Brutus No. I. By: Julia, Emma, Omar, and Sophie

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Brutus No. I. By: Julia, Emma, Omar, and Sophie"

Transcription

1 Brutus No. I By: Julia, Emma, Omar, and Sophie

2 Summary: Brutus I raises excellent points and concerns with the Constitution and the loss of freedom states would experience, if the power allocated to each of the three branches were to fall out of balance. This was an Anti Federalist essay about whether or not to accept the Constitution.

3 Concerns with the Article of Confederation A weak central government Feebleness of the ties by which these United-States are held together. The want of sufficient energy in our present confederation, to manage, in some instances, our general concerns. Various expedients have been proposed to remedy these evils, but none have succeeded.

4 Forms of Government This form of government contains principles that will lead to the subversion of liberty -- if it tends to establish a despotism, or, what is worse, a tyrannic aristocracy. Whether they should continue thirteen confederated republics, under the direction and control of a supreme federal head for certain defined national purposes only?

5 Concern about the Dispersing of Power When people part with power it is very hard to obtain it again unless by force. Few, if any, rulers have given up their power. Little power is left to the general government. In a short amount of time all power reserved for the individual state may be non existent. The legislative power has no limits (taxes, duties, imposts) they have the power to contract debts.

6 Primary Concern with the new Constitution The government reported by the convention does not go to a perfect and entire consolidation, yet it approaches so near to it, that it must, if executed, certainly and infallibly terminate in it. This government is to possess absolute and uncontrollable power, legislative, executive, and judicial, with respect to every object to which it extends.

7 Concerns with the Necessary and Proper Clause No need of any intervention of the state governments... to execute any one power vested in the general government. The constitution and laws of every state are nullified and declared void, so far as they are or shall be inconsistent with this constitution.

8 Concern with the Legislature s power to tax The authority to lay and collect taxes is the most important of any power that can be granted. The legislative power is competent to lay taxes, duties, imposts, and excises; -there is no limitation to this power, unless it be said that the clause which directs the use to which those taxes, and duties shall be applied, may be said to be a limitation. This in no restriction of the power at all... They are the sole judges of what is necessary to provide for the common defence, and they only are to determine what is for the general welfare. The only mean therefore left, for any state to support its government and discharge its debts, is by direct taxation.

9 Concerns with the Judicial Branch These courts will eclipse the dignity, and take away from the respectability, of the state courts. These courts will be, in themselves, totally independent of the states, deriving their authority from the United States, and receiving from them fixed salaries.

10 Concerns regarding politicians... Every man, and every body of men, invested with power, are ever disposed to increase it, and to acquire a superiority over every thing that stands in their way. This disposition, which is implanted in human nature, will operate in the federal legislature to lessen and ultimately to subvert the state authority

11 Concerns About a Large Republic A free republic cannot succeed over a country of such immense extent. It is natural to a republic to have only a small territory, otherwise it cannot long subsist (de Montesquieu). (The Greek and Roman Republics) governments were changed from that of a free government to those of the most tyrannical that ever existed. The laws and customs of the several states are, in many respects, very diverse, and in some opposite. The concern with this is that the government would be too large and constantly fighting about beliefs.

12 The abuse of power The legislature cannot attend to the various concerns and wants of its different parts, and is not connected with the local conditions and wants of the different districts. And being the large republic we are, the government would soon have control over the people and abuse their power to obtain more power and money, oppressing the rest. To have control over the troops and navy of the republic, the appointment of officers, to be able to pardon offences, and the collecting of public revenues must be exercised by every state and left in the hands of a few honorable people. Men will always want this power, and when they have it they may use it to gratify their own interest and ambitions. When this happens they must be called out for misconduct.

13 Should the Republic have control over a larger populace Is it natural to a republic to have only a small territory In a small one, the interest of the public is easier perceived, better understood, and more within the reach of every citizen. Abuses are of less extent, and of course are less protected. In a large republic there are men of large fortunes, and consequently of less moderation; there are trusts too great to be placed in any single subject.