Authorization Report Insul-Tarp. 1. Applicant 2. Manufacturing Facilities

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Authorization Report Insul-Tarp. 1. Applicant 2. Manufacturing Facilities"

Transcription

1 777 Bay Street, 2 nd Floor 777, rue Bay, 2 etage Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2E5 Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2E5 T: T: F: TC: W: W: Date of Authorization November 29, 2007 BMEC Authorization BMEC Application A Date of Revision May 29, 2008 R 1 Indicated May 29, 2008 Authorization Report 1. Applicant 2. Manufacturing Facilities 2711 North Main Street East Peoria, Illinois, USA, Truck Haven Road East Preoria, Illinois USA, Tel: Fax: Web: 3. Description The by is a combination of thin layers of closed cell foam insulation, an aluminium reflective material and a protective poly coating which forms a tarp-like insulation blanket. s claim that the material is not affected by moisture or humidity such that its thermal insulation properties will not be reduced over time. The vapour permeance of the product is 0 ng/pa.s.m 2. R 1 R 1 The is intended to be installed directly on top of the ground with aconcrete slab-on-ground radiant heating system. The, DRFB 12.7 mm (0.5 ) has a reported RSI value equivalent to RSI 1.76, when tested in accordance with ASTM C Standard Test Method for Steady-State Thermal Performance of Building Assemblies by Means of a Guarded Hot Box. The is available in rolls of 3.66 m (12-0 ) and 1.83 m (6-0 ) in width. Page 1 of 5

2 4. Authorization Requested The applicant sought a Building Materials Evaluation Commission (BMEC) authorization for the use of, under concrete floors supported on ground applications, to improve the thermal performance of radiant heat systems, and as an alternative insulation as required by Division B, Subsections Thermal Insulation, and Vapour Barriers of O.Reg. 350/07 (the Building Code ). 5. Assessment Reports and assessments provided by the applicant show that if the, is designed, performance tested and installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and limitations and the specific terms and conditions stated in this authorization, the level of performance required by the Building Code will be provided. The following is a list of documents submitted, and reviewed, but not limited to: 1. s Manufacturer s Literature. 2. s Installation Instruction. 3. s Material Safety Data Sheet. 4. s Product Specifications. 5. s two Wisconsin Case Studies. 6. s Lab Test 1, Test 2 and Test Manufacturing and Quality Control Manual 3 rd Edition. 8. CAN/ULC-S Standard For Thermal Insulation Polystyrene Boards and Pipe Covering. 9. Test Results - United States Testing Company, Inc. s, ASTM C Standard Test Method for Steady-State Thermal Performance of Building Assemblies by Means of a Guarded Hot Box. 10. Test Results -Maximum Technologies Twin City Testing, ASTM C A Standard Test Method for Steady-State Heat Flux Measurements and Thermal 11. Test Results SGS, ASTM D , Compression Set Report No R, dated November 6, Test Results SGS, ASTM D751-00, Bursting Strength Report No R, dated November 6, Page 2 of 5

3 13. Test Results SGS, ASTM D412-98, Tensile Strength and Elongation Report No R, November 6, Test Results SGS, ASTM E96 Water Vapour Transmission Report No R, November 6, Test Results Architectural Testing, Inc. ASTM C , A Standard Test Method for Steady-State Thermal Transmission Properties By Means of the Heat Flow Meter Apparatus, Report No , dated October 6, ASTM C , A Standard Test Method for Steady-State Thermal 17. ASTM C , A Standard Test Method for Steady-State Thermal 18. ASTM C Standard Test Method of Steady-State Thermal Performance of Building Assemblies by Means of a Guarded Hot Box. 19. s Manufacturer s Literature on Radon and Termite Protection, dated August 20, s Installation Instruction, revised August 20, Supplementary Engineer Letter Report, R values dated August 20, Supplementary Engineer Letter Report, Durability and Degradation, dated August 20, Revised Supplementary Engineer Letter Report, R values dated October 15, s Installation Instruction, revised October 15, Authorization The is authorized for use for under concrete floors supported on ground as an alternative means of thermal insulation and vapour barrier as required by Division B, Thermal Insulation, and Vapour Barriers respectively of the Building Code; all other requirements pertaining to the design, installation and construction are subject to the regulations of the Building Code, and to the following terms and conditions: Note: If a conflict arises between the provisions of this authorization, and the manufacturer s installation instructions, then the most restrictive provision shall apply. A. Specific Terms & Conditions 1. This authorization is valid only for s DRFB 12.7 Page 3 of 5

4 mm (0.5 ). 2. The must be installed in accordance with the manufacturer s installation instructions. 3. The shall only be used in buildings regulated by Part 9 of the Building Code. 4. The shall be installed in one layer application only. 5. The shall be installed only under concrete slabs-on-ground that incorporate radiant heating systems. 6. The, installed under concrete slabs-on-ground, shall be located so that heat from the building is not restricted from reaching the ground beneath the perimeter, where exterior walls are not supported by a footing extending below the frost level. B. General Conditions 1. The use of the s as described in Section 3. and 6. A. Specific Terms and Conditions must comply with the Building Code Act, 1992 as amended or re-enacted from time to time and except as specifically authorized herein, with the Building Code as amended or remade from time to time. 2. A copy of this Authorization shall accompany each application for a building permit and shall be maintained on the site of the construction with the building permit. 3. The Applicant named in Part 1 hereof shall promptly notify the BMEC of (a) (b) the failure of the Applicant, or of the material, system or building design that is the subject matter of this Authorization, to comply with any of the terms and conditions set out in 6. A. above; or the occurrence of any of the events described in Conditions 6. B. 4. (a) and (b) (ii) below. 4. The BMEC may amend or revoke this Authorization where it determines that: (a) any change has been made to: (i) (ii) (iii) the material, system or building design that is the subject matter of this Authorization; the address of the applicant specified in Part 1 of this Authorization; or, the ownership of the applicant specified in Part 1 of this Authorization. (b) the use of the material, system or building design authorized herein; (i) does not comply with the Building Code Act, 1992 or any relevant legislation as they may be amended or re-enacted from time to time; or Page 4 of 5

5 (ii) provides an unsatisfactory level of performance, in situ. (c) (d) the Applicant, or the material, system or building design that is the subject matter of this Authorization, has failed to comply with any of the terms and conditions set out in this Authorization; or any Building Code provision relevant to this Authorization has been amended or remade. 5. Where the BMEC receives additional information concerning the material, system or building design, the BMEC may, after the review, amend or revoke this Authorization as in the opinion of the BMEC may be necessary. Dated at Toronto this 29 day of November BUILDING MATERIALS EVALUATION COMMISSION Edward Link, P. Eng. Chair, Building Materials Evaluation Commission Page 5 of 5