BISHOP MOORE PD. Property Location: 3821 Edgewater Drive, located north of Rockmont Ct, east of Edgewater Dr, and south of Webster Ave.

Transcription

1 October 16, 2018 Staff Report to the Municipal Planning Board G M P I T E M # 3 A BISHOP MOORE PD Existing Bishop Moore Property Location Map S U M M A R Y Applicant Albert Bustamante Baker Hosteller LLP Owner John G. Noonan Diocese of Orlando Project Planner Michaëlle Petion, AICP Updated: October 9, 2018 Property Location: 3821 Edgewater Drive, located north of Rockmont Ct, east of Edgewater Dr, and south of Webster Ave. (±0.73 acres, District 3) Applicant s Request: Amend the City s adopted growth management plan to change FLU designation of the subject property from Mixed Use Medium Intensity/Resource Protection to Residential Low Intensity/Resource Protection. This will allow the Bishop Moore PD to transfer intensities across the full extent of their property. See ZON for an associated rezoning request. Subject Site Staff s Recommendation: Approval of the request, subject to the conditions in this report. Public Comment Courtesy notices were mailed to property owners located within 300 feet of the subject property during the week of September 3, As of the published date of this report, staff has not received any comments from the public concerning this request.

2 Page 2 Future Land Use Map

3 Page 3 Zoning Map

4 Page 4 Project Analysis Project Description The applicant is requesting to amend the City s adopted growth management plan to change Future Land Use designation of the subject property from Mixed Used Corridor Medium Intensity/Resource Protection to Residential Low Intensity/ Resource Protection. Approval of this request will The property is 0.73 acres in area and generally located north of Rockmont Court, east of Edgewater Drive, and south of Arthur Street. An associated case will incorporate this property into the newly created Bishop Moore PD (see ZON ). Previous Actions: 1962 Existing warehouse is built; 2002 Subject property annexed into the City of Orlando; 2017 Current owner purchases the subject property. Project Context The subject property is currently vacant however used for warehousing associated with a garden center. Table 1 summarizes the future land uses, zoning, and existing uses surrounding the subject site. Table 1 Project Context Future Land Use Zoning Surrounding Use North RES-LOW/RES-PRO R-1AA/W/RP Bishop Moore Property East RES-LOW R-1/W Single Family Homes South MUC-MED/RES-PRO MU-1/W/RP/SP/AR Garden Center West COMMERCIAL C-1 Multi-tenant Commercial Consistency with 163, Florida Statutes The proposed GMP amendment is being processed as a small scale amendment to the Future Land Use Map in accordance with the requirements of Chapter , Florida Statutes. As provided in Chapter 163, small scale amendments require only one public hearing before City Council (the adoption hearing) and are not subject to review by the State Department of Economic Opportunity Division of Community Planning unless challenged by an affected party within 30 days of the adoption hearing. If not challenged, the amendment is effective 31 days after the adoption. Conformance with the Growth Management Plan (GMP) Residential Low FLU Objective 2.3 and Policy of the Future Land Use Element provide standards relating to development outside of activity centers and mixed-use corridors. Policy states: Standards for land use categories outside of activity centers and mixed-use corridors shall be shown in Figure LU-1. The densities and intensities established in Figure LU-1 for land use categories outside of activity centers and mixed use corridors shall not be altered except by amendment of this Growth Management Plan. The intensity of use allowed on land outside of activity centers and mixed use corridors shall be based on: a) Appropriate topography, soil conditions, and the availability of facilities and services; redevelopment and renewal of blighted areas; elimination or reduction of uses inconsistent with the community s character and future land uses; protection of natural resources and historic resources; and discouragement of urban sprawl; b) Compatibility with existing development in the area; and c) The public services and facilities which exist or are available to the location, based upon the policies of the Capital Improvement Element and the City s Concurrency Management System. Resource Protection Overlay FLU The City of Orlando shall protect Environmentally Sensitive Lands within its jurisdiction through the utilization of the Resource Protection Overlay Future Land Use Designation. Typically, all projects requiring Municipal Planning Board and City Council review within the City shall include an Environmental Assessment however in this case the extent of area already developed renders an environmental assessment superfluous.

5 Page 5 Subarea Policy S.2.4 The property is subject to Subarea Policy S.2.4 which states the follow: a) To protect residential uses on property adjoining this subarea, non- residential uses allowed within this subarea shall be restricted to property within this subarea. b) Development within the activity center, mixed use corridor and office areas shall provide a logical transition in mass, scale and height between existing residential neighborhoods and proposed development. c) Design of proposed development, including streetscape, arcades, landscaping, location of ingress/egress and materials, shall be tailored to create a pedestrian-friendly environment. Environmental As aforementioned, no environmental study was required for this site. A Bald Eagle Nest was identified elsewhere on the Bishop Moore property, in excess of 660-feet from the subject site. Public Facilities Analysis State law requires the City to perform a public facilities evaluation for GMP amendments that would increase the allowable density or intensity of a property. Although the proposed GMP amendment to change the future land use designation to Residential Low Intensity/Resource Protection would permit intensities on the subject property less than that permitted under the Mixed Use Corridor Medium Intensity/Resource Protection future land use designation, the evaluation is included for informational purposes. This evaluation assumes that the property is developed at the maximum intensity and density allowed by each future land use category. Typically, sites are developed at a lesser intensity, so these impacts represent an upper limit, rather than a true projection of demand. Each year, the City prepares the Capacity Availability Report (CAR) to identify any surpluses or deficiencies in the ability to provide public services. The CAR also accounts for future population and employment growth consistent with the City s adopted future land use categories. Because the growth associated with this GMP amendment was not included in the growth projections, this analysis is performed to ensure capacity is available to serve the development. Projected Demand Evaluation 1 This evaluation considered the impact of developing the site at the maximum intensity permitted by the existing Mixed Use Corridor Medium Intensity/Resource Protection future land use designation ( FAR and 30 du/ac = 333,234 sq. ft.). Evaluation 2 This evaluation considered the impact of developing the site at the maximum intensity permitted by the proposed Residential Low Intensity/Resource Protection future land use designation ( FAR = 311,018 sq. ft.). Net Decrease The net decrease in development capacity is 6,360 sq. ft. and 13 dwelling units. Table 2 Project Demand Potable Water Wastewater Community Neighborhood Transportation (GPD) (GPD) Parks (Acres) Parks (Acres) (Trips) Evaluation #1 6,447 5, Evaluation #2 4,087 3, Net Increase (Decrease) (2,360) (2,543) (0.03) (0.02) (335) The amount of development included in the evaluations above translates to a total project demand for public facilities shown in the table below. Details about how the above impacts were calculated are available in the City s Capacity Availability Report. Potable Water, Wastewater and Parks Table 3 summarizes available capacity, existing demand, projected increases in demand from city -wide growth, projected increases in supply (such as from construction of a new facility) and the maximum demand expected from this GMP amendment. There are no deficiencies in available capacity of potable water, wastewater, community parks, or neighborhood parks.

6 EDGEWATER DRIVE Page 6 Table 3 Available Capacity Stormwater and Solid Waste The City s adopted stormwater level of service standards require new development to provide on-site stormwater retention and/or detention consistent with the requirements of the Water Management District. Therefore, each increment of new development, if properly permitted, will meet the stormwater level of service standard. Solid Waste collection is funded by user fees, therefore any new customers generate revenues sufficient to fund any capital costs. Therefore, a solid waste capacity analysis was not performed. Transportation The City has adopted a Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) citywide. Therefore, the City requires projects to support the multi-modal transportation system. Projects generating 1,000 trips or more per day are required to submit a transportation study and mitigate for impacts to the roadway network. This specific project is not expected to generate greater than 1,000 daily trips and thus a transportation study was not required by the City, although one was provided (see ZON for further analysis). Capital Improvement Program The City has no Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects that directly affect the subject site. School Capacity Orange County Public Schools (OCPS) has two school review processes. The Capacity Enhancement Process (CEP) applies to land use approvals, including GMP amendments, that increase residential density. The proposed development program is for nonresidential uses only, therefore the Capacity Enhancement Process is not applicable. Aerial Map of Subject Site (2018 MapWorks) Potable Water (MGPD) Community Parks (Acres) for Neighborhood Parks (Acres) for Wastewater (MGPD) Capacity Reported Demand Projected increase in Demand Projected increase in Supply Demand from GMP (0.00) (0.03) (0.02) Net Available Capacity WEBSTER AVENUE

7 Page 7 Site Photos Looking north on Rockmont Ct

8 Page 8 Boundary Survey

9 Page 9 Proposed Concept Plan Subject Property

10 Page 10 Findings Subject to the conditions contained herein, the proposal is consistent with the requirements for approval of the future land use application contained in Chapter 65 of the Land Development Code (LDC): 1. The proposed Future Land Use Map amendment is consistent with State Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 187, Florida Statutes). 2. The proposed Future Land Use Map amendment is consistent with the East Central Florida Strategic Policy Plan. 3. The proposed Future Land Use Map amendment is consistent with the provisions of Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes. 4. The proposed Future Land Use Map amendment is consistent with the objectives and policies of the City s adopted Growth Management Plan (GMP); particularly Figure LU The proposed Future Land Use Map amendment is consistent with the purpose and intent of the requirements of the Land Development Code. 6. The proposed Future Land Use Map amendment and initial zoning are compatible with the surrounding development pattern. 7. The proposal will not result in demands on public facilities and services that exceed the capacity of such facilities and services since it is subject to Chapter 59 of the City Code, the Concurrency Management Ordinance. Staff recommends approval of the GMP Future Land Use amendment subject to the conditions below: Conditions of Approval City Planning 1. GENERAL CODE COMPLIANCE Development of the proposed project shall be consistent with the conditions in this report. Conditions in this report shall supersede conflicting provisions in all codes and ordinances of the City of Orlando. The project shall comply with applicable requirements of the State of Florida, and all other applicable regulatory agencies. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencing development. 2. DEVELOPMENT PERMIT As provided by subsection (5), Florida Statutes, issuance of a development permit by a municipality does not in any way create any right on the part of an applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the municipality for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. In accordance with subsection (5), Florida Statutes, it is hereby made a condition of this permit that all other applicable state or federal permits be obtained before commencement of the development. 3. SUBJECT TO CODES ZONING Except aa provided herein, the development is subject to all codes and ordinances of the State of Florida, City of Orlando, and all other applicable regulatory agencies.

11 Page Contact Information City Planning For questions regarding City Planning review, please contact Wes Shaffer at or Urban Design For questions regarding Urban Design plan review, contact Jason Burton at or Transportation For questions regarding Transportation Planning plan review, please contact John Rhoades at or Transportation Impact Fees For questions and information regarding Transportation Impact Fee rates you may contact Nancy Ottini at or Development Review and Engineering/Zoning For questions regarding Development Review and Engineering or Zoning contact Keith Grayson at or Building For questions regarding Building Plan Review issues contact Don Fields at (407) or Police For questions regarding the Orlando Police Department plan review, please contact Audra Nordaby at or Fire For questions regarding Fire review, please contact Charles Howard at or Water Reclamation For questions regarding Water Reclamation review, please contact David Breitrick at or Review/Approval Process Next Steps 1. GMP ordinance requests to City Attorney s Office; 2. City Council approved the MPB minutes; 3. First reading and second reading of GMP ordinance; 4. Adoption package of GMP ordinance sent to Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) for review; 5. The GMP ordinance becomes effective after 31 days.