We make buildings work better.

Transcription

1 Why MacDonald-Miller & How to Leverage Facility ESCO Solutions We make buildings work better.

2 Panel Members Joe Sullivan PE Energy Engineer Department of Enterprise Services John Van Hersett ESCO Project Manager MacDonald-Miller Barry Holldorf Director of Facilities & Operations Highline College Brian Hanson PE ESCO Development Manager MacDonald-Miller

3 Highline s Story B4 innovative project Project challenges Leverage federal funds for Commerce grants More dollars for building improvement Failing Heating Water Distribution System Corroded 10 mains Decouple from plant Solutions

4 What is ESCO process & DES Role? 1986 RCW Legislative Authority to GA (Now DES) Prequalified Providers Project Oversight Contractual Framework & Coordination Financial Transparency

5 ESCO Benefits Collaboration between Owner, DES, and ESCO Ability to fast-track Owner involved with contractor selection Owner involved with equipment selection One responsible entity (ESCO) GUARANTEED: Maximum project cost Energy savings Equipment/System performance

6 Financing Current Operational Before During After Costs Savings New Annual Debt Service Savings Operational Costs Utility & Maintenance Costs Utility & Maintenance Costs Utility & Maintenance Costs

7 Department of Enterprise Services Experience Energy conservation in public facilities since 1986 Over 500 projects totaling $300 million Over $100 million in energy cost saved $30 million in utility rebates brought to the projects Clients include state agencies, colleges and universities, cities and towns, counties, school districts, port districts, libraries, hospitals, health districts: Customers: Highline College Olympic College King County Tumwater School District City of Olympia Port of Bellingham Yakima School District Valley Medical Center City of Tukwila Department of Corrections University of Washington Veterans Administration and dozens more

8 Sequence of an ESCO Project Project initiated by Interagency Agreement Preliminary Audit Design & Construction #1 #3 #5 #2 #4 #6 ESCO Selection Investment Grade Audit Measurement & Verification

9 Project Overview Highline College Building 4 Energy Efficiency Upgrades CONCERNS Outdated lighting, controls & mechanical system 147 EUI = Inefficiency No Air Conditioning Aircraft Noise Interruption Failing heating distribution system T-12 Light fixtures Hydronic Baseboards & Hydronic Multizone System Pneumatic Controls

10 Project Overview OPPORTUNITY FAA Noise Abatement Grant - Port of Seattle In 2011, the College received a FAA Noise Abatement Grant Envelope upgrades was primary focus Not enough funding to address the other Identified challenges Department of Commerce Grants Bundled EE projects on Campus leveraging FAA funds to qualify for DOC grants Leveraged minimal funds available from College

11 NEW HVAC System LED & T-5 Lighting Building Controls GUARANTEED System Performance Project Cost Energy Outcomes Project Process UNIQUE CONTRACTING STRUCTURE HC Building 4 HC / DES Project Management OTHERS Removed from Central Heating Plant Air Conditioning Addition

12 Project Overview BENEFITS Aircraft Noise Reduction Increased Occupant Comfort Removed from Central Plant State of the Art Lighting Control Efficient HVAC & Lighting 147 EUI To 37

13 Measurement & Verification B4 MacDonald-Miller conforms to the International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol (IPMVP) IPMVP Option D. Energy Model Simulation Agreed to by DES and College as the proper M&V option to use Document building conditions for the energy model simulation Envelope Lighting Mechanical system operation Miscellaneous equipment energy usage Existing and proposed hours of operation PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: Deliver the Expected Energy Savings at the Building Meter Year- Over-Year Savings Achieved Post Project M&V: Infrared pictures of Envelope Document wattage of installed lighting Trend lighting panel to confirm schedules Trend HVAC operation to confirm scheduling, Occupied and unoccupied setpoints. Compare trending and equipment efficiencies to savings calculations and compare them to the guaranteed savings.

14 Boilers, Oh My! Performing Site survey for crane pick What's coming out of that vault? Uh oh. Engage DES approval for Engineering investigation Develop cost analysis for repair options Expedited Contracting, Tight construction window

15 What was presented: Options Studied: Pipe Bursting (Trenchless) Cured-In-Place Pipe Lining (Trenchless) Open Cut Excavation and Pipeline Replacement Direct Boring (Trenchless) Satellite Boiler Temporary Boilers (If piping failed prior to a permanent fix) Each Option Included: Overview of the option Advantages Disadvantages Impact of students and staff Timeframe for completion ROM Total Project Cost

16 Construction B4 B29 Discovery DES on Board NTP for IGA Report Delivered NTP for Construction Installation Completed 9/16/17 9/17/17 10/18/17 11/18/17 11/19/17 1/05/18

17 Partnership Provided: Integrated Design and Construction Turn Key Solutions Stretching Dollars Innovative Project Risk Mitigation Time of Delivery & Project Flexibility Interactive Communication Guaranteed Cost Best solution vs. Low Bid Partnership & Trust Transparency Leverage Grants

18 Attractive ESCO Projects 1. Projects with significant Energy/Utility Savings Interior and exterior Lighting (LED) HVAC projects chillers, boilers, pumps, AHUs, distribution systems, commissioning Water conversation projects Building Envelope Upgrade

19 Attractive ESCO Projects 2. Projects with some energy savings and significant project complexities Projects that require scheduling work around client requirements on critical deadlines Projects with numerous unknowns like retro commissioning projects or major HVAC renovations Projects that need contractor flexibility Projects that need guaranteed cost & energy savings to apply for grants

20 Questions? Contact us! Joe Sullivan PE John Van Hersett Barry Holldorf Brian Hanson PE