Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, 16 Isabella Street South, St. Jacobs, Ontario dated January 24, 2012.

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, 16 Isabella Street South, St. Jacobs, Ontario dated January 24, 2012."

Transcription

1 January 17, 2018 File No.: E17484 Mr. Mike Puopolo Polocorp Inc. 379 Queen Street South Kitchener, Ontario N2G 1W6 RE: Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment Summary 16 Isabella Street South, St. Jacobs, Ontario Dear Mr. Puopolo: CHUNG & VANDER DOELEN ENGINEERING LTD. (CVD) was retained to conduct a Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) on the property located at 16 Isabella Street South in St. Jacobs, Ontario (hereinafter referred to as the Site ). Introduction The Site is an irregular shaped property approximately 1.67 hectares (4.13 acres) in area, located on the west side of Isabella Street South, in an area of residential and commercial land uses in St. Jacobs, Ontario. The Phase One Property is improved with a three storey residence with three (3) detached single storey outbuildings including a former spa, boardroom and pool house. A Phase I ESA was conducted by exp Services Inc. in January 2012 and the findings and conclusions of the investigation were documented in the following report: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, 16 Isabella Street South, St. Jacobs, Ontario dated January 24, The findings of the Phase I ESA did not identify any actual sources of contamination on the Site or surrounding land uses. However, potential environmental concerns associated with the Site were identified and are summarized as follows: A railway line is present adjacent to the west property boundary and there was formerly a railway line on Site. The presence of railway spur lines on the Site may pose an environmental concern with respect to potential polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) and/or metals contamination of shallow overburden soils.

2 Polocorp Inc. January 17, 2018 Phase II ESA Summary File No.: E Isabella Street South, St. Jacobs, Ontario Page 2 Reportedly, a heating oil UST was present on Site and was removed in the late 1970s to early 1980s by Aden Weber Excavating. No records or documents have been obtained indicating the quality of the soil and groundwater in the vicinity of the UST. The former heating oil UST was likely located to the northwest of the Site building. There is a potential for mercury/lead based paints, PCB containing light ballasts, and hydrochloro fluorocarbon (HCFC) R 22 refrigerant to be present in the Site building. Based on the potential environmental concerns identified, exp Services Inc. offered the following recommendations: It is recommended to conduct a Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment to include borehole drilling and sampling of soil and groundwater, to investigate potential impacts to soil and groundwater related to the presence of a railway line on Site, and the presence of a former heating oil UST. If renovations or demolition of the Site building are planned, it is recommended that the materials (potential PCB containing light ballasts and mercury/lead based paints) be assessed and managed in accordance with the applicable regulations and guidelines. Refrigerator and air conditioning units (likely containing R 22) should be maintained by a licensed contractor. However, a total ban of CFCs is proposed and may require consideration for future phase out programs. A subsequent Phase II ESA was conducted by Stragis Environmental Services Inc. (Stragis) in November The findings of the investigation were documented in the following report: Phase II ESA, 16 Isabella Street South, St. Jacobs, On dated November 23, The conclusions and recommendations of the Phase II ESA are as follows: The investigation program completed by Stragis included the collection of subsurface soil samples in areas deemed most likely to have been affected by potentially contaminating activities. A groundwater sample was also collected from an existing monitoring well installed on Site during the geotechnical investigation being conducted concurrently by PML. A total of 10 subsurface soil samples and one (1) groundwater sample were collected and submitted for laboratory analysis. The purpose of the study was to investigate the potential for the presence of on Site contamination related to the on Site concerns stemming from the presence of a former railway line and removed heating oil UST. The soil samples and groundwater samples analyzed were compared to the applicable MOE O. Reg 153/04 Soil and Groundwater Standards Table 4 Stratified Site Condition Standards in a Potable Ground Water Condition Residential/Parkland/Institutional Property Use as amended April 15, 2011.

3 Polocorp Inc. January 17, 2018 Phase II ESA Summary File No.: E Isabella Street South, St. Jacobs, Ontario Page 3 The results of the soil analyses for Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PHCs), Polyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), and Metals indicated that all samples submitted for analysis met the applicable MOE O. Reg. 153/04 Table 4. The results of the groundwater analyses for PHCs indicated that all samples submitted for analysis met the applicable MOE O. Reg. 153/04 Table 4. Based on the findings of the soil and groundwater sampling program contamination was not identified on the property. No further investigation was recommended. As part of future redevelopment plans on the Site, an RSC is required. As a result, CVD prepared a Phase One ESA in September The findings and conclusions of the investigation were documented in the following report: Phase One Environmental Site Assessment, 16 Isabella Street South, St. Jacobs, Ontario dated September 12, Based on the information obtained and reviewed as part of the assessment, current and historical Potentially Contaminating Activities (PCAs) associated with the Phase One Property and within the Phase One Study Area were identified. Furthermore, Areas of Potential Environmental Concern (APECs) were determined from the identified PCAs as described in the following table: Area of Potential Environmental Concern (APEC) APEC 1 APEC 2 Location of APEC on Phase One Property Adjacent to the northwest corner of the residence Tract of raised land across the Phase One Property, SW NE orientation Potentially Contaminating Activity (PCA) PCA No. 28 Gasoline & Associated Products Stored in Fixed Tanks PCA No. 46 Rail Yards, Tracks and Spurs Location of PCA (on Site or off Site) On Site On Site Contaminants of Potential Environmental Concern BTEX & PHCs PAHs & Metals Media Potentially Impacted (groundwater, soil and/or sediment) Soil & Groundwater Soil & Groundwater Based on the information obtained as part of the Phase One ESA investigation, APECs were identified on the Phase One Property. As a result, a Record of Site Condition (RSC) could not be filed at the time and a Phase Two ESA investigation was recommended to further evaluate the environmental quality of the soil and groundwater on the Phase One Property. The main findings of the Phase One ESA are summarized as follows:

4 Polocorp Inc. January 17, 2018 Phase II ESA Summary File No.: E Isabella Street South, St. Jacobs, Ontario Page 4 According to available resources, the building was formerly heated by furnace oil. Furnace oil was reportedly stored in a UST that was removed by Aden Weber Excavating in the late 1970s to early 1980s. No records of the UST removal were available to CVD during the completion of the Phase One ESA. During the Site reconnaissance, CVD did not observe any evidence of former USTs or ASTs on the Phase One Property. A railway spur line was historically present on the Phase One Property, running in a southwestnortheast orientation through the property. During the Site reconnaissance, CVD observed a raised tract of land extending along the inferred location of the former spur line and it is anticipated that deleterious fill material (ballast) may be present along this location. A railway line owned by the Region of Waterloo and known as the Waterloo Spur is located adjacent to the west of the Phase One Property. According to available resources, the railway line was constructed in the late 1800s and has remained in operation since that time, through multiple ownerships. Based on observations made during the Site reconnaissance and inferred trans gradient location with respect to shallow groundwater flow, the railway line is not considered to be an environmental concern to the Phase One Property. The purpose of the Phase Two ESA was to investigate the soil and groundwater conditions on the property based on a previous CVD Phase One ESA in order to support the submission of a Record of Site Condition (RSC) to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC). Fieldwork CVD directed and supervised the advancement of six (6) boreholes (BH1 to BH6) using a Diedrich D Turbo, track mounted drill rig operated by Direct Environmental Drilling, Inc. of St. Thomas, Ontario. The boreholes were advanced to a maximum depth of meters below ground surface (mbgs). The borehole locations are provided on the attached Figure 1. The Phase Two ESA was completed using standard engineering and scientific judgement, principles and practices, and was conducted in general accordance with the amended Ontario Regulation 153/04. The boreholes were advanced in close proximity to the areas of concern identified in the CVD Phase One ESA. The drilling program was conducted on September 15 th, The work was overseen by a representative of CVD, and was conducted using standard field protocols. Prior to commencing the drilling activities, the locations of natural gas, sewer, water, telephone and electrical services were located and cleared by contacting Ontario One Call and a private utility locator (G Tel Engineering). CVD conducted the following scope of work: Six (6) boreholes (BH1 to BH6) were advanced on the Site to characterize the underlying soil and groundwater conditions. A monitoring well was installed in two (2) of the six (6) boreholes (BH1 and BH5) to assess the groundwater conditions.

5 Polocorp Inc. January 17, 2018 Phase II ESA Summary File No.: E Isabella Street South, St. Jacobs, Ontario Page 5 Selected soil samples were submitted for chemical analyses which included ph, benzene, toluene, ethylene and xylenes (BTEX), petroleum hydrocarbon fractions F1 to F4 (PHCs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and metals. An additional groundwater sample was collected from an existing Stragis monitoring well, (EMW1). Groundwater samples were submitted for chemical analyses, including BTEX, PHCs, PAHs and metals. A comprehensive groundwater elevation survey was completed on September 20 th, Soil samples were collected from each spilt spoon interval based on visual, olfactory and/or PID evidence of impact. Soil samples from the boreholes were logged for physical characteristics, as well as olfactory and visual evidence of contamination. In addition to visual and olfactory observations, soil samples recovered at regular intervals throughout the sampling activities were field screened for head space VOC concentrations using the MiniRAE 3000 PID to further direct the investigation. A maximum soil vapour reading of 160 ppm was identified in BH6 (BH6 5). Where soil samples were suspected of being impacted, five (5) grams of the soil was collected using a designated sampler and placed into a pre weighed laboratory supplied vial of methanol. As well, a portion of the soil sample was place directly into a laboratory supplied glass jar. The samples were either kept in a refrigerated environment or on ice until such time as they could be delivered to an accredited laboratory for chemical analysis. Soil samples were submitted to ALS Laboratory Group (CAEAL accredited laboratory) in Waterloo, Ontario, for chemical analyses. Groundwater sampling was conducted in accordance with the Ministry of the Environment & Climate Change (MOECC) document entitled Guidance on Sampling and Analytical Methods for Use at Contaminated Sites in Ontario dated December 1996 and the amended Ontario Regulation 153/04. New dedicated, Waterra tubing was installed in the CVD and Stragis monitoring wells to obtain groundwater samples. The monitoring wells were developed by purging more than three well volumes prior to sampling. The groundwater samples were placed in laboratory prepared containers and either refrigerated or stored in a cooler with ice from the time of sampling until delivery to the laboratory. A comprehensive groundwater elevation survey was completed on September 20 th, Groundwater was measured in the monitoring wells between 3.12 mbgs and 4.29 mbgs. Based on the groundwater elevations on September 20 th, 2017, the general shallow groundwater flow is in a northeasterly direction toward Conestogo River and a mill race directly adjacent to the north of the Site.

6 Polocorp Inc. January 17, 2018 Phase II ESA Summary File No.: E Isabella Street South, St. Jacobs, Ontario Page 6 Applicable Site Condition Standards The Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act dated April 15, 2011 established in accordance with the amended Ontario Regulation 153/04 was consulted in the assessment of the soil and groundwater on the property. The Village of St. Jacobs relies on groundwater as a source of potable water and the Site is located within 30 m of a waterbody (Conestogo River and mill race). Therefore, the analytical results were compared to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC) Table 8 Generic Site Condition Standards for Use within 30 m of a Water Body in a Potable Ground Water Condition. The current property use is residential and therefore, the soil and groundwater results were compared to the residential/parkland/institutional/industrial/commercial/community property use for a coarse textured soil (herein referred to as the applicable Table 8 standards ). A coarse textured soil definition for the Site was adopted to evaluate the soil and groundwater conditions at a higher standard than medium and fine textured soil. Analytical Results The analytical results of the soil samples selected for analysis from the boreholes located in the areas of potential contamination that were identified in the Phase One ESA, reported elevated concentrations of BTEX, petroleum hydrocarbon (PHC), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) and metals that were above the applicable Table 8 standards. BTEX and PHC concentrations were reported above the applicable Table 8 standards in BH1 (BH1 1) and BH6 (BH6 5). PAH concentrations were reported above the applicable Table 8 standards in BH1 (BH1 1), BH2 (BH2 1), BH3 (BH3 1), BH4 (BH4 1) and BH5 (BH5 1). Metals concentrations were reported above the applicable Table 8 standards in BH4 (BH4 1). A comparison of the soil chemistry results to the applicable table 8 standards is included in Appendix B. The analytical results of the groundwater samples selected for analysis from the monitoring wells located in the areas of potential contamination that were identified in the Phase One ESA, had no chemical parameters that exceeded the applicable Table 8 standards. A comparison of the groundwater chemistry results to the applicable table 8 standards is included in Appendix B. The certificates of chemical analysis showing all of the reported analytical results for the Site are enclosed in Appendix C.

7 Polocorp Inc. January 17, 2018 Phase II ESA Summary File No.: E Isabella Street South, St. Jacobs, Ontario Page 7 Conclusions Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) on the property located at 16 Isabella Street South in St. Jacobs, Ontario. The overall findings of the Phase Two ESA conclude the following: Six (6) boreholes (BH1 to BH6) were advanced on the Site to characterize the underlying soil and groundwater conditions. A monitoring well was installed in two (2) of the six (6) boreholes (BH1 and BH5) to assess the groundwater conditions. An additional groundwater sample was collected from an existing Stragis monitoring well, (EMW1). The analytical results of the soil samples selected for analysis from the boreholes located in the areas of potential contamination that were identified in the Phase One ESA, reported elevated concentrations of BTEX, petroleum hydrocarbon (PHC), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) and metals that were above the applicable Table 8 standards. The analytical results of the groundwater samples selected for analysis from the monitoring wells located in the areas of potential contamination that were identified in the Phase One ESA, had no chemical parameters that exceeded the applicable Table 8 standards. Based on the groundwater elevations on September 20th, 2017, the general shallow groundwater flow is in a northeasterly direction toward Conestogo River and a mill race directly adjacent to the north of the Site.

8 Polocorp Inc. January 17, 2018 Phase II ESA Summary File No.: E Isabella Street South, St. Jacobs, Ontario Page 8 Closing The American Society of Testing and Materials Standard of Practice notes that no environmental site assessment can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for recognized environmental conditions in connection with a property. Performance of a standardized environmental site assessment protocol is intended to reduce, but not eliminate, uncertainty regarding the potential for recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property, given reasonable limits of time and cost. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Polocorp Inc. for specific application to this project property. The environmental investigation was conducted in accordance with the verbal and written requests from the Client, and generally accepted assessment practices. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. We trust this summary meets your needs at this time. Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned if you have any questions or concerns. Respectfully, CHUNG & VANDER DOELEN ENGINEERING LTD. Jared Barclay, B.A. (Hons) Environmental Scientist

9 APPENDIX A BOREHOLE LOCATION PLAN

10 B H 5 B H 6/ EMW1 B H 4 B H 3 B H 2 B H 1 Isabella St. S. Albert St. Legend Site Boundary - Monitoring Well Location - Borehole Location - Stragis Monitoring Well Victoria Street North Kitchener / Ontario / N2H 5E PROPOSED BOREHOLE LOCATION PLAN 16 ISABELLA STREET SOUTH ST. JACOBS, ONTARIO Date: Jan., 2018 Scale: NTS File No.: E17484 Appendix: A

11 APPENDIX B COMPARISON OF CHEMISTRY RESULTS TO THE MOECC TABLE 8 STANDARDS

12 ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR SOIL MOECC Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, April 15, 2011 Table 8: Generic Site Condition Standards for Use within 30 m of a Water Body in a Potable Ground Water Condition Residential/Parkland/Institutional/Industrial/Commercial/Community Property Use (Coarse Textured Soil) E17484 BTEX Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PHCs) NOTES: Amended O.Reg. BH1 1 BH2 1 BH3 1 BH4 1 BH5 1 BH /04 Table 8 (0.0 m 0.61 m) (0.0 m 0.61 m) (0.0 m 0.61 m) (0.0 m 0.61 m) (0.0 m 0.61 m) (3.05 m 3.66 m) Benzene < Ethylbenzene <0.018 Toluene <0.080 Xylenes (Total) < F1 (C6 C10) F1 BTEX F2 (C10 C16) F2 Naphth 15 F3 (C16 C34) F3 PAH 327 F4 (C34 C) < F4G SG (GHH Silica) Units = mg/kg unless otherwise noted Concentrations above regulatory criteria BOLD & HIGHLIGHTED 1 of 1

13 ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR SOIL MOECC Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, April 15, 2011 Table 8: Generic Site Condition Standards for Use within 30 m of a Water Body in a Potable Ground Water Condition Residential/Parkland/Institutional/Industrial/Commercial/Community Property Use (Coarse Textured Soil) E17484 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) Amended O.Reg. BH1 1 BH2 1 BH3 1 BH4 1 BH5 1 BH /04 Table 8 (0.0 m 0.61 m) (0.0 m 0.61 m) (0.0 m 0.61 m) (0.0 m 0.61 m) (0.0 m 0.61 m) (3.05 m 3.66 m) Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzo(a)anthracene Benzo(a)pyrene Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Chrysene * Dibenzo(ah)anthracene 0.1 < < Fluoranthene * Fluorene Indeno(1,2,3 cd)pyrene Methylnaphthalenes Methylnaphthalene Methylnaphthalene Naphthalene Phenanthrene Pyrene Antimony (Sb) 1.3 < 1.1 < 1.5 < Arsenic (As) Barium (Ba) Beryllium (Be) Boron (B) Cadmium (Cd) Chromium (Cr) Cobalt (Co) Metals Copper (Cu) Lead (Pb) Molybdenum (Mo) 2 < Nickel (Ni) Selenium (Se) 1.5 < < < < < Silver (Ag) 0.5 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 Thallium (Tl) 1 Uranium (U) 2.5 < < < < < Vanadium (V) Zinc (Zn) ph NOTES: Units = mg/kg unless otherwise noted Concentrations above regulatory criteria BOLD & HIGHLIGHTED 1 of 1

14 ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR GROUNDWATER MOECC Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, April 15, 2011 Table 8: Generic Site Condition Standards for Use within 30 m of a Water Body in a Potable Ground Water Condition E17484 BTEX Amended BHD 1 Travel Field O. Reg. 153/04 EMW1 BH1 BH5 Duplicate Blank Blank (Table 8) (BH1) Benzene 5 Ethylbenzene 2.4 Toluene 22 Xylenes (Total) 300 Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PHCs) NOTES: F1 (C6 C10) 420 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 F1 BTEX 420 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 F2 (C10 C16) 1 <100 <100 <100 <100 F2 Naphth <100 <100 F3 (C16 C34) 0 <2 <2 <2 <2 F3 PAH <2 <2 F4 (C34 C) 0 <2 <2 <2 <2 Units = unless otherwise noted Concentrations above regulatory criteria BOLD & HIGHLIGHTED

15 E17484 ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR GROUNDWATER MOECC Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, April 15, 2011 Table 8: Generic Site Condition Standards for Use within 30 m of a Water Body in a Potable Ground Water Metals Amended O. Reg. 153/04 EMW1 BH1 BH5 (Table 8) Antimony (Sb) Dissolved 6 <0.10 <0.10 Arsenic (As) Dissolved Barium (Ba) Dissolved Beryllium (Be) Dissolved 4 <0.10 <0.10 Boron (B) Dissolved Cadmium (Cd) Dissolved 2.1 < Chromium (Cr) Dissolved Cobalt (Co) Dissolved Copper (Cu) Dissolved Lead (Pb) Dissolved 10 < < Molybdenum (Mo) Dissolved Nickel (Ni) Dissolved Selenium (Se) Dissolved 10 < 0.92 Silver (Ag) Dissolved 1.2 < < Sodium (Na) Dissolved Thallium (Tl) Dissolved <0.010 Uranium (U) Dissolved Vanadium (V) Dissolved 6.2 Zinc (Zn) Dissolved 890 < 1.3 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) NOTES: Acenaphthene 4.1 Acenaphthylene 1 Anthracene 1 Benzo(a)anthracene 1 Benzo(a)pyrene 0.01 <0.010 <0.010 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.1 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 0.2 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.1 Chrysene 0.1 Dibenzo(ah)anthracene 0.2 Fluoranthene 0.41 Fluorene 120 Indeno(1,2,3 cd)pyrene Methylnaphthalenes 3.2 <0.028 < Methylnaphthalene Methylnaphthalene 3.2 Naphthalene 11 < < Phenanthrene 1 Pyrene 4.1 Units = unless otherwise noted Concentrations above regulatory criteria BOLD & HIGHLIGHTED

16 APPENDIX D CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

17 CHUNG AND VANDER DOELEN ATTN: JARED BARCLAY 311 VICTORIA ST. N. KITCHENER ON N2H 5E1 Date Received: Report Date: Version: 19-SEP SEP-17 09:32 (MT) FINAL Client Phone: Certificate of Analysis Lab Work Order #: L Project P.O. #: E17484 Job Reference: ST. JACOBS RSC C of C Numbers: Legal Site Desc: Mary-Lynn Pike Client Services Supervisor [This report shall not be reproduced except in full without the written authority of the Laboratory.] ADDRESS: 60 Northland Road, Unit 1, Waterloo, ON N2V 2B8 Canada Phone: Fax: ALS CANADA LTD Part of the ALS Group An ALS Limited Company

18 ANALYTICAL GUIDELINE REPORT ST. JACOBS RSC Sample Details Grouping Analyte Result Qualifier D.L. Units Analyzed L BH 1-1 Sampled By: JB on 15-SEP-17 Matrix: SOIL L CONTD... Page 2 of SEP-17 09:32 (MT) Guideline Limits #1 #2 #3 Physical Tests Moisture Metals Antimony (Sb) Arsenic (As) Barium (Ba) Beryllium (Be) Boron (B) Cadmium (Cd) Chromium (Cr) Cobalt (Co) Copper (Cu) Lead (Pb) Molybdenum (Mo) Nickel (Ni) Selenium (Se) Silver (Ag) Thallium (Tl) Uranium (U) Vanadium (V) Zinc (Zn) Volatile Organic Compounds Benzene Ethylbenzene Toluene o-xylene m+p-xylenes Xylenes (Total) Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene Surrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene Hydrocarbons F1 (C6-C10) F1-BTEX F2 (C10-C16) F2-Naphth F3 (C16-C34) F3-PAH F4 (C34-C) F4G-SG (GHH-Silica) Total Hydrocarbons (C6-C) Chrom. to baseline at nc Surrogate: 2-Bromobenzotrifluoride Surrogate: 3,4-Dichlorotoluene Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene ** Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made. * Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guideline Limit listed on this report. Guideline Limits applied: Ontario Regulation 153/04 - April 15, 2011 Standards = [Suite] - T8-ALL-SOIL-CATEGORIES #1: T8-Soil-Agricultural or Other Property Use #2: T8-Soil-Res/Park/Inst/Ind/Com/Commu Property Use #3: T8-Sediment-All Types of Property Uses 9.46 < < 13.4 < <0.20 < NO No Unit * *120 *0.02 *0.02 *0.05 *0.05 *0.2 *0.2 *0.05 * *10 *10 *240 * *120 *120 * *0.093 *

19 ANALYTICAL GUIDELINE REPORT ST. JACOBS RSC Sample Details Grouping Analyte Result Qualifier D.L. Units Analyzed L CONTD... Page 3 of SEP-17 09:32 (MT) Guideline Limits L Sampled By: Matrix: BH 1-1 JB on 15-SEP-17 SOIL #1 #2 #3 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Benzo(a)anthracene Benzo(a)pyrene Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Chrysene Dibenzo(ah)anthracene Fluoranthene Fluorene Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1+2-Methylnaphthalenes 1-Methylnaphthalene 2-Methylnaphthalene Naphthalene Phenanthrene Pyrene Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl Surrogate: p-terphenyl d < * * * * *0.05 *0.59 *0.05 *0.59 *0.05 *0.59 *0.05 *0.09 *0.56 *0.69 * L Sampled By: Matrix: BH 2-1 JB on 15-SEP-17 SOIL #1 #2 #3 Physical Tests Moisture Metals Antimony (Sb) Arsenic (As) Barium (Ba) Beryllium (Be) Boron (B) Cadmium (Cd) Chromium (Cr) Cobalt (Co) Copper (Cu) Lead (Pb) Molybdenum (Mo) Nickel (Ni) Selenium (Se) Silver (Ag) Thallium (Tl) Uranium (U) Vanadium (V) Zinc (Zn) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Acenaphthene < <0.20 < *1 1.3 *11 18 * * * *120 *0.05 *0.072 ** Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made. * Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guideline Limit listed on this report. Guideline Limits applied: Ontario Regulation 153/04 - April 15, 2011 Standards = [Suite] - T8-ALL-SOIL-CATEGORIES #1: T8-Soil-Agricultural or Other Property Use #2: T8-Soil-Res/Park/Inst/Ind/Com/Commu Property Use #3: T8-Sediment-All Types of Property Uses

20 ANALYTICAL GUIDELINE REPORT ST. JACOBS RSC Sample Details Grouping Analyte Result Qualifier D.L. Units Analyzed L CONTD... Page 4 of SEP-17 09:32 (MT) Guideline Limits L Sampled By: Matrix: BH 2-1 JB on 15-SEP-17 SOIL #1 #2 #3 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzo(a)anthracene Benzo(a)pyrene Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Chrysene Dibenzo(ah)anthracene Fluoranthene Fluorene Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1+2-Methylnaphthalenes 1-Methylnaphthalene 2-Methylnaphthalene Naphthalene Phenanthrene Pyrene Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl Surrogate: p-terphenyl d DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC *0.093 *0.093 *0.22 *0.22 *0.22 *0.32 *0.36 *0.32 *0.078 *0.3 *0.37 *0.3 *0.47 *0.2 *0.68 *0.17 *0.24 *0.48 *0.24 *0.34 *2.8 *0.34 *0.1 *0.1 *0.06 *0.69 *0.69 *0.75 *0.19 *0.19 *0.19 *0.2 *0.23 *0.2 *0.05 *0.59 *0.05 *0.59 *0.05 *0.59 *0.05 *0.09 *0.56 *0.69 *0.56 *0.49 *1 *0.49 L Sampled By: Matrix: BH 3-1 JB on 15-SEP-17 SOIL #1 #2 #3 Physical Tests Moisture Metals Antimony (Sb) Arsenic (As) Barium (Ba) Beryllium (Be) Boron (B) Cadmium (Cd) Chromium (Cr) Cobalt (Co) Copper (Cu) Lead (Pb) Molybdenum (Mo) Nickel (Ni) Selenium (Se) Silver (Ag) Thallium (Tl) Uranium (U) Vanadium (V) Zinc (Zn) 11.4 < < <0.20 < * * * * ** Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made. * Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guideline Limit listed on this report. Guideline Limits applied: Ontario Regulation 153/04 - April 15, 2011 Standards = [Suite] - T8-ALL-SOIL-CATEGORIES #1: T8-Soil-Agricultural or Other Property Use #2: T8-Soil-Res/Park/Inst/Ind/Com/Commu Property Use #3: T8-Sediment-All Types of Property Uses

21 ANALYTICAL GUIDELINE REPORT ST. JACOBS RSC Sample Details Grouping Analyte Result Qualifier D.L. Units Analyzed L CONTD... Page 5 of SEP-17 09:32 (MT) Guideline Limits L Sampled By: Matrix: BH 3-1 JB on 15-SEP-17 SOIL #1 #2 #3 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzo(a)anthracene Benzo(a)pyrene Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Chrysene Dibenzo(ah)anthracene Fluoranthene Fluorene Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1+2-Methylnaphthalenes 1-Methylnaphthalene 2-Methylnaphthalene Naphthalene Phenanthrene Pyrene Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl Surrogate: p-terphenyl d * *0.093 *0.093 *0.22 *0.22 *0.22 *0.32 *0.36 *0.32 *0.078 *0.3 *0.37 *0.3 *0.47 *0.2 *0.68 *0.17 *0.24 *0.48 *0.24 * *0.34 *0.1 *0.1 *0.06 *0.69 *0.69 * *0.2 *0.23 *0.2 *0.05 *0.59 *0.05 *0.59 *0.05 *0.59 *0.05 *0.09 *0.56 *0.69 *0.56 *0.49 *1 *0.49 L Sampled By: Matrix: BH 4-1 JB on 15-SEP-17 SOIL #1 #2 #3 Physical Tests Moisture Metals Antimony (Sb) Arsenic (As) Barium (Ba) Beryllium (Be) Boron (B) Cadmium (Cd) Chromium (Cr) Cobalt (Co) Copper (Cu) Lead (Pb) Molybdenum (Mo) Nickel (Ni) Selenium (Se) Silver (Ag) Thallium (Tl) Uranium (U) Vanadium (V) < <0.20 < *1 * * * * * ** Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made. * Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guideline Limit listed on this report. Guideline Limits applied: Ontario Regulation 153/04 - April 15, 2011 Standards = [Suite] - T8-ALL-SOIL-CATEGORIES #1: T8-Soil-Agricultural or Other Property Use #2: T8-Soil-Res/Park/Inst/Ind/Com/Commu Property Use #3: T8-Sediment-All Types of Property Uses

22 ANALYTICAL GUIDELINE REPORT ST. JACOBS RSC Sample Details Grouping Analyte Result Qualifier D.L. Units Analyzed L CONTD... Page 6 of SEP-17 09:32 (MT) Guideline Limits L Sampled By: Matrix: BH 4-1 JB on 15-SEP-17 SOIL #1 #2 #3 Metals Zinc (Zn) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzo(a)anthracene Benzo(a)pyrene Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Chrysene Dibenzo(ah)anthracene Fluoranthene Fluorene Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1+2-Methylnaphthalenes 1-Methylnaphthalene 2-Methylnaphthalene Naphthalene Phenanthrene Pyrene Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl Surrogate: p-terphenyl d *290 *290 *120 * *0.093 * *0.32 *0.36 *0.32 *0.078 *0.3 *0.37 *0.3 *0.47 * *0.17 * *0.24 * *0.34 *0.1 *0.1 *0.06 *0.69 *0.69 * *0.2 *0.23 *0.2 *0.05 *0.59 *0.05 *0.59 *0.05 *0.59 *0.05 *0.09 *0.56 *0.69 *0.56 *0.49 *1 *0.49 L Sampled By: Matrix: BH 5-1 JB on 15-SEP-17 SOIL #1 #2 #3 Physical Tests Moisture ph Metals Antimony (Sb) Arsenic (As) Barium (Ba) Beryllium (Be) Boron (B) Cadmium (Cd) Chromium (Cr) Cobalt (Co) Copper (Cu) Lead (Pb) Molybdenum (Mo) Nickel (Ni) Selenium (Se) Silver (Ag) < < < ph units 23-SEP * *1 1.2 * * * * ** Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made. * Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guideline Limit listed on this report. Guideline Limits applied: Ontario Regulation 153/04 - April 15, 2011 Standards = [Suite] - T8-ALL-SOIL-CATEGORIES #1: T8-Soil-Agricultural or Other Property Use #2: T8-Soil-Res/Park/Inst/Ind/Com/Commu Property Use #3: T8-Sediment-All Types of Property Uses

23 ANALYTICAL GUIDELINE REPORT ST. JACOBS RSC Sample Details Grouping Analyte Result Qualifier D.L. Units Analyzed L CONTD... Page 7 of SEP-17 09:32 (MT) Guideline Limits L Sampled By: Matrix: BH 5-1 JB on 15-SEP-17 SOIL #1 #2 #3 Metals Thallium (Tl) Uranium (U) Vanadium (V) Zinc (Zn) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzo(a)anthracene Benzo(a)pyrene Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Chrysene Dibenzo(ah)anthracene Fluoranthene Fluorene Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1+2-Methylnaphthalenes 1-Methylnaphthalene 2-Methylnaphthalene Naphthalene Phenanthrene Pyrene Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl Surrogate: p-terphenyl d14 < < *120 *0.05 * * * * *0.05 *0.59 *0.05 *0.59 *0.05 *0.59 *0.05 *0.09 *0.56 *0.69 *0.56 * *0.49 L Sampled By: Matrix: BH 6-5 JB on 15-SEP-17 SOIL #1 #2 #3 Physical Tests Moisture ph Volatile Organic Compounds Benzene Ethylbenzene Toluene o-xylene m+p-xylenes Xylenes (Total) Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene Surrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene Hydrocarbons F1 (C6-C10) F1-BTEX F2 (C10-C16) ** Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made. * Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guideline Limit listed on this report. Guideline Limits applied: Ontario Regulation 153/04 - April 15, 2011 Standards = [Suite] - T8-ALL-SOIL-CATEGORIES #1: T8-Soil-Agricultural or Other Property Use #2: T8-Soil-Res/Park/Inst/Ind/Com/Commu Property Use #3: T8-Sediment-All Types of Property Uses < <0.018 <0.080 <0.036 <0.030 < DLVH ph units 23-SEP *17 *25 *17 *25

24 ANALYTICAL GUIDELINE REPORT ST. JACOBS RSC Sample Details Grouping Analyte Result Qualifier D.L. Units Analyzed L BH 6-5 Sampled By: JB on 15-SEP-17 Matrix: SOIL L CONTD... Page 8 of SEP-17 09:32 (MT) Guideline Limits #1 #2 #3 Hydrocarbons F3 (C16-C34) F4 (C34-C) Total Hydrocarbons (C6-C) Chrom. to baseline at nc Surrogate: 2-Bromobenzotrifluoride Surrogate: 3,4-Dichlorotoluene 772 < 1790 YES No Unit *10 *10 *240 * ** Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made. * Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guideline Limit listed on this report. Guideline Limits applied: Ontario Regulation 153/04 - April 15, 2011 Standards = [Suite] - T8-ALL-SOIL-CATEGORIES #1: T8-Soil-Agricultural or Other Property Use #2: T8-Soil-Res/Park/Inst/Ind/Com/Commu Property Use #3: T8-Sediment-All Types of Property Uses

25 ST. JACOBS RSC Reference Information L CONTD... Page 9 of SEP-17 09:32 (MT) Sample Parameter Qualifier key listed: Qualifier Description DLVH DLHC Detection Limit raised due to interference from Volatile Hydrocarbons on VOC method. Chromatographic elution of interfering peaks in the same region as test analytes prevents a determination of whether VOC analyte is present or absent (above/below regular detection limits). Detection Limit Raised: Dilution required due to high concentration of test analyte(s). Methods Listed (if applicable): ALS Test Code Matrix Test Description Method Reference*** BTX-511-HS-WT Soil BTEX-O.Reg 153/04 (July 2011) SW BTX is determined by extracting a soil or sediment sample as received with methanol, then analyzing by headspace-gc/ms. Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011). F1-F4-511-CALC-WT Soil F1-F4 Hydrocarbon Calculated CCME CWS-PHC, Pub #1310, Dec 2001-S Parameters Analytical methods used for analysis of CCME Petroleum Hydrocarbons have been validated and comply with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC. Hydrocarbon results are expressed on a dry weight basis. In cases where results for both F4 and F4G are reported, the greater of the two results must be used in any application of the CWS PHC guidelines and the gravimetric heavy hydrocarbons cannot be added to the C6 to C hydrocarbons. In samples where BTEX and F1 were analyzed, F1-BTEX represents a value where the sum of Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene and total Xylenes has been subtracted from F1. In samples where PAHs, F2 and F3 were analyzed, F2-Naphth represents the result where Naphthalene has been subtracted from F2. F3-PAH represents a result where the sum of Benzo(a)anthracene, Benzo(a)pyrene, Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene, Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene, Fluoranthene, Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene, Phenanthrene, and Pyrene has been subtracted from F3. Unless otherwise qualified, the following quality control criteria have been met for the F1 hydrocarbon range: 1. All extraction and analysis holding times were met. 2. Instrument performance showing response factors for C6 and C10 within 30 of the response factor for toluene. 3. Linearity of gasoline response within 15 throughout the calibration range. Unless otherwise qualified, the following quality control criteria have been met for the F2-F4 hydrocarbon ranges: 1. All extraction and analysis holding times were met. 2. Instrument performance showing C10, C16 and C34 response factors within 10 of their average. 3. Instrument performance showing the C response factor within 30 of the average of the C10, C16 and C34 response factors. 4. Linearity of diesel or motor oil response within 15 throughout the calibration range. F1-HS-511-WT Soil F1-O.Reg 153/04 (July 2011) E3398/CCME TIER 1-HS Fraction F1 is determined by extracting a soil or sediment sample as received with methanol, then analyzing by headspace-gc/fid. Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011), unless a subset of the Analytical Test Group (ATG) has been requested (the Protocol states that all analytes in an ATG must be reported). F2-F4-511-WT Soil F2-F4-O.Reg 153/04 (July 2011) MOE DECPH-E3398/CCME TIER 1 Petroleum Hydrocarbons (F2-F4 fractions) are extracted from soil with 1:1 hexane:acetone using a rotary extractor. Extracts are treated with silica gel to remove polar organic interferences. F2, F3, & F4 are analyzed by GC-FID. F4G-sg is analyzed gravimetrically. Notes: 1. F2 (C10-C16): Sum of all hydrocarbons that elute between nc10 and nc F3 (C16-C34): Sum of all hydrocarbons that elute between nc16 and nc F4 (C34-C): Sum of all hydrocarbons that elute between nc34 and nc. 4. F4G: Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons 5. F4G-sg: Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons (F4G) after silica gel treatment. 6. Where both F4 (C34-C) and F4G-sg are reported for a sample, the larger of the two values is used for comparison against the relevant CCME guideline for F4. 7. F4G-sg cannot be added to the C6 to C hydrocarbon results to obtain an estimate of total extractable hydrocarbons. 8. This method is validated for use. 9. Data from analysis of validation and quality control samples is available upon request. 10. Reported results are expressed as milligrams per dry kilogram, unless otherwise indicated. Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011), unless a subset of the Analytical Test Group (ATG) has been requested (the Protocol states that all analytes in an ATG must be reported).

26 ST. JACOBS RSC Reference Information L CONTD... Page 10 of SEP-17 09:32 (MT) F4G-ADD-511-WT Soil F4G SG-O.Reg 153/04 (July MOE DECPH-E3398/CCME TIER ) F4G, gravimetric analysis, is determined if the chromatogram does not return to baseline at or before C. A soil sample is extracted with a solvent mix, the solvent is evaporated and the weight of the residue is determined. Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011). MET CCMS-WT Soil Metals in Soil by CRC ICPMS EPA 200.2/6020A (mod) This method uses a heated strong acid digestion with HNO3 and HCl and is intended to liberate metals that may be environmentally available. Silicate minerals are not solubilized. Dependent on sample matrix, some metals may be only partially recovered, including Al, Ba, Be, Cr, Sr, Ti, Tl, V, W, and Zr. Volatile forms of sulfur (including sulfide) may not be captured, as they may be lost during sampling, storage, or digestion. Analysis is by Collision/Reaction Cell ICPMS. Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011), unless a subset of the Analytical Test Group (ATG) has been requested (the Protocol states that all analytes in an ATG must be reported). METHYLNAPS-CALC-WT Soil ABN-Calculated Parameters SW MOISTURE-WT PAH-511-WT Soil Soil Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011), unless a subset of the Analytical Test Group (ATG) has been requested (the Protocol states that all analytes in an ATG must be reported). PH-WT Soil ph MOEE E3137A Protection Act (July 1, 2011). XYLENES-SUM-CALC- Soil WT Moisture PAH-O.Reg 153/04 (July 2011) A representative sub-sample of soil is fortified with deuterium-labelled surrogates and a mechanical shaking techniqueis used to extract the sample with a mixture of methanol and toluene. The extracts are concentrated and analyzed by GC/MS. Depending on the analytical GC/MS column used benzo(j)fluoranthene may chromatographically co-elute with benzo(b)fluoranthene or benzo(k)fluoranthene. A minimum 10g portion of the sample is extracted with 20mL of 0.01M calcium chloride solution by shaking for at least 30 minutes. The aqueous layer is separated from the soil and then analyzed using a ph meter and electrode. Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Sum of Xylene Isomer Concentrations Gravimetric: Oven Dried SW /8270 CALCULATION Total xylenes represents the sum of o-xylene and m&p-xylene. *** ALS test methods may incorporate modifications from specified reference methods to improve performance. Chain of Custody numbers: The last two letters of the above test code(s) indicate the laboratory that performed analytical analysis for that test. Refer to the list below: Laboratory Definition Code Laboratory Location Laboratory Definition Code Laboratory Location WT ALS ENVIRONMENTAL - WATERLOO, ONTARIO, CANADA

27 ST. JACOBS RSC Reference Information L CONTD... Page 11 of SEP-17 09:32 (MT) GLOSSARY OF REPORT TERMS Surrogates are compounds that are similar in behaviour to target analyte(s), but that do not normally occur in environmental samples. For applicable tests, surrogates are added to samples prior to analysis as a check on recovery. In reports that display the D.L. column, laboratory objectives for surrogates are listed there. mg/kg - milligrams per kilogram based on dry weight of sample mg/kg wwt - milligrams per kilogram based on wet weight of sample mg/kg lwt - milligrams per kilogram based on lipid-adjusted weight mg/l - unit of concentration based on volume, parts per million. < - Less than. D.L. - The reporting limit. - Result not available. Refer to qualifier code and definition for explanation. Test results reported relate only to the samples as received by the laboratory. UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED, ALL SAMPLES WERE RECEIVED IN ACCEPTABLE CONDITION. Analytical results in unsigned test reports with the DRAFT watermark are subject to change, pending final QC review. Application of guidelines is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including, but not limited to fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement. ALS assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in the information.

28 Quality Control Report Workorder: L Report Date: 28-SEP-17 Page 1 of 8 Client: Contact: CHUNG AND VANDER DOELEN 311 VICTORIA ST. N. KITCHENER ON N2H 5E1 JARED BARCLAY Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed BTX-511-HS-WT Soil Batch R WG DUP Benzene WG < < Ethylbenzene <0.018 < m+p-xylenes <0.030 < o-xylene 40 Toluene <0.080 < WG Benzene LCS 93.7 Ethylbenzene 99.4 m+p-xylenes 99.4 o-xylene 99.3 Toluene 97.2 WG Benzene MB < Ethylbenzene < m+p-xylenes < o-xylene 0.02 Toluene < Surrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene WG Benzene MS WG Ethylbenzene 98.6 m+p-xylenes 98.3 o-xylene Toluene 98.3 F1-HS-511-WT Soil Batch R WG DUP F1 (C6-C10) WG <5.0 < WG F1 (C6-C10) LCS 93.3 WG F1 (C6-C10) MB <5.0 5 Surrogate: 3,4-Dichlorotoluene WG MS WG

29 Quality Control Report Workorder: L Report Date: 28-SEP-17 Page 2 of 8 Client: Contact: CHUNG AND VANDER DOELEN 311 VICTORIA ST. N. KITCHENER ON N2H 5E1 JARED BARCLAY Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed F1-HS-511-WT Soil Batch R WG MS F1 (C6-C10) WG F2-F4-511-WT Soil Batch R WG CRM F2 (C10-C16) ALS PHC2 IRM 94.6 F3 (C16-C34) 97.8 F4 (C34-C) 94.0 WG F2 (C10-C16) DUP WG <10 <10 30 F3 (C16-C34) < < 30 F4 (C34-C) < < 30 WG F2 (C10-C16) LCS F3 (C16-C34) 99.3 F4 (C34-C) 98.4 WG F2 (C10-C16) MB <10 10 F3 (C16-C34) < F4 (C34-C) < Surrogate: 2-Bromobenzotrifluoride 75.0 F4G-ADD-511-WT Soil Batch R WG LCS F4G-SG (GHH-Silica) 87.6 WG MB F4G-SG (GHH-Silica) <2 2 MET CCMS-WT Soil Batch R WG CRM Antimony (Sb) WT-CANMET-TILL Arsenic (As) Barium (Ba) 96.6 Beryllium (Be) Boron (B) 2.9 mg/kg 0-8.2

30 Quality Control Report Workorder: L Report Date: 28-SEP-17 Page 3 of 8 Client: Contact: CHUNG AND VANDER DOELEN 311 VICTORIA ST. N. KITCHENER ON N2H 5E1 JARED BARCLAY Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed MET CCMS-WT Soil Batch R WG CRM Cadmium (Cd) WT-CANMET-TILL Chromium (Cr) Cobalt (Co) Copper (Cu) Lead (Pb) Molybdenum (Mo) 99.9 Nickel (Ni) Selenium (Se) 0.30 mg/kg Silver (Ag) 0.24 mg/kg Thallium (Tl) mg/kg Uranium (U) Vanadium (V) Zinc (Zn) WG Zinc (Zn) DUP WG WG Antimony (Sb) LCS 97.0 Arsenic (As) 95.8 Barium (Ba) 97.2 Beryllium (Be) 91.8 Boron (B) 85.8 Cadmium (Cd) 95.4 Chromium (Cr) 91.5 Cobalt (Co) 92.4 Copper (Cu) 89.3 Lead (Pb) 93.2 Molybdenum (Mo) 93.8 Nickel (Ni) 90.7 Selenium (Se) 91.6 Silver (Ag) 97.6 Thallium (Tl) 92.0 Uranium (U) 98.4 Vanadium (V) 95.3 Zinc (Zn) 87.6

31 Quality Control Report Workorder: L Report Date: 28-SEP-17 Page 4 of 8 Client: Contact: CHUNG AND VANDER DOELEN 311 VICTORIA ST. N. KITCHENER ON N2H 5E1 JARED BARCLAY Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed MET CCMS-WT Soil Batch R WG MB Antimony (Sb) <0.10 mg/kg 0.1 Arsenic (As) <0.10 mg/kg 0.1 Barium (Ba) mg/kg 0.5 Beryllium (Be) <0.10 mg/kg 0.1 Boron (B) <5.0 mg/kg 5 Cadmium (Cd) mg/kg 0.02 Chromium (Cr) mg/kg 0.5 Cobalt (Co) <0.10 mg/kg 0.1 Copper (Cu) mg/kg 0.5 Lead (Pb) mg/kg 0.5 Molybdenum (Mo) <0.10 mg/kg 0.1 Nickel (Ni) mg/kg 0.5 Selenium (Se) <0.20 mg/kg 0.2 Silver (Ag) <0.10 mg/kg 0.1 Thallium (Tl) < mg/kg 0.05 Uranium (U) < mg/kg 0.05 Vanadium (V) <0.20 mg/kg 0.2 Zinc (Zn) <2.0 mg/kg 2 MOISTURE-WT Soil Batch R WG DUP Moisture L WG Moisture LCS WG Moisture MB < Batch R WG DUP Moisture L WG Moisture LCS WG Moisture MB < PAH-511-WT Soil

32 Quality Control Report Workorder: L Report Date: 28-SEP-17 Page 5 of 8 Client: Contact: CHUNG AND VANDER DOELEN 311 VICTORIA ST. N. KITCHENER ON N2H 5E1 JARED BARCLAY Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed PAH-511-WT Soil Batch R WG DUP 1-Methylnaphthalene WG <0.030 < Methylnaphthalene <0.030 < Acenaphthene < < 40 Acenaphthylene < < 40 Anthracene < < 40 Benzo(a)anthracene < < 40 Benzo(a)pyrene < < 40 Benzo(b)fluoranthene < < 40 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene < < 40 Benzo(k)fluoranthene < < 40 Chrysene < < 40 Dibenzo(ah)anthracene < < 40 Fluoranthene < < 40 Fluorene < < 40 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene < < 40 Naphthalene < < 40 Phenanthrene < < 40 Pyrene < < 40 WG LCS 1-Methylnaphthalene Methylnaphthalene 84.2 Acenaphthene 84.4 Acenaphthylene 82.7 Anthracene 87.0 Benzo(a)anthracene 86.4 Benzo(a)pyrene 88.3 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 90.6 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 83.0 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 89.5 Chrysene 94.7 Dibenzo(ah)anthracene 86.7 Fluoranthene 83.8 Fluorene 85.6

33 Quality Control Report Workorder: L Report Date: 28-SEP-17 Page 6 of 8 Client: Contact: CHUNG AND VANDER DOELEN 311 VICTORIA ST. N. KITCHENER ON N2H 5E1 JARED BARCLAY Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed PAH-511-WT Soil Batch R WG LCS Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 84.3 Naphthalene 85.6 Phenanthrene 84.3 Pyrene 86.8 WG MB 1-Methylnaphthalene < Methylnaphthalene < Acenaphthene < 0.05 Acenaphthylene < 0.05 Anthracene < 0.05 Benzo(a)anthracene < 0.05 Benzo(a)pyrene < 0.05 Benzo(b)fluoranthene < 0.05 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene < 0.05 Benzo(k)fluoranthene < 0.05 Chrysene < 0.05 Dibenzo(ah)anthracene < 0.05 Fluoranthene < 0.05 Fluorene < 0.05 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene < 0.05 Naphthalene < 0.05 Phenanthrene < 0.05 Pyrene < 0.05 Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 91.8 Surrogate: p-terphenyl d WG MS 1-Methylnaphthalene WG Methylnaphthalene 84.9 Acenaphthene 85.7 Acenaphthylene 83.8 Anthracene 83.9 Benzo(a)anthracene 89.5 Benzo(a)pyrene 90.6 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 91.1

34 Quality Control Report Workorder: L Report Date: 28-SEP-17 Page 7 of 8 Client: Contact: CHUNG AND VANDER DOELEN 311 VICTORIA ST. N. KITCHENER ON N2H 5E1 JARED BARCLAY Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed PAH-511-WT Soil Batch R WG MS Benzo(g,h,i)perylene WG Benzo(k)fluoranthene 90.4 Chrysene 94.6 Dibenzo(ah)anthracene 87.6 Fluoranthene 87.2 Fluorene 86.9 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 82.0 Naphthalene 84.8 Phenanthrene 85.2 Pyrene 89.5 PH-WT Soil Batch R WG DUP ph L J ph units SEP-17 WG ph LCS 6.99 ph units SEP-17

35 Workorder: L Quality Control Report Report Date: 28-SEP-17 Client: Contact: CHUNG AND VANDER DOELEN 311 VICTORIA ST. N. KITCHENER ON N2H 5E1 JARED BARCLAY Page 8 of 8 Legend: Limit ALS Control Limit (Data Quality Objectives) DUP Duplicate RPD Relative Percent Difference Not Available LCS Laboratory Control Sample SRM Standard Reference Material MS Matrix Spike MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate ADE Average Desorption Efficiency MB Method Blank IRM Internal Reference Material CRM Certified Reference Material CCV Continuing Calibration Verification CVS Calibration Verification Standard LCSD Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate Sample Parameter Qualifier Definitions: Qualifier Description J Duplicate results and limits are expressed in terms of absolute difference. Relative Percent Difference Not Available due to result(s) being less than detection limit. Hold Time Exceedances: All test results reported with this submission were conducted within ALS recommended hold times. ALS recommended hold times may vary by province. They are assigned to meet known provincial and/or federal government requirements. In the absence of regulatory hold times, ALS establishes recommendations based on guidelines published by the US EPA, APHA Standard Methods, or Environment Canada (where available). For more information, please contact ALS. The ALS Quality Control Report is provided to ALS clients upon request. ALS includes comprehensive QC checks with every analysis to ensure our high standards of quality are met. Each QC result has a known or expected target value, which is compared against predetermined data quality objectives to provide confidence in the accuracy of associated test results. Please note that this report may contain QC results from anonymous Sample Duplicates and Matrix Spikes that do not originate from this Work Order.

36 ALS Sample ID: L Client Sample ID: BH Response - MilliVolts Time - Minutes Printed on 9/27/2017 4:23:23 PM

37 ALS Sample ID: L Client Sample ID: BH Response - MilliVolts Time - Minutes Printed on 9/27/2017 4:23:19 PM

38

39 CHUNG AND VANDER DOELEN ATTN: JARED BARCLAY 311 VICTORIA ST. N. KITCHENER ON N2H 5E1 Date Received: Report Date: Version: 21-SEP-17 12:42 (MT) FINAL REV. 2 Client Phone: Certificate of Analysis Lab Work Order #: L Project P.O. #: E17484 Job Reference: ST JACOBS RSC C of C Numbers: Legal Site Desc: Mary-Lynn Pike Client Services Supervisor [This report shall not be reproduced except in full without the written authority of the Laboratory.] ADDRESS: 60 Northland Road, Unit 1, Waterloo, ON N2V 2B8 Canada Phone: Fax: ALS CANADA LTD Part of the ALS Group An ALS Limited Company

40 ANALYTICAL GUIDELINE REPORT ST JACOBS RSC Sample Details Grouping Analyte Result Qualifier D.L. Units Analyzed L CONTD... Page 2 of 8 12:42 (MT) Guideline Limits L Sampled By: Matrix: EMW1 J.BARCLAY on 21-SEP-17 WATER #1 Volatile Organic Compounds Benzene Ethylbenzene Toluene o-xylene m+p-xylenes Xylenes (Total) Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene Surrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene Hydrocarbons F1 (C6-C10) F1-BTEX F2 (C10-C16) F3 (C16-C34) F4 (C34-C) Total Hydrocarbons (C6-C) Chrom. to baseline at nc Surrogate: 2-Bromobenzotrifluoride Surrogate: 3,4-Dichlorotoluene <0.30 < <25 <25 <100 <2 <2 <370 YES No Unit L Sampled By: Matrix: BH1 J.BARCLAY on 20-SEP-17 WATER #1 Dissolved Metals Dissolved Metals Filtration Location Antimony (Sb)-Dissolved Arsenic (As)-Dissolved Barium (Ba)-Dissolved Beryllium (Be)-Dissolved Boron (B)-Dissolved Cadmium (Cd)-Dissolved Chromium (Cr)-Dissolved Cobalt (Co)-Dissolved Copper (Cu)-Dissolved Lead (Pb)-Dissolved Molybdenum (Mo)-Dissolved Nickel (Ni)-Dissolved Selenium (Se)-Dissolved Silver (Ag)-Dissolved Sodium (Na)-Dissolved Thallium (Tl)-Dissolved Uranium (U)-Dissolved Vanadium (V)-Dissolved Zinc (Zn)-Dissolved Volatile Organic Compounds Benzene Ethylbenzene ** Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made. * Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guideline Limit listed on this report. Guideline Limits applied: T8-Ground Water - All Types of Property Use #1: T8-Ground Water - All Types of Property Use FIELD < < < < < < < No Unit

41 ANALYTICAL GUIDELINE REPORT ST JACOBS RSC Sample Details Grouping Analyte Result Qualifier D.L. Units Analyzed L CONTD... Page 3 of 8 12:42 (MT) Guideline Limits L Sampled By: Matrix: BH1 J.BARCLAY on 20-SEP-17 WATER #1 Volatile Organic Compounds Toluene o-xylene m+p-xylenes Xylenes (Total) Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene Surrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene Hydrocarbons F1 (C6-C10) F1-BTEX F2 (C10-C16) F2-Naphth F3 (C16-C34) F3-PAH F4 (C34-C) Total Hydrocarbons (C6-C) Chrom. to baseline at nc Surrogate: 2-Bromobenzotrifluoride Surrogate: 3,4-Dichlorotoluene Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzo(a)anthracene Benzo(a)pyrene Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Chrysene Dibenzo(ah)anthracene Fluoranthene Fluorene Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1+2-Methylnaphthalenes 1-Methylnaphthalene 2-Methylnaphthalene Naphthalene Phenanthrene Pyrene Surrogate: d10-acenaphthene Surrogate: d12-chrysene Surrogate: d8-naphthalene Surrogate: d10-phenanthrene <0.30 < <25 <25 <100 <100 <2 <2 <2 <370 YES <0.010 <0.028 < No Unit L Sampled By: Matrix: BH5 J.BARCLAY on 20-SEP-17 WATER #1 ** Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made. * Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guideline Limit listed on this report. Guideline Limits applied: T8-Ground Water - All Types of Property Use #1: T8-Ground Water - All Types of Property Use

42 ANALYTICAL GUIDELINE REPORT ST JACOBS RSC Sample Details Grouping Analyte Result Qualifier D.L. Units Analyzed L CONTD... Page 4 of 8 12:42 (MT) Guideline Limits L BH5 Sampled By: Matrix: Dissolved Metals J.BARCLAY on 20-SEP-17 WATER Dissolved Metals Filtration Location Antimony (Sb)-Dissolved Arsenic (As)-Dissolved Barium (Ba)-Dissolved Beryllium (Be)-Dissolved Boron (B)-Dissolved Cadmium (Cd)-Dissolved Chromium (Cr)-Dissolved Cobalt (Co)-Dissolved Copper (Cu)-Dissolved Lead (Pb)-Dissolved Molybdenum (Mo)-Dissolved Nickel (Ni)-Dissolved Selenium (Se)-Dissolved Silver (Ag)-Dissolved Sodium (Na)-Dissolved Thallium (Tl)-Dissolved Uranium (U)-Dissolved Vanadium (V)-Dissolved Zinc (Zn)-Dissolved Volatile Organic Compounds Benzene Ethylbenzene Toluene o-xylene m+p-xylenes Xylenes (Total) Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene Surrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene Hydrocarbons F1 (C6-C10) F1-BTEX F2 (C10-C16) F2-Naphth F3 (C16-C34) F3-PAH F4 (C34-C) Total Hydrocarbons (C6-C) Chrom. to baseline at nc Surrogate: 2-Bromobenzotrifluoride Surrogate: 3,4-Dichlorotoluene Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzo(a)anthracene ** Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made. * Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guideline Limit listed on this report. Guideline Limits applied: T8-Ground Water - All Types of Property Use #1: T8-Ground Water - All Types of Property Use FIELD < < < < 6990 < <0.30 < <25 <25 <100 <100 <2 <2 <2 <370 YES No Unit No Unit #

43 ANALYTICAL GUIDELINE REPORT ST JACOBS RSC Sample Details Grouping Analyte Result Qualifier D.L. Units Analyzed L CONTD... Page 5 of 8 12:42 (MT) Guideline Limits L Sampled By: Matrix: BH5 J.BARCLAY on 20-SEP-17 WATER #1 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Benzo(a)pyrene Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Chrysene Dibenzo(ah)anthracene Fluoranthene Fluorene Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1+2-Methylnaphthalenes 1-Methylnaphthalene 2-Methylnaphthalene Naphthalene Phenanthrene Pyrene Surrogate: d10-acenaphthene Surrogate: d12-chrysene Surrogate: d8-naphthalene Surrogate: d10-phenanthrene <0.010 <0.028 < L Sampled By: Matrix: BHD-1 J.BARCLAY on 20-SEP-17 WATER #1 Volatile Organic Compounds Benzene Ethylbenzene Toluene o-xylene m+p-xylenes Xylenes (Total) Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene Surrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene Hydrocarbons F1 (C6-C10) F1-BTEX F2 (C10-C16) F3 (C16-C34) F4 (C34-C) Total Hydrocarbons (C6-C) Chrom. to baseline at nc Surrogate: 2-Bromobenzotrifluoride Surrogate: 3,4-Dichlorotoluene <0.30 < <25 <25 <100 <2 <2 <370 YES No Unit L Sampled By: Matrix: TRAVEL BLANK J.BARCLAY on 20-SEP-17 WATER #1 ** Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made. * Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guideline Limit listed on this report. Guideline Limits applied: T8-Ground Water - All Types of Property Use #1: T8-Ground Water - All Types of Property Use

44 ANALYTICAL GUIDELINE REPORT ST JACOBS RSC Sample Details Grouping Analyte Result Qualifier D.L. Units Analyzed L CONTD... Page 6 of 8 12:42 (MT) Guideline Limits L Sampled By: Matrix: TRAVEL BLANK J.BARCLAY on 20-SEP-17 WATER #1 Volatile Organic Compounds Benzene Ethylbenzene Toluene o-xylene m+p-xylenes Xylenes (Total) Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene Surrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene Hydrocarbons F1 (C6-C10) F1-BTEX Surrogate: 3,4-Dichlorotoluene <0.30 < <25 < L Sampled By: Matrix: FIELD BLANK J.BARCLAY on 20-SEP-17 WATER #1 Volatile Organic Compounds Benzene Ethylbenzene Toluene o-xylene m+p-xylenes Xylenes (Total) Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene Surrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene Hydrocarbons F1 (C6-C10) F1-BTEX Surrogate: 3,4-Dichlorotoluene <0.30 < <25 < ** Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made. * Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guideline Limit listed on this report. Guideline Limits applied: T8-Ground Water - All Types of Property Use #1: T8-Ground Water - All Types of Property Use

45 ST JACOBS RSC Reference Information L CONTD... Page 7 of 8 12:42 (MT) Methods Listed (if applicable): ALS Test Code Matrix Test Description Method Reference*** BTX-511-HS-WT Water BTEX by Headspace SW (511) BTX is determined by analyzing by headspace-gc/ms. F1-F4-511-CALC-WT Water F1-F4 Hydrocarbon Calculated Parameters CCME CWS-PHC, Pub #1310, Dec 2001-L Analytical methods used for analysis of CCME Petroleum Hydrocarbons have been validated and comply with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC. In cases where results for both F4 and F4G are reported, the greater of the two results must be used in any application of the CWS PHC guidelines and the gravimetric heavy hydrocarbons cannot be added to the C6 to C hydrocarbons. In samples where BTEX and F1 were analyzed, F1-BTEX represents a value where the sum of Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene and total Xylenes has been subtracted from F1. In samples where PAHs, F2 and F3 were analyzed, F2-Naphth represents the result where Naphthalene has been subtracted from F2. F3-PAH represents a result where the sum of Benzo(a)anthracene, Benzo(a)pyrene, Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene, Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene, Fluoranthene, Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene, Phenanthrene, and Pyrene has been subtracted from F3. Unless otherwise qualified, the following quality control criteria have been met for the F1 hydrocarbon range: 1. All extraction and analysis holding times were met. 2. Instrument performance showing response factors for C6 and C10 within 30 of the response factor for toluene. 3. Linearity of gasoline response within 15 throughout the calibration range. Unless otherwise qualified, the following quality control criteria have been met for the F2-F4 hydrocarbon ranges: 1. All extraction and analysis holding times were met. 2. Instrument performance showing C10, C16 and C34 response factors within 10 of their average. 3. Instrument performance showing the C response factor within 30 of the average of the C10, C16 and C34 response factors. 4. Linearity of diesel or motor oil response within 15 throughout the calibration range. F1-HS-511-WT Water F1-O.Reg 153/04 (July 2011) E3398/CCME TIER 1-HS Fraction F1 is determined by analyzing by headspace-gc/fid. Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011), unless a subset of the Analytical Test Group (ATG) has been requested (the Protocol states that all analytes in an ATG must be reported). F2-F4-511-WT Water F2-F4-O.Reg 153/04 (July 2011) MOE DECPH-E3398/CCME TIER 1 Petroleum Hydrocarbons (F2-F4 fractions) are extracted from water using a hexane micro-extraction technique. Instrumental analysis is by GC-FID, as per the Reference Method for the Canada-Wide Standard for Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil Tier 1 Method, CCME, Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011), unless a subset of the Analytical Test Group (ATG) has been requested (the Protocol states that all analytes in an ATG must be reported). MET-D-UG/L-MS-WT Water Diss. Metals in Water by ICPMS EPA () The metal constituents of a non-acidified sample that pass through a membrane filter prior to ICP/MS analysis. Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011), unless a subset of the Analytical Test Group (ATG) has been requested (the Protocol states that all analytes in an ATG must be reported). METHYLNAPS-CALC-WT Water PAH-Calculated Parameters SW PAH-511-WT must be reported). XYLENES-SUM-CALC- WT Water PAH-O. Reg 153/04 (July 2011) Aqueous samples, fortified with surrogates, are extracted using liquid/liquid extraction technique. The sample extracts are concentrated and then analyzed using GC/MS. Depending on the analytical GC/MS column used benzo(j)fluoranthene may chromatographically co-elute with benzo(b)fluoranthene or benzo(k)fluoranthene. Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011), unless a subset of the Analytical Test Group (ATG) has been requested (the Protocol states that all analytes in an ATG Water Sum of Xylene Isomer Concentrations SW /8270 CALCULATION Total xylenes represents the sum of o-xylene and m&p-xylene. *** ALS test methods may incorporate modifications from specified reference methods to improve performance. Chain of Custody numbers:

46 ST JACOBS RSC Reference Information L CONTD... Page 8 of 8 12:42 (MT) The last two letters of the above test code(s) indicate the laboratory that performed analytical analysis for that test. Refer to the list below: Laboratory Definition Code Laboratory Location Laboratory Definition Code Laboratory Location WT ALS ENVIRONMENTAL - WATERLOO, ONTARIO, CANADA GLOSSARY OF REPORT TERMS Surrogates are compounds that are similar in behaviour to target analyte(s), but that do not normally occur in environmental samples. For applicable tests, surrogates are added to samples prior to analysis as a check on recovery. In reports that display the D.L. column, laboratory objectives for surrogates are listed there. mg/kg - milligrams per kilogram based on dry weight of sample mg/kg wwt - milligrams per kilogram based on wet weight of sample mg/kg lwt - milligrams per kilogram based on lipid-adjusted weight mg/l - unit of concentration based on volume, parts per million. < - Less than. D.L. - The reporting limit. - Result not available. Refer to qualifier code and definition for explanation. Test results reported relate only to the samples as received by the laboratory. UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED, ALL SAMPLES WERE RECEIVED IN ACCEPTABLE CONDITION. Analytical results in unsigned test reports with the DRAFT watermark are subject to change, pending final QC review. Application of guidelines is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including, but not limited to fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement. ALS assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in the information.

47 Quality Control Report Workorder: L Report Date: Page 1 of 8 Client: Contact: CHUNG AND VANDER DOELEN 311 VICTORIA ST. N. KITCHENER ON N2H 5E1 JARED BARCLAY Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed BTX-511-HS-WT Water Batch R WG DUP Benzene WG Ethylbenzene 30 m+p-xylenes <0.40 < o-xylene <0.30 < Toluene 30 WG Benzene LCS SEP-17 Ethylbenzene SEP-17 m+p-xylenes SEP-17 o-xylene SEP-17 Toluene SEP-17 WG Benzene MB 0.5 Ethylbenzene 0.5 m+p-xylenes < o-xylene < Toluene 0.5 Surrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene 99.6 Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 98.8 WG Benzene MS WG Ethylbenzene m+p-xylenes o-xylene Toluene Batch R WG DUP Benzene WG Ethylbenzene 30 m+p-xylenes <0.40 < o-xylene <0.30 < Toluene 30 WG Benzene LCS 103.8

48 Quality Control Report Workorder: L Report Date: Page 2 of 8 Client: Contact: CHUNG AND VANDER DOELEN 311 VICTORIA ST. N. KITCHENER ON N2H 5E1 JARED BARCLAY Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed BTX-511-HS-WT Water Batch R WG LCS Ethylbenzene m+p-xylenes o-xylene Toluene WG Benzene MB 0.5 Ethylbenzene 0.5 m+p-xylenes < o-xylene < Toluene 0.5 Surrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene WG Benzene MS WG Ethylbenzene 96.1 m+p-xylenes o-xylene Toluene F1-HS-511-WT Water Batch R WG DUP F1 (C6-C10) WG <25 <25 30 WG F1 (C6-C10) LCS SEP-17 WG F1 (C6-C10) MB <25 25 Surrogate: 3,4-Dichlorotoluene WG F1 (C6-C10) MS WG Batch R WG DUP F1 (C6-C10) WG <25 <25 30 WG F1 (C6-C10) LCS 94.5 WG MB

49 Quality Control Report Workorder: L Report Date: Page 3 of 8 Client: Contact: CHUNG AND VANDER DOELEN 311 VICTORIA ST. N. KITCHENER ON N2H 5E1 JARED BARCLAY Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed F1-HS-511-WT Water Batch R WG MB F1 (C6-C10) <25 25 Surrogate: 3,4-Dichlorotoluene WG F1 (C6-C10) MS WG F2-F4-511-WT Water Batch R WG LCS F2 (C10-C16) F3 (C16-C34) F4 (C34-C) WG F2 (C10-C16) LCSD WG F3 (C16-C34) F4 (C34-C) WG F2 (C10-C16) MB < F3 (C16-C34) <2 2 F4 (C34-C) <2 2 Surrogate: 2-Bromobenzotrifluoride 92.4 MET-D-UG/L-MS-WT Water Batch R WG DUP Antimony (Sb)-Dissolved WG Arsenic (As)-Dissolved Barium (Ba)-Dissolved Beryllium (Be)-Dissolved <0.10 < Boron (B)-Dissolved Cadmium (Cd)-Dissolved Chromium (Cr)-Dissolved 20 Cobalt (Co)-Dissolved Copper (Cu)-Dissolved Lead (Pb)-Dissolved < < 20 Molybdenum (Mo)-Dissolved Nickel (Ni)-Dissolved

50 Quality Control Report Workorder: L Report Date: Page 4 of 8 Client: Contact: CHUNG AND VANDER DOELEN 311 VICTORIA ST. N. KITCHENER ON N2H 5E1 JARED BARCLAY Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed MET-D-UG/L-MS-WT Water Batch R WG DUP Selenium (Se)-Dissolved WG Silver (Ag)-Dissolved < < 20 Sodium (Na)-Dissolved Thallium (Tl)-Dissolved J Uranium (U)-Dissolved Vanadium (V)-Dissolved 20 Zinc (Zn)-Dissolved 1.9 < 20 WG LCS Antimony (Sb)-Dissolved Arsenic (As)-Dissolved Barium (Ba)-Dissolved Beryllium (Be)-Dissolved 97.8 Boron (B)-Dissolved 97.0 Cadmium (Cd)-Dissolved 98.0 Chromium (Cr)-Dissolved 97.3 Cobalt (Co)-Dissolved 96.3 Copper (Cu)-Dissolved 94.3 Lead (Pb)-Dissolved Molybdenum (Mo)-Dissolved 99.9 Nickel (Ni)-Dissolved 95.6 Selenium (Se)-Dissolved 93.4 Silver (Ag)-Dissolved Sodium (Na)-Dissolved 89.2 Thallium (Tl)-Dissolved 97.1 Uranium (U)-Dissolved 98.2 Vanadium (V)-Dissolved 99.4 Zinc (Zn)-Dissolved 91.5 WG MB Antimony (Sb)-Dissolved < Arsenic (As)-Dissolved < Barium (Ba)-Dissolved < Beryllium (Be)-Dissolved < Boron (B)-Dissolved <10 10 Cadmium (Cd)-Dissolved <

51 Quality Control Report Workorder: L Report Date: Page 5 of 8 Client: Contact: CHUNG AND VANDER DOELEN 311 VICTORIA ST. N. KITCHENER ON N2H 5E1 JARED BARCLAY Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed MET-D-UG/L-MS-WT Water Batch R WG MB Chromium (Cr)-Dissolved 0.5 Cobalt (Co)-Dissolved < Copper (Cu)-Dissolved < Lead (Pb)-Dissolved < 0.05 Molybdenum (Mo)-Dissolved < 0.05 Nickel (Ni)-Dissolved 0.5 Selenium (Se)-Dissolved < 0.05 Silver (Ag)-Dissolved < 0.05 Sodium (Na)-Dissolved <0 0 Thallium (Tl)-Dissolved < Uranium (U)-Dissolved < Vanadium (V)-Dissolved 0.5 Zinc (Zn)-Dissolved < 1 WG MS Antimony (Sb)-Dissolved WG Arsenic (As)-Dissolved Barium (Ba)-Dissolved MS-B - Beryllium (Be)-Dissolved 96.5 Boron (B)-Dissolved 85.4 Cadmium (Cd)-Dissolved 98.9 Chromium (Cr)-Dissolved 95.4 Cobalt (Co)-Dissolved 92.6 Copper (Cu)-Dissolved 87.9 Lead (Pb)-Dissolved 97.3 Molybdenum (Mo)-Dissolved 96.5 Nickel (Ni)-Dissolved 90.4 Selenium (Se)-Dissolved Silver (Ag)-Dissolved Sodium (Na)-Dissolved MS-B - Thallium (Tl)-Dissolved 93.5 Uranium (U)-Dissolved MS-B - Vanadium (V)-Dissolved 98.4 Zinc (Zn)-Dissolved 88.2 PAH-511-WT Water

52 Quality Control Report Workorder: L Report Date: Page 6 of 8 Client: Contact: CHUNG AND VANDER DOELEN 311 VICTORIA ST. N. KITCHENER ON N2H 5E1 JARED BARCLAY Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed PAH-511-WT Water Batch R WG LCS 1-Methylnaphthalene Methylnaphthalene 81.4 Acenaphthene 81.8 Acenaphthylene 88.3 Anthracene 99.8 Benzo(a)anthracene Benzo(a)pyrene Benzo(b)fluoranthene 80.4 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 92.8 Benzo(k)fluoranthene Chrysene 93.7 Dibenzo(ah)anthracene 93.3 Fluoranthene 94.2 Fluorene 95.3 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 99.9 Naphthalene 94.6 Phenanthrene 96.4 Pyrene 95.2 WG LCSD 1-Methylnaphthalene WG Methylnaphthalene Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzo(a)anthracene Benzo(a)pyrene Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Chrysene Dibenzo(ah)anthracene Fluoranthene Fluorene

53 Quality Control Report Workorder: L Report Date: Page 7 of 8 Client: Contact: CHUNG AND VANDER DOELEN 311 VICTORIA ST. N. KITCHENER ON N2H 5E1 JARED BARCLAY Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed PAH-511-WT Water Batch R WG LCSD Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene WG Naphthalene Phenanthrene Pyrene WG MB 1-Methylnaphthalene Methylnaphthalene 0.02 Acenaphthene 0.02 Acenaphthylene 0.02 Anthracene 0.02 Benzo(a)anthracene 0.02 Benzo(a)pyrene < Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.02 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 0.02 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.02 Chrysene 0.02 Dibenzo(ah)anthracene 0.02 Fluoranthene 0.02 Fluorene 0.02 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.02 Naphthalene < 0.05 Phenanthrene 0.02 Pyrene 0.02 Surrogate: d8-naphthalene Surrogate: d10-phenanthrene Surrogate: d12-chrysene 90.4 Surrogate: d10-acenaphthene 95.5

54 Workorder: L Quality Control Report Report Date: Client: Contact: CHUNG AND VANDER DOELEN 311 VICTORIA ST. N. KITCHENER ON N2H 5E1 JARED BARCLAY Page 8 of 8 Legend: Limit ALS Control Limit (Data Quality Objectives) DUP Duplicate RPD Relative Percent Difference Not Available LCS Laboratory Control Sample SRM Standard Reference Material MS Matrix Spike MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate ADE Average Desorption Efficiency MB Method Blank IRM Internal Reference Material CRM Certified Reference Material CCV Continuing Calibration Verification CVS Calibration Verification Standard LCSD Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate Sample Parameter Qualifier Definitions: Qualifier Description J MS-B Duplicate results and limits are expressed in terms of absolute difference. Matrix Spike recovery could not be accurately calculated due to high analyte background in sample. Relative Percent Difference Not Available due to result(s) being less than detection limit. Hold Time Exceedances: All test results reported with this submission were conducted within ALS recommended hold times. ALS recommended hold times may vary by province. They are assigned to meet known provincial and/or federal government requirements. In the absence of regulatory hold times, ALS establishes recommendations based on guidelines published by the US EPA, APHA Standard Methods, or Environment Canada (where available). For more information, please contact ALS. The ALS Quality Control Report is provided to ALS clients upon request. ALS includes comprehensive QC checks with every analysis to ensure our high standards of quality are met. Each QC result has a known or expected target value, which is compared against predetermined data quality objectives to provide confidence in the accuracy of associated test results. Please note that this report may contain QC results from anonymous Sample Duplicates and Matrix Spikes that do not originate from this Work Order.

55 ALS Sample ID: L Client Sample ID: EMW Response - MilliVolts Time - Minutes Printed on 9/25/2017 2:59:21 PM

56 ALS Sample ID: L Client Sample ID: BH Response - MilliVolts Time - Minutes Printed on 9/25/2017 2:59:23 PM

57 ALS Sample ID: L Client Sample ID: BH Response - MilliVolts Time - Minutes Printed on 9/25/2017 2:59:25 PM

58 ALS Sample ID: L Client Sample ID: BHD Response - MilliVolts Time - Minutes Printed on 9/25/2017 2:59:27 PM

59