Large CO 2 Capture Pilot Plant (10 MWe) at City, Water, Light, and Power

Transcription

1 Large CO 2 Capture Pilot Plant (10 MWe) at City, Water, Light, and Power Enhancing the Regional Economy PUBLIC UTILITIES MEETING SPRINGFIELD CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 10, 2018 Prairie Research Institute (PRI) at the University of Illinois Applied scientific research impacts the environment and economy PRAIRIE RESEARCH INSTITUTE ILLINOIS NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY ILLINOIS SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY CENTER ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ILLINOIS STATE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY ILLINOIS STATE WATER SURVEY 2 1

2 For years researchers have worked on processes to remove Carbon Dioxide directly from flue gas Current carbon capture technology is energy intensive = expensive Need new technologies that are cost effective Cost effective technologies are being developed through the US Department of Energy Need to transition technologies from the lab to pilot scale 3 Next Generation Technology CO 2 Capture Technology Linde/BASF s OASE blue solvent Started lab scale testing 2004 Exceeded DOE/NETL performance goals at 0.45 MW scale Exceeded DOE/NETL performance goals at 1.5 MW scale Next key step in commercializing technology is 10 MW scale 1.5 Mw scale at National Carbon Capture Center, Wilsonville, AL (2015). 4 2

3 Phase I Team Well defined roles based on relevant capabilities 5 Competitive Selection Process for Large Pilot Funding Proposal submissions to US DOE 9 awardees 4 5 awardees 1 2 awardees Phase I : Preliminary design Phase II : Finalize design Phase III : Build and Operate 6 3

4 Proposed Location of CO 2 Capture Unit: Dallman #4 7 Roles and Responsibilities CWLP Project Team Provide flue gas for capture unit Manage project Provide utilities for capture unit (steam, water, electric power, compressed air) Provide requested plant data to project team (drawing, flue gas composition, etc.) Obtain funding for project (US DOE and cost share) Cover project costs Design capture system Build capture system Operate capture system Reporting to US DOE Design tests and interpret results Regulatory and permitting lead 8 4

5 Estimated Timeline for Project 9 Project Benefits Local labor for construction Global exposure and visitors to Springfield Reduce potential workforce reductions; i.e. redeploy operators from other units Future training site for capture plant operators Provides option to reduce CO 2 emissions from existing fossil fueled power plants Expect to attract additional US DOE funding for follow on work 10 5

6 Regional & Global Test Bed for CCUS Concentration of natural resources and intellectual capital Proposed host site Capture of CO 2 Springfield Storage of CO 2 : ADM Project Decatur Mattoon Utilization of CO 2 : Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) Fairfield, Olney Robinson, Mt. Carmel Operator Training Carbondale Coal combustion 11 6

7 WATER DEPARTMENT PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMITTEE MEETING December 10, 2018 AGENDA Land and Water Resources Watershed Water Works Improvement Project Supplemental Water Supply Status Update 1

8 The land use in the watershed is ~75% agriculturally oriented. Given this, the lake is very much influenced by soils, land uses, weather and human activity. 2

9 A Strong Alliance has been formed between CWLP and the Sangamon County Soil and Water Conservation District (SCSWCD) Strong, Active Partners Yield Results Ag Retailers & Producers 3

10 First comprehensive report of Lake and watershed data How human presence and their activities affect Lake Springfield 3 Major Issues Sedimentation Nutrients Shoreline erosion 4

11 Lake Springfield Watershed Resource Plan 1990: Updated in 2015 & 2017 ISSUES ADDRESSED IN WATERSHED RESOURCE PLAN Agricultural Sedimentation Nutrients/Herbicides/Pesticides Shoreline Erosion Urban Erosion Control Storm Water Management Install Sewer Around Lake 5

12 6

13 Another Goal for CWLP is to eliminate approximately 400 septic systems from the Lake Springfield Marginal Lands. Shoreline Stabilization 7

14 Tillage and Cover Crops 8

15 Farmer hosted Meetings 74 Farmers 6 Meetings 9

16 12/10/2018 Grab Sample Sites Cover Crop Sites N Rate Studies IEPA 319 Grant BMPs Implemented

17 12/10/ acres waterways 120 acres cover crops 4 structures 14 NMPs 1,908 acres 11

18 SEDIMENTATION SURVEYS Lake Surveys completed: 1948, 1965, 1977, 1984, 2004, 2007, 2009, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 Continue to Monitor sediment levels in lake 12

19 10' No Dredge Limit (typ.) 7North Bank, R37 X-section R37-R38 Distance (ft) South Bank, 5 R Depth (ft) Depth 1993 Depth, post dredge 2004 Depth 2017 Depth GOALS Obtain Grant Funds Minimize Sediment and Nutrients Entering Lake Continue Shoreline Stabilization Continue Sewer Installation Increase Grass Filter Strips/Setbacks Increase Cover Crops Dredge Lake 13

20 ISAWWA 2014 SOURCE WATER PROTECTION AWARD Water Works Improvement Projects 14

21 BOND ISSUE FOR WATER WORKS IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 2008 $22,140, $68,050,000 Rate Increases: % % % % Current Rate for 10 units = 7,480 gallons 5/8 meter= $28.00 Bond Fund Projects Water Works Improvement Projects $84 M DCS Controls Upgrade $3 million New Dam Gates (5) completed Jan $6 million, 6 MG Clearwell completed fall 2012 $8.2 million Low Service Pump Station (LSP) Started October 2012 on line Sept. 12, 2014 High Service Pump Station (HSP) Started September 2012 on line May 9, 2014 HSP and LSP combined cost $32.8 million Retrofit Clarifier #3, 4 MGD additional capacity complete October 2014 $5 million Chlorine, Lime, Ammonia, CO2 storage tank area $7 million Filtration capacity upgrade $15 million start May

22 DCS Controls Project 2011 through 2014 DCS System Installed in Two Phases Phase I included controls for all equipment except LSPS, HSPS, Intake and Carbon Building Phase II included all Pump Stations Project Cost was approximately $3 million Spaulding Dam Improvements 2008 Replaced Five (5) Floating Drum Gates with Hydraulically Operated Hinge Crest Gates 16

23 Intake Structure Improvements 2014 Five (5) gates at intake (4 screens) One (1) shoreline gate with screen Automated Control of Gates Low Service Pump Station Improvements Pumps Total Pump Type: Vertical Turbine Peak Flow Rate: INITIAL 52 MGD ULTIMATE 65 MGD 17

24 High Service Pump Station Improvements May 9, Pumps Total Pump Type: Horizontal Split Case Peak Flow Rate: INITIAL 60 MGD ULTIMATE 80 MGD Filter Expansion Future Project Current Filter Capacity = 47 MGD 1944 Expansion Added 4 Filters 1955 Expansions Added 4 Filters Future Capacity: 63 MGD Currently in Design, Construction 6/2019 6/

25 Supplemental Water Supply Update Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) Process guided by National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Current SEIS is updating 2000 EIS supplementalwater.cwlp.com Supplemental Water Supply Update June 2016: Amec Foster Wheeler, now WOOD Plc, hired to prepare SEIS and related studies under USACE direction August 15, 2016 USACE Publishes Notice of Intent in Federal Register August 24, 2016: Public scoping meeting held to provide an overview and history of the project, present the project alternatives, and solicit comments from the public 19

26 Supplemental Water Supply Update Submitted and Pending Initial draft of SEIS Chapter 1 (Purpose and Need) March 2017 USACE Requesting justification on recreational need Draft SEIS Chapter 2 (Alternatives) November 2018 Hunter Lake and Havana USACE Requested the wells northwest of Lincoln to be added USACE Requested information on Land Acquisition and Easement cost USACE Requesting information on Cost Threshold Values Draft Chapter 3 (Environment & Consequences) Submitted by AMEC/WOOD to USACE November 2018 SEIS What s next Submit remaining requested information to USACE USACE to finalize review and approve Chapters 2 & 3 Draft SEIS to be submitted by Wood to USACE by end of March 2019 USACE to finalize and publish Draft SEIS IEPA 401 Water Quality Certification Second Public Scoping Period Record of Decision City Council Action 20

27 SAFE, CLEAN DRINKING WATER, IT S NOT OUR JOB, IT S OUR RESPONSIBILITY 21