THE PROPOSED UPGRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF MOUNT AYLIFF GRAVEL ACCESS ROADS AND CONCRETE CAUSEWAYS

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "THE PROPOSED UPGRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF MOUNT AYLIFF GRAVEL ACCESS ROADS AND CONCRETE CAUSEWAYS"

Transcription

1 UMZIMVUBU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY THE PROPOSED UPGRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF MOUNT AYLIFF GRAVEL ACCESS ROADS AND CONCRETE CAUSEWAYS DRAFT BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT AUGUST 2017 Prepared for Prepared by Umzimvubu Local Municipality ACER (Africa) Environmental Consultants Private Bag 9020 P O Box 503 Mount Frere Mtunzini

2 BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT (For official use only) File Reference Number: Application Number: Date Received: Basic assessment report in terms of the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2014, promulgated in terms of the National Environmental Management Act, 1998(Act No. 107 of 1998), as amended. Kindly note that: 1. This basic assessment report is a standard report that may be required by a competent authority in terms of the EIA Regulations, 2014 and is meant to streamline applications. Please make sure that it is the report used by the particular competent authority for the activity that is being applied for. 2. The report must be typed within the spaces provided in the form. The size of the spaces provided is not necessarily indicative of the amount of information to be provided. The report is in the form of a table that can extend itself as each space is filled with typing. 3. Where applicable tick the boxes that are applicable or black out the boxes that are not applicable in the report. 4. An incomplete report may be returned to the applicant for revision. 5. The use of not applicable in the report must be done with circumspection because if it is used in respect of material information that is required by the competent authority for assessing the application, it may result in the rejection of the application as provided for in the regulations. 6. This report must be handed in at offices of the relevant competent authority as determined by each authority. 7. No faxed or ed reports will be accepted. 8. The report must be compiled by an independent environmental assessment practitioner (EAP). 9. Unless protected by law, all information in the report will become public information on receipt by the competent authority. Any interested and affected party should be provided with the information contained in this report on request, during any stage of the application process. 10. A competent authority may require that for specified types of activities in defined situations only parts of this report need to be completed.

3 SECTION A: ACTIVITY INFORMATION Has a specialist been consulted to assist with the completion of this NO section? If YES, please complete form Details of Specialist and Declaration of Intent for each specialist thus appointed: Any specialist reports must be contained in Appendix D. 1. ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION Describe the activity, which is being applied for, in detail BACKGROUND The Umzimvubu Local Municipality appointed ACER (Africa) Environmental Consultants (ACER) as the Environmental Assessment Practitioner (EAP) responsible for obtaining environmental authorisation and the relevant permits and licences required for the proposed upgrading and construction of gravel access roads and concrete causeways (bridge culverts) near Mount Ayliff in the Umzimvubu Local Municipality, Eastern Cape (See Figure 1 for locality). The Umzimvubu Local Municipality is proposing to construct new access roads and causeways to service rural communities near Mount Ayliff. The proposed development will consist of the following projects: Phuka Bridge Gravel Access Road (1,477 m) and Concrete Causeway. Brooksnek Gravel Access Road (6.28 km) and Concrete Causeway. Bridgelink to Bottoman Gravel Access Road (837 m) and 3 Concrete Causeways. The proposed development will consist of three different projects which will be authorised under a single environmental application process as agreed on with the Eastern Cape Department of Economic Development, Environmental Affairs and Tourism (DEDEAT). ACER, on behalf of the Umzimvubu Local Municipality, is undertaking the required Environmental Authorisation and associated Public Participation Process required for listed activities under the current Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2014 published in Government Notices R 982, 983, 984 and 985 of 4 December 2014 (as amended). Additionally, the proposed development will require

4 authorisation from the Department of Water and Sanitation (DWS), for water uses in terms of Section 21 (c) and (i) of the National Water Act, 1998 (Act No 36 of 1998)(NWA). The applications and supporting documentation will be submitted to the DEDEAT and DWS respectively, for consideration and decision-making. WATER USE LICENSING The proposed gravel roads construction and watercourse crossings will also require Water Use Licensing (WUL) from the DWS, for water uses in terms of Section 21 (c) and (i) of the National Water Act, 1998 (Act No 36 of 1998) (NWA). However in terms of GN509 OF 26 August 2016 published by DWS on 26th August 2016 for Section 21 (c) and (i) water uses; all maintenance of bridges over rivers, streams and wetlands and new construction of bridges done according to the SANRAL Drainage Manual or similar norms and standards are generally authorisable for municipalities subject only to the conditions of the notice.

5 Figure 1 Locality of the three proposed projects.

6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Phuka Bridge Gravel Access Road (1477 m) and Concrete Causeway The proposed new and gravel road upgrades, and Phuka Bridge culverts are approximately 16.5 km north-east of Mount Ayliff in the Umzimvubu Local Municipality, Eastern Cape. The proposed new and upgraded gravel road sections will serve to improve and provide new access to the adjacent National Road 2 (N2), thereby providing significant positive socio-economic impacts including increased safety and improved accessibility between the surrounding areas. Figure 2 Locality of the proposed Phuka Bridge access road and culvert crossing and existing roads. The proposed development will involve the following: The upgrading and formalisation of two sections of adjoining gravel roads; the first being from the N2 at A (30 41'26.26"S / 29 26'57.60"E) for a distance of approximately 761 m to B (30 41'26.47"S / 29 27'21.37"E), and an adjoining section which connects to the first at C (30 41'27.78"S / 29 27'14.54"E) and extends south for approximately 318 m to D (30 41'36.83"S / 29 27'9.88"E). The construction of a new gravel access road of approximately 398 m in length, from E (30 41'13.18"S / 29 27'32.60"E) to F (30 41'8.74"S / 29 27'45.04"E).

7 The new Phuka Bridge culvert crossing at the watercourse crossing (30 41'12.30"S / 29 27'42.28"E). Brooksnek Gravel Access Roads (6.28 km) and Concrete Causeway Brooksnek Mission is located near the Eastern Cape and KwaZulu-Natal border, approximately 10 km south-west of the town of Kokstad and 22 km north-east of Mount Ayliff in the Umzimvubu Local Municipality. The existing gravel access road to and from Brooksnek Mission is dilapidated and highly eroded. The existing crossing over the Mvalweni River is not accessible or passable with non four-wheel drive vehicles. The proposed gravel access roads upgrade and the construction of the culvert crossing will have significant positive socio-economic impacts such as increased safety and will serve as an alternative access road between Brooksnek and communities adjacent to the N2. In total, approximately 6.28 km of gravel road will be upgraded and formalised, and will be comprised of the following sections and crossing points: Approximately 4,603 m of gravel road upgrades from A (30 38'10.87"S / 29 28'52.26"E) to B (30 38'10.17"S / 29 28'34.48"E). Approximately 558 m of gravel road upgrades from C (30 38'10.88"S / 29 28'52.27"E) to D (30 38'10.19"S / 29 28'34.49"E). Approximately 204 m of gravel road upgrades from E (30 37'55.11"S / 29 28'33.87"E) to F (30 37'56.43"S / 29 28'26.85"E). Approximately 645 m of gravel road upgrades from G (30 37'54.35"S / 29 28'59.91"E) to H (30 37'52.05"S / 29 29'1.45"E). Approximately 180 m of gravel road upgrades from I (30 37'50.57"S / 29 29'3.16"E) to J (30 37'45.10"S / 29 29'3.47"E). Approximately 57 m of gravel road upgrades from K (30 37'49.65"S / 29 29'14.99"E) to L (30 37'47.84"S / 29 29'15.03"E). The construction of a concrete causeway across the Mvalweni River (30 38'57.64"S / 29 29'9.48"E).

8 Figure 3 Locality of the proposed Brooksnek gravel access roads and concrete causeway. Bridgelink to Bottoman Gravel Access Road (837 m) and 3 Concrete Causeways The remote villages of Dundee and Mnqwane are situated approximately 9 km north-east of Mount Ayliff in the Umzimvubu Local Municipality, Eastern Cape. Currently, no formal access roads exist. As such, the proposed development of a gravel access road and concrete causeways will have significant positive socio-economic impacts such as improved access and safety for all people commuting to and from these communities. The proposed development entails the construction of approximately 837 m of new gravel access road from the southern parts of the Dundee settlement (A '54.86"S / 29 25'34.76"E) to the northern parts of Mnqwane (B '16.54"S / 29 25'23.63"E). Concrete causeways will be constructed at the watercourse crossings at the following approximate locations: Crossing 1: 30 44'59.82" S / 29 25'30.48" E Crossing 2: 30 45'7.41" S / 29 25'29.47" E Crossing 3: 30 45'14.23" S / 29 25'27.99" E

9 Figure 4 Locality of the proposed Bridgelink to Bottoman access road and concrete causeway. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Alternative route and location for the Phuka Bridge gravel access road and concrete causeway. An alternative route for the proposed gravel access road and position of the concrete causeway was considered during the initial investigations and site assessments as shown in figure 5 below. However, this option was considered to be unviable due to the following: This alignment would have not served the community as it would have not provided access to the communities. The location of the concrete causeway is not the preferred location according to the local communities within in the area. During the stakeholder engagements with the local communities which included the traditional council it was emphasized that the surrounding communities, who will be the main beneficiaries of the project, wanted the crossing point at the preferred location as this is the location which is best situated to provide access between the surrounding areas. Subsequently, the EIA team assessed the site and developed the most viable option (as

10 indicated by the preferred alternative). Figure 5 Phuka Bridge Alternative alignment and crossing locations. Layout and design alternatives Layout considerations During the planning stage, the layout options were influenced by the following: Use of existing road servitudes and infrastructure. The option to construct the new gravel roads along existing tracks and informal roads to limit the impact on the receiving environment. Methods of crossing watercourses, roads and sensitive areas. Slopes and topography. Land use and zoning. Suitability of soils and the underlying geology. Infrastructure design considerations The design of the infrastructure will include the following considerations to ensure that no further erosion of the drainage lines will take place as a result of the construction:

11 The causeways will be keyed into the banks of the drainage line Wing walls will be incorporated into the design of the causeways Culverts should be placed in a manner that allows for the free movement of water and sediment Culverts should be placed at the same level as the base of the drainage line Culverts need to allow for the natural flows of water across the drainage line and not confine flow Culverts will have sufficient grade to be self-scouring or self-cleaning and not prone to sedimentation and be equipped with energy breakers at the outlet to ensure the downstream areas of the wetland habitat do not scour. Taking into account the above design and layout considerations, the proposed alignments and infrastructure designs for the access gravel roads and locations for the concrete causeways are considered the most practical and optimal in terms of practicality, construction, avoidance of sensitive environments and providing safe and reliable access to the local communities for whom the proposed development is intended to serve. As such no additional layout and design alternatives have been considered during this Environmental Assessment. However, it should be noted that some localised realignment of the roads may be required once an Environmental Assessment of the footprint has been concluded and/or I&AP s raise issues regarding the proposed alignments and locations of the concrete causeways. Site alternatives In terms of site alternatives it is important to note that proposed development consists of creating access and improving existing gravel road infrastructure for specific settlements and communities within and around the town of Mount Ayliff. It involves the upgrading and refurbishing of existing gravel roads and the construction of new gravel access roads and concrete causeways to increase safety and provide access for people commuting between the areas. As such, site alternatives were very limited as the proposed development is very site specific. It should be noted that during the stakeholder engagement meetings with the local communities, the preferred routes and crossing points were indentified and discussed. However, when selecting the proposed alignments for the new gravel roads and crossings, the following criteria were taken into account by the engineering and EIA team to find the most practical, cost effective and environmentally friendly alignments: The placing of the roads and concrete causeways close to and along already disturbed areas such as existing tracks and footpaths. The proposed alignments will as far as practically possible follow the existing footpaths and gravel access roads currently being used by the local community. This will not only limit the amount of disturbance to undisturbed areas, but will also limit the potential of any road users from deviating from the new roads and crossings.

12 The sections of new gravel access roads to be constructed will follow the existing contours and ridgelines. This will ensure that the proposed gravel roads and crossings have limited potential to create new erosion channels or impact on the existing onsite drainage lines. Technology alternatives In terms of technology alternatives; the following considerations influenced the selection of the chosen specifications: Health, safety and environmental considerations. The footprint sizes of the proposed infrastructure. Uniformity between the existing and upgraded infrastructure. The rural location of the sites and the high probability of flooding. Amount of traffic volumes. Financial availability. According to the SANRAL Drainage Manual, 6 th edition (2013) which provides guidance and recommendations for designs of Low-Level River Crossings (LLRC) such as the proposed concrete causeways; LLRCs are the most appropriate designs for crossings in rural locations for the following reasons: Cost of construction is generally lower than conventional crossings. Maintenance does not have to occur as regularly as conventional crossings. The crossings are meant to withstand flooding, which is not uncommon in the area. Considering all of the above, the only technology option considered was the preferred technology option as described below. Preferred technology options: Stream and river crossings: The construction of concrete causeways approximately 5.5 m in length and 4.5 m wide with a peak flow of 8.96m 3 / s, comprising of prefabricated pipes (10 x 600 mm diameter and 4 x 900mm diameter pipes) attached along the length of the bridge.

13 Figure 5 Example of concrete causeway/culvert to be constructed according to the SANRAL Drainage manual (2013). Gravel access roads: New 5 m wide gravel access roads consisting of G5 gravel and compacted to a height of approximately 200 mm. Concrete drive strips for the steeper sections. The construction of storm water infrastructure such as cut-out drains and dish drains where required along the alignment.

14 The option of not developing the proposed development (no-go option) This alternative would mean that there will be no safe and reliable access provided to the communities within these areas. Additionally, the three proposed projects are in line with the Umzimvubu Local Municipality IDP Key Performance Areas (KPAs) in the Project Management Unit (Umzimvubu LM IDP, revision ). As such, the no-go option will be disregarding the mandate of the Umzimvubu Local Municipality to provide safe and reliable access to the communities within their administrative boundaries. It is the professional opinion of the EIA team that the no-go alternative is undesirable and unrealistic in the face of social and economic needs within the region.

15 Provide a detailed description of the listed activities associated with the project as applied for Listed activity as described in GN 327, 325 and 324 of 4 April 2017 LN1 - The development of Activity 12 (i) dams or weirs, where the dam or weir, including infrastructure and water surface area, exceeds 100 square metres; or (ii) infrastructure or structures with a physical footprint of 100 square metres or more; LN1 - Activity 19 LN3 - Activity 4 where such development occurs (a) within a watercourse; (b) in front of a development setback; or (c) if no development setback exists, within 32 metres of a watercourse, measured from the edge of a watercourse; The infilling or depositing of any material of more than 10 cubic metres into, or the dredging, excavation, removal or moving of soil, sand, shells, shell grit, pebbles or rock of more than 10 cubic metres from a watercourse; The development of a road a. Eastern Cape wider than 4 metres with a i. Outside urban reserve less than 13, 5 areas: metres. (bb) National Protected Area Expansion Strategy Focus areas; (ee) Critical biodiversity areas as indentified systematic biodiversity plans in as adopted by the competent authority or in Description of project activity The construction of the new gravel roads and concrete causeways will constitute a physical footprint of more than 100 m 2 within the watercourses that they will cross. The construction of the concrete causeways will potentially require the moving of more than 10 m 3 of material within the watercourses. The proposed gravel roads will be wider than 4 m, and have a road reserve of less than 13.5 m. All three of the project components fall within the CBA 1 and 2.

16 LN3 - Activity 12 LN3 - Activity 14 The clearance of an area of 300 square metres or more of indigenous vegetation except where such clearance of indigenous vegetation is required for maintenance purposes undertaken in accordance with a maintenance management plan. The development of (xii) infrastructure or structures with a physical footprint of 10 square metres or more; where such development occurs (a) within a watercourse; bioregional plans. a. Eastern Cape (ii) Within critical biodiversity areas identified in bioregional plans; i. Outside urban areas: (bb) National Protected Area Expansion Strategy Focus areas; (ff) Critical biodiversity areas or ecosystem service areas as identified in systematic biodiversity plans adopted by the competent authority or in bioregional plans. The proposed gravel roads will require the clearance of more than 300 m 2 of indigenous vegetation. All three of the project components fall within the CBA 1 and 2. The construction of the new gravel roads and concrete causeways will constitute a physical footprint of more than 100 m 2 within watercourses that they will cross. All three of the project components fall within the CBA 1 and 2.

17 2. FEASIBLE AND REASONABLE ALTERNATIVES alternatives, in relation to a proposed activity, means different means of meeting the general purpose and requirements of the activity, which may include alternatives to (a) the property on which or location where it is proposed to undertake the activity; (b) the type of activity to be undertaken; (c) the design or layout of the activity; (d) the technology to be used in the activity; (e) the operational aspects of the activity; and (f) the option of not implementing the activity. Describe alternatives that are considered in this application. Alternatives should include a consideration of all possible means by which the purpose and need of the proposed activity could be accomplished in the specific instance taking account of the interest of the applicant in the activity. The no-go alternative must in all cases be included in the assessment phase as the baseline against which the impacts of the other alternatives are assessed. The determination of whether site or activity (including different processes etc.) or both is appropriate needs to be informed by the specific circumstances of the activity and its environment. After receipt of this report the competent authority may also request the applicant to assess additional alternatives that could possibly accomplish the purpose and need of the proposed activity if it is clear that realistic alternatives have not been considered to a reasonable extent. Paragraphs 3 13 below should be completed for each alternative. a) The property on which or where the activity will be undertaken: Phuka Bridge The property for the proposed project is located in ward 26 of the Umzimvubu Local Municipality on tribal land governed by the Lubaleko Traditional Council. Mrs. Duduzile Jojo-Mkeme is the local Chief of the administrative area. The project will directly benefit the surrounding communities within Phuka Bridge and Dundee. Additional information regarding the property is listed in table 1 below: Table 1 Property description Phuka Bridge Farm description: Registration division: Maxesibeni Area size: ha ha (existing road)

18 Farm name and portion: 1. Brooksneck No. 35 (existing road) SG number: 1. C C Brooksnek The property for the proposed project is located in ward 1 of the Umzimvubu Local Municipality. The land is governed by the Lubaleko Traditional Council. Mrs. Duduzile Jojo-Mkeme is the local Chief of the administrative area. The project will directly benefit the people of the lower and upper Brooksnek mission settlements. Additional information regarding the property are in listed in the table 2 below: Table 2 Property description - Brooksnek Farm description: Registration division: Maxesibeni Area size: ha Farm name and portion: CABAZANA 20 SG 21-digit number: C Bridgelink to Bottoman The property for the proposed project is located within ward 4 of the Umzimvubu Local Mmunicipality. The land is governed and administered by the Xesibe Traditional Council. Mrs. T Jojo is the local chief of the area. Additional information regarding the property are in listed in the table 3 below: Table 3 Property description Bridgelink to Bottoman Farm description: Registration division: Maxesibeni Area size: ha Farm name and portion: DUNDEE 18 SG number: C

19 b) The type of activity to be undertaken: The type of activity involves upgrading a number of gravel access roads, the construction of new gravel access roads and the construction of concrete causeways in order to improve access and safety for communities located in and around Mount Ayliff within the Umzimvubu Local Municipality. c) The operational aspect of the activity: During operations, scheduled maintenance will be conducted by contractors appointed by the Umzimvubu Local Municipality to maintain these roads and causeways. 3. ACTIVITY POSITION Indicate the position of the activity using the latitude and longitude of the centre point of the site for each alternative site. The co-ordinates should be in degrees and decimal minutes. The minutes should have at least three decimals to ensure adequate accuracy. The projection that must be used in all cases is the WGS84 spheroid in a national or local projection. List alternative sites if applicable. Latitude (S): Longitude (E): Alternative: Alternative S1 1 (preferred or only site See co-ordinates provided for each project alternative) below. Alternative S2 (if any) o o Alternative S3 (if any) o o In the case of linear activities: Alternative: Latitude (S): Longitude (E): Alternative S1 (preferred or only route alternative) Phuka Bridge Starting point of the activity (north) 30 41'8.85"S 29 27'45.06"E Middle point of the activity 30 41'12.77"S 29 27'39.89"E End point of the activity (south) 30 41'13.19"S 29 27'32.61"E 1 Alternative S.. refer to site alternatives.

20 Brooksnek Starting point of the activity (north) 30 38'22.20"S 29 28'44.78"E Middle point of the activity 30 38'57.59"S 29 29'9.43"E End point of the activity (south) 30 39'49.31"S 29 28'28.75"E Bridgelink to Bottoman Starting point of the activity (north) 30 44'54.80"S 29 25'34.75"E Middle point of the activity 30 45'6.10"S 29 25'30.30"E End point of the activity (south) 30 45'16.43"S 29 25'23.55"E Alternative S2 (if any) Starting point of the activity o o Middle point of the activity o o End point of the activity o o Alternative S3 (if any) Starting point of the activity o o Middle point of the activity o o End point of the activity o o For route alternatives that are longer than 500m, please provide an addendum with co-ordinates taken every 250 meters along the route for each alternative alignment. See Appendix A5 for coordinates taken every 250 m for each project.

21 4. PHYSICAL SIZE OF THE ACTIVITY Indicate the physical size of the preferred activity/technology as well as alternative activities/technologies (footprints): Size of the activity: Phuka Bridge Alternative: Size of the activity: Alternative A1 2 (preferred activity alternative) 5m x 1477m 7385m 2 Alternative A2 (if any) m 2 Alternative A3 (if any) m 2 or, for linear activities: Brooksnek Alternative: Size of the activity: Alternative A1 3 (preferred activity alternative) 5m x 6280m 31400m 2 Alternative A2 (if any) m 2 Alternative A3 (if any) m 2 Bridgelink to Bottoman Alternative: Size of the activity: Alternative A1 4 (preferred activity alternative) 5m x 837m 4185m 2 Alternative A2 (if any) m 2 Alternative A3 (if any) m 2 Length of the Activity: Phuka Bridge Alternative: Length of the activity: Alternative A1 (preferred activity alternative) 1477m Alternative A2 (if any) m Alternative A3 (if any) m 2 Alternative A.. refer to activity, process, technology or other alternatives. 3 Alternative A.. refer to activity, process, technology or other alternatives. 4 Alternative A.. refer to activity, process, technology or other alternatives.

22 Brooksnek Alternative: Length of the activity: Alternative A1 (preferred activity alternative) 6280m Alternative A2 (if any) m Alternative A3 (if any) m Bridgelink to Bottoman Alternative: Length of the activity: Alternative A1 (preferred activity alternative) 837m Alternative A2 (if any) M Alternative A3 (if any) M Indicate the size of the alternative sites or servitudes (within which the above footprints will occur): Alternative: Size of the site/servitude: Alternative A1 (preferred activity alternative) m 2 Alternative A2 (if any) m 2 Alternative A3 (if any) m 2

23 5. SITE ACCESS Does ready access to the site exist? If NO, what is the distance over which a new access road will be built YES Describe the type of access road planned: Not applicable. The site is accessible though existing networks of informal gravel and sand roads. As such, no access roads to get to the sites will be required. Include the position of the access road on the site plan and required map, as well as an indication of the road in relation to the site. 6. SITE OR ROUTE PLAN A detailed site or route plan(s) must be prepared for each alternative site or alternative activity. It must be attached as Appendix A to this document. The site or route plans must indicate the following: 6.1 the scale of the plan which must be at least a scale of 1:500; 6.2 the property boundaries and numbers of all the properties within 50metres of the site; 6.3 the current land use as well as the land use zoning of each of the properties adjoining the site or sites; 6.4 the exact position of each element of the application as well as any other structures on the site; 6.5 the position of services, including electricity supply cables (indicate above or underground), water supply pipelines, boreholes, street lights, sewage pipelines, storm water infrastructure and telecommunication infrastructure; 6.6 all trees and shrubs taller than 1.8metres; 6.7 walls and fencing including details of the height and construction material; 6.8 servitudes indicating the purpose of the servitude; 6.9 sensitive environmental elements within 100metres of the site or sites including (but not limited thereto):

24 rivers; the 1:100 year flood line (where available or where it is required by DWA); ridges; cultural and historical features; areas with indigenous vegetation (even if it is degraded or invested with alien species); 6.9 for gentle slopes the 1metre contour intervals must be indicated on the plan and whenever the slope of the site exceeds 1:10, the 500mm contours must be indicated on the plan; and 6.10 the positions from where photographs of the site were taken. See Appendix A for project Maps. 7. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Colour photographs from the centre of the site must be taken in at least the eight major compass directions with a description of each photograph. Photographs must be attached under Appendix B to this form. It must be supplemented with additional photographs of relevant features on the site, if applicable. See Appendix B for Site Photographs. 8. FACILITY ILLUSTRATION A detailed illustration of the activity must be provided at a scale of 1:200 as Appendix C for activities that include structures. The illustrations must be to scale and must represent a realistic image of the planned activity. The illustration must give a representative view of the activity. See Appendix C for Facility Illustration.

25 9.ACTIVITY MOTIVATION 9(a) Socio-economic value of the activity What is the expected capital value of the activity on completion? The contractor has not yet been appointed and the project has not been out on tender, as such the following values are based on estimations: Phuka Bridge = R Brooksnek = R Bridgelink to Bottoman = R Total = What is the expected yearly income that will be generated by or as a result of the activity? Will the activity contribute to service infrastructure? Is the activity a public amenity? How many new employment opportunities will be created in the development phase of the activity? What is the expected value of the employment opportunities during the development phase? What percentage of this will accrue to previously disadvantaged individuals? R 0.00 No direct income will be generated by the proposed projects. However, it is expected that the proposed development will stimulate economic activity within the area as a result of improved road access. YES YES Approximately 10 temporary employment opportunities during construction will be created for each road and causeway project. R 0.00 A contractor has not yet been appointed; as such the exact value cannot be determined yet. However, based on previous projects and existing Municipal guidelines in the area, approximately 40% of the contract value will accrue to employment opportunities. 40%

26 How many permanent new employment opportunities will be created during the operational phase of the activity? What is the expected current value of the employment opportunities during the first 10 years? What percentage of this will accrue to previously disadvantaged individuals? No direct employment opportunities will be created as a result of the project. However, it is expected that there will be an increase in economic activity in the area as a result of improved road access. R0 No direct employment opportunities will be created as a result of the project. However, it is expected that there will an increase in economic activity in the area as a result of improved road access. 0% No direct jobs will be created during the operational phase of the development although it is anticipated that better access to these areas will result in economic growth and possible enterprise development within these rural areas which will benefit these disadvantaged communities. 9(b) Need and desirability of the activity Motivate and explain the need and desirability of the activity (including demand for the activity): The three projects described in this environmental assessment are all located in the rural areas near the town of Mount Ayliff in the Umzimvubu Local Municipality. The three proposed projects are in line with the Umzimvubu Local Municipality IDP Key Performance Areas (KPAs) as outlined in the Project Management Unit report (Umzimvubu LM IDP, revision ). The first project is located near the remote villages of Dundee and Mnqwane which are situated approximately 9.1 km north-east of Mount Ayliff. There are currently no formal access roads that exist in these areas. As such, the proposed development of a gravel access road and concrete causeways will have significant positive socioeconomic impacts to the remote villages, as it will improve access and safety for the local communities, commuting to and from these villages. The second proposed development is located near the settlement of Brooksnek, approximately 22 km north-east of Mount Ayliff, and will involve the upgrading and formalisation of an existing access gravel road and the construction of a concrete causeway that will connect Brooksnek with the surrounding communities. The existing gravel road

27 leading to Brooksnek is dilapidated and highly eroded. Additionally, the existing crossing over the Mvalweni River is currently not accessible to be used by all modes of transport, thus forcing the local community to use unstable footpaths or to walk next to the National Road 2 (N2) to commute between the areas. The third proposed development is located near Phuka Bridge and is approximately 16.5 km north-east of Mount Ayliff. The proposed development will involve the upgrading and formalisation of approximately 1,090 m of an existing access gravel road and the construction of a new gravel access road and culvert crossings that will connect the surrounding communities to one another. The proposed upgrades and construction of a concrete causeway will serve to improve and provide access to the adjacent National Road 2 (N2), where there is currently no access. Therefore, the proposed development will provide significant positive socio-economic impacts including increased safety and improved accessibility between the surrounding areas. Indicate any benefits that the activity will have for society in general: Benefits of the proposed projects will include the following: Increased job opportunities and economic activities. Improved road safety Provide safe crossing points across drainage lines for school children needing to access schools Improved access to the affected communities which includes the delivery of basic services such as mobile clinics, service infrastructure and availability of transport providers. Indicate any benefits that the activity will have for the local communities where the activity will be located: During the construction phase the proposed projects will increase job opportunities for the local communities. During the operational phase, the local communities will have access to the surrounding areas which were previously inaccessible, as well as a link to the N2 highway. In areas where there was already road access this access will be improved to accommodate all modes of transport and increase the road safety for all road users. The improved road access can lead to improved economic standing in the improved linkages between communities and the National Road (N2) and the urban areas, in this case the town of Mount Ayliff and Kokstad. With the construction of formalized bridges, community safety will improve, as they will no longer have to use unstable pathways or the N2 to commute.

28 10. APPLICABLE LEGISLATION, POLICIES AND/OR GUIDELINES List all legislation, policies and/or guidelines of any sphere of government that are applicable to the application as contemplated in the EIA regulations, if applicable: Title of legislation, policy or guideline: Administering authority: Date: South Africa s Constitution (Act 108 of 1996), including the Bill of Rights (Chapter 2, Section 24) The Constitutional Court 1996 Promotion of Access to Information Act (Act 2 of 2000) Department of Justice and 2000 Constitutional Development National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (No. 107 Eastern Cape Department of 1998 of 1998) and Environmental Impact Assessment Development, Environmental Affairs Regulations published there under as amended [2014 and Tourism published in Government Notices R982, R983, R984 and R985 in Government Gazette (as amended)] Integrated Environmental Management (IEM) guideline series published by DEA (various documents dated from 2002 to present) National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act (Act No. 10 of 2004) (NEM:BA) Provincial Parks Board Act, 2003 (Eastern Cape) (Act 12 of 2003) National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act (Act No. 10 of 2004) Threatened or Protected Species (TOPS) Regulations Conservation of Agricultural Resources Act, 1983 (Act 43 of 1983) National Environmental Management: Waste Act (Act No. 59 of 2008) (NEM:WA) Eastern Cape Department of Economic Development, Environmental Affairs and Tourism Eastern Cape Department of Economic Development, Environmental Affairs and Tourism Eastern Cape Provincial Parks Board and Eastern Cape Department of Development, Environmental Affairs and Tourism Eastern Cape Provincial Parks Board and Eastern Cape Department of Development, Environmental Affairs and Tourism Department of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries Eastern Cape Department of Development, Environmental Affairs and Tourism National Forests Act (Act No. 84 of 1998) National, Provincial and Regional Department of Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries National Water Act (Act No. 36 of 1998) (NWA) National, Provincial and Regional Department of Water and Sanitation

29 Occupational Health and Safety Act 1993 (Act No 85 of 1993), relevant associated Regulations - Construction Regulations (2003) National Heritage Resources Act (Act No. 25 of 1999) (NHRA) Department of Labour 2003 South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA)and Eastern Cape Provincial Heritage Resource Agency 1999

30 11. WASTE, EFFLUENT, EMISSION AND NOISE MANAGEMENT 11(a) 11(a) Solid waste management Will the activity produce solid construction waste during the construction/initiation phase? If yes, what estimated quantity will be produced per month? YES Approximately 25m 3 How will the construction solid waste be disposed of (describe)? Construction solid waste will be collected from site on a regular basis from the designated collection area pre-determined by the ECO and in line with the EMPr (Appendix G) and disposed at the nearest registered and licensed landfill site located in the town of Mount Frere. Where will the construction solid waste be disposed of (describe)? Construction solid waste produced during the construction phase will be disposed at the nearest landfill site located in the town of Mount Frere which is a registered and licensed landfill site administered and controlled by the Umzimvubu Local Municipality. Will the activity produce solid waste during its operational phase? NO If yes, what estimated quantity will be produced per month? How will the solid waste be disposed of (describe)? Not applicable. Where will the solid waste be disposed if it does not feed into a municipal waste stream (describe)? Not applicable. If the solid waste (construction or operational phases) will not be disposed of in a registered landfill site or be taken up in a municipal waste stream, then the applicant should consult with the competent authority to determine whether it is necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA. Can any part of the solid waste be classified as hazardous in terms of the NO

31 relevant legislation? If yes, inform the competent authority and request a change to an application for scoping and EIA. Is the activity that is being applied for a solid waste handling or treatment NO facility? If yes, then the applicant should consult with the competent authority to determine whether it is necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA. 11(b) Liquid effluent Will the activity produce effluent, other than normal sewage, that will be disposed of in a municipal sewage system? NO If yes, what estimated quantity will be produced per month? Will the activity produce any effluent that will be treated and/or disposed of on site? NO If yes, the applicant should consult with the competent authority to determine whether it is necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA. Will the activity produce effluent that will be treated and/or disposed of at another facility? If yes, provide the particulars of the facility: NO Facility name: Contact person: Postal address: Postal code: Telephone: Cell: Fax: Describe the measures that will be taken to ensure the optimal reuse or recycling of waste water, if any:

32 Not applicable 11(c) Emissions into the atmosphere Will the activity release emissions into the atmosphere? NO If yes, is it controlled by any legislation of any sphere of government? If yes, the applicant should consult with the competent authority to determine whether it is necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA. If no, describe the emissions in terms of type and concentration: Not applicable. The only emissions likely to be generated by the proposed activities are dust as a result of earth moving activities, and emissions released by site machinery and equipment. None of the emissions likely to be generated by the proposed activity will require a license/permit or are controlled by any legislation. 11(d) Generation of noise Will the activity generate noise? NO If yes, is it controlled by any legislation of any sphere of government? If yes, the applicant should consult with the competent authority to determine whether it is necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA. If no, describe the noise in terms of type and level:

33 Noise associated with the proposed projects will include that of construction equipment on site. Noise impacts associated with the proposed development will be temporary and short term given the short timeframe of the development. Should construction activities extend beyond normal working hours, any surrounding landowners and/or homes that might be affected by the noise will be consulted and notified in advance. 12. WATER USE Please indicate the source(s) of water that will be used for the activity by ticking the appropriate box(es) Municipal water board groundwater river, stream, dam or lake other the activity will not use water If water is to be extracted from groundwater, river, stream, dam, lake or any other natural feature, please indicate the volume that will be extracted per month: Not applicable. The Activity will not require water during operations. Does the activity require a water use permit from the Department of Water Affairs? YES If yes, please submit the necessary application to the Department of Water Affairs and attach proof thereof to this application if it has been submitted.

34 A freshwater ecosystem delineation study was undertaken by Ground Truth Water, Wetlands and Environmental Engineering (Ground Truth) for each of the three project components. The following is summary of their findings: Phuka Bridge The freshwater ecosystem delineation study identified multiple drainage lines, a riparian B channel and a small portion of a riparian C channel within a 500m radius of the proposed road and associated infrastructure. (See Appendix A 1 for a map indicating the freshwater systems on site). The riparian C channel, namely the Mvalweni River, is located approximately 500m (measured from the nearest point) downstream of the proposed new access road and culvert infrastructure. The river will not be directly impacted upon by the proposed infrastructure; however, it does receive hydrological inputs from the drainage lines that will be crossed by the new access road. Therefore, it is important that the proposed development does not result in catchment impacts to the riparian system, such as sedimentation caused by erosion. As such, the recommended mitigation measures as per section D of this report and included in the EMPr should be implemented to avoid any catchment impacts. The riparian B channel is hydrologically isolated from the proposed road and associated infrastructure and therefore, will not be impacted upon by the activities. Multiple drainage lines exist within the study area which will be crossed by the proposed new access road and bride infrastructure at two points. The drainage lines have eroded to form large gullies that do not support any form of wetland or riparian habitat within or adjacent to the drainage line. Brooksnek The alignment of the existing road infrastructure that will be upgraded crosses freshwater ecosystems at five points, which includes crossing of the riparian C channel (Mvalweni River), HGM Unit 2, HGM Unit 3, HGM unit 4 and HGM Unit 5. (See Appendix A 2 for a map indicating all the freshwater systems that will be crossed). The Mvalweni River flows in a south-westerly direction and includes portions of riparian habitat upstream and downstream of a channelled valley-bottom wetland system (HGM Unit 1). It is a transitional river, which is dominated by bedrock and boulder habitat and is generally confined to the valley-bottom. The current impacts to the riparian zone include encroachment of the alien invasive tree species Acacia mearnsii, accelerated bank erosion, inundation and channel modification. HGM Unit 1 is a channelled valley-bottom wetland that is approximately 8.8ha in size and flows in a south-westerly direction. It is present in areas where the Mvalweni River loses confinement, as well as within portions of the channel that is characterised by wetland rather than riparian habitat.

35 HGM Unit 2 is a channelled valley-bottom that feeds into HGM Unit 1. It flows in a westerly direction and is approximately 0.5ha in size. It receives hydrological inputs from upstream tributaries and surface flows from the catchment. HGM Unit 3 is a hillslope seep that is linked to a stream channel that is approximately 0.1ha in size and flows in an easterly direction. The wetland is located on the upstream side of the existing road infrastructure and feeds an eroded drainage line on the downstream side of the road. HGM Unit 4 is a hillslope seep linked to a stream channel that flows in an easterly direction and is approximately 0.3ha in size. It is characterised by the presence of artificial wetland habitat upstream of the existing road infrastructure and natural wetland habitat downstream of the existing road infrastructure. HGM Unit 5 is a channelled valley-bottom that is approximately 0.2ha in size and flows in a north-easterly direction. The wetland is located on the upstream side of the existing road infrastructure and feeds a riparian A channel (See Appendix A2) that is located on the downstream side of the road infrastructure. It receives hydrological inputs predominantly from channel overtopping and surface flows from the catchment. Multiple riparian A channels were identified within the study area which ultimately drains into the Mvalweni River. They are mountain streams, which are characterised by steep gradients and dominated by boulder and bedrock habitat. The current impacts to these systems include encroachment of alien invasive vegetation and bank erosion. Bridgelink to Bottoman The proposed Bridgelink to Bottoman access road development will not result in the direct loss of freshwater habitat. There was no wetland or riparian habitat identified within a 500 m radius of the proposed development. However, the proposed development will cross onsite drainage lines at three points. (See Appendix A 3 for all drainage lines to be crossed).these drainage lines are characteristically similar and have been eroded to form gullies. In order to prevent further erosion of these systems and ensure that the downstream water resource is protected from increased sediment loading, it is important that the recommended stabilisation and storm water management activities are adopted with guidance from a qualified environmental engineer.

36 The development of the proposed gravel roads and concrete causeways will cross several watercourses and drainage lines and is within the regulated area of wetland(s). As such, Water Use Licensing (WUL) will be required from the Department of Water and Sanitation (DWS) for water uses in terms of Section 21 (c) and (i) of the National Water Act, 1998 (Act 36 of 1998). The specialists freshwater ecosystem studies undertaken for the proposed development identified that according to the DWS Risk Matrix (GN of 2015), the risk associated with the proposed development is Low, provided that the specialist recommendations and mitigation measures are adopted and implemented during construction and operations. These recommendations and mitigation measures are included in the EMPr (Appendix G) and in section D (Impact Assessment) of this report and include the following: Specific recommendations regarding the design of the infrastructure at crossing points; Specific measures and recommendations incorporated into the EMPr to protect the riparian habitat during construction of the road and concrete causeways; Management of drainage lines at crossing points; Monitoring requirements to ensure that the surrounding freshwater systems are not systematically polluted or degraded over time. GN509 OF 26 AUGUST For water uses as defined in Section 21 (c) or (i) This General Authorisation published by DWS on 26th August 2016 essentially replaces the need to apply for a licence for water uses in terms of Section 21 (c) and (i), provided that the water use is within the limits and conditions as set out in the notice. According to Appendix D2, the proposed activities from municipalities and State Owned Companies (SOCs) and institutions are generally authorisable, subject only to the conditions of the notice: SANRAL and other provincial Departments of Transport or municipalities: All maintenance of bridges over river, streams and wetlands and new construction of bridges be done according to SANRAL Drainage Manual or similar norms and standards.