Date with a Technical Corrigendum No final decision can yet be taken for the following reason(s) (indicate when decision is expected):

Transcription

1 RESULT OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF ISO STANDARD Date Title of TC or SC concerned Identification and description ISO/TC 46 / SC9 N 642 This document is to be completed by the committee secretariat and circulated within 6 months of the termination of the review period to (1) all P- and O-members, organizations and committees in liaison, (2) the ISO Central Secretariat, (3) the TC secretariat in the case of review in an SC. Review ISO/TC 46/SC 9 Circulation Deadline Reference number and title of International Standard ISO ISO 15707:2001 English title French title Information and documentation -- International Standard Musical Work Code (ISWC) Information et documentation -- Code international normalisé des oeuvres musicales (ISWC) Results (the compilation of results is given as an annex) The following criteria have been met 1 A simple majority of voting P-members has proposed the following action: a withdrawal b revision/amendment c confirmation (with or without correction) 2 Has been adopted/is intended to be adopted (with or without change), or is used per se, by at least 5 P-members 3 No changes other than corrections are proposed by any P-member Average points (y/x) awarded by P-members for market relevance (score as calculated in annex) N/A Note: This SVAT score is not intended to be the principle criterion upon which a decision is based, but rather is additional support for determining the best action. Nevertheless, if the average points scored is less than 9 consideration should be given to withdrawal. In the light of results, the following action is proposed: Withdrawal [criteria 1 a met] Revision [criteria 1 b & 2 met see Note)] Amendment [criteria 1 b & 2 met see Note)] Note: The choice between revision and amendment is essentially based on an assessment of whether or not the changes are limited (amendment) or if they require the redevelopment the whole document (revision). To be determined by the committee secretariat. Confirmation [criteria 1 c, 2, & 3 met]... with a Technical Corrigendum No final decision can yet be taken for the following reason(s) (indicate when decision is expected): Other (Please describe, e.g. division into Parts, combination with another IS, conversion to another deliverable type) Further procedures (attribution to TC/SC/WG, Project Leader, development procedure, meetings, etc.) The proposed amendment/revision is to be registered as a Preliminary Work Item (stage 00.60) Other: Experts (give details below, or as a separate annex) Other associated information (e.g. documents to be considered. Give details below, or as a separate annex) Although the systematic review ballot has resulted in a confirmation of this standard, the maintenance agency for this standard, CISAC, has indicated interest in pursuing a revision and plans to send a new work item proposal to the Secretariat. Proposed development track 1 (24 months) 2 (36 months - default) 3 (48 months) Note: Selection of a development track will automatically associate default target dates with critical stages. If you envisage that you can advance a project quicker than the default target dates you may indicate your preferred earlier target dates in the field "Target date for submission'. Important! Quoting earlier target dates implies a commitment to meeting these dates If you do not want to change the defaults to earlier dates do not put anything in the "Target date for submission" fields. Target date for as a CD: as a FDIS: submission: as a DIS: for publication: FORM 21 (ISO) v Page 1 of 7

2 Result of voting on systematic review of International Standard Secretariat Date Signature of the TC or SC Secretary ANSI/NISO

3 Q.1 "Recommended action" Compilation of the results of systematic review Questions Q.2 "Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication?" Q.3 "Is the national publication identical, or proposed to be identical, to the International Standard or modified?" Q.4 "Is this International Standard used in your country without national adoption or are products used in your country based on this standard?" Q.5 "Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced in regulations in your country?" Votes by members Country Member Status Confirm Confirm & Correct Revise / Amend Withdra w Abstain Q.2 Q.3 Q.4 Q.5 Australia SA P-Member X No Yes No Austria ASI O-Member X Belgium NBN P-Member X No Yes No Bulgaria BDS P-Member X No No No Canada SCC P-Member X No Yes No China SAC P-Member X Yes Identical No Colombia ICONTEC P-Member X Croatia HZN P-Member X Yes Identical No Czech Republic UNMZ P-Member X Yes Identical No Denmark DS P-Member X Yes Identical No Estonia EVS P-Member X Finland SFS P-Member X Yes Identical No France AFNOR P-Member X No Yes No Germany DIN P-Member X No Yes No Iran, Islamic Republic of ISIRI O-Member X Italy UNI P-Member X Yes Identical Yes Japan JISC P-Member X No Yes No Kenya KEBS P-Member Korea, Republic of KATS P-Member X Yes Identical No Malaysia DSM X New Zealand SNZ P-Member X No Yes No Norway SN P-Member X No Yes No Poland PKN O-Member X Yes Identical No Portugal IPQ P-Member X No Yes No Russian Federation GOST R P-Member X South Africa SABS P-Member X No Yes No Spain AENOR P-Member X Sweden SIS P-Member X Switzerland SNV P-Member X Thailand TISI O-Member X No Yes No Ukraine DSSU P-Member X No Yes No FORM 21 (ISO) v Page 3 of 7

4 Votes by members Country Member Status Confirm Confirm & Correct Revise / Amend Withdra w Abstain Q.2 Q.3 Q.4 Q.5 United Kingdom BSI P-Member X Yes Identical No USA ANSI Secretariat X No Yes No P-Member TOTALS Total of P-Members voting: 21 Confirm with or without correct: 18 Revise/Amend: 3 Withdraw: Yes, 13 No 8 Identical, 0 Modified 12 Yes, 1 No 1 Yes, 20 No TOTALS Yes, 14 No 9 Identical, 0 Modified 13 Yes, 1 No 1 Yes, 22 No Answers to Q.1: "Recommended action" 0 x Withdraw 3 x Revise/Amend France (AFNOR) 20 x Confirm Australia (SA) Bulgaria (BDS) China (SAC) Italy (UNI) 0 x Confirm, with correction of errors 9 x Abstain Austria (ASI) Colombia (ICONTEC) Estonia (EVS) Iran, Islamic Republic of (ISIRI) Malaysia (DSM) Russian Federation (GOST R) Spain (AENOR) Sweden (SIS) Switzerland (SNV) 0 x Abstain with survey replies FORM 21 (ISO) Page 4 of 7

5 Answers to Q.2: "Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication?" 9 x Yes China (SAC) Italy (UNI) 14 x No Australia (SA) Bulgaria (BDS) France (AFNOR) Answers to Q.3: "Is the national publication identical, or proposed to be identical, to the International Standard or modified?" 9 x Identical China (SAC) Italy (UNI) 0 x Modified Answers to Q.4: "Is this International Standard used in your country without national adoption or are products used in your country based on this standard?" 13 x Yes Australia (SA) France (AFNOR) 1 x No Bulgaria (BDS) FORM 21 (ISO) Page 5 of 7

6 Answers to Q.5: "Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced in regulations in your country?" 1 x Yes Italy (UNI) 22 x No Australia (SA) Bulgaria (BDS) China (SAC) France (AFNOR) Comments from Voters Member: Comment: Date: Bulgaria (BDS) Comment :00:21 No information China (SAC) Comment :40:18 - Comment :51:20 HRN ISO 15707:2005 Czech Republic (UNMZ) Comment :03:26 CSN ISO 15707:2002 Comment :25:07 DS/ISO 15707:2002 Comment :15:38 SFS-ISO 15707:2008 Italy (UNI) Comment :58:24 FORM 21 (ISO) Page 6 of 7

7 UNI ISO 15707:2011 has been adopted see National Agency for ISWC Korea, Republic of (KATS) KSXISO15707 Comment :44:24 Comment :03:43 PN-ISO 15707:2005 Comment :24:10 BS ISO 15707:2001 FORM 21 (ISO) Page 7 of 7