CHAPTER 5: PUBLIC OUTREACH
|
|
- Emma Harris
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CHAPTER 5: PUBLIC OUTREACH 5.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter describes public outreach activities undertaken to date by Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) New York City Transit (NYCT) and MTA Capital Construction (MTA CC) in the planning of the Fulton Street Transit Center (FSTC). The regulatory context for public participation is discussed in Section 5.2. Details of the public outreach program that was initiated during the scoping phase of the project are included herein (Sections 5.3 and 5.4) and an explanation of the ongoing coordination with local, State, Regional and Federal agencies involved in the planning of the project is presented. 5.2 REGULATORY CONTEXT This Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) has been prepared in accordance with regulations for implementing the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) as issued by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) (49 C.F.R. 662 and 23 C.F.R. 771) in conformance with the regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) (40 C.F.R ). NEPA requires that Federal agencies evaluate the environmental consequences of proposed actions and their alternatives, identify measures to mitigate any significant adverse impacts and conduct the entire process in coordination with other agencies and the general public. In order for the FTA to approve and fund the construction of the FSTC, the project must comply with the public and agency coordination requirements of NEPA, and evidence of this compliance must be documented in the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). In addition to NEPA, Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 also contains provisions and requirements for public outreach activities. Executive Order also references effective public outreach as an important component of Federal decision-making related to environmental justice. In accordance with Federal guidelines, the public outreach program implemented for this project has and will continue to include early, proactive and ongoing efforts by NYCT and MTA CC. 5.3 PROJECT SCOPING PROCESS The environmental process for the FSTC project was officially initiated on April 3, 2003, when the FTA published a Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an EIS in the Federal Register (see Appendix P: Part I). The NOI was published in the New York Post, the Daily News, the Amsterdam News and El Diario. The NOI also invited the public to participate in the Project Scoping Process, including attendance at a Project Scoping Meeting. Scoping refers to the process for determining the scope of the issues to be addressed and for identifying the significant issues related to a proposed action (40 C.F.R ). In addition, the NOI indicated the availability of a Scoping Information Packet (i.e., the Draft Scoping Document) on the MTA web site ( The general public and interest groups were also invited to participate in the Scoping Process via a variety of advertising and outreach mechanisms, including newspaper notices and the MTA s web site. In addition, Federal, State, Regional and local agencies were invited by letter to participate in the Scoping Process; each letter included a copy of the complete Draft Scoping Document for review in advance of the Scoping Meeting. The Draft Scoping Document provided an overview of the FSTC project and Scoping Process, as well as FTA and MTA s contact persons. The Draft Scoping Document also provided: the background of the Proposed Action; the Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action; a discussion of alternatives; a general analysis approach for assessing the impacts; a discussion of FTA procedures; and a summary of public and agency participation efforts to be implemented during the course of the project. 5-1
2 A formal Scoping Meeting was held on April 29, 2003 at the Alexander Hamilton U.S. Custom House at One Bowling Green in Lower Manhattan. The Scoping Meeting included a formal presentation by NYCT, followed by an opportunity for the public to provide comments on the scope of the issues to be addressed in the DEIS. An informal session staffed by MTA and NYCT personnel, and including poster boards providing project information, was held at the same location immediately prior to the formal Scoping Meeting. A total of 147 members of the general public, including public officials and agency staff, signed the attendance sheet at the Scoping Meeting and 19 of those participated by making statements for the record. Written comments on the Draft Scoping Document and the Proposed Action were accepted until May 13, 2003, 30 days after the release of the document. A total of 14 written comment letters were received during that period. Most of the comments, including those provided at the Scoping Meeting, expressed support for the FSTC. Some raised concerns regarding the treatment of cultural resources during the environmental review process and requested a detailed analysis of potentially historic buildings as part of the EIS. Specific comments were received in favor of the preservation of the Corbin Building, a National Register-eligible historic building located at 192 Broadway. Other comments related to the potential expansion of the existing subway network at Fulton Street by connecting it to other transportation modes and systems, such as the Port Authority Trans-Hudson (PATH) system, JFK International Airport and the proposed Second Avenue Subway (SAS). There were also additional comments regarding air quality, indirect and cumulative effects and noise. Comments received from the public, agencies and other interested parties were used to focus the analyses of potential environmental impacts presented in this DEIS. Formal written responses to the comments received are included in this DEIS in Appendix P: Part II, which includes a full summary of all comments received with responses. These documents are available to the public via the MTA web site at (click Inside the MTA, then Planning Studies, and then Fulton Street Transit Center ). 5.4 ONGOING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS GENERAL Public involvement has been sought via attendance at general public meetings and presentations to local civic and community groups and stakeholders in order to achieve full and comprehensive public participation in the planning of the FSTC. These meetings, which began with the Scoping Meeting discussed in Section 5.3, provide a way for citizens to receive information about the project, provide their opinions and contribute to the ongoing decision-making process (see Table 5-1). Every effort has been made to ensure that the widest possible range of public participants attend these meetings. Attendance has been, and will continue to be, encouraged through advertising and press releases. NYCT has been meeting with local groups such as Community Boards within the study area to explain the FSTC DEIS and solicit comments on the Proposed Action. The outreach efforts are ongoing and continuous to ensure that the public has ample opportunity to provide input into the process. As appropriate, target audiences include: 5-2
3 Table 5-1 Summary of Public Outreach Activities Date Organization/Meeting April 22, 2002 New York City Partnership May 8, 2002 Rockefeller Institute June 24, 2002 Citizen's Budget Commission August 21, 2002 Empire State Transportation Alliance September 25, 2002 NYC Bar Association November 21, 2002 Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee to the MTA November 22, 2002 Creative Cities Conference December 10, 2002 National Public Finance Conference February 10, 2003 Community Board #1 February 13, 2003 NYC Council Transportation Committee April 9, 2003 American Planning Association April 14, 2003 Technical Advisory Committee Meeting No. 1 April 29, 2003 Public Scoping Meeting June 11, 2003 Technical Advisory Committee Meeting No. 2 May 16, 2003 Congressmember Jerrold Nadler September 24, 2003 Technical Advisory Committee Meeting No. 3 October 9, 2003 Community Board #1 October 14, 2003 American Institute of Architects October 16, 2003 Business Owners and Managers Association October 19, 2003 Community Board #1 Manhattan October 29, 2003 Alliance for Downtown New York October 30, 2003 American Express November 21, 2003 Real Estate Board of New York November 25, 2003 Lower Manhattan Emergency Preservation Foundation, Municipal Arts Society, Landmarks Conservancy December 18, 2003 Technical Advisory Committee Meeting No. 4 February 4, 2004 Community Board # 1 Source: NYCT Elected officials; Community boards; Community-based organizations; Business Improvement Districts (BIDs); Residents of the study area and other concerned citizens; Schools, hospitals and other public and private institutions; Private professional, technical and business groups; and, Civic organizations and transit advocates. Meetings with many of the above groups have been held at each milestone of the project throughout the DEIS process. The public outreach program has encouraged dialogue among all interested parties throughout the FSTC planning and environmental review process. In addition to meeting NEPA requirements, the program is intended to set the stage for continued public and agency involvement beyond the EIS process. A mailing list related to the FSTC project was established from the outset and has been amended to include additional stakeholders and interested parties as they are identified. All names included on the mailing list will continue to be notified about future project information updates. Detailed discussions of the specific outreach activities utilized on this project are presented in the sections below. 5-3
4 5.4.2 TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETINGS AND AGENCY COORDINATION A Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) was established by NYCT as a forum to keep agencies informed about the FSTC project and to solicit input from agencies as the environmental analysis of the project progresses. TAC members contribute to the environmental review process by sharing technical expertise, presenting the interests and concerns of their organizations and assisting with the distribution of study information to their constituent groups. In addition to the role of the TAC as a whole, working groups including individual TAC members have been assembled to provide specific technical input in support of the environmental analyses. The TAC consists of representatives of all of the major transportation, environmental and planning agencies having planning and/or regulatory jurisdiction in Lower Manhattan, as well as local elected officials and City agencies and services. Specifically, the agencies that have been invited to participate with NYCT in the TAC include: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; New York State Department of Environmental Conservation; New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation; New York State Department of Transportation; New York State Office of General Services; Empire State Development Corporation; Port Authority of New York and New Jersey; New York City Department of Environmental Protection; New York City Department of Transportation; New York City Economic Development Corporation; New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission; New York City Department of City Planning; New York City Mayor s Office; New York City Fire Department; New York City Police Department; and, Lower Manhattan Development Corporation. The TAC meetings incorporate technical presentations by the NYCT; discussions, comments and questions are encouraged throughout the presentations. This promotes continuous dialogue among the sponsoring agencies, consultant team and public agencies and representatives, supported by a timely response to and documentation of public concerns and recommendations. The first TAC meeting was held on April 14, 2003, with the primary purposes of establishing and identifying the responsibilities of the TAC and introducing the TAC agencies to the FSTC project in advance of the formal Scoping Meeting. The meeting began with an overview presentation of the project by the project team, followed by a question-and-answer session. Subsequent to the meeting, a list of attendees with their contact information was provided to TAC members. The second TAC meeting was held on June 11, 2003, with the primary purposes of updating the TAC agencies on the FSTC project and introducing NYCT s Environmental Performance Commitments (EPCs). An update on the working groups established for the FSTC was provided. Specifically, it was announced that a working group had been set up to focus on traffic issues and that working groups for air, noise and socioeconomic effects would be initiated in the near future. The Scoping Meeting was discussed and a presentation of the NYCT s Design for the Environment (DfE) and Construction for the Environment (CfE) guidelines was provided. The potential applicability of that concept to the FSTC was also discussed. Subsequent to this meeting, the minutes and a list of attendees, including contact information, were provided to TAC members. 5-4
5 The third TAC meeting was held on September 24th, 2003, with the primary purpose of informing the TAC agencies of the project alternatives. Minutes of the meeting and a list of all attendees and their contact information were provided to the attendees subsequent to the meeting. A fourth TAC meeting was held on Dec 18th, 2003, with the primary purpose of updating the TAC members with respect to recent project progress and NYCT s EPCs. In addition to the TAC meetings, working coordination sessions were held by NYCT with various stakeholders. These included sponsors of other Lower Manhattan Recovery Projects, such as Lower Manhattan Development Corporation (LMDC), Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ) and New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT), the New York Police Department (NYPD) and Fire Department of New York (FDNY) and public agencies such as the New York Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and the New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission (LPC). Regular working sessions were also conducted with specific groups such as the Downtown Alliance, New York City Economic Development Corporation and New York City Department of Transportation (NYCDOT) to discuss a wide range of issues. These issues included EPCs, technical analysis methodologies, pedestrian circulation, economic development, street reconstruction, air quality, noise, cultural resources, safety and security, construction traffic coordination and access to local businesses. The technical methodologies and baseline data used for the environmental analyses in this DEIS reflect the conclusions and outcome of this coordination. Further advice from recognized experts in performing NEPA reviews for similarly complex projects was implemented through a peer-review of the Preliminary DEIS. The peer reviewers consisted of representatives from other major transit organizations (Boston, Chicago, Washington D.C.) and the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (Penn DOT) COMMUNITY BOARD COORDINATION Manhattan is divided into 12 Community Boards (CBs), each of which represents the interests and concerns of the local community and acts as a coordinator for the residents and employees located within its jurisdictional boundaries. Each CB serves to ensure that its community s needs are taken into account as part of the City s budget process, and provides input regarding actions requiring City approval. Each CB also forms committees to study special issues such as transportation, land use and/or historic resources. The FSTC project is located within the boundaries of Manhattan CB1 (Lower Manhattan), covering the area from the southern tip of the island to as far north as Canal and Baxter Streets (abutting CB3). During the DEIS process, NYCT held four (4) meetings with CB1. These meetings, held on February 10th, 2003, October 9, 2003, October and February 4, 2004, enabled CB1 to obtain information on the FSTC and provide input into the environmental review process INFORMATIONAL MATERIALS To help facilitate the public s participation in project planning, information is distributed to interested parties, community members and elected officials. These recipients are on a mailing list, which is continually updated to ensure that informational and notification materials are properly distributed. In addition to the above-stated informational materials distributed for this project, the outreach effort has included ongoing communication with the public on the MTA s web site located at (click Inside the MTA, then Planning Studies, and then Fulton Street Transit Center ). This web site is updated as new information regarding the project becomes available. 5-5
6 5.4.5 PUBLIC HEARING ON THE DEIS AND FEIS DEVELOPMENT PROCESS Upon completion of this DEIS a Notice of Availability (NOA) would be published in the Federal Register. This DEIS has been circulated to those agencies with jurisdiction by law, parties that have expressed an interest, either through the scoping process or in response to the NOA and other entities potentially affected by any of the alternatives. Copies of this DEIS have been made available for public review on the MTA website and at designated locations (CB1 office and the offices of local elected officials see Table 5-2) throughout the study area. A public hearing on the DEIS will be held to provide an opportunity for additional public input. The hearing record will remain open to receive public comments for no less than 45 days after the publication of the Notice of Availability. The hearing will be conducted in accordance with all NEPA requirements and will provide a formal opportunity for public and agency review of the FSTC. The hearing will include a presentation on the DEIS and receipt of public comments. To reach the widest possible audience, prior to the hearing notifications will be published in the Federal Register and will be placed in local and citywide newspapers, including those used for the earlier NOI and posted in local subway stations. A report will be prepared to summarize input received at the hearings, as well as to itemize issues or areas of concern that require follow-up and/or response. This will include comments received as testimony during the public hearing as well as those received in writing during the comment period. Responses will be prepared to address the comments received and will be made available to the agencies and the public as part of the Final EIS (FEIS) process. They will also be made available on the MTA s web site. Following the DEIS comment period, an FEIS document will be prepared. As appropriate, revisions to the project and/or DEIS document will be incorporated into the FEIS document as a result of the comments raised and the responses provided. The NOA of the FEIS will be published in the Federal Register and also in the same newspapers used for the NOI. The FEIS will identify the Preferred Alternative, mitigation measures that will be developed to minimize significant adverse impacts and EPCs to further minimize environmental effects associated with the implementation of the FSTC. The FTA may prepare a Record of Decision no sooner than 30 days after the publication of a NOA of the FEIS, stating FTA s basis for their decision on the Proposed Action. 5-6
7 Table 5-2 DEIS Viewing Sites Organization Contact Address City State Zip Assemblymember Silver's Office Ms. Lea Feng 250 Broadway Suite 2307 Community Board #1 - Manhattan Ms. Madelyn Wils Chambers Street Room 715 Community Board #3 Manhattan District Manager 59 East 4 th Street New York NY New York City Comptroller William Thompson, Jr. 1 Centre Street Room 530 New York City Council Alan J. Gerson 51 Chambers Street Room. 429 New York City Public Advocate Betsy Gotbaum 1 Centre Street 15th Floor North New York State Senate Martin Connor 250 Broadway Suite 1930 New York State Assembly Sheldon Silver 250 Broadway Room 2307 Manhattan Borough President C. Virginia Fields Municipal Building 1 Centre Street - 19th Fl U.S. House of Representatives Staten Island Borough President U.S. House of Representatives New York City Council Community Board #1 Staten Island Federal Transit Administration Metropolitan Transportation Administration New York Public Library New Amsterdam Branch Source: NYCT, Jerrold L. Nadler James Molinaro Vito J. Fossella, Jr. Michael McMahon Mr. Joseph Carroll Donald Burns 201 Varick Street Suite 669 New York NY Richmond Terrace New York NY Amboy Road New York NY Stuyvesant Place 6 th Floor 1 Edgewater Place Room 217 Lower Manhattan Recovery Office One Bowling Green Room 436 New York NY New York NY New York NY Doug Sussman 347 Madison Avenue New York NY Lynn Taylor 9 Murray Street 5-7
8 This Page Intentionally Left Blank
CHAPTER 21: COMMITMENT OF RESOURCES
CHAPTER 21: COMMITMENT OF RESOURCES 21.1 INTRODUCTION In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Council on Environmental Quality s implementing procedures under Title 40,
More informationWINCHESTER FREDERICK COUNTY (WIN-FRED) METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO) PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PLAN (PIP)
WINCHESTER FREDERICK COUNTY (WIN-FRED) METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO) PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PLAN (PIP) Adopted June 28, 2005 PAGE INTENTIONALY LEFT BLANK 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE NO. Table
More informationPreparation of an Environmental Impact Statement for High Capacity Transit
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 11/19/2013 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2013-27583, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Transit
More informationEnvironmental Impact Statement; Lone Star Regional Rail Project Williamson, Travis, Bastrop, Hays, Caldwell, Comal, Guadalupe, and Bexar Counties, TX
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 10/06/2014 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2014-23711, and on FDsys.gov [4910-22] DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
More informationDRAFT. P reface P.1 PURPOSE AND IMPORTANCE OF THIS PLAN. Moscow Comprehensive Plan COMPREHENSIVE PLAN P.1
Moscow Comprehensive Plan P.1 Introduction and Purpose COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This Comprehensive Plan is a statement of the community s values and policies to guide the long-range physical development of the
More informationPublic Participation. Public Participation Plan and Schedule for the 10th Year Comprehensive Plan Update
Public Participation and Schedule for the 10th Year Update prepared for. CHEROKEE COUNTY, GA prepared by. McBRIDE DALE CLARION revised on. AUGUST 17, 2005 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN OVERVIEW Effective citizen
More informationEnvironmental Impact Statement for the Baltimore-Washington Superconducting Maglev (SCMAGLEV) Project, between Baltimore, Maryland and Washington, DC
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 11/25/2016 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2016-28285, and on FDsys.gov 4910-06-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
More informationAppendix M Draft EIS Review Process and Public Hearing Summary
Appendix M Draft EIS Review Process Appendix M Draft EIS Review Process TABLE OF CONTENTS Page APPENDIX M DRAFT EIS REVIEW PROCESSAND PUBLIC HEARING SUMMARY... M 1 M.0 Summary of Draft EIS Review and
More informationProgrammatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for Lower Green River Corridor Plan Request for Proposals:
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for Lower Green River Corridor Plan Request for Proposals: The King County Flood District (District) is seeking proposals from firms to prepare a programmatic
More informationCHAPTER 24 PUBLIC OUTREACH OVERVIEW
CHAPTER 24 PUBLIC OUTREACH OVERVIEW CHAPTER 24 PUBLIC OUTREACH OVERVIEW An extensive 18-month public outreach effort was conducted for the PWRP 2025 Plan and EIR. This effort included a series of meetings
More informationIndirect and Cumulative Effects
Indirect and Cumulative Effects 19.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter discusses potential indirect and cumulative effects of the Modified Design, in comparison to the 2004 FEIS Design. The White House Council
More informationNotice of Intent to Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the
BILLING CODE: 3720-58 This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 02/10/2017 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2017-02779, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
More informationAppendix. Sample EA/EIS Scope of Work
Appendix K Sample EA/EIS Scope of Work EA/EIS Sample Scope of Work The purpose of this Scope of Work (SOW) is to prepare an EA document pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to analyze
More informationPUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN STRATEGY. A general outline for how a community may organize its public participation plan
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN STRATEGY A general outline for how a community may organize its public participation plan INTRODUCTION A public participation plan (P³) is essential for outlining how the public
More informationATLANTA BELTLINE S c o p i n g B o o k l e t
RFP P5413 Contract No. 200703566 Work Order No. 2008-07 ATLANTA BELTLINE S c o p i n g B o o k l e t Prepared for: Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority Prepared by: DMJM Harris/JJG Joint Venture
More informationPublic Participation
Purpose Dubuque Metropolitan Area Transportation Study (DMATS) Public Involvement Policy (PIP) was developed due to a need for proactive citizen involvement in the long-range transportation plan (LRTP)
More information6. The following paragraphs provide further interim guidance where the ACHP regulations are not specific to the Corps Regulatory Program:
ENCLOSURE Subject: Interim Guidance for Implementing Appendix C of 33 CFR part 325 with the revised Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Regulations at 36 CFR part 800 1. Consulting parties. Public
More informationLast Mile Freight Delivery: Cities and Logistics
Last Mile Freight Delivery: Cities and Logistics Presented October 4, 2013 to University Transportation Research Center Region II Presented by Stacey D. Hodge, NYCDOT Office of Freight Mobility Outline
More informationCity of Albuquerque Code of Ordinances
PART 2: NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION RECOGNITION 14-8-2-1 SHORT TITLE. Sections 14-8-2-1 et seq. may be cited as the "Neighborhood Association Recognition Ordinance." ('74 Code, 7-11-1) (Ord. 14-1987) 14-8-2-2
More informationEnvironmental Impact Statement for the Southeast High Speed Rail Project from
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 10/23/2014 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2014-25219, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Railroad
More informationThe 2007 Comprehensive Plan
The 2007 Comprehensive Plan for Lexington - Fayette County, Kentucky Public Participation Public Participation Public Input 20 Eagle Creek Public Input 2006 - Beaumont Central, Main Street MPO Public Input
More informationPUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN FOR REGIONAL PLANNING IN SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN FOR REGIONAL PLANNING IN SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN PLANNING FOR OUR REGION In Southeastern Wisconsin, regional planning for land use, transportation, and other elements of public
More informationPublic Involvement Plan for the Montgomery 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)
This Public Involvement Plan (PIP) outlines the overall approach to involve MPO Committees and the general public during the Montgomery 2030 LRTP update. The range of outreach techniques to provide information,
More informationRequest for Proposals For Professional Service Assistance
Request for Proposals For Professional Service Assistance INTRODUCTION General The Permian Basin MPO (PBMPO) is soliciting proposals from qualified firms to strengthen its ongoing public involvement process
More informationAgency Scoping. May 31, :00 a.m. 1:00 p.m. Environmental Impact Statement Port Columbus International Airport
Agency Scoping Meeting 10:00 a.m. 1:00 p.m. Environmental Impact Statement Port Columbus International Airport Presented to: CMH EIS Agencies By: FAA Consultant, Landrum & Brown Date: Agenda I. History,
More informationTHE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS MARTIN KRENTZ, DOE DOCUMENT MANAGER
THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS MARTIN KRENTZ, DOE DOCUMENT MANAGER March 2018 Why an SEIS? DOE and NYSERDA have determined that an SEIS would further the purposes of NEPA and SEQR: By including new information
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
Off Airport On the Move REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Transportation Planning Consulting Services Issued on: May 28, 2018 Requested by: Greater JFK District Management Association, Inc. 157-11 Rockaway Boulevard
More informationBOARD POLICY NO. 025 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN POLICY. Purpose
BOARD POLICY NO. 025 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN POLICY Purpose This policy establishes a process for obtaining input from and providing information to the public concerning agency programs, projects, and
More informationFinal Quiet Zone Work Plan
Executive Summary Recognizing the impacts of commuter train horns on the communities they serve, RTD will assist and facilitate the local jurisdictions Quiet Zone applications along the Gold Line, Northwest
More information6.1 INTRODUCTION 6.2 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS COMPLIANCE STATUS TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY
Chapter 6 Air Quality 6.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter presents a project-level analysis of the potential for air quality impacts that could result from mobile and stationary sources of air emissions generated
More informationWilliamsport Area Transportation Study Metropolitan Planning Organization
Williamsport Area Transportation Study Metropolitan Planning Organization LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2018-2038 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Purpose of a Long Range Transportation Plan Transportation infrastructure
More informationUniversity Corridor Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS)
University Corridor Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) Public Meetings/Open Houses August 13, 27 August 14, 27 5: pm to 7: pm 5: pm to 7: pm Holiday Inn Select- Greenway* Wheeler Avenue Baptist
More informationENVISION BURLINGAME General Plan
City of Burlingame ENVISION BURLINGAME General Plan Public Review Draft City Council Hearing Draft November 2018August 2017 ENVISION BURLINGAME Chapter I. Introduction THE BURLINGAME GENERAL PLAN articulates
More informationSummary. Preliminary Alternative Development and Screening. DEIS July 23, 2018
What is the Carolina Crossroads Project? The South Carolina Department of Transportation (SCDOT), in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), is proposing to upgrade and redesign a key
More informationTargeted stakeholder meetings to address specialized issues and localized concerns
SCOPING PROCESS 2.1 Early Scoping Activities In order to help define the purpose and need and identify a range of reasonable alternatives, Metro conducted an AA, an early public scoping process consistent
More informationMount Penn & Lower Alsace Consolidation Committee Citizens Input Meeting
Mount Penn & Lower Alsace Consolidation Committee Citizens Input Meeting Hosted BY the Antietam Valley Community Partnership & Mount Penn Area Business Association Wednesday, May 21, 2014 6:00 PM Antietam
More informationEnvironmental Impact Statement (EIS)/ Section 106 Public Meeting Proposed Alternatives. December 14, 2017
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)/ Section 106 Public Meeting Proposed Alternatives December 14, 2017 Today s Agenda Project Overview Project Schedule Purpose and Need Concept Screening Process Level
More informationPUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN FOR REGIONAL PLANNING FOR SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN FOR REGIONAL PLANNING FOR SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission PLANNING FOR OUR REGION In Southeastern Wisconsin, regional planning for land
More informationEnvironmental Impact Statement for the Green Line to the Airport Project. ACTION: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 11/18/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-29418, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Transit
More informationDepartment of the Army; Corps of Engineers
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 08/28/2012 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2012-21186, and on FDsys.gov BILLING CODE: 3720-58 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
More informationDurham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project
Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project Scoping Information Booklet WHAT S INSIDE What is Scoping? p. 3 How was the LPA determined? p. 3 Project development process p. 4 Project Purpose & Need p. 5 Alternatives
More informationPUBLIC AND AGENCY INVOLVEMENT
CHAPTER 5 PUBLIC AND AGENCY INVOLVEMENT Since late 2010, several types of public and agency participation have occurred as a part of the project design and the environmental review process, pursuant to
More informationOpportunities for Public Comment Facility for Rare Isotope Beams DOE and MSU are fully committed to providing the public access to information about i
Facility for Rare Isotope Beams Draft FRIB Meeting Objectives and Agenda MEETING OBJECTIVES The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is sponsoring a public meeting and encouraging public involvement in the
More informationSubject: Statement of Qualifications for Public Safety Building Design
March 5, 2010 Subject: Statement of Qualifications for Public Safety Building Design The City of Porterville seeks Statements of Qualification (SOQ) from qualified architectural and engineering firms for
More informationIndirect and Cumulative Effects
Chapter 19: Indirect and Cumulative Effects A. INTRODUCTION The federal Council on Environmental Quality s regulations implementing the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act, set
More informationChapter 5 Transportation Draft
Chapter 5 Transportation Draft Discussion Similar to the other elements in the Comprehensive Plan, the transportation element impacts the quality of life, economic development and public safety of the
More informationRecord of Decision for Issuing a Presidential Permit to Champlain Hudson Power Express,
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 10/01/2014 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2014-23421, and on FDsys.gov [6450-01-P] DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (OE Docket
More informationProject Purpose. Federal Railroad Administration
Project Purpose To preserve the current functionality of Amtrak s Northeast Corridor service and NJ TRANSIT s commuter rail service between New Jersey and Penn Station New York by repairing the deteriorating
More informationProject Scope and Timetable
2 PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK The timetable enclosed in this proposal presents the schedule for completing all of the work items identified within a six-month timeframe from receipt of a signed professional
More informationMetropolitan Council PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN. for Transportation Planning and Programming
Metropolitan Council PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN for Transportation Planning and Programming Introduction and Federal Requirement Public participation is an essential element of planning in the Twin Cities
More informationTHE ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK TASK FORCE ON DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT. Principles for Public Participation
THE ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK TASK FORCE ON DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT Principles for Public Participation The Association s Special Task Force on Downtown Redevelopment has as its principal
More informationAPPENDIX A THE NEPA PROCESS
APPENDIX A THE NEPA PROCESS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 2.0 THE EIS PROCESS... 1 2.1 SCOPING... 1 2.2 ANALYSIS ACTIONS... 2 2.2.1 COLLECTION AND INTERPRETATION OF BASELINE/BACKGROUND INFORMATION...
More informationBetter Preservation Solutions through Early Coordination of Section 106, Section 4(f) and NEPA
Better Preservation Solutions through Early Coordination of Section 106, Section 4(f) and NEPA Carol Legard, FHWA Liaison TRB Environment and Energy Research Conference Raleigh, June 9, 2010 Photo credit:
More informationNEW YORK NEW JERSEY HARBOR AND TRIBUTARIES COASTAL STORM RISK MANAGEMENT
NEW YORK NEW JERSEY HARBOR AND TRIBUTARIES COASTAL STORM RISK MANAGEMENT 237 217 200 80 237 217 200 119 FEASIBILITY 237 217 200 STUDY 27 255 0 163 131 239 110 112 62 102 130 National Environmental Policy
More informationSection 2.0 Introduction and Purpose
Section 2.0 SECTION 2.0 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that all State and local agencies consider the environmental consequences of projects over which
More informationKammy Horne, AICP URS Corporation Multimodal Transportation Manager Phoenix, Arizona
Categorical Exclusions for Federally Funded Transit Projects: Due Diligence in Compliance with Environmental Regulations Kammy Horne, AICP URS Corporation Multimodal Transportation Manager Phoenix, Arizona
More informationIndirect and Cumulative Effects
Chapter 21: Indirect and Cumulative Effects 21-1 INTRODUCTION The federal Council on Environmental Quality s (CEQ) regulations implementing the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy
More informationTHIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT/ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT LEAD AGENCIES: Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation and Los Angeles County
More informationNorthwest State Route 138 Corridor Improvement Project
Northwest State Route 138 Corridor Improvement Project Los Angeles County, CA DISTRICT 7- LA- 138 (PM 0.0/36.8); DISTRICT 7- LA- 05 (PM 79.5/83.1); DISTRICT 7- LA- 14 (PM 73.4/74.4) 265100/ 0700001816
More informationTHE MLK DISTRICT. Help Us Plan the Future of. The MLK District
t DIVISION AVE Wright Park S 6TH ST S 9TH ST MLK District S 15TH ST MARTIN LUTHER KING JR WAY S 17TH ST S YAKIMA AVE SCOPING Meeting: Help Us Plan the Future of THE MLK DISTRICT The City of Tacoma is working
More information1.0 INTRODUCTION A. PURPOSE OF THE DRAFT EIR 1-1
1.0 INTRODUCTION This Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR or EIR) has been prepared for the 1020 S. Figueroa Street Project (the Project). Jia Yuan USA Co., Inc., the Applicant, proposes to develop
More informationPublic Notice October 21, 2016 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Charleston District
Public Notice October 21, 2016 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Charleston District Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Jasper Ocean Terminal in Jasper County,
More informationAnchorage 2040 Land Use Plan. Public Involvement Plan (PIP) and Public Process Documentation
Anchorage 2040 Land Use Plan Public Involvement Plan (PIP) and Public Process Documentation November 1, 2016 DRAFT revised 1. Introduction Planning Department Staff will involve a variety of stakeholders
More informationTier 2 Environmental Impact Statement for the High-Speed Rail Project from Granite
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 02/18/2014 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2014-03324, and on FDsys.gov 4910-06-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
More informationPUBLIC HEARING April 24, 2017
PUBLIC HEARING April 24, 2017 1 Agenda SDEIS Public Review Environmental Process Overview Project Highlights Comments to Stenographer 2 3 SDEIS Public Review Public Hearing Schedule Monday, April 24, 2017
More informationMountain Transportation Study
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Salt Lake County and its study partners including the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT), the Utah Transit Authority (UTA), the United States Forest Service (USFS), Salt Lake City,
More informationBQE Atlantic to Sands Project Overview. 1. Project Background 2. Current Conditions & Findings 3. Upcoming Activities
BQE Atlantic to Sands Project Overview 1. Project Background 2. Current Conditions & Findings 3. Upcoming Activities Commissioner Polly Trottenberg, New York City Department of Transportation June 29,
More informationNEW YORK NEW JERSEY HARBOR AND TRIBUTARIES COASTAL STORM RISK MANAGEMENT
NEW YORK NEW JERSEY HARBOR AND TRIBUTARIES COASTAL STORM RISK MANAGEMENT 237 217 200 80 237 217 200 119 FEASIBILITY 237 217 200 STUDY 27 255 0 163 131 239 110 112 62 102 130 National Environmental Policy
More informationBetter Preservation Solutions through Early Coordination of Section 106, Section 4(f) and NEPA
Better Preservation Solutions through Early Coordination of Section 106, Section 4(f) and NEPA Carol Legard, FHWA Liaison TRB Environment and Energy Research Conference Raleigh, June 9, 2010 Photo credit:
More informationNorthern Intermodal Transit Facility WHAT IS AN INTERMODAL TRANSIT FACILITY?
WHAT IS AN INTERMODAL TRANSIT FACILITY? An intermodal transit facility gathers many modes of transportation together and is strategically located to increase destination alternatives. Intermodal facilities
More informationNational Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Process and Federal Agency Compliance
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Process and Federal Agency Compliance Prepared for Northwest/Tribal Transportation Program Training/Conference April 1, 2014 4/2/2014 1 Course Objectives Provide
More informationNew York City Bar Association Issues for Consideration by the Charter Revision Commission. April 2010
New York City Bar Association Issues for Consideration by the Charter Revision Commission April 2010 On behalf of the New York City Bar Association 1, we write to thank you for your willingness to serve
More informationTown of Lincoln COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN. Prepared by the Town of Lincoln Plan Commission
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING Prepared by the Town of Lincoln Plan Commission Adopted by the Town of Lincoln Town Board November 2007 With assistance from: TOWN OF LINCOLN COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING PURPOSE Public
More informationLimited English Proficiency Plan
Limited English Proficiency Plan Lake~Sumter Metropolitan Planning Organization Draft for Advisory Committee & Board Review January 2018 www.lakesumtermpo.com Contents About the MPO... 1 Introduction...
More informationTitle VI Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Four Factor Analysis and Implementation Plan
Title VI Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Four Factor Analysis and Implementation Plan Tyler Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Title VI Coordinator Rose Ray, Human Resources Manager 212 N Bonner,
More informationRegional Planning Commission
Regional Planning Commission for Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard, St. Tammany and Tangipahoa Parishes Public Involvement Plan 2014 Regional Planning Commission 10 Veterans Memorial Boulevard
More informationWELCOME TO THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINSTRATION SCOPING MEETING
TIER 2 EIS MEETING December 3, 2003 WELCOME TO THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINSTRATION MEETING Slide 1 The Federal Aviation Administration would like to welcome you here and thank you for participating in today
More informationFEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION RECORD OF DECISION FOR THE LYNNWOOD LINK EXTENSION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION RECORD OF DECISION FOR THE LYNNWOOD LINK EXTENSION AUGUST 2015 Table of Contents 1 Decision... 1 1.1 Project Description... 2 1.2 Basis for the FHWA Decision... 7 1.2.1
More informationAPTS01 Transit Vehicle Tracking MTA Long Island Rail Road
APTS01 Transit Vehicle Tracking MTA Long Island Rail Road MTA LIRR transit vehicle location data Transit Vehicle MTA LIRR Trains Location Data Source Vehicle Location System position fix APTS02 Transit
More informationINTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT TRANSPORTATION PROJECT FUNDING AGREEMENT
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT TRANSPORTATION PROJECT FUNDING AGREEMENT This Intergovernmental Agreement ( Agreement ) is made and entered into by and between the City of Tualatin ( Tualatin ) and Metro,
More informationThe State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) NYS Department of Environmental Conservation
The State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) What is SEQRA? Article 8 of the NYS Environmental Conservation Law Carried out through Part 617 of the New York Codes of Rules and Regulations Became
More informationNotice of Preparation For Link Union Station (Link US) Project. Joint Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report
Notice of Preparation For Link Union Station (Link US) Project Joint Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report Date: May 27, 2016 To: Subject: Project Title: From: All Interested Agencies,
More informationRegional Transportation Studies Regional Council
Pima Association of Governments 1 E. Broadway, Tucson, Arizona Santa Rita Conference Room Regional Transportation Studies Regional Council September 28, 2017 I-11 Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. MnDOT MPO TIP Check List. Section 1 INTRO & Public Involvement 2 Public Participation Activities 6 Annual Resolutions 9
TABLE OF CONTENTS MnDOT MPO TIP Check List A-E Section 1 INTRO & Public Involvement 2 Public Participation Activities 6 Annual Resolutions 9 Section 2: ANNUAL LISTING 15 Section 3: PROGRAM OF PROJECTS
More informationGreen Line extension Project Fall 2009
Introduction The Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) is proposing to extend the Green Line to improve transit service, mobility, and regional access for residents and visitors of Cambridge,
More informationENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CLEVELAND HARBOR, CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO DREDGED MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN PUBLIC SCOPING INFORMATION PACKET
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CLEVELAND HARBOR, CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO DREDGED MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN PUBLIC SCOPING INFORMATION PACKET March 16, 2006 ANNOUNCEMENT OF PUBLIC SCOPING MEETINGS The U.S.
More informationPUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN INTRODUCTION The purpose of the Public Participation Plan (PPP) is to outline methods for encouraging citizens, affected organizations and other interested parties to be involved
More informationDEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT (FONSI) FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO AND THE U.S. NAVY FOR REDEVELOPMENT OF
More informationFigure Preferred Alternative Modified Alternative 2 Means of Egress
Figure 7.5-4 Preferred Alternative Modified Alternative 2 Means of Egress Science Park/West End Station Accessibility Improvements Section 4(f) Statement Measures to Minimize Harm Measures to minimize
More informationRCOs: A Philadelphia Model for Community Input in Planning
RCOs: A Philadelphia Model for Community Input in Planning Registered Community Organizations October 12, 2014 2:30pm-3:45pm 2 0 1 4 A nnual C onference PA Chapter of A PA Citizens Planning Institute Panel
More informationAGENDA Tuesday, September 29, 2015
9/24/15 Page 1 of 1 GRAND COUNTY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING ADMINISTRATIVE WORKSHOP Grand County Council Chambers 125 East Center Street, Moab, Utah AGENDA Tuesday, September 29, 2015 9:00 a.m. WORKSHOP Call
More informationPublic Participation Plan
Town of Drummond Comprehensive Plan Public Participation Plan DRAFT V.1 11-2005 As approved and passed by the Town of Drummond Board of Supervisors on [DATE] Town of Drummond Comprehensive Plan Public
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY EC U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CECW-P Washington, D.C EXPIRES 15 JANUARY 2012 Planning WATERSHED PLANS
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY EC 1105-2-411 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CECW-P Washington, D.C. 20314-1000 Circular No. 1105-2-411 2010 15 January EXPIRES 15 JANUARY 2012 Planning WATERSHED PLANS 1. Purpose.
More informationPublic Participation Policies and Public Notification: A Guide for Municipalities
Public Participation Policies and Public Notification: A Guide for Municipalities Table of Contents Part 1: Municipal Public Participation Policies... 2 Part 2: Public Participation Policy Template...
More informationJanuary 9, The Honorable Eliot L. Spitzer Governor of New York State State Capitol Albany, NY Dear Governor Spitzer:
The Honorable Eliot L. Spitzer State Capitol Albany, NY 12224 Dear Governor Spitzer: The NY Metro Chapter of the American Planning Association is pleased to offer our congratulations and support for your
More informationAtlanta BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study. Technical Advisory Committee/Agency Coordination. Kick-Off Meeting
Atlanta BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study Technical Advisory Committee/Agency Coordination Kick-Off Meeting July 17, 2008 Overview Project Overview Objectives Milestones Why GEPA and NEPA? Environmental
More informationITS Projects. Page 1 of 5. Project Name Project Status Timeframe Project Description
NYSDOT-X80599-NYC TIP ID: Traffic Management NYSDOT R11 Advanced Traffic and Demand Management NYSDOT - Island Expy and Brooklyn Queens Expy Travel Time Systems MTA Bridges and Tunnels - VN-03 NYCDOT-X80674-NYC
More informationNeighborhood and Homeowner Association Registration Policy
Neighborhood and Homeowner Association Registration Policy The purpose of this document is to help ensure the functionality of Neighborhood Associations as well as the effectiveness of the services provided
More informationAn Overview and Comparison of the Tennessee Department of Transportation s Environmental Evaluation Process
Introduction This document provides a brief overview of the policy and procedures that govern the environmental evaluation process that the Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT) must follow for
More informationPUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN INTRODUCTION The Metropolitan Council ( Council ) is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization ( MPO ) for the seven-county metropolitan area and is responsible for certain
More information