Utility scale bulk energy storage. Current use in the NEM, and its importance in a future low carbon electricity system

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Utility scale bulk energy storage. Current use in the NEM, and its importance in a future low carbon electricity system"

Transcription

1 Utility scale bulk energy storage Current use in the NEM, and its importance in a future low carbon electricity system Dan Manderson MandersonD@pbworld.com October 2016

2 A DIVERSIFIED GLOBAL FIRM

3 AGENDA Defining utility scale bulk energy storage Why talk about this category of storage? What have we currently got in the NEM? New capacity technology options and costs Conclusions

4 DEFINING UTILITY SCALE BULK ENERGY STORAGE Molten Salt Region of interest Source: Energy Storage for Commercial Renewable Integration South Australia Milestone 3 Report: Energy Storage Systems (Executive Summary)

5 WHY BULK ENERGY STORAGE? TYPICAL SUMMER WEEK Utility scale bulk energy storage Optimistic baseload Source: AEMO 100% renewables study modelling outcomes report (Chapter 6 Page 43)

6 WHAT HAVE WE CURRENTLY GOT IN THE NEM? Wivenhoe, 500MW (2 x 250MW) Shoalhaven, 240MW (2 x 80, 2 x 40MW) Tumut3, 600MW (3 x 200MW) Sources: Snowy Hydro Website Sources: Google Maps, CS Energy Wivenhoe Brochure Sources: Roam Pumped Hydro in Australia Study

7 CURRENT USE IN THE NEM Characteristic Wivenhoe Shoalhaven Tumut 3 Charging capacity factor 1.1% 3.3% 0.2% Average station load when pumping 37% 46% 30% Discharging capacity factor 0.5% 3.0% Not separable from Average station output when generating 24.0% 39.0% overall Snowy operations Indicative cycle efficiency under typical operating conditions ~ 45% ~ 72% <68%* Estimate of storage capacity (output) 5GWh 4.7GWh ~15GWh** Duty description Ancillary services / CS Energy Portfolio Management Peaking Not really used *Based on operating optimum number of units, based on plant specifications for Tumut 3 rather than on AEMO data **Based on lower reservoir capacity assuming minimum 40% level for successful return pumping; only 3.3GWh pumping without generating observed in the 3 years of data. Shoalhaven operation week commencing 8 th Jan 2016

8 WHAT ARE OUR OPTIONS FOR MORE CAPACITY? Molten Salt, Integral to concentrating solar thermal (CST) Batteries NaS or Li-Ion More pumped hydro Compressed air

9 MOLTEN SALT (INTEGRAL TO CST) Source: NaNO 3 / KNO 3 blend, o C operating temperature range, dense & high heat capacity fluid Cheap (<$20/MWh), reliable, very high cycle efficiency Inherently tied to the fate of concentrating solar thermal technology

10 BATTERIES 50MW/300MWh NaS battery installation at Buzen substation, Japan ~75% AC cycle efficiency Source: NGK Buzen Substation Project Presentation Planned 20MW/80MWh Tesla Li-Ion project at Mira Loma substation, California 89% AC cycle efficiency Source: Tesla website Powerpack concept illustration and technical specifications

11 MORE PUMPED HYDRO What is the realistic potential in Australia? - NOBODY KNOWS (YET) Genex: Old mine sites ROAM: Use existing large water bodies as one reservoir, create another upper or lower reservoir Melbourne Energy Institute Seawater only; SA and VIC only Andrew Blakers (ANU): Closed cycle sites; Araluen Valley (ACT region) case study Sources: ARENA website Genex update Roam Pumped Hydro in Australia Study Melbourne Energy Institute Report: Opportunities for pumped hydro energy storage in Australia

12 COMPRESSED AIR ENERGY STORAGE (CAES) Compress air to high pressure during low price periods (charging) Store air in a salt cavern Expand through a turbine to generate power during high price periods (discharging) Existing plants use gas firing during; many new concepts are fuel-free 70% cycle efficiency is likely best achievable Source: _plant/compressed_air_energy

13 CAES IN AUSTRALIA What is the realistic potential in Australia? - NOBODY KNOWS (YET) Boree domal salt deposit Source: Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics, Evaporites in Australia, 1980

14 INTEGRAL SOLAR AND STORAGE COSTS Back of the envelope only Only considering solar here: to enable direct comparison with CST because daily cycling is a good application for bulk energy storage CST - $150/MWh PV + NaS batteries - $230/MWh PV + Li NMC batteries - $230/MWh PV + PHS potentially $150/MWh PV + CAES - $180/MWh Generic system sized for 70% capacity factor Assumes $80/MWh PV energy cost Considers capex, opex, cycle efficiency, cycle life 5% discount rate, 25 year life

15 CONCLUSIONS Utility scale bulk energy storage will be a critical element of our future low carbon electricity supply Whilst many expect significant cost reductions in batteries, non-battery energy storage options should not be ignored, particularly for bulk energy storage applications

16 DISCLAIMER The material in this presentation has been prepared by WSP Parsons Brinckerhoff. Copyright and other intellectual property rights in this presentation vest exclusively with WSP Parsons Brinckerhoff. Apart from any use permitted under applicable copyright legislation, no part of this work may in any form or by any means (electronic, graphic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) be reproduced, copied, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted without prior written permission. WSP Parsons Brinckerhoff assumes no responsibility and will not be liable to any person or organisation ( Third Party ) for or in relation to any matter dealt with or conclusions expressed in the material, or for any loss or damage suffered (or alleged to be suffered) by a Third Party arising out of or in connection with any matter dealt with in the material. A Third Party should make its own enquiries and obtain independent advice in relation to any matter dealt with or conclusions expressed in the material. Any use which a Third Party makes of this Report or any reliance on (or decisions to be made) based on this Report, is the responsibility of that Third Party. All rights reserved.