IEA Wind Task 27. Development and Deployment of Small. Ignacio Cruz CIEMAT Trudy Forsyth Wind Advisors April 25, 2012

Transcription

1 IEA Wind Task 27 Development and Deployment of Small Wind Turbine Consumer Label Ignacio Cruz CIEMAT Trudy Forsyth Wind Advisors April 25, 2012

2 Task 27 Small Wind Consumer Labeling Participants: 14 Countries Australia, Canada, China WEA, Denmark, France, Germany, Japan, Korea, Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States Operating Agent Spain, Ignacio Cruz CIEMAT

3 Current IEA Task 27 membership Country Representative Australia Canada Spain Japan Sweden United Kingdom United States Denmark Korea Italy Ireland Jonathan Whale(RISE) Gerald Giroux(WEICan) Ignacio Cruz(CIEMAT) Hikaru Matsumiya(HikaruWind) Sven Ruin(TEROC) Alistair Mackinnon(TUV NEL) Jason Fields(NREL) Brent Summerville(SWCC) Peggy Friis(RISO-DTU) Seokwoo Kim(KIER-Korean institute for Energy Research Domenico Coiro(Universita de Napoli) Luigi Izzo(Universita de Napoli) Raymond Byrne(Dundalk Institute of Technology France Popular Republic of China Maeva Sabre from CSTB-CAPE) Wang Yongli(Chinese Wind Energy Association) Germany Paul Kühn(ISET-Kassel University) Matthias Gehling (?)

4 Task 27 Small Wind Consumer Labeling Meetings: (all linked with IEC rd revision) Meeting 1, hosted by Spain, February 2009 Meeting 2, hosted by United Kingdom, April 2009 Meeting 3, hosted by Canada, September 2009 Meeting 4, hosted by Japan, December 2009 (IEA Task 27 proposal approved in November 2009) Meeting 5, hosted by Germany, March 2010 Meeting 6, Hosted by United Kingdom, July 2010 Meeting 7, Hosted by U.S., September 2010 Meeting 8, Hosted by Australia, December 2010 Meeting 9, Hosted by Madrid, March 2011 Move to 2/year webinar meetings (Summer/Winter) Move to 2/year face-to-face meetings (Spring/Fall) Have one meeting in EU every year Meeting 10, Hosted by China, November 2011 Meeting 11, Hosted by US (Intertek), April 2012 Will move to an IEA fee based activity with proposed new Activities Website: 27 Public Access for new Consumer Labels Private Access (Members Only) for IEA work on development of Consumer Labels

5 Complete-Subtask A: Develop and deploy an international label for small wind turbines (grid-connect and battery charging) based on IEC power performance, acoustics, and duration test results complete Draft Recommended Practice on Consumer Labeling for SWT 2. Subtask B:Peer reviewed testing and development at Small Wind Association of Testers (SWAT) Initiate the new group of SWAT as labeling organization Set up SWAT governance Set up with annual meetings (or other web tools) international member s exchange, provide a website Develop peer reviewed taskactivities such as data analysis exchange, test protocol and methodology, promotion of SWT trials, comparison of test results and strategies, relationships of anemometers. Validate each other test results. Dissemination activities, etc.

6 First

7 Task 27 (draft Extension Proposal) 3. Working Package 3: Development of testing and design standards for builtenvironment small wind turbines Activity 3.0 Critical literature review state of art Activity 3.1 Develop international team of experts capable of analyzinglarge amounts of existing 3-D data Activity 3.2 Develop 3-D models of the inflow for the built-environment Activity 3.3 Validation of the CFD models with measurements Activity 3.4 Validate CFD models with a wind tunnel Activity 3.5 Based on data and models develop a BWT wind resource assessment approach Activity 3.6 Develop guidelines for end users 4. Working Package 4: Development of testing and design standards for built- environment small wind turbines Activity 4.1 Develop international team involved with testing BWT Activity 4.2 Compare data collection strategies and modifications needed to test BWT. Activity 4.3 Document BWT testing approaches for part of Recommended Practice Activity 4.4 Develop an IEC Turbine Design Classfor urban turbines based on analyses and test data collection 5. Working Package 5: Development of consumer labeling for small wind turbines and a Recommended Practice for small turbines in a builtenvironment Activity 5.1: Development of Recommended Practice for SWT installation in the builtenvironment Activity 5.2 Develop a draft consumer label specifically for BWT turbines Activity 5.3 Develop a Recommended Practice for testing and designing turbines in the builtenvironment

8 Draft Extension Proposal (in progress) A1.1. SWAT/ Label deployment 1Q11 2Q11 4Q11 2Q12 4Q12 2Q13 4Q13 A2.1:Data/Experts In progress A2.2:Models A2.3:Compare A2.4:WR Approach A2.5:Document A3.1:Test BWT A3.2:Compare A3.3:Document A3.4:IEC Design Class A4.1:Label for BWT A4.2:RP BWT Design and Test

9 Draft Budget Plan USD USD/yr Euro Euro/yr Meetings, coordination work, finances, incl. workshops 3 person-month 24,000 12,000 Reporting 2 person-month 16,000 8,000 Reports (State of the art, Best Practice) 1 person-month 8,000 4,000 Travel costs 12,000 6,000 Website 4,000 2,000 TOTAL

10

11 Power Performance Power (kw) Normalized Wind Speed (m/s) A plot showing the binned sea level normalized power curve. The power curve should also show any power consumption below cut in wind speed. The plot should show the uncertainty bands indicating the standard uncertainty on power in both directions. Note that some wind turbines will adjust their settings (e.gblade pitch) to accommodate for air density effects. For those turbines no additional air density normalization should be done.

12 Power Performance Scatter Plot 14 Std. Dev Minimum 12 Maximum Average 10 Power (kw) Measured Hub Height Wind Speed (m/s) A scatter plot of the measured power and wind speed used for the binned power curve. Average, maximum and minimum and standard deviation for each data point should be shown.

13 Annual Energy Production Hub height annual average wind speed (Rayleigh) Estimated annual energy production, database A (all valid data) Reference air density: kg/m^3 Cut-out wind speed: m/s AEP-measured Standard Uncertainty in AEPmeasured AEPextrapolated Complete if AEP measured is at least 95% of AEP extrapolated m/s kwh kwh % kwh 4 7,884 1,717 22% 7,884 Complete 5 15,327 1,948 13% 15,329 Complete 6 23,516 2,144 9% 23,572 Complete 7 30,967 2,271 7% 31,330 Complete 8 36,718 2,325 6% 37,924 Complete 9 40,459 2,314 6% 43,158 Incomplete 10 42,350 2,254 5% 47,049 Incomplete 11 42,770 2,160 5% 49,696 Incomplete AEP measured assumes zero power between highest bin and cutout AEP extrapolated assumes power in last bin between last bin and cutout A table with the calculated Annual Energy production for sea level air density.

14 12,000 Power Degradation 10,000 Power [W] 8,000 6,000 4,000 2, Jul-08 Aug-08 Sep-08 Oct-08 Nov-08 Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 The power degradation plot shows the trend in the binned power level (based on ten minute averages) for several wind speeds from month to month. Only data from within the measurement sector is used to assure good inflow conditions. The data should also be sea level normalisedto reduce the effect of air density on the plot. The objective for the plot is to look for trends that might suggest hidden degradation of the turbine system. Some changes are still expected due to seasonal effects such as temperatures, air density etc.

15 Duration Hours of power production above: max gust 15 # Data T T T U T E T N O Month 0 m/s 9 m/s 13.5 m/s (m/s) m/s (%) points (hours) (hours) (hours) (hours) (%) Overall Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar The table provides the key overall results but also the breakdown for each month. The report further will describe the reason for any time classified as T U T E and T N. The TI@15 m/s is based on a ten minute statistics. The max gust is the highest instantaneous wind speed measured during the test.

16 Immission Noise Map Immission Noise Map NO DATA ABOVE 15 m/s wind sp peed (m/s) Distance from rotor centre (m) The plot shows sound pressure levels which are calculated from a declared apparent sound power level for a range of wind speeds and distances to the centre of the wind turbine rotor.

17 Subtask A:Development of small wind turbines (up to 200 m2 rotor swept area) consumer labeling for grid tie and battery connected applications. Activity A1:Development of consumer label. Activity A.1.1. Identification of the test required to labeling. Activity A1.2.Recommendations for labeling reporting. Activity A1.3. Identification of the label display parameters. Activity A1.4.Publication requirement of summary test results.

18 Subtask D:Peer reviewed testing and development at Small Wind Association of Testers (SWAT) Activity D1:Develop peer reviewed task activities such as data analysis exchange, test protocol and methodology, comparison of test results and strategies, relationships of anemometers. Activity D2:Set up SWAT, annual meetings international members audit at test results from other organizations. Activity D3:Develop testing and labeling strategies for other applications as water pumping. Activity D4:Develop test collaborative for urban building integrated turbines. Activity D5:Analyze urban test data for development of IEC urban turbine requirements.