MONITO.RING REPORT FORM.(CDM-MR) Version 01- in effect as of: 28/

Transcription

1 MONITO.RING REPORT FORM.(CDM-MR) Version 01- in effect as of: 28/ CONTENTS A. General description of the project activity A.l.Brief description of the project activity A.2. Project participants A.3.Location ofthe project activity A.4. Technical description of the project A.5. Title, reference and version of the baseline and monitoring methodology applied to the project activity A.6.Registration date of the project activity A.7.Crediting period ofthe project activity and related information A.8.Name of responsible person(s)/entity(ies) B. Implementation of the project activity B.l. Implementation status of the project activity B.2. Revision of the monitoring plan B.3. Request for deviation applied to this monitoring period B.4. Notification cir request for approval of changes C. Description ofthe monitoring system D. Data and parameters D.l.Data and parameters determined at registration and not monitored during the monitoring period, including default values and factors D.2.Data and parameters monitored E. Emission reductions calculation E. I. Baseline emissions calculation E.2. Project emissions calculation E.3. Leakage calculation E.4. Emission reductions calculation E.5. Comparison of actua) emission reductions with estimates in the registered POD E.6. Remarks on difference from estimated value

2 MONITORING REPORT Version 2, February 14,2013 PUCK WIND FARM GENERATION PROJECT IN THE GNIEZDZEWO AREA NEAR THE PUCK COMMUNE IN THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND Monitoring period reference number: 6 Monitoring period dates: 01/01/ / I SECTION A. General description of the project activity I A.l. Brief description of the project activity: The main purpose of the Project is the energy production by wind turbines substituting electricity from the Polish National grid operated by Energa Operator SA -local electric distribution company. By replacing electricity mainly generated on basis of fossil fuels, GHG emissions in Polish national grid are reduced. The Project consists of 11 wind generators of 2 MW each, located in a wind farm northwest ofpuck in the Pomerania Province in the North-West of Poland. Project commenced its operations on 28 of December Since then Project is fully operational. The total emission reductions for the monitoring period considered (01/01/2012 to 31/12/2012) are 38,971 tc02. I A.2. Project Participants Dipol Sp. z o.o. is a special purpose company set up for running the Project financed by Polish Energy Partners S.A. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) as the Trustee of Netherlands European Carbon Facility. I A.3. Location of the project activity: Puck Wind Farm is located in Gniezdzewo, northwest of Puck in the Pomerania Province. GPS coordinates ofthe site are: North 54 44' 16.32", East 18 22' 17.17". Dipol Sp. z o.o. office address is: Wiertnicza 169, Warsaw, Poland. I A.4. Technical description of the project Puck Wind Farm Generation Project has a total production capacity of 22 MW and consists of 11 units of Game sa G80 wind turbines, each with capacity of 2 MW and 78 m hub height. The project was constructed and operated by Gamesa Wind GmbH. The manufacturer of the wind turbines was also Gamesa, and civil works were done by the Polish subcontractor MEGA and electrical installations by AGA T. The project is connected to the national grid with the 110 kv high-voltage transmission lin~ for supply of generated energy and with 15 2

3 kv line for back-up feed, which is used only for emergency power supply and is equipped with power meter. There are two transformers installed, 15 kv and 110 kv respectively. The wind farm generates electric energy estimated to be at an annual average rate of 51,000 MWh per year over the 20 years of expected life of the turbines. The output of the project, transferred through 110 kv, is sold to the Polish grid through the Energa Operator SA, electric distribution company. A.S. Title, reference and version of the baseline and monitoring methodology applied to the project activity: Consolidated monitoring methodology for zero emissions grid-connected electricity generation from renewable sources. The baseline and related monitoring plan are governed to the maximum extent possible by ACM0002 (version 6). I A.6. Registration date of the project activity: 09/06/2008 A.7. Crediting period of the project activity and related information (start date and choice of crediting period): The crediting period is from the start of operations (28/12/2006) till the end ofkyoto Protocol first commitment period (31 /12/20 12). This Monitoring Report covers period of 0 I /01/ /12/2012. J A.8. Name of responsible person(s)/entity(ies): Mr. Marcin Lohmann Operation and Maintenance Wind Farms Manager Polish Energy Partners SA Signature: 3

4 I SECTION B. Implementation of the project activity I B.l. Implementation status ofthe project activity I. Project commenced its operations on 28 of December Since then the Project is fully operational. According to contract between Dipol and Gamesa, Gamesa was fully responsible for operation, service and maintenance of the wind park until the end of February From 1st March 2012 DIPOL has signed a full maintenance contract with Polish company Vent Energy Operators. 2. In 2012 year 40, MWh of electric energy was generated and 40, MWh of net electric energy was sent to the grid, which was ca 14 % below the estimate for the year. Availability of the wind park was over 90% and was below the target level of97.0%. Year 2012 was the fifth in row when the average wind speed was below the forecasted level that was the first cause of the lower energy production by the wind park. That situation was observed not only in Puck area. Other wind parks in Poland also achieved lower energy production than forecasted. 3. In 2012 there were no design modifications and changes. There were two big breakdowns which took place in August and October. First, it was a substation failure when the whole wind farm has been stopped for 16 days. Second, one generator was replaced due to its internal short circuit. As a result, the turbine EW7 has not been working for 29 days. I 8.2. Revision of the monitoring plan Not applicable. I 8.3. Request for deviation applied to this monitoring period Not applicable. I 8.4. Notification or request for approval of changes Not applicable. I SECTION C. Description of the monitoring system Dipol is responsible for collecting and processing monitoring data and the calculation of emission reductions. A description of the roles and responsibilities associated with data management is provided in the diagram below. 4

5 Data Processing Scheme Monthly reports to Controlling Department (W 1) Monthly reports to Board Members Application for green certificates Yearly Monitoring Report Yearly Accountant Reports - data collection ---+ confirmation of data. invoices Dipol created on the F disc of its server a special folder where data related to the wind farm are maintained for a period of 5 years. This data include: invoices for electric energy sold to and purchased from the grid as well as the obtained green certificates. manual readouts from meters performed by Dipol/wind park operator. operational reports prepared by Gamesa or another subcontractor, the project operator, as applicable. all reports concerning the meters (legalization, repairs, changes, etc.). other reports, e.g. from ornithological studies as applicable. Moreover, in its office in Warsaw at 169 Wiertnicza St., Dipol maintains copies of the abovementioned documents, for the period of at least 5 years. Dipol has implemented the following internal control procedures: Facility Manager is fully responsible for the operation of the wind farm. The Facility Manager reports directly to the Vice-President of the Management Board. By the 5th day of every month, the Facility Manager agrees (by or phone) with Energa's Operator on the quantity of electricity sold to and purchased from the grid ih the previous month (the quantity of electric energy sold to and purchased from the grid shall be also compared against the manual meters reading). This reading constitutes the basis for the request to issue a VAT invoice which is sent (by ) to the Accounting Department. The request is sent to Energa by post. By the 5th day of every month, the Facility Manager prepares the Wl form (special excel sheet) where all operational dates are presented for the previous month in comparison with the budget. The Wl form is sent to the Controlling Department. Controlling Department prepares a report for the Board. 5

6 All results are discussed every month during the Management Meeting where the Facility Manager must explain or comment on the difference between the current month results and the budget. Dipol and Energa have agreed and implemented the following emergency procedures in the case of damage or failure of the one or more installed meters. In the case of damage to or failure of the main meter (no ), readouts shall be taken from the control of main meter (no ). In the case of damage or failure of the back-up line meter (no ), the principle described in item of the Energa Tariff shall apply - According to the Polish Energy Law. According to the item ofthe Energa Tariff: "In the case of damage to or failure of a measurement and accounting system element, whose duration is less than one accounting period, the quantity of electric energy consumed in the respective time zones of the day shall be determined on the basis of proportions of consumption in these zones in the accounting period before or after the period of failure." In each of the above cases, Energa shall inform (by phone) the operator of the wind farm and Dipol. In the case of damage to or failure of data transmission from the meters (the main one, the control of main one, and the back-up line one), the technical service of Energa shall perform the readout manually. Energa, without undue delay (within days) shall inspect the correctness of operation and, possibly, performs repairs. The inspection shall take place in the presence of the operator of the wind farm and shall be confirmed by a proper report. Any possible repairs shall also be confirmed by a proper report. In the scheme attached below the main components of the Puck Wind Farm, including the meters, are shown. Locat distribution cor->pany I Local distribution coropany I Energo Dperato - Energo. Operator ""!"" ~----~_15_kv r I I I "I DIPDL Substantio~ 0,4 kv CD------::n Mete~ (])---- control Meter[ 110/15 I I 15 kv I _j <V 'w'tnl 'w'tn2 'w'tnn llx'w'tx2m\t/ 6

7 I SECTION D. Data and parameters D.l. Data and parameters determined at registration and not monitored during the monitoring period, including default values and factors Points IPCC data. Assumption made in PDD leaves this fixed at transformation loss of 3.0% and line loss of2.0% D.2. Data and parameters monitored 7

8 Measured and calculated ESy is the difference between produced and consumed power. The calculation is based on the invoices Dipol sent out to Energa and invoices received from Energa. Three documents are used as a raw source for data origin: Electricity supplied by the 110 kv line to the grid Electricity consumed by the 110 kv line from the grid Electricity consumed by the 15 kv line from the grid (back-up line) The invoices are based on meter Energy sold to grid: 40, MWh Energy purchased from grid (tariff A 23): MWh Energy purchased from grid (tariffb 11): MWh Net energy sold to grid: 40, MWh Baseline calculation. The data from invoices are transferred manually to ER calculation tool. There are installed two 110 kv meters (main and control) and one 15 kv meter on back-up line: main meter (no , Landis & Gyr ZMD402CT S2, accuracy class 0.2)- metering of electricity supplied and consumed by the 110 kv line, in operation from , calibrated , next calibration till (calibration is valid 8 years). control meter for main meter (no , Landis & Gyr ZMD402CT S2, accuracy class 0.2) - metering of electricity supplied and consumed by the 110 kv line, in operation from , calibrated , next calibration till (calibration is valid 8 years). back-up feed (emergency) meter (no , Landis & Gyr ZMD405CT S2, accuracy class 0.5) - metering of electricity consumed by the 15 kv line from local distribution network, in operation from , calibrated , next calibration till is valid 8 Measuring: every 1 hour : once a month Difference between produced and consumed energy, see Excel file "Puck mon workbook 2012.xls" 8

9 Baseline calculation. The data from ARE are transferred manually to ER calculation tool. Baseline calculation. The data from ARE are transferred manually to ER calculation tool. Baseline calculation. The data from ARE are transferred manually to ER calculation tool. 9

10 Baseline calculation Baseline calculation. The data from KASHUE are transferred manually to ER calculation tool. 10

11 however it is not used for 2012 Max MW Jan 24, II2 Feb 24,255 Mar 23,389 Apr 2I,556 May 20,544 Jun I9,763 Jul I9,4I8 Aug 20,595 Sep 2I,826 Oct 23,066 Nov 23,583 Dec 24,040 22,I66 Baseline calculation. The data from ARE are transferred manually to ER calculation tool. II

12 12

13 13

14 I SECTION E. Emission reductions calculation I E.l. Baseline emissions calculation In accordance with the principles of ACM0002, operating margin has been evaluated using the most recent available data at the time of submission of the PDD. The operating margin analysis of 2003 Polish grid data has demonstrated that the most probable and conservative selection of current displaced grid plants will be the hard coal fired plants referred to as group EWK. Consideration of added future units that would be the most likely to operate on the margin showed that CCGT units operating up to 2,000 hours per year will be the most probable types for this kind of duty. Rather than speculating on future additions, the PDD proposed ex-post monitoring of future grid data to determine the mix of generation that will be displaced in each year. Such monitoring establishes the operating margin CEF for each reporting year. The calculation of annual operating margin CEF differs depending on whether or not there have been any new CCGT plants added that are not CHPs. The two methods are summarized as follows: Option 1: if no new CCGT PPs are added during and Option 2: if any new CCGT PPs are added during Until now no CCGT PPs ar~ added to the Polish grid, so the Option 1 is used. Baseline emissions are calculated for the monitoring period as following: BEy= ESy x CMCEFy x (GG/NG) I (1- GEN110LOSS), where all parameters are described in Section D1 and D2. BE2o12 = 40,120 x x I (1-0.05) = 38,971 tc02e Since annual verifications are normally conducted at the beginning of each year, only ARE (The Energy Market Agency in Poland) Report from previous years will be available at the time of each verification. Therefore, in order to ensure consistency, it has been determined that the data from the previous year shall be always used for the calculation of the emission reductions for the verified year. Thus we used ARE data for 2011 in this monitoring report. I E.2. Project emissions calculation The wind project does not generate any project emissions, hence PEy = 0 tc02e I E.3. Leakage calculation Not applicable, hence LEy= 0 tc02e I E.4. Emission reductions calculation I table Emission reductions ERy = BEy- PEy- LEy 14

15 Item Annual (01/ to 31/12/2012) Units Baseline emissions, BEy 38,971 tc02e Project emissions: PEy 0 tc02e Leakage emission LEy 0 tc02e Emission reductions ERy 38,971 tc02e I E.S. Comparison of actual emission reductions with estimates in the registered PDD I E.6. Remarks on difference from estimated value in the PDD The direct cause of the lower value of emission reductions achieved in was the average wind speed that was below the forecasted level as well as two big breakdowns. 15

16