EXHIBIT G ELEVATIONS

Transcription

1 EXHIBIT G ELEVATIONS

2 1 2 METAL RAILING Architectural NEXUS, Inc East Parleys Way Salt Lake City, Utah T E Retail Elevation / Elevation 1 STOREFRONT WINDOW SYSTEM AT RETAIL % OF (primary material): 51% % OF COMPOSITE WOOD (primary material): 40% % OF CONCRETE: 9% Original drawings remain the property of the Architect and as such the Architect retains total ownership and control. The design represented by these drawings is sold to the client for a one time use, unless otherwise agreed upon in writing by the Architect. Architectural Nexus, Inc ADDRESS LETTERING TO READ S DRAPER GATE DR BOARD FORMED CONCRETE TOTAL % OF PRIMARY MATERIALS:91% MECHANICAL UNITS TO BE SCREENED METAL RAILING METAL RAILING STOREFRONT WINDOW SYSTEM AT LEASING OFFICE D 4 Elevation 2 % OF (primary material): 12% % OF COMPOSITE WOOD (primary material): 83% % OF CONCRETE: 5% 5 Elevation 3 % OF (primary material): 64% % OF COMPOSITE WOOD (primary material): 36% # Date TOTAL % OF PRIMARY MATERIALS: 100% TOTAL % OF PRIMARY MATERIALS: 95% 1 GARAGE DOORS Back Elevation 1 1" = 20'-0" C S DRAPER GATE DR DRAPER, UT LIBERTY POINT BOARD FORMED CONCRETE COWBOY PARTNERS % OF (primary material): 76% % OF COMPOSITE WOOD (primary material): 24% TOTAL % OF PRIMARY MATERIALS: 100% SIDE ELEVATION 1 UP RETAIL ELEVATION METAL RAILING BACK ELEVATION 1 UP 6 B Back Elevation 3 2 % OF (primary material): 53% % OF COMPOSITE WOOD (primary material): 47% Back Elevation 2 TOTAL % OF PRIMARY MATERIALS: 100% Revision % OF (primary material): 63% % OF COMPOSITE WOOD (primary material): 37% TOTAL % OF PRIMARY MATERIALS: 100% GENERAL NOTE BUILDING ELEVATION METAL FASCIA A. ALL MECHANICAL UNITS TO BE SCREENED BY PARAPET WALLS THAT MATCH BUILDING MATERIALS. ELEVATION 1 METAL RAILING BACK ELEVATION 2 BACK ELEVATION 3 METAL FASCIA METAL RAILING 9/13/2016 3:02:44 PM KEY PLAN NEXUS PROJECT #: CHECKED BY: KEJ Author DRAWN BY: 6/23/2016 DATE: BUILDING ELEVATIONS ELEVATION 2 9 ELEVATION 2 A SIDE ELEVATION 2 Project Status 8 Side Elevation 2 % OF (primary material): 59% % OF COMPOSITE WOOD (primary material): 41% Side Elevation 1 % OF (primary material): 62% % OF COMPOSITE WOOD (primary material): 38% TOTAL % OF PRIMARY MATERIALS: 100% TOTAL % OF PRIMARY MATERIALS: 100%

3 EXHIBIT H ARCHITECTURAL DEVIATION REQUEST

4 ARCHITECTURAL NEXUS, Inc archnexus.com SALT LAKE CITY 2505 East Parleys Way Salt Lake City, Utah T SACRAMENTO 1990 Third Street, Suite 500 Sacramento, California T DATE: September 12, 2016 PROJECT: OWNER: Liberty Point S Draper Gate Drive Draper, UT Cowboy Partners ARCHITECT S PROJECT #: SUBJECT: Deviation Request Roof Lines with Undisturbed Lengths of greater than 50 Per DCMC , we request a deviation from the design standards, as we find that what has been submitted will fulfil the intent of the design standards, resulting in a well-designed and functional development. The Liberty Point project is developing a site with many challenges. Because of the narrow piece of buildable land in front of a steep slope, the resulting building is by default a long, narrow mass. The design is contemporary in style with clean lines as the intended aesthetic, featuring unbroken lines for both horizontal and vertical elements, for dramatic effect. The composition is intended to provide a clean linear expression of the 50 residential units with natural breaking points providing interest. The long sweeping nature of the site is expressed by the façade, making the building feel cohesive and unified with the site, avoiding a more disjointed expression. This type of expression suits the location and feel of the neighborhood. Thus, we have articulated groups of units using different materials, then tied together larger groups of units with horizontal roof lines above. Because of the articulation of the units below the roof lines, the façade does not read as a solid plane, and the individual units are well-articulated, as set forth in DCMC But because of the long, linear nature of the building, we have used an upper roof line to tie together sections of the building, and create unity from the articulation below. The articulated units serve to create the variation, creating a scale consistent with the 50-foot roofline guideline in DCMC , while allowing for an overall cohesive feel to the building. We thus request a deviation allowance for the rooflines as designed. Sincerely, Douglas A. Thimm, AIA, LEED AP, BD+C Senior Principal Architectural Nexus Form Version: 6/ Architectural Nexus, Inc. Printed: 12 September :09 PM

5 EXHIBIT I GRADING PLAN

6 MATCH LINE: SEE SHEET C3.11 LEGEND E Architectural NEXUS, Inc East Parleys Way Salt Lake City, Utah T GENERAL NOTES 09/12/2016 PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF MATTHEW D. IDEMA, P.E. UTAH REGISTRATION NO FOR AND ON BEHALF OF KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSTRUCTION NOTES D KIMLEY-HORN 215 South State Street, Ste 400 Salt Lake City, Utah T EA ST C MATCH LINE: SEE SHEET C3.11 NO RT H C3.10 # Date Revision DR ER AP T GA B R. ED KEY MAP NOT TO SCALE ER AP R D W RK PA AY NEXUS PROJECT #: CHECKED BY: MDI DRAWN BY: JC DATE: 09/12/2016 GRADING PLAN A C3.10

7 CONSTRUCTION NOTES MA H C T LI N E EE S : ET E SH 0 1. C3 Architectural NEXUS, Inc East Parleys Way Salt Lake City, Utah T /12/2016 E PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF MATTHEW D. IDEMA, P.E. UTAH REGISTRATION NO FOR AND ON BEHALF OF KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. D KIMLEY-HORN 215 South State Street, Ste 400 Salt Lake City, Utah T C TH N OR EA ST # GENERAL NOTES Date Revision TOTAL DETENTION AVAILABLE B DR ER AP LEGEND T GA R. ED C3.11 ER AP R D W RK PA AY NEXUS PROJECT #: CHECKED BY: MDI DRAWN BY: JC DATE: 09/12/2016 KEY MAP NOT TO SCALE GRADING PLAN A C3.11

8 EXHIBIT J BUILDING CROSS SECTIONS

9 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 3 Architectural NEXUS, Inc East Parleys Way Salt Lake City, Utah T LEVEL 2 EXISTING GRADE LEVEL 2 Original drawings remain the property of the Architect and as such the Architect retains total ownership and control. The design represented by these drawings is sold to the client for a one time use, unless otherwise agreed upon in writing by the Architect. Architectural Nexus, Inc E EXISTING GRADE INFILL LEVEL 1 INFILL LEVEL 1 D 2 SECTION 1/8" = 1'-0" LEVEL 3 1 SECTION 1/8" = 1'-0" COWBOY PARTNERS LIBERTY POINT S DRAPER GATE DR DRAPER, UT LEVEL 3 LEVEL 2 EXISTING GRADE LEVEL 2 INFILL RETAIL SPACE LEVEL 1 EXISTING GRADE PARKING POOL DECK RETAIL LEVEL INFILL INFILL LEVEL 1 C 4 SECTION 1/8" = 1'-0" 3 SECTION 1/8" = 1'-0" 5 KEY PLAN UP # Date Revision LEVEL 3 UP 4 B EXISTING GRADE LEVEL 2 BLOCK RETAINING RETAIL SPACE RETAIL LEVEL Project Status 5 SECTION 1/8" = 1'-0" NEXUS PROJECT #: CHECKED BY: KEJ DRAWN BY: Author DATE: 6/23/2016 BUILDING SECTIONS 8/19/2016 1:16:26 PM A

10 EXHIBIT K GEO-TECHNICAL APPROVAL LETTER

11 2650 North 180 East Lehi, Utah P F July 20, 2016 Mr. Keith Collier, Chief Building Official Draper City 1020 East Pioneer Road Draper, Utah Subject: Geotechnical Review Liberty Point Amended South Draper Gate Drive Draper, Utah TG Project No Draper City Application No. SP Subject Documents: Architectural Nexus: Liberty Point, Building Sections, Sheet, Nexus Project No , dated June 23, Wilding Engineering, Inc., Geotechnical Letter, Liberty Point Development, Northeast Corner of Draper Gate Drive and Draper Parkway, Draper, Utah, Project No , prepared for Architectural Nexus, dated June 23, Wilding Engineering, Inc., Geotechnical Engineering Report, Liberty Point Development, Northeast Corner of Draper Gate Drive and Draper Parkway, Draper, Utah, Project No , prepared for Brent Harman, dated March 31, Review Status: GEOTECHNICAL SUBMITTAL COMPLETE Dear Mr. Collier: At your request, Taylor Geotechnical (TG) reviewed the subject documents. The purpose of TG s review is to evaluate whether or not Wilding adequately addresses geotechnical engineering parameters at the property, as applicable to commercial development, consistent with concerns for public health, safety, and reasonable professional standard of practice. Based upon the information presented in the subject documents, it is TG s opinion that Wilding Engineering has adequately addressed the geotechnical engineering parameters for the proposed project. TG previously prepared three geotechnical review reports for the subject. However, the previous reviews were related to various development concepts. The current development plan as presented by Architectural Nexus dated June 23, 2016, indicates that the existing slope 2.5H:1V slope on the eastern side of the property will not be modified or altered. The proposed construction will consist of three story townhouses with slab on grade floors, no basement construction and may have retail space on the front of the buildings facing Draper Gate Drive.

12 Liberty Point Amended, Draper, Utah July 20, 2016 Geotechnical Review Project No Public Right-of-Way TG understands that no public right-of-way improvements are planned for the proposed development. Draper Gate Drive, which is partially within the proposed development, is a private road. If public right-of-way is planned, then the pavement section for roadways should be based on a CBR value less than 3 and the City s pavement standard based on proposed use. If a higher CBR is desired by the applicant, then TG recommends Draper City request Wilding to complete a CBR on the proposed subgrade. Pavement recommendations provided in the report are for the proposed private drive. Geotechnical Report Summary for Plan Review 1. The geotechnical report is for a multi-story mixed use development. 2. All organics, topsoil, existing fill and other deleterious material should be removed from below proposed building and pavement areas. 3. Footings for the structures may be supported on undisturbed native soils or on compacted structural fill extended to native soils. Footings bearing on undisturbed natural soil may be designed using a maximum allowable bearing pressure of 2,000 psf. 4. Footings should have a minimum width of 18 inches for strip footings and 24 inches for spot footings. 5. Footings should be located a minimum depth of 30 inches for frost protection. Interior footings should have a minimum cover of 18 inches. 6. The following seismic design spectral response accelerations should be used for seismic analysis for proposed structures at the site: 0.2 sec (short period) S DS = 1.02g; and, 1.0 sec (long period) S D1 = 0.64g. The values are factored based on Site Class of D. 7. The site is not mapped in any Draper City Geologic Hazard Area. 8. No basement construction is planned for the proposed development. 9. If basement construction is considered, foundation walls for basements should be designed using an equivalent fluid weight of 50 pcf for level backfill and 70 for sloping backfill under static conditions. For seismic design, the equivalent fluid weights should be increased by 27 pcf. 10. In accordance with 2012 IBC, A perimeter foundation drain is required for basement construction of commercial structures but not for residential structures at this site. 11. Floor slabs are to be underlain by at least 4-inches of free draining gravel. 12. No special cement type was specified for concrete placed in contact with natural soil. 13. Prior to the placement of concrete, a letter from the geotechnical engineer should be obtained that indicates subgrade for footing and floor slab support was prepared in accordance with the geotechnical report and ready for the placement of concrete. Taylor Geotechnical Page 2 of 3

13 Liberty Point Amended, Draper, Utah July 20, 2016 Geotechnical Review Project No Gutters should discharge beyond the limits of backfill. 15. Surface drainage should slope away from the structure in all directions. IBC requires a 5 percent grade for the first 10 feet. 16. All import materials should be approved by Geotechnical Engineer. 17. All compaction for interior and exterior backfill adjacent to the building should be verified by the geotechnical engineer. CLOSURE This letter is issued solely in response to the Consultants evaluation of the referenced site. Comments and recommendations in this review are based on data presented in the subject document. Taylor Geotechnical accordingly provides no warranty that the data in the subject document is correct or accurate, and has not performed an independent site evaluation. Comments and recommendations presented herein are provided to aid Draper City in reducing risks from geotechnical hazards and to protect public health and safety. There is no other warranty, either express or implied. All services performed by Taylor Geotechnical for this review were provided for the exclusive use and benefit of Draper City. No other person or entity is entitled to use or rely upon any of the information or reports generated by Taylor Geotechnical as a result of this review. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the undersigned. The opportunity to be of continued service to Draper City is appreciated. Respectfully submitted, Taylor Geotechnical Alanson O. Taylor, P.E. Principal Taylor Geotechnical Page 3 of 3