Using FPInterface to Estimate Availability of Forest-Origin Biomass in British Columbia: Mackenzie TSA

Transcription

1 Using FPInterface to Estimate Availability of Forest-Origin in British Columbia: Mackenzie TSA Technical Report no. 4 - January, 21 Charles Friesen, Senior Researcher, Fibre Supply Non-restricted Distribution fpinnovations.ca

2 FPInnovations is a not-for-profit worldleading R&D institute that specializes in the creation of scientific solutions in support of the Canadian forest sector s global competitiveness and responds to the priority needs of its industry members and government partners. It is ideally positioned to perform research, innovate, and deliver state-of-the-art solutions for every area of the sector s value chain, from forest operations to consumer and industrial products. Its R&D laboratories are located in Québec, Montréal, and Vancouver, and it has technology transfer offices across Canada. For more information about FPInnovations, visit: Follow us on: Abstract Based on inventory information and a 2-year harvest queue, estimates of the amount of biomass available from forest harvest residues are estimated in $ increments of delivered cost. For the Mackenzie Timber Supply Area, 12, odt/year is projected to be available at $6/odt. Acknowledgements The author would like to thank Albert Nussbaum of the MFLNRO for helping bring this project to realization. Rob Schuetz of Timberline was instrumental in supplying data for the Conifex portion of the project. Additionally, Tim Salkeld, Atmo Prasad, and Barry Snowdon, all of the MFLNRO were key in providing reliable MFLNRO data. Reviewers Stuart Spencer, Researcher, Fibre Supply Marian Marinescu, Researcher, Fibre Supply Janet Mitchell, Associate Research Leader, Fibre Supply Contact Charles Friesen Senior Researcher Fibre Supply, Forest Operations (64) charles.friesen@fpinnovations.ca 217 FPInnovations. All rights reserved. Unauthorized copying or redistribution prohibited. Disclosure for Commercial Application: If you require assistance to implement these research findings, please contact FPInnovations at info@fpinnovations.ca.

3 Table of contents 1. Executive summary Introduction Objectives Methods... 7 Overall process... 7 Data acquisition... Data transformation... equations... 9 FPInterface parameters... Tree species associations... Road classes... General parameters Comminution cost Topping diameter Utilization of lodgepole pine and mountain pine beetle-attacked wood: considerations Time frame Parameters as entered into FPInterface Delivery locations calculations Results and discussion... 1 Summary key results... 1 Conifex harvest projection: Comparison to MFLNRO projection Conclusions References Appendix: Output maps and cost-availability tables... 2 FPInnovations Page 3

4 List of figures Figure 1. Steps in the method for building the final inventory of economically available biomass.... Figure 2. Utilization of mountain pine beetle-affected lodgepole pine stems: standards used in the analysis Figure 3. Cost availability of biomass in the Mackenzie TSA: former method of accounting for extra lodgepole pine waste created due to some wood being degraded by the mountain pine beetle infestation Figure 4. Cost availability of biomass in the Mackenzie TSA: improved method of accounting for extra lodgepole pine waste created due to some wood being degraded by the mountain pine beetle infestation Figure 5. Recoverable biomass in the Mackenzie TSA, at a grinding cost of $2.4/ODT Figure 6. Projected biomass yield (ODT per hectare) Figure 7. Availability of biomass in the Mackenzie TSA, by 5-year period. Average = 3.7 ODT/ha Figure. Pile of biomass adjacent to a power plant in the Interior British Columbia Figure 9. Availability of biomass in the Mackenzie TSA, by grinding cost: 2-year scenario Figure. Availability of biomass in the Mackenzie TSA, by 5-year period, at $6/ODT Figure 11. Total availability of biomass from harvesting in the Mackenzie TSA, by 5-year period Figure 12. Cost of delivered biomass from point of origin to the town of Mackenzie Figure 13. Cost of delivered biomass from point of origin to the town of Mackenzie List of tables Table 1. Tree species associations... Table 2. Road class associations Table 3. Cost-availability of biomass, at $27.27/ODT Table 4. FPInterface parameters Table 5. Cost of water transportation of biomass, by log dump Table 6. Calculation of biomass ratio Table 7. Cost availability of biomass in the Mackenzie TSA: comparison of two grinding scenarios Table. projections FPInnovations Page 4

5 1. Executive summary In 211 FPInnovations used FPInterface to develop and demonstrate a method for estimating available forest-origin biomass in British Columbia s Timber Supply Areas (TSA): the test case was the Quesnel TSA. The method was subsequently refined and applied to the Williams Lake TSA (212); the Prince George TSA (212); and the Lakes TSA (213), for which the results are reported here. The biomass inventory was based on 2-year harvest and road network plans for Crown land (excluding Woodlot Licenses, Tree Farm Licenses, Community Forest Agreements, and First Nations tenures) provided by the British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations. The delivery point for biomass was the town of Mackenzie. All planned blocks were assumed to be clearcut harvested, processed at roadside, and accessible to comminution operations Forest License holder Conifex Timber Inc. expressed interested in collaborating on this analysis by supplying data from their Mackenzie operations in order to enhance or supplement the MFLNRO information. Separate analyses of specific Conifex areas were performed and these were compared to runs based on the MFLNRO data. The results of the analysis of the Mackenzie TSA showed that small gains in efficiency can yield large gains in economic biomass volume, and that using Williston Lake, which is a large and central feature in the Mackenzie TSA, for log transportation allows about half the total biomass to become available at $6/ODT. The analysis of available biomass supply in the Mackenzie TSA indicates an average biomass yield of 3.7 ODT/ha. This is in the form of comminuted hog fuel and comes from harvest residues only, i.e., tops, branches, and other roadside harvesting waste. Approximately 31% of this material is generated from mountain pine beetle-attacked wood, i.e., which would not be available if the lodgepole pine were healthy. The expected biomass ratio (the ratio of recovered biomass to recovered merchantable roundwood) is 42%. This is high for typical harvesting operations, i.e., ones that do not include mountain pine beetlekilled wood, but is usual for areas with some mountain pine beetle infestation. Because of the efficiency of grinding operations has improved in recent years, two price points for grinding were tested: $2.4/ODT, representing optimistic conditions; and $27.27/ODT, representing the typical conditions of the time. At an economic price of $6/ODT for hog fuel delivered to the town of Mackenzie, the $2.4/ODT grinding scenario predicted a total of 3.6 million ODT over the 2-year harvest horizon (1 ODT/year) and the $27.27/ODT scenario predicted a total of 2.4 million ODT or 12 ODT/year. This difference shows the sensitivity to small gains in grinding efficiency. A further 25% more volume would be available at $7/ODT ($2.4/ODT grinding scenario, optimistic conditions). There was a noticeable difference in the amounts of biomass available at $6/ODT for each grinding cost scenario. Much of the biomass available at $7/ODT at the higher grinding cost would be available at $6/ODT at the lower grinding cost. If further efficiencies could be realized even more biomass can be available. Gains in potentially available biomass began to tail off after the cost of biomass reaches $ or $9/ODT. FPInnovations Page 5

6 We used data provided by Conifex Timber Inc., one of several licensees in the TSA, to perform some separate analyses of specific Conifex areas and these runs were compared to ones based on the MFLNRO data for the Mackenzie TSA. The comparison showed that the Conifex biomass harvest projection contained more spruce than lodgepole pine, while the MFLNRO projection contained more lodgepole pine. The Conifex blocks were spread further afield and occurred only in Conifex-designated areas. Although the total Conifex harvest was predicted to be 44% of the MFLNRO s total projected harvest, the amount of available Conifex biomass at $6/ODT was only about 29% of the MFLNRO s available biomass. 2. Introduction In order to progress toward full implementation of a bioeconomy in British Columbia a key piece of information is needed i.e., a detailed inventory of economically available biomass. To address this need, in 211 FPInnovations undertook a project in partnership with the Inventory Branch of the British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations (MFLNRO). The specific goals of the project were to develop a process for calculating biomass inventories in Timber Supply Areas in the Central Interior. The projections of biomass availability were based on 2-year harvest and road network plans for Crown land (excluding Woodlot Licenses, Tree Farm Licenses, Community Forest agreements, and First Nations tenures) provided by the MFLNRO. In 211 FPInnovations developed a method for estimating and projecting available forest-origin biomass in British Columbia s Timber Supply Areas (TSA), using FPInterface: the test case was the Quesnel TSA (Friesen & Goodison, 211). In 212 this method was refined and applied to the Williams Lake TSA (Friesen, 212a), the Prince George TSA (Friesen, 212b), and the Lakes TSA (Friesen, 212c). An analysis of the Mackenzie TSA was run in 213, for which the outcomes are reported here. The aim in providing this information is to help decision makers better understand biomass availability when preparing industrial proposals. Detailed introductory statements describing the background and rationale of this project and the greater project as a whole are in Friesen & Goodison (211). One of the Forest License holders in the Mackenzie TSA, Conifex Timber Inc., expressed interested in collaborating on the project by supplying data from their Mackenzie operations, in order to enhance or supplement the MFLNRO information. Separate analyses of specific Conifex areas were performed and these were compared to runs based on the MFLNRO data. 3. Objectives As abridged from the report about the Quesnel TSA (Friesen & Goodison, 211) the objectives were to: Calculate biomass supply for volume-based tenures in the Mackenzie Timber Supply Area (TSA) for a 2-year period. The specific deliverables included: a. An analysis showing the delivered cost of biomass from point of origin FPInnovations Page 6

7 b. An analysis showing the amount of biomass delivered at different price points The market value of 1 oven-dried tonne (ODT) of biomass was not clear at the time, but $6 was set as the agreed-upon threshold at which to determine commercial biomass availability. 4. Methods Overall process The basic methodology for determining the biomass supply in the Central Interior was established during analyses of the Quesnel TSA (Friesen & Goodison, 211) and the Williams Lake TSA (Friesen, 212a). It is reviewed below. The analysis focused on the TSA and was based on polygon data (tree characteristics) and a road data set supplied by the MFLNRO. It did not include any nearby Woodlot Licenses, Tree Farm Licenses, Community Forest Agreements, or any First Nations tenures because the inclusion of some of these areas could have altered the available supply of biomass. Additionally, stands considered unmerchantable due to small stem size were not included in the analysis. The analysis focused on recovering harvest residues from merchantable stands. However, purposely harvesting unmerchantable stands for biomass could add to the biomass supply and further analysis could be undertaken to determine its profitability. The process map in Figure 1 graphically displays the steps taken to build the final inventory of economically available biomass for the Quesnel TSA (Friesen & Goodison, 211). The same method was used for this analysis of the Mackenzie TSA. FPInnovations Page 7

8 Figure 1. Steps in the method for building the final inventory of economically available biomass. Data acquisition Data layers for the Mackenzie TSA (excluding Woodlot Licenses, Tree Farm Licenses, Community Forest Agreements, and First Nations tenures) were acquired from the MFLNRO. The data included Vegetation Resources Inventory polygons with attributes, and road linework with attributes. The polygon data covered 2 years of harvest over four consecutive 5-year periods. The 2-year harvest raster is a point-in-time snapshot. It indicates which polygons are expected to be harvested over the 2 years. No attempt was made to model possible growth or mortality during the 2- year horizon. Any projections of growth or mortality were already accounted for in the harvestable proportion contained in the harvest raster data. Road network data were acquired from both Conifex and the MFLNRO. The Conifex road network contained less detail and was thought to unduly shorten cycle times and/or isolate blocks such that no delivery pathway could be found. Therefore the MFLNRO road network was used for the analysis of the MFLNRO and the Conifex polygons (separate reports). The use of the same road network for both reports allowed greater comparability in cost comparison, and it focused the analysis of differences on polygon attribute data. Data transformation FPInterface requires two major inputs a polygon layer of harvestable blocks with attributes, and a road layer. The polygon layer must also have a harvest raster built into it, indicating which polygons are FPInnovations Page

9 to be cut in which time period. To calculate biomass amounts, FPInterface requires both tree size data (height and dbh) and either stand density (stems per ha) or volume per hectare by species in each polygon. When the polygon layer is uploaded it is necessary to tie species in the resultant to the species present in FPInterface. In order to speed up the calculation, polygons with little or no merchantable volume were targeted for elimination. Polygons with no volume were removed from the resultant. Some of these polygons resulted from the process of intersecting the Vegetation Resources Inventory and the harvest raster layers. Aggregation rules meant blocks were grouped if they had identical harvest years and were within a km radius. FPInterface calculates cost in part by finding a transport route from the product origin in a polygon (block) to the mill or delivery site. It relies on a continuous path along the road network. If digital road segments are not joined together (snapped) the program is not able to find a path between the block and the mill, or it may find a sub-optimal circuitous path. Examination of the data set showed that a great deal of road snapping was required. equations To perform the analysis, tree species indicated in the inventory are tied to single-tree biomass equations in FPInterface. These equations were based on Canadian national tree above ground biomass equations (Lambert et al, 25). Although this equation set includes trees from all across Canada, including western and northern Canada, there were very few samples from British Columbia. More recently, Ung et al. (2) have released tree equations for British Columbia (accepted by the MFLNRO) and these were incorporated into FPInterface for all the analyses performed after the initial one (Quesnel TSA). FPInnovations Page 9

10 FPInterface parameters Tree species associations Species associations were made as shown in Table 1. Table 1. Tree species associations Conifex species cottonwood aspen subalpine fir white birch Douglas-fir tamarack larch pine spruce white spruce Engelmann spruce hybrid spruce black spruce FPInterface biomass equation black cottonwood trembling aspen alpine fir white birch Douglas-fir (Interior) western larch western larch lodgepole pine white spruce white spruce white spruce white spruce black spruce Road classes Unlike the dataset used in the analysis of the Quesnel TSA (Friesen & Goodison, 211), there were no road classes contained in the road data set for the Mackenzie TSA. However, FPInterface has the ability to assign road classes based on the amount of volume hauled over each section of road. The volume hauled is for merchantable volume as calculated by FPInterface. The volume and speeds associated with each road class were assigned as listed in Table 2. FPInnovations Page

11 Table 2. Road class associations FPInterface road class Volume Road speed Minimum Maximum Posted speed Empty haul a (m3) (m3) (km/h) (km/h) Paved Class Class (off highway) Class Class Class Class (operational) Class 5 (winter) a 95% of posted speed. b 5% of posted speed. Loaded haul b (km/h) General parameters The price of fuel can have significant impacts on model results. Some equipment in the model can use diesel and while other equipment is eligible for marked fuel. A price of $1.25/L was assigned, which was near to commercial rates for diesel, but slightly higher than the price of marked fuel at the time. The program s default values for productivities and costs of forestry equipment rely on a long history of FPInnovations studies and on other information gathered by FPInnovations. If users have specific values or costs they wish to apply to any phase or machine, these can be used instead of the defaults. For this project, only the default values were used. To verify their suitability the default values were compared with the machine costs listed in the Interior Appraisal Manual and were found to be close approximates. Based on a terrain classification system developed by the Canadian Pulp and Paper Association (CPPA) (Mellgren, 19), average slope for the Mackenzie TSA was assigned to CPPA Class 4 (33 to 49%). Ground strength was rated as CPPA Class 2 (good), and ground roughness was rated as CPPA Class 2 (slightly even). Comminution cost Working time for British Columbia conditions was based on previous base case studies, consisting of one 12-hour shift/day, 2 days/year. Grinder efficiency was set at 6%, and the amount of fuel used per productive machine-hour for the grinder was the standard 135 L/PMH. These are the standard base case parameters used in past FPInnovations studies and are included for ease of comparison to those studies. In this study, these parameters produce a grinding cost of $27.27/ODT on moderate ground. However, recent developments in the industry have led to a lower grinding cost of about $2/ODT, therefore the parameters were changed in a low-cost grinding scenario to 75% efficiency and fuel use of 7L/PMH, in order to represent the new conditions. Thus the grinding cost was $2.4/ODT which was thought to be achievable by an experienced operator in the conditions of the Mackenzie TSA. FPInnovations Page 11

12 Topping diameter Although British Columbia regulations require a topping diameter of cm for most merchantable species, this analysis used 12.5 cm in order to reflect more common industrial practise. Topping diameter has a significant impact on the volume of a tree available for biomass use. Utilization of lodgepole pine and mountain pine beetle-attacked wood: considerations The harvesting of standing trees for biomass purposes is not generally considered economic in British Columbia because their recovery must cover the full costs of planning, developing, and harvesting of the stands, in addition to costs for biomass recovery 1 operations. However, because of mortality due to the mountain pine beetle infestation of lodgepole pine in the Interior, some whole logs were included for biomass chipping. Although the timber harvesting land base (THLB) proportion attribute includes mortality attributed to mountain pine beetle infestation, because of continuing attack by the beetle and the resulting degradation of logs, 3% of lodgepole pine volume was removed from availability as merchantable volume. Half of this (15% of total lodgepole pine volume) was estimated to be available for whole-log chipping or grinding at roadside, and the remainder was counted as loss (Figure 2). One part of the methodology was changed from the biomass calculations made in the preceding reports in this series of studies (Friesen & Goodison, 211; Friesen, 212a, 212b, 212c). When 15% of total pine sawlogs is indicated for conversion to biomass, FPInterface assigns harvest costs as part of the acquisition of this biomass. However, because none of the biomass in this analysis is actually purposely harvested biomass, any costs attributed to obtaining biomass from mountain pine beetle whole-trees were reduced by $7/ODT, and the Merchantable volume was added to the Residues volume to produce Table 3. This increases the amount of biomass available at each price point. $7/ODT was the chosen amount by which to reduce costs so that the maximum cost for acquiring Merchantable volume would match the maximum cost for acquiring Residues, i.e., $12/ODT, and approximate the cost for harvest converted to ODT. For example, Table 3 presents the FPInterface output at $27.27/ODT for grinding. However, the amount put forward in this report (in the Results section, below) is ODT available at $6/ODT. This is achieved by adding the Residues amount at $6 (i.e., ) to the Merchantable volume amount at $13 (i.e., ). This is thought to be a fair representation of what would actually be achievable for $6/ODT (at a grinding cost of $27.27/ODT). In Figure 3, the volume obtained from mountain pine beetle-attacked wood (15% of total lodgepole pine) has harvest costs attributed it according to the old method. In Figure 4 these costs are reduced by $7 to reflect actual practise: Figure 4 is thought to be more representative of actual conditions. 1 biomass recovery = comminution plus transport of harvest residues FPInnovations Page 12

13 Unutilized stems, 15% Stems to merchantable logs, 7% Stems converted to biomass, 15% Figure 2. Utilization of mountain pine beetle-affected lodgepole pine stems: standards used in the analysis. Table 3. Cost-availability of biomass, at $27.27/ODT FPInnovations Page 13

14 7,, available (ODT) 6,, 5,, 4,, 3,, 2,, 1,, 15% pine residues only $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $7 $ $9 $ $1 $12 $13 $14 $15 $16 $17 $1 $19 Cost availability ($/ODT) Figure 3. Cost availability of biomass in the Mackenzie TSA: former method of accounting for extra lodgepole pine waste created due to some wood being degraded by the mountain pine beetle infestation. 7,, 6,, available (odt) 5,, 4,, 3,, 2,, 1,, extra 15% pine waste residues only $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $7 $ $9 $ $1 $12 Cost ($/odt) Figure 4. Cost availability of biomass in the Mackenzie TSA: improved method of accounting for extra lodgepole pine waste created due to some wood being degraded by the mountain pine beetle infestation. FPInnovations Page 14

15 Time frame The harvest period data were in four 5-year periods, for a total of 2 years of harvest. Parameters as entered into FPInterface Table 4 presents a summary of some of the parameters as entered into FPInterface, at a grinding cost of $27.27/ODT. At a grinding cost of $2.4, the grinder efficiency was adjusted to 75% and grinder fuel use was adjusted to 7 L/PMH. FPInnovations Page 15

16 Table 4. FPInterface parameters Run descriptor Grinding at $27.27/ODT run name MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson output name MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson block system MinFinal road system TSA16_roads4 transfer yard(s) E Bear Valley, Bear Valley, Nabesche, Finlay Forks, Ospika, S Fort Grahame, Fort Grahame, Chowika, Deserters, Isola, Ingenika, Swannell, Factor Ross, Pete Toy, Chunamon, Raspberry, Mesilinka, Omineca, Mackenzie cost per transfer yard, respectively 7.5, 7.5, 7.5, 7, 7.5, 7.5, 7.5,,,,,, 7.5, 7.5, 7.5, 7, 7, 7, year(s) analyzed All species attribute linking BC automatic assignment of road class by volume Yes road maintenance Yes haul speeds Graduated haul speeds at 95% / 5% of posted Yes transport shifts / day 1 transport hours / shift 12 transport days / year 2 transport fuel price $/litre 1.25 ground strength 2 good ground roughness 2 slightly even average slope slash used for biomass Yes full stem used for biomass No Pl utilization of THLB merchantable timber (%) 7 Pl unutilized merchantable used for biomass (%) 15 Pl stems for biomass chipped where? Roadside Pl merchantable stemwood for biomass directed where closest yard chips destination closest yard topping diameter 12.5 cm truck used for chips 3-axle truck used for logs B-train harvesting fuel price / litre (x3) $1.25 harvesting shifts / day (x3) 1 harvesting hours / shift (x3) 12 harvesting days / yr (x3) 2 harvesting system full tree with roadside processing felling & processing mechanized and bunched skid type skidder with grapple type of roadside processing cut-to-length on site biomass treatment (roadside) comminution recovery season winter slash freshness fresh slash pre-piled at roadside Yes grinder size type horizontal 6 kw biomass fuel price / litre (x2) $1.25 biomass hours / shift (x2) 12 biomass shifts / day (x2) 1 biomass days / yr (x2) 2 grinder efficiency (%) 6 a grinder fuel use (L/PMH) 135 a indirect costs - biomass ($ value) $. indirect costs - harvesting ($ value) $. a At a grinding cost of $2.4, the parameters highlighted in yellow were adjusted to 75% and 7 L/PMH. FPInnovations Page 16

17 Delivery locations Because it has the largest population in the TSA and is the site of existing mills, the town of Mackenzie was used as the delivery point for biomass. The presence of Williston Lake, which is a large and dominant feature in the Mackenzie TSA, means that forest products can be transported from distant locations by water for costs significantly less than hauling on roads. delivery points (transfer yards) were designated at log dumps along the lake. Then a cost to deliver the biomass from that dump to Mackenzie was added to the costs required to deliver the comminuted biomass to the dump. Costs include unload, reload, lake tow, and de-watering. The costs associated with lake transport for the different dumps are shown in Table 5. Whether or not the analysis should include the Manson dump as a potential route for material to the mill was debated, but in the end it was excluded. In current practise, logs are transported down the mainline (Finlay FSR) instead of via the dump, a feat made possible by the existence of a causeway across the lake. This suggests that this is the most cost-effective method for transport. Whether or not this produces the lowest stumpage has not been confirmed by the MFLNRO at the time of writing; however, this report reflects industry practise and excludes Manson dump. Table 5. Cost of water transportation of biomass, by log dump Log dump Cost ($/ODT) Deserter s Isola Ingenika Swannell Chowika Pete Toy 7.5 Fort Grahame 7.5 South Fort Grahame 7.5 Ospika 7.5 Factor Ross 7.5 Chunamon 7.5 Bear Valley 7.5 East Bear Valley 7.5 Nabesche 7.5 Finlay Forks 7 Raspberry 7 Mesilinka 7 Omineca 7 FPInnovations Page 17

18 calculations The biomass calculations in FPInterface produce an amount of total available biomass once merchantable roundwood has been removed. For this project, only biomass transported to roadside was considered recoverable, and biomass likely to remain at the stump or dispersed on the cutblock was not. Once it is transported to roadside, some biomass becomes unavailable due to handling and technical losses. The remainder is considered recovered biomass. Figure 5 shows this breakdown with the numbers from the 2-year harvest of the low-cost grinding scenario, at a grinding cost of $2.4/ODT. Figure 5. Recoverable biomass in the Mackenzie TSA, at a grinding cost of $2.4/ODT. 5. Results and discussion Summary key results The FPInterface analysis of biomass supply in the Mackenzie TSA, which was based on inventory information and the road network supplied by the MFLNRO, indicated an average biomass yield of 3.7 ODT/ha. This was in the form of comminuted hog fuel, derived from harvest residues only, i.e., tops, branches, and other roadside harvesting waste. Mill residues are not predicted by the model. Approximately 31% of this material was obtained from mountain pine beetle-affected wood in excess of what would be generated if the pine were healthy. This means 26.7 ODT/ha were derived from normal harvesting waste, and an additional 12 ODT/ha comprised extra material which was available due the mountain pine beetle infestation of lodgepole pine (Figure 6), averaged over all cutblocks in the study. Looking at the yield period by period (Figure 7), the first two 5-year periods expect greater yield per hectare than the last two periods, probably owing to the availability of a greater amount of mountain FPInnovations Page 1

19 pine beetle-affected wood in the first two periods. The greater presence of pine in the first two periods means more material is calculated as waste (usable for biomass), because mountain pine beetle-killed trees yield more waste than healthy trees. The biomass ratio (the ratio of recovered biomass to recovered merchantable roundwood) (Table 6) is 41.% when both values are expressed in the same units. In this case, ODT of roundwood and ODT of biomass are expected. Expressing this volumetrically for roundwood, m 3 of roundwood are expected 2 and the biomass ratio expressed in heterogeneous units (ODT of biomass/m 3 of roundwood) is 12.5%. This is high for typical harvesting operations that do not include mountain pine beetle-killed wood, but low for mountain pine beetle-infested areas; it represents a weighted average of both as distributed in this harvest queue. When biomass supply studies were begun for the MFLNRO two years ago, the typical grinding cost was about $3/ODT. However, recent advances in operational efficiency have lowered the grinding cost to about $2 to 25/ODT. Therefore, two scenarios were analyzed, each with a different grinding cost. Key results from the runs for 2 years of harvest, and grinding costs at $2.4/ODT and at $27.27/ODT, are summarized in Tables 7 and. More detailed results are shown in Appendix 1. The results for the different grinding costs are compared in Figure 9. Note the significant difference in the amounts available at $6/ODT for each grinding cost. Much of the biomass costing $7/ODT at the higher grinding cost is available at $6/ODT at the lower grinding cost. If further efficiencies could be realized, even more biomass would be available. Gains in potentially available biomass tail off significantly after $ or $9/ODT. The total biomass available at any price point from harvest residues and mountain pine beetle waste (the portion deemed recoverable) over the next 2 years was projected to be 5.95 million ODT. At a grinding cost of $2.4/ODT about 3.6 million ODT (or approximately 1 ODT/year) would be available for $6/ODT. At a grinding cost of $27.27/ODT the amount of biomass available would be about 11 ODT/year at a $6/ODT price point. What is very significant here is that half the total amount of biomass in the TSA is available for $6/ODT (approximate average of the grinder cost scenarios). This is almost certainly because the transportation of wood on the lake allows far-flung areas to be accessed for reasonable cost. This level of biomass availability was not observed in the other TSAs where only a quarter or less of the total possible biomass was available at $6/ODT (Friesen & Goodison, 211; Friesen, 212a, 212b, 212c). If the acceptable price of delivered biomass rose to $7/ODT, then available biomass would be about 25% greater at a $2.4/ODT grinding cost, and about 67% greater at a $27.27/ODT grinding cost. Figure shows biomass availability at $6/ODT for each period. 2 As shown in the Forest Supply report for either scenario, p.. (Appendix 1, Section 1.1). Conversion to m 3 is achieved by dividing by 2.56, which is the weighted average ratio for all species as shown in the ratio on the flow diagram for merchantable volume harvested, Figure 5. FPInnovations Page 19

20 Again, the difference in available amounts at each grinding cost is highlighted by the differences in the bar heights by colour. In general, much more biomass is available at the lower grinding cost. The difference is smaller in period 4, likely because there are consistently longer distances from the blocks to the delivery points. It is interesting that there is not a falldown in biomass availability at $6/ODT across the periods. There is a slight drop in total biomass available during the periods, possibly due to mountain pine beetle, (Figure 11), but the trend for stability at $6/ODT suggests that the harvest planned at locations within the $6/ODT radius does not decrease. This is not typical of the other TSAs we have modelled. An isometric map of harvest blocks by biomass cost is presented in Figure 12. Note that the map averages the cost of biomass from roadside residues with the cost from mountain pine beetle stems (as calculated by the program). In general, the blocks closest to the delivery point have the lowest delivered costs and blocks furthest from the mill are the most expensive. Blocks which are close to the lake and benefit from water transportation can remain cost-effective at distances from the mill not usually realized in land-bound TSAs. Figure 13 provides a more detailed look at one portion of the TSA. Some blocks quite far from the mill in Mackenzie were calculated to be reasonably affordable for biomass extraction if they can access a log dump on the lake. In this figure color gradation based on distance from the mill is more visible. Figure 6. Projected biomass yield (ODT per hectare). FPInnovations Page 2

21 yield (ODT/ha) period 1 period 2 period 3 period 4 5-year harvest periods Figure 7. Availability of biomass in the Mackenzie TSA, by 5-year period. Average = 3.7 ODT/ha. Table 6. Calculation of biomass ratio Figure. Pile of biomass adjacent to a power plant in the Interior British Columbia. FPInnovations Page 21

22 Table 7. Cost availability of biomass in the Mackenzie TSA: comparison of two grinding scenarios Cost ($/ODT) Volume of biomass available at a grinding cost of $2.4/ODT Volume of biomass available at a grinding cost of $27.27/ODT Total available (ODT) Available annually (ODT/year) Total available (ODT) Available annually (ODT/year) ,,. availability (ODT) 6,,. 5,,. 4,,. 3,,. 2,,. 1,,. grinding at $2.4 grinding at $ $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $7 $ $9 $ $1 $12 Cost availability ($/ODT) Figure 9. Availability of biomass in the Mackenzie TSA, by grinding cost: 2-year scenario. FPInnovations Page 22

23 Available biomass (ODT) 1,4,. 1,2,. 1,,.,. 6,. 4,. 2,. Grinding at $2.4 Grinding at $ period 1 period 2 period 3 period 4 5-year harvest period Figure. Availability of biomass in the Mackenzie TSA, by 5-year period, at $6/ODT. 1,,. 1,6,. 1,4,. (ODT) 1,2,. 1,,.,. 6,. 4,. 2,. biomass - period 1 period 2 period 3 period 4 Figure 11. Total availability of biomass from harvesting in the Mackenzie TSA, by 5-year period. FPInnovations Page 23

24 Figure 12. Cost of delivered biomass from point of origin to the town of Mackenzie in increments of $/ODT. Blocks with the lowest delivered costs are the greenest in colour. The most expensive blocks are violet in colour. The brown log piles represent log dumps on the lake, and the southernmost one is the mill at Mackenzie. The colour scale represents estimated cost ($/ODT) of delivered biomass from that block. FPInnovations Page 24

25 Figure 13. Cost of delivered biomass from point of origin to the town of Mackenzie, in increments of $/ODT: southern detail. Blocks with the lowest delivered costs are the greenest in colour. The most expensive blocks are violet in colour. The brown log pile represents a log dump on the lake. The colour scale represents estimated cost ($/ODT) of delivered biomass from that block. Conifex harvest projection: Comparison to MFLNRO projection We used data provided by Conifex Timber Inc., one of several licensees in the area, to perform some separate analyses of specific Conifex areas and these runs were compared to ones based on the MFLNRO data for the Mackenzie TSA. The comparison showed that, not surprisingly, less biomass was predicted by the Conifex data. Although the total Conifex harvest is 44% of the MFLNRO s total projection, the Conifex amount available at $6/ODT is only 29% of the MFLNRO amount. This may be because Conifex harvest areas are further from the delivery point (Mackenzie) on average; the Conifex blocks were spread further afield and occurred only in Conifex-designated areas. The comparison showed that the Conifex harvest projection contained more spruce than lodgepole pine, while the MFLNRO projection contained more pine. This would also tend to reduce the amount of biomass available for Conifex, because less biomass is obtained from mountain pine beetle-killed pine. A comparison of biomass predictions based on the Conifex and MFNRO datasets is in Table. FPInnovations Page 25

26 Table. projections, based on the Conifex and MFLNRO datasets, by cost per ODT and grinding cost: comparison Cost ($/ODT) MFLNRO Grinding at $2.4/ODT (ODT) Grinding at $27.27/ODT (ODT) Conifex Grinding at $2.4/ODT (ODT) Grinding at $27.27/ODT (ODT) Total volume available Highest cost ($/ODT) Conclusions We developed a method for estimating available forest-origin biomass for British Columbia Timber Supply Areas, using FPInterface. The Quesnel TSA was the test case (Friesen & Goodison, 211). Extrapolating on that experience and subsequent runs for the Williams Lake TSA (Friesen, 212a), the Prince George TSA (Friesen, 212b), and the Lakes TSA (Friesen, 212c), estimates were made for the Mackenzie TSA. The biomass inventory was based on 2-year harvest and road network plans for Crown land (excluding TFL licenses) provided by the British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resources. The delivery point for biomass was designated at the town of Mackenzie only. All planned blocks were assumed to be clearcut harvested, processed at roadside, and accessible to comminution operations. In addition, we used data provided by Conifex Timber Inc., one of several licensees in the TSA, to perform some separate analyses of specific Conifex areas, and these runs were compared to ones based on the MFLNRO data for the Mackenzie TSA. FPInnovations Page 26

27 The analysis of 2-year biomass supply in the Mackenzie TSA predicts a yield of 3.7 ODT/ha of biomass in the form of hog fuel from harvest residue. The biomass ratio of recovered biomass to recovered roundwood is 42%. This is high for typical harvesting operations, i.e., ones that do not include mountain pine beetle-killed wood, but is usual for areas comprised of some wood degraded by mountain pine beetle infestation. Because the efficiency of grinding operations has improved in recent years, two price points for grinding were tested: one at $2.4/ODT, representing optimistic conditions, and one at $27.27/ODT, representing less efficient conditions. At an economic price of $6/ODT for delivered hog fuel, the $2.4 grinding scenario predicts 3.6 million ODT for 2 years (1 ODT/year) and the $27.27 scenario predicts 2.4 million ODT over 2 years and 12 ODT/year. This difference shows the sensitivity to small gains in grinding efficiency. Additionally, a further 25% more volume is available at $7/ODT ($2.4 grinding scenario), so there is room for realization of even greater biomass volume if higher costs can be paid or greater efficiency can be obtained. In comparing the run based on the Conifex data to the run based on the MFLNRO data (which comprised the entire Mackenzie TSA), the Conifex total harvest is about 44% of the MFLNRO harvest, but only about 29% as large at the economic level of $6/ODT. Perhaps the most significant take-away messages from this study are that small gains in efficiency can yield large gains in economic biomass volume, and that the in the Mackenzie TSA the option of using water transportation (via Williston Lake) rather than hauling wood by road makes about half the total biomass available at $6/ODT. 7. References Friesen, C. (212a). Using FPInterface to estimate available forest-origin biomass in British Columbia: Williams Lake TSA (Technical Report). Vancouver, British Columbia: FPInnovations. Friesen, C. (212b). Using FPInterface to estimate available forest-origin biomass in British Columbia: Prince George TSA (Technical Report). Vancouver, British Columbia: FPInnovations. Friesen, C. (212c). Using FPInterface to estimate available forest-origin biomass in British Columbia: Lakes TSA (Technical Report). Vancouver, British Columbia: FPInnovations. Friesen, C., & Goodison, A. (211). Using FPInterface to estimate available forest-origin biomass in British Columbia: Quesnel TSA (Technical Report). Vancouver, British Columbia: FPInnovations. Lambert, M-C., Ung, C-H., & Raulier, R. (25). Canadian national tree aboveground biomass equations. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 35: Mellgren, P.G. (19) Terrain classification for Canadian forestry. Woodlands Section, Canadian Pulp and Paper Association (CPPA). Ung, C.-H., Bernier, P., & Guo, X.-J. (2). Canadian national biomass equations: New parameter estimates that include British Columbia data. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 35: FPInnovations Page 27

28 . Appendix: Output maps and cost-availability tables 1.1 reports 1.2 Forest Supply Reports FPInnovations Page 2

29 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Territory: Sector: Cut block: Unknown territory Unknown sector <Multiple selection> Statistics - Selected Items Area 153,7.3 ha Number of cut blocks 9 Recovered biomass 5,952,512.2 odt Recovery rate 3.7 odt/ha odt / Merchantable m³.147 odt/m³ Delivered products Chips Bundles Trunks and Residues Energy balance Available energy Fuel consumption % % % 31 : 1 21,465,675 MWh 13.4 L/odt Cost Harvesting recovery Transfer yard Transportation Stumpage fees Road network - Maintenance Indirect costs Total $/odt $/odt 5.9 $/odt 32.2 $/odt. $/odt 1.51 $/odt. $/odt.2 $/odt Revenue Sale value Silvicultural discount. $/odt. $/odt Net Profit -.2 $/odt 5/3/213 1:29:14 PM Page 1 of 13

30 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Flow Total 27,7,396.9 odt Merch. vol. harvested 16,469,63. odt 42,112,37. m³ Available biomass,,452.4 odt Uncut trees 2,537,36.5 odt Natural losses 4,162.3 odt Residue retention 2 % 413,36.5 odt At the stump 1,653,473.9 odt Not recovered 1,653,473.9 odt Technical availability. odt Roadside 6,773,447. odt Not recovered 2,935.6 odt Recovery / Available 67. % Recovered biomass 5,952,512.2 odt Recovery / Total 21.3 % Products Product name odt odt/m³ odt/ha Pine-biomass 1,53, Pine (residues) 1,62, Spruce (residues) 1,356, Subalpine fir (residues) 427, Pine-biomass (residues) 34, Aspen (residues) 226, Birch (residues) 53, Black spruce (residues) 37, Cottonwood (residues) 2, Douglas fir (residues) ,952, /3/213 1:29:14 PM Page 2 of 13

31 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] 9 selected site(s) / 9 Area covered: 153,7 ha / 153,7 ha 5/3/213 1:29:15 PM Page 3 of 13

32 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Recovery summary Volume(odt) Area(ha) Number of cut blocks recovery location At the stump Roadside. 5,952, ,7.3 9 Recovery season Summer Winter. 5,952, ,7.3 9 Residue freshness Fresh Brown Brittle 5,952, , Supply summary Recovered biomass to Merchantable volume (odt) Residues (odt) Total biomass (odt) $/odt... 2 $/odt... 3 $/odt. 44, , $/odt. 4, , $/odt. 496, , $/odt. 1,597,17.3 1,597, $/odt. 2,696,49. 2,696,49. $/odt. 3,27, ,27, $/odt ,72, ,72,564. $/odt 15,.7 3,96,64. 3,975, $/odt 46,42.1 4,97, ,143, $/odt 199,93.9 4,99, ,29, $/odt 762,756. 4,99, ,61, $/odt 1,237,13.3 4,99, ,336, $/odt 1,471,59.1 4,99, ,57, $/odt 1,669, ,99, ,76, $/odt 1,77, ,99, ,77,1.4 1 $/odt 1,51, ,99, ,95, $/odt 1,53, ,99, ,952,512.2 Maximum cost $/odt $/odt 5/3/213 1:29:15 PM Page 4 of 13

33 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Delivery to mills Destination Product Format odt Transport average distance (Km) <Closest transfer yard> Transfer yard: Raspberry dump Aspen (residues) Chips 6,95 Birch (residues) Chips 1,5 Cottonwood (residues) Chips 24 Pine (residues) Chips 14,126 Pine-biomass Chips 15,25 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 3,27 Spruce (residues) Chips 15,5 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 1,746 59,33 Aspen (residues) Chips 14, Birch (residues) Chips 2, Black spruce (residues) Chips 4,27 63 Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 137,4 5 Pine-biomass Chips 145,4 57 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 29,537 5 Spruce (residues) Chips 7,15 57 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 13, , /3/213 1:29:15 PM Page 5 of 13

34 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Chunamon dump Transfer yard: S Fort Grahame dump Aspen (residues) Chips 1,26 15 Birch (residues) Chips Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 7, Pine-biomass Chips, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 1, Spruce (residues) Chips 3, Subalpine fir (residues) Chips , Aspen (residues) Chips 9,64 14 Birch (residues) Chips 5,3 14 Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 65, Pine-biomass Chips 77,96 16 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 14, Spruce (residues) Chips 41, Subalpine fir (residues) Chips, , /3/213 1:29:15 PM Page 6 of 13

35 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Fort Grahame dump Transfer yard: Chowika dump Aspen (residues) Chips 2,66 7 Birch (residues) Chips 34 9 Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips 3 Pine (residues) Chips 14,62 Pine-biomass Chips 16,937 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 3,13 Spruce (residues) Chips 9,311 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 2, ,53 Aspen (residues) Chips 3,17 14 Birch (residues) Chips 3,23 16 Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 14, Pine-biomass Chips 1, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 3, Spruce (residues) Chips 13,95 16 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 2, , /3/213 1:29:15 PM Page 7 of 13

36 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Ingenika dump Transfer yard: Swannell dump Aspen (residues) Chips Birch (residues) Chips Black spruce (residues) Chips 1, Cottonwood (residues) Chips 46 Pine (residues) Chips 16, Pine-biomass Chips 22,73 25 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 3,54 25 Spruce (residues) Chips 4,93 27 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips ,51 25 Aspen (residues) Chips 1, Birch (residues) Chips 6 22 Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips 9 24 Pine (residues) Chips 1,79 45 Pine-biomass Chips 25,57 43 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 4,46 45 Spruce (residues) Chips 7,73 43 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips , /3/213 1:29:15 PM Page of 13

37 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Pete Toy dump Transfer yard: Mesilinka dump Transfer yard: E Bear Valley dump Aspen (residues) Chips 23 Birch (residues) Chips 563 Black spruce (residues) Chips 17 Cottonwood (residues) Chips 62 Pine (residues) Chips 2,636 Pine-biomass Chips 3,56 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 565 Spruce (residues) Chips 3,29 12 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 1, ,61 Aspen (residues) Chips 2,36 21 Birch (residues) Chips 7 Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 29,34 41 Pine-biomass Chips 39,75 39 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 6, Spruce (residues) Chips 19, 36 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 2, ,64 3 Aspen (residues) Chips 74 3 Birch (residues) Chips 3 Cottonwood (residues) Chips 21 3 Pine (residues) Chips 2,5 3 Pine-biomass Chips 2,512 3 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips Spruce (residues) Chips 3,329 4 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 613 4,45 3 5/3/213 1:29:15 PM Page 9 of 13

38 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Finlay Forks dump Transfer yard: Nabesche dump Transfer yard: Bear Valley dump Aspen (residues) Chips 17, Birch (residues) Chips 5,55 29 Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 29, Pine-biomass Chips 34,75 25 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 6, Spruce (residues) Chips 36, Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 15, , Aspen (residues) Chips 1,557 7 Birch (residues) Chips 27 Cottonwood (residues) Chips 16 2 Pine (residues) Chips 7,43 7 Pine-biomass Chips,39 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 1,64 7 Spruce (residues) Chips 9,913 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 1,9 31,7 Aspen (residues) Chips 1,92 12 Birch (residues) Chips Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips,94 14 Pine-biomass Chips 11, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 2, Spruce (residues) Chips 1,25 15 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 3, , /3/213 1:29:15 PM Page of 13

39 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Ospika dump Transfer yard: Isola dump Aspen (residues) Chips 13, Birch (residues) Chips 7,422 1 Black spruce (residues) Chips 1,26 17 Cottonwood (residues) Chips 1,16 2 Pine (residues) Chips 47, Pine-biomass Chips 57,37 22 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips,12 22 Spruce (residues) Chips 36,73 23 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 9, ,5 22 Aspen (residues) Chips Birch (residues) Chips Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips 13 3 Pine (residues) Chips 9,2 13 Pine-biomass Chips 12,9 13 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 1,99 13 Spruce (residues) Chips 5, Subalpine fir (residues) Chips , /3/213 1:29:15 PM Page 11 of 13

40 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Deserters dump Transfer yard: Factor Ross dump Aspen (residues) Chips 5,99 24 Birch (residues) Chips Black spruce (residues) Chips 1, Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 3,264 2 Pine-biomass Chips 37,3 2 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 6,45 2 Spruce (residues) Chips 14,1 2 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips ,252 2 Aspen (residues) Chips 1,671 7 Birch (residues) Chips Black spruce (residues) Chips 13 Cottonwood (residues) Chips 121 Pine (residues) Chips 15,12 Pine-biomass Chips 21,266 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 3,242 Spruce (residues) Chips 9,31 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 9 52,77 5/3/213 1:29:15 PM Page 12 of 13

41 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Omineca dump Transfer yard: Mackenzie mill Aspen (residues) Chips 3, Birch (residues) Chips 4 Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 9, Pine-biomass Chips 126, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 21,15 32 Spruce (residues) Chips 43, Subalpine fir (residues) Chips, , Aspen (residues) Chips 137, Birch (residues) Chips 24, Black spruce (residues) Chips 24, Cottonwood (residues) Chips 12, Douglas fir (residues) Chips 4 29 Pine (residues) Chips 1,56,251 4 Pine-biomass Chips 1,163,44 2 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 226,339 4 Spruce (residues) Chips 979,95 95 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 34, ,973, ,952, /3/213 1:29:15 PM Page 13 of 13

42 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Territory: Sector: Cut block: Unknown territory Unknown sector <Multiple selection> Statistics - Selected Items Area 153,7.3 ha Number of cut blocks 9 Recovered biomass 5,952,512.2 odt Recovery rate 3.7 odt/ha odt / Merchantable m³.147 odt/m³ Delivered products Chips Bundles Trunks and Residues Energy balance Available energy Fuel consumption % % % 3 : 1 21,465,675 MWh. L/odt Cost Harvesting recovery Transfer yard Transportation Stumpage fees Road network - Maintenance Indirect costs Total $/odt 2.4 $/odt 5.9 $/odt 32.2 $/odt. $/odt 1.51 $/odt. $/odt 1.41 $/odt Revenue Sale value Silvicultural discount. $/odt. $/odt Net Profit $/odt 5/3/213 1:37:4 PM Page 1 of 13

43 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Flow Total 27,7,396.9 odt Merch. vol. harvested 16,469,63. odt 42,112,37. m³ Available biomass,,452.4 odt Uncut trees 2,537,36.5 odt Natural losses 4,162.3 odt Residue retention 2 % 413,36.5 odt At the stump 1,653,473.9 odt Not recovered 1,653,473.9 odt Technical availability. odt Roadside 6,773,447. odt Not recovered 2,935.6 odt Recovery / Available 67. % Recovered biomass 5,952,512.2 odt Recovery / Total 21.3 % Products Product name odt odt/m³ odt/ha Pine-biomass 1,53, Pine (residues) 1,62, Spruce (residues) 1,356, Subalpine fir (residues) 427, Pine-biomass (residues) 34, Aspen (residues) 226, Birch (residues) 53, Black spruce (residues) 37, Cottonwood (residues) 2, Douglas fir (residues) ,952, /3/213 1:37:4 PM Page 2 of 13

44 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] 9 selected site(s) / 9 Area covered: 153,7 ha / 153,7 ha 5/3/213 1:37:41 PM Page 3 of 13

45 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Recovery summary Volume(odt) Area(ha) Number of cut blocks recovery location At the stump Roadside. 5,952, ,7.3 9 Recovery season Summer Winter. 5,952, ,7.3 9 Residue freshness Fresh Brown Brittle 5,952, , Supply summary Recovered biomass to Merchantable volume (odt) Residues (odt) Total biomass (odt) $/odt... 2 $/odt... 3 $/odt. 4,59. 4,59. 4 $/odt. 336, , $/odt. 1,62,75.5 1,62, $/odt. 2,476, ,476, $/odt. 3,1,26.1 3,1,26.1 $/odt. 3,57,72.3 3,57, $/odt,27. 3,7,27.4 3,96,35.2 $/odt 35,22.1 4,6,92.5 4,4, $/odt 132,391. 4,99, ,231, $/odt 53,75.6 4,99, ,637, $/odt 1,12, ,99, ,227, $/odt 1,45,15.3 4,99, ,55, $/odt 1,621,49.6 4,99, ,72, $/odt 1,742,2. 4,99, ,41, $/odt 1,21,16.5 4,99, ,92, $/odt 1,53, ,99, ,952,512.2 Maximum cost $/odt 5.7 $/odt 5/3/213 1:37:41 PM Page 4 of 13

46 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Delivery to mills Destination Product Format odt Transport average distance (Km) <Closest transfer yard> Transfer yard: Raspberry dump Aspen (residues) Chips 6,95 Birch (residues) Chips 1,5 Cottonwood (residues) Chips 24 Pine (residues) Chips 14,126 Pine-biomass Chips 15,25 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 3,27 Spruce (residues) Chips 15,5 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 1,746 59,33 Aspen (residues) Chips 14, Birch (residues) Chips 2, Black spruce (residues) Chips 4,27 63 Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 137,4 5 Pine-biomass Chips 145,4 57 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 29,537 5 Spruce (residues) Chips 7,15 57 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 13, , /3/213 1:37:41 PM Page 5 of 13

47 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Chunamon dump Transfer yard: S Fort Grahame dump Aspen (residues) Chips 1,26 15 Birch (residues) Chips Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 7, Pine-biomass Chips, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 1, Spruce (residues) Chips 3, Subalpine fir (residues) Chips , Aspen (residues) Chips 9,64 14 Birch (residues) Chips 5,3 14 Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 65, Pine-biomass Chips 77,96 16 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 14, Spruce (residues) Chips 41, Subalpine fir (residues) Chips, , /3/213 1:37:41 PM Page 6 of 13

48 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Fort Grahame dump Transfer yard: Chowika dump Aspen (residues) Chips 2,66 7 Birch (residues) Chips 34 9 Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips 3 Pine (residues) Chips 14,62 Pine-biomass Chips 16,937 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 3,13 Spruce (residues) Chips 9,311 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 2, ,53 Aspen (residues) Chips 3,17 14 Birch (residues) Chips 3,23 16 Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 14, Pine-biomass Chips 1, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 3, Spruce (residues) Chips 13,95 16 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 2, , /3/213 1:37:41 PM Page 7 of 13

49 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Ingenika dump Transfer yard: Swannell dump Aspen (residues) Chips Birch (residues) Chips Black spruce (residues) Chips 1, Cottonwood (residues) Chips 46 Pine (residues) Chips 16, Pine-biomass Chips 22,73 25 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 3,54 25 Spruce (residues) Chips 4,93 27 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips ,51 25 Aspen (residues) Chips 1, Birch (residues) Chips 6 22 Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips 9 24 Pine (residues) Chips 1,79 45 Pine-biomass Chips 25,57 43 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 4,46 45 Spruce (residues) Chips 7,73 43 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips , /3/213 1:37:41 PM Page of 13

50 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Pete Toy dump Transfer yard: Mesilinka dump Transfer yard: E Bear Valley dump Aspen (residues) Chips 23 Birch (residues) Chips 563 Black spruce (residues) Chips 17 Cottonwood (residues) Chips 62 Pine (residues) Chips 2,636 Pine-biomass Chips 3,56 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 565 Spruce (residues) Chips 3,29 12 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 1, ,61 Aspen (residues) Chips 2,36 21 Birch (residues) Chips 7 Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 29,34 41 Pine-biomass Chips 39,75 39 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 6, Spruce (residues) Chips 19, 36 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 2, ,64 3 Aspen (residues) Chips 74 3 Birch (residues) Chips 3 Cottonwood (residues) Chips 21 3 Pine (residues) Chips 2,5 3 Pine-biomass Chips 2,512 3 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips Spruce (residues) Chips 3,329 4 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 613 4,45 3 5/3/213 1:37:41 PM Page 9 of 13

51 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Finlay Forks dump Transfer yard: Nabesche dump Transfer yard: Bear Valley dump Aspen (residues) Chips 17, Birch (residues) Chips 5,55 29 Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 29, Pine-biomass Chips 34,75 25 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 6, Spruce (residues) Chips 36, Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 15, , Aspen (residues) Chips 1,557 7 Birch (residues) Chips 27 Cottonwood (residues) Chips 16 2 Pine (residues) Chips 7,43 7 Pine-biomass Chips,39 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 1,64 7 Spruce (residues) Chips 9,913 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 1,9 31,7 Aspen (residues) Chips 1,92 12 Birch (residues) Chips Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips,94 14 Pine-biomass Chips 11, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 2, Spruce (residues) Chips 1,25 15 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 3, , /3/213 1:37:41 PM Page of 13

52 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Ospika dump Transfer yard: Isola dump Aspen (residues) Chips 13, Birch (residues) Chips 7,422 1 Black spruce (residues) Chips 1,26 17 Cottonwood (residues) Chips 1,16 2 Pine (residues) Chips 47, Pine-biomass Chips 57,37 22 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips,12 22 Spruce (residues) Chips 36,73 23 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 9, ,5 22 Aspen (residues) Chips Birch (residues) Chips Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips 13 3 Pine (residues) Chips 9,2 13 Pine-biomass Chips 12,9 13 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 1,99 13 Spruce (residues) Chips 5, Subalpine fir (residues) Chips , /3/213 1:37:41 PM Page 11 of 13

53 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Deserters dump Transfer yard: Factor Ross dump Aspen (residues) Chips 5,99 24 Birch (residues) Chips Black spruce (residues) Chips 1, Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 3,264 2 Pine-biomass Chips 37,3 2 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 6,45 2 Spruce (residues) Chips 14,1 2 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips ,252 2 Aspen (residues) Chips 1,671 7 Birch (residues) Chips Black spruce (residues) Chips 13 Cottonwood (residues) Chips 121 Pine (residues) Chips 15,12 Pine-biomass Chips 21,266 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 3,242 Spruce (residues) Chips 9,31 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 9 52,77 5/3/213 1:37:41 PM Page 12 of 13

54 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Omineca dump Transfer yard: Mackenzie mill Aspen (residues) Chips 3, Birch (residues) Chips 4 Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 9, Pine-biomass Chips 126, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 21,15 32 Spruce (residues) Chips 43, Subalpine fir (residues) Chips, , Aspen (residues) Chips 137, Birch (residues) Chips 24, Black spruce (residues) Chips 24, Cottonwood (residues) Chips 12, Douglas fir (residues) Chips 4 29 Pine (residues) Chips 1,56,251 4 Pine-biomass Chips 1,163,44 2 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 226,339 4 Spruce (residues) Chips 979,95 95 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 34, ,973, ,952, /3/213 1:37:41 PM Page 13 of 13

55 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Territory: Sector: Cut block: Unknown territory Unknown sector <Multiple selection> Statistics - Selected Items Area 36,43.9 ha Number of cut blocks 163 Recovered biomass 1,55,263.2 odt Recovery rate 42.6 odt/ha odt / Merchantable m³.1563 odt/m³ Delivered products Chips Bundles Trunks and Residues Energy balance Available energy Fuel consumption % % % 34 : 1 5,66,369 MWh 12.4 L/odt Cost Harvesting recovery Transfer yard Transportation Stumpage fees Road network - Maintenance Indirect costs Total $/odt 2.4 $/odt 2.4 $/odt 37.4 $/odt. $/odt 1.96 $/odt. $/odt 6.7 $/odt Revenue Sale value Silvicultural discount. $/odt. $/odt Net Profit -6.7 $/odt 16/5/213 3:4: PM Page 1 of 6

56 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Flow Total 7,15,6.9 odt Merch. vol. harvested 3,9,13.3 odt,1,56.1 m³ Available biomass 2,259,977. odt Uncut trees 767,699. odt Natural losses 5,216.3 odt Residue retention 2 %,15. odt At the stump 4,63.3 odt Not recovered 4,63.3 odt Technical availability. odt Roadside 1,754,62.5 odt Not recovered 24,419.2 odt Recovery / Available 6.6 % Recovered biomass 1,55,263.2 odt Recovery / Total 22.1 % Products Product name odt odt/m³ odt/ha Pine-biomass 55, Pine (residues) 499, Spruce (residues) 29, Pine-biomass (residues) 7, Subalpine fir (residues) 35, Aspen (residues) 34, Black spruce (residues), Birch (residues) 4, Cottonwood (residues) 1, ,55, /5/213 3:4: PM Page 2 of 6

57 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] 163 selected site(s) / 9 Area covered: 36,431 ha / 153,7 ha 16/5/213 3:4: PM Page 3 of 6

58 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Recovery summary Volume(odt) Area(ha) Number of cut blocks recovery location At the stump Roadside. 1,55, , Recovery season Summer Winter. 1,55, , Residue freshness Fresh Brown Brittle 1,55, , Supply summary Recovered biomass to Merchantable volume (odt) Residues (odt) Total biomass (odt) $/odt... 2 $/odt... 3 $/odt... 4 $/odt. 23,6. 23,6. 5 $/odt. 157, , $/odt. 519, , $/odt. 69, ,79.4 $/odt. 96, , $/odt. 97,4.5 97,4.5 $/odt 2, , , $/odt 2, ,23.5 1,2, $/odt 111, ,23.5 1,3, $/odt 311, ,23.5 1,33, $/odt 436, ,23.5 1,42, $/odt 54, ,23.5 1,495, $/odt 552, ,23.5 1,543, $/odt 553, ,23.5 1,545, $/odt 55, ,23.5 1,55,263.2 Maximum cost $/odt 2.24 $/odt 16/5/213 3:4: PM Page 4 of 6

59 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Delivery to mills Destination Product Format odt Transport average distance (Km) Transfer yard: Raspberry dump Transfer yard: Omineca dump Transfer yard: Mackenzie mill Aspen (residues) Chips 5, 6 Birch (residues) Chips 4 59 Black spruce (residues) Chips 1, Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 54, Pine-biomass Chips 59,7 64 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 11,6 64 Spruce (residues) Chips 3,446 6 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 3, , Aspen (residues) Chips 12 Pine (residues) Chips 4,46 7 Pine-biomass Chips 6,41 5 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips Spruce (residues) Chips 2,744 6 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips ,76 6 Aspen (residues) Chips 29, Birch (residues) Chips 3,72 6 Black spruce (residues) Chips,51 93 Cottonwood (residues) Chips 1, Pine (residues) Chips 44,33 9 Pine-biomass Chips 492, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 94,464 9 Spruce (residues) Chips 265,375 2 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 31, ,36, /5/213 3:4: PM Page 5 of 6

60 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] 1,55, /5/213 3:4: PM Page 6 of 6

61 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Territory: Sector: Cut block: Unknown territory Unknown sector <Multiple selection> Statistics - Selected Items Area 41,937. ha Number of cut blocks 175 Recovered biomass 1,61,152.3 odt Recovery rate 4.1 odt/ha odt / Merchantable m³.1631 odt/m³ Delivered products Chips Bundles Trunks and Residues Energy balance Available energy Fuel consumption % % % 33 : 1 6,75,719 MWh 12.7 L/odt Cost Harvesting recovery Transfer yard Transportation Stumpage fees Road network - Maintenance Indirect costs Total $/odt 2.4 $/odt 2.37 $/odt 3.94 $/odt. $/odt 1.9 $/odt. $/odt 7.36 $/odt Revenue Sale value Silvicultural discount. $/odt. $/odt Net Profit $/odt 16/5/213 3:3:1 PM Page 1 of 6

62 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Flow Total 7,453,4.3 odt Merch. vol. harvested 4,15,7. odt,533,157.7 m³ Available biomass 2,47,913.3 odt Uncut trees 7,7.1 odt Natural losses 7,16.1 odt Residue retention 2 % 112,733.4 odt At the stump 45,933.4 odt Not recovered 45,933.4 odt Technical availability. odt Roadside 1,9,7.5 odt Not recovered 226,926.2 odt Recovery / Available 67. % Recovered biomass 1,61,152.3 odt Recovery / Total 22.6 % Products Product name odt odt/m³ odt/ha Pine-biomass 563, Pine (residues) 543, Spruce (residues) 336, Pine-biomass (residues) 116, Subalpine fir (residues) 5, Aspen (residues) 49, Black spruce (residues) 13, Birch (residues) 4, Cottonwood (residues) 2, ,61, /5/213 3:3:2 PM Page 2 of 6

63 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] 175 selected site(s) / 9 Area covered: 41,93 ha / 153,7 ha 16/5/213 3:3:2 PM Page 3 of 6

64 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Recovery summary Volume(odt) Area(ha) Number of cut blocks recovery location At the stump Roadside. 1,61, , Recovery season Summer Winter. 1,61, , Residue freshness Fresh Brown Brittle 1,61, , Supply summary Recovered biomass to Merchantable volume (odt) Residues (odt) Total biomass (odt) $/odt... 2 $/odt... 3 $/odt... 4 $/odt. 33, , $/odt. 165, ,21. 6 $/odt. 511, , $/odt. 754, ,719. $/odt. 95, , $/odt. 1,92,57.3 1,92,57.3 $/odt 4, ,111, ,115, $/odt 32,53.6 1,117, ,15, $/odt 96,24.9 1,117, ,214, $/odt 249,96.1 1,117, ,367, $/odt 357,17.7 1,117, ,475, $/odt 462,21. 1,117, ,5, $/odt 539, ,117, ,657, $/odt 559,45. 1,117, ,677, $/odt 563, ,117, ,61,152.3 Maximum cost $/odt 2.2 $/odt 16/5/213 3:3:2 PM Page 4 of 6

65 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Delivery to mills Destination Product Format odt Transport average distance (Km) Transfer yard: Raspberry dump Transfer yard: Omineca dump Aspen (residues) Chips 5,937 6 Birch (residues) Chips Black spruce (residues) Chips 1,29 65 Cottonwood (residues) Chips 2 5 Pine (residues) Chips 63, 64 Pine-biomass Chips 61, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 13, Spruce (residues) Chips 3, 61 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 4, ,6 63 Aspen (residues) Chips Birch (residues) Chips 323 Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips 1 72 Pine (residues) Chips 15, Pine-biomass Chips 1, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 3, Spruce (residues) Chips 6, Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 1,75 46, /5/213 3:3:2 PM Page 5 of 6

66 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Transfer yard: Mackenzie mill Aspen (residues) Chips 43,214 7 Birch (residues) Chips 4,53 6 Black spruce (residues) Chips 11,46 4 Cottonwood (residues) Chips 1,91 92 Pine (residues) Chips 464,54 5 Pine-biomass Chips 43,32 3 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 99,544 5 Spruce (residues) Chips 299, 5 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 44,45 5 1,452, ,61, /5/213 3:3:2 PM Page 6 of 6

67 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Territory: Sector: Cut block: Unknown territory Unknown sector <Multiple selection> Statistics - Selected Items Area 3,229.2 ha Number of cut blocks 243 Recovered biomass 1,51,11. odt Recovery rate 39.7 odt/ha odt / Merchantable m³.1467 odt/m³ Delivered products Chips Bundles Trunks and Residues Energy balance Available energy Fuel consumption % % % 64 : 1 5,491,127 MWh 6.5 L/odt Cost Harvesting recovery Transfer yard Transportation Stumpage fees Road network - Maintenance Indirect costs Total 25.9 $/odt 2.4 $/odt $/odt 1.22 $/odt. $/odt.33 $/odt. $/odt.7 $/odt Revenue Sale value Silvicultural discount. $/odt. $/odt Net Profit -.7 $/odt 16/5/213 3:1:23 PM Page 1 of 13

68 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Flow Total 7,122,611.5 odt Merch. vol. harvested 4,151,245.4 odt,35,29. m³ Available biomass 2,27,2.7 odt Uncut trees 764,345.4 odt Natural losses 13,25.2 odt Residue retention 2 % 95,652.5 odt At the stump 32,69.9 odt Not recovered 32,69.9 odt Technical availability. odt Roadside 1,715,553.2 odt Not recovered 197,372.2 odt Recovery / Available 6. % Recovered biomass 1,51,11. odt Recovery / Total 21.3 % Products Product name odt odt/m³ odt/ha Pine-biomass 569, Pine (residues) 457, Spruce (residues) 24, Pine-biomass (residues) 9, Aspen (residues) 7, Subalpine fir (residues) 36, Birch (residues) 21, Black spruce (residues) 9, Cottonwood (residues) 5, ,51, /5/213 3:1:23 PM Page 2 of 13

69 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] 243 selected site(s) / 9 Area covered: 3,229 ha / 153,7 ha 16/5/213 3:1:24 PM Page 3 of 13

70 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Recovery summary Volume(odt) Area(ha) Number of cut blocks recovery location At the stump Roadside. 1,51,11.. 3, Recovery season Summer Winter. 1,51,11.. 3, Residue freshness Fresh Brown Brittle 1,51, , Supply summary Recovered biomass to Merchantable volume (odt) Residues (odt) Total biomass (odt) $/odt... 2 $/odt... 3 $/odt. 32, , $/odt. 2, , $/odt. 267, , $/odt. 7,77. 7,77. 7 $/odt. 53,6.9 53,6.9 $/odt. 913, , $/odt 6, , ,27. $/odt 19, , , $/odt 43, , , $/odt 27, , ,219, $/odt 461, , ,49, $/odt 514, , ,462, $/odt 54, , ,497, $/odt 565, , ,514, $/odt 56, , ,517, $/odt 569, , ,51,11. Maximum cost $/odt 5.7 $/odt 16/5/213 3:1:24 PM Page 4 of 13

71 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Delivery to mills Destination Product Format odt Transport average distance (Km) <Closest transfer yard> Transfer yard: Raspberry dump Aspen (residues) Chips 2,24 Birch (residues) Chips 592 Cottonwood (residues) Chips 265 Pine (residues) Chips 11,7 Pine-biomass Chips 12,327 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 2,547 Spruce (residues) Chips,752 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 996 4,19 Aspen (residues) Chips 1,927 2 Birch (residues) Chips 76 Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 14, Pine-biomass Chips 19,154 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 3, Spruce (residues) Chips 4,2 9 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips , /5/213 3:1:24 PM Page 5 of 13

72 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Transfer yard: Chunamon dump Transfer yard: S Fort Grahame dump Aspen (residues) Chips 1,16 16 Birch (residues) Chips Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips 46 1 Pine (residues) Chips 7, Pine-biomass Chips, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 1,63 13 Spruce (residues) Chips 3,5 14 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 6 26, Aspen (residues) Chips, Birch (residues) Chips 2, Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 62, 17 Pine-biomass Chips 73, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 13, Spruce (residues) Chips 37,32 17 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips, , /5/213 3:1:24 PM Page 6 of 13

73 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Transfer yard: Fort Grahame dump Transfer yard: Chowika dump Aspen (residues) Chips 2,361 6 Birch (residues) Chips 7 9 Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips 3 Pine (residues) Chips 13,4 Pine-biomass Chips 16,25 9 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 2,9 Spruce (residues) Chips,456 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 2, ,6 Aspen (residues) Chips 1,92 12 Birch (residues) Chips 1, Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 12, Pine-biomass Chips 15, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 2, Spruce (residues) Chips 9,41 15 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 1, , /5/213 3:1:24 PM Page 7 of 13

74 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Transfer yard: Ingenika dump Transfer yard: Swannell dump Aspen (residues) Chips Birch (residues) Chips Black spruce (residues) Chips 1, Cottonwood (residues) Chips 46 Pine (residues) Chips 16, Pine-biomass Chips 22,73 25 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 3,54 25 Spruce (residues) Chips 4,93 27 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips ,51 25 Aspen (residues) Chips 94 3 Birch (residues) Chips 6 22 Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips 9 24 Pine (residues) Chips 1, Pine-biomass Chips 25, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 4,19 45 Spruce (residues) Chips 7,65 43 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips , /5/213 3:1:24 PM Page of 13

75 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Transfer yard: Pete Toy dump Transfer yard: Mesilinka dump Transfer yard: E Bear Valley dump Aspen (residues) Chips 23 Birch (residues) Chips 563 Black spruce (residues) Chips 17 Cottonwood (residues) Chips 62 Pine (residues) Chips 2,636 Pine-biomass Chips 3,56 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 565 Spruce (residues) Chips 1,65 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 126 9,57 Aspen (residues) Chips 2,15 2 Birch (residues) Chips 7 Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 2,25 41 Pine-biomass Chips 37, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 6,55 41 Spruce (residues) Chips 13, Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 1, , Aspen (residues) Chips 73 3 Birch (residues) Chips 99 2 Cottonwood (residues) Chips 13 3 Pine (residues) Chips 2,1 3 Pine-biomass Chips 2,136 3 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips Spruce (residues) Chips 1,265 3 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips , /5/213 3:1:24 PM Page 9 of 13

76 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Transfer yard: Finlay Forks dump Transfer yard: Nabesche dump Transfer yard: Bear Valley dump Aspen (residues) Chips 9, Birch (residues) Chips 3, Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 25, Pine-biomass Chips 3, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 5,56 24 Spruce (residues) Chips 15, Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 1, , Aspen (residues) Chips 1,214 6 Birch (residues) Chips 54 9 Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 7,29 7 Pine-biomass Chips,299 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 1,56 7 Spruce (residues) Chips 6,473 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips ,442 Aspen (residues) Chips 1,34 12 Birch (residues) Chips Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips 25 Pine (residues) Chips, Pine-biomass Chips,9 15 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 1,11 15 Spruce (residues) Chips 9, Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 1, , /5/213 3:1:24 PM Page of 13

77 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Transfer yard: Ospika dump Transfer yard: Isola dump Aspen (residues) Chips 11, Birch (residues) Chips 5,434 1 Black spruce (residues) Chips 1,176 1 Cottonwood (residues) Chips 1, Pine (residues) Chips 45,47 22 Pine-biomass Chips 54,94 22 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 9, Spruce (residues) Chips 32,33 24 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 6, ,67 22 Aspen (residues) Chips 5 12 Birch (residues) Chips Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 9,7 13 Pine-biomass Chips 12, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 1, Spruce (residues) Chips 4, Subalpine fir (residues) Chips , /5/213 3:1:24 PM Page 11 of 13

78 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Transfer yard: Deserters dump Transfer yard: Factor Ross dump Aspen (residues) Chips 4,91 24 Birch (residues) Chips Black spruce (residues) Chips 1, Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 3,2 2 Pine-biomass Chips 37,491 2 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 6,433 2 Spruce (residues) Chips 14,593 2 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips ,77 2 Aspen (residues) Chips 1,553 7 Birch (residues) Chips 537 Black spruce (residues) Chips 13 Cottonwood (residues) Chips 121 Pine (residues) Chips 14,2 Pine-biomass Chips 2,3 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 3,172 Spruce (residues) Chips,739 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 52 5,71 16/5/213 3:1:24 PM Page 12 of 13

79 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Transfer yard: Omineca dump Transfer yard: Mackenzie mill Aspen (residues) Chips 2, Birch (residues) Chips 7 7 Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 76, Pine-biomass Chips 99, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 16,4 39 Spruce (residues) Chips 29, Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 4, ,71 3 Aspen (residues) Chips 13, Birch (residues) Chips 3,31 46 Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips 1,113 5 Pine (residues) Chips 4, Pine-biomass Chips 57, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips,41 44 Spruce (residues) Chips 27, Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 3, , ,51, /5/213 3:1:24 PM Page 13 of 13

80 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Territory: Sector: Cut block: Unknown territory Unknown sector <Multiple selection> Statistics - Selected Items Area 37,29.4 ha Number of cut blocks 39 Recovered biomass 1,22,915.7 odt Recovery rate 32.3 odt/ha odt / Merchantable m³.1214 odt/m³ Delivered products Chips Bundles Trunks and Residues Energy balance Available energy Fuel consumption % % % 42 : 1 4,292,46 MWh 9. L/odt Cost Harvesting recovery Transfer yard Transportation Stumpage fees Road network - Maintenance Indirect costs Total.9 $/odt 2.4 $/odt 3. $/odt 2. $/odt. $/odt 1.2 $/odt. $/odt $/odt Revenue Sale value Silvicultural discount. $/odt. $/odt Net Profit $/odt 16/5/213 3:5:12 PM Page 1 of 11

81 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Flow Total 6,295,514.3 odt Merch. vol. harvested 4,144,42.5 odt 11,192,346. m³ Available biomass 1,934,54.5 odt Uncut trees 216,553.3 odt Natural losses 14,572.7 odt Residue retention 2 % 4,966. odt At the stump 419,67.3 odt Not recovered 419,67.3 odt Technical availability. odt Roadside 1,395,133.6 odt Not recovered 192,21. odt Recovery / Available 62.2 % Recovered biomass 1,22,915.7 odt Recovery / Total 19.1 % Products Product name odt odt/m³ odt/ha Spruce (residues) 472, Subalpine fir (residues) 33, Pine-biomass 161, Pine (residues) 127, Aspen (residues) 71, Pine-biomass (residues) 27, Birch (residues) 23, Cottonwood (residues), Black spruce (residues) 4, Douglas fir (residues) ,22, /5/213 3:5:12 PM Page 2 of 11

82 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] 39 selected site(s) / 9 Area covered: 37,29 ha / 153,7 ha 16/5/213 3:5:12 PM Page 3 of 11

83 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Recovery summary Volume(odt) Area(ha) Number of cut blocks recovery location At the stump Roadside. 1,22, , Recovery season Summer Winter. 1,22, , Residue freshness Fresh Brown Brittle 1,22, , Supply summary Recovered biomass to Merchantable volume (odt) Residues (odt) Total biomass (odt) $/odt... 2 $/odt... 3 $/odt. 16,2.3 16,2.3 4 $/odt. 19, , $/odt. 46, , $/odt. 736, , $/odt. 95,9.5 95,9.5 $/odt. 95,2. 95,2. 9 $/odt 2, ,33, ,36,12.2 $/odt,946. 1,4, ,49, $/odt 27, ,4, ,6, $/odt 6, ,4, ,1, $/odt 5, ,4, ,146, $/odt 141, ,4, ,12, $/odt 154, ,4, ,195, $/odt 161,242. 1,4, ,22, $/odt 161, ,4, ,22,915.7 Maximum cost $/odt $/odt 16/5/213 3:5:12 PM Page 4 of 11

84 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Delivery to mills Destination Product Format odt Transport average distance (Km) <Closest transfer yard> Transfer yard: Raspberry dump Transfer yard: Chunamon dump Aspen (residues) Chips 4,1 Birch (residues) Chips 1,266 Cottonwood (residues) Chips 559 Pine (residues) Chips 2,239 Pine-biomass Chips 2,93 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 4 Spruce (residues) Chips 6,36 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 75 19,141 Aspen (residues) Chips 1,41 6 Birch (residues) Chips Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 5, Pine-biomass Chips 6, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 1, Spruce (residues) Chips 14,27 56 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 4, , Aspen (residues) Chips 92 5 Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips Pine-biomass Chips Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 32 5 Spruce (residues) Chips 44 5 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips , /5/213 3:5:12 PM Page 5 of 11

85 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Transfer yard: S Fort Grahame dump Transfer yard: Fort Grahame dump Transfer yard: Chowika dump Aspen (residues) Chips 6 16 Birch (residues) Chips 2,79 15 Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips 22 Pine (residues) Chips 3,116 1 Pine-biomass Chips 3, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 66 1 Spruce (residues) Chips 4, Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 1, , Aspen (residues) Chips Birch (residues) Chips 55 Black spruce (residues) Chips 23 1 Pine (residues) Chips 52 Pine-biomass Chips 679 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 125 Spruce (residues) Chips 55 9 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips ,993 Aspen (residues) Chips 1,27 16 Birch (residues) Chips 1, Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 2, 2 Pine-biomass Chips 3,67 19 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips Spruce (residues) Chips 4, Subalpine fir (residues) Chips , /5/213 3:5:12 PM Page 6 of 11

86 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Transfer yard: Swannell dump Transfer yard: Pete Toy dump Transfer yard: Mesilinka dump Transfer yard: E Bear Valley dump Aspen (residues) Chips 4 26 Birch (residues) Chips 26 Pine (residues) Chips Pine-biomass Chips Pine-biomass (residues) Chips Spruce (residues) Chips Spruce (residues) Chips 1, Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 1, , Aspen (residues) Chips Black spruce (residues) Chips 2 31 Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 1,126 4 Pine-biomass Chips 1, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips Spruce (residues) Chips 5,4 32 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 1,39 26, Aspen (residues) Chips 46 4 Birch (residues) Chips 1 4 Cottonwood (residues) Chips 4 Pine (residues) Chips 32 4 Pine-biomass Chips Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 7 4 Spruce (residues) Chips 2,64 4 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips , /5/213 3:5:12 PM Page 7 of 11

87 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Transfer yard: Finlay Forks dump Transfer yard: Nabesche dump Transfer yard: Bear Valley dump Aspen (residues) Chips 7, Birch (residues) Chips 1,53 27 Black spruce (residues) Chips 4 32 Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 3,41 25 Pine-biomass Chips 4,43 25 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips Spruce (residues) Chips 21,79 26 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 14, , Aspen (residues) Chips 343 Birch (residues) Chips 216 Cottonwood (residues) Chips 26 Pine (residues) Chips 455 Pine-biomass Chips 541 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 97 Spruce (residues) Chips 3,44 9 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 1,247 6,365 9 Aspen (residues) Chips 51 Birch (residues) Chips 34 5 Black spruce (residues) Chips 4 14 Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 1, Pine-biomass Chips 1,36 12 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips Spruce (residues) Chips,71 16 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 2, , /5/213 3:5:12 PM Page of 11

88 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Transfer yard: Ospika dump Transfer yard: Isola dump Transfer yard: Deserters dump Aspen (residues) Chips 1, Birch (residues) Chips 1,9 1 Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 2,47 16 Pine-biomass Chips 2, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips Spruce (residues) Chips 4,4 19 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 2, ,39 1 Aspen (residues) Chips 17 2 Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips Pine-biomass Chips Pine-biomass (residues) Chips Spruce (residues) Chips Subalpine fir (residues) Chips , Aspen (residues) Chips 2 22 Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips Pine-biomass Chips Pine-biomass (residues) Chips Spruce (residues) Chips , /5/213 3:5:12 PM Page 9 of 11

89 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Transfer yard: Factor Ross dump Transfer yard: Omineca dump Transfer yard: Mackenzie mill Aspen (residues) Chips Birch (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips 7 Pine (residues) Chips 326 Pine-biomass Chips 463 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 7 Spruce (residues) Chips Subalpine fir (residues) Chips ,6 Aspen (residues) Chips Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips 2 42 Pine (residues) Chips 2, Pine-biomass Chips 2, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips Spruce (residues) Chips 5,27 3 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 2, ,37 22 Aspen (residues) Chips 51,164 4 Birch (residues) Chips 13, Black spruce (residues) Chips 3,542 3 Cottonwood (residues) Chips 7, Douglas fir (residues) Chips 4 29 Pine (residues) Chips 2,262 9 Pine-biomass Chips 13,126 7 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 21,913 9 Spruce (residues) Chips 37,5 72 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 269, , /5/213 3:5:12 PM Page of 11

90 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] 1,22, /5/213 3:5:13 PM Page 11 of 11

91 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Territory: Sector: Cut block: Unknown territory Unknown sector <Multiple selection> Statistics - Selected Items Area 36,43.9 ha Number of cut blocks 163 Recovered biomass 1,55,263.2 odt Recovery rate 42.6 odt/ha odt / Merchantable m³.1563 odt/m³ Delivered products Chips Bundles Trunks and Residues Energy balance Available energy Fuel consumption % % % 2 : 1 5,66,369 MWh 15. L/odt Cost Harvesting recovery Transfer yard Transportation Stumpage fees Road network - Maintenance Indirect costs Total $/odt $/odt 2.4 $/odt 37.4 $/odt. $/odt 1.96 $/odt. $/odt $/odt Revenue Sale value Silvicultural discount. $/odt. $/odt Net Profit $/odt 16/5/213 3:46:41 PM Page 1 of 6

92 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Flow Total 7,15,6.9 odt Merch. vol. harvested 3,9,13.3 odt,1,56.1 m³ Available biomass 2,259,977. odt Uncut trees 767,699. odt Natural losses 5,216.3 odt Residue retention 2 %,15. odt At the stump 4,63.3 odt Not recovered 4,63.3 odt Technical availability. odt Roadside 1,754,62.5 odt Not recovered 24,419.2 odt Recovery / Available 6.6 % Recovered biomass 1,55,263.2 odt Recovery / Total 22.1 % Products Product name odt odt/m³ odt/ha Pine-biomass 55, Pine (residues) 499, Spruce (residues) 29, Pine-biomass (residues) 7, Subalpine fir (residues) 35, Aspen (residues) 34, Black spruce (residues), Birch (residues) 4, Cottonwood (residues) 1, ,55, /5/213 3:46:41 PM Page 2 of 6

93 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] 163 selected site(s) / 9 Area covered: 36,431 ha / 153,7 ha 16/5/213 3:46:41 PM Page 3 of 6

94 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Recovery summary Volume(odt) Area(ha) Number of cut blocks recovery location At the stump Roadside. 1,55, , Recovery season Summer Winter. 1,55, , Residue freshness Fresh Brown Brittle 1,55, , Supply summary Recovered biomass to Merchantable volume (odt) Residues (odt) Total biomass (odt) $/odt... 2 $/odt... 3 $/odt... 4 $/odt... 5 $/odt. 33, , $/odt. 257, ,9.3 7 $/odt. 554, ,963.1 $/odt. 797, , $/odt. 93, ,35.9 $/odt. 979, , $/odt 6, , , $/odt 35, ,23.5 1,26, $/odt 195, ,23.5 1,16, $/odt 34, ,23.5 1,331, $/odt 46, ,23.5 1,452, $/odt 533, ,23.5 1,525, $/odt 553, ,23.5 1,544, $/odt 557, ,23.5 1,549, $/odt 55, ,23.5 1,55,263.2 Maximum cost 11.4 $/odt 9.3 $/odt 16/5/213 3:46:42 PM Page 4 of 6

95 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Delivery to mills Destination Product Format odt Transport average distance (Km) Transfer yard: Raspberry dump Transfer yard: Omineca dump Transfer yard: Mackenzie mill Aspen (residues) Chips 5, 6 Birch (residues) Chips 4 59 Black spruce (residues) Chips 1, Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 54, Pine-biomass Chips 59,7 64 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 11,6 64 Spruce (residues) Chips 3,446 6 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 3, , Aspen (residues) Chips 12 Pine (residues) Chips 4,46 7 Pine-biomass Chips 6,41 5 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips Spruce (residues) Chips 2,744 6 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips ,76 6 Aspen (residues) Chips 29, Birch (residues) Chips 3,72 6 Black spruce (residues) Chips,51 93 Cottonwood (residues) Chips 1, Pine (residues) Chips 44,33 9 Pine-biomass Chips 492, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 94,464 9 Spruce (residues) Chips 265,375 2 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 31, ,36, /5/213 3:46:42 PM Page 5 of 6

96 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] 1,55, /5/213 3:46:42 PM Page 6 of 6

97 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Territory: Sector: Cut block: Unknown territory Unknown sector <Multiple selection> Statistics - Selected Items Area 41,937. ha Number of cut blocks 175 Recovered biomass 1,61,152.3 odt Recovery rate 4.1 odt/ha odt / Merchantable m³.1631 odt/m³ Delivered products Chips Bundles Trunks and Residues Energy balance Available energy Fuel consumption % % % 27 : 1 6,75,719 MWh 15.4 L/odt Cost Harvesting recovery Transfer yard Transportation Stumpage fees Road network - Maintenance Indirect costs Total $/odt $/odt 2.37 $/odt 3.94 $/odt. $/odt 1.9 $/odt. $/odt $/odt Revenue Sale value Silvicultural discount. $/odt. $/odt Net Profit $/odt 16/5/213 3:49:9 PM Page 1 of 6

98 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Flow Total 7,453,4.3 odt Merch. vol. harvested 4,15,7. odt,533,157.7 m³ Available biomass 2,47,913.3 odt Uncut trees 7,7.1 odt Natural losses 7,16.1 odt Residue retention 2 % 112,733.4 odt At the stump 45,933.4 odt Not recovered 45,933.4 odt Technical availability. odt Roadside 1,9,7.5 odt Not recovered 226,926.2 odt Recovery / Available 67. % Recovered biomass 1,61,152.3 odt Recovery / Total 22.6 % Products Product name odt odt/m³ odt/ha Pine-biomass 563, Pine (residues) 543, Spruce (residues) 336, Pine-biomass (residues) 116, Subalpine fir (residues) 5, Aspen (residues) 49, Black spruce (residues) 13, Birch (residues) 4, Cottonwood (residues) 2, ,61, /5/213 3:49:9 PM Page 2 of 6

99 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] 175 selected site(s) / 9 Area covered: 41,93 ha / 153,7 ha 16/5/213 3:49:9 PM Page 3 of 6

100 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Recovery summary Volume(odt) Area(ha) Number of cut blocks recovery location At the stump Roadside. 1,61, , Recovery season Summer Winter. 1,61, , Residue freshness Fresh Brown Brittle 1,61, , Supply summary Recovered biomass to Merchantable volume (odt) Residues (odt) Total biomass (odt) $/odt... 2 $/odt... 3 $/odt... 4 $/odt. 7,22.6 7, $/odt. 66,59. 66,59. 6 $/odt. 252, ,96. 7 $/odt. 562, ,76.6 $/odt. 37,2. 37,2. 9 $/odt. 1,2, ,2,723.3 $/odt. 1,6,29.1 1,6, $/odt 4, ,117, ,122, $/odt 41,535. 1,117, ,159, $/odt 134,5.5 1,117, ,251, $/odt 295, ,117, ,413, $/odt 39, ,117, ,516, $/odt 51, ,117, ,619, $/odt 557, ,117, ,675,41. 1 $/odt 562,94.1 1,117, ,6, $/odt 563, ,117, ,61,152.3 Maximum cost $/odt 9.7 $/odt 16/5/213 3:49:9 PM Page 4 of 6

101 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Delivery to mills Destination Product Format odt Transport average distance (Km) Transfer yard: Raspberry dump Transfer yard: Omineca dump Aspen (residues) Chips 5,937 6 Birch (residues) Chips Black spruce (residues) Chips 1,29 65 Cottonwood (residues) Chips 2 5 Pine (residues) Chips 63, 64 Pine-biomass Chips 61, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 13, Spruce (residues) Chips 3, 61 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 4, ,6 63 Aspen (residues) Chips Birch (residues) Chips 323 Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips 1 72 Pine (residues) Chips 15, Pine-biomass Chips 1, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 3, Spruce (residues) Chips 6, Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 1,75 46, /5/213 3:49:9 PM Page 5 of 6

102 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Mackenzie mill Aspen (residues) Chips 43,214 7 Birch (residues) Chips 4,53 6 Black spruce (residues) Chips 11,46 4 Cottonwood (residues) Chips 1,91 92 Pine (residues) Chips 464,54 5 Pine-biomass Chips 43,32 3 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 99,544 5 Spruce (residues) Chips 299, 5 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 44,45 5 1,452, ,61, /5/213 3:49:9 PM Page 6 of 6

103 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Territory: Sector: Cut block: Unknown territory Unknown sector <Multiple selection> Statistics - Selected Items Area 3,229.2 ha Number of cut blocks 243 Recovered biomass 1,51,11. odt Recovery rate 39.7 odt/ha odt / Merchantable m³.1467 odt/m³ Delivered products Chips Bundles Trunks and Residues Energy balance Available energy Fuel consumption % % % 45 : 1 5,491,127 MWh 9.2 L/odt Cost Harvesting recovery Transfer yard Transportation Stumpage fees Road network - Maintenance Indirect costs Total 25.9 $/odt $/odt $/odt 1.22 $/odt. $/odt.33 $/odt. $/odt 6.6 $/odt Revenue Sale value Silvicultural discount. $/odt. $/odt Net Profit -6.6 $/odt 16/5/213 3:5:15 PM Page 1 of 13

104 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Flow Total 7,122,611.5 odt Merch. vol. harvested 4,151,245.4 odt,35,29. m³ Available biomass 2,27,2.7 odt Uncut trees 764,345.4 odt Natural losses 13,25.2 odt Residue retention 2 % 95,652.5 odt At the stump 32,69.9 odt Not recovered 32,69.9 odt Technical availability. odt Roadside 1,715,553.2 odt Not recovered 197,372.2 odt Recovery / Available 6. % Recovered biomass 1,51,11. odt Recovery / Total 21.3 % Products Product name odt odt/m³ odt/ha Pine-biomass 569, Pine (residues) 457, Spruce (residues) 24, Pine-biomass (residues) 9, Aspen (residues) 7, Subalpine fir (residues) 36, Birch (residues) 21, Black spruce (residues) 9, Cottonwood (residues) 5, ,51, /5/213 3:5:15 PM Page 2 of 13

105 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] 243 selected site(s) / 9 Area covered: 3,229 ha / 153,7 ha 16/5/213 3:5:15 PM Page 3 of 13

106 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Recovery summary Volume(odt) Area(ha) Number of cut blocks recovery location At the stump Roadside. 1,51,11.. 3, Recovery season Summer Winter. 1,51,11.. 3, Residue freshness Fresh Brown Brittle 1,51, , Supply summary Recovered biomass to Merchantable volume (odt) Residues (odt) Total biomass (odt) $/odt... 2 $/odt... 3 $/odt. 27, , $/odt. 35, , $/odt. 96, , $/odt. 49, , $/odt. 72,9.5 72,9.5 $/odt. 6,92.9 6, $/odt. 91, ,227.7 $/odt 11, , , $/odt 23, , , $/odt 1,13. 94, ,3, $/odt 36, , ,39, $/odt 47, , ,436, $/odt 532, , ,41, $/odt 552, , ,51, $/odt 566,7.2 94, ,515, $/odt 569, , ,51,11. Maximum cost 17.9 $/odt $/odt 16/5/213 3:5:16 PM Page 4 of 13

107 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Delivery to mills Destination Product Format odt Transport average distance (Km) <Closest transfer yard> Transfer yard: Raspberry dump Aspen (residues) Chips 2,24 Birch (residues) Chips 592 Cottonwood (residues) Chips 265 Pine (residues) Chips 11,7 Pine-biomass Chips 12,327 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 2,547 Spruce (residues) Chips,752 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 996 4,19 Aspen (residues) Chips 1,927 2 Birch (residues) Chips 76 Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 14, Pine-biomass Chips 19,154 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 3, Spruce (residues) Chips 4,2 9 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips , /5/213 3:5:16 PM Page 5 of 13

108 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Chunamon dump Transfer yard: S Fort Grahame dump Aspen (residues) Chips 1,16 16 Birch (residues) Chips Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips 46 1 Pine (residues) Chips 7, Pine-biomass Chips, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 1,63 13 Spruce (residues) Chips 3,5 14 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 6 26, Aspen (residues) Chips, Birch (residues) Chips 2, Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 62, 17 Pine-biomass Chips 73, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 13, Spruce (residues) Chips 37,32 17 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips, , /5/213 3:5:16 PM Page 6 of 13

109 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Fort Grahame dump Transfer yard: Chowika dump Aspen (residues) Chips 2,361 6 Birch (residues) Chips 7 9 Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips 3 Pine (residues) Chips 13,4 Pine-biomass Chips 16,25 9 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 2,9 Spruce (residues) Chips,456 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 2, ,6 Aspen (residues) Chips 1,92 12 Birch (residues) Chips 1, Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 12, Pine-biomass Chips 15, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 2, Spruce (residues) Chips 9,41 15 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 1, , /5/213 3:5:16 PM Page 7 of 13

110 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Ingenika dump Transfer yard: Swannell dump Aspen (residues) Chips Birch (residues) Chips Black spruce (residues) Chips 1, Cottonwood (residues) Chips 46 Pine (residues) Chips 16, Pine-biomass Chips 22,73 25 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 3,54 25 Spruce (residues) Chips 4,93 27 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips ,51 25 Aspen (residues) Chips 94 3 Birch (residues) Chips 6 22 Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips 9 24 Pine (residues) Chips 1, Pine-biomass Chips 25, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 4,19 45 Spruce (residues) Chips 7,65 43 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips , /5/213 3:5:16 PM Page of 13

111 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Pete Toy dump Transfer yard: Mesilinka dump Transfer yard: E Bear Valley dump Aspen (residues) Chips 23 Birch (residues) Chips 563 Black spruce (residues) Chips 17 Cottonwood (residues) Chips 62 Pine (residues) Chips 2,636 Pine-biomass Chips 3,56 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 565 Spruce (residues) Chips 1,65 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 126 9,57 Aspen (residues) Chips 2,15 2 Birch (residues) Chips 7 Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 2,25 41 Pine-biomass Chips 37, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 6,55 41 Spruce (residues) Chips 13, Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 1, , Aspen (residues) Chips 73 3 Birch (residues) Chips 99 2 Cottonwood (residues) Chips 13 3 Pine (residues) Chips 2,1 3 Pine-biomass Chips 2,136 3 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips Spruce (residues) Chips 1,265 3 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips , /5/213 3:5:16 PM Page 9 of 13

112 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Finlay Forks dump Transfer yard: Nabesche dump Transfer yard: Bear Valley dump Aspen (residues) Chips 9, Birch (residues) Chips 3, Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 25, Pine-biomass Chips 3, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 5,56 24 Spruce (residues) Chips 15, Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 1, , Aspen (residues) Chips 1,214 6 Birch (residues) Chips 54 9 Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 7,29 7 Pine-biomass Chips,299 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 1,56 7 Spruce (residues) Chips 6,473 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips ,442 Aspen (residues) Chips 1,34 12 Birch (residues) Chips Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips 25 Pine (residues) Chips, Pine-biomass Chips,9 15 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 1,11 15 Spruce (residues) Chips 9, Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 1, , /5/213 3:5:16 PM Page of 13

113 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Ospika dump Transfer yard: Isola dump Aspen (residues) Chips 11, Birch (residues) Chips 5,434 1 Black spruce (residues) Chips 1,176 1 Cottonwood (residues) Chips 1, Pine (residues) Chips 45,47 22 Pine-biomass Chips 54,94 22 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 9, Spruce (residues) Chips 32,33 24 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 6, ,67 22 Aspen (residues) Chips 5 12 Birch (residues) Chips Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 9,7 13 Pine-biomass Chips 12, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 1, Spruce (residues) Chips 4, Subalpine fir (residues) Chips , /5/213 3:5:16 PM Page 11 of 13

114 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Deserters dump Transfer yard: Factor Ross dump Aspen (residues) Chips 4,91 24 Birch (residues) Chips Black spruce (residues) Chips 1, Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 3,2 2 Pine-biomass Chips 37,491 2 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 6,433 2 Spruce (residues) Chips 14,593 2 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips ,77 2 Aspen (residues) Chips 1,553 7 Birch (residues) Chips 537 Black spruce (residues) Chips 13 Cottonwood (residues) Chips 121 Pine (residues) Chips 14,2 Pine-biomass Chips 2,3 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 3,172 Spruce (residues) Chips,739 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 52 5,71 16/5/213 3:5:16 PM Page 12 of 13

115 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Omineca dump Transfer yard: Mackenzie mill Aspen (residues) Chips 2, Birch (residues) Chips 7 7 Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 76, Pine-biomass Chips 99, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 16,4 39 Spruce (residues) Chips 29, Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 4, ,71 3 Aspen (residues) Chips 13, Birch (residues) Chips 3,31 46 Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips 1,113 5 Pine (residues) Chips 4, Pine-biomass Chips 57, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips,41 44 Spruce (residues) Chips 27, Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 3, , ,51, /5/213 3:5:16 PM Page 13 of 13

116 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Territory: Sector: Cut block: Unknown territory Unknown sector <Multiple selection> Statistics - Selected Items Area 37,29.4 ha Number of cut blocks 39 Recovered biomass 1,22,915.7 odt Recovery rate 32.3 odt/ha odt / Merchantable m³.1214 odt/m³ Delivered products Chips Bundles Trunks and Residues Energy balance Available energy Fuel consumption % % % 33 : 1 4,292,46 MWh 12.4 L/odt Cost Harvesting recovery Transfer yard Transportation Stumpage fees Road network - Maintenance Indirect costs Total.9 $/odt $/odt 3. $/odt 2. $/odt. $/odt 1.2 $/odt. $/odt $/odt Revenue Sale value Silvicultural discount. $/odt. $/odt Net Profit $/odt 16/5/213 3:51:24 PM Page 1 of 11

117 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Flow Total 6,295,514.3 odt Merch. vol. harvested 4,144,42.5 odt 11,192,346. m³ Available biomass 1,934,54.5 odt Uncut trees 216,553.3 odt Natural losses 14,572.7 odt Residue retention 2 % 4,966. odt At the stump 419,67.3 odt Not recovered 419,67.3 odt Technical availability. odt Roadside 1,395,133.6 odt Not recovered 192,21. odt Recovery / Available 62.2 % Recovered biomass 1,22,915.7 odt Recovery / Total 19.1 % Products Product name odt odt/m³ odt/ha Spruce (residues) 472, Subalpine fir (residues) 33, Pine-biomass 161, Pine (residues) 127, Aspen (residues) 71, Pine-biomass (residues) 27, Birch (residues) 23, Cottonwood (residues), Black spruce (residues) 4, Douglas fir (residues) ,22, /5/213 3:51:25 PM Page 2 of 11

118 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] 39 selected site(s) / 9 Area covered: 37,29 ha / 153,7 ha 16/5/213 3:51:25 PM Page 3 of 11

119 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Recovery summary Volume(odt) Area(ha) Number of cut blocks recovery location At the stump Roadside. 1,22, , Recovery season Summer Winter. 1,22, , Residue freshness Fresh Brown Brittle 1,22, , Supply summary Recovered biomass to Merchantable volume (odt) Residues (odt) Total biomass (odt) $/odt... 2 $/odt... 3 $/odt. 16,2.3 16,2.3 4 $/odt. 42,14. 42,14. 5 $/odt. 3,3.2 3,3.2 6 $/odt. 5, , $/odt. 796, ,11.7 $/odt. 931, , $/odt ,5,19.5 1,5,3.7 $/odt 3, ,39,469. 1,42, $/odt 12,5.9 1,4, ,53, $/odt 3, ,4, ,79, $/odt 73,1. 1,4, ,114,1. 14 $/odt 114,39.1 1,4, ,154, $/odt 149,45.1 1,4, ,19, $/odt 15,97.1 1,4, ,199, $/odt 161, ,4, ,22,45. 1 $/odt 161, ,4, ,22,915.7 Maximum cost $/odt 4.33 $/odt 16/5/213 3:51:25 PM Page 4 of 11

120 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Delivery to mills Destination Product Format odt Transport average distance (Km) <Closest transfer yard> Transfer yard: Raspberry dump Transfer yard: Chunamon dump Aspen (residues) Chips 4,1 Birch (residues) Chips 1,266 Cottonwood (residues) Chips 559 Pine (residues) Chips 2,239 Pine-biomass Chips 2,93 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 4 Spruce (residues) Chips 6,36 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 75 19,141 Aspen (residues) Chips 1,41 6 Birch (residues) Chips Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 5, Pine-biomass Chips 6, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 1, Spruce (residues) Chips 14,27 56 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 4, , Aspen (residues) Chips 92 5 Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips Pine-biomass Chips Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 32 5 Spruce (residues) Chips 44 5 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips , /5/213 3:51:25 PM Page 5 of 11

121 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: S Fort Grahame dump Transfer yard: Fort Grahame dump Transfer yard: Chowika dump Aspen (residues) Chips 6 16 Birch (residues) Chips 2,79 15 Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips 22 Pine (residues) Chips 3,116 1 Pine-biomass Chips 3, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 66 1 Spruce (residues) Chips 4, Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 1, , Aspen (residues) Chips Birch (residues) Chips 55 Black spruce (residues) Chips 23 1 Pine (residues) Chips 52 Pine-biomass Chips 679 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 125 Spruce (residues) Chips 55 9 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips ,993 Aspen (residues) Chips 1,27 16 Birch (residues) Chips 1, Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 2, 2 Pine-biomass Chips 3,67 19 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips Spruce (residues) Chips 4, Subalpine fir (residues) Chips , /5/213 3:51:25 PM Page 6 of 11

122 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Swannell dump Transfer yard: Pete Toy dump Transfer yard: Mesilinka dump Transfer yard: E Bear Valley dump Aspen (residues) Chips 4 26 Birch (residues) Chips 26 Pine (residues) Chips Pine-biomass Chips Pine-biomass (residues) Chips Spruce (residues) Chips Spruce (residues) Chips 1, Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 1, , Aspen (residues) Chips Black spruce (residues) Chips 2 31 Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 1,126 4 Pine-biomass Chips 1, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips Spruce (residues) Chips 5,4 32 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 1,39 26, Aspen (residues) Chips 46 4 Birch (residues) Chips 1 4 Cottonwood (residues) Chips 4 Pine (residues) Chips 32 4 Pine-biomass Chips Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 7 4 Spruce (residues) Chips 2,64 4 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips , /5/213 3:51:25 PM Page 7 of 11

123 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Finlay Forks dump Transfer yard: Nabesche dump Transfer yard: Bear Valley dump Aspen (residues) Chips 7, Birch (residues) Chips 1,53 27 Black spruce (residues) Chips 4 32 Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 3,41 25 Pine-biomass Chips 4,43 25 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips Spruce (residues) Chips 21,79 26 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 14, , Aspen (residues) Chips 343 Birch (residues) Chips 216 Cottonwood (residues) Chips 26 Pine (residues) Chips 455 Pine-biomass Chips 541 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 97 Spruce (residues) Chips 3,44 9 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 1,247 6,365 9 Aspen (residues) Chips 51 Birch (residues) Chips 34 5 Black spruce (residues) Chips 4 14 Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 1, Pine-biomass Chips 1,36 12 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips Spruce (residues) Chips,71 16 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 2, , /5/213 3:51:25 PM Page of 11

124 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Ospika dump Transfer yard: Isola dump Transfer yard: Deserters dump Aspen (residues) Chips 1, Birch (residues) Chips 1,9 1 Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips 2,47 16 Pine-biomass Chips 2, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips Spruce (residues) Chips 4,4 19 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 2, ,39 1 Aspen (residues) Chips 17 2 Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips Pine-biomass Chips Pine-biomass (residues) Chips Spruce (residues) Chips Subalpine fir (residues) Chips , Aspen (residues) Chips 2 22 Cottonwood (residues) Chips Pine (residues) Chips Pine-biomass Chips Pine-biomass (residues) Chips Spruce (residues) Chips , /5/213 3:51:25 PM Page 9 of 11

125 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Factor Ross dump Transfer yard: Omineca dump Transfer yard: Mackenzie mill Aspen (residues) Chips Birch (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips 7 Pine (residues) Chips 326 Pine-biomass Chips 463 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 7 Spruce (residues) Chips Subalpine fir (residues) Chips ,6 Aspen (residues) Chips Black spruce (residues) Chips Cottonwood (residues) Chips 2 42 Pine (residues) Chips 2, Pine-biomass Chips 2, Pine-biomass (residues) Chips Spruce (residues) Chips 5,27 3 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 2, ,37 22 Aspen (residues) Chips 51,164 4 Birch (residues) Chips 13, Black spruce (residues) Chips 3,542 3 Cottonwood (residues) Chips 7, Douglas fir (residues) Chips 4 29 Pine (residues) Chips 2,262 9 Pine-biomass Chips 13,126 7 Pine-biomass (residues) Chips 21,913 9 Spruce (residues) Chips 37,5 72 Subalpine fir (residues) Chips 269, , /5/213 3:51:25 PM Page of 11

126 [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] 1,22, /5/213 3:51:25 PM Page 11 of 11

127 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Territory: Sector: Cut block: Unknown territory Unknown sector <Multiple selection> Cut blocks Area 153,7.3 ha Number of cut blocks 9 Average skidding dist. 25 m Volume/km m³/km Area/km ha/km Cut type Clearcut Harvesting system Full-tree with roadside processing 153,7.3 ha 153,7.3 ha Terrain conditions CPPA class Ground strength (%) Roughness (%) Slope (%) Costs Harvesting Equipment transport Road network - Construction Road network - Repair Road network - Improvement Road network - Maintenance Transportation Transfer yard Stumpage fees Indirect costs Stand establishment Total 27. $/m³.75 $/m³. $/m³. $/m³. $/m³.53 $/m³ $/m³ 3.62 $/m³. $/m³. $/m³ N/A $/m³ Revenue Value Reimbursements (silv.). $/m³ N/A Net Profit $/m³ 5/3/213 1:29:37 PM Page 1 of 9

128 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Products Name Format m³ m³/ha m³/stem %/total Pine Logs 1,725, Spruce Logs 11,25, Pine-biomass Logs 4,12, Subalpine fir Logs 3,95, Aspen Logs 1,14, Birch Logs 279, Black spruce Logs 233, Cottonwood Logs 169, Douglas fir Logs ,425, Delivery to mills Destination <Closest transfer yard> Product Format m³ Transport average distance (Km) Transfer yard: Raspberry dump Aspen Logs 55,4 Birch Logs,365 Cottonwood Logs 6,77 Pine Logs 152, Spruce Logs 131,796 Subalpine fir Logs 15, ,43 Aspen Logs 175,233 6 Birch Logs 11, Black spruce Logs 5,73 4 Cottonwood Logs 11,222 1 Pine Logs 5,23, Spruce Logs 2,993, Subalpine fir Logs 55, ,92, /3/213 1:29:37 PM Page 2 of 9

129 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Chunamon dump Transfer yard: S Fort Grahame dump Transfer yard: Fort Grahame dump Aspen Logs,56 15 Birch Logs 2, Black spruce Logs 3,71 15 Cottonwood Logs 5, Pine Logs,79 13 Spruce Logs 35,94 13 Subalpine fir Logs 7, ,2 13 Aspen Logs 69, Birch Logs 24, Black spruce Logs 5,1 16 Cottonwood Logs 2, Pine Logs 72,91 16 Spruce Logs 346,5 16 Subalpine fir Logs 9,45 1 1,32,12 16 Aspen Logs 2,62 6 Birch Logs 3,959 Black spruce Logs 1,7 6 Cottonwood Logs Pine Logs 172,63 9 Spruce Logs 74,96 9 Subalpine fir Logs 23, ,4 9 5/3/213 1:29:37 PM Page 3 of 9

130 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Chowika dump Transfer yard: Ingenika dump Transfer yard: Swannell dump Aspen Logs 2,76 14 Birch Logs 17, Black spruce Logs Cottonwood Logs 3,32 16 Pine Logs 19,63 17 Spruce Logs 12, Subalpine fir Logs 2, , Aspen Logs 2,62 26 Birch Logs 1,3 26 Black spruce Logs,47 25 Cottonwood Logs 4 46 Pine Logs 235,4 25 Spruce Logs 44,9 27 Subalpine fir Logs 1, , Aspen Logs 14,17 27 Birch Logs Black spruce Logs 2, Cottonwood Logs Pine Logs 274,32 44 Spruce Logs 6,13 42 Subalpine fir Logs 3, , /3/213 1:29:37 PM Page 4 of 9

131 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Pete Toy dump Transfer yard: Mesilinka dump Transfer yard: E Bear Valley dump Aspen Logs 1,31 Birch Logs 2,97 Black spruce Logs 1,36 Cottonwood Logs 573 Pine Logs 36,9 Spruce Logs 29, Subalpine fir Logs 2, , 11 Aspen Logs 19,66 19 Birch Logs 2 7 Black spruce Logs 2,41 5 Cottonwood Logs 5,29 37 Pine Logs 44,16 39 Spruce Logs 17, Subalpine fir Logs 27, , Aspen Logs 5,7 3 Birch Logs Cottonwood Logs Pine Logs 24,2 3 Spruce Logs 24,752 4 Subalpine fir Logs 4, ,67 4 5/3/213 1:29:37 PM Page 5 of 9

132 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Finlay Forks dump Transfer yard: Nabesche dump Transfer yard: Bear Valley dump Aspen Logs 15, Birch Logs 2,5 31 Black spruce Logs 1,97 33 Cottonwood Logs 3, Pine Logs 353,75 25 Spruce Logs 319,79 26 Subalpine fir Logs 152,9 27 1,,3 25 Aspen Logs,5 7 Birch Logs 1,5 Cottonwood Logs 1,341 3 Pine Logs 9,3 Spruce Logs 4,532 9 Subalpine fir Logs 17, 9 25,331 Aspen Logs 14, Birch Logs 1,1 12 Black spruce Logs 1,73 17 Cottonwood Logs Pine Logs 121, Spruce Logs 15,92 15 Subalpine fir Logs 3, , /3/213 1:29:37 PM Page 6 of 9

133 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Ospika dump Transfer yard: Isola dump Transfer yard: Deserters dump Aspen Logs 112,4 17 Birch Logs 35,115 1 Black spruce Logs,236 1 Cottonwood Logs 15,29 2 Pine Logs 54, Spruce Logs 32,1 23 Subalpine fir Logs 77, ,136, Aspen Logs 7,64 12 Birch Logs 1,67 12 Black spruce Logs 7, 11 Cottonwood Logs Pine Logs 134,2 13 Spruce Logs 46,59 15 Subalpine fir Logs 3, ,62 14 Aspen Logs 42, Birch Logs 1,14 19 Black spruce Logs 11, Cottonwood Logs, Pine Logs 3,44 2 Spruce Logs 122,177 2 Subalpine fir Logs 7, , /3/213 1:29:37 PM Page 7 of 9

134 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Factor Ross dump Transfer yard: Omineca dump Transfer yard: Mackenzie mill Aspen Logs 13,921 7 Birch Logs 5,39 7 Black spruce Logs 9 Cottonwood Logs 1,35 Pine Logs 221,592 9 Spruce Logs 7,566 Subalpine fir Logs,32 33,694 9 Aspen Logs 33,45 23 Birch Logs 1,74 Black spruce Logs 5, Cottonwood Logs 2,13 15 Pine Logs 1,297, Spruce Logs 36, Subalpine fir Logs 72, ,799, Aspen Logs 1,24,72 54 Birch Logs 131,51 49 Black spruce Logs 114, Cottonwood Logs 99, Douglas fir Logs Pine Logs 7,69,26 73 Spruce Logs 5,737,47 65 Subalpine fir Logs 2,761, ,73, ,413, /3/213 1:29:37 PM Page of 9

135 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] 9 selected site(s) / 9 Area covered: 153,7 ha / 153,7 ha 5/3/213 1:29:37 PM Page 9 of 9

136 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Territory: Sector: Cut block: Unknown territory Unknown sector <Multiple selection> Cut blocks Area 153,7.3 ha Number of cut blocks 9 Average skidding dist. 25 m Volume/km m³/km Area/km ha/km Cut type Clearcut Harvesting system Full-tree with roadside processing 153,7.3 ha 153,7.3 ha Terrain conditions CPPA class Ground strength (%) Roughness (%) Slope (%) Costs Harvesting Equipment transport Road network - Construction Road network - Repair Road network - Improvement Road network - Maintenance Transportation Transfer yard Stumpage fees Indirect costs Stand establishment Total 27. $/m³.75 $/m³. $/m³. $/m³. $/m³.53 $/m³ $/m³ 3.62 $/m³. $/m³. $/m³ N/A $/m³ Revenue Value Reimbursements (silv.). $/m³ N/A Net Profit $/m³ 5/3/213 1:3:16 PM Page 1 of 9

137 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Products Name Format m³ m³/ha m³/stem %/total Pine Logs 1,725, Spruce Logs 11,25, Pine-biomass Logs 4,12, Subalpine fir Logs 3,95, Aspen Logs 1,14, Birch Logs 279, Black spruce Logs 233, Cottonwood Logs 169, Douglas fir Logs ,425, Delivery to mills Destination <Closest transfer yard> Product Format m³ Transport average distance (Km) Transfer yard: Raspberry dump Aspen Logs 55,4 Birch Logs,365 Cottonwood Logs 6,77 Pine Logs 152, Spruce Logs 131,796 Subalpine fir Logs 15, ,43 Aspen Logs 175,233 6 Birch Logs 11, Black spruce Logs 5,73 4 Cottonwood Logs 11,222 1 Pine Logs 5,23, Spruce Logs 2,993, Subalpine fir Logs 55, ,92, /3/213 1:3:16 PM Page 2 of 9

138 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Chunamon dump Transfer yard: S Fort Grahame dump Transfer yard: Fort Grahame dump Aspen Logs,56 15 Birch Logs 2, Black spruce Logs 3,71 15 Cottonwood Logs 5, Pine Logs,79 13 Spruce Logs 35,94 13 Subalpine fir Logs 7, ,2 13 Aspen Logs 69, Birch Logs 24, Black spruce Logs 5,1 16 Cottonwood Logs 2, Pine Logs 72,91 16 Spruce Logs 346,5 16 Subalpine fir Logs 9,45 1 1,32,12 16 Aspen Logs 2,62 6 Birch Logs 3,959 Black spruce Logs 1,7 6 Cottonwood Logs Pine Logs 172,63 9 Spruce Logs 74,96 9 Subalpine fir Logs 23, ,4 9 5/3/213 1:3:16 PM Page 3 of 9

139 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Chowika dump Transfer yard: Ingenika dump Transfer yard: Swannell dump Aspen Logs 2,76 14 Birch Logs 17, Black spruce Logs Cottonwood Logs 3,32 16 Pine Logs 19,63 17 Spruce Logs 12, Subalpine fir Logs 2, , Aspen Logs 2,62 26 Birch Logs 1,3 26 Black spruce Logs,47 25 Cottonwood Logs 4 46 Pine Logs 235,4 25 Spruce Logs 44,9 27 Subalpine fir Logs 1, , Aspen Logs 14,17 27 Birch Logs Black spruce Logs 2, Cottonwood Logs Pine Logs 274,32 44 Spruce Logs 6,13 42 Subalpine fir Logs 3, , /3/213 1:3:16 PM Page 4 of 9

140 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Pete Toy dump Transfer yard: Mesilinka dump Transfer yard: E Bear Valley dump Aspen Logs 1,31 Birch Logs 2,97 Black spruce Logs 1,36 Cottonwood Logs 573 Pine Logs 36,9 Spruce Logs 29, Subalpine fir Logs 2, , 11 Aspen Logs 19,66 19 Birch Logs 2 7 Black spruce Logs 2,41 5 Cottonwood Logs 5,29 37 Pine Logs 44,16 39 Spruce Logs 17, Subalpine fir Logs 27, , Aspen Logs 5,7 3 Birch Logs Cottonwood Logs Pine Logs 24,2 3 Spruce Logs 24,752 4 Subalpine fir Logs 4, ,67 4 5/3/213 1:3:16 PM Page 5 of 9

141 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Finlay Forks dump Transfer yard: Nabesche dump Transfer yard: Bear Valley dump Aspen Logs 15, Birch Logs 2,5 31 Black spruce Logs 1,97 33 Cottonwood Logs 3, Pine Logs 353,75 25 Spruce Logs 319,79 26 Subalpine fir Logs 152,9 27 1,,3 25 Aspen Logs,5 7 Birch Logs 1,5 Cottonwood Logs 1,341 3 Pine Logs 9,3 Spruce Logs 4,532 9 Subalpine fir Logs 17, 9 25,331 Aspen Logs 14, Birch Logs 1,1 12 Black spruce Logs 1,73 17 Cottonwood Logs Pine Logs 121, Spruce Logs 15,92 15 Subalpine fir Logs 3, , /3/213 1:3:16 PM Page 6 of 9

142 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Ospika dump Transfer yard: Isola dump Transfer yard: Deserters dump Aspen Logs 112,4 17 Birch Logs 35,115 1 Black spruce Logs,236 1 Cottonwood Logs 15,29 2 Pine Logs 54, Spruce Logs 32,1 23 Subalpine fir Logs 77, ,136, Aspen Logs 7,64 12 Birch Logs 1,67 12 Black spruce Logs 7, 11 Cottonwood Logs Pine Logs 134,2 13 Spruce Logs 46,59 15 Subalpine fir Logs 3, ,62 14 Aspen Logs 42, Birch Logs 1,14 19 Black spruce Logs 11, Cottonwood Logs, Pine Logs 3,44 2 Spruce Logs 122,177 2 Subalpine fir Logs 7, , /3/213 1:3:16 PM Page 7 of 9

143 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Factor Ross dump Transfer yard: Omineca dump Transfer yard: Mackenzie mill Aspen Logs 13,921 7 Birch Logs 5,39 7 Black spruce Logs 9 Cottonwood Logs 1,35 Pine Logs 221,592 9 Spruce Logs 7,566 Subalpine fir Logs,32 33,694 9 Aspen Logs 33,45 23 Birch Logs 1,74 Black spruce Logs 5, Cottonwood Logs 2,13 15 Pine Logs 1,297, Spruce Logs 36, Subalpine fir Logs 72, ,799, Aspen Logs 1,24,72 54 Birch Logs 131,51 49 Black spruce Logs 114, Cottonwood Logs 99, Douglas fir Logs Pine Logs 7,69,26 73 Spruce Logs 5,737,47 65 Subalpine fir Logs 2,761, ,73, ,413, /3/213 1:3:16 PM Page of 9

144 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] 9 selected site(s) / 9 Area covered: 153,7 ha / 153,7 ha 5/3/213 1:3:16 PM Page 9 of 9

145 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Territory: Sector: Cut block: Unknown territory Unknown sector <Multiple selection> Cut blocks Area 36,43.9 ha Number of cut blocks 163 Average skidding dist. 25 m Volume/km m³/km Area/km ha/km Cut type Clearcut Harvesting system Full-tree with roadside processing 36,43.9 ha 36,43.9 ha Terrain conditions CPPA class Ground strength (%) Roughness (%) Slope (%) Costs Harvesting Equipment transport Road network - Construction Road network - Repair Road network - Improvement Road network - Maintenance Transportation Transfer yard Stumpage fees Indirect costs Stand establishment Total 2.1 $/m³.75 $/m³. $/m³. $/m³. $/m³.77 $/m³ 14.6 $/m³ 2.93 $/m³. $/m³. $/m³ N/A $/m³ Revenue Value Reimbursements (silv.). $/m³ N/A Net Profit $/m³ 16/5/213 3:4:24 PM Page 1 of 4

146 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Products Name Format m³ m³/ha m³/stem %/total Pine Logs 5,625, Spruce Logs 2,4, Pine-biomass Logs 1,25, Subalpine fir Logs 3, Aspen Logs 251, Black spruce Logs 61, Birch Logs 21, Cottonwood Logs 15, ,93, Delivery to mills Destination Product Format m³ Transport average distance (Km) Transfer yard: Raspberry dump Transfer yard: Omineca dump Aspen Logs 53,469 7 Birch Logs 2, Black spruce Logs 2,561 1 Cottonwood Logs 4,134 7 Pine Logs 2,261, Spruce Logs 1,65, Subalpine fir Logs 139, ,546, Aspen Logs 1,51 6 Pine Logs 67,71 5 Spruce Logs 24,414 5 Subalpine fir Logs 2,69 95, /5/213 3:4:24 PM Page 2 of 4

147 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Transfer yard: Mackenzie mill Aspen Logs 196, Birch Logs 19, Black spruce Logs 41, 79 Cottonwood Logs 11,675 7 Pine Logs 3,297,7 75 Spruce Logs 1,32,69 76 Subalpine fir Logs 16, ,55,525 75,697, /5/213 3:4:24 PM Page 3 of 4

148 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] 163 selected site(s) / 9 Area covered: 36,431 ha / 153,7 ha 16/5/213 3:4:24 PM Page 4 of 4

149 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Territory: Sector: Cut block: Unknown territory Unknown sector <Multiple selection> Cut blocks Area 41,937. ha Number of cut blocks 175 Average skidding dist. 25 m Volume/km m³/km Area/km ha/km Cut type Clearcut Harvesting system Full-tree with roadside processing 41,937. ha 41,937. ha Terrain conditions CPPA class Ground strength (%) Roughness (%) Slope (%) Costs Harvesting Equipment transport Road network - Construction Road network - Repair Road network - Improvement Road network - Maintenance Transportation Transfer yard Stumpage fees Indirect costs Stand establishment Total 2.6 $/m³.75 $/m³. $/m³. $/m³. $/m³.77 $/m³ $/m³ 3.17 $/m³. $/m³. $/m³ N/A 4.6 $/m³ Revenue Value Reimbursements (silv.). $/m³ N/A Net Profit -4.6 $/m³ 16/5/213 3:3:27 PM Page 1 of 4

150 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Territory: Sector: Cut block: Unknown territory Unknown sector <Multiple selection> Cut blocks Area 3,229.2 ha Number of cut blocks 243 Average skidding dist. 25 m Volume/km m³/km Area/km ha/km Cut type Clearcut Harvesting system Full-tree with roadside processing 3,229.2 ha 3,229.2 ha Terrain conditions CPPA class Ground strength (%) Roughness (%) Slope (%) Costs Harvesting Equipment transport Road network - Construction Road network - Repair Road network - Improvement Road network - Maintenance Transportation Transfer yard Stumpage fees Indirect costs Stand establishment Total $/m³.75 $/m³. $/m³. $/m³. $/m³.13 $/m³.1 $/m³ 6.43 $/m³. $/m³. $/m³ N/A $/m³ Revenue Value Reimbursements (silv.). $/m³ N/A Net Profit $/m³ 16/5/213 3:2:26 PM Page 1 of 9

151 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Products Name Format m³ m³/ha m³/stem %/total Pine Logs 5,35, Spruce Logs 2,125, Pine-biomass Logs 1,25, Aspen Logs 567, Subalpine fir Logs 324, Birch Logs 111, Black spruce Logs 62, Cottonwood Logs 49, ,326, Delivery to mills Destination <Closest transfer yard> Product Format m³ Transport average distance (Km) Transfer yard: Raspberry dump Aspen Logs 2,2 Birch Logs 2,56 Cottonwood Logs 1,49 Pine Logs 122,57 Spruce Logs 69,32 Subalpine fir Logs,14 224,43 Aspen Logs 16,4 19 Birch Logs 4,39 Black spruce Logs 1, Cottonwood Logs Pine Logs 197,614 Spruce Logs 35,93 9 Subalpine fir Logs 4,649 26, /5/213 3:2:26 PM Page 2 of 9

152 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Transfer yard: Chunamon dump Transfer yard: S Fort Grahame dump Transfer yard: Fort Grahame dump Aspen Logs 9,94 16 Birch Logs 2, Black spruce Logs 3,71 15 Cottonwood Logs 4,177 1 Pine Logs 6, Spruce Logs 31, Subalpine fir Logs 5,55 163, Aspen Logs 63,44 14 Birch Logs 13, Black spruce Logs 4,44 16 Cottonwood Logs 2,9 16 Pine Logs 745,33 16 Spruce Logs 3,11 17 Subalpine fir Logs 75, 19 1,216,41 16 Aspen Logs 1,923 5 Birch Logs 3,699 Black spruce Logs 1,579 5 Cottonwood Logs Pine Logs 165,71 9 Spruce Logs 6,7 9 Subalpine fir Logs 2, , /5/213 3:2:26 PM Page 3 of 9

153 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Transfer yard: Chowika dump Transfer yard: Ingenika dump Transfer yard: Swannell dump Aspen Logs 15,59 12 Birch Logs 7,22 14 Black spruce Logs Cottonwood Logs 1, Pine Logs 156, Spruce Logs 79, Subalpine fir Logs 14, , Aspen Logs 2,62 26 Birch Logs 1,3 26 Black spruce Logs,47 25 Cottonwood Logs 4 46 Pine Logs 235,4 25 Spruce Logs 44,9 27 Subalpine fir Logs 1, , Aspen Logs,659 2 Birch Logs Black spruce Logs 2, Cottonwood Logs Pine Logs 272,43 45 Spruce Logs 67, Subalpine fir Logs 3, , /5/213 3:2:26 PM Page 4 of 9

154 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Transfer yard: Pete Toy dump Transfer yard: Mesilinka dump Transfer yard: E Bear Valley dump Aspen Logs 1,31 Birch Logs 2,97 Black spruce Logs 1,36 Cottonwood Logs 573 Pine Logs 36,9 Spruce Logs 15,2 Subalpine fir Logs 1,311 6,791 Aspen Logs 1,334 1 Birch Logs 2 7 Black spruce Logs 2,22 5 Cottonwood Logs 2,23 31 Pine Logs 3, Spruce Logs 116,92 37 Subalpine fir Logs 15, ,779 3 Aspen Logs 4,626 3 Birch Logs 37 3 Cottonwood Logs 9 3 Pine Logs 21,25 3 Spruce Logs,361 3 Subalpine fir Logs , /5/213 3:2:26 PM Page 5 of 9

155 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Transfer yard: Finlay Forks dump Transfer yard: Nabesche dump Transfer yard: Bear Valley dump Aspen Logs 3, Birch Logs 19,4 31 Black spruce Logs 1,73 33 Cottonwood Logs 1,79 27 Pine Logs 37,6 25 Spruce Logs 127,13 27 Subalpine fir Logs 9, , Aspen Logs,47 6 Birch Logs 294 Cottonwood Logs 1,9 1 Pine Logs 4,34 Spruce Logs 54,659 Subalpine fir Logs 5,9 154,22 Aspen Logs,5 11 Birch Logs Black spruce Logs 1,413 1 Cottonwood Logs 199 Pine Logs 2,62 15 Spruce Logs 77,96 15 Subalpine fir Logs 12, , /5/213 3:2:26 PM Page 6 of 9

156 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Transfer yard: Ospika dump Transfer yard: Isola dump Transfer yard: Deserters dump Aspen Logs 94,51 1 Birch Logs 25,96 1 Black spruce Logs 7,667 1 Cottonwood Logs 13,42 21 Pine Logs 559,7 23 Spruce Logs 265, Subalpine fir Logs 55,6 23 1,22,73 22 Aspen Logs 7,4 12 Birch Logs 1,67 12 Black spruce Logs 7, 11 Cottonwood Logs Pine Logs 131, Spruce Logs 41,25 13 Subalpine fir Logs ,24 13 Aspen Logs 41, Birch Logs 1,14 19 Black spruce Logs 11, Cottonwood Logs 5,43 16 Pine Logs 34,25 2 Spruce Logs 119,562 2 Subalpine fir Logs 7, , /5/213 3:2:26 PM Page 7 of 9

157 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Transfer yard: Factor Ross dump Transfer yard: Omineca dump Transfer yard: Mackenzie mill Aspen Logs 12,69 6 Birch Logs 2,949 Black spruce Logs 9 Cottonwood Logs 1,32 Pine Logs 216,767 9 Spruce Logs,916 Subalpine fir Logs 7, ,6 9 Aspen Logs 23, Birch Logs 39 7 Black spruce Logs 4,27 52 Cottonwood Logs 2, Pine Logs 1,16,15 39 Spruce Logs 264, Subalpine fir Logs 3, ,349,4 3 Aspen Logs 4, Birch Logs 1,65 45 Black spruce Logs 3, Cottonwood Logs 9,53 45 Pine Logs 53, Spruce Logs 246, Subalpine fir Logs 33, , ,75, /5/213 3:2:26 PM Page of 9

158 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] 243 selected site(s) / 9 Area covered: 3,229 ha / 153,7 ha 16/5/213 3:2:26 PM Page 9 of 9

159 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Products Name Format m³ m³/ha m³/stem %/total Pine Logs 5,6, Spruce Logs 2,66, Pine-biomass Logs 1,2, Subalpine fir Logs 419, Aspen Logs 353, Black spruce Logs 77, Birch Logs 22, Cottonwood Logs 16, ,295, Delivery to mills Destination Product Format m³ Transport average distance (Km) Transfer yard: Raspberry dump Transfer yard: Omineca dump Aspen Logs 7,373 1 Birch Logs 1, Black spruce Logs 27,56 Cottonwood Logs 5, Pine Logs 2,35, Spruce Logs 1,199, Subalpine fir Logs 17, ,5, Aspen Logs 6,21 26 Birch Logs 1, Black spruce Logs Cottonwood Logs 7 6 Pine Logs 1,59 12 Spruce Logs 52,42 22 Subalpine fir Logs 14,97 263, /5/213 3:3:27 PM Page 2 of 4

160 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Transfer yard: Mackenzie mill Aspen Logs 276, Birch Logs 19,2 5 Black spruce Logs 49,49 9 Cottonwood Logs 11,21 69 Pine Logs 3,53, Spruce Logs 1,355,31 74 Subalpine fir Logs 216,2 76 4,91, ,95, /5/213 3:3:27 PM Page 3 of 4

161 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] 175 selected site(s) / 9 Area covered: 41,93 ha / 153,7 ha 16/5/213 3:3:27 PM Page 4 of 4

162 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Territory: Sector: Cut block: Unknown territory Unknown sector <Multiple selection> Cut blocks Area 37,29.4 ha Number of cut blocks 39 Average skidding dist. 25 m Volume/km m³/km Area/km ha/km Cut type Clearcut Harvesting system Full-tree with roadside processing 37,29.4 ha 37,29.4 ha Terrain conditions CPPA class Ground strength (%) Roughness (%) Slope (%) Costs Harvesting Equipment transport Road network - Construction Road network - Repair Road network - Improvement Road network - Maintenance Transportation Transfer yard Stumpage fees Indirect costs Stand establishment Total $/m³.75 $/m³. $/m³. $/m³. $/m³.45 $/m³.4 $/m³ 2.2 $/m³. $/m³. $/m³ N/A $/m³ Revenue Value Reimbursements (silv.). $/m³ N/A Net Profit $/m³ 16/5/213 3:5:53 PM Page 1 of

163 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Products Name Format m³ m³/ha m³/stem %/total Spruce Logs 4,142, Subalpine fir Logs 2,5, Pine Logs 1,664, Aspen Logs 642, Pine-biomass Logs 356, Birch Logs 124, Cottonwood Logs 7, Black spruce Logs 31, Douglas fir Logs ,9, Delivery to mills Destination <Closest transfer yard> Product Format m³ Transport average distance (Km) Transfer yard: Raspberry dump Aspen Logs 35,2 Birch Logs 5,5 Cottonwood Logs 4,22 Pine Logs 3,231 Spruce Logs 62,467 Subalpine fir Logs 7, ,947 Aspen Logs 35,343 Birch Logs 2,94 31 Black spruce Logs, Cottonwood Logs 1,742 9 Pine Logs 466,5 112 Spruce Logs 692,721 9 Subalpine fir Logs 226,324 1,434, /5/213 3:5:53 PM Page 2 of

164 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Transfer yard: Chunamon dump Transfer yard: S Fort Grahame dump Transfer yard: Fort Grahame dump Transfer yard: Chowika dump Aspen Logs 9 5 Cottonwood Logs 1,174 5 Pine Logs 2,446 5 Spruce Logs 4,221 5 Subalpine fir Logs 2, ,1 5 Aspen Logs 5, Birch Logs, Black spruce Logs Cottonwood Logs Pine Logs 36, Spruce Logs 36, Subalpine fir Logs 13, ,6 15 Aspen Logs 1, Birch Logs 26 9 Black spruce Logs Pine Logs 6,5 Spruce Logs 6,26 9 Subalpine fir Logs 2,94 7 1,241 Aspen Logs 13, Birch Logs 9, Black spruce Logs Cottonwood Logs 1,79 19 Pine Logs 32,33 19 Spruce Logs 4,5 17 Subalpine fir Logs 6, , /5/213 3:5:53 PM Page 3 of

165 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Transfer yard: Swannell dump Transfer yard: Pete Toy dump Transfer yard: Mesilinka dump Transfer yard: E Bear Valley dump Aspen Logs 5, Birch Logs 26 Pine Logs 2,25 26 Spruce Logs , Spruce Logs 13, Subalpine fir Logs 19, ,22 16 Aspen Logs 1, Black spruce Logs 1 3 Cottonwood Logs 3,16 41 Pine Logs 15,93 39 Spruce Logs 61, Subalpine fir Logs 11, ,59 32 Aspen Logs Birch Logs 5 4 Cottonwood Logs 51 4 Pine Logs 3,795 4 Spruce Logs 16,391 4 Subalpine fir Logs 3, ,3 4 16/5/213 3:5:53 PM Page 4 of

166 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Transfer yard: Finlay Forks dump Transfer yard: Nabesche dump Transfer yard: Bear Valley dump Aspen Logs 67, Birch Logs, Black spruce Logs Cottonwood Logs 1,54 1 Pine Logs 46,15 25 Spruce Logs 191,95 26 Subalpine fir Logs 143, ,57 25 Aspen Logs 2,317 Birch Logs 756 Cottonwood Logs 244 Pine Logs 5,499 Spruce Logs 29,73 Subalpine fir Logs 11,2 5,59 9 Aspen Logs 4,44 Birch Logs 179 Black spruce Logs Cottonwood Logs Pine Logs 1,44 13 Spruce Logs 72, Subalpine fir Logs 17, , /5/213 3:5:53 PM Page 5 of

167 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Transfer yard: Ospika dump Transfer yard: Isola dump Transfer yard: Deserters dump Transfer yard: Factor Ross dump Aspen Logs 1,33 12 Birch Logs 9,155 1 Black spruce Logs Cottonwood Logs 2,49 13 Pine Logs 25, Spruce Logs 36,514 1 Subalpine fir Logs 22, ,2 17 Aspen Logs Cottonwood Logs 2 32 Pine Logs 2,524 2 Spruce Logs 5, Subalpine fir Logs 2, , Aspen Logs 1, Cottonwood Logs 2, Pine Logs 4, Spruce Logs 2,615 21,94 2 Aspen Logs 1,52 9 Birch Logs 2,44 7 Cottonwood Logs 3 7 Pine Logs 4,26 Spruce Logs 6,65 11 Subalpine fir Logs ,626 16/5/213 3:5:53 PM Page 6 of

168 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] Transfer yard: Omineca dump Transfer yard: Mackenzie mill Aspen Logs 1,94 31 Black spruce Logs Cottonwood Logs Pine Logs 25,57 12 Spruce Logs 45, Subalpine fir Logs 16, , Aspen Logs 446,93 41 Birch Logs 74, Black spruce Logs 2,247 6 Cottonwood Logs 67,27 37 Douglas fir Logs Pine Logs 934,612 6 Spruce Logs 2,15, Subalpine fir Logs 2,342, ,71, ,544, /5/213 3:5:53 PM Page 7 of

169 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson-cheap] 39 selected site(s) / 9 Area covered: 37,29 ha / 153,7 ha 16/5/213 3:5:53 PM Page of

170 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Territory: Sector: Cut block: Unknown territory Unknown sector <Multiple selection> Cut blocks Area 36,43.9 ha Number of cut blocks 163 Average skidding dist. 25 m Volume/km m³/km Area/km ha/km Cut type Clearcut Harvesting system Full-tree with roadside processing 36,43.9 ha 36,43.9 ha Terrain conditions CPPA class Ground strength (%) Roughness (%) Slope (%) Costs Harvesting Equipment transport Road network - Construction Road network - Repair Road network - Improvement Road network - Maintenance Transportation Transfer yard Stumpage fees Indirect costs Stand establishment Total 2.1 $/m³.75 $/m³. $/m³. $/m³. $/m³.77 $/m³ 14.6 $/m³ 2.93 $/m³. $/m³. $/m³ N/A $/m³ Revenue Value Reimbursements (silv.). $/m³ N/A Net Profit $/m³ 16/5/213 3:4:2 PM Page 1 of 4

171 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Territory: Sector: Cut block: Unknown territory Unknown sector <Multiple selection> Cut blocks Area 41,937. ha Number of cut blocks 175 Average skidding dist. 25 m Volume/km m³/km Area/km ha/km Cut type Clearcut Harvesting system Full-tree with roadside processing 41,937. ha 41,937. ha Terrain conditions CPPA class Ground strength (%) Roughness (%) Slope (%) Costs Harvesting Equipment transport Road network - Construction Road network - Repair Road network - Improvement Road network - Maintenance Transportation Transfer yard Stumpage fees Indirect costs Stand establishment Total 2.6 $/m³.75 $/m³. $/m³. $/m³. $/m³.77 $/m³ $/m³ 3.17 $/m³. $/m³. $/m³ N/A 4.6 $/m³ Revenue Value Reimbursements (silv.). $/m³ N/A Net Profit -4.6 $/m³ 16/5/213 3:49:36 PM Page 1 of 4

172 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Products Name Format m³ m³/ha m³/stem %/total Pine Logs 5,6, Spruce Logs 2,66, Pine-biomass Logs 1,2, Subalpine fir Logs 419, Aspen Logs 353, Black spruce Logs 77, Birch Logs 22, Cottonwood Logs 16, ,295, Delivery to mills Destination Product Format m³ Transport average distance (Km) Transfer yard: Raspberry dump Transfer yard: Omineca dump Aspen Logs 7,373 1 Birch Logs 1, Black spruce Logs 27,56 Cottonwood Logs 5, Pine Logs 2,35, Spruce Logs 1,199, Subalpine fir Logs 17, ,5, Aspen Logs 6,21 26 Birch Logs 1, Black spruce Logs Cottonwood Logs 7 6 Pine Logs 1,59 12 Spruce Logs 52,42 22 Subalpine fir Logs 14,97 263, /5/213 3:49:36 PM Page 2 of 4

173 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Mackenzie mill Aspen Logs 276, Birch Logs 19,2 5 Black spruce Logs 49,49 9 Cottonwood Logs 11,21 69 Pine Logs 3,53, Spruce Logs 1,355,31 74 Subalpine fir Logs 216,2 76 4,91, ,95, /5/213 3:49:36 PM Page 3 of 4

174 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] 175 selected site(s) / 9 Area covered: 41,93 ha / 153,7 ha 16/5/213 3:49:36 PM Page 4 of 4

175 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Products Name Format m³ m³/ha m³/stem %/total Pine Logs 5,625, Spruce Logs 2,4, Pine-biomass Logs 1,25, Subalpine fir Logs 3, Aspen Logs 251, Black spruce Logs 61, Birch Logs 21, Cottonwood Logs 15, ,93, Delivery to mills Destination Product Format m³ Transport average distance (Km) Transfer yard: Raspberry dump Transfer yard: Omineca dump Aspen Logs 53,469 7 Birch Logs 2, Black spruce Logs 2,561 1 Cottonwood Logs 4,134 7 Pine Logs 2,261, Spruce Logs 1,65, Subalpine fir Logs 139, ,546, Aspen Logs 1,51 6 Pine Logs 67,71 5 Spruce Logs 24,414 5 Subalpine fir Logs 2,69 95, /5/213 3:4:2 PM Page 2 of 4

176 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Mackenzie mill Aspen Logs 196, Birch Logs 19, Black spruce Logs 41, 79 Cottonwood Logs 11,675 7 Pine Logs 3,297,7 75 Spruce Logs 1,32,69 76 Subalpine fir Logs 16, ,55,525 75,697, /5/213 3:4:2 PM Page 3 of 4

177 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] 163 selected site(s) / 9 Area covered: 36,431 ha / 153,7 ha 16/5/213 3:4:2 PM Page 4 of 4

178 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Territory: Sector: Cut block: Unknown territory Unknown sector <Multiple selection> Cut blocks Area 3,229.2 ha Number of cut blocks 243 Average skidding dist. 25 m Volume/km m³/km Area/km ha/km Cut type Clearcut Harvesting system Full-tree with roadside processing 3,229.2 ha 3,229.2 ha Terrain conditions CPPA class Ground strength (%) Roughness (%) Slope (%) Costs Harvesting Equipment transport Road network - Construction Road network - Repair Road network - Improvement Road network - Maintenance Transportation Transfer yard Stumpage fees Indirect costs Stand establishment Total $/m³.75 $/m³. $/m³. $/m³. $/m³.13 $/m³.1 $/m³ 6.43 $/m³. $/m³. $/m³ N/A $/m³ Revenue Value Reimbursements (silv.). $/m³ N/A Net Profit $/m³ 16/5/213 3:5:45 PM Page 1 of 9

179 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Products Name Format m³ m³/ha m³/stem %/total Pine Logs 5,35, Spruce Logs 2,125, Pine-biomass Logs 1,25, Aspen Logs 567, Subalpine fir Logs 324, Birch Logs 111, Black spruce Logs 62, Cottonwood Logs 49, ,326, Delivery to mills Destination <Closest transfer yard> Product Format m³ Transport average distance (Km) Transfer yard: Raspberry dump Aspen Logs 2,2 Birch Logs 2,56 Cottonwood Logs 1,49 Pine Logs 122,57 Spruce Logs 69,32 Subalpine fir Logs,14 224,43 Aspen Logs 16,4 19 Birch Logs 4,39 Black spruce Logs 1, Cottonwood Logs Pine Logs 197,614 Spruce Logs 35,93 9 Subalpine fir Logs 4,649 26, /5/213 3:5:46 PM Page 2 of 9

180 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Chunamon dump Transfer yard: S Fort Grahame dump Transfer yard: Fort Grahame dump Aspen Logs 9,94 16 Birch Logs 2, Black spruce Logs 3,71 15 Cottonwood Logs 4,177 1 Pine Logs 6, Spruce Logs 31, Subalpine fir Logs 5,55 163, Aspen Logs 63,44 14 Birch Logs 13, Black spruce Logs 4,44 16 Cottonwood Logs 2,9 16 Pine Logs 745,33 16 Spruce Logs 3,11 17 Subalpine fir Logs 75, 19 1,216,41 16 Aspen Logs 1,923 5 Birch Logs 3,699 Black spruce Logs 1,579 5 Cottonwood Logs Pine Logs 165,71 9 Spruce Logs 6,7 9 Subalpine fir Logs 2, , /5/213 3:5:46 PM Page 3 of 9

181 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Chowika dump Transfer yard: Ingenika dump Transfer yard: Swannell dump Aspen Logs 15,59 12 Birch Logs 7,22 14 Black spruce Logs Cottonwood Logs 1, Pine Logs 156, Spruce Logs 79, Subalpine fir Logs 14, , Aspen Logs 2,62 26 Birch Logs 1,3 26 Black spruce Logs,47 25 Cottonwood Logs 4 46 Pine Logs 235,4 25 Spruce Logs 44,9 27 Subalpine fir Logs 1, , Aspen Logs,659 2 Birch Logs Black spruce Logs 2, Cottonwood Logs Pine Logs 272,43 45 Spruce Logs 67, Subalpine fir Logs 3, , /5/213 3:5:46 PM Page 4 of 9

182 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Pete Toy dump Transfer yard: Mesilinka dump Transfer yard: E Bear Valley dump Aspen Logs 1,31 Birch Logs 2,97 Black spruce Logs 1,36 Cottonwood Logs 573 Pine Logs 36,9 Spruce Logs 15,2 Subalpine fir Logs 1,311 6,791 Aspen Logs 1,334 1 Birch Logs 2 7 Black spruce Logs 2,22 5 Cottonwood Logs 2,23 31 Pine Logs 3, Spruce Logs 116,92 37 Subalpine fir Logs 15, ,779 3 Aspen Logs 4,626 3 Birch Logs 37 3 Cottonwood Logs 9 3 Pine Logs 21,25 3 Spruce Logs,361 3 Subalpine fir Logs , /5/213 3:5:46 PM Page 5 of 9

183 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Finlay Forks dump Transfer yard: Nabesche dump Transfer yard: Bear Valley dump Aspen Logs 3, Birch Logs 19,4 31 Black spruce Logs 1,73 33 Cottonwood Logs 1,79 27 Pine Logs 37,6 25 Spruce Logs 127,13 27 Subalpine fir Logs 9, , Aspen Logs,47 6 Birch Logs 294 Cottonwood Logs 1,9 1 Pine Logs 4,34 Spruce Logs 54,659 Subalpine fir Logs 5,9 154,22 Aspen Logs,5 11 Birch Logs Black spruce Logs 1,413 1 Cottonwood Logs 199 Pine Logs 2,62 15 Spruce Logs 77,96 15 Subalpine fir Logs 12, , /5/213 3:5:46 PM Page 6 of 9

184 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Ospika dump Transfer yard: Isola dump Transfer yard: Deserters dump Aspen Logs 94,51 1 Birch Logs 25,96 1 Black spruce Logs 7,667 1 Cottonwood Logs 13,42 21 Pine Logs 559,7 23 Spruce Logs 265, Subalpine fir Logs 55,6 23 1,22,73 22 Aspen Logs 7,4 12 Birch Logs 1,67 12 Black spruce Logs 7, 11 Cottonwood Logs Pine Logs 131, Spruce Logs 41,25 13 Subalpine fir Logs ,24 13 Aspen Logs 41, Birch Logs 1,14 19 Black spruce Logs 11, Cottonwood Logs 5,43 16 Pine Logs 34,25 2 Spruce Logs 119,562 2 Subalpine fir Logs 7, , /5/213 3:5:46 PM Page 7 of 9

185 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Factor Ross dump Transfer yard: Omineca dump Transfer yard: Mackenzie mill Aspen Logs 12,69 6 Birch Logs 2,949 Black spruce Logs 9 Cottonwood Logs 1,32 Pine Logs 216,767 9 Spruce Logs,916 Subalpine fir Logs 7, ,6 9 Aspen Logs 23, Birch Logs 39 7 Black spruce Logs 4,27 52 Cottonwood Logs 2, Pine Logs 1,16,15 39 Spruce Logs 264, Subalpine fir Logs 3, ,349,4 3 Aspen Logs 4, Birch Logs 1,65 45 Black spruce Logs 3, Cottonwood Logs 9,53 45 Pine Logs 53, Spruce Logs 246, Subalpine fir Logs 33, , ,75, /5/213 3:5:46 PM Page of 9

186 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] 243 selected site(s) / 9 Area covered: 3,229 ha / 153,7 ha 16/5/213 3:5:46 PM Page 9 of 9

187 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Territory: Sector: Cut block: Unknown territory Unknown sector <Multiple selection> Cut blocks Area 37,29.4 ha Number of cut blocks 39 Average skidding dist. 25 m Volume/km m³/km Area/km ha/km Cut type Clearcut Harvesting system Full-tree with roadside processing 37,29.4 ha 37,29.4 ha Terrain conditions CPPA class Ground strength (%) Roughness (%) Slope (%) Costs Harvesting Equipment transport Road network - Construction Road network - Repair Road network - Improvement Road network - Maintenance Transportation Transfer yard Stumpage fees Indirect costs Stand establishment Total $/m³.75 $/m³. $/m³. $/m³. $/m³.45 $/m³.4 $/m³ 2.2 $/m³. $/m³. $/m³ N/A $/m³ Revenue Value Reimbursements (silv.). $/m³ N/A Net Profit $/m³ 16/5/213 3:51:54 PM Page 1 of

188 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Products Name Format m³ m³/ha m³/stem %/total Spruce Logs 4,142, Subalpine fir Logs 2,5, Pine Logs 1,664, Aspen Logs 642, Pine-biomass Logs 356, Birch Logs 124, Cottonwood Logs 7, Black spruce Logs 31, Douglas fir Logs ,9, Delivery to mills Destination <Closest transfer yard> Product Format m³ Transport average distance (Km) Transfer yard: Raspberry dump Aspen Logs 35,2 Birch Logs 5,5 Cottonwood Logs 4,22 Pine Logs 3,231 Spruce Logs 62,467 Subalpine fir Logs 7, ,947 Aspen Logs 35,343 Birch Logs 2,94 31 Black spruce Logs, Cottonwood Logs 1,742 9 Pine Logs 466,5 112 Spruce Logs 692,721 9 Subalpine fir Logs 226,324 1,434, /5/213 3:51:54 PM Page 2 of

189 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Chunamon dump Transfer yard: S Fort Grahame dump Transfer yard: Fort Grahame dump Transfer yard: Chowika dump Aspen Logs 9 5 Cottonwood Logs 1,174 5 Pine Logs 2,446 5 Spruce Logs 4,221 5 Subalpine fir Logs 2, ,1 5 Aspen Logs 5, Birch Logs, Black spruce Logs Cottonwood Logs Pine Logs 36, Spruce Logs 36, Subalpine fir Logs 13, ,6 15 Aspen Logs 1, Birch Logs 26 9 Black spruce Logs Pine Logs 6,5 Spruce Logs 6,26 9 Subalpine fir Logs 2,94 7 1,241 Aspen Logs 13, Birch Logs 9, Black spruce Logs Cottonwood Logs 1,79 19 Pine Logs 32,33 19 Spruce Logs 4,5 17 Subalpine fir Logs 6, , /5/213 3:51:54 PM Page 3 of

190 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Swannell dump Transfer yard: Pete Toy dump Transfer yard: Mesilinka dump Transfer yard: E Bear Valley dump Aspen Logs 5, Birch Logs 26 Pine Logs 2,25 26 Spruce Logs , Spruce Logs 13, Subalpine fir Logs 19, ,22 16 Aspen Logs 1, Black spruce Logs 1 3 Cottonwood Logs 3,16 41 Pine Logs 15,93 39 Spruce Logs 61, Subalpine fir Logs 11, ,59 32 Aspen Logs Birch Logs 5 4 Cottonwood Logs 51 4 Pine Logs 3,795 4 Spruce Logs 16,391 4 Subalpine fir Logs 3, ,3 4 16/5/213 3:51:54 PM Page 4 of

191 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Finlay Forks dump Transfer yard: Nabesche dump Transfer yard: Bear Valley dump Aspen Logs 67, Birch Logs, Black spruce Logs Cottonwood Logs 1,54 1 Pine Logs 46,15 25 Spruce Logs 191,95 26 Subalpine fir Logs 143, ,57 25 Aspen Logs 2,317 Birch Logs 756 Cottonwood Logs 244 Pine Logs 5,499 Spruce Logs 29,73 Subalpine fir Logs 11,2 5,59 9 Aspen Logs 4,44 Birch Logs 179 Black spruce Logs Cottonwood Logs Pine Logs 1,44 13 Spruce Logs 72, Subalpine fir Logs 17, , /5/213 3:51:54 PM Page 5 of

192 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Ospika dump Transfer yard: Isola dump Transfer yard: Deserters dump Transfer yard: Factor Ross dump Aspen Logs 1,33 12 Birch Logs 9,155 1 Black spruce Logs Cottonwood Logs 2,49 13 Pine Logs 25, Spruce Logs 36,514 1 Subalpine fir Logs 22, ,2 17 Aspen Logs Cottonwood Logs 2 32 Pine Logs 2,524 2 Spruce Logs 5, Subalpine fir Logs 2, , Aspen Logs 1, Cottonwood Logs 2, Pine Logs 4, Spruce Logs 2,615 21,94 2 Aspen Logs 1,52 9 Birch Logs 2,44 7 Cottonwood Logs 3 7 Pine Logs 4,26 Spruce Logs 6,65 11 Subalpine fir Logs ,626 16/5/213 3:51:54 PM Page 6 of

193 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] Transfer yard: Omineca dump Transfer yard: Mackenzie mill Aspen Logs 1,94 31 Black spruce Logs Cottonwood Logs Pine Logs 25,57 12 Spruce Logs 45, Subalpine fir Logs 16, , Aspen Logs 446,93 41 Birch Logs 74, Black spruce Logs 2,247 6 Cottonwood Logs 67,27 37 Douglas fir Logs Pine Logs 934,612 6 Spruce Logs 2,15, Subalpine fir Logs 2,342, ,71, ,544, /5/213 3:51:54 PM Page 7 of

194 Forest supply [MinBlk MinRd - 3May213-manson] 39 selected site(s) / 9 Area covered: 37,29 ha / 153,7 ha 16/5/213 3:51:54 PM Page of

195 Head Office Pointe-Claire 57 Saint-Jean Blvd. Pointe-Claire, QC Canada H9R 3J9 T (514) 63-4 Vancouver 2665 East Mall Vancouver, BC Canada V6T 1Z4 T (64) Québec 319 rue Franquet Québec, QC Canada G1P 4R4 T (41)