Technip Supporting Malaysian OTEC Ambitions. Jim O SULLIVAN, CTO Technip Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia September 2015

Transcription

1 Technip Supporting Malaysian OTEC Ambitions Jim O SULLIVAN, CTO Technip Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia September

2 Table of contents 1. Technip Today 2. OTEC Design & Economic Issues 3. Malaysian OTEC Opportunities 2

3 Technip Today 3 Footer can be customized

4 Technip Today With engineering, technologies and project management, on land and at sea, we safely and successfully deliver the best solutions for our clients in the energy business Worldwide presence with over 38,000 people in 48 countries Industrial assets on all continents, a fleet of 27 vessels (of which 6 under construction) 2014 revenue: 10.7 billion ENERGY IS AT THE CORE OF TECHNIP 4

5 An Absolute Commitment to HSES The Health and Safety of our people is a core value and an absolute commitment Thierry Pilenko, Chairman and CEO of Technip Technip s global HSES climate change program A Reference Company in HSES ( Chevron, Wheatstone, Shell Prelude, Shell Malikai, Petronas RAPID) DELIVERING EXCELLENT HSES PERFORMANCE AT EVERY LEVEL 5

6 Malaysia Major Technip Resource Center 4,200 Engineering & Project Management Asiaflex Products, flexible pipe and umbilical manufacturing plant 4,000 Fleet & others 3,400 9,800 2,500 2,500 Asia Pacific 6,000 1,000 4,600 Fabrication Part Owner MMHE Marine Vessels 3,000 in Malaysia Technip Projects: Kikeh Gumusut- Kakap Malikai Petronas FLNG1 6

7 OTEC Technip Malaysia Technip globally covers the full range of OTEC technologies and delivery capabilities, and envisions OTEC facilities as a future design and delivery service. Technip has a very strong organization in Asia Pacific, centered in Malaysia where we have maintained strong client relationships and made substantial investments. Technip understands Malaysia s desire to be a leader in OTEC and wants to support that ambition. Offshore Malaysia represents an ideal environment for a demonstration plant and educational facility. 7

8 8 OTEC Design & Economic Issues

9 OTEC Plant Architecture OTEC System Platform Power Generation Power Delivery Instrument & Control Integration & Installation Hull Structure Ammonia System Platform Substation Platform Management Platform Fabrication Super Structure Heat Exchanger Power Transmission Power Cycle Management Facilities Integration Station Keeping Marine System Cold Water Lift System Warm Water Lift System Onshore Substation Environmental Monitoring Management Transportation and Installation Mixed Water Discharge System Technip has design engineers and supplier networks for all OTEC components 9

10 Technip Did Designs for 5, 10 & 100 MW Net NH3 Feed Pump NH3 Circ. Pump WW Lift Pump CW Lift Pump Hotel Load Total Parasitic Pow NH3 Turbine Power Generator Power Net Power FI 2001 WARM SEAWATER SUPPLY (20 m depth) 224 kg/s 1003 WARM WATER PIPE (HDPE) FC V-102 AMMONIA DEMISTER LC OTEC - PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM CASE X1 TP 5MW Pilot (Delivered Power) Weiland Tube Evaporator/ Weiland Tube Condenser 1005 E-101A-F AMMONIA EVAPORATOR (Weiland Tube) PC 4003A DISCHARGE (60 m depth) F-101A/B AMMONIA FILTER DISCHARGE PIPE (HDPE) P-101A/B AMMONIA FEED PUMP T-101 AMMONIA TURBINE/ GENERATOR 1008 E-102A/B AMMONIA Condenser CONDENSER (Weiland Tube) 2004 WARM WATER 60.7% C V LIFT PUMP bar_g AMMONIA kg/s BUFFER 0.36 m3/s VESSEL 5739 gpm P kw 70.0% 296 kw S-201 WARM WATER SUMP kw 689 kw 1,085 kw 270 kw 2,361 kw 8,001 kw 7,681 kw 5,320 kw Ratio Gen/Net Powe 1.44 Delivered Power Warm Water Flow Cold Water Flow Working Fluid Flow C 1.95 bar_g 5,001 kw 20,845 kg/s 13,921 kg/s C 8.29 bar_g kg/s vfrac= 0 P-201A/B C bar_g kg/s m3/s gpm C 8.29 bar_g kg/s 0.77 m3/s gpm P kw C 0.22 bar_g kg/s 1006 E MW UA 78.91E6W/C 2.6 C M in App U= 3383 W/C A= 23325m2 Shells= 5.7 P-102A/B AMMONIA CIRCULATING PUMP C 8.29 bar_g kg/s vfrac= C 8.45 bar_g 1002 Hydraulics WW#1 inlet Head+Line Loss 0.00 (bar) WW#1 Evaporator loss 0.15 (bar) WW#1 Duct loss+disch Loss 0.08 (bar) WW#1 pump head req 0.23 (bar) CW#1 inlet Head+Line Loss 0.26 (bar) CW#1 Condenser loss 0.21 (bar) CW#1 Duct loss+disch Loss 0.08 (bar) CW#1 pump head req 0.55 (bar) NH3 #1 Evaporator loss 0.16 (bar) NH3 #1 Condenser loss 0.16 (bar) NH3 #1 Pump CV discharge l 2.00 (bar) C 8.13 bar_g kg/s vfrac= S-401 RETURN WATER SUMP C 0.01 bar_g kg/s m3/s gpm C 0 bar_g kg/s m3/s gpm 1002 T kw 81.0% C 0.01 bar_g kg/s m3/s gpm 4003A C 5.88 bar_g P kw 60.7% C 5.5 bar_g kg/s vfrac= E M W UA 61.5E6W/C 2.1 C M in App U= 2722 W/C A= 22593m2 Shells= 1.8 T kw 81.0% G kw 96.0% Parasit ic 2361 kw N et Power 5320 kw Delivered P 5001 kw 94.0% Make-Up Ammonia FI C 5.33 bar_g kg/s 0.36 m3/s 5739 gpm S-301 COLD WATER SUMP COLD WATER PIPE (HDPE) COLD SEAWATER SUPPLY (1000 m depth) Working Fluid WW:CW ratio 1.50 WW Temp CW Temp Working Fluid SW Efficiencies P kw 70.0% C 0.27 bar_g kg/s m3/s gpm 3003A 3002A P-301A/B COLD WATER LIFT PUMP C 4.2 C NH3 Hysys-Fresh Water Water Pumps 70% Working fluid Pump 61% Pow er Turbine 81% Generator 96% Delivered Pow er Ef 94% HX min. approach temp. Evaporators C bar_g 2.6 C 2.1 C C bar_g kg/s m3/s gpm 10

11 11 5MW Plant Served As The Building Block

12 Spar Type Considered Motions, Fabrication & Installation Issues For Hull Selection vs Power Capacities Advantages Best in-situ stability for cold pipe design Best operability in cyclonic regions Disadvantages Horizontal fabrication, transport, on site up-righting and topside installation Access for maintenance in hull Multi-Column Type Advantages Vertical fabrication and integration Relatively good stability in cyclonic regions with large deck areas Disadvantages Access for maintenance in hull Low hull inefficiency for higher power capacity 12 Ship Shape Type Advantages Lowest cost for supporting facilities Drydock fabrication and quayside topside integration with large deck areas Disadvantages Vessel motions in cyclonic regions difficult cold pipe designs Caisson Type Advantages Spar like stability excellent operability in cyclonic region Vertical fabrication, transportation and installation Good hull efficiency and access for maintenance Disadvantages Fabrication sites

13 Installed Capital Cost ($/kw) Resulting Installed CAPEX Curve Similar To Published Curves But Marginally Higher Technical Price Estimates for 5, 10 and 100 MW Net OTEC Power Plants, Installed Δ < 20MW the installed cost strong function of floater Δ > 20MW the installed cost strong function of numbers of heat exchangers Δ Nominal Plant Size, MW-net Differences were in integration, transportation and installation not in hardware and hull

14 Majority Of Potential Users Have Positive Returns With Today s Energy Prices Market expected return 14 Source: NYU Stern School of Business for Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) of Global Power Generation 2013

15 Malaysian OTEC 15 Footer can be customized

16 Potential for OTEC in Malaysia Mild environment, >1000m depth (Sabah Trench), DT>25 C, <120km offshore Several near-by production facilities power users 16

17 Technip Has Been Involved In Several Sabah Trough Deliveries Know Area Well SHELL Gumusut-Kakap Semi-Sub, Offshore Sabah (Detailed Engineering) MURPHY Kikeh Spar Dry Tree Unit + Subsea facilities, Offshore Sabah (Engineering, Procurement, Construction & Installation) Shell Malikai TLP, Malaysia ( Engineering, Procurement, Construction ) 17

18 Sabah O&G Deepwater: Technip s OTEC Integration Plan Study O&G fields across entire Sabah Deepwater / Trough Identify power demand for each O&G DW cluster Identify strategies that optimize power costs considering both OTEC and conventional Gas- Fired Turbine Power Generation Support Petronas and PSCs to become pioneer of this hybrid solution and promote it worldwide! 18

19 Summary OTEC technology is mature Ample supplier base for key components Availability of advanced testing facilities Economics are workable Power generation clear visible market There are other less visible markets Malaysia is an ideal location for OTEC industry Environment ideal National resources available We can do this 19

20 Thank you 20