Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change - Record of Site Condition #

Transcription

1 Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change - Record of Site Condition # Record of Site Condition Under Part XV.1 of the Environment Protection Act Summary Record of Site Condition Number Date Filed to Environmental Site Registry 2015/10/02 Certification Date 2015/08/21 Current Property Use Commercial Intended Property Use Institutional Certificate of Property Use Number Applicable Site Condition Standards** Full Depth Generic Site Conditions Standard, with Non-potable Ground Water, Coarse Textured Soil, for Institutional property use Property Municipal Address 645 GARDINERS ROAD, KINGSTON, ON, K7M 8K2 Notice to Readers Concerning Due Diligence This record of site condition has been filed in the Environmental Site Registry to which the public has access and which contains a notice advising users of the Environmental Site Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Environmental Site Registry. Contents of this Record of Site Condition This record of site condition consists (RSC) of this document which is available to be printed directly from the Environmental Site Registry as well as all supporting documentation indicated in this RSC to have been submitted in electronic format to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change. Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/10/02 1 of 20

2 PART 1: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, PROPERTY INFORMATION AND OWNER'S CERTIFICATIONS Information about the owner who is submitting or authorizing the submission of the RSC Owner Name Authorized Person Mailing Address Postal Code ONTARIO INC. ROBERT PAZ-PROVIZOR 3, 541 DAYS ROAD, KINGSTON ONTARIO, CANADA K7M 3R8 Phone (613) Fax Address Information about the agent Agent Name Mailing Address Postal Code KEVIN SHIPLEY 100, 4 CATARAQUI STREET, WOOLEN MILL, EAST WING, KINGSTON ONTARIO, CANADA K7K 1Z7 Phone (613) Fax Address Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/10/02 2 of 20

3 RSC Property Location Information Municipal Address(es) Municipality Legal Description Assessment Roll Number(s) Property Identifier Number(s) 645 GARDINERS ROAD, KINGSTON, ON K7M 8K2 Kingston See Attached Lawyer s Letter (LT) RSC Property Geographical References Coordinate System UTM Datum NAD 83 Zone 18 Easting 374, Northing 4,900, RSC Property Use Information The following types of property uses are defined by the Regulation: Agricultural or other use, Commercial use, Community use, Industrial use, Institutional use, Parkland use, and Residential use. Current Property Use Intended Property Use Certificate of Property Use has been issued under section of the EPA Commercial Institutional No Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/10/02 3 of 20

4 Please See the Signed Statements of Property Owner, or Agent, or Receiver at the End of this RSC The rest of this page has been left intentionally blank Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/10/02 4 of 20

5 PART 2: LIST OF REPORTS, SUMMARY OF SITE CONDITIONS AND QUALIFIED PERSON S STATEMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONS Qualified Person's Information Name Type of Licence Under Professional Engineers Act KEVIN SHIPLEY Licence Licence Number QP Employer Name Mailing Address XCG CONSULTANTS LIMITED 100, 4 CATARAQUI STREET, WOOLEN MILL, EAST WING, KINGSTON ONTARIO, K7K 1Z7 CANADA Phone (613) Fax (613) Address kevin.shipley@xcg.com Municipal Information Local or Single-Tier Municipality Kingston Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change District Office District Office District Office Address Kingston District Office Box 22032, 1259 Gardiners Road, Kingston ON K7M 8S5 Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/10/02 5 of 20

6 Phase One Environmental Site Assessment Report Document used as the phase one environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing The date the last work on all of the records review, interviews and site reconnaissance components of the phase one environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 28(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04) (YYYY/MM/DD) Type of Report Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD) Author of Report Name of Consulting Company P1 ESA Phase One Environmental Site Assessment, 607 and 645 Gardiners Road, Kingston, Ontario Kevin Shipley and Alex Wing XCG CONSULTANTS LIMITED Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase One Environmental Site Assessment Reports and other documents relied upon in certifying the information set out in section 10 of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase one environmental site assessment Report Title Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Gardiners Road, Kingston, Ontario Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD) Author of Report Dale White and Kevin Shipley Name of Consulting Company XCG CONSULTANTS LIMITED Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/10/02 6 of 20

7 Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment Report Document used as the phase two environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing The date the last work on all of the planning of the site investigation and conducting the site investigation components of the phase two environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 33.5(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04) (YYYY/MM/DD) Type of Report Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD) Author of Report Name of Consulting Company P2 ESA Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment, 607 and 645 Gardiners Road, Kingston, Ontario Kevin Shipley and Alex Wing XCG CONSULTANTS LIMITED P2 ESA Update Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment Update, 645 Gardiners Road, Kingston, Ontario Kevin Shipley XCG CONSULTANTS LIMITED Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment Reports and other documents relied upon in making any certifications in the RSC for the purposes of Part IV of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase two environmental site assessment Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD) Author of Report Name of Consulting Company N/A Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/10/02 7 of 20

8 Environmental Condition Section 41 applies? Section 43.1 applies? No No Site Condition Information Certification date (YYYY/MM/DD) 2015/08/21 Total area of RSC property (in hectares) Number of any previously filed RSC that applies to any part of the RSC property Number of any previously filed Transition Notice that applies to any part of the RSC property Soil Texture Assessment/Restoration Approach Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of ground water? Is there soil present that is sufficient to investigate, sample and analyze soil on, in or under the property in accordance with s. 6, Schedule E of O.Reg. 153/04? Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of soil on, in or under the property which is used in the RSC? Name of the laboratory used to analyze any samples collected of soil, ground water or sediment Ground water condition (potable, non-potable) Coarse Full Depth Generic Yes No Yes AGAT LABORATORIES Non-potable Applicable Site Condition Standard TABLE 3 Local or single-tier municipality non-potable written notification date 2015/06/10 Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/10/02 8 of 20

9 Table 1 Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil Contaminant Name Maximum Concentration Applicable Site Condition Standard Unit of Measure 1 Boron (Hot Water Soluble)* < µg/g 2 Chromium VI < µg/g 3 Mercury µg/g 4 Antimony < µg/g 5 Arsenic µg/g 6 Selenium µg/g 7 Acenaphthene < µg/g 8 Acenaphthylene < µg/g 9 Anthracene < µg/g 10 Benz[a]anthracene < µg/g 11 Benzo[a]pyrene < µg/g 12 Benzo[b]fluoranthene < µg/g 13 Benzo[ghi]perylene < µg/g 14 Benzo[k]fluoranthene < µg/g 15 Chrysene < µg/g 16 Dibenz[a h]anthracene < µg/g 17 Fluoranthene < µg/g 18 Fluorene < µg/g 19 Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene < µg/g 20 Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) *** < µg/g 21 Naphthalene < µg/g 22 Phenanthrene < µg/g 23 Pyrene < µg/g 24 Bromodichloromethane < µg/g 25 Bromoform < µg/g 26 Dibromochloromethane < µg/g 27 Benzene < µg/g 28 Ethylbenzene < µg/g 29 Toluene < µg/g 30 Xylene Mixture µg/g 31 Acetone < µg/g 32 Bromomethane < µg/g 33 Carbon Tetrachloride < µg/g 34 Chlorobenzene < µg/g 35 Chloroform < µg/g...continued on next page Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/10/02 9 of 20

10 Table 1 Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil Continued from previous page... Contaminant Name Maximum Concentration Applicable Site Condition Standard Unit of Measure 36 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < µg/g 37 Dichlorobenzene, 1,3- < µg/g 38 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4- < µg/g 39 Dichlorodifluoromethane < µg/g 40 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < µg/g 41 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < µg/g 42 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < µg/g 43 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < µg/g 44 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < µg/g 45 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < µg/g 46 Dichloropropene,1,3- < µg/g 47 Ethylene dibromide < µg/g 48 Hexane (n) < µg/g 49 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < µg/g 50 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < µg/g 51 Methyl tert-butyl Ether (MTBE) < µg/g 52 Methylene Chloride µg/g 53 Styrene < µg/g 54 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < µg/g 55 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < µg/g 56 Tetrachloroethylene < µg/g 57 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < µg/g 58 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < µg/g 59 Trichloroethylene < µg/g 60 Trichlorofluoromethane < µg/g 61 Vinyl Chloride < µg/g 62 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** µg/g 63 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F µg/g 64 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F µg/g 65 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F4 < µg/g 66 Barium µg/g 67 Beryllium 1 4 µg/g 68 Boron (total) µg/g 69 Cadmium < µg/g 70 Chromium Total µg/g...continued on next page Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/10/02 10 of 20

11 Table 1 Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil Continued from previous page... Contaminant Name Maximum Concentration Applicable Site Condition Standard Unit of Measure 71 Cobalt µg/g 72 Copper µg/g 73 Lead µg/g 74 Molybdenum < µg/g 75 Nickel µg/g 76 Silver < µg/g 77 Thallium < µg/g 78 Uranium 1 23 µg/g 79 Vanadium µg/g 80 Zinc µg/g Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/10/02 11 of 20

12 Table 1 Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued) Ground Water Contaminant Name Maximum Concentration Applicable Site Condition Standard Unit of Measure 1 Benzene µg/l 2 Ethylbenzene < µg/l 3 Toluene < µg/l 4 Xylene Mixture < µg/l 5 Acetone < µg/l 6 Bromomethane < µg/l 7 Carbon Tetrachloride < µg/l 8 Chlorobenzene < µg/l 9 Chloroform µg/l 10 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < µg/l 11 Dichlorobenzene, 1,3- < µg/l 12 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4- < µg/l 13 Dichlorodifluoromethane < µg/l 14 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < µg/l 15 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < µg/l 16 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < µg/l 17 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < µg/l 18 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < µg/l 19 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < µg/l 20 Dichloropropene,1,3- < µg/l 21 Ethylene dibromide < µg/l 22 Hexane (n) < µg/l 23 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < µg/l 24 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < µg/l 25 Methyl tert-butyl Ether (MTBE) < µg/l 26 Methylene Chloride < µg/l 27 Styrene < µg/l 28 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < µg/l 29 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < µg/l 30 Tetrachloroethylene < µg/l 31 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < µg/l 32 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < µg/l 33 Trichloroethylene < µg/l 34 Trichlorofluoromethane < µg/l 35 Vinyl Chloride < µg/l...continued on next page Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/10/02 12 of 20

13 Table 1 Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued) Ground Water Continued from previous page... Contaminant Name Maximum Concentration Applicable Site Condition Standard Unit of Measure 36 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < µg/l 37 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < µg/l 38 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F3 < µg/l 39 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F4 < µg/l 40 Acenaphthene < µg/l 41 Acenaphthylene < µg/l 42 Anthracene < µg/l 43 Benz[a]anthracene < µg/l 44 Benzo[a]pyrene < µg/l 45 Benzo[b]fluoranthene < µg/l 46 Benzo[ghi]perylene < µg/l 47 Benzo[k]fluoranthene < µg/l 48 Chrysene < µg/l 49 Dibenz[a h]anthracene < µg/l 50 Fluoranthene < µg/l 51 Fluorene < µg/l 52 Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene < µg/l 53 Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) *** < µg/l 54 Naphthalene < µg/l 55 Phenanthrene < µg/l 56 Pyrene < µg/l 57 Barium µg/l 58 Beryllium < µg/l 59 Boron (total) µg/l 60 Cadmium < µg/l 61 Chromium Total < µg/l 62 Cobalt µg/l 63 Copper µg/l 64 Lead < µg/l 65 Molybdenum µg/l 66 Nickel < µg/l 67 Silver < µg/l 68 Thallium < µg/l 69 Uranium µg/l 70 Vanadium µg/l...continued on next page Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/10/02 13 of 20

14 Table 1 Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued) Ground Water Continued from previous page... Contaminant Name Maximum Concentration Applicable Site Condition Standard Unit of Measure 71 Zinc < µg/l Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/10/02 14 of 20

15 Remedial Action and Mitigation Remediated Soils Estimated quantities of the soil, if any, originating at and remaining on the RSC property that have been remediated, at a location either on or off the property, to reduce the concentration of contaminants in the soil. Indicate the remediation process or processes used and the estimated amount of soil remediated by each identified process. Soil Remediation Process Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³) Soil excavation and off-site disposal at a landfill Description of Remediation Description of any action taken to reduce the concentration of contaminants (including soil removals) on, in or under the RSC property. The excavation activities consisted of the removal of impacted soil in a former re-fuelling area from original ground surface to bedrock approximately 2.2 to 2.5 metres below ground surface. A total of 1, tonnes of soil were excavated and disposed of off-site at a licensed facility. Following the removal of the contaminated soil, verification samples were collected from the walls of the excavations and select base sample areas where the excavation did not extend to bedrock. The excavation was backfilled with clean granular material from a licensed pit/quarry. Soil or Sediment Removed and Not Returned Estimated quantities of soil or sediment, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property. Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³) Estimated Quantity of Sediment (in-ground volume in m³) 0.0 Soil Brought to the Property Estimated quantity of the soil, if any, being brought from another property to and deposited at the RSC property, not including any soil that may have originated at but been remediated off the RSC property and that is identified in section 28 of Schedule A. Estimated Quantity of Soil Brought to the Property (in-ground volume in m³) 0.0 Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/10/02 15 of 20

16 Ground Water Control or Treatment Measures Ground water control or treatment measures that were required for the RSC property prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing. Ground water control or treatment measures that are required for the RSC property after the certification date. Estimated volume of ground water, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property. Estimated Volume of Ground Water (in litres) Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/10/02 16 of 20

17 Other Activities Including Risk Management Measures Constructed works that prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing, were required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property. Constructed works that after the certification date, are required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property. Monitoring or Maintenance Soil Management Measures Soil monitoring requirements or any requirements for care, maintenance or replacement or any monitoring or control works for known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date. Ground Water Management Measures Ground water monitoring requirements or requirements for care, maintenance or replacement of any monitoring or control works or known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date. Remediated or Removed Soil, Sediment or Ground Water From Near Property Boundary Has any soil, sediment or ground water at the RSC property that is or was located within 3 metres of the RSC property boundary been remediated or removed for the purpose of remediation? Yes Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/10/02 17 of 20

18 Qualified Person s Statements and Certifications As the qualified person, I certify that: A phase one environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from a records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, a report and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation. A phase two environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from planning and conducting a site investigation, a report, and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation. The information represents the site conditions at the sampling points at the time of sampling only and the conditions between and beyond the sampling points may vary. As of 2015/08/21, in my opinion, based on the phase one environmental site assessment and the phase two environmental site assessment, and any confirmatory sampling, there is no evidence of any contaminants in the soil, ground water or sediment on, in or under the RSC property that would interfere with the type of property use to which the RSC property will be put, as specified in the RSC. Ground water sampling has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation. I have, within the six months immediately before the submission of this record of site condition, given written notice of intention to apply non-potable ground water site condition standards to the clerk of the local municipality in which the property is located and the clerk of any upper-tier municipality in which the property is located. As of 2015/08/21, in my opinion, based on the phase one and phase two environmental site assessments and any confirmatory sampling, the RSC property meets the applicable full depth generic site condition standards prescribed by section 37 of the regulation for all contaminants prescribed by the regulation in relation to the type of property use for which this RSC is filed, except for those contaminants (if any) specified in this RSC at Table 2, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment. As of 2015/08/21, the maximum known concentration of each contaminant in soil, sediment and ground water at the RSC property for which sampling and analysis has been performed is specified in this RSC at Table 1, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards. I am a qualified person and have the qualifications required by section 5 of the regulation. I have in place an insurance policy that satisfies the requirements of section 7 of the regulation. I acknowledge that the RSC will be submitted for filing in the Environmental Site Registry, that records of site condition that are filed in the Registry are available for examination by the public and that the Registry contains a notice advising users of the Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Registry. The opinions expressed in this RSC are engineering or scientific opinions made in accordance with generally accepted principles and practices as recognized by members of the environmental engineering or science profession or discipline practising at the same time and in the same or similar location. I do not hold and have not held and my employer XCG CONSULTANTS LIMITED does not hold and has not held a direct or indirect interest in the RSC property or any property which includes the RSC property and was the subject of a phase one or two environmental site assessment or risk assessment upon which this record of site condition is based To the best of my knowledge, the certifications and statements in this part of the RSC are true as of 2015/08/21. By signing this RSC, I make no express or implied warranties or guarantees. By checking the boxes above, and entering my membership/licence number in this submission, I, KEVIN SHIPLEY, a qualified person as defined in section 5 of O. Reg. 153/04 am, on 2015/09/04: a) signing this record of site condition submission as a qualified person; and b) making all certifications required as a qualified person for this record of site condition. I Agree Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/10/02 18 of 20

19 Additional Documentation Provided by Property Owner or Agent The following documents have been submitted to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change as part of the record of site condition Certificate of Status or equivalent for the owner Authorization for Agent to submit RSC for filing Lawyer s letter consisting of a legal description of the property Copy of any deed(s), transfer(s) or other document(s) by which the RSC property was acquired A Current plan of Survey Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property Phase 2 Conceptual Site Model Owner or agent certification statements Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/10/02 19 of 20

20 As an agent acting on behalf of the owner of the RSC property: 1. I acknowledge that the RSC will be submitted for filing in the Environmental Site Registry, that records of site condition that are filed in the Registry are available for examination by the public and that the Registry contains a notice advising users of the Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Registry. 2. I have conducted reasonable inquiries to obtain all information relevant to this RSC, including information from the other current owners of the RSC property named in this part of the RSC and I have obtained all information relevant to this RSC of which I am aware. 3. I have disclosed all information referred to in paragraph 2 to any qualified person named in this RSC. 4. To my knowledge, the statements made in this part of the RSC are true as of September 4, I have ensured that access to the entire property, including the phase one property, any phase two property and the RSC property, has been afforded to the qualified person and to persons supervised by the qualified person, for purposes of conducting the site reconnaissance. I certify that I have been authorized by the owner of the RSC property to make the statements prescribed by this section on their behalf and that the owner of the RSC property has read and understands the statements being made on their behalf. Name of the Agent Kevin Shipley Signature Date Signed September 4, 2015_ Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/10/02 20 of 20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33 Phase One Property Boundary Phase Two and RSC Property Boundary

34 TABLE OF AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (Refer to clause 16(2)(a), Schedule D, O. Reg. 153/04) Area of Potential Environmental Concern 1 APEC1: Former gasoline underground storage tank installed in 1985 and reportedly removed in 1998 Location of Area of Potential Environmental Concern on Phase One Property Northwest corner of the Phase One Property Potentially Contaminating Activity Gasoline and associated products storage in fixed tanks Location of PCA (on site or offsite) Contaminants of Potential Concern 3 Media Potentially Impacted (Ground water, soil and/or sediment) Off Site PHCs, VOCs, Metals, PAHs Groundwater APEC2: Former commercial trucking operation present during the period of approximately 1970 to 1984 South portion of the Phase One Property 11. Commercial Trucking and Container Terminals On Site PHCs, VOCs, Metals Soil and Groundwater AEC1: Former fuel underground storage tank used for truck re fuelling during the period of approximately 1970 to 1984 South central area of the Phase 28. Gasoline and associated One Property products storage in fixed tanks On Site PHCs, VOCs, Metals, PAHs Soil and Groundwater

35 TABLE OF CURRENT AND PAST USES OF THE PHASE ONE PROPERTY (Refer to clause 16(2)(b), Schedule D, O. Reg. 153/04) Year Name of Owner Description of Property Use Property Use 1 Plans, Etc. Other Observations from from Aerial Photographs, Fire Insurance 645 Gardiners Road 1962 The Corporation of the Township of Kingston Vacant undeveloped open field with no structures Agriculture or Other Use The owner name was obtained from a title search. Based on a 1962 aerial photograph, the property at that time was an undeveloped open field with no structures. Therefore, 1962 was prior to the first developed use of the Phase One Property Terminal Realty & Investments Ontario Limited Vacant undeveloped open field with no structures Agriculture or Other Use The owner name was obtained from a title search. Based on the 1962 aerial photograph and city directory listings, which show no listing for the Phase One Property in 1966, the property at that time was an undeveloped open field with no structures. Therefore, 1966 was prior to the first developed use of the Phase One Property Smth Transport Co. Limited Trucking operation with refuelling station Commercial The owner name was obtained from a title search. The year 1971 is believed to be the date of the first developed use of the subject property based on the change of name to Smith Transport Co. Limited in this year and the fact that a 1975 aerial photograph shows what is apparently a commercial trucking operation on the Phase One Property Smth Transport Co. Limited Trucking operation with refuelling station Commercial The corporate name change to Smith Transport Co. Limited was found in a title search. Based on the 1975, 1978 and 1984 aerial photographs of the subject property, and based on city directories, 645 Gardiners Road was occupied by a commercial trucking operation with a refuelling station during this period Canadian Pacific Transport Company Limited Trucking operation with refuelling station Commercial The corporate name change to Canadian Pacific Transport Company Limited was found in a title search. Based on the 1975, 1978 and 1984 aerial photographs of the subject property, and based on city directories, 645 Gardiners Road was occupied by a commercial trucking operation with a refuelling station during this period Canadian Pacific Express & Transport Ltd. Trucking operation with refuelling station Commercial The corporate name change to Canadian Pacific Express & Transport Ltd. was found in a title search. Based on the 1975, 1978 and 1984 aerial photographs of the subject property, and based on city directories, 645 Gardiners Road was occupied by a commercial trucking operation with a refuelling station during this period Gary Robert Jacob, In Trust Vacant commercial property Commercial 1986 Bertoia Lathing Company Limited Vacant commercial property Commercial 1990 Bertoia Lathing Company Limited Multi unit commercial plaza Commercial Ontario Limited Multi unit commercial plaza Commercial Ontario Limited Multi unit commercial plaza Commercial Ontario Limited Multi unit commercial plaza Commercial Ontario Inc. Multi unit commercial plaza Commercial The change in ownership was identified in a title search. Based on city directories and aerial photographs, the property at 645 Gardiners Road became vacant and the building was demolished in approximately The owner name was obtained from a title search. Based on city directories and aerial photographs, the property at 645 Gardiners Road was vacant (building demolished) in The owner name was obtained from a title search. A 1990 aerial photo shows the commercial plaza on the property as it appears today. The owner name was obtained from a title search. Based on city directories and aerial photographs, the property at 645 Gardiners Road remained unchanged in The owner name was obtained from a title search. Based on city directories and aerial photographs, the property at 645 Gardiners Road remained unchanged in The owner name was obtained from a title search. Based on city directories and aerial photographs, the property at 645 Gardiners Road remained unchanged in The owner name was obtained from a title search. Based on city directories and aerial photographs, the property at 645 Gardiners Road remained unchanged in 2014.

36 645 Gardiners Road, Kingston, Ontario PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL A Conceptual Site Model (CSM) was prepared during the Phase One ESA (see Figure 5 in Attachment 1). The PCAs identified in the Phase Two Study Area during the Phase One ESA are shown on Figure 3 in Attachment 1. The areas of potential environmental concern (APECs) and area of environmental concern (AEC) identified at the Phase Two Property during the Phase One ESA are shown on Figure 4 in Attachment 1 and presented in Table 1 at the end of text. This Phase Two CSM covers the property municipally addressed as 645 Gardiners Road, Kingston, Ontario. The boundary of the Phase Two property is shown on Figure 2 in Attachment 1. APEC1 identified in the Phase One ESA is located in the northwest corner of 645 Gardiners Road. This APEC is associated with PCA #28 - Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks - identified at 681 Gardiners Road, where a former fuelling operation was located. This has the potential to have resulted in petroleum hydrocarbon (PHC) contaminants migrating from the north northwest onto the subject property by way of groundwater flow. APEC2 is associated with PCA #11 - Commercial Trucking and Container Terminals - and occupies the area shown on Figure 4 (Attachment 1) where a former trucking operation was located. Metals, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and PHCs contaminants have the potential to exist in soil and groundwater in this area. AEC1 is located in the southern portion of 645 Gardiners Road, immediately north of 607 Gardiners Road. Historically the commercial transport truck operation included a refuelling station in the location of AEC1 (see Figure 4, Attachment 1). This is designated as an AEC because past subsurface investigations identified concentrations of PHCs in the F1 and F2 ranges, xylene mixture, and 2- and 1-methylnaphthalene, exceeding the applicable Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC) Site Condition Standards. The Phase Two field activities were conducted during the period from May 2013 to August Initial sampling locations were chosen based on the results of a Phase I ESA completed by XCG for the properties at 607 and 645 Gardiners Road and 690 Development Drive, dated October Additional sampling was conducted based on the findings of a Phase One ESA report dated June 29, The boundary of the Phase Two Property is shown on Figure 1 in Attachment 2. The Phase Two ESA results presented in this CSM cover the entire Phase Two Property as shown on Figure 1, Attachment 2. Based on the Phase One ESA conducted in June 2015, no properties of concern outside of the pre-defined Phase One Study Area were identified during the interviews and site reconnaissance. The Phase One Study Area included all properties (whole or in part) located within a 250-metre radius of each boundary of the Phase Two Property, as shown on Figure 1 in Attachment 1. The closest permanent water body is to the Phase Two Property is the Little Cataraqui Creek, located approximately 700 metres to the west. The creek flows south and joins Lake Ontario approximately 3 kilometres to the southeast of the Phase Two Property. There are no water bodies located on the Phase Two Property. The Phase Two Property is not designated as an area of natural significance, and there are no areas of natural significance located within the Phase Two Study area /CSM rev 1.

37 645 Gardiners Road, Kingston, Ontario PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL The Phase Two Property is generally flat relative to the adjacent properties with a slight slope down towards the southwest. The adjacent properties to the north and east are at slightly higher elevation. Surface grading on the subject property directs water toward catch basins located in the asphalt parking lot and towards a drainage ditch located along the west property boundary. The subject property is primarily asphalt covered with small areas of grassed landscape along the east property boundary fronting onto Gardiners Road and along the shared property boundary between 607 and 645 Gardiners Road. Stormwater run-off would be collected by stormwater drains along the shared property boundary between 607 and 645 Gardiners Road. The Phase Two Property is currently developed with one commercial building and an asphalt paved parking lot. There are no changes proposed to the current layout of the subject property. The building on the subject property will remain the same with respect to its footprint and position on the site. During the Phase Two ESA activities, the stratigraphy at the Phase Two Property was determined to generally consist of a layer of asphalt underlain by a layer of granular A base material at depths ranging from 0.08 to 1.60 metres bgs. Native clay with discontinuous layers of sand and gravel underlie the granular A base material. Native clay was encountered at depths ranging from 0.76 to 2.54 metres bgs underlain by limestone bedrock. Bedrock was encountered at depths ranging from 1.52 to 2.54 metres bgs. The locations of the cross-sections are shown on Figures 2 and 3 in Attachment 2, and the stratigraphy of the Phase Two Property is shown in the cross-sections included as Figures 7 and 8 in Attachment 2. The cross-sections also include the well construction details at the Phase Two Property, groundwater elevations, and the interpreted water table depth. Stratigraphy and well construction details are also provided on the borehole logs in Attachment 3. The calculated average horizontal hydraulic gradient on May 15, 2013, was m/m. The calculated average horizontal hydraulic gradient on June 1, 2015, was also m/m. The depth to groundwater for these events was measured between 0.60 and 1.23 metres below top of pipe, and varied between the two groundwater level measuring events. A third groundwater measurement was collected on August 21, The interpreted groundwater elevations for May 15, 2013, June 1, 2015, and August 21, 2015, are shown on Figures 4, 5, and 6 in Attachment 2 and presented in Table 2 at the end of text. Based on the groundwater elevation contours, the direction of shallow bedrock groundwater flow is in a south to southeasterly direction. In order to satisfy the Ontario Regulation 153/04 requirement for a minimum of three monitoring wells on the Phase Two Property, MW1, which had been decommissioned during remediation activities in June 2015, was reinstalled in its previous location in August At the same time, a new monitoring well, MW15-2, was installed to further investigate APEC2, bringing the total number of on-site monitoring wells to three. Figure 2 in Attachment 2 shows the locations of the monitoring wells. Bedrock was encountered during the Phase Two ESA at depths ranging from 1.52 to 2.54 metres bgs. Granular A base material and native clay with discontinuous layers of sand and gravel were encountered across the entire site. As of the date of this report, 1,123 tonnes of contaminated soil have been removed from the site and replaced by approximately the same quantity of clean gravel and shot rock from a licensed quarry. The removal of the contaminated material was completed in June 2015 from the area of AEC1 and APEC2. Based on the findings /CSM rev 1.

38 645 Gardiners Road, Kingston, Ontario PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL of the Phase One ESA, there is no evidence that fill material of unknown quality has been brought onto the Phase Two Property. Prior to remediation, the soil contamination at the Phase Two Property consisted of concentrations of the following parameters exceeding the MOECC Table 3 standards: PHCs in the F1 and F2 ranges, xylene mixture, and 2- and 1- methylnaphthalene. The exceedances were encountered in boreholes BH1, BH3/MW1, and BH14. The distribution of contamination is entirely in the immediate vicinity of AEC1 (former location of fuel UST on southern portion of 645 Gardiners Road property) and APEC2 (former trucking operation) and may be described as follows: The PHC (F1) and xylene mixture exceedances in soil were identified in a sample collected from BH1 at a depth range of 1.53 to 2.14 metres bgs. A PHC (F2) exceedance was identified in BH14 at a depth range of 1.53 to An exceedance of 2- and 1-methyl naphthalene was identified in BH3/MW1 at a depth range of 2.14 to 2.31 metres bgs (see Figures 9, 10, and 11 in Attachment 2). All exceedances were identified in the vicinity of a fuel containing UST historically located in the southern portion of 645 Gardiners Road, adjacent to the northern property boundary of 607 Gardiners Road. There were no exceedances of metals identified in soil, and no exceedances identified in groundwater. Figures 12 and 13 in Attachment 2 show the vertical distribution of contaminants in soil on the Phase Two Property. It is likely that these contaminants were discharged to the natural environment as a result of a historic commercial transport truck refuelling station on the Phase Two Property. The Phase Two Property operated as a commercial transport truck operation with a refuelling station from approximately 1975 to late Based on contamination delineation and based on the findings of remedial activities and confirmatory sampling that took place concurrently with the completion of this Phase Two ESA report, it is expected that migration of contaminants in soil has been limited. Future migration of contaminants in soil will not occur following removal of contaminated soil during remedial activities, which took place in June The contaminated soil would have an increased potential to migrate upon disturbing the soil, allowing the soil to become exposed to erosive forces such as wind and rain. However, the contaminated soil has now been removed from the Phase Two Property. Climatic and temporal fluctuations in the groundwater at the Phase Two Property may have influenced distribution and migration of contaminants in soil. Based on the nature of the contaminants of concern, it is possible that the fluctuations in groundwater table elevation would potentially cause the contamination to spread vertically throughout the area of concern as well as laterally in the direction of groundwater flow. However, groundwater quality investigations did not identify exceedances of the applicable site condition standards in groundwater, which indicates that significant contaminant leaching to groundwater has not occurred at the Phase Two Property. There are a number of sub-surface utilities at the subject property which have the potential to have influenced the migration and distribution of contaminants in the sub-surface. The locations of these utilities are shown on Figures 1, 7 and 8 in Attachment 2. The utilities consist of sub-surface storm sewer, sanitary sewer, water service, natural gas service, and electrical /CSM rev 1.

39 645 Gardiners Road, Kingston, Ontario PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL lines. As discussed above, contaminants were not identified in the groundwater at the site at concentrations exceeding the applicable site condition standards. Therefore, it is not expected that significant migration of contamination along sub-surface utilities corridors has occurred at the Phase Two Property. Based on the fact that the contamination was identified in a localized area within the vicinity of the former UST location, and based on the fact that the buildings are a significant distance away from the contaminated area, it is not anticipated that soil vapour intrusion into the building is a potential concern. There are no basements or crawlspaces present in the on-site building. The building is heated by roof mounted, natural gas forced-air heaters. Section 41 of O. Reg. 153/04 does not apply to the Phase Two Property as it is not located within, adjacent to or near an area of natural significance; and the qualified person is not of the opinion that Section 41 applies to the subject site. Stratified site condition standards were not used to evaluate soil and groundwater quality at the site. Section 43.1 of O. Reg. 153/04 does not apply at the Phase Two Property because the site is not a shallow soil property - less than one-third of the area of the site consists of soil equal to or less than 2 metres in depth beneath the soil surface. The Phase Two ESA pictorial CSM is presented in Figure 14 in Attachment 2 and includes the release mechanisms, transport pathways, human and ecological receptors, receptor exposure points, and routes of exposure to investigated AECs/APECs at the Phase Two Property. Groundwater at the Phase Two Property is not used as a potable or industrial source of water. To ensure that all release and exposure pathways are incomplete the property required remediation for soil which, as discussed above, was completed in June /CSM rev 1.

40 645 Gardiners Road, Kingston, Ontario PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL Table 1 APECs and AECs Identified in the Phase One ESA AEC Identifier Location of AEC on Phase One Property Potentially Contaminating Activity Location of PCA (on-site or offsite) Contaminants of Potential Concern Media Potentially Impacted Recommended Activities for Phase Two ESA APEC APEC1 Northwest corner of the property at 645 Gardiners Road 28. Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks Off-site PHCs, VOCs, Metals, PAHs Groundwater Monitoring Well APEC2 Southern portion of the property at 645 Gardiners Road in the vicinity of the former commercial trucking and container terminal 11. Commercial Trucking and Container Terminals On-Site PHCs, VOCs, Metals Soil and Groundwater Boreholes and Monitoring Wells AEC AEC1 Southern portion of the property at 645 Gardiners Road in the vicinity of a former UST 28. Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks On-Site PHCs, VOCs, Metals, PAHs Soil and Groundwater Boreholes and Monitoring Wells Table 2 Summary of Groundwater Elevations Monitoring Well ID Ground Surface Elevation (masd) Top of Pipe Elevation (masd) GW Depth (mbtop) GW Elevation (masd) GW Depth (mbtop) GW Elevation (masd) GW Depth (mbtop) GW Elevation (masd) 15-May-13 1-Jun Aug-15 MW MW MW MW Note: All elevations are relative to an on-site assumed datum. MW2 is located beyond the southern boundary of the Phase Two Property but is included in this table because its elevation was considered in developing groundwater elevation contour maps. mbtop - Metres below top of pipe masd - Metres above site datum GW Groundwater 1 The original monitoring well MW1 was decommissioned as part of remediation activities and was reinstalled in August 2015 in its previous location /CSM rev 1.

41 645 Gardiners Road, Kingston, Ontario PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL ATTACHMENT 1 PHASE ONE CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL FIGURES /CSM rev 1.

42 SUBJECT SITE KEY MAP NOT TO SCALE m 1 : 4000 PHASE ONE ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE ONE STUDY AREA 645 GARDINERS ROAD KINGSTON, ONTARIO DATE JOB NO. FIGURE NO. (file: R dwg) AUGUST

43 SUBJECT SITE 677/681/685 GARDINERS ROAD (COMMERCIAL) 630 GARDINERS ROAD (COMMERCIAL) KEY MAP NOT TO SCALE 645 GARDINERS ROAD (COMMERCIAL) 606 GARDINERS ROAD (COMMERCIAL) 607 GARDINERS ROAD (COMMERCIAL) 690 DEVELOPMENT DRIVE (COMMERCIAL) m 680 DEVELOPMENT DRIVE (COMMERCIAL) 599 GARDINERS ROAD (COMMERCIAL) 1 : 1000 PHASE ONE ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT SITE LAYOUT 645 GARDINERS ROAD KINGSTON, ONTARIO DATE JOB NO. FIGURE NO. (file: R dwg) AUGUST

44 SUBJECT SITE KEY MAP NOT TO SCALE POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATING ACTIVITIES 20 ADDRESS GARDINERS ROAD #11 #28 CONTAMINATING ACTIVITY DEVELOPMENT DRIVE #11 3 DEVELOPMENT DRIVE AND GARDINERS ROAD #18 #55 # DEVELOPMENT DRIVE #32 #33 # JUSTUS DRIVE #1 #11 # DEVELOPMENT DRIVE #32 #33 # DEVELOPMENT DRIVE #1 #28 # GARDINERS ROAD #1 #2 #28 # GARDINERS ROAD # DEVELOPMENT DRIVE #1 # a JUSTUS DRIVE # JUSTUS DRIVE #8 # GARDINERS ROAD # JUSTUS DRIVE # JUSTUS DRIVE # JUSTUS DRIVE #1 #8 # JUSTUS DRIVE # JUSTUS DRIVE # GARDINERS ROAD #12 # GARDINERS ROAD #28 21 RAIL LINE # m 1 : 4000 PHASE ONE ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATING ACTIVITIES 645 GARDINERS ROAD KINGSTON, ONTARIO DATE JOB NO. FIGURE NO. (file: R dwg) AUGUST

45 SUBJECT SITE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF FORMER UST (PCA #28) 677/681/685 GARDINERS ROAD (COMMERCIAL) APEC1 630 GARDINERS ROAD (COMMERCIAL) KEY MAP NOT TO SCALE 645 GARDINERS ROAD (COMMERCIAL) APPROXIMATE AREA OF FORMER COMMERCIAL TRUCKING OPERATION (PCA #11) APEC2 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF FORMER PUMP ISLAND APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF FORMER UST (PCA #28) SEE FIGURE GARDINERS ROAD (COMMERCIAL) AEC1 606 GARDINERS ROAD (COMMERCIAL) 690 DEVELOPMENT DRIVE (COMMERCIAL) m 680 DEVELOPMENT DRIVE (COMMERCIAL) 599 GARDINERS ROAD (COMMERCIAL) 1 : 1000 PHASE ONE ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN 645 GARDINERS ROAD KINGSTON, ONTARIO DATE JOB NO. FIGURE NO. (file: R dwg) AUGUST

46 SUBJECT SITE APPROXIMATE AREA OF FORMER COMMERCIAL TRUCKING OPERATION (PCA #11) KEY MAP NOT TO SCALE APEC2 AEC1 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF FORMER PUMP ISLAND APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF FORMER UST (PCA #28) m 1 : 250 PHASE ONE ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT DETAIL OF APECs AND SAMPLING LOCATIONS 645 GARDINERS ROAD KINGSTON, ONTARIO DATE JOB NO. FIGURE NO. (file: R dwg) AUGUST

47 PHASE ONE PROPERTY ECOTOXICITY MAMMALS AND BIRDS 645 GARDINERS ROAD DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER m bgs S-OA S-I S-D S-PI BURIED UTILITIES (UNKNOWN DEPTH) DEPTH TO BEDROCK m bgs S-OA S-I S-D S-PI HISTORICAL UST CONFIRMED SOIL CONTAMINATION (AEC1) LIMESTONE BEDROCK GROUNDWATER GW-OA GW-I POTENTIAL GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION (APEC1) *NOT TO SCALE PHASE ONE ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE ONE CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL 645 GARDINERS ROAD KINGSTON, ONTARIO DATE JOB NO. FIGURE NO. (file: R dwg) AUGUST

48 645 Gardiners Road, Kingston, Ontario PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL ATTACHMENT 2 PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL FIGURES /CSM rev 1.

49 GAS GAS SUBJECT SITE 677/681/685 GARDINERS ROAD (COMMERCIAL) GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS 630 GARDINERS ROAD (COMMERCIAL) KEY MAP NOT TO SCALE E GAS GAS 645 GARDINERS ROAD (COMMERCIAL) GAS SAN SAN SAN SAN E E WS WS WS WS WS GAS WS E STM E E SAN STM STM STM STM STM STM E STM E STM STM 606 GARDINERS ROAD (COMMERCIAL) 607 GARDINERS ROAD (COMMERCIAL) 690 DEVELOPMENT DRIVE (COMMERCIAL) m 680 DEVELOPMENT DRIVE (COMMERCIAL) 599 GARDINERS ROAD (COMMERCIAL) 1 : 1000 PHASE TWO ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT SITE LAYOUT 645 GARDINERS ROAD KINGSTON, ONTARIO DATE JOB NO. FIGURE NO. (file: R dwg) AUGUST