Acquisition Systems Engineering (SE) Environmental Risk Management Approach

Transcription

1 As of: 24 Mar 06 1 Headquarters U.S. Air Force I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Acquisition Systems Engineering (SE) Environmental Risk Management Approach Mr. Sherman Forbes Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Science, Technology and Engineering)

2 As of: 24 Mar 06 2 Overview F-16 Emergency Power Unit Integrated ESOH risk management (RM) Evolution of Environmental RM E, S, and OH RM Comparisons MIL-STD-882D ESOH RM

3 As of: 24 Mar 06 3 F-16 Emergency Power Unit (EPU) Significant Safety & Reliability Improvement Turbine Power Unit Location (internal) Turbine Exhaust (underside) Hydrazine Tank Location (internal)

4 As of: 24 Mar 06 4 Significant Occupational Health Risks from Hydrazine Significant Environmental Risks from Hydrazine Spills

5 As of: 24 Mar 06 5 Integrated ESOH RM Since 1996, DoD has focused on integrating ESOH into Systems Engineering (SE) Objective to imbed ESOH into core Acquisition process -- SE Utilize the System Safety process -- already part of SE Part of the Ongoing Acquisition Transformation (Reform) Dating Back to 1996

6 As of: 24 Mar 06 6 Integrated ESOH RM Environment Safety Integrated ESOH Risk Assessment Systems Engineering Occupational Health E, S, & OH need to integrate inputs to avoid F-16 Hydrazine EPU oversight

7 As of: 24 Mar 06 7 Integrated ESOH RM MIL-STD-882D, DoD Standard Practice for System Safety, eight elements Document strategy for SE integration Identify hazards Assess risks Identify mitigation measures Reduce risks to acceptable levels Verify risk reductions Formally accept residual risks Track and report ESOH hazards

8 As of: 24 Mar 06 8 Evolution of Environmental RM 1970 NEPA Environmental Impact Analysis Process essentially RM Identify potential environmental impacts Assess significance of the impacts Evaluate and implement mitigation measures as necessary Approval of analysis and procedures by appropriate authority

9 As of: 24 Mar 06 9 Evolution of Environmental RM 1980s-1990s emphasis on Pollution Prevention (P2) Environmental risk mitigation strategy Based on a hierarchy of mitigation measures Eliminate at the source Re-use/Recycle Treatment Disposal

10 As of: 24 Mar Evolution of Environmental RM 1996 ISO Environmental Management System (EMS) RM approach Document EMS approach SEP & PESHE Identify activities for analysis SE Identify their environmental aspects Identify their environmental impacts Evaluate significance Risks Control, manage, and improve Mitigations Review with management Hazards Mishaps Risk Acceptance Decisions

11 As of: 24 Mar E, S, & OH RM Comparisons International Organization for Standardization ISO 14001, EMS Occupational Health and Safety Assessment Series (OHSAS) 18001, Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems MIL-STD-882D, Standard Practice for System Safety, tailored for ESOH RM in SE

12 As of: 24 Mar E, S, & OH RM Comparisons System Safety MIL-STD-882D Environmental ISO OH OHSAS Hazard Aspect Hazard Mishap Impact Accident Risk Significance Risk

13 As of: 24 Mar E, S, & OH RM Comparisons MIL-STD-882D Mitigation Measures Design selection Safety devices ISO Preventive Actions Eliminate at the source Re-use/Recycle OHSAS Controls Eliminate hazard Engineering controls/isolation Warning devices Treatment Administrative Procedures & training Disposal Personal Protective Equipment

14 As of: 24 Mar MIL-STD-882D ESOH RM MIL-STD-882D Severity Categories Description Category Environmental, Safety, and Health Result Criteria Catastrophic I Could result in death, permanent total disability, loss exceeding $1M, or irreversible severe environmental damage that violates law or regulation. Critical II Could result in permanent partial disability, injuries or occupational illness that may result in hospitalization of at least three personnel, loss exceeding $200K but less than $1M, or reversible environmental damage causing a violation of law or regulation. F-16 EPU Hydrazine Environmental Hazard Marginal III Could result in injury or occupational illness resulting in one or more lost work days(s), loss exceeding $10K but less than $200K, or mitigatible environmental damage without violation of law or regulation where restoration activities can be accomplished. F-16 EPU Hydrazine Occupational Health Hazard Negligible IV Could result in injury or illness not resulting in a lost work day, loss exceeding $2K but less than $10K, or minimal environmental damage not violating law or regulation.

15 MIL-STD-882D ESOH RM Hazard Risk Index and Acceptance DoDI , E7.7 & MIL-STD-882D FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE I CATASTROPHIC HAZARD CATEGORIES II CRITICAL III MARGINAL IV NEGLIGIBLE (A) Frequent (B) Probable 2 F-16 5 E 9 16 (C) Occasional 4 6 F-16 11H 18 HIGH(CAE) HIGH(CAE) SERIOUS (PEO) SERIOUS (PEO) MEDIUM (PM) MEDIUM (PM) LOW (PM) LOW (PM) (D) Remote (E) Improbable I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e As of: 24 Mar 06 15

16 As of: 24 Mar Summary Integrate E,S, and OH into SE using RM Imbed into Acquisition process Influence design development Utilize MIL-STD-882D Environmental RM evolved over 30 years Common E, S, and OH RM approaches Different E, S, and OH RM terminology MIL-STD-882D RM to connect E, S, & OH