GIS Analysis of Gully Head Erosion Rates on High Ridge Tree Farm in Winona County, Minnesota
|
|
- Gerald Wright
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 GIS Analysis of Gully Head Erosion Rates on High Ridge Tree Farm in Winona County, Minnesota Lisa M. Worrell Department of Resource Analysis, Saint Mary s University of Minnesota, Winona, MN Keywords: Gully Head Erosion, Hydrology, Slope, Driftless Area, Private Land Ownership Abstract High Ridge Tree Farm is a 108 acre, privately owned and managed wooded property located outside of Lewiston, MN. Existing within what is known as the Driftless Area, High Ridge Tree Farm is susceptible to soil loss from gullies that form from run-off on surrounding agricultural land. The unique topography, steep sided ridges, springs and vast number of coldwater streams make the Midwest s Driftless Area an ecologically distinct and interesting zone. Because of the large size (24,000 square miles) of the Driftless Area and the varying abilities and funding for numerous management agencies, very few of the watersheds and streams are functioning properly within the region. Historic clearing of the land for agricultural purposes led to upland soils accumulating in the lower valleys which created shallower, warmer streams with steep, high banks. High Ridge Tree Farm, located in the heart of the Driftless Area, represents the importance of private land management in controlling erosion and restoring watershed health. Comprehensive analysis of the gully head erosion rates in the sub-watershed encompassing the High Ridge Tree Farm will locate areas of high concern for soil loss and identify conservation measures appropriate for curbing erosion. Introduction Gully erosion is a highly noticeable form of soil erosion and can affect soil productivity and impair roads and waterways. Soil eroded from gullies can cause siltation of streams, culverts, dams, and reservoirs. Suspended sediments, which may have attached nutrients and pesticides, can adversely affect water quality. Furthermore, these fine particles remain in suspension and can clog groundwater aquifers, pollute water courses, and disturb aquatic life. Gully erosion is caused when run-off concentrates and flows at a velocity particles. Water run-off increases with energy as it spills over a gully head and water splashback at the base erodes the subsoil, advancing the gully head up a slope. Gully head development may be initiated by several different factors including: cultivation or grazing on sites susceptible to gully erosion (as is the case throughout the Driftless Area), increased run-off due to landcover changes, poor vegetative cover or removal of preferred vegetative cover, and improper design, construction or maintenance of waterways in cropping areas (Welter, 2005). Over one hundred sufficient to detach and transport soil Worrell, Lisa GIS Analysis of Gully Head Erosion Rates on High Ridge Tree Farm in Winona County, Minnesota. Volume 10, Papers in Resource Analysis. 6 pp. Saint Mary s University of Minnesota Central Services Press. Winona, MN. Retrieved (date)
2 years of landcover alterations, including clearing land for agricultural purposes in the Driftless Area, have led to soil movement from the steep hillsides down into the valleys. This process has dramatically altered watershed and stream health in the region. Many large scale restoration projects completed by various conservation and government agencies have seen marked success in improving stream and watershed quality. This success can be enlarged by increasing the focus on privately held lands, particularly in sensitive watersheds, which are the most at risk for soil loss and stream siltation. High Ridge Tree Farm (HRTF) is located within the Garvin Brook watershed in Winona County, MN, which has been identified as a target watershed for restoration efforts by the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS). This research project will focus on the subwatershed that encompasses HRTF and the smaller, micro-watersheds within the subwatershed. Analysis involved data collected in the field including GPS waypoints for each gully head and specific measurements recorded at each gully head location, along with GIS generated watershed delineation and digitized micro-watershed and gullyshed layers. A ranking system from 1-7 for each of three categories: microwatershed acreage, pooled gully head soil loss in tons per year for each microwatershed, and average slope for each micro-watershed was created using criteria supported by soil conservation experts. Rankings for each category were aggregated to produce a microwatershed rating to focus conservation practices on the most critical microwatersheds within the larger subwatershed. Methods Watershed Delineation The first step in delineating the watershed included downloading the streams layer along with the DRG (digital raster graphic), and DEM (digital elevation model) layers from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Data Deli. Using the Watershed tool within the Hydrology toolset in the Spatial Analyst toolbox, a grid layer was created for all of the subwatersheds in Winona County. From this raster, the sub-watershed encompassing HRTF could be delineated into a vector shapefile by onscreen digitizing as seen in Figure 1. Figure 1. Digitized sub-watershed from watershed raster (in shades of pink). From this shapefile, using the topographic map, micro-watersheds were digitized according to contour lines and elevation changes. Finally, gullysheds were further digitized to delineate the drainage area to each gully head. The X-Tools extension was used to calculate acreages for each level of 2
3 watershed, sub-watershed, microwatershed and gully-shed. Calculating Gully Head Erosion Rates Gully head locations around HRTF were collected using a Garmin GPS; measurements including top width, bottom width, and depth were recorded at each gully head. These measurements were integrated into the following equation, obtained from the NRCS to determine gully head erosion rates in tons per year (Cheetham, 1982): d = gully head depth bw = gully head bottom width tw = gully head top width 10 = constant; recession rate/year average for HRTF.045 = constant; soil weight (90 #/cubic foot for clay/silt found on HRTF over 2000 #/ton) d x bw + tw x 10 x Each gully head erosion rate was calculated individually; then aggregated rates were calculated for each microwatershed and gully-shed. Calculating Average Slope The average slope for each microwatershed and gully-shed was calculated by using the Extract by Mask tool within the Extract toolset in the Spatial Analyst toolbox. Using a slope (degree) grid, individual slope grids were extracted for each micro-watershed and gully-shed. The statistics for each new grid were calculated through their attribute tables, and mean values were used as average slopes for analysis and ranking purposes. Ranking Each Micro-Watershed A rank between 1 and 7 was assigned to each micro-watershed for each of the three grid criteria: acreage, average slope, and gully head erosion rate, with 1 as the lowest micro-watershed when sorted in descending order and 7 as the highest. For example, the acreages of each micro-watershed ranged from acres to acres. The microwatershed with acres was assigned a value of 1, while the micro-watershed with acres was assigned a value of 7. Each individual category rank was then multiplied using the Raster Calculator in the Spatial Analyst extension to establish an overall microwatershed ranking. The final rankings were added to the attribute table for the micro-watersheds and symbolized in ArcMap for easy identification of critical areas of soil erosion. Structure/No Structure Comparison Of the seven micro-watersheds within the sub-watersheds of HRTF, two have soil erosion control structures, or dams. The logical assumption would be that micro-watersheds with dam structures in place would have significantly reduced gully head erosion rates. This comparison involved the overall gully head erosion rate in tons per year per acre both with and without dam structures, and also a comparison of two sets of micro-watersheds with similar acreages and average slopes, but with dam structures as the test variable. Results/Discussion Ranking the Micro-Watersheds 3
4 Results of ranking each micro-watershed based on three different criteria are illustrated in figures 2, 3, and 4. Acreages of the micro-watersheds ranged from acres to acres. Gully head soil loss ranged from 0 Tons/Acre/Year to Tons/Acre/Year. Average slope for each micro-watershed ranged from 5.83 degrees to degrees. that of the micro-watersheds indicated, those two micro-watersheds on the east side of the sub-watershed are the highest concern for gully head erosion. Figure 4. Watersheds 1-7 ranked by gully head soil loss in tons/acre, symbolized as lowest = green (0 Tons/Acre/Year) and highest = red ( Tons/Acre/Year). Figure 2. Watersheds 1-7 ranked by acreage, symbolized as lowest = green (26.41 acres) and highest = red (78.88 acres). Figure 5. Aggregate ranking of microwatersheds. Red = Most Critical, Green = Least Critical. Structure/No Structure Comparison Figure 3. Watersheds 1-7 ranked by average slope in degrees, symbolized as lowest = green (5.83 degrees) and highest = red (17.48 degrees). Results of the aggregated ranking, as illustrated in figure 5, show This study compared overall gully head erosion rates in tons per acre per year. The result found that soil erosion rates from gully heads without any dam structures were 5.43 times higher than 4
5 soil erosion rates from gully heads with dam structures. Using two sets of two like micro-watersheds (similar to each other in acreage and average slope), but with soil loss as the variable, it was established that soil erosion was 7-10 times greater in micro-watersheds without dam structures than those with dam structures. This supports the theory that conservation measures involving dams significantly reduce the amount of soil erosion from gully heads. from gully heads on HRTF could be reduced by 58% to 5.7 tons per year (Figure 8). Discussion According to county soil conservation district guidelines, it is recommended that soil erosion be reduced by 60% on average (Cheetham, 1982). At a sum of approximately 45 tons of soil per year, loss through gully head erosion from the sub-watershed encompassing HRTF, it is advised that conservation practices be implemented to curb nearly 27 tons per year of soil loss. Concentrating on the individual gully-sheds, two sites were identified as most suited for dam structures (Figure 6). By implementing this conservation practice on just two gully head sites, soil loss from gully head erosion would be reduced by 25 tons per acre per year. These specific gully head locations however, are outside the HRTF boundary, and would involve cooperation with neighboring landowners (Figure 7). When focusing solely on gully heads within or on the boundary of HRTF, it is noted that of the four gully heads directly adjacent to the HRTF boundary, two have existing dam structures. These four gully heads have an annual soil loss of 9.84 tons per year, with 7.3 tons per year (74%) originating from the two gully heads without dams. By constructing a single dam, soil loss Figure 6. Proposed dam structure locations shown in green and existing dam structure locations shown in red. Figure 7. Gully-sheds directly adjacent to HRTF boundary shown in green. 5
6 Conclusions This project was designed to analyze gully head erosion rates in the subwatershed encompassing the High Ridge Tree Farm to both identify critical areas of soil loss due to gully head erosion and to compare management on HRTF to that of accepted management practices in the Driftless Area. Because of the unique topography in the Driftless Area, special measures need to be taken to abate soil erosion which causes sedimentation in the characteristically deep, cold water trout streams found in the region. and a positive conservation measure in the Driftless Area. Acknowledgements I would like to thank Bob Micheel for his insight and technical assistance on this project, as well as Johnny Micheel for his on-sight field assistance. I would also like to thank John Ebert of the Resource Analysis staff at Saint Mary s University of Minnesota for his guidance through this process. References Cheetham, R. N. Jr., Determining Sediment Volumes from Sheet, Rill, and Gully Erosion in Wisconsin. Natural Resource Conservation Service. p nrcs.usda.gov Welter, D Trout Unlimited: The Driftless Area-A Landscape of Opportunities. p 3. Figure 8. Proposed dam structure for HRTF shown in yellow. According to the results of this study, High Ridge Tree Farm is in accordance with common management practices within the Driftless Area. The HRTF owners have installed two dams to curb soil erosion, and according to the calculations found in this study, that has reduced soil loss by approximately 4 tons per year. This is significant at the private landowner level 6
Shoreland Rules Revision Project Using GIS in North-Central Minnesota
Shoreland Rules Revision Project Using GIS in North-Central Minnesota Andrew J. Williquett Department of Resource Analysis, Saint Mary s University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55404 Keywords: GIS, docks,
More informationPrioritizing Water-Quality Improvement Efforts on Agricultural Lands Using LiDAR Elevation Data
Prioritizing Water-Quality Improvement Efforts on Agricultural Lands Using LiDAR Elevation Data Aaron Ruesch and Theresa Nelson Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources WLWCA March 11, 2014 Outline WLWCA
More informationAdel M. Gilroy Department of Resource Analysis, Saint Mary s University of Minnesota, Winona, MN 55987
Detecting Change in Soil Erosion in 8-Digit Hydrologic Units in Iowa: Correlation Between Level of Soil Erosion and Active Conservation Practices from 19-19 Adel M. Gilroy Department of Resource Analysis,
More informationAgricultural/Rural Riparian Buffer Analysis
Agricultural/Rural Riparian Buffer Analysis December 2014 Executive Summary The Agricultural/Rural Riparian Buffer Analysis was developed from a 2014 analysis of current requirements for the riparian areas
More informationWatershed Assessments and Techniques
Chapter 4 Watershed Assessments and Techniques Watershed Assessments Several different approaches were used to analyze the watershed. Analysis of the watershed included: Pollutant load estimations using
More informationUpper Iowa Watershed at a Glance
Upper Iowa Watershed at a Glance This story was made with Esri's Story Map Journal. Read the interactive version on the web at https://arcg.is/0y54t8. Esri, HERE, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, EPA The Mississippi
More informationCROSBY BROOK RESTORATION STUDY BRATTLEBORO, VT
Key Stakeholders: CROSBY BROOK RESTORATION STUDY BRATTLEBORO, VT Funded By: VT Dept. of Environmental Conservation VT Agency of Transportation (VTrans) Town of Brattleboro NEWEA Spring Meeting Omni Mt.
More informationEvaluating BMP selection and placement in intermittent channels in Fort Cobb watershed
Evaluating BMP selection and placement in intermittent channels in Fort Cobb watershed Preliminary Research Solmaz Rasoulzadeh, Arthur Stoecker Ph.D Student, Environmental Science Professor, Agricultural
More informationStormwater Erosion Control & Post-Construction Plans (Stormwater Quality Plans)
Stormwater Erosion Control & Post-Construction Plans (Stormwater Quality Plans) Allen County Stormwater Plan Submittal Checklist The following items must be provided when applying for an Allen County Stormwater
More informationIntegrated Watershed Management and Sedimentation
Journal of Environmental Protection, 2016, 7, 490-494 Published Online March 2016 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/jep http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jep.2016.74043 Integrated Watershed Management and
More informationWest Fork White River Watershed Conservation Map Summaries. Prepared for the Beaver Watershed Alliance. By the Watershed Conservation Resource Center
West Fork White River Watershed Conservation Map Summaries Prepared for the Beaver Watershed Alliance By the Watershed Conservation Resource Center November 2014 The Watershed Conservation Resource Center
More informationReservoir age, increasing human population,
B-6249 02/12 Eagle Mountain Watershed Management Brent Clayton, Justin Mechell, David Waidler and Clint Wolfe* Reservoir age, increasing human population, and changing land uses have prompted the development
More informationWhat is a Watershed? Understanding Surface Runoff. Controlling Erosion and Sediment.
What is a Watershed? Understanding Surface Runoff. Controlling Erosion and Sediment. Aleksey Sheshukov Assistant Professor and Water-Quality Specialist Biological & Agricultural Engineering ashesh@ksu.edu,
More informationTORCH LAKE TOWNSHIP WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN
TORCH LAKE TOWNSHIP WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN Elk-River-Chain-of-Lakes Gaps Analysis Project The Watershed Center Grand Traverse Bay Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council Michigan Department of Natural Resources
More informationDeriving Harvestable Area in Arcata Community Forest
Deriving Harvestable Area in Arcata Community Forest By: Abstract Kittens with Mittens Corey Humphrey and Taylor Jensen The Arcata Community Forest (ACF), along with education and recreation, is used for
More informationUnit E: Basic Principles of Soil Science. Lesson 7: Understanding Soil Erosion and Management Practices
Unit E: Basic Principles of Soil Science Lesson 7: Understanding Soil Erosion and Management Practices 1 Important Terms Accelerated erosion Conservation tillage Cover crops Diversion ditches Geologic
More informationStormwater Management. Cayuga County NY 20 July 2016 Presenter : John B. Zepko, CPESC
Stormwater Management Cayuga County NY 20 July 2016 Presenter : John B. Zepko, CPESC Agenda What is Stormwater? Why is Stormwater a Problem? NY State Regulations Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans What
More informationBlue Lake Stormwater Retrofit Analysis
P a g e 1 Blue Lake Stormwater Retrofit Analysis Prepared by: Isanti Soil and Water Conservation District And Sherburne Soil and Water Conservation District P a g e 4 Executive Summary Blue Lake and its
More informationAnnAGNPS. Annualized AGricultural Non-Point Source Pollurant Loading Model. Annualized Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollutant Loading Model
AnnAGNPS Annualized AGricultural Non-Point Source Pollurant Loading Model 1 Erosion Erosion can be expresed as: E=f(C, S, T, SS, M) E = erosion C = climate S = soil properties T = topography SS = soil
More informationErosion, Erosion, Everywhere
Erosion, Erosion, Everywhere Main Objectives 1.Capable of describing the magnitude of accelerated soil erosion in the past and at the present. 2.Comprehend the mechanics and the factors influencing water
More informationStatewide Ranking of Ecological Value of CRP and other Critical Lands
Statewide Ranking of Ecological Value of CRP and other Critical Lands Funded by ENRTF as recommended by LCCMR 2008 2009 D. J. Mulla, S. J. Taff, G. Host, J. Galzki, T. Brown, A. Lewandowski, and J. Nelson
More informationELK RAPIDS TOWNSHIP WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN
ELK RAPIDS TOWNSHIP WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN Elk-River-Chain-of-Lakes Gaps Analysis Project The Watershed Center Grand Traverse Bay Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council Michigan Department of Natural Resources
More informationTypical Local Erosion Control Requirements (Storm Water Management Authority, Inc.)
Module 2: Selection of Controls and Site Planning for Construction Site Erosion Prevention Robert Pitt Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering University of Alabama Tuscaloosa,
More informationWATERSHED MANAGEMENT IN MINNESOTA. GOVERNANCE, PLANNING, AND FUNDING June 19, 2018 Cedar Rapids, Iowa
WATERSHED MANAGEMENT IN MINNESOTA GOVERNANCE, PLANNING, AND FUNDING June 19, 2018 Cedar Rapids, Iowa GOVERNANCE - WD 1955 Watershed Act (MN Statute 103D) Local petition to form VOLUNTARY watershed district
More informationARTICLE 6 EXCAVATION OF MINERAL MATERIALS
ARTICLE 6 EXCAVATION OF MINERAL MATERIALS SECTION 1. PURPOSE All excavations, extraction of materials and minerals, open pits and impounding of waters hereafter established or enlarged shall conform to
More informationFrom My Backyard to Our Bay It s the 911 for the Chesapeake Bay
From My Backyard to Our Bay Reporting Problems on Our Bay, Rivers, and Streams We can all be the eyes and ears of our local waterways. Maryland has established the Chesapeake Bay Safety and Environmental
More informationFieldDoc.org User Guide For 2017 NFWF Chesapeake Bay Stewardship Fund Applicants. Background 2. Step 1: Register for a FieldDoc account 3
FieldDoc.org User Guide For 2017 NFWF Chesapeake Bay Stewardship Fund Applicants Table of Contents (click to go to page) Background 2 Step 1: Register for a FieldDoc account 3 Step 2: Create the Project
More informationEROSION HAZARD MAPPING FOR MICRO-WATERSHED PRIORITIZATION USING REMOTE SENSING AND GIS TECHNIQUES
EROSION HAZARD MAPPING FOR MICRO-WATERSHED PRIORITIZATION USING REMOTE SENSING AND GIS TECHNIQUES Dilip G. Durbude*, B. Venkatesh Hard Rock Regional Centre, National Institute of Hydrology, Hanuman Nagar,
More informationPrioritizing restoration activities for salmonid habitat within a watershed
Prioritizing restoration activities for salmonid habitat within a watershed Author: Lisa Lackey Co-author: Laurel Marcus Abstract Maacama Creek, a tributary of the Russian River has 45 miles of tributary
More informationDegradation of the resource Fertility loss Organic matter Tilth degradation. Water quality Sediment Nutrients
Near Blue River ca. 1980 Degradation of the resource Fertility loss Organic matter Tilth degradation Water quality Sediment Nutrients Program cost Cheaper to prevent Still expensive Long-term productivity
More informationPhase II: Proposed (regulated) Impervious in disturbed area (ac) Long Lake Existing Impervious in disturbed area (ac)
Permit Application No.: 17-181 Rules: Erosion Control, Wetland Protection, and Waterbody Crossings & Structures Applicant: Hennepin County Received: 4/27/17 Project: CSAH 112 Phase II Complete: 9/5/17
More informationSection 6: Stormwater Improvements
Section 6: Stormwater Improvements A major objective of this study was to identify opportunities for improvements to address the widespread water quality impairments caused by stormwater runoff in the
More informationAppendix D. Erosion Management Sub- Plan
Appendix D Erosion Management Sub- Plan DRENNAN SOLAR ENERGY FACILITY EROSION MANAGEMENT PLAN PRODUCED FOR ERM ON BEHALF OF SOLAIREDIRECT BY Simon.Todd@3foxes.co.za JUNE 2013 PURPOSE The purpose of the
More informationVariable-width buffers to reduce sediment pollution from potato production on steep slopes of Black Brook Watershed using AgBufferBuilder
Variable-width buffers to reduce sediment pollution from potato production on steep slopes of Black Brook Watershed using AgBufferBuilder Josée Owen and Sheldon Hann Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Potato
More informationUTILIZING GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO IDENTIFY AND MONITOR CONCENTRATED ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATIONS IN DUPLIN COUNTY, NC
UTILIZING GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO IDENTIFY AND MONITOR CONCENTRATED ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATIONS IN DUPLIN COUNTY, NC Sean Burke Graduate Student Department of Geography and Geology University of
More informationIntegrating Agricultural Land Management into a Watershed Response Model
Integrating Agricultural Land Management into a Watershed Response Model Adam Freihoefer, Tom Beneke, & Aaron Ruesch Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources NCASI Northern Region Meeting May 6, 2014
More informationEnvironmental Resource Inventories. What are ERIs? Significance of information How to use them
Environmental Resource Inventories What are ERIs? Significance of information How to use them Environmental Resource Inventory - ERI Compiled by the environmental commission Information about the natural
More informationBMP 5.4.2: Protect /Conserve/Enhance Riparian Areas
BMP 5.4.2: Protect /Conserve/Enhance Riparian Areas The Executive Council of the Chesapeake Bay Program defines a Riparian Forest Buffer as "an area of trees, usually accompanied by shrubs and other vegetation,
More informationHydrology and Flooding
Hydrology and Flooding Background The 1996 flood Between February 4, 1996 and February 9, 1996 the Nehalem reporting station received 28.9 inches of rain. Approximately 14 inches fell in one 48 hour period.
More informationVILLAGE OF BELLAIRE WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN
VILLAGE OF BELLAIRE WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN Elk-River-Chain-of-Lakes Gaps Analysis Project The Watershed Center Grand Traverse Bay Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council Michigan Department of Natural Resources
More informationFieldDoc.io User Guide For 2016 NFWF Chesapeake Bay Stewardship Fund Applicants
FieldDoc.io User Guide For 2016 NFWF Chesapeake Bay Stewardship Fund Applicants This guide provides step-by-step instructions for the use of FieldDoc.io to estimate nutrient and sediment load reductions
More informationHighway Surface Drainage
Highway Surface Drainage R obert D. M iles, Research Engineer Joint Highway Research Project, and Assistant Professor of Highway Engineering, School of Civil Engineering Purdue University IN T R O D U
More informationMinnesota Stewardship Spatial Analysis Project Methodology and Analysis documentation January 28, 2008
Minnesota Stewardship Spatial Analysis Project Methodology and Analysis documentation January 28, 2008 Summary In the fall of 2004, Minnesota DNR and the U.S. Forest Service began working together to create
More informationBluff Creek One Water
Bluff Creek One Water The Bluff Creek Watershed has no lakes within its boundaries. As the westernmost watershed within the District, land use changes from agricultural to residential have occurred relatively
More informationOVERVIEW OF RUSLE 2 DICK WOLKOWSKI DEPT. OF SOIL SCIENCE UW-MADISON
OVERVIEW OF RUSLE 2 DICK WOLKOWSKI DEPT. OF SOIL SCIENCE UW-MADISON WHAT IS RUSLE 2 GREAT GRANDSON OF USLE MODEL TO PREDICT SOIL LOSS WHERE OVERLAND FLOW OCCURS COMPUTES ANNUAL SHEET/RILL EROSION COMPUTES
More informationMinnesota EAW Supplement
Appendix I: Minnesota EAW Supplement Lower Pool 2 Channel Management Study: Boulanger Bend to Lock and Dam No. 2 Minnesota EAW Item Identification A supplement prepared for the Minnesota DNR to identify
More informationWatershed Delineation Techniques
Watershed Delineation Techniques Stacy D. Dehne DATCP Engineer February 2008 1 What Is a Watershed? An Area of Land that Drains to a given location February 2008 2 Contour Map Features Contour Maps: Represent
More informationThe Bear River. Utah s Last Untapped Water Source. Trevor Datwyler
The Bear River Utah s Last Untapped Water Source Trevor Datwyler CEE 6440 December 2012 Introduction and Background The Bear River has often been called Utah s last untapped water source. The reasons behind
More informationFARMER-LED WATERSHED COUNCIL PILOT PROJECT MAPPING ANALYSIS SUMMARY
FARMER-LED WATERSHED COUNCIL PILOT PROJECT MAPPING ANALYSIS SUMMARY PREPARED FOR: WHITEWATER WATERSHED PROJECT PREPARED BY: 1648 THIRD AVENUE SE ROCHESTER, MN 55904 FARMER-LED WATERSHED COUNCIL PILOT PROJECT
More informationD Olive Watershed. Path Toward Restoration
D Olive Watershed Path Toward Restoration Water is the most critical resource issues of our lifetime and our children s lifetime. The health of our waters is the principal measure of how we live on the
More informationSite Condition Evaluation & Environmental Benefits Report
Site Evaluation & Environmental Benefits Report Background The New York State Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program is a collaborative effort between the USDA and the State of New York. The goal of
More informationRecommended Resources: The following resources may be useful in teaching this lesson:
Unit E: Basic Principles of Soil Science Lesson 7: Understanding Soil Erosion and Management Practices Student Learning Objectives: Instruction in this lesson should result in students achieving the following
More informationUtilizing GIS for Mapping Reforestation of an Agricultural Landscape, , in Coon Creek Watershed, Wisconsin
Utilizing GIS for Mapping Reforestation of an Agricultural Landscape, 1939-1993, in Coon Creek Watershed, Wisconsin Martha Kelty Roldán Department of Resource Analysis, Saint Mary s University of Minnesota,
More informationWater Plans. Water Plans: Houston County LWMP amended 2012 Winona County LWMP
Mississippi River La Crescent Watershed: Water Plans The Mississippi River La Crescent Watershed encompasses Houston and Winona Counties. Each county has developed a 10-year rotating comprehensive local
More informationComparison of Streamflow and Precipitation in the Upper Provo River Watershed
Comparison of Streamflow and Precipitation in the Upper Provo River Watershed By: Steven McKee CEE 6440 GIS in Water Resources Final Project 12/6/2012 0 Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Methods to Determine
More informationMILTON TOWNSHIP WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN
MILTON TOWNSHIP WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN Elk-River-Chain-of-Lakes Gaps Analysis Project The Watershed Center Grand Traverse Bay Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council Michigan Department of Natural Resources
More informationOCEANS AND AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS- Vol. I - Geographic Information Systems Applied to the Analysis of Riparian Buffer Zones and Lakes - Norio Tanaka
GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS APPLIED TO THE ANALYSIS OF RIPARIAN BUFFER ZONES AND LAKES Norio Tanaka Saitama University, Saitama, Japan Keywords: GIS, remote sensing, riparian buffer zone, aquatic macrophytes,
More informationFieldDoc.org User Guide - for 2018 NFWF Chesapeake Bay Stewardship Fund Applicants -
FieldDoc.org User Guide - for 2018 NFWF Chesapeake Bay Stewardship Fund Applicants - Table of Contents (click to go to page) Background 2 Step 1: Register for a FieldDoc account 3 Step 2: Create the Project
More information4. Ponds and infiltration BMPs can achieve 60 to 100% removal efficiencies for sediment.
Landscape BMPs For the purposes of this project, preventive measures have been categorized into two categories: landscape BMPs and source prevention BMPs. Landscape BMPs includes both vegetative practices
More informationCLEARWATER TOWNSHIP WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN
CLEARWATER TOWNSHIP WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN Elk-River-Chain-of-Lakes Gaps Analysis Project The Watershed Center Grand Traverse Bay Michigan Department of Environmental Quality July 2011 Purpose The Grand
More informationEngineering Report Preliminary Floodplain Study. Executive Summary
Executive Summary Engineering Report Preliminary Floodplain Study The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has updated the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) for Finney County, including the City of
More information11. Prioritizing Farmlands for Future Protection
11. Prioritizing Farmlands for Future Protection Identification of Important Farmlands in Putnam County I n order to implement this Plan successfully, Putnam County decision-makers will have to take advantage
More informationMulti-criteria decision analysis and GIS modeling for soil erosion vulnerability in the Toplica River Watershed
University of Belgrade Faculty of Forestry Multi-criteria decision analysis and GIS modeling for soil erosion vulnerability in the Toplica River Watershed Tijana Vulevic, Nada Dragovic, Boris Radic University
More informationStreamlines V2, n2 (May 1997) A Newsletter for North Carolina Water Supply Watershed Administrators
Page 1 of 5 STREAMLINES A Newsletter for North Carolina Water Supply Watershed Administrators Volume 2, Number 2 May 1997 Non-Point Source (NPS) Pollution This issue of Streamlines provides basic information
More informationAlix Scarborough, Project Manager. Melissa Keen, GIS Analyst. Matthew Leach, GIS Analyst. Chad Sydow, GIS Analyst
Alix Scarborough, Project Manager Melissa Keen, GIS Analyst Matthew Leach, GIS Analyst Chad Sydow, GIS Analyst Watershed and Tree Canopy Association in Austin, TX Project Proposal Prepared by Trees in
More informationEVALUATION - SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT DISCHARGE OF SEDIMENTS FROM OR THROUGH A DAM
EVALUATION - SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT DISCHARGE OF SEDIMENTS FROM OR THROUGH A DAM U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT CONCORD, MA PROJECT: Northfield Brook Dam, Naugatuck River
More informationForest Stewardship Spatial Analysis Project Illinois Methodology March, 2007
Forest Stewardship Spatial Analysis Project Illinois Methodology March, 2007 Project Summary Administered by the U.S. Forest Service and implemented by State forestry agencies, the Forest Stewardship Program
More informationCOON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW. Spring Lake Park Schools Westwood Middle School st Avenue NE, Spring Lake Park, MN 55432
PAN 16-112, Westwood Middle School, Page 1 of 6 COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW MEETING DATE: August 22, 2016 AGENDA NUMBER: 10 FILE NUMBER: 16-112 ITEM: Westwood Middle School RECOMMENDATION:
More informationMaps for Nutrient Management Planning
Maps for Nutrient Management Planning Table of Contents Introduction... 3 Dry Poultry NMP Exceptions... 3 Making a Base Map... 3 NRCS Toolkit... 3 Online Maps... 4 Photocopied Maps... 4 Additional or Supporting
More informationFloodplains are an important constituent of coho habitats and can be targeted for restoration. NetMap s advanced floodplain mapping tool calculates
1 2 3 Floodplains are an important constituent of coho habitats and can be targeted for restoration. NetMap s advanced floodplain mapping tool calculates floodplains based on multiples of bankfull depths
More informationAssessment of the impacted waterbody and its watershed with data that supports the identification of the water quality problems to be addressed Paint
Assessment of the impacted waterbody and its watershed with data that supports the identification of the water quality problems to be addressed Paint Creek and Village Creek Watersheds: The City of Waukon
More informationLaura Zanolli Geography Major/GIS/Geology/Water Resources Portland State University
Laura Zanolli Geography Major/GIS/Geology/Water Resources Portland State University The canopy is one part of a system of shade and cover that promotes bank stability and along with vegetation helps to
More informationModels Overview: Purposes and Limitations
Models Overview: Purposes and Limitations Pollutant load originates from: Point-source discharges (NPDES facilities) Info is available on the discharges (DMRs, etc.) Some are steady-flow, others are precip-driven
More informationBest Management Practices (BMPs) are structural
Agriculture and Natural Resources WATER QUALITY: Controlling Nonpoint Source (NPS) Pollution A L A B A M A A & M A N D A U B U R N U N I V E R S I T I E S ANR-790-4.2.3 The Rural Environment And NPS Pollution
More informationMunicipal Stormwater Management Plan Prepared For The Borough of Cape May Point By Van Note-Harvey Associates VNH File No.
Municipal Stormwater Management Plan Prepared For The Borough of Cape May Point By Van Note-Harvey Associates 2005 VNH File No. 35317-210-21 Table of Contents Introduction... 3 Goals... 3 Storm water Discussion...
More informationCATCHMENT AREA TREATMENT PLAN
CATCHMENT AREA TREATMENT PLAN 1 NEED FOR CATCHMENT AREA TREATMENT It is a wellestablished fact that reservoirs formed by dams on rivers are subjected to sedimentation. The process of sedimentation embodies
More informationDOMINANT CRITICAL AREA BASIC PLANNING CONCEPTS FOR RUSLE2
NRCS, WI April 2005 DOMINANT CRITICAL AREA BASIC PLANNING CONCEPTS FOR RUSLE2 NRCS requires the use of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation, Version 2 (RUSLE2) for conservation planning done to address
More informationAPPENDIX I. Plan Reviewer Checklist
APPENDIX I Plan Reviewer Checklist PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Annual Standards and Specifications The ESC/SWM Plan clearly indicates the version of Virginia Tech Annual Standards and Specifications applicable.
More informationWatershed Systems & Impairments
Watershed Systems & Impairments Environmental Stewards Program ~ 2014 Lisa Galloway Evrard Senior Program Coordinator Rutgers Cooperative Extension Water Resources Program Part I: Overview of Watershed
More informationMixed Conifer Working Group Meeting April 15, 2011 Water and Soil Resource Management Considerations
Mixed Conifer Working Group Meeting April 15, 2011 Water and Soil Resource Management Considerations It is difficult to tie watershed health directly to mixed-conifer forests. Watersheds encompass a variety
More informationTHE WATERSHED The watershed is an area of land that drains into a stream. This includes both the surface runoff and groundwater. Because a stream is m
Understanding Streams A stream is the product of its watershed. Good land use in the watershed will be reflected in the stream. MOST PEOPLE enjoy the captivating qualities of flowing water. But streams
More informationCHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION. Stream processes are strongly related to the physical conditions of the
1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Stream processes are strongly related to the physical conditions of the watershed from which they flow. Alterations to physical conditions of a watershed manifest themselves through
More informationConservation Practices for Water Quality: Sediment & Nutrient Control. Trap Sediments/Trap Nutrients on the Field. Improve Soil Health.
Conservation Practices for Water Quality: Sediment & Nutrient Control. Trap Sediments/Trap Nutrients on the Field. Improve Soil Health. Sediment Conservation Cover Cover Crop Critical Area Planting Field
More informationCHAPTER 2 EROSION CONTROL
CHAPTER 2 EROSION CONTROL 2.1 EROSION AND EROSION CONTROL Understanding Erosion Erosion occurs when soil particles are detached from the land surface and carried downslope by moving water. Figure 2.1-1
More informationThe Construction General Permit and Erosion Prevention and Sedimentation Control
The Construction General Permit and Erosion Prevention and Sedimentation Control Presented at the Tennessee Gas Association Conference April 23, 2008 More than thirty years ago, two-third of the nation's
More informationMonitoring the Effectiveness of Best Management Practices in the Whitewater Watershed, Minnesota
Monitoring the Effectiveness of Best Management Practices in the Whitewater Watershed, Minnesota Susan Miller Department of Resource Analysis, St. Mary s University of Minnesota, Winona, MN Keywords: holistic
More informationBANKS TOWNSHIP WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN
BANKS TOWNSHIP WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN Elk-River-Chain-of-Lakes Gaps Analysis Project The Watershed Center Grand Traverse Bay Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council Michigan Department of Natural Resources
More informationCannon River One Watershed, One Plan. POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING January 10, 2018 Rice County Government Center Faribault, MN
Cannon River One, One Plan POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING January 10, 2018 Rice County Government Center Faribault, MN TASK Task 1. Aggregate Existing Physical & Spatial Data 1A. Create project maps 1B. Meeting
More informationErosion and Sediment Control Plan for a Timber Harvesting Operation
3930-FM-WM0155 Rev. 7/2004 Erosion and Sediment Control Plan for a Timber Harvesting Operation 1. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Location Municipality B. Timber sale area = acres Date County C. Landowner Name
More informationSECTION 10: WETLANDS PROTECTION
SECTION 10: WETLANDS PROTECTION 10-1 INTENT AND PURPOSE A. Intent 1. The City finds that wetlands serve a variety of beneficial functions. Wetlands maintain water quality, reduce flooding and erosion,
More informationConstruction Site Erosion Control and Phase II of the Stormwater Permit Program
Construction Site Erosion Control and Phase II of the Stormwater Permit Program Robert Pitt Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering University of Alabama Tuscaloosa, AL In Georgia,
More informationFrom the Ground Up- Field Soil Considerations
From the Ground Up- Field Soil Considerations Ted Bilderback Nursery Extension Specialist Department of Horticulture Science North Carolina State University Ted_Bilderback@ncsu.edu http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/depts/hort/nursery/
More informationMINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT BOARD OF MANAGERS REVISIONS PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES 103D.341. Adopted April 24, 2014 Effective June 6, 2014
MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT BOARD OF MANAGERS REVISIONS PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES 103D.341 Adopted April 24, 2014 Effective June 6, 2014 EROSION CONTROL RULE 1. POLICY. It is the policy of
More informationImpacts of 2008 flooding on agricultural lands in Illinois, Missouri, and Indiana Kenneth R. Olson
FEATURE doi:10.2489/jswc.64.6.167a Impacts of 2008 flooding on agricultural lands in Illinois, Missouri, and Indiana Kenneth R. Olson T he 2008 spring rains in Illinois, Missouri, and Indiana delayed planting,
More informationConstruction Site Erosion Control and Phase II of the Stormwater Permit Program
Construction Site Erosion Control and Phase II of the Stormwater Permit Program Robert Pitt Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering University of Alabama Tuscaloosa, AL In Georgia,
More informationRole of Soils in Water Quality. Mike Marshall Extension Associate Texas A&M-Institute of Renewable Natural Resources
Role of Soils in Water Quality Mike Marshall Extension Associate Texas A&M-Institute of Renewable Natural Resources Water Quality in Texas Water is a finite resource that can be impaired by pollution from
More informationLong Prairie River Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (WRAPS) Report Summary
Long Prairie River Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (WRAPS) Report Summary Minnesota has adopted a watershed approach to address the state s 80 major watersheds (denoted by 8-digit hydrologic
More informationBLOCKING AND FILLING SURFACE DRAINAGE DITCHES
MINNESOTA WETLAND RESTORATION GUIDE BLOCKING AND FILLING SURFACE DRAINAGE DITCHES TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT Document No.: WRG 4A-1 Publication Date: 10/14/2015 Table of Contents Introduction Application
More informationCENTRAL COAST POST-CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE SERIES 1
CENTRAL COAST POST-CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE SERIES 1 SERIES ISSUE #2: DECENTRALIZED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT TO COMPLY WITH RUNOFF RETENTION POST-CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
More informationKANKAKEE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR CLASS I & II GRADING AND DRAINAGE/STOMRWATER PERMIT APPLICATION
KANKAKEE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR CLASS I & II GRADING AND DRAINAGE/STOMRWATER PERMIT APPLICATION Michael J. Van Mill, AICP Planning Director 189 East Court Street Kankakee, IL 60901
More information