AGENDA. VILLAGE OF ROSELLE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES Roselle Village Hall 31 S. Prospect Street Monday, July 27, :00 p.m.

Transcription

1 AGENDA VILLAGE OF ROSELLE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES Roselle Village Hall 31 S. Prospect Street Monday, July 27, :00 p.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Roll Call 4. Presentation of Prepared Agenda 5. Officials and Staff Reports A. Mayor 1. Appoint Laura Kaczmarczyk to the Sister Cities Commission 2. Recognition of Retiring Finance Director Pam Figolah 3. Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the Appointment of an Interim Village Treasurer B. Village Trustees C. Village Clerk D. Village Administrator E. Village Attorney F. Chamber of Commerce Liaison 6. Citizen Comments/Questions Residents who wish to address the Board, please come to the podium, state your name and address, and limit your comments to three minutes. A resident may comment on a Consent Agenda item during this portion of the meeting. CONSENT AGENDA All items listed on the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine, procedural, informational, self-explanatory, or non-controversial in nature and will be enacted in one motion. There will be no discussion of these items unless a Board member requests that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed on the Regular Agenda. 1. Presentation of Village Board Minutes of July 13, Presentation of Committee of the Whole Minutes of July 13, 2015.

2 Village Board Agenda July 27, 2015 Page 2 3. Approve Contractor Payout #8 in the amount of $219, for the Devlin Clarifier Improvement Project 4. Authorize the purchase of 37 AVON FM12 Masks, 5 Mask Cases, and 8 Vision Correction Assemblies from Pro-Tech, at a cost not to exceed $9, Pass an Ordinance Amending the Code of Ordinances, Village of Roselle, Illinois Limitation on Number of Licenses Covering the Sale of Alcoholic Liquors in the Village of Roselle (Tilted Kilt Class T). 6. Pass an Ordinance Amending the Code of Ordinances, Village of Roselle, Illinois Limitation on Number of Licenses Covering the Sale of Alcoholic Liquors in the Village of Roselle (Pearl Banquet & Conference Center- Class N). REGULAR AGENDA 7. Community Development Trustee Wayne Domke A. Pass an Ordinance Approving the Tax Increment Financing District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan and Project for the Roselle Road- Nerge Redevelopment Project Area. B. Any motion amending the TIF Plan/Project but not requiring a Joint Review Board meeting or Public Hearing. C. Pass an Ordinance Designating the Roselle Road-Nerge Redevelopment Project Area. D. Pass an Ordinance Adopting Tax Increment Financing E. Pass an Ordinance Establishing a Tax Increment Financing District Interested Parties Registry and Adopting Registration Rules. F. Pass an Ordinance Convening a Joint Review Board for the Proposed Irving-Central Tax Increment Financing District. G. Pass an Ordinance Establishing Certain Dates, Times and Places for Statutory Required Public Hearings Associated with the Proposed Irving- Central Tax Increment Financing District. 8. Administration Trustee Lee Trejo 9. Fire Trustee Andy Maglio 10. Police Trustee Patrick Devitt 11. Public Works Trustee Carrie Dahlstrom A. Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the Execution of a Contract for the 2015 Street Improvement Program to Arrow Road Construction Company in the Amount of $625,000.

3 Village Board Agenda July 27, 2015 Page 3 B. Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the Execution of a Contract for the 2015 Pavement Patching Program to GA Paving in the Amount of $100,000. C. Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the Execution of a Contract for the 2015 Sidewalk and Curb Replacement Program to Mondi Construction at a Project Cost of $46, Finance Trustee Bruce Berkshire A. Approve the accounts payable list for July 27, 2015, in the amount of $1,052, Citizen Comments/Questions (Residents who wish to address the Board, please come to the podium, state your name and address, and limit your comments to three minutes.) 14. Executive Session (Motion to Convene Executive Session) A. Personnel B. Executive Session Minutes C. Collective Bargaining D. Security Procedures E. Real Property F. Litigation G. Security Procedures H. Risk Management 15. Other Business For Discussion Only 16. Adjourn In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person with a disability requiring a reasonable accommodation to participate in the meeting should contact Jason Bielawski, ADA Compliance Officer, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, telephone: , jbielawski@roselle.il.us.

4 AGENDA ITEM 7A.2 PROCLAMATION PAMELA K. FIGOLAH RECOGNIZING 19 YEARS OF SERVICE TO THE VILLAGE OF ROSELLE WHEREAS, Pam was hired by the Village of Roselle in October 1996 as the Chief Accountant and subsequently promoted to Finance Director in January 1999; and WHEREAS, due to Pam s diligence and attention to detail, the Village of Roselle has continued to receive a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting from the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) for its Certified Annual Financial Report; and WHEREAS, Pam s preparation of the Village s Annual Budget document also resulted in the Village receiving the Distinguished Budget Presentation Award from the GFOA in 2005, 2006 and 2007; and WHEREAS, as project manager, Pam successfully implemented the Village s Operations Management System, and authored several financial internal control policies eventually adopted by the Village Board; and WHEREAS, Pam s commitment to financial prudence was demonstrated by her involvement with both the Police and Fire Pension Boards serving as Treasurer and Board Member; and WHEREAS, Pam served as 2 nd Vice President, 1 st Vice President, and President for the Chicago Metro Chapter of the Illinois Government Finance Officers Association, as well as a contributing member on several committees, and shared her knowledge by teaching educational seminars for the organization; and WHEREAS, during the Great Recession, Pam s efforts to assist the Village Board and staff ensure fiscal sustainability were instrumental in reducing operational expenditures while creating greater efficiencies in the provision of municipal services. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gayle A. Smolinski, Mayor of the Village of Roselle, do hereby proclaim on behalf of the Board of Trustees and Village staff, our sincerest gratitude to Pam Figolah for 19 years of exceptional service, with our wishes for good health and many years of happy retirement. Gayle A. Smolinski, Mayor July 27, 2015

5 AGENDA ITEM # 5A.3 AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Village Board Meeting July 27, 2015 Item Title: Staff Contact: Interim Treasurer Appointment Jeffrey D. O Dell, Village Administrator VILLAGE BOARD ACTION The Village Board adopt a Resolution appointing the Village Administrator Interim Treasurer. Executive Summary: The Finance Director serves as the Village s Treasurer. By ordinance, the Mayor appoints the Village Treasurer with the advice and consent of the Board of Trustees. With the Finance Director retiring on August 3, 2015 the Village Board will need to appoint an Interim Treasurer until a new Finance Director is appointed. Until the recruitment process is completed and a new Finance Director is appointed, the Village Attorney has opined that it would be appropriate for the Village Board to appoint an Interim Treasurer by Resolution. The Finance Director and I recommend that interim appointment be filled by the Village Administrator. We hope to finalize the appointment of a new Finance Director by the first part of September, at which time, the Mayor could appoint a new Village Treasurer. Implications: Is this item budgeted? N/A Any other implications to be considered? Attachments: Resolution 1

6 RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE APPOINTMENT OF AN INTERIM VILLAGE TREASURER WHEREAS, the Village of Roselle Finance Director/Village Treasurer is retiring on August 3, 2015, which will create a vacancy for the position of Village Treasurer; and WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities of the Village of Roselle deem it in the best interests of the Village to appoint Village Administrator Jeffrey D. O Dell as the Interim Village Treasurer effective August 4, 2015; and WHEREAS, Jeffrey O Dell will serve as the Interim Village Treasurer until a new Finance Director/Village Treasurer is appointed. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Roselle that the Mayor is hereby authorized to appoint Village Administrator Jeffrey O Dell as Interim Village Treasurer effective August 4, ADOPTED this 27 th day of July, 2015 AYES: NAYS: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: Gayle Smolinski, Mayor Patty Burns, Village Clerk

7 CONSENT AGENDA #3 MEMORANDUM To: Jeff O'Dell, Village Administrator From: Phil Cotter, Director of Public Works Date July 27, 2015 Re: 8th Partial Payment - Devlin Clarifier Improvement Project Project Name: Contractor: Devlin Clarifier Improvement Project Boller Construction Company, Inc. Date of Award: June 23, 2014 Awarded Amount: $ 5,177, Change Orders: No. 1-10/13/2014 $ (8,800.00) No. 2-3/9/2015 $ (3,037.81) $ (11,837.81) Total Contract: $ 5,165, Total Value of Completed Work: $ 2,714, Retainage: 5% $ 258, Less Previous Payments: 1st - December 2014 $ 269, nd - January 2015 $ 293, rd - March 2015 $ 333, th - March 2015 $ 101, th - April 2015 $ 36, th - April 2015 $ 229, th - June 2015 $ 971, Subtotal: $ 2,236, Total Payment Due: $ 219, Account Numbers: $ 219, Waiver Approval: Partial Final Approval: Director of Public Works

8 AGENDA ITEM # CONSENT 4 AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Village Board Meeting July 27, 2015 Item Title: Staff Contact: Purchase of Replacement AVON Escape Masks Police Chief Steve Herron VILLAGE BOARD ACTION Authorize the purchase of 37 AVON FM12 Masks, 5 AVON Mask Cases and 8 Vision Correction Assemblies from Pro-Tech, at a cost not to exceed $9, Executive Summary: Ten years ago the Illinois Law Enforcement Alarm System (ILEAS) issued each Illinois first responder an AVON escape gas mask and filter. On a yearly basis, each of our officers are fit tested so they may utilize these masks in the event of biological/terrorist event. These AVON masks have a 10 year life expectancy and are in need of replacement in In FY 2015 the police department has budgeted $10,000 for the replacement of these AVON escape masks for our police officers. Pro-Tech Industries is the only company which is offering a $ trade-in of our existing AVON FM12 masks. The replacement mask for law enforcement use is the AVON C50 mask. This purchase will be for 37 AVON C50 masks, 5 mask carriers and 8 vision monocles. We received three bids on these items: PRO-TECH $ 9, STREICHER S $20, SAFEWARE $14, (does not include vision monocles) It is our recommendation to award the purchase of replacement Escape Masks to PRO- TECH of Berea, Ohio at a cost not to exceed $9, Implications: Is this item budgeted? Yes, $10,000 is budgeted for replacement AVON Masks. Any other implications to be considered? No Attachments: Quotations from PRO-Tech, Streicher s, and Safeware 1

9

10

11

12 AGENDA ITEM # CONSENT 5 AND 6 AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Village Board Meeting July 27, 2015 Item Title: Staff Contact: Amendments to Liquor Ordinance Class T and Class N Patty Burns, Village Clerk VILLAGE BOARD ACTION Approve an ordinance increasing the number of T Licenses available for the Tilted Kilt. Approve an ordinance increasing the number of N License available for Pearl Banquets. Executive Summary: During a review of Liquor files it was noticed that the Liquor Ordinance was never amended to include the T License issued to the Tilted Kilt in Pearl Banquets is Roselle s new Banquet and Conference Center and is the holder of our first N Class License. Implications: Is this item budgeted? N/A Any other implications to be considered? No Attachments: Ordinance Amending the Liquor Ordinance to increase the number of T Licenses from 6 to 7. Ordinance Amending the Liquor Ordinance to increase the number of N Licenses from 0 to 1. 1

13 ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, VILLAGE OF ROSELLE, ILLINOIS LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF LICENSES COVERING THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC LIQUORS IN THE VILLAGE OF ROSELLE BE IT ORDAINED BY the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Roselle, DuPage and Cook Counties, Illinois, as follows: SECTION 1: That the Code of Ordinances, Village of Roselle, Illinois, Chapter 3 entitled, Alcoholic Beverages, Section 3-33, Limitation on Number of Licenses shall be amended as follows: Increase the number of Class T Licenses from 6 to 7 Tilted Kilt 1360 Lake Street, Roselle IL SECTION 2: That all parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed to the extent of such inconsistency. SECTION 3: Should any court of competent jurisdiction find any portion of this ordinance to be legally invalid; such partial invalidity shall not affect the remainder of the ordinance. SECTION 4: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication in pamphlet form. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED AND APPROVED this day of July PUBLISHED in pamphlet form this day of July ATTEST: Mayor, Village of Roselle Village Clerk

14 ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, VILLAGE OF ROSELLE, ILLINOIS LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF LICENSES COVERING THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC LIQUORS IN THE VILLAGE OF ROSELLE BE IT ORDAINED BY the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Roselle, DuPage and Cook Counties, Illinois, as follows: SECTION 1: That the Code of Ordinances, Village of Roselle, Illinois, Chapter 3 entitled, Alcoholic Beverages, Section 3-33, Limitation on Number of Licenses shall be amended as follows: Increase the number of Class N Licenses from 0 to 1 Pearl Banquet & Conference Center 1490 W. Lake Street Roselle, IL SECTION 2: That all parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed to the extent of such inconsistency. SECTION 3: Should any court of competent jurisdiction find any portion of this ordinance to be legally invalid; such partial invalidity shall not affect the remainder of the ordinance. SECTION 4: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication in pamphlet form. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED AND APPROVED this day of July PUBLISHED in pamphlet form this day of July ATTEST: Mayor, Village of Roselle Village Clerk

15 AGENDA ITEM # 7A/B/C/D AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Village Board Meeting July 27, 2015 Item Title: Approval of Roselle Road Nerge Tax Increment Financing District Staff Contact: Patrick N. Watkins, Community Development Director VILLAGE BOARD ACTION 1. Ordinance Approving the Tax Increment Financing District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan and Project 2. Any motion amending the TIF Plan/Project but not requiring a Joint Review Board meeting or public hearing 3. Ordinance Designating the Roselle Road Nerge Redevelopment Project Area 4. Ordinance Adopting Tax Increment Financing Executive Summary: Attached are the three ordinances for the establishment of the North Roselle Road TIF District. At the June 8, 2015 Village Board meeting, a unanimous recommendation was made concerning the adoption of these ordinances. The Eligibility Study and Redevelopment Plan and Project are on file with the Village Clerk. There was also a desire by several Trustees to further state that the intent is not to utilize eminent domain authority on the four properties located on Indian Hill Drive. Thus the Mayor will entertain a motion by the Board Motion that it is not the intent of the Village Board to utilize eminent domain on any of the residential properties on Indian Hill Drive. Implications: Is this item budgeted? NA Any other implications to be considered? NA Attachments: Ordinance Approving the Tax Increment Financing District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan and Project Ordinance Designating the Roselle Road Nerge Redevelopment Project Area Ordinance Adopting Tax Increment Financing 1

16 ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT ELIGIBILITY STUDY, REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PROJECT FOR THE ROSELLE ROAD - NERGE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA WHEREAS, pursuant to the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, 65 ILCS 5/ et seq., as amended (the Act ), the Village of Roselle, Cook County and DuPage County, Illinois (the Village ), desires to implement tax increment financing for the development of certain property as a redevelopment project area, as that term is defined in the Act, said property being located wholly within the municipal boundaries of the Village and being legally described on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein, and generally depicted on a boundary map attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit B (the Area ), which Area constitutes in the aggregate more than 1-1/2 acres; and WHEREAS, the written document entitled the Tax Increment Financing District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan and Project for the Roselle Road - Nerge Redevelopment Project Area (the Plan and Project ) which attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit C, has been prepared by the Village s consultants, S. B. Friedman & Company, and constitutes a redevelopment plan and describes a redevelopment project, as those terms are defined in the Act, ; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, the Plan and Project calls for the use of tax increment financing to provide for the development or redevelopment of real estate by payment of redevelopment project costs, as that term is defined in the Act, which are intended to encourage development, growth and expansion of commercial businesses, residential property and industrial and manufacturing facilities within the Village in order to reduce or eliminate those conditions the existence of which qualified the redevelopment project area as a blighted area for vacant parcels and for improved parcels under the Act and to enhance the tax bases of those taxing districts which extend into the redevelopment project area; and WHEREAS, the Plan and Project includes the redevelopment program to be undertaken to accomplish the objectives described above and the following redevelopment program details: (i) an itemized list of the redevelopment project costs; (ii) the sources of funds to pay such costs; (iii) the nature and term of any obligations to be issued by the Village to pay such costs; (iv) the most recent equalized assessed valuation of the Area; (v) evidence indicating that the Area on the whole has not been subject to growth and development through investment by private enterprise; (vi) an assessment of any financial impact of the Area on or any increased demand for services from any taxing district affected by the Plan and Project and any program to address such financial impact or increased demand; (vii) an estimate of the equalized assessed valuation of the Area after completion of the Plan and Project; (viii) a description of the general land uses to apply in the Area; and (ix) a commitment by the

17 Village to fair employment practices and an affirmative action plan with respect to any redevelopment program to be undertaken by the Village; and WHEREAS, on March 23, 2015, the Village made the Plan and Project available for public review and inspection during regular business hours at the offices of the Village Clerk; and WHEREAS, on April 13, 2015, the Mayor and Village Trustees of the Village (collectively, the Corporate Authorities ) adopted Ordinance No entitled An Ordinance Establishing Certain Dates, Times and Places for Statutory Required Public Hearings Associated With the Proposed Roselle Road Nerge Redevelopment Project Area ( Ordinance No ) and set the date for the public hearing as June 8, 2015, pursuant to the Section of the Act; and WHEREAS, on April 20, 2015, the Village provided notice of the availability of the Plan and Project and eligibility report, including how to obtain said information, to all residential addresses that, after a good faith effort, the Village determined are located inside the Area and outside the proposed Area and within 750 feet of the boundaries of the proposed Area; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the Act, Ordinance No and all other applicable laws, the Village convened a joint review board, as that term is defined in the Act (the JRB ); and WHEREAS, in compliance with the Act, Ordinance No and all other applicable laws, written notice of the convening of the JRB was sent by certified mail on April 20, 2015, to all taxing districts of which taxable property is included in the Area, as well as to the Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity (the Department ); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, the JRB conducted a meeting on May 6, 2015, which was duly noticed pursuant to the Act and pursuant to the Illinois Open Meetings Act, 5 ILCS 120/1 et seq.; and WHEREAS, at the JRB meeting, the JRB reviewed the public record, the Plan and Project and the Area and moved to recommend that the Village designate the Area as a redevelopment project area under the Act and that the Plan and Project and the Area fulfill the objectives of the Act, and said motion carried by a majority vote of those JRB members present and voting; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section of the Act, Ordinance No and all other applicable laws, written notice of the public hearing (the Hearing ) was published in the Daily Herald, as required by the Act, said newspaper being a newspaper of general circulation within the taxing districts having property within the Area; and 2

18 WHEREAS, in compliance with Section of the Act, Ordinance No and all other applicable laws, written notice of the Hearing was sent by certified mail on April 20, 2015, to all taxing districts of which taxable property is included in the Area and to the Department; and WHEREAS, in compliance with Section of the Act, Ordinance No and all other applicable laws, written notice of the Hearing was sent by certified mail on April 20, 2015, addressed to the person or persons in whose name the general taxes for the last preceding year were paid on each lot, block, tract or parcel of land lying within the Area or, in the event that any such taxes for the preceding year were not paid, to the persons last listed on the tax rolls within the preceding three (3) years as the owners of such property; and WHEREAS, in compliance with Section of the Act, Ordinance No and all other applicable laws, written notice of the Hearing was sent on April 20, 2015, addressed to all persons whom, after a good faith effort, the Village determined to be residing in the Area; and WHEREAS, on June 8, 2015, pursuant to Section of the Act, the Corporate Authorities caused a public hearing to be held relative to the Plan and Project and the designation of the Area as a redevelopment project area under the Act, in the Village Council Chambers of the Village, to hear and determine all protests, objections and other comments to the proposed designation of the Area and adoption of the Plan and Project; and WHEREAS, the Plan and Project sets forth the blighting factors in the Area, and the Corporate Authorities have reviewed testimony and considered evidence, concerning the need to reduce or eliminate the blighting conditions as presented at the Hearing and have reviewed other studies and is generally informed of the conditions in the proposed Area which qualify the Area as a combination blighted area for vacant parcels and for improved parcels under the Act; and WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities have reviewed the conditions pertaining to lack of private investment in the proposed Area to determine whether private development would take place in the proposed Area as a whole without the adoption of the proposed Plan and Project; and WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities have reviewed the conditions pertaining to real property in the proposed Area to determine whether contiguous parcels of real property and improvements thereon would be substantially benefited by the proposed redevelopment project improvements; and WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities have reviewed its proposed Plan and Project and the Comprehensive Plan for the development of the City as a whole to determine whether the proposed Plan and Project conforms to the Comprehensive Plan of the Village. 3

19 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, BY THE VILLAGE BOARD OF THE VILLAGE OF ROSELLE, ILLINOIS, as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals as contained in the preambles to this Ordinance are true and correct and are hereby incorporated in this Ordinance as if set out in full by this reference. SECTION 2. Findings. The Village Board of the Village of Roselle hereby makes the following findings: a. The area constituting the proposed Area in the Village of Roselle, Illinois is described as follows: See Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein. b. There exist conditions which cause the Area to be designated as a redevelopment project area and classified as a blighted area for vacant parcels and improved parcels as those terms are defined in Section (b) of the Act. c. The proposed Area on the whole has not been subject to growth and development through investment by private enterprise and would not be reasonably anticipated to be developed without the adoption of the Plan and Project. d. The Plan and Project conforms to the Comprehensive Plan for the development of the municipality as a whole. e. The parcels of real property in the proposed Area are contiguous and only those contiguous parcels of real property and improvements thereon which will be substantially benefited by the proposed redevelopment project improvements are included in the proposed Area. f. The estimated date for final completion of the Plan and Project is December 31 of the year in which the payment to the County Treasurer is to be made with respect to the ad valorem taxes levied in the twenty-third (23 rd ) calendar year after the year in which this Ordinance became effective. g. The estimated date for retirement of obligations incurred to finance the Plan and Project costs is December 31 of the year in which the payment to the County Treasurer is to be made with respect to the 4

20 ad valorem taxes levied in the twenty-third (23 rd ) calendar year after the year in which this Ordinance became effective. SECTION 3. Adoption. The Tax Increment Financing District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan and Project, for the Roselle Road - Nerge Redevelopment Project Area, which was the subject matter of the Hearing held June 8, 2015 is hereby approved and adopted. A copy of the Plan and Project marked Exhibit C is attached to and made a part of this Ordinance. SECTION 4. Superseder. All ordinances, resolutions, rules and orders, or parts thereof, in conflict herewith, are to the extent of such conflict hereby superseded. SECTION 5. Publication. A full, true and complete copy of this Ordinance shall be published in pamphlet form as provided by the Illinois Municipal Code, as amended. The Village Clerk is hereby directed to publish this Ordinance in pamphlet form. SECTION 6. Severability. The provisions and sections of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be separable, and the invalidity of any portion of this Ordinance shall not affect the validity of the remainder. SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval, and publication as required by law. 5

21 PASSED BY THE MAYOR AND VILLAGE TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF ROSELLE, ILLINOIS, THIS 27 th DAY OF JULY, AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Mayor, Village of Roselle ATTEST: Village Clerk 6

22 Exhibit A Legal Description THAT PART OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 10 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE WEST RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE OF MARION STREET AND THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE ELGIN - O'HARE CORRIDOR (FAP ROUTE 426) AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF HIGHWAYS, JOB NUMBER R AS PREPARED FOR THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (IDOT) BY BAIRD AND COMPANY, DATED OCTOBER 31, 1988; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ROSELLE ROAD, AS WIDENED BY SAID PLAT OF HIGHWAYS; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE OF ROSELLE ROAD TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 90 FEET OF THE SOUTH 240 FEET OF LOT 3 IN BLOCK A OF CONCORD TERRACE SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED JUNE 3, 1994 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER ; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION AND SOUTH LINE TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTH 90 FEET OF THE SOUTH 240 FEET; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE AND ITS WESTERLY EXTENSION TO A POINT ON SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ROSELLE ROAD; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE OF PRATT BOULEVARD; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ROSELLE ROAD TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTH LINE OF BRANIGAR'S COMMERCIAL RESUBDIVISION AS RECORDED JANUARY 23, 1974 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER ; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION AND NORTH LINE OF BRANIGAR'S COMMERCIAL RESUBDIVISION TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID BRANIGAR'S COMMERCIAL RESUBDIVISION AND ITS SOUTHERLY EXTENSION TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF NERGE ROAD; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF NERGE ROAD TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1 IN BLOCK B OF SAID CONCORD TERRACE SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED JUNE 3, 1964 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER ; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1 TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1 AND ITS EASTERLY EXTENSION TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF INDIAN HILL DRIVE; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 5 IN SAID BLOCK B OF 7

23 CONCORD TERRACE SUBDIVISION; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND SOUTH LINE OF LOT 5 TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF, SAID SOUTHWEST CORNER ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID BLOCK B OF CONCORD TERRACE SUBDIVISION; THENCE S0UTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID ELGIN - O'HARE CORRIDOR (FAP ROUTE 426); THENCE SOUTHERLY TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 8 IN VANTAGE POINTE SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED ON MAY 18, 1987 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER ; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 8 TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 7 IN SAID VANTAGE POINTE SUBDIVISION; THENCE WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 7 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF, SAID NORTHWEST CORNER ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID VANTAGE POINTE SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE AND ITS SOUTHERLY EXTENSION TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF DEVON AVENUE; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE AND ITS WESTERLY EXTENSION TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE OF AFORESAID ROSELLE ROAD (AS WIDENEND); THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ARTHUR AVENUE; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE WESTERLY 100 FEET OF LOT 10, 11 AND 12 AS MEASURED ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 10 AND THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 12 IN BLOCK 3 IN BOEGER ESTATES ADDITION TO ROSELLE AS RECORDED ON MARCH 1, 1927 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER ; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION AND EASTERLY LINE TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 10; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; SAID NORTHWEST CORNER ALSO BEING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 9 IN SAID BOEGER ESTATES ADDITION TO ROSELLE; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 9 AND LOTS 8 THRU 4, INCLUSIVE, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4 TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE OF AFORESAID MARION STREET; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 8

24 Exhibit B Boundary Map of the Area 9

25 Exhibit C Copy of Tax Increment Financing District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan and Project 10

26 VILLAGE OF ROSELLE, IL Tax Increment Financing ( TIF ) Eligibility Study and Redevelopment Plan and Project Roselle Road - Nerge Redevelopment Project Area Report: March 23, 2015

27 VILLAGE OF ROSELLE, IL TIF Eligibility Study and Redevelopment Plan and Project: Roselle Road-Nerge Redevelopment Project Area Table of Contents SECTION PAGE 1. Executive Summary Introduction Eligibility Analysis Redevelopment Plan and Project Financial Plan Required Findings and Tests Provisions for Amending Action Plan Commitment to Fair Employment Practices and Affirmative Action Plan Appendix 1: Boundary Legal Description Appendix 2: Summary of EAV (by PIN) LIST OF MAPS Map 1: Community Context... 6 Map 2: Boundary and Existing Land Use Map... 7 Maps 3A-3B: Vacant Land Factors Maps 4A-4E: Improved Land Factors Map 5: Proposed Future Land Use Map S. B. FRIEDMAN & COMPANY 221 N. LaSalle St. Suite 820 Chicago, IL T: F: E: info@sbfriedman.com SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS i

28 1. Executive Summary In April of 2014, SB Friedman Development Advisors ( SB Friedman ) was engaged by the Village of Roselle (the Village ) to conduct a Tax Increment Financing ( TIF ) Eligibility Study and, assuming the proposed redevelopment area satisfied statutory qualifications, prepare a Redevelopment Plan and Project. This report details the eligibility factors found within the Roselle Road-Nerge Redevelopment Project Area (the Roselle Road-Nerge RPA or RPA ) in support of its TIF designation as a blighted area for vacant and improved land within the definitions set forth in the Illinois Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, 65 ILCS 5/ et seq., as amended (the Act ). In addition to the eligibility analysis, this report contains the Redevelopment Plan and Project for the RPA. The RPA consists of 82 tax parcels comprising approximately 30 acres of land; approximately 16 acres are made up of vacant land and 13.9 acres are improved land. The RPA largely includes the frontage along Roselle Road, roughly extending from Blackhawk Drive on the north to Arthur Avenue on the south, and the frontage along Elgin-O Hare Expressway, roughly from S. Indian Hill Drive on the east to Marion Street on the west. Determination of Eligibility This report concludes that the Roselle Road-Nerge RPA is eligible for TIF designation as a blighted area for vacant parcels and as a blighted area for improved parcels. Eligibility factors are defined under the Act at 65 ILCS 5/ (a) and (b), and are more fully described herein. Redevelopment Goals, Objectives and Strategies The overall goal of this TIF Eligibility Study and Redevelopment Plan and Project is to reduce or eliminate blighting influences within the RPA. Likewise, this Redevelopment Plan and Project is intended to: 1) provide the direction and mechanisms necessary to establish the RPA as a vibrant mixed-use area; 2) stimulate the redevelopment of vacant and underutilized parcels; and 3) provide new public facilities. Redevelopment of the RPA will strengthen the economic base and enhance the quality of life of the Village as a whole by eliminating blighting influences and adding jobs to the local economy. Development of the RPA is to be achieved through an integrated and comprehensive strategy that leverages public resources to stimulate additional private investment. The underlying strategy is to use Tax Increment Financing, as well as other funding sources, to reinforce and encourage new private investment. Objectives. Five (5) objectives support the overall goal of area-wide revitalization of the RPA. These objectives include: 1. Facilitate and encourage development of vacant or underutilized properties within the RPA, including assembly, site preparation, and marketing of available sites in the RPA, as allowed by the Act; SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 1

29 Roselle Road-Nerge RPA Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan & Project 2. Foster the construction and/or improvement of the public infrastructure where needed, including public utilities, sidewalks, streets, curbs, gutters, underground water and sanitary systems and physical plants, and stormwater detention of adequate capacities to create an environment conducive to private investment; 3. Strengthen the RPA as a vibrant mixed-use area by providing resources for the rehabilitation of existing properties; 4. Provide resources for streetscaping, landscaping and signage to improve the image and accessibility of the RPA, and provide, where appropriate, for buffering between incompatible land uses and screening or softening non-residential land uses from residential land uses; and 5. Support the goals and objectives of other overlapping plans, and coordinate available federal, state and local resources to further the goals of this Redevelopment Plan and Project. Strategies. These objectives will be implemented through five (5) integrated strategies. These include: 1. Facilitate Site Preparation. Financial assistance may be provided to private developers seeking to acquire land and assemble sites for projects supportive of this Redevelopment Plan and Project. To meet the goals, policies or objectives of this Redevelopment Plan, the Village may acquire and assemble property throughout the RPA. Land assemblage by the Village may be done by purchase, exchange, donation, lease or eminent domain, and may be for the purposes of: (a) sale, lease or conveyance to private developers; or (b) sale, lease, conveyance or dedication for the construction of public improvements or facilities. Site preparation may include demolition of existing improvements and environmental remediation, where needed. The Village may require written development agreements with developers before acquiring any properties. As appropriate, the Village may devote acquired property to temporary uses until such property is scheduled for disposition and development. 2. Encourage Private-Sector Activities. Through the creation and support of public-private partnerships or through written agreements, the Village may provide financial and other assistance to encourage the private sector, including local property owners and businesses, to undertake redevelopment and new construction projects, and other improvements that are consistent with the goals of this Redevelopment Plan and Project. 3. Implement Public Improvements. A series of public improvements throughout the RPA may be designed and implemented to help define and create an identity for the area, prepare sites for anticipated private investment, and create a more conducive environment for new development. Public improvements that are implemented with TIF assistance are intended to complement and not replace existing funding sources for public improvements in the RPA. These improvements may include new streets and sidewalks, streetscaping, improved street and sidewalk lighting, resurfacing of streets and other paved surfaces, improvement of underground infrastructure and physical plants, stormwater detention of adequate capacity, and other public improvements and utilities consistent with this Redevelopment Plan and Project. These public improvements may be completed pursuant to redevelopment agreements with private entities or SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 2

30 Roselle Road-Nerge RPA Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan & Project intergovernmental agreements with other public entities, and may include the construction, rehabilitation, renovation or restoration of public improvements on one or more parcels. 4. Assist Businesses and Property Owners. The Village may provide assistance to support businesses and property owners in the RPA in furtherance of the RPA s goals and objectives. 5. Other Statutory Strategies. Implement and effectuate any other strategy authorized by the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, 65 ILCS 5/ et seq., (hereinafter the Act ) which will promote the purposes and goals of the Redevelopment Plan and Project. Required Findings and Tests The required conditions for the adoption of this Redevelopment Plan and Project are found to be present within the RPA. First, the Village is required to evaluate whether or not the RPA has been subject to growth and private investment, and must substantiate a finding of lack of such investment prior to establishing a Tax Increment Financing district. Supporting this finding, nearly four-fifths of the RPA (65 out of 82 parcels, or 79%) is vacant. In addition, less than 45 permits for building activity have occurred over the past five years representing minor maintenance and repair to existing structures. Finally, the equalized assessed value (EAV) of the RPA as a whole has grown at a rate slower than the remainder of the Village and slower than the Consumer Price Index during five of the last five year-to-year periods. On the whole, the RPA has not been subject to widespread growth and development through investment by private enterprise. Second, the Village is required to find that, but for the designation of the TIF district and the use of Tax Increment Financing, it is unlikely that significant investment will occur in the RPA. Without the support of public resources, the redevelopment objectives for the RPA would most likely not be realized. In addition to stormwater management expenses that are not economically viable for the private sector to support, the improved area was developed in a piecemeal fashion that did not follow the Village s Comprehensive Plan and has resulted in adverse impacts that limit further development potential. Public resources to assist with infrastructure improvements and site preparation are needed to leverage private investment and facilitate development. The Village has limited financial capacity to make these improvements. TIF funds can be used to fund infrastructure improvements, site preparation and other related costs. Accordingly, but for the designation of a TIF district, these projects, which would contribute substantially to redevelopment, are unlikely to occur. Third, the RPA includes only those contiguous parcels of real property that are expected to benefit substantially from the proposed Redevelopment Plan and Project improvements. Thus, the RPA meets this requirement. Finally, the proposed land uses described in this Redevelopment Plan and Project are consistent with the Village of Roselle s Comprehensive Plan. The redevelopment opportunities identified in this Redevelopment Plan and Project will be substantially supported and their implementation facilitated through the creation of the TIF district. SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 3

31 2. Introduction The Study Area The RPA includes approximately 16 acres of vacant land and approximately 13.9 acres of improved land. In April 2014, SB Friedman was engaged by the Village to conduct a study of the properties in the RPA to determine whether said properties exhibited the eligibility factors necessary to qualify for TIF district designation under the Act. The location of the RPA is shown on Map 1 on page 6. Map 2 details the boundaries of the RPA which include only those contiguous parcels of real property that are expected to benefit substantially by the improvements discussed herein. The Eligibility Study covers events and conditions that exist and that were determined to support the designation of the RPA as a blighted area for vacant and improved land under the Act, at the completion of our research in September 2014 and not thereafter. These events or conditions include, without limitation, governmental actions and additional developments. This Eligibility Study and Redevelopment Plan and Project document summarizes the analysis and findings of the consultant s work, which, unless otherwise noted, is solely the responsibility of SB Friedman Development Advisors. The Village is entitled to rely on the findings and conclusions of this Redevelopment Plan and Project in designating the RPA as a TIF district under the Act. SB Friedman has prepared this Redevelopment Plan and Project with the understanding that the Village would rely: (1) on the findings and conclusions of this Redevelopment Plan and Project in proceeding with the designation of the RPA and the adoption and implementation of this Redevelopment Plan and Project; and (2) on the fact that SB Friedman obtained the necessary information relating to the RPA, so that this Redevelopment Plan and Project will comply with the Act, and the Roselle Road-Nerge RPA can be designated as a TIF district in compliance with the Act. Existing Land Use Based upon SB Friedman s research, six (6) land uses have been identified within the Roselle Road-Nerge RPA: Vacant Commercial Residential Right-of-Way Park/Open Space Infrastructure/Utilities The existing land use pattern in the RPA is shown in Map 2 on page 7. Following is a description of the existing land uses in the RPA: SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 4

32 Roselle Road-Nerge RPA Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan & Project Vacant and Right-of-Way. Approximately 79% of the RPA parcels (65 out of 82 parcels) are vacant. Of this total, 34 parcels are dedicated as right-of-way for the Elgin-O Hare Expressway. Commercial. Commercial land in the RPA includes 11 total parcels. Residential. Six parcels contain residential uses. Park/Open Space. Heather Green Pond is located at the far southwestern corner of the RPA. Utility. One parcel is dedicated for utilities and other infrastructure. SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 5

33 Roselle Road-Nerge RPA Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan & Project SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 6

34 Roselle Road-Nerge RPA Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan & Project SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 7

35 3. Eligibility Analysis Provisions of the Illinois Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act Based upon the conditions found within the RPA at the completion of SB Friedman s research, it has been determined that the RPA meets the eligibility requirements of the Act as a blighted area for vacant land as well as a blighted area for improved land. The following outlines the provisions of the Act to establish eligibility. Under the Act, two primary avenues exist to establish eligibility for an area to permit the use of Tax Increment Financing for area redevelopment: declaring an area as a blighted area and/or a conservation area. Blighted areas are those improved or vacant areas with blighting influences that are impacting the public safety, health, morals or welfare of the community, and are substantially impairing the growth of the tax base in the area. Conservation areas are those improved areas that are deteriorating and declining and soon may become blighted if the deterioration is not abated. The statutory provisions of the Act specify how a district can be designated as a conservation area and/or blighted area district, based upon an evidentiary finding of certain eligibility factors listed in the Act. According to the Act, blighted areas for improved land must have a combination of five (5) or more of these eligibility factors acting in concert, which threaten the health, safety, morals or welfare of the proposed district. Conservation areas must have a minimum of 50% of the total structures within the area aged 35 years or older, plus a combination of three (3) or more additional eligibility factors that are detrimental to the public safety, health, morals or welfare, and which could result in such an area becoming a blighted area. A separate set of factors exists for the designation of vacant land as a blighted area. There is no provision for designating vacant land as a conservation area. Factors for Vacant Land According to the Act, there are two ways by which vacant land can be designated as blighted. One is to find that at least two (2) of six (6) factors from the list discussed below under the Two-Factor Test are present to a meaningful extent and reasonably distributed throughout the RPA. The second is to find that at least one (1) of the six (6) factors discussed under the One-Factor Test is present to a meaningful extent and reasonably distributed throughout the RPA. TWO-FACTOR TEST Under the provisions of the blighted area section of the Act, if the land is vacant, an area qualifies as blighted if a combination of two (2) or more of the following factors may be identified, which combine to impact the sound growth of the redevelopment project area: SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 8

36 Roselle Road-Nerge RPA Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan & Project Obsolete Platting of Vacant Land. This includes parcels of limited or narrow size, or configurations of parcels of irregular size or shape that would be difficult to develop on a planned basis and in a manner compatible with contemporary standards and requirements, or platting that failed to create rights-ofway for streets or alleys or that created inadequate right-of-way widths for streets, alleys or other public rights-of-way, or that omitted easements for public utilities. Diversity of Ownership. Diversity of ownership is when adjacent properties are owned by multiple parties. This factor applies when diversity of ownership of parcels of vacant land is sufficient in number to retard or impede the ability to assemble the land for development. Tax and Special Assessment Delinquencies. Tax and special assessment delinquencies exist or the property has been the subject of tax sales under the Property Tax Code within the last five years. Deterioration of Structures or Site Improvements in Neighboring Areas Adjacent to the Vacant Land. Evidence of structural deterioration and area disinvestment in blocks adjacent to the vacant land may substantiate why new development had not previously occurred on the vacant parcels. Environmental Contamination. The area has incurred Illinois Environmental Protection Agency or United States Environmental Protection Agency remediation costs for, or a study conducted by an independent consultant recognized as having expertise in environmental remediation has determined a need for, the clean-up of hazardous waste, hazardous substances, or underground storage tanks required by state or federal law, provided that the remediation costs constitute a material impediment to the development or redevelopment of the redevelopment project area. Lack of Growth in Equalized Assessed Value. The total equalized assessed value (EAV) of the proposed RPA has declined for three of the last five calendar years prior to the year in which the RPA is designated; or is increasing at an annual rate that is less than the balance of the municipality for three of the last five calendar years for which information is available; or is increasing at an annual rate that is less than the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the United States Department of Labor or successor agency for three of the last five calendar years prior to the year in which the RPA is designated. ONE-FACTOR TEST Under the provisions of the blighted area section of the Act, if the land is vacant, an area qualifies as blighted if one (1) or more of the following factors is found to be present to a meaningful extent: The area contains unused quarries, strip mines or strip mine ponds; The area contains unused rail yards, rail track, or railroad rights-of-way; The area, prior to its designation, is subject to: (i) chronic flooding that adversely impacts on real property in the area, as certified by a registered professional engineer or appropriate regulatory agency, or (ii) surface water that discharges from all or a part of the area and contributes to flooding within the same watershed, but only if the redevelopment project provides for facilities or improvements to contribute to the alleviation of all or part of the flooding; The area contains unused or illegal dumping sites; The area was designated as a town center prior to January 1, 1982, is between 50 and 100 acres in size, and is 75% vacant land; or SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 9

37 Roselle Road-Nerge RPA Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan & Project The area qualified as blighted prior to becoming vacant. Factors for Improved Land As stated, blighted areas must have a combination of five (5) or more of the eligibility factors listed below, and conservation areas must have a minimum of 50% of the total structures within the area aged 35 years or older, plus a combination of three (3) or more additional eligibility factors. Dilapidation. An advanced state of disrepair or neglect of necessary repairs to the primary structural components of buildings or improvements in such a combination that a documented building condition analysis determines that major repair is required, or the defects are so serious and so extensive that the buildings must be removed. Obsolescence. The condition or process of falling into disuse. Structures have become ill-suited for the original use. Deterioration. With respect to buildings, defects including, but not limited to, major defects in the secondary building components, such as doors, windows, porches, gutters and downspouts, and fascia. With respect to surface improvements, that the condition of roadways, alleys, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, off-street parking, and surface storage areas evidence deterioration, including but not limited to, surface cracking, crumbling, potholes, depressions, loose paving material, and weeds protruding through paved surfaces. Presence of Structures below Minimum Code Standards. All structures that do not meet the standards of zoning, subdivision, building, fire, and other governmental codes applicable to property, but not including housing and property maintenance codes. Illegal Use of Individual Structures. The use of structures in violation of the applicable federal, state or local laws, exclusive of those applicable to the Presence of Structures below Minimum Code Standards. Excessive Vacancies. The presence of buildings that are unoccupied or under-utilized and that represent an adverse influence on the area because of the frequency, extent or duration of the vacancies. Lack of Ventilation, Light or Sanitary Facilities. The absence of adequate ventilation for light or air circulation in spaces or rooms without windows, or that require the removal of dust, odor, gas, smoke or other noxious airborne materials. Inadequate natural light and ventilation means the absence of skylights or windows for interior spaces or rooms and improper window sizes and amounts by room area to window area ratios. Inadequate sanitary facilities refers to the absence or inadequacy of garbage storage and enclosure, bathroom facilities, hot water and kitchens, and structural inadequacies preventing ingress and egress to and from all rooms and units within a building. Inadequate Utilities. Underground and overhead utilities such as storm sewers and storm drainage, sanitary sewers, water lines, and gas, telephone and electrical services that are shown to be inadequate. Inadequate utilities are those that are: (i) of insufficient capacity to serve the uses in the redevelopment project area, (ii) deteriorated, antiquated, obsolete or in disrepair, or (iii) lacking within the SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 10

38 Roselle Road-Nerge RPA Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan & Project redevelopment project area. Excessive Land Coverage and Overcrowding of Structures and Community Facilities. The overintensive use of property and the crowding of buildings and accessory facilities onto a site. Examples of problem conditions warranting the designation of an area as one exhibiting excessive land coverage are: (i) the presence of buildings either improperly situated on parcels or located on parcels of inadequate size and shape in relation to present-day standards of development for health and safety, and (ii) the presence of multiple buildings on a single parcel. For there to be a finding of excessive land coverage, these parcels must exhibit one or more of the following conditions: insufficient provision for light and air within or around buildings, increased threat of spread of fire due to the close proximity of buildings, lack of adequate or proper access to a public right-of-way, lack of reasonably required off-street parking, or inadequate provision for loading and service. Deleterious Land Use or Layout. The existence of incompatible land use relationships, buildings occupied by inappropriate mixed uses, or uses considered to be noxious, offensive or unsuitable for the surrounding area. Environmental Clean-Up. The proposed redevelopment project area has incurred Illinois Environmental Protection Agency or United States Environmental Protection Agency remediation costs for, or a study conducted by an independent consultant recognized as having expertise in environmental remediation has determined a need for, the clean-up of hazardous waste, hazardous substances, or underground storage tanks required by state or federal law, provided that the remediation costs constitute a material impediment to the development or redevelopment of the redevelopment project area. Lack of Community Planning. The proposed redevelopment project area was developed prior to or without the benefit or guidance of a community plan. This means that the development occurred prior to the adoption by the municipality of a comprehensive or other community plan, or that the plan was not followed at the time of the area s development. This factor must be documented by evidence of adverse or incompatible land use relationships, inadequate street layout, improper subdivision, parcels of inadequate shape and size to meet contemporary development standards, or other evidence demonstrating an absence of effective community planning. Lack of Growth in Equalized Assessed Value. The total equalized assessed value of the proposed redevelopment project area has declined for three of the last five calendar years prior to the year in which the redevelopment project area is designated; or is increasing at an annual rate that is less than the balance of the municipality for three of the last five calendar years for which information is available; or is increasing at an annual rate that is less than the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the United States Department of Labor or successor agency for three of the last five calendar years prior to the year in which the redevelopment project area is designated. Methodology Overview and Determination of Eligibility Analysis of the eligibility factors was conducted through research involving an exterior survey, an engineering study of the parcels contained in the RPA, review of building and property records, and interviews with Village staff. Property records include building permit data, utility data and assessment records. Our survey of the area established that there are a total of 82 parcels (65 vacant and 17 improved) and 16 buildings (not including ancillary structures) within the Roselle Road-Nerge RPA. SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 11

39 Roselle Road-Nerge RPA Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan & Project These properties were examined for qualification factors consistent with either blighted area or conservation area requirements of the Act. We concluded that the properties within the RPA qualify for designation as a blighted area for vacant land and a blighted area for improved land, based upon the presence to a meaningful extent of the eligibility criteria as defined by the Act. To arrive at this designation, SB Friedman analyzed the presence of eligibility factors on a parcel-byparcel basis. When appropriate, we calculated the presence of eligibility factors on infrastructure and ancillary properties associated with the structures. The eligibility factors were correlated to parcels using aerial maps, property files created from field observations, and record searches. This information was then graphically plotted on a tax parcel map of the Roselle Road-Nerge RPA to establish the distribution of eligibility factors, and to determine which factors were present to a major extent. Blighted Area Findings Vacant Land As required by the Act, two (2) of the two-factor vacant land eligibility factors must be found present to a meaningful extent, and reasonably distributed throughout the vacant area in order to characterize such area as a blighted area. Our research indicates that the following two (2) factors for vacant property are present to a major extent (shown on Maps 3A and 3B on the following pages): Lack of Growth in Equalized Assessed Value (EAV) Obsolete Platting The sections following the maps summarize our field research as it pertains to each of the identified blighted area eligibility factors found within the RPA. SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 12

40 Roselle Road-Nerge RPA Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan & Project SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 13

41 Roselle Road-Nerge RPA Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan & Project SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 14

42 Roselle Road-Nerge RPA Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan & Project 1. LACK OF GROWTH IN EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUE (EAV) VACANT PARCELS The total EAV is a measure of the property value in the RPA. In order to qualify for this eligibility factor, the total EAV of the area must have: increased at an annual rate that is less than the balance of the municipality; increased at an annual rate that is less than the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for All Urban Consumers; or declined for at least three of the last five calendar years prior to the year in which the RPA is designated. The EAV history of all the included tax parcels in the RPA was tabulated for the last six years (five yearto-year periods) for which assessed values and EAV are available. The most recent year for which final information is available is A lack of growth in EAV has been found for the vacant land in the RPA, based on the following two findings: The change in EAV of the vacant portion of the RPA has not kept pace with CPI for four of the past five year-to-year periods; and The change in EAV of the vacant portion of the RPA has been negative (declined) during four of the last five year-to-year periods. The basis for these findings is summarized in Table 1 below. Lack of growth in EAV within the area is one of the strongest indicators that the area as a whole has been falling into a state of decline. This eligibility factor was analyzed area-wide and is considered to be present to a meaningful extent for the vacant portion of the Roselle Road-Nerge RPA. Table 1: Percent Change in Annual Equalized Assessed Valuation (EAV) [1] Change in EAV by Year RPA - Vacant Parcels -54.5% -6.2% 3.6% -1.8% -51.1% CPI [2] -1.2% 1.4% 2.7% 1.5% 1.1% Source: Cook County Assessor s Office. [1] Non-qualifying periods are shaded. [2] Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers and all items, in the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha area, not seasonally adjusted. 2. OBSOLETE PLATTING VACANT PARCELS The TIF Act defines obsolete platting as the platting of vacant land that: Results in parcels of limited or narrow size, or configurations of parcels of irregular size or shape that would be difficult to develop on a planned basis and in a manner compatible with contemporary standards and requirements; or Fails to create rights-of-way for streets or alleys, or that creates inadequate right-of-way widths for streets, alleys or other public rights-of-way, or that omits easements for public utilities. Much of the vacant land in the RPA has been platted for residential development but is currently zoned for commercial use and fronts major thoroughfares, including Roselle Road and the Elgin-O Hare Expressway. Development of these parcels for commercial land uses would require substantial SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 15

43 Roselle Road-Nerge RPA Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan & Project assembly. The originally intended residential land use is also inappropriate due to the safety issues created by the access and proximity to major thoroughfares. Additionally, 34 of the 65 total vacant parcels in the RPA (52%) are either located within the current right-of-way for the Elgin-O Hare Expressway or have been dedicated for future right-of-way expansion. Original platting of this area did not allow for the regional highway, thus this area has since been vacated, while adjacent parcels were never developed according to their originally intended commercial and residential uses and are now dedicated for right-of-way expansion. The width and layout of the road has also created adjacent parcel shapes that are of atypical sizes and shapes that would be difficult to develop on a planned basis without substantial assembly. Therefore, obsolete platting is considered to be present and reasonably distributed throughout the vacant portion of the RPA. Blighted Area Findings Improved Land As required by the Act, five (5) of 13 improved land eligibility factors must be found present to a meaningful extent, and reasonably distributed throughout the improved area in order to characterize such area as a blighted area. Our research indicates that the following five (5) factors for improved property are present to a major extent: Lack of Growth in Equalized Assessed Value (EAV) Deterioration Lack of Community Planning Excessive Vacancies Presence of Structures below Minimum Code Based on the presence of these factors, the Roselle Road-Nerge RPA meets the requirements of a blighted area for improved land under the Act. Maps 4a through 4e on the following pages illustrate the distribution of those eligibility factors by highlighting each parcel where the respective factors were found to be present to a meaningful degree. The sections following the maps summarize our field research as it pertains to each of the identified blighted area eligibility factors found within the RPA. SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 16

44 Roselle Road-Nerge RPA Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan & Project SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 17

45 Roselle Road-Nerge RPA Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan & Project SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 18

46 Roselle Road-Nerge RPA Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan & Project SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 19

47 Roselle Road-Nerge RPA Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan & Project SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 20

48 Roselle Road-Nerge RPA Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan & Project SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 21

49 Roselle Road-Nerge RPA Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan & Project 1. LACK OF GROWTH IN EAV IMPROVED PARCELS In order to qualify for this factor, the total EAV of the area must have: increased at an annual rate that is less than the balance of the municipality; increased at an annual rate that is less than the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for All Urban Consumers; or declined for at least three of the last five calendar years prior to the year in which the RPA is designated. The total EAV is a measure of the property value in the RPA. The EAV history of all the included tax parcels in the RPA was tabulated for the last six years (five year-to-year periods) for which assessed values and EAV are available. The most recent year for which final information is available is A lack of growth in EAV has been found for the improved land in the RPA based on the following two findings: The change in EAV of the improved portion of the RPA has not kept pace with CPI for four of the past five year-to-year periods; and The change in EAV of the improved portion of the RPA has been negative (declined) during four of the last five year-to-year periods. The basis for these findings is summarized in Table 2 below. Lack of growth in EAV within the area is one of the strongest indicators that the area as a whole has been falling into a state of decline. This eligibility factor was analyzed area-wide and is considered to be present to a meaningful extent for the improved portion of the Roselle Road-Nerge RPA. Table 2: Percent Change in Annual Equalized Assessed Valuation (EAV) [1] Change in EAV by Year RPA - Improved Parcels 24.8% -14.3% -15.1% -20.8% -17.6% CPI [2] -1.2% 1.4% 2.7% 1.5% 1.1% Source: Cook County Assessor s Office. [1] Non-qualifying periods are shaded. [2] Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers and all items, in the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha area, not seasonally adjusted. 2. DETERIORATION IMPROVED PARCELS Overall, 14 of the 17 improved parcels (82%) in the Roselle Road-Nerge RPA exhibit deterioration in primary structures, ancillary structures or surface improvements. Deterioration was evaluated on a building-by-building and parcel-by-parcel basis. Catalogued deterioration included defects in the fascia and soffit components of buildings, and widespread surface cracks, crumbling, protruding weeds and potholes. Deterioration is considered to be present to a meaningful extent within the Roselle Road- Nerge RPA. 3. LACK OF COMMUNITY PLANNING IMPROVED PARCELS The TIF Act defines lack of community planning as development that occurred prior to the adoption of a comprehensive or other community plan by the municipality, or which did not follow a community plan at the time of the area's development. SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 22

50 Roselle Road-Nerge RPA Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan & Project While Village plans dating back to the 1970s (including the Comprehensive Plan) encompass the RPA, many of the parcels were under Cook County s jurisdiction and were not developed according to the recommendations set forth in the Village s Comprehensive Plan. As a result, improved land uses within the RPA are inconsistent with land use recommendations in the Comprehensive Plan. The Village s Comprehensive Plan states standards for commercial development include, among other items: a minimal number of curb cuts; common driveways; pedestrian access between commercial and residential land uses; and shared parking. On the whole, the improved areas in the RPA lack these characteristics. Comprehensive Plan text also states that the east side of Roselle Road from Nerge Road to Blackhawk Drive should be developed as office business, and wherever possible, should be in a parklike setting with substantial setbacks and landscaping. Current improvements include neighborhoodlevel retail, a health clinic, and vacant land with minimal setbacks and landscaping, and discontinuous sidewalks. Additionally, the presence of parcels that are of inadequate sizes and shapes, and the inadequate provision of right-of-way for the Elgin-O Hare Expressway further demonstrate the absence of effective community planning in this area. Because of a lack of coordinated effort in developing the RPA, and the presence of both surface and building improvements that are inconsistent with the recommendations of the Village s Comprehensive Plan, lack of community planning is considered to impact the entire RPA. 4. EXCESSIVE VACANCIES IMPROVED PARCELS The TIF Act defines excessive vacancies as the presence of buildings that are unoccupied or underutilized and that represent an adverse influence on the area because of the frequency, extent or duration of the vacancies. Overall, approximately 31% of the total square footage in the RPA is unoccupied. This includes three (3) out of 16 total buildings in the RPA that have vacancy levels at or above 40%. When combined with widespread deterioration and a lack of community planning, these properties become less competitive, and have the adverse impacts of decreased fiscal revenues and employment opportunities that could be realized. 5. STRUCTURES BELOW MINIMUM CODE IMPROVED PARCELS Structures below minimum code standards are those that do not meet applicable standards of zoning, subdivision, building, fire and other governmental codes. The principal purpose of such codes is to protect the health and safety of the public. As such, structures below minimum code standards may jeopardize the health and safety of building occupants, pedestrians, or occupants of neighboring structures. The Watershed Management Ordinance regulating stormwater management in Cook County became effective in 2014 subsequent to a multi-year planning and evaluation effort beginning in The purpose of the ordinance includes, among other items: protecting the public health, safety and welfare; reducing the potential for loss of property due to flood damage; and protecting waters within Cook County to preserve public health. The regulations adopted under this ordinance significantly increase required storage volumes and decrease runoff rates during storm events to alleviate hazards from flooding, erosion and water quality degradation. The Village has elected to hold development to the standards of the DuPage County stormwater ordinance which has an even higher standard than the Cook County ordinance. All of the improved properties in the RPA were improved prior to both the effective date and the preceding planning and evaluation period of this ordinance. The Village has not SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 23

51 Roselle Road-Nerge RPA Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan & Project identified any available funding sources for stormwater improvements in this area. While a very high percentage of the improvements in the RPA may be grandfathered in and thus, are not in direct violation of the ordinance, those structures below current development standards may present a health or safety hazard. They also reduce the overall competiveness and economic viability of the area. Therefore, we have concluded that this factor is reasonably distributed and present to a meaningful extent throughout the RPA. SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 24

52 4. Redevelopment Plan and Project Redevelopment Needs of the RPA The land use and existing conditions for the RPA suggest three (3) major redevelopment needs: 1. Development of vacant and underutilized parcels; 2. Site preparation and stormwater management; and 3. Capital improvements that further the objectives set forth in this Redevelopment Plan and Project. This Redevelopment Plan and Project identifies tools for the Village to provide necessary infrastructure improvements and public facilities that benefit both property owners in the RPA, and support other public and private improvements that serve the best interests of the local community and the Village. Currently, the RPA is characterized by lack of growth in EAV, deterioration, lack of community planning, excessive vacancies, and flooding. It is our understanding that the Village of Roselle does not have the financial resources to help fund necessary improvements to reduce or eliminate these blighting influences. This situation limits the potential for growth and contributes to the lack of new investment within the RPA. The public improvements outlined in this Redevelopment Plan and Project will create an environment conducive to private investment and development within the RPA. The goals, objectives and strategies discussed below have been developed to address these needs and facilitate the development of the RPA. To support specific projects and encourage future investment in the RPA, public resources including Tax Increment Financing may be used to expand RPA infrastructure, and facilitate site development and site preparation. Redevelopment Goals, Objectives and Strategies The overall goal of this TIF Eligibility Study and Redevelopment Plan and Project is to reduce or eliminate blighting influences within the RPA. Likewise, this Redevelopment Plan and Project is intended to: 1) provide the direction and mechanisms necessary to establish the RPA as a vibrant mixed-use area; 2) stimulate the redevelopment of vacant and underutilized parcels; and 3) provide new public facilities. Redevelopment of the RPA will strengthen the economic base and enhance the quality of life of the Village as a whole by eliminating blighting influences and adding jobs to the local economy. Development of the RPA is to be achieved through an integrated and comprehensive strategy that leverages public resources to stimulate additional private investment. The underlying strategy is to use Tax Increment Financing, as well as other funding sources, to reinforce and encourage new private investment. Objectives. Five (5) objectives support the overall goal of area-wide revitalization of the RPA. These objectives include: SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 25

53 Roselle Road-Nerge RPA Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan & Project 1. Facilitate and encourage development of vacant or underutilized properties within the RPA, including assembly, site preparation, and marketing of available sites in the RPA, as allowed by the Act; 2. Foster the construction and/or improvement of the public infrastructure, where needed, including public utilities, sidewalks, streets, curbs, gutters, underground water and sanitary systems and physical plants, and stormwater detention of adequate Village capacity to create an environment conducive to private investment; 3. Strengthen the RPA as a vibrant mixed-use area by providing resources for the rehabilitation of existing properties; 4. Provide resources for streetscaping, landscaping and signage to improve the image and accessibility of the RPA, and provide, where appropriate, for buffering between incompatible land uses and screening or softening non-residential land uses from residential land uses; and 5. Support the goals and objectives of other overlapping plans, and coordinate available federal, state and local resources to further the goals of this Redevelopment Plan and Project. Strategies. These objectives will be implemented through five (5) integrated strategies. These include: 1. Facilitate Site Preparation. Financial assistance may be provided to private developers seeking to acquire land and assemble sites for projects supportive of this Redevelopment Plan and Project. To meet the goals, policies or objectives of this Redevelopment Plan, the Village may acquire and assemble property throughout the RPA. Land assemblage by the Village may be done by purchase, exchange, donation, lease or eminent domain, and may be for the purposes of: (a) sale, lease or conveyance to private developers; or (b) sale, lease, conveyance or dedication for the construction of public improvements or facilities. Site preparation may include demolition of existing improvements and environmental remediation, where needed. The Village may require written development agreements with developers before acquiring any properties. As appropriate, the Village may devote acquired property to temporary uses until such property is scheduled for disposition and development. 2. Encourage Private-Sector Activities. Through the creation and support of public-private partnerships or through written agreements, the Village may provide financial and other assistance to encourage the private sector, including local property owners and businesses, to undertake redevelopment and new construction projects, and other improvements that are consistent with the goals of this Redevelopment Plan and Project. 3. Implement Public Improvements. A series of public improvements throughout the RPA may be designed and implemented to help define and create an identity for the area, prepare sites for anticipated private investment, and create a more conducive environment for new development. Public improvements that are implemented with TIF assistance are intended to complement and not replace existing funding sources for public improvements in the RPA. These improvements may include new streets and sidewalks, streetscaping, improved street and sidewalk lighting, resurfacing of streets and other paved surfaces, improvement of underground SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 26

54 Roselle Road-Nerge RPA Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan & Project infrastructure and physical plants, stormwater detention of adequate capacity, and other public improvements and utilities consistent with this Redevelopment Plan and Project. These public improvements may be completed pursuant to redevelopment agreements with private entities or intergovernmental agreements with other public entities, and may include the construction, rehabilitation, renovation or restoration of public improvements on one or more parcels. 4. Assist Businesses and Property Owners. The Village may provide assistance to support businesses and property owners in the RPA in furtherance of the RPA s goals and objectives. 5. Other Statutory Strategies: Implement and effectuate any other strategy authorized by the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, 65 ILCS 5/ et seq., (hereinafter the Act ) which will promote the purposes and goals of the Redevelopment Plan and Project. Proposed Future Land Use The future land use of the RPA reflects the objectives of this Redevelopment Plan and Project, which are to support the improvement of the RPA as an active mixed-use commercial district and to support other improvements that serve the redevelopment interests of the local community, business owners and the Village. The proposed objectives are compatible with historic land use patterns and support current development trends in the area. The proposed land uses are detailed on Map 5 on the following page. Future land use designations allows for the following uses: Commercial Residential Park/Open Space Rights-of-Way Infrastructure/Utilities Allowances for institutional or public uses, for purposes such as water towers or lift stations, could be made depending on future needs of development. These uses would be deemed allowable land uses under the Act. SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 27

55 Roselle Road-Nerge RPA Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan & Project SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 28

56 Roselle Road-Nerge RPA Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan & Project Housing Impact and Related Matters As set forth in the Act, if a redevelopment plan for a redevelopment project area would result in the displacement of residents from 10 or more inhabited residential units, or if the redevelopment project area contains 75 or more inhabited residential units and a municipality is unable to certify that no displacement will occur, the municipality must prepare a Housing Impact Study and incorporate the study in the Redevelopment Plan and Project document. The RPA contains an estimated five (5) residential units and no displacement is anticipated to result from this Redevelopment Plan and Project. Therefore, a Housing Impact Study is not required under the Act. SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 29

57 5. Financial Plan Eligible Costs The Act outlines several categories of expenditures that can be funded using tax increment revenues. These expenditures, referred to as eligible redevelopment project costs, include all reasonable or necessary costs incurred or estimated to be incurred, and any such costs incidental to this Redevelopment Plan and Project pursuant to the Act. The Village proposes to realize its goals and objectives of redevelopment through public finance techniques, including, but not limited to, Tax Increment Financing, and by undertaking certain activities and incurring certain costs. Such costs may include, without limitation, the following: 1. Costs of studies, surveys, development of plans and specifications, implementation and administration of the Redevelopment Plan and Project, including but not limited to, staff and professional service costs for architectural, engineering, legal, financial, planning or other services (excluding lobbying expenses), provided that no charges for professional services are based on a percentage of the tax increment collected; 2. The costs of marketing sites within the RPA to prospective businesses, developers and investors; 3. Property assembly costs, including but not limited to, acquisition of land and other property, real or personal, or rights or interests therein, demolition of buildings, site preparation, site improvements that serve as an engineered barrier addressing ground level or below ground environmental contamination, including, but not limited to parking lots and other concrete or asphalt barriers, and the clearing and grading of land; 4. Costs of rehabilitation, reconstruction, or repair or remodeling of existing public or private buildings, fixtures and leasehold improvements; and the costs of replacing an existing public building if pursuant to the implementation of a redevelopment project the existing public building is to be demolished to use the site for private investment or devoted to a different use requiring private investment; 5. Costs of the construction of public works or improvements subject to the limitations in Section (q)(4) of the Act; 6. Costs of job training and retraining projects including the costs of welfare to work programs implemented by businesses located within the RPA; 7. Financing costs, including but not limited to, all necessary and incidental expenses related to the issuance of obligations and which may include payment of interest on any obligations issued thereunder, including interest accruing during the estimated period of construction of any redevelopment project for which such obligations are issued and for a period not exceeding 36 months following completion and including reasonable reserves related thereto; SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 30

58 Roselle Road-Nerge RPA Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan & Project 8. All or a portion of a taxing district s capital costs resulting from the redevelopment project, necessarily incurred or to be incurred within a taxing district in furtherance of the objectives of this Redevelopment Plan and Project; 9. Relocation costs to the extent that the Village determines that relocation costs shall be paid or is required to make payment of relocation costs by federal or state law, or by Section (n)(7) of the Act; 10. Payment in lieu of taxes as defined in the Act; 11. Costs of job training, retraining, advanced vocational education or career education, including but not limited to, courses in occupational, semi-technical or technical fields leading directly to employment, incurred by one or more taxing districts, provided that such costs: (i) are related to the establishment and maintenance of additional job training, advanced vocational education or career education programs for persons employed or to be employed by employers located in the RPA; and (ii) when incurred by a taxing district or taxing districts other than the Village, are set forth in a written agreement by or among the Village and the taxing district(s), which describes the program to be undertaken, including but not limited to, the number of employees to be trained, a description of the training and services to be provided, the number and type of positions available or to be available, itemized costs of the program and sources of funds to pay for the same, and the term of the agreement. Such costs include, specifically, the payment by community college districts of costs pursuant to Sections 3-37, 3-38, 3-40, and of the Public Community College Act, 110 ILCS 805/3-37, 805/3-38, 805/3-40 and 805/3-40.1, and by school districts of costs pursuant to Sections a and a of the School Code, 105 ILCS 5/ a and 5/ a; and 12. Interest costs incurred by a developer related to the construction, renovation or rehabilitation of a redevelopment project provided that: a. Such costs are to be paid directly from the special tax allocation fund established pursuant to the Act; b. Such payments in any one (1) year may not exceed thirty percent (30%) of the annual interest costs incurred by the developer with regard to the development project during that year; c. If there are not sufficient funds available in the special tax allocation fund to make the payment pursuant to this provision, then the amounts so due shall accrue and be payable when sufficient funds are available in the special tax allocation fund; d. The total of such interest payments paid pursuant to the Act may not exceed thirty percent (30%) of the total of: (i) cost paid or incurred by the developer for the redevelopment project; and (ii) redevelopment project costs, excluding any property assembly costs and any relocation costs incurred by the Village pursuant to the Act. If a Special Service Area is established pursuant to the Special Service Area Tax Act, 35 ILCS 200/27-5 et seq., then any tax increment revenues derived from the tax imposed pursuant to the Special Service SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 31

59 Roselle Road-Nerge RPA Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan & Project Area Tax Act may be used within the redevelopment project area for the purposes permitted by the Special Service Area Tax Act as well as the purposes permitted by the Act. Unless explicitly stated in the Act and as provided for in relation to low- and very low-income housing units, the cost of construction of new privately owned buildings shall not be an eligible redevelopment project cost. Estimated Redevelopment Project Costs The estimated eligible costs of this Redevelopment Plan and Project are shown in Table 3 on the next page. The total eligible project cost provides an upper limit on expenditures that are to be funded using tax increment revenues, exclusive of capitalized interest, issuance costs, interest, and other financing costs. Within this limit, adjustments may be made in line items without amendment to this Redevelopment Plan and Project. Additional funding in the form of county, state and federal grants, private developer contributions, and other outside sources may be pursued by the Village as a means of financing improvements and facilities, which are of benefit to the general community. Adjustments to the estimated line item costs in Table 3 are expected and may be made by the Village without amendment to this Redevelopment Plan. Each individual project cost will be re-evaluated in light of projected private development and resulting incremental tax revenues as it is considered for public financing under the provisions of the Act. The totals set forth for each line item below are not intended to place a limit on the described expenditures. Adjustments may be made in line items within the total without amendment to the Redevelopment Plan, either increasing or decreasing line item costs because of changed redevelopment costs and to accommodate the evolution of development in the Project Area, as driven by economic synergies, so long as the increase or decrease is consistent with the Act and this Plan. SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 32

60 Roselle Road-Nerge RPA Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan & Project Table 3: Estimated TIF-Eligible Redevelopment Project Costs Project/Improvements Costs of Studies Site Marketing Costs Property Assembly (including acquisition, site preparation and environmental remediation) Rehabilitation of Buildings, Fixtures and Leasehold Improvements Public Works or Improvements (including streets and utilities, parks and open space, and public facilities) Costs of Job Training Taxing District Capital Costs [1] Financing Costs Relocation Costs Interest Costs (developer or property owner) TOTAL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT COSTS [2] Estimated Project Costs 2,500,000 1,500,000 6,500,000 5,500,000 8,500, , ,000 1,500, ,000 2,000,000 29,500,000 [3] [4] [1] This category may include paying for or reimbursing capital costs of taxing districts impacted by the redevelopment of the RPA. As permitted by the Act, to the extent the Village by written agreement accepts and approves the same, the Village may pay, or reimburse all or a portion of a taxing district s capital costs resulting from a redevelopment project necessarily incurred or to be incurred within a taxing district in furtherance of the objectives of this Redevelopment Plan and Project. [2] Total Redevelopment Project Costs exclude any additional financing costs, including any interest expense, capitalized interest, and costs associated with optional redemptions. These costs are subject to prevailing market conditions and are in addition to Total Redevelopment Project Costs. [3] Increases in estimated Total Redevelopment Project Costs of more than 5%, after adjustment for inflation from the date of this Redevelopment Plan adoption, are subject to the Redevelopment Plan amendment procedures, as provided under the Act. [4] The amount of the Total Redevelopment Project Costs that can be incurred in the RPA will be reduced by the amount of redevelopment project costs incurred in contiguous redevelopment project areas, or those separated from the RPA only by a public right-of-way, that are permitted under the Act to be paid, and are paid, from incremental property taxes generated in the RPA, but will not be reduced by the amount of redevelopment project costs incurred in the RPA that are paid from incremental property taxes generated in contiguous redevelopment project areas or those separated from the RPA by a public right-of-way. SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 33

61 Roselle Road-Nerge RPA Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan & Project Phasing and Scheduling of the Redevelopment Each private project that receives TIF funding within the RPA shall be governed by the terms of a written redevelopment agreement entered into by a designated developer and the Village and approved by the Village Board. Where tax increment funds are used to pay eligible redevelopment project costs, to the extent funds are available for such purposes, expenditures by the Village shall be coordinated to coincide on a reasonable basis with the actual redevelopment expenditures of the developer(s). As provided in the Act, this Redevelopment Plan and Project shall be completed, and all obligations issued to finance redevelopment costs shall be retired, no later than December 31 of the year in which the payment to the Village Treasurer is to be made with respect to ad valorem taxes levied in the twentythird calendar year following the year in which the ordinance approving this Redevelopment Project Area is adopted (by December 31, 2039, if the ordinances establishing the RPA are adopted during 2015). Sources of Funds to Pay Costs Funds necessary to pay for redevelopment project costs and/or municipal obligations, which may be issued or incurred to pay for such costs, are to be derived principally from tax increment revenues and/or proceeds from municipal obligations, which have as a repayment source tax increment revenue. To secure the issuance of these obligations and the developer s performance of redevelopment agreement obligations, the Village may require the utilization of guarantees, deposits, reserves and/or other forms of security made available by private-sector developers. The Village may incur redevelopment project costs that are paid from the funds of the Village other than incremental taxes, and the Village then may be reimbursed for such costs from incremental taxes. The tax increment revenue, which will be used to fund tax increment obligations and eligible redevelopment project costs, shall be the incremental real property tax revenues. Incremental real property tax revenue is attributable to the increase of the current equalized assessed value of each taxable lot, block, tract, or parcel of real property in the RPA over and above the certified initial equalized assessed value of each such property. Without the use of such incremental revenues, the RPA is not likely to redevelop. Other sources of funds, which may be used to pay for development costs and associated obligations issued or incurred, include land disposition proceeds, state and federal grants, investment income, private investor and financial institution funds, and other sources of funds and revenues as the municipality and developer from time to time may deem appropriate. The RPA may be or become contiguous to, or be separated only by a public right-of-way from, other redevelopment areas created under the Act (65 ILCS 5/ et. seq.). The Village may utilize net incremental property tax revenues received from the RPA to pay eligible redevelopment project costs, or obligations issued to pay such costs, in other contiguous redevelopment project areas, or those separated only by a public right-of-way, and vice versa. The amount of revenue from the RPA made available to support such contiguous redevelopment project areas, or those separated only by a public right-of-way, when added to all amounts used to pay eligible redevelopment project costs within the RPA, shall not at any time exceed the Total Redevelopment Project Costs described in Table 3 of this Redevelopment Plan and Project. SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 34

62 Roselle Road-Nerge RPA Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan & Project The Roselle Road-Nerge RPA may be or become contiguous to, or separated only by a public right-ofway from, other redevelopment project areas created under the Illinois Industrial Jobs Recovery Law, (65 ILCS 5/ et. seq.). If the Village finds that the goals, objectives and financial success of such contiguous redevelopment project areas or those separated only by a public right-of-way are interdependent with those of the RPA, the Village may determine that it is the best interests of the Village and in furtherance of the purposes of this Redevelopment Plan that net revenues from the RPA be made available to support any such redevelopment project areas, and vice versa. The Village, therefore, proposes to utilize net incremental revenues received from the RPA to pay eligible redevelopment projects costs (which are eligible under the Industrial Jobs Recovery Law referred to above) in any such areas, and vice versa. Such revenues may be transferred or loaned between the RPA and such areas. The amount of revenue from the RPA so made available, when added to all amounts used to pay eligible redevelopment project costs within the RPA or other areas as described in the preceding paragraph, shall not at any time exceed the Total Redevelopment Project Costs described in Table 3 of this Redevelopment Plan and Project. If necessary, the redevelopment plans for other contiguous redevelopment project areas that may be or already have been created under the Act may be drafted or amended, as applicable, to add appropriate and parallel language to allow for sharing of revenues between such districts. Issuance of Obligations To finance project costs, the Village may issue bonds or obligations secured by the anticipated tax increment revenue generated within the RPA, or such other bonds or obligations as the Village may deem as appropriate. The Village may require the utilization of guarantees, deposits or other forms of security made available by private-sector developers to secure such obligations. In addition, the Village may provide other legally permissible credit enhancements to any obligations issued pursuant to the Act. All obligations issued by the Village pursuant to this Redevelopment Plan and Project and the Act shall be retired within the timeframe described under Phasing and Scheduling of the Redevelopment subsection above. Also, the final maturity date of any such obligations that are issued may not be later than 20 years from their respective dates of issue. One or more of a series of obligations may be sold at one or more times in order to implement this Redevelopment Plan and Project. The amounts payable in any year as principal and interest on all obligations issued by the Village shall not exceed the amounts available from tax increment revenues, or other sources of funds, if any, as may be provided by ordinance. Obligations may be of parity or senior/junior lien nature. Obligations issued may be serial or term maturities, and may or may not be subject to mandatory, sinking fund, or optional redemptions. In addition to paying redevelopment project costs, tax increment revenues may be used for the scheduled and/or early retirement of obligations, and for reserves and bond sinking funds. To the extent that real property tax increment is not required for such purposes or other eligible redevelopment costs, revenues shall be declared surplus and become available for distribution annually to area taxing districts in the manner provided by the Act. SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 35

63 Roselle Road-Nerge RPA Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan & Project Most Recent EAV of Properties in the Redevelopment Project Area The purpose of identifying the most recent equalized assessed value (EAV) of the RPA is to provide an estimate of the initial EAV, which the Cook County Clerk will certify for the purpose of annually calculating the incremental EAV and incremental property taxes of the RPA. The 2013 EAV (the most recent year in which assessed values and the equalizer were available) of all taxable parcels in the RPA is approximately $5,737,613. This total EAV amount by PIN is summarized in Appendix 2. The EAV is subject to verification by the Cook County Clerk. After verification, the final figure shall be certified by the Cook County Clerk, and shall become the Certified Initial EAV from which all incremental property taxes in the Redevelopment Project Area will be calculated by Cook County. Anticipated EAV By tax year 2038 (collection year 2039), the EAV for the RPA will be approximately $8.8 million. This estimate is based on an assumed inflation factor of 2.0% per year on the EAV of all properties within the RPA. SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 36

64 6. Required Findings and Tests Lack of Growth and Private Investment The Village is required to evaluate whether or not the RPA has been subject to growth and private investment and must substantiate a finding of lack of such investment prior to establishing a Tax Increment Financing district. Over two-thirds of the RPA is comprised of vacant land that is characterized by obsolete platting, and the RPA, on whole, has experienced declining EAV in four of the past five yearto-year periods. Finding: The Redevelopment Project Area (RPA) on the whole has not been subject to growth and development through investment by private enterprise and would not reasonably be anticipated to be developed without the adoption of this Redevelopment Plan and Project. But For... The Village is required to find that, but for the designation of the TIF district and the use of Tax Increment Financing, it is unlikely that significant investment will occur in the RPA. Without the support of public resources, the redevelopment objectives for the RPA would most likely not be realized. The area-wide improvements and development assistance resources needed to develop the RPA as a mixed-use area are extensive and costly, and the private market, on its own, has shown little ability to absorb all such costs. Public resources to assist with public infrastructure improvements and site preparation are needed to leverage private investment and facilitate area-wide development consistent with the Village s Comprehensive Plan. The Village has limited capacity to fund capital improvements of the sort that appear necessary to make the study area attractive for development. Accordingly, but for the designation of a TIF district, these projects, which would contribute substantially to area-wide redevelopment, are unlikely to occur. Finding: But for the adoption of this Redevelopment Plan and Project, critical resources will be lacking that would otherwise support the redevelopment of the RPA, and the RPA would not reasonably be anticipated to be developed. Conformance to the Plans of the Village The Act specifies that the Redevelopment Plan and Project conform to the comprehensive plan for the development of the municipality as a whole. Accordingly, the proposed land uses described in this Redevelopment Plan and Project are consistent with the Village of Roselle Comprehensive Plan. Through the designation of the RPA, the redevelopment opportunities identified in this Redevelopment Plan and Project will be substantially supported and their implementation facilitated. Dates of Completion The dates of completion of the project and retirement of obligations are described in Phasing and Scheduling of the Redevelopment in Section 5 above. SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 37

65 Roselle Road-Nerge RPA Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan & Project Financial Impact of the Redevelopment Project As explained above, without the adoption of this Redevelopment Plan and Project and TIF designation, the Roselle Road-Nerge RPA is not expected to be redeveloped by private enterprise. This document describes the comprehensive redevelopment program proposed to be undertaken by the Village to create an environment in which private investment can reasonably occur. The redevelopment program will be staged gradually over the 23-year life of the RPA. If a redevelopment project is successful, various new projects will be undertaken that will assist in alleviating blighting conditions and promoting development in the RPA. This Redevelopment Plan and Project is expected to have short- and long-term financial impacts on the affected taxing districts. During the period when Tax Increment Financing is utilized, real estate tax increment revenues from the increases in EAV over and above the Certified Initial EAV (established at the time of adoption of this document) may be used to pay eligible redevelopment project costs for the RPA. At the time when the RPA is no longer in place under the Act, the real estate tax revenues resulting from the redevelopment of the RPA will be distributed to all taxing district levying taxes against property located in the RPA. These revenues will then be available for use by the affected taxing districts. Demand on Taxing District Services and Program to Address Financial and Service Impact In 1994, the Act was amended to require an assessment of any financial impact of a redevelopment project area on, or any increased demand for service from, any taxing district affected by the redevelopment plan, and a description of any program to address such financial impacts or increased demand. The Village intends to monitor development in the RPA and, with the cooperation of the affected taxing districts, work to address any increased needs in connection with any particular development. Given the preliminary nature of this Redevelopment Plan and Project, specific fiscal impacts on the taxing districts and increases in demand for services provided by those districts cannot accurately be assessed within the scope of this Plan. The following major taxing districts presently levy taxes on properties within the RPA: Cook County Cook County Consolidated Elections Cook County Forest Preserve District Schaumburg Township General Assistance Schaumburg Township Road and Bridge Schaumburg Township Village of Roselle Schaumburg Township School District 54 Palatine Township High School District 211 Harper Community College District 512 Schaumburg Park District SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 38

66 Roselle Road-Nerge RPA Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan & Project Schaumburg Township District Public Library Roselle Public Library Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago Northwest Mosquito Abatement District DuPage Water Commission Development of vacant sites with active and more intensive uses may result in additional demands on services and facilities provided by the taxing districts. At this time, no special programs are proposed for these taxing districts. Should demand increase, the Village will work with the affected taxing districts to determine what, if any, program is necessary to provide adequate services. SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 39

67 7. Provisions for Amending Action Plan This Redevelopment Plan and Project document may be amended pursuant to the provisions of the Act. SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 40

68 8. Commitment to Fair Employment Practices and Affirmative Action Plan The Village of Roselle is an equal opportunity employer. As part of this Redevelopment Plan and Project, the Village will work with any developers who assist in the redevelopment of the RPA to implement an effective affirmative action program that conforms to Village policies and practices. This program will ensure equal opportunity for all personnel regardless of race, color, religion, sex, age, marital status, handicapped status, nation of origin, sexual preference, creed or ancestry. This program will also meet Village standards for any applicable prevailing wage rate as ascertained by the Illinois Department of Labor to all project employees. All entities involved are responsible for conformance to the policy that is put in place. SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 41

69 Appendix 1: Boundary Legal Description THAT PART OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 10 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF MARION STREET AND THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE ELGIN O HARE CORRIDOR (FAP ROUTE 426) AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF HIGHWAYS, JOB NUMBER R AS PREPARED FOR THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (IDOT) BY BAIRD AND COMPANY, DATED OCTOBER 31, 1988; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ROSELLE ROAD, AS WIDENED BY SAID PLAT OF HIGHWAYS; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE OF ROSELLE ROAD TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 90 FEET OF THE SOUTH 240 FEET OF LOT 3 IN BLOCK A OF CONCORD TERRACE SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED JUNE 3, 1994 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER ; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION AND SOUTH LINE TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTH 90 FEET OF THE SOUTH 240 FEET; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE AND ITS WESTERLY EXTENSION TO A POINT ON SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ROSELLE ROAD; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF PRATT BOULEVARD; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ROSELLE ROAD TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTH LINE OF BRANIGAR S COMMERCIAL RESUBDIVISION AS RECORDED JANUARY 23, 1974 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER ; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION AND NORTH LINE OF BRANIGAR S COMMERCIAL RESUBDIVISION TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID BRANIGAR S COMMERCIAL RESUBDIVISION AND ITS SOUTHERLY EXTENSION TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF NERGE ROAD; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 42

70 Roselle Road-Nerge RPA Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan & Project LINE OF NERGE ROAD TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1 IN BLOCK B OF SAID CONCORD TERRACE SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED JUNE 3, 1964 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER ; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1 TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1 AND ITS EASTERLY EXTENSION TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF INDIAN HILL DRIVE; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 5 IN SAID BLOCK B OF CONCORD TERRACE SUBDIVISION; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND SOUTH LINE OF LOT 5 TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF, SAID SOUTHWEST CORNER ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID BLOCK B OF CONCORD TERRACE SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID ELGIN O HARE CORRIDOR (FAP ROUTE 426); THENCE SOUTHERLY TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 8 IN VANTAGE POINTE SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED ON MAY 18, 1987 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER ; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 8 TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 7 IN SAID VANTAGE POINTE SUBDIVISION; THENCE WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 7 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF, SAID NORTHWEST CORNER ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID VANTAGE POINTE SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE AND ITS SOUTHERLY EXTENSION TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF DEVON AVENUE; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND ITS WESTERLY EXTENSION TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE OF AFORESAID ROSELLE ROAD (AS WIDENEND); THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ARTHUR AVENUE; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE WESTERLY 100 FEET OF LOT 10, 11 AND 12 AS MEASURED ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 10 AND THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 12 IN BLOCK 3 IN BOEGER ESTATES ADDITION TO ROSELLE AS RECORDED ON MARCH 1, 1927 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER ; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION AND EASTERLY LINE TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 43

71 Roselle Road-Nerge RPA Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan & Project OF SAID LOT 10; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; SAID NORTHWEST CORNER ALSO BEING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 9 IN SAID BOEGER ESTATES ADDITION TO ROSELLE; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 9 AND LOTS 8 THRU 4, INCLUSIVE, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4 TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE OF AFORESAID MARION STREET; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 44

72 Appendix 2: Summary of EAV (by PIN) Count PIN 2013 EAV $275, $107, $362, $65, $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $5, $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $0 SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 45

73 Roselle Road-Nerge RPA Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan & Project $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $70, $167, $50, $34, $ $6, $ $1,339, $204, $325, $624, $439, $809, $165, $431, $69, $63, $59, $59,048 Total EAV $5,737,613 SB FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 46

74 ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING THE ROSELLE ROAD NERGE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA WHEREAS, the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, 65 ILCS 5/ , et seq., as amended (the Act ), authorizes the Village of Roselle, Cook County and DuPage County, Illinois (the Village ) to designate a redevelopment project area as that term is defined by the Act; and WHEREAS, the Act authorizes the Village to designate a redevelopment project area only after the Village has held a public hearing on the proposed designation, pursuant to notice by publication and certified mail to interested parties as required by the Act; and WHEREAS, the Village desires to designate the real property legally described on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein, and generally depicted on a boundary map attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit B (the Area ), as a redevelopment project area pursuant to the Act, and the Mayor and Trustees (collectively, the Corporate Authorities ) find that it is in the Village s best interests to do so; and WHEREAS, the Area consists of parcels of real property which comprise in the aggregate not less than one and one-half (1-1/2) acres and are located wholly within municipal boundaries of the Village; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, Ordinance No , entitled An Ordinance Establishing Certain Dates, Times and Places for Statutory Required Public Hearings Associated with the Proposed Roselle Road/Nerge Tax Increment Financing District, which was adopted by the Corporate Authorities on April 13, 2015 ( Ordinance No ), and the Village held a public hearing (the Hearing ) on June 8, 2015 to consider the project and plan for the Area,; and WHEREAS, in compliance with the Act, Ordinance No and all other applicable laws, written notice of the Hearing has be published in accordance with the statutory requirements in the Daily Herald, said newspaper being a newspaper of general circulation within the taxing districts of which taxable property is included in the Area; and WHEREAS, in compliance with the Act, Ordinance No and all other applicable laws, written notice of the Hearing was sent by certified mail on April 20, 2015, to all taxing districts of which taxable property is included in the Area and to the Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity; and WHEREAS, in compliance with the Act, Ordinance No and all other applicable laws, written notice of the Hearing was sent by certified mail on April 20, 2015, addressed to the person or persons in whose name the general taxes for the last preceding year were paid on each lot, block, tract or parcel of land lying within the Area or,

75 in the event that any such taxes for the preceding year were not paid, to the persons last listed on the tax rolls within the preceding three years as the owners of such property; and WHEREAS, on June 8, 2015, the Corporate Authorities adopted an Ordinance, entitled An Ordinance Approving the Tax Increment Financing District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan and Project for the Roselle Road Nerge Redevelopment Project Area, which will include a redevelopment plan and project for the Area; and WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities further find that it is in the Village s best interests to designate the Area as a redevelopment project area pursuant to the Act and that all legal prerequisites for this designation have been fulfilled. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED BY THE VILLAGE BOARD OF THE VILLAGE OF ROSELLE, ILLINOIS, as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals as contained in the preambles to this Ordinance are true and correct and are hereby incorporated in this Ordinance as if set out in full by this reference. SECTION 2. Redevelopment Project Area Designated. The following described area is hereby designated as the Roselle Road - Nerge Redevelopment Project Area pursuant to Section of the Act: See Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein. SECTION 3. Severability. The provisions and sections of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be separable, and the invalidity of any portion of this Ordinance shall not affect the validity of the remainder. SECTION 4. Superseder. All ordinances, resolutions, rules and orders, or parts thereof, in conflict herewith, are to the extent of such conflict hereby superseded. SECTION 5. Publication. A full, true and complete copy of this Ordinance shall be published in pamphlet form as provided by the Illinois Municipal Code, as amended. The Village Clerk is hereby directed to publish this Ordinance in pamphlet form. SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval, and publication as required by law. 1

76 PASSED BY THE MAYOR AND VILLAGE TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF ROSELLE, ILLINOIS, THIS 27 th DAY OF JULY, AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ATTEST: Village Clerk Mayor, Village of Roselle 2

77 Exhibit A THAT PART OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 10 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE WEST RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE OF MARION STREET AND THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE ELGIN - O'HARE CORRIDOR (FAP ROUTE 426) AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF HIGHWAYS, JOB NUMBER R AS PREPARED FOR THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (IDOT) BY BAIRD AND COMPANY, DATED OCTOBER 31, 1988; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ROSELLE ROAD, AS WIDENED BY SAID PLAT OF HIGHWAYS; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE OF ROSELLE ROAD TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 90 FEET OF THE SOUTH 240 FEET OF LOT 3 IN BLOCK A OF CONCORD TERRACE SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED JUNE 3, 1994 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER ; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION AND SOUTH LINE TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTH 90 FEET OF THE SOUTH 240 FEET; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE AND ITS WESTERLY EXTENSION TO A POINT ON SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ROSELLE ROAD; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF PRATT BOULEVARD; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE OF ROSELLE ROAD TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTH LINE OF BRANIGAR'S COMMERCIAL RESUBDIVISION AS RECORDED JANUARY 23, 1974 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER ; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION AND NORTH LINE OF BRANIGAR'S COMMERCIAL RESUBDIVISION TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID BRANIGAR'S COMMERCIAL RESUBDIVISION AND ITS SOUTHERLY EXTENSION TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF NERGE ROAD; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF NERGE ROAD TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1 IN BLOCK B OF SAID CONCORD TERRACE SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED JUNE 3, 1964 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER ; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1 TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1 AND ITS EASTERLY EXTENSION TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF INDIAN HILL DRIVE; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 5 IN SAID BLOCK B OF CONCORD TERRACE SUBDIVISION; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND SOUTH LINE OF LOT 5 TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF, SAID SOUTHWEST CORNER ALSO BEING 3

78 A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID BLOCK B OF CONCORD TERRACE SUBDIVISION; THENCE S0UTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID ELGIN - O'HARE CORRIDOR (FAP ROUTE 426); THENCE SOUTHERLY TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 8 IN VANTAGE POINTE SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED ON MAY 18, 1987 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER ; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 8 TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 7 IN SAID VANTAGE POINTE SUBDIVISION; THENCE WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 7 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF, SAID NORTHWEST CORNER ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID VANTAGE POINTE SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE AND ITS SOUTHERLY EXTENSION TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE OF DEVON AVENUE; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE AND ITS WESTERLY EXTENSION TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE OF AFORESAID ROSELLE ROAD (AS WIDENEND); THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ARTHUR AVENUE; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE WESTERLY 100 FEET OF LOT 10, 11 AND 12 AS MEASURED ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 10 AND THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 12 IN BLOCK 3 IN BOEGER ESTATES ADDITION TO ROSELLE AS RECORDED ON MARCH 1, 1927 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER ; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION AND EASTERLY LINE TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 10; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; SAID NORTHWEST CORNER ALSO BEING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 9 IN SAID BOEGER ESTATES ADDITION TO ROSELLE; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 9 AND LOTS 8 THRU 4, INCLUSIVE, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4 TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE OF AFORESAID MARION STREET; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 4

79 Exhibit B Boundary Map of the Area 5

80 ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING WHEREAS, on June 8, 2015, pursuant to the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, 65 ILCS 5/ , et seq., as amended (the Act ),, the Mayor and Trustees (the Corporate Authorities ) of the Village of Roselle, Cook County and DuPage County, Illinois (the Village ), adopted Ordinance No , entitled An Ordinance Approving the Tax Increment Financing District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan and Project for the Roselle Road Nerge Redevelopment Project Area, which approved a redevelopment plan and redevelopment project, as those terms are defined in the Act, for the real property legally described on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein, and generally depicted on a boundary map attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit B (the Area ); and WHEREAS, on June 8, 2015, the Corporate Authorities adopted Ordinance No , entitled An Ordinance Designating the Roselle Road -Nerge Redevelopment Project Area, pursuant to which the Area was designated as a redevelopment project area, as that term is defined in the Act; and WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities desire and find it necessary to adopt tax increment financing, as such term is used in the Act, for the Area having been designated as a redevelopment project area, and that it is in the Village s best interests to do so; and WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of such tax increment financing for the Area has been fulfilled. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF ROSELLE, ILLINOIS, as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals as contained in the preambles to this Ordinance are true and correct and are hereby incorporated in this Ordinance as if set out in full by this reference. SECTION 2. Adoption of Tax Increment Financing. Pursuant to the Act, tax increment financing is hereby adopted with respect to the Tax Increment Financing District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan and Project, approved and adopted by the Corporate Authorities pursuant to Ordinance No , and the Area, which is designated by the Corporate Authorities pursuant to Ordinance No SECTION 3. Pledging of Funds.

81 After the total equalized assessed valuation of taxable real property in the Area exceeds the total initial equalized assessed value of all taxable real property in the Area, the ad valorem taxes, if any, arising from the levies upon real property in the Area by taxing districts and the rates determined in the manner provided in Section (b) of the Act each year after the effective date of this Ordinance until the Area costs and obligations issued in respect thereto have been paid shall be divided as follows: a. That portion of taxes levied upon each taxable lot, block, tract or parcel of real property which is attributable to the lower of the existing equalized assessed value or the initial equalized assessed value of each such taxable lot, block, tract, or parcel of real property in the Area shall be allocated to and when collected shall be paid by the County Collector to the respective affected taxing districts in the manner required by law in the absence of the adoption of tax increment financing. b. That portion, if any, of such taxes which is attributable to the increase in the current equalized assessed valuation of each lot, block, tract or parcel of real property in the Area over and above the initial equalized assessed value of each property in the Area shall be allocated to and when collected shall be paid to the municipal treasurer who shall deposit said funds in a special fund called the Special Tax Allocation Fund for the Roselle Road Nerge Redevelopment Project Area of the Village for the purpose of paying qualified Area costs and obligations incurred in the payment thereof, pursuant to such appropriations which may be subsequently made. SECTION 4. Severability. The provisions and sections of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be separable, and the invalidity of any portion of this Ordinance shall not affect the validity of the remainder. SECTION 5. Superseder. All ordinances, resolutions, rules and orders, or parts thereof, in conflict herewith, are to the extent of such conflict hereby superseded. SECTION 6. Publication. A full, true and complete copy of this Ordinance shall be published in pamphlet form as provided by the Illinois Municipal Code, as amended. The Village Clerk is hereby directed to publish this Ordinance in pamphlet form. SECTION 7. Effective Date. 1

82 This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval, and publication as required by law. PASSED BY THE MAYOR AND TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF ROSELLE, ILLINOIS, THIS 27 th DAY OF JULY, AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ATTEST: Village Clerk Mayor 2

83 Exhibit A THAT PART OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 10 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE WEST RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE OF MARION STREET AND THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE ELGIN - O'HARE CORRIDOR (FAP ROUTE 426) AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF HIGHWAYS, JOB NUMBER R AS PREPARED FOR THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (IDOT) BY BAIRD AND COMPANY, DATED OCTOBER 31, 1988; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ROSELLE ROAD, AS WIDENED BY SAID PLAT OF HIGHWAYS; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE OF ROSELLE ROAD TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 90 FEET OF THE SOUTH 240 FEET OF LOT 3 IN BLOCK A OF CONCORD TERRACE SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED JUNE 3, 1994 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER ; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION AND SOUTH LINE TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTH 90 FEET OF THE SOUTH 240 FEET; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE AND ITS WESTERLY EXTENSION TO A POINT ON SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ROSELLE ROAD; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE OF PRATT BOULEVARD; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ROSELLE ROAD TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTH LINE OF BRANIGAR'S COMMERCIAL RESUBDIVISION AS RECORDED JANUARY 23, 1974 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER ; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION AND NORTH LINE OF BRANIGAR'S COMMERCIAL RESUBDIVISION TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID BRANIGAR'S COMMERCIAL RESUBDIVISION AND ITS SOUTHERLY EXTENSION TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF NERGE ROAD; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF NERGE ROAD TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1 IN BLOCK B OF SAID CONCORD TERRACE SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED JUNE 3, 1964 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER ; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1 TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1 AND ITS EASTERLY EXTENSION TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF INDIAN HILL DRIVE; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 5 IN SAID BLOCK B OF CONCORD TERRACE SUBDIVISION; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID 3

84 EASTERLY EXTENSION AND SOUTH LINE OF LOT 5 TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF, SAID SOUTHWEST CORNER ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID BLOCK B OF CONCORD TERRACE SUBDIVISION; THENCE S0UTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID ELGIN - O'HARE CORRIDOR (FAP ROUTE 426); THENCE SOUTHERLY TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 8 IN VANTAGE POINTE SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED ON MAY 18, 1987 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER ; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 8 TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 7 IN SAID VANTAGE POINTE SUBDIVISION; THENCE WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 7 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF, SAID NORTHWEST CORNER ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID VANTAGE POINTE SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE AND ITS SOUTHERLY EXTENSION TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF DEVON AVENUE; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE AND ITS WESTERLY EXTENSION TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE OF AFORESAID ROSELLE ROAD (AS WIDENEND); THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ARTHUR AVENUE; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE WESTERLY 100 FEET OF LOT 10, 11 AND 12 AS MEASURED ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 10 AND THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 12 IN BLOCK 3 IN BOEGER ESTATES ADDITION TO ROSELLE AS RECORDED ON MARCH 1, 1927 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER ; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION AND EASTERLY LINE TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 10; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; SAID NORTHWEST CORNER ALSO BEING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 9 IN SAID BOEGER ESTATES ADDITION TO ROSELLE; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 9 AND LOTS 8 THRU 4, INCLUSIVE, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4 TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE OF AFORESAID MARION STREET; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 4

85 Exhibit B Boundary Map of the Area 5

86 AGENDA ITEM # 7E AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Village Board Meeting July 27, 2015 Item Title: Ordinance Establishing a Tax Increment Financing District Interested Parties Registry and Adopting Registration Rules for the Irving-Central TIF District Staff Contact: Patrick N. Watkins, Community Development Director VILLAGE BOARD ACTION Vote on the Ordinance Establishing a Tax Increment Financing District - Interested Parties Registry and Adopting Registration Rules. Executive Summary: Attached is the ordinance establishing the Interested Parties Registry while adopting registration rules. This is a statutorily required ordinance for a jurisdiction looking to create a TIF District. It is also the first ordinance passed in the process of creating a district. The registry is kept by the Village Clerk and is utilized as a means to keep interested parties informed concerning the district (i.e. notices, feasibility studies, and plans). Implications: Is this item budgeted? NA Any other implications to be considered? None Attachments: Ordinance 1

87 ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT- INTERESTED PARTIES REGISTRY AND ADOPTING REGISTRATION RULES WHEREAS, the Village of Roselle ( Village ) is an Illinois municipal corporation exercising such powers as is authorized by statute, the Illinois Constitution and pertaining to its government and affairs; and WHEREAS, Section of the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act (65 ILCS 5/ , hereinafter the Act ) requires the Village to establish an interested party registry and adopt registration rules and regulations for the registry; and WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities for the Village have decided to adopt this Ordinance to comply with such requirements of the Act. NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED, by the President and Board of Trustees for the Village of Roselle, DuPage and Cook Counties, Illinois as follows: SECTION 1: The above recitals are incorporated herein and made part hereof. SECTION 2: The Village Clerk or her designee is hereby authorized and directed to create an Interested Parties registry in accordance with Section of the Act for the redevelopment project known as the proposed Irving Central Tax Increment Financing District whether now existing or created after the date of the adoption of this Ordinance. SECTION 3: In accordance with Section of the Act the Village hereby adopts the registration rules attached hereto as Exhibit A as the registration rules for each such interested party of the registry. The Village Clerk, with the consent of the Village s corporation counsel, as to form and legality shall have the authority to amend such registration rules from time to time as may be necessary and desirable to comply with or carry out the purposes intended by the Act. SECTION 4: If any provision of this Ordinance is held to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason the invalidity or unenforceability of any such provision shall not affect any other provisions of this Ordinance. SECTION 5: All ordinances, resolutions, motions or orders in conflict with this Ordinance are repealed to the extent of such conflict. SECTION 6: If a court of competent jurisdiction sets aside any portion of this Ordinance as unconstitutional or unlawful, it shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the Ordinance.

88 SECTION 7: Any ordinance which is inconsistent with this Ordinance is repealed to the extent of such inconsistency including preemptive Federal and State regulations. SECTION 8: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form as is hereby authorized and directed to be done by the President and Board of Trustees. AYES: NAYES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY of, PUBLISHED in pamphlet form this DAY of, Mayor, Village of Roselle ATTEST: Village Clerk

89 EXHIBIT A VILLAGE OF ROSELLE INTERESTED PARTIES TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN REGISTRATION RULES 1. Any resident of the Village of Roselle or organization active within the municipality is qualified to be placed upon the Village of Roselle interested parties tax increment financing registry. 2. Every registered interested party shall be entitled to receive copies of all notices, feasibility studies and plans by mail at the address provided by the registrant in the Village s registration form. 3. The resident or organization for which is part of the registry shall remain on the registry initially for a period of three years from the anniversary date of the adoption of the ordinance establishing these registration rules and shall be entitled to renew their registration for a period of three years upon written notice from the Village Clerk s office that the resident or organization registration will expire unless renewed. Unless notices of expiration are sent out by the Village Clerk members of the registry shall remain registered through the duration of any tax increment financing plan approved for a redevelopment project area. 4. The interested parties registry shall be maintained by the Village Clerk. Three years after the adoption of the resolution approving the registry the Village Clerk, shall inquire of the Corporate Authorities, whether they wish to send out notices of termination of registration or simply continue the interested parties registry as constituted. The Clerk shall follow the direction of the Corporate Authorities in making this determination. The Village Clerk may send out notices of termination without the approval of the Corporate Authorities when a resident is no longer a resident of the Village of Roselle or the organization active within the municipality is no longer active within the municipality. 5. All members of the registry may specify on the registration form what tax increment financing documents and notifications the registrant requests during the period of time the registrant remains on the interested parties registry. The Village Clerk will refer registrants to online documents by communication when those documents have been posted on the Village s website. Any interested party registrant who does not have an address may secure copies of the documents in paper form by paying a fee to the Village consistent with the amounts charged under the Illinois Freedom of Information Act.

90 Nothing in the document request category shall constitute a waiver by the Village of documents subject to exemptions under the Freedom of Information Act. 7. Nothing in these rules shall be interpreted to prohibit or otherwise effect with the ability of eligible organizations and individuals to register for receipt of information to which they are entitled to under the Tax Increment Financing Act including the information required by: (i) Subsection (a) of Section ; (ii) Paragraph (9) of Subsection (d) of Section ; (iii) Subsection (e) of Section

91 REGISTRATION FORM Full Name of Resident or Organization: Mailing Address: Address: If an Organization, the identity of the person and address to whom interested registry documents should be directed: If an Organization, briefly summarize in what respect the organization is active within the Village of Roselle: In consequence of My/Our registration as a interested party for activities related to the development of TIF Project Areas, I/We request access to the following documents (check boxes): Any tax increment feasibility study, plan or project documents; All notices of public hearings related to a proposed TIF district or amendment of existing TIF redevelopment project and plan Notice of any Village of Roselle Board Agenda in which an item related to an improved TIF project or plan appears as an Agenda item. Documents referenced in 65 ILCS 5/ (a); Section (9 of subsection (d)); Subsection (c) of Section Other (specify in detail): Signature of Applicant Date Patti Burns, Village Clerk 31 S. Prospect Roselle, Illinois ** If the registrant has an address the Village Clerk will refer the registrant to the Village s website for the documents. If a registrant prefers paper copies they will be provided upon written request.

92 AGENDA ITEM # 7F AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Village Board Meeting July 27, 2015 Item Title: Ordinance Convening a Joint Review Board for the Proposed Irving - Central Tax Increment Financing District on August 19, 2015 at 2:30pm at the Roselle Village Hall at 31 S. Prospect Street. Staff Contact: Patrick N. Watkins, Community Development Director VILLAGE BOARD ACTION Vote on the Ordinance Convening a Joint Review Board for the Proposed Irving - Central Tax Increment Financing District on August 19, 2015 at 2:30pm at the Roselle Village Hall at 31 S. Prospect Street. Executive Summary: The attached ordinance sets the first meeting for the Joint Review Board of the Irving - Central TIF District (August 19, 2015 at 2:30pm in Village Hall). Establishing and convening a Joint Review Board is required per the state statute. The following tax bodies (as listed in the ordinance) receive notification for the meeting: Roselle Library District, Roselle Park District, College of DuPage, Roselle Grade School District 12, Lake Park High School District 108, Bloomingdale Township, County of DuPage. The Joint Review Board s work and report should be completed within 30 days of the meeting. Implications: Is this item budgeted? NA Any other implications to be considered? None Attachments: Ordinance 1

93 ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE CONVENING A JOINT REVIEW BOARD FOR THE PROPOSED IRVING CENTRAL TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Village of Roselle, Illinois Irving-Central Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Plan which includes the Tax Increment Financing District Qualification Report was placed on file with the Village Clerk of the Village of Roselle on June 26, 2015 (with subsequent updates filed July 8, 2015 and July 16, 2015), for the establishment of the proposed Irving-Central Tax Increment Financing District (hereinafter IC Plan ); and WHEREAS, 65 ILCS 5/ (b) requires that prior to holding a public hearing to approve, or amend, a proposed redevelopment plan a municipality shall convene a joint review board consisting of a representative of each community college district, local elementary school, high school district, park district, library district, township, fire protection district and county that have authority to directly levy taxes on the property within the proposed redevelopment project area at the time the area would be approved; and WHEREAS, subsection (b) of 65 ILCS 5/ also requires that the joint review board include a representative selected by the municipality and a public member; and WHEREAS, the public member is selected at the first meeting of the joint review board and thereafter the board s chairperson is selected by a majority of the board member s present. NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED, by the President and Board of Trustees for the Village of Roselle, DuPage and Cook Counties, Illinois as follows: SECTION 1: There is hereby established, for all applicable statutory purposes, a Joint Review Board (hereinafter JRB ), to consider and make recommendations regarding the proposed RRN Plan. The Corporate Authorities of the Village of Roselle find that the following are qualified taxing districts for JRB membership: Roselle Library District Roselle Park District College of DuPage Roselle Grade School District 12 Lake Park High School District 108 Bloomingdale Township County of DuPage SECTION 2: That Village staff shall mail notice of the formation of the JRB, including the first date the Board shall convene, to the qualified taxing districts as required by 65 ILCS 5/ (c).

94 SECTION 3: The first Board meeting of the JRB shall be on August 19, 2015 at 2:30pm at the Roselle Village Hall, 31 S. Prospect Street. SECTION 4: That the agenda for the initial JRB meeting is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. SECTION 5: Village staff shall provide administrative support to the JRB. SECTION 6: If a court of competent jurisdiction sets aside any portion of this Ordinance as unconstitutional or unlawful, it shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the Ordinance. SECTION 7: Any ordinance which is inconsistent with this Ordinance is repealed to the extent of such inconsistency including preemptive Federal and State regulations. SECTION 8: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form as is hereby authorized and directed to be done by the President and Board of Trustees. AYES: NAYES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY of, PUBLISHED in pamphlet form this DAY of, Mayor, Village of Roselle ATTEST: Village Clerk

95 EXHIBIT A Joint Review Board Meeting Agenda

96 AGENDA ITEM # 7G AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Village Board Meeting July 27, 2015 Item Title: Ordinance Establishing Certain Dates, Times, and Places for Statutory Required Public Hearings Associated With the Proposed Irving-Central Tax Increment Financing District Staff Contact: Patrick N. Watkins, Community Development Director VILLAGE BOARD ACTION Motion to Approve an Ordinance Establishing Certain Dates, Times, and Places for Statutory Required Public Hearings Associated with the Proposed Irving- Central Tax Increment Financing District. Executive Summary: This Ordinance sets the public hearing date for the Irving-Central Tax Increment Financing District as September 14, 2015 at 7:00pm before the Village Board. The hearing is for the consideration of the Irving-Central plan and eligibility report. It further allows for the proposing of the adoption and implementation of the Irving-Central Tax Increment Financing Plan. The Joint Review Board meeting will occur on August 19 at 2:30pm. The Plan for the Irving-Central Redevelopment Project Area was filed with the Village Clerk on June 26, There were amendments filed on July 8, 2015, and July 16 which updated the exhibits and included the final legal description. Implications: Is this item budgeted? NA Any other implications to be considered? None Attachments: Ordinance 1

97 ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING CERTAIN DATES, TIMES AND PLACES FOR STATUTORY REQUIRED PUBLIC HEARINGS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED IRVING - CENTRAL TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Village of Roselle, Illinois, Irving-Central Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Plan which includes the Tax Increment Financing Qualification Report was placed on file, with the Village Clerk of the Village of Roselle on June 26, 2015 (with updates filed on July 8, 2015 and July 16, 2015) for the establishment of the proposed Irving - Central Tax Increment Financing District (hereinafter I-C Plan ); and WHEREAS, the Village has adopted ordinance number (insert) establishing an interested parties TIF registry, rules, regulations and eligibility report; and WHEREAS, 65 ILCS 5/ requires the Village to fix a time and place for a public hearing to consider the I-C Plan and eligibility report and, proposing the adoption of the I-C Plan and implementation of the Roselle Irving - Central Tax Increment Financing District; and WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities of the Village of Roselle find that at least ten (10) days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance the Village has made available for public inspection the proposed redevelopment plan and report detailing the basis for the eligibility of the redevelopment project area as well the I-C Plan for the District, if approved; WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities of the Village of Roselle further find that it has appointed the Village Clerk, Patricia Burns, as the person to contact for further information regarding the tax increment financing area; and WHEREAS, the Village staff is directed, after the adoption of this Ordinance to provide notice of the availability of the I-C redevelopment plan and eligibility report, including how to obtain, by mail, within a reasonable time after the adoption of this Ordinance, to all residential addresses that after a good faith effort, the municipality determines are located outside the proposed project area and within 750 feet of the boundaries of the proposed redevelopment area. WHEREAS, the Village has adopted ordinance [insert number] establishing and convening a Joint Review Board for the I-C Plan as required by 65 ILCS 5/ (b). NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED, by the President and Board of Trustees for the Village of Roselle, DuPage and Cook Counties, Illinois as follows: SECTION 1: The foregoing recitals are incorporated herein as if fully set forth.

98 SECTION 2: That the public hearing before the Roselle Village Board to consider the proposed I-C Plan eligibility report, plan and district is hereby scheduled for September 14, 2015 at 7:00pm at 31 South Prospect Street on the second floor of Village Hall in the Village of Roselle. SECTION 3: If a court of competent jurisdiction sets aside any portion of this Ordinance as unconstitutional or unlawful, it shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the Ordinance. SECTION 4: Any ordinance which is inconsistent with this Ordinance is repealed to the extent of such inconsistency including preemptive Federal and State regulations. SECTION 5: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form as is hereby authorized and directed to be done by the President and Board of Trustees. AYES: NAYES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY of, PUBLISHED in pamphlet form this DAY of, Mayor, Village of Roselle ATTEST: Village Clerk

99 AGENDA ITEM # 11A AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Village Board Meeting July 27, 2015 Item Title: Staff Contact: 2015 Street Improvement Program Phil Cotter, Director of Public Works VILLAGE BOARD ACTION Village Board adopt a resolution authorizing the execution of a contract in the amount of $625,000 to Arrow Road Construction Company for the 2015 Street Improvement Program. Executive Summary: On June 17, 2015, the Village received and opened six competitive bids for the 2015 Street Improvement Program. The lowest responsible bidder is Arrow Road Construction Company, of Mount Prospect, Illinois, who submitted a bid in the amount of $743, At the July 13, 2015 Committee of the Whole meeting, considering bids for this project came in higher than the amount appropriated in the 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), the Village Board authorized Staff to award this contract at the appropriated amount of $625,000. The reduced scope of work involves deferring the repaving of four courts. Arrow Road Construction has worked on road resurfacing projects in Roselle in previous years and has performed well. Therefore, Staff recommends awarding the contract for the 2015 Street Improvement Program to Arrow Road Construction in the amount of $625, Implications: Is this item budgeted? The 5-Year CIP (FY 2015 FY 2019) appropriates $625,000 for the 2015 Street Improvement Program. Any other implications to be considered? None Attachments: Resolution Bid Tabulation 2015 SIP 1

100 RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF ROSELLE AND ARROW ROAD CONSTRUCTION CO. FOR THE 2015 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM WHEREAS, in accordance with the Village of Roselle s purchasing policy, bids were received and opened on June 17, 2015, for the 2015 Street Improvement Program, and WHEREAS, the low bidder, Arrow Road Construction Company, has been determined to be qualified to perform this work, and WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the Village of Roselle believe it is in the best interests of the Village to authorize the execution of a contract with Arrow Road Construction Company. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Roselle, DuPage and Cook Counties, Illinois, that the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign and the Village Clerk is hereby directed to attest to that certain contract between the Village of Roselle and Arrow Road Construction Company. ADOPTED this 27 th day of July, 2015 AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ATTEST: Gayle Smolinski, Mayor Patricia Burns, Village Clerk

101 Village of Roselle Public Works Attended by: Patricia Burns, Village Clerk Bid Opening Date: June 17, Street Program Jorge Jorda, Civil Engineer Time: 2:00 PM BID TABULATION Arrow Road Construction Schroeder Asphalt Serv. J.A. Johnson Paving Co. R.W. Dunteman Company GA Paving, LLC K-Five Construction Corp. Mount Prospect, IL Huntley, IL Arlington Heights, IL Addison, IL Bellwood, IL Lemont, IL Item No. Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost 1 Combination Curb and Gutter Removal Foot 5,150 $ 5.30 $ 27, $ 4.73 $ 24, $ 4.80 $ 24, $ 5.25 $ 27, $ $ 64, $ $ 61, Sidewalk Removal Sq-Ft 5,100 $ 1.30 $ 6, $ 1.31 $ 6, $ 1.35 $ 6, $ 1.80 $ 9, $ 2.00 $ 10, $ 4.25 $ 21, Driveway Pavement Removal Sq-Yd 1,235 $ $ 19, $ $ 15, $ 0.01 $ $ $ 23, $ 7.00 $ 8, $ $ 19, HMA Surface Removal (Variable Depth) Sq-Yd 31,419 $ 2.15 $ 67, $ 2.60 $ 81, $ 2.10 $ 65, $ 4.80 $ 150, $ 3.00 $ 94, $ 2.75 $ 86, Hot-Mix-Asphalt Surface Removal (Butt Joint) Sq-Yd 601 $ 7.55 $ 4, $ 2.60 $ 1, $ 2.10 $ 1, $ $ 7, $ 5.00 $ 3, $ $ 7, Frames and Lids to be Adjusted Each 37 $ $ 15, $ $ 20, $ $ 16, $ $ 15, $ $ 20, $ $ 18, Frames and Lids to be Adjusted (special) Each 3 $ 1, $ 3, $ 1, $ 3, $ 1, $ 3, $ 1, $ 3, $ $ 1, $ 1, $ 3, Pipe Underdrains, 6" Peforated PVC with Socks Foot 200 $ $ 7, $ $ 12, $ $ 7, $ $ 7, $ $ 13, $ $ 11, Frames and Lids, Type 1 Each 9 $ $ 3, $ $ 2, $ $ 3, $ $ 3, $ $ 3, $ $ 2, Combination Concrete Curb and Gutter, Type M-4.12 Foot 5,300 $ $ 88, $ $ 111, $ $ 113, $ $ 113, $ $ 106, $ $ 98, Portland Cement Concrete Sidewalk, 5" Sq-Ft 4,950 $ 6.65 $ 32, $ 5.15 $ 25, $ 5.25 $ 25, $ 5.25 $ 25, $ 5.50 $ 27, $ 6.40 $ 31, Detectable Warnings Sq-Ft 93 $ $ 2, $ $ 2, $ $ 2, $ $ 2, $ $ 2, $ $ 2, PCC Driveway Pavement, 7" Sq-Yd 366 $ $ 24, $ $ 24, $ $ 28, $ $ 22, $ $ 21, $ $ 21, Class D Patches, Type II 6" Sq-Yd 410 $ $ 21, $ $ 27, $ $ 17, $ $ 29, $ $ 26, $ $ 32, Class D Patches, Type III 6" Sq-Yd 380 $ $ 19, $ $ 25, $ $ 15, $ $ 22, $ $ 22, $ $ 30, Bituminous Materials (Prime Coat) Gal 10,998 $ 0.01 $ $ 0.01 $ $ 0.01 $ $ 0.01 $ $ 2.00 $ 21, $ 0.01 $ Aggregate Materials (Prime Coat) Ton 66 $ 1.00 $ $ 1.00 $ $ 1.00 $ $ 1.00 $ $ $ 1, $ 0.01 $ Hot-Mix-Asphalt Leveling Binder (Machine Method), N50 Ton 1,356 $ $ 103, $ $ 107, $ $ 114, $ $ 103, $ $ 117, $ $ 108, Hot-Mix-Asphalt Surface Course, Mixture "D", N50 Ton 2,714 $ $ 215, $ $ 214, $ $ 229, $ $ 207, $ $ 206, $ $ 206, Traffic Control and Protection, Standard L.S. 1 $ 29, $ 29, $ 9, $ 9, $ 43, $ 43, $ 9, $ 9, $ 8, $ 8, $ 43, $ 43, HMA Driveway Pavement Sq-Yd 908 $ $ 41, $ $ 25, $ $ 33, $ $ 31, $ $ 21, $ $ 43, Earth Excavation Cu-Yd 40 $ $ 8, $ $ 1, $ $ 3, $ $ 3, $ $ 2, $ $ 4, TOTAL AS-READ $ 743, $ 745, $ 758, $ 834, $ 852, $ 856, (Per Special Provision) TOTAL AS-CORRECTED $ 743, $ 745, $ 758, $ 821, $ 807, $ 856,919.99

102 AGENDA ITEM # 11B AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Village Board Meeting July 27, 2015 Item Title: Staff Contact: 2015 Pavement Patching Program Phil Cotter, Director of Public Works VILLAGE BOARD ACTION Village Board adopt a resolution authorizing the execution of a contract for the 2015 Pavement Patching Program to GA Paving in the amount of $100, Executive Summary: On June 17, 2015, the Village received and opened five competitive bids for the 2015 Pavement Patching Program. The lowest responsible bidder is GA Paving, of Bellwood, Illinois, who submitted a bid in the amount of $126, At the July 13, 2015 Committee of the Whole meeting, considering bids for this project came in higher than the amount appropriated in the 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), the Village Board authorized Staff to award this contract at the appropriated amount of $100,000. Although GA Paving has not previously worked for the Village of Roselle, Staff contacted references provided by the contractor and they were positive. Therefore, Staff recommends awarding the contract for the 2015 Pavement Patching Program to GA Paving in the amount of $100, Implications: Is this item budgeted? The 5-Year CIP (FY 2015 FY 2019) appropriates $100,000 for the 2015 Pavement Patching Program. Any other implications to be considered? None Attachments: Resolution Bid Tabulation 2015 Pavement Patching Program 1

103 RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF ROSELLE AND GA PAVING FOR THE 2015 PAVEMENT PATCHING PROGRAM WHEREAS, in accordance with the Village of Roselle s purchasing policy, bids were received and opened on June 17, 2015, for the 2015 Pavement Patching Program, and WHEREAS, the low bidder, GA Paving, has been determined to be qualified to perform this work, and WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the Village of Roselle believe it is in the best interests of the Village to authorize the execution of a contract with GA Paving. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Roselle, DuPage and Cook Counties, Illinois, that the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign and the Village Clerk is hereby directed to attest to that certain contract between the Village of Roselle and GA Paving. ADOPTED this 27 th day of July, 2015 AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ATTEST: Gayle Smolinski, Mayor Patricia Burns, Village Clerk

104 Village of Roselle Public Works 2015 Pavement Patching Program Attended by: Patricia Burns, Village Clerk Bid Opening Date: June 17, 2015 Bid Tabulation Jorge Jorda, Civil Engineer Time: 2:00 PM GA Paving LLC J.A. Johnson Paving Co. Alamp Concrete Contractors Schroeder Asphalt Services Inc. Bellwood, IL Arlington Heights, IL Schaumburg, IL Huntley, IL Item No. Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost 1 Class D Surface Patch, Type I, 2" Sq-Yd 100 $ $ 5, $ $ 3, $ $ 7, $ $ 3, Class D Surface Patch, Type II, 2" Sq-Yd 200 $ $ 8, $ $ 6, $ $ 12, $ $ 6, Class D Surface Patch, Type III, 2" Sq-Yd 500 $ $ 16, $ $ 16, $ $ 16, $ $ 14, Class D Surface Patch, Type IV, 2" Sq-Yd 2,000 $ $ 44, $ $ 60, $ $ 60, $ $ 56, HMA Pavement Patching, Full-Depth Sq-Yd 500 $ $ 40, $ $ 33, $ $ 30, $ $ 53, HMA Driveway Pavement Sq-Yd 100 $ $ 4, $ $ 3, $ $ 6, $ $ 3, Mobilization Each 4 $ 2, $ 8, $ 1, $ 4, $ 1, $ 4, $ 1, $ 5, Total As-Read $ 126, $ 127, $ 136, $ 141, Total As Corrected Chicagoland Paving Lake Zurich, IL Item No. Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Total Cost 1 Class D Surface Patch, Type I, 2" Sq-Yd 100 $ $ 3, Class D Surface Patch, Type II, 2" Sq-Yd 200 $ $ 7, Class D Surface Patch, Type III, 2" Sq-Yd 500 $ $ 14, Class D Surface Patch, Type IV, 2" Sq-Yd 2,000 $ $ 58, HMA Pavement Patching, Full-Depth Sq-Yd 500 $ $ 49, HMA Driveway Pavement Sq-Yd 100 $ $ 2, Mobilization Each 4 $ 3, $ 14, Total As-Read 149, $ Total As Corrected

105 AGENDA ITEM # 11C AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Village Board Meeting July 27, 2015 Item Title: Staff Contact: 2015 Sidewalk and Curb Replacement Program Phil Cotter, Director of Public Works VILLAGE BOARD ACTION Village Board adopt a resolution authorizing the execution of a contract for the 2015 Sidewalk and Curb Replacement Program to Mondi Construction at a project cost of $46, Executive Summary: On June 17, 2015, the Village received and opened six competitive bids for the 2015 Sidewalk and Curb Replacement Program. The lowest responsible bidder is Mondi Construction, of West Chicago, Illinois, who submitted a bid in the amount of $86, At the July 13, 2015 Committee of the Whole meeting, considering bids for this project came in higher than the amount budgeted in the FY 2015 Budget, the Village Board authorized Staff to award this contract at the budgeted amount of $46,250. Although Mondi Construction has not previously worked for the Village of Roselle, Staff contacted references provided by the contractor and they were positive. Therefore, Staff recommends awarding the contract for the 2015 Sidewalk and Curb Replacement Program to Mondi Construction in the amount of $46, Implications: Is this item budgeted? The FY 2015 Budget appropriates $40,000 for the sidewalk and curb replacement program from the General Fund and $6,250 from the Water and Sewer Fund. Any other implications to be considered? None Attachments: Resolution Bid Tabulation Sidewalk and Curb Replacement Program 1

106 RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF ROSELLE AND MONDI CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR THE 2015 SIDEWALK AND CURB REPLACEMENT PROGRAM WHEREAS, in accordance with the Village of Roselle s purchasing policy, bids were received and opened on June 17, 2015, for the 2015 Sidewalk and Curb Replacement Program, and WHEREAS, the low bidder, Mondi Construction, Inc., has been determined to be qualified to perform this work, and WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the Village of Roselle believe it is in the best interests of the Village to authorize the execution of a contract with Mondi Construction, Inc. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Roselle, DuPage and Cook Counties, Illinois, that the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign and the Village Clerk is hereby directed to attest to that certain contract between the Village of Roselle and Mondi Construction, Inc. ADOPTED this 27 th day of July, 2015 AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ATTEST: Gayle Smolinski, Mayor Patricia Burns, Village Clerk

107 Village of Roselle Public Works Attended by: Patricia Burns, Village Clerk Bid Opening Date: June 17, Sidewalk, Curb & Gutter Program Jorge Jorda, Civil Engineer Time: 2:00 PM Mondi Construction Schroeder & Schroeder D'Land Construction G & M Cement Construction West Chicago, IL Skokie, IL Bensenville, IL Addison, IL Item No. Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost 1 PCC Sidewalk, Remove/Replace Sq Ft 7,500 $ 7.50 $ 56, $ 8.00 $ 60, $ 8.19 $ 61, $ $ 78, Curb & Gutter, Remove/Replace Foot 500 $ $ 16, $ $ 13, $ $ 14, $ $ 16, PCC Drive Pavement, Remove/Replace Sq Yd 125 $ $ 9, $ $ 9, $ $ 8, $ $ 12, Detectable Warnings Sq Ft 120 $ $ 4, $ $ 5, $ $ 3, $ $ 4, Total As-Read $ 86, $ 87, $ 88, $ 111, Total As Corrected ALAMP Concrete GA Paving LLC Schaumburg, IL Bellwood, IL Item No. Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost 1 PCC Sidewalk, Remove/Replace Sq Ft 7,500 $ $ 78, $ $ 79, Curb & Gutter, Remove/Replace Foot 500 $ $ 22, $ $ 32, PCC Drive Pavement, Remove/Replace Sq Yd 125 $ $ 8, $ $ 16, Detectable Warnings Sq Ft 120 $ $ 4, $ $ 3, Total As-Read $ 114, $ 132, Total As Corrected

108 AGENDA ITEM # 12A AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Village Board Meeting July 27, 2015 Item Title: Staff Contact: Bills List Pam Figolah, Finance Director VILLAGE BOARD ACTION Approval of the attached bills list. Fund General Fund $105, Equipment Replacement $7, Taste of Roselle $ Sister Cities $36.00 General Capital $26, Water/Sewer Fund $304, Water/Sewer Capital Improvements $222, Parking Lot Fund $ Insurance Fund $9, Total 07/28/15 Bills Payable $678, Total 7/22/15 Payroll $374, Total Disbursements $1,052, G:\brenda\billslistcoverpage.doc