CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION WORKSHEET: RESOURCE CONSIDERATIONS
|
|
- Abraham Lucas
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION WORKSHEET: RESOURCE CONSIDERATIONS Developed Recreation/Trails, Wilderness & Roadless Jasper Mountain Priest Lake Ranger District Idaho Panhandle National Forest Description of the Proposed Action Vegetation management, fuel management, road management and watershed improvement activities proposed for this project are depicted in Table 1. Vegetation management activities include commercial thinning, improvement cuts and regeneration harvest (shelterwood and seedtree). These are the same types of activities discussed during the field trip to the project area and at the workshop to develop the proposed action. Fuel treatment associated with timber harvest activities would occur and would include underburning, grapple piling, slash & grapple piling or slash & underburning. Natural fuels/ecosystem burning not associated with timber harvest is also proposed to benefit wildlife habitat. Road management activities are needed to implement the project (e.g. maintenance, reconditioning, reconstruction, temporary road construction). Some roads in the project area that are not needed for project implementation will have restoration work conducted. This restoration road work will reduce sediment contribution to streams (accomplished through road maintenance or reconstruction) or make system roads hydrologically inert if they are no longer needed (decommissioning) or until needed for future use (storage). Some non-national Forest System (NFS)/unclassified roads in the project area that are located on NFS lands will be decommissioned. Upon project completion, closures will be installed for some roads currently closed to public motorized use but that are being used for project implementation. One aquatic organism passage (culvert) was identified for replacement as part of stewardship activities. Replacement would reconnect a small amount of habitat for seasonal fish use by eliminating a barrier. Correct realignment would lower the risk of the culvert plugging and road erosion/washout. Table 1: Summary of Activities and Treatment Size Activity Vegetation Management Commercial Harvest (acres; rounded to nearest whole #) Shelterwood w/ Reserves Seed Tree w/ Reserves Commercial Thin Improvement Cut TOTAL Non-Harvest (acres; rounded to nearest whole #) Natural fuels/ecosystem burning TOTAL Activity/Treatment Size ,
2 Activity Activity/Treatment Size TOTAL COMMERCIAL HARVEST AND NON-HARVEST (acres) 2,037 Reforestation (acres) 1,281 Road Management Activities for Project Implementation (Miles; rounded to nearest tenth) Maintenance 15.7 Reconstruction 22.0 Construction of Temp Roads (Decommission after project completion) 3.4 Reconditioning (Decommission after project completion) 4.0 Reconstruction (Stored after project completion) 10.3 Construction of permanent system road None Watershed Improvement Activities (Restoration) Aquatic organism passage repair (# of culverts) Road Maintenance (miles) Road Reconstruction (miles) Road Storage (miles) Road Decommissioning (miles) Regeneration Harvest and Openings Greater than 40 Acres 1 along Quartz Creek It is desired to trend the forests in the Jasper project area toward early seral tree species (western larch, ponderosa pine and western white pine) that are less susceptible to root disease fungi and thus decrease the amount of tree mortality occurring. To achieve this desired condition a combination of even-aged and two-aged silvicultural systems are being proposed for some stands. Reforestation of these units is required to occur within 5 years of the unit being harvested. Regeneration harvest is the preferred treatment for some stands for the following reasons: The project area is deficit in stands dominated by early seral species, as they were historically. Stands identified for regeneration harvest are dominated by late seral species (grand fir, Douglasfir, western hemlock) that are susceptible to and experiencing root diseases and insects. Stands are older and existing stand structure is breaking apart, not regenerating to early seral species and creating an unacceptable/undesirable fuel load. A shelterwood with reserves regeneration method is proposed for stands with enough resilient early seral species trees to provide a seed source and moderate the microenvironment in the understory. Following successful establishment of regeneration this harvest method will result in a distinct two-aged stand. A seedtree with reserves regeneration method is proposed for stands that only have enough resilient early seral species trees to provide a seed source but there are not enough reserve seed trees to moderate the microenvironment and thus an exposed microenvironment is created in the understory. Following successful establishment of regeneration this harvest method will result in an even-aged stand. It is also desired that regeneration harvests create a variety of patch sizes and stand structures that break up the homogenization and simplification of the current landscape pattern. Increasing the heterogeneity of patch sizes, stand structures and species compositions will increase the resiliency of forest stands to insects and diseases and decrease the risk of very large wildfire. To create a variety of patch sizes some of the proposed regeneration harvest activities would result in openings greater than 40 acres, as depicted in Table 2. These opening sizes would require Regional Forester approval (FSM ). 2
3 Table 2: Openings Greater than 40 Acres Group Unit(s) Treatment Prescription Opening Size (Acres) & 107A Shelterwood & 47 Seedtree & 44A 44 Shelterwood; 44A Seedtree Shelterwood & 16B Seedtree; 15 & , 16, 16B & 116 Shelterwood Seedtree 189 Required Design Features The following design features are required to ensure compliance with the regulatory framework for this resource and/or to reduce the risk of adverse impacts to this resource. A description is provided as to when, where and how the design feature should be applied and/or what conditions would trigger the need to apply the design feature. 1. Provisions in the timber sale contract would require that traffic control signs using standards set forth in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, 2003) be posted on affected routes to alert travelers to haul truck traffic. 2. Provisions in the timber sale contract would restrict timber hauling on the weekends and on summer holidays (Memorial Day, 4th of July and Labor Day), unless otherwise agreed. Timber hauling would also be restricted on days when events, for which a special use permit is held (e.g. AERC Equestrian Event), occur in the project area if the days of the event do not fall on a weekend or summer holiday. 3. All brush piles, landing and skid trails will be located at least 200 from the PeeWee and Steep Creek trails unless blocked by topography from the view of trail users. 4. Trailheads will not be used for decking or piling operations and trails will not be used as haul routes. 5. While activities are not anticipated to impact access to the PeeWee or Steep Creek Trails, advanced notice would be provided to key user groups and at the trail head locations should any trails require closure during project implementation. Cause-Effect Relationship Based on concerns raised during the collaborative process to develop this project, units that directly impacted the PeeWee or Steep Creek trail systems were dropped or unit boundaries were adjusted to avoid activities within 200 of the trail systems; therefore, activities are not expected to impact access to the trail systems. Traffic on National Forest System roads is likely to increase as part of project implementation. Design features are in place to reduce impacts from increased traffic and provide advanced notice if trail access is affected during project implementation. 3
4 Recreationists may experience impacts from smoke associated with burning activities. Burning activities would be coordinated through the Montana/Idaho Airshed Group to minimize or prevent impacts from smoke. No changes to public motorized access, as depicted on the Kaniksu Zone Motor Vehicle Use Map, will occur as part of this project. No wilderness, wilderness study areas, recommended wilderness areas, inventoried roadless areas, national recreation areas or research natural areas exist in the project area or are within close proximity to proposed activities. Regulatory Framework The proposed action has been reviewed and is determined to be in compliance with the management framework applicable to this resource. The laws, regulations, policies and Forest Plan direction applicable to this project and this resource are as follows: Idaho Panhandle Forest Plan (Revised, January 2015) The Forest Plan designates National Forest System lands according to Management Areas (MA). MA s are described in terms of their distinctive resource values and characteristics. Recreation is a resource element within the MAs to be managed according to the Standards established by the Forest Plan. The Jasper Mountain project is located in Management Area 6 (General Forest). Most of this MA consists of relatively large areas with roads, trails, and structures, as well as sign of past and ongoing activities designed to actively manage the forest vegetation. This MA provides a wide variety of recreation opportunities, both motorized and non-motorized. The density of motorized routes in this MA is higher than most of the other MAs. Constructed improvements in this MA generally consist of campgrounds, picnic or day use areas, trails, lookouts, and cabins. Most of the WUI on the Forest occurs within MA6 and activities designed to reduce hazardous fuels are common. Vegetation and watershed restoration is accomplished predominantly through active management. Evidence of past management activities vary across the landscape, but are generally more noticeable in this MA than others. Many of the acres within this MA are suitable for the production of timber on a regulated basis, providing wood fiber in response to regional and national demand. The following desired conditions and guidelines apply to Access and Recreation within MA 6; however, no standards for MA 6 are applicable to Access and Recreation. Desired Conditions A range of recreational opportunities (e.g., motorized and non-motorized) are provided within this MA while route conditions are maintained or improved. Summer and winter recreation opportunities and experiences are consistent with the ROS classification of semi-primitive non-motorized to roaded natural. Existing recreation facilities are managed to accommodate public use and provide safe recreation experiences. 4
5 Guidelines Motor vehicle use is allowed. Mechanized use is allowed (e.g., mountain bikes and other wheeled equipment). Road construction is allowed. Reconstruction of roads is allowed. Management activities should be consistent with the Scenic Integrity Objective of Low to High. Activities proposed for the Jasper Mountain project are consistent with the Forest Plan. Extraordinary Circumstances Following are the resource conditions that should be considered in determining whether extraordinary circumstances related to a proposed action warrant further analysis and documentation in an EA or an EIS: 1) Federally listed threatened or endangered species or designated critical habitat, species proposed for Federal listing or proposed critical habitat, or Forest Service sensitive species; 2) Flood plains, wetlands, or municipal watersheds; 3) Congressionally designated areas, such as wilderness, wilderness study areas, or national recreation areas; 4) Inventoried roadless areas or recommended wilderness areas; 5) Research natural areas; 6) American Indians and Alaska Native religious or cultural sites; and 7) Archaeological sites, or historic properties or areas. The following conditions were necessary to consider for this resource and the following determinations are made based on a review of the proposed action, required design features, the regulatory framework, and necessary analysis for this resource: Congressionally designated areas, such as wilderness, wilderness study areas, or national recreation areas; Extraordinary Circumstances Determination: Will not have extraordinary circumstances associated with the proposed actions. Explain Determination: No wilderness, wilderness study areas, wild and scenic river or national recreation areas are located in or within close proximity to the project area. Inventoried roadless areas or recommended wilderness areas; Extraordinary Circumstances Determination: Will not have extraordinary circumstances associated with the proposed actions. 5
6 Explain Determination: No inventoried roadless areas, recommended wilderness areas or any other area of forest plan special designation are located within the project area. Specialist: Dan Gillfillan April 1,
The Galton Project Kootenai National Forest. The Galton Project
Introduction The Galton Project The Fortine Ranger District of the Kootenai National Forest is in the early stages of developing a project entitled Galton, named for the mountain range dominating the eastern
More informationSKIBO PROJECT SCOPING REPORT Laurentian Ranger District, Superior National Forest
SKIBO PROJECT SCOPING REPORT Laurentian Ranger District, Superior National Forest I. Introduction The Laurentian Ranger District of the Superior National Forest is proposing management activities within
More informationWildlife Conservation Strategy
Wildlife Conservation Strategy Boise National Forest What is the Wildlife Conservation Strategy? The Boise National Forest is developing a Wildlife Conservation Strategy (WCS) in accordance with its Land
More informationPROJECT INFORMATION Manchester Ranger District Apple Tree Release and Maintenance Project
PROJECT INFORMATION Manchester Ranger District Apple Tree Release and Maintenance Project The USDA Forest Service is proposing to release and prune living apple trees in the Manchester Ranger District,
More informationBig Hill Insect and Disease Project Proposed Action
Big Hill Insect and Disease Project Proposed Action Project Background and 2014 Farm Bill The Big Hill Insect and Disease project on the Challis-Yankee Fork Ranger District of the Salmon-Challis National
More informationParadise and Watson Creek Headcut Treatment Project (see map on next page)
Paradise and Watson Creek Headcut Treatment Project (see map on next page) T 34 S, R 15 E, Sections 11, 13 and 14 The purpose of the project would be to stabilize the stream channel by treating headcuts
More informationAppendix C. Activity Codes
Appendix C Activity Codes Activity Code Groupings 1000 Fire 2000 - Range 3000 Cultural Resources and Recreation 4000 Timber and Silviculture 5000 Soil, Air and Watershed 6000 Wildlife; Threatened, Endangered,
More informationFontana Project Scoping Record August 2013
Fontana Project Scoping Record August 2013 The Cheoah Ranger District, Nantahala National Forest, is conducting an interdisciplinary analysis of a proposed project, called the Fontana Project, in Graham
More informationLa Grande Ranger District
La Grande Ranger District Wallowa-Whitman National Forest 3502 Highway 30, La Grande, OR. 97850 (541) 963-7186 January 15, 2015 Dear Forest User: The La Grande Ranger District has recently completed a
More informationIdaho Panhandle National Forests
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Idaho Panhandle National Forests Sandpoint Ranger District 1602 Ontario Road Sandpoint, ID 83864-9509 (208)263-5111 File Code: 1950 Date: July 14,
More informationIntroduction. Methodology for Analysis
1 Medicine Lake Caldera Vegetation Treatment Project Scenic Report Prepared by: /s/gary Kedish Natural Resources Specialist for: Big Valley and Doublehead Ranger Districts Modoc National Forest February
More informationProposed Action Report Big Creek WBP Enhancement Project
Proposed Action Report Big Creek WBP Enhancement Project USDA Forest Service Cascade Ranger District Boise National Forest Valley County, Idaho July 2013 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PROPOSED ACTION The encroachment
More informationKreist Creek. Environmental Assessment. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Kreist Creek Environmental Assessment Bonners Ferry Ranger District, Idaho Panhandle National Forests, Boundary County, Idaho May 2014 For More Information
More informationDECISION MEMO. West Fork Blacktail Deer Creek Hardened Crossing
Page 1 of 6 Background DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Madison Ranger District Madison County T12S, R4W, Section 30 The project is in the Gravelly Landscape, Snowcrest Recommended Wilderness Management
More informationThe project will be conducted in partnership with the Nez Perce Tribe.
DECISION MEMO Tributary to Brushy Fork Culvert Replacements Private Land USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Powell Ranger District Nez Perce Clearwater National Forests Idaho County, Idaho I. Decision
More informationCHEAT MOUNTAIN WILDLIFE HABITAT ENHANCEMENT
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Monongahela National Forest Greenbrier Ranger District Box 67 Bartow, WV 24920 304-456-3335 CHEAT MOUNTAIN WILDLIFE HABITAT ENHANCEMENT USDA Forest
More informationOchoco, Umatilla, Wallowa-Whitman National Forests; Oregon and Washington; Blue Mountains
[3410-11- P] DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service Ochoco, Umatilla, Wallowa-Whitman National Forests; Oregon and Washington; Blue Mountains Forest Resiliency Project AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. ACTION:
More information3-13 Other Required Findings and Regulatory Compliance
Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences 3-13 Other Required Findings and Regulatory Compliance 3-13.1 Short-term Uses and Long-term Productivity NEPA requires consideration of the relationship
More informationPRESCRIBED FIRE IN SOUTHWEST IDAHO
2016 PRESCRIBED FIRE IN SOUTHWEST IDAHO In southwest Idaho, public land managers work to: address public health and safety concerns; treat insect and disease infestations; reduce the risk of severe wildfires
More informationProvince Integrated Resource Management Project
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service July 2012 Province Integrated Resource Management Project Township of Chatham, Carroll County, New Hampshire Scoping Report Prepared By Saco Ranger
More informationTable of Contents. 1 Introduction. 2 Decision. 3 Rationale for the Decision. 4 Other Alternatives Considered
Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1.1 Summary of the Decision 1.2 Project Area 1.3 Background 1.4 Purpose and Need 2 Decision 3 Rationale for the Decision 3.1 Overview 3.2 Purpose and Need 3.3 Significant
More informationKeefer Pasture Drift Fence Project. Challis-Yankee Fork Ranger District Salmon-Challis National Forest
Keefer Pasture Drift Fence Project Challis-Yankee Fork Ranger District Salmon-Challis National Forest PROPOSED ACTION The Challis-Yankee Fork Ranger District proposes construction of approximately.11 miles
More informationIntroduction. Methodology for Analysis
Scenic Report Prepared by: /s/gary Kedish Natural Resources Specialist for: Warner Mountain Ranger District Modoc National Forest January 20, 2016 Introduction This report focuses on the Visual Quality
More informationAshland Tree Planting Project
DECISION MEMO Ashland Tree Planting Project Ashland Ranger District Custer National Forest USDA Forest Service Powder River and Rosebud Counties, Montana Purpose and Need for Proposing Action Forest cover
More informationBoulder Creek Restoration Project
United States Department of Agriculture Boulder Creek Restoration Project Environmental Assessment Forest Service Idaho Panhandle National Forests Bonners Ferry Ranger District September 2017 For More
More informationWillamette National Forest Sweet Home Ranger District
Forest Service Willamette National Forest Sweet Home Ranger District File Code: 1950 4431 Highway 20 Sweet Home, OR 97386 Tel (541) 367-5168 FAX (541) 367-2367 Date: December 16, 2015 Dear Interested public,
More informationBlanche Park Reservoir Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact
Blanche Park Reservoir Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact U.S. Forest Service Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests Delta County, Colorado INTRODUCTION The Grand Mesa
More informationDECISION MEMO. Non-Commercial Thinning on the Ocala National Forest (PALS project # 39238)
Decision DECISION MEMO Non-Commercial Thinning on the Ocala National Forest (PALS project # 39238) USDA Forest Service Ocala National Forest Lake, Marion, and Putnam County, Florida Based on the analysis
More informationCamp Lick Project. Recreation Report. Prepared by: Teresa L. Dixon Recreation Program Manager. for:
Prepared by: Teresa L. Dixon Recreation Program Manager for: Blue Mountain Ranger District Malheur National Forest June 8, 2017 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture
More informationMONITORING QUESTIONS AND TASKS FOR THE GEORGE WASHINGTON PLAN
MONITORING QUESTIONS AND TASKS FOR THE GEORGE WASHINGTON PLAN MONITORING THEME 1 CONSERVATION OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY FOR ECOSYSTEMS MQ 1: How are ecological conditions maintaining or making progress toward
More informationMANTI-LA SAL NATIONAL FOREST
MANTI-LA SAL NATIONAL FOREST FERRON RANGER DISTRICT CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION REVIEW FILE NUMBER: 2240 PROJECT TITLE: Olsen-McCadden Livestock Water Development PROJECT LEAD: Steven Cox ESTIMATED DATE FOR
More informationProposed Action for Motorized Travel Management on the North Kaibab Ranger District
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Proposed Action for Motorized Travel Management on the North Kaibab Ranger District Kaibab National Forest March 2010 The U.S. Department of Agriculture
More informationAppendix 1 Hood River Stewardship Crew Collaborative Recommendations
Appendix 1 Hood River Stewardship Crew Collaborative Recommendations July 24, 2014 Hood River Collaborative Stew Crew Objectives/Priorities: Protect the integrity of and access to recreational trails and
More informationAPPENDIX A VEGETATION RESTORATION TREATMENT SUMMARY ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THE HARVEST TREATMENT SUMMARY TABLES
APPENDIX A VEGETATION TREATMENTS APPENDIX A VEGETATION RESTORATION TREATMENT SUMMARY This table provides information about the proposed treatment units including the existing conditions, the proposed treatment,
More informationPreliminary Decision Memo 2015 Recreation Residence Projects Odell Lake
2015 Recreation Residence Projects Odell Lake USDA Forest Service Crescent Ranger District, Deschutes National Forest Klamath County, Oregon Background The Crescent Ranger District maintains 66 recreation
More informationLakeview Stewardship CFLRP Work Plan 2012
Responses to the prompts on this work plan should be typed directly into this template 1. Describe the manner in which the proposal will be implemented to achieve ecological and community economic benefit,
More informationLake Britton Planning Unit. Fish, Plant, and Wildlife Habitat LAKE BRITTON PLANNING UNIT
LAKE BRITTON PLANNING UNIT Pit-McCloud River Watershed Lake Britton Planning Unit Fish, Plant, and Wildlife Habitat Conduct surveys of lands outside the FERC boundary to identify biological resources and
More informationSBEADMR Priority Treatment Areas Process and Results
SBEADMR Priority Treatment Areas Process and Results GIS Optimization & Interdisciplinary Validation, September & October 2015 Purpose Use GIS to focus and prioritize potential treatment areas within the
More informationPLAN CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
PLAN CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS What is a Categorical Exclusion? Categorical exclusions are an essential part of NEPA that provide a categorical determination, based on agency experience,
More informationCommercial Firewood Project. McCall and New Meadows Ranger Districts Payette National Forest
1 Commercial Firewood Project McCall and New Meadows Ranger Districts Payette National Forest PROPOSED ACTION The proposal would harvest approximately 47 acres of trees in the Upper Elkhorn Creek drainage,
More informationCFLRP Annual Report 2012
CFLR Project (Name/Number): _Weiser-Little Salmon Headwaters/13 National Forest(s): _Payette Responses to the prompts on this annual report should be typed directly into this template, including narratives
More informationEnvironmental Assessment
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service March 2010 East Fork Meadow Creek Environmental Assessment Bonners Ferry Ranger District Idaho Panhandle National Forests The U.S. Department of Agriculture
More informationSmall NEPA Scoping Letter April 2017 Fremont - Winema National Forest
Project Proposals 1) Van Hulzen Private Land Access [Klamath RD] Proposed Category: 36 CFR 220.6(e) (3) Approval, modification, or continuation of minor special uses of NFS lands that require less than
More informationWest Branch LeClerc Creek Watershed Restoration Project Environmental Assessment
West Branch LeClerc Creek Watershed Restoration Project Environmental Assessment Decision Notice, Finding of No Significant Impact, and Response to Public Comments April 2015 USDA Forest Service Colville
More informationPROPOSED ACTION Cooperative Horse Removal with Fort McDermitt Paiute-Shoshone Tribe
PROPOSED ACTION Cooperative Horse Removal with Fort McDermitt Paiute-Shoshone Tribe Proposed Action The Santa Rosa Ranger District of the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest is proposing to remove all unauthorized
More informationCollaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program
Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program Meg Roessing U.S.D.A. Forest Service Forest Management Staff Washington Office mroessing@fs.fed.us Background: Department and Agency Priority Our shared
More informationJames Creek Fuel Reduction Project Decision Notice & Finding of No Significant Impact
James Creek Fuel Reduction Project Decision Notice & Finding of No Significant Impact Introduction USDA Forest Service Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forests And Pawnee National Grassland Boulder Ranger District
More informationElkhorn Project Proposed Action
Elkhorn Project Proposed Action PROJECT LOCATION The Elkhorn project area is defined by the Cache la Poudre River and Highway 14 to the south, the Manhattan Road (CR 69) to the east, the Deadman Road to
More informationDecision Memo Tongass National Forest. Wrangell Ranger District. Pre-Commercial Thinning CE 2010
Decision Memo Tongass National Forest Pre-Commercial Thinning CE 2010 Decision It is my decision to authorize pre-commercial thinning (PCT) on approximately 7,500 acres of overstocked young-growth forest
More information3.1 Forest Vegetation and Wildlife Habitat
3.1 Forest Vegetation Echo Trail Area Forest Management Project Forest vegetation and wildlife habitat analyses are based on data contained in a Region 9 program referred to as CDS (Combined Data System).
More informationHuron-Manistee National Forests Mio Ranger District 107 McKinley Road Mio, MI 48647
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Huron-Manistee National Forests Mio Ranger District 107 McKinley Road Mio, MI 48647 989-826-3252 (Voice) 989-826-6073 (Fax) Dial 711 for relay service
More informationDECISION MEMO Divide Creek Barrier Enhancement
Page 1 of 7 Background DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Butte Ranger District Silver Bow County, Montana T. 2 N., R. 9 W., Section 32 The North Fork of Divide Creek is approximately 4 miles west of the
More informationJUNE 20, Collaborative Initiatives: Restoring watersheds and large landscapes across boundaries through State and Federal partnerships
TESTIMONY of LESLIE WELDON DEPUTY CHIEF, NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE BEFORE THE SENATE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES SUBCOMMITTEE ON PUBLIC
More informationApplying Ecosystem Services to Collaborative Forest Management Elk River Public Meeting
Applying Ecosystem Services to Collaborative Forest Management Elk River Public Meeting Nikola Smith Ecologist and Ecosystem Services Specialist U.S. Forest Service Port Orford City Hall February 2, 2017
More informationTelegraph Forest Management Project
Telegraph Forest Management Project Black Hills National Forest Northern Hills Ranger District Lawrence and Pennington Counties, South Dakota Proposed Action and Request for Comments March 2008 Table of
More informationSustainable Non-Agriculture Land Management
Forest, Wetlands and Habitat Verification Checklist A boxed risk level indicates the level required for environmental assurance verification. Bold black print indicates a violation of state or federal
More informationDraft Decision Notice Maroon Bells - Snowmass Wilderness Overnight Visitor Use Management Plan
Draft Decision Notice Maroon Bells - Snowmass Wilderness Overnight Visitor Use Management Plan USDA Forest Service Aspen-Sopris Ranger District, White River National Forest Gunnison Ranger District, Grand
More informationNEW Vision 2020 CFLRP Work Plan Template 2012
Responses to the prompts on this work plan should be typed directly into this template 1. Describe the manner in which the proposal will be implemented to achieve ecological and community economic benefit,
More informationChapter 1. Purpose and Need for Action
Final Environmental Impact Statement Plumas National Forest Chapter 1. Purpose and Need for Action Document Structure The Forest Service has prepared this Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) in
More informationOutlook Landscape Diversity Project
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Outlook Landscape Diversity Project Environmental Assessment Middle Fork Ranger District, Willamette National Forest, Lane County, Oregon December
More informationNorth Pioneer Fire Salvage and Reforestation Project
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service North Pioneer Fire Salvage and Reforestation Project Environmental Assessment Lowman Ranger District, Boise National Forest, Boise County, Idaho April
More informationDECISION NOTICE FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT (FONSI)
DECISION NOTICE AND FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT (FONSI) FOR CASA LOMA RECREATION RESIDENCE PERMIT RENEWAL U.S. FOREST SERVICE CIBOLA NATIONAL FOREST SANDIA RANGER DISTRICT BERNALILLO COUNTY, NEW MEXICO
More informationBirch Project Scoping Report August 2010 Kawishiwi Ranger District, Superior National Forest
Scoping Report August 2010 Kawishiwi Ranger District, Superior National Forest I. Introduction The Kawishiwi Ranger District of the Superior National Forest is proposing management activities within the
More informationRennic Stark Visual Quality Report March 31, 2011 (edited January 9, 2012) /s/ Norma E. Staaf, Forest Landscape Architect
Rennic Stark Visual Quality Report March 31, 2011 (edited January 9, 2012) /s/ Norma E. Staaf, Forest Landscape Architect 1 Table of Contents AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT... 3 Forest Plan Direction and Regulatory
More informationEnvironmental Information Worksheet
Environmental Information Worksheet Water System Owner (Attach additional sheets if necessary) Needs and Alternatives Provide a brief narrative that describes: Current drinking water system needs. Project
More informationScenery Report Salmon Reforestation Project
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service May 12, 2014 Scenery Report Salmon/Scott River Ranger District, Klamath National Forest Siskiyou County, California For Information Contact: Bob Talley
More informationAppendix G: Alternative Sent by the Karuk Tribe
Draft Environmental Impact Statement Westside Fire Recovery Project Appendix G: Alternative Sent by the Karuk Tribe 440 Westside Fire Recovery Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement 441 Draft Environmental
More informationNew Mexico Forest Restoration Principles
New Mexico Forest Restoration Principles Preamble These principles were collaboratively developed by a team of dedicated professionals representing industry, conservation organizations, land management
More informationKatahdin Forest Management 2016 SFI Summary Audit Report
Katahdin Forest Management 2016 SFI Summary Audit Report Introduction The SFI Program of Katahdin Forest Management of Millinocket, Maine has demonstrated continued conformance with the SFI 2015-2019 Standard
More informationNORTH FORK MILL CREEK REVISED
Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact NORTH FORK MILL CREEK REVISED USDA Forest Service Hood River and Wasco Counties, Oregon T1S, R11E, Sections 4-9; Willamette Meridian DECISION AND REASONS
More informationMechanical Site Preparation
Mechanical Site Preparation 1 Mechanical Site Preparation Introduction...3 CONTENTS The Benefits of Guidelines...3 Considerations...5 Design Outcomes To Maintain Soil Productivity...6 Planning...7 Planning
More informationDear Interested Party,
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Medicine Bow Routt National Forests and Thunder Basin National Grassland Parks Ranger District 100 Main Street, PO Box 158 Walden, CO 80480-0158 970-723-2700
More informationSalmon-Challis National Forest Borah Peak Recommended Wilderness Area USFS Region 4 - Idaho
Salmon-Challis National Forest Borah Peak Recommended Wilderness Area USFS Region 4 - Idaho The Salmon-Challis National Forest recently designated 109 miles of new motorized routes in Inventoried Roadless
More informationInvasive Dandelion Removal in the Alpine Zone. Decision Memo. White Mountain National Forest, NH and ME
United States Department of Agriculture Invasive Dandelion Removal in the Alpine Zone White Mountain National Forest, NH and ME Decision Memo For Information Contact: Dan Sperduto Supervisor s Office 71
More informationForsythe II Project. September 2015
Forsythe II Project September 2015 The Boulder Ranger District (BRD) of the Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests is proposing vegetation treatments on 3,840 acres of National Forest System (NFS) lands
More informationDraft Record of Decision
Final Environmental Impact Statement USDA Forest Service Medicine Bow Routt National Forests Thunder Basin NG Yampa Ranger District Grand and Routt Counties, Colorado Introduction... 1 Background... 2
More informationEnvironmental Assessment
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service November 2008 Environmental Assessment Sisters Area Fuels Reduction (SAFR) Project Sisters Ranger District, Deschutes National Forest Deschutes County,
More informationAppendix A Silvicultural Prescription Matrix Spruce Beetle Epidemic and Aspen Decline Management Response
Appendix A Silvicultural Prescription Matrix Spruce Beetle Epidemic and Aspen Decline Management Response Treatment objectives within the matrix are a combination of objectives for silvicultural, fuels,
More informationDecision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service June 2011 Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact Vail Ski Area Forest Health Project Holy Cross Ranger District, White River National
More informationCOUNTY, OREGON T20 S R14E SECTIONS 25 AND 36; T20S R15E SECTIONS 19-34; AND T21S R15E SECTIONS 3-9 AND
PINE MOUNTAIN SAGE GROUSE HABITAT RESTORATION PROJECT Bend/ Fort Rock Ranger District Deschutes National Forest DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON T20 S R14E SECTIONS 25 AND 36; T20S R15E SECTIONS 19-34; AND T21S
More informationCATEGORICAL EXCLUSION REVIEW - NEPA COMPLIANCE RECORD
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT SALEM DISTRICT OFFICE Marys Peak Resource Area Lincoln County, Oregon CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION REVIEW - NEPA COMPLIANCE RECORD Project: Miami Corporation
More informationHat Creek Planning Unit. Fish, Plant, and Wildlife Habitat. LCP Volume II Supporting Analysis for Recommendations
Hat Creek Planning Unit Fish, Plant, and Wildlife Habitat Conduct surveys of the planning unit to identify biological resources and enable their protection. Though a partial survey of botanical resources
More informationManchester Ranger District. Apple Tree Release and Maintenance Project
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service February 2009 Manchester Ranger District Apple Tree Release and Maintenance Project Decision Memo USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region Green Mountain
More informationDECISION MEMO CATARACT CREEK-MOUNTAIN MEADOW PLAN OF OPERATIONS
Page 1 of 8 DECISION MEMO CATARACT CREEK-MOUNTAIN MEADOW PLAN OF OPERATIONS USDA Forest Service Madison Ranger District Madison County, Montana T2S, R3W, sections 16 & 21 Background Moen Excavation of
More informationIdaho Panhandle National Forests Watershed Specialist Review. Extraordinary Circumstances Review: Floodplains, Wetlands, Municipal Watersheds
Idaho Panhandle National Forests Watershed Specialist Review Project: Idaho Buckhorn Restoration Burn Date: June 10, 2013 Extraordinary Circumstances Review: Floodplains, Wetlands, Municipal Watersheds
More informationNatural Resource Management of Pipeline Infrastructure
Natural Resource Management of Pipeline Infrastructure Dan Devlin Director, Bureau of Forestry www.dcnr.state.pa.us Connection between Pipelines & DCNR Commonwealth s forests Fragmentation or reduction
More informationHandout for Collaborative Process Participants
Jasper Mountain Workshop Handout for Collaborative Process Participants September 19-20, 2014 Priest River, ID JASPER MOUNTAIN PROJECT WEBPAGE http://www.fs.usda.gov/projects/ipnf/landmanagement/projects
More informationDECISION NOTICE AND FINDING OF No SIGNIFICANT IMPACT HOPKINS FIRE SALVAGE
DECISION NOTICE AND FINDING OF No SIGNIFICANT IMPACT HOPKINS FIRE SALVAGE DECISION U.S. FOREST SERVICE OCALA NATIONAL FOREST SEMINOLE RANGER DISTRICT MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA Based upon my review of the
More informationTimber Sale Contract/Purpose and Need/Range of Alternatives
North Fork Mill Creek Revised Project Environmental Assessment (EA) Objection Statements and Responses Hood River and Barlow Ranger Districts Mt. Hood National Forest December 2014 Objectors Bark and Oregon
More informationMODULE 5: ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS
MODULE 5: ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS Purpose This module describes measures for ecological restoration and rehabilitation efforts. The module is primarily focused on fire hazard reduction and its ecological effects.
More informationAPPENDIX A. NEPA Assessment Checklist
APPENDI A NEPA Assessment Checklist NEPA CHECKLIST DATE: January 12, 2009 PREPARER: Frederick Wells, RLA PIN and Project Title: Surplus Property Request Wilder Balter Partners Marketplace Town of Newburgh,
More informationSupervisor s Office 5162 Valleypointe Parkway Roanoke, VA
Supervisor s Office 5162 Valleypointe Parkway Roanoke, VA 24019 540-265-5100 www.fs.fed.us/r8/gwj James River Ranger District Glenwood-Pedlar Ranger District 810A East Madison Avenue 27 Ranger Lane Covington,
More informationCold Springs Project
Cold Springs Project Scenery Management Resource Report Prepared by: Nicole R. Hill Landscape Architect for: Northern Hills Ranger District Black Hills National Forest July 26, 2011 Scenery Management
More informationThorn Fire Salvage Recovery Project Record of Decision
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service March 2008 Thorn Fire Salvage Recovery Project Record of Decision And Finding of Non-Significant Forest Plan Amendment #63 Malheur National Forest,
More informationDECISION MEMO Besson Special Use Permit Ottawa National Forest
I DECISION DECISION MEMO Besson Special Use Permit Ottawa National Forest T49N R37W Section 19, 30 Houghton County; T49N R38W Sections 24,25 Ontonagon County Forest Roads 1157, 1157-G, and spur road in
More informationChapter 3 Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences
Sterling Highway MP 45 60 Draft SEIS and Draft Section 4(f) Evaluation Chapter 3 Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences Prepared for: Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities
More informationHazard Reduction. Timber Sale Project
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region D-Bug Hazard Reduction Timber Sale Project Umpqua National Forest Diamond Lake Ranger District April 2011 The U.S. Department
More informationDraft Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact (DN/FONSI)
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service January 2016 Draft Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact (DN/FONSI) Rock Creek Vegetation and Fuels Healthy Forest Restoration Act
More informationFor the property described as: Property Owner: Name. Phone Number. Mailing Address. City. Report Year:
Timber Management Plan For the property described as: Property Owner: Name Phone Number Mailing Address City State Zip Report Year: (This template is provided to assist Cherokee County land owners who
More informationKootenai Valley Resource Initiative. Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Proposal Lower Kootenai River Watershed
Kootenai Valley Resource Initiative Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Proposal Lower Kootenai River Watershed February 7, 2011 Executive Summary Dominant forest type(s): The dominant forest types
More information