Closing the Efficiency Gap

Transcription

1 217 report and outlook Ernesto Reyes Rome, Guiding Group Meeting 6 March, 218 1

2 ork the Efficiency Gap During 217, the A.N. has continued working together with the A.N. Global Network of Silvopastoral Systems. 2

3 ork the Efficiency Gap Metrics and guidelines Methodologies and tools Project proposals Efficiency matrix Agri benchmark models Criteria for selecting projects Silvopastoral Case studies Horizontal and vertical assessment Modeling Baseline and Alternative scenarios ork on Global Network of SPS Areas Indicators Focus groups Typical farms 3

4 ork the Efficiency Gap Metrics and guidelines Methodolgies and tools Project proposals 4

5 Vertical analysis Efficiency matrix FORAGE & GRAIN PRODUCTION Yield/ha % dry matter Protein/energy content Feed digestibility % of total production sold/used ANIMAL FEEDING Fresh/dry matter intake Feed ration composition Feed ration intake per ingredient % of purchased feed % Home grown produced Protein, energy and fiber content/ingredient Feed conversion ratio Metrics and HERD guidelines PERFORMANCE Reproductive performance Nº. Animals transferred or sold to other production units LIVESTOCK PERFORMANCE PRODUCTION PERFORMANCE Yield per unit per year Nº. of production periods per year Yield/unit per Action period Network Co-products per unit/year Gap ANIMAL HEALTH Methodolgies Mortality distribution by and tools age group % disease incidence by age group % disease prevalence by age group MANURE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Methane emission per unit/year Manure applied as % total produced Synthetic fertilizier applied/ha/year Manure applied per ha/year N, P, K, M, Ca Nutrients Water Land Project proposals Economic Animal Welfare Social Impact Environmental Horizontal analysis 5

6 agri benchmark models (Farm level) Focus group discussions Typical farm approach Information gathering and compiling Researchers Advisors Farmers Local expertise Prevailing production systems (Production factor combination) Modelling Modeling and characterising ALTERNATIVE BASELINE SCENARIOS (which (which issues issues are to being solved) solved) Sustainable scenarios?? Historical Information Farm records Applied research Information (plots, pilots, trials) Local knowledge and expertise Economic Indicators Production indicators Animal health indicators Environmental indicators Metrics and guidelines 6

7 Criteria for selecting projects Focalization NRUE Possibility of Intervention Capacity Building Regional and Livestock Diversity Interaction with AN SPS case studies Impact Methodolgies and tools Implement. Capacity Synergies Network osing iciency Gap 7

8 Network osing iciency Silvopastoral Gap case studies ork on Global Network of SPS Project proposals Institutions that participating have made on possible this workthe case studies agri benchmark Beef and Sheep Network Centre for Research on Sustainable Agricultural Production Systems, CIPAV 8

9 Silvopastoral case studies ork on Global Network of SPS Case 1 BEEF FINISHING COLOMBIA Region: Cesar FORAGE PRODUCTION Ton. dry matter/ha 7% Total area: 2 ha. % Area under SPS 7% Climate condition: Dry tropical reached: 8th year Baseline vs. SPS From degraded soils to intensive sustainable production SPS strategy implemented Intensive SPS Leucaena + Panicum + Eucalyptus Sustainability issue to illustrate Restoring degraded natural resources Emphasis on SDG LAND PRODUCTIVITY Kg. meat/ha 45% ANIMAL WELFARE Feeding Housing Health Behaviour ECONOMIC RESULTS Initial investment USD/Ha. 1,85 Profit (USD/year) 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, -5, -1, Base line year ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Kg CO 2 / 1 kg LW added 9

10 Silvopastoral case studies ork on Global Network of SPS Case 2 DUAL PURPOSE COLOMBIA Region: Valle del Cauca FORAGE PRODUCTION Ton. dry matter/ha 11.6% Total area: 3 ha. % Area under SPS 47% Climate condition: Semihumid Tropical Baseline vs. SPS From intensive production system with high dependence on external inputs to intensive sustainable production SPS strategy implemented Intensive SPS Leucaena + star grass/panicum Sustainability issue to illustrate Intensive sustainable production Emphasis on SDG LAND PRODUCTIVITY Tons ECMilk/ha 117% ANIMAL WELFARE Feeding Housing Health Behaviour -3, reached: 4th year ECONOMIC RESULTS Initial investment USD/Ha. 2,36 Profit (USD/year) 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, -1, -2, Baseline year ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Kg CO 2 / 1 kg ECM Base line SPS Feed Manure Nox Manure methane Enteric fermentation 1

11 Silvopastoral case studies ork on Global Network of SPS Case 3 DAIRY COLOMBIA Region: Valle del Cauca FORAGE PRODUCTION Ton. dry matter/ha 17.4% Total area: 135 ha. % Area under SPS 69% Climate condition: Dry Tropical Baseline vs. SPS From intensive production system with high dependence on external inputs to intensive sustainable production SPS strategy implemented Intensive SPS Leucaena + star grass/panicum Sustainability issue to illustrate Intensive sustainable production Emphasis on SDG LAND PRODUCTIVITY Tons ECMilk/ha 52% ANIMAL WELFARE Feeding Housing Health Behaviour reached: 9th year ECONOMIC RESULTS Initial investment USD/Ha. 2,6 Profit (USD/year) 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, -5, -1, Base line year ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Kg CO 2 / 1 kg ECM Base line SPS Feed Manure Nox Manure methane Enteric fermentation 11

12 Silvopastoral case studies ork on Global Network of SPS Case 4 DAIRY COLOMBIA Region: Quindío FORAGE PRODUCTION Ton. dry matter/ha 29% Total area: 5 ha. % Area under SPS 1% Climate condition: Semihumid Tropical Baseline vs. SPS From intensive production system with high dependence on external inputs to intensive sustainable production SPS strategy implemented Intensive SPS Leucaena + star grass Sustainability issue to illustrate Intensive sustainable production Emphasis on SDG LAND PRODUCTIVITY Tons ECMilk/ha 117% ANIMAL WELFARE Feeding Housing Health Behaviour -1, reached: 5th year ECONOMIC RESULTS Initial investment USD/Ha. 1,635 Profit (USD/year) 2, 15, 1, 5, -5, Base line year ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Kg CO 2 / 1 kg ECM Base line SPS Feed Manure Nox Manure methane Enteric fermentation 12

13 Silvopastoral case studies ork on Global Network of SPS Case 5 CATTLE BREEDING COLOMBIA Region: Valle del Cauca FORAGE PRODUCTION Ton. dry matter/ha 653% Total area: 37 ha. % Area under SPS 68% Climate condition: Semihumid Tropical Baseline vs. SPS From degraded soils to sustainable production SPS strategy implemented Trees in rows + star grass Sustainability issue to illustrate Restoring degraded natural resources Emphasis on SDG LAND PRODUCTIVITY Kg LW/ha 1,114% ANIMAL WELFARE Feeding Housing Health Behaviour -4, reached: 5th year ECONOMIC RESULTS Initial investment USD/Ha. 1,195 Profit (USD/year) 4, 3, 2, 1, -1, -2, -3, Base line year ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Kg CO 2 / 1 kg LW added Base line SPS Feed Manure Nox Manure methane Enteric fermentation 13

14 Baseline Silvopastoral case studies ork on Global Network of SPS Case 6 DUAL PURPOSE COLOMBIA Region: Caquetá FORAGE PRODUCTION Ton. dry matter/ha 436% Total area: 17 ha. % Area under SPS 59% Climate condition: Humid Tropical Baseline vs. SPS From deforested areas for extensive production to intensive sustainable production, releasing land for ecosystem recovery SPS strategy implemented Scattered trees + Tithonia diversifolia Sustainability issue to illustrate Alternatives to reduce deforestation and ecosystem recovery Emphasis on SDG LAND PRODUCTIVITY Tons ECMilk/ha 99% ANIMAL WELFARE Feeding Housing Health Behaviour reached: 1th year ECONOMIC RESULTS Initial investment USD/Ha. 1,621 Profit (USD/year) 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, -2, -4, year ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Kg CO 2 / 1 kg ECM Base line SPS Feed Manure Nox Manure methane Enteric fermentation 14

15 Base line Silvopastoral case studies ork on Global Network of SPS Case 7 DAIRY MEXICO Region: Michoacán FORAGE PRODUCTION Ton. dry matter/ha 181% Total area: 5 ha. % Area under SPS 1% Climate condition: Dry subtropical Baseline vs. SPS From intensive production system with high dependence on external inputs to intensive sustainable production SPS strategy implemented Intensive SPS - Leucaena + Guinea Sustainability issue to illustrate Scaling up Intensive sustainable production Emphasis on SDG LAND PRODUCTIVITY Tons ECMilk/ha 29% reached: 5th year ECONOMIC RESULTS Initial investment USD/Ha. 1,274 Profit (USD/year) 16, 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, -2, -4, -6, year ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Kg CO 2 / 1 kg ECM Base line SPS Feed Manure Nox Manure methane Enteric fermentation 15

16 Baseline Silvopastoral case studies ork on Global Network of SPS Case 8 BEEF FINISHING MEXICO Region: Michoacán FORAGE PRODUCTION Ton. dry matter/ha 187% Total area: 6 ha. % Area under SPS 1% Climate condition: Dry subtropical reached: 6th year Baseline vs. SPS From extensive land use to intensive sustainable production SPS strategy implemented Intensive SPS - Leucaena + Guinea Sustainability issue to illustrate Scaling up Intensive sustainable production Emphasis on SDG LAND PRODUCTIVITY Kg LW/ha 684% ECONOMIC RESULTS Initial investment USD/Ha. 1,274 Profit (USD/year) 18, 16, 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, -2, -4, year ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Kg CO 2 / 1 kg LW added Base line SPS Feed Manure Nox Manure methane Enteric fermentation 16

17 Silvopastoral case studies ork on Global Network of SPS Case 9 FORESTRY + FINISHING ARGENTINA Region: Misiones FORAGE PRODUCTION Ton. dry matter/ha 75% Total area: 24 ha. % Area under SPS 1% Climate condition: Humid subtropical Baseline vs. SPS From monoculture land use (forestry) to diversified land use SPS strategy implemented Hybrid Pine + Axonopus grass Sustainability issue to illustrate Sustainable diversification for land use LAND PRODUCTIVITY Kg LW/ha 915% reached: 16th year ECONOMIC RESULTS Initial investment USD/Ha. 1,29 Profit (USD/year) 25, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Kg CO 2 / 1 kg LW added Base line SPS Feed Manure Nox Manure methane Enteric fermentation 2, Emphasis on SDG 15, 1, 5, Base line year 17

18 Silvopastoral case studies ork on Global Network of SPS Case 1 BEEF FINISHING ARGENTINA Region: Corrientes FORAGE PRODUCTION Ton. dry matter/ha 78% Total area: 95 ha. % Area under SPS 7% Climate condition: Humid subtropical Baseline vs. SPS From extensive land use to intensive sustainable production SPS strategy implemented Hybrid Pine + Axonopus grass Sustainability issue to illustrate Sustainable alternatives for land use Emphasis on SDG LAND PRODUCTIVITY Kg LW/ha 221% reached: 16th year ECONOMIC RESULTS Initial investment USD/Ha. 88 Profit (USD/year) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Kg CO 2 / 1 kg LW added Base line SPS Feed Manure Nox Manure methane Enteric fermentation 45, 4, 35, 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, -5, -1, Base line year 18

19 What is next? Launching a Publication on SPS case studies at the MSP meeting (Mongolia, June 218) ork Gap Modelling (models, methodologies, tools) Presenting project proposals to IKI and Gates foundation Joint proposal with the GN of SPS and A.N. Restoring Value to Grasslands 19

20 ork Gap How this A.N. contributes to the COP 23 and the GFFA? Methods and approaches for assessing adaptation, adaptation co-benefits and resilience Focus on models and tools for modeling (assessing) sustainable options 2

21 ork Gap Ensuring food Security and Nutrition By promoting better dissemination and application of technologies and innovations, in particular regarding breeding, feeding and livestock husbandry Conserving natural resources, protecting the environment and addressing climate change Promotes sustainable and resource-efficient livestock production, including through innovations, integrated systems, agro-ecological methods and organic farming, inter alia by phasing out unsustainable policies and practices Supports international research collaboration on reducing the intensity of GHG emissions from livestock production systems, including by pasture restoration and soil carbon sequestration 21

22 ork Gap Thanks 22