CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Transcription

1 all images courtesy of Renovation vs. Rebuild Analysis SCHLENKER & McKITTRICK ARCHITECTS, P.C.

2 RENOVATION VS. REBUILD ANALYSIS Central School Site Advantages Project Criteria VISION Existing Building Renovation Advantages & Disadvantages New Construction Advantages & Disadvantages Cost Of Construction Comparison

3 CENTRAL SCHOOL SITE ADVANTAGES Location History Community

4 CENTRAL SCHOOL SITE ADVANTAGES LOCATION Google Earth Image CARROLL COLLEGE EXPLORATION WORKS DOWNTOWN HELENA HOLTER MUSEUM MT HELENA PARK SUGARLOAF & MEATLOAF MONTANA STATE CAPITAL

5 CENTRAL SCHOOL SITE ADVANTAGES LOCATION C.R. ANDERSON MIDDLE SCHOOL BROADWATER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LINCOLN SCHOOL Google Earth Image HAWTHORNE SCHOOL FRONT STREET LEARNING CENTER HELENA MIDDLE SCHOOL BRYANT SCHOOL HELENA HIGH SCHOOL JEFFERSON SCHOOL SMITH SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICES

6 CENTRAL SCHOOL SITE ADVANTAGES HISTORY Original Central School Built West Addition Built 1921 East Addition Built Central Elementary School Seismic Retrofit Overview CTA Architects Central Elementary School Seismic Retrofit Overview CTA Architects th Avenue Gymnasium Built Original Central School Demolished Repair & Reinforcement Heating System Replacement Study by CTA

7 CENTRAL SCHOOL SITE ADVANTAGES COMMUNITY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT HELENA Community Involvement Community Enhancement en.wikipedia.org

8 PROJECT CRITERIA RENOVATION OR NEW CONSTRUCTION VISION Provide 21st Century Learning Environment Increase Facility Capacity to Allow for Consolidation of District Programs 75 Year Building Lifespan Respect Historical Context of Site & Neighborhood Environmental Responsibility & Sustainability Fiscal Responsibility Set a Precedent

9 PROJECT CRITERIA RENOVATION OR NEW CONSTRUCTION PROVIDE 21 ST CENTURY LEARNING ENVIRONMENT 21st Century Elementary Classroom - A Customized Learning Tool Helena School Facility Planning 21st Century Classroom Pods for Individual & Team Teaching Helena School Facility Planning This is primarily a Middle School model - where students are more able to work alone or in small groups away from the rest of the class. Tall storage units (some lockable) Large sink with water bubbler Secure entry door with keyed lock from inside Individual classroom temperature control Central clock Public address Smartboard Mutiple IT hard-wired or wireless connectivi Individual 21st Century classroom 4 to 6 classrooms per pod, maximum Teacher control over each classroom environment Wall cabinets Simpler teacher de (storage and recor elsewhere in room Base cabinets (some lockable) with counter Multiple lighting levels Ample windows for natural light Shared area Rectangular shape for better group breakout options Approx. 950 square feet for adequate multiple learning scenarios Good sound control from adjacent classrooms Hard surface flooring (non-allergenic surface) Good interior acoustic control At least one operable window for emergency egress situations Flexible seating arrangements for multiple learning strategies Window coverings for light control and lock down security Flexible learning environment within each classroom Team teachin individual lea area outside classroom Corridor connection to othe pods and other areas of the school facility graphics courtesy of Kent Kultgen Ed. D.

10 PROJECT CRITERIA RENOVATION OR NEW CONSTRUCTION INCREASE FACILITY CAPACITY TO ALLOW FOR CONSOLIDATION OF DISTRICT PROGRAMS Community Center Other District Programs Performance Space Gymnasium Multipurpose Space Adult Education Meeting Space 75 YEAR BUILDING LIFESPAN

11 PROJECT CRITERIA RENOVATION OR NEW CONSTRUCTION RESPECT HISTORICAL CONTEXT OF SITE & NEIGHBORHOOD

12 PROJECT CRITERIA RENOVATION OR NEW CONSTRUCTION ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY & SUSTAINABILITY FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY INVESTMENT - Social - Capital - Political - Life Cycle Costs

13 EXISTING BUILDING RENOVATION ADVANTAGES Maintain Central School Identity Maintain Historical Neighborhood Fabric Opportunity to Restore Original Character Embodied Energy of Existing Materials Quality/Durability of Existing Materials No Construction Phasing Required DISADVANTAGES Spatial & Programming Limitations Extent & Cost of Renovation Required Useful Lifespan of Existing Materials Non-sustainable Existing Construction

14 EXISTING BUILDING RENOVATION ADVANTAGES Maintain Central School Identity Maintain Historical Neighborhood Fabric Opportunity to Restore Original Character ADVANTAGES Maintain Central School Identity Maintain Historical Neighborhood Fabric Opportunity to Restore Original Character Embodied Energy of Existing Materials Quality/Durability of Existing Materials No Construction Phasing Required DISADVANTAGES Spatial & Programming Limitations Extent & Cost of Renovation Required Useful Lifespan of Existing Materials Non-sustainable Existing Construction

15 EXISTING BUILDING RENOVATION ADVANTAGES Embodied Energy of Existing Materials Quality/Durability of Existing Materials Reuse Mining/ Extraction Recycling Disposal Transportation LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS OF BUILDING MATERIALS Use No Construction Phasing Required Processing Transportation Manufacturing Transportation/ Distribution ADVANTAGES Maintain Central School Identity Maintain Historical Neighborhood Fabric Opportunity to Restore Original Character Embodied Energy of Existing Materials Quality/Durability of Existing Materials No Construction Phasing Required DISADVANTAGES Spatial & Programming Limitations Extent & Cost of Renovation Required Useful Lifespan of Existing Materials Non-sustainable Existing Construction

16 EXISTING BUILDING RENOVATION DISADVANTAGES Spatial & Programming Limitations GIRL'S BATHROOM-1 TEACHER'S WORK LOUNGE ROOM BOY'S BATHROOM PENTHOUSE GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE = 343 PENTHOUSE NET SQUARE FOOTAGE = 318 Extent & Cost of Renovation Required BOY'S BATHROOM-2 GIRL'S BOY'S GIRL'S BATHROOM-1 BATHROOM-1 BATHROOM-2 40 DN UP PENTHOUSE BOILERROOM OFFICE 91 CONFERENCE ROOM PENTHOUSE GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE = 343 HEALTH TEACHER'S WORK LOUNGE ROOM PENTHOUSE 10NET SQUARE FOOTAGE 11= GIRL'S OFFICE OFFICE 272BOY'S BATHROOM BATHROOM PRINCIPAL'S 73 OFFICE PENTHOUSE GROSS SQUARE318 FOOTAGE = 343BOY'S STUDY 738 BATHROOM-2 TEACHER'S WORK ROOM LOUNGE ROOM PENTHOUSE NET SQUARE FOOTAGE = 318 GIRL'S BATHROOM DN UP DN DN FIRST FLOOR GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE= 11,984 PENTHOUSE BOILERROOM OFFICE 91 FIRST FLOOR NET SQUARE FOOTAGE= 10, CONFERENCE ROOM HEALTH BOY'S BATHROOM FIRSTFLOOR OFFICE 8 OFFICE GIRL'S BATHROOM DN UP PRINCIPAL'S 73 PENTHOUSE OFFICE BOILERROOM OFFICE CONFERENCE ROOM 7 64 BATHROOM HEALTH STUDY ROOM SECOND FLOOR OFFICE 8 OFFICE DN DN 195 FIRST FLOOR GROSS 104 PRINCIPAL'S SQUARE FOOTAGE= 11,984 19A 73 OFFICE FIRST FLOOR NET SQUARE 205 FOOTAGE= 10, SECOND FLOOR GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE= 93 11, A H.O.S.T.S SECOND FLOOR NET SQUARE FOOTAGE= 10, STUDY BATHROOM FIRSTFLOOR 1690 ROOM TUNNEL TUNNEL 258 FIRST FLOOR UP SECOND DN DN FLOOR FIRST FLOOR GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE= 11, FIRST FLOOR NET SQUARE FOOTAGE= 10, SPEECH 550 BATHROOM 147 DN UP FIRSTFLOOR TUNNEL SECOND FLOOR PROJECT SUB BASEMENTDETAIL 19A PROMISE CAFETERIA SECOND FLOOR GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE= 11, KITCHEN 18 18A H.O.S.T.S A SECOND FLOOR NET SQUARE FOOTAGE= 10,307 BATHROOM BATHROOM SECOND FLOOR TUNNEL TUNNEL UP A SECOND FLOOR GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE= 11, BASEMENTLEVEL 18 18A SPEECH 550 H.O.S.T.S SECOND FLOOR NET 147 ALL SQUARE SPACES FOOTAGE= SQUARE 10,307 FOOTAGE DN UP BATHROOM INDICATED BY BOLD FACE NUMBER 57 GROUND FLOOR GROSS TUNNEL SQUARE FOOTAGE= 12, TUNNEL TUNNEL PROJECT GROUND FLOOR NET SQUARE FOOTAGE= UP9,684 SUB BASEMENTDETAIL PROMISE CAFETERIA KITCHEN A SPEECH DN UP 17 TUNNEL PROJECT SUB BASEMENTDETAIL PROMISE CAFETERIA KITCHEN 16 BASEMENTLEVEL A 112 ALL SPACES SQUARE FOOTAGE 17 INDICATED BY BOLD FACE NUMBER GROUND FLOOR GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE= 12,017 GROUND FLOOR 103 NET 103SQUARE FOOTAGE= 9, BASEMENTLEVEL BASEMENT LEVEL GROUND FLOOR GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE= 12,017 GROUND FLOOR NET SQUARE FOOTAGE= 9, ALL SPACES SQUARE FOOTAGE INDICATED BY BOLD FACE NUMBER ADVANTAGES Maintain Central School Identity Maintain Historical Neighborhood Fabric Opportunity to Restore Original Character Embodied Energy of Existing Materials Quality/Durability of Existing Materials No Construction Phasing Required DISADVANTAGES Spatial & Programming Limitations Extent & Cost of Renovation Required Useful Lifespan of Existing Materials Non-sustainable Existing Construction

17 EXISTING BUILDING RENOVATION DISADVANTAGES Useful Lifespan of Existing Materials Non-sustainable Existing Construction ADVANTAGES Maintain Central School Identity Maintain Historical Neighborhood Fabric Opportunity to Restore Original Character Embodied Energy of Existing Materials Quality/Durability of Existing Materials No Construction Phasing Required DISADVANTAGES Spatial & Programming Limitations Extent & Cost of Renovation Required Useful Lifespan of Existing Materials Non-sustainable Existing Construction

18 NEW CONSTRUCTION ADVANTAGES Program & Spatial Flexibility Maximize Site Utilization Energy Efficient Design & Construction Lifespan of New Construction Materials No Construction Phasing Required DISADVANTAGES Loss of Neighborhood Icon Loss of School Identity Disposal of Existing Building Materials Cost of Demolition & Site Preparation

19 NEW CONSTRUCTION ADVANTAGES Program & Spatial Flexibility Maximize Site Utilization New H.E.N. Quality & Patient Safety Proj. Director Flex Director Wrkstn Flex Coordinator Care Transitions Nurse Res. Programs Hospital Preparedness Coordinator Education & Conferences Vice President Restrooms Staff Entry Copy Work Room Storage Google Earth Image Wrkstn Admin. Prof. Wrkstn Future - E & C Support Info Services Coordinator Vice President Conference Room Wrkstn Admin. Prof. Wrkstn Admin. Prof. Elevator Admin. Prof. Reception Admin. Prof. Board Room Break Room Waiting / Lobby Entry Kitchen Restrooms Restrooms Conference Room Restrooms Vice President President Information Technology Manager Future - Executive Future MHREF Future - Standard Future MHREF Full Time Full Time Full Time Wrkstn Support Staff Storage ADVANTAGES Program & Spatial Flexibility Maximize Site Utilization Energy Efficient Design & Construction Lifespan of New Construction Materials No Construction Phasing Required DISADVANTAGES Loss of Neighborhood Icon Loss of School Identity Disposal of Existing Building Materials Cost of Demolition & Site Preparation

20 NEW CONSTRUCTION ADVANTAGES Energy Efficient Design & Construction Lifespan of New Construction Materials No Construction Phasing Required ADVANTAGES Program & Spatial Flexibility Maximize Site Utilization Energy Efficient Design & Construction Lifespan of New Construction Materials No Construction Phasing Required DISADVANTAGES Loss of Neighborhood Icon Loss of School Identity Disposal of Existing Building Materials Cost of Demolition & Site Preparation

21 NEW CONSTRUCTION DISADVANTAGES Loss of Neighborhood Icon Loss of School Identity ADVANTAGES Program & Spatial Flexibility Maximize Site Utilization Energy Efficient Design & Construction Lifespan of New Construction Materials No Construction Phasing Required DISADVANTAGES Loss of Neighborhood Icon Loss of School Identity Disposal of Existing Building Materials Cost of Demolition & Site Preparation

22 NEW CONSTRUCTION DISADVANTAGES Disposal of Existing Building Materials Cost of Demolition & Site Preparation OLD HELENA HIGH SCHOOL DEMOLITION, Disposal ADVANTAGES Program & Spatial Flexibility Maximize Site Utilization Energy Efficient Design & Construction Lifespan of New Construction Materials No Construction Phasing Required DISADVANTAGES Loss of Neighborhood Icon Loss of School Identity Disposal of Existing Building Materials Cost of Demolition & Site Preparation

23 COST OF CONSTRUCTION COMPARISON Renovation New Construction Renovation vs. New Construction all cost information has been provided by the Helena School District s Educational Planning Operational/Implementation Plan, 2013 and CTA Architects Central Elementary School Seismic Retrofit Overview, 2013

24 COST OF CONSTRUCTION COMPARISON RENOVATION CONSTRUCTION COST ONLY Site Improvements: $1,599,330 Life/Safety Codes: $396,893 Roofing: $143,560 Heating & Ventilation: $1,184,328 Structural Upgrades: $2,245,000 Electrical: $418,500 Plumbing: $529,500 ADA Upgrades: $680,000 Building Envelope: $420,000 Flooring: $125,000 TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS: $7,742,111 SQUARE FOOTAGE: COST / SQUARE FOOTAGE: 36,260 SF $214/SF 7 TH AVENUE GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION COST ONLY Life/Safety Codes: $181,964 Roofing: $46,900 Heating & Ventilation: $312,000 Structural Upgrades: $680,000 Interior Renovations: $1,200,000 ADA Upgrades: $185,000 TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS: $2,605,864 SQUARE FOOTAGE: COST / SQUARE FOOTAGE: 12,988 SF $201/SF TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS: $10,347,975 Includes All Renovation Construction Costs all cost information has been provided by the Helena School District s Educational Planning Operational/Implementation Plan, 2013 and CTA Architects Central Elementary School Seismic Retrofit Overview, 2013

25 COST OF CONSTRUCTION COMPARISON NEW CONSTRUCTION NEW CONSTRUCTION: CONSTRUCTION COST ONLY Building Removal: $473,000 New Construction: $9,600,000 TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS: $10,073,000 SQUARE FOOTAGE: COST / SQUARE FOOTAGE: 40,190 SF $251/SF NEW GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION COST ONLY Building Removal: $304,000 New Construction: $3,450,000 TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS: $3,754,000 SQUARE FOOTAGE: COST / SQUARE FOOTAGE: 15,016 SF $250/SF Total square footage of new gym was not provided in CTA report. Square footage and cost/s.f. are based on assumptions. TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS: $13,827,000 Includes All New Construction Costs all cost information has been provided by the Helena School District s Educational Planning Operational/Implementation Plan, 2013 and CTA Architects Central Elementary School Seismic Retrofit Overview, 2013

26 COST OF CONSTRUCTION COMPARISON TOTAL COMPARISON RENOVATION: CONSTRUCTION COST ONLY Central School: 36,260 sq ft NEW CONSTRUCTION: CONSTRUCTION COST ONLY New Central School: 40,190 sq ft 7th Avenue Gym: 12,988 sq ft New Gymnasium: 15,016 sq ft TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS: $10,347,975 Includes All Renovation Construction Costs TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS: $13,827,000 Includes All New Construction Costs all cost information has been provided by the Helena School District s Educational Planning Operational/Implementation Plan, 2013 and CTA Architects Central Elementary School Seismic Retrofit Overview, 2013

27 all images courtesy of Either way, there is an opportunity for something great. - Quality Education - Community Service - Environmental Stewardship - Central School s Legacy What is the right answer?...with the vision upheld, whichever choice is made. SCHLENKER & McKITTRICK ARCHITECTS, P.C.

28 all images courtesy of Renovation vs. Rebuild Analysis SCHLENKER & McKITTRICK ARCHITECTS, P.C.