Tim Williams. Steve Tatge. Assistant Director, Major Projects Group, Capital Projects Office University of Washington

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Tim Williams. Steve Tatge. Assistant Director, Major Projects Group, Capital Projects Office University of Washington"

Transcription

1 Steve Tatge Assistant Director, Major Projects Group, Capital Projects Office University of Washington Tim Williams Project Manager ZGF Architects LLP

2 Steve Tatge Assistant Director, Major Projects Group, Capital Projects Office University of Washington Tim Williams Project Manager ZGF Architects LLP PRESENTERS

3 University of Washington Molecular Engineering & Sciences Building Seattle, WA

4 Agenda Trending Drivers and Value Propositions Process and Features Delivering on Predicted Outcomes How Features are Impacting the Science

5 Trending Drivers/ Value Propositions Speculative Lab Facility Open/Shared Labs Open/Shared Office Campus/College Sustainable Initiatives Reduced Air Change Rates in Lab Spaces Enhanced Collaboration Opportunities Flexibility/Adaptability Long and Short Term Project Overview

6 Campus Location Trending Drivers

7 Campus Location Trending Drivers

8

9 Open Labs Shared Lab Support Shared Lab Trending Drivers

10 Open Office Faculty Offices Shared Office Trending Drivers

11 Campus and College Initiatives Appetite for Change ACUPCC LEED Silver Mandate Eco-Charrette Trending Drivers

12 Reduced Air Change Rates Trending Drivers

13 Enhanced Collaboration Opportunities Open Stair White Boards Informal Meeting Spaces Open Office Trending Drivers

14 Flexibility/Adaptability - Lab Trending Drivers

15 So, What Did We Do?

16 Disproportionate Energy Use Labs Other bldg types % SF on UW campus % estimated energy use

17 Lab Benchmarking Target Finder / CBECS

18 Total Site Energy Use Intensity BTU/sf-yr for various laboratories in the Labs21 Benchmarking Database Lab Benchmarking Labs21/ISL2

19 PROGRAMMING IS THE FIRST CHANCE TO INFLUENCE OPERATING COSTS Programming

20 Abstract Layout Options

21 Energy Programming Energy Studies in Buildings Laboratory

22 Energy Programming Natural Ventilation

23 Energy Programming Daylight

24 Natural Ventilation Zone Annual Temp and RH Trends

25 ASHRAE Comfort Range for Naturally Conditioned Spaces Adaptive Comfort Range

26 Natural Ventilation Idea Energy: Costs: Reliability: Occupants: Climate: Reduced energy use Reduced operating costs Reduced construction costs Reduced mechanical systems Increased satisfaction and productivity of building occupants Opportunities presented by Pacific NW climate

27 Lab Office Morphologies

28 Building Organization Scheme 1: office on west Scheme 2: office on east Program/Building Organization

29 Integrated Design

30 Design Process Needs Clear Identification of Project Goals Knowledgeable Owner Engage Stakeholders Open/Honest Communication Messy Talk Capital Projects Structural Geo Tech Campus PE Campus PE Contractor Campus PE Capital Projects Waterproofing Contractor Architect Active Participation

31

32 Lab Safety: Office Infiltration Office infiltration: Open window in office, open door to lab, neutral pressure between office and lab Lab exfiltration: 35 MPH wind on lab side with 1 crack on lab wall Partial Tracing

33 Options and Relative Costs

34 Peak load: July 10 th, 10am (Temp = 73F) Solar Gain Load Reduction

35 Façade Development

36 Reducing Solar Gain Total 81.1% reduction vs. 81.7% goal Façade opacity 40.8% red. Glass type 34.1% red. Overhangs 51.6% red. Shading Studies

37 Floor Plan Views and Daylight

38 Floor Plan Views and Daylight

39 Views and Daylight

40 Baseline excludes mass and mechanical assist. With mass Excludes mech. assist. With mass With mechanical assist. Preliminary Macro-Flow Interior Temp. Results

41 Phase Change Material Natural Ventilation

42 Phase Change Material Passive Cooling

43 Evaluating Project Outcomes

44 Which Metrics Tell the Story? Energy Use Data Performance Benchmarks LEED Certification Level Building Performance Analysis Occupant Interviews

45 Campus Energy Dashboard Outcomes

46 Lab Benchmarking Target Finder / CBECS

47 Modeled Performance Metered Performance Total Site Energy Use Intensity BTU/sf-yr for various laboratories in the Labs21 Benchmarking Database Lab Benchmarking Labs21/ISL2

48 EUI kbtu/sf/yr % Reduction 50% Reduction Aggregated Data EXT USAGE DOMEST HOT WTR HT PUMP SUPPLEM REFRIG DISPLAY VENT FANS PUMPS & AUX HEAT REJECT 150 SPACE COOLING SPACE HEATING 100 MISC EQUIP TASK LIGHTS 50 LIGHTS 0 Baseline Modeled Metered equivalent to the energy used annually by 380 homes

49 Ongoing Analysis Active Data Gathering Occupant Interviews Center for the Built Environment Survey

50 Phase Change Material

51 High 79 Low High 88 Low 57 High 88 Low 58 High 88 Low 55 High 87 Low Morning Solar Load PCM Absorbing Heat 75 F Phase Change PCM Releasing Heat pm 12 am 12 pm 12 am 12 pm 12 am 12 pm 12 am 12 pm Ambient Air Wall Cavity with No PCM Wall Cavity with PCM

52 Feedback

53 The Tradeline 3 Changing the Standard Pays Dividends offers Research Environment Benefits Getting it right requires Owner Commitment

54 Steve Tatge Tim Williams Q & A