DECISION MEMO. Steve Simpson and Associates, Inc. Simpson #114 & #116 Gas Well Project Compartment 106
|
|
- Rudolph Tyler
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 DECISION MEMO Steve Simpson and Associates, Inc. Simpson #114 & #116 Gas Well Project Compartment 106 USDA FOREST SERVICE REGION 8 NATIONAL FORESTS AND GRASSLANDS IN TEXAS SABINE NATIONAL FOREST ANGELINA/SABINE RANGER DISTRICT Tract S-2K-II, William Arledge Survey A-259 Sabine County, Texas DECISION I have decided to authorize the Surface Use Plan of Operations (SUPO) for Steve Simpson and Associates, Inc. to conduct surface operations associated with accessing, drilling, testing, completing, and producing the Simpson Well #116 and Simpson Unit Well #114 gas wells. This includes installation and construction of the associated access road and pipeline right-of-ways (ROW). The SUPO is a binding part of the Application for Permit to Drill authorized by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). The location for the Simpson #116 and #114 gas wells and access road and pipeline ROWs is within administrative Compartment 106 on the Sabine National Forest, Sabine County, approximately 8 miles southeast of Hemphill, Texas. The Simpson #116 well location will be located on the east side of National Forest System Road (NFSR) 179 approximately 0.3 mile north of the Sabine County CCC road intersection. An access road 57 feet in length and 32 feet in width will connect the well pad to NFSR 179. The Simpson #114 well location is located adjacent to an existing power line ROW near the end of NFSR 179. An access road 882 feet in length and 32 feet in width would connect the well pad to NFSR 179. If the wells are successful, a pipeline will be installed for each well. The pipeline for the #116 well will be 2,100 feet in length and 10 feet in width and travel north and east adjacent to the NFSR 179 ROW to a connection with an existing pipeline that lies within the power line ROW. The pipeline for the #114 well will be 110 feet in length and 10 feet in width and travel west adjacent to the access road ROW and tie into an existing pipeline within the power line ROW. A Special Use Permit will be issued for the pipelines once they are installed. The total of the two projects covers an area of about 2.1 acres (well pads 1 acre, access roads 0.7 acre, and pipeline 0.4 acres) and will require removal of merchantable timber. Operations would occur on lease TXNM and would include the following performed by the Operator: Clearing and leveling of two 0.5 acre sites for the drill pads. Constructing approximately 57 feet of road to access the Simpson #116 well pad Constructing approximately 882 feet of road to access the Simpson #114 well pad. Moving in and rigging up drilling equipment. Steve Simpson and Associates Inc Simpson #114 & #116 Gas Well Project Page 1 of 5
2 Conducting drilling operations for approximately 3 weeks until the wells are drilled to the target horizon. Testing each well for production capability. Installing approximately 2210 feet of pipeline adjacent to NFSR 179 and access road ROWs (2,100 feet for Simpson #116 and 110 feet for Simpson #114). Issuing a Special Use Permit to authorize the pipeline after installation. Installation of production facilities including tank battery and compressor. Plugging of wells and rehabilitation of all disturbed areas if and when well is not producible. Reduction of well pad size to accommodate production and re-vegetation of reduced area. If the well proves to be potentially capable of production, Steve Simpson and Associates, Inc. would cement the casing in the well and prepare it for additional testing under applicable BLM and State requirements. Depending on results of production testing, production equipment could be installed on the well site or the well could be plugged and the site reclaimed. Exposed soil will be seeded, fertilized, and mulched (if needed) upon completion of approved work. To prevent the introduction and spread of Non Native Invasive Plant Species (NNIPS) to the project area during construction and rehabilitation efforts, only an agency approved seeding mixture will be used, straw or hay for mulching will be certified weed free and there will be follow up monitoring of the revegetation work for potential NNIPS. The monitoring and the follow up treatment for NNIPS will be completed in accordance to the 1996 Revised Land and Resource Management Plan for the National Forests and Grasslands in Texas (the Plan) and the 2008 Non Native Invasive Plant Species (NNIPS) Environmental Assessment (EA) for the National Forests and Grasslands in Texas. This project is categorically excluded from documentation in an environmental assessment (EA) or an environmental impact statement (EIS) for the following reasons (36 CFR (a)): 1) Past projects, which are similar to the proposed action, have had no significant effects, individually or cumulatively, and no extraordinary circumstances exist in this proposal that might cause the action to have significant effects upon the human environment. 2) This proposal is consistent with and similar to the categories of action which may be excluded from documentation in an EIS or an EA as described in (36 CFR (e)(17)). No floodplains, wetlands, municipal watersheds, congressionally designated areas, inventoried or potential roadless areas, or research projects are involved in the proposed project area (36 CFR (b)). I have considered the effect of this project on climate change, as well as the effect of climate change on this project. Any resulting greenhouse gas emission would not be measurable on a global scale. As indicated by the project specific biological evaluation (BE # ), the proposed action has a determination of no effects on any federally listed or proposed threatened and endangered species. As for Regional Forester s Sensitive Species, the proposed action has a determination of may impact individuals, but not likely to cause a trend toward federal listing, or loss of viability on Sabine fencing crayfish and no impacts on any other Region 8 sensitive species. This Biological Evaluation is based upon the best available science, including Steve Simpson and Associates Inc Simpson #114 & #116 Gas Well Project Page 2 of 5
3 peer-reviewed scientific literature, state and federal agency reports and management input, discussions with scientists and other professionals, and ground-based observations. As indicated in the Heritage Resources Survey project titled A Cultural Resource Survey of Steve Simpson and Associates Simpson well #114 and Simpson well # Wells, Access Road, and Pipeline Sabine County Texas, the proposed action will have no effect on heritage resources (sites) that are eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) or on any other site that has not been evaluated for NRHP eligibility. The State Historical Preservation Officer (SHPO) concurred with this report on July 26, In accordance with the requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (NHPA), Executive Order 13007, the American Indian Religious Freedom Act (AIRFA), and others, consultation with the Caddo Nation of Oklahoma and The Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas has been conducted and has identified no concerns. Visual resources will be minimally impacted. The effects on water quality will range from minimal to no effect during the life of this project. In relation to air quality, the proposed actions will not cause the National Ambient Air Quality Standards or Class II Areas to be violated. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT A scoping letter was mailed to the current list of potentially interested or affected parties on October 12, This project was originally denoted as Steve Simpson and Associates Inc Simpson #114 & #116 Gas Well Project on the Schedule of Proposed Actions. Four responses were received during the scoping period. The first response was from an archeologist requesting that archeological surveys be conducted for all proposed activities. The Forest Service complies with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. This area was ground surveyed, researched, and a report was submitted to the State Historical Preservation Officer for concurrence and submitted to the Tribal contacts for their input before a decision on this project was made. The second and third responses were from Tribal contacts that had no objection to the project. The fourth response was from Stine Timber Management, Inc. with the following concerns: 1. Transportation/Traffic Safety. a. Comment: Construct to Level C standard those roads classified as Level B and temporary that will serve the transportation needs of the planned pad site locations Response: Currently, approximately 0.65 miles of National Forest System Road (NFSR) 179 which accesses the proposed well pads is a level C road which means it has a gravel surface and is maintained for passenger cars. The road is open continuously. The remaining 1.05 miles of this road has a natural surface and is open intermittently. It is not maintained for passenger cars and is not open to the public. The US Forest Service maintains both categories of NFSR 179. The oil and gas company proposing these wells will meet with the district engineer/road technician and develop a road permit requiring the company to maintain the road for the life of the well to support the weight and type of use that is proposed on the road. This will be to Forest Service standards and will be attached to the special use permit. Steve Simpson and Associates Inc Simpson #114 & #116 Gas Well Project Page 3 of 5
4 b. Comment: Sign and enforce traffic safety requirements. Response: Any person or entity operating on National Forest System land is subject to the federal, state, and county traffic rules in place for that area, including seed limits. These rules are enforced by federal, state and county law enforcement agents. The FS is continuously working on road signage. 2. Soil and Water a. Comment: Protect streams adjacent to pad sites from drilling residue spills. Response: Before the pad is built, the FS meets with the well owner and they work together to lay out the well pad avoiding streamside protection zones and 100-year floodplains as defined in the Amended National Forests and Grasslands in Texas Forest Plan (the Plan). A trench is built around the drilling rig and associated equipment. Any runoff from the rig or equipment including spill and rainwater is collected in the lined trench and funneled into a holding tank and hauled off to an approved disposal site. The well pad is designed to have a gentle slope so that rainwater will run off the site. Silt fences, hale bales, or other material is placed where the runoff occurs to capture any silt. On all these operations, operators are required to follow Forest Service standards and guidelines. b. Comment: Seed with native wildlife mix and fertilize pipeline locations. Response: Exposed soil is fertilized and seeded with native or non persistent forbes and grasses. c. Comment: Construct waterbar placement as determined by percent slope stands in the Forest Plan d. Comment: Protect any spring locations with buffer widths as specified in the Forest Plan. Response to c and d: These requirements are part of the special use permit. e. Comment: Prohibit land farming. Response: Land farming has not been requested and is not part of the permit. f. Comment: Use the Schlumberger Green slurry system or equivalent for hydraulic fracturing in order to protect all waters resource from migration and residual effects of toxic hydraulic fluids. Response: The Forest Service can suggest that oil and gas operators use or consider using a certain system for hydraulic fracturing. However, The Forest Service does not have jurisdiction of the subsurface drilling program, only the Texas Railroad Commission or the Bureau of Land Management can set requirements on fracturing programs. 3. Timber a. Comment: Determine damage value of future growth of forested acres lost to the construction of pad sites, pipelines, and access roads and apply to the Special Use Permit and Conditions of Approval. b. Comment: Sell timber for site clearings at rates incorporating the highest plus market adjustment or the lowest negative adjustment by product/species within the prior 6 month period. Response to a and b: Currently the Forest Service sells the wood at the current market value. Steve Simpson and Associates Inc Simpson #114 & #116 Gas Well Project Page 4 of 5
5 The public and internal scoping did not lead to any information that would result in a change of the project Decision. Documentation of public involvement is on file at the District Office on State Highway 21 just east of Milam, Texas. FINDING REQUIRED BY OTHER LAWS This project is consistent with the management direction, including standards and guidelines, in the Plan as amended. IMPLEMENTATION Implementation of this decision may begin on or after the date of the signature of the Deciding Official below. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW OR APPEAL OPPORTUNITIES This action is not subject to appeal pursuant to 36 CFR (f). For further information on this decision contact, Lynn Jackson at (409) or Holly Erimias, 2221 N. Raguet, Lufkin, Texas 75904, (936) Signature: /s/ Lynn Jackson LYNN JACKSON Angelina/Sabine District Ranger Sabine National Forest 5050 Highway 21 East Hemphill, TX /3/2011 Date The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C or call (800) (voice) or 202) (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Steve Simpson and Associates Inc Simpson #114 & #116 Gas Well Project Page 5 of 5
PROJECT INFORMATION Manchester Ranger District Apple Tree Release and Maintenance Project
PROJECT INFORMATION Manchester Ranger District Apple Tree Release and Maintenance Project The USDA Forest Service is proposing to release and prune living apple trees in the Manchester Ranger District,
More informationLocally Led Conservation & The Local Work Group. Mark Habiger NRCS
Locally Led Conservation & The Local Work Group Mark Habiger NRCS 1 What Is Locally Led Conservation? Community Stakeholders 1. Assessing their natural resource conservation needs 2. Setting community
More informationDecision Memo Tongass National Forest. Wrangell Ranger District. Pre-Commercial Thinning CE 2010
Decision Memo Tongass National Forest Pre-Commercial Thinning CE 2010 Decision It is my decision to authorize pre-commercial thinning (PCT) on approximately 7,500 acres of overstocked young-growth forest
More informationDecision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact
Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact Gold Lake Bog Research Natural Area Boundary Adjustment and Nonsignificant Forest Plan Amendment #53 USDA Forest Service Middle Fork Ranger District,
More informationDECISION NOTICE FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT (FONSI)
DECISION NOTICE AND FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT (FONSI) FOR CASA LOMA RECREATION RESIDENCE PERMIT RENEWAL U.S. FOREST SERVICE CIBOLA NATIONAL FOREST SANDIA RANGER DISTRICT BERNALILLO COUNTY, NEW MEXICO
More informationDECISION MEMO. Non-Commercial Thinning on the Ocala National Forest (PALS project # 39238)
Decision DECISION MEMO Non-Commercial Thinning on the Ocala National Forest (PALS project # 39238) USDA Forest Service Ocala National Forest Lake, Marion, and Putnam County, Florida Based on the analysis
More informationDECISION MEMO Divide Creek Barrier Enhancement
Page 1 of 7 Background DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Butte Ranger District Silver Bow County, Montana T. 2 N., R. 9 W., Section 32 The North Fork of Divide Creek is approximately 4 miles west of the
More informationProposed Action: In response to resource specialist concerns raised during internal scoping, the following restrictions will apply:
DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Inyan Kara Riders Motorcycle Enduro Event Rocky Mountain Region Thunder Basin National Grassland Medicine Bow-Routt National Forests Douglas Ranger District April 2011
More informationPRELIMINARY DECISION MEMO
PRELIMINARY DECISION MEMO Snoqualmie Christmas Tree Project USDA Forest Service Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest Snoqualmie Ranger District King County, Washington Proposed Action, Purpose and Need
More informationDECISION NOTICE AND FINDING OF No SIGNIFICANT IMPACT HOPKINS FIRE SALVAGE
DECISION NOTICE AND FINDING OF No SIGNIFICANT IMPACT HOPKINS FIRE SALVAGE DECISION U.S. FOREST SERVICE OCALA NATIONAL FOREST SEMINOLE RANGER DISTRICT MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA Based upon my review of the
More informationSupervisor s Office 5162 Valleypointe Parkway Roanoke, VA
Supervisor s Office 5162 Valleypointe Parkway Roanoke, VA 24019 540-265-5100 www.fs.fed.us/r8/gwj James River Ranger District Glenwood-Pedlar Ranger District 810A East Madison Avenue 27 Ranger Lane Covington,
More informationProposed Action for Motorized Travel Management on the North Kaibab Ranger District
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Proposed Action for Motorized Travel Management on the North Kaibab Ranger District Kaibab National Forest March 2010 The U.S. Department of Agriculture
More informationInvasive Dandelion Removal in the Alpine Zone. Decision Memo. White Mountain National Forest, NH and ME
United States Department of Agriculture Invasive Dandelion Removal in the Alpine Zone White Mountain National Forest, NH and ME Decision Memo For Information Contact: Dan Sperduto Supervisor s Office 71
More informationHuron-Manistee National Forests Mio Ranger District 107 McKinley Road Mio, MI 48647
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Huron-Manistee National Forests Mio Ranger District 107 McKinley Road Mio, MI 48647 989-826-3252 (Voice) 989-826-6073 (Fax) Dial 711 for relay service
More informationCHEAT MOUNTAIN WILDLIFE HABITAT ENHANCEMENT
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Monongahela National Forest Greenbrier Ranger District Box 67 Bartow, WV 24920 304-456-3335 CHEAT MOUNTAIN WILDLIFE HABITAT ENHANCEMENT USDA Forest
More informationPublic Rock Collection
Public Rock Collection Eagle-Holy Cross Ranger District, White River national Forest Eagle County, Colorado T7S, R80W, Section 18 & T6S, R84W, Section 16 Comments Welcome The Eagle-Holy Cross Ranger District
More informationDECISION MEMO Besson Special Use Permit Ottawa National Forest
I DECISION DECISION MEMO Besson Special Use Permit Ottawa National Forest T49N R37W Section 19, 30 Houghton County; T49N R38W Sections 24,25 Ontonagon County Forest Roads 1157, 1157-G, and spur road in
More informationCOUNTY, OREGON T20 S R14E SECTIONS 25 AND 36; T20S R15E SECTIONS 19-34; AND T21S R15E SECTIONS 3-9 AND
PINE MOUNTAIN SAGE GROUSE HABITAT RESTORATION PROJECT Bend/ Fort Rock Ranger District Deschutes National Forest DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON T20 S R14E SECTIONS 25 AND 36; T20S R15E SECTIONS 19-34; AND T21S
More informationDECISION MEMO CATARACT CREEK-MOUNTAIN MEADOW PLAN OF OPERATIONS
Page 1 of 8 DECISION MEMO CATARACT CREEK-MOUNTAIN MEADOW PLAN OF OPERATIONS USDA Forest Service Madison Ranger District Madison County, Montana T2S, R3W, sections 16 & 21 Background Moen Excavation of
More informationPreliminary Decision Memo 2015 Recreation Residence Projects Odell Lake
2015 Recreation Residence Projects Odell Lake USDA Forest Service Crescent Ranger District, Deschutes National Forest Klamath County, Oregon Background The Crescent Ranger District maintains 66 recreation
More informationThe project will be conducted in partnership with the Nez Perce Tribe.
DECISION MEMO Tributary to Brushy Fork Culvert Replacements Private Land USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Powell Ranger District Nez Perce Clearwater National Forests Idaho County, Idaho I. Decision
More informationFARM BILL 2002 Colorado Conservation Provisions
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service FARM BILL 2002 Colorado Conservation Provisions Conserving Natural Resources on Colorado s Privately Owned Farmland Farm Bill
More informationDECISION MEMO. West Fork Blacktail Deer Creek Hardened Crossing
Page 1 of 6 Background DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Madison Ranger District Madison County T12S, R4W, Section 30 The project is in the Gravelly Landscape, Snowcrest Recommended Wilderness Management
More informationDecision Memo. National Ecological Observatory Network Long Term Research Project
National Ecological Observatory Network Long Term Research Project USDA, Forest Service National Forests in Alabama Talladega National Forest Oakmulgee District Bibb and Hale County, Alabama Summary I
More informationManchester Ranger District. Apple Tree Release and Maintenance Project
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service February 2009 Manchester Ranger District Apple Tree Release and Maintenance Project Decision Memo USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region Green Mountain
More informationSeasonal High Tunnels. Conservation Benefits Interim Practice Standard Financial Assistance Guidance
Seasonal High Tunnels Conservation Benefits Interim Practice Standard Financial Assistance Guidance Financial Assistance Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) Today s Focus Conservation Benefits
More informationNRCS Conservation Programs Update
NRCS Conservation Programs Update Opportunities for Fruit and Vegetable Growers Chad Cochrane Resource Conservationist USDA-NRCS Fruit and Vegetable Farms Fruit and Vegetable Farms Focus on Resource Concerns
More informationDust Bowl and USDA - NRCS. Kim Wright USDA-NRCS Program Liaison Bryan, Texas
Dust Bowl and USDA - NRCS Kim Wright USDA-NRCS Program Liaison Bryan, Texas Who is the NRCS? The Natural Resources Conservation Service is a Federal agency that works in partnership with the American people
More informationSugarbush Valley House Lift Replacement Project
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Eastern Region Sugarbush Valley House Lift Replacement Project Decision Memo March 2014 Green Mountain National Forest Rochester Ranger District Town
More informationPROPOSED ACTION Cooperative Horse Removal with Fort McDermitt Paiute-Shoshone Tribe
PROPOSED ACTION Cooperative Horse Removal with Fort McDermitt Paiute-Shoshone Tribe Proposed Action The Santa Rosa Ranger District of the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest is proposing to remove all unauthorized
More informationDECISION MEMO. USDA Forest Service. Butte District Silver Bow County T4N, R8W, Section 36
Page 1 of 5 Background DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Butte District Silver Bow County T4N, R8W, Section 36 Northwestern Energy operates utility systems and facilities on federal lands under a Master
More informationCorn Objective Yield Survey Data,
Washington, D.C. Corn Objective Yield Survey Data, 1992-2006 Released May 18, 2007, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS),, U.S. Department of Agriculture. For information on call Ty Kalaus
More informationDECISION MEMO IDAHO DREAM PLAN OF OPERATIONS
Page 1 of 7 BACKGROUND DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Dillon Ranger District Beaverhead County The project area is included in the Ermont Mining District in T5S R11W Section 36 and T6S R11W Section
More informationFINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT OWL CREEK GRAVEL PIT EXPANSION U.S. FOREST SERVICE
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT OWL CREEK GRAVEL PIT EXPANSION U.S. FOREST SERVICE OURAY RANGER DISTRICT OURAY COUNTY, COLORADO BACKGROUND The Owl Creek Gravel Pit, also known as the Spruce Ridge Pit,
More informationEfficiency and Conservation in Agricultural Water Use
Efficiency and Conservation in Agricultural Water Use Scott D. Edwards Assistant State Conservationist for Programs, June 10, 2017 As the Nation s largest water user, agriculture accounts for about 80
More informationScoping Document. Precious Minerals Mining and Refining Corporation East Walker Clay Mine Expansion Project Lyon County, Nevada
Scoping Document Precious Minerals Mining and Refining Corporation East Walker Clay Mine Expansion Project Lyon County, Nevada United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service USDA Forest Service
More informationNRCS Standards and Criteria for Dead Animal Composting
Helping People Help the Land NRCS Standards and Criteria for Dead Animal Composting Matthew Robert, PE Agricultural Engineer Champaign, Illinois www.il.nrcs.usda.gov Matthew.Robert@il.usda.gov Following
More informationDECISION MEMO. Missoula Electric Cooperative Point 118. MEC - Buried Electric Powerline (Along West Fork Butte Access Road #37 to Point 118)
DECISION MEMO Missoula Electric Cooperative Point 118 MEC - Buried Electric Powerline (Along West Fork Butte Access Road #37 to Point 118) USDA Forest Service - Lolo National Forest Missoula Ranger District
More informationDear Interested Party,
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Medicine Bow Routt National Forests and Thunder Basin National Grassland Parks Ranger District 100 Main Street, PO Box 158 Walden, CO 80480-0158 970-723-2700
More informationProposed New Type and Diameter (ft)* T30N, R6E, Sec. 5, NW¼ NW¼- South Fork Clear Creek. Diameter (ft)
DECISION MEMO CLEAR CREEK CULVERTS REPLACEMENTS USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Moose Creek Ranger District, Nez Perce National Forest Idaho County, Idaho I. Decision I have decided to authorize replacement
More informationNational Best Management Practices Monitoring Summary Report
United States Department of Agriculture National Best Management Practices Monitoring Summary Report Fiscal Year 2013 Forest Service FS-1042 January 2015 United States Department of Agriculture Forest
More informationMississippi River Basin Healthy Watershed Initiative
Mississippi River Basin Healthy Watershed Initiative A Progress Report for Arkansas Presented by: Mike Sullivan, State Conservationist FY 2010 12 States 41 Focus Areas FY 2011 Added two focus areas: SD/MS
More informationWest Branch LeClerc Creek Watershed Restoration Project Environmental Assessment
West Branch LeClerc Creek Watershed Restoration Project Environmental Assessment Decision Notice, Finding of No Significant Impact, and Response to Public Comments April 2015 USDA Forest Service Colville
More informationBUDGET BASICS TRAINING TOPIC: DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS. Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP)
BUDGET BASICS TRAINING TOPIC: DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) Acknowledgment Statement 2 You understand and acknowledge that: the training you are about to take does
More informationRECORD OF DECISION BATTLE PARK C&H ALLOTMENTS FOR LIVESTOCK GRAZING ON THE AND MISTY MOON S&G. United States Department of Agriculture.
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Rocky Mountain Region Bighorn National Forest RECORD OF DECISION FOR LIVESTOCK GRAZING ON THE BATTLE PARK C&H AND MISTY MOON S&G ALLOTMENTS September
More informationTelegraph Forest Management Project
Telegraph Forest Management Project Black Hills National Forest Northern Hills Ranger District Lawrence and Pennington Counties, South Dakota Proposed Action and Request for Comments March 2008 Table of
More informationBlanche Park Reservoir Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact
Blanche Park Reservoir Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact U.S. Forest Service Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests Delta County, Colorado INTRODUCTION The Grand Mesa
More information3-13 Other Required Findings and Regulatory Compliance
Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences 3-13 Other Required Findings and Regulatory Compliance 3-13.1 Short-term Uses and Long-term Productivity NEPA requires consideration of the relationship
More informationFor the property described as: Property Owner: Name. Phone Number. Mailing Address. City. Report Year:
Timber Management Plan For the property described as: Property Owner: Name Phone Number Mailing Address City State Zip Report Year: (This template is provided to assist Cherokee County land owners who
More informationNRCS Progress in the Great Lakes Basin (Past, Present and Future)
NRCS Progress in the Great Lakes Basin (Past, Present and Future) 5 th National Conference for Ecosystem Restoration July 31, 2013 Mike Moorman Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Coordinator (Past) The
More informationEnvironmental Assessment for Road Diobsud Road Repairs
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region Environmental Assessment for Road Diobsud Road Repairs Contents Chapter 1 purpose of and need for action... 3 Introduction...
More informationYankee Hill Fuel Treatment Project Decision Notice & Finding of No Significant Impact
Yankee Hill Fuel Treatment Project Decision Notice & Finding of No Significant Impact USDA Forest Service Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests And Pawnee National Grassland Clear Creek Ranger District
More informationSmall Project Proposal
Combined Scoping and Notice and Comment Document Small Project Proposal USDA Forest Service Fishlake National Forest Beaver Ranger District Sevier County, Utah The purpose of this document is to inform
More informationEffects of All-Terrain Vehicles on Forested Lands and Grasslands
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service National Technology & Development Program Recreation Management 0823 1811 SDTDC December 2008 U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration
More informationEffect of Cattle Grazing, Seeded Grass, and an Herbicide on Ponderosa Pine Seedling Survival and Growth
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station http://www.psw.fs.fed.us/ Research Paper PSW-RP-242 Effect of Cattle Grazing, Seeded Grass, and an Herbicide on
More informationPuerto Rico - Various
United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service Puerto Rico Various Agricultural Statistics 2011 Summary April 2012 ISSN: 21548692 Summary Milk production decreased 1
More informationSAN LUIS VALLEY PUBLIC LANDS CENTER
Decision Notice And Finding of No Significant Impact Watershed and Fisheries Conservation Treatments SAN LUIS VALLEY PUBLIC LANDS CENTER USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Region Public Lands Center Rio
More informationOUTREACH NOTICE 2018 TEMPORARY POSITIONS BEAVERHEAD-DEERLODGE NATIONAL FOREST HOW TO APPLY: RECREATION POSITIONS BEING HIRED:
OUTREACH NOTICE 2018 TEMPORARY POSITIONS BEAVERHEAD-DEERLODGE NATIONAL FOREST The Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest will be filling multiple temporary (seasonal) positions for the upcoming 2018 field
More informationJ O I N T P U B L I C N O T I C E
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SAVANNAH DISTRICT 100 W. OGLETHORPE AVENUE SAVANNAH, GEORGIA 31401-3604 J O I N T P U B L I C N O T I C E CHARLESTON AND SAVANNAH DISTRICTS- US ARMY
More informationWater Talk Series
Kansas Water Talk Series - 2017 Joel A. Willhoft, NRCS Resource Conservationist 785.624.3127 joel.willhoft@ks.usda.gov NRCS Conservation Programs NRCS provides eligible producers financial assistance to
More informationDECISION MEMO. final BACKGROUND
DECISION MEMO Longstreet Exploration Project Plan of Operations #04-10-02 Star Gold Corporation Tonopah Ranger District, Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest Nye County, Nevada BACKGROUND Star Gold Corp. submitted
More informationUnited States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service
Jericho Winter, USDA NRCS Resource Soil Scientist Jeremy Baker, Rural Conservationist, East Multnomah SWCD Kim Galland, Multnomah Co. District Conservationist United States Department of Agriculture Natural
More informationCOST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS. Categorical Exclusions for Oil and Gas Exploration and Development Activities. USDA Forest Service
December 7, 2005 COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS Categorical Exclusions for Oil and Gas Exploration and Development Activities USDA Forest Service COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS Categorical Exclusions for Oil and Gas Exploration
More informationDraft Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact (DN/FONSI)
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service January 2016 Draft Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact (DN/FONSI) Rock Creek Vegetation and Fuels Healthy Forest Restoration Act
More informationPLAN CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
PLAN CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS What is a Categorical Exclusion? Categorical exclusions are an essential part of NEPA that provide a categorical determination, based on agency experience,
More informationDraft Record of Decision
Final Environmental Impact Statement USDA Forest Service Medicine Bow Routt National Forests Thunder Basin NG Yampa Ranger District Grand and Routt Counties, Colorado Introduction... 1 Background... 2
More informationConservation Practices. Conservation Choices. These five icons will show the benefits each practice offers... 6/4/2014
Conservation Choices Your guide to conservation and environmental farming practices. Conservation Choices These five icons will show the benefits each practice offers... The practice reduces soil erosion
More informationAttention Baled Hay Producers. Don t Transport Imported Fire Ants. United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
Attention Baled Hay Producers Don t Transport Imported Fire Ants United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Program Aid No. 1996 The Threat Imported fire ants (IFA)
More informationFacts on Direct-to-Consumer Food Marketing
United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Marketing Service May 2009 Facts on Direct-to-Consumer Food Marketing Incorporating Data from the 2007 Census of Agriculture Written by: Adam Diamond
More informationMANTI-LA SAL NATIONAL FOREST
MANTI-LA SAL NATIONAL FOREST FERRON RANGER DISTRICT CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION REVIEW FILE NUMBER: 2240 PROJECT TITLE: Olsen-McCadden Livestock Water Development PROJECT LEAD: Steven Cox ESTIMATED DATE FOR
More informationWORKFORCE CONNECTIONS, INC. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES
WORKFORCE CONNECTIONS, INC. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES Updated 10/31/16 Workforce Connections, Inc. employment applicants, employees, program applicants and program participants have the right to enter into
More informationHandling Routine Losses. TCEQ REGULATORY GUIDANCE Waste Permits Divison RG-326 August 2009
TCEQ REGULATORY GUIDANCE Waste Permits Divison RG-326 August 2009 Handling and Disposal of Carcasses from Poultry Operations On farm disposal of dead animals should always be carried out in a manner that
More informationAshland Tree Planting Project
DECISION MEMO Ashland Tree Planting Project Ashland Ranger District Custer National Forest USDA Forest Service Powder River and Rosebud Counties, Montana Purpose and Need for Proposing Action Forest cover
More informationI. DECISION A. Project Description B. Purpose
DECISION MEMO North Country Trail Bridge Project USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region, Ottawa National Forest Bergland and Ontonagon Districts Houghton and Ontonagon Counties, Michigan I. DECISION A. Project
More informationErosion and Sediment Control Plan for a Timber Harvesting Operation
3930-FM-WM0155 Rev. 7/2004 Erosion and Sediment Control Plan for a Timber Harvesting Operation 1. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Location Municipality B. Timber sale area = acres Date County C. Landowner Name
More informationRoad Cards Appendix 2
Appendix 2 Appendix 2 Introduction The following road cards are organized with new National Forest System (NFS) roads first, followed by reconstructed NFS roads second, and roads with bridge replacements
More informationANALYSIS OF MILK MOVEMENTS FROM DAIRY FARMS TO MILK PROCESSING PLANTS: MAY 2016 PACIFIC NORTHWEST ORDER. Staff Paper John Mykrantz.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Marketing Service 1930-220 th Street SE, Ste. 102 Dairy Programs Bothell, WA 98021 Phone: (425) 487-6009 FEDERAL MILK ORDERS 124 & 131 Fax: (425) 487-2775
More informationTRENDS IN DELAWARE S FORESTS
United States Department of Agriculture TRENDS IN DELAWARE S FORESTS Forest Service Northeastern Research Station NE-INF-150-02 Delaware Department of Agriculture Forest Service DELAWARE FORESTS Forests
More informationCattle on Feed. U.S. Cattle on Feed Up 4 Percent
Washington, D.C. Cattle on Feed Released December 9, 003, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS),, U.S. Department of Agriculture. For information on "" call Steve Anderson at (0) 70-40,
More informationEVOLUTION OF A MEETING: 20+ YEARS OF RESEARCH COMMUNICATION AND COORDINATION
EVOLUTION OF A MEETING: 20+ YEARS OF RESEARCH COMMUNICATION AND COORDINATION Michael L. McManus 1 (retired) and Kurt W. Gottschalk 2 1 USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Hamden CT 06514 2
More informationLYLE FREES Water Quality Specialist, NRCS Phone:
Water Issues in Kansas Lyle Frees Water Quality Specialist, NRCS 2007 Insurance Workshop Policy and Structural Changes Affecting Agricultural Risk November 8, 2007 Courtyard by Marriott Salina, Kansas
More informationConger Rock Harvesting Project
Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact Conger Rock Harvesting Project Aspen-Sopris Ranger District White River National Forest Gunnison County, Colorado T11S, R88W, Section 21 and 22 Decision
More informationDECISION MEMO. Fall Creek Trail Reroute
DECISION MEMO Fall Creek Trail Reroute USDA Forest Service Willamette National Forest Middle Fork Ranger District Lane County, OR Township 18S, Range 3E, Section 21, Willamette Meridian DECISION It is
More informationCarson National Forest El Rito Ranger District El Rito, New Mexico Outreach Response due by close of business on March 26, 2013.
Carson National Forest El Rito, New Mexico Outreach Response due by close of business on March 26, 2013. Outreach Notice: Forestry Technician Silviculture Technician (GS-0462-05/06/07) This notification
More informationForest Resources of the Black Hills National Forest
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station August 22 Forest Resources of the Black Hills National Forest Larry T. DeBlander About the author Larry T. DeBlander
More informationA Comparison of Two Estimates of Standard Error for a Ratio-of-Means Estimator for a Mapped-Plot Sample Design in Southeast Alaska
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Research Note PNW-RN-532 June 2002 A Comparison of Two Estimates of Standard Error for a Ratio-of-Means Estimator
More informationKeefer Pasture Drift Fence Project. Challis-Yankee Fork Ranger District Salmon-Challis National Forest
Keefer Pasture Drift Fence Project Challis-Yankee Fork Ranger District Salmon-Challis National Forest PROPOSED ACTION The Challis-Yankee Fork Ranger District proposes construction of approximately.11 miles
More informationEstimated Costs of Crop Production in Iowa 2002
Estimated Costs of Crop Production in Iowa 2002 The estimated costs of corn, corn silage, soybeans, alfalfa, and pasture maintenance in this report are based on data from several sources. They include
More informationEstimated Costs of Crop Production in Iowa 2003
Estimated Costs of Crop Production in Iowa 2003 The estimated costs of corn, corn silage, soybeans, alfalfa, and pasture maintenance in this report are based on data from several sources. They include
More informationIntroduction... 2 Asparagus... 4 Basil... 5 Beans, Speciality Green... 6 Carrots... 7 Eggplant... 8 Garlic... 9 Greens, Salad Peas, Snow...
Iowa Vegetable Production Budgets PM 2017 February 2006 Index Introduction... 2 Asparagus... 4 Basil... 5 Beans, Speciality Green... 6 Carrots... 7 Eggplant... 8 Garlic... 9 Greens, Salad... 10 Peas, Snow...
More informationWORKFORCE CONNECTIONS, INC. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES
WORKFORCE CONNECTIONS, INC. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES Updated 4/6/16 Workforce Connections, Inc. employment applicants, employees, program applicants and program participants have the right to enter into the
More informationINVASIVE SPECIES CONTROL PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND POST CONSTRUCTION MONITORING
INVASIVE SPECIES CONTROL PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND POST CONSTRUCTION MONITORING INTRODUCTION Black Oak Wind Farm, LLC is proposing to develop a wind-powered electric generating facility (the
More informationUsers Guide for Noble Fir Bough Cruiser
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station General Technical Report PNW-GTR-644 July 2005 Users Guide for Noble Fir Bough Cruiser Roger D. Fight, Keith A.
More informationRecord of Decision. South Unit Oil and Gas Development Final Environmental Impact Statement
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service February 2012 Record of Decision South Unit Oil and Gas Development Final Environmental Impact Statement Duchesne Ranger District, Ashley National
More informationPROJECT INFORMATION AMEREN POWERLINE RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT April 2014
PROJECT INFORMATION AMEREN POWERLINE RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT April 2014 The United States Forest Service (USFS), Shawnee National Forest (SNF), is analyzing a request from Ameren Services (Ameren), a group
More informationNatural Resources Conservation Service
Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Health 101 What is soil health and how do we measure it? Name: Tom Roth Title: Conservation Agronomist Location, Salina Kansas Email: thomas.roth@ks.usda.gov
More informationEnvironmental Assessment
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Stanislaus National Forest Pedro Flat Campground (27121) Environmental Assessment Stanislaus National Forest Summit Ranger District Tuolumne County,
More informationCATEGORICAL EXCLUSION WORKSHEET: RESOURCE CONSIDERATIONS
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION WORKSHEET: RESOURCE CONSIDERATIONS Developed Recreation/Trails, Wilderness & Roadless Jasper Mountain Priest Lake Ranger District Idaho Panhandle National Forest Description of the
More informationMixed Use of Forest Roads 459 and 457 Environmental Assessment
Mixed Use of Forest Roads 459 and 457 Environmental Assessment USDA Forest Service Superior National Forest Kawishiwi Ranger District St. Louis County, Minnesota February, 2014 For additional information,
More informationESTIMATE OF QUANTITIES
Sheet 1 of 9 INDEX OF SHEETS Sheet 1 Sheet 2 Sheets 3 & 4 Sheets 5-7 Sheets 8 & 9 Layout Map Index of Sheets Estimate of Quantities Environmental Commitments & Plan Notes Tables of Spot Asphalt Concrete
More information