mr. Tom Royster Phone Number: Results Needed By: 5 Day TAT Page: J. Benson /I. St. John Normandie Complex Laundry Facility St. Louis, MO N/A 1 of 2 Date: 02/02/12 Sample No. Sample Description Sample Location 1-01 Roof Shingle 1-02 Roof Shingle 1-03 Roof Shingle 2-01 Door Caulk 2-02 Door Caulk 2-03 Door Caulk 3-01 Window Caulk 3-02 Window Caulk 3-03 Window Caulk 4-01 Window Glazing 4-02 Window Glazing 4-03 Window Glazing 5-01 Expansion Joint Caulk 5-02 Expansion Joint Caulk 5-03 Expansion Joint Caulk 7-01 Pipe Insulation 7-02 Pipe Insulation 7-03 Pipe Insulation 8-01 Mudded Joint Fittings 8-02 Mudded Joint Fittings Room 101 Room 101 Room 101 Room 101 Room 101 Submitted by: lan St. John Date/Time 2:15 pm Received by: EMSL - St. Louis Shipped to: EMSL - St. Louis Via: United Date: 02/03/12

86 United Infrastructure Corporation Environmental Consultants 8129 Delmar Blvd., Suite 204 St. Louis, MO Tel: (314) Fax: (314) Asbestos Bulk Sampling Form Stop at 1st Positive Project Number: Taken By: J. Benson I I. St. John Date: 02/02/12 Client: UMSL Facility: Normandie Complex Address: 1 University Blvd. Address: Laundry Facility City/State: St. Louis, MO City/State: St. Louis, MO Contact: Mr. Tom Royster Phone Number: N/A Results Needed By: 5 Day TAT Page: 2 of2 Sample No. Sample Description Sample Location 8-03 Mudded Joint Fittings Room Floor Tile I Mastic- 9" x 9" Green Room Floor Tile I Mastic- 9" x 9" Green Room Floor Tile I Mastic- 9" x 9" Green Room Drywall/ Joint Compound Room Drywall/ Joint Compound Room Drywall/ Joint Compound Room Vapor Barrier Room Vapor Barrier Room Vapor Barrier Room 101 Submitted by: lan St. John Date/Time: 2:15 pm Received by: EMSL- St. Louis Shipped to EMSL - St. Louis Via: United Date: 02/03/12

87 EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL Order: $.Jefferson, Saint Louis, MO CustomeriD: UNIT55 Phone/Fax: (314) I (314) CustomerPO: com Projec!ID: Attn: John Benson Phone: (314) United Infrastructure Corp. Fax: (314) Delmar Blvd. Received: St. Louis, MO Analysis Date: 2/13/2012 Collected: 02/03/12 2:15PM Project: Normandie Complex Laundry Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance Various Non-Asbestos % Fibrous % 23% Glass 75% Non-fibrous (other) 2% Quartz Asbestos % Type None Detected Various 23% Glass 75% Non-fibrous (other) 2% Quartz None Detected Various 23% Glass 75% Non-fibrous (other) 2% Quartz None Detected Gray 96% Non-fibrous (other) 4% Chrysotile Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) Gray 96% Non-fibrous (other) 4% Chrysotlle Analyst(s) Sue Ferrario (20) Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintams liability I 1m ited to cost of analysis_ This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, w1\hout wrillen approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection acli~ties or analytical method limitations_ Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NV LAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government Noll-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gra~metnc reduction pnor to analysis_ Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted Esbmated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc Saint Louis, MO NVLAP Lab Code J lntttal report from 02/13/ :51:33 Test Reoort PLM Printed: 2/13/ :51 :33 PM

88 EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL Order: S. Jefferson, Saint Louis, MO CustomeriD: UNIT 55 PhonefFax: (314) I (314) CustomerPO: ProjectiD: Attn: John Benson Phone: (314) United Infrastructure Corp. Fax: (314) Delmar Blvd. Received: St. Louis, MO Analysis Date: 2/ Collected: 02/03/12 2:15 PM Project Normandie Complex Laundry Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance Non-Asbestos % Fibrous % Asbestos % Type Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) Gray 96% Non-fibrous (other) 4% Chrysotile N!011 Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) Q012 Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) Q0/3 Gray 91% Non-fibrous (other) 9% Chrysotile Q014 Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) Analyst{s) Sue Ferrario (20) c.. U~J"~_IA/ (/IV rrv-~~~ Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis_ This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced. except 1n full, w1thout written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical metllod limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client This report must not be used by the client to cia 1m product cert1fication. approval. or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-triable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc Saint Louis. MO NVLAP Lab Code J lntttal report from 02/13/ :51:33 Test Reoort PLM Printed: 2/13/201212:51:33 PM 2

89 saio!loui EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL Order: S. Jefferson, Saint Louis, MO CustomeriD: Phone/Fax: (314) f (314) CustomerPO: ProjectiD: Attn: John Benson Phone: (314) United Infrastructure Corp. Fax: (314) Delmar Blvd. Received: St. Louis, MO Analysis Date: Collected: 02/ :15 PM UNIT55 Project: Normandie Complex Laundry Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous Non-Asbestos % Asbestos % Type Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) Tan Fibrous 83% Cellulose 9% Synthetic 4% Hair 2% Non-fibrous (other) 2% Chrysotile Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) Various 6% Fibrous {other) 20% Non-fibrous {other) 74% Chrysotile <1% Amosite Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) Analyst{s) Sue Ferrario (20) Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL matntains liability ltm1ted to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears no responsibthly for sample collectton activi!tes or analyttcal method ltmitations_ Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client This report must not be used by the client to claim product certtfication, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetnc reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc Saint Louis, MO NVLAP Lab Code [ lntbal report from 02/13/ Test Reoort PLM Printed: 2/13/ :51 :33 PM 3

90 EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL Order: S. Jefferson, Saint Louis, MO CustomeriD: UNIT 55 Phone/Fax: (314) I (314) CustomerPO: ProjecttD: Attn: John Benson Phone: (314) United Infrastructure Corp. Fax: (314) Delmar Blvd. Received: St. Louis, MO Analysis Date: 2/ Collected: 02/03/12 2:15PM Project: Normandie Complex Laundry Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance Non-Asbestos % Fibrous % Asbestos % Type 9-01-Fioor Tile Green 91% Non-fibrous (other) 9% Chrysotile 9-01-Adhesive A Black 81% Non-fibrous (other) 19% Chrysotile 9-02-Fioor Tile Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) 9-02-Adhesive A Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) 9-03-Fioor Tile Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) 9-03-Adhesive A Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) Joint Compound White 96% Non-fibrous (other) 4% Mica None Detected Analyst(s) Sue Ferrario (20) Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL mau1tains liability limited to cost of analysis_ This report relates only to the samples reported arid may not be reproduced, except in full, without wntlen approval by EMSL EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection aclivilles or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client This report must not be used by the client to claim product certif1cation. approval, or endorsement by NV LAP. NIST or any agency of the federal gowmment. Non-friable oryan1cally bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gra,.,metnc reduction pnor to analysis. Samples receiwd in good condition unless otherwise noted. Es~mated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical. Inc. Saint Louis, MO NVL.AP Lab Code J lnltlalreportfrom02/13/ :51:33 Test Reoort PLM Printed: 2/13/ :51:33 PM 4

91 EMSL Order: EMSL Analytical, Inc S. Jefferson, Saint Louis, MO CustomeriD: UNIT55 Phone/Fax: (314) I (314) CustomerPO: sainllouislab@emsl.com ProjectiD: Attn: John Benson Phone: (314) United Infrastructure Corp. Fax: (314) Delmar Blvd. Received: 02/03/12 2:15PM St. Louis, MO Analysis Date: 2/13/2012 Collected: Project: Normandie Complex Laundry Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance Drywall Various A Joint Cream Compound ()026 NQn-Asbestos % Fibrous % 9% Cellulose 74% Non-fibrous (other) 17% Min. Wool 96% Non-fibrous (other) 4% Mica Asbestos %Type None Detected None Detected ry.vall Various A 9% Cellulose 17% Glass 74% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Joint Compound Cream 96% Non-fibrous (other) 4% Mica None Detected Drywall Various A 9% Cellulose 17% Glass 74% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Brown % Cellulose 4% Synthetic 61% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Brown % Cellulose 4% Synthetic 61% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Analyst(s) Sue Ferrario (20) Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without wrillen approval by EMSL EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activit1es or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem malnx and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetnc reduction prior to analysis_ Samples rece1ved 1n good condition unless o\hel\'lise noted Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data ava1lable upon request Samples analyled by EMSL Analytical, Inc_ Sair.t Louis, MO NVLAP Lab Code J ln1ttal report from 02/13/ Test Reoort PLM Printed: 2/13/ :51 :33 PM 5

92 EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL Order: S. Jefferson, Saint Louis, MO CustomeriD: UNIT55 Phone/Fax {314) /(314) CustomerPO:!<QtD ProjectiD: Attn: John Benson Phone: (314) United Infrastructure Corp. Fax: (314) Delmar Blvd. Received: 02/03/12 2:15PM St. Louis, MO Analysis Date: Collected: Project Normandie Complex Laundry Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance Brown % Fibrous 35% Cellulose 4% Synthetic Non-Asbestos Asbestos % % Type 61% Non-fibrous {other) None Detected Analyst(s) Sue Ferrario (20) Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations_ Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP. NIST or any agency of the federal government Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetnc reduction prior to analysis Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc Saint Louis, MO NVtAP tab Code j ln1t1al report from 02/13/ Test Reoort PLM Printed: 2/13/ :51:33 PM THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT. 6

93 United Infrastructure Corporation Environmental Consultants 8129 Delmar Blvd., Suite 204 St. Louis, MO Tel: (314) Fax: (314) Stop at 1st Positive Asbestos Bulk Sampling Form Project Number: Taken By: J. Benson /I. St. John Date: 02/02/12 Client: UMSL Facility: Normandie Complex Address: 1 University Blvd. Address: Laundry Facility City/State: St. Louis, MO City/State: St. Louis, MO Contact: Results Needed By: Mr. Tom Royster 1 Day TAT Phone Number: Page: N/A 1 of 1 Sample Sample Sample No. Description Location 6-01 Vermiculite Room Vermiculite Room Vermiculite Room 101 Note: Analyze by Modified Chatfield Method Submitted by: tan St. John Date/Time: 02/03/12@ 2:15pm Received by: EMSL -St. Louis Shipped to: EMSL- St. Louis Via: United Date: 02/03112

94 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

95 Fax: EIViSL Analyticid, Inc. :;020 S. Jdfcrson, Saint Louis, MO 63'118 (314) 77U-3J13 Emaii:.$JJflJlQJ.,1.l!i!il.Pi~msJJ;om Attn: John Benson Customer ID: United Infrastructure Corp. Customer PO: UNIT Delmar Blvd. Received: 02/03/12 2:15 PM St. Louis, MO EMSL Order: Fax: (314) Phone: (314) Project: Normandie Complex Laundry EMSL Proj: Analysis Date: 2/13/2012 Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via Transmission Electron Microscopy. Chatfield Method (rev 2) APPRO X. MATRIX SAMPLE ID COLOR MATERIAL NON-ASBESTOS FIBERS RANGE ASBESTOS TYPE AVG 6-01 Various 100.0% Various 100.0% <1% <1% Tremolite <1% Tremolite <1% 6-03 Various 100.0% NO NO llnitia!reportfrom 02/13/ :08:12 Analyst(s) Donald Schmidt (3) Jeff Siria, laboratory Manager or other approved signatory The above report relates only to the items tested. This repor1 may not be reproduced, except in full, without written appmval by EMSL Analytical, Inc. The test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted Samples receiwd in good cond1t1on unless otherwise noted. Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Sa1nt Louis, MO TEMChatver Printed: 2/13/2012 2:08:12 PM THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT.

96 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

97 SECTION III LIMITED LEAD-BASED PAINT INSPECTION RESULTS University of Missouri- St. Louis 8224 Natural Bridge Road; St. Louis, MO Normandie Complex- Laundry Facility Project No

98 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

99 Lead-Based Paint - Section III: Inspection Results 1. Introduction United Infrastructure Corporation (United) is pleased to present this report summarizing the results of the limited lead-based paint survey performed at the Normandie Complex- Laundry Facility; St. Louis, MO for the University of Missouri- St. Louis. United was contracted by the University of Missouri - St. Louis to perform this inspection. The Normandie Complex - Laundry Facility was inspected to determine the location of components containing lead-based paint for the purpose of demolition. The inspectors conducting the inspection are accredited and licensed by the State of Missouri. 2. Scope of Survey John Benson and Ian St. John of United conducted a limited lead-based paint inspection of the Normandie Complex- Laundry Facility; St. Louis, MO in February of2012. Accessible painted components that may be disturbed by the demolition activities were tested. Components were tested utilizing the RMD XRF Lead Paint Analyzer LPA-1 (Serial# 1684, Missouri Registration# IRM-122). The XRF LBP survey form is enclosed. Any readings of 1.0 or greater are considered to be lead-based paint. Your XRF survey form is described the following way: Column 1: Column 2: Column 3: Column 4: Column 5: Column 6: Column 7: Column 8: the room number referenced by the drawing the direction: North, South, East or West the description of the surface the substrate of the surface: W = wood, M = metal, D = drywall, P = plaster, C = concrete, B = Brick, T = Transite, S = stone, CT = ceramic tile, CB = concrete block, CER = ceramic, FG = fiberglass, and V =vinyl. the condition of the surface: P = poor, F = fair, and G = good. the XRF Reading. Any reading I.0 or greater is considered to be lead-based paint. whether or not the reading was P = positive for the presence of lead-based paint, or I = inconclusive. If the column is left blank, the reading was negative. the surveyor's notes. These notes may address visual observations of existing conditions and conditions which may impact Lead-Based Paint hazards. University of Missouri- St. Louis 8224 Natural Bridge Road; St. Louis, MO Normandie Complex- Laundry Facility Project No

100 3. Summary of Work The following areas were found to contain lead-based paint (LBP): LOCATION I Room Room 102 AREAS All Wood Window Components Front Door, Door Jamb, Door Lintel, Door Casing Front Door Overhang Ceiling All Wood Storm Window Sashes Fascia and Gutterboard Side Door, Door Jamb, Door Casing Ceiling and Front Door (To ) All Wood Window Sashes Please refer to the attached XRF Results sheets for exact locations of Lead-Based Paint. Note: The foundation walls were not painted 4. Conclusion and Recommendations The components which contain lead-based paint are not required to be removed prior to any demolition taking place. The demolition contractor should be made aware of the presence of lead-based paint so that they can take appropriate precautions as per OSHA regulations. If the University decides to remove the lead-based paint prior to demolition, the work should be conducted by a Missouri licensed lead abatement contractor, in accordance with all applicable Federal, State, and Local regulations. 5. Assumptions and Limitations The results, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in the report are based only on conditions that were noted during the inspection. The report is designed to aid the building owner, architect, construction manager, general contractors, and contractors in locating lead-based paint. Under!!Q circumstances is the report to be utilized as a bidding document or as a project specification document since it does not have all the components required to serve as a Lead Abatement Project Design document or an Abatement Work plan. Our professional services have been performed, our findings obtained, and our conclusions and recommendations prepared in accordance with customary principles and practices in the fields of environmental science and engineering. This statement is in lieu of other statements either University of Missouri- St. Louis 8224 Natural Bridge Road; St. Louis, MO Nom1andie Complex- Laundry Facility Project No

101 expressed or implied. This report does not wan ant against future operations or conditions, nor does it wan ant against operations or conditions present of a type or at a location not investigated. This report is intended for the sole use of University of Missouri - St. Louis. The scope of services performed in execution of this evaluation may not be appropriate to satisfy the needs of other users, and use or re-use of this document or the findings, conclusions, or recommendations is at the risk of said user. Thank you for the opportunity to provide environmental services to the University of Missouri - St. Louis. Please contact John Benson or Melissa Dotmelly at (314) if you have any questions regarding this report. Sincerely, UNITED INFRASTRUCTURE CORPORATION Project Manage Missouri Lead Risk Assessor License # University of Missouri- St. Louis 8224 Natural Bridge Road; St. Louis, MO Nonnandie Complex- Laundry Facility Project No

102 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

103 SECTION IV XRFRESULTS University of Missouri- St. Louis 8224 Natural Bridge Road; St. Louis, MO Normandie Complex- Laundry Facility Project No

104 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

105 I Room II Room 101 Room 101 Room 101 Room 101 Room 101 Room 101 Room 102 UMSL - Normandie Complex - Laundry Front= North Dir II Surface II Substrate II Condition II Reading II P/1 II Notes I UNIT Calibration Calibration Calibration Window Sash Window Casing Front Door Front Door Jamb Front Door Lintel Front Door Casing Front Door Overhang -Ceiling Fascia Storm Window Sash Gutter Side Door Side Door Jamb Side Door Casing Side Door Overhang Frame Side Door Overhang Ceiling w w w w w w w w w M G 0.0 w w w w Wall Cer. Block s Wall Cer. Block Ceiling Door to (Front) Door Jamb to Room 102 Door Casing to Room 102 M p 0.3 N Wall B G 0.2 w w w w w p 3.7 p Brick Siding p >9.9 p Foundation Not Painted p >9.9 p p >9.9 p p >9.9 p p >9.9 p p >9.9 p p >9.9 p p 4.9 p p 1.0 p p 1.0 p p 1.3 p p 0.3 G -0.3 G -0.2 F 7.8 p p >9.9 p F -0.2 F 0.3 1

106 I Room II Room 102 Room 102 Room 102 Room 102 Room 102 Room 102 Room 103 Room UNIT UMSL - Normandie Complex- Laundry Dir II Surface II Substrate s Wall CB Wndow Sash Wndow Casing Door Casing to Room 1 03 Ceiling Door to w w w w Wall CB E Wall CB ---- Calibration Calibration Calibration D w II Condition II Reading II P/1 II Notes I G -0.2 I p 1.2 p p -0.1 F 00 F -0.1 F 0.6! G 00 G I 2

107 SECTIONV FLOOR PLANS University of Missouri- St. Louis 8224 Natural Bridge Road; St. Louis, MO Normandie Complex- Laundry Facility Project No

108 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

109 L) 1 01 I I ~/ t::j [\J,.p::.. ()l 0 FEET First 25 Floor NORTH ~ University of Missouri - Building No.Me I'w' Lo.unclry - SS061 St. Louis Lo.st 'w'o.lkthrough Verifico.tion Dote Poge I of I 1/8' = 1'0'

110 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

111 SECTION VI CERTIFICATES University of Missouri- St. Louis 8224 Natural Bridge Road; St. Louis, MO Normandie Complex- Laundry Facility Project No

112 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

113 Expiration Date Training Date: 11/3/ /26/2011 Certificate Number: MOIR456 Missouri State Certificate for Asbestos Related Occupations issued by Department of Natural Resources P.O. Box 176 Jefferson City, MO Phone (573) John A. Benson has successfully completed the requirements for certification as a INSPECTOR. This Missouri State Certification is subject to review and the director may deny, suspend or revoke the certification per RSMo chapter /4/2011 ~~x~m Date Director of Air Pollution Control Program ~

114 Expiration Date 12/15/2012 Certificate Number: MOIR6626 Training Date: 12/15/2011 Missouri State Certificate for Asbestos Related Occupations issued by Department of Natural Resources P.O. Box 176 Jefferson City, MO Phone (573) lan M. St. John has successfully completed the requirements for certification as a INSPECTOR. This Missouri State Certification is subject to review and the director may deny, suspend or revoke the certification per RSMo chapter /19/2012 Date Director of Air Pollution Control Program

115 lead Abate ent Cdntri~lir ll~;pnse ----M-----'- - - ~ ;.. ;,_~: --><~,.~~-~:;.q~_~4~~ ;,~~'t(~i)~~~~- -}~:f-j:0:j _..-> '',';_' ::, ; ~~tfi~;.:;~'. \.... < ; ;.,., ~ ~:.;~l.it~l!'ltt;. The person, firm or corporation \Vhos~.l1~me.apB~<lrs on this'c~rt1fita(e('i~)'li<::ensed as a Lead Abatement Contractorasseifotihinth~Missouri R~\ii '~~l\st~tfites l.338and 19 CSR 30-''lO.lSO; sj~rig~ llhtsuspendecion~}~~q~~ ;.and ; is hereby authorized toerigageil11ead.~9eljiirig s]ibstance actiyi(rg$.&:if':~~r; ". 1. Issued ;:,' cy,;, c~~iwl, \. '-''" l'<p"' ' ''fcii:;:\c" ' :.::.;:;i united INFRASTRUCTURE'. ~qtm2%tl2~... ; DEI_/l\1Al{:;BL\fD;i#~04. sf toms.m:o;63i3o.. ;: - _:.'::-' ~:-:: "''- :. ~.,.-. Issuance Date: Expiration Date: License Number: ''5/1/2010 5/1/ ~ Margaret T. Donnelly Director Department of Health and Senior Services Lead Licensing Program, PO Box 570, Jefferson City, MO 65102

116 STATE IIMISSIIBI DIPABTMIIITIIIULTI A/ /CII i I I ' I lead OCCIIiAtlO~"liellff'(tfaiSTRATION... :~ ~~i;~~~i:~,.~, ;,:!: s,x;..,;:y'~:~";!, ~t ff'.t \ ;. i ' cjtrjitj~jic ;*Z'~\ ' - : -. -, :- _ > -~<~ _,.';"'5":: :'~--~};;-.::;<.._.._ ~-~- ;...._,:..... ;.. >',,_, ;- -,.;.:>:' ;-; -_ ' --\--:,\ :,... - /.;".:, -._::~~~.c~~ ~: -~\ ~~"~;;<;;- ' ; ' t ~,,, <.. Th(pyl]pp;,prw:'orcorporation,~hos~ namj:.appe'ar~ 9n this ce:r,ti.pf~~~. ~~ \41flfi.IJ~d the requiremenrs for l,icenstj]:e as.&et foij;p;jp,the :f\1i~s9,uri R~Y! ed Statutes , as long'as no~ susp(.inde<(or reyokeq, an(i is hereby authorized to enga.ge:~injht)'ac}!y~tyjisted Belq,w.,' 'I..:. : :~~; i;~~.~,~i ~~~~~~~~~~~;;:1~>;i:. c~}~~~~~t~w~~,~~:se 0..,. ' '...;~... ':1~~&ij~!*&!yJ'1. Issuance Date: '6t16/2010 Bxpita.#on Date: 6/16/2012 Lic~nse'Number: Q006i622oo ~,_-.. _ : I I I! ' I i.,,... x;,..c~~.,,l.'''ii c, -,~ ; Margaret T. Donnelly Director Department of Health and Senior Services Lead Licensing Program, PO Box 570, Jefferson City, MO '--~ '"' '-' :~\';,.,

117 rtificilte uf, ietjemcnt This is to certify that John A. Benson United Infrastructure on the 3rd day of June 1999 successfully completed the factory training for RMD's LPA-1 Lead Paint Inspection System including, but not limited to, the topics of Radiation Safety and the Proper Use of the Instrument. I ~.D~ ~ '--~ Jacob H. Paster, Vice President, RMD, Inc. Hunt St., Watertown, Massachusetts

118

119 rtifictcte of-, iajement This is to certify that Ian St. John United Infrastructure Corp. I. on the 30'h day of March 2007 successfully completed the factory training for RMD's LRA-1 Lead Paint Inspection System including, but not limited tote topics of Radiation Safety, DOT Regulations, and the Proper Use of the Instrument. I