a) Certain issues would be better dealt with in national law than at Community level:
|
|
- Hugh Chase
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 R E P U B L I C O F H U N G A R Y MINISTRY OF JUSTICE DEPUTY SECRETARY OF STATE H-1055 Budapest, Kossuth tér 4. Tel: (+36-1) , Fax: (+36-1) Reference: Response to the Consultation paper on Future Priorities for the Action Plan on Modernising Company Law and Enhancing Corporate Governance in the European Union Directorate General Internal Market F2 European Commission Rue de la Loi Brussels Budapest 27th of March Dear Sir, With reference to the Consultation initiated by the Directorate General for Internal Market and Services on Future priorities for the Action Plan on Modernising Company Law and Enhancing Corporate Governance in the European Union, the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Hungary would like to respond the Commission s questions as follows. Question 1 By answering the questions raised in the Commission s consultation document, we came to the general conclusion that large number of legislative measures foreseen by the Action Plan does not correspond to the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality. In our view, future Community legislation in the field of company law should make a clear distinction between those measures that are necessary for the enhancement of competitiveness in the Internal Market, and those measures that are not justified. a) Certain issues would be better dealt with in national law than at Community level: Until present, for instance, the need for Community legislation on wrongful trading rules has not been proven. Such evidence would be difficult to be produced since several Member States have already introduced wrongful trading rules in their national legislation. Likewise, one can ask whether rules on the voting policies of institutional investors would not be better defined in national legislation than at Community level. Also, in our view, there is no reason to adopt an EC directive on the choice between monistic and dualistic board structures (one-tier or two-tier). (NB. The new Hungarian Companies Act, n IV. of 2006, ensures the free choice for shareholders between monistic and dualistic board structures.) b) Regarding certain measures foreseen in the Action Plan, both the need and the chance to reach an agreement for adoption of Community legislation are weak. Regarding these 1
2 measures, we would suggest adopting Commission recommendations rather than EC directives: For instance, we do not see the chance to adopt entirely binding (i.e. not optional) community rules on groups, because of the substantial differences between legislative concepts of Member States (even if the idea of adopting a text as detailed as it was seen in the proposal for the 9 th directive is already abandoned). In our view, most of the provisions of the proposal for a directive on shareholder s rights presented in January 2006 should be rather take the form of a Commission recommendation. We can agree with the proposal made by Commissioner McCreevy, according to which, in order to avoid adopting a binding text with several optional arrangements, the one share- one vote rule should take the form of a recommendation. c) Recognizing and respecting the axiom of Less is more! can not be avoided in the reform of EC Company Law. Dealing with Company law issues having cross-border relevance and an impact on the functioning of the Internal Market, future Community legislation should intervene only in specific cases where national law cannot bring adequate solution. We would stress the need for the revision of existing EC regulations and directives. If the Commission would like to bring into effect the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, upcoming proposals should focus on the following issues: - The adoption of the 14 th directive on the transfer of registered office - The revision of the regulation on the SE statute - The adoption of the regulation on the EPC statute - The revision of the capital maintenance regime of the 2 nd Directive (Council Directive 77/91/EEC). The first, second and third points of the above-mentioned list will be elaborated in detail in Questions 7, 11 and 12. Regarding the forth point, we would like to stress that the complete revision and deregulation of the 2 nd Directive should be foreseen among the middle-term priorities of the Action Plan. The 2 nd Directive, as a first generation company law directive, should be aligned with the principle of subsidiarity and proportionality. The wrong starting point of the Action Plan was that the slight amendment of the 2 nd Directive would be sufficient to take it as a good basis for the elaboration of the alternative capital maintenance regime. However, experts, shareholders and managers of companies across the EU certainly would agree with our view, that Community legislation cannot prohibit national legislation to make a free choice between different creditors protection regimes. Likewise, Community legislation can not neglect the expectations of stakeholders; nor can exclude the application of the arrangements that the market has judged to be more efficient. Although, as a general rule, we do not encourage the subsequent amendment of the same directive in a short time scale, in the case of the 2 nd Directive this seems to be unavoidable. Question 2 We support the efforts of the Commission to emphasize the application of better regulation principles in the adoption of upcoming Community measures in the field of company law. We agree that during the EU decision-making process, it is important to carry out impact 2
3 assessment studies, ensuring sufficient time for consultations, and involving stakeholders, economic actors. However, we are not convinced that the codification of existing company law directives into one piece of legislation would bring an added value, or would have an impact on the competitiveness of EU companies. Firstly, EC Company law directives and regulations are already compiled in text books that fulfil the function of having one single text. Secondly, directives are always transposed into national legislation; therefore companies generally do not read the text itself of the directives, but the transposing national law. We share the view that first generation company law directives should be treated in the same way, should respect the same set of criteria as the new ones. The analysis of the Company law acquis in the light of Better regulation principles should bring to the abolition of a number of rules of the 2 nd directive, and regarding the other directives, the lifting of a number of binding rules, in order to widen the room for manoeuvre in national legislation. Question 3 We believe that most of the short-term measures of the Action Plan in the field of corporate governance have made important contribution to the transparency of the structure and the decision-making in listed companies. We agree with the Commission that deviations from the one share, one vote principle distort the equilibrium between control and risk-bearing in limited liability companies. However, for the time being, it is not likely that a single approach could prevail in all Member States. Moreover, we do not believe that this measure is necessary in order to improve the Internal Market. The exceptions to the one share, one vote principle, and their aims vary widely in Member States. There also seems to be a tendency towards the limitation of exceptions in certain countries. In some of them it is the efficient capital market that reduces the use of preference shares etc., in others it is the national legislation. As we pointed out earlier, we believe that the basic guidelines for the Community legislation should be the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality. In our opinion, addressing the substance of this issue at the EU level would not have much added value, firstly because it could not take the form of legislative constraint, secondly because ensuring the transparency of the capital structure is more important than regulating the capital structure itself. Nevertheless, in the latter field the EU could play an important role and ensure the appropriate transparency of the capital structure of listed companies. Article 10 of Directive 2004/25/EC on takeover bids may serve as an example for the proposed legislation. Question 4 The approximation of shareholders substantive rights (investigation rights, wrongful trading rule, etc.) must have some positive effect on the improvement of the single market, but we do not consider it as a priority. A legislative instrument would move some elements of the substantive national law to the Community level. Nevertheless, these elements only have marginal connection with cross-border issues. 3
4 We emphasise once again that Community legislation should focus on problems, market failures, etc. that cannot be solved on the national level. In the last decade the converging tendencies of the substantive corporate law of the Member States (and other countries) have been obvious, important corporate law reforms have been carried out. These changes have brought forth the appearance of new institutions in some national regimes, automatically harmonizing the Member States legislations. Several countries have already adopted the aforementioned shareholders rights in their legislation. For the shareholders of companies having their seats in the latter countries, the Community action would have no added value at all. For shareholders in other States the Community legislation may result in some progress, however, we do not believe that addressing these questions at EU level would make significant contribution to the improvement of the single market. Question 5 Institutional investors play an important role in determining the governance of listed companies. Therefore their investment and voting policies are of great importance to other market participants. We believe however that in this particular field it would be difficult to find proper justification for Community action. Primarily the market itself should encourage institutional investors action to disclose their investment and voting policies. And even if market pressures do not have enough influence on the behaviour of institutional investors, disclosure may easily be specified in national legislation. There is no reason to believe that this aim can be better achieved on the Community level. Question 6 Wrongful trading rules and the issue of directors disqualification are important substantial elements of corporate law. Broadening directors responsibility has been a general trend in Europe for years and these rules have emerged in a number of national legislations. But it is obvious that even if the principle is the same, the actual regulations vary widely in the Member States. They have to be adapted to the national legal systems. Therefore, we believe that it would be difficult to accept common rules in this field since it widely affects the substantial law. Question 7 The 14 th Directive on transfer of registered office is just as important as the 10 th Directive on cross-border merges. We believe that the adoption of the 14 th Directive is key priority, even if its elaboration and adoption will raise several questions, and the Community legislator will have to make a number of decisions on company law and private international law issues. At present, the legislation of Member States varies widely regarding the legal consequences of a transfer of registered office. However, it is obvious that in a well-functioning Internal Market, companies should be allowed to freely adapt themselves to the market conditions, 4
5 business environment, and transfer their registered office from one Member State to the other. Therefore, it has to be clarified whether the transfer of a companies head office or registered office requires the aligning of the company statute to the national legislation of the host Member State. Obviously, this cannot be answered without an in-depth analysis made by the Commission on the application of the principle of registered office, and that of the country of incorporation. A debate should also be launched between Member States applying the principle of registered office, and the principle of country of incorporation. The decisions of the European Court of Justice (for instance, more recently, on the 13 th of December 2005 in the case SEVIC Systems AG) would serve as good starting point for discussions. Question 8 Regulating the organisation of listed companies has been on the Community s agenda for decades. The Action Plan focuses on ensuring their organisational freedom, instead of trying to make the companies uniform all over Europe. Following the American and the European financial scandals, the lack of independent control over the management of listed companies was defined as one of the major factors leading to the violations of law. Since then many Member States have strengthened the control over the management and the independence of some members of the board or of the supervisory body has been guaranteed. The trends have been very similar in the Member States regardless of the dominant board structure in the respective country. The Commission s Recommendations on directors pay and on independent board members may also have positive impact. On one hand, the one-tier system and the two-tier system are even as far as the guarantees of independent control are concerned. On the other hand we can still see some need for Community legislation in this field. We believe that ensuring greater freedom of choice to companies concerning their board structure may help to improve the Internal Market. This freedom reduces the costs of cross-border movements, restructuring etc. by letting the companies keep their original form after moving their registered office to another Member State. However, the EU should refrain from detailed legislation because it would concern substantial law and for that reason it would compromise the success of the proposal. Question 9 Squeeze out and sell out rights bring up substantial legal questions because they influence the ownership structure of the companies. Their introduction also requires the examination of constitutional questions since they affect property rights. In our opinion, the case of listed companies has to be strictly separated from other companies whose shares are not traded on the regulated market. Concerning the latter ones, we believe that legal intervention into the ownership structure of the company can not be justified neither on the national nor on the Community level. This matter belongs to the autonomy of the founders/owners of the company. As far as listed companies are concerned, the Community should not go beyond the rules set out in the Takeover Directive. We do not believe that introducing squeeze out and sell out rights would contribute to the improvement of the single market but may force the investors by putting legal and financial burden on them. 5
6 Question 10 We agree with the Internal Market DG s opinion that there is no need for Community legislation dealing with group relations. These matters, if it is necessary, may be dealt with on the national level. Question 11 According to Article 69 of 2157/2001/EC Regulation on the Statute of the European Company, 5 years at the latest after its entry into force, the Commission will draw up a report on the application of the Regulation and will make proposals for amendments, and to present this report to the Council and the European Parliament. In its report, the Commission will have to examine, whether it would be appropriate to abolish the ban on placing the SE s head office and registered office in different Member States. In this report, it would also be important to examine if the rule excluding natural persons from the establishment of an SE, and other rules reducing the room for manoeuvre of the companies establishing the SE should be maintained or not. The experience of the application of Directive 2001/86/EC regarding the involvement of employees in an SE should also be revised. The one and a half years experience since the entry into force of the regulation on the statute of the SE does not show that the regulation would be a success story. In Hungary, for instance, the possibility of establishing an SE was almost unobserved by stakeholders. However, the revision of the regulation has great importance, not only from the point of view of an eventual amendment of the text, but this experience will also have an impact on the elaboration of both the regulation of the statute of the European private company and the 14 th directive. Question 12 In our view, priority should be given to the adoption of the regulation on the statute of the European private company. According to the Action Plan, the decision on the need for the EPC statute depends on the outcome of the feasibility study, which was due to be presented by the end of Also, the Winter Report gave first priority to the adoption of the 10 th Directive. Although a study has been published on the Commission s website, the lack of a clear conclusion did not advance the Commission to make a well-founded decision. However, there is no doubt, that the need for the EPC statute has still a strong justification. The 10 th Directive, even if it will certainly enhance the cross-border cooperation of companies, does not respond to the need for a new, entrepreneur-friendly sui generis company form. The advantage of the EPC statute is exactly the fact that it can have an activity all over the Internal Market, and since the same binding rules of the regulation apply in all Member States, the costs of complying with 25 different national legislations can be reduced. However, the EPC statute will only be successful, if the following conditions will be met: - Contrary to the SE statute, the EPC statute has to provide the possibility of establishing the EPC even without an existing predecessor company. A good example for this is the statute on the European cooperative society, where the ECS can also be established by natural persons (Regulation 1435/2003/EC). 6
7 - Under condition that the economic activity of the future EPC will cover several Member States, the EPC could also be established by members coming from only one Member State, as it was suggested in the Winter Report. - Making reference to national legislation in the regulation on the EPC statute should be the exception. The EPC statute will only be successful if its rules are clear and comprehensive, and give sufficient freedom for the members of the EPC. Therefore, as a general rule, we suggest that the members of the EPC should be free to decide on issues that are not covered by the regulation. National legislation could not restrict the right of decision of the members of the EPC, nor require to apply the company law of the Member State where the EPC was incorporated. - The EPC statute can have a positive impact on the company law in the 25 Member States only if the regulation is restricted to minimum rules. A good example for this is the model regulation drafted by the French Chamber of Commerce in We would suggest that the EPC statute does not provide as burdensome rules on protection of creditors as the 2 nd Directive. The added value of the regulation on the EPC statue would be exactly to encourage national legislator to give up obsolete rules. - Unlike the SE statute, the EPC statute should not contain any rules on the involvement of employees. (In our view, Directive 2001/86/EC regarding the involvement of employees in an SE is the main reason of the failure of the SE statute.) We understand, that in case of EPCs having large number of employees, Member States would not agree on a text containing no rules on the involvement of employeess. One solution to this problem could be the limitation of the number of employees of the EPC to 500. Question 13 We cannot see any reason to support the idea of the European Foundation Statute. We believe that it does not make any contribution to the improvement of the Internal Market. Our objection to the creation of this particular European legal form does not mean that a feasibility study would be without any value. But it should focus on helping the cross-border movement and other cross-border aspects (fund raising, etc.) of foundations based on Member State law by the elimination the legal, financial and administrative burdens. It would have greater added value if this could be achieved without harmonizing substantial law. Yours sincerely, Gábor GADÓ Dr. Deputy Secretary of State 7
European Association of Co-operative Banks Groupement Européen des Banques Coopératives Europäische Vereinigung der Genossenschaftsbanken MARCH 2006
European Association of Co-operative Banks Groupement Européen des Banques Coopératives Europäische Vereinigung der Genossenschaftsbanken THE EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION OF CO-OPERATIVE BANKS RESPOND TO The European
More informationProposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, XXX [ ](2017) XXX draft Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Directive 2009/73/EC concerning common rules for the internal market
More informationParliament of Romania Chamber of Deputies Committee for information technologies and communications
Parliament of Romania Chamber of Deputies Committee for information technologies and communications The reform of the EU Data Protection framework Building trust in a digital and global world 9/10 October
More information15489/14 TA/il 1 DG E 2 A
Council of the European Union Brussels, 20 November 2014 (OR. en) Interinstitutional Files: 2013/0028 (COD) 2013/0029 (COD) 15489/14 TRANS 528 CODEC 2240 NOTE From: To: General Secretariat of the Council
More informationThe Implementation of UN Economic Sanctions by the European
Summary The Implementation of UN Economic Sanctions by the European Community The UN Security Council s authorisation to impose mandatory sanctions under Chapter VII UNC on a UN Member State in case of
More informationFAQ on the 10th company law directive with regard to the cross-border merger of limited liability companies (2005/56/EC) 1
FAQ on the 10th company law directive with regard to the cross-border merger of limited liability companies (2005/56/EC) 1 Johannes Heuschmid, SEEurope network March 2006 (updated: July 2009) General 1.
More informationEuropean Association of Co-operative Banks Groupement Européen des Banques Coopératives Europäische Vereinigung der Genossenschaftsbanken
European Association of Co-operative Banks Groupement Européen des Banques Coopératives Europäische Vereinigung der Genossenschaftsbanken Committee of European Brussels, October 28, 2005 Banking Supervisors
More informationEuropean law and equality: An introduction
European law and equality: An introduction European law has had, and continues to have, a powerful effect in broadening and strengthening the UK s laws on equality. This leaflet briefly explains the relationship
More information(Legislative acts) DIRECTIVE 2014/55/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 16 April 2014 on electronic invoicing in public procurement
6.5.2014 L 133/1 I (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES DIRECTIVE 2014/55/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 16 April 2014 on electronic invoicing in public procurement (Text with EEA relevance)
More informationScienceDirect. The Future of Employees Board-Level Representation in The European Union
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia Economics and Finance 23 ( 2015 ) 1394 1400 2nd GLOBAL CONFERENCE on BUSINESS, ECONOMICS, MANAGEMENT and TOURISM, 30-31 October 2014, Prague,
More informationECR Group proposals on the revision of the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making
ECR Group proposals on the revision of the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making April 2015 Overview The ECR Group views the improvement of our regulatory environment as an essential element
More informationEBA/RTS/2017/ December Final Report. Draft regulatory technical standards. on central contact points under Directive (EU) 2015/2366 (PSD2)
EBA/RTS/2017/09 11 December 2017 Final Report Draft regulatory technical standards on central contact points under Directive (EU) 2015/2366 (PSD2) FINAL REPORT ON CENTRAL CONTACT POINTS UNDER THE PSD2
More informationThe Clean Energy package. Position of the Austrian electricity industry
The Clean Energy package Position of the Austrian electricity industry The Clean Energy package On 30 November 2016, the European Commission published a wide-ranging package of measures entitled Clean
More informationFinansinspektionen s response at the webb-survey, to the Commission Consultation on FinTech
FI dnr 17-4481 Finansinspektionen Box 7821 SE-103 97 Stockholm [Brunnsgatan 3] Tel +46 8 408 980 00 Fax +46 8 24 13 35 finansinspektionen@fi.se www.fi.se Finansinspektionen s response at the webb-survey,
More informationGREEN PAPER The EU corporate governance framework
Denise Silva Ferreira Juvenal rio1042370@terra.com.br Accountant Commentary individual Rio de Janeiro / Brazil Sir Chairman and Members of European Commission Chair of Discussion Paper GREEN PAPER - The
More informationThe Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Agricultural Product Quality Schemes
EUROPEAN COMMISSION - DG AGRI Unit H2 L130 03/168 Rue de la Loi, 200 1049 Bruxelles By email to: Agri-H2@ec.europa.eu 3 July 2012 The Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council
More informationCOMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 8.11.2017 SWD(2017) 368 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Assessing the amendments to Directive 2009/73/EC setting out rules for gas pipelines connecting the European
More informationAmCham EU s position on Directive on certain aspects concerning contracts for the supply of digital content
AmCham EU s position on Directive on certain aspects concerning contracts for the supply of digital content The Commission s proposal on digital content: further measures needed to drive online cross-border
More informationAnalysis. The democratic accountability of the EU s legislative approach
Analysis The democratic accountability of the EU s legislative approach Steve Peers, Professor of Law, University of Essex The EU legislative process lacks the basic rudiments of openness and transparency
More information15575/17 ADD 1 1 DPG
Council of the European Union Brussels, 22 December 2017 (OR. en) 15575/17 ADD 1 DRAFT MINUTES Subject: PV/CONS 72 JAI 1186 COMIX 826 3584th meeting of the Council of the European Union (Justice and Home
More informationCORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES 1 GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES Crayon considers good corporate governance to be a prerequisite for value creation and trustworthiness, and for access to capital. In order to secure
More informationTHE PRINCIPLE OF SUBSIDIARITY
THE PRINCIPLE OF SUBSIDIARITY In areas in which the European Union does not have exclusive competence, the principle of subsidiarity, laid down in the Treaty on European Union, defines the circumstances
More informationCOUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 19 July 2005 (20.07) (OR. fr) 11341/05 PI 18
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 19 July 2005 (20.07) (OR. fr) 11341/05 PI 18 COVER NOTE from: Secretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Ms Patricia BUGNOT, Director date of receipt:
More informationClosing keynote speech
11 April 2017 ESMA-31-68-153 Closing keynote speech CMU Mid-Term Review Public Hearing European Commission Brussels Steven Maijoor Chair European Securities and Markets Authority Ladies and gentlemen,
More informationConsultation Paper. Draft Regulatory Technical Standards
EBA/CP/2017/09 29 June 2017 Consultation Paper Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the criteria for determining the circumstances in which the appointment of a central contact point pursuant to Article
More informationCOUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 23 May 2014 (OR. en) 9371/14 Interinstitutional File: 2010/0208 (COD) LIMITE
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 23 May 2014 (OR. en) 9371/14 Interinstitutional File: 2010/0208 (COD) LIMITE AGRI 340 AGRILEG 100 CODEC 1198 DENLEG 91 ENV 420 MI 402 NOTE From: To: Subject: Presidency
More informationAmending the (Dutch) Constitution?
Amending the (Dutch) Constitution? Expert Meeting on National Constitutions and Globalisation Background materials on the place of the Constitution in the Dutch legal system The Dutch Legal System: A Monistic
More informationMeijers Committee standing committee of experts on international immigration, refugee and criminal law
1806 Note on the use of soft law instruments under EU law, in particular in the area of freedom, security and justice, and its impact on fundamental rights, democracy and the rule of law 9 April 2018 Background
More informationEBA/CP/2013/12 21 May Consultation Paper
EBA/CP/2013/12 21 May 2013 Consultation Paper Draft Regulatory Technical Standards On Passport Notifications under Articles 35, 36 and 39 of the proposed Capital Requirements Directive Consultation Paper
More information15868/13 JB/mf 1 DGG 1B
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 11 November 2013 (OR. en) 15868/13 Interinstitutional File: 2013/0253 (COD) EF 216 ECOFIN 988 CODEC 2479 REPORT From: To: Subject: Presidency Council Single Resolution
More informationCORPORATE GOVERNANCE CODE OF STOPANSKA BANKA AD - SKOPJE
S T O P A N S K A B A N K A AD S K O P J E CORPORATE GOVERNANCE CODE OF STOPANSKA BANKA AD - SKOPJE Skopje, April 2013 Page 1 of 12 1 On the basis of Article 26 of the Statute of Stopanska Banka AD Skopje
More informationLEGAL AND POLICY DEVELOPMENTS OF NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE IMPORT IN ALBANIA
LEGAL AND POLICY DEVELOPMENTS OF NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE IMPORT IN ALBANIA I. ABSTRACT This paper deals with a topic which has been very much debated within the Albanian arena for the last years: that of import
More informationHelsinki European Council (10-11 December 1999) Presidency Conclusions. Introduction
Helsinki European Council (10-11 December 1999) Presidency Conclusions Introduction 1. The European Council met in Helsinki on 10 and 11 December 1999. It adopted the Millennium Declaration. It has taken
More informationProposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 22.4.2015 COM(2015) 177 final 2015/0093 (COD) Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 as regards the
More informationPosition Paper UEAPME 1 position on the Green Paper Modernising the professional Qualifications Directive COM (2011) 367 UEAPME would to recall the importance and role of professional qualifications and
More informationD&I Quarterly » Court of Appeal Rules on Copyright to Contract Terms» Renewed Act on Cooperation within Undertakings
D&I Quarterly Finland Q2 2007 Q2 D&I Quarterly 2007 MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS» Authorisations for Share Issue DISPUTE RESOLUTION» Civil Procedure and EU Law Doctoral Thesis CORPORATE & COMMERCIAL» New Public
More informationAugust THE APPOINTMENT OF THE AUDITOR AND THE DURATION OF THE AUDIT ENGAGEMENT: Striving for a Workable Single Market in the EU
Federation of European Accountants Fédération des Experts comptables Européens Briefing Paper Standing for trust and integrity August 2014 THE APPOINTMENT OF THE AUDITOR AND THE DURATION OF THE AUDIT ENGAGEMENT:
More informationChapter 7. The interface between member states and the European Union
7. THE INTERFACE BETWEEN MEMBER STATES AND THE EUROPEAN UNION 133 Chapter 7 The interface between member states and the European Union Regulations emanating from the EU are of growing importance for member
More informationOMV Aktiengesellschaft
OMV Aktiengesellschaft Statement of OMV Aktiengesellschaft on the Green Paper of the European Commission on the European Corporate Governance Framework Ladies and Gentlemen! OMV Aktiengesellschaft appreciates
More informationEuropean Parliament resolution of 8 March 2011 on the revision of the General Product Safety Directive and market surveillance (2010/2085(INI))
P7_TA(2011)0076 General product safety and market surveillance European Parliament resolution of 8 March 2011 on the revision of the General Product Safety Directive and market surveillance (2010/2085(INI))
More informationDGE 2 EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 21 March 2018 (OR. en) 2016/0149 (COD) PE-CONS 69/17
EUROPEAN UNION THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT THE COUNCIL Brussels, 21 March 2018 (OR. en) 2016/0149 (COD) PE-CONS 69/17 POSTES 28 TELECOM 369 MI 974 COMPET 884 DIGIT 285 CONSOM 403 CODEC 2106 LEGISLATIVE ACTS
More informationCompetition Policy and Structural Reform: Indonesia s Experience in Developing Competition Regime
Competition Policy and Structural Reform: Indonesia s Experience in Developing Competition Regime Introduction Initially the competition regime design in Indonesian economic policy is much emphasize on
More informationTEXTS ADOPTED. having regard to the Treaties, and in particular to Articles 2, 3, 4 and 6 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU),
European Parliament 2014-2019 TEXTS ADOPTED P8_TA(2016)0344 Recent developments in Poland and their impact on fundamental rights as laid down in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union
More informationORGALIME 1 Reflection Paper Brussels, 27 February Why assessing the definition of the producer in Directive 2002/96/EC?
Assessing the Interpretation of the Producer Definition under Directive 2002/96/EC (WEEE) for the Purpose of Transposition in National Laws and for the Purpose of Enforcement at National Levels ORGALIME
More informationEuropean Association of Co-operative Banks Groupement Européen des Banques Coopératives Europäische Vereinigung der Genossenschaftsbanken
Brussels 6 th January 2015 VH/MM/B18 EACB Note on BCBS Guidelines on Corporate Governance Principles for Banks The members of the European Association of Cooperative Banks (EACB) support the aim of the
More informationOfficial Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES
3.6.2014 L 164/1 I (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES DIRECTIVE2014/63/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 15 May 2014 amending Council Directive 2001/110/EC relating to honey THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT
More information2. The Competitiveness Council hereby submits this Key Issues Paper as its contribution to the Spring European Council 2008.
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 26 February 2008 6933/08 COMPET 82 RECH 76 TELECOM 18 ECOFIN 88 UEM 82 AG 23 SOC 132 NOTE from : Council (Competitiveness) to : European Council Prev.doc.: 6282/08
More informationBilateral screening: Chapter 27 PRESENTATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
REPUBLIC OF SERBIA Negotiating Group for the Chapter 27 Bilateral screening: Chapter 27 PRESENTATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA Directive 2003/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May
More informationThe EU competence and duty to regulate corporate responsibility to respect Human Rights through mandatory Human Rights Due Diligence
ECCJ BRIEFING NOVEMBER 2017 The EU competence and duty to regulate corporate responsibility to respect Human Rights through mandatory Human Rights Due Diligence The protection of human rights from corporate
More informationProposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Directive 2003/88/EC concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (presented by the Commission) EN 1 EN
More informationeni s proposals on Corporate Governance
eni s proposals on Corporate Governance eni s proposals on Corporate Governance 1. Introduction 5 1.1. Objective 5 1.2. Methodology 5 1.3. Proposals 6 2. Proposals 7 2.1. List of proposals 7 2.2.The proposals
More informationPublic consultation on the targeted revision of EU consumer law directives
Contribution ID: 9bc8877a-52d8-47ac-9e3a-d76c3fe675ca Date: 08/10/2017 16:48:05 Public consultation on the targeted revision of EU consumer law directives Fields marked with * are mandary. About you *
More informationPrior Checking Opinion
Prior Checking Opinion "Data processing for social media monitoring" at the European Central Bank (ECB) Case 2017-1052 *** The ECB intends to monitor and track mentions of ECB related topics in different
More informationEN United in diversity EN A7-0170/27. Amendment
29.6.2011 A7-0170/27 27 Recital 2 a (new) (2a) Attention should be drawn to point 10 of the conclusions of the Environment Council meeting of 4 December 2008 which invites EFSA and Member States to pursue
More informationEUROPEAN LIVESTOCK AND MEAT TRADING UNION / EUROPÄISCHE VIEH- UND FLEISCHHANDELSUNION
EUROPEAN LIVESTOCK AND MEAT TRADING UNION / EUROPÄISCHE VIEH- UND FLEISCHHANDELSUNION Brussels, 11 th October 2006 O/REF: note N-073-2006-EN RE: MONITORING REPORT ON THE STATE OF PREPAREDNESS FOR EU MEMBERSHIP
More informationThe adoption of the Electronic Communications Convention by Montenegro: Policy choices and Impact
The adoption of the Electronic Communications Convention by Montenegro: Policy choices and Impact Aneta Spaic Assistant Professor University of Montenegro School of Law Luca Castellani Secretary, Working
More informationECB-PUBLIC OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK. of 4 October 2017
EN ECB-PUBLIC OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK of 4 October 2017 on a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 and Regulation (EU)
More informationFREEDOM OF INFORMATION UNDER MALTESE LAW 1 By Kevin Aquilina. 1. Constitution Aspects of Freedom of information Legislation
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION UNDER MALTESE LAW 1 By Kevin Aquilina 1. Constitution Aspects of Freedom of information Legislation In Malta, freedom of information is contemplated in two distinct fundamental freedoms
More informationLegal and Regulatory Aspects of Public Service Broadcasting - Panel Contribution
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Competition DG Information, communication and multimedia Media The Head of Division Bucharest, 19 September 2003 COMP/C2/HU/rdu Legal and Regulatory Aspects of Public Service Broadcasting
More informationCommittee on Industry, Research and Energy Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection
European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Industry, Research and Energy Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection 28.2.2017 2016/2276(INI) DRAFT REPORT on online platforms and the digital
More informationARTICLES THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION AND THE ECB
ARTICLES THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION AND THE ECB The Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe (European Constitution) was agreed upon by the Heads of State or Government of the European Union (EU) during
More informationCOMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. Vademecum on European standardisation in support of Union legislation and policies PART III
Ref. Ares(2015)4888510-06/11/2015 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 27.10.2015 SWD(2015) 205 final PART 3/3 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Vademecum on European standardisation in support of Union legislation
More information1. Context. 1.1 Scope
Ref. Ares(2014)1782351-02/06/2014 28/5/2014 REQUEST TO ESMA FOR TECHNICAL ADVICE ON IMPLEMENTING ACTS CONCERNING THE REGULATION ON INSIDER DEALING AND MARKET MANIPULATION (MARKET ABUSE) ((EU)No XXX/2014)
More informationCouncil of the European Union Brussels, 19 February 2015 (OR. en)
Council of the European Union Brussels, 19 February 2015 (OR. en) 6197/15 MI 82 COMPET 40 MAP 5 TELECOM 37 NOTE From: Permanent Representatives Committee (Part 1) To: Council Subject: Draft Council Conclusions
More informationEUROPEAN SEA PORTS ORGANISATION ASBL/VZW ORGANISATION DES PORTS MARITIMES EUROPEENS ASBL/VZW
EUROPEAN SEA PORTS ORGANISATION ASBL/VZW ORGANISATION DES PORTS MARITIMES EUROPEENS ASBL/VZW European Commission Green Paper TEN-T: A policy review Towards a core and comprehensive network policy contribution
More informationComments on Chapter IV Part I Controller and processor 25/08/2015 Page 1
Comments on Chapter IV Part I Controller and processor 25/08/2015 Page 1 Bitkom represents more than 2,300 companies in the digital sector, including 1,500 direct members. With more than 700,000 employees,
More informationLost in consultation or Entering a new debate
Lost in consultation or Entering a new debate Opinion expressed on the consultation paper Towards a Coherent European Approach to Collective Redress 1 At the public hearing on the consultation paper on
More informationESPO views on the revision of Directive 2000/59/EC. on Port Reception Facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues
ESPO views on the revision of Directive 2000/59/EC on Port Reception Facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues May 2016 1. Introduction Directive 2000/59/EC aims to reduce the discharges of
More information1 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BUSINESS ACTIVITY REGULATORY OUTLINE. Objectives, background and legal basis
1 (7) 1 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BUSINESS ACTIVITY REGULATORY OUTLINE Objectives, background and legal basis The regulatory framework for good corporate governance and business activities is designed to
More informationTTIP- EU proposal for Chapter: Regulatory Cooperation
TTIP- EU proposal for Chapter: Regulatory Cooperation Preamble to the TTIP: The Parties, having regard to: the importance of regulatory measures to achieve public policy objectives, and each Party s right
More informationPublic Interest Regimes in the European Union differences and similarities in approach. Final Report of the EU Merger Working Group 10 March 2016
Public Interest Regimes in the European Union differences and similarities in approach Final Report of the EU Merger Working Group 10 March 2016 Introduction 1. The EU Merger Working Group (EUMWG) decided
More informationARTICLE 29 Data Protection Working Party
ARTICLE 29 Data Protection Working Party 05/EN WP108 Working Document Establishing a Model Checklist Application for Approval of Binding Corporate Rules Adopted on April 14 th, 2005 This Working Party
More informationThe role of the European Commission in protecting human participants in biomedical research
European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies (EGE) Bureau of European Policy Advisers (BEPA) The role of the European Commission in protecting human participants in biomedical research Disclaimer:
More informationREGULATORY REFORM IN SERBIA IN THE CONTEXT OF UPGRADING REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS
REGULATORY REFORM IN SERBIA IN THE CONTEXT OF UPGRADING REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS INTRODUCTION Modern legal systems have introduced the obligation of regulatory authorities to perform a Regulatory Impact
More information10972/14 IV/NC/kp DGB 2
Council of the European Union Brussels, 11 July 2014 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2010/0208 (COD) 10972/14 LEGISLATIVE ACTS AND OTHER INSTRUMTS Subject: AGRI 445 V 621 AGRILEG 130 DLEG 108 MI 496
More informationImproved participation in the planning process?
May 2003 Briefing Environmental Law Foundation Improved participation in the planning process? It is 15 months since the Government announced an overhaul of the land use planning system to tackle a regime
More informationPRESENTATION BY. Michael GIBBONS. Member of the Better Regulation Task Force
PRESENTATION BY Michael GIBBONS Member of the Better Regulation Task Force Implementation and Impact looking to the future. What needs to change? Michael Gibbons Member of the Better Regulation Task Force
More informationProposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. on certain aspects concerning contracts for the supply of digital content
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 9.12.2015 COM(2015) 634 final 2015/0287 (COD) Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on certain aspects concerning contracts for the supply
More informationUEAPME 1 Evaluation and Impact Assessment of Recommendation 2003/361/EC concerning the definition of micro, small and mediumsized
Position Paper UEAPME 1 Evaluation and Impact Assessment of Recommendation 2003/361/EC concerning the definition of micro, small and mediumsized enterprises Key Messages UEAPME members feel the SME definition
More informationRef : Consultation on ESMA Guidelines on Alternative Performance Measures
ESMA 103 rue de Grenelle 75007 Paris France Paris, May 13, 2014 Dear Sir/ Madam Ref : Consultation on ESMA Guidelines on Alternative Performance Measures MEDEF shares the general objective of these guidelines
More informationepp european people s party
Smart Regulation - Towards smarter regulation and cutting red tape in the EU 01 We believe in the values of freedom, subsidiarity, solidarity, individual responsibility and proportionality. Compared to
More informationRepublic of Bulgaria NATIONAL ANTI-CORRUPTION STRATEGY
Republic of Bulgaria NATIONAL ANTI-CORRUPTION STRATEGY In the last years corruption has become a global threat not only for the economic development of the countries themselves and their international
More informationBrussels, 7 May 2009 (Case ) 1. Procedure
Opinion on notifications for prior checking received from the Data Protection Officers of certain Community agencies concerning the "Staff recruitment procedures". Brussels, 7 May 2009 (Case 2009-287)
More informationDER BINNENMARKT IST DER MOTOR DES WIRTSCHAFTSWACHSTUMS
DER BINNENMARKT IST DER MOTOR DES WIRTSCHAFTSWACHSTUMS Position der Wirtschaftskammer Österreich zur Binnenmarktstrategie für Waren und Dienstleistungen Jänner 2016 SINGLE MARKET INFORMATION TOOL (SMIT)
More informationCOMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER
EN EN EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 22 January 2010 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER INTERPRETATIVE NOTE ON DIRECTIVE 2009/72/EC CONCERNING COMMON RULES FOR THE INTERNAL MARKET IN ELECTRICITY AND DIRECTIVE
More informationThe Revised Directive on European Works Councils
Frequently Asked Questions The Revised Directive on European Works Councils Wolfgang Greif GPA-djp/Austria March 2009 Available online in English and German: http://www.worker-participation.eu/european_works_councils/
More informationIndependent Regulators Group Rail. IRG Rail
IRG-Rail (15) 6 Independent Regulators Group Rail IRG Rail Position Paper on the new proposals concerning governance and the award of public service contracts with a strong focus on the role of the regulatory
More informationEstablishment of an Internal Postal Market Joint responsibility of all stakeholders
Establishment of an Internal Postal Market Joint responsibility of all stakeholders Dr. Jörg Reinbothe Head of Postal Services Unit European Commission Regulatory interventions and development perspectives
More informationReport to the European Commission on the Application of Group Supervision under the Solvency II Directive
EIOPA 17-648 22 December 2017 Report to the European Commission on the Application of Group Supervision under the Solvency II Directive EIOPA Westhafen Tower, Westhafenplatz 1-60327 Frankfurt Germany -
More informationWORKING DOCUMENT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament
European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Constitutional Affairs 5.10.2017 WORKING DOCUMT on the implementation of the Treaty provisions concerning national parliaments Committee on Constitutional Affairs
More informationQUESTION 114. Biotechnology
QUESTION 114 Yearbook 1994/II, pages 396-397 Executive Committee of Copenhagen, June 12-18, 1994 Q114 Question Q114 Resolution AIPPI taking into account recent developments in the fields of science and
More informationState Aid Issues for Local Authorities
State Aid Issues for Local Authorities Is state aid a relevant concern for local authorities? The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union provides that certain government activities may be prohibited
More informationINSTITUTE OF DIRECTORS
Mr Norman Murray, Audit Firm Governance Working Group, Chartered Accountants Hall, PO Box 433, Moorgate Place, London EC2P 2BJ. 9 February 2009 Dear Mr Murray, Audit Firm Governance: Evidence Gathering
More informationCommittee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs WORKING DOCUMENT. Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
EUROPEAN PARLIAMT 2009-2014 Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs 06.07.2012 WORKING DOCUMT on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free
More informationInput to Members of the European Parliament on the PSD2 RTS proposal covering banks obligations
Input to Members of the European Parliament on the PSD2 RTS proposal covering banks obligations ESBG (European Savings and Retail Banking Group) Rue Marie-Thérèse, 11 - B-1000 Brussels ESBG Transparency
More informationEXPLANATORY NOTE DRAFT
EXPLANATORY NOTE DRAFT to the draft Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine On Approval of the Regulations on Imposing Specific Duties on Natural Gas Market Participants to Meet General Public
More informationOfficial Journal of the European Union. (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS
17.3.2017 L 72/1 II (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) 2017/459 of 16 March 2017 establishing a network code on capacity allocation mechanisms in gas transmission systems and
More informationCOMMISSION OPINION. of XXX
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, XXX [ ](2012) XXX draft COMMISSION OPINION of XXX pursuant to Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 714/2009 and Article 10(6) of Directive 2009/72/EC - Austria - Certification
More informationConsultation Paper. Draft Implementing Standards
EBA/CP/2017/15 11 October 2017 Consultation Paper Draft Implementing Standards on the provision of information for the purpose of resolution plans under Article 11(3) of Directive 2014/59/EU Contents 1.
More informationDRAFT OPINION. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2017/0035(COD)
European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety 8.12.2017 2017/0035(COD) DRAFT OPINION of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety for the Committee
More information