CHEAT MOUNTAIN WILDLIFE HABITAT ENHANCEMENT
|
|
- Geoffrey Powers
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Monongahela National Forest Greenbrier Ranger District Box 67 Bartow, WV CHEAT MOUNTAIN WILDLIFE HABITAT ENHANCEMENT USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region Greenbrier Ranger District, Monongahela National Forest Randolph County, West Virginia I. Decision and Project Description A. Summary Description of Project I have decided to authorize activities to enhance wildlife habitat by increasing the amount of future overstory red spruce and/or black cherry on approximately 419 acres on Cheat Mountain. B. Purpose and Need The entire project is located in Management Prescription (MP) Spruce and Spruce- Hardwood Ecosystem Management. The MP 4.1 area of Cheat Mountain has been identified as one of three priority areas for red spruce ecosystem restoration in West Virginia by the Central Appalachian Spruce Restoration Initiative (CASRI). The primary objective is to use active management in recently timbered areas and a few second-growth northern hardwood stands heavily impacted by beech bark disease to accelerate red spruce restoration. Air photo interpretation and field review show a substantial amount of understory red spruce in a predominately hardwood overstory. The younger stands are over-stocked, with over 5,000 stems per acre of mostly beech, birch, and maple. The two older stands also have inclusions that are over-stocked (over 5,000 stems per acre) with beech brush as a result of beech bark disease. If left untreated, the stands would continue to be overstocked, which would hinder stand development. Additionally, the overstory would end up being predominantly undesirable hardwood species. A primary objective is to accelerate tree growth and achieve a mixed spruce-hardwood overstory with at least 30 percent red spruce overstory in the future. A secondary objective is to favor the growth of black cherry, an important wildlife species. C. Project Location The areas to be treated are within Randolph County, on the Greenbrier Ranger District of the Monongahela National Forest. All treatment areas can be found on the Mill Creek, Wildell, or Snyder Knob quadrangles.
2 D. Project Description Twenty-four stands totaling 419 acres, and ranging in size from 2.5 to 56.4 acres, will be treated. Eighteen of the hardwood-dominated stands (253.6 acres) are young (less than 30 years old), with an understory component of red spruce. In order to increase the amount of future overstory red spruce and/or black cherry, naturally-regenerating saplings of red spruce and black cherry will be released by cutting the surrounding competing vegetation (e.g., beech brush and striped maple). The goal is to release over 150 red spruce per acre, and over 100 black cherry per acre. Because of the young age of these stands, all competing vegetation to be cut will be less than 5 inches diameter at breast height (dbh). If any trees greater than 5 inches dbh are suppressing the growth of red spruce or black cherry in these stands, they will be girdled. If stands lack red spruce or black cherry regeneration, small openings (less than 0.1 acre in size) will be created to encourage uneven-aged stand structure. Four of the treatment areas (94.1 acres) are 30 to 40 years old and just entering the pole stage. Goals and activities for these stands are the same as described for the young stands, except that more girdling is expected because much of the competing vegetation may be greater than 5 inches dbh. The final two hardwood dominant stands (71.3 acres) are older (70 to 90 years old), but heavily impacted by beech bark disease. Field review showed that these older stands have good spruce regeneration in the understory and midstory. Because of the closed canopy of these two older stands, black cherry regeneration is not expected. In these two older stands, the goal is to encourage uneven-aged stand structure, while releasing red spruce, and creating snags by girdling. Snag creation in the two older stands will not exceed 10 sawlog-size trees per acre, and may create openings up to 0.1 acre in size to mimic natural disturbances while releasing red spruce. Any trees greater than 5 inches dbh needing to be killed will be girdled instead of cut down to protect the West Virginia northern flying squirrel and the Indiana bat. Table 1. Cheat Mountain Wildlife Habitat Enhancement Stands Compartment Stand Acres Year of Origin Site Index * Forest Type of 8
3 Compartment Stand Acres Year of Origin Site Index * Forest Type Total Acres 419 * Forest types: 13: red spruce-balsam fir (18.1 acres); 81: sugar maple-beech-yellow birch (46.8 acres); 86: beech (41.6 acres); 87: sugar maple-beech-yellow birch-red spruce (170.6 acres); 89: mixed hardwoods (141.9 acres). While the project is designed to avoid perennial or intermittent streams, if intermittent or perennial streams are encountered, the prescription will not deviate. This project is designed to have an immeasurable impact on forest canopy, while improving habitat for TES species, in particular the northern goshawk and the West Virginia northern flying squirrel and others (see Standard SW34 in the Forest Plan). All treatments will be mechanical; there will be no herbicide applications. No road work will be needed or done to access the units. II. Reasons for Categorically Excluding the Project Decisions may be categorically excluded from documentation in an environmental impact statement or environmental assessment when they are within one of the categories identified by the U.S. Department of Agriculture in 7 CFR part 1b.3 or one of the categories identified by the Chief of the Forest Service in Forest Service Handbook (FSH) sections or 31.2, and there are no extraordinary circumstances related to 3 of 8
4 the decision that may result in a significant individual or cumulative effect on the quality of the human environment. This project is appropriately categorically excluded from documentation in an environmental impact statement or environmental assessment as it is a routine activity within a category of exclusion, and there are no extraordinary circumstances related to the project that may result in a significant individual or cumulative effect on the quality of the human environment. This conclusion is based on information presented in this document and the entirety of the project file. A. Category of Exclusion This project can be categorically excluded because it is within the category of exclusion identified in Forest Service Handbook (FSH) , Chapter 30, Section 31.2(6), and in 36 CFR 220.6(e)(6): Timber stand and/or wildlife habitat improvement activities that do not include the use of herbicides or do not require more than one mile of low-standard road construction. B. Relationship to Extraordinary Circumstances The extraordinary circumstances have been reviewed and are summarized below. Additional details are contained within the project file. There are no extraordinary circumstances, as defined in FSH , Chapter 30, Section 31.2, which would warrant further analysis and documentation in an EA or an EIS. 1. Federally listed threatened or endangered species or designated critical habitat, species proposed for Federal listing or proposed critical habitat, or Forest Service sensitive species. a. Aquatics The project is low impact on the land and aquatic resources issues are minimal. The one issue would be protecting channel buffers during implementation on the few channels that will be encountered in the project area. b. Wildlife The stands have been evaluated for potentially occurring threatened, endangered, or sensitive (TES) species. The LOO (Likelihood of Occurrence Table) is in the project file. Habitat and potential for presence of TES species was also reviewed from District and Forest occurrence records. It has been determined that the project area either does not provide TES habitat, or the activities will have a negligible (or beneficial) effect on any TES species. 4 of 8
5 Additionally, the project is designed to improve and enhance habitat for the federally-listed West Virginia northern flying squirrel. The MP 4.1 area of Cheat Mountain has been identified as one of three priority areas for red spruce ecosystem restoration in West Virginia by the Central Appalachian Spruce Restoration Initiative. c. Botany Many of the stands to be treated are young sapling stands that were impacted by timber harvest less than 40 years ago. Therefore, TES plants associated with late successional habitats will not be affected. Due to the dense sapling canopy, TES plants associated with early successional habitats are unlikely to occur. If any do occur, they could experience a temporary benefit from the partial canopy openings created by the project. TES plants associated with mid-successional, closedcanopy forests could occur, but likely will not be harmed by the activity. A partial tree canopy will remain, and the trees that are left, along with the released seedlings and saplings, likely will form a closed canopy again after several years. Herbicides will not be used, which eliminates the chance of direct impacts to non-target plants. In the two older stands, spruce release will be accomplished by girdling up to 10 scattered canopy trees per acre. The small canopy gaps created by this activity will mimic the natural disturbance regime and will have only a minor effect on the light regime. This minor effect will not be large enough to stimulate a response by shade-intolerant plants that might out-compete any TES plant species that may be present. The minor increase in light availability could be beneficial to any TES plant species that may be present. Work will not involve log skidders or other off-road vehicles. Therefore, the project will have a very low risk of spreading non-native invasive plants. 2. Flood plains, wetlands, or municipal watersheds. Activities will not affect flood plains, wetlands, or municipal watersheds. 3. Congressionally designated areas, such as wilderness, wilderness study areas, or national recreation areas. Inventoried roadless areas. Research natural areas. Activities will not occur in or adjacent to any congressionally designated areas, inventoried roadless areas (including Roadless Area Conservation Rule areas), or research natural areas on the Forest. Because of the limited scope of the activities and their locations shown on the map provided, there should be no discernable effects to the special areas noted above. 4. American Indians and Alaska Native religious or cultural sites. Archaeological sites, or historic properties or areas. 5 of 8
6 No other extraordinary circumstances related to this project were identified. There are no soil disturbing activities associated with this project and previous analyses of similar TSI and wild life enhancement activities have shown no adverse effects to the archeology resources. III. Public Involvement This project was scoped, beginning with the interdisciplinary team process. On June 25, 2009 the scoping began with the identification of internal issues. This initial notice was used to identify interested publics in addition to those already known and on an established mailing list. This project was first included in the October 1, 2010 SOPA (Schedule of Proposed Actions). It has been included in every quarterly issue since then. The scoping letter, containing the project description and direction on how to get additional directions and provide comments, was mailed to over 70 individuals, organizations, and other agencies on June 7, This same letter was ed to over 50 addresses. This list is in the project file at the Cheat Potomac office in Petersburg, WV. Four responses were received from the public. Most comments were supportive of the project. Three also asked questions or made recommendations, which are summarized below, along with our responses. o Marquette Crockett of the FWS asked about Cheat Mountain salamanders (CMS) and their habitat. o CMS surveys have been conducted at over 50 sites in proximity to the treatment areas, including one area in a treatment area. No CMS have been found. Although the CMS could occur in the treatment areas, over 50 surveys have been negative and proposed activities would not have an adverse effect on the CMS or its habitat (LOO, project file). o Janette Cross of WV DNR made the following recommendations: that merchantable timber not be girdled for the sake of red spruce release; that the openings planned (up to 0.1 acre in size) be increased in size to 0.5 acre or larger; and that surveys be conducted for suitable habitat and the presence of CMS). o The number of merchantable trees to be girdled will be minimal, and snags provide valuable wildlife habitat. Commercial logging in this area would involve road work and would result in soil disturbance by harvest equipment. Opening sizes of 0.1 acre and less are designed to mimic natural openings, while accelerating red spruce and black cherry regeneration. See previous bullet for information on CMS. o Amy Cimarolli of The Nature Conservancy expressed concern about nonnative invasive plant species and recommended the incorporation of integrated pest management activities into this project. 6 of 8
7 o Because work will not involve log skidders or other off-road vehicles, the project will have a very low risk of spreading non-native invasive (NNIS) plants. The MNF prioritizes NNIS treatment areas. Funding does not allow treatment of all NNIS infestations. IV. Findings Required By And/Or Related To Other Laws and Regulations This project will comply with all applicable laws and regulations. This project is consistent with the goals and management direction, including the standards and guidelines in the Land and Resource Management Plan for the Monongahela National Forest (Forest Plan) (2006). Specifically, the following Forest Plan goals and objectives will be achieved through this project: 4102; VE (02, 07); TE (01, 03, 04); and WF01. This project is not in a visually sensitive area and there will be no change in visual quality as a result of this project. Civil rights impact analysis is an integrated requirement for projects falling under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), including those projects that qualify for categorical exclusion. This project is located solely on National Forest System land. During internal scoping, the interdisciplinary team could not identify any affected private property, or any direct effects that single out individuals or groups, including those defined as minorities or other identified categories. The project will be done by force account (Forest Service employees) or be contracted out through a bidding process that provides equal opportunity to all individuals, organizations, and businesses authorized to live, work, and/or operate in the United States. No social issues of any type were identified during public scoping. There is no record of an environmental justice issue being identified on any Monongahela National Forest vegetation management projects prepared under the current Forest Plan. The absence of effects or issues leads to the conclusion that civil rights and environmental justice impacts will not occur as a result of this project, and that additional analysis of these issues is unnecessary. V. Appeal Opportunities This decision is not subject to administrative review or appeal pursuant to 36 CFR VI. Implementation Date Implementation may begin immediately. VII. Contact Person Further information about this decision may be obtained during normal office hours (weekdays, 8:00a.m. to 4:30 p.m.) from Shane C. Jones, Greenbrier Ranger District 7 of 8
8 Wildlife Biologist, at the district office, Bartow, WV 24920; Phone Extension 114; Fax ; or VIII. Signature of Responsible Official and Date /s/ Jack Tribble July 18, 2011 JACK TRIBBLE Monongahela National Forest District Ranger Greenbrier Ranger District Responsible Official Date The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA s Target Center at (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Ave. SW, Washington, DC or call (voice or TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 8 of 8
Cheat Mountain Wildlife Habitat Enhancement
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Monongahela National Forest Greenbrier Ranger District Box 67 Bartow, WV 24920 304-456-3335 File Code: 2670/1950 Date: June 7, 2011 Scoping - Opportunity
More informationScoping and 30-Day Notice and Comment Period for. Grassy Knob American Chestnut Planting
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Monongahela National Forest Greenbrier Ranger District Box 67 Bartow, WV 24920 Phone (304) 456-3335 File Code: 2020/2070/1950 Date: November 15, 2012
More informationDECISION MEMO. Wildlife Habitat Improvement Project Wildlife Opening Construction, Rehabilitation and Expansion FY
DECISION MEMO Wildlife Habitat Improvement Project Wildlife Opening Construction, Rehabilitation and Expansion FY 2007-2013 USDA Forest Service Bankhead National Forest - National Forests in Alabama Winston
More informationDECISION MEMO. Cheat-Potomac Ranger District Multiple Recreation Facilities and Related Granger-Thye Concessions Special Use Permit
DECISION MEMO Cheat-Potomac Ranger District Multiple Recreation Facilities and Related Granger-Thye Concessions Special Use Permit United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service (FS) Eastern Region
More informationDECISION MEMO SPECIAL USE AUTHORIZATION FOR GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS
DECISION MEMO SPECIAL USE AUTHORIZATION FOR GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS USDA-Forest Service, Eastern Region Huron-Manistee National Forests, Baldwin/White Cloud Ranger District Newaygo County, Michigan
More informationKENTUCKY UTILITIES SPECIAL USE AUTHORIZATION AMENDMENT: MOUNT VICTORY TRANSMISSION TOWER REPLACEMENT DECISION MEMO
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE SOUTHERN REGION DANIEL BOONE NATIONAL FOREST KENTUCKY MARCH 2016 KENTUCKY UTILITIES SPECIAL USE AUTHORIZATION AMENDMENT: MOUNT VICTORY TRANSMISSION
More informationDECISION MEMO. Griz Thin (Stand )
Background DECISION MEMO Griz Thin (Stand 507089) USDA Forest Service Siuslaw National Forest Central Coast Ranger District Lane County, Oregon Township 16 South, Range 10 West, Sections 6 and 7 The Cummins-Tenmile
More informationHuron-Manistee National Forests Mio Ranger District 107 McKinley Road Mio, MI 48647
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Huron-Manistee National Forests Mio Ranger District 107 McKinley Road Mio, MI 48647 989-826-3252 (Voice) 989-826-6073 (Fax) Dial 711 for relay service
More informationDraft Decision Memo Santiam Junction Maintenance Station Truck Shop Extension
Draft Decision Memo Santiam Junction Maintenance Station Truck Shop Extension USDA Forest Service McKenzie River Ranger District Willamette National Forest Linn County, OR T.13 S., R.7 E., Section 14,
More informationDecision Memo. Cabin #5 Electric, Water, Septic Improvements
Decision Memo Cabin #5 Electric, Water, Septic Improvements USDA Forest Service Ocoee/ Hiwassee Ranger District, Cherokee National Forest Polk County, Tennessee Section 18, Township 2, Range 3 East; Lot
More informationPheasant Mountain Timber Stand Improvement (TSI) Decision Memo
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Monongahela National Forest Cheat Potomac Ranger District 2499 North Fork Highway Petersburg, WV 26847 304-257-4488 Pheasant Mountain Timber Stand
More informationDecision Memo for Pax Ponderosa Pine Planting Project
Decision Memo for Pax Ponderosa Pine Planting Project USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region Fremont-Winema National Forests Lakeview Ranger District Lake County, Oregon Introduction The Lakeview
More informationWetland Creation Project. Decision Memo
Wetland Creation Project UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE Eastern REGION Monongahela NATIONAL FOREST West Virginia Decision Memo USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region, Monongahela National
More informationPROJECT INFORMATION Manchester Ranger District Apple Tree Release and Maintenance Project
PROJECT INFORMATION Manchester Ranger District Apple Tree Release and Maintenance Project The USDA Forest Service is proposing to release and prune living apple trees in the Manchester Ranger District,
More informationDECISION MEMO Robinhood Creek Helicopter Log Deck June, 2008
DECISION MEMO Robinhood Creek Helicopter Log Deck June, 2008 USDA Forest Service, Mt. Hood National Forest Hood River Ranger District Hood River County, Oregon Flooding in the fall of 2006 caused significant
More informationPreliminary Decision Memo Recreation Residence Septic Repairs
Preliminary Decision Memo 2014 Recreation Residence Septic Repairs USDA Forest Service McKenzie River Ranger District Willamette National Forest Lane County, Oregon T. 16 S., R. 5 E, Section 16 Willamette
More informationFinal Decision Memo. Murphy Meadow Restoration Project. USDA Forest Service Willamette National Forest McKenzie River Ranger District
Final Decision Memo Murphy Meadow Restoration Project USDA Forest Service Willamette National Forest McKenzie River Ranger District T19S, R5E, Sec. 23, 24. Lane County Oregon BACKGROUND The Murphy Meadow
More informationDECISION MEMO FOURTH OF JULY PARK 2 USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Red River Ranger District, Nez Perce National Forest Idaho County, Idaho
DECISION MEMO FOURTH OF JULY PARK 2 USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Red River Ranger District, Nez Perce National Forest Idaho County, Idaho I. Decision II. I have decided to authorize issuance of
More informationDECISION MEMO SPECIAL USE AUTHORIZATION FOR PRIVATE ROAD PERMIT
DECISION MEMO SPECIAL USE AUTHORIZATION FOR PRIVATE ROAD PERMIT USDA-Forest Service, Eastern Region Huron-Manistee National Forests, Baldwin Ranger District Newaygo County, Michigan I. DECISION A. Background
More informationDraft Decision Memo OHV Trails 22 and 42 Reroute Project
Draft Decision Memo OHV Trails 22 and 42 Reroute Project USDA Forest Service McKenzie River Ranger District Willamette National Forest Linn County, OR T13S, R7E, Sections 25 and 34 Willamette Meridian
More informationDECISION MEMO MANHATTAN FUELS REDUCTION PROJECT U.S. FOREST SERVICE CANYON LAKES RANGER DISTRICT LARIMER COUNTY, CO
DECISION MEMO MANHATTAN FUELS REDUCTION PROJECT U.S. FOREST SERVICE CANYON LAKES RANGER DISTRICT LARIMER COUNTY, CO Background and Project Description In order to improve forest health and reduce hazardous
More informationDECISION MEMO Eureka Fire Whitebark Pine Planting
Page 1 of 6 DECISION MEMO Eureka Fire Whitebark Pine Planting USDA Forest Service Madison Ranger District Madison County T11S, R2W, Sections16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 29, 30, 31 & 32 T11S, R3W, Sections 25 &
More informationUSDA Forest Service Decision Memo. Mattie V Creek Minesite Rehabilitation Project
USDA Forest Service Decision Memo Mattie V Creek Minesite Rehabilitation Project Ninemile Ranger District Lolo National Forest Mineral County, Montana I. DECISION TO BE IMPLEMENTED A. Decision Description:
More informationDecision Memo. Programmatic Forest Plan Amendment for Cultural Resource Protection Standards and Guidelines. United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Decision Memo Programmatic Forest Plan Amendment for Cultural Resource Protection Standards and Guidelines Coconino National Forest Coconino, Gila,
More informationDecision Memo for the City of Detroit Root Rot Timber Sale Project
Decision Memo for the City of Detroit Root Rot Timber Sale Project USDA Forest Service Detroit Ranger District Willamette National Forest Marion and Linn Counties, OR T.10S., R.5 E., Section 2, Willamette
More informationMichigan Wing-Civil Air Patrol
DECISION MEMO Michigan Wing-Civil Air Patrol (CAP) Navigational Equipment Special Use Permit #MUN250 Hiawatha National Forest Munising Ranger District Alger County, Michigan I DECISION A. Description My
More informationThe location of the valve site is displayed on a map in the project file.
DECISION MEMO Special Use Permit # RAR401201 Amendment #7 Hiawatha National Forest Rapid River Ranger District Delta County, Michigan I DECISION A. Description My decision is to issue an amendment to the
More informationSHASTA-MCCLOUD MANAGEMENT UNIT OVER SNOW VEHICLE TRAIL GROOMING AND SNOWMOBILE FACILITY MAINTENANCE PROPOSAL
DRAFT DECISION MEMO SHASTA-MCCLOUD MANAGEMENT UNIT OVER SNOW VEHICLE TRAIL GROOMING AND SNOWMOBILE FACILITY MAINTENANCE PROPOSAL U.S. FOREST SERVICE TOWNSHIP 40, 41, 42 AND 43 NORTH, RANGE 1, 2, 3 WEST,
More informationDECISION MEMO 4-H Tree Farm LLC Driveway Permit
DECISION MEMO 4-H Tree Farm LLC Driveway Permit I. DECISION USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region, Hoosier National Forest Tell City Ranger District Perry County, Indiana T73S, R2W, SESE Section 36 A. Description
More informationDecision Memo Raptor 1 and 9 Prescribed Burns Project
Decision Memo Raptor 1 and 9 Prescribed Burns Project USDA Forest Service Chemult Ranger District, Fremont-Winema National Forests Klamath County, OR Township (T) 29 South (S), Range (R) 6 East (E), Section
More informationI. Decision to be Implemented. II. Reasons for Categorically Excluding the Decision. A. Description of Decision - 1 -
Decision Memo Guitonville Penelec Power Line Right-of-Way Special Use Permit USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region 9 Allegheny National Forest Marienville Ranger District Warrant 5133, Green Township Forest
More informationDecision Memo Starkey Elk Handling Facility Water System Improvements
Decision Memo Starkey Elk Handling Facility Water System Improvements USDA Forest Service Wallowa-Whitman National Forest La Grande Ranger District Union County, Oregon I. DECISION TO BE IMPLEMENTED A.
More informationDecision Memo. North Fork Calispell Creek Restoration Project
Project Description Decision Memo North Fork Calispell Creek Restoration Project USDA Forest Service Newport-Sullivan Lake Ranger Districts Colville National Forest Pend Oreille County, Washington Surveys
More informationU.S.D.A. Forest Service National Forest & Grasslands in Texas Angelina National Forest Angelina/Sabine Ranger District Jasper County, Texas
DECISION MEMO WESTWOOD WATER SUPPLY CORPORATION SPECIAL USE PERMIT REISSUANCE AND MODIFICATION PROJECT U.S.D.A. Forest Service National Forest & Grasslands in Texas Angelina National Forest Angelina/Sabine
More informationDECISION MEMO Pony Whitebark Pine Planting
Page 1 of 5 DECISION MEMO Pony Whitebark Pine Planting USDA Forest Service Jefferson Ranger District Madison County T2S, R3W, Sections 4 & 9 Background The Pony Fire of 2012 burned 5,157 acres on the (BDNF).
More informationDecision Memo Tongass National Forest. Wrangell Ranger District. Pre-Commercial Thinning CE 2010
Decision Memo Tongass National Forest Pre-Commercial Thinning CE 2010 Decision It is my decision to authorize pre-commercial thinning (PCT) on approximately 7,500 acres of overstocked young-growth forest
More informationWildlife Habitat Restoration and Improvements FY 2007 Project
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region Wildlife Habitat Restoration and Improvements FY 2007 Project Umpqua National Forest Diamond Lake Ranger District April 2008
More informationDecision Memo North Boundary Salvage
Map # Proposal and Need for the Proposal Decision Memo North Boundary Salvage USDA Forest Service Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest Medford-Park Falls Ranger District The U.S. Forest Service (USFS) is
More informationEnvironmental Assessment
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service May 2009 Environmental Assessment Powder River Campground Decommissioning Powder River Ranger District, Bighorn National Forest Johnson and Washakie
More informationDECISION MEMO SFA EXPERIMENTAL FOREST HERBACEOUS POND RESTORATION AUGUST, 2009 ANGELINA/SABINE RANGER DISTRICT ANGELINA NATIONAL FOREST
402 C B B DECISION MEMO SFA EXPERIMENTAL FOREST HERBACEOUS POND RESTORATION AUGUST, 2009 ANGELINA/SABINE RANGER DISTRICT ANGELINA NATIONAL FOREST NACOGDOCHES COUNTY, TEXAS USDA FOREST SERVICE, REGION 8
More informationDECISION MEMO. Bull Bear 1H-18 Oil and Gas Pipeline
DECISION MEMO Bull Bear 1H-18 Oil and Gas Pipeline USDA, Forest Service Cibola National Forest, Black Kettle National Grasslands Roger Mills County, Oklahoma BACKGROUND: Laredo Petroleum, Inc., in order
More informationDecision Memo Young Stand Density Management and Conifer Pruning
Decision Memo Young Stand Density Management and Conifer Pruning Purpose and Need USDA Forest Service Middle Fork Ranger District Willamette National Forest Lane and Douglas Counties, OR T17S-T25S and
More informationDecision Memo Sawtooth Trail #3634 Reroute
Decision Memo Sawtooth Trail #3634 Reroute USDA Forest Service Middle Fork Ranger District Willamette National Forest Lane County, OR T.25S, R.5.5E, Section 22, Willamette Meridian Purpose and Need The
More informationDECISION MEMO. East Fork Blacktail Trail Reroute
Page 1 of 6 DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Madison Ranger District Madison County Background The East Fork Blacktail Trail #6069 is a mainline trail in the Snowcrest Mountains. The Two Meadows Trail
More informationDECISION MEMO JASON MINE-BAT HABITAT IMPROVEMENT AND MINE CLOSURE Section 22, T. 13S., R. 2W. Union County, Illinois
DECISION MEMO JASON MINE-BAT HABITAT IMPROVEMENT AND MINE CLOSURE Section 22, T. 13S., R. 2W. Union County, Illinois USDA Forest Service Mississippi Bluffs Ranger District, Shawnee National Forest Background
More informationBACKGROUND DECISION. June 2016 Page 1 of 6
BACKGROUND DECISION MEMO HOUSE ROCK WILDLIFE AREA PASTURE FENCE USDA FOREST SERVICE, SOUTHWEST REGION (R3) KAIBAB NATIONAL FOREST - NORTH KAIBAB RANGER DISTRICT COCONINO COUNTY, ARIZONA The Kaibab National
More informationTenmile and Priest Pass Restoration Project Scoping Notice
Introduction Tenmile and Priest Pass Restoration Project Scoping Notice USDA Forest Service Helena National Forest Helena Ranger District Lewis and Clark County, Montana The Helena Ranger District of the
More informationDECISION MEMO Divide Creek Barrier Enhancement
Page 1 of 7 Background DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Butte Ranger District Silver Bow County, Montana T. 2 N., R. 9 W., Section 32 The North Fork of Divide Creek is approximately 4 miles west of the
More informationDecision Memo. Delta A Septic Repair (#33)
Decision Memo Delta A Septic Repair (#33) USDA Forest Service Willamette National Forest McKenzie River Ranger District T16S, R5E, Section 16 Lane County, OR Proposed Action The McKenzie River Ranger District
More informationTelegraph Forest Management Project
Telegraph Forest Management Project Black Hills National Forest Northern Hills Ranger District Lawrence and Pennington Counties, South Dakota Proposed Action and Request for Comments March 2008 Table of
More informationKinder/Morgan Southern Natural Gas. Right-of-Way Maintenance Project Woody Vegetation Control. Decision Notice And Finding of No Significant Impact
Kinder/Morgan Southern Natural Gas United States Department of Agriculture Southern Region Forest Service March 2013 Right-of-Way Maintenance Project Woody Vegetation Control Decision Notice And Finding
More informationDECISION MEMO For ASL (Allegheny Snowmobile Loop) Marshburg Connector Project
DECISION MEMO For ASL (Allegheny Snowmobile Loop) Marshburg Connector Project I. DECISION TO BE IMPLEMENTED A. Description of Decision USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region 9 Allegheny National Forest Bradford
More informationPROJECT INFORMATION Moosalamoo National Recreation Area Campground Timber Management Project
PROJECT INFORMATION Moosalamoo National Recreation Area Campground Timber Management Project The USDA Forest Service (USFS) is initiating an environmental analysis process for the proposed Moosalamoo National
More informationPROJECT INFORMATION Warren Falls Parking Lot Expansion Project
PROJECT INFORMATION Warren Falls Parking Lot Expansion Project The USDA Forest Service (USFS) has initiated an environmental analysis process for the proposed Warren Falls Parking Lot Expansion Project
More informationDecision Memo Rose Canyon Salvage Project
Decision Memo Rose Canyon Salvage Project USDA Forest Service Coronado National Forest Pima County, Arizona Background The Rose Canyon Salvage Project is located in the Rose Canyon Campground on the Santa
More informationI. DECISION. A. Description of Decision
DECISION MEMO Southern Indiana Power Oriental Road USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region Hoosier National Forest Tell City Ranger District Perry County, Indiana I. DECISION A. Description of Decision My
More informationCow Mountain Pond Snowmobile Trail Relocation Project
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Eastern Region August 2011 Cow Mountain Pond Snowmobile Trail Relocation Project Decision Memo Northeastern States Forest Legacy Program Green Mountain
More informationDECISION MEMO SMART CREEK MINERAL EXPLORATION PROJECT
Page 1 of 7 DECISION MEMO SMART CREEK MINERAL EXPLORATION PROJECT Background USDA Forest Service Pintler Ranger District Granite County, Montana T8N, R13W, sections 5, 6 and 7 The Kennecott Exploration
More informationDecision Memo Cow Pen Project. USDA Forest Service Talladega National Forest - Oakmulgee District Bibb and Tuscaloosa Counties, Alabama
Decision Memo Cow Pen Project USDA Forest Service Talladega National Forest - Oakmulgee District Bibb and Tuscaloosa Counties, Alabama Decision and Rationale I have decided to implement the actions listed
More informationDECISION MEMO. West Fork Blacktail Deer Creek Hardened Crossing
Page 1 of 6 Background DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Madison Ranger District Madison County T12S, R4W, Section 30 The project is in the Gravelly Landscape, Snowcrest Recommended Wilderness Management
More informationDECISION MEMO WEST RIVER COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY BURIED FIBER OPTIC CABLE PROJECT
DECISION MEMO WEST RIVER COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY BURIED FIBER OPTIC CABLE PROJECT USDA, FOREST SERVICE GRAND RIVER NATIONAL GRASSLAND GRAND RIVER RANGER DISTRICT INTRODUCTION: West River Cooperative
More informationDECISION MEMO. Crow Creek Hardened Crossing
Page 1 of 5 DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Madison Ranger District Madison County T12S, R4W in Section 35 Background A perennial cattle crossing on Crow Creek in in the Gravelly Landscape in the Centennial
More informationDecision Memo Halliburton Ann Exploration Project U.S. Forest Service Austin Ranger District, Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest Nye County, Nevada
Decision Memo Halliburton Ann Exploration Project U.S. Forest Service Austin Ranger District, Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest Nye County, Nevada Background The Ann Exploration Project is located on the
More informationDECISION MEMO USDA FOREST SERVICE
DECISION MEMO USDA FOREST SERVICE Eagle River-Florence and Lakewood-Laona Ranger Districts Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest Florence, Forest, Langlade, Oconto, Oneida, and Vilas Counties, Wisconsin
More informationDECISION MEMO ISSUE AN AMENDMENT TO AN EXISTING SPECIAL USE PERMIT
DECISION MEMO ISSUE AN AMENDMENT TO AN EXISTING SPECIAL USE PERMIT HIGH WEST ENERGY, INC. For A Single-Phase (2-Wire), Overhead Power Line US FOREST SERVICE Arapaho & Roosevelt National Forests and Pawnee
More informationDECISION MEMO OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (ODOT) SAND SHED CINDER PIT EXPLORATION PROJECT
DECISION MEMO OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (ODOT) SAND SHED CINDER PIT EXPLORATION PROJECT USDA Forest Service Bend/Fort Rock Ranger District, Deschutes National Forest Deschutes County, Oregon
More informationGeneral Location: Approximately 6 miles east of Huntsville, Utah along the South Fork of the Ogden River (Figure 1)
PUBLIC SCOPING SOUTH FORK WUI OGDEN RANGER DISTRICT, UINTA-WASATCH-CACHE NATIONAL FOREST WEBER COUNTY, UTAH OCTOBER 6, 2017 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Ogden Ranger District of the Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National
More informationDECISION MEMO. Non-Commercial Thinning on the Ocala National Forest (PALS project # 39238)
Decision DECISION MEMO Non-Commercial Thinning on the Ocala National Forest (PALS project # 39238) USDA Forest Service Ocala National Forest Lake, Marion, and Putnam County, Florida Based on the analysis
More informationMount Diablo Baseline and Meridian. T42N, R54E, Section 29 and 30
DECISION MEMO Walker Ridge Gold Exploration Project Plan of Operations #06-12-05 Mountain City Ranger District, Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest Elko County, Nevada BACKGROUND On February 21, 2012, Columbia
More informationSuss ATV Access Special Use Authorization
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service December 2010 Suss ATV Access Special Use Authorization Decision Memo USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region Green Mountain National Forest Manchester
More informationTub Run Abandoned Coal Mine Restoration Decision Notice & Finding of No Significant Impact
Tub Run Abandoned Coal Mine Restoration USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region 9 Monongahela National Forest, Cheat Potomac Ranger District Pocahontas County, West Virginia January 2013 Introduction The Tub
More informationOn/Off periods Improvements Grazing System. 2 fence segments. 1 water development, 2 cattle guards
DECISION NOTICE HENRY CREEK AND SWAMP CREEK RANGE ALLOTMENT MANAGEMENT PLANS REVISION U.S. FOREST SERVICE PLAINS/THOMPSON FALLS RANGER DISTRICT LOLO NATIONAL FOREST SANDERS COUNTY, MONTANA DECISION Based
More informationForest Resources of the Black Hills National Forest
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station August 22 Forest Resources of the Black Hills National Forest Larry T. DeBlander About the author Larry T. DeBlander
More informationDECISION MEMO POT MOUNTAIN TRAIL CONSTRUCTION USDA
DECISION MEMO POT MOUNTAIN TRAIL CONSTRUCTION USDA Forest Service, Northern Region North Fork Ranger District, Clearwater National Forest Clearwater County, Idaho I. Decision I have decided to authorize
More informationProposed Action. for the. North 40 Scrub Management Project
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Proposed Action for the North 40 Scrub Management Project National Forests in Florida, Ocala National Forest February 2016 For More Information Contact:
More informationDecision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact
Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact Gold Lake Bog Research Natural Area Boundary Adjustment and Nonsignificant Forest Plan Amendment #53 USDA Forest Service Middle Fork Ranger District,
More informationDecision Memo Hungry Creek Watershed Road Maintenance and Stony Quarry Development Project
Decision Memo Hungry Creek Watershed Road Maintenance and Stony Quarry Development Project USDA Forest Service Mount Hough and Beckwourth Ranger Districts Plumas County, CA Background We, (the USDA Forest
More informationDecision Memo Special Forest Products Sales. USDA Forest Service Detroit Ranger District, Willamette National Forest Marion & Linn County, Oregon
Decision Memo Special Forest Products Sales USDA Forest Service Detroit Ranger District, Willamette National Forest Marion & Linn County, Oregon 1 Table of Contents 1. Purpose and Need... 3 2. Proposed
More informationDECISION MEMO. Kelly s Pond / NFSR 204 Hazard Tree Removal. USDA Forest Service Sam Houston National Forest Montgomery County, Texas
DECISION MEMO Kelly s Pond / NFSR 204 Hazard Tree Removal USDA Forest Service Sam Houston National Forest Montgomery County, Texas Decision I have decided to remove approximately 500 hazard trees in and
More informationDECISION MEMO LOWER STILLWATER FISHERY ENHANCEMENT U.S. FOREST SERVICE DUCHESNE RANGER DISTRICT ASHLEY NATIONAL FOREST DUCHESNE COUNTY, UTAH
DECISION MEMO LOWER STILLWATER FISHERY ENHANCEMENT U.S. FOREST SERVICE DUCHESNE RANGER DISTRICT ASHLEY NATIONAL FOREST DUCHESNE COUNTY, UTAH BACKGROUND The Rock Creek drainage is a very popular recreation
More informationScoping Report for the Aldridge Creek Tornado Salvage Project 51712
United States Department of Agriculture Scoping Report for the Aldridge Creek Tornado Salvage Project 51712 Poplar Bluff Ranger District Mark Twain National Forest Butler County, Missouri Cover Photo:
More informationLake Fire Restoration and Hazardous Tree Removal. Project Proposed Action and Scoping Document
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service November 2016 Lake Fire Restoration and Hazardous Tree Removal Heather McRae Project Proposed Action and Scoping Document USDA Forest Service Shasta-Trinity
More informationDECISION MEMO. Steve Simpson and Associates, Inc. Simpson #114 & #116 Gas Well Project Compartment 106
DECISION MEMO Steve Simpson and Associates, Inc. Simpson #114 & #116 Gas Well Project Compartment 106 USDA FOREST SERVICE REGION 8 NATIONAL FORESTS AND GRASSLANDS IN TEXAS SABINE NATIONAL FOREST ANGELINA/SABINE
More informationAppalachian Trail/Long Trail Cold River Road Relocation Project
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Eastern Region Appalachian Trail/Long Trail Cold River Road Relocation Project Decision Memo August 2012 Green Mountain National Forest Manchester
More informationPRELIMINARY DECISION MEMO
PRELIMINARY DECISION MEMO Snoqualmie Christmas Tree Project USDA Forest Service Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest Snoqualmie Ranger District King County, Washington Proposed Action, Purpose and Need
More informationMower Tract Restoration Project
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Mower Tract Restoration Project Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact Region 9 Monongahela National Forest Greenbrier Ranger District
More informationLambson Draw On/Off Allotment Livestock Conversion Decision Notice
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Lambson Draw On/Off Allotment Livestock Conversion Decision Notice Ashley National Forest Flaming Gorge-Vernal Ranger District Uintah County, Utah
More informationClear Addition Project Decision Memo January 2013 DECISION MEMO. Clear Addition Fuels Reduction and Aspen Enhancement Project
DECISION MEMO Clear Addition Fuels Reduction and Aspen Enhancement Project USDA Forest Service Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest, Carson Ranger District Douglas County and Carson City, Nevada I. PROJECT
More informationDECISION MEMO. Vipond Water Development
Page 1 of 5 DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Wise River Ranger District Beaverhead County T2S, R10W, Sections 12, 13, 14, &18 Background This project is located in the Pioneer Landscape, East Face Management
More informationThe project will be conducted in partnership with the Nez Perce Tribe.
DECISION MEMO Tributary to Brushy Fork Culvert Replacements Private Land USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Powell Ranger District Nez Perce Clearwater National Forests Idaho County, Idaho I. Decision
More informationPreliminary Decision Memo 2017 BPA Utility Corridor Maintenance and Danger Tree Project
Preliminary Decision Memo 2017 BPA Utility Corridor Maintenance and Danger Tree Project USDA Forest Service Crescent Ranger District, Deschutes National Forest Klamath County, Oregon The Crescent Ranger
More informationMeacham Creek Restoration Project
Meacham Creek Restoration Project Meacham Creek Restoration Project Umatilla National Forest Walla Walla Ranger District Michael Rassbach, District Ranger Public Scoping Document Proposal Summary The Walla
More informationParadise and Watson Creek Headcut Treatment Project (see map on next page)
Paradise and Watson Creek Headcut Treatment Project (see map on next page) T 34 S, R 15 E, Sections 11, 13 and 14 The purpose of the project would be to stabilize the stream channel by treating headcuts
More informationDECISION MEMO Clay Butte Radio Repeater Relocation Project
Background DECISION MEMO Clay Butte Radio Repeater Relocation Project USDA FOREST SERVICE Rocky Mountain Region (R2) Shoshone National Forest Park County, Wyoming The Shoshone National Forest, Clarks Fork
More informationBEATONS LAKE TIMBER SALE Highlights Watersmeet Ranger District OTTAWA NATIONAL FOREST The Beatons Lake Timber Sale Area is located 10 miles west of Watersmeet, Michigan, and 1 mile north on Gogebic County
More informationManchester Ranger District. Apple Tree Release and Maintenance Project
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service February 2009 Manchester Ranger District Apple Tree Release and Maintenance Project Decision Memo USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region Green Mountain
More informationDECISION MEMO Lazyman Repeater Shelter and Tower Replacement
Page 1 of 5 Background DECISION MEMO Lazyman Repeater Shelter and Tower Replacement USDA Forest Service Madison Ranger District Madison County The Lazyman Repeater was installed in 1988 and serves parts
More informationShort Form Botany Resource Reports:
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service December 2014 Short Form Botany Resource Reports: 1) Botany Resource Report 2) Biological Assessment for Threatened, Endangered, Proposed Species
More informationProposed Action for 30-day Notice and Comment Emerald Ash Borer SLow Ash Mortality (SLAM) Hoosier National Forest Brownstown Ranger District
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service February 2012 Proposed Action for 30-day Notice and Comment 2012 Emerald Ash Borer SLow Ash Mortality (SLAM) Hoosier National Forest Brownstown Ranger
More informationBotany Resource Reports:
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service December 2014 Botany Resource Reports: 1) Botany Resource Report 2) Biological Assessment for Threatened, Endangered, Proposed Species 3) Biological
More information