SCOPE OF WORK AND DELIVERABLES

Transcription

1 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW The State of Minnesota (State) has identified the need for the replacement of Bridge 5308, a railroad bridge that carries the Canadian Pacific Railroad (CP Rail) over Trunk Highway (TH) 100 in Hennepin County. The new bridge has been assigned as Bridge Number This Contract will include: Professional engineering design services for preliminary and final design of Bridge 27303; Subsurface investigations and geotechnical analysis and reporting; Design of all track work, including the associated shoo-fly track alignment onto the adjacent existing Bridge 5309 to serve as a temporary shoo-fly bypass bridge, and preliminary bridge plans for Bridge 5309; Development of an acceptable staging scheme including design of vertical shoring/sheet piling as necessary to stabilize the temporary shoo-fly alignment to enable construction of the new bridge abutments of Bridge and removal of existing bridge The associated State Project Number (S.P.) is The anticipated letting date for the bridge portion of the TH 100 expansion project is May This project is a result of State proposing to widen the existing roadway from the existing substandard geometric conditions in accordance with the new proposed Trunk Highway (TH) 100 layout, which includes three standard 12 lanes, shoulders, adjacent acceleration/deceleration lanes, and appropriate clear zone set back to the face of the new proposed abutments. Bridge will be designed as a single-track, 2-span thru-girder type bridge, and provide minimum vertical clearance of 16-4 with inclusion of a sacrificial fascia beam, or 17-4 without a sacrificial fascia beam, over the new proposed TH100 alignment. During State s project development phase, depth of structure investigations were explored in conjunction with the proposed TH 100 profile grades, existing CP Rail elevations, and the required span layout for proposed Bridge This resulted in a determination that a thru-girder type bridge would be required to achieve the required vertical clearance. For thru-girder type bridges, it is desirable to achieve 17-4 vertical clearance, or provide a sacrificial fascia beam to protect the main load carrying girders from potential traffic impact. This Contract includes further design of track work including development of a new profile grade for CP Rail, leading to an acceptable minimum profile grade raise of the existing tracks. A combination of a slight track profile grade raise will be further explored in conjunction with the proposed TH100 profile grade in consideration of the need for a sacrificial fascia beam. Concept development of track work and shoo-fly layout, along with proposed track profile grades will precede development of Preliminary Bridge Plans. Track work development will require consideration of survey information from existing Bridge 5308 and Bridge 5309 in development of the shoo-fly alignment and profile grade, and final alignment and profile grade for Bridge 27303, including any track signalization requirements yet to be determined by CP Rail. Once the track work is approved by CP Rail, Preliminary Bridge Plans for both Bridge and Bridge 5309 will be completed. In consideration of utilizing Bridge 5309 as a temporary shoo-fly bridge, inspections were completed in August 2012 along with analysis and load ratings, as documented in the Canadian Pacific Railway over TH100 Bridge Evaluation Final Report, October 5, Track work and preliminary bridge plans for Bridge 5309 will be developed as part of this Contract will be incorporated into a separate - 1 -

2 Final Plan for Bridge 5309 (plan set preparation for Bridge 5309 will be completed under a separate contract). Metro District personnel will develop roadway plans concurrently with the development of the preliminary and final bridge plans, based on Staff Approved Layout that will be made available to the consultant. 2.0 PROJECT COORDINATION 2.1 Contract Administration State will provide a Project Manager to give direction to Contractor s activities. It will be the responsibility of State s Project Manager to receive the work produced by Contractor, review the work for compliance with contract requirements, and to recommend payment for such work. Contractor will conduct the administration of the project, which includes communication with State, invoicing, supplemental agreements, cost and schedule updates, billing preparation, application of quality assurance plan, and other non-technical work. Contractor will provide regular project updates to State s Project Manager with regard to the status of the project schedule and budget. State will establish a Project Wise directory for large file transfers. Contractor will input electronic files of working documents, plans, etc. as the project progresses toward completion. Contractor will create and maintain a ftp site for the project. Parties will mutually agree upon a method for electronic document transfer that is convenient and useable by all parties. No changes in Contractor project management or lead design personnel will be made without written notice to State. State will notify Contractor of any changes to State s project management personnel. State anticipates that the further project coordination efforts will be required in determination of an acceptable profile grade for the proposed CP Rail alignment and shoo-fly bridge alignment. Coordination of this effort will be completed with the State s Preliminary Bridge Plans Engineer through completion of the Preliminary Bridge Plans. The State will also designate a Project Manager from MnDOT Bridge Office Final Design Section for project review and coordination with development of Final Plans. 2.2 Quality Management Plan (QMP) Contractor will submit a project specific Quality Management Plan to State within five days of Notice to Proceed with contracted services. The QMP must specify how Contractor will perform Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) activities throughout the duration of the project to ensure delivery of a quality product in a timely manner that conforms to established contract requirements. Design and Plan Sheet Check Contractor is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of its work. Design calculations and plan sheets must be independently checked and reconciled prior to submittal. Review comments from State on Contractor s various plan review submittals does not relieve Contractor of liability for an inaccurate or incomplete bridge design or plan. Computer Programs All computer programs and/or spreadsheets utilized by Contractor must be verified by Contractor s in-house Quality Assurance Program

3 Quality Assurance Verification Contractor s Project Manager or Quality Assurance Manager will review the entire plan design and production process to ensure the completeness and adequacy of the work, and conformance with Contractor s QA procedures. 2.3 Railroad Coordination Initial coordination of all railroad meetings and correspondence will be conducted by State s Rail Administration Project Manager, who will serve as the single point of contact with CP Rail. The Contractor will not contact CP Rail directly unless authorized by State s Railroad Agreements Administrator. Prior to development of the thru-girder type bridge preliminary plans, the Contactor will explore depth of structure requirements for a 2-span thru-girder type structure, preliminary track alignment, and the resulting profile grade raise requirement for the tracks to obtain 16-4 vertical clearance over the proposed TH 100 alignment provided by State. A coordination effort is anticipated with CP Rail to obtain review and approval of this bridge type based on consideration of required grade raise, and the ability of the CP Rail to achieve this clearance with minimal grade adjustment. Contractor will investigate the required track work and profile grade raise requirements necessary to achieve 17-4 of vertical clearance of the proposed TH 100 alignment provide by the State. These initial track alignments and profile grade raise implications will be developed prior to the initial CP Rail coordination meeting so that consideration of use of a sacrificial beam can be explored together with track grade raise requirements and tie-in considerations. Development of Preliminary Bridge Plans will not commence until the profile grade, bridge type, and determination of the need for a sacrificial beam have been reviewed and determined, based on continued project development provided by Contractor and approved by State. Approval and final selection of bridge type is a critical component of the project schedule and Contractor must prepare all materials necessary for this evaluation and coordination meeting with Canadian Pacific Railroad. State will conduct all railroad coordination efforts early in the project development phase, and throughout project development. Contractor will follow State and AREMA processes for coordination efforts. Railroad coordination meetings will be scheduled as required to coordinate the railroad bridge design and ensure timely CP Rail reviews and approval of the design. Railroad coordination meetings will coincide with monthly project meetings. Contractor is responsible for ensuring that CP Rail s coordination process aligns with State s project delivery schedule. Contractor will coordinate with the Rail Administration Project Manager and CP Rail to establish a communication process for the project. Contractor will schedule and facilitate meetings at key phases of the design process and will include the Rail Administration Project Manager, State s Project Manager, State s Roadway Project Manager, and CP Rail personnel as coordinated by State. 2.4 Project Meetings Contractor will facilitate a minimum of eight monthly project meetings with State s Project Manager, State s Rail Administration Project Manager, CP Rail project management personnel - 3 -

4 (if available), and State s Roadway Project Manager. Meetings will be held at the District Office in Roseville, MN or the Bridge Office in Oakdale, MN. Contractor will record and furnish meeting minutes within three working days of each meeting. Contractor will participate in the project kick-off meeting (estimated date: January 15 th ) to establish the project schedule and decision-making strategy, and to discuss the Right of Entry application process. The kick-off meeting will be held in conjunction with the initial meeting for the conceptual design process. The kick-off meeting may include a site visit to identify issues and preliminary conceptual ideas for replacement options and assist the group in identifying site constraints and selection of potential options which will be carried forward into more detailed conceptual design. State will bring information as listed in Task 3.2: State Deliverables to the kick-off meeting. Contractor will coordinate additional meetings with project stakeholders as directed by State s Project Manager. 3.0 CONCEPT DESIGN 3.1 Concept Development of Bridge and Shoo-fly Track Alignment for Bridge 5309 The conceptual design process will consist of the following components: Two hour kick-off meeting held at MnDOT Bridge Office; Development of draft concept shoo-fly alignment based on previous conceptual track layout work completed in MnDOT Contract No , as documented in the Canadian Pacific Railway over TH100 Bridge Evaluation Final Report, October 5, 2012; Draft concept shoo-fly alignment will be updated and tied into existing CP Rail tracks based on survey information provided by the State; Coordination of site visit; Four week conceptual development work period to design the updated draft shoo-fly alignment, profile grades, and structure depth requirements for obtaining 16-4 vertical clearance with sacrificial fascia beam and 17-4 with associated track alignment and profile tie-in points; Workshop #1: Contractor will lead a half-day workshop, and give a presentation of the Concept Design to State and CP Rail at the Bridge Office in Oakdale; Workshop #2: Two hour workshop approximately four weeks later with State (held at the Bridge Office on Oakdale); Final Concept Design submittal based on updating the initial Concept Design submittal in accordance with project requirements as determined at Workshop #2. The draft concept design will be completed and submitted to CP Rail for review (30 day review period). The draft concept design will demonstrate State s intent for the project and is based on existing conceptual drawings by State. The submittal will include the plan, elevation and typical section of the proposed grade separation, the shoo-fly bridge alignment, and consideration of required grade raise to achieve vertical clearances over the proposed TH 100 profile. Final track layout work will be based on input from CP Rail. Preliminary discussions have resulted in the consideration to use adjacent bridge 5309 as a shoo-fly bridge. A concept level track layout for the shoo-fly has been developed in a separate Bridge Condition and Ratings Report conducted under MnDOT Contract 01158, and is documented in the Canadian Pacific Railway over TH100 Bridge Evaluation Final Report, October 5, This layout will be the basis for the initial shoo-fly concept. Final Shoo-fly track alignment and final track alignment must include all switches and track alignment, as well as turnout size and location for track work - 4 -

5 staging necessary to maximize storage space on western siding track. Final development of track alignments will be a requirement of Contractor and must be performed by experienced railroad track alignment engineers in accordance with AREMA and CP Rail requirements. 3.2 State Deliverables Topographic and engineering survey; Existing alignment profile beginning and end points; TH 100 Layout including roadway cross section, alignment, and profile; Utility information; Existing operating and maintenance agreements; Allowable vertical and horizontal clearances; Allowable structure types and constraints; Construction staging and maintenance of traffic concepts including potential detour options; Letting and construction schedule; Budget information; Work Order Number between State and CP Rail. 3.3 Contractor Deliverables Draft Concept Design Submittal Contractor will prepare and submit an application for Right of Entry and the Draft Concept Design (plans and site pictures) to State s Project Manager. The Draft Concept Design submittal will, at a minimum, include the following: Plan, Elevation, and Typical Section of proposed grade separation; Profile, alignment and general configuration of mainline and shoo-fly track; Photo log with pictures of the proposed project location. Site pictures will be taken in all controlling directions including, but not limited to, North, East, South and West. The plan view will show a reference location and direction for each picture; Four hard copy sets and a.pdf of the Concept Design submittal Conceptual Development Workshops The outcomes and deliverables of the Contractor-facilitated workshop(s) will include: Bridge length, skew, foundation assumptions and loadings; Minimum vertical and horizontal clearances; Determination of sacrificial fascia beam (if required); Construction staging shoo-fly, phased; Track profile and alignment (including shoo-fly); Siding track, storage, fence requirements and service road (if required); Operating and maintenance conditions Final Concept Design Submittal The Final Concept Design submittal will include an updated Draft Concept Design including profile, alignment, structure type and arrangement and general configuration of mainline and shoo-fly track. 4.0 GEOTECHNICAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS Contractor will perform subsurface investigations and geotechnical analysis and provide foundation recommendations in accordance with the provisions found at the following web link:

6 State anticipates that this work will require two soils borings per substructure, and six borings (three on each end) for the shoo-fly crossover between Bridges 5308 and Contractor will be responsible for obtaining permission from property owners to take all borings which are located on property not owned by State. All railroad charges (e.g. flagging) will be Contractor s responsibility. Contractor will also contact utility companies prior to taking borings and will assure that in-place utility structures will not be encountered. Contractor will be responsible for any claims resulting from damage to any structures above and/or below ground. Contractor will be responsible for providing proper temporary traffic control when working on State right-of-way. Contractor must obtain and follow the most recent version of the guidelines in the MnDOT Field Manual entitled Temporary Traffic Control Zone Layouts. 4.1 State Deliverables Plans showing approximate substructure locations Review and approval of proposed boring plan Template for boring log program (electronic copy) 4.2 Contractor Deliverables See for the comprehensive list of procedures and deliverables for this task. Proposed boring plan Cone Penetration Test Sounding log (electronic copy) Copy of final boring logs (electronic copy) FADR report addressing bridge substructure design and shoo-fly crossover embankment recommendations 5.0 PRELIMINARY BRIDGE DESIGN AND PLAN PREPARATION Contractor will conduct preliminary bridge design and prepare a Preliminary Bridge Plan in accordance with the provisions detailed below. Preliminary Bridge Plans will be completed for both Bridge and Bridge 5309, along with the approved shoo-fly track alignment and final track alignment configurations. Approximate limits of all temporary sheet piling/vertical shoring requirements will be shown. Preliminary Bridge Plans will include final proposed profile, alignment, structure type and arrangement and general configuration of the mainline and shoo-fly track. Preliminary Bridge Plans will be completed by Contractor based on initial project conceptual design development meetings and workshop(s). Preliminary Plans will include sufficient detail addressing the required final construction to be proposed including: Construction staging: Show phased construction and planned use of adjacent Bridge 5309 as railroad shoo-fly bridge including all track alignments, profiles, switches, tie-in points, switches, including siding track and all proposed track work with profiles; Grade adjustments: clearances, track profile raise, roadway grade profiles, structure depth for proposed bridge type; vertical clearance; - 6 -

7 Roadway alignment and cross section: median width, bridge skew and span arrangement; show any needed temporary trail re-alignment (if needed); Plan sets: Provide Preliminary Bridge Plans for Bridge and Bridge 5309 in separate plan sets with reference to MnDOT Preliminary Bridge Plans check-list; include proposed fencing to separate existing trail from shoo-fly alignment, beam spans, design loadings; Railroad agreements: construction options, future maintenance, switch locations, siding track details, and any service road requirements. Final design submittals will not commence until the Preliminary Bridge Plans for both the proposed new Bridge and the existing shoo-fly bridge 5309 have been prepared, submitted, and approved the State Bridge Engineer. Final Design of Bridge 5309 will be completed by others. 5.1 Preliminary Bridge Design Contractor will perform necessary engineering and design to determine the type, size, location and geometrics of the required Bridge Contractor will also prepare preliminary bridge plans for Bridge Preliminary bridge design will be conducted with ongoing development of the final roadway plans based on the State TH 100 Staff Approved Layout, with consideration of roadway geometrics, staging needs, consideration of any needed adjustment to proposed profile grades, drainage requirements, economics and all other project constraints. A Preliminary Bridge Plan and Preliminary Bridge Estimate will be prepared and submitted to State s Project Manager for all work described in this Contract, and will be presented in separate Preliminary and Final Bridge Plans for Bridge and Bridge Bridge Type Selection Report The bridge type selection report will be prepared based on Task 3.0: Concept Design in coordination with the alternative construction phasing and design concepts for the roadway and railway design. Bridge type selection will consider roadway and railroad geometrics, State preferences, CP Rail preferences, construction entity and phasing, economics and environmental constraints. The bridge type selection report will include all considerations leading to the proposed bridge type for Bridge 27303, and will contain the project log, site photos, and relevant project documentation Bridge Surveys State will provide available field surveys and mapping. Contractor will verify field items, pick up additional points for the design, and perform any additional survey work required to prepare bridge survey sheets. Survey data must be referenced to North American Vertical Datum 88 (NAVD 88), and National Geodetic Vertical Datum 29 (NGVD 29) Foundations Contractor will work with the CP Rail to determine recommended foundation design capacities, approach fill settlement periods, estimated pile lengths and other specific foundation recommendations and coordinate with CP Rail and State to resolve any differences between CP Rail recommendations and the FADR Aesthetics Contractor will collaborate with the State s Project Manager on the bridge aesthetics. It is anticipated that the bridge will be Aesthetic Level B (medium) and that State has already done some work in this area which Contractor will use as a starting point. Proposed aesthetics will be advanced during the development of the Preliminary Bridge Plans with assistance from the State s Bridge Office Architectural Specialist

8 5.1.5 Roadway Alignment Metro District will provide a preliminary roadway cross-section, alignment and profile and MnDOT Staff approved Layout Railway Design Contractor will conduct all railway design, including the establishment of temporary and permanent railway cross sections, alignments, and profiles to support preliminary bridge design. Railway operations will need to be maintained at all times during construction. Contractor will conduct all railway design, including any drainage design ditches and access road requirements, temporary shoo-fly accommodations for the CP Rail main track, siding tracks, and access road if necessary, and other associated design items. This design will accommodate existing train service to existing industrial customers and access to the railroads sidings and storage tracks that may be impacted by the project. Temporary design must include evaluation of Bridge 5309 and design of all temporary vertical shoring/sheet piling requirements. Vertical shoring is defined as sheet piling, soldier pile walls, and/or other means to enable construction of Bridge adjacent to temporary excavation limits that will be necessary. Vertical shoring will be designed for railroad live-load surcharge (E- 80 or E90), or as required by the CP Rail Cost Estimate Contractor will prepare a Preliminary Bridge Cost Estimates for the new proposed Bridge and for the adjacent shoo-fly Bridge 5309, including any proposed modifications, together with cost for vertical shoring, sheet piling, and shoo-fly track work. These estimates will be submitted along with the Preliminary Bridge Plans. Contractor will provide preliminary estimates of temporary and permanent railroad track and embankment work required to construct the bridge. Contractor will coordinate directly with the Preliminary Plans Unit of the State s Bridge Office. The Roadway Project Manager will be copied or notified of all significant correspondence. The State s Bridge Office will attend project meetings and respond to Contractor inquiries. Comments on the review copy of the Preliminary Bridge Plan will be returned within 20 working days. 5.2 Design Standards and Plan Preparation The Preliminary Bridge Plan will be prepared in accordance with the following standards and documents: MnDOT LRFD Bridge Design Manual; American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Load Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) Bridge Design Specifications; MnDOT Surveying And Mapping Manual; MnDOT Drainage Manual; MnDOT Check List for Preliminary Plans (dated 5/23/2008 or later); MnDOT Computer Assisted Design and Drafting (CADD) Standards; MnDOT Summary of Recommended Drafting Standards (found at Click on CADD Resources, then Summary of Recommended Drafting Standards ); AREMA Manual for Railway Engineering; - 8 -

9 CP Rail Guidelines for Railroad Grade Separation Projects; CP Rail Bridge Standards; MnDOT staff-approved Layout; MnDOT Environmental Documents and Design Memorandums; Project Wise directory guidelines. When State and CP Rail standards are in conflict, they must be resolved to the satisfaction of both parties. All plan submittals will be on 11x17 paper, 20 lb. white bond or approved equivalent. Plan sheets will be produced using the most current version of MicroStation. 5.3 Plan Content The Preliminary Bridge Plan will show the general dimensions, elevations, sections, aesthetic features, survey information, foundation borings and design data. If a temporary bridge is needed, a preliminary plan will be prepared for it similar to the final bridge. The Plan will include: General Plan And Elevation Sheet o General Plan and Elevation o Profile of Finished Bridge Deck o Design Data o Proposed Type of Structure Block o Title Block o Transverse Section o Track alignment and profiles for both permanent and temporary tracks Bridge Survey Sheet o Contracted Profile o Plat and Index Map o Alignment Tabulations o Typical Roadway Sections o Engineers Observations o Bench Mark Data o In-place Utility Locations Boring Sheet o Boring Plan o Geotechnical Boring Logs Other Sheets and Details as Required o Staging Details o Aesthetic Details o Construction Plan o Railroad Profile Contractor will submit appropriate electronic files with the Preliminary Plan, including a Digital Terrain Model (TIN) file, MicroStation files containing planimetric mapping (APL, PLN), MicroStation files showing the location of in-place utilities and other surveyed field input (FIP), and a Geopak file (GPK) containing the chains, profiles, and shots of other surveyed features in the project area

10 5.4 Deliverables Contractor will submit all deliverables to State s Project Manager. State s Project Manager will forward deliverables to State s OFCVO, which will, in turn, provide deliverables to the CP Rail as the 30 % Submittal. Expect CP Rail plan reviews to take four to six weeks for each submittal, and each submittal may require a completed submittal checklist as per any specific requirements provided at the concept development workshop State Deliverables Projected traffic volumes; Staff Approved Layout including roadway cross-section, alignment and profiles for TH 100; FADR review comments; Project Wise directory for electronic file transfers; Signature and distribution of Preliminary Bridge Plan Contractor Deliverables Bridge Type Selection Report; Draft Preliminary Bridge Plan (Bridge and Bridge 5309); Foundation borings and draft FADR; Working copies of electronic design files (MicroStation, GPK, TIN, FIP) for input into Project Wise directory; Preliminary track profile, alignment and cross section for mainline and shoofly; Final Preliminary Bridge Plans (Bridge and Bridge 5309); Copies of Electronic design files (MicroStation, GPK, TIN, FIP); Preliminary Bridge Cost Estimates; Preliminary Railway Cost Estimate. 6.0 FINAL BRIDGE DESIGN AND PLAN PREPARATION Contractor will conduct detailed bridge design and prepare a Final Bridge Plans for proposed Bridge in accordance with the provisions described herein. Final Plans for Bridge 5309 will be completed by others. It is assumed for the scope definition that the Bridge structure type will be defined in the preliminary plan stage as a 230-foot, two-span single track thru-girder type superstructure with the wall type pier with integral crash struts aligned within the center concrete median barrier area separating northbound and southbound TH 100. The new track alignment for proposed Bridge is a single track alignment centered near the existing mainline CP Rail alignment. Final track work development off each end of the proposed bridge includes switches connecting to siding tracks on both the eastern and western sides of Bridge The siding will be rebuilt to mainline standards. A new alignment will be developed by Contractor with consideration of input from CP Rail and will tie back into the existing tracks at the termini of the proposed shoo-fly alignments as depicted in the Canadian Pacific Railway over TH100 Bridge Evaluation Final Report, October 5, A new bridge track profile raise of 6 inches +/_above the current mainline profile at the new bridge is anticipated to be acceptable. The existing bridge will be removed and the portion of mainline track will be removed. The plans will include: Superstructure single track with foot walk and handrail on a thru-girder steel ballast deck with waterproofing; Bearing and expansion devices; Substructure: pile supported wall pier and deep abutments;

11 Parallel retaining walls from each abutment; All sheet piling/vertical shoring requirements showing complete design including design loads for all tie-backs if needed. 6.1 Final Bridge Design Contractor will perform all required engineering to determine the geometric, material and procedural requirements for the construction of the bridge. A certified Final Bridge Plan and Special Provisions for Bridge and Bridge 5309 will be prepared and submitted for the State Bridge Engineer s signature. 6.2 Design Standards and Plan Preparation The Final Bridge Plan sheets will be prepared in accordance with the current versions of the following Standards and documents: State LRFD Bridge Design Manual; AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications; State Bridge Details Manual (Parts I and II); Bridge Standard Plans Manual Box Culverts; State Standard Specifications for Highway Construction; AREMA Manual for Railway Engineering; Applicable Railway Company Guidelines ; State CADD Standards; State Summary of Recommended Drafting Standards; State Approved Preliminary Bridge Plan; State Roadway Design Plan; Authorized Project Wise directory structure, as provided access to by the State. When State and CP Rail standards are in conflict, they must be resolved to the satisfaction of both parties. All plan submittals will be on 11x17 paper, 20 lb. white bond or approved equivalent. Plan sheets will be produced using MicroStation. Form, sequence, and content of plans will comply with State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, Technical Manual Section , related appendices, State CADD standards, and the State s current design concepts and practices. 6.3 Plan Review and Content Contractor will coordinate directly with an assigned Final Bridge Design Unit of the State s Bridge Office. The Roadway Project Manager will be copied or notified of all significant correspondence. Contractor will prepare these submittals for review and acceptance by the State Bridge Office: % Plan Review The 30% Plan will contain: General Plan and Elevation sheet, completed to the extent necessary to show the general dimensions, elevations, bridge cross section with proposed beam spacing, architectural features and basic design data; Bridge Layout sheet, showing the corner details and sections, indicating control points, reference line and proposed working point locations. A complete working point tabulation is not required;

12 Architectural or Special Details that may require coordination between State and the Contractor prior to final design and detailing; Bridge Survey sheet; Boring Sheet; Shoo-fly crossover embankment design details; Staging Details; Track Plan and Profile; Preliminary cross sections. The 30% Plan review is an early assessment of Contractor s project understanding and confirmation of the basic bridge geometry. Contractor will not proceed with further design until State s 30% Plan acceptance is obtained. The State Bridge Office will return 30% Plan review comments within 15 working days % Plan Review The intent of the 60% Plan review is to verify Contractor s progress toward plan completion and evaluate against project and Contract timelines. The 60% Plan submittal should include a full set of in-progress plan sheets. Contractor may continue with design during this submittal. State Bridge Office will return 60% Plan review comments within 20 working days. Contractor must submit plan sheets and quantities for the shoo-fly crossover embankment CP Rail 60% Submittal (60% Plan with State s comments addressed) Contractor will address State comments from the 60% Plan Review and provide a full set of in-progress plan sheets to CP Rail for review. At this stage, submittal materials must include responses to CP Rail 30% review comments, 60% design plans and calculations, draft geotechnical report, draft project special provisions, drainage report and plan as applicable, and construction staging % Plan Review The intent of the 95% Plan review is for State to verify that the plan is acceptable for the State Bridge Engineer s Signature. The 95% Plan should be complete in all areas to the extent that in can be certified by Contractor, although a certification signature is not required until after this review is complete. The State s Bridge Office will return 95% Plan review comments within 20 working days. Contractor is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of their work. Design calculations and plan details must be completely checked prior to submittal. If the State s Bridge Office determines that major plan revisions are necessary at any stage in the review process, Contractor will furnish revised review plans and computations CP Rail 100% Submittal (95% Plan with State s comments addressed) Contractor will address State comments from 95% Plan Review and provide a full set of final plan sheets for submittal to CP Rail for review. At this stage, submittal will include responses to CP Rail 60% review comments, 100% design plans and calculations, final geotechnical report, project special provisions, drainage report and plan as applicable, track profile and alignment sheets with geometry, cross sections, and construction phasing. CP Rail review time is expected to take four weeks

13 6.4 Deliverables Contractor will submit all deliverables to State s Project Manager. State s Project Manager will forward deliverables to OFCVO, which will in turn, provide deliverables to CP Rail for 60% and 100% submittals. CP Rail submittals will be in State s standard format. All submittals must include electronic files State Deliverables: Foundations and Other Recommendations; District approved roadway cross-section, alignment, and profile; Red-lined review plans and comments; State will use ProjectWise directory structure and provide access to the Contractor; Signature and distribution of Final Bridge Plan Contractor Deliverables: State 30% Submittal; State 60% Submittal; Final FADR; CP Rail 60% Submittal Materials; Review copies of 95% Bridge Plan (two sets, per review schedule); Revised review copies of Final Bridge Plan (two sets, as needed); CP Rail 100% Submittal Materials; Working copies of electronic design files (MicroStation, Geopak); Certified Final Bridge Plans for Bridge 27303; Certified Special Provisions for Bridge and 5309 including all provisions for track work, temporary sheet piling/vertical shoring requirements (one bound set and one electronic copy, MS Word latest version); Final Design Calculations (one bound set); Final Quantity Calculations (one bound set); Electronic file of Final Bridge Plans (MicroStation) Authorized Project Wise directory structure, as provided access to by the State. If State determines that major plan revisions are necessary at any stage of the review process, Contractor will submit revised plans and computations. THE BALANCE OF THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK