Mid-South Regional Travel Surveys & Model Update

Transcription

1 Mid-South Regional Travel Surveys & Model Update May 9, 2014 Presented to the Mid-South Travel Survey and Model Update Steering Committee By: Thomas Rossi, Anurag Komanduri, and Brent Selby, Cambridge Systematics Subconsultants: Abt SRBI, Dikita Engineering and Neel-Schaffer

2 Introductions Update on modeling data Transit survey status update Household survey status update Update on freight data Update on bike-ped data Project schedule/status Questions and comments

3 Introductions of Steering Committee Consultant Team Cambridge Systematics prime, modeling lead & survey analysis Dikita Engineering transit onboard survey lead Abt SRBI household survey lead Neel-Schaffer support on freight and non-motorized surveys

4 Finalize TAZ boundaries Input from MDoT & ADoT Input from West Memphis MPO Consistent with ACS boundaries Share with TDoT for approval Highway and transit networks Revised bus stop data from MATA TeleAtlas data for QA/QC NPMRDS data for free flow speeds Socioeconomic data ACS data primary source Consistent with TDoT projections Grounded in reality

5 Survey fieldwork Additional surveys for Trolley 101 in March Drawing for prizes in April Met 10% ridership target on all routes Paratransit survey design MATA review underway Data Analysis Updated bus stop shapefiles from MATA in late April QA/QC ongoing (geocoding & reasonableness checks) Expansion and findings in May/June

6 Household Travel Survey Almost 10,000 households recruited 68% by phone 32% by web GPS recruitment complete 60 households in March 63 households in April 9,144 households had travel dates in March and April 744 have travel dates in May Total Households in Sample Region ( year ACS) Recruited Households Region County N % N % 1 Shelby County 340, % 7, % 2 DeSoto County 56, % % Tipton County 21, % % Fayette County 13, % % 3 Marshall County 12, % % Tate County 9, % % Tunica County 3, % % TOTAL 459, % 9, % Multimodal retrieval Web ($10 incentive) Mail-back Phone (upon request)

7 Household Travel Survey 4,515 households retrieved as of May 8 exceeded target 4,263 processed Will collect 5% over target Some segments falling short Zero-vehicle households Large households Some counties Have taken corrective actions Increased incentives for lowerresponse segments Load more rural sample Reminders to rural 0 vehicle HHs already recruited Purchased sample of lower income households

8 Household Travel Survey Interim survey dataset provided by SRBI CS staff performing QA/QC 100 standard checks Preliminary data analysis routines CheckNo Critical Description 8-May % 18-Apr % Status 1 1 Missing Geocodes, Home % 0 0.0% CLEAN 2 1 Sign Inconsistency in Geocodes, home 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Always Clean 3 1 Geocodes Out of the Region, home 0 0.0% 1 0.0% Always Clean 4 0 Length HHID must be constant % 0 0.0% Always Clean 5 0 Number of Workers > HH Members % 0 0.0% Always Clean 6 1 HH Missing Income % % To be imputed 7 0 HH Has Only Over/Under $50K Income % % To be imputed 8 1 HH ID in HH File Not in Person file 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Always Clean 9 1 Number of People in Person File Must Equal HHsize 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Always Clean 11 0 Number of Spouses > % 2 0.0% Need to check

9 Household Travel Survey CheckNo Critical Description 8-May % 18-Apr % Status 1 1 Trip: Missing Geocode, origin % % To investigate 2 1 Trip: Missing Geocode, destination % % Much Better 3 1 Trip: Sign Inconsistency in Geocode, origin 2 0.0% 1 0.0% Small Number 4 1 Trip: Sign Inconsistency in Geocode, destination 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Always Clean 5 0 Trip: Geocode Out of the Region, origin % % To investigate 6 0 Trip: Geocode Out of the Region, destination % % To investigate 7 1 Trip: All HHs in the Trip File Should be in HH File 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Always Clean 8 1 Trip: Duplicate Trip Record 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Always Clean 9 0 Trip: Final Trip Record not Marked as Last 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Always Clean 10 1 Trip: Non-traveller has destination % 0 0.0% Always Clean 11 0 Trip: Non-traveler not at home % 0 0.0% To investigate 12 1 Trip: Name/Origin Activity/Type Don't Match Previous Destination's 1 0.0% 0 0.0% Small Number 13 1 Trip: Origin Lat/Long Don't Match Previous Destination Lat/Long % % Getting Better 14 1 Trip: Same O or D (Name & Address) as Previous Record % % To investigate 15 1 Trip: O and D (Name and Address) are the Same % % To investigate 16 0 Trip: O and D are Both Home Activity % % To investigate 17 0 Trip: Day Does not Start at Home or Work % % OK 18 0 Trip: Day Does not End at Home or Work % 0 0.0% Big Change 19 1 Trip: Missing Time Information % % Much Better

10 Discussions with TDoT, MDoT and ADoT about Freight Data TDoT will share TRANSEARCH data from IHS/Global Insight Processed Truck GPS data from ATRI also to be shared by TDoT Freight finder database discussion with MDoT Review of freight survey conducted by University of Memphis Need for supplementary surveys to be discussed Late summer time-frame

11 Bike-ped counts completed by Neel-Schaffer in April Information from one count location processed QA/QC underway before processing other count information

12 Online bike-ped survey monitored by Abt-SRBI 550+ online completes as of May 8, 2014 Recruitment of HTS participants week of 5/12 Via web HTS Recruits providing addresses (~5400) Data collection to be completed by June 15

13 1. Project Management 2. Travel Demand Model Consultation 3. Research Design, Pretest, and Refinement 4. Household Travel Survey Data Collection 5. Freight Survey Task 6. Transit Onboard Survey 7. Bicycle and Pedestrian Survey 8. Data Weighting and Expansion 9. Travel Surveys Final Report/ Data Delivery 10.Travel Demand Model Update Jun 1 Approximate Month (revised) Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Interim Findings Deliverable Project Oversight Steering Committee Meetings 13

14