FOREST BIOMASS FOR ENERGY PRODUCTION POTENTIALS, MANAGEMENT AND RISKS UNDER CLIMATE CHANGE

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "FOREST BIOMASS FOR ENERGY PRODUCTION POTENTIALS, MANAGEMENT AND RISKS UNDER CLIMATE CHANGE"

Transcription

1 FOREST BIOMASS FOR ENERGY PRODUCTION POTENTIALS, MANAGEMENT AND RISKS UNDER CLIMATE CHANGE Ashraful Alam, Antti Kilpeläinen, Seppo Kellomäki School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu Future Climate and Renewable Energy Impacts, Risks and Adaptation ti Oslo, Norway 2 June, 2010

2 Contents Forestry in Finland Challenges Objectives Methodology Key findings Conclusions 2

3 Forestry in Finland 1. Land area distribution 2. Species distribution Total Forestry land 26.3 mill. ha 3. Growing stocks, increment and drain 4. Site type distribution Source: Finnish Forest Research Institute,

4 Forest management Final felling Timber Energy biomass Thinning Timber Pre-commercial or energy biomass thinning Regeneration Regeneration Time 4

5 Main assortments Saw logs Pulpwood Energy biomass Small trees Residues Stumps 5

6 Use of biomass based energy in Finland Pellets 1% (0.5 Mm3) Forest residues and small trees used as chips 9% (3.4 Mm3) Sawdust 9% (3.4 Mm3) Energy biomass 46 TWh (55%) Traditional firewood 15% (6 Mm3) Black liquor 45% (18 Mm3) Bark 21% (8.4 Mm3) Energy biomass: 20% of the primary energy production Source: Finnish Forest Research Institute,

7 Interactions: forests, climate, management &production Boreal forests: growth is mainly limited by low temperature, short growing season Climate change effect: defined by increase in temperature, precipitation p and CO 2, may yprovide favourable condition to boreal forests to grow forest faster Management: expected climate change may bring a new dimension to current mgt. as it utilises the opportunity provided by the surrounding environment Energy biomass production 7

8 What are the challenges? EU is committed to raise the share of renewable energy to 20% by 2020 This target for Finland is 38% by 2020 The production of energy biomass to substitute fossil fuels In 2006, 21 mil. m 3 (46 TWh) of energy biomass was used in Finland, of which only 9% was from forest residues and small-sized sized trees 8

9 Objectives Effect of climate on the potential production of energy biomass at different scales in space and time Effect of forest management on energy biomass production along with timber and carbon stocks in the forest ecosystem To assess the ecological risks to produce energy biomass 9

10 Ecosystem model Measurements of Temperature and climate parameters precipitation Monthly statistics Climate scenarios Temperature conditions Light conditions Moisture conditions Decomposition Litter, humus and dead trees Management regimes Multipliers Degree-days, dry-days, availability of light, water, and nitrogen Tree population Species composition, age and size distribution, growth rate of different species Regeneration Potential growth Different tree Mortality Carbon dioxide concentration at the atmosphere 10

11 Input data Finnish NFI data total 2816 permanent sample plots for the whole of Finland (south: 1855; north: 961) FMI - Climatic data Current climate ( ) Changing climate during ( ; ; ) A2 scenario Summer Winter Temp. 6 c c 7 c c Precip. +10% +30% CO 2 Nearly double 11

12 Forest management principles 1 ) Basal area (m 2 ha -1 Energy biomass wood thinning Basal area just before thinning Thinning threshold Remaining basal area threshold Basal area just after thinning Dominant height (m) 12

13 Management regimes Changes in basal area thinning thresholds in % Basal ar rea (m 2 ha -1 ) Basal a rea (m 2 ha -1 ) Dominant height (m) Dominant height (m) - Changes in initial stand density stems /ha Basal area (m 2 ha -1 ) Energy wood thinning Basal area just before thinning Thinning threshold Remaining basal area threshold Basal area just after thinning Dominant height (m) 13

14 Emission calculation tool (ECT) E n e r g y i n p u t Working paths and machinery transportation + C a r b o Plant production and transportation Site preparation Planting Thinnings/ harvesting operations Short distance transportation Long distance transportation Chipping Energy wood in power plant Timber in pulp and saw mill n d i o x i d e E m i s s i o n s Ecosystem model Rotation period Emission parameters Emission calculation tool CO 2 balance 14

15 Findings Effect of climate and management on energy biomass production Basal area (m 2 ha -1 ) Energy wood thinning Basal area just Thinning threshold before thinning Basal area just after thinning Remaining basal area threshold Dominant height (m) 15

16 Findings: production and substitution potential ( ) Total energy biomass at EBT and FF in Finland Management regimes Current climate Climate change EBT FF Total EBT FF Total TWh yr -1 % TWh yr -1 % M0 (0%) M1 (+15%) M2 (+30%) M3 (+45%) al area (m 2 ha -1 ) Bas Energy wood thinning Basal area just before thinning Thinning threshold Remaining basal area threshold Basal area just after thinning Dominant height (m) 16

17 Findings MWh -1 (a) Norway spruce: Oxalis-Myrtillus type ISD 3000 ISD 4000 ISD 9 8 Cu (0%) M 1 (+10%) M 2 (+20%) M 3 (+30%) M 4 (10%) (-10%) M 5 (-20%) M 6 (-30%) E n e r g y i n p u t Working paths and machinery transportation + C Plant production and a transportation r b o Site preparation n Planting Thinnings/ harvesting operations Energy wood in power plant Short distance transportation Long distance transportation Chipping Timber in pulp and saw mill d i o x i d e E m i s s i o n s Kg CO (b) Norway spruce: Myrtillus type l area (m 2 ha -1 ) Basal Energy wood thinning Basal area just before thinning Basal area just after thinning Thinning threshold Remaining basal area threshold 8 Dominant height (m) Energy wood (Mg ha -1 ) 17

18 Findings: ecosystem CO 2 balance g CO 2 m Management Litter Humus Emissions Capture Balance 18

19 Conclusions Large amount of unutilised energy biomass are available in Finland Climate change increased energy biomass production Higher production can be gained with changed forest management Energy biomass production are associated with timber production Forest biomass energy is competitive compared with other fuels (coal and peat) in respect of carbon benefits 19

20 Moving! g Green Energy HuH 20