Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Analysis 3 9

Transcription

1 3.4 WATE AND WASTEWATE IMPACT FEES The impact fee analysis involves determining the utilization of existing and proposed projects required as defined by the capital improvement plan to serve new development over the next 10 year time period. For existing or proposed projects, the impact fee is calculated as a percentage of the project cost, based upon the percentage of the project s capacity required to serve development projected to occur between 2014 and Capacity serving existing development and development projected for more than 10 years in the future cannot be charged to impact fees Eligible Impact Fee Costs A summary of the costs for each of the projects required for the 10 year growth period used in the impact fee analysis for both the water and wastewater systems is shown in Table 3 7 and Table 3 8, respectively. Detailed project costs are included in Appendix C. Water distribution system projects 2a, 2b, and 3 are currently under design and more detailed cost estimates were developed as part of the Alta Vista Pump Station Expansion project. Costs listed for the existing projects are based on actual design and construction costs provided by the City. Table 3 7 and Table 3 8 show 2014 percent utilization as the portion of a project s capacity required to serve existing development. It is not included in the impact fee analysis. The 2024 percent utilization is the portion of the project s capacity that will be required to serve the in The percent utilization is the portion of the project s capacity required to serve development from 2014 to The water and wastewater hydraulic models were used to assist in the calculation of project utilization percentages. The portion of a project s total cost that is used to serve development projected to occur from 2014 through 2024 is calculated as the total actual cost multiplied by the percent utilization. Only this portion of the cost is used in the impact fee analysis. Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Analysis 3 9

2 Table 3 7 Water Distribution System Improvements, Cost Allocation for Impact Fee Calculations Percent Utilization Costs Based on 2014 Dollars Current Development 10 Year ) No. Description of Project * Capital Cost EXISTING A 3.0 MG Pearson Ground Storage Tank 15% 65% 50% $1,779,010 $266,852 $889,505 B Pearson Pump Station Improvements 75% 90% 15% $1,197,400 $898,050 $179,610 C Knox Elevated Storage Tank 60% 85% 25% $2,059,216 $1,235,530 $514,804 D Keller Smithfield Elevated Storage Tank 75% 90% 15% $2,074,509 $1,555,882 $311,176 E 16 inch Lower Pressure Plane Water Line 75% 90% 15% $3,084,977 $2,313,733 $462,747 F 12 inch Lower Pressure Plane Water Line 55% 85% 30% $2,757,117 $1,516,414 $827,135 G 12 inch Upper Pressure Plane Water Line 10% 70% 60% $232,000 $23,200 $139,200 H 12 inch ufe Snow Water Line 50% 85% 35% $204,000 $102,000 $71,400 I 12 inch Upper Pressure Plane Water Line 25% 55% 30% $200,000 $50,000 $60,000 J Water Impact Fee Study 0% 100% 100% $42,000 $0 $42,000 Existing Project Sub total $13,630,229 $7,961,660 $3,497,577 POPOSED 1 12 inch Water Lines in Upper Pressure Plane 25% 60% 35% $320,600 $80,150 $112,210 2a Alta Vista Pump Station Expansion to 18 MGD 15% 40% 25% $5,521,200 $828,180 $1,380,300 2b Fort Worth Water Delivery Capital Cost ecovery 0% 40% 40% $1,216,440 $0 $486, inch Alta Vista Pump Station Water Line 0% 40% 40% $5,472,000 $0 $2,188, inch Water Lines in Upper Pressure Plane 0% 60% 60% $884,600 $0 $530, inch Johnson oad Water Line 20% 70% 50% $743,900 $148,780 $371, inch Mt. Gilead and Bancroft oad and 12 inch Keller Smithfield oad Water Line 55% 95% 40% $1,933,200 $1,063,260 $773, inch Florence oad Water Line 10% 65% 55% $1,229,600 $122,960 $676, inch Lower Pressure Plane Water Line 0% 5% 5% $219,000 $0 $10,950 9 Pearson Pump Station Upper Pressure Plane Expansion 0% 20% 20% $905,700 $0 $181, inch Florence oad Water Line 15% 50% 35% $1,100,900 $165,135 $385, inch Bear Creak Parkway Water Line 10% 55% 45% $707,000 $70,700 $318, inch and 16 inch South Upper Pressure Plane Water Lines 45% 60% 15% $632,100 $284,445 $94,815 Proposed Project Sub total $20,886,240 $2,763,610 $7,510,526 Total Capital Improvements Cost $34,516,469 $10,725,270 $11,008,103 * Utilization in 2014 on Proposed Projects indicates a portion of the project that will be used to address deficiencies within the existing system, and therefore are not eligible for impact fee cost recovery for future growth.

3 Table 3 8 Wastewater Collection System Improvements, Cost Allocation for Impact Fee Calculations Percent Utilization Costs Based on 2014 Dollars Current Development 10 Year ) No. Description of Project * Capital Cost EXISTING A Marshall Branch West Lift Station and Interceptor 35% 80% 45% $1,855,759 $649,516 $835,092 B Marshall Branch East Lift Station and Interceptor 40% 85% 45% $1,611,295 $644,518 $725,083 C Big Bear East Branch Interceptor 5% 55% 50% $1,582,758 $79,138 $791,379 Katy oad Lift Station and Sanitary Sewer D Improvements 30% 80% 50% $1,959,449 $587,835 $979,725 E Wastewater Impact Fee Study 0% 100% 100% $42,000 $0 $42,000 Existing Project Sub total $7,051,261 $1,961,006 $3,373,278 POPOSED 1 8 inch and 12 inch Big Bear East Wastewater Interceptor 0% 65% 65% $703,600 $0 $457,340 2 North Big Bear East Septic Elimination Lines 0% 30% 30% $636,800 $0 $191,040 3 Southwest Marshall Branch Septic Elimination Lines 0% 40% 40% $1,979,200 $0 $791,680 4 West Big Bear East Septic Elimination Lines 0% 30% 30% $1,204,000 $0 $361,200 5 Big Bear East Wastewater Improvements 0% 40% 40% $1,280,700 $0 $512, inch to 18 inch Big Bear Wastewater Interceptor 0% 50% 50% $1,377,300 $0 $688,650 7 North Branch of Big Bear Wastewater Interceptor 0% 25% 25% $744,800 $0 $186,200 8 Big Bear West Collector eplacement 30% 45% 15% $427,400 $128,220 $64, inch and 10 inch Wastewater Lines in Western Big Bear Southwest 30% 60% 30% $388,400 $116,520 $116, Cade Branch Interceptor 0% 55% 55% $288,000 $0 $158, Big Bear East Assorted Septic Eliminations 0% 35% 35% $1,506,200 $0 $527, Big Bear West Interceptor eplacement 85% 90% 5% $465,800 $395,930 $23, Big Bear Southwest Interceptor eplacement 85% 95% 10% $441,400 $375,190 $44, Big Bear South 1 Interceptor eplacement 85% 90% 5% $305,000 $259,250 $15, Little Bear East Interceptor eplacement 90% 95% 5% $360,600 $324,540 $18, Big Bear South 2 Interceptor eplacement 90% 100% 10% $233,300 $209,970 $23, inch Northern Marshall Branch East Wastewater Line 0% 20% 20% $385,600 $0 $77, Big Bear East Central Septic Elimination Lines 0% 45% 45% $611,200 $0 $275, Northern Big Bear East Septic Elimination Lines 0% 40% 40% $1,200,600 $0 $480, Melody Hills Estates Septic Elimination Lines 0% 45% 45% $945,900 $0 $425,655 Proposed Project Sub total $15,485,800 $1,809,620 $5,436,685 Total Capital Improvements Cost $22,537,061 $3,770,626 $8,809,963 * Utilization in 2014 on Proposed Projects indicates a portion of the project that will be used to address deficiencies within the existing system, and therefore are not eligible for impact fee cost recovery for future growth.

4 3.4.2 Service Units The maximum impact fee may not exceed the amount determined by dividing the cost of capital improvements required by the total number of service units attributed to new development during the impact fee eligibility period. A water service unit is defined as service equivalent to a water connection for a single family residence. The does not directly meter wastewater flows and bills for wastewater services based on the customer s water consumption. Therefore, a wastewater service unit is defined as the wastewater service provided to a customer with a water connection for a single family residence. The service associated with public, commercial, and industrial connections is converted into service units based upon the capacity of the meter used to provide service. The number of service units required to represent each meter size is based on the maximum rated capacity of the meters. American Water Works Association AWWA) standards C700 Cold Water Meters Displacement Type), C710 Cold Water Meters Displacement Type), and C702 Cold Water Meters Compound Type) were used to determine the safe maximum operating capacity. The service unit equivalent for each meter size used by the City is listed in Table 3 9. Table 3 9: Service Unit Equivalencies Safe Maximum Operating Capacity gpm) 1) Service Unit Equivalent Meter Size Meter Type 5/8" Displacement /4 Displacement Displacement /2 Displacement Compound Compound Compound Compound 1, Compound 1, Compound 2, ) Safe maximum operating capacity is based on AWWA standards C700, C710, and C702. Table 3 10 and Table 3 11 show the water and wastewater service units for 2014 and the projected service units for Typically, in Keller, single family residences are served with 5/8 inch water meters. Larger meters represent public, commercial, and industrial water use. The City provided data that included the meter size of each active water meter as of May Due to the existing septic residents projected to Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Analysis 3 12

5 connect to the wastewater system within the next 10 years, the growth in service units is greater for the wastewater system than it is for the water system. Table 3 10: Projected Water Service Units for Meter Size 2014 Meters 2014 Service Units 2024 Meters 2024 Service Units Projected Growth in Service Units 5/8" 14,012 14,012 17,081 17,081 3,069 3/4" " 463 1, , /2" " 257 2, , " " " Total 14,937 19,235 18,249 23,892 4,657 Table 3 11: Projected Wastewater Service Units for Meter Size 2014 Meters 2014 Service Units 2024 Meters 1) 2024 Service Units Growth in Service Units 5/8" 12,085 12,085 16,118 16,118 4,033 3/4" " , /2" " 97 1, , " " " Total 12,661 14,999 17,012 20,820 5,821 1) The number of meters in 2024 assumes that approximately 50% of the residents using septic systems will connect to Keller s sewer system within the next 10 years Maximum Impact Fee Calculation The methodology used herein satisfies the requirements of the Texas Local Government Code Section 395 for the establishment of impact fees. Texas Local Government Code Section 395 requires an impact fee analysis before impact fees are set. Section 395 requires that land use assumptions and capital improvement plans be updated at least every five years, and the last performed an impact fee analysis in Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Analysis 3 13

6 Section 395 states that the maximum impact fee may not exceed the amount determined by dividing the cost of capital improvements required by the total number of service units attributed to new development during the impact fee eligibility period less a credit to account for water and wastewater revenues and property taxes used to finance capital improvement plans. The total costs include the projected capital improvement costs to serve 10 year development, the recoupment costs for existing projects with excess capacity, and the consultant cost for preparing and updating the Capital Improvements Plan. Maximum Allowable Water Impact Fee The cost of water capital improvements to serve development projected to occur between 2014 and 2024 is $11,008,103. A 3.0% interest rate compounded annually was used to calculate financing costs. No debt service was included for recoupment projects. The increase in the number of service units due to growth over the next ten years is projected as 4,657 service units. The maximum allowable water impact fee with the credit is $1,459 per service unit. The maximum allowable water impact fee calculation is summarized as follows: Total Eligible Capital Improvement Costs $11,008,103 Financing Costs $2,582,993 Total Eligible Costs $13,591,096 Growth in Service Units 4,657 Maximum Water Impact Fee = Total Eligible Costs/Growth in Service Units = $13,591,096/4,657 = $2,918 per Service Unit Maximum Allowable Water Impact Fee = Maximum Impact Fee Credit 50%) = $2,918 $1,459 = $1,459 per Service Unit The also pays water impact fees to the City of Fort Worth as a wholesale customer of Fort Worth. Effective January 1, 2013, the City of Fort Worth s water impact fee is $469 per service unit. Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Analysis 3 14

7 Maximum Allowable Wastewater Impact Fee The cost of wastewater system capital improvements to serve development projected to occur between 2014 and 2024 is $8,809,963. A 3.0% interest rate compounded annually was used to calculate financing costs. The increase in the number of service units due to growth over the next ten years is projected as 5,821 service units. The maximum allowable wastewater impact fee with the credit is $918 per service unit. The maximum allowable wastewater impact fee calculation is summarized as follows: Total Capital Improvement Costs $8,809,963 Financing Costs $1,869,765 Total Eligible Costs $10,679,728 Growth in Service Units 5,821 Maximum Wastewater Impact Fee = Total Eligible Costs/Growth in Service Units = $10,679,728/5,821 = $1,835 per Service Unit Maximum Allowable Wastewater Impact Fee = Maximum Impact Fee Credit 50%) = $1,835 $918 = $918 per Service Unit Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Analysis 3 15

8 4.0 OADWAY IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS 4.1 METHODOLOGY oadway impact fee definitions are shown in Appendix D. To update the roadway impact fee system, a series of work tasks were undertaken that included the following: Service areas were updated to address any changes in municipal boundaries. A set of land use assumptions within the city limits were prepared to identify projected growth over the ten year planning period Projections of population and employment were prepared by service area. The vehicle mile of travel during the PM peak hour was retained as the appropriate service unit for measuring capacity and system utilization for the impact fee calculation. Capacity was based on values developed by the North Central Texas Council of Governments NCTCOG) for level of service C/D operations. A roadway conditions inventory of major thoroughfares in Keller was updated for lane geometries, roadway classifications and segment lengths. New collector and/or arterial streets not previously classified were added to the program database. The existing roadway network was evaluated based on updated traffic volume count information, collected in April 2014, to determine roadway capacity, current utilization, and deficiencies, if present, for each service area. Twenty peak hour directional counts were conducted citywide as part of the update and were supplemented by additional traffic counts from the 2014 traffic count study performed by the Keller Public Works Department. New vehicle miles of demand over a 10 year planning period) were calculated for each service area based on the land use equivalency table supplemented with demographic data of population and employment by service area. The land use equivalency table is based on data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers ITE) Trip Generation Manual 9 th Edition, and a Workplace Survey prepared by NCTCOG. A capital improvements plan was prepared based on future growth needs and staff input. The roadway impact fee capital improvements plan identifies specific projects, project limits, roadway sizing, functional class as per the official City Thoroughfare Plan), and associated cost for facility implementation. Project costs include construction, engineering, right of way acquisition and debt service. Updated costs were prepared for all projects based on cost oadway Impact Fee Analysis 4 1

9 estimates prepared by Freese and Nichols, Inc. and cost data provided by the Keller Public Works Department. Costs for study updates are eligible for impact fee recovery and were included in the total project cost. The capital improvements plan also identifies service units of capacity provided by, utilized by based on traffic volume count) and remaining by project and by service area. As a prelude to program update process, the capacity provided by the existing impact fee CIP was evaluated to ensure excess capacity remained in the system for retention in the impact fee program. The evaluation revealed all previously identified projects to contain excess capacity and were therefore retained in the system. The cost of capacity supplied, cost attributable to new development, and the maximum cost per service unit were calculated for each service area. A credit of 50% was applied to the overall cost of the capital improvements program for the identification of the maximum allowable cost per service unit consideration. Sample fee calculations were prepared based upon specific uses, the land use vehicle mile equivalency table and the maximum allowable cost per service unit. This report was prepared to document the procedures, findings, and conclusions of the study. The land use equivalency table was updated, where possible, to include new trip generation data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 9 th Edition. Similar land use categories were retained and include; single family residential, multi family, retirement center, nursing home, day care center, medical dental office, general office, institutional, industrial, retail/commercial, hotel, golf course, and parks. 4.2 OADWAY IMPACT FEE SEVICE AEAS Service areas are required by State Law to define the area served by the oadway Capital Improvements. Chapter 395 requires that service areas be defined for impact fees to ensure that facility improvements are located in proximity to the area that is generating the need. A new development in a particular service area can only be assessed an impact fee based on the cost of the capital improvements necessitated by the new development within that service area. Legislation requires that roadway service areas be limited to a six mile maximum diameter and must be located within the current city limits. oadway service areas are different from other impact fee service areas, which may include the city limits and extra territorial jurisdiction ETJ). This is primarily because roadway systems are "open" to both local and regional use as oadway Impact Fee Analysis 4 2

10 opposed to a defined limit of service that is provided with water and wastewater systems. The result is that new development can only be assessed an impact fee based on the cost of necessary capital improvements within that service area. As there were no changes in Keller s municipal limits since the previous update, no changes were made to the service area structure. Previously defined as North and South, the service areas have been renamed as A North) and B South). The services areas are bisected by Johnson oad, ufe Snow oad and Keller Parkway. All portions of the revised service area structure fall within the six mile requirements. Figure 4 1 illustrates the service areas for the. oadway Impact Fee Analysis 4 3

11 Figure 4 1 oadway Service Area oadway Impact Fee Analysis 4 4

12 4.3 OADWAY IMPACT FEES LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS Chapter 395 requires that land use assumptions and capital improvements plans be updated at least every five 5) years. The capital improvements plan and land use assumptions are developed for a period of time not more than ten 10) years. The land use assumptions provide the basis and structure for determining impact fees attributed to future growth and development. For the system update, service unit generation future growth) was based on population and employment growth from the land use assumptions discussed as part of Chapter 2. For roadways, both population and employment data are necessary for the determination of both residential and non residential traffic vehicle miles) over the planning period. Derived demographic data by service area, in conjunction with service unit generation from the land use equivalency table, formed the basis for ten year growth estimates. Population data was prepared by analysis of data from NCTCOG, existing land use trends, land use zoning and input from City staff. Data of population identified a 10 year growth of over 9,200 persons between 2014 and 2024 and represents an average annual growth rate of about two percent. The corresponding increase in the number of dwelling units is 3, persons per dwelling unit) over the planning period. Table 4 1 details the breakout of population data by service area. Table 4 1: Population and Employment Data by Service Area Year Population Service Area Population Total Service Area A Service Area B Employment A B Basic Service etail Total Basic Service etail Total ,040 11,819 30,221 11, , ,860 1,372 4,940 2,836 9, ,247 15,428 35,819 14, , ,706 1,799 6,475 3,718 11,992 Total Added 9,207 3,609 5,598 3, , ,844 Data of employment was obtained from estimates prepared by NCTCOG. Data by work type basic, service and retail was used to estimate service unit generation of non residential growth within the City. The projected employment growth for the city is 3,690 persons between 2014 and The total employment for year 2024 is estimated to be 14,698 persons. Table 4 1 details the breakout of employment data by work component and total for service areas. 4.4 OADWAY CAPITAL IMPOVEMENT PLAN Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code specifies the requirements necessary to prepare the impact fee capital improvements plan. These requirements include: oadway Impact Fee Analysis 4 5

13 1. A description of the existing capital improvements within the service area and the cost to upgrade, update, improve, expand or replace the improvements to meet existing needs and usage; 2. An analysis of the total capacity, the level of current usage, and commitments for usage of capacity of the existing capital improvements; 3. A description of all or the parts of the capital improvements and their costs necessitated by and attributable to new development in the service area based on approved land use assumptions; 4. A definitive table establishing the specific level or quantity of use, consumption, generation, or discharge of service unit for each category of capital improvements and an equivalency table establishing the ratio of the service unit to various types of land uses, including residential, commercial, and industrial; 5. The total number of projected service units necessitated by and attributable to new development within the service area based on the approved land use assumptions; 6. The projected demand for capital improvements required by the new service units projected over a reasonable period of time; 7. A plan for awarding a credit for the portion of the ad valorem tax generated by new service units during the program period that is used for the payment of improvements or, in the alternative a credit equal to 50 percent of the total projected cost of implementing the capital improvements plan. The plan must contain two distinct components: analysis of existing conditions and analysis of projected conditions. To analyze these components, two measures of performance must be established and include level of service and service units. 4.5 OADWAY LEVEL OF SEVICE Level of Service LOS) refers to the operational performance of the roadway system and is one of the basic design criterion used in thoroughfare planning. The design level of service determines the capacity for which the roadway is intended to operate. Level of service is rated from A to F with A providing free flow conditions, and F heavy congestion and grid lock. While higher levels of service A B) provide better operational conditions, there is a higher construction cost to achieving this quality. Level of Service oadway Impact Fee Analysis 4 6

14 E is considered to be the minimal acceptable capacity limit of urban roadways. Level of Service C/D is the design level of service selected for the Impact Fee Analysis based upon design requirements of the Thoroughfare Plan. Table 4 2 lists the maximum service volumes for level of service C/D as a function of facility type. Table 4 2: oadway Facility oadway Facility Vehicle Mile Capacities oadway Type Capacity LOS C/D Vehicles per hour per lane mile of oadway Facility* Principal Arterial Divided PDA 700 Principal Arterial Undivided PDA U 625 Divided Minor Arterials DA 625 Undivided Minor Arterials UA 550 Undivided Collector 4 Lane C4U 440 Undivided Collector 3 Lane C3U 400 Undivided Collector 2 Lane C2U 350 Undivided Collector 3 Lane with center turn lane UCS 400 *Hourly capacity for LOS C/D obtained from NCTCOG DFW egional Travel Model and the Highway Capacity Manual and adjusted for local conditions. oadway Impact Fee Analysis 4 7

15 4.6 OADWAY IMPACT FEE SEVICE UNITS Service units establish a relationship between roadway projects and demand placed on the street system by development, as well as the ability to calculate and assess impact fees for specific development proposals. As defined, "Service unit means a standardized measure of consumption, use, generation, or discharge attributable to an individual unit of development in accordance with generally accepted engineering or planning standards for a particular category of capital improvements or facility expansions." To determine the roadway impact fee for a particular development, the service unit must accurately identify the impact that the development will have on the major roadway system i.e., arterial and collector roads) serving the development. This impact is a combination of the number of new trips generated by the development, the particular peaking characteristics of the land uses) within the development, and the length of each new trip on the transportation system. The service unit must also reflect the capacity, which is provided by the roadway system, and the demand placed on the system during the time in which peak, or design, conditions are present on the system. Transportation facilities are designed and constructed to accommodate volumes expected to occur during the peak hours design hours). These volumes typically occur during the peak hours as motorists travel to and from work. The vehicle mile during the PM peak hour was retained as the service unit for impact fees in Keller. This service unit establishes a more precise measure of capacity, utilization and intensity of land development through the use of published trip generation data. It also recognizes legislative requirements with regards to trip length. 4.7 OADWAY EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS An inventory of major roadway facilities was conducted to determine existing conditions throughout Keller. This analysis determines the capacity provided by the existing roadway system, the demand currently placed on the system, and the existence of any deficiencies on the system. Data for the inventory was obtained from field reconnaissance, traffic volume counts, the City Thoroughfare Plan and City Staff. oadway Impact Fee Analysis 4 8

16 4.7.1 Existing Traffic Volumes Existing directional PM peak hour volumes were obtained from automated traffic counts collected by Freese and Nichols, Inc. during April Automated traffic counts at 20 separate locations were collected on major roadways as identified in the Thoroughfare Plan as arterial or collector status) throughout the city. In an effort to minimize the total number of counts, data was collected at locations where traffic volumes would typify link volumes on the major segments within the immediate area. Data from the 2014 Traffic Count Study by the Keller Public Works Department supplemented the counts collected by Freese and Nichols, Inc. For segments not counted, estimates were developed based on peaking characteristics of area roadways or data from adjoining roadway counts. These data were compiled for major roadway segments throughout the city and entered into the database for use in calculations. A summary of volumes by roadway segment is included in Appendix E as part of the existing capital improvements database Vehicle Miles of Existing Capacity Supply) An analysis of the total capacity for each service area was performed. For each roadway segment, the existing vehicle miles of capacity supplied were calculated using the following equation: Vehicle Miles of Capacity = Link capacity per peak hour per lane x No. of Lanes x Length of segment miles) For example: a 4 lane divided roadway that is 3 miles in length and has a capacity of 700 vehicles per hour per lane: Vehicle Miles of Capacity = 700 vehicles per hour x 4 lanes x 3 miles = 8,400 veh miles per hour. A summary of existing capacity for the two service areas is illustrated in Table 4 3. It is important to note that the roadway capacity depicted in the table is system wide for most major roadways and not restricted to those roadways proposed in the impact fee capital improvements plan. For a detailed listing of vehiclemiles of capacity by roadway segment, refer to Appendix E. oadway Impact Fee Analysis 4 9

17 4.7.3 Vehicle Miles of Existing Demand The vehicle miles of existing demand or the current usage of the facilities for each roadway segment was obtained using the equation below: Vehicle Miles of Demand = PM peak hour volume x Length of oadway miles) For example: a 3 mile long roadway that carries a PM peak hour volume of 500 vehicles per hour: Vehicle Miles of Demand = 500 vehicles per hour x 3 miles = 1,500 vehicle miles per hour. A summary of the existing demand for the service areas is also illustrated in Table 4 3. A detailed listing by roadway segment and service area is provided in Appendix E. Table 4 3: Service Area Existing Capacity and Demand Capacity Supply) Veh Miles per Hour) Demand Veh Miles per Hour) A 24,674 17,927 B 55,422 36,389 Total 80,096 54, Vehicle Miles of Existing Excess Capacity or Deficiencies For each roadway segment, the existing vehicle miles of excess capacity and/or deficiencies were calculated. Each direction was evaluated to determine if vehicle demands exceeded the available capacity. If demand exceeded capacity in one or both directions, the deficiency is deducted from the supply associated with the impact fee capital improvement plan. A summary of existing excess capacity and/or deficiencies for each service area is illustrated in Table 4 4. A complete detailed listing by roadway segment and service area is provided in Appendix E. oadways with deficiencies include US Hwy 377, Keller Smithfield oad, Preston oad, Johnson oad, and FM 1709 Keller Parkway). oadway Impact Fee Analysis 4 10

18 Table 4 4: Service Area Excess Capacity and Deficiencies Excess Capacity Veh Miles per Hour) Deficiencies Veh Miles per Hour) A 8,135 1,388 B 19, Total 28,113 2, Projected Conditions Analysis Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code requires a description of all capital improvements and their cost attributable to new development within the service area. To determine the cost attributable to new development the following information needs to be calculated or supplied: future land use assumptions, vehicle miles of new demand, a capital improvement plan, vehicle miles of new capacity supplied by the capital improvements plan and the costs for the roadway improvements. The recommended service unit for assessing impact fees of new development on roadway facilities is a combination of the trips generated vehicles) by the new development during the peak hour and the average trip length miles) of each trip. The following section describes the methodology used in developing service units for new developments Trip Generation Trip generation rates are used to determine the number of vehicles added to the roadway system as a result of new development. The trip generation rates were developed for the PM peak weekday period. The trip generation rates were established using the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual 9 th Edition and the North Central Texas Council of Governments NCTCOG) travel demand model rates. Appropriate independent variables have been selected based on type of land use. The following development units are typically used: Dwelling Units DU) Total number of habitable dwellings within the development. This should not be mistaken as bedrooms. For example, a single family residence is one dwelling unit, a 50 unit apartment complex is 50 dwelling units. oadway Impact Fee Analysis 4 11

19 Gross Floor Area GFA) Total square feet of building floor area bounded by the exterior boundary of outer building walls. Uncovered and outdoor patios are excluded from GFA. This metric is used for office, commercial, industrial, and other uses. Acres The total number of acres included in the development. Adjustments to the trip generation rates are necessary to reflect the differences between driveway volumes and the total amount of traffic added to the roadway system. The actual traffic impact of the new development is based only on the traffic added to the adjacent roadways. The actual traffic added to the adjacent roadways is determined by adjusting the driveway volumes to account for pass by trips, diverted trips, and internal trips. Pass by trips are those trips attracted to a development from traffic that would otherwise pass by the site on an adjacent roadway. For example, a stop at a convenience store on the way from the office to home is a pass by trip for the convenience store. The trip does not create an additional burden on the street system and therefore should not be doublecounted. The burden of this type should be assigned to the office and/or residence. Diverted trips are those trips that are already on the roadway system and are diverted to the roadway system serving the new development. For example, a trip from home to work along US 377 would be a diverted trip if the travel path was changed to Keller Parkway for the purposes of stopping at the cleaners. On a system wide basis, this trip also does not add a significant additional burden to the street system so it is not considered in assessing impact fees. Internal trips are those that would typically be made in a mixed use development between two uses within the development, not utilizing a thoroughfare outside the development for that trip. For example, a trip between an office building and a restaurant contained within the same site would be considered and internal trip, and does not create any additional burden on the roadway system. oadway Impact Fee Analysis 4 12

20 4.7.7 Trip Length The assessment of an individual development's impact fee is based on the premise that each vehicle trip has an origin and a destination and that the development end should pay for one half of the cost necessary to complete each trip. To prevent double charging, and to fairly attribute the demand placed on the system to each trip end location, the trip length was ivided by two to reflect half of the vehicle trip to and from the development. Data from the 1994 NCTCOG Workplace Survey served as a basis for the determination of trip lengths. Adjusted trip lengths which exceed six miles are truncated to the maximum to remain in accordance with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code, which limits service areas to six miles. Appendix K details the full and adjusted trip lengths by land use for the derivation of service unit equivalencies by major land use types Projected Growth and Vehicle Miles of New Demand Projected vehicle miles of demand are the product of the growth expected to occur during the 10 year planning period and the service unit generation for each of the population and employment data components basic, service and retail). Separate calculations were performed for each data component to more accurately reflect residential and non residential vehicular growth and were then aggregated by service area. Vehicle miles of demand for population growth were based on dwelling units, and vehiclemiles of demand for employment were based on the number of employees and estimates of square footage per employee. The associated growth was then multiplied by the corresponding service unit equivalent to yield 1 year growth by service area. A summary of the vehicle miles of new demand for each service area is illustrated in Table 4 5. A complete detailed listing by service area is provided in Appendix F. Table 4 5: Projected Vehicle Miles of New Demand Service Area Projected Vehicle Miles of New Demand A 5,717 B 16,318 Total 22,035 oadway Impact Fee Analysis 4 13

21 4.7.9 Capital Improvements Plan CIP) The capital improvements plan includes roadway improvements by service area that are needed to accommodate growth based on the adopted land use assumptions and vehicle miles of travel for various types of land uses. The impact fee CIP can only contain roadways which are included on the City s Thoroughfare Plan that are classified as arterial or collector status facilities. At the outset of the update process, capacity provided by the CIP) was evaluated to ensure sufficient excess capacity remained in the system for consideration for impact fees. Based on updated traffic volume data collected in Spring 2014, all existing projects were found to have sufficient remaining capacity and therefore could be retained in the impact fee system. Projects in the impact fee CIP include both new and recoupment projects. ecoupment projects are those projects that were recently constructed and still contain excess capacity. Previous 2009) Impact Fee System The previous impact fee system included 20 project segments totaling $78.7 million in both service areas A and B. Since 2009, several impact fee projects have been completed and include Bourland from Mount Gilead to Marshall idge, North Tarrant Parkway from Whitley to the eastern City Limits, ufe Snow from Bear Creek to app oad, and one half of Keller Smithfield from Shady Grove to North Tarrant Parkway Impact Fee System No changes were made to the capital improvements plan CIP) for roadways beyond the transition of completed projects from new to recoupment status. Updated cost estimates were prepared to reflect current pricing for those projects yet to be built. Updated costs include construction, surveying and engineering 12.5% of construction), right of way acquisition $3.50 per square foot), debt service 3% compounded annually over 10 years) and study update costs one update every 5 years at $35,000 each). No debt service was included for recoupment projects. Projects listed as recoupment were also updated to reflect only the cities portion of cost for facility implementation. Costs removed include any developer participation or credits and any proceeds from the Downtown Tax Increment Financing TIF) District. Table 4 6 lists the roadway impact fee capital improvement projects and associated total costs and Figure 4 2 illustrates the location of each project. The cost of the updated impact fee program is $85.7M. Of oadway Impact Fee Analysis 4 14

22 this total, $51.8M is associated with new projects and $33.9M is associated with recoupment projects. When considering the state mandated credit 50%), the cost of the impact fee CIP is $42.8M of which $32.9M is located in service A and $52.9M in service area B. The derivation of individual project costs are detailed in Appendix G, Engineer s Opinion of Probable Construction Cost. A summary breaking down project, finance and cost for study updates by service area is provided in Table 4 7. The cost eligible for impact fees is also cited by service area. This cost is based on the needed amount of the CIP that is necessitated by new growth. In service area A, all of the capacity made available by the impact fee CIP will be consumed by future growth. In service area B, 93% of the capacity will be needed to cover future growth. Appendix H details the capacity made available by project and corresponding service area and Appendix I summarizes project costs and the associated allocation of cost for study updates by project. Study update costs were allocated based on capacity available by each impact fee project. Appendix J details the cost of capacity made available by the impact fee CIP, the credited cost 50%) of the CIP and the cost attributable to new growth over the 10 year period by service area. oadway Impact Fee Analysis 4 15

23 Table 4 6: oadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan Serv CIP eference Project Length No. of Type Thoroughfare Plan Area Origin CIP No. oadway From To Status mi) Lanes dwy Description OW Project Cost* 5280 A Johnson oad US 377 Hallelujah ecoup UCS C4U Undiv Coll 80 $2,029,504 A Johnson oad Hallelujah Keller Smithfield New UC4 C4U Undiv Coll 80 $1,976,500 A Mt. Gilead US 377 oanoke New UC4 C4U Undiv Coll 80 $9,461,944 A a Bourland oad Johnson Mt. Gilead New UC4 C4U Undiv Coll 80 $6,142,560 A b Bourland oad Mt. Gilead Marshall idge ecoup UCS C3U Collector 70 $415,413 A Keller Smithfield Johnson FM 1709 ecoup UC4 C4U Undiv Coll 80 $268,500 A ufe Snow Drive FM 1709 Johnson New DA A4D Divided Art 100 $1,211,997 A Pearson Lane Florence City Limits New UC4 C4U Undiv Coll 80 $11,363,607 Sub-total SA A 7.44 $32,870,024 B Bourland oad FM 1709 Johnson ecoup DA A4D Divided Art 100 $1,845,210 B North Tarrant Parkway US 377 Whitley ecoup PDA A6D Divided Art 125 $1,030,959 B North Tarrant Parkway Whitley City Limits ecoup PDA A6D Divided Art 125 $7,319,481 B Bear Creek Parkway Keller Smithfield Davis ecoup DA A6D Divided Art 125 $2,736,917 B Bear Creek Parkway Keller Smithfield ufe Snow ecoup DA A6D Divided Art 125 $2,738,269 B ufe Snow Drive FM 1709 Bear Creek ecoup PDA A6D Divided Art 125 $449,812 B ufe Snow Drive Johnson FM 1709 New DA A4D Divided Art 100 $1,211,997 B ufe Snow Drive Bear Creek app ecoup PDA A6D Divided Art 125 $7,936,400 B Keller Smithfield oad FM 1709 Wayside ecoup DA A4D Divided Art 100 $522,495 B Keller Smithfield oad Wayside Bear un ecoup DA A4D Divided Art 100 $4,236,688 B Keller Smithfield oad Bear un Shady Grove New DA A4D Divided Art 90 $8,226,070 B Keller Smithfield oad Shady Grove North Tarrant Parkway ecoup UA A4D Divided Art 90 $368,622 B Keller Smithfield oad Shady Grove North Tarrant Parkway New UA A4D Divided Art 90 $1,924,910 B app oad US 377 ufe Snow New DA A6D Divided Art 125 $10,298,114 B Johnson oad US 377 Halleluiah ecoup UCS C4U Undiv Coll 80 $2,029,504 Sub-total SA B $52,875,447 Totals: $85,745,472 Notes: PDA- Principal divided arterial facility ecoup - ecoupment project DA- Divided arterial facility New - New Project UA- Undivided arterial facility + TXDOT Project, City participation DC- Divided collector facility UC4- Undivided collector facility - 4 lane UCS- Undivided collector with center turn-lane $16,856,899 UC2- Undivided collector facility - 2 lane oadway Impact Fee Analysis 4 16

24 Figure 4 2 oadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan oadway Impact Fee Analysis 4 17

25 Service Area Construction Cost Table 4 7: Financing Cost Summary of Impact Fee Costs Impact Fee Study Cost Total for Impact Fee Program Total Eligible Impact Fee Program A $25,112,945 $7,757,080 $17,820 $32,887,844 $8,815,525 B $43,442,078 $9,433,369 $52,180 $52,927,627 $14,040,097 Total $68,555,023 $17,190,449 $70,000 $85,815,472 $22,855, Projected Vehicle Miles of New Capacity Supply) The vehicle miles of capacity is listed in Table 4 8. A complete detailed listing by roadway segment is provided in Appendix H. Table 4 8: Projected Vehicle Miles of New Capacity Service Area Projected Vehicle Miles of New Capacity Supply) A 10,504 B 30,757 Total 41, Vehicle Miles of Existing Demand on CIP oadways The vehicle miles of existing demand on CIP roadways is provided in Table 4 9. A complete detailed listing by roadway segment is provided in Appendix H. Table 4 9: Vehicle Miles of Existing Demand on CIP oadways Service Area Vehicle Miles of Existing Demand A 3,485 B 12,300 Total 15, Maximum Cost per Service Unit The calculation of the cost per service unit involves the calculation of the net capacity supplied by the CIP after existing demand and deficiencies are removed, and the total cost of the net capacity supplied. Where net capacity supplied is greater than the new demand, the cost per service unit is simply the cost of the net capacity divided by the number of service units provided. In this case, only the portion of the oadway Impact Fee Analysis 4 18

26 CIP necessitated by new development is used in the calculation. If the net capacity supplied is less than projected new demand, then the cost per service unit is calculated by dividing the total cost of net supply by the portion of new demand attributable and necessary by development. In other words, the cost of the CIP that is being provided is spread out over the vehicle miles of demand generated in the 10 year window. Table 4 10 and Table 4 11 list the results of the cost per service unit calculation by service area. The actual cost per service unit was calculated to be $3,082 and $1,720 for service areas A and B, respectively, and was based on the total cost of net capacity supplied by the CIP and the demand attributable to new development over the 10 year planning period. oadway Impact Fee Analysis 4 19

27 Table 4 10: Calculation of Maximum Impact Fees Credited) Service Area A Line # Maximum Assessable Impact Fee 1 Total Veh Miles of Capacity Added by the CIP 10,504 From Projected Veh Miles of New Capacity Table 4 8) 2 Total Veh Miles of Existing Demand on CIP oads 3,485 From Veh Miles of Existing Demand ON CIP oadways Table 4 9) 3 Total Veh Miles of Existing Deficiencies on Existing oads 1,388 From Excess Capacity and Deficiencies Table 4 4) 4 Net Amount of Veh Miles of Capacity Added 5,631 Line #1 Line #2 Line #3) 5 Total Cost of CIP Within Service Area $32,887,844 From Engineer s Opinion of Probable Construction Costs Table 4 7) 6 Total Cost of CIP Within Service Area With 50% Credit $16,443,922 Line #5 / 2 7 Cost of Net Capacity Supplied $8,815,525 Line #4 / Line #1) x Line #6) 8 Cost to Meet Existing Needs and Usage $7,628,397 Line #6 Line #7) 9 Total Veh Miles of New Demand Over 10 Years 5,717 From Projected Vehicle Miles of New Demand Table 4 5) 10 Percent of Capacity Added Attributed to New Growth 101.5% Line #9 / Line #4)** Use 100% 11 Cost of Capacity Added Attributed to New Growth $8,815,525 Line #7 x Line #10) 12 Cost per Service Unit with 50% Credit $1, Line #11 / Line #9) 13 Maximum Fee per Service Unit $3, Line #12 * 2 **If Line #9 > Line #4, then reduce Line #10 to 100% oadway Impact Fee Analysis 4 20

28 Table 4 11: Calculation of Maximum Impact Fees Credited) Service Area B Line # Maximum Assessable Impact Fee 1 Total Veh Miles of Capacity Added by the CIP 30,757 From Projected Veh Miles of New Capacity Table 4 8) 2 Total Veh Miles of Existing Demand on CIP oads 12,300 From Veh Miles of Existing Demand ON CIP oadways Table 4 9) 3 Total Veh Miles of Existing Deficiencies on Existing oads 945 From Excess Capacity and Deficiencies Table 4 4) 4 Net Amount of Veh Miles of Capacity Added 17,512 Line #1 Line #2 Line #3) 5 Total Cost of CIP Within Service Area $52,927,627 From Engineer s Opinion of Probable Construction Costs Table 4 7) 6 Total Cost of CIP Within Service Area With 50% Credit $26,463,814 Line #5 / 2 7 Cost of Net Capacity Supplied $15,067,435 Line #4 / Line #1) x Line #6) 8 Cost to Meet Existing Needs and Usage $11,396,379 Line #6 Line #7) 9 Total Veh Miles of New Demand Over 10 Years 16,318 From Projected Vehicle Miles of New Demand Table 4 5) 10 Percent of Capacity Added Attributed to New Growth 93.2% Line #9 / Line #4)** 11 Cost of Capacity Added Attributed to New Growth $14,040,097 Line #7 x Line #10) 12 Cost per Service Unit with 50% Credit $ Line #11 / Line #9) 13 Maximum Fee per Service Unit $1, Line #12 * 2 **If Line #8 > Line #4, then reduce Line #9 to 100% oadway Impact Fee Analysis 4 21

29 State legislation requires that a credit for the portion of ad valorem tax revenues generated by improvements over the program period, or a credit equal to 50% of the total projected cost of implementing a roadway impact fee capital improvements program be given. Based on a 50% credit, the maximum allowable cost per service is $1, and $ for service areas A and B, respectively. Appendix J summarizes the derivation of the cost per service unit calculation by service area Land Use / Vehicle Mile Equivalency Table A land use/vehicle mile equivalency table establishes the service unit rate for various land uses. This table is a result of combining PM peak hour trip generation rates with average trip length information for various land uses. These rates are based on an appropriate development unit for each land use. For example; office, retail, industrial, and institutional are based on development of 1,000 square feet of gross floor area, while single family and multi family residential is based on dwelling units. The s Land Use Vehicle Mile Equivalency Table is made up of twelve land uses and include; single family residential, multi family, retirement center, nursing home, day care center, medical dental office, general office, institutional, industrial, retail/commercial, golf course, and parks. Table 4 12 illustrates the total service units generated by the various land uses. Appendix K details the derivation of the land use equivalency table. oadway Impact Fee Analysis 4 22

30 Table 4 12: Land Use Equivalency Table Land Use Development Unit Total Service Units Veh mi/dev Unit) esidential Single Family Dwelling Unit D.U.) 2.85 Multi Family Dwelling Unit D.U.) 1.65 etirement Center Dwelling Unit D.U.) 0.81 Nursing Home/Assisted Living Beds 0.87 Day Care Center 1,000 GFA 0.96 General Office 1,000 GFA 3.98 Medical Dental Office 1,000 GFA etail/commercial 1,000 GFA 7.00 Hotel ooms 1.30 Industrial 1,000 GFA 2.50 Institutional 1,000 GFA 1.77 Golf Course Acres 0.71 Parks and Open Space Acres OADWAY IMPACT FEE CALCULATION The calculation of the actual fee charged to development is a two part process. These parts are: Part 1: Determine number of service units vehicle miles) generated by the development using the land use vehicle mile equivalency table. No. of Development x Vehicle miles Total Service Units) Units per development unit = Development s Vehicle miles Part 2: Calculate the impact due by new development. This fee based on the cost per service unit for the service area where the development is located. Development s Vehicle miles from Part 1) x Cost per vehicle mile from CIP calculation) = Impact Fee due from development oadway Impact Fee Analysis 4 23

31 Examples: The following fee would be assessed to new developments in Service Area B, with a cost per service unit of $ % credit). Single Family Dwelling 1 dwelling unit x 2.85 vehicle miles) / 1 dwelling unit = 2.85 vehicle miles 2.85 Vehicle miles x $ / vehicle mile = $2, ,000 square foot s.f.) General Office Building 10,000 s.f x 3.98 vehicles miles)/1000 s.f. units = 39.8 vehicle miles 39.8 vehicle miles x $860.00/vehicle mile = $34, ,000 s.f. etail Center 10,000 s.f. x 7.00 vehicle miles)/ 1,000 s.f. units = 70.0 vehicle miles 70.0 vehicle miles x $860.00/vehicle mile = $60, ,000 s.f. Industrial Development 50,000 s.f. x 2.50 vehicle miles)/ 1,000 s.f. units = vehicle miles vehicle miles x $860.00/ vehicle mile = $107, oadway Impact Fee Analysis 4 24

32 APPENDIX A WASTEWATE POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT BY SEWE BASIN

33 CEEK BED COAL KATY D WHITLEY D ELM ST JESSIE ST SHADY LN OANOKE D 4044 SMITHFIELD D PESTON LN AUSTIN ST OY LN ANITA AVE PENNY LN DANA LN DAVIS LN INDIAN KNOLL TL ANDALL MILL D PAE AVE COLLEGE AVE APACHE TL UFE SNOW NAVAJO GLOIA ST HILLVIEW SWEETGUM CI KANDY LN ALIE LN LEDAA CLAA LN VISTA TL HAELL THONHILL ANDOL MILL AVE CUTIS D OVE BLUEBONNET HUXLEY ST KENA LN JUDGE BLAND D HALLMAK SAAH BOOKS KAYS CT BANDONWOOD ASHE J T OTTINGE D KISTINA LN BUCKNE LN LN WINDSO FOEST TL SUTTON PL OAKWOOD STEGALL D YOSEMITE LN LAKEVIEW HANDEL GLEN HOLLOW LONGVIEW ASHMOE CT VEMILION CT SPUCE OY LN BODEGA BAY ALMA TOWN CENTE LN SHOPSHIE CT OYAL LN MAVIN BILTMOE VENICE AVE BEA HOLLOW SOENSON TL CAMBELEY CT BOCK BETTY LN LISMOE CT CASTLE CEEK D TAILHEAD HIGHLAND CT CIMMAON T LODESTA SUMAC BOWN LN HILLTOP ST JEICHO CT PIXIE OSE AZALEA CT GILLIS CT GEENBIA 4041 WILDENESS CT OU LN HELEN ST B 170 PAK VISTA BLVD 170 PAE CT FOXPAW TL WOODLAND SPINGS COPPE CEEK CHINKAPIN LN ig Bear Creek VENTUA ST YELLOW ANCHO UV 170 GASSY GLEN KELLE HASLET D LN ED BICH NETLEAF WESTPOT PKWY PANGOLIN Marshall Branch OAK HAVEN COFFEETEE KELLE HICKS D WALL PICE KELLE D WALL PICE D LIBETY WAY MOUNTAIN LD GO C EEK LN STAGE COACH D BONANZA GAYWOLF IDGE TL ED OBIN WESTEN TL LA K S VIEW PT HOUNDS TAIL LN SHADY BICH SOCCE PKWY OAK ST TIMBELAND EGG KOGE PAK VISTA CI CAYLO D STOE LINE IVE AVE IDG E LAKE H AVEN CED A WATE OAK LOS T PAIIE BLVD SUGA MAPLE D OOSTE ST PYO CT EGG FAM D SPOT PKWY LA QUIN T A CI PIN TAIL CT YELLOW CEDA TL DODGE TL QUAY IDGE TL MAPLEWOOD FM 1709 SANTA FE TL KING TL INNOVATION WAY OPTICAL WAY L AKE WAY Marshall Branch LAMA ST SE -HA-PAYAK D BIG BEA CEEK D CHISOLM TL CALVELEY PL BUSEY D UBY ST 4059 HILL ST INDEPENDENCE PKWY WESTPOT PKWY HA MO N SON JENNIFE CT CHALES ST BATES ST P A K FANK LN STALLION COLT LN GATEWAY ALLIANCE ODEO CUTTING HOSE LN BUSEY D VALLEY IDGE HOME STEA D PAGE ST BIG BEND WESTPAK CALOW CT FOXFOD HAPE CT PIMLICO EDWOOD CT EDENDEY FLANIGAN HILL KILKEN NY CT TIPPE AY DUNMOE CT Marsha TAVIS ST OAK 377 ll Branch NOMA LN BLUE STEM AVE CALAIS PALOMINO TL LINDA ST LOINE ST PEAL ST COLLEGE ST WILLIS LN SUNISE STELING MASHALL IDGE TACE BIAN BAT ST BOULAND D VINE ST BEA CEEK PKWY C CINDY ST TAYLO ST PKWY EMEALD IDGE HIDEWAY COSS TIMBES GLEN OLAND BEVELY ST APP D HASE OAKS ELAINE ST WOODLAND TL OY CT MOONLIGHT LN MONING STA LN STALIGHT DOYLE MISTY IDGE MONACH HILL D Big Bear West 2,962 3,416 3,870 TAYLO ST Big Bear Southwest 3,731 3,837 3,944 SHA DY LN LACEY OAK LN OVECUP LN PIN O A K IDGEGATE VA SE Y OA K ALTA IDGE SANTA CUZ TL PEBBLECEEK MONTEEY MISTY OAK LN OAK BEND LN SEENE CT GAND MEADOWS Cade Branch 3,297 3,707 4,118 LAVENA DALE CT UNB IDLED CAIAGE LN OAK VALLE Y D Marshall Branch IDGE POINT PKWY LN VALLE VISTA CT HOLLY CT HILL ST BELINDA BIA UN PHEASANT IDGE GATEWOOD APPLEWOOD WILLOWWO O D TL NOTHEN TCE WICKHAM CT CHA THAM LN HILLSIDE BANCOFT D INDIA ST PATE O D PHILLIPS BABAA LN M U WEYBIDGE LN SILVE LAKE ST Little Bear West 8,927 9,790 10,655 T A ANT PKWY TAHOE LN TALL OAK LN TEAL LN IFIELD CLIFFMOO SCOT LN N ALI LN DE PAINTBUSH SEQUOIA LN BLUE QUAIL D ANEWS LN MEADOW PAK KELSEY D BIA MEADOW TALBOT ST KELLE PKWY QUAIL IDGE CAT MO UNTAI N HEATH E LN STEV E CT HIGHLAND LAKES JANET CT WISE ST CI M EA D O W PAKING LOT CELESTE LN OLYMPIC CEEK TEACE IDGE CT HIGHLAND OAKS THO N TON Big Bear Central 5,941 7,329 8,715 Big Bear South 1 2,117 2,242 2,366 WATES EDGE KEYSTONE WAY TL SIMMONS CANTEBUY L N OXBUY WAY AUSTIN THOMAS HOLLY IDGE CT EAGLE PASS OAK TL HALLELUJAH TL GADEN LN MELISSA WILLIAMSBUG LN ATLEE FALL CEEK TL STATFOD PL JACKSON D USH CEEK D CEE KB E ND TUSCANY TE VENETIAN ST CHIANTI LN DOUBLE SPINGS LN AMBE CT CAT HOLLOW CT OVELOOK IDGE BUSEY D MELODY LN ANNES CT MESQUITE CEEKIDGE GANITE FALLS OBIN OAK HILL D IVE TL BEA UN DANBUY PAKS LUNA MESA TL LIMESTONE CEE K COUNTY BOOK BOADMOO JACOB TAANT PKWY VALLEY A VE L CONTINENTAL TL AVENWO OD DAYLL LN WOODS MANO WAY TANQUIL CT HAWTHONE LN SILVEADO TL KELLE-SMITHFIELD D CLAK SPING S MIC A SMETHWICK COVE MADEA CT CIELO VISTA AVEN TCE Marshall Branch West ENGLAND H WAY LA WINDY OAKS LATIGO LN F ONTAINE LN KNOX D SHADY GOVE D OBIN CT EATA D SPANI SH BAY LOST LAKE OSEWOOD OCKWOOD ittle Bear Creek KIM ST LOST BELAIE CHANDLE D WAYSIDE SOUTHFOK HUDNALL FAM BELLECHASE CEEKVIEW D D T L LAMBET LN BENTWOOD TL SENDEO HONDA D KINGWOOD Big Bear South 2 2,267 2,347 WALES 2,427 CONTINENTAL TL WESTOVE TL FLYING TL OTTINGE D SECL USION BLEVINS FALCON FOEST BEND LN MEANDEING WOODS VIL LA GE TEALWOOD TL WATE FOD LN LN WICKLOW BLACKW OOD NIGHTINGALE CI HADWICK TL BOBBI CT ACON TEEHOUSE LN CASTLE COVE LN Big Bear East 3,429 4,047 4,664 MEADOW KNOLL CT BEA HOLLOW BEA CEEK PKWY Little Bear East 1,442 1,480 1,519 FLOENCE PL ADA L MASON CT INA KE CT KENDALL CT HIELSCHE DOVE D S P IN G SUMME LN KINGSBIDGE LN BASK LN TALON CT GEEN TL GUADALUPE D OLD YOK BIA IDG E D HAVENWOOD AUTUMN STONECASTLE BIDGECEST LN CA STLEMAN CT PE ASON BLUE IDGE D TIMBE IDGE LN ELKIN LN XING Big ZAVALA D EDGEWOOD BIA GOVE KANES SHADY OAKS BEVELY ASPEN Marshall Branch East WINTE 1,254 1,325 1,396 FLOWE CT OBET'S CT SILVELEAF IO BEND CT W I NDSONG CI COWN CT WOOD IDGE BUSEY D STONECASTLE ELMGOVE CT P ECAN IDGE LOST MAPLE VIN E WOOD FIESIDE CT WYCK HI L L ASPEN LN VISTA LN VISTA D GAY LN BANTY KINSALE LAZY LN JODAN CHESAPEAK E Bear Creek EGENCY MEADOWVIEW TEXAS TL SPANISH TL 3001 CIMAON TL BEACON HILL LEGACY CT SHADY HOLLOW CT SUMMIT CT WESTWIND LN LN SPENCE D GEENWOOD LN HICKOY HOLLOW LN PAK BOOK FIO SHADYW OO D LN CHEOKEE TL COUNT Y FLOENCE D OVELAND TL MEIMAC CT CYPESS PLACE KING FISHE BEWE D JELLICO CI WATEC EST BUSHCEEK PINE HUST TIMBE HICKOY CT VAQUEO WAINGTON LN FAWKES LN KATELYN LN WAT EMEE FM 1938 JOHNSON D UNION CHUCH D LAKEPOINT ELM C E DA TE ESTATES EMBE WOODS ED GE B OOK SANDY TL THONWAY STATFOD WIST EIA W AY TALL WOODS TL BIDGEWOOD TAILS EDGE IDGE UN HIGH POINT CT LUCIAN LN LAGUNA TL HUNTES LN THONBEY LIMEICK CT HIGH PO S T O A K BLVD Kirkwood Branch GAPE ABO CT KEN T WOOD D COUNTY PL Florence Branch IVE OAKS A VE POST OAK SIEN A COUNTY GLEN LN Big Bear PL HILLSIDE CT EAGLE TL Creek BELSHIE PECINCT LINE D Kirkwood Branch BAZOS CT WOODLAWN CT ANCH HOUSE MICHAEL L YNDHUST WAY THON NAVASOTA COVE SPUCE CT EMUDA CT LAK CT Big Bear Southeast 4,767 5,151 5,535 Big Bear Central Big Bear East WILL'S CT IDGE STONEBIDGE LN COTSWOLD CT OLLIN G EDGEMONT BELAIE OA K LEAF BANDIT TL MAANTHA WAY BE AM KINGSWOOD GIFFOD CT CAMDEN CI PECINCT LINE D FM 1709 GEENBIA MUPHY D FIGUE A-1 LEGEND HEBET ST WATE LILY LAVACA TL LD LOCKETT D Kirkwood Branch MOGAN D CONTINENTAL BLVD WOOD LN MONET FANNING ST MESQUITE D EMBANT CEEK D DA VINCI MCDONWELL SCHOOL D STELING BILTMOE D CESCENT LN DOVE D ED WING CT WILD EMMAS CT PLAYES CI BIG BEND COVE COUNTY MOSS WAY BOKEN BEND FAI O AKS PHEASANT LN EGAL OAKS OAK LN Higgins Branch W OODB O OK L N E D W IN G D EGET LN OSE WAY NATIVE ENCLAVE CT MOCKINGBID LN FOEST LN DANCE PL CEDA CT ME A DOW PEYTONVILLE AVE GEENLEAF COVE CHALET CT MONT EUX AVE CITY OF KELLE TOTAL POPULATION BY SEWE BASIN Big Bear West Cade Branch SHESTON GLEN GLN TEACE LN Big Bear South 1 Big Bear South 2 Big Bear Southeast Big Bear Southwest Florence Branch Kirkwood Branch Little Bear East Little Bear West I ,800 3,600 SCALE IN FEET Calloway Branch Basin Name 2014 Population 2019 Population 2024 Population Marshall Branch East Marshall Branch West Created By Freese and Nichols, Inc. Job No.: KEL14180 Location: H:\W_WW_PLANNING\Final_eport\Figure-A-1)-Total_Population_by_WWBasin.mxd Updated: Thursday, March 26, :22:19 PM

34 CEEK BED COAL KATY D WHITLEY D ELM ST JESSIE ST SHADY LN OANOKE D 4044 SMITHFIELD D PESTON LN AUSTIN ST OY LN ANITA AVE PENNY LN DANA LN DAVIS LN INDIAN KNOLL TL ANDALL MILL D PAE AVE COLLEGE AVE APACHE TL UFE SNOW NAVAJO GLOIA ST HILLVIEW SWEETGUM CI KANDY LN ALIE LN LEDAA CLAA LN VISTA TL HAELL THONHILL ANDOL MILL AVE CUTIS D OVE BLUEBONNET HUXLEY ST KENA LN JUDGE BLAND D HALLMAK SAAH BOOKS KAYS CT BANDONWOOD ASHE J T OTTINGE D KISTINA LN BUCKNE LN LN WINDSO FOEST TL SUTTON PL OAKWOOD STEGALL D YOSEMITE LN LAKEVIEW HANDEL GLEN HOLLOW LONGVIEW ASHMOE CT VEMILION CT SPUCE OY LN BODEGA BAY ALMA TOWN CENTE LN SHOPSHIE CT OYAL LN MAVIN BILTMOE VENICE AVE BEA HOLLOW SOENSON TL CAMBELEY CT BOCK BETTY LN LISMOE CT CASTLE CEEK D TAILHEAD HIGHLAND CT CIMMAON T LODESTA SUMAC BOWN LN HILLTOP ST JEICHO CT PIXIE OSE AZALEA CT GILLIS CT GEENBIA 4041 WILDENESS CT OU LN HELEN ST B 170 PAK VISTA BLVD 170 PAE CT FOXPAW TL WOODLAND SPINGS COPPE CEEK CHINKAPIN LN ig Bear Creek VENTUA ST YELLOW ANCHO UV 170 GASSY GLEN KELLE HASLET D LN ED BICH NETLEAF WESTPOT PKWY PANGOLIN Marshall Branch OAK HAVEN COFFEETEE KELLE HICKS D WALL PICE KELLE D WALL PICE D LIBETY WAY MOUNTAIN LD GO C EEK LN STAGE COACH D BONANZA GAYWOLF IDGE TL ED OBIN WESTEN TL LA K S VIEW PT HOUNDS TAIL LN SHADY BICH SOCCE PKWY OAK ST TIMBELAND EGG KOGE PAK VISTA CI CAYLO D STOE LINE IVE AVE IDG E LAKE H AVEN CED A WATE OAK LOS T PAIIE BLVD SUGA MAPLE D OOSTE ST PYO CT EGG FAM D SPOT PKWY LA QUIN T A CI PIN TAIL CT YELLOW CEDA TL DODGE TL QUAY IDGE TL MAPLEWOOD FM 1709 SANTA FE TL KING TL INNOVATION WAY OPTICAL WAY L AKE WAY Marshall Branch LAMA ST SE -HA-PAYAK D BIG BEA CEEK D CHISOLM TL CALVELEY PL BUSEY D UBY ST 4059 HILL ST INDEPENDENCE PKWY WESTPOT PKWY HA MO N SON JENNIFE CT CHALES ST BATES ST P A K FANK LN STALLION COLT LN GATEWAY ALLIANCE ODEO CUTTING HOSE LN BUSEY D VALLEY IDGE HOME STEA D PAGE ST BIG BEND WESTPAK CALOW CT FOXFOD HAPE CT PIMLICO EDWOOD CT EDENDEY FLANIGAN HILL KILKEN NY CT TIPPE AY DUNMOE CT Marsha TAVIS ST OAK 377 ll Branch NOMA LN BLUE STEM AVE CALAIS PALOMINO TL LINDA ST LOINE ST PEAL ST COLLEGE ST WILLIS LN SUNISE STELING MASHALL IDGE TACE BIAN BAT ST BOULAND D VINE ST BEA CEEK PKWY C CINDY ST TAYLO ST PKWY EMEALD IDGE HIDEWAY COSS TIMBES GLEN OLAND BEVELY ST APP D HASE OAKS ELAINE ST WOODLAND TL OY CT MOONLIGHT LN MONING STA LN STALIGHT DOYLE MISTY IDGE MONACH HILL D Big Bear West TAYLO ST Big Bear Southwest SHA DY LN LACEY OAK LN OVECUP LN PIN O A K IDGEGATE VA SE Y OA K ALTA IDGE SANTA CUZ TL PEBBLECEEK MONTEEY MISTY OAK LN OAK BEND LN SEENE CT GAND MEADOWS Cade Branch LAVENA DALE CT UNB IDLED CAIAGE LN OAK VALLE Y D Marshall Branch IDGE POINT PKWY LN VALLE VISTA CT HOLLY CT HILL ST BELINDA BIA UN PHEASANT IDGE GATEWOOD APPLEWOOD WILLOWWO O D TL NOTHEN TCE WICKHAM CT CHA THAM LN HILLSIDE BANCOFT D INDIA ST PATE O D PHILLIPS BABAA LN M U WEYBIDGE LN SILVE LAKE ST Little Bear West T A ANT PKWY TAHOE LN TALL OAK LN TEAL LN IFIELD CLIFFMOO SCOT LN N ALI LN DE PAINTBUSH SEQUOIA LN BLUE QUAIL D ANEWS LN MEADOW PAK KELSEY D BIA MEADOW TALBOT ST KELLE PKWY QUAIL IDGE CAT MO UNTAI N HEATH E LN STEV E CT HIGHLAND LAKES JANET CT WISE ST CI M EA D O W PAKING LOT CELESTE LN OLYMPIC CEEK TEACE IDGE CT HIGHLAND OAKS THO N TON Big Bear Central Big Bear South WATES EDGE KEYSTONE WAY TL SIMMONS CANTEBUY L N OXBUY WAY AUSTIN THOMAS HOLLY IDGE CT EAGLE PASS OAK TL HALLELUJAH TL GADEN LN MELISSA WILLIAMSBUG LN ATLEE FALL CEEK TL STATFOD PL JACKSON D USH CEEK D CEE KB E ND TUSCANY TE VENETIAN ST CHIANTI LN DOUBLE SPINGS LN AMBE CT CAT HOLLOW CT OVELOOK IDGE BUSEY D MELODY LN ANNES CT MESQUITE CEEKIDGE GANITE FALLS OBIN OAK HILL D IVE TL BEA UN DANBUY PAKS LUNA MESA TL LIMESTONE CEE K COUNTY BOOK BOADMOO JACOB TAANT PKWY VALLEY A VE L CONTINENTAL TL AVENWO OD DAYLL LN WOODS MANO WAY TANQUIL CT HAWTHONE LN SILVEADO TL KELLE-SMITHFIELD D CLAK SPING S MIC A SMETHWICK COVE MADEA CT CIELO VISTA AVEN TCE Marshall Branch West ENGLAND H WAY LA WINDY OAKS LATIGO LN F ONTAINE LN KNOX D SHADY GOVE D OBIN CT EATA D SPANI SH BAY LOST LAKE OSEWOOD OCKWOOD ittle Bear Creek KIM ST LOST BELAIE CHANDLE D WAYSIDE SOUTHFOK HUDNALL FAM BELLECHASE CEEKVIEW D D T L LAMBET LN BENTWOOD TL SENDEO HONDA D KINGWOOD Big Bear South WALES 2427 CONTINENTAL TL WESTOVE TL FLYING TL OTTINGE D SECL USION BLEVINS FALCON FOEST BEND LN MEANDEING WOODS VIL LA GE TEALWOOD TL WATE FOD LN LN WICKLOW BLACKW OOD NIGHTINGALE CI HADWICK TL BOBBI CT ACON TEEHOUSE LN CASTLE COVE LN Big Bear East MEADOW KNOLL CT BEA HOLLOW BEA CEEK PKWY Little Bear East FLOENCE PL ADA L MASON CT INA KE CT KENDALL CT HIELSCHE DOVE D S P IN G SUMME LN KINGSBIDGE LN BASK LN TALON CT GEEN TL GUADALUPE D OLD YOK BIA IDG E D HAVENWOOD AUTUMN STONECASTLE BIDGECEST LN CA STLEMAN CT PE ASON BLUE IDGE D TIMBE IDGE LN ELKIN LN XING Big ZAVALA D EDGEWOOD BIA GOVE KANES SHADY OAKS BEVELY ASPEN Marshall Branch East WINTE FLOWE CT OBET'S CT SILVELEAF IO BEND CT W I NDSONG CI COWN CT WOOD IDGE BUSEY D STONECASTLE ELMGOVE CT P ECAN IDGE LOST MAPLE VIN E WOOD FIESIDE CT WYCK HI L L ASPEN LN VISTA LN VISTA D GAY LN BANTY KINSALE LAZY LN JODAN CHESAPEAK E Bear Creek EGENCY MEADOWVIEW TEXAS TL SPANISH TL 3001 CIMAON TL BEACON HILL LEGACY CT SHADY HOLLOW CT SUMMIT CT WESTWIND LN LN SPENCE D GEENWOOD LN HICKOY HOLLOW LN PAK BOOK FIO SHADYW OO D LN CHEOKEE TL COUNT Y FLOENCE D OVELAND TL MEIMAC CT CYPESS PLACE KING FISHE BEWE D JELLICO CI WATEC EST BUSHCEEK PINE HUST TIMBE HICKOY CT VAQUEO WAINGTON LN FAWKES LN KATELYN LN WAT EMEE FM 1938 JOHNSON D UNION CHUCH D LAKEPOINT ELM C E DA TE ESTATES EMBE WOODS ED GE B OOK SANDY TL THONWAY STATFOD WIST EIA W AY TALL WOODS TL BIDGEWOOD TAILS EDGE IDGE UN HIGH POINT CT LUCIAN LN LAGUNA TL HUNTES LN THONBEY LIMEICK CT HIGH PO S T O A K BLVD Kirkwood Branch GAPE ABO CT KEN T WOOD D COUNTY PL Florence Branch IVE OAKS A VE POST OAK SIEN A COUNTY GLEN LN Big Bear PL HILLSIDE CT EAGLE TL Creek BELSHIE PECINCT LINE D Kirkwood Branch BAZOS CT WOODLAWN CT ANCH HOUSE MICHAEL L YNDHUST WAY THON NAVASOTA COVE SPUCE CT EMUDA CT LAK CT Big Bear Southeast Big Bear Central Big Bear East WILL'S CT IDGE STONEBIDGE LN COTSWOLD CT OLLIN G EDGEMONT BELAIE OA K LEAF BANDIT TL MAANTHA WAY BE AM KINGSWOOD GIFFOD CT CAMDEN CI PECINCT LINE D FM 1709 GEENBIA MUPHY D FIGUE A-2 LEGEND HEBET ST WATE LILY LAVACA TL LD LOCKETT D Kirkwood Branch MOGAN D CONTINENTAL BLVD WOOD LN MONET FANNING ST MESQUITE D EMBANT CEEK D DA VINCI MCDONWELL SCHOOL D STELING BILTMOE D CESCENT LN DOVE D ED WING CT WILD EMMAS CT PLAYES CI BIG BEND COVE COUNTY MOSS WAY BOKEN BEND FAI O AKS PHEASANT LN EGAL OAKS OAK LN Higgins Branch W OODB O OK L N E D W IN G D EGET LN OSE WAY NATIVE ENCLAVE CT MOCKINGBID LN FOEST LN DANCE PL CEDA CT ME A DOW PEYTONVILLE AVE GEENLEAF COVE CHALET CT MONT EUX AVE CITY OF KELLE SEVED POPULATION BY SEWE BASIN Big Bear West Cade Branch SHESTON GLEN GLN TEACE LN Big Bear South 1 Big Bear South 2 Big Bear Southeast Big Bear Southwest Florence Branch Kirkwood Branch Little Bear East Little Bear West I ,800 3,600 SCALE IN FEET Calloway Branch Basin Name 2014 Population 2019 Population 2024 Population Marshall Branch East Marshall Branch West Created By Freese and Nichols, Inc. Job No.: KEL14180 Location: H:\W_WW_PLANNING\Final_eport\Figure-A-2)-Total_Served_by_WWBasin.mxd Updated: Thursday, March 26, :23:05 PM

35 CEEK BED COAL KATY D WHITLEY D ELM ST JESSIE ST SHADY LN OANOKE D 4044 SMITHFIELD D PESTON LN AUSTIN ST OY LN ANITA AVE PENNY LN DANA LN DAVIS LN INDIAN KNOLL TL ANDALL MILL D PAE AVE COLLEGE AVE APACHE TL UFE SNOW NAVAJO GLOIA ST HILLVIEW SWEETGUM CI KANDY LN ALIE LN LEDAA CLAA LN VISTA TL HAELL THONHILL ANDOL MILL AVE CUTIS D OVE BLUEBONNET HUXLEY ST KENA LN JUDGE BLAND D HALLMAK SAAH BOOKS KAYS CT BANDONWOOD ASHE J T OTTINGE D KISTINA LN BUCKNE LN LN WINDSO FOEST TL SUTTON PL OAKWOOD STEGALL D YOSEMITE LN LAKEVIEW HANDEL GLEN HOLLOW LONGVIEW ASHMOE CT VEMILION CT SPUCE OY LN BODEGA BAY ALMA TOWN CENTE LN SHOPSHIE CT OYAL LN MAVIN BILTMOE VENICE AVE BEA HOLLOW SOENSON TL CAMBELEY CT BOCK BETTY LN LISMOE CT CASTLE CEEK D TAILHEAD HIGHLAND CT CIMMAON T LODESTA SUMAC BOWN LN HILLTOP ST JEICHO CT PIXIE OSE AZALEA CT GILLIS CT GEENBIA 4041 WILDENESS CT OU LN HELEN ST B 170 PAK VISTA BLVD 170 PAE CT FOXPAW TL WOODLAND SPINGS COPPE CEEK CHINKAPIN LN ig Bear Creek VENTUA ST YELLOW ANCHO UV 170 GASSY GLEN KELLE HASLET D LN ED BICH NETLEAF WESTPOT PKWY PANGOLIN Marshall Branch OAK HAVEN COFFEETEE KELLE HICKS D WALL PICE KELLE D WALL PICE D LIBETY WAY MOUNTAIN LD GO C EEK LN STAGE COACH D BONANZA GAYWOLF IDGE TL ED OBIN WESTEN TL LA K S VIEW PT HOUNDS TAIL LN SHADY BICH SOCCE PKWY OAK ST TIMBELAND EGG KOGE PAK VISTA CI CAYLO D STOE LINE IVE AVE IDG E LAKE H AVEN CED A WATE OAK LOS T PAIIE BLVD SUGA MAPLE D OOSTE ST PYO CT EGG FAM D SPOT PKWY LA QUIN T A CI PIN TAIL CT YELLOW CEDA TL DODGE TL QUAY IDGE TL MAPLEWOOD FM 1709 SANTA FE TL KING TL INNOVATION WAY OPTICAL WAY L AKE WAY Marshall Branch LAMA ST SE -HA-PAYAK D BIG BEA CEEK D CHISOLM TL CALVELEY PL BUSEY D UBY ST 4059 HILL ST INDEPENDENCE PKWY WESTPOT PKWY HA MO N SON JENNIFE CT CHALES ST BATES ST P A K FANK LN STALLION COLT LN GATEWAY ALLIANCE ODEO CUTTING HOSE LN BUSEY D VALLEY IDGE HOME STEA D PAGE ST BIG BEND WESTPAK CALOW CT FOXFOD HAPE CT PIMLICO EDWOOD CT EDENDEY FLANIGAN HILL KILKEN NY CT TIPPE AY DUNMOE CT Marsha TAVIS ST OAK 377 ll Branch NOMA LN BLUE STEM AVE CALAIS PALOMINO TL LINDA ST LOINE ST PEAL ST COLLEGE ST WILLIS LN SUNISE STELING MASHALL IDGE TACE BIAN BAT ST BOULAND D VINE ST BEA CEEK PKWY C CINDY ST TAYLO ST PKWY EMEALD IDGE HIDEWAY COSS TIMBES GLEN OLAND BEVELY ST APP D HASE OAKS ELAINE ST WOODLAND TL OY CT MOONLIGHT LN MONING STA LN STALIGHT DOYLE MISTY IDGE MONACH HILL D Big Bear West 1,618 1,793 1,968 TAYLO ST Big Bear Southwest SHA DY LN LACEY OAK LN OVECUP LN PIN O A K IDGEGATE VA SE Y OA K ALTA IDGE SANTA CUZ TL PEBBLECEEK MONTEEY MISTY OAK LN OAK BEND LN SEENE CT GAND MEADOWS Cade Branch LAVENA DALE CT UNB IDLED CAIAGE LN OAK VALLE Y D Marshall Branch IDGE POINT PKWY LN VALLE VISTA CT HOLLY CT HILL ST BELINDA BIA UN PHEASANT IDGE GATEWOOD APPLEWOOD WILLOWWO O D TL NOTHEN TCE WICKHAM CT CHA THAM LN HILLSIDE BANCOFT D INDIA ST PATE O D PHILLIPS BABAA LN M U WEYBIDGE LN SILVE LAKE ST Little Bear West 3,188 3,680 4,175 T A ANT PKWY TAHOE LN TALL OAK LN TEAL LN IFIELD CLIFFMOO SCOT LN N ALI LN DE PAINTBUSH SEQUOIA LN BLUE QUAIL D ANEWS LN MEADOW PAK KELSEY D BIA MEADOW TALBOT ST KELLE PKWY QUAIL IDGE CAT MO UNTAI N HEATH E LN STEV E CT HIGHLAND LAKES JANET CT WISE ST CI M EA D O W PAKING LOT CELESTE LN OLYMPIC CEEK TEACE IDGE CT HIGHLAND OAKS THO N TON Big Bear Central 2,521 3,080 3,638 Big Bear South WATES EDGE KEYSTONE WAY TL SIMMONS CANTEBUY L N OXBUY WAY AUSTIN THOMAS HOLLY IDGE CT EAGLE PASS OAK TL HALLELUJAH TL GADEN LN MELISSA WILLIAMSBUG LN ATLEE FALL CEEK TL STATFOD PL JACKSON D USH CEEK D CEE KB E ND TUSCANY TE VENETIAN ST CHIANTI LN DOUBLE SPINGS LN AMBE CT CAT HOLLOW CT OVELOOK IDGE BUSEY D MELODY LN ANNES CT MESQUITE CEEKIDGE GANITE FALLS OBIN OAK HILL D IVE TL BEA UN DANBUY PAKS LUNA MESA TL LIMESTONE CEE K COUNTY BOOK BOADMOO JACOB TAANT PKWY VALLEY A VE L CONTINENTAL TL AVENWO OD DAYLL LN WOODS MANO WAY TANQUIL CT HAWTHONE LN SILVEADO TL KELLE-SMITHFIELD D CLAK SPING S MIC A SMETHWICK COVE MADEA CT CIELO VISTA AVEN TCE Marshall Branch West ENGLAND H WAY LA WINDY OAKS LATIGO LN F ONTAINE LN KNOX D SHADY GOVE D OBIN CT EATA D SPANI SH BAY LOST LAKE OSEWOOD OCKWOOD ittle Bear Creek KIM ST LOST BELAIE CHANDLE D WAYSIDE SOUTHFOK HUDNALL FAM BELLECHASE CEEKVIEW D D T L LAMBET LN BENTWOOD TL SENDEO HONDA D KINGWOOD Big Bear South WALES 708 CONTINENTAL TL WESTOVE TL FLYING TL OTTINGE D SECL USION BLEVINS FALCON FOEST BEND LN MEANDEING WOODS VIL LA GE TEALWOOD TL WATE FOD LN LN WICKLOW BLACKW OOD NIGHTINGALE CI HADWICK TL BOBBI CT ACON TEEHOUSE LN CASTLE COVE LN Big Bear East MEADOW KNOLL CT BEA HOLLOW BEA CEEK PKWY Little Bear East FLOENCE PL ADA L MASON CT INA KE CT KENDALL CT HIELSCHE DOVE D S P IN G SUMME LN KINGSBIDGE LN BASK LN TALON CT GEEN TL GUADALUPE D OLD YOK BIA IDG E D HAVENWOOD AUTUMN STONECASTLE BIDGECEST LN CA STLEMAN CT PE ASON BLUE IDGE D TIMBE IDGE LN ELKIN LN XING Big ZAVALA D EDGEWOOD BIA GOVE KANES SHADY OAKS BEVELY ASPEN Marshall Branch East WINTE FLOWE CT OBET'S CT SILVELEAF IO BEND CT W I NDSONG CI COWN CT WOOD IDGE BUSEY D STONECASTLE ELMGOVE CT P ECAN IDGE LOST MAPLE VIN E WOOD FIESIDE CT WYCK HI L L ASPEN LN VISTA LN VISTA D GAY LN BANTY KINSALE LAZY LN JODAN CHESAPEAK E Bear Creek EGENCY MEADOWVIEW TEXAS TL SPANISH TL 3001 CIMAON TL BEACON HILL LEGACY CT SHADY HOLLOW CT SUMMIT CT WESTWIND LN LN SPENCE D GEENWOOD LN HICKOY HOLLOW LN PAK BOOK FIO SHADYW OO D LN CHEOKEE TL COUNT Y FLOENCE D OVELAND TL MEIMAC CT CYPESS PLACE KING FISHE BEWE D JELLICO CI WATEC EST BUSHCEEK PINE HUST TIMBE HICKOY CT VAQUEO WAINGTON LN FAWKES LN KATELYN LN WAT EMEE FM 1938 JOHNSON D UNION CHUCH D LAKEPOINT ELM C E DA TE ESTATES EMBE WOODS ED GE B OOK SANDY TL THONWAY STATFOD WIST EIA W AY TALL WOODS TL BIDGEWOOD TAILS EDGE IDGE UN HIGH POINT CT LUCIAN LN LAGUNA TL HUNTES LN THONBEY LIMEICK CT HIGH PO S T O A K BLVD Kirkwood Branch GAPE ABO CT KEN T WOOD D COUNTY PL Florence Branch IVE OAKS A VE POST OAK SIEN A COUNTY GLEN LN Big Bear PL HILLSIDE CT EAGLE TL Creek BELSHIE PECINCT LINE D Kirkwood Branch BAZOS CT WOODLAWN CT ANCH HOUSE MICHAEL L YNDHUST WAY THON NAVASOTA COVE SPUCE CT EMUDA CT LAK CT Big Bear Southeast Big Bear Central Big Bear East WILL'S CT IDGE STONEBIDGE LN COTSWOLD CT OLLIN G EDGEMONT BELAIE OA K LEAF BANDIT TL MAANTHA WAY BE AM KINGSWOOD GIFFOD CT CAMDEN CI PECINCT LINE D FM 1709 GEENBIA MUPHY D FIGUE A-3 LEGEND HEBET ST WATE LILY LAVACA TL LD LOCKETT D Kirkwood Branch MOGAN D CONTINENTAL BLVD WOOD LN MONET FANNING ST MESQUITE D EMBANT CEEK D DA VINCI MCDONWELL SCHOOL D STELING BILTMOE D CESCENT LN DOVE D ED WING CT WILD EMMAS CT PLAYES CI BIG BEND COVE COUNTY MOSS WAY BOKEN BEND FAI O AKS PHEASANT LN EGAL OAKS OAK LN Higgins Branch W OODB O OK L N E D W IN G D EGET LN OSE WAY NATIVE ENCLAVE CT MOCKINGBID LN FOEST LN DANCE PL CEDA CT ME A DOW PEYTONVILLE AVE GEENLEAF COVE CHALET CT MONT EUX AVE CITY OF KELLE TOTAL EMPLOYMENT BY SEWE BASIN Big Bear West Cade Branch SHESTON GLEN GLN TEACE LN Big Bear South 1 Big Bear South 2 Big Bear Southeast Big Bear Southwest Florence Branch Kirkwood Branch Little Bear East Little Bear West I ,800 3,600 SCALE IN FEET Calloway Branch Basin Name 2014 Employment 2019 Employment 2024 Employment Marshall Branch East Marshall Branch West Created By Freese and Nichols, Inc. Job No.: KEL14180 Location: H:\W_WW_PLANNING\Final_eport\Figure-A-3)-Total_Employment_by_WWBasin.mxd Updated: Thursday, March 26, :26:05 PM

36 APPENDIX B GEOCODED BILLING METE DATA

37 V U 170 DOVE D DOVE D k Kir FAI O AK S ANDO L MIL L AV E TE M LAMBET LN TO EL TANQUIL CT sh al M ar PAK V IS TA BLVD Branch od wo LIN E D ASPEN LN PECINCT PO S A ED C C VAQUE O OU LN L M IL MOGAN D D OL FANNING ST ANDALL MILL D N PA INT BUS H WAY IN D IA PEYTONVILLE AVE BOB O LINK ANDOL MILL AVE D E E H OL L OW BLV D E A GL E T L S O E NSON T L HAYS OO D D E DG EW INDIAN KNOLL TL HANDEL DA VINCI CLAA LN FM TALBOT T HEBET ST KAYS CT CESCENT LN LEGEND STELING HALLMAK T HO NBID THONHILL TIMBE CIMMAON T CUTIS D VA L L E Y OAK S CAST L E CEE K D PAKDALE PE B A N D O N WO O D D GIFFOD LN BIA GO V E BUCKNE LN ME AND E IN G WO ODS ASHMOE CT PESTON LN TE ALW OOD SMITHFIELD D SAAH BOOKS KISTINA LN ALIE LN KANDY LN KENA LN BILT MOE AN LODESTA TAILHEAD WAT E ME E VENICE AVE PAKVIEW LN BOCK VEMILION CT JEL LICO CI HAELL STANSBUY DD I EL OM F B LO L ON GV IE W GL EN HOL LOW BE A HOL L OW LOS T T L KELL E S MI T H F IE L D D HUNTE LN D MAANT HA WAY SUMAC M AV IN KATE LY N LN S UT TON P L OYAL LN TIMBE TL OVE L AND T L C IM AO N T L WOODLAWN CT L IME IC K C T SANDHILL CT JU DGE BL AND D HICKOY CT HIGHLAND CT D WINDSO FOEST TL EX VISTA TL 4041 ELKIN LN C AS T LE M AN CT BOB BI C T CHANDLE D EASTWOOD C E E K SIDE D L AS ASHE SWEETGUM CI H IG HL AND O AKS D VA LL E Y ALMA PECINCT LINE D LISMOE CT BASK LN GEENBIA F L OE N CE PL LEDAA J T OTTINGE D DANA LN EATA D W E S T OVE T L STATFOD PL CHAPELWOOD AD ME IA B SC OT LN OW LN UFE SNOW GEOCODED BILLING METES BY SIZE OOD E MM A S C T DYW SE ENE CT FIGUE B-1 SHA C L IF F D IM OCK H A D WI C K T L Q UAIL IDGE UFE SNOW MOCK IN GBID L N LN NT B ICHMO K L W IL LIS L N L OV E G AS S L N MD BUCKIN GHA WICK LOW LN BETTY LN OAKWOOD IV E T L C OU NT Y B OOK D PATE O D INDIA ST TOWN CENTE LN BLUEBONNET P H E AS ANT IDGE OAK VA LL E Y S UN IS E T E M P LE M OE O AK BEND L N M IST Y OAK L N CAIAGE LN ES T EL OY LN WHITLEY D E LN T JO Y N NE INE D OK D PAINT PON Y BONCO L N CITY OF KELLE CE D IDGE T L OTTINGE D DAYLL LN JACKSON D D G E I IL HILLVIEW HILLSIDE VALLE VISTA LN SIOUX ST ANITA AV E NAVAJO GLOIA ST CINDY ST APACHE TL CINDY CT CINDY ST OY LN AUSTIN ST BODEGA BAY CAMEL BOULAND D GE NTL E WIN D D V IC K I ST AV E STEM ST BL UE LIND A PAGE ST ELM ST K PA SHADY LN CHIS OL M T L SANTA FE TL CHISHOLM TL COLLEGE ST 377 UBY ST L AM A ST S P OT P KW Y COLLEGE AVE JESSIE ST CHALE S ST HICKOY CI KATY D E GG S TOE D GS IN SP ND LA OD WO B E LL E CHAS E OA NOKE D THONTON HUXLEY ST PENNY LN STEGALL D MOIS OAK HIDEWAY SPUCE OAKWOOD CI IE I A M AP L E W OOD D WAT E OAK H LN C BI ED W E S T E N T L P E C IN C T L B O QUA Y ND ANCHO EE MO SPEN GAYWOLF IDGE TL G PA K ST IL VALL EY D Q UA A GE OVE V I LL EDGE BO OK AVE GE ID Meter Size 377 BE E DIN G L N ID GE L O S E T ED FO E A BLUE IDGE D VIE W EO CAT M O UNTA IN T L ED H OL LY ID G LA K E D ES HIGHLAND LAK O FLY ING TL W O OD D AD IA WO O LE ANNE S CT M O D AP P A P P L E WO CHAS E OAK S D OV ECUP LN 2 Inches oad 3 Inches ailroad 3/4-Inch 4 Inches Stream 1 Inch 8 Inches Lake TSZ Boundary Parcel 5/8-Inch 1 1/2 Inch City Limit C SCALE IN FEET Created By Freese and Nichols, Inc. Job No.: KEL14180 Location: H:\W_WW_PLANNING\Final_eport\Figure-B-1)-Geocoded_Billing_Meters.mxd Updated: Thursday, March 26, :13:50 PM nch Bra ay low 3,600 al 1,800 L A K E WAY D I COAL AC D GATE W OO D G E D W I N HIL L HOLL AND LAKE VIEW UNNYMEDE D CO UNT Y HIL L DE MEE WAY M TL WIN BELINDA M E A D O WL A K L N BEW E D ELAIN E ST E ND D L ISO CH GB BI L T S TE LN CHESAPEAKE D DA N L T DO A D VE S IL LD F IE I TH KE L L E- S M ST T M IN O WAY MAN BA EN WAY H U F FM AN BL UF F L AU ST HA L LE J AH T L HAL L EL UJ AH T L E EK D DC OL WE VAL LEY ID GE BILTMOE L L I D G E P K WY MA S H A ar sh M NCH D W OODS LY BA F OX PAW T L EVEEST D C O GT LI N LEW IS S TE YOSEMITE LN A CE Marsh al S E-H A-PAYAK D Ma rsh all Bra nch PAE AVE P ICK E AL BIN O PL AK D TL 0 AY W LAMB ET LN PL OAK IA LE S FI D D K NOX D BD LU HAWTHONE LN SPING E Y D T B AN ranch lb D IN K N G WINTE S I SS FEN VAL LEY Branch OU L N Kirkwood OAK LN COV TY EN PL O AK LN GADEN LN AUTUMN E P P K LAZY W KE L LE H AS LE T D T B OIN Y IDG LN E L M E L IS SA AI E GEENWOOD LN SUMME LN LN MELODY PANGO LIN D h ID G E L N Y B W E c n a r TEEHOUSE LN MEADOWVIEW ll B UNBIDLED a LN L BOT TA S T BEAM FAWK LN ES IS E S W T TL WOODS 4059 L T TALL PA NI S H S P O BI N C T T S O ch L OBIN s Bran OOD iggin TIMBELAND BLVD H IN GS W K STONECASTLE BIDGEWOOD SE CL T E XA S T OAK HAVEN U L S N IA B I S ON G S OD KIN WO A B I D G E W L N BE EM I LD T LN O O D WAY IN W L MA ST ENA V CAYLO D A L E DGUM LN VISTA GIFFOD CT ALMOND LN S D VISTA S WE CE PL EN D FLOENCE HAMONSON FL O D BANCOFT LN ED A T E E E M FF L D HIL SUGA MAPLE CO OAK O N HIL LS IDE CT D TE M ES QU I BA D B A A TA D I LY N N WAT E L SA TL G E C N U Z A TA S EG D Y TOP A IL L N H WA O O SE W IL D EGG FAM D FE E D MIL L MONTEEY JOHNSON D NE TL EA F LN HOVE NK AM P ST CHINKAPIN LN BLEVINS TL MESA KELLE HICKS D CI W DO MEA GAY LN K C EE L OINE S T NE TO ES LIM MASHA ST JODAN 09 ST PEAL FM 17 FM KE L L E P KW Y TAYL O ST O TAY L S T ST HILL SOCCE PKWY HILL ST ST HILL N D IA L WAYSIDE AK IL V S E D E L S T V INE BAT VIEW ES CEEK ST FALCON LINE IVE AV E CHEOKEE MICHAEL E SHADOWBOOK OLIV ST E N T E L TL G GE EN B IA PECAN ST S IE NA LN CLOVE PHILLIPS E E N L B D T N O S F CONTINENTA L BLVD UNIO N CHUCH D 377 BEA CEEK PKWY FLINT TL ar Creek e BEA UN B g i B D COACH STAGE Big B L ear T E O Cre G D D LN e A GLE N BABA k TE Y W PK K E C E EK JACOB AVE B UG L N L IA M S E W IL C C S T D T A OLAND Z A V A L A BE D L F A L M A N D D HU BEVELY ST LE A D O I T E LN W A F C BEA BO NANZ A CEEK LAKE LOST PKWY L AK B E A C WOODLAND TL ON H ILL D IN T E O P D E K A C E E K D L Big Be OSEWOOD L A K D ar Cr FO E S T E S WALES e L ek OY CT T G N OOD D K L N E A O I N I L OCKW L L A E T YN DH UST WAY K HO SIMMONS S L BENTWOOD TL KE E D LL IC E WA P LL MO CANTE BUY LN O CESTW TL OOD N S L ME Q U I I G T E L N H D K S T A P Y A N B U L D N O M TEAL LN NI NG S T A LD LN O O K Y D TL BANDIT B STALIGHT IA ID G E D E T L 307 G A ILL D APP V A N T E MB TAILS EDGE D LEE AT KOGE LUN A M UI F PAK VISTA CI I E LD BAH MS A ID GE UN C D NS L O I FF N D M UPHY D 3001 CALAIS Y G O VE D HAD S N AL LN D I A C M ONT E UX AVE SHADY OAKS EA DAVIS LN H HA PE TH CT E L N MCDONWELL SCHOOL D D Y L VE BE LN FANK ED DG T I K N O A IN P A C OA Y E N WAY D S USH CEEK A V T HO PKWY WILSON LN TAANT L E MA P T S LAVACA TL IDGE LAKE LO O OD D N V IN E W IND L T L I O STW N D S A L E W TAANT P KW Y Y ENC EG Y G L W T S L L E N N E O K TP N L CH AN AC ON EDGEMONT E A OK T EE T L L HIELSCHE TA L T CO NT IN E N THONBEY BELAIE E G D ID F K O O I L O V E ES ST KIM I STATFOD DE AF BUSEY D L it K LE L WALL PICE D T K E E OA tl e L L C F A Be a D E AT S r S A EG P C reek G E ID L G A E D BU SEY D BELSHIE LD LOCKETT D EY ALTA IDGE S U B BUSEY D U S E Y D B OAK TL YT A E N C US T D KNOX LN D B EN K EN BO B OK EN BE ND G F IS H E D TE KI N ST PO 377 K HI LL IS n ra lb W YC W PAK VISTA BLVD ch WESTPOT PKWY WESTPOT PKWY OOD W LIBETY WAY GAS SY GLEN AV EN TCE AVEN AVENWOOD 0 17 INDE P E NDE NCE P KW Y 0 17

38 APPENDIX C WATE AND WASTEWATE POJECT COSTS

39 10 Year Water CIP OPINION OF POBABLE COST Construction Project Number 1 Project Description 12-INCH WATE LINES IN UPPE PESSUE PLANE Detailed Description Two 12-inch lines currently under construction in the southern and northeastern Upper Pressure Plane. Purpose Provides looping and additional capacity for future demands in the Upper Pressure Plane. The construction of the southern portion of the project is part of an agreement between the city and a developer. The developer's contribution includes costs for an 8-inch line while the city's contribution includes the difference in cost between the 8-inch contribution and the installed 12-inch line. ITEM DESCIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PICE TOTAL 1 12" Pipe < 8 feet deep 1,500 LF $84 $126, " to 12" Upsize 1,300 LF $24 $31,200 3 Pavement epair 1,500 LF $50 $75,000 SUBTOTAL: $232,200 CONTINGENCY 20% $46,500 SUBTOTAL: $278,700 ENG/SUVEY 15% $41,900 SUBTOTAL: $320,600 POJECT TOTAL $320,600 Construction Project Number 4 Project Description 12-INCH HIGHWAY 377 WATE LINES Detailed Description Construction of 12-inch water lines along US Highway 377. Purpose Connects existing 12-inch lines and provides increased capacity and looping in the western portion of the Upper Pressure Plane. ITEM DESCIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PICE TOTAL 1 12" Pipe < 8 feet deep 4,000 LF $84 $336,000 2 Pavement epair 4,000 LF $50 $200, " Boring and Casing 300 LF $350 $105,000 SUBTOTAL: $641,000 CONTINGENCY 20% $128,200 SUBTOTAL: $769,200 ENG/SUVEY 15% $115,400 SUBTOTAL: $884,600 POJECT TOTAL $884,600 C-1

40 10 Year Water CIP OPINION OF POBABLE COST Construction Project Number 5 Project Description 12-INCH JOHNSON OAD WATE LINE Detailed Description eplace existing 8-inch water line with 12-inch water line along Johnson oad between Bourland oad and ufe Snow Drive. Purpose This project connects existing 12-inch lines in the central portion of the City and provides increased capacity to meet projected demands in the Upper Pressure Plane. ITEM DESCIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PICE TOTAL 1 12" Pipe < 8 feet deep 3,500 LF $84 $294,000 2 Pavement epair 3,500 LF $50 $175, " Boring and Casing 200 LF $350 $70,000 SUBTOTAL: $539,000 CONTINGENCY 20% $107,800 SUBTOTAL: $646,800 ENG/SUVEY 15% $97,100 SUBTOTAL: $743,900 POJECT TOTAL $743,900 Construction Project Number 6 Project Description 16-INCH MT. GILEAD AND BANCOFT OAD AND 12-INCH KELLE- SMITHFIELD OAD WATE LINES Detailed Description eplace existing 4-inch water line with a 16-inch water line along Mt Gilead oad between obin Drive and Bancroft oad and along Bancroft oad to Keller-Smithfield oad, as well as a 12-inch line along Keller-Smithfield oad between Bancroft and Johnson oad replacing an 8-inch line. Purpose Provides increased capacity to meet projected demands in the Upper Pressure Plane and provides additional transmission capacity to the Knox EST. ITEM DESCIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PICE TOTAL 1 16" Pipe < 8 feet deep 4,200 LF $112 $470, " Pipe < 8 feet deep 2,600 LF $84 $218, " Boring and Casing 800 LF $465 $372,000 4 Pavement epair 6,800 LF $50 $340,000 SUBTOTAL: $1,400,800 CONTINGENCY 20% $280,160 SUBTOTAL: $1,681,000 ENG/SUVEY 15% $252,200 SUBTOTAL: $1,933,200 POJECT TOTAL $1,933,200 C-2

41 10 Year Water CIP OPINION OF POBABLE COST Construction Project Number 7 Project Description 16-INCH FLOENCE OAD WATE LINE Detailed Description 16-inch water line along Florence oad between Keller-Smithfield oad and Pearson Lane parallel to existing Fort Worth Supply waterline and 6-inch water line. Connects to existing 24- inch and proposed 12-inch at Pearson Land and Florence oad. Purpose Provides looping for system reliability, decreases headloss, and increases capacity for the northeastern Upper Pressure Plane. ITEM DESCIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PICE TOTAL 1 16" Pipe < 8 feet deep 5,500 LF $112 $616,000 2 Pavement epair 5,500 LF $50 $275,000 SUBTOTAL: $891,000 CONTINGENCY 20% $178,200 SUBTOTAL: $1,069,200 ENG/SUVEY 15% $160,400 SUBTOTAL: $1,229,600 POJECT TOTAL $1,229,600 Construction Project Number 8 Project Description 8-INCH LOWE PESSUE PLANE WATE LINE Detailed Description 8-inch water line between Bandit Trail and Creek oad. Purpose Connect existing 6-inch and 8-inch lines in the southeast portion of the City and provides increased capacity and looping in the Lower Pressure Plane. ITEM DESCIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PICE TOTAL 1 8" Pipe < 8 feet deep 1,500 LF $56 $84,000 SUBTOTAL: $84,000 CONTINGENCY 20% $16,800 SUBTOTAL: $100,800 ENG/SUVEY 15% $118,200 SUBTOTAL: $219,000 POJECT TOTAL $219,000 C-3

42 10 Year Water CIP OPINION OF POBABLE COST Construction Project Number 9 Project Description PEASON PUMP STATION UPPE PESSUE PLANE EXPANSION Detailed Description eplace the smallest pump Pump No. 3) with a second 6.9 MGD pump and VFD at Pearson Upper Pressure Plane to expand the station's capacity. Purpose Provides increased firm capacity to accommodate projected Upper Pressure Plane demands. ITEM DESCIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PICE TOTAL hp Pump and Motor 1 EA $300,000 $300, hp VFD 1 EA $175,000 $175,000 3 Duct Bank / Wire & Conduit 1 LS $60,000 $60,000 4 SCADA 1 LS $20,000 $20,000 5 HVAC 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 6 Switchgear - ework 1 LS $60,000 $60,000 SUBTOTAL: $625,000 CONTINGENCY 20% $125,000 SUBTOTAL: $750,000 MOBILIZATION 5% $37,500 SUBTOTAL: $787,500 ENG/SUVEY 15% $118,200 SUBTOTAL: $905,700 POJECT TOTAL $905,700 Construction Project Number 10 Project Description 12-INCH FLOENCE OAD WATE LINE Detailed Description eplace existing 6-inch water line with 12-inch water line along Florence oad; replace existing 4- inch with 12-inch along andol Mill Avenue. Purpose Provides increased capacity to meet projected demands in the Upper Pressure Plane. ITEM DESCIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PICE TOTAL 1 12" Pipe < 8 feet deep 5,300 LF $84 $445,200 2 Pavement epair 5,300 LF $50 $265, " Boring and Casing 250 LF $350 $87,500 SUBTOTAL: $797,700 CONTINGENCY 20% $159,600 SUBTOTAL: $957,300 ENG/SUVEY 15% $143,600 SUBTOTAL: $1,100,900 POJECT TOTAL $1,100,900 C-4

43 10 Year Water CIP OPINION OF POBABLE COST Construction Project Number 11 Project Description 12-INCH BEA CEEK PAKWAY WATE LINE Detailed Description eplace existing 6-inch water line with 12-inch water line along Bear Creek Parkway between Elaine Street and ufe Snow Drive. Purpose This project connects an existing 12-inch line with an existing 12-inch line] and provides increased ITEM DESCIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PICE TOTAL 1 12" Pipe < 8 feet deep 3,300 LF $84 $277,200 2 Pavement epair 3,300 LF $50 $165, " Boring and Casing 200 LF $350 $70,000 SUBTOTAL: $512,200 CONTINGENCY 20% $102,500 SUBTOTAL: $614,700 ENG/SUVEY 15% $92,300 SUBTOTAL: $707,000 POJECT TOTAL $707,000 Construction Project Number 12 Project Description 12-INCH AND 16-INCH SOUTH UPPE PESSUE PLANE WATE LINES Detailed Description 16-inch water line along Chase Oaks Drive and 12-inch water lines along Tarrant Parkway and Keller-Smithfield oad. Purpose Provides looping for system reliability, decreases headloss, and increases capacity for the central southern Upper Pressure Plane. ITEM DESCIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PICE TOTAL 1 12" Pipe < 8 feet deep 700 LF $84 $58, " Pipe < 8 feet deep 1,600 LF $112 $179,200 3 Pavement epair 2,300 LF $50 $115, " Boring and Casing 300 LF $350 $105,000 SUBTOTAL: $458,000 CONTINGENCY 20% $91,600 SUBTOTAL: $549,600 ENG/SUVEY 15% $82,500 SUBTOTAL: $632,100 POJECT TOTAL $632,100 C-5

44 10 Year Wastewater CIP OPINION OF POBABLE COST Construction Project Number 1 Project Description 8-INCH AND 12-INCH BIG BEA EAST WASTEWATE INTECEPTO Detailed Description Construction of new 8-inch and 12-inch wastewater lines. Purpose Provides a service extension for septic users in the Big Bear East Basin. ITEM DESCIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PICE TOTAL 1 8" Pipe < 8 feet deep 1,000 LF $56 $56, " Pipe < 8 feet deep 3,200 LF $84 $268,800 3 Pavement epair 2,800 LF $50 $140, " Diameter Manhole 9 EA $5,000 $45,000 SUBTOTAL: $509,800 CONTINGENCY 20% $102,000 SUBTOTAL: $611,800 ENG/SUVEY 15% $91,800 SUBTOTAL: $703,600 POJECT TOTAL $703,600 Construction Project Number 2 Project Description NOTH BIG BEA EAST SEPTIC ELIMINATION LINES Detailed Description Construction of new 8-inch wastewater lines. Purpose Provides services to septic users in the Big Bear East Basin. This project has been designed and construction will begin in the fall of ITEM DESCIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PICE TOTAL 1 8" Pipe < 8 feet deep 4,400 LF $56 $246,400 2 Pavement epair 3,400 LF $50 $170, " Diameter Manhole 9 EA $5,000 $45,000 SUBTOTAL: $461,400 CONTINGENCY 20% $92,300 SUBTOTAL: $553,700 ENG/SUVEY 15% $83,100 SUBTOTAL: $636,800 POJECT TOTAL $636,800 C-6

45 10 Year Wastewater CIP OPINION OF POBABLE COST Construction Project Number 3 Project Description SOUTHWEST MASHALL BANCH SEPTIC ELIMINATION LINES Detailed Description 8-inch collector lines connecting to the existing 12-inch line east of Ottinger oad. Purpose Provides sewer service to Summer idge, Belaire Hills, and Shepek Estates. This project has been designed and construction will begin in the fall of ITEM DESCIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PICE TOTAL 1 8" Pipe < 8 feet deep 12,350 LF $56 $691, " Diameter Manhole 25 EA $5,000 $125,000 3 Pavement epair 12,350 LF $50 $617,500 SUBTOTAL: $1,434,100 CONTINGENCY 20% $286,900 SUBTOTAL: $1,721,000 ENG/SUVEY 15% $258,200 SUBTOTAL: $1,979,200 POJECT TOTAL $1,979,200 Construction Project Number 4 Project Description WEST BIG BEA EAST SEPTIC ELIMINATION LINES Detailed Description Construction of 8-inch collector lines connecting to 12-inch line along Bancroft oad. Purpose Provides sewer service to the southwestern neighborhoods of the Big Bear East Basin. This project has ITEM DESCIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PICE TOTAL 1 8" Pipe < 8 feet deep 5,500 LF $56 $308, " Pipe < 8 feet deep 1,600 LF $84 $134,400 3 Pavement epair 7,100 LF $50 $355, " Diameter Manhole 15 EA $5,000 $75,000 SUBTOTAL: $872,400 CONTINGENCY 20% $174,500 SUBTOTAL: $1,046,900 ENG/SUVEY 15% $157,100 SUBTOTAL: $1,204,000 POJECT TOTAL $1,204,000 C-7

46 10 Year Wastewater CIP OPINION OF POBABLE COST Construction Project Number 5 Project Description BIG BEA EAST WASTEWATE IMPOVEMENTS Detailed Description Construction of an 8-inch wastewater line along Ottinger oad, Treehouse Lane, and Betty Lane. Purpose Provides connections for new development and service extensions to serve existing septic users. This project has been designed and construction will begin in the fall of ITEM DESCIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PICE TOTAL 1 8" Pipe < 8 feet deep 8,000 LF $56 $448,000 2 Pavement epair 8,000 LF $50 $400, " Diameter Manhole 16 EA $5,000 $80,000 SUBTOTAL: $928,000 CONTINGENCY 20% $185,600 SUBTOTAL: $1,113,600 ENG/SUVEY 15% $167,100 SUBTOTAL: $1,280,700 POJECT TOTAL $1,280,700 Construction Project Number 6 Project Description 12-INCH TO 18-INCH BIG BEA WASTEWATE INTECEPTO Detailed Description Construction of new 12-inch and 15-inch lines and replace existing 8-inch and 12-inch lines with new 15-inch and 18-inch lines. Purpose Provides increased capacity for development in Big Bear Central Basin as well as service extensions for septic users. ITEM DESCIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PICE TOTAL 1 12" Pipe < 8 feet deep 3,000 LF $84 $252, " Pipe < 8 feet deep 3,600 LF $105 $378, " Pipe < 8 feet deep 1,500 LF $126 $189, " Boring and Casing 200 LF $420 $84,000 5 Pavement epair 200 LF $50 $10, " Diameter Manhole 17 EA $5,000 $85,000 SUBTOTAL: $998,000 CONTINGENCY 20% $199,600 SUBTOTAL: $1,197,600 ENG/SUVEY 15% $179,700 SUBTOTAL: $1,377,300 POJECT TOTAL $1,377,300 C-8

47 10 Year Wastewater CIP OPINION OF POBABLE COST Construction Project Number 7 Project Description NOTH BANCH OF BIG BEA WASTEWATE INTECEPTO Detailed Description Construction of extension of project 1, 12-inch and 8-inch interceptor to the north. Purpose Provides services to additions in the Big Bear Central Basin. ITEM DESCIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PICE TOTAL 1 12" Pipe < 8 feet deep 2,700 LF $84 $226, " Pipe < 8 feet deep 1,300 LF $56 $72,800 3 Pavement epair 4,000 LF $50 $200, " Diameter Manhole 8 EA $5,000 $40,000 SUBTOTAL: $539,600 CONTINGENCY 20% $108,000 SUBTOTAL: $647,600 ENG/SUVEY 15% $97,200 SUBTOTAL: $744,800 POJECT TOTAL $744,800 Construction Project Number 8 Project Description BIG BEA WEST COLLECTO EPLACEMENT Detailed Description eplace a 6" line parallel to and along Highway 377 with an 8" line. Purpose Provides capacity for existing and projected future flows. ITEM DESCIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PICE TOTAL 1 8" Pipe < 8 feet deep 2,850 LF $56 $159, " Diameter Manhole 6 EA $5,000 $30,000 3 Pavement epair 2,400 LF $50 $120,000 SUBTOTAL: $309,600 CONTINGENCY 20% $62,000 SUBTOTAL: $371,600 ENG/SUVEY 15% $55,800 SUBTOTAL: $427,400 POJECT TOTAL $427,400 C-9

48 10 Year Wastewater CIP OPINION OF POBABLE COST Construction Project Number 9 Project Description 8-INCH AND 10-INCH WASTEWATE LINES IN WESTEN BIG BEA SOUTHWEST Detailed Description eplace existing 6-inch and 8-inch lines with 8-inch and 10-inch lines, respectively. Purpose Provides additional capacity for growth in the area. ITEM DESCIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PICE TOTAL 1 8" Pipe < 8 feet deep 1,400 LF $56 $78, " Pipe < 8 feet deep 900 LF $70 $63,000 3 Pavement epair 2,300 LF $50 $115, " Diameter Manhole 5 EA $5,000 $25,000 SUBTOTAL: $281,400 CONTINGENCY 20% $56,300 SUBTOTAL: $337,700 ENG/SUVEY 15% $50,700 SUBTOTAL: $388,400 POJECT TOTAL $388,400 Construction Project Number 10 Project Description CADE BANCH INTECEPTO Detailed Description Extension of 8-inch interceptor south in the Marshall idge Development to serve additional residential & commercial area in the southwest portion of the basin. Purpose Provides capacity in the Cade Branch sub-basin to meet flows associtaed with future development in the area. ITEM DESCIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PICE TOTAL 1 8" Pipe < 8 feet deep 3,100 LF $56 $173, " Diameter Manhole 7 EA $5,000 $35,000 SUBTOTAL: $208,600 CONTINGENCY 20% $41,800 SUBTOTAL: $250,400 ENG/SUVEY 15% $37,600 SUBTOTAL: $288,000 POJECT TOTAL $288,000 C-10

49 10 Year Wastewater CIP OPINION OF POBABLE COST Construction Project Number 11 Project Description BIG BEA EAST ASSOTED SEPTIC ELIMINATIONS Detailed Description Construction of 8" interceptors throughout the central Big Bear East Basin. Purpose Provides service connections for septic users. ITEM DESCIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PICE TOTAL 1 8" Pipe < 8 feet deep 9,400 LF $56 $526,400 2 Pavement epair 9,400 LF $50 $470, " Diameter Manhole 19 EA $5,000 $95,000 SUBTOTAL: $1,091,400 CONTINGENCY 20% $218,300 SUBTOTAL: $1,309,700 ENG/SUVEY 15% $196,500 SUBTOTAL: $1,506,200 POJECT TOTAL $1,506,200 Construction Project Number 12 Project Description BIG BEA WEST INTECEPTO EPLACEMENT Detailed Description eplace a portion of the existing 12-inch line in BB-West with a 15-inch line beginning near the intersection of Bear Creek Parkway and Apache Trail and connecting to the existing 24-inch TA line. Purpose Provides capacity for existing and projected future flows. ITEM DESCIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PICE TOTAL 1 15" Pipe < 8 feet deep 2,500 LF $105 $262, " Diameter Manhole 5 EA $5,000 $25,000 3 Pavement epair 1,000 LF $50 $50,000 SUBTOTAL: $337,500 CONTINGENCY 20% $67,500 SUBTOTAL: $405,000 ENG/SUVEY 15% $60,800 SUBTOTAL: $465,800 POJECT TOTAL $465,800 C-11

50 10 Year Wastewater CIP OPINION OF POBABLE COST Construction Project Number 13 Project Description BIG BEA SOUTHWEST INTECEPTO EPLACEMENT Detailed Description 12-inch interceptor to replace existing 8-inch line along Shady Lane between Bear Creek Park oad and Bear Creek Parkway. Purpose Provides capacity for existing and projected future flows. ITEM DESCIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PICE TOTAL 1 12" Pipe < 8 feet deep 2,200 LF $84 $184, " Diameter Manhole 5 EA $5,000 $25,000 3 Pavement epair 2,200 LF $50 $110,000 SUBTOTAL: $319,800 CONTINGENCY 20% $64,000 SUBTOTAL: $383,800 ENG/SUVEY 15% $57,600 SUBTOTAL: $441,400 POJECT TOTAL $441,400 Construction Project Number 14 Project Description BIG BEA SOUTH 1 INTECEPTO EPLACEMENT Detailed Description 12-inch interceptor to replace existing 10-inch line west of ufe Snow Drive beginning near Barbara Lane and connecting to the existing 27-inch TA line. Purpose Provides capacity for existing and projected future flows ITEM DESCIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PICE TOTAL 1 12" Pipe < 8 feet deep 1,500 LF $84 $126, " Diameter Manhole 4 EA $5,000 $20,000 3 Pavement epair 1,500 LF $50 $75,000 SUBTOTAL: $221,000 CONTINGENCY 20% $44,200 SUBTOTAL: $265,200 ENG/SUVEY 15% $39,800 SUBTOTAL: $305,000 POJECT TOTAL $305,000 C-12

51 10 Year Wastewater CIP OPINION OF POBABLE COST Construction Project Number 15 Project Description LITTLE BEA EAST INTECEPTO EPLACEMENT Detailed Description 12-inch interceptor to replace existing 8-inch/10-inch lines along Sarah Brooks Drive to TA Meter Station 14-7B. Purpose Provides capacity for existing and projected future flows. ITEM DESCIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PICE TOTAL 1 12" Pipe < 8 feet deep 1,800 LF $84 $151,200 2 Pavement epair 1,800 LF $50 $90, " Diameter Manhole 4 EA $5,000 $20,000 SUBTOTAL: $261,200 CONTINGENCY 20% $52,300 SUBTOTAL: $313,500 ENG/SUVEY 15% $47,100 SUBTOTAL: $360,600 POJECT TOTAL $360,600 Construction Project Number 16 Project Description BIG BEA SOUTH 2 INTECEPTO EPLACEMENT Detailed Description 12-inch interceptor to replace existing 8-inch line located northeast of Bear Creek Parkway and Deerwood Lane connecting to the existing 30-inch TA line. Purpose Provides capacity for existing and projected future flows. ITEM DESCIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PICE TOTAL 1 12" Pipe < 8 feet deep 1,000 LF $84 $84, " Diameter Manhole 3 EA $5,000 $15, " Boring and Casing 200 LF $350 $70,000 SUBTOTAL: $169,000 CONTINGENCY 20% $33,800 SUBTOTAL: $202,800 ENG/SUVEY 15% $30,500 SUBTOTAL: $233,300 POJECT TOTAL $233,300 C-13

52 10 Year Wastewater CIP OPINION OF POBABLE COST Construction Project Number 17 Project Description 8-INCH NOTHEN MASHALL BANCH EAST WASTEWATE LINE Detailed Description 8-inch wastewater line tying into existing 8-inch gravity line prior to the Marshall Branch East Lift Station along Lambert Lane and Ottinger oad. Purpose Provides service to the northern Marshall Branch East Basin. ITEM DESCIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PICE TOTAL 1 8" Pipe < 8 feet deep 2,400 LF $56 $134,400 2 Pavement epair 2,400 LF $50 $120, " Diameter Manhole 5 EA $5,000 $25,000 SUBTOTAL: $279,400 CONTINGENCY 20% $55,900 SUBTOTAL: $335,300 ENG/SUVEY 15% $50,300 SUBTOTAL: $385,600 POJECT TOTAL $385,600 C-14

53 10 Year Wastewater CIP OPINION OF POBABLE COST Construction Project Number 18 Project Description BIG BEA EAST CENTAL SEPTIC ELIMINATION LINES Detailed Description 8-inch collector lines connecting to proposed 12-inch sanitary sewer line Project 1) in Big Bear East sub-basin. Purpose Provides sewer service to septic residents in the central Big Bear East Basin. ITEM DESCIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PICE TOTAL 1 8" Pipe < 8 feet deep 3,800 LF $56 $212, " Diameter Manhole 8 EA $5,000 $40,000 3 Pavement epair 3,800 LF $50 $190,000 SUBTOTAL: $442,800 CONTINGENCY 20% $88,600 SUBTOTAL: $531,400 ENG/SUVEY 15% $79,800 SUBTOTAL: $611,200 POJECT TOTAL $611,200 Construction Project Number 19 Project Description NOTHEN BIG BEA EAST SEPTIC ELIMINATION LINES Detailed Description 8-inch line extending east along Daryll Lane; 8-inch line along obin Drive; 8-inch line along obin Court; 8-inch line along acquet Circle; 8-inch line along Melody Lane Purpose Provides sewer service to the northern Big Bear East residents currently served by septic. ITEM DESCIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PICE TOTAL 1 8" Pipe < 8 feet deep 7,500 LF $56 $420, " Diameter Manhole 15 EA $5,000 $75,000 3 Pavement epair 7,500 LF $50 $375,000 SUBTOTAL: $870,000 CONTINGENCY 20% $174,000 SUBTOTAL: $1,044,000 ENG/SUVEY 15% $156,600 SUBTOTAL: $1,200,600 POJECT TOTAL $1,200,600 C-15