Welsh Government M4 Corridor Enhancement Measures (CEM) Participation Report Executive Summary
|
|
- Agnes Ashlie Patterson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 M4 Corridor Enhancement Measures (CEM) Participation Report Executive Summary Issue 5 August 2013 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. Job number Ove Arup & Partners Ltd 4 Pierhead Street Capital Waterside Cardiff CF10 4QP United Kingdom
2 Executive Summary This Participation Report summarises the M4 Corridor Enhancement Measures (CEM) Programme and results of its engagement and consultation process. This Participation Report fits within a wider suite of WelTAG 1 reports, prepared as part of the M4 CEM Programme. The aim of these reports was to help the appropriate Welsh Government Minister to make an informed, evidenced-based decision on whether to progress any of the M4 CEM options. The M4 CEM Programme was based upon the ability to deliver any identified measures in phases to improve affordability. As a result of on-going discussions with the UK Government there has been a significant change in the assessment of the affordability of a major enhancement of the M4. On 26 June 2013, Edwina Hart AM CStJ MBE, Minister for Economy, Science and Transport, published the following written statement: Addressing the capacity and resilience issues on the M4 around Newport is the top transport challenge that we face in ensuring that Wales has an effective economic infrastructure which improves our competitiveness and access to jobs and services As a result of ongoing discussions with the UK Government there has been a significant change in the assessment of the affordability of a major enhancement of the M4. Building on the extensive development and consultation work undertaken on, we will be consulting formally over the summer with Natural Resources Wales in order to go out to public consultation this September with a finalised draft Plan and Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Report. If implemented, the draft plan would lead to a motorway being built south of Newport. The Welsh Government has also commissioned a separate study and report on proposals to develop a metro system for South East Wales. The report will focus on how a metro system could support economic growth and regeneration at key locations across South East Wales. As such, public transport measures will not form part of the draft Plan. The consultation responses reported within this M4 CEM Participation Report, in addition to the wider engagement and consultation that helped shape the development of the M4 CEM Programme, has helped inform the development of an M4 Corridor around Newport draft Plan and therefore remain of relevance moving forward. The M4 Corridor around Newport consultation documents will include a finalised draft Plan and Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Report and other associated assessments. 1 Welsh Transport Planning and Appraisal Guidance Page 2
3 Introduction The M4 CEM Programme was set up to explore and resolve issues of capacity, safety and resilience along the M4 corridor around Newport, in south-east Wales. Many people using the M4 Corridor and the surrounding highway network around Newport are affected by the congestion and potential hazards that result from the large number of vehicles using the M4 between Magor and Castleton. At peak times the volume of traffic is greater than the road was designed to accommodate. Travellers and local residents are also affected by the disruption caused by unexpected events and incidents. It can take a long period of time following an incident before traffic flows normally again; this suggests that the resilience of the M4 and surrounding highway network needs to be improved. The aims of the M4 CEM Programme were subject to public and stakeholder engagement and were to: 1. Make it easier and safer for people to access their homes, workplaces and services by walking, cycling, public transport or road. 2. Deliver a more efficient and sustainable transport network supporting and encouraging long-term prosperity in the region, across Wales, and enabling access to international markets. 3. To produce positive effects overall on people and the environment, making a positive contribution to the overarching Welsh Government goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to making Wales more resilient to the effects of climate change. Further information about what was the M4 CEM Programme can be found at which will remain accessible but will no longer be updated. A link to the new website for the draft Plan will be provided in due course. Engagement and consultation Recognising the potential level of public interest in transport issues within the M4 corridor around Newport, and the numbers of people potentially affected by any new measures presented as part of the M4 CEM Programme, the Welsh Government undertook wide-ranging and focussed engagement with stakeholders and local people from September The engagement work was appropriately aligned, in terms of timing and decision making, to the technical assessment process of the M4 CEM Programme, which helped to shape the M4 CEM Consultation Document. During the engagement process, the Welsh Government and its project team conducted dialogue and deliberative sessions both with internal and external specialists and expert stakeholders, as well as with communities and other organisations who were likely to be interested in and affected by any transport related interventions. The M4 CEM Consultation, which asked participants to comment on a range of options that could contribute towards a strategy to reduce traffic congestion on the M4 around Newport, ran between March and July All available documents published as part of the engagement and consultation process associated with the M4 CEM Programme can be found at Page 3
4 Activities undertaken The M4 CEM Programme involved public and stakeholder participation in three key phases: 1. To help identify all relevant travel-related problems, aims and goals in the M4 Corridor around Newport and to establish if there was a need for a transport intervention; 2. To explore a wide range of possible approaches to achieving the goals and aims of the Programme; and 3. To ensure that Welsh Government benefit from understanding public views, as well as those of key stakeholders, to allow them to identify measures that represented a better economic, social, environmental and technical solution to the problems affecting travel on the M4 corridor between Magor and Castleton. A comprehensive promotion and publicity campaign was undertaken to make people across South Wales aware of the opportunity to engage and comment on the M4 CEM Consultation. The then Minister for Local Government and Communities advised all AMs and MPs in the South Wales area of the public consultation. All Local Authorities and Clerks of Community Councils in the Newport were also notified. The Welsh Government arranged for adverts to be placed in Newport Matters, Capital Times and the Cardiff and South Wales Advertiser to try to reach as many of the public as possible. In addition, Public Notices about the Consultation were published in local papers including the South Wales Echo, South Wales Argus, Glamorgan Gazette, South Wales Evening Post and Western Mail. There were also adverts on Newport Buses, on the Big Screen in Cardiff, and at Motorway services along the M4 (Magor to Swansea). Newsletters were left in a number of public buildings around Newport. Following feedback from some of the attendees of the original drop-in exhibitions about the failure of some of the original publicity attempts to raise awareness, the Welsh Government arranged for three additional drop-in public exhibitions and the Welsh Government also extended the Consultation period by a month. To advertise these exhibitions and the extended period for responses, the Welsh Government arranged for some 80,000 leaflets to be distributed in the Newport area. To further highlight the public consultation and the additional exhibitions, a radio advertising campaign was held on Real Radio and Gold Radio. Page 4
5 Summary of M4 CEM Consultation results After processing, a total of 674 responses to the Consultation Document were received and analysed. Participants included members of the public as well as a range of organisations; some of which represented Welsh communities, economic, environmental and transport interests. 54 of the responses received overall were identical or largely identical responses from a campaign group 2. The Welsh Government analysed all comments, equally. All participants are listed at the end of the Participation Report. Whilst a total of 674 responses were made directly to the Consultation Document, more than 2,100 people attended an M4 CEM event and approximately 1,100 people attended external (non-m4 CEM specific) events, at which members of the project team were available to discuss the Programme. Some 11,247 visits were made to the dedicated website between March and December 2012, equating to an average of over 1,100 visits per month over this 10 month period. Most participants provided online responses. Of the participants who responded, most were either daily or weekly users of the M4 around Newport; and used the motorway for leisure or commuting trips. Problems The problems, goals and aims of the M4 CEM Programme were the subject of dialogue during the early stages of the engagement process, with public and stakeholders. 17 problems were established; which encompassed themes of capacity, (network) resilience, safety and sustainable development. Respondents were asked to prioritise up to four problems out of the full list of 17. Although 130 of the 674 respondents did not select any of the problems, all of the problems were selected at least once, suggesting the majority of respondent agreed a problem exists. Of the 130 who did not select any of the problems, 54 comprised a campaign group response, which argued that a 'do nothing' option in combination with existing, planned and proposed improvements to traffic management and sustainable transport would achieve the Welsh Government's aims, whilst a new dual carriageway [to the south of Newport] would cause an adverse impact on the unique wildlife and landscape of the Gwent levels and add to climate change. Of the other 76 participants who did not select a problem, the majority did not respond directly to the consultation questions at all. This group included Newport City Council, who in their response suggested that there is a need to do something and stated that Option A (an additional high quality road to the south of Newport) offers the greatest benefits in terms of the transport efficiency and the economy and that such benefits should assist in making Newport a more accessible location and a more attractive option for investment, with the least amount of disruption for existing routes. Newport Unlimited, in their response, also suggested that there is a need to do something and stated that longer-term plans for investment are clearly important, but must not replace the need to make the 2 54 responses followed a format that did not directly answer the Consultation questions, coordinated by campaign group Campaign against the Levels Motorway (CALM); in all but seven cases of these cases each response is identical. See Page 5
6 impact in the short term that businesses tell us they need. The CBI simply stated that the number one infrastructure priority in Wales should be the construction of the M4 Relief Road and that the future security of the Welsh economy requires a speedy solution to this problem. This view was shared by the South Wales Chamber of Commerce who stated that there can be no other option but to bring the M4 relief road back in to the equation and proceed with that as a one of the key priorities of the Welsh Government. The following problems were the most selected: Problem 1: A greater volume of traffic uses the M4 around Newport than it was designed to accommodate, resulting in regular congestion at peak times over extended periods; Problem 5: The 2-lane Brynglas tunnels are a major capacity constraint; Problem 7: Difficulties maintaining adequate traffic flows on the M4 and alternative highway routes at times of temporary disruption; alternative routes are not able to cope with M4 traffic; and Problem 9: When there are problems on the M4, there is severe disruption and congestion on the local and regional highway network. However, key stakeholders predominantly prioritised problems 1, 9, 15 and 17 (Problem 15: There is a lack of adequate sustainable integrated transport alternatives for existing road users; Problem 17: The existing transport network acts as a constraint to economic growth and adversely impacts the current economy). This demonstrated that whereas problems of capacity and resilience were prioritised the most by respondents; problems of sustainable development were prioritised to a much greater extent by key stakeholders 3. Goals 15 goals were established during the early stages of the engagement process with public and stakeholders. Each of the M4 CEM goals aimed to address one or more of the problems. Respondents were asked to prioritise up to four goals out of the full list of 15 and the following goals were selected the most times by the 463 respondents who responded to Question 2a (for information, a total of 468 respondents responded to Question 2b): Goal 1: Safer, easier and more reliable travel east-west in South Wales; Goal 4: Best possible use of the existing M4, local road network and other transport networks; Goal 5: More reliable journey times along the M4 Corridor; and Goal 7: Improved safety on the M4 Corridor between Magor and Castleton. However, Goal 6 (increased level of choice for all people making journeys within the transport corridor by all modes between Magor and Castleton, commensurate with demand for alternatives), and Goal 15 (a cultural shift in travel behaviour towards more sustainable choices), were prioritised above others by key stakeholders. 3 Key stakeholders are considered to be organisations that have a strategic interest and/or detailed experience of addressing travel related issues in South Wales, and/or represent the environment, community or economy of South Wales. They are listed in Table 4.1. Page 6
7 Public Transport A series of public transport measures were developed during the engagement process, supported by a Public Transport Overview report 4. Respondents were asked to choose from, and comment on, a list of six public transport measures, identifying all those that would make the best contribution to relieving traffic on the M4 between Magor and Castleton. 453 respondents commented on one or more of the public transport measures. Of those 453 respondents; 60 suggested that the public transport measures would be helpful to some extent and a further 65 respondents commented that the public transport measures would help to address the problems to a limited extent, or expressed support for public transport measures with caveats. 106 of the respondents argued that none of the public transport measures would help to address transport related problems or meet their travel needs. Of the possible public transport measures selected, the majority of respondents prioritised more park and ride facilities, additional rail services and better modal integration. Additional bus and/or coach services were the least selected options (and not selected at all by key stakeholders). Highways Infrastructure Options The options presented within the Consultation Document included: Highway Option A: additional high quality road to the south of Newport. Highway Option B: at grade junction improvements to the A48 Newport Southern Distributor Road (SDR). Highway Option C: grade separated junction improvements to the A48 SDR. Highway Option D: online widening on the M4 between Junctions 24 and 29, including an additional tunnel at Brynglas. Respondents were asked to reflect and comment on how each of the four options addressed the problems and goals they prioritised. Questions 4a, b, c and d attracted 437, 424, 387 and 397 responses respectively. Highway Infrastructure Option A attracted the most comments as a preferred or supported Option (128), whilst a further 32 respondents provided qualified support for the option. This option was supported by most key stakeholders and members of the public, many cited its possible benefits to transport and the economy. 44 respondents in their comments to question 4a directly stated that they challenged or opposed Option A. Concerns expressed about Option A predominantly included the potential cost of delivery and the potential adverse environmental effects of its construction on the Gwent Levels. 4 Public Transport Overview, available to download at Page 7
8 Statements about Highway Infrastructure Option B indicated that its relatively inexpensive cost is attractive, but there were concerns over its potential adverse impact on local traffic flows. Many compared Option B unfavourably to Option C as a measure that could utilise the SDR to address the problems and goals of the M4 CEM Programme. Whilst some supported a variation or element of Option B, many also suggested that it could be delivered alongside another Highway Infrastructure Option in order to provide increased resilience on the road network. Option B attracted many comments of opposition and/or challenge (89). 71 respondents offered qualified support or support with a caveat to Highway Infrastructure Option C, they favoured its potential to improve resilience but there were concerns about it not increasing road capacity on the highway network. Many considered Option C to be preferable to Option B, although 50 respondents challenged it as a solution or clearly stated that they did not believe Option C would address the problems or achieve the goals they chose. Highway Infrastructure Option D was favoured by 42 respondents, supporting it largely on the basis of it being an online solution (making best use of existing infrastructure) and it was thought to effectively address the perceived bottleneck at Brynglas. A significant number of comments expressed strong concerns about its potential impact on property and land take. It attracted the most comments of opposition and/or challenge (92). Common measures Common measures comprised a mix of other highway infrastructure, demand management, alternative modes and smarter sustainable choices. They were selected from a long list of more than 100 possible interventions considered effective in a strategic package of public transport and highway infrastructure measures, to address travel related problems on the M4 Corridor, Magor to Castleton 5. Respondents were not asked directly to comment on these in the Consultation exercise but some provided comments as part of their answers to one or more of the Consultation questions. Many respondents demonstrated an appreciation of the important role that the common measures would play in the package to be chosen but were not considered to be measures that would contribute substantially, particularly in isolation, to resolving transport related problems. Some responses also proposed a range of alternative strategies to the public transport and highway infrastructure options. Many of these suggestions echoed elements of the common measures presented in the Consultation Document, though very few responses referred to the common measures explicitly. Examples include better information systems; at-grade junction improvements; changes to junctions and feeder roads; and different policing or traffic management strategies. 5 Alternatives Considered that were not progressed through the M4 CEM Programme are available to view in the Alternatives Considered Workbook at Page 8
9 Additional comments 444 responses were analysed as additional comments (Question 5 in the consultation response form). Of these 444 responses, 381 directly responded to Question 5 of the response form as part of a participant s answer. However, 63 participants provided comments without using the response form provided, using either their own response format or submitting a comment by . These responses were analysed as additional comments. Of the 63 responses that provided representations that did not respond to the Consultation questions specifically, 54 comprise a campaign group response. General comments made on the highways infrastructure options included over 100 concerns over the environmental impact of the options, in particular the detrimental impact that there could be on wildlife and landscape. More than half of these 100 responses, which included the 54 campaign groups responses and some key stakeholder responses, challenged Highway Option A; primarily on its potential adverse environmental impact on biodiversity. 90 respondents made comments about the data presented in the Consultation Document. Criticisms related to the age of the data used and more than 60 responses, including those 54 from the campaign group who challenged the highway infrastructure options, felt that incorrect assumptions about continuing traffic growth were used. More than 50 responses expressed concerns that the options would negatively impact on recreational activities, tourism and property prices. More than 30 respondents referred to the importance of modal shift and a number of responses highlighted the importance of public transport in addressing local transport problems. More than 5 respondents expressed their disappointment that the M4 relief road proposal was announced as being unaffordable in Comments included that none of the options would be as effective as the proposed M4 relief road and expressed a desire for it to be reinstated. Current Situation Although the M4 CEM Programme is not being progressed further, its website will remain accessible but will no longer be updated. A new website will be set up for the forthcoming public consultation on the M4 Corridor around Newport draft Plan. When operational, it will contain a link to the M4 CEM website. All those who attended an M4 CEM stakeholder or public event, or who have responded to a previous associated consultation, have been offered the opportunity to provide contact details for future developments. Those people and/or organisations will be notified by Arup in due course of the new website and the start date of the public consultation on the draft Plan and its associated assessments. Whilst this Participation Report summarises the M4 CEM Programme engagement and consultation process, a Participation Report will also be produced to summarise the M4 Corridor around Newport draft Plan Consultation, which will commence from September Page 9
Welsh Government M4 Corridor Enhancement Measures (CEM) Participation Report
M4 Corridor Enhancement Measures (CEM) 12/8668 : Arup & Catrin Ellis Associates Issue 5 August 2013 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not
More informationWelsh Government M4 Corridor Enhancement Measures (M4 CEM) WelTAG Appraisal Report Stage 1 (Strategy Level)
M4 Corridor Enhancement Measures (M4 CEM) WelTAG Appraisal Report Stage 1 (Strategy Level) Issue March 2013 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It
More information150Intr Transport and Strategic Regeneration Welsh Assembly Government New M4 Project Magor to Castleton WelTAG Appraisal Report Stage 1 DRAFT 3 WORKI
150Intr Transport and Strategic Regeneration Welsh Assembly Government WelTAG Appraisal Report Stage 1 DRAFT 3 WORKING DOCUMENT 1 Transport and Strategic Regeneration Welsh Assembly Government WelTAG Appraisal
More informationWelsh Government M4 Corridor around Newport WelTAG Appraisal Report Stage 1 (Strategy Level)
WelTAG Appraisal Report Stage 1 (Strategy Level) 13/8883 Issue 24 June 2013 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should
More informationJJ/AP. Final 10 September Job number
M4 Corridor Enhancement Measures (M4 CEM) Scoping Report; Strategic Environmental Assessment, Health Impact and Equality Impact Assessments JJ/AP Final 10 September 2012 This report takes into account
More informationStrategic Environmental Assessment Environmental Report Non Technical Summary
Number: WG19741 We want your views on our draft Plan which aims to address transport related problems on the M4 around Newport M4 Corridor around Newport draft Plan Consultation Document Strategic Environmental
More informationTransport and Strategic Regeneration Welsh Assembly Government New M4 Project Magor to Castleton Addendum to WelTAG Planning Stage Report DRAFT 2 WORK
Transport and Strategic Regeneration Welsh Assembly Government Addendum to WelTAG Planning Stage Report DRAFT 2 WORKING DOCUMENT 1 Transport and Strategic Regeneration Welsh Assembly Government Addendum
More informationThe London to Fishguard Trunk Road (East of Magor to Castleton) Order 201-
Proof of Evidence Construction Adran yr Economi a r Seilwaith Department for Economy and Infrastructure The M4 Motorway (Junction 23 (East of Magor) to West of Junction 29 (Castleton) and Connecting Roads)
More informationGreater Cambridge City Deal Executive Board. A428/A1303 Better Bus Journeys Scheme Public Consultation Outcomes and Next Steps
Report To: Greater Cambridge City Deal Executive Board 3 rd March 2016 Lead Officer: Graham Hughes, Executive Director of Economy, Transport and Environment, Cambridgeshire County Council A428/A1303 Better
More informationAlternative transport options for South Wales
Rpep Alternative transport options for South Wales An options re-appraisal in light of the Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015 Alternative transport options for South Wales: An options re-appraisal
More informationChichester District Council. THE CABINET (SPECIAL) 8 June 2018 THE COUNCIL (SPECIAL) 8 June 2018
Chichester District Council THE CABINET (SPECIAL) 8 June 2018 THE COUNCIL (SPECIAL) 8 June 2018 1. Contacts A27 Chichester Bypass Improvements: Submission to the Government s Roads Investment Strategy
More informationIPSWICH NORTHERN ROUTES STUDY. Stage 1 Progress
IPSWICH NORTHERN ROUTES STUDY Stage 1 Progress 17 th January 2017 STUDY CONTEXT 2 The study is being funded in partnership with the Suffolk district and borough councils. Work forms part of the Suffolk
More informationProposed Petone to Grenada Link Road Options
Report 15.41 Date 2 March 2015 File TP/03/29/02 Committee Author Regional Transport Committee Chris Upton, Chair Chief Executives Forum Proposed Petone to Grenada Link Road Options 1. Purpose This report
More informationHilary Holden, City Access Programme. City Access congestion reduction proposals: Consultation Responses and Next Steps
Report To: Greater Cambridge City Deal Executive Board 25 January 2017 Lead Officer: Hilary Holden, City Access Programme City Access congestion reduction proposals: Consultation Responses and Next Steps
More informationRegional Travel Demand Management Plan
Regional Travel Demand Management Plan Adopted October 2009 Quality for life Regional Travel Demand Management Plan Adopted October 2009 For more information, contact: Greater Wellington 142 Wakefield
More informationWelsh Transport Appraisal Guidance (WelTAG) 2017
Welsh Transport Appraisal Guidance (WelTAG) 2017 Consultation Response Form Your Name: Ruth Tipping Organisation Name (if applicable): Natural Resources Wales Email / telephone number: 4489 Your Address:
More informationConsultation response. February 2014
Department for Transport National road and rail networks: draft national policy statement Consultation response pteg Support Unit Wellington House 40-50 Wellington Street Leeds LS1 2DE 0113 251 7445 info@pteg.net
More informationGovernment Policy Statement on Land Transport 2018/ /28. DRAFT (FOR ENGAGEMENT ) NOT GOVERNMENT POLICY February 2017
DRAFT (FOR ENGAGEMENT ) NOT GOVERNMENT POLICY February 2017 Government Policy Statement on Land Transport 2018/19 2027/28 DRAFT GOVERNMENT POLICY STATEMENT Contents 1 Land transport context 1 A: Role of
More informationLocal Transport Plan. Implementation Plan ( )
Local Transport Plan Implementation Plan (2011-2015) www.cheshireeast.gov.uk/travel Contents 1 Introduction 2 Initiatives to Ensure a Sustainable Future 3 Initiatives to Create Conditions for Business
More informationNorth Yorkshire County Council. County Area Committee for the Harrogate District. 7 December Harrogate Relief Road Review Progress Report
North Yorkshire County Council County Area Committee for the Harrogate District 7 December 2017 Harrogate Relief Road Review Progress Report Report of the Corporate Director Business and Environmental
More informationA465 Heads of the Valleys Sections 5 and 6: Dowlais Top to Hirwaun
A465 Blaenau r Cymoedd A465 Heads of the Valleys Adrannau 5 + 6: Dowlais Top - Hirwaun Sections 5 + 6: Dowlais Top - Hirwaun www.cymru.gov.uk A465 Heads of the Valleys Sections 5 and 6: Dowlais Top to
More informationProject Appraisal Using PRISM Simon Hubbard 28 th September 2004
Project Appraisal Using PRISM Simon Hubbard 28 th September 2004 Introduction : Overview of Presentation - Option Appraisal Policy Context - Potential PRISM Applications - Use of the Model / Scale of the
More informationLocal Transport Plan 4
Central Bedfordshire Council Executive 5 April 2016 Local Transport Plan 4 Report of Cllr Nigel Young, Executive Member for Regeneration (nigel.young@centralbedfordshire.gov.uk) Advising Officers: Marcel
More informationM4 Public Inquiry - Debunking WG Statements -Proof of Evidence submitted by Wales Green Party
M4 Public Inquiry - Debunking WG Statements -Proof of Evidence submitted by Wales Green Party To: The Public Inspector, Mr WSC Wadrup Purpose of this document To examine some of the facts produced in the
More informationSWDP 4: Moving Around South Worcestershire. SWDP 4: Moving Around South Worcestershire. Managing Travel Demand
SWDP 4: Moving Around South Worcestershire Managing Travel Demand A. Proposals must demonstrate that: the layout of development will minimise demand for travel, they offer genuinely sustainable travel
More informationANNEX C. Economic Assessment. Parking Proposals Comments of the Economic Development Team
ANNEX C Economic Assessment Parking Proposals Comments of the Economic Development Team This report summaries the views of the Economic Development Team on the proposed changes to parking charges in Milton
More informationFeedback on the 2015 Government Policy Statement
7 October 2016 Andrew Jackson Deputy Chief Executive Ministry of Transport PO Box 3175 Wellington 6140 Dear Andrew Feedback on the 2015 Government Policy Statement I write to you today in response to the
More informationExecutive Summary. Introduction
Executive Summary 01 Introduction The City of Southampton lies at the western end of the South Hampshire sub-region. The wider urban South Hampshire area, consisting of Southampton, Eastleigh, Fareham,
More informationSECTION 32 TRANSPORT CHAPTER
SECTION 32 TRANSPORT CHAPTER AUGUST 2014 VERSION 1 CONTENTS 1. STRATEGIC CONTEXT...3 1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE TRANSPORT CHAPTER...3 1.2 PROPOSED DISTRICT PLAN: OVERVIEW AND SYNOPSIS...4 1.3 RESEARCH...5
More informationSECTOR ASSESSMENT (SUMMARY): URBAN TRANSPORT 1
Greater Dhaka Sustainable Urban Transport Project (RRP BAN 42169) Sector Road Map SECTOR ASSESSMENT (SUMMARY): URBAN TRANSPORT 1 1. Sector Performance, Problems, and Opportunities 1. Dhaka, the capital
More informationLong-term Plan Transport Proposal. 29 October 2014
Long-term Plan Transport Proposal 29 October 2014 2 Table of Contents Introduction... 4 The Two Networks... 5 What will it cost?... 12 What are the benefits?... 15 Meeting the government s transport objectives...
More informationHow the NZTA s Investment and Revenue Strategy guides our investment in the land transport system
How the NZTA s Investment and Revenue Strategy guides our investment in the land transport system The NZTA creates transport solutions for a thriving New Zealand. Our job is to help New Zealanders travel
More informationNicola Detheridge Joint Northern Studies - Stakeholder Reference Group Partner Engagement Manager, Transport for the North
Nicola Detheridge Joint Northern Studies - Stakeholder Reference Group Partner Engagement Manager, Transport for the North Housekeeping Have we all signed in? Fire alarms and exits Phones Toilets Agenda
More informationE13: MANAGEMENT OF TRAFFIC DURING CONSTRUCTION
HIGH SPEED TWO INFORMATION PAPER E13: MANAGEMENT OF TRAFFIC DURING CONSTRUCTION This paper outlines the framework for the control and management of traffic associated with the construction of the Proposed
More informationReport to: Greater Cambridge Partnership Joint Assembly 18 January 2018
Report to: Greater Cambridge Partnership Joint Assembly 18 January 2018 Lead officer: Chris Tunstall Greater Cambridge Partnership Recommendations from the Ely to Cambridge A10 Transport Study and proposed
More informationThat will also contribute to achievement of a number of objectives and policies in the Regional Policy Statement.
Board of Inquiry MacKays to Peka Peka Expressway Proposal Submitters Evidence Public Transport Voice 5 October 2012 Executive Summary Increasing modal share for public transport is a key outcome in the
More informationSydney Transport Network Efficiency
Sydney Transport Network Efficiency Congestion is a child of many fathers - and Sydney is showing many growing pains Cities are constantly changing, and Sydney is no exception. Sydney s transport systems
More informationTown & Country Planning Act 1990
Town & Country Planning Act 1990 Your Ref: 17/0411/OUT Proposed Development at Gwern y Domen by PMG Ltd and Persimmon Homes Ltd I of am against the proposed development for a number of reasons which are
More informationDepartment for Transport. March 2018
Consultation response Proposals for the creation of a Major Road Network Department for Transport March 2018 Jonathan Bray Director Urban Transport Group Wellington House 40-50 Wellington Street Leeds
More informationNetwork Operation Planning - A new approach to managing congestion
Network Operation Planning - A new approach to managing congestion Andrew Wall VicRoads, Melbourne, VIC, Australia 1 Introduction Congestion is an unavoidable aspect of most urban cities. However, there
More informationAs one of our greatest assets there is a need to take collective action to protect, enhance and value our environment for now and for future
1 As one of our greatest assets there is a need to take collective action to protect, enhance and value our environment for now and for future generations, ensuring that the Vale of Glamorgan is globally
More informationMilton Keynes South Midlands Growth Area Modal Shift Strategy. Stakeholder Workshop
Milton Keynes South Midlands Growth Area Modal Shift Strategy Stakeholder Workshop 22 nd July 2008 Consultancy Team - Introductions Appointed by the MKSM Strategic Transport Board to help develop the Modal
More informationNumber: WG Welsh Government Consultation Document
Number: WG 16557 Welsh Government Consultation Document November 2012 M4 Corridor Enhancement Measures (CEM) Strategic Habitats Regulations Assessment (SHRA) Statement to inform Appropriate Assessment
More informationDAVID CARTER, DIRECTOR OF INFRASTRUCTURE
REPORT TO: WECA COMMITTEE DATE: 30 NOVEMBER 2018 REPORT TITLE: DIRECTOR: AUTHOR: TRANSPORT UPDATE DAVID CARTER, DIRECTOR OF INFRASTRUCTURE JASON HUMM, HEAD OF TRANSPORT Purpose of Report: 1. To update
More informationThe movement of construction vehicles is predicted to: give rise to some measurable increases in the early morning and evening;
5 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT 5.1 SUMMARY OF RESIDUAL IMPACTS The movement of construction vehicles is predicted to: give rise to some measurable increases in the early morning and evening; be outside of the
More informationLocal Transport Plan 3 March Frank Baxter Travel and Transport Policy Manager Southampton City Council
Local Transport Plan 3 March 2012 Frank Baxter Travel and Transport Policy Manager Southampton City Council 02380 832079 Transport enables delivery of aspirations Port growth New housing Low Carbon City
More informationTransport choices for everyone
Getting around easily. Well connected routes. Integrated transport options. Great public transport. A well planned city. Proofed for the future. Personal safety. Enjoyable journeys. River walkways. Choices
More informationSouth East Manchester Multi-Modal Strategy
South East Manchester Multi-Modal Strategy Key Messages - Consultation Draft May 2018 Contents Background... 1 Context...4 Vision... 5 Strategic priorities... 6 Principal intervention areas... 7 Early
More informationIntelligent Transport Systems Master Plan
Intelligent Transport Systems Master Plan The RAC welcomes the preparation of the Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) Master Plan by Main Roads Western Australia (MRWA) to set out the strategic direction
More informationA465 Heads of the Valleys Dualling Sections 5 and 6. WelTAG Phase 1 Review FOR REVIEW
A465 Heads of the Valleys Dualling Sections 5 and 6 WelTAG Phase 1 Review FOR REVIEW B1855100/D4/2/011 May 2015 Document control sheet BPP 04 F8 Project: A465 Heads of the Valleys Dualling Sections 5 &
More informationCheshire & Warrington Local Transport Body
Cheshire & Warrington Local Transport Body Date of Meeting: Friday 21 December 2018 Report of: Roy Newton Subject/Title: Priorities for Studies and Business Case Development 1. Report Summary 1.1. The
More informationSUSTAINABLE URBAN MOBILITY PLAN TRAINING WORKSHOP. Module 4 Problems, Vision and Objectives
SUSTAINABLE URBAN MOBILITY PLAN TRAINING WORKSHOP Module 4 Problems, Vision and Objectives SUMP Problem Analysis: Important to know current mobility status: Draws from the data collection on urban mobility
More informationAuckland Transport Alignment Project. Arterial Roads Report
Auckland Transport Alignment Project Arterial Roads Report Contents 1. Executive Summary... 4 2. Background... 5 3. Arterial Road Productivity... 7 3.1. Defining Productivity... 7 3.2. Operational Performance
More informationDrivers of Congestion Growth & Change
Drivers of Congestion Growth & Change A Congestion Blueprint Transport Policy Branch, Department of Transport and Main Roads 1 Our values, our diversity 2 Queensland Government s objectives for the community
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY ORGANIZATION OF REPORT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Over the past year, the Dillon Consulting team conducted a comprehensive review of public transit in Guelph. The City of Guelph has for many years been a leader among Canadian municipalities
More informationOption Assessment Report for Cambourne to Cambridge Better Bus Journeys
Option Assessment Report for Cambourne to Cambridge Better Bus Journeys Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 2 PART 1 BACKGROUND SETTING THE SCENE... 6 Introduction... 6 Objectives of the Scheme... 7
More informationWorkplace Travel Plans A guide for Swindon developers
Workplace Travel Plans A guide for Swindon developers Incorporating the use of Modeshift Starsfor to create Travel Plans and support planning applications Contents What this guidance does... 3 What is
More informationThe Western Corridor Transportation Study A Bold New Step in a Brave New World or Traditional Transport Planning Recycled?
Anthony W Brennand 1, Graham Taylor 2 and Steven Knowles 3 1 Greater Wellington Regional Council, Wellington, New Zealand 2 Transit New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand 3 Maunsell Limited, Wellington,
More informationTransport for South Hampshire Transport Delivery Plan
Transport for South Hampshire Transport Delivery Plan Stakeholder Feedback Round 2 Session 1 Transport Group, 9 th October 2012 Report for Transport for South Hampshire and Stakeholders December 2012 TfSH
More informationPark and Ride Action Plan Summary. A Catalyst for Change The Regional Transport Strategy for the west of Scotland
Park and Ride Action Plan Summary A Catalyst for Change The Regional Transport Strategy for the west of Scotland 2007-2021 Strathclyde Partnership for Transport Contents Purpose...2 Issues, Constraints
More informationWELLINGTON NORTHERN CORRIDOR. Project Summary Statement 21 December 2009
WELLINGTON NORTHERN CORRIDOR Project Summary Statement 21 December 2009 1 Table of Contents 1. Purpose of Document 2. Strategic Context 3. Benefits 4. Project Scope and Economics 5. Implementation Plan
More informationTransport Domain Plan. Draft list of Enduring Questions
Transport Domain Plan Draft list of Engagement Draft v1.0 August 2014 Introduction The Transport Domain Plan is jointly led by Statistics NZ and the Ministry of Transport. It is a project that will identify
More informationMaidstone Borough Council Draft Local Plan February 2016 Local Plan Regulation 19 Representation from Helen Whately MP
Maidstone Borough Council Draft Local Plan February 2016 Local Plan Regulation 19 Representation from Helen Whately MP 1. Introduction 1.1. I have read the Maidstone Borough Council (MBC) draft Local Plan
More informationStrategic Transport Plan Position Statement. June 2017
Strategic Transport Plan Position Statement June 2017 Transport for the North s Vision A thriving North of England, where modern transport connections drive economic growth and support an excellent quality
More informationProof of Evidence Planning & Sustainable Development
Adran yr Economi a r Seilwaith Department for Economy and Infrastructure The M4 Motorway (Junction 23 (East of Magor) to West of Junction 29 (Castleton) and Connecting Roads) and The M48 Motorway (Junction
More informationLEVIN TO WELLINGTON ROAD OF NATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE - QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
LEVIN TO WELLINGTON ROAD OF NATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE - QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS GENERAL What is a Road of National Significance? The Government has identified seven Roads of National Significance (RoNS). The
More informationTABLE OF AIMS FOR THE WELSH GOVERNMENT S STREET WORKS VISION
TABLE OF AIMS FOR THE WELSH GOVERNMENT S STREET WORKS VISION A Vision for Street Works The Welsh Government s vision for street works is; The management of street works on the road network will be carried
More informationWELSH GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENT AND RURAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE REPORT:
WELSH GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENT AND RURAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE REPORT: FEEDBACK ON THE WELSH GOVERNMENT S DRAFT WELSH NATIONAL MARINE PLAN JUNE 2018 Background
More informationIntegrated transport planning. Report 4:
Integrated transport planning Report 4: 2017 18 www.qao.qld.gov.au LinkedIn: Queensland Audit Office December 2017 Contact details The Performance Audit Division of the Queensland Audit Office is the custodian
More informationTraffic Management Plan. Environmental Management and Monitoring Program. Appendix VI
Traffic Management Plan Environmental Management and Monitoring Program Appendix VI Gunlake Quarries December 2009 Olsen Consulting Group Pty Ltd 6/25 Victoria Street WOLLONGONG 2500 PO Box 353 FIGTREE
More informationSustainability Policy Statement
Sustainability Policy Statement Responsible Manager Next Review Date August 2018; then bi-annually. Last Review Date January 2017 Version 3.0 This Policy document is available in Welsh and English and
More informationNorth Central Bedfordshire Growth Options Study Appendix 5 part 2
Central Bedfordshire Council www.centralbedfordshire.gov.uk rth Central Bedfordshire Growth Options Study Appendix 5 part 2 July 2017-1 - Location ID: N14 Name: Potton West Location area: 93.2 hectares
More informationFishermans Bend Integrated Transport Plan Peer Review John Kiriakidis, GTA Consultants 28/03/2018
Fishermans Bend Integrated Transport Plan Peer Review John Kiriakidis, GTA Consultants 28/03/2018 GTA creating transport that works 01 Preliminaries GTA creating transport that works Review scope : Review
More informationAs acknowledged in the draft CCP, very little progress has been made in tackling emissions from transport. Transport emissions
Transform Scotland Draft Climate Change Plan: Evidence to the REC Committee 2 February 2017 1. Introduction Transform Scotland welcomes the opportunity to give evidence to the REC Committee on the Policies
More informationPario Sample 360 Report
Pario Sample 360 Report Pario 360 Feedback Personal Development Feedback Report Chris Case-Study Report Compiled 16th May 2011 Note: This report does not include the table that compares mean ratings of
More informationFSB Wales response to Cardiff Council
FSB Wales response to Cardiff Council Transport and Clean Air Green Paper July 2018 About FSB Wales FSB Wales is the authoritative voice of businesses in Wales, with around 10,000 members. It campaigns
More informationINTEGRATED TRANSPORT PLANNING: A QUEENSLAND EXPERIENCE
INTEGRATED TRANSPORT PLANNING: A QUEENSLAND EXPERIENCE Louw, J. Queensland Transport. ABSTRACT Transport plays a vital role in maintaining quality of life and enhancing attractiveness for industry development
More informationEDINBURGH TRAM (LINE ONE) BILL
EDINBURGH TRAM (LINE ONE) BILL PROMOTER S MEMORANDUM INTRODUCTION 1. This document relates to the Edinburgh Tram (Line One) Bill introduced in the Scottish Parliament on 29 January 2004. It has been prepared
More informationThe Leeds Trolley Vehicle System Order
Documents Reference: APP-4-1 Transport and Works Act 1992 The Leeds Trolley Vehicle System Order John Henkel: Metro NGT and Bus Operations APP-4-1: Summary Proof of Evidence on behalf of the Applicants
More informationCEDR Transnational Road Research Programme
CEDR Transnational Road Research Programme MoDBeaR Mobility Management and Driver Behaviour Research January 2019 CEDR Transnational Road Research Programme February 2019 This report takes into account
More informationResponse to a Bridge Strike. at a Bridge carrying the Railway. over a Road
Response to a Bridge Strike at a Bridge carrying the Railway over a Road A Protocol for Highway and Road Managers, Emergency Services and Bridge Owners NR/GPG/CIV/008 3 rd March 2009 Note This protocol
More informationSubmission in response to: New South Wales Draft Climate Change Strategic Plan and. Draft Plan to Save Energy and Money
Submission in response to: New South Wales Draft Climate Change Strategic Plan and Draft Plan to Save Energy and Money December 2016 1 This document has been prepared by the Freight on Rail Group (the
More informationThe Victorian Transport Plan (Department of Transport, 2008).
18 TRANSPORT Planning should ensure an integrated and sustainable transport system that provides access to social and economic opportunities, facilitates economic prosperity, contributes to environmental
More informationAvalon Airport Rail Link. Community and Stakeholder Issues and Ideas Report Understanding what s important. December 2011
Avalon Airport Rail Link Community and Stakeholder Issues and Ideas Report Understanding what s important 6 December 2011 1. 1. Introduction The Victorian Government committed $3 million in the 2011-12
More information1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. 1.1 Introduction
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 Introduction 1.1.1 As part of the Second East Sussex Local Transport Plan (LTP2) an accompanying Accessibility Strategy was published in March 2006. The strategy identified a number
More informationGreater Manchester Local Transport Plan / /11
Greater Manchester Local Transport Plan 2 2006/07 2010/11 March 2006 Contents 1 2 3 4 Foreword Summary Introduction 1.1 The Greater Manchester Area and its Regional Context 1.2 Challenges for Greater Manchester
More informationLevel 3 Diploma in Traffic Management
Qualification Specification ProQual 2013 Contents Page Introduction 3 The Qualifications and Credit Framework (QCF) 3 Qualification profile 4 Rules of combination 5 Centre requirements 7 Support for candidates
More informationNational Transport Commission Submission to Infrastructure Victoria
National Transport Commission Submission to Infrastructure Victoria Automated and zero emission vehicles March 2018 Submission outline 1 Introduction 3 1.1 The purpose of this submission 3 About the NTC
More informationINTEGRATED MOBILITY PLAN
Re: Item No. 3 INTEGRATED MOBILITY PLAN Committee of the Whole December 5, 2017 halifax.ca/integratedmobility Presentation Outline Why the IMP Now? Big Transportation Moves in HRM IMP Vision and Transportation
More informationGwent Wildlife Trust Ymddiriedolaeth Natur Gwent
Gwent Wildlife Trust Ymddiriedolaeth Natur Gwent Response to the Welsh Government Consultation Document M4 Corridor Enhancement Measures Magor to Castleton Easing the Flow Seddon House Dingestow Monmouth
More informationGoal 3: To ensure that Vaughan is a city that is easy to get around with a low environmental impact
How we get around Goal 3: To ensure that Vaughan is a city that is easy to get around with a low environmental impact Vaughan is committed to making choices that will reduce automobile dependency, traffic
More informationFriends of the Earth Cymru inspires solutions to environmental problems, which make life better for people Friends of the Earth Cymru:
Briefing Proposed A40 St Clears- Haverfordwest Dualling Friends of the Earth Cymru inspires solutions to environmental problems, which make life better for people Friends of the Earth Cymru: is dedicated
More informationAsset Management Plan Strategic Context
Asset Management Plan 2012 2015 Strategic Context Asset Management Plan 2012 2015 Strategic Context Quality Record Sheet REPORT STATUS Final ORIGINATOR Asset Management Unit Infrastructure Division Contributors:
More informationInformation supporting the traffic chapters
Annex I Metro North EIS Information supporting the traffic chapters - Baseline traffic report Information Note Project Title: MVA Project Number: Metro North EIA C8103900 Subject: Alterations to Baseline
More informationTransportation Master Plan Introduction
1. Introduction Building a Liveable Ottawa 2031 has set out a process to guide the completion of a fiveyear update of the City s Official Plan, Transportation Master Plan, Infrastructure Master Plan, Cycling
More informationResponse of the Road Haulage Association to Transport for London. Consultation on Mayor s Transport Strategy.
Response of the Road Haulage Association to Transport for London. Consultation on Mayor s Transport Strategy. Background about the RHA 2 October 2017 1. The Road Transport Industry is a dynamic, business
More informationPROPOSED APPROACH FOR AUCKLAND S RAPID TRANSIT NETWORK PROGRAMME
Chair Cabinet Economic Development Committee Office of the Minister of Transport PROPOSED APPROACH FOR AUCKLAND S RAPID TRANSIT NETWORK PROGRAMME Proposal 1 This paper informs Cabinet of my proposed approach
More informationBrisbane Metro: Draft Design Report (DDR) Consultation Comments
25 May 2018 Brisbane Metro Brisbane City Council GPO Box 1434 BRISBANE QLD 4001 Submitted via email: metro@brisbane.qld.gov.au Dear Sir/Madam Brisbane Metro: Draft Design Report Engineers Australia and
More informationGreater Newcastle Transport Plan
Greater Newcastle Transport Plan Engineers Australia submission 16 February 2018 11 National Circuit, Barton ACT 2600 Tel: 02 6270 6555 Email: publicaffairs@engineersaustralia.org.au www.engineersaustralia.org.au
More informationCYNGOR SIR POWYS COUNTY COUNCIL. CABINET 10 th October Portfolio Holder for Waste and Recycling. Waste & Recycling Logistics Route Optimisation
CYNGOR SIR POWYS COUNTY COUNCIL. CABINET 10 th October 2017 REPORT AUTHOR: SUBJECT: County Councillor Phyl Davies Portfolio Holder for Waste and Recycling Waste & Recycling Logistics Route Optimisation
More information