MOBILITY PARTNERSHIP AGENDA

Transcription

1 1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL MOBILITY PARTNERSHIP Wednesday, November 9, :30 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. Gilroy City Council Chambers 7351 Rosanna Street, Gilroy, CA AGENDA 2. PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS: This portion of the agenda is reserved for persons desiring to address the Committee on any matter not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to 2 minutes. The law does not permit Committee action or extended discussion on any item not on the agenda except under special circumstances. If Committee action is requested, the matter can be placed on the next agenda. All statements that require a response will be referred to staff for reply in writing. 3. ORDERS OF THE DAY CONSENT AGENDA 4. Approve the Regular Meeting Minutes of September 14, REGULAR AGENDA 5. INFORMATION ITEM Receive reports from Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) and Council of San Benito County Governments (SBCOG) staff. 6. INFORMATION ITEM Presentation on SR 156 West Corridor Project by Transportation Agency for Monterey County 7. INFORMATION ITEM Presentation on Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) formation 8. INFORMATION ITEM Presentation on Outreach Plan 9 ACTION ITEM Workplan Update/Next Steps 10. ACTION ITEM Future meeting schedule

2 Mobility Partnership November 9, ADJOURN If you have any questions about the Mobility Partnership, please contact VTA Community Outreach Department at (408) , TTY (408) , or e- mail In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), those requiring accommodations or accessible media for this meeting should notify the Board Secretary s Office 48 hours prior to the meeting at (408) or board.secretary@vta.org or TTY (408) VTA s Homepage is located on the web at: or visit us on Facebook Uhttp://

3 MOBILITY PARTNERSHIP Wednesday, September 14, 2016 MINUTES CALL TO ORDER The Mobility Partnership Meeting was called to order at 9:30 a.m. by Chairperson Woodward in the Gilroy Police Department Community Room, 7351 Rosanna Street, Gilroy, CA ROLL CALL Attendee Name Title Representing Status Terri Aulman Member County of Santa Clara Absent Margie Barrios Member County of San Benito Present Larry Carr Member County of Santa Clara Present Jerry Muenzer Vice -Chairperson County of San Benito Present Perry Woodward Chairperson County of Santa Clara Present Ignacio Velazquez Member County of San Benito Present A quorum was present. 2. PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS There were no public presentations. 3. ORDERS OF THE DAY REGULAR AGENDA Member Ignacio arrived at the meeting at 9:31 a.m. and took his seat. The Agenda was taken out of order. 5. REPORTS FROM VTA AND SBCOG STAFF Chris Metzger, Project Manager, and Mary Gilbert, Council of San Benito County Governments (SBCOG) Executive Director, provided updates on staff changes at VTA, high speed rail and SR 156. Mobility Partnership Page 1 of 6 July 19, 2016

4 Discussions: 1. On behalf of Casey Emoto, Deputy Director -Planning and Program Development, Mr. Metzger provided an update on the staff changes at VTA. Carolyn Gonot has been appointed as Interim Director Planning and Program Development Division with John Ristow s retirement from VTA. 2. Mr. Metzger also provided updates on High Speed Rail (HSR). HSR is on schedule and record of decision for environmental document maybe out late Draft Environmental Document maybe out early Mr. Woodward shared that HSR could have a preferred alternative at least through Gilroy by end of Mr. Metzger said that the planned schedule does show a decision by the end of this year, but that there is a potential that the selection of an initial preferred alternative will not be out until early Mr. Metzger discussed a HSR workshop held in Los Banos in August. Mr. Metzger noted that staff from Los Banos highlighted their connection to the Bay Area, and noted that the Gilroy station would be their connection point to the HSR for entry to San Jose and San Francisco. In subsequent meetings with HSR staff, Mr. Metzger noted the importance of the planned improvements to SR 152 in creating dependable efficient access to the Gilroy station from south and east of the station (i.e. San Benito County and the central valley). Although HSR staff could not commit any funding support for the project, they stated they would support any messaging to State Legislators of the importance of improvements to SR 152 to improve access to the HSR system. 2. Ms. Gilbert provided update on SR 156 (Monterey County) P3 project development. Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC) is currently working on a Level 2 Traffic and Revenue study on SR 156 (between US 101 and Highway 1). Debbie Hale, Executive Director TAMC, will provide updates on the SR 156 study at the next MP meeting in November. 3. Mr. Muenzer noted that the Board of Supervisors in San Benito County adopted a resolution rescinding a previous resolution that supported a northern alternative. This will pave way to study other alternatives. SBCOG is also considering to adopt a similar resolution to allow further study of all possible alignments. 6. PRESENTATION ON PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERHIP (P3) CASE STUDIES AND RELATED INFORMATION. Discussions: Mr. Metzger provided a presentation on Public Private Partnership (P3) case studies (SR 91 Express Lanes, SR 125 South Bay Expressway and Presidio Parkway) and related information. Mobility Partnership Page 2 of 6 September 14, 2016

5 1. Mr. Velasquez noted that SR 91 had one of the carpool lanes converted to a toll road. Public acceptance for SR 91 congestion toll pricing has improved due to faster travel time. Mr. Velasquez asked if the proposed tolling for SR 152 will follow the same format as SR 91 and toll options. Mr. Metzger discussed that a pure toll road stretch was initially proposed get on/off in the toll facility. One of the tolling alternatives considered was to toll motorists on the new facility between SR 25 and SR 156 with no tolling on the existing SR 152 or SR 25 facilities. Mr. Muenzer noted that one of the alternatives presented at the last MP meeting would have the toll booth near Casa de Fruta vicinity, which is a concern for the San Benito County residents. Mr. Woodward noted that it is one of the threshold issues; toll the existing facility or toll the new facility. Member Carr arrived at the meeting at 9:46 a.m. and took his seat. 2. Mr. Metzger noted that South Bay Expressway s (SR 125) status at P3 financial close should be not environmentally cleared. 3. Mr. Carr asked if state law currently allows Pre-development Agreement (PDA). Mr. Metzger will confirm if the current state law allows PDA at the next meeting. 4. Ms. Barrios asked if a PDA would come before the pre-procurement process in P3. Mr. Metzger clarified that a PDA is a P3 project delivery mechanism. A PDA, if pursued, would be entered into with a private entity earlier in the project development process than most other P3 delivery methods (which typically wait for environmental clearance). PDA will be an open competition process. 5. Mr. Woodward asked if anything needs to be done to make PDA more likely considering the status of SR 125 project. Mr. Metzger discussed that for any P3 process, outreach and discussions with the industry would occur. Mr. Woodward queried if PDA should be explored now. Mr. Metzger suggested that PDA discussion may be deferred until after the November 2016 election to consider the outcome of the sales tax measure, however, PDA would still be a viable approach to consider regardless of the outcome of the election Mobility Partnership Page 3 of 6 September 14, 2016

6 6. Mr. Velasquez inquired on the status of US 101/SR 25 interchange if the VTA sales tax Measure passes on November Mr. Metzger noted that funds are identified in the envision program of projects for the US 101/SR 25 interchange improvements. 7. Mr. Emoto discussed the similarities of the SR 152 s MP initiatives and SR 37 in Sonoma County. 4. CONSENT AGENDA On General Consensus and there being no objection, Mobility Partnership Regular Meeting Minutes of July 16, 2016 were approved. REGULAR AGENDA (continued) 7. PRESENTATION ON JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT (JPA) FORMATION Discussions: Mr. Metzger provided an overview presentation on Joint Powers Authority (JPA). 1. Ms. Barrios directed an inquiry to Ms. Goodwin regarding the previous JPA presentation on March 9 which identified two (2) types of JPA. Ms. Goodwin discussed that difference lies in the level of formality and legal procedures. 2. Ms. Barrios inquired on the timeline of JPA formation for the SR 152 project. Ms. Goodwin suggested that JPA discussion be deferred after the November 2016 election to consider the outcome of the sales tax measure. 3. Ms. Barrios asked if State will provide funds more favorably on a JPA agreement vis-à-vis a MOU agreement. Mr. Emoto noted that on discussions with VTA s Government Affairs that a JPA is usually formed to define a common purpose and address governance, powers and finances requirements for the project. 4. Mr. Muenzer inquired on who will be the partner agencies on the JPA. Ms. Goodwin said that VTA staff will provide information on how appointments will be made under a JPA for the SR 152 project on the next meeting. It was clarified that the initial Mobility Partnership Page 4 of 6 September 14, 2016

7 thought would be for VTA and SBCOG to be the agencies entering into the JPA, though this was subject to research and open for discussion. 5. Mr. Carr asked if SBCOG is allowed to enter into a JPA agreement. Ms. Gilbert will confer with the SBCOG s Legal Department and provide confirmation at the next meeting. 6. Mr. Woodward said that Staff and Legal Department need to provide recommendation on JPA formation for this project. Mr. Woodward also inquired if it s premature to do it now or wait for the outcome of Santa Clara s sales tax measure. Mr. Metzger said that Staff will seek counsel on JPA formation. Mr. Woodward requested that Staff collaborate with Legal Department and SBCOG to provide recommendation on JPA formation for this project at the next meeting. 7. Mr. Carr noted that notwithstanding the outcome of the November s sales tax measure (pass or fail); P3 arrangement might be needed to move the project forward. PDA is very intriguing. It is suggested not to wait for the outcome of Santa Clara s sales tax measure; and MP should go forward and lay out the path for the project. Mr. Carr identified two (2) goals for this project: (1) build the project and (2) operate the project. Mr. Carr inquired on how the language in the JPA would address the project goals. 8. Mr. Velazquez stressed the importance of JPA in building the project as a common goal. Committed partnership through JPA will assist in gaining public support for the project. 9. Mr. Woodward explained that one of the issues that could come up will be the eminent domain authority for the project s JPA. 8. PRESENTATION ON OUTREACH PLAN Mr. Goodwin provided a presentation on outreach plan. Discussions: 1. Ms. Barrios noted that County Planning Department and Public Works Department are now under Resource Management Agency under Mr. Brent C. Barnes. Requested inclusion of San Benito County Chamber of Commerce in the business interests group; and the community committee/core of city leaders that replaced San Juan Bautista s Chamber of Commerce. 2. Ms. Barrios requested invitation in planned outreach meetings. Mobility Partnership Page 5 of 6 September 14, 2016

8 3. Ms. Aileen Loe, Deputy District Director of Caltrans District 5, made introductions to the MP members. 9. NEXT STEPS AND ACTION ITEMS Discussions: 1. Next MP meeting will be on November 9, 2016 (Wednesday) at 9:30am. 2. Mr. Velazquez requested discussion with Caltrans District 4 and 5 representatives on SR 25 s Bloomfield/Bolsa right-turn-only issue which creates traffic congestion. Mr. Velazquez requested inclusion of this issue in future meeting items. Mr. Saleh agreed on a focus meeting outside of the MP meetings to address this issue. 3. Mr. Saleh reported on the US 101 Rehabilitation Project in Morgan Hill which will be completed by mid-october Mr. Saleh also discussed additional information related to P3 case studies concepts. Mr. Saleh noted that the SR 152 is a trade corridor and has inter-regional interest. Thus, interests of the JPA as it relates to SR 152 could be beyond Santa Clara and San Benito counties. Also, Federal authority will be required in order to implement tolling on the existing SR 152 facility that is designated as a national trade corridor. It was agreed this issue will be looked into for the next meeting. 10. ADJOURNMENT On order of Chairperson Woodward, and there being no objection, the meeting was adjourned at 10: 41 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Rebecca de Leon VTA Highway Program Mobility Partnership Page 6 of 6 September 14, 2016

9 Memo on Agenda Item 5 Date: November 9, 2016 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mobility Partnership Carolyn Gonot, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Interim Director of Planning and Program Development Division; Mary Gilbert, Council of San Benito County Governments (SBCOG) Executive Director Receive reports from VTA and SBCOG staff INFORMATION ITEM RECOMMENDATION: Receive report from VTA and SBCOG staff on items related to the Mobility Partnership. BACKGROUND: Staff from VTA and SBCOG to provide status update on the following: Sales tax measure results for Santa Clara County SR 25 Route Adoption State legislation update High Speed Rail update FASTLANE Grant Program assessing viability of application

10 Memo on Agenda Item 6 Date: November 9, 2016 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mobility Partnership Mary Gilbert, Council of San Benito County Governments (SBCOG) Executive Director Todd Muck, Transportation Agency for Monterey County Deputy Executive Director Presentation on SR 156 West Corridor Project developed by the Transportation Agency for Monterey County INFORMATION ITEM RECOMMENDATION: Receive presentation on SR 156 West Corridor Project toll road efforts developed by the Transportation Agency for Monterey County. BACKGROUND: Oral report to be provided.

11 Memo on Agenda Item 7 Date: November 9, 2016 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mobility Partnership Chris Metzger, Project Manager Victor Pappalardo, Senior Assistant Counsel (VTA) Presentation on Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) formation INFORMATION ITEM RECOMMENDATION: Receive a presentation on Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) formation. BACKGROUND: Oral report to be provided expanding on introduction provided at September 14, 2016 Mobility Partnership meeting.

12 Memo on Agenda Item 8 Date: November 9, 2016 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mobility Partnership Eileen Goodwin, Project Consultant Presentation on outreach plan INFORMATION ITEM RECOMMENDATION: Receive a presentation on outreach plan. BACKGROUND: Oral report to be provided.

13 Memo on Agenda Item 9 Date: November 9, 2016 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mobility Partnership Chris Metzger, Project Manager Workplan Update/Next Steps RECOMMENDATION: ACTION ITEM Approve workplan updates, next steps, and action items per today s meeting. BACKGROUND: See attached workplan document, summarizing status of work plan adopted at the December 17, 2015 Mobility Partnership meeting, and presenting potential future activities/decisions. Based on this workplan and discussions held at the meeting, agree upon next steps.

14 Work Plan Status November 3, 2016 Original Work Plan Element Status Next Action 1. Review New Improvement Concepts Two Alternative Corridors defined: PSR corridor and Southern corridor per July 19,2016 meeting Refine Southern Corridor to define geometry and identify/assess impacts/cost 2. Assess Potential Near Term Funding Opportunities 3. Workshop on Institutional/Governance Topics 4. Assess Opportunities to Coordinate with High Speed Rail Potential Funding for US 101/SR 25 I/C from SCC Sales Tax Measure November, State transportation funding bill (Beall/Frazier) under discussion. Considering application to FASTLANE Grant program. Received report(s) for MP meetings conducted on the following 2016 dates: March 9, September 14, and November 9. Received report at May 11, 2016 meeting. Regular updates planned. HSR supportive of improving 152 to provide access to Gilroy Station, but does not see nexus to help fund from HSR funds Contact Beall/Frazier to advocate for funding for 152 Corridor and/or P3 legislation. Assess FASTLANE Grant program Pending identification of funding and/or direction forward. Develop more formal support from HSRA for use in discussions with State Legislators. 5. Establish and implement Outreach Plan Draft Plan presented at September 14, Report on initial outreach at November 9, 2016 MP meeting. 6. Review and define actions in pursuing Project Goals approved at May 11, 2016 meeting. Funding Options for Improvements Funding possible for Goods Movement, Safety, Economic viability of area, access to HSR. Consider any post-election efforts. Refine message and meet with Metropolitan Planning Organizations (AMBAG and Metropolitan Transportation Commission) and State Legislators 7. Assess Options for Delivering SR 152 Trade Corridor and SR 25 improvements Discussion held at July 19, 2016 MP meeting that full funding from public funds not likely. Presentation on P3 basics part of September 14, 2016 MP meeting. TBD In support of the above items discussed in the December 17, 2015 Mobility Partnership (MP) meeting, the following lays out the project development steps that would be required, approximate timelines, and major issues for which the MP would be requested to provide direction.

15 Memo on Agenda Item 10 Date: November 9, 2016 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mobility Partnership Carolyn Gonot, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Interim Director of Planning and Program Development Division Establish schedule for future meetings ACTION ITEM RECOMMENDATION: Approve schedule of future meetings. BACKGROUND: No future meetings are scheduled at this time. Based on availability of MP members for this meeting, staff is recommending the following meeting dates for discussion and approval: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 morning. Time and location TBD Wednesday, February 8, 2017 morning. Time and location TBD Wednesday, March 8, 2017 morning. Time and location TBD