Ontario Ministry of the Environment - Record of Site Condition # Record of Site Condition Under Part XV.1 of the Environment Protection Act

Transcription

1 Ontario Ministry of the Environment - Record of Site Condition # Record of Site Condition Under Part XV.1 of the Environment Protection Act Summary Record of Site Condition Number Date Filed to Environmental Site Registry 03/12/2012 Certification Date 29/03/2012 Current Property Use Industrial Intended Property Use Commercial Certificate of Property Use Number Applicable Site Condition Standards** Property Municipal Address No CPU Full Depth Generic Site Conditions Standard, with Potable Ground Water, Coarse Textured Soil, for Commercial property use 500 Norwich Ave N4S 3W5, 504 Norwich Ave. N4S 3W5, 496 Norwich Ave N4S 3W5 Notice to Readers Concerning Due Diligence This record of site condition has been filed in the Environmental Site Registry to which the public has access and which contains a notice advising users of the Environmental Site Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Environmental Site Registry. Contents of this Record of Site Condition This record of site condition consists (RSC) of this document which is available to be printed directly from the Environmental Site Registry as well as all supporting documentation indicated in this RSC to have been submitted in electronic format to the Ministry of the Environment.

2 RSC Information Each field marked by an asterisk (* ) must be completed. Is the property used, or has it ever been used, in whole or in part for an industrial use or as a garage; a bulk liquid dispensing facility, including a gasoline outlet; or for the operation of dry cleaning equipment? Yes * No Is the property being used or has the property ever been used, in whole or in part (a) for quarrying to excavate consolidated or unconsolidated aggregate; or (b) for that aspect of the production of oil and gas consisting of the presence of an oil well or gas well on, in or under the property? Yes * No Is the property currently used for an agricultural or other use, or a community use, an institutional use, a parkland use or a residential use? Yes * No Select Type of RSC * Phase 1 and 2 RSC Phase 1 and 2 RSC with RA

3 Owners' General Information Submitting Owner's Information Owner's Information Owners' General Information Is the submitting owner(s) a Receiver for the Property? * Yes No Is the submitting owner(s) represented by an Agent? * Yes No

4 Owners' General Information Submitting Owner's Information Owner's Information Submitting Owner's Information Type of Owner * Owner Name * Firm, Corporation or Partnership Ontario Limited Street Number * Street Name * Apt No. /RR No. 780 Dundas Street City, Town or Village * Province * Postal Code * Country Woodstock Ont N4S 1E9 Submitting Owner's Contact Information Contact First Name * Contact Last Name * Hussein Zabian Phone Number * (including area code) Fax Number (including area code) Address (519)

5 Property Address Municipality Information Property Address Does the Property have a Municipal Address? Yes No * Property Reference Number Geographical Reference/Area of RSC Property Is the property administered by MNR under the Public Lands Act? Yes No * Previously Filed RSC(s) and TN(s) Street Number * Street Name * 500 Norwich Ave Apt No. /RR No. City, Town or Village * Woodstock Street Number * Street Name * Province * Ont Postal Code * N4S 3W5 Apt No. /RR No. 504 Norwich Ave. City, Town or Village * Woodstock Province * Ont Postal Code * N4S 3W5 Street Number * Street Name * 496 Norwich Ave Apt No. /RR No. City, Town or Village * Province * Postal Code * Woodstock Ont N4S 3W5

6 Property Address Municipality Information Property Reference Number Geographical Reference/Area of RSC Property Previously Filed RSC(s) and TN(s) Municipality & Property Address Information Municipality Information Lower or Single Tier Municipality * Woodstock Click here to view the list of municipalities Tier of Municipality Upper Tier Municipality Lower Tier Oxford The District Office of MOE * London District Office Address of District Office of MOE 733 Exeter Road, London ON N6E 1L3

7 Property Address Municipality Information Property Reference Number Geographical Reference/Area of RSC Property Previously Filed RSC(s) and TN(s) Municipality & Property Address Information Property Reference Number Assessment Roll Number Property Identifier Number (PIN #)

8 Property Address Municipality Information Property Reference Number Geographical Reference/Area of RSC Property Previously Filed RSC(s) and TN(s) Geo Reference & Other Properties Details Geographical References UTM Coordinates Datum NAD 83 Zone * 17 Easting * 521, Northing * 4,773, Area of RSC Property Total Area of RSC Property in Hectares * 0.32

9 Previous Submission Information Previously Filed Record of Site Condition Number: Property Address Municipality Information Property Reference Number Previously Filed Transition Notice Number: Geographical Reference/Area of RSC Property Previously Filed RSC(s) and TN(s)

10 Other Site Condition Information Site Conditions for 2011 Generic Standards Risk Assessment Information Property Use and Certification Date Remedial Action and Mitigation Details Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern Table of Current/Past Property Uses of Phase One Property Site Condition Information Other Site Condition Information Is the RSC being submitted using the transition provision under Section 21.1 of the Regulation? Yes No *

11 Other Site Condition Information Site Conditions for 2011 Generic Standards Risk Assessment Information Property Use and Certification Date Remedial Action and Mitigation Details Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern Table of Current/Past Property Uses of Phase One Property Site Condition Information Site Conditions for 2011 Generic Standards Is Property: (i) Within an area of natural significance? or Does Property: (ii) Include or is adjacent to an area of natural significance or part of such an area? or (ii) Include land that is within 30 m of an area of natural significance or part of such an area. Yes No Soil at the property has: (i) a ph value for Surface Soil less than 5 or greater than 9 or (ii) a ph value for Subsurface Soil less than 5 or greater than 11. Yes No Is qualified person of the opinion that, given the characteristics of the property and the certifications the qualified person would be required to make in a record of site condition in relation to the property as specified in Schedule A, it is appropriate to apply this section to the property? * Yes No What is the intended use of the property? * Commercial Is the property a shallow soil property? Yes * * * No Does the property include or is the property adjacent to a water body or does it include land that is within 30 metres of a water body? * Yes No What is the Assessment/Restoration approach? Background * Full Depth Generic Stratified What is the ground water condition for the property? Potable * Non-potable What is the texture of the soil? Coarse * Medium and Fine Applicable 2011 Generic Standard Table Number : TABLE 2

12 Other Site Condition Information Risk Assessment Information Has a Certificate of Property Use (CPU) been issued under section of the Act for the RSC property? Yes No Site Conditions for 2011 Generic Standards Risk Assessment Information Property Use and Certification Date Remedial Action and Mitigation Details Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern Table of Current/Past Property Uses of Phase One Property

13 Other Site Condition Information Site Conditions for 2011 Generic Standards Property Use and Certification Date Current Property Use and Certification Date What is the current use of the property? * Industrial Certification Date * 2012/03/29 Risk Assessment Information Property Use and Certification Date Remedial Action and Mitigation Details Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern Table of Current/Past Property Uses of Phase One Property

14 Other Site Condition Information Site Conditions for 2011 Generic Standards Remedial Action & Mitigation Soil Control or Treatment Measures Identify the estimated quantities of the soil, if any, originating at and remaining on the RSC property that have been remediated, at a location either on or off the property, to reduce the concentration of contaminants in the soil as measured in, or equivalent to, in-ground volume in cubic metres, and indicate the remediation process or processes used and the estimated amount of soil remediated by each identified process. None Risk Assessment Information Property Use and Certification Data Remedial Action and Mitigation Details Identify the estimated quantities of soil or sediment, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property as measured in, or equivalent to, the in-ground volume in cubic metres. None Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern Table of Current/Past Property Uses of Phase One Property Identify the estimated quantity of the soil, if any, being brought from another property to and deposited at the RSC property, not including any soil that may have originated at but been remediated off the RSC property not including any soil that may have been remediated off the property and brought back to the property as measured in, or equivalent to, the in-ground volume in cubic metres. None Indicate if any soil, sediment or ground water at the RSC property that is or was located within 3 metres of the RSC property boundary has been remediated or removed for the purpose of remediation. None

15 Other Site Condition Information Site Conditions for 2011 Generic Standards Remedial Action & Mitigation Ground Water Control or Treatment Measures Identify and describe any ground water control or treatment measures that were required for the RSC property prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing; or are or will be required for the RSC property after the certification date. None Risk Assessment Information Property Use and Certification Data Remedial Action and Mitigation Details Identify the estimated volume in litres of ground water, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property. None Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern Table of Current/Past Property Uses of Phase One Property Other Treatment Measures Other than the activities identified in the in the Soil or Ground Water Control or Treatment Measures above, identify any constructed works that, prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing, were required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property; or after the certification date, are required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property. None Indicate whether there are any monitoring requirements or any requirements for care, maintenance or replacement of any monitoring or control works for known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date, and whether any monitoring requirements or requirements for care, maintenance or replacement of any monitoring or control works are ground water management measures or soil management measures. None

16 Other Site Condition Information Site Conditions for 2011 Generic Standards Risk Assessment Information Property Use and Certification Data Remedial Action and Mitigation Details Potential Environmental Concern Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern Are there areas of potential environmental concern? * Yes No Click here for Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern Form Current and Past Property Use Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property Click here for Table of Current and Past Property Use Form Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern Table of Current/Past Property Use of Phase One Property

17 Contaminants Measured in SOIL Contaminants Measured in GROUND WATER Contaminants Measured in SEDIMENTS Contaminants Measured in SOIL General Information Related to Soil Media Is there no soil on, in or under the property? * (Note there is no soil if either there is no soil on, in or under the property OR the soil present is not sufficient to investigate, sample and analyze in a manner which will meet the requirements and objectives of a phase two environmental site assessment) Yes No

18 Contaminants Measured in SOIL Contaminants Measured in GROUND WATER Contaminants Measured in SEDIMENTS Contaminants Measured in SOIL Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil Contaminant 1-30 * Type of Measurement * Measured * Applicable Concentration Standard Unit Of Measure Antimony Minimum Detectable.8 40 µg/g Arsenic Measured 5 18 µg/g Barium Measured µg/g Beryllium Minimum Detectable.5 8 µg/g Boron (total) Measured µg/g Cadmium Measured µg/g Chromium Total Measured µg/g Cobalt Measured µg/g Copper Measured µg/g Lead Measured µg/g Molybdenum Measured.8 40 µg/g Nickel Measured µg/g Selenium Minimum Detectable µg/g Silver Measured.3 40 µg/g Thallium Minimum Detectable µg/g Uranium Measured.7 33 µg/g Vanadium Measured µg/g Zinc Measured µg/g Electrical Conductivity Measured ms/cm Sodium Adsorption Ratio Measured Naphthalene Minimum Detectable µg/g Acenaphthylene Minimum Detectable µg/g Acenaphthylene Minimum Detectable µg/g Fluorene Minimum Detectable µg/g Pyrene Measured µg/g Benz[a]anthracene Measured µg/g Boron (Hot Water Soluble)* Measured.72 2 µg/g Chrysene Measured µg/g Benzo[b]fluoranthene Measured µg/g Benzo[k]fluoranthene Measured µg/g Total # of Contaminants 72

19 Contaminants Measured in SOIL Contaminants Measured in GROUND WATER Contaminants Measured in SEDIMENTS Contaminants Measured in SOIL Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil Contaminant * Type of Measurement * Measured * Applicable Concentration Standard Unit Of Measure Benzo[a]pyrene Measured µg/g Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene Measured µg/g Dibenz[a h]anthracene Minimum Detectable µg/g Benzo[ghi]perylene Minimum Detectable µg/g Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) *** Minimum Detectable µg/g Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** Minimum Detectable 5 55 µg/g Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 Minimum Detectable µg/g Petroleum Hydrocarbons F3 Minimum Detectable µg/g Petroleum Hydrocarbons F4 Minimum Detectable µg/g Dichlorodifluoromethane Minimum Detectable µg/g Vinyl Chloride Minimum Detectable µg/g Bromomethane Minimum Detectable µg/g Trichlorofluoromethane Minimum Detectable.05 4 µg/g Acetone Minimum Detectable.5 16 µg/g Dichloroethylene, 1,1- Minimum Detectable µg/g Methylene Chloride Minimum Detectable µg/g Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- Minimum Detectable µg/g Methyl tert-butyl Ether (MTBE) Minimum Detectable µg/g Dichloroethane, 1,1- Minimum Detectable µg/g Methyl Ethyl Ketone Minimum Detectable.5 70 µg/g Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- Minimum Detectable µg/g Chloroform Minimum Detectable µg/g Dichloroethane, 1,1- Minimum Detectable µg/g Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- Minimum Detectable µg/g Carbon Tetrachloride Minimum Detectable µg/g Benzene Minimum Detectable µg/g Dichloropropane, 1,2- Minimum Detectable µg/g Trichloroethylene Minimum Detectable µg/g Bromodichloromethane Minimum Detectable µg/g Methyl Isobutyl Ketone Minimum Detectable.5 31 µg/g Total # of Contaminants 72

20 Contaminants Measured in SOIL Contaminants Measured in GROUND WATER Contaminants Measured in SEDIMENTS Contaminants Measured in SOIL Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil Contaminant * Type of Measurement * Measured * Applicable Concentration Standard Unit Of Measure Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- Minimum Detectable µg/g Toluene Minimum Detectable µg/g Dibromochloromethane Minimum Detectable µg/g Ethylene dibromide Minimum Detectable µg/g Tetrachloroethylene Minimum Detectable µg/g Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- Minimum Detectable µg/g Chlorobenzene Minimum Detectable µg/g Ethylbenzene Minimum Detectable µg/g Xylene Mixture Minimum Detectable µg/g Bromoform Minimum Detectable µg/g Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- Minimum Detectable µg/g Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- Minimum Detectable µg/g Total # of Contaminants 72

21 Contaminants Measured in SOIL Contaminants Measured in GROUND WATER Contaminants Measured in SEDIMENTS Contaminants Measured in Ground Water Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Ground Water Contaminant 1-30 * Type of Measurement * Measured * Applicable Concentration Standard Unit Of Measure Antimony Minimum Detectable.5 6 µg/l Arsenic Minimum Detectable 1 25 µg/l Barium Measured µg/l Beryllium Minimum Detectable.5 4 µg/l Boron (total) Measured µg/l Cadmium Minimum Detectable µg/l Chromium Total Measured µg/l Cobalt Measured µg/l Copper Measured µg/l Lead Measured 1 10 µg/l Molybdenum Measured µg/l Nickel Measured µg/l Selenium Measured µg/l Silver Minimum Detectable µg/l Thallium Minimum Detectable.3 2 µg/l Uranium Measured.8 20 µg/l Vanadium Measured µg/l Zinc Measured µg/l Mercury Minimum Detectable µg/l Chromium VI Minimum Detectable 5 25 µg/l Cyanide (CN-) Minimum Detectable 2 66 µg/l Chloride Measured µg/l Sodium Measured µg/l Dichlorodifluoromethane Minimum Detectable µg/l Vinyl Chloride Minimum Detectable µg/l Bromomethane Minimum Detectable µg/l Trichlorofluoromethane Minimum Detectable µg/l Acetone Minimum Detectable µg/l Dichloroethylene, 1,1- Minimum Detectable µg/l Methylene Chloride Minimum Detectable.3 50 µg/l Total # of Contaminants 72

22 Contaminants Measured in SOIL Contaminants Measured in GROUND WATER Contaminants Measured in SEDIMENTS Contaminants Measured in Ground Water Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Ground Water Contaminant * Type of Measurement * Measured * Applicable Concentration Standard Unit Of Measure Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- Minimum Detectable µg/l Methyl tert-butyl Ether (MTBE) Minimum Detectable.2 15 µg/l Dichloroethane, 1,1- Minimum Detectable.3 5 µg/l Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- Minimum Detectable µg/l Carbon Tetrachloride Minimum Detectable µg/l Benzene Minimum Detectable.2 5 µg/l Dichloropropane, 1,2- Minimum Detectable.2 5 µg/l Trichloroethylene Minimum Detectable µg/l Bromodichloromethane Minimum Detectable.2 16 µg/l Methyl Isobutyl Ketone Minimum Detectable µg/l Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- Minimum Detectable µg/l Toluene Measured µg/l Dibromochloromethane Minimum Detectable.1 25 µg/l Ethylene dibromide Minimum Detectable µg/l Tetrachloroethylene Minimum Detectable µg/l Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- Minimum Detectable µg/l Chlorobenzene Minimum Detectable.1 30 µg/l Naphthalene Minimum Detectable.2 11 µg/l Acenaphthylene Minimum Detectable.2 1 µg/l Acenaphthene Minimum Detectable µg/l Fluorene Minimum Detectable µg/l Phenanthrene Minimum Detectable.1 1 µg/l Anthracene Minimum Detectable µg/l Fluoranthene Minimum Detectable µg/l Pyrene Minimum Detectable µg/l Benz[a]anthracene Minimum Detectable.2 1 µg/l Chloroform Minimum Detectable µg/l Methyl Ethyl Ketone Minimum Detectable µg/l Chrysene Minimum Detectable µg/l Benzo[b]fluoranthene Minimum Detectable µg/l Total # of Contaminants 72

23 Contaminants Measured in SOIL Contaminants Measured in GROUND WATER Contaminants Measured in SEDIMENTS Contaminants Measured in Ground Water Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Ground Water Contaminant * Type of Measurement * Measured * Applicable Concentration Standard Unit Of Measure Benzo[k]fluoranthene Minimum Detectable µg/l Benzo[a]pyrene Minimum Detectable µg/l Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene Minimum Detectable µg/l Dibenz[a h]anthracene Minimum Detectable µg/l Benzo[ghi]perylene Minimum Detectable µg/l Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) *** Minimum Detectable µg/l Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** Minimum Detectable µg/l Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 Minimum Detectable µg/l Petroleum Hydrocarbons F3 Minimum Detectable µg/l Petroleum Hydrocarbons F4 Minimum Detectable µg/l Ethylbenzene Minimum Detectable µg/l Xylene Mixture Minimum Detectable µg/l Total # of Contaminants 72

24 Contaminants Measured in SOIL Contaminants Measured in GROUND WATER Contaminants Measured in SEDIMENTS Contaminants Measured in Sediments Has sediment sampling been conducted at the property? Yes No *

25 Contaminants Measured in SOIL Contaminants Measured in GROUND WATER Contaminants Measured in SEDIMENTS Laboratory Information Laboratory Name * Agat Laboratories

26 Phase One ESA Reports Phase Two ESA Reports Phase One Reports and Other Documents ESA Reports Phase One ESA Reports The date the last work on the records review, interviews and site reconnaissance components of the phase one environmental site assessment was done. 2012/02/29 * Type of Report * Report Title * Date of Report* Author of Report * Name of Consulting Organization Phase One ESA A Phase I Enviro 2012/11/19 George Duncan A & A Environmental C Phase Two Reports and Other Documents

27 Phase One ESA Reports Phase Two ESA Reports Phase One Reports and Other Documents ESA Reports Phase Two ESA Reports The date the last work on the planning of the site investigation and conducting the site investigation components of the phase two environmental site assessment was done. 2012/11/12 * Type of Report * Report Title * Date of Report* Author of Report * Name of Consulting Organization Phase Two ESA A Phase II Enviro 2012/11/20 George Duncan A & A Environmental C Phase Two Reports and Other Documents

28 Phase One ESA Reports Phase Two ESA Reports Reports and Other Documents Phase 1 Reports and Other Documents List the Reports/Documents other than the document(s) used as your Phase 1 ESA relied on in certifying the information set out in Section 10 of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the Phase 1 ESA Report Title* Date of Report* Author of Report * A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment R 2012/03/12 Robert J. Helwig LVM Name of Consulting Organization for Report Phase One Reports and Other Documents Phase Two Reports and Other Documents

29 Phase One ESA Reports Reports and Other Documents Phase 2 Reports and Other Documents List the Reports/Documents other than the document(s) used as your Phase 2 ESA relied on in making any certifications in the RSC in relation to the Phase 2 ESA or otherwise used in conducting the Phase 2 ESA Report Title Date of Report Author of Report Name of Consulting Organization for Report Phase Two ESA Reports Phase One Reports and Other Documents Phase Two Reports and Other Documents

30 QP Information First Name * Middle Name Last Name * George Which one of the following licences under the Professional Engineers Act do you hold? * Duncan QP Information Which one of the following memberships under the Professional Geoscientists Act do you hold? * Limited Member Membership Number 1794 * Is the QP Employed? * Employer Name * Yes A & A Environmental Consultants Inc No QP Contact Information Phone Number * Fax Number * * (519) (519) gduncan@aaenvironmental.ca QP Mailing Address Information Street Number * Street Name * Apt No. / RR No. 513 Adelaide St 2 City, Town or Village * Province * Postal Code * Woodstock Ont. N4S 4B5

31 QP Owner QP C As the qualified person, I certify that: * A phase one environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from a records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, a report and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation. A phase two environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from planning and conducting a site investigation, a report, and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation. The information represents the site conditions at the sampling points at the time of sampling only and the conditions between and beyond the sampling points may vary. As of 2012/03/29, in my opinion, based on the phase one environmental site assessment and the phase two environmental site assessment, and any confirmatory sampling, there is no evidence of any contaminants in the soil, ground water or sediment on, in or under the RSC property that would interfere with the type of property use to which the RSC property will be put, as specified in the RSC. Ground water sampling has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation. As of 2012/03/29, in my opinion, based on the phase one and phase two environmental site assessments and any confirmatory sampling, the RSC property meets the applicable full depth generic site condition standards prescribed by section 36 of the regulation for all contaminants prescribed by the regulation in relation to the type of property use for which this RSC is filed, except for those contaminants (if any) specified in this RSC at Table 2, Maximum Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment. As of 2012/03/29, the maximum known concentration of each contaminant in soil, sediment and ground water at the RSC property for which sampling and analysis has been performed is specified in this RSC at Table 1, Maximum Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards. I am a qualified person and have the qualifications required by section 5 of the regulation. I have in place an insurance policy that satisfies the requirements of section 7 of the regulation. I acknowledge that the RSC will be submitted for filing in the Environmental Site Registry, that records of site condition that are filed in the Registry are available for examination by the public and that the Registry contains a notice advising users of the Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Registry. The opinions expressed in this RSC are engineering or scientific opinions made in accordance with generally accepted principles and practices as recognized by members of the environmental engineering or science profession or discipline practising at the same time and in the same or similar location. I do not hold and have not held a direct or indirect interest in the RSC property or any property which includes the RSC property and was the subject of a phase one or two environmental site assessment or risk assessment upon which this record of site condition is based To the best of my knowledge, the certifications and statements in this part of the RSC are true as of 2012/03/29. By signing this RSC, I make no express or implied warranties or guarantees. I, the qualified person named below, on the date stated below, make all of the stated certifications applicable to the qualified person in this Part of the record of site condition. George Duncan 2012/11/20

32 Owner Click here to download Firm, Corp, Other Form QP Owner

33 Please note, only PDF attachments will be accepted with the exception of the Property Specific Standard, which must be an Excel document. Certificate of Status or equivalent Certificate of Status Nov, 13, 2012.pdf Lawyer s letter consisting of a legal description of the property * * Lawyers letter revised Sept 21, 2012.pdf Copy of any deed(s), transfer(s) or other document(s) Transfer Deed.pdf A Current plan of Survey * PlanofSurvey-marked-Nov 20.pdf * Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern * APEC Table.pdf Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property * Table of Current and Past Uses-Revised Nov 12.pdf Phase 2 Conceptual Site Model * PHASE II CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL revised Nov 12.pdf Owner * Ownerscert Nov 20.pdf

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41 TABLE OF AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN Area of Potential Environmental Concern 1 Location of Area of Potential Environmental Concern on Phase One Property Potentially Contaminating Activity 2 Location of PCA (on-site or offsite) Contaminants of Potential Concern 3 Media Potentially Impacted (Ground water, soil and/or sediment) Auto repair facility on Juliana Drive Along east boundary # 27 - Garages and Maintenance and Repair of Railcars, Marine Vehicles and Aviation Vehicles Off-site BTEX/F1-F4 hydrocarbons Metals VOC s Groundwater Dumping of coal slag Mid-section of property on surface # 30 - Importation of Fill Material of Unknown Quality On-site Metals, PAH s Soil, groundwater Gas Stations to the east across Norwich Ave. Along east boundary # 28 - Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks Off-site BTEX/F1-F4 hydrocarbons PAH s Metals, VOC s Groundwater Former auto-wrecker on site and Immediately west of the subject site Across entire site #49 - Salvage Yard, including automobile wrecking On-site Metals, BTEX/F1-F4 hydrocarbons VOC s Groundwater Notes: 1 - Area of Potential Environmental Concern means the area on, in or under a phase one property where one or more contaminants are potentially present, as determined through the phase one environmental site assessment, including through, (a) identification of past or present uses on, in or under the phase one property, and (b) identification of potentially contaminating activity. 2 - Potentially Contaminating Activity means a use or activity set out in Column A of Table 2 of Schedule D that is occurring or has occurred in a

42 phase one study area 3 - when completing this column, identify all contaminants of potential concern using the Method Groups as identified in the "Protocol for in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, March 9, 2004, amended as of July 1, 2011, as specified below: ABNs PCBs Metals Electrical Conductivity SAR CPs PAHs As, Sb, Se Cr (VI) 1,4-Dioxane THMs Na Hg Dioxins/Furans, PCDDs/PCDFs VOCs B-HWS Methyl Mercury OCs BTEX Cl- high ph PHCs Ca, Mg CN- low ph

43 "TABLE OF CURRENT AND PAST USES OF THE PHASE ONE PROPERTY" (Refer to clause 16(2)(b), Schedule D, O.Reg. 153/04) Year Name of Owner Description of Property Use 1 Property Use Other Observations from Aerial Photograhs, Fire Insurance Plans, Etc. Dec Hon. Robert Hamilton Assumed residential use residential use Land title entry of patent issued May 1830 Aug 1835 Apr 1861 Aug 1869 Jan 1897 William Peers Assumed residential use residential use Land title entry of Deed 1553 Benjamin Lampert Assumed residential use residential use Land title entry of Deed 2676 James Scarff, Assumed residential use residential use Land title entry of Deed William Ingram, Assumed residential use residential use Land title entry of Deed Thomas Brown Assumed residential use residential use Land title entry of Deed Albert Veale Assumed residential use residential use Land title entry of Deed 1904 Oct 1910 Thomas Hughill Assumed residential use residential use Land title entry of Deed 5915 June 1929 Arthur & Elise Hughill Assumed residential use residential use Land title entry of Deed 8668 May 1928 William Fletcher Assumed residential use residential use Land title entry of Deed 8801

44 Year Name of Owner Description of Property Use 1 Property Use Other Observations from Aerial Photograhs, Fire Insurance Plans, Etc. Apr 1942 Mar 1946 Mar 1946 Samuel Carlisle residential use residential use Land title entry of Deed Thomas Carlisle residential use residential use Land title entry of Deed John Carlisle residential use residential use Land title entry of Deed Mar 1955 June 1961 Emmerick & Elizabeth Horvath John & Marian Carlisle residential use residential use Land title entry of Deed residential use residential use Land title entry of Deed A37025 May, 1962 Oct 1964 Emmerick Horvath residential use residential use Land title entry of Deed A44014 Shirley Sullivan residential use residential use Land title entry of Deed A65100

45 Year Name of Owner Description of Property Use 1 Property Use Other Observations from Aerial Photograhs, Fire Insurance Plans, Etc. Nov 1966 Joyce Miller possible use as an autowrecker industrial use Land title entry of Deed A Aerial photo shows 2 residences on site with further residence to the north and possibly to the south. Land across Norwich Avenue is farmland. Interview with client indicates one resident used the back yard area to the west (now a separate site) for storing vehicles. Interviews reveal an auto-wrecker operation was conducted on the subject site and the site immediately to the west which were both part of the same site at this time (PCA #49). Fire insurance plans and City Directory did not cover this area of Woodstock and no auto-wrecking business was ever registered here. Nov 1966 The DVLA possible use as an autowrecker industrial use Land title entry of Deed A80003 Aug 1969 John & Shirley Sullivan possible use as an autowrecker industrial use Land title entry of Deed B933

46 Year Name of Owner Description of Property Use 1 Property Use Other Observations from Aerial Photograhs, Fire Insurance Plans, Etc. Sept 1982 Ronald & Doris Sharpe possible use as an autowrecker industrial use Land title entry of Deed Aerial photo shows further residential development immediately to the north and some commercial development to the south (hotel) with a new road (Juliana Rd.) south of the subject property. The site immediately to the west appears to have a number of unidentifiable items located on site, possibly vehicles. Interviews reveal the site was used as an auto-wrecker (PCA #49). Auto garage on Juliana east of subject site may be present (PCA #27). Personal interviews with client indicate the residence used to store old automobiles on the site immediately to the west. Nov 1989 Gerard & Mary Longtin possible use as an autowrecker industrial use Land title entry of Deed Sept 1999 Nov 1999 George Harvey Bishop Ontario Limited Site is vacant industrial use Land title entry of Deed George Harvey Bishop is a local lawyer and the lawyer for the current owner. He transferred the site to the current owner in November, Site is vacant industrial use Land title entry of Deed

47 Year Name of Owner Description of Property Use 1 Property Use Other Observations from Aerial Photograhs, Fire Insurance Plans, Etc. June 2000 Oct 2008 June 2010 June 2010 April 2012 Hussein Fedal Zabian Hussein Fedal Zabian Ontario Limited Ontario Limited Ontario Limited Ontario Limited Site is vacant industrial use Land title entry of Deed Aerial photo shows subject site unchanged except that the numerous items previously located on the land to the west are gone. Auto garage on Juliana east of subject site may be present (PCA #27). Site is vacant industrial use Land title entry of Deed C satellite view shows the land across Norwich Ave to the east has been developed for big box and other retail stores. The two current gas stations are in place here (PCA #28). Auto garage site on Juliana (PCA #27) has changed size of building. Land immediately south is unchanged. Site is vacant industrial use Land title entry of Deed C Land to the south has been developed as a church and drive-through restaurants. Site is vacant industrial use Land title entry of Deed C Site is vacant industrial use Interview with current owner and his solicitor indicate the site has remained vacant. Notes: 1 - for each owner, specify one of the following types of property use (as defined in O.Reg. 153/04) that applies:

48 Agriculture or other use Commercial use Community use Industrial use Institutional use Parkland use Residential use 2 - when submitting a record of site condition for filing, a copy of this table must be attached **Cette publication hautement spécialisée n est disponible qu en anglais en vertu du règlement 671/92, qui en exempte l application de la Loi français. Pour obtenir de l aide en francais, veuillez communiquer avec le ministère de l Environnement au sur les services en

49 PHASE II CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL, Property located at 500 and 504 Norwich Avenue, Woodstock, ON 1.0 Introduction The Phase II conceptual site model has been developed to include details on potential migration pathways for contaminants. These are shown in Figures 1 to 6 below. The preferential pathways along utility line corridors are also discussed. Figure 1 shows the site location; Figure 2 shows the site layout; Figure 3 shows the borehole and monitoring well locations and the preferential pathways for migration of contaminants; Figure 4 shows the groundwater flow direction through the site. Figure 5 shows an east-west cross-section through the subject site and Figure 6 shows a north-south cross-section through the subject site. Section 41 of Regulation 153/04 does not apply to the subject site as there are no areas of natural significance within the study area. Section 43.1 does not apply to the subject site since the property is not a shallow soil property or within 30 m of a waterfront. 2.0 PCA s at Former Gas Stations, and Auto Repair Facilities There are three PCA s within a 250 m radius which were identified in the Phase I ESA. PCA #27 Auto repair garage located on Juliana Drive approximately 250 m to the east. This site is up-gradient from the subject site and sits on the 250 m study area limit so the risk from this source minimal.

50 PCA #28 - two operating gas stations located on the east side of Norwich Avenue. One of these is 175 m east-southeast of the subject site and the other is 120 m east-northeast of the subject site. Both are up-gradient from the subject site across Norwich Avenue and the inferred groundwater flow from these is towards the subject site so there is a risk of contamination from these. The boreholes drilled at the east end of the site showed no impact to the soil or groundwater from these sources. PCA #49 - the former auto-wrecking yard on the adjacent site to the west. This adjacent site was originally combined with the subject site during its period of use as an auto-wrecker. Autowrecking yards have a poor environmental track record and so the former presence of this operation on site represents a significant risk to the subject site. It appears this auto-wrecker did not operate as a registered commercial business but rather as a part-time enterprise of the

51 residence owner. The boreholes drilled on site showed no impact to the soil or groundwater from this source. 3.0 Preferential Pathways Utility lines typically are sand-filled that can form preferential pathways for migration of contaminants. The subject site is not connected to any utilities. Therefore, this study has shown that there are no PCA s that will likely use utility lines as pathways to enter the site. The site is located immediately west of 504 Norwich Avenue in the City of Woodstock, Ontario, which sits on the west side of the Avenue (area outlined in yellow). There is a golf course down-gradient to the west, residential homes to the north, a church property to the south and a vacant site to the east, also owned by the same client. East of this is Norwich Avenue and across Norwich Avenue and up-gradient, there is a large shopping precinct housing two gas stations (PCA 28) and an auto repair garage (PCA #27) on Juliana drive just south of the shopping precinct. The adjacent site to the west was formerly used as an auto-wreckers yard (PCA # 49) and the site surface is grassy vegetation so any leakage from parked vehicles would enter the soil on site and potentially impact the groundwater. The site layout is shown in Figure 2 and the potential migration pathways for contaminants is shown in Figure Borehole and Monitoring Well Locations Eight boreholes were drilled on site to a maximum depth of ~ 8 m. Three groundwater monitoring wells were installed and used to determine the groundwater flow direction and the groundwater quality. The rationale for the boreholes is as follows: Borehole #1 (BH-1) was drilled in the southeast corner of the subject site. The borehole was placed where the building, which formerly occupied 504 Norwich Avenue once stood. It was drilled to a depth of 7.3 m (24 ft), and a groundwater monitoring well (MW-1) was installed within the annulus of the borehole. This borehole was sampled at 4.6 m (14-16 ft) due to an elevated VOC reading being observed at this depth. This position was chosen to determine possible contamination from: any potential contamination from the house formerly occupying the location

52 any potential contamination from activities to the south, and east of Norwich Avenue Borehole #2 (BH-2) was drilled in the southwest corner of the subject site. It was drilled to 2.1 m (7 ft) depth and then sampled at depth. This position was chosen to determine possible contamination from: any potential contamination the former auto wrecking operations any potential contamination migrating downhill from the eastern portion for the site Borehole #3 (BH-3) was drilled in the eastern area of the subject site, in the rubble of the house formerly occupying 504 Norwich Avenue. It was drilled using a hand auger to a depth of 1.2 m (4 ft), and sampled at depth. The position was chosen to determine possible contamination from: any potential contamination from the former house on site any potential contamination PCAs located to the east of Norwich Avenue Borehole #4 (BH-4) was drilled in the south central area of the subject site. It was drilled using a hand auger to a depth of 0.9 m (3 ft), and sampled at depth. This position was chosen to determine possible contamination from the presence of slag located on the soil surface and the former auto wrecking operations. Borehole #5 (BH-5) was drilled in the north central area of the subject site. It was drilled to a depth of 2.4 m (8 ft) and sampled at depth. This position was chosen to determine possible contamination from surrounding PCAs and from historical land use of the site. Borehole #6 (BH-6) was drilled in the northwest corner of the subject site. It was drilled to a depth of 6.1 m (20 ft), and a groundwater monitoring well (MW-2) was installed within the annulus of the borehole. This borehole was sampled at 4.6 m (14-16 ft) due to an elevated VOC reading being observed at this depth. The position was chosen to determine possible contamination from: any potential contamination from the former auto-wrecking operations

53 any potential contamination migrating downhill from the eastern portion of the site Borehole #7 (BH-7) was drilled in the front yard of the house occupying 500 Norwich Avenue. A groundwater monitoring well was planned for this location, but a gravel and cobble layer was encountered at a depth of 10 and the drill could not advance to a greater depth. This location was chosen to test for potential contamination from the Canadian Tire Gas Bar located east of Norwich Avenue. Soils at 2 ft intervals were analysed on site for hexane vapours and no significant levels were identified. No soil samples were taken at this location because another borehole was drilled nearby in an attempt to reach groundwater. Borehole #8 (BH-8) was drilled immediately south of the building occupying 500 Norwich Avenue, in the gravel entranceway to the subject site. It was drilled to a depth of 6.1 m (20 ft), and a groundwater monitoring well (MW-3) was installed within the annulus of the borehole. This borehole was sampled at 4.6 m (14-16 ft) due to an elevated VOC reading being observed at this depth. This position was chosen to determine possible contamination from: potential contamination from the Canadian Tire Gas Bar located east of Norwich Avenue APECs and PCAs Identified in the Phase I ESA The following Areas of Potential Environmental Concern (APECs) and Potentially Contaminating Activities (PCAs) were identified in the Phase I report:

54 "TABLE OF AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN" (Refer to clause 16(2)(a), Schedule D, O. Reg. 153/04) Area of Potential Environmental Concern 1 Disposal of Slag, Cinder and Coal Fill on surface of property. Location of Area of Potential Environmental Concern on Phase One Property Entire Property Potentially Contaminating Activity 2 PCA #58 Waste Disposal and Waste Management, including thermal treatment, landfilling and transfer of waste, other than use of biosoils as soil conditioners Location of PCA (on-site or off-site) Contaminants of Potential Concern 3 Media Potentially Impacted (Ground water, soil and/or sediment) On-site PAHs, Metals Soil & Groundwater An Auto repair garage operates east of the subject site on Juliana Drive about 200 m from the subject site Entire East Side PCA #27 Garages and Maintenance and Repair of Railcars, Marine Vehicles and Aviation Vehicles On-site PAHs, metals, VOCs and PHCs Soil & Groundwater Two operating gas stations across Norwich Avenue about 80 m distant are up-gradient from the subject site and may impact the groundwater Entire East Side PCA #28 Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks; Offsite: 789 and 799 Juliana Dr & 503, 465 and 435 Norwich Ave VOCs, PHCs Soil & Groundwater Aerial photos and interviews from the phase 1 ESA indicate a possible use of the adjacent site to the west as an Auto-wrecker. Entire West Side PCAs #49 Auto-wrecker Offsite: property immediately to the west PAHs, metals, VOCs and PHCs Soil & Groundwater

55 Discussion of APECs 1. PCA # 58 relates to disposal of Slag, Cinder and Coal Fill on surface of property. The evidence for this material being deposited on site was obtained from the phase 1 site inspection and from the phase 1 interviews with knowledgeable persons. There was a small area of this material visible at the mid-section of the site. However, the phase 2 ESA was conducted after the site had been prepared for construction and the top surface had been removed and no evidence of this material was found except for the odd piece of coal clinker. The phase 2 analyses for metals and PAH s did not reveal any impact from this material. 2. PCA #27 & #28 relate to the operating gas stations (2) and repair garage (1) across Norwich Avenue. These operations are up-gradient from the subject site and may possibly have impacted the groundwater along the east side at its boundary with Norwich Avenue but no evidence of this was found in the phase 2 investigation. The phase 2 analyses for PHCs, metals and PAH s did not reveal any impact from these operations. 3. PCA #49 relates to the use of the adjacent site to the west as a possible auto-wrecker. The historical information shows that the site was formerly a private residence with frontage on to Norwich Avenue and that used vehicles were stored on site but it is uncertain if the site was used as an auto-wrecker. However, such use has been considered here. Site Stratigraphy Figures 5 & 6 below show the sub-soil stratigraphy which was fairly uniform over the entire site: m Some surface debris with silty soil m Sily clay becoming increasingly moist at depth m Silty clay, water saturated

56

57

58

59

60

61 Hydrogeological Characteristics Three groundwater monitoring wells were installed, two at the east end of the site and one down-slope at the west end. These revealed an unconfined aquifer at a depth of 5.2 m bgs at the east end and 4.5 m bgs at the west end of the site. The groundwater flow direction was established to be in a westerly direction following the contour of the land (see Figures 4, 5 & 6). Approximate Depth to Bedrock The bedrock depth was established from the OGS maps to be approximately 22 m (see Figures 4, 5 & 6). Approximate depth to water Table This was established by the borehole drilling program to be 5.2 m bgs at the east end and 4.5 m bgs at the west end of the site(see Figures 4, 5 & 6). Imported Fill Following the phase I ESA, and prior to the phase 2 ESA, the site was cleared for construction of the new building so there was little evidence of any imported fill. However, there were surface signs of some imported sand (<0.3 m) Approximate Location of Building The client provided preliminary plans showing a proposed commercial building to be located in the middle of the site toward the south side and occupying <25% of the total available area (see figures 2, 5 & 6)..