ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, LLC LIMITED ASBESTOS RENOVATION SURVEY REPORT UPDATE FOR

Transcription

1 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, LLC LIMITED ASBESTOS RENOVATION SURVEY REPORT UPDATE FOR HISTORIC BOYNTON BEACH HIGH SCHOOL 125 EAST OCEAN AVENUE BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA Prepared for CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH DEVELOPMENT, BUILDING/ENGINEERING 100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BLVD. BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA ATTENTION: MR. ANDREW P. MACK, P.E., Prepared by EE&G Environmental Services, LLC EE&G) 5751 Miami Lakes Drive Miami Lakes, Florida (305) Original Issue Date: January 13, 2004 EE&G Project No Updated: April 3, 2014 EE&G Project No.:

2 CONTENTS Section Page INTRODUCTION BUILDING DESCRIPTION METHODS AND LIMITATIONS ASBESTOS SURVEY METHODS LABORATORY ANALYSIS METHODS LIMITATIONS SURVEY RESULTS ASBESTOS ANALYSIS RESULTS ADDITIONAL OBSERVATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR REGULATED (FRIABLE) ACM RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CATEGORY I NONFRIABLE ACM RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CATEGORY II NONFRIABLE ACM GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS SIGNATURE PAGE TABLES TABLE 1 Survey Results 2003 & APPENDICES APPENDIX A General Terms: Types of Asbestos-Containing Materials Types of Asbestos-Containing Roofing Materials NESHAP Categories APPENDIX B Laboratory Reports (2003 & 2014) APPENDIX C Figures APPENDIX D Certificates APPENDIX E Photographs (2003 & 2014) i

3 SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION A limited asbestos interior survey was conducted at the Historic Boynton Beach High School Building located at 125 East Ocean Avenue, Boynton Beach, Florida. The interior survey was conducted on December 5 th and the roof areas on December 18, 2003, by AHERA-certified inspector Robert M. Miro of EE&G. Access to the site in 2003 was authorized and provided by the client and CBB. At the request of CBB, EE&G was retained in 2014 to revisit the site to reassess conditions and provide this updated report. The revisit was performed by Bob Miro and Richard Grupenhoff on March 22, The purpose of this limited asbestos survey was to identify the presence, extent, and condition of asbestos-containing materials (ACM) in the interior, exterior and roof areas of the former High School building and offices, that may undergo renovation or demolition to make way for redevelopment of the structure or the entire site itself. All observed suspect materials were either sampled to determine asbestos content or assumed to contain asbestos. Terms used in this report are defined in the General Terms section located in Appendix A. Additional information on the classification of ACM for National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) is also located in Appendix A. These NESHAP categories are helpful in determining the need for asbestos abatement and must be used in the NESHAP notification of intent to renovate or demolish. 1-1

4 SECTION 2.0 BUILDING DESCRIPTION The structure, constructed in 1925, was observed to be constructed primarily of poured concrete or block, with mortar and clay blocks in the older areas; interior walls were typically finished with drywall and plaster system. Floors were typically finished with wood, ceramic tile, carpet, or vinyl floor tile. The ceilings were finished with plaster, drop-in ceiling tiles or unfinished (in the gymnasium). All plumbing components were located within walls, above hard ceilings, or underground. The heating ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) consist of roof mounted units with foil/fiberglass insulation. The surveyed first floor and second floor area was approximately 40,000 square feet. 2-1

5 SECTION 3.0 METHODS AND LIMITATIONS 3.1 ASBESTOS SURVEY METHODS The interior areas and the roof of 125 East Ocean Avenue were inspected for suspect ACM, unless otherwise noted. Each observed suspect material was assigned a homogenous area number, described, and measured. Each observed suspect material was either sampled or assumed to be asbestos-containing. Samples of suspect ACM were collected using procedures established by the United States (US) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 40 Part 763 Subpart E, Asbestos-Containing Materials in Schools. 3.2 LABORATORY ANALYSIS METHODS Samples were sent to American Asbestos Laboratories, Inc. and EMSL in North Miami Beach, Florida for analysis. Upon arrival at the laboratory, the samples were logged-in and stored for analysis. Analyses were performed using the polarized light microscopy (PLM) method of asbestos detection using guidelines and procedures established in the Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (EPA-600/R July, 1993). 3.3 LIMITATIONS This limited asbestos survey report has been prepared by EE&G in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions. No other warranty, expressed or implied is made. The intent of this survey report is to assist Bender & Associates and their Client, The City of Boynton Beach in locating ACM. Under no circumstances is this survey to be utilized as a proposal or a project specification document without the expressed written consent of EE&G. The survey was conducted to identify suspect ACM observed in the interior and roof areas only. If other areas at this location are to be impacted during planned or future renovations, a separate asbestos survey of these areas will be required. Some ACM may not have been discovered due to inaccessibility or incomplete plans. Any suspect materials discovered subsequent to the issue of this survey report should be sampled and analyzed to determine asbestos content and to initiate appropriate responses. Analyses were carried out by PLM. While the most commonly accepted analytical method for detecting asbestos in bulk materials, PLM is known to have limited resolution and may not detect extremely small asbestos fibers. Certain materials, notably vinyl floor tiles, may contain extremely fine asbestos fibers that are beyond the resolution of PLM. EE&G's interpretations and recommendations are based upon the results of sample collection and analyses in compliance with environmental regulations, quality control and assurance standards, and the scope of work as indicated in EE&G s proposal. The results, conclusions, and recommendations contained in this report pertain to conditions observed at the time of the survey. Other conditions elsewhere in the subject building(s) may differ from those in the 3-1

6 inspected/surveyed locations and, such conditions are unknown, may change over time, and have not been considered. This report was prepared solely for the use of EE&G s client City of Boynton Beach (and their eventually direct subcontractors) and is not intended for use by other third party beneficiaries. The client shall indemnify and hold EE&G harmless against any liability for any loss arising out of or relating to reliance by any third party on any work performed there under, or the contents of this report. EE&G will not be held responsible for the interpretation or use by others of data developed pursuant to the compilation of this report, nor for use of segregated portions of this report. 3-2

7 SECTION 4.0 SURVEY RESULTS 4.1 ASBESTOS ANALYSIS RESULTS The results of the PLM analyses and assessment of suspect ACM are summarized in Table 1. The original laboratory report is attached as Appendix B Asbestos-containing materials In 2003, Asbestos was detected or assumed in amounts greater than 1 percent in the following materials sampled: Green 9"x9" Vinyl Floor Tile (VFT) and black mastic. Beige 9"x9" VFT. Green 9"x9" VFT. Black Pebble BUR on the lower roof. Gray shingle BUR on the upper roof. Black sealer on the parapet walls. Black Edge flashing cement on both lower and upper roofs. Skylight sealer. Black roof patch. VTR cement both types found Nonasbestos-containing materials In 2003, Asbestos was not detected or was found in amounts less than or equal to 1 percent in the following materials: White 2-hour rated plaster finish White 1-hour rated plaster finish. White ceiling plaster. White 2'x4' ceiling tiles White 12"x12" ceiling tiles. Black chalk board mastic. Green 12"x12' VFT w/glue. Green chalk boards. Beige 12"x12" VFT with glue. Refer to Table 1 for the location of these materials. 4-1

8 4.2 ADDITIONAL OBSERVATIONS In addition to the results presented in Section 4.1, EE&G observed the following: No fireproofing or thermal system insulation was found during this inspection. Safely accessible Roofing materials and exterior stucco were sampled and included in this report. No suspect pipe insulation was found even in the boiler room. No sink undercoating were found on the old porcelain sinks No window caulk was observed as they were put in with mortar. 4-2

9 : BBHS Limited Asbestos Survey Update April 3, 2014 TABLE 1. UPDATED 2003 SURVEY RESULTS FOR THE HISTORIC BOYNTON BEACH HIGH SCHOOL LOCATED AT 125 EAST OCEAN AVE., BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA Homogeneous Area (HA #) Material Description Sample ID HA Location Approx. Quantity Asbestos Content Friability Condition NESHAP Category Hour rated White Plaster Finish 1 Hour rated White Plaster Finish 03 White Ceiling Plaster 04 White 2'x4' Ceiling Tiles White 12"x12"Ceiling Tiles w/ mastic Green 9"x9" VFT w/ mastic Beige 9"x9" VFT w/ mastic Black Chalkboard mastic Green 12"x12" VFT w/glue 10 Green chalkboard 11 Beige 12"x12" w/glue BM BM BM BM BM BM BM BM BM BM BM 35 1 st Floor corridors, stairwells 1 st Floor hand rail walls, kitchen, stairwell outer wall 1 st Floor North storage Room, Bathrooms NA NAD NA NA NA NA NAD NA NA NA NA NAD NA NA NA Front office NA NAD NA NA NA Kitchen NA NAD NA NA NA 1 st Floor corridors, cafeteria, and kitchen Kitchen (2003) Floor 2 West stage door entry (2014) Abated in 2000 s, none observed in 2014 Abated in 2000 s, but <4SF remains at flr 2 W stage entry 2-5% C in VFT, 2-5% C in mastic 2-5% C in VFT, None in mastic Non friable Non friable Good in 2003, Not Present in , <4 SF is Good 1 st Floor, Classroom 111 NA NAD NA NA NA Kitchen NA NAD NA NA NA 1 st Floor Classroom 104 NA NAD NA NA NA Kitchen NA NAD NA NA NA I I 4-3

10 : BBHS Limited Asbestos Survey Update April 3, 2014 Homogeneous Area (HA #) Material Description Sample ID HA Location Approx. Quantity Asbestos Content Friability Condition NESHAP Category nd Floor 2 Hour rated White Plaster Finish 2 nd Floor 1Hour rated White Plaster Finish Green 9"x9" Vinyl floor tile w/ mastic White Ceiling Plaster Finish 16 Green Chalkboard 17 Black Pebble BUR 18 Gray Shingle BUR 19 Black Parapet Sealer Edge Flashing Cement Black Edge Flashing Cement #2 22 Black Skylight Sealer 23 Black Roof Patch BM BM BM BM BM BM BM BM BM BM BM BM 79 Corridors, inside walls of classrooms, stairwells Corridors, outside walls of classrooms, stairwells 2 nd Floor Corridors NA NAD NA NA NA NA NAD NA NA NA Abated in 2000 s, none observed in % C in tile only Non friable Good in 2003, Not Present in 2014 Stairwells NA NAD NA NA NA 2 nd Floor, Room 209 NA NAD NA NA NA Lower Roof, Flat Roof Surfaces Upper Roof, Pitched Roof Surfaces 10,000 SF 10% C 8,000 SF 7% C Lower Roof 150 LF 10% C Lower Roof Edges 300 LF 10% C Upper Roof Edges 200 LF 20% C Lower Roof 80 LF 5% C Lower Roof Surface 30 SF 3% C Non friable Non friable Non friable Non friable Non friable Non friable Non friable Good in 2014 Good in 2014 Good in 2014 Good in 2014 Good in 2014 Good in 2104 Good in 2014 I I I I I I I I 4-4

11 : BBHS Limited Asbestos Survey Update April 3, 2014 Homogeneous Area (HA #) Material Description Sample ID HA Location Approx. Quantity Asbestos Content Friability Condition NESHAP Category 24 Black VTR Cement 25 Black VTR Cement #2 26 Gray Stucco Coat 15 White/brown Plaster Finish 10 Green chalkboard White 12"x12"Ceiling Tiles w/ mastic Brown wall brick mortar cement 28 White kiln insulation BM BM BM BM BM BM BM BM 10 Lower Roof, East Side Protrusions 8 LF 15% C Lower Roof, West side 6 LF 10% C Non Friable Non Friable Good in 2014 Good in 2014 Exterior Surfaces NA NAD NA NA NA Flr 1 classrooms NA NAD NA NA NA Flr 1 classrooms NA NAD NA NA NA Kitchen debris NA NAD NA NA NA Rm 104 exposed walls NA NAD NA NA NA Kitchen kiln lining NA NAD NA NA NA I I NA = Not Applicable NAD = No Asbestos Detected C = Chrysotile Asbestos SF = Square Feet LF = Linear Feet TBD = To Be Determined * All quantities are approximate. Additional quantities may be present in other areas of the facility. 4-5

12 SECTION 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR REGULATED ACM (RACM) None of the materials sampled in 2003 or 2014 were identified as friable RACM during this limited survey. 5.2 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CATEGORY I NONFRIABLE ACM In 2003, the various colors of 9"x9" VFT and various roofing/flashing components were identified as Category I Nonfriable ACM during this limited survey. As observed in 2014 on revisit, only <4SF of Beige VFT remains on the floor 2 west stage door entry remains, as well as all of the roofing ACMs previously identified. Just as in 2003, in 2014, for renovations, these materials must be removed prior to any activity that would release asbestos fibers from these materials. Specifically, any renovation or demolition activity that will crush, abrade, or dissolve the matrix of these materials must be performed by a Florida-licensed Asbestos Contractor or a Florida licensed roofing contractor properly trained in the handling and disposal of these ACRMs. If these materials can remain intact during renovation or demolition, then no other special handling is required for these materials. If entire or parts of the structure are demolished, then these materials may remain within/on the structure during wet demolition provided they remain nonfriable. However, they must be removed prior to any activities that would release asbestos fibers. Specifically, any demolition activity that will crush, abrade, or dissolve the matrix of these materials must be performed by a Florida-licensed Asbestos Contractor. If they can remain intact during wet demolition, then removal is not required, but the contractor must still follow NESHAP guidelines and OSHA training and protection requirements. A further explanation of some of these requirements are included in the Specific Recommendations Section of this document. 5.3 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CATEGORY II NONFRIABLE ACM In 2003 and 2014, none of the materials sampled were identified as Category II ACMs: 5.4 GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS If other structures at this location are to be impacted during demolition, an asbestos survey of these structures will be required. Suspect materials discovered after this inspection should be sampled and analyzed to determine asbestos content and to initiate appropriate responses. 5-1

13 This report should be updated if demolition of buildings covered in this survey does not take place within six months of the date of this survey, i.e. by October Prior to any widespread renovation or full/partial demolition activities, the property should be inspected for all potentially hazardous materials. The identified materials should be removed from the property, and properly disposed of in accordance with federal, state, and local regulations. Demolition activities shall be conducted in accordance with 40 CFR 61 (NESHAP). It is recommended that contractor personnel receive a copy of EPA guidance on wet methods for asbestos removal and demolition, as well as the EPA guidance document on demolition practices under the asbestos NESHAP. Workers who perform demolition activities must comply with the OSHA construction standard for Occupational Exposure to Asbestos (CFR ), and a NESHAP competent person must be present on the project during demolition to note changes in the condition of ACM impacted during wet demolition. Where ACM is being disturbed, either by wet demolition or removed prior to demolition, OSHA requires that workers be monitored for exposure to airborne fibers so that an exposure assessment may be made to determine the appropriate level of respiratory protection. Only a Project Monitor working under the direction of a Florida-licensed consultant may perform airborne fiber monitoring. For structures undergoing wet demolition with nonfriable ACM present, a licensed asbestos consulting firm should perform daily air monitoring for airborne fibers to document the ambient air quality during demolition. EE&G recommends a walk-through of the property with the owner/owner s representative and the demolition contractor prior to commencement of demolition activities. The demolition contractor should be provided the Pre- Demolition Survey Report, and should inspect the property for unidentified ACM. Any unidentified suspect ACM should be sampled and analyzed prior to the start of demolition activities. The Palm Beach County Department of Health (PBDOH) requires notification of intent to renovate or demolish. Notification must be sent at least 10 working days prior to the start of any construction activities. The general contractor should also keep a copy of this survey at the construction site during the entire construction project as proof of compliance with 40 CFR 61 (NESHAP). 5-2

14 SECTION 6.0 SIGNATURE PAGE Submitted by Robert M. Miro Senior Inspector and Project Professional, EE&G Richard Grupenhoff Senior AHERA Inspector Senior Manager, EE&G Reviewed by Daniel J. Cottrell, Ph.D., P.G. Senior Technical Advisor, EE&G Asbestos Consultant #DD

15 APPENDIX A GENERAL TERMS: TYPES OF ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS TYPES OF ASBESTOS-CONTAINING ROOFING MATERIALS NESHAP CATEGORIES FOR ACM

16 TYPES OF ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM) Asbestos-containing materials, as defined by National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), are materials that have an asbestos content of greater than 1 percent. Friable Material Materials that can be crumbled or reduced to a powder using normal hand pressure are friable. Nonfriable material is too hard to be crumbled or reduced to a powder without the use of tools. Nonfriable materials may become friable if abraded or broken. Suspect Materials There are three broad classes that define suspect, asbestos-containing materials. These are: 1) surfacing material, 2) thermal system insulation, and 3) miscellaneous material. All materials that fit the description of these materials (as described below) are suspected to contain asbestos, until sampled and analyzed. Surfacing Material - Materials applied by spray or trowel are classified as surfacing materials. Asbestos was used in a variety of surfacing materials for fireproofing, acoustic dampening, condensation control, and decorative purposes. Surfacing materials that contain asbestos usually occur as fireproofing on steel-frame members, textured ceilings, or acoustic plaster ceilings. Thermal System Insulation (TSI) Material - Chill water, hot water, and steamgenerating mechanical systems are frequently insulated with materials that contain asbestos. Pipes may be insulated with a nonasbestos-containing material, but have mastic or plastered joints that contain asbestos. Insulation materials that contain asbestos are generally found in boiler rooms and chiller rooms, in pipe chases in walls, in pipe runs above suspended ceilings, or in crawl spaces under buildings. Insulation covered with an undamaged jacket or wrap is classified as nonfriable. Adhesives used to hold insulation in place or provide an airtight seal are also nonfriable materials. Most other types of thermal insulation are friable. Miscellaneous Material - Miscellaneous building materials are materials which are used for finishing of interior spaces, or adhesive materials applied to building materials and roofs. These materials have been manufactured with asbestos for strength enhancement, fire retardation, condensation control, acoustical dampening, or corrosion resistance. The most common type of friable miscellaneous material is ceiling tile. Most other miscellaneous materials are nonfriable materials such as vinyl floor tile, adhesives, and cementitious panels (Transite ).

17 TYPES OF ASBESTOS-CONTAINING ROOFING MATERIALS (ACRM) Field Membrane This area is usually the predominant part of any roof deck and is comprised of all nonflashed areas and is applied directly to the roof substrate over an intermediate insulating layer. It usually consists of alternating layers of rolled-out felts and hot tar, topped with more hot tar to waterseal, and gravel. The asbestos, if found, is in one or more of the layers of tar or may be in the felts themselves. Edge Flashing This component consists of a cold bull/pitch applied to the substrate around the perimeter of a flat roof deck. An additional 8" - 12" of felt is applied to the bull/pitch to seal the edge of the roof substrate before a 4" - 6" piece of metal drip guard is placed over these materials to counterflash and protect against wind and rain. The field membrane felts are then blended in with the inner edge to conform with the rest of the roof. The asbestos, if found, is in the layers of bull/pitch, tar, or may be in the flashing felts themselves. Wall Base/Parapet Flashing This component consists of a cold bull/pitch applied to the roof substrate, adjoining wall base, fan/vent, scupper trough, hatch, chimney, or raised parapet wall. An additional 12" - 48" of felt (often painted silver) is applied to the bull/pitch to seal the edges of the roof substrate, wall(s), or the side or top of the concrete parapet wall. The field membrane felts are then blended in with the inner edge to conform with the rest of the roof. The asbestos, if found, is in the layers of bull/pitch, tar, or may be in the flashing felts themselves. Roof Fixture Flashing This component consists of a cold bull/pitch applied to the roof substrate around any of the following fixtures: roof drain, vent-thru-roof stack (VTR), pitch pan, gooseneck vents, mechanical equipment supports, or any other roof penetration. An additional sheet of metal counterflashing (extending 4" - 24" from the center) is applied to the bull/pitch to seal the edges to the roof substrate. The field membrane felts are placed over up to the fixture sides to conform with the rest of the roof. The asbestos, if found, is in the layers of bull/pitch, tar, or may be in the flashing felts themselves.

18 NESHAP CATEGORIES FOR ACM Regulated ACM (RACM) All ACM that is friable or likely to become friable during renovation or demolition activities is considered to be RACM. These materials must be removed from buildings prior to renovation or demolition activities that will disturb them. Category I Nonfriable ACM Resilient flooring, such as vinyl floor tile and rolled vinyl sheeting, valve packings and gaskets, and asphalt (bituminous) roofing materials are all classified as Category I Nonfriable materials. If these materials are in good condition, they are not likely to become friable during demolition, and therefore, may remain in place for demolition. However, these materials must be removed prior to renovations if the renovation involves alteration that would render them friable. Category II Nonfriable ACM Category II materials are all other nonfriable materials that are not classified as Category I. Asbestos cement products and plaster are the most common types of Category II materials. Most Category II materials are likely to become friable during demolition, and therefore, must be removed prior to demolition. These materials must be removed prior to renovations if the renovation involves alteration that would render them friable.

19 APPENDIX B1 LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORTS PLM RESULTS 2003

20 PLM RESULTS AVAILABLE FOR EXTRACTION FROM 2003 BACKUP TAPE DRIVE UPON REQUEST

21 APPENDIX B2 LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORTS PLM RESULTS 2014

22 EMSL Analytical, Inc West Cypress Creek Road, Suite B-111, Fort Lauderdale, FL Phone/Fax: (954) / (954) pompanobeachlab@emsl.com EMSL Order: CustomerID: CustomerPO: ProjectID: EEG50 Attn: Rich Grupenhoff EE & G 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Miami Lakes, FL Phone: (305) Fax: Received: 03/21/14 2:25 PM Analysis Date: 3/24/2014 Collected: 3/20/2014 Project: Boynton HS Re-Cert Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Type BM-1-Skim Coat Plaster White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous BM-1-Rough Coat A BM-2-Skim Coat BM-2-Rough Coat A BM-3-Skim Coat BM-3-Rough Coat A BM Plaster Gray 2% Hair 98% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Fibrous Homogeneous Plaster White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Plaster Gray 2% Hair 98% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Fibrous Homogeneous Plaster White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Plaster Gray 2% Hair 98% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Fibrous Homogeneous Chalk Board Brown/Green 90% Cellulose 10% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Fibrous Homogeneous Analyst(s) Anne Paul (14) Amrita Paul, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Fort Lauderdale, FL Initial report from 03/24/ :42:15 Test Report PLM Printed: 3/24/ :42:15 AM 1

23 EMSL Analytical, Inc West Cypress Creek Road, Suite B-111, Fort Lauderdale, FL Phone/Fax: (954) / (954) pompanobeachlab@emsl.com EMSL Order: CustomerID: CustomerPO: ProjectID: EEG50 Attn: Rich Grupenhoff EE & G 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Miami Lakes, FL Phone: (305) Fax: Received: 03/21/14 2:25 PM Analysis Date: 3/24/2014 Collected: 3/20/2014 Project: Boynton HS Re-Cert Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Type BM Chalk Board Brown/Green 90% Cellulose 10% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Fibrous Homogeneous BM BM Chalk Board Brown/Green 90% Cellulose 10% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Fibrous Homogeneous Mastic on CT Brown 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous BM-8-Floor Tile Floor Tile Brown/Beige Non-Fibrous 95% Non-fibrous (other) 5% Chrysotile Homogeneous BM-8-Mastic A BM BM Floor Tile Yellow/Clear 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Mortar Blocks Gray 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Insulation White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Analyst(s) Anne Paul (14) Amrita Paul, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Fort Lauderdale, FL Initial report from 03/24/ :42:15 Test Report PLM Printed: 3/24/ :42:15 AM THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT. 2

24

25 APPENDIX C FIGURE(S)

26

27

28 APPENDIX D CERTIFICATES

29

30

31 United States Department of Commerce National Institute of Standards and Technology Certificate of Accreditation to ISO/IEC 17025:2005 NVLAP LAB CODE: EMSL Analytical, Inc. Fort Lauderdale, FL is accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program for specific services, listed on the Scope of Accreditation, for: BULK ASBESTOS FIBER ANALYSIS This laboratory is accredited in accordance with the recognized International Standard ISO/IEC 17025:2005. This accreditation demonstrates technical competence for a defined scope and the operation of a laboratory quality management system (refer to joint ISO-ILAC-IAF Communique dated January 2009) through Effective dates For the National Institute of Standards and Technology NVLAP-01C (REV )

32 SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005 EMSL Analytical, Inc West Cypress Creek Road Bldg. B, Suite 111 Fort Lauderdale, FL Ms. Kim Wallace Phone: (954) Fax: (954) URL: BULK ASBESTOS FIBER ANALYSIS (PLM) NVLAP LAB CODE NVLAP Code Designation / Description 18/A01 EPA 600/M : Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples 18/A03 EPA 600/R-93/116: Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials Page 1 of through Effective dates For the National Institute of Standards and Technology NVLAP-01S (REV )

33

34 APPENDIX E1 PHOTOGRAPHS INITIAL 2003 SURVEY

35 Photo 1: Historic Boynton Beach HS at 125 East Ocean Avenue Photo 2: Northwest elevation looking east

36 Photo 3: HA-06 Green 9 x9 VFT w/mastic 1 st Floor (Positive) Photo 4: HA-14 Green 9 x9 VFT w/mastic 2 nd Floor (Positive)

37 Photo 5: HA-17 Pebble BUR, Lower Roof (Positive) Photo 6: HA-18 Shingle BUR, upper roof surface (Positive)

38 Photo 7: HA-19 Black Parapet Wall Sealer, Lower roof surface (Positive) Photo 8: HA-20 Edge Flashing Cement, Lower roof surface (Positive)

39 Photo 9: HA-21 Edge Flashing Cement, upper roof surface (Positive) Photo 10: HA-22 Skylight Sealer, lower roof surface (Positive)

40 Photo 11: HA-23 Black Roof Patch, lower roof surface (Positive) Photo 12: HA-24 VTR Cement, lower roof surface (Positive)

41 Photo 13: HA-25 VTR Cement #2, lower roof surface (Positive) Photo 14: HA-26 Exterior Stucco Coat (Negative)

42 APPENDIX E2 PHOTOGRAPHS 2014 REVISIT

43 Photo 1: Floor 2 stage area Photo 2: Floor 2 gym area

44 Photo 3: Floor 2 bleachers Photo 4: Floor 2 corridors with ACM VFTs abated

45 Photo 5: Floor 2 delaminating plaster in corridors Photo 6: Exposed structural block in floor 1 classrooms

46 Photo 7: Ground floor kitchen area with ACM VFTs abated Photo 8: Evidence of poly prep for abatement in 2000 s

47 Photo 9: Remaining polyprep on critical window barrier in kitchen Photo 10: Exposed bare piping in kitchen walls

48 Photo 11: Remnant nonacm 1x1 ceiling tiles in the kitchen Photo 12: Floor 1 corridors with ACM VFT abated