APPENDIX A Reports & Permits

Transcription

1 APPENDIX A Reports & Permits

2 BOREHOLE GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES 2016 CAPITAL WORKS PENTICTON, BRITISH COLUMBIA PRESENTED TO THE CITY OF PENTICTON JANUARY 25, 2016 ISSUED FOR USE FILE: ENG.KGEO Tetra Tech EBA Inc. 150, 1715 Dickson Avenue Kelowna, BC V1Y 9G6 CANADA Tel Fax

3 This page intentionally left blank. Penticton Borehole Geotechnical Services.docx

4 BOREHOLE GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES FILE: ENG.KGEO JANUARY 25, 2016 ISSUED FOR USE TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION General SITE DESCRIPTION SITE INVESTIGATION Subsurface Investigation Laboratory Testing SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Conklin Avenue/Douglas Avenue Materials Skaha Lake Road Materials Main Street Materials Groundwater DISCUSSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Pavement Structure Recommendations General Subgrade Preparation Conklin Avenue/Douglas Avenue Main Street Temporary Excavations and Utility Trenching Excavations Trench Design Review and Construction Inspections CLOSURE... 7 LIST OF TABLES IN TEXT Table 3.2 Summary of Laboratory Results... 2 Table 4.4 Summary of Groundwater Depths... 4 Table 5.1 Recommended Pavement Structure... 5 i Penticton Borehole Geotechnical Services.docx

5 BOREHOLE GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES FILE: ENG.KGEO JANUARY 25, 2016 ISSUED FOR USE APPENDIX SECTIONS FIGURES Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Borehole Location Plan Conklin Avenue and Douglas Avenue Borehole Location Plan Skaha Lake Road Borehole Location Plan Main Street APPENDICES Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Tetra Tech EBA s General Conditions Borehole Logs Laboratory Test Results ii Penticton Borehole Geotechnical Services.docx

6 BOREHOLE GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES FILE: ENG.KGEO JANUARY 25, 2016 ISSUED FOR USE LIMITATIONS OF REPORT This report and its contents are intended for the sole use of The City of Penticton and their agents. Tetra Tech EBA Inc. (Tetra Tech EBA) does not accept any responsibility for the accuracy of any of the data, the analysis, or the recommendations contained or referenced in the report when the report is used or relied upon by any Party other than The City of Penticton, or for any Project other than the proposed development at the subject site. Any such unauthorized use of this report is at the sole risk of the user. Use of this report is subject to the terms and conditions stated in Tetra Tech EBA s Services Agreement. Tetra Tech EBA s General Conditions are provided in Appendix A of this report. iii Penticton Borehole Geotechnical Services.docx

7 BOREHOLE GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES FILE: ENG.KGEO JANUARY 25, 2016 ISSUED FOR USE 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 General The City of Penticton (The City) retained Tetra Tech EBA Inc. (Tetra Tech EBA) to provide geotechnical engineering services to develop strategies, recommendations and design specifications for the 2016 Capital Works Project. The primary focus of the investigation was to complete a surface and subsurface geotechnical investigation in order to obtain the necessary information to provide current road structure and recommendations for subsurface/road base and sub-base upgrades and drainage improvements for each road investigated. This report provides a summary of the results from the Tetra Tech EBA geotechnical investigation, with comments and recommendations based on the findings of the field investigation. Pavement structure recommendations included in the report follows the classification as per City of Penticton Subdivision and Development Bylaw SITE DESCRIPTION The overall geotechnical assessment completed, entailed three separate locations within the City of Penticton. Geotechnical field investigations were completed in the following three areas of the city. Conklin Avenue and Douglas Avenue between Fairview Road to Moosejaw Street, and Argyle Street between Conklin Avenue and Hastings Avenue (Location 1 Conklin Avenue/Douglas Avenue); Parkview Street/Skaha Lake Road from Lee Avenue to Guelph Avenue (Location 2 Skaha Lake Road); and Main Street from Nanaimo Avenue W. to Lakeshore Drive (Location 3 Main Street). The locations of the completed boreholes are shown on Figures SITE INVESTIGATION The field and laboratory program for the geotechnical site investigation comprised: The drilling of 27 boreholes; In-situ testing; and Laboratory testing on recovered soil samples. A total of four boreholes were not completed due to drilling equipment access issues and proximity to underground utilities. 3.1 Subsurface Investigation Tetra Tech EBA conducted a field investigation on December 15, 16, 2015 and January 6, 2016, using a truck mounted drilling rig supplied and operated by On The Mark Drilling and Coring from West Kelowna, BC. Twenty seven (27) boreholes that included Scala Penetrometer and Standard Penetration Testing (SPT) were conducted at selected depths and locations. The boreholes were advanced between 2.0 m and 4.0 m below the existing road elevation. During the drilling Mr. Steve Kalinocka of Tetra Tech EBA, collected representative soil Penticton Borehole Geotechnical Services.docx

8 BOREHOLE GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES FILE: ENG.KGEO JANUARY 25, 2016 ISSUED FOR USE samples during the drilling, as well as kept a continuous log of the soils that were encountered. The complete borehole logs can be found in the attached Appendix C. 3.2 Laboratory Testing Laboratory testing was conducted on select soil samples at the Tetra Tech Kelowna Material Testing Laboratory. The testing consisted of sieve analysis to confirm soil gradation, and moisture content tests. A summary of the laboratory sieve analysis test results is presented in Table 3-2 below, detailed test results can be seen in Appendix C. Table 3.2 Summary of Laboratory Results Location Location 1 Conklin Avenue/Douglas Avenue Sample Depth (m) Moisture Content (%) Fines (%) Sand (%) Gravel (%) BH m 1.2 m BH m 2.0 m BH m 2.0 m BH m 0.8 m Location 2 Skaha Lake Road BH m 1.3 m BH m 2.1 m Location 3 Main Street BH m 0.8 m BH m 1.4 m SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 4.1 Conklin Avenue/Douglas Avenue Materials From the information obtained from the current investigation, the typical subsurface profile of the project area is: Asphalt, underlain by; Fill loose to compact sand, underlain by; and Alluvial deposits typically interbedded loose to compact sands. Asphalt encountered across the site ranged in thickness from 80 mm to 150 mm thick. The average thickness encountered was approximately 100 mm. Organic soil/buried topsoil was encountered in borehole BH The organic soil was described as silty clay containing some sand, organics and rootlets. The consistency of the organic clay was very soft. The clay was moist and dark brown to black in colour. The organic clay was encountered at a depth of approximately 1.0 m and 2 Penticton Borehole Geotechnical Services.docx

9 BOREHOLE GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES FILE: ENG.KGEO JANUARY 25, 2016 ISSUED FOR USE extended to a depth of 1.8 m. Extensive cracking of the asphalt was observed in the area surrounding borehole BH The organic clay soil was not encountered in surrounding boreholes BH15-05 and BH Skaha Lake Road Materials From the information obtained from the current investigation, the typical subsurface profile of the project area is: Asphalt, underlain by; Fill compact to very dense sand and gravel underlain by; and Alluvial deposits typically interbedded loose to compact sands. Asphalt encountered across the site ranged in thickness from 180 mm to 200 mm thick. The average thickness encountered was approximately 200 mm. Petroleum/chemical odour was present during the drilling of two boreholes. The odour was present in Boreholes BH15-22 and BH The odour was present throughout the entire depth of the boreholes. 4.3 Main Street Materials From the information obtained from the current investigation, the typical subsurface profile of the project area is: Asphalt, underlain by; Fill loose to dense sand and gravel, underlain by; and Alluvial deposits typically interbedded loose to compact sands. Asphalt encountered across the site ranged in thickness from 90 mm to 110 mm thick. The average thickness encountered was approximately 100 mm. Asphalt was encountered at the surface of borehole BH16-02 in the parking lot northwest of City Hall and was approximately 50 mm in thickness. Organic soil/buried topsoil layers were encountered in borehole BH16-01 and BH The organic layers was encountered at depths of approximately 0.6 m and 0.7 m and were approximately 0.1 m to 0.2 m thick. Petroleum/chemical odour was present during the drilling of one borehole. The odour was present in Borehole BH16-02 (parking lot adjacent to Main Street). The odour was present throughout the entire depth of the borehole. 4.4 Groundwater The depth to the groundwater was measured during the drilling of the boreholes when encountered. The depths to groundwater have been summarized in Table 4.4 below. Groundwater was not encountered at Location 1 (Conklin/Douglas Avenue). Penticton Borehole Geotechnical Services.docx

10 BOREHOLE GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES FILE: ENG.KGEO JANUARY 25, 2016 ISSUED FOR USE Table 4.4 Summary of Groundwater Depths Location Location 2 Skaha Lake Road Date Depth to Groundwater Encountered Below Ground (m) BH /16/ BH /16/ BH /16/ BH /16/ BH /16/ Location 3 Main Street BH /6/ BH /6/ BH /6/ BH /6/ BH /6/ If utilities are to be installed/upgraded, excavations may encounter the groundwater table. It should be noted that the groundwater levels will fluctuate seasonally (seasonally high in the late spring and early summer) and in response to climatic conditions; thus, they may be encountered at different depths when construction commences. 5.0 DISCUSSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 Pavement Structure Recommendations Standard Penetration Test and Scala Penetrometer Test results were utilized to estimate the CBR % of the upper 2 m to 4 m of the subsurface. The native soils encountered beneath the existing fill soils were fairly consistent based on the data obtained from the field investigation. Based on the considerations mentioned, a CBR=8 is estimated to be representative of the soils conditions encountered at the three locations under consideration General Subgrade Preparation Prior to the construction of any paved areas, we recommend that all topsoil, organic soil, any loose, soft, wet, weathered or disturbed soils are removed to expose a subgrade of compact sand or sand and gravel. We also recommend that the subgrade be proof-rolled under the direction of a geotechnical engineer from Tetra Tech EBA, prior to placing any sub-base fill material. The proof-rolling should be done immediately after the subgrade compaction operation, when the moisture content of the subgrade soil is near the optimum moisture content or at the moisture content that achieved the compaction. This minimizes the subgrade becoming too wet or too dry for an effective proof-rolling evaluation. If the subgrade is too wet, the material will displace and rut. If the subgrade is too dry, a hard surface crust may carry the proof-roll over an undesirable soft wet underlying material without rutting or deflection, and the soft subgrade may not be detected. It is important to choose the correct load for the type of soil on the project. These loads and tire pressures are soil type sensitive when evaluating the subgrade. For the soils encountered on the project is recommended to use a 32 metric ton roller with a tire pressure of 830 kpa. 4 Penticton Borehole Geotechnical Services.docx

11 BOREHOLE GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES FILE: ENG.KGEO JANUARY 25, 2016 ISSUED FOR USE Any soft or loose spots, if encountered, should be over-excavated and replaced with granular sub-base material as outlined below. Any fill required to raise the grade of the site, beneath the pavement section, should be placed on the approved proof-rolled subgrade surface. This fill should then be compacted in 300 mm maximum loose layer thickness lifts to a minimum 95% Modified Proctor Maximum Dry Density (MPMDD), within 2% of optimum moisture content. Granular fill should be well graded, with a maximum particle size of 75 mm, and not more than 8% passing the #200 sieve (equivalent to sub-base material) Conklin Avenue/Douglas Avenue Soft organic clay soil was encountered in Borehole BH15-06 on Conklin Avenue at a depth of 1.0 m. It is recommended that the soil be over-excavated and replaced with granular material as outlined in Section The lateral extent of the soil deposit was not determined. However, boreholes BH15-05 and BH15-07 did not encounter the clay soil Main Street Buried topsoil/organic soil was encountered in boreholes BH16-01 and on Main Street at an approximate depth of 0.6 m and extending up to a depth 0.8 m. It is recommended that if encountered, these soils be over-excavated and replaced with granular material as outlined in Section Once the subgrade is prepared as indicated in Section 5.1.1, the recommended pavement structure is provided in Table 5.1 Table 5.1 Recommended Pavement Structure Location Classification ESALs Conklin Avenue Argyle Street Douglas Avenue Main Street Skaha Lake Road S-R5 TAC-UCU60 S-R5 TAC-UCU60 S-R2 TAC-ULU50 S-R6a TAC-UCU60 S-R6a TAC-UCU60 Required Structural Number (SN) Minimum Asphalt Thickness (mm) Minimum. Granular Base (mm) Minimum Granular Sub-base 280, , , ,000, (2x50) ,000, (2x50) The actual compaction of all granular and asphalt materials placed should be confirmed with in situ density testing. The gradation of all materials used in construction should be tested, prior to construction, to confirm that they satisfy minimum requirements as per the City of Penticton Bylaw Good drainage provisions will optimize pavement performance. The finished pavement surface should be free of depressions and should be sloped (preferably at a minimum grade of two percent) to provide effective surface drainage toward catch basins. Surface water should not be allowed to pond adjacent to the outside edges of pavement areas. In low areas, subdrains should be installed to intercept excess subsurface moisture and prevent subgrade softening. Penticton Borehole Geotechnical Services.docx

12 BOREHOLE GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES FILE: ENG.KGEO JANUARY 25, 2016 ISSUED FOR USE 5.2 Temporary Excavations and Utility Trenching Excavations All work conducted in and around excavations should be carried out in accordance with requirements specified by the WorkSafe BC Occupational Health and Safety Regulations, Part 20. Unsupported excavations greater than 1.2 m depth should be reviewed by a professional engineer in accordance with WorkSafe BC. Alternatively, service line trenches or excavations deeper than 1.2 m must be shored. Temporary trenches for underground utilities excavated within the loose sand should be excavated no steeper than 2.0(H):1(V). Excavated material from the trench should be placed a minimum distance away from the excavation, equal to the depth of the excavation. Excavations below the groundwater table will require temporary dewatering Trench Design All utilities should be bedded as per the City of Penticton Development By-laws. We recommend the native material be used as general trench backfill to subgrade elevation unless it is below a roadway. General trench backfill above the bedding should be placed in loose lifts not exceeding 300 mm thickness, and each lift should be compacted to a minimum of 95% of Modified Proctor MDD. 5.3 Review and Construction Inspections Tetra Tech EBA recommends that geotechnical/materials engineering field services, such as proof-rolling, observation of the bearing surface, backfill, and the testing of soil density be performed to ensure that the requirements of this report are followed. 6 Penticton Borehole Geotechnical Services.docx

13

14 BOREHOLE GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES FILE: ENG.KGEO JANUARY 25, 2016 ISSUED FOR USE FIGURES Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Borehole Location Plan Conklin Avenue and Douglas Avenue Borehole Location Plan Skaha Lake Road Borehole Location Plan Main Street Penticton Borehole Geotechnical Services.docx

15 SITE LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE SITE BH15-08 BH15-07 BH15-06 Q:\Kelowna\Drafting\ENG.KGEO\ENGKGEO City of Penticton\2014 Civil 3D\Production Drawings\3005 Figures Rev A.dwg [FIGURE 01] January 18, :24:08 pm (BY: HALLEY, RICHARD) LEGEND BH16-## BORING NUMBER COMPLETION YEAR 0 DISCRETION 100m Scale: 11"x17" APPROXIMATE BOREHOLE LOCATION MOOSEJAW ST. BH15-18 BH15-17 DOUGLAS AVE. CONKLIN AVE. HASTINGS AVE. BH15-15 BH15-05 NOTES 1. ORTHOGRAPHIC IMAGE ADOPTED FROM GOOGLE EARTH PRO. 2. PROPERTY LINES ARE APPROXIMATE. 3. BORING LOCATIONS ESTABLISHED WITH THE USE OF A HANDHELD GPS UNIT. ARGYLE ST. BH15-13 BH15-04 CLIENT BH15-03 BH15-12 Client EBA BH15-11 PROJECT NO. DWN CKD REV ENG.KGEO03005 OFFICE Kelowna BH CAPITAL WORKS PENTICTON, BC BOREHOLES 1-18 LOCATIONS PLAN VIEW RERH DATE SK January 12, 2016 BH15-10 ISSUED FOR USE 0 BH15-01 FAIRVIEW RD. Figure 01

16 SITE LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE YORKTON AV. LEE AV. PARKVIEW ST. BH15-20 Q:\Kelowna\Drafting\ENG.KGEO\ENGKGEO City of Penticton\2014 Civil 3D\Production Drawings\3005 Figures Rev A.dwg [FIGURE 02] January 12, :46:41 am (BY: HALLEY, RICHARD) LEGEND BH16-## BORING NUMBER COMPLETION YEAR 0 DISCRETION 50m Scale: 11"x17" SITE APPROXIMATE BOREHOLE LOCATION BH15-24 SKAHA LAKE RD. BH15-23 BH15-22 NOTES 1. ORTHOGRAPHIC IMAGE ADOPTED FROM GOOGLE EARTH PRO. 2. PROPERTY LINES ARE APPROXIMATE. 3. BORING LOCATIONS ESTABLISHED WITH THE USE OF A HANDHELD GPS UNIT. CLIENT Client BH15-21 EBA PROJECT NO. DWN CKD REV ENG.KGEO03005 OFFICE Kelowna ISSUED FOR USE 2016 CAPITAL WORKS PENTICTON, BC BOREHOLES LOCATIONS PLAN VIEW RERH DATE SK January 12, Figure 02

17 SITE LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE SITE Q:\Kelowna\Drafting\ENG.KGEO\ENGKGEO City of Penticton\2014 Civil 3D\Production Drawings\3005 Figures Rev A.dwg [FIGURE 03] January 12, :44:48 am (BY: HALLEY, RICHARD) LEGEND BH16-## BORING NUMBER COMPLETION YEAR 0 DISCRETION 100m Scale: 11"x17" APPROXIMATE BOREHOLE LOCATION LAKESHORE DR. BH16-01 BH16-07 BH16-02 BH16-03 NOTES 1. ORTHOGRAPHIC IMAGE ADOPTED FROM GOOGLE EARTH PRO. 2. PROPERTY LINES ARE APPROXIMATE. 3. BORING LOCATIONS ESTABLISHED WITH THE USE OF A HANDHELD GPS UNIT. BH16-04 CLIENT MAIN STREET Client BH16-05 EBA BH16-06 PROJECT NO. DWN CKD REV ENG.KGEO03005 OFFICE Kelowna NANAIMO AV. W ISSUED FOR USE 2016 CAPITAL WORKS PENTICTON, BC BOREHOLES 1-7 LOCATIONS PLAN VIEW RERH DATE SK January 12, Figure 03

18 BOREHOLE GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES FILE: ENG.KGEO JANUARY 25, 2016 ISSUED FOR USE APPENDIX A TETRA TECH EBA S GENERAL CONDITIONS Penticton Borehole Geotechnical Services.docx

19 GENERAL CONDITIONS GEOTECHNICAL REPORT This report incorporates and is subject to these General Conditions. 1.0 USE OF REPORT AND OWNERSHIP This geotechnical report pertains to a specific site, a specific development and a specific scope of work. It is not applicable to any other sites nor should it be relied upon for types of development other than that to which it refers. Any variation from the site or development would necessitate a supplementary geotechnical assessment. This report and the recommendations contained in it are intended for the sole use of Tetra Tech EBA s Client. Tetra Tech EBA does not accept any responsibility for the accuracy of any of the data, the analyses or the recommendations contained or referenced in the report when the report is used or relied upon by any party other than Tetra Tech EBA s Client unless otherwise authorized in writing by Tetra Tech EBA. Any unauthorized use of the report is at the sole risk of the user. This report is subject to copyright and shall not be reproduced either wholly or in part without the prior, written permission of Tetra Tech EBA. Additional copies of the report, if required, may be obtained upon request. 2.0 ALTERNATE REPORT FORMAT Where Tetra Tech EBA submits both electronic file and hard copy versions of reports, drawings and other project-related documents and deliverables (collectively termed Tetra Tech EBA s instruments of professional service), only the signed and/or sealed versions shall be considered final and legally binding. The original signed and/or sealed version archived by Tetra Tech EBA shall be deemed to be the original for the Project. Both electronic file and hard copy versions of Tetra Tech EBA s instruments of professional service shall not, under any circumstances, no matter who owns or uses them, be altered by any party except Tetra Tech EBA. Tetra Tech EBA s instruments of professional service will be used only and exactly as submitted by Tetra Tech EBA. Electronic files submitted by Tetra Tech EBA have been prepared and submitted using specific software and hardware systems. Tetra Tech EBA makes no representation about the compatibility of these files with the Client s current or future software and hardware systems. 4.0 NATURE AND EXACTNESS OF SOIL AND ROCK DESCRIPTIONS Classification and identification of soils and rocks are based upon commonly accepted systems and methods employed in professional geotechnical practice. This report contains descriptions of the systems and methods used. Where deviations from the system or method prevail, they are specifically mentioned. Classification and identification of geological units are judgmental in nature as to both type and condition. Tetra Tech EBA does not warrant conditions represented herein as exact, but infers accuracy only to the extent that is common in practice. Where subsurface conditions encountered during development are different from those described in this report, qualified geotechnical personnel should revisit the site and review recommendations in light of the actual conditions encountered. 5.0 LOGS OF TESTHOLES The testhole logs are a compilation of conditions and classification of soils and rocks as obtained from field observations and laboratory testing of selected samples. Soil and rock zones have been interpreted. Change from one geological zone to the other, indicated on the logs as a distinct line, can be, in fact, transitional. The extent of transition is interpretive. Any circumstance which requires precise definition of soil or rock zone transition elevations may require further investigation and review. 6.0 STRATIGRAPHIC AND GEOLOGICAL INFORMATION The stratigraphic and geological information indicated on drawings contained in this report are inferred from logs of testholes and/or soil/rock exposures. Stratigraphy is known only at the locations of the testhole or exposure. Actual geology and stratigraphy between testholes and/or exposures may vary from that shown on these drawings. Natural variations in geological conditions are inherent and are a function of the historic environment. Tetra Tech EBA does not represent the conditions illustrated as exact but recognizes that variations will exist. Where knowledge of more precise locations of geological units is necessary, additional investigation and review may be necessary. 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL AND REGULATORY ISSUES Unless stipulated in the report, Tetra Tech EBA has not been retained to investigate, address or consider and has not investigated, addressed or considered any environmental or regulatory issues associated with development on the subject site. 1

20 GENERAL CONDITIONS GEOTECHNICAL REPORT 7.0 PROTECTION OF EXPOSED GROUND Excavation and construction operations expose geological materials to climatic elements (freeze/thaw, wet/dry) and/or mechanical disturbance which can cause severe deterioration. Unless otherwise specifically indicated in this report, the walls and floors of excavations must be protected from the elements, particularly moisture, desiccation, frost action and construction traffic. 8.0 SUPPORT OF ADJACENT GROUND AND STRUCTURES Unless otherwise specifically advised, support of ground and structures adjacent to the anticipated construction and preservation of adjacent ground and structures from the adverse impact of construction activity is required. 9.0 INFLUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY There is a direct correlation between construction activity and structural performance of adjacent buildings and other installations. The influence of all anticipated construction activities should be considered by the contractor, owner, architect and prime engineer in consultation with a geotechnical engineer when the final design and construction techniques are known OBSERVATIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION Because of the nature of geological deposits, the judgmental nature of geotechnical engineering, as well as the potential of adverse circumstances arising from construction activity, observations during site preparation, excavation and construction should be carried out by a geotechnical engineer. These observations may then serve as the basis for confirmation and/or alteration of geotechnical recommendations or design guidelines presented herein DRAINAGE SYSTEMS Where temporary or permanent drainage systems are installed within or around a structure, the systems which will be installed must protect the structure from loss of ground due to internal erosion and must be designed so as to assure continued performance of the drains. Specific design detail of such systems should be developed or reviewed by the geotechnical engineer. Unless otherwise specified, it is a condition of this report that effective temporary and permanent drainage systems are required and that they must be considered in relation to project purpose and function BEARING CAPACITY Design bearing capacities, loads and allowable stresses quoted in this report relate to a specific soil or rock type and condition. Construction activity and environmental circumstances can materially change the condition of soil or rock. The elevation at which a soil or rock type occurs is variable. It is a requirement of this report that structural elements be founded in and/or upon geological materials of the type and in the condition assumed. Sufficient observations should be made by qualified geotechnical personnel during construction to assure that the soil and/or rock conditions assumed in this report in fact exist at the site SAMPLES Tetra Tech EBA will retain all soil and rock samples for 30 days after this report is issued. Further storage or transfer of samples can be made at the Client s expense upon written request, otherwise samples will be discarded INFORMATION PROVIDED TO TETRA TECH EBA BY OTHERS During the performance of the work and the preparation of the report, Tetra Tech EBA may rely on information provided by persons other than the Client. While Tetra Tech EBA endeavours to verify the accuracy of such information when instructed to do so by the Client, Tetra Tech EBA accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or the reliability of such information which may affect the report. 2

21 BOREHOLE GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES FILE: ENG.KGEO JANUARY 25, 2016 ISSUED FOR USE APPENDIX B BOREHOLE LOGS Penticton Borehole Geotechnical Services.docx

22 Depth (m) 0 The City of Penticton Method Core Diameter (mm) ASPHALT (80 mm thick) Soil Description SAND (FILL) - some gravel, trace silt, compact, moist, brown; rounded to angular gravel Borehole No: Project: Borehole Geotechnical Services Location: Conklin Avenue Penticton, British Columbia Graphical Representation Sample Type Sample Number Gravel (%) Particle Size Distribution Fines Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%) Field Blowcount (blows/300 mm) SPT Project No: ENG.KGEO UTM: E; N; Z 11 NAD83 Vane (kpa) Post-Peak Peak Plastic Limit Moisture Content Liquid Limit Depth (ft) 0 1 S1: 6/9/10/10 recovery - 38 cm S1 2 1 Solid stem auger 150 -gravelly, occasional cobbles, dense 3 4 S2: 8/20/26/21 recovery - 36 cm (rock fragments in SPT spoon) S2 5 B1 6 2 END OF BOREHOLE Target depth reached VANCOUVER CITY OF PENTICTON.GPJ EBA.GDT 1/18/16 Contractor: On The Mark Drilling Rig Type: Truck Mounted Auger Logged By: SK Reviewed By: GM Completion Depth: 2 m Start Date: December 15, 2015 Completion Date: December 15, 2015 Page 1 of 1

23 Depth (m) 0 The City of Penticton Method Core Diameter (mm) ASPHALT (100 mm thick) Soil Description Borehole No: Project: Borehole Geotechnical Services Location: Conklin Avenue Penticton, British Columbia Graphical Representation Sample Type Sample Number Gravel (%) Particle Size Distribution Fines Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%) Field Blowcount (blows/300 mm) SPT Project No: ENG.KGEO UTM: E; N; Z 11 NAD83 Vane (kpa) Post-Peak Peak Plastic Limit Moisture Content Liquid Limit Depth (ft) 0 SAND (FILL) - silty, trace gravel, loose, moist, brown; fine to medium grained B Solid stem auger 150 S1: 4/4/2/3 - recovery 40 cm S SAND AND GRAVEL (FILL) - trace silt, occasional cobbles, damp, brown 5 B2 -difficult drilling 1.8 m to 2.0 m (gravel and cobbles) 6 2 END OF BOREHOLE Target depth reached VANCOUVER CITY OF PENTICTON.GPJ EBA.GDT 1/18/16 Contractor: On The Mark Drilling Rig Type: Truck Mounted Auger Logged By: SK Reviewed By: GM Completion Depth: 2 m Start Date: December 15, 2015 Completion Date: December 15, 2015 Page 1 of 1

24 Depth (m) 0 The City of Penticton Method Core Diameter (mm) ASPHALT (80 mm thick) Soil Description SAND (FILL) - some silt, trace gravel, trace organics and rootlets, moist, brown; fine to medium grained Borehole No: Project: Borehole Geotechnical Services Location: Conklin Avenue Penticton, British Columbia Graphical Representation Sample Type Sample Number Gravel (%) Particle Size Distribution Fines Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%) SCALA PENETROMETER Project No: ENG.KGEO UTM: E; N; Z 11 NAD83 Blow Per 50 mm Penetration Vane (kpa) Post-Peak Peak Plastic Limit Moisture Content Liquid Limit Depth (ft) 0 1 B1 2 1 Solid stem auger B2 5 -trace silt, occasional cobbles 6 2 END OF BOREHOLE Target depth reached VANCOUVER CITY OF PENTICTON.GPJ EBA.GDT 1/18/16 Contractor: On The Mark Drilling Rig Type: Truck Mounted Auger Logged By: SK Reviewed By: GM Completion Depth: 2 m Start Date: December 15, 2015 Completion Date: December 15, 2015 Page 1 of 1

25 Depth (m) 0 The City of Penticton Method Core Diameter (mm) ASPHALT (80 mm thick) Soil Description SAND (FILL) - trace gravel, trace silt, compact, moist, brown; fine to medium grained Borehole No: Project: Borehole Geotechnical Services Location: Conklin Avenue Penticton, British Columbia Graphical Representation Sample Type Sample Number Gravel (%) Particle Size Distribution Fines Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%) Field Blowcount (blows/300 mm) SPT Project No: ENG.KGEO UTM: E; N; Z 11 NAD83 Vane (kpa) Post-Peak Peak Plastic Limit Moisture Content Liquid Limit Depth (ft) 0 1 S1: 8/8/7/8 - recovery 45 cm S1 2 1 Solid stem auger 150 B1 3 -loose 4 S2: 4/5/3/3 - recovery 40 cm S END OF BOREHOLE Target depth reached VANCOUVER CITY OF PENTICTON.GPJ EBA.GDT 1/18/16 Contractor: On The Mark Drilling Rig Type: Truck Mounted Auger Logged By: SK Reviewed By: GM Completion Depth: 2 m Start Date: December 15, 2015 Completion Date: December 15, 2015 Page 1 of 1

26 Depth (m) 0 The City of Penticton Method Core Diameter (mm) ASPHALT (100 mm thick) Soil Description Borehole No: Project: Borehole Geotechnical Services Location: Conklin Avenue Penticton, British Columbia Graphical Representation Sample Type Sample Number Gravel (%) Particle Size Distribution Fines Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%) Field Blowcount (blows/300 mm) SPT Project No: ENG.KGEO UTM: E; N; Z 11 NAD83 Vane (kpa) Post-Peak Peak Plastic Limit Moisture Content Liquid Limit Depth (ft) 0 SAND (FILL) - some gravel, trace silt, occasional cobbles, compact, moist, brown; subrounded to angular gravel B1 1 -trace gravel, damp, light brown 2 1 Solid stem auger 150 S1: 3/4/4/3 S B2 6 2 END OF BOREHOLE Target depth reached VANCOUVER CITY OF PENTICTON.GPJ EBA.GDT 1/18/16 Contractor: On The Mark Drilling Rig Type: Truck Mounted Auger Logged By: SK Reviewed By: GM Completion Depth: 2 m Start Date: December 15, 2015 Completion Date: December 15, 2015 Page 1 of 1

27 Depth (m) 0 The City of Penticton Method Core Diameter (mm) ASPHALT (100 mm thick) Soil Description Borehole No: Project: Borehole Geotechnical Services Location: Conklin Avenue Penticton, British Columbia Graphical Representation Sample Type Sample Number Gravel (%) Particle Size Distribution Fines Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%) Field Blowcount (blows/300 mm) SPT Project No: ENG.KGEO UTM: E; N; Z 11 NAD83 Vane (kpa) Post-Peak Peak Plastic Limit Moisture Content Liquid Limit Depth (ft) 0 SAND (FILL) - gravelly, trace silt, trace organics, compact, moist, brown; rounded to angular gravel, fine to medium grained sand 1 S1: 10/12/10/8 S1 2 1 Solid stem auger 150 CLAY (BURRIED TOPSOIL) - silty, some sand, containing organics and rootles, very soft, moist, dark brown to black B1 3 4 S2: 2 blows for 600 mm of penetration S2 5 SAND - gravelly, trace silt, moist, light brown; medium grained sand; rounded gravel B END OF BOREHOLE Target depth reached VANCOUVER CITY OF PENTICTON.GPJ EBA.GDT 1/18/16 Contractor: On The Mark Drilling Rig Type: Truck Mounted Auger Logged By: SK Reviewed By: GM Completion Depth: 2 m Start Date: December 15, 2015 Completion Date: December 15, 2015 Page 1 of 1

28 Depth (m) 0 The City of Penticton Method Core Diameter (mm) ASPHALT (80 mm thick) Soil Description SAND (FILL) - some silt, trace gravel, moist, light brown Borehole No: Project: Borehole Geotechnical Services Location: Conklin Avenue Penticton, British Columbia Graphical Representation Sample Type Sample Number Gravel (%) Particle Size Distribution Fines Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%) SCALA PENETROMETER Project No: ENG.KGEO UTM: E; N; Z 11 NAD83 Blow Per 50 mm Penetration Vane (kpa) Post-Peak Peak Plastic Limit Moisture Content Liquid Limit Depth (ft) Solid stem auger 150 B SAND AND SILT, containing organics and rootles, moist, dark brown to black (possibly burried topsoil) B END OF BOREHOLE Target depth reached VANCOUVER CITY OF PENTICTON.GPJ EBA.GDT 1/18/16 Contractor: On The Mark Drilling Rig Type: Truck Mounted Auger Logged By: SK Reviewed By: GM Completion Depth: 2 m Start Date: December 15, 2015 Completion Date: December 15, 2015 Page 1 of 1

29 Depth (m) 0 The City of Penticton Method Core Diameter (mm) ASPHALT (120 mm thick) Soil Description Borehole No: Project: Borehole Geotechnical Services Location: Conklin Avenue Penticton, British Columbia Graphical Representation Sample Type Sample Number Gravel (%) Particle Size Distribution Fines Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%) Field Blowcount (blows/300 mm) SPT Project No: ENG.KGEO UTM: E; N; Z 11 NAD83 Vane (kpa) Post-Peak Peak Plastic Limit Moisture Content Liquid Limit Depth (ft) 0 SAND AND GRAVEL (FILL) - trace silt, occasional, cobbles, dense, damp, brown; fine to coarse sand; rounded to angular gravel 1 S1: 8/21/17/12 recovery - 38 cm S1 2 1 Solid stem auger 150 -loose 3 4 S2: 3/2/6/5 recovery - 25 cm S END OF BOREHOLE Target depth reached VANCOUVER CITY OF PENTICTON.GPJ EBA.GDT 1/18/16 Contractor: On The Mark Drilling Rig Type: Truck Mounted Auger Logged By: SK Reviewed By: GM Completion Depth: 2 m Start Date: December 15, 2015 Completion Date: December 15, 2015 Page 1 of 1

30 Depth (m) 0 The City of Penticton Method Core Diameter (mm) ASPHALT (100 mm thick) Soil Description Borehole No: Project: Borehole Geotechnical Services Location: Douglas Avenue Penticton, British Columbia Graphical Representation Sample Type Sample Number Gravel (%) Particle Size Distribution Fines Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%) Field Blowcount (blows/300 mm) SPT Project No: ENG.KGEO UTM: E; N; Z 11 NAD83 Vane (kpa) Post-Peak Peak Plastic Limit Moisture Content Liquid Limit Depth (ft) 0 SAND AND GRAVEL (FILL) - trace silt, compact, damp, brown; subrounded to angular gravel; fine to medium grained sand 1 S1: 12/7/7/5 recovery - 38 cm S1 2 1 Solid stem auger 150 SAND - some silt, trace gravel, loose, moist, reddish brown 3 4 S2: 4/3/3/4 S2 5 B1 6 2 END OF BOREHOLE Target depth reached VANCOUVER CITY OF PENTICTON.GPJ EBA.GDT 1/18/16 Contractor: On The Mark Drilling Rig Type: Truck Mounted Auger Logged By: SK Reviewed By: GM Completion Depth: 2 m Start Date: December 15, 2015 Completion Date: December 15, 2015 Page 1 of 1

31 Depth (m) 0 The City of Penticton Method Core Diameter (mm) ASPHALT (100 mm thick) Soil Description Borehole No: Project: Borehole Geotechnical Services Location: Douglas Avenue Penticton, British Columbia Graphical Representation Sample Type Sample Number Gravel (%) Particle Size Distribution Fines Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%) Field Blowcount (blows/300 mm) SPT Project No: ENG.KGEO UTM: E; N; Z 11 NAD83 Vane (kpa) Post-Peak Peak Plastic Limit Moisture Content Liquid Limit Depth (ft) 0 SAND (FILL) - some gravel, some silt, compact, moist, brown 1 S1: 5/8/4/4 recovery - 23 cm S1 2 1 Solid stem auger 150 SAND - trace silt, loose, damp, reddish brown B1 6 2 END OF BOREHOLE Target depth reached VANCOUVER CITY OF PENTICTON.GPJ EBA.GDT 1/18/16 Contractor: On The Mark Drilling Rig Type: Truck Mounted Auger Logged By: SK Reviewed By: GM Completion Depth: 2 m Start Date: December 15, 2015 Completion Date: December 15, 2015 Page 1 of 1

32 Depth (m) 0 The City of Penticton Method Core Diameter (mm) ASPHALT (100 mm thick) Soil Description Borehole No: Project: Borehole Geotechnical Services Location: Douglas Avenue Penticton, British Columbia Graphical Representation Sample Type Sample Number Gravel (%) Particle Size Distribution Fines Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%) Field Blowcount (blows/300 mm) SPT Project No: ENG.KGEO UTM: E; N; Z 11 NAD83 Vane (kpa) Post-Peak Peak Plastic Limit Moisture Content Liquid Limit Depth (ft) 0 SAND AND SILT - trace gravel, trace organics and rootlets, loose, moist, brown 1 S1: 5/4/5/4 recovery - 40 cm S Solid stem auger 150 -trace silt, damp 3 4 S2: 2/3/3/3 recovery - 26 cm S2 5 B1 6 2 END OF BOREHOLE Target depth reached VANCOUVER CITY OF PENTICTON.GPJ EBA.GDT 1/18/16 Contractor: On The Mark Drilling Rig Type: Truck Mounted Auger Logged By: SK Reviewed By: GM Completion Depth: 2 m Start Date: December 15, 2015 Completion Date: December 15, 2015 Page 1 of 1

33 Depth (m) 0 The City of Penticton Method Core Diameter (mm) ASPHALT (150 mm thick) Soil Description Borehole No: Project: Borehole Geotechnical Services Location: Douglas Avenue Penticton, British Columbia Graphical Representation Sample Type Sample Number Gravel (%) Particle Size Distribution Fines Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%) Field Blowcount (blows/300 mm) SPT Project No: ENG.KGEO UTM: E; N; Z 11 NAD83 Vane (kpa) Post-Peak Peak Plastic Limit Moisture Content Liquid Limit Depth (ft) 0 SAND (FILL) - silty, trace gravel, trace organics, loose, moist, brown 1 S1: 3/5/4/4 recovery - 42 cm S1 2 1 Solid stem auger 150 S2: 2/2/3/2 recovery - 32 cm S B1 6 2 END OF BOREHOLE Target depth reached VANCOUVER CITY OF PENTICTON.GPJ EBA.GDT 1/18/16 Contractor: On The Mark Drilling Rig Type: Truck Mounted Auger Logged By: SK Reviewed By: GM Completion Depth: 2 m Start Date: December 15, 2015 Completion Date: December 15, 2015 Page 1 of 1

34 Depth (m) 0 The City of Penticton Method Core Diameter (mm) ASPHALT (150 mm thick) Soil Description Borehole No: Project: Borehole Geotechnical Services Location: Douglas Avenue Penticton, British Columbia Graphical Representation Sample Type Sample Number Gravel (%) Particle Size Distribution Fines Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%) Field Blowcount (blows/300 mm) SPT Project No: ENG.KGEO UTM: E; N; Z 11 NAD83 Vane (kpa) Post-Peak Peak Plastic Limit Moisture Content Liquid Limit Depth (ft) 0 SAND (FILL) - some silt, trace gravel, compact, moist, brown; fine to medium grained Solid stem auger 150 S1: 12/9/11/7 recovery - 41 cm S1 3 trace silt, very loose, damp, light brown (thin layers of organic soil 1.2 m to 2.0 m) 4 S2: 3/2/1/2 S END OF BOREHOLE Target depth reached VANCOUVER CITY OF PENTICTON.GPJ EBA.GDT 1/18/16 Contractor: On The Mark Drilling Rig Type: Truck Mounted Auger Logged By: SK Reviewed By: GM Completion Depth: 2 m Start Date: December 15, 2015 Completion Date: December 15, 2015 Page 1 of 1

35 Depth (m) 0 The City of Penticton Method Core Diameter (mm) ASPHALT (100 mm thick) Soil Description Borehole No: Project: Borehole Geotechnical Services Location: Douglas Avenue Penticton, British Columbia Graphical Representation Sample Type Sample Number Gravel (%) Particle Size Distribution Fines Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%) Field Blowcount (blows/300 mm) SPT Project No: ENG.KGEO UTM: E; N; Z 11 NAD83 Vane (kpa) Post-Peak Peak Plastic Limit Moisture Content Liquid Limit Depth (ft) 0 SAND (FILL) - some silt, trace gravel, loose, moist, brown; fine grained 1 S1: 8/6/3/2 recovery - 35 cm S1 2 1 Solid stem auger 150 -silty, trace rootlets, very loose 3 4 S2: 1/1/2/2 recovery - 40 cm S2 5 B1 6 2 END OF BOREHOLE Target depth reached VANCOUVER CITY OF PENTICTON.GPJ EBA.GDT 1/18/16 Contractor: On The Mark Drilling Rig Type: Truck Mounted Auger Logged By: SK Reviewed By: GM Completion Depth: 2 m Start Date: December 15, 2015 Completion Date: December 15, 2015 Page 1 of 1

36 Depth (m) 0 The City of Penticton Method Core Diameter (mm) ASPHALT (130 mm thick) Soil Description Borehole No: Project: Borehole Geotechnical Services Location: Douglas Avenue Penticton, British Columbia Graphical Representation Sample Type Sample Number Gravel (%) Particle Size Distribution Fines Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%) Field Blowcount (blows/300 mm) SPT Project No: ENG.KGEO UTM: E; N; Z 11 NAD83 Vane (kpa) Post-Peak Peak Plastic Limit Moisture Content Liquid Limit Depth (ft) 0 SAND (FILL) - trace gravel, trace silt, compact, light brown 1 S1: 10/10/8/7 recovery - 40 cm S1 2 1 Solid stem auger 150 B1 3 4 S2: 4/3/3/2 recovery - 42 cm S2 5 SAND - silty, trace clay, trace organics, loose, moist, brown (possibly burried topsoil) B2 6 2 END OF BOREHOLE Target depth reached VANCOUVER CITY OF PENTICTON.GPJ EBA.GDT 1/18/16 Contractor: On The Mark Drilling Rig Type: Truck Mounted Auger Logged By: SK Reviewed By: GM Completion Depth: 2 m Start Date: December 15, 2015 Completion Date: December 15, 2015 Page 1 of 1

37 Depth (m) 0 The City of Penticton Method Core Diameter (mm) ASPHALT (200 mm thick) Soil Description Borehole No: Project: Borehole Geotechnical Services Location: Skaha Lake Road Penticton, British Columbia Graphical Representation Sample Type Sample Number Gravel (%) Particle Size Distribution Fines Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%) Field Blowcount (blows/300 mm) SPT Project No: ENG.KGEO UTM: E; N; Z 11 NAD83 Vane (kpa) Post-Peak Peak Plastic Limit Moisture Content Liquid Limit Depth (ft) 0 SAND (FILL) - some gravel, trace silt, compact, damp, brown; angular to subangular gravel; medium grained sand 1 S1: 10/11/7/7 recovery 30 cm S trace gravel, moist B loose 5 2 Solid stem auger 150 S2:2/4/4/4 recovery 34 cm SAND - trace silt, loose, wet, grey; medium to coarse grained Groundwater Encountered S B trace gravel 10 S3: 4/4/4/4 S END OF BOREHOLE Target depth reached B VANCOUVER CITY OF PENTICTON.GPJ EBA.GDT 1/18/16 Contractor: On The Mark Drilling Rig Type: Truck Mounted Auger Logged By: SK Reviewed By: GM Completion Depth: 4 m Start Date: December 16, 2015 Completion Date: December 16, 2015 Page 1 of 1 16

38 Depth (m) 0 The City of Penticton Method Core Diameter (mm) ASPHALT (200 mm thick) Soil Description Borehole No: Project: Borehole Geotechnical Services Location: Skaha Lake Road Penticton, British Columbia Graphical Representation Sample Type Sample Number Gravel (%) Particle Size Distribution Fines Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%) Field Blowcount (blows/300 mm) SPT Project No: ENG.KGEO UTM: E; N; Z 11 NAD83 Vane (kpa) Post-Peak Peak Plastic Limit Moisture Content Liquid Limit Depth (ft) 0 SAND AND GRAVEL (FILL) - trace silt, dense, damp, brown; fine to medium grained sand; subrounded to angular gravel S1: 25/42/34/25 recovery - 22 cm S B1 4 SAND - trace gravel, trace silt, loose, reddish brown; medium grained 5 2 Solid stem auger 150 S2: 3/5/4/3 recovery - 23 cm Groundwater Encountered S brown to grey 8 -grey B compact 10 S3: 2/7/8/8 S END OF BOREHOLE Target depth reached B VANCOUVER CITY OF PENTICTON.GPJ EBA.GDT 1/18/16 Contractor: On The Mark Drilling Rig Type: Truck Mounted Auger Logged By: SK Reviewed By: GM Completion Depth: 4 m Start Date: December 16, 2015 Completion Date: December 16, 2015 Page 1 of 1 16

39 Depth (m) 0 The City of Penticton Method Core Diameter (mm) ASPHALT (200 mm thick) Soil Description Borehole No: Project: Borehole Geotechnical Services Location: Skaha Lake Road Penticton, British Columbia Graphical Representation Sample Type Sample Number Gravel (%) Particle Size Distribution Fines Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%) Field Blowcount (blows/300 mm) SPT Project No: ENG.KGEO UTM: E; N; Z 11 NAD83 Vane (kpa) Post-Peak Peak Plastic Limit Moisture Content Liquid Limit Depth (ft) 0 SAND (FILL) - some gravel, some silt, compact, damp, brown *petroleum/hydrocarbon odour present* 1 S1: 9/17/6/5 recovery - 24 cm S1 2 1 SAND (FILL) - silty, trace clay, trace gravel, trace organics, loose, moist, dark brown to grey -orgnic layers (approximately 50 mm-100 mm thick) present from 1.0 m to 1.9 m B Solid stem auger 150 S2: 1/2/3/2 recovery - 20 cm SAND - trace silt, trace gravel, trace organics, wet, grey; medium grained Groundwater Encountered S B S3: 1/2/4/4 recovery - 10 cm S END OF BOREHOLE Target depth reached B VANCOUVER CITY OF PENTICTON.GPJ EBA.GDT 1/18/16 Contractor: On The Mark Drilling Rig Type: Truck Mounted Auger Logged By: SK Reviewed By: GM Completion Depth: 4 m Start Date: December 16, 2015 Completion Date: December 16, 2015 Page 1 of 1 16

40 Depth (m) 0 The City of Penticton Method Core Diameter (mm) ASPHALT (180 mm thick) Soil Description Borehole No: Project: Borehole Geotechnical Services Location: Skaha Lake Road Penticton, British Columbia Graphical Representation Sample Type Sample Number Gravel (%) Particle Size Distribution Fines Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%) Field Blowcount (blows/300 mm) SPT Project No: ENG.KGEO UTM: E; N; Z 11 NAD83 Vane (kpa) Post-Peak Peak Plastic Limit Moisture Content Liquid Limit Depth (ft) 0 SAND AND GRAVEL (FILL) - trace silt, compact, damp, dark brown; angular gravel; fine to medium grained sand *petroleum/hydrocarbon odour present* S1: 4/17/11/7 recovery - 26 cm S1 3 4 B1 -very loose 5 2 Solid stem auger 150 S2: 1/1/1/3 recovery - 10 cm SAND - trace silt, trace gravel, trace organics, wet, grey; medium grained Groundwater Encountered S B compact 10 S3: 3/5/7/9 recovery - 41 cm S END OF BOREHOLE Target depth reached B VANCOUVER CITY OF PENTICTON.GPJ EBA.GDT 1/18/16 Contractor: On The Mark Drilling Rig Type: Truck Mounted Auger Logged By: SK Reviewed By: GM Completion Depth: 4 m Start Date: December 16, 2015 Completion Date: December 16, 2015 Page 1 of 1 16

41 Depth (m) 0 The City of Penticton Method Core Diameter (mm) ASPHALT (200 mm thick) Soil Description Borehole No: Project: Borehole Geotechnical Services Location: Skaha Lake Road Penticton, British Columbia Graphical Representation Sample Type Sample Number Gravel (%) Particle Size Distribution Fines Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%) Field Blowcount (blows/300 mm) SPT Project No: ENG.KGEO UTM: E; N; Z 11 NAD83 Vane (kpa) Post-Peak Peak Plastic Limit Moisture Content Liquid Limit Depth (ft) 0 SAND (FILL) - silty, some gravel, trace organics, occasional cobbles, dense (possibly due to cobbles/gravel), moist, grey; angular to subangular gravel; fine to coarse grained sand S B1 3 ORGANIC LAYER (burried topsoil) - silt, clayey, some sand, moist, dark brown SAND - trace silt, trace gravel, loose, moist, brown; medium grained Solid stem auger 150 S trace organics and wood debris, wet, grey Groundwater Encountered B compact 10 S END OF BOREHOLE Target depth reached B VANCOUVER CITY OF PENTICTON.GPJ EBA.GDT 1/18/16 Contractor: On The Mark Drilling Rig Type: Truck Mounted Auger Logged By: SK Reviewed By: GM Completion Depth: 4 m Start Date: December 16, 2015 Completion Date: December 16, 2015 Page 1 of 1 16

42 Depth (m) 0 The City of Penticton Method Core Diameter (mm) ASPHALT (100 mm thick) Soil Description SAND AND GRAVEL (FILL) - some silt, trace organics, compact to dense, damp, brown Borehole No: Project: Borehole Geotechnical Services Location: Main Street Penticton, British Columbia Graphical Representation Sample Type Sample Number Gravel (%) Particle Size Distribution Fines Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%) Project No: ENG.KGEO NAD83 Field Blowcount (blows/300 mm) SPT Vane (kpa) Post-Peak Peak Plastic Limit Moisture Content Liquid Limit Depth (ft) 0 1 -layer of burried topsoil/organics (200 mm thick) S1 2 1 SAND - silty, trace gravel, trace organics, very loose, wet, grey 3 Solid stem auger 150 B1 S Groundwater Encountered 7 8 B2 9 3 END OF BOREHOLE Target depth reached VANCOUVER CITY OF PENTICTON.GPJ EBA.GDT 1/18/16 Contractor: On The Mark Drilling Rig Type: Truck Mounted Auger Logged By: SK Reviewed By: GM Completion Depth: 3 m Start Date: January 6, 2016 Completion Date: January 6, 2016 Page 1 of 1 13

43 Depth (m) 0 The City of Penticton Method Core Diameter (mm) Soil Description ASPHALT/GRAVEL (50 mm thick) SAND (FILL) - silty, some gravel, trace organics, loose, moist, grey -petroleum/hydrocarbon odour present SILT - sandy, trace gravel, trace to some organics, very soft, moist to wet, grey -petroleum/hydrocarbon odour present Borehole No: Project: Borehole Geotechnical Services Location: Lot NW of City Hall Penticton, British Columbia Graphical Representation Sample Type Sample Number S1 Gravel (%) Particle Size Distribution Fines Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%) Project No: ENG.KGEO NAD83 Field Blowcount (blows/300 mm) SPT Vane (kpa) Post-Peak Peak Plastic Limit Moisture Content Liquid Limit Depth (ft) Solid stem auger 150 B1 S B2 3 SAND - trace silt, wet, grey; medium grained Groundwater Encountered END OF BOREHOLE Target depth reached VANCOUVER CITY OF PENTICTON.GPJ EBA.GDT 1/18/16 Contractor: On The Mark Drilling Rig Type: Truck Mounted Auger Logged By: SK Reviewed By: GM Completion Depth: 3 m Start Date: January 6, 2016 Completion Date: January 6, 2016 Page 1 of 1 13

44 Depth (m) 0 The City of Penticton Method Core Diameter (mm) Solid stem auger 150 ASPHALT (100mm thick) Borehole No: Project: Borehole Geotechnical Services Location: Main Street Penticton, British Columbia Soil Description SAND (FILL) - gravelly, trace silt, dense, damp, brown; angular to subangular gravel; fine to medium grained sand -SPT refusal at 0.2m (no penetration, no smaple recovery) -concrete encountered at.25 m. Does not appear to be debris. Possibly unknown utility (absent from all utility drawings) END OF BOREHOLE Refusal on concrete Graphical Representation Gravel (%) Project No: ENG.KGEO NAD83 Particle Size Distribution Fines Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%) Vane (kpa) Post-Peak Peak Plastic Limit Moisture Content Liquid Limit Depth (ft) VANCOUVER CITY OF PENTICTON.GPJ EBA.GDT 1/18/16 Contractor: On The Mark Drilling Rig Type: Truck Mounted Auger Logged By: SK Reviewed By: GM Completion Depth: 0.3 m Start Date: January 6, 2016 Completion Date: January 6, 2016 Page 1 of 1 13

45 Depth (m) 0 The City of Penticton Method Core Diameter (mm) ASPHALT (110 mm thick) Soil Description SAND (FILL) - gravelly, trace silt, dense, damp, brown; angular to subangular gravel; fine to medium grained sand Borehole No: Project: Borehole Geotechnical Services Location: Main Street Penticton, British Columbia Graphical Representation Sample Type Sample Number Gravel (%) Particle Size Distribution Fines Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%) Project No: ENG.KGEO NAD83 Field Blowcount (blows/300 mm) SPT Vane (kpa) Post-Peak Peak Plastic Limit Moisture Content Liquid Limit Depth (ft) 0 1 S B1 4 Solid stem auger 150 SAND - silty, trace gravel, trace organics, compact, moist, brown to grey 5 S moist to wet 8 B2 Groundwater Encountered 9 3 END OF BOREHOLE Target depth reached VANCOUVER CITY OF PENTICTON.GPJ EBA.GDT 1/18/16 Contractor: On The Mark Drilling Rig Type: Truck Mounted Auger Logged By: SK Reviewed By: GM Completion Depth: 3 m Start Date: January 6, 2016 Completion Date: January 6, 2016 Page 1 of 1 13

46 Depth (m) 0 The City of Penticton Method Core Diameter (mm) ASPHALT (100 mm thick) Soil Description SAND AND GRAVEL (FILL) - some silt, dense, damp, brown; angular to subangular gravel; fine to medium grained sand Borehole No: Project: Borehole Geotechnical Services Location: Main Street Penticton, British Columbia Graphical Representation Sample Type Sample Number Gravel (%) Particle Size Distribution Fines Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%) Project No: ENG.KGEO NAD83 Field Blowcount (blows/300 mm) SPT Vane (kpa) Post-Peak Peak Plastic Limit Moisture Content Liquid Limit Depth (ft) 0 1 S SAND - trace to some silt, loose, damp, brown; fine to medium grained 3 Solid stem auger 150 -traces of organics B1 4 5 S wet, grey Groundwater Encountered END OF BOREHOLE Target depth reached B VANCOUVER CITY OF PENTICTON.GPJ EBA.GDT 1/18/16 Contractor: On The Mark Drilling Rig Type: Truck Mounted Auger Logged By: SK Reviewed By: GM Completion Depth: 3 m Start Date: January 6, 2016 Completion Date: January 6, 2016 Page 1 of 1 13

47 Depth (m) 0 The City of Penticton Method Core Diameter (mm) ASPHALT (90 mm thick) Soil Description SAND (FILL) - some silt, some gravel, compact, damp, brown to reddish brown; rounded to subrounded gravel; fine to medium grained sand -concrete debris 0.09 m to 0.75 m (SPT refusal at 0.09 m due to concrete debris) Borehole No: Project: Borehole Geotechnical Services Location: Main Street Penticton, British Columbia Graphical Representation Sample Type Sample Number B1 Gravel (%) Particle Size Distribution Fines Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%) Project No: ENG.KGEO NAD83 Field Blowcount (blows/300 mm) SPT Vane (kpa) Post-Peak Peak Plastic Limit Moisture Content Liquid Limit Depth (ft) S1 3 4 Solid stem auger 150 SAND - trace gravel, trace silt, damp, reddish brown -some silt, moist, light brown B2 5 S traces of organics 8 B3 9 3 END OF BOREHOLE Target depth reached VANCOUVER CITY OF PENTICTON.GPJ EBA.GDT 1/18/16 Contractor: On The Mark Drilling Rig Type: Truck Mounted Auger Logged By: SK Reviewed By: GM Completion Depth: 3 m Start Date: January 6, 2016 Completion Date: January 6, 2016 Page 1 of 1 13

48 Depth (m) 0 The City of Penticton Method Core Diameter (mm) ASPHALT (110 mm thick) Soil Description SAND AND GRAVEL (FILL) - some silt, trace organics, compact to dense, damp, brown Borehole No: Project: Borehole Geotechnical Services Location: Main Street Penticton, British Columbia Graphical Representation Sample Type Sample Number Gravel (%) Particle Size Distribution Fines Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%) Project No: ENG.KGEO NAD83 Field Blowcount (blows/300 mm) SPT Vane (kpa) Post-Peak Peak Plastic Limit Moisture Content Liquid Limit Depth (ft) 0 1 S layer of burried topsoil/organics (100 mm thick) SAND - some to trace silt, trace gravel, very loose, moist, reddish brown; fine grained 3 B Solid stem auger 150 -layer of organics and wood debris, silty, dark brown 5 S2 6 2 SAND - some silt, grey, wet, 7 Groundwater Encountered B END OF BOREHOLE Target depth reached VANCOUVER CITY OF PENTICTON.GPJ EBA.GDT 1/18/16 Contractor: On The Mark Drilling Rig Type: Truck Mounted Auger Logged By: SK Reviewed By: GM Completion Depth: 3 m Start Date: January 6, 2016 Completion Date: January 6, 2016 Page 1 of 1 13

49 BOREHOLE GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES FILE: ENG.KGEO JANUARY 25, 2016 ISSUED FOR USE APPENDIX C LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Penticton Borehole Geotechnical Services.docx

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 107 MAIN STREET AND THE INTERSECTION OF SKAHA LAKE ROAD AND YORKTON AVENUE PENTICTON, BC PRESENTED TO The City of Penticton JUNE, 2016 ISSUED FOR REVIEW FILE: ENG.KGEO This Issued for Review document is provided solely for the purpose of client review and presents our interim findings and recommendations to date. Our usable findings and recommendations are provided only through an Issued for Use document, which will be issued subsequent to this review. Final design should not be undertaken based on the interim recommendations made herein. Once our report is issued for use, the Issued for Review document should be either returned to Tetra Tech EBA or destroyed. Tetra Tech EBA Inc Dickson Avenue Kelowna, BC V1Y 9G6 CANADA Tel Fax

62 This page intentionally left blank. ESA Report - Penticton, BC.docx

63 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT FILE: ENG.KGEO JUNE, 2016 ISSUED FOR REVIEW EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Tetra Tech EBA Inc. (Tetra Tech EBA) was retained by the City of Penticton (the City) to conduct an Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of two sites (herein collectively referred to as the Property ) as follows: Property No. 1: Outdoor Parking Lot at 107 Main Street, Penticton, BC Property No. 2: The intersection of Skaha Lake Road and Yorkton Avenue, Penticton, BC To facilitate discussion of the area of potential environmental concern (APEC) for each Property, Tetra Tech EBA assigned a number for each APEC as follows: APEC #1: Outdoor Parking Lot 107 Main Street, Penticton, BC and associated potential contaminants of concern (PCOCs) included: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs); Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbon (VPH); Light/Heavy Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (LEPH / HEPH); Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs); and Metals. APEC #2: Intersection of Skaha Lake Road and Yorkton Avenue, Penticton, BC and associated PCOCs included: Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and Xylenes (BTEX); VPH; LEPH / HEPH; PAHs; and Lead. The ESA consisted of a drilling investigation and the installation of groundwater monitoring wells. A total of five boreholes were advanced, all of which were completed as groundwater monitoring wells. i ESA Report - Penticton, BC.docx

64 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT FILE: ENG.KGEO JUNE, 2016 ISSUED FOR REVIEW Environmental Site Assessment Findings APEC # Soil Groundwater APEC 1 Outdoor Parking Lot 107 Main Street, Penticton, BC APEC 2 Intersection of Skaha Lake Road and Yorkton Avenue, Penticton, BC No exceedances in soil greater than the CSR CL and IL standards were observed in 16MW01, 16MW02, and 16MW03. Soil samples assessed meet the CSR CL and IL standards in 16MW04 and 16MW05 Notes: APEC - Area of Potential Environmental Concern CSR BC Contaminated Sites Regulation standards protective of soil, and groundwater CSR AW CSR standards protective of freshwater aquatic life CSR DW CSR standards protective of drinking water CL Commercial Land use IL Industrial Land use Recommendations In 16MW01, vinyl chloride concentration of 9.4 µg/l exceeded the CSR DW standard of 2 µg/l. In 16MW02, benzo(a)pyrene concentration of µg/l exceeded the CSR DW standard of 0.01 µg/l, and concentrations of trichloroethene (98 µg/l), tetrachloroethene (57 µg/l), and vinyl chloride (5.5 µg/l) exceeded the CSR DW standards of 5 µg/l, 30 µg/l, and 2 µg/l, respectively. In 16MW03, benzo(a)pyrene concentrations of µg/l exceeded the CSR DW standard of 0.01 µg/l, and concentrations of trichloroethene (136 µg/l) and tetrachloroethene (98.6 µg/l) exceeded the CSR DW standards of 5 µg/l and 30 µg/l, respectively. No exceedances of the CSR AW standards and the City of Penticton Irrigation, Sewer and Water Bylaw Schedule C Restricted Wastes were observed in groundwater samples collected from this APEC. In 16MW04, benzo(a)pyrene concentration of µg/l marginally exceeded the CSR DW standard of 0.01 µg/l. However, concentration of benzo(a)pyrene in 16MW04 met the CSR AW standard of 0.1 µg/l and the City of Penticton Irrigation, Sewer and Water Bylaw Schedule C Restricted Wastes of 50,000 µg/l. No groundwater exceedances were found in 16MW05. No exceedances of the CSR AW standards and the City of Penticton Irrigation, Sewer and Water Bylaw Schedule C Restricted Wastes were observed in groundwater samples collected from this APEC. Based on the analytical test results, the soil quality at the discrete borehole locations was not classified as contaminated soil nor hazardous waste soil. Therefore, during the utilities upgrade construction, excavated soil can be disposed of at Campbell Mountain Landfill as clean cover material, if needed. Although the above noted groundwater monitoring well locations contained groundwater quality that exceeded the CSR DW standards, the identified groundwater exceedances met the CSR AW standards and the City of Penticton Irrigation, Sewer and Water Bylaw Schedule C Restricted Wastes. Therefore, if dewatering is necessary during the utilities upgrade construction, Tetra Tech EBA recommends that groundwater generated from dewatering operation be discharged into the City of Penticton sanitary sewer network system. ii ESA Report - Penticton, BC.docx

65 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT FILE: ENG.KGEO JUNE, 2016 ISSUED FOR REVIEW TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... i 1.0 INTRODUCTION General Background Objective Authorization Qualifications of Assessors PROPERTY DESCRIPTION SCOPE OF SERVICES ESA METHODOLOGY Sampling Locations Borehole Drilling and Soil Sampling Groundwater Monitoring Well Installation and Development Groundwater Sampling Analytical Testing Survey Quality Assurance/Quality Control ESA RESULTS Soil Stratigraphy Hydrogeology ASSESSMENT STANDARDS Soil Assessment Standards CSR Groundwater Assessment Standards ANALYTICAL TEST RESULTS Soil and Groundwater Laboratory Results APEC 1: Outdoor Parking Lot, 107 Main Street, Penticton, BC APEC 2: Intersection of Skaha Lake Road and Yorkton Avenue, Penticton, BC Quality Assurance/Quality Control Results and Discussion CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS APEC 1 Outdoor Parking Lot, 107 Main Street, Penticton, BC APEC 2 Intersection of Skaha Lake Road and Yorkton Avenue, Penticton, BC CLOSURE... 5 REFERENCES... 6 iii ESA Report - Penticton, BC.docx

66 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT FILE: ENG.KGEO JUNE, 2016 ISSUED FOR REVIEW LIST OF TABLES IN TEXT Table 4.1: ESA Sampling Locations... 5 Table 4.2: ESA Analytical Testing... 7 Table 7.1: Groundwater Analytical Results for APEC Table 7.2: Groundwater Analytical Results for APEC APPENDIX SECTIONS TABLES Table 1 Table 2a Table 2b Table 2c Table 3a Table 3b Table 3c Table 4 Table 5 Monitoring Well Installation Details and Groundwater Monitoring Data Soil Analytical Results Hydrocarbons Soil Analytical Results Metals Soil Analytical Results Volatile Organic Compounds Groundwater Analytical Results Hydrocarbons Groundwater Analytical Results Dissolved Metals Groundwater Analytical Results Volatile Organic Compounds Soil Quality Assurance/Quality Control Analytical Results Groundwater Quality Assurance/Quality Control Analytical Results FIGURES Figure 1 Site Plan APEC 1 Outdoor Parking Lot, 107 Main Street, Penticton, BC Figure 2 Site Plan APEC 2 Intersection of Skaha Lake Road and Yorkton Avenue, Penticton, BC Figure 3 Groundwater Elevation Contour (April 26, 2016) APEC 1 Outdoor Parking Lot, 107 Main Street, Penticton, BC Figure 4 Groundwater Elevation Contour (April 26, 2016) APEC 2 Intersection of Skaha Lake Road and Yorkton Avenue, Penticton, BC APPENDICES Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Tetra Tech EBA s General Conditions Borehole Logs ALS Environmental Laboratory Certificate QA/QC Program Summary iv ESA Report - Penticton, BC.docx

67 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT FILE: ENG.KGEO JUNE, 2016 ISSUED FOR REVIEW ACRONYMS & ABBREVIATIONS APEC AW BTEXS CALA CL COC CSR CWS DW EMA ESA HEPH IL LEPH mbc mbgs MoE PAH PCOC PHC PVC QA/QC QMS RDL ROW RL RPD VH VOC VPH Area of Potential Environmental Concern Standards/Guidelines Protective of Aquatic Life Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Xylene, Styrene Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Commercial Land Use Contaminant of Concern British Columbia Contaminated Sites Regulation Canada-Wide Standard Standards / Guidelines Protective of Drinking Water Environmental Management Act Environmental Site Assessment Heavy Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons Industrial Land Use Light Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons metres below casing metres below ground surface British Columbia Ministry of Environment Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Potential Contaminant of Concern Petroleum Hydrocarbon Fractions Polyvinyl Chloride Quality Assurance/Quality Control Quality Management System Laboratory Reported Detection Limit Right of Way Residential Land Use Relative Percentage Difference Volatile Hydrocarbons Volatile Organic Compounds Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons v ESA Report - Penticton, BC.docx

68 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT FILE: ENG.KGEO JUNE, 2016 ISSUED FOR REVIEW LIMITATIONS OF REPORT This report and its contents are intended for the sole use of the City of Penticton and their agents. Tetra Tech EBA Inc. (Tetra Tech EBA) does not accept any responsibility for the accuracy of any of the data, the analysis, or the recommendations contained or referenced in the report when the report is used or relied upon by any Party other than the City of Penticton or for any Project other than the proposed development at the subject site. Any such unauthorized use of this report is at the sole risk of the user. Use of this report is subject to the terms and conditions stated in Tetra Tech EBA s Services Agreement. Tetra Tech EBA s General Conditions are provided in Appendix A of this report. vi ESA Report - Penticton, BC.docx

69 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT FILE: ENG.KGEO JUNE, 2016 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 General Tetra Tech EBA Inc. (Tetra Tech EBA) was retained by the City of Penticton (the City) to conduct an Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of two sites (herein collectively referred to as the Property ) as follows: Property No. 1: Outdoor Parking Lot at 107 Main Street, Penticton, BC Property No. 2: Intersection of Skaha Lake Road and Yorkton Avenue, Penticton, BC Site Plans showing each Property are attached as Figure 1 and Background Tetra Tech EBA completed a geotechnical subsurface exploration on Properties No. 1 and No. 2 on December 16, The primary focus of the geotechnical investigation was to obtain the necessary information to provide current road structure and recommendations for subsurface/road base and sub-base upgrades and drainage improvements for each road investigated. To facilitate discussion of each area of potential environmental concern (APEC) for each Property, Tetra Tech EBA assigned a number for each APEC as discussed in the following subsections: APEC #1: Outdoor Parking Lot 107 Main Street, Penticton, BC In January 2016, one geotechnical borehole (BH16-02) was located on the western portion of the parking lot. Olfactory evidence of hydrocarbons was encountered during the drilling of BH Tetra Tech EBA requested the City of Penticton to provide any available environmental reports pertaining to the vicinity of Property No. 1 in their possession. Following the request, the City of Penticton provided an environmental report as follows: Environmental Site Assessment & Preliminary Drilling Investigation, Star Cleaners Facility, 100 Block, Martin Street, Penticton, BC, prepared for Whiteway Linen Services Ltd., dated July 19, 1993 by Morrow Environmental Consultants Inc. The 1993 environmental report covered 100 Block of Martin Street, however, the report did not include any figures showing the actual investigated site locations. The 1993 report identified potential contaminants of concern (PCOCs) on the 100 Block, Martin Street which was considered to be in the close proximity of the 107 Main Street site. The identified PCOCs included: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs); Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbon (VPH); Light / Heavy Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (LEPH / HEPH); Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs); and Metals. 1 ESA Report - Penticton, BC.docx

70 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT FILE: ENG.KGEO JUNE, 2016 ISSUED FOR REVIEW APEC #2: Intersection of Skaha Lake Road and Yorkton Avenue, Penticton, BC In December 2015, two geotechnical boreholes (BH15-22 and BH15-23) that were drilled close to the intersection of Skaha Lake Road and Yorkton Avenue encountered olfactory evidence of hydrocarbons. Given the proximity of a former gas station which was located at the northeast corner of the above noted intersection, the PCOCs included the following: Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and Xylenes (BTEX); Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE); VPH; LEPH / HEPH; PAHs; and Lead. 1.3 Objective The objective of the ESA is to assess the soil and groundwater chemistry at the APECs in relation to the PCOCs as discussed in Section 1.2. The primary focus of this ESA is to assess soil and groundwater quality in the right-ofway (ROW) and in the outdoor parking lot site to facilitate the future utilities upgrade construction and to determine the degree of soil contamination for the purposes of off-site disposal, if any. 1.4 Authorization Mr. Tyler Figgitt of the City of Penticton provided Tetra Tech EBA with written consulting agreement to proceed with the ESA on April 20, Qualifications of Assessors Mr. Chris Chu, P.Eng. Field Engineer and Report Author: Mr. Chu conducted and managed this ESA project including field investigation work and preparation of this report. Mr. Chu has 20 years of experience in conducting and managing Stage 1 and 2 preliminary site investigations (PSIs), detailed site investigation, and Phase I and II ESAs. Mr. Don Williams, P.Eng., CSAP Senior Review: Mr. Williams is a Senior Engineer with over 24 years of experience in conducting the investigation and remediation of contaminated sites and overall environmental management. As a Member of the Contaminated Sites Approved Professional Society, Mr. Williams has been involved in the detailed review of all stages of environmental reports and has completed sixteen recommendations to the Ministry of Environment (MoE) to issue legal instruments for various sites in British Columbia. 2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The general description and approximate global position of the Property is provided below. APEC #1: Outdoor Parking Lot 107 Main Street, Penticton, BC APEC #1 is located at 107 Main Street, Penticton, BC. The western portion of the APEC #1 is currently used as an outdoor parking area whereas the eastern portion is currently a park. The land is bordered on the north by Gyro 2 ESA Report - Penticton, BC.docx

71 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT FILE: ENG.KGEO JUNE, 2016 ISSUED FOR REVIEW Park, on the east by Main Street, on the south by the City Hall, and on the west by Martin Street. The approximate global position of the centre of this part of the APEC #1 is: Latitude: 49 30' 4.72" N Longitude: ' 39.88" W APEC #2: Intersection of Skaha Lake Road and Yorkton Avenue, Penticton, BC APEC #2 is a road alignment located at the intersection of Skaha Lake Road and Yorkton Avenue in Penticton, BC. The land is bordered on the north by the Skaha Lake Road right-of-way (ROW), on the east by a new retail complex (i.e., 3480 Skaha Lake Road), on the south by the road intersection of Skaha Lake Road and Yorkton Avenue, and on the west by an Empire Motel (i.e., 255 Yorkton Avenue). The approximate global position of the centre of this part of the APEC #2 is: Latitude: 49 27' 24.7" N Longitude: ' 14.39" W 3.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES The scope of services for the ESA included the following tasks: Preparing a Tetra Tech EBA safe work form that was implemented during the ESA site works; Retaining an independent utilities contractor to survey the site for underground utilities prior to the intrusive field investigation; Retaining a traffic control company to control the road traffic during the field investigation near the road intersection; For APEC #1 Outdoor Parking Lot, advancing three boreholes and completed all boreholes as groundwater monitoring wells. All three boreholes/monitoring wells were located immediately adjacent to the existing easement where the current utilities trench alignment is to be upgraded. Boreholes were advanced to a maximum depth of approximately 3.96 m below ground surface. Monitoring wells were installed to depths ranging from 2.88 m to 3.2 m below ground surface; For APEC #2 the Skaha Lake Road and Yorkton Avenue Intersection, advancing two boreholes at the immediate adjacent locations of geotechnical boreholes BH15-22 and BH15-23 on the north bound lane of the Skaha Lake Road passing lane and completed both boreholes as groundwater monitoring wells. Boreholes were advanced to a maximum depth of approximately 4.27 m below ground surface. Monitoring wells were installed to depths ranging from 2.96 m to 3.1 m below ground surface; Logging soil stratigraphy from each boring location and collecting soil samples at regular intervals of depth or when there was a change in material type or color; Marking the location of each borehole and monitoring well sample using a smart phone GPS app and performing a vertical survey of monitoring wells relative to a local datum; Monitoring headspace hydrocarbon vapours and observing the potential presence of free-phase liquid in the groundwater monitoring wells; 3 ESA Report - Penticton, BC.docx

72 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT FILE: ENG.KGEO JUNE, 2016 ISSUED FOR REVIEW Developing the monitoring wells using a whale pump. Completing field measurements of electrical conductivity, ph, and temperature of groundwater during developing, purging, and sampling at each monitoring well location; Collecting groundwater samples from the monitoring well locations using dedicated bailers; Submitting selected soil and groundwater samples to a qualified analytical laboratory (ALS Environmental) for analysis of PCOCs as discussed in Section 1.2; Tabulating analytical results with comparison to applicable standards outlined in the British Columbia Contaminated Sites Regulation (CSR) and Schedule C Restricted Wastes, the City of Penticton Irrigation, Sewer and Water Bylaw ; Estimating the groundwater flow directions and gradients from the groundwater elevation and water level measurements; and Preparing an ESA report which documents the field investigation and analysis methods, the observed soil and groundwater conditions at the site, the analytical results, and presenting the findings and conclusions from the investigation. 4.0 ESA METHODOLOGY The ESA consisted of a drilling investigation and installation of groundwater monitoring wells. A total of five boreholes were advanced, all of which were completed as groundwater monitoring wells. The boreholes were drilled using a track-mounted drill rig provided by On-The-Mark Drilling and Coring of West Kelowna, BC. Soil and groundwater sampling programs were included to assess the soil and groundwater conditions. Tetra Tech EBA s representative, Mr. Chris Chu, P.Eng., monitored the drilling investigations and groundwater monitoring well installation, logged the soils encountered, and collected soil and groundwater samples for laboratory analysis. 4.1 Project Safety A SWF was completed prior to the initiation of all fieldwork and applicable safe work procedures were reviewed. The SWFs were reviewed by a Tetra Tech EBA personnel and the drilling contractor. At that time, emergency shutoffs on contractor equipment were identified, site conditions were discussed, and a safe meeting location was chosen. Prior to the field drilling, Tetra Tech EBA obtained a City of Penticton Construction Road Closure Permit for drilling at APEC #2 Skaha Lake Road ROW. A traffic control contractor was retained to set up barricades and provided on-site traffic control and detouring. 4.2 Sampling Locations Table 4.1 describes which ESA sampling locations were used to investigate each APEC and the rationale for the placement of each. 4 ESA Report - Penticton, BC.docx

73 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT FILE: ENG.KGEO JUNE, 2016 ISSUED FOR REVIEW Table 4.1: ESA Sampling Locations APEC 1 APEC 2 APECs Outdoor Parking Lot 107 Main Street Skaha Lake Road and Yorkton Avenue intersection Borehole/Monitoring Well Locations and Rationale Advancing three boreholes (16MW01, 16MW02, and 16MW03) and completed all boreholes as groundwater monitoring wells. All three boreholes/monitoring wells were located immediately adjacent to the existing easement, where the current utilities trench alignment is to be upgraded and in the close proximity of borehole 16-02, where suspected hydrocarbon impacted soil was identified. Monitoring wells were installed to depths ranging from 2.88 m to 3.2 m below ground surface. Advancing two boreholes (16MW04 and 16MW05) and completed all boreholes as groundwater monitoring wells. These monitoring wells were located immediately adjacent to the former boreholes BH15-22 and BH15-23 on the north bound of the Skaha Lake Road passing lane, where suspected hydrocarbon impacted soil was identified. Monitoring wells were installed to depths ranging from 2.96 m to 3.1 m below ground surface. The borehole/monitoring well locations for APEC 1 and APEC 2 are shown on Figures 1 and 2, respectively. 4.3 Borehole Drilling and Soil Sampling On April 25 and 26, 2016, Tetra Tech EBA monitored the advancement of five boreholes (16MW01 through 16MW05) within APECs 1, and 2 using a track-mounted drill rig provided by On-The-Mark Drilling and Coring. Soil at each assessment location was described according to the modified unified soil classification system (USCS) with additional comments on combustible vapour concentrations (CVCs), presence of water-saturated soils, visible staining, and ambient odours, if observed. Borehole logs are included in Appendix B Soil samples were collected directly from the solid stem auger of the drill rig at regular intervals (0.76 m) and/or at changes in lithology or soil staining. The outside of each soil sample collected was trimmed with a metal hand tool to remove smeared or remnant soil and minimize the potential for cross-contamination between discrete sample locations collected from the auger. For personal protection, nitrile gloves were worn when handling soil and were changed regularly to further reduce the potential for cross-contamination of soil samples. Soil samples were screened in the field for CVCs using an RKI Eagle (RKI) portable hydrocarbon detector with readings recorded in parts per million (ppm). Soil samples were placed into plastic bags for field CVC measurements which are depicted on the borehole logs in Appendix B and sterile glass jars with Teflon -lined lids for organic analyses. Soil samples were tightly packed into the jars to help prevent loss of volatile compounds into any headspace. In addition, soil samples for volatile constituents were extracted at each test location using the Terra Core tm sampling method and placed into methanol preserved vials on site as per laboratory instruction. Drill cuttings were collected in two 45-gallon drums and stored at the outdoor parking lot site. All sample jars and vials were stored in a chilled cooler and then transported under chain-of-custody protocol to ALS Environmental (ALS). 5 ESA Report - Penticton, BC.docx

74 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT FILE: ENG.KGEO JUNE, 2016 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 4.4 Groundwater Monitoring Well Installation and Development Monitoring wells were installed in all five boreholes advanced within APEC 1 (16MW01 to 16MW03), and APEC 2 (16MW04 and 16MW05). Well completion details for each monitoring well are shown on the logs in Appendix B and a general description of the installation methodology is provided below. Monitoring wells were constructed of solid 51 mm nominal flush threaded schedule 40 polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe. The slotted interval was comprised of 1.5 m length of machine slotted screen (10 slot or 0.25 mm in width). The borehole annulus was backfilled with silica sand to an elevation of approximately 0.3 m above the slotted interval. Bentonite was placed above the sand-pack to ground surface in the borehole to provide a hydraulic seal. At ground surface, the PVC pipe was set in a flush mounted steel monument that was cemented into place. Monitoring well locations were horizontally surveyed using a smart phone GPS apps. Following well installation, all groundwater monitoring wells were developed using a submersible Whale pump until the groundwater was running clear. 4.5 Groundwater Sampling Due to the road closure permit schedule, all of the installed monitoring wells (16MW01 to 16MW05) were sampled on April 26, Prior to groundwater sampling, Tetra Tech EBA measured the water level in each well. Measured groundwater levels are shown on the attached borehole logs and in Table 1. To sample groundwater, Tetra Tech EBA used a dedicated bailer to purge the well prior to sampling. Groundwater purging continued until at least three consecutive measurements of ph, temperature, electrical conductivity, oxidation-reduction potential, and dissolved oxygen were within 10% of each other. Following purging, Tetra Tech EBA collected groundwater samples using the bailer. Groundwater samples were collected directly from the bailer into clean, labeled, new laboratory-supplied containers. Groundwater samples for metals were field filtered or preserved. The groundwater samples were placed in ice-chilled coolers for temporary storage and transported to ALS using chain-of-custody procedures. 4.6 Analytical Testing ALS is a Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation (CALA) accredited laboratory that is qualified to analyze the samples using British Columbia Ministry of Environment (MoE) approved procedures. Soil, and groundwater samples were analyzed by ALS using MoE approved laboratory methods. Soil samples were selected for laboratory testing of PCOCs based on knowledge of the APECs and field screening (CVC readings) during borehole drilling. Groundwater samples were selected for laboratory analysis based on PCOCs of the APECs. The following table details the parameters analyzed for each APEC during the ESA. 6 ESA Report - Penticton, BC.docx

75 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT FILE: ENG.KGEO JUNE, 2016 ISSUED FOR REVIEW Table 4.2: ESA Analytical Testing APEC Testing Locations Analyzed Parameters APEC 1 (Outdoor Parking Lot) 16MW01, 16MW02, 16MW03 Soil: LEPH, HEPH, PAHs, VOCs, VPH, metals Groundwater :EPHw10-19, LEPHw, HEPHw, PAHs, VOCs, VPHw, VHw, dissolved metals APEC 2 (Skaha Lake Road ROW) 16MW04, 16MW05 Soil : LEPH, HEPH, PAHs, BTEX, VPH, Lead Groundwater : EPHw10-19, LEPHw, HEPHw, PAHs, BTEX, VPHw, VHw, dissolved lead Note: LEPH HEPH EPH PAHs VOCs VPH BTEX Light Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons Heavy Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Volatile Organic Compounds Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Xylenes 4.7 Survey The horizontal locations of the ESA sampling locations were marked using a smart phone GPS apps. The accuracy of the GPS unit is anticipated to be ±3 m. A vertical survey of the all the newly installed monitoring wells at APECs 1 and 2 was also undertaken. The vertical survey was completed with a construction level used to determine the elevation of the monitoring wells relative to an arbitrary site datum set at 100 m by Tetra Tech EBA field staff. The relative elevations of the groundwater well locations used for the ESA are shown on the attached Table 1, along with the datum used. 4.8 Quality Assurance/Quality Control During the ESA, Tetra Tech EBA implemented a Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) program to ensure the integrity of the sampling methodology and analytical testing. The QA/QC program adhered to Tetra Tech EBA s inhouse Quality Management System (QMS), which was designed to generate representative samples, minimize the potential for cross-contamination between sampling locations and samples, and reduce the potential for systematic bias. A summary of the QA/QC program tasks conducted by Tetra Tech EBA and ALS is provided in Appendix C. To assess for analytical accuracy, Tetra Tech EBA submitted duplicate soil and groundwater samples for analytical testing. The duplicate pairs submitted for laboratory testing were as follows: Soil sample 2.28 m (duplicate designated DUP 1) analyzed for VOCs, VPH, LEPH, HEPH, PAH, and metals; and Groundwater sample 16MW04 (duplicate designated DUP 2) analyzed for BTEXS, LEPHw, HEPHw, PAHs, VPHw, and dissolved lead. Tetra Tech EBA formed the duplicate samples by alternately placing approximately 10% of the sample volume into the original sample container and then placing the same amount into the duplicate sample container. Tetra Tech EBA continued placing additional aliquots of approximately 10% of the sample volume into each container until both containers were filled. The RPD calculations are discussed in Section ESA Report - Penticton, BC.docx

76 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT FILE: ENG.KGEO JUNE, 2016 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 5.0 ESA RESULTS 5.1 Soil Stratigraphy A detailed description of the soil stratigraphy encountered at each borehole location is presented on the borehole logs in Appendix B. Field measurements of CVC readings for the duplicated soil samples collected from the boreholes are also presented on the borehole logs. Borehole locations are shown on Figure 1 and 2. A general summary of the soil conditions observed during drilling is provided below. APEC #1: Outdoor Parking Lot 107 Main Street, Penticton, BC The soils encountered during drilling were generally consistent across the Property. Asphalt pavement was present at grade. The thickness of asphalt ranged approximately from 150 mm to 175 mm. Fill material generally consisted of sand and gravel with trace silt was presented beneath the asphalt layer. The thickness of the fill was typically ranging approximately 0.3 m to 0.76 m. In 16MW01, beneath the sand and gravel fill, sandy silt with trace gravel was encountered and present to a maximum advanced depth of 3.96 m. Within the sandy silt horizon, a 1.5 m thick of wood waste was encountered at a depth of 2.1 m. Given the presence of wood waste in 16MW01, this sandy silt horizon is considered to be fill material. In 16MW02 and 16MW03, the thickness of the sandy silt fill was 0.9 m and 0.6 m, respectively. Beneath the sandy silt fill horizon, native fine grained sand was encountered. The native fine grained sand was present to the maximum depth drilled in 16MW02 and 16MW03. Tetra Tech EBA did not encounter olfactory and visual staining of suspected hydrocarbon impact soil during the drilling of 16MW01 to 16MW03. APEC #2: Intersection of Skaha Lake Road and Yorkton Avenue, Penticton, BC Asphalt pavement was present at grade along the Skaha Lake Road ROW. The thickness of asphalt was approximately 100 mm and 175 mm in 16MW04 and 16MW05, respectively. Fill material generally consisted of crushed gravel, some sand and trace silt was presented beneath the asphalt layer. The thickness of the crushed gravel fill was approximately 0.6 m. Beneath the crushed gravel fill, native silt with trace to some sand and trace gravel was encountered. The thickness of the native silt ranged approximately from 0.76 m to 1.1 m. Beneath the native silt horizon, medium grained sand with trace silt was encountered. The native medium grained sand was present to the maximum depth drilled in 16MW04 and 16MW05. During drilling of 16MW04 and 16MW05, slight hydrocarbon odour was noted at a depth of approximately 1.7 m but no hydrocarbon staining was noted. 5.2 Hydrogeology All monitoring wells installed as part of this ESA encountered a shallow sand aquifer. Tetra Tech EBA surveyed the groundwater monitoring wells to an arbitrary benchmark of m and measured the depth to groundwater in all wells to determine groundwater elevations and infer the direction of groundwater flow for each APEC. A minimum of three wells are required to determine the groundwater flow direction, and ideally, the wells should not be located along a straight line. However, due to spatial limitations and the requirement to install two monitoring wells within APEC 2 on the Skaha Lake Road ROW, those monitoring wells (16MW04 and 16MW05) were installed approximately in a straight line which complicates the determination of the direction of groundwater flow for APEC 2. 8 ESA Report - Penticton, BC.docx

77 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT FILE: ENG.KGEO JUNE, 2016 ISSUED FOR REVIEW Based on the data collected on April 26, 2016, the depth to groundwater at APEC #1 ranged from about 1.51 to 1.62 mbgs. The groundwater in the area of APEC 1 was inferred to flow in a northerly direction towards Okanagan Lake. Based on the locations of the monitoring wells in the area of APEC #2, the groundwater flow direction cannot be inferred in this area. Inferred groundwater flow direction is shown on Figure 3 and ASSESSMENT STANDARDS The provincial standards that would be considered applicable to the Property and to potential soil disposal sites are stipulated in the following document: Environmental Management Act (EMA), Contaminated Sites Regulation (CSR), B.C. Reg. 375/96, deposited 1996/12/16, O.C. 1480/96, effective 1997/04/01 [including amendments up to B.C. Reg. 4/2014, effective January 31, 2014]. 6.1 Soil Assessment Standards Generic standards for the assessment and remediation of soils are detailed in CSR Schedules 4 and 10. Generic standards depend solely on land use. In general, APEC 1 is currently zoned for public assembly (P1). This P1 zone provides for governmental and institutional uses including, educational, health and recreational uses, and civic or cultural gatherings. Therefore, the CSR Commercial Land (CL) use standards are applied to APEC 1. APEC 2 is a road right-of-way and based on the CSR roads and highways are classified as industrial land use, therefore the CSR Industrial Land (IL) use standards are applied to APEC 2. Matrix standards for the assessment and remediation of soils are detailed in Schedule 5 of the CSR. Matrix standards are risk-based standards that depend on land use and a number of site-specific factors. For ph-dependent matrix standards, either the most stringent ph or the site median ph was used to select the appropriate standard based on ESA laboratory data. Two site specific factors from Schedule 5 apply to all land uses: intake of contaminated soil and toxicity to soil invertebrates and plants. The following subsections detail the assessment to determine if standards protective of drinking water, aquatic life and irrigation and livestock water apply to the Sites. Site-Specific Standards Protective of Drinking Water MoE document Protocol 21 for Contaminated Sites Water Use Determination (February 2016) (Protocol 21) contains guidance for water use determination at contaminated sites and evaluates current and future water use separately. CSR Protocol 21 indicates that CSR standards protective of drinking water apply to a site if a drinking water supply is currently within 500 m of the site or if the aquifer underlying the site is suitable to supply drinking water based on the aquifer s hydraulic conductivity, yield and water potability. A search of the BC MoE Water Resources Atlas revealed one well within 500 m of each APEC. The well was registered for commercial and industrial and unknown well use. Because a water well was identified within 500 m of each APEC, and due to a lack of hydrogeological data discounting the potential future usage of the aquifer underlying the APECs as a drinking water source, Schedule 5 standards protective of drinking water have been applied. 9 ESA Report - Penticton, BC.docx

78 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT FILE: ENG.KGEO JUNE, 2016 ISSUED FOR REVIEW Site-Specific Standards Protective of Aquatic Life Protocol 21 indicates that CSR standards protective of aquatic life apply to a site if a surface waterbody containing aquatic life is located within 500 m. APEC #1 and APEC #2 are within 500 m of Okanagan Lake and Skaha Lake, respectively. Based on the above information, CSR Schedule 5 standards protective of groundwater flow to surface water used by freshwater aquatic life has been applied to each APEC. Site-Specific Standards Protective of Irrigation and Livestock Water Use Technical Guidance 6 indicates that CSR standards protective of irrigation and livestock watering apply to a site if irrigation or livestock water wells or surface water intakes are located within 500 m. Based on the aerial image from the City of Penticton interactive mapping and BC MoE Water Resources Atlas, no water wells or surface water intakes for irrigational or livestock watering within a 500 m radius of the APECs were identified; therefore, Tetra Tech EBA does not consider standards protective of irrigation and livestock water to be applicable to the Property, at this time. In addition to the above noted standards, for the purpose of soil disposal at an off-site location, Tetra Tech EBA also referenced the CSR Residential Land (RL) use standards and CSR Schedule 7 Standards Triggering Contaminated Soil Relocation Agreements (CSRA). All applicable CSR soil standards are included in Tables 2a, 2b, and 2c. 6.2 CSR Groundwater Assessment Standards As described previously in Section 6.1, Tetra Tech EBA s assessment of groundwater use and surface water receptors in the area indicate that CSR groundwater standards for the protection of drinking water (DW) and for flow to surface water used by freshwater aquatic life (faw) apply to both APECs. The CSR Stage 8 amendments restrict the application of the water standards for iron and manganese to sites with specific activities that used iron and manganese. Therefore, as per the CSR Stage 8 amendments, no water standards for iron and manganese applied to the APECs due to the absence of these on-site specific activities as follows: A6. ink or dye manufacturing or wholesale bulk storage A7. leather or hides tanning A8. paint, lacquer or varnish manufacturing, formulation, recycling or wholesale bulk storage A11. textile dying C1. foundries or scrap metal smelting C2. galvanizing C3. metal plating or finishing C4. metal salvage operations C6. welding or machine shops (repair or fabrication) D2. coal coke manufacture, wholesale bulk storage or shipping D3. coal or lignite mining, milling, wholesale bulk storage or shipping D5. nonferrous metal concentrate wholesale bulk storage or shipping D6. nonferrous metal mining or milling E4. coal gasification (manufactured gas production) 10 ESA Report - Penticton, BC.docx

79 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT FILE: ENG.KGEO JUNE, 2016 ISSUED FOR REVIEW H14. mine tailings waste disposal H11. industrial waste lagoons or impoundments H20. hazardous waste storage, treatment or disposal In addition to the CSR groundwater standards, Tetra Tech EBA also references the City of Penticton Irrigation, Sewer and Water Bylaw Schedule C Restricted Wastes. During the utilities upgrade construction, the groundwater could be pumped and discharged into the City sewer network if the groundwater quality meets the Sewer Bylaw Schedule C standards. All applicable CSR groundwater standards and the City of Penticton Irrigation, Sewer and Water Bylaw Schedule C Restricted Wastes are summarized in Tables 3a, 3b, and 3c. 7.0 ANALYTICAL TEST RESULTS The following report sections summarize the comparison of ESA laboratory results to the applicable CSR standards and Sewer Bylaw standards and the QA/QC program laboratory results. Laboratory testing and field monitoring results are summarized in Tables 2 through 5. Laboratory certificates are attached as Appendix C. 7.1 Soil and Groundwater Laboratory Results APEC 1: Outdoor Parking Lot, 107 Main Street, Penticton, BC Soil Analytical Results Selected soil samples from borehole locations 16MW01, 16MW02, and 16MW03 were analyzed for PCOCs including VOCs, VPH, LEPH, HEPH, PAHs, and metals based on field observations or stratigraphy. Field observations included vapour headspace readings, visible construction and wood debris, discernable odours. The majority of tested soil parameters had concentrations less than the laboratory reported detection limits (RDL). Soil samples with detectable parameters included: 0.76 m: ethylbenzene, xylene, PAHs, Trichloroethene, cis-1,2-dichloroethene were detected; 0.76 m, 2.28 m, 2.28 m, 2.28 m, 2.28 m, 2.28 m: metals were detected. Of the detectable parameters, all tested soil parameters including metals had concentrations less than the CSR RL, CL, IL, and CSRA standards except for the following: Soil sample collected from 0.76 m contained zinc concentration of 151 µg/g slightly exceeded the CSRA standard of 150 µg/g. Full soil analytical results for APEC 1 are presented in Tables 2a, 2b, and 2c. Groundwater Analytical Results The following Table 7.1 summarizes the groundwater analytical results for APEC 1. Groundwater analytical results for APEC 1 can also be found in Tables 3a, 3b, and 3c. 1 ESA Report - Penticton, BC.docx

80 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT FILE: ENG.KGEO JUNE, 2016 ISSUED FOR REVIEW Table 7.1: Groundwater Analytical Results for APEC 1 Monitoring Well ID Location within APEC Analyzed Parameters Analytical Results Concentrations of VPHw, LEPHw, HEPHw, and PAHs less than the CSR AW and DW Standards and the Sewer Bylaw Schedule C. 16MW01 Northern portion of the easement VOCs, VPHw, LEPHw, HEPHw, PAH Majority of VOC parameters were less than the Laboratory RDL except for the following: Detectable concentrations of cis-1,2-dichloroethene (164 µg/l) and trans-1,2-dichloroethene (4.1 µg/l) below the CSR DW standards of 370 µg/l and 730 µg/l, respectively. No CSR AW and Bylaw standards exist for the above noted parameters. Concentration of Vinyl Chloride (9.4 µg/l) exceeded the CSR DW standard of 2 µg/l; however, no CSR AW and Bylaw standards exist for Vinyl Chloride. Concentrations of VPHw, LEPHw, and HEPHw less than the CSR AW and DW Standards and the Sewer Bylaw Schedule C. 16MW02 Central portion of the easement VOCs, VPHw, LEPHw, HEPHw, PAH, dissolved metals Majority of VOC and PAH parameters were less than the Laboratory RDL except for the following: Concentration of Benzo(a)pyrene (0.013 µg/l) exceeded the CSR DW standard of 0.01 µg/l but below the CSR AW of 0.1 µg/l and the Bylaw standards 50,000 µg/l. Concentrations of Trichloroethene (98 µg/l), Tetrachloroethene (57 µg/l), and Vinyl Chloride (5.5 µg/l) exceeded the CSR DW standards of 5 µg/l, 30 µg/l, and 2 µg/l, respectively. However, no CSR AW and Bylaw standards exist for the above noted parameters. Dissolved metals concentrations met the CSR AW and DW Standards and the Sewer Bylaw Schedule C. Concentrations of VPHw, LEPHw, and HEPHw less than the CSR AW and DW Standards and the Sewer Bylaw Schedule C. 16MW03 Southern portion of the easement VOCs, VPHw, LEPHw, HEPHw, PAH Majority of VOC and PAH parameters were less than the Laboratory RDL except for the following: Concentrations of Benzo(a)pyrene (0.013 µg/l) exceeded the CSR DW standard of 0.01 µg/l but below the CSR AW of 0.1 µg/l and the Bylaw standards 50,000 µg/l. Concentrations of Trichloroethene (136 µg/l) and Tetrachloroethene (98.6 µg/l) exceeded the CSR DW standards of 5 µg/l and 30 µg/l, respectively APEC 2: Intersection of Skaha Lake Road and Yorkton Avenue, Penticton, BC Soil Analytical Results Two boreholes completed as monitoring wells (16MW04 and 16MW05) were advanced at APEC 2. Selected soil samples from each location were analyzed for PCOCs including BTEX, MTBE, VPH, LEPH, HEPH, PAHs and Lead based on field observations or stratigraphy. Field observations included vapour headspace readings, visible construction and wood debris, discernable odours. 1 ESA Report - Penticton, BC.docx

81 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT FILE: ENG.KGEO JUNE, 2016 ISSUED FOR REVIEW The majority of tested soil parameters had concentrations less than the laboratory reported detection limits (RDL). Soil sample with detectable parameters included: 2.28 m: benzene, ethylbenzene, xylene 2.28 m, and 2.28 m: lead was detected. Of the detectable parameters, all tested soil parameters including metals had concentrations less than the CSR RL, CL, IL, and CSRA standards. Full soil analytical results for APEC 2 are presented in Tables 2a, 2b, and 2c. Groundwater Analytical Results Two monitoring wells (16MW04 and 16MW05) were installed within APEC 2. The following Table 7.2 summarizes the groundwater analytical results for APEC 2. Groundwater analytical results for APEC 2 can also be found in Tables 3a, 3b, and 3c. Table 7.2: Groundwater Analytical Results for APEC 2 Monitoring Well ID Location within APEC Analyzed Parameters Analytical Results 16MW04 Northern portion of the ROW BTEXS, VPHw, LEPHw, HEPHw, PAH, dissolved metals Concentrations of BTEXS, VPHw, LEPHw, and HEPHw less than the CSR AW and DW Standards and the Sewer Bylaw Schedule C. Majority of PAH parameters were less than the Laboratory RDL except for the following: Concentrations of Benzo(a)pyrene (0.011 µg/l) marginally exceeded the CSR DW standard of 0.01 µg/l but was below the CSR AW of 0.1 µg/l and the Bylaw standards 50,000 µg/l. Dissolved lead was less the laboratory RDL 16MW05 Southern portion of the ROW BTEXS, VPHw, LEPHw, HEPHw, PAH, dissolved metals Concentrations of BTEXS, VPHw, LEPHw, and HEPHw less than the CSR AW and DW Standards and the Sewer Bylaw Schedule C. PAH parameters and dissolved lead were less than the Laboratory RDL. 7.2 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Results and Discussion Tetra Tech EBA compared the relative per cent differences (RPD) between soil, groundwater and duplicate sample pairs as part of the QA/QC program. The calculated RPD values are presented in Tables 4 (soil) and 5 (groundwater). During the ESA, the reliability of laboratory analyses is assessed by calculating the RPD values for duplicate pairs when the result of each analysis was greater than a multiple of five of the RDL. Elevated analytical variability is common when analyte concentrations are within a factor of five of the RDL. The screening thresholds were applied as stated in Appendix D. 2 ESA Report - Penticton, BC.docx

82 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT FILE: ENG.KGEO JUNE, 2016 ISSUED FOR REVIEW Where calculable, all the relative percent difference (RPD) values were less than the RPD discussion trigger with the exception of five analyses: Uranium at 2.28 m (DUP 1) had RPD value of 61.6% respectively. The thresholds for discussion are 45% for uranium. The QAQC report included in the laboratory Certificate of Analysis only covers VOC analyses and may not be applicable to the metals analyses. However, the lab QAQC report indicates surrogate recovery levels of 80.5% to 85.1% for this sample, which is below the optimal range of 90% to 100%. We note that metal concentrations are highly variable within soil matrix. All other calculable RPDs were within acceptable levels. The duplicate results from 2.28 m (DUP 1) may suggest that the analytical results from this sample may be compromised. However, because the remainder of the duplicates were within acceptable levels, the higher RPDs in the above samples may be caused by localized variability in metals concentrations. For the purposes of this report, Tetra Tech EBA considered the analyses to be representative of the soil and groundwater samples obtained from the APECs. 8.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8.1 APEC 1 Outdoor Parking Lot, 107 Main Street, Penticton, BC Although slight detectable concentrations of ethylbenzene, xylene, PAHs, Trichloroethene, and cis-1,2- dichloroethene were found in the soil sample 0.76 m, the detectable concentrations of these parameters were below the applicable CSR RL, CL, IL, and CSRA standards. All other tested soil parameters including metals had concentrations less than the CSR RL, CL, IL, and CSRA standards except for zinc concentration. Soil sample collected from 0.76 m contained zinc concentration of 151 µg/g slightly exceeded the CSRA standard of 150 µg/g. Based on the analytical test results, the soil quality at the discrete borehole locations was not classified as contaminated soil nor hazardous waste soil. Therefore, during the utilities upgrade construction, excavated soil could be disposed of at Campbell Mountain landfill as clean cover material, if needed. Groundwater exceedances were identified as follows: In 16MW01, vinyl chloride concentration of 9.4 µg/l exceeded the CSR DW standard of 2 µg/l. In 16MW02, benzo(a)pyrene concentration of µg/l exceeded the CSR DW standard of 0.01 µg/l, and concentrations of trichloroethene (98 µg/l), tetrachloroethene (57 µg/l), and vinyl chloride (5.5 µg/l) exceeded the CSR DW standards of 5 µg/l, 30 µg/l, and 2 µg/l, respectively. In 16MW03, benzo(a)pyrene concentrations of µg/l exceeded the CSR DW standard of 0.01 µg/l, and concentrations of trichloroethene (136 µg/l) and tetrachloroethene (98.6 µg/l) exceeded the CSR DW standards of 5 µg/l and 30 µg/l, respectively. Although the above noted groundwater monitoring well locations contained groundwater quality that exceeded the CSR DW standards, the identified groundwater exceedances met the CSR AW standards and the City of Penticton Irrigation, Sewer and Water Bylaw Schedule C Restricted Wastes. 3 ESA Report - Penticton, BC.docx

83 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT FILE: ENG.KGEO JUNE, 2016 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 8.2 APEC 2 Intersection of Skaha Lake Road and Yorkton Avenue, Penticton, BC Soil parameters tested for BTEX, VPH, VH, LEPH, HEPH, and PAHs met the CSR RL, CL, IL, and CSRA standards. Therefore, no hydrocarbon exceedances were identified in soil in APEC 2 during this investigation. During the utilities upgrade construction, excavated soil can be disposed of at Campbell Mountain landfill as clean cover material, if needed. Based on the results of the groundwater analyses including BTEXS, VPHw, LEPHw, HEPHw, and PAH, the groundwater exceedence included the followings: In 16MW04, benzo(a)pyrene concentration of µg/l marginally exceeded the CSR DW standard of 0.01 µg/l. However, concentration of benzo(a)pyrene in 16MW04 met the CSR AW standard of 0.1 µg/l and the City of Penticton Irrigation, Sewer and Water Bylaw Schedule C Restricted Wastes of 50,000 µg/l. 4 ESA Report - Penticton, BC.docx

84 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT FILE: ENG.KGEO JUNE, 2016 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 9.0 CLOSURE This report has been prepared based on the scope of work and for the use of The City of Penticton, which includes distribution as required for the purposes for which this assessment was commissioned. The assessment has been carried out in accordance with generally accepted engineering practice. No other warranty is made, either express or implied. Professional judgment has been applied in developing the recommendations in this report. This report was prepared by personnel with professional experience in investigations of this nature and who specifically conducted the investigations at these Properties. Reference should be made to the Geoenvironmental Report General Conditions attached in Appendix A that forms a part of this report. We trust this report meets your present requirements. If you have any questions or comments, please contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, Tetra Tech EBA Inc. ISSUED FOR REVIEW ISSUED FOR REVIEW Prepared by: Reviewed by: Chris Chu, P.Eng. Don Williams, P.Eng. Project Engineer Senior Project Engineer Environment Practice Environment Practice Direct Line: Direct Line: Don.Williams@tetratech.com 5 ESA Report - Penticton, BC.docx

85 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT FILE: ENG.KGEO JUNE, 2016 ISSUED FOR REVIEW REFERENCES MoE, Contaminated Sites Regulation, BC Reg. 375/96, including amendments up to January 31, MoE, Technical Guidance 6 on Contaminated Properties - Applying Water Quality Standards to Groundwater and Surface Water. Morrow Environmental Consultants Inc., July 19, Environmental Site Assessment & Preliminary Drilling Investigation, Star Cleaners Facility, 100 Block, Martin Street, Penticton, BC. 6 ESA Report - Penticton, BC.docx

86 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT FILE: ENG.KGEO JUNE, 2016 ISSUED FOR REVIEW TABLES Table 1 Table 2a Table 2b Table 2c Table 3a Table 3b Table 3c Table 4 Table 5 Monitoring Well Installation Details and Groundwater Monitoring Data Soil Analytical Results Hydrocarbons Soil Analytical Results Metals Soil Analytical Results Volatile Organic Compounds Groundwater Analytical Results Hydrocarbons Groundwater Analytical Results Dissolved Metals Groundwater Analytical Results Volatile Organic Compounds Soil Quality Assurance/Quality Control Analytical Results Groundwater Quality Assurance/Quality Control Analytical Results ESA Report - Penticton, BC.docx

87 FILE: ENG.KGEO MAY 2016 ISSUED FOR USE Table 1: Monitoring Well Installation Details and Groundwater Monitoring Data APEC Monitoring Well ID Ground Elevation (m) Top of Casing Elevation (m) Monitoring Well Depth (mbc) 1 Monitoring Well Screen Interval (mbg) 2 PVC Casing Stick-Up (mbg) Depth to Groundwater (mbc) Groundwater Elevation (m) Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) April 26, 2016 EC (us/cm) ph Temp. ( o C) APEC #1 Outdoor Parking Lot Main Street, Penticton, BC APEC #2: Intersection of Skaha Lake Road and Yorkton Avenue, Penticton, BC 16MW to MW to MW to MW to MW to Notes: 1 mbc: meters below casing. 2 mbg: meters below ground surface. - DO, EC, ph, and Temp. measurements recorded at the time of sampling using a YSI 6820 Multi Parameter Sonde 2.85". - For APEC 1, elevation are relative to an on-site temporary benchmark (i.e., southwest bolts on the base of light pole located near central of the parking lot) with an assigned elevation of 100 m. - For APEC 2, elevation are relative to an on-site temporary benchmark (i.e., a nail at the base of hydro pole located on the north bound Skaha Lake Road sidewalk near Yorkton Avenue) with an assigned elevation of 100 m. ENG.KGEO Soil and GW Analytical Tables.xlsm

88 FILE: ENG.KGEO MAY 2016 ISSUED FOR USE Table 2a: Soil Analytical Results - Hydrocarbons Parameter Unit CSR - RL CSR - CL CSR - IL CSR Schedule 7 16 MW02 DUP1 16 MW03 16 MW04 16 MW m (2.5') 2.28 m (7.5') 2.28 m (7.5') m (7.5') 2.28 m (7.5') 2.28 m (7.5') 25-Apr Apr Apr Apr Apr Apr Apr-2016 Physical Parameters Moisture % BTEXS & MTBE Benzene µg/g 0.04 # # # < < < < < < Toluene µg/g 1.5 #1 2.5 #1 2.5 #1 1.5 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Ethylbenzene µg/g 1 #1 7 #1 7 # <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 < <0.015 Xylenes (m & p) µg/g <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 < <0.050 Xylene (o) µg/g <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Xylenes Total µg/g 5 #1 20 #1 20 # <0.075 <0.075 <0.075 < <0.075 Styrene µg/g <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 MTBE µg/g 320 #2 700 #2 700 #2 - <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 Hydrocarbons EPH µg/g <200 <200 <200 <200 <200 <200 <200 EPH µg/g <200 <200 <200 <200 <200 <200 <200 LEPH µg/g <200 <200 <200 <200 <200 <200 <200 HEPH µg/g <200 <200 <200 <200 <200 <200 <200 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) 2-methylnaphthalene µg/g <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Acenaphthene µg/g <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Acenaphthylene µg/g <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Anthracene µg/g <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Benz(a)anthracene µg/g <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Benzo(a)pyrene ug/g 1 #1 10 #1 10 # <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Benzo(b)fluoranthene µg/g <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene µg/g <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Benzo(k)fluoranthene µg/g <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Chrysene µg/g <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene µg/g <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Fluoranthene µg/g <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Fluorene µg/g <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene µg/g <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Naphthalene µg/g <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Phenanthrene µg/g <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Pyrene µg/g <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Laboratory Identification Number L L L L L L L MW01 NOTES: #1 CSR Schedule 5 substance. #2 CSR Schedule 10 Substance. - Not analyzed or no CSR standard exists. < Concentration is less than the laboratory detection limit indicated. EPHs Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons. LEPHs/HEPHs Light and Heavy EPHs. CSR BC Contaminated Sites Regulation (BC Reg. 375/96, includes amendments up to B.C. Reg. 4/ January 31, Schedules 4, 5, 7 and 10). RL Residential Land Standards CL Commercial Land Standards IL Industrial Land Standards CSR Schedule 7 Standards Triggering Contaminated Soil Relocation Agreements (Soil Relocation to Nonagricultural Land) Site specific factors include: - Intake of contaminated soil. - Toxicity to soil invertebrates and plants. - Groundwater used for drinking water. - Groundwater flow to surface water used by freshwater aquatic life. Most stringent applicable site specific factor is shown. Bold Bold and shaded indicates an exceedance of the CSR Standard ENG.KGEO Soil and GW Analytical Tables.xlsm

89 FILE: ENG.KGEO MAY 2016 ISSUED FOR REVIEW Table 2b: Soil Analytical Results -Metals 16 MW01 16 MW02 DUP1 16 MW03 16 MW04 16 MW05 Parameter Unit CSR - RL CSR - CL CSR - IL CSR Schedule m (2.5') 2.28 m (7.5') 2.28 m (7.5') m (7.5') 2.28 m (7.5') 2.28 m (7.5') 25-Apr Apr Apr Apr Apr Apr Apr-2016 Physical Parameters ph ph Units Metals Antimony µg/g <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 < Arsenic µg/g 15 #1 15 #1 15 # Barium µg/g 400 #1 400 #1 400 # Beryllium µg/g <0.10 <0.10 < Cadmium µg/g 1.5 #1,2 1.5 #1,2 1.5 #1, <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 < Chromium µg/g 60 #1 60 #1 60 # Cobalt µg/g Copper µg/g 150 #1,2 250 #1,2 250 #1, Lead µg/g 250 #1,2 250 #1,2 250 #1, Mercury µg/g 15 #1 40 #1 150 # <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 < Molybdenum µg/g < Nickel µg/g Selenium µg/g <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 < Silver µg/g <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 < Thallium µg/g <0.050 <0.050 < Tin µg/g <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 < Uranium µg/g 16 #3 200 #3 200 # Vanadium µg/g Zinc µg/g 300 #1,2 300 #1,2 300 #1, Laboratory Identification Number L L L L L L L NOTES: #1 CSR Schedule 5 substance. #2 Standard ph Dependent. Values shown based on the most stringent ph of #3 CSR Schedule 10 Substance. - Not analyzed or no CSR standard exists. < Concentration is less than the laboratory detection limit indicated. CSR BC Contaminated Sites Regulation (BC Reg. 375/96, includes amendments up to B.C. Reg. 4/ January 31, Schedules 4, 5, 7 and 10). RL Residential Land Standards CL Commercial Land Standards IL Industrial Land Standards CSR Schedule 7 Standards Triggering Contaminated Soil Relocation Agreements (Soil Relocation to Nonagricultural Land) Site specific soil factors include: - Intake of contaminated soil. - Toxicity to soil invertebrates and plants. - Groundwater used for drinking water. - Groundwater flow to surface water used by freshwater aquatic life. Most stringent applicable site specific factor is shown. Bold Bold and shaded indicates an exceedance of the CSR Standard ENG.KGEO Soil and GW Analytical Tables.xlsm

90 Table 2c: Soil Analytical Results -Volatile Organic Compounds FILE: ENG.KGEO MAY 2016 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 16 MW01 16 MW02 DUP1 16 MW03 16 MW04 16 MW05 Parameter Unit CSR - RL CSR - CL CSR - IL CSR Schedule m (2.5') 2.28 m (7.5') 2.28 m (7.5') m (7.5') 2.28 m (7.5') 2.28 m (7.5') 25-Apr Apr Apr Apr Apr Apr Apr-2016 Physical Parameters Moisture % Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) VH 6-10 µg/g <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 VPH 6-10 µg/g <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane µg/g 32 #2 73 #2 73 #2 - <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 < ,1,1-trichloroethane µg/g <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 < ,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane µg/g 4.1 #2 9.3 #2 9.3 #2 5 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 < ,1,2-trichloroethane µg/g <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 < ,1-dichloroethane µg/g <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 < ,1-dichloroethene µg/g <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 < ,2-dichlorobenzene µg/g <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 < ,2-dichloroethane µg/g <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 < ,2-dichloropropane µg/g <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 < ,3-dichlorobenzene µg/g <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 < ,4-dichlorobenzene µg/g <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 < Bromodichloromethane µg/g 8.2 #2 18 #2 18 #2 - <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 < Bromoform µg/g 620 # # #2 - <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 < Carbon tetrachloride µg/g <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 < Chlorobenzene µg/g <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 < Dibromochloromethane µg/g 11 #2 26 #2 26 #2 - <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 < Chloroethane µg/g 30 #2 65 #2 65 #2 - <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 < Chloroform µg/g <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 < Chloromethane µg/g 47 #2 160 #2 160 #2 - <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 < cis-1,2-dichloroethene µg/g 0.1 #2 50 #2 50 # <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 < cis-1,3-dichloropropene µg/g <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 < Dichloromethane µg/g <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 < Trichloroethene µg/g # # # <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 < Tetrachloroethene µg/g 5 #1 5 #1 5 #2 5 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 < trans-1,2-dichloroethene µg/g 0.1 #2 50 #2 50 #2 - <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 < trans-1,3-dichloropropene µg/g <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 < Trichlorofluoromethane µg/g 390 # # #2 - <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 < Vinyl chloride µg/g 0.79 #2 7.5 #2 7.5 #2 - <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 < Laboratory Identification Number L L L L L L L Notes: #1 CSR Schedule 5 substance. #2 CSR Schedule 10 Substance. - Not analyzed or no CSR standard exists. < Concentration is less than the laboratory detection limit indicated. VPH Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbon CSR BC Contaminated Sites Regulation (BC Reg. 375/96, includes amendments up to B.C. Reg. 4/ January 31, Schedules 4, 5, 7 and 10). RL Residential Land Standards CL Commercial Land Standards IL Industrial Land Standards CSR Schedule 7 Standards Triggering Contaminated Soil Relocation Agreements (Soil Relocation to Nonagricultural Land) Site specific soil factors include: - Intake of contaminated soil. - Toxicity to soil invertebrates and plants. - Groundwater used for drinking water. - Groundwater flow to surface water used by freshwater aquatic life. Most stringent applicable site specific factor is shown. Bold Bold and shaded indicates an exceedance of the CSR Standard ENG.KGEO Soil and GW Analytical Tables.xlsm

91 FILE: ENG.KGEO MAY 2016 ISSUED FOR REVIEW Table 3a: Groundwater Analytical Results - Hydrocarbons Parameter Unit Bylaw MW01 16 MW02 16 MW03 16 MW04 DUP #2 16 MW05 CSR - AW (Fresh) CSR - DW Schedule C 26-Apr Apr Apr Apr Apr Apr-2016 BTEXS & MTBE Benzene µg/l <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 Toluene µg/l #1 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 Ethylbenzene µg/l #1 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 Xylenes (m & p) µg/l <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 Xylene (o) µg/l <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 Xylenes Total µg/l #1 <0.75 <0.75 <0.75 <0.75 <0.75 <0.75 Styrene µg/l <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 MTBE µg/l - 34, <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 Hydrocarbons EPH µg/l 50, <250 <250 <250 <250 <250 <250 EPH µg/l 50, <250 <250 <250 <250 <250 <250 LEPH µg/l 50, <250 <250 <250 <250 <250 <250 HEPH µg/l 50, <250 <250 <250 <250 <250 <250 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) Acenaphthene µg/l 50, <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Acenaphthylene µg/l 50, <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Acridine µg/l 50, <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Anthracene µg/l 50, <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Benz(a)anthracene µg/l 50, <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Benzo(a)pyrene µg/l 50, < <0.010 Benzo(b)fluoranthene µg/l 50, <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene µg/l 50, <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Benzo(k)fluoranthene µg/l 50, <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Chrysene µg/l 50, <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene µg/l 50, <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Fluoranthene µg/l 50, <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Fluorene µg/l 50, <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene µg/l 50, <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Naphthalene µg/l 50, <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.080 <0.050 Phenanthrene µg/l 50, <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Pyrene µg/l 50, <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Quinoline µg/l 50, <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.080 <0.20 <0.050 Laboratory Identification Number L L L L L L NOTES: #1 Standard to protect against taste and odour concerns. EPHw Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Water LEPH/HEPH Light/Heavy Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons - Not analyzed or no CSR standard exists. < Concentration is less than the laboratory detection limit indicated. Bylaw Schedule C The Corporation of the City of Penticton (April 2005). Irrigation, Sewer and Water Bylaw No , Schedule C Restricted Wastes for Grab bag samples CSR BC Contaminated Sites Regulation (BC Reg. 375/96, includes amendments up to B.C. Reg. 4/ January 31, Schedule 6). AW Freshwater Aquatic Life Standards DW Drinking Water Standards Bold Bold and shaded indicates an exceedance of the CSR Standard ENG.KGEO Soil and GW Analytical Tables.xlsm

92 FILE: ENG.KGEO MAY 2016 ISSUED FOR REVIEW Table 3b: Groundwater Analytical Results - Metals Parameter Unit Bylaw Schedule C CSR - AW (Fresh) 16 MW02 16 MW04 16 MW05 26-Apr Apr Apr-2016 Physical Parameters Hardness as CaCO 3 mg/l Dissolved Metals Aluminum µg/l 200, < Antimony µg/l < Arsenic µg/l < Barium µg/l - 10, Beryllium µg/l < Boron µg/l 200,000 50, Cadmium µg/l #1 5 < Calcium µg/l , Chromium µg/l 13, #2 50 < Cobalt µg/l 20, Copper µg/l # #3 < Iron µg/l 40, # Lead µg/l #1 10 <1.0 <50 <50 Lithium µg/l #4 < Magnesium µg/l ,000 #3 24, Manganese µg/l 20, # Mercury µg/l < Molybdenum µg/l , < Nickel µg/l #1 - < Selenium µg/l < Silver µg/l #1 - < Sodium µg/l ,000 #3 175, Thallium µg/l < Titanium µg/l < Uranium µg/l Vanadium µg/l < Zinc µg/l 12, # #3 < Laboratory Identification Number L L L NOTES: #1 Standard varies with hardness. Values shown based on site hardness value of 338 mg/l. #2 Standard is for Chromium VI. #3 Standard to protect against taste and odour concerns. #4 CSR Schedule 10 Substance. #5 Stage 8 Amendment of the CSR applies. - Not analyzed or no CSR standard exists. < Concentration is less than the laboratory detection limit indicated. Bylaw Schedule C The Corporation of the City of Penticton (April 2005). Irrigation, Sewer and Water Bylaw No , Schedule C Restricted Wastes for Grab bag samples CSR - DW CSR AW DW Bold BC Contaminated Sites Regulation (BC Reg. 375/96, includes amendments up to B.C. Reg. 4/ January 31, Schedules 6 and 10). Freshwater Aquatic Life Standards Drinking Water Standards Bold and shaded indicates an exceedance of the CSR DW Standard ENG.KGEO Soil and GW Analytical Tables.xlsm

93 FILE: ENG.KGEO MAY 2016 ISSUED FOR REVIEW Table 3c: Groundwater Analytical Results - Volatile Organic Compounds Parameter Unit Bylaw MW01 16 MW02 16 MW03 16 MW04 DUP #2 16 MW05 CSR - AW (Fresh) CSR - DW Schedule C 26-Apr Apr Apr Apr Apr Apr-2016 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) VH 6-10 µg/l 50,000 15,000 15,000 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 VPH 6-10 µg/l 50, <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane µg/l #1 <1.0 <1.0 < ,1,1-trichloroethane µg/l ,000 #1 <1.0 <1.0 < ,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane µg/l #1 <1.0 <1.0 < ,1,2-trichloroethane µg/l #1 <1.0 <1.0 < ,1-dichloroethane µg/l #1 <1.0 <1.0 < ,1-dichloroethene µg/l <1.0 < ,2-dichlorobenzene µg/l #2 <0.70 <0.70 < ,2-dichloroethane µg/l <1.0 <1.0 < ,2-dichloropropane µg/l #1 <1.0 <1.0 < ,3-dichlorobenzene µg/l <1.0 <1.0 < ,3-Dichloropropene µg/l #1 <1.4 <1.4 < ,4-dichlorobenzene µg/l #2 <1.0 <1.0 < Bromodichloromethane µg/l <1.0 <1.0 < Bromoform µg/l <1.0 <1.0 < Carbon tetrachloride µg/l <0.50 <0.50 < Chlorobenzene µg/l #2 <1.0 <1.0 < Dibromochloromethane µg/l <1.0 <1.0 < Chloroethane µg/l #1 <1.0 <1.0 < Chloroform µg/l <1.0 <1.0 < Chloromethane µg/l #1 <5.0 <5.0 < cis-1,2-dichloroethene µg/l # cis-1,3-dichloropropene µg/l <1.0 <1.0 < Dichloromethane µg/l <5.0 <5.0 < Trichloroethene µg/l < Tetrachloroethene µg/l < trans-1,2-dichloroethene µg/l # trans-1,3-dichloropropene µg/l <1.0 <1.0 < Trichlorofluoromethane µg/l ,000 #1 <1.0 <1.0 < Vinyl chloride µg/l < Laboratory Identification Number L L L L L L NOTES: #1 CSR Schedule 10 Substance. #2 Standard to protect against taste and odour concerns. - Not analyzed or no CSR standard exists. < Concentration is less than the laboratory detection limit indicated. VPH Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbon Bylaw Schedule C The Corporation of the City of Penticton (April 2005). Irrigation, Sewer and Water Bylaw No , Schedule C Restricted Wastes for Grab bag samples CSR BC Contaminated Sites Regulation (BC Reg. 375/96, includes amendments up to B.C. Reg. 4/ January 31, Schedules 6 and 10). AW Freshwater Aquatic Life Standards DW Drinking Water Use Bold Bold and shaded indicates an exceedance of the CSR Standard ENG.KGEO Soil and GW Analytical Tables.xlsm

94 FILE: ENG.KGEO MAY 2016 ISSUED FOR REVIEW Table 4: Soil Quality Assurance/Quality Control Analytical Results 16 MW02 DUP1 Parameter Unit RDL 2.28 m (7.5') - RPD (%) 25-Apr-2016 Physical Parameters ph ph Units Moisture % Metals Antimony µg/g 0.1 <0.10 < Arsenic µg/g Barium µg/g Beryllium µg/g 0.1 <0.10 < Cadmium µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < Chromium µg/g Cobalt µg/g Copper µg/g Lead µg/g Mercury µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < Molybdenum µg/g Nickel µg/g Selenium µg/g 0.2 <0.20 < Silver µg/g 0.1 <0.10 < Thallium µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < Tin µg/g 2 <2.0 <2.0 - Uranium µg/g Vanadium µg/g Zinc µg/g BTEXS & MTBE Benzene µg/g < < Toluene µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < Ethylbenzene µg/g 0.01 <0.015 < Xylenes (m & p) µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < Xylene (o) µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < Xylenes Total µg/g 0.07 <0.075 < Styrene µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < MTBE µg/g 0.2 <0.20 < Hydrocarbons EPH µg/g 200 <200 <200 - EPH µg/g 200 <200 <200 - LEPH µg/g 200 <200 <200 - HEPH µg/g 200 <200 <200 - Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) 2-methylnaphthalene µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < Acenaphthene µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < Acenaphthylene µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < Anthracene µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < Benz(a)anthracene µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < Benzo(a)pyrene ug/g 0.05 <0.050 < Benzo(b)fluoranthene µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < Benzo(g,h,i)perylene µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < Benzo(k)fluoranthene µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < Chrysene µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < Dibenz(a,h)anthracene µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < Fluoranthene µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < Fluorene µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < Naphthalene µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < Phenanthrene µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < Pyrene µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) VH 6-10 µg/g 100 <100 <100 - VPH 6-10 µg/g 100 <100 <100-1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < ,1,1-trichloroethane µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < ,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < ,1,2-trichloroethane µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < ,1-dichloroethane µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < ,1-dichloroethene µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < ,2-dichlorobenzene µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < ,2-dichloroethane µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < ,2-dichloropropane µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < ,3-dichlorobenzene µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < ,4-dichlorobenzene µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < Bromodichloromethane µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < Bromoform µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < Carbon tetrachloride µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < Chlorobenzene µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < Dibromochloromethane µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < Chloroethane µg/g 0.1 <0.10 < Chloroform µg/g 0.1 <0.10 < Chloromethane µg/g 0.1 <0.10 < cis-1,2-dichloroethene µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < cis-1,3-dichloropropene µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < Dichloromethane µg/g 0.3 <0.30 < Trichloroethene µg/g 0.01 <0.010 < Tetrachloroethene µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < trans-1,2-dichloroethene µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < trans-1,3-dichloropropene µg/g 0.05 <0.050 < Trichlorofluoromethane µg/g 0.1 <0.10 < Vinyl chloride µg/g 0.1 <0.10 < Laboratory Identification Number L L NOTES: - Not analyzed or RPD not calculated. < Concentration is less than the laboratory detection limit indicated. RDL Laboratory Reportable Detection Limit RPD RPD is Relative Percentage Difference calculated as RPD=[C2-C1]/[(C1+C2)/2] where C1,C2 = concentrations of parameters in 1st and 2nd sample respectively. BOLD RPDs have only been considered where a concentration is greater than 5 times the RDL High RPDs are in bold (acceptable RPD is 45% for metals in soil [60% for high variability metals] 75% for PAHs in soil, and 60% for EPH and other organics in soil as recommended by BC Ministry of Environment Q&A, and BC Environmental Laboratory Manual). High variability metals include: Ag, Al, Ba, Hg, K, Mo, Na, Pb, Sn, Sr, and Ti ENG.KGEO Soil and GW Analytical Tables.xlsm

95 FILE: ENG.KGEO MAY 2016 ISSUED FOR REVIEW Table 5: Groundwater Quality Assurance/Quality Control Analytical Results Parameter Unit RDL 16 MW04 DUP #2 RPD (%) 26-Apr-2016 Dissolved Metals Lead µg/l 1 <50 <50 - BTEXS & MTBE Benzene µg/l 0.5 <0.50 < Toluene µg/l 0.5 <0.50 < Ethylbenzene µg/l 0.5 <0.50 < Xylenes (m & p) µg/l 0.5 <0.50 < Xylene (o) µg/l 0.5 <0.50 < Xylenes Total µg/l 0.75 <0.75 < Styrene µg/l 0.5 <0.50 < MTBE µg/l 0.5 <0.50 < Hydrocarbons EPH µg/l 250 <250 <250 - EPH µg/l 250 <250 <250 - LEPH µg/l <250 <250 - HEPH µg/l <250 <250 - Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) Acenaphthene µg/l 0.05 <0.050 < Acenaphthylene µg/l 0.05 <0.050 < Acridine µg/l 0.05 <0.050 < Anthracene µg/l 0.05 <0.050 < Benz(a)anthracene µg/l 0.05 <0.050 < Benzo(a)pyrene µg/l Benzo(b)fluoranthene µg/l 0.05 <0.050 < Benzo(g,h,i)perylene µg/l 0.05 <0.050 < Benzo(k)fluoranthene µg/l 0.05 <0.050 < Chrysene µg/l 0.05 <0.050 < Dibenz(a,h)anthracene µg/l 0.05 <0.050 < Fluoranthene µg/l 0.05 <0.050 < Fluorene µg/l 0.05 <0.050 < Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene µg/l 0.05 <0.050 < Naphthalene µg/l 0.05 <0.050 < Phenanthrene µg/l 0.05 <0.050 < Pyrene µg/l 0.05 <0.050 < Quinoline µg/l 0.05 <0.080 < Dissolved Metal (single) lead (ICP OES) µg/l 50 <50 <50 - Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) VH 6-10 µg/l 100 <100 <100 - VPH 6-10 µg/l 100 <100 <100 - Laboratory Identification Number L L NOTES: - Not analyzed or RPD not calculated. < Concentration is less than the laboratory detection limit indicated. RDL Laboratory Reportable Detection Limit RPD RPD is Relative Percentage Difference calculated as RPD=[C2-C1]/[(C1+C2)/2] where C1,C2 = concentrations of parameters in 1st and 2nd sample respectively. BOLD RPDs have only been considered where a concentration is greater than 5 times the RDL High RPDs are in bold (groundwater metals were compared against a 30% screening threshold and groundwater VOCs and other organics were compared to a 45% screening threshold. as recommended by BC Ministry of Environment Q&A, and BC Environmental Laboratory Manual). ENG.KGEO Soil and GW Analytical Tables.xlsm

96 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT FILE: ENG.KGEO JUNE, 2016 ISSUED FOR REVIEW FIGURES Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Site Plan APEC 1 Outdoor Parking Lot, 107 Main Street, Penticton, BC Site Plan APEC 2 Intersection of Skaha Lake Road and Yorkton Avenue, Penticton, BC Groundwater Elevation Contour (April 26, 2016) APEC 1 Outdoor Parking Lot, 107 Main Street, Penticton, BC Groundwater Elevation Contour (April 26, 2016) APEC 2 Intersection of Skaha Lake Road and Yorkton Avenue, Penticton, BC ESA Report - Penticton, BC.docx

97 MAIN STREET Q:\Kelowna\Drafting\ENG.KGEO\ENGKGEO City of Penticton\2014 Civil 3D\Production Drawings\3005 Figures ESA Rev A.dwg [FIGURE 01] May 17, :04:56 am (BY: HALLEY, RICHARD) LEGEND 16MW-## APPROXIMATE BOREHOLE LOCATION BORING NUMBER DISCRETION COMPLETION YEAR SITE LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE SITE 0 25m Scale: 11"x17" NOTES 1. ORTHOGRAPHIC IMAGE ADOPTED FROM GOOGLE EARTH PRO. 2. BORING LOCATIONS ESTABLISHED WITH THE USE OF A HANDHELD GPS UNIT. CLIENT Client EBA PROJECT NO. DWN CKD REV ENG.KGEO03005 OFFICE Kelowna 2016 CAPITAL WORKS 107 MAIN STREET, PENTICTON, BC SITE PLAN APEC 1 - OUTDOOR PARKING LOT RERH DATE May 17, 2016 CC ISSUED FOR REVIEW 0 Figure 01

98 SITE LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE Q:\Kelowna\Drafting\ENG.KGEO\ENGKGEO City of Penticton\2014 Civil 3D\Production Drawings\3005 Figures ESA Rev A.dwg [FIGURE 02] May 17, :11:21 am (BY: HALLEY, RICHARD) LEGEND 16MW-## SITE 0 25m Scale: 11"x17" APPROXIMATE BOREHOLE LOCATION BORING NUMBER DISCRETION COMPLETION YEAR SKAHA LAKE RD NOTES 1. ORTHOGRAPHIC IMAGE ADOPTED FROM GOOGLE EARTH PRO. 2. BORING LOCATIONS ESTABLISHED WITH THE USE OF A HANDHELD GPS UNIT. YORKTON AV CLIENT Client EBA PROJECT NO. DWN CKD REV ENG.KGEO03005 OFFICE Kelowna ISSUED FOR REVIEW 2016 CAPITAL WORKS - SKAHA LAKE ROAD AND YORKTON AVENUE, PENTICTON, BC SITE PLAN APEC 2 - INTERSECTION SKAHA LAKE ROAD RERH DATE May 17, 2016 CC 0 Figure 02

99 MAIN STREET Q:\Kelowna\Drafting\ENG.KGEO\ENGKGEO City of Penticton\2014 Civil 3D\Production Drawings\3005 Figures ESA Rev A.dwg [FIGURE 03] May 17, :33:39 am (BY: HALLEY, RICHARD) LEGEND 16MW-## APPROXIMATE BOREHOLE LOCATION BORING NUMBER DISCRETION COMPLETION YEAR (97.74) (97.73) GROUNDWATER ELEVATION (m) GROUNDWATER CONTOUR INFERRED GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION (97.75) (97.73) (97.76) (97.74) (97.75) (97.76) NOTES 1. ORTHOGRAPHIC IMAGE ADOPTED FROM GOOGLE EARTH PRO. 2. BORING LOCATIONS ESTABLISHED WITH THE USE OF A HANDHELD GPS UNIT. 0 25m Scale: 11"x17" CLIENT Client EBA PROJECT NO. DWN CKD REV ENG.KGEO03005 OFFICE Kelowna 2016 CAPITAL WORKS 107 MAIN STREET, PENTICTON, BC GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOURS (APRIL 26, 2016) APEC 1 - OUTDOOR PARKING LOT RERH DATE May 17, 2016 CC ISSUED FOR REVIEW 0 Figure 03

100 Q:\Kelowna\Drafting\ENG.KGEO\ENGKGEO City of Penticton\2014 Civil 3D\Production Drawings\3005 Figures ESA Rev A.dwg [FIGURE 04] May 17, :32:03 am (BY: HALLEY, RICHARD) LEGEND 16MW-## APPROXIMATE BOREHOLE LOCATION BORING NUMBER DISCRETION COMPLETION YEAR SKAHA LAKE RD GROUNDWATER ELEVATION (m) GROUNDWATER CONTOUR NOTES 1. ORTHOGRAPHIC IMAGE ADOPTED FROM GOOGLE EARTH PRO. 2. BORING LOCATIONS ESTABLISHED WITH THE USE OF A HANDHELD GPS UNIT. 0 25m Scale: 11"x17" YORKTON AV CLIENT Client EBA PROJECT NO. DWN CKD REV ENG.KGEO03005 OFFICE Kelowna 2016 CAPITAL WORKS - SKAHA LAKE ROAD AND YORKTON AVENUE, PENTICTON, BC GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOURS (APRIL 26, 2016) APEC 2 - INTERSECTION SKAHA LAKE ROAD RERH DATE May 17, 2016 CC ISSUED FOR REVIEW 0 Figure 04

101 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT FILE: ENG.KGEO JUNE, 2016 ISSUED FOR REVIEW APPENDIX A TETRA TECH EBA S GENERAL CONDITIONS ESA Report - Penticton, BC.docx

102 GENERAL CONDITIONS GEOENVIRONMENTAL REPORT This report incorporates and is subject to these General Conditions. 1.0 USE OF REPORT AND OWNERSHIP This report pertains to a specific site, a specific development, and a specific scope of work. It is not applicable to any other sites, nor should it be relied upon for types of development other than those to which it refers. Any variation from the site or proposed development would necessitate a supplementary investigation and assessment. This report and the assessments and recommendations contained in it are intended for the sole use of Tetra Tech EBA s client. Tetra Tech EBA does not accept any responsibility for the accuracy of any of the data, the analysis or the recommendations contained or referenced in the report when the report is used or relied upon by any party other than Tetra Tech EBA s Client unless otherwise authorized in writing by Tetra Tech EBA. Any unauthorized use of the report is at the sole risk of the user. This report is subject to copyright and shall not be reproduced either wholly or in part without the prior, written permission of Tetra Tech EBA. Additional copies of the report, if required, may be obtained upon request. 3.0 NOTIFICATION OF AUTHORITIES In certain instances, the discovery of hazardous substances or conditions and materials may require that regulatory agencies and other persons be informed and the client agrees that notification to such bodies or persons as required may be done by Tetra Tech EBA in its reasonably exercised discretion. 4.0 INFORMATION PROVIDED TO TETRA TECH EBA BY OTHERS During the performance of the work and the preparation of the report, Tetra Tech EBA may rely on information provided by persons other than the Client. While Tetra Tech EBA endeavours to verify the accuracy of such information when instructed to do so by the Client, Tetra Tech EBA accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or the reliability of such information which may affect the report. 2.0 ALTERNATE REPORT FORMAT Where Tetra Tech EBA submits both electronic file and hard copy versions of reports, drawings and other project-related documents and deliverables (collectively termed Tetra Tech EBA s instruments of professional service), only the signed and/or sealed versions shall be considered final and legally binding. The original signed and/or sealed version archived by Tetra Tech EBA shall be deemed to be the original for the Project. Both electronic file and hard copy versions of Tetra Tech EBA s instruments of professional service shall not, under any circumstances, no matter who owns or uses them, be altered by any party except Tetra Tech EBA. The Client warrants that Tetra Tech EBA s instruments of professional service will be used only and exactly as submitted by Tetra Tech EBA. Electronic files submitted by Tetra Tech EBA have been prepared and submitted using specific software and hardware systems. Tetra Tech EBA makes no representation about the compatibility of these files with the Client s current or future software and hardware systems. 1

103 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT FILE: ENG.KGEO JUNE, 2016 ISSUED FOR REVIEW APPENDIX B BOREHOLE LOGS ESA Report - Penticton, BC.docx

104 Borehole No: 16MW-01 Project: Environmental Site Assessment Project No: ENG.KGEO Location: 107 Main Street Ground Elev: m Penticton, BC UTM: E; N; Z 11 NAD83 Depth (m) 0 Method Asphalt Soil Description Graphical Representation Sample Type Sample Number Vapour readings (ppmv) Notes and Comments 16MW-01 Elevation (m) SAND (Fill) AND GRAVEL; trace silt; organics; compact to dense; dry; light brown. 99 SILT (Fill) Sandy; trace gravel,; soft to firm; dry; grey. becomes wet at 1.2 m SA# April 26, Solid Stem Auger Wood Waste observed. SA#2 SA#3 April 26, SA#4 96 SA#5 4 END OF BOREHOLE (3.96 metres) Groundwater metres (97.73 m Elev.) on April 26, 2016 Groundwater well installed to 3.20 metres 95 5 ENVIRONMENTAL 704-ENG.KGEO ENVIRONMENTAL.GPJ EBA.GDT 16/5/16 Contractor: On The Mark Drilling Rig Type: Solid Stem Auger Logged By: CC Reviewed By: Completion Depth: 3.96 m Start Date: 2016 April 25 Completion Date: 2016 April 25 Page 1 of 1

105 Borehole No: 16MW-02 Project: Environmental Site Assessment Project No: ENG.KGEO Location: 107 Main Street Ground Elev: m Penticton, BC UTM: E; N; Z 11 NAD83 Depth (m) 0 Method Asphalt Soil Description Graphical Representation Sample Type Sample Number Vapour readings (ppmv) Notes and Comments 16mw-02 Elevation (m) SAND (Fill) AND GRAVEL; trace silt; compact; dry; light brown. Rust color inclusions at 0.9 m 99 SA#1 1 SILT (Fill); Sandy;fine grained sand; firm; moist to wet; grey. becomes saturated at 1.2 m SA#2 98 April 26, Solid Stem Auger SAND; silty to some silt; fine grained sand; compact; wet; grey. becomes light brown and some gravel at 2.7 m SA#3 April 26, becomes light brown and some gravel at 2.7 m SAND AND GRAVEL; coarse sand; compact; wet; light brown 3 SA#4 96 SA#5 4 END OF BOREHOLE (3.96 metres) Groundwater metres (97.75 m Elev.) on April 26, 2016 Groundwater well installed to 2.92 metres 95 5 ENVIRONMENTAL 704-ENG.KGEO ENVIRONMENTAL.GPJ EBA.GDT 16/5/16 Contractor: On The Mark Drilling Rig Type: Solid and Hollow Stem Auger Logged By: CC Reviewed By: Completion Depth: 3.96 m Start Date: 2016 April 25 Completion Date: 2016 April 25 Page 1 of 1

106 Borehole No: 16MW-03 Project: Environmental Site Assessment Project No: ENG.KGEO Location: 107 Main Street Ground Elev: m Penticton, BC UTM: E; N; Z 11 NAD83 Depth (m) 0 Method Asphalt Soil Description Graphical Representation Sample Type Sample Number Vapour readings (ppmv) Notes and Comments 16MW-03 Elevation (m) SAND (Fill) AND GRAVEL; trace silt; organics; loose to compact; dry; medium brown. 99 SILT (Fill) ; trace sand; firm; moist; medium brown Organic inclusions observed at 0.9 m SA#1 1 April 26, Solid/Hollow Stem Auger SAND; trace silt; fine grained sand; loose to compact; moist; light brown becomes wet at 1.7 m SA#2 April 26, SA# SA#4 SAND AND GRAVEL; coarse sand; compact; wet; light brown 96 4 END OF BOREHOLE (3.96 metres) Groundwater metres (97.76 m Elev.) on April 26, 2016 Groundwater well installed to 2.88 metres SA# ENVIRONMENTAL 704-ENG.KGEO ENVIRONMENTAL.GPJ EBA.GDT 16/5/16 Contractor: On The Mark Drilling Rig Type: Solid and Hollow Stem Auger Logged By: CC Reviewed By: Completion Depth: 3.96 m Start Date: 2016 April 25 Completion Date: 2016 April 25 Page 1 of 1

107 Borehole No: 16MW-04 Project: Environmental Site Assessment Project No: ENG.KGEO Location: Skaha Lake Rd. and Yorkton Ave. Ground Elev: m Penticton, BC UTM: E; N; Z 11 NAD83 Depth (m) 0 Method Soil Description Asphalt CRUSHED GRAVEL (Fill); some sand; trace silt; angular to subangular gravel; compact; dry; light brown. Graphical Representation Sample Type Sample Number Vapour readings (ppmv) Notes and Comments 16MW-04 Elevation (m) SILT; trace to some sand; trace gravel; firm; dry to moist; greenish brown SA# Organic inclusions observed at 1.2 m SA#2 April 26, Solid Stem Auger SAND; trace silt; medium grained sand; loose to compact; wet; grey Slight Hydrocarbon odor SA#3 April 26, SA# SA#5 END OF BOREHOLE (4.27 metres) Groundwater metres (98.18 m Elev.) on April 26, 2016 Groundwater well installed to 2.96 metres 5 Contractor: On The Mark Completion Depth: 4.3 m 95 Drilling Rig Type: Solid Stem Auger Start Date: 2016 April 26 Logged By: CC Completion Date: 2016 April 26 ENVIRONMENTAL 704-ENG.KGEO ENVIRONMENTAL.GPJ EBA.GDT 16/5/16 Reviewed By: Page 1 of 1

108 Borehole No: 16MW-05 Project: Environmental Site Assessment Project No: ENG.KGEO Location: Skaha Lake Rd. and Yorkton Ave. Ground Elev: m Penticton, BC UTM: E; N; Z 11 NAD83 Depth (m) 0 Method Soil Description Asphalt - Includes 100 mm overlay CRUSHED GRAVEL(Fill); some sand; trace silt; angular to subangular gravel; compact; dry; light brown. Graphical Representation Sample Type Sample Number Vapour readings (ppmv) Notes and Comments 16MW-05 Elevation (m) 100 SA#1 SILT; trace to some sand; trace gravel; firm; dry to moist; greenish brown 1 99 Becomes sandy, rusty brown at 1.2 m SA#2 SAND; trace silt; medium grained sand; loose to compact; wet; grey April 26, Solid and Hollow Stem Auger Slight Hydrocarbon odor SA#3 April 26, SA# END OF BOREHOLE (4.27 metres) Groundwater metres (98.18 m Elev.) on April 26, 2016 Groundwater well installed to 3.10 metres SA#5 5 ENVIRONMENTAL 704-ENG.KGEO ENVIRONMENTAL.GPJ EBA.GDT 16/5/16 Contractor: On The Mark Drilling Rig Type: Solid and Hollow Stem Auger Logged By: CC Reviewed By: Completion Depth: 4.3 m Start Date: 2016 April 26 Completion Date: 2016 April 26 Page 1 of 1

109 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT FILE: ENG.KGEO JUNE, 2016 ISSUED FOR REVIEW APPENDIX C ALS ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY CERTIFICATE ESA Report - Penticton, BC.docx

110 Tetra Tech EBA Inc. ATTN: Chris Chu # Dickson Avenue Kelowna BC V1Y 9G6 Date Received: Report Date: Version: 28-APR MAY-16 09:59 (MT) FINAL Client Phone: Certificate of Analysis Lab Work Order #: L Project P.O. #: NOT SUBMITTED Job Reference: 704-ENG.KGEO C of C Numbers: , Legal Site Desc: Brent Mack, B.Sc. Account Manager [This report shall not be reproduced except in full without the written authority of the Laboratory.] ADDRESS: 8081 Lougheed Hwy, Suite 100, Burnaby, BC V5A 1W9 Canada Phone: Fax: ALS CANADA LTD Part of the ALS Group A Campbell Brothers Limited Company

111 ALS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL REPORT L CONTD... PAGE 2 of MAY-16 09:59 (MT) Version: FINAL Sample ID Description Sampled Date Sampled Time Client ID L L L L L Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil 25-APR APR APR APR APR MW01 D=2 1/2 (0.76M) 16 MW01 D=7 1/2 (2.28M) 16 MW02 D=7 1/2 (2.28M) 16 MW03 D=7 1/2 (2.28M) 16 MW04 D=7 1/2 (2.28M) Grouping SOIL Physical Tests Metals Volatile Organic Compounds Analyte Moisture (%) ph (1:2 soil:water) (ph) Antimony (Sb) (mg/kg) Arsenic (As) (mg/kg) Barium (Ba) (mg/kg) Beryllium (Be) (mg/kg) Cadmium (Cd) (mg/kg) Chromium (Cr) (mg/kg) Cobalt (Co) (mg/kg) Copper (Cu) (mg/kg) Lead (Pb) (mg/kg) Mercury (Hg) (mg/kg) Molybdenum (Mo) (mg/kg) Nickel (Ni) (mg/kg) Selenium (Se) (mg/kg) Silver (Ag) (mg/kg) Thallium (Tl) (mg/kg) Tin (Sn) (mg/kg) Uranium (U) (mg/kg) Vanadium (V) (mg/kg) Zinc (Zn) (mg/kg) VOC Sample Container Benzene (mg/kg) Bromodichloromethane (mg/kg) Bromoform (mg/kg) Carbon Tetrachloride (mg/kg) Chlorobenzene (mg/kg) Dibromochloromethane (mg/kg) Chloroethane (mg/kg) Chloroform (mg/kg) Chloromethane (mg/kg) 1,2-Dichlorobenzene (mg/kg) 1,3-Dichlorobenzene (mg/kg) 1,4-Dichlorobenzene (mg/kg) 1,1-Dichloroethane (mg/kg) 1,2-Dichloroethane (mg/kg) 1,1-Dichloroethylene (mg/kg) * Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers detected <0.10 <0.10 < <0.10 < <0.050 <0.050 < <0.050 <0.050 < < <0.20 <0.20 < <0.10 <0.10 < <0.050 < <2.0 <2.0 < Field MeOH Field MeOH Field MeOH Field MeOH Field MeOH < < < < <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050

112 ALS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL REPORT L CONTD... PAGE 3 of MAY-16 09:59 (MT) Version: FINAL Sample ID Description Sampled Date Sampled Time Client ID L L Soil 26-APR MW05 D=7 1/2 (2.28M) Soil 25-APR-16 DUP1 Grouping SOIL Physical Tests Metals Volatile Organic Compounds Analyte Moisture (%) ph (1:2 soil:water) (ph) Antimony (Sb) (mg/kg) Arsenic (As) (mg/kg) Barium (Ba) (mg/kg) Beryllium (Be) (mg/kg) Cadmium (Cd) (mg/kg) Chromium (Cr) (mg/kg) Cobalt (Co) (mg/kg) Copper (Cu) (mg/kg) Lead (Pb) (mg/kg) Mercury (Hg) (mg/kg) Molybdenum (Mo) (mg/kg) Nickel (Ni) (mg/kg) Selenium (Se) (mg/kg) Silver (Ag) (mg/kg) Thallium (Tl) (mg/kg) Tin (Sn) (mg/kg) Uranium (U) (mg/kg) Vanadium (V) (mg/kg) Zinc (Zn) (mg/kg) VOC Sample Container Benzene (mg/kg) Bromodichloromethane (mg/kg) Bromoform (mg/kg) Carbon Tetrachloride (mg/kg) Chlorobenzene (mg/kg) Dibromochloromethane (mg/kg) Chloroethane (mg/kg) Chloroform (mg/kg) Chloromethane (mg/kg) 1,2-Dichlorobenzene (mg/kg) 1,3-Dichlorobenzene (mg/kg) 1,4-Dichlorobenzene (mg/kg) 1,1-Dichloroethane (mg/kg) 1,2-Dichloroethane (mg/kg) 1,1-Dichloroethylene (mg/kg) * Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers detected < <0.10 < Field MeOH < <0.20 <0.10 <0.050 < Field MeOH < < <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050

113 ALS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL REPORT L CONTD... PAGE 4 of MAY-16 09:59 (MT) Version: FINAL Grouping SOIL Volatile Organic Compounds Hydrocarbons Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Analyte cis-1,2-dichloroethylene (mg/kg) trans-1,2-dichloroethylene (mg/kg) Dichloromethane (mg/kg) 1,2-Dichloropropane (mg/kg) cis-1,3-dichloropropylene (mg/kg) trans-1,3-dichloropropylene (mg/kg) Ethylbenzene (mg/kg) Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) (mg/kg) Styrene (mg/kg) 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane (mg/kg) 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane (mg/kg) Tetrachloroethylene (mg/kg) Toluene (mg/kg) 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (mg/kg) 1,1,2-Trichloroethane (mg/kg) Trichloroethylene (mg/kg) Trichlorofluoromethane (mg/kg) Vinyl Chloride (mg/kg) ortho-xylene (mg/kg) meta- & para-xylene (mg/kg) Xylenes (mg/kg) Sample ID Description Sampled Date Sampled Time Client ID Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene (SS) (%) Surrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene (SS) (%) EPH10-19 (mg/kg) EPH19-32 (mg/kg) LEPH (mg/kg) HEPH (mg/kg) Volatile Hydrocarbons (VH6-10) (mg/kg) VPH (C6-C10) (mg/kg) Surrogate: 3,4-Dichlorotoluene (SS) (%) Acenaphthene (mg/kg) Acenaphthylene (mg/kg) Anthracene (mg/kg) Benz(a)anthracene (mg/kg) Benzo(a)pyrene (mg/kg) L L L L L Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil 25-APR APR APR APR APR MW01 D=2 1/2 (0.76M) 16 MW01 D=7 1/2 (2.28M) 16 MW02 D=7 1/2 (2.28M) 16 MW03 D=7 1/2 (2.28M) <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 < MW04 D=7 1/2 (2.28M) <0.015 <0.015 < <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 < <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 < <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 < <0.050 <0.050 < <0.075 <0.075 < <200 <200 <200 <200 <200 <200 <200 <200 <200 <200 <200 <200 <200 <200 <200 <200 <200 <200 <200 <200 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 < <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 < <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 * Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers detected.

114 ALS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL REPORT L CONTD... PAGE 5 of MAY-16 09:59 (MT) Version: FINAL Grouping SOIL Volatile Organic Compounds Hydrocarbons Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Analyte cis-1,2-dichloroethylene (mg/kg) trans-1,2-dichloroethylene (mg/kg) Dichloromethane (mg/kg) 1,2-Dichloropropane (mg/kg) cis-1,3-dichloropropylene (mg/kg) trans-1,3-dichloropropylene (mg/kg) Ethylbenzene (mg/kg) Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) (mg/kg) Styrene (mg/kg) 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane (mg/kg) 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane (mg/kg) Tetrachloroethylene (mg/kg) Toluene (mg/kg) 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (mg/kg) 1,1,2-Trichloroethane (mg/kg) Trichloroethylene (mg/kg) Trichlorofluoromethane (mg/kg) Vinyl Chloride (mg/kg) ortho-xylene (mg/kg) meta- & para-xylene (mg/kg) Xylenes (mg/kg) Sample ID Description Sampled Date Sampled Time Client ID Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene (SS) (%) Surrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene (SS) (%) EPH10-19 (mg/kg) EPH19-32 (mg/kg) LEPH (mg/kg) HEPH (mg/kg) Volatile Hydrocarbons (VH6-10) (mg/kg) VPH (C6-C10) (mg/kg) Surrogate: 3,4-Dichlorotoluene (SS) (%) Acenaphthene (mg/kg) Acenaphthylene (mg/kg) Anthracene (mg/kg) Benz(a)anthracene (mg/kg) Benzo(a)pyrene (mg/kg) L L Soil 26-APR MW05 D=7 1/2 (2.28M) Soil 25-APR-16 DUP1 <0.050 <0.050 <0.30 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.015 <0.015 <0.20 <0.20 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.010 <0.10 <0.10 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.075 < <200 <200 <200 <200 <200 <200 <200 <200 <100 <100 <100 < <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 SURR- ND * Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers detected.

115 ALS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL REPORT L CONTD... PAGE 6 of MAY-16 09:59 (MT) Version: FINAL Grouping SOIL Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Analyte Benzo(b)fluoranthene (mg/kg) Benzo(g,h,i)perylene (mg/kg) Benzo(k)fluoranthene (mg/kg) Chrysene (mg/kg) Dibenz(a,h)anthracene (mg/kg) Fluoranthene (mg/kg) Fluorene (mg/kg) Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene (mg/kg) 2-Methylnaphthalene (mg/kg) Naphthalene (mg/kg) Phenanthrene (mg/kg) Pyrene (mg/kg) Surrogate: Acenaphthene d10 (%) Surrogate: Chrysene d12 (%) Surrogate: Naphthalene d8 (%) Surrogate: Phenanthrene d10 (%) Sample ID Description Sampled Date Sampled Time Client ID L L L L L Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil 25-APR APR APR APR APR MW01 D=2 1/2 (0.76M) 16 MW01 D=7 1/2 (2.28M) 16 MW02 D=7 1/2 (2.28M) 16 MW03 D=7 1/2 (2.28M) 16 MW04 D=7 1/2 (2.28M) <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 < <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 < <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 < <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 < <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 < * Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers detected.

116 ALS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL REPORT L CONTD... PAGE 7 of MAY-16 09:59 (MT) Version: FINAL Grouping SOIL Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Analyte Benzo(b)fluoranthene (mg/kg) Benzo(g,h,i)perylene (mg/kg) Benzo(k)fluoranthene (mg/kg) Chrysene (mg/kg) Dibenz(a,h)anthracene (mg/kg) Fluoranthene (mg/kg) Fluorene (mg/kg) Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene (mg/kg) 2-Methylnaphthalene (mg/kg) Naphthalene (mg/kg) Phenanthrene (mg/kg) Pyrene (mg/kg) Surrogate: Acenaphthene d10 (%) Surrogate: Chrysene d12 (%) Surrogate: Naphthalene d8 (%) Surrogate: Phenanthrene d10 (%) Sample ID Description Sampled Date Sampled Time Client ID L L Soil 26-APR MW05 D=7 1/2 (2.28M) Soil 25-APR-16 DUP1 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 < * Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers detected.

117 ALS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL REPORT L CONTD... PAGE 8 of MAY-16 09:59 (MT) Version: FINAL Sample ID Description Sampled Date Sampled Time Client ID L L L L L Water Water Water Water Water 26-APR APR APR APR APR MW01 16 MW02 16 MW03 16 MW04 16 MW05 Grouping WATER Physical Tests Dissolved Metals Volatile Organic Compounds Analyte Hardness (as CaCO3) (ug/l) Dissolved Mercury Filtration Location Dissolved Metals Filtration Location Aluminum (Al)-Dissolved (ug/l) Antimony (Sb)-Dissolved (ug/l) Arsenic (As)-Dissolved (ug/l) Barium (Ba)-Dissolved (ug/l) Beryllium (Be)-Dissolved (ug/l) Boron (B)-Dissolved (ug/l) Cadmium (Cd)-Dissolved (ug/l) Calcium (Ca)-Dissolved (ug/l) Chromium (Cr)-Dissolved (ug/l) Cobalt (Co)-Dissolved (ug/l) Copper (Cu)-Dissolved (ug/l) Iron (Fe)-Dissolved (ug/l) Lead (Pb)-Dissolved (ug/l) Lithium (Li)-Dissolved (ug/l) Magnesium (Mg)-Dissolved (ug/l) Manganese (Mn)-Dissolved (ug/l) Mercury (Hg)-Dissolved (ug/l) Molybdenum (Mo)-Dissolved (ug/l) Nickel (Ni)-Dissolved (ug/l) Selenium (Se)-Dissolved (ug/l) Silver (Ag)-Dissolved (ug/l) Sodium (Na)-Dissolved (ug/l) Thallium (Tl)-Dissolved (ug/l) Titanium (Ti)-Dissolved (ug/l) Uranium (U)-Dissolved (ug/l) Vanadium (V)-Dissolved (ug/l) Zinc (Zn)-Dissolved (ug/l) Benzene (ug/l) Bromodichloromethane (ug/l) Bromoform (ug/l) Carbon Tetrachloride (ug/l) Chlorobenzene (ug/l) Dibromochloromethane (ug/l) Chloroethane (ug/l) * Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers detected FIELD FIELD FIELD FIELD <10 <0.50 < < < < < <1.0 <50 <50 < <0.20 <1.0 <5.0 <1.0 < <0.20 < <30 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0

118 ALS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL REPORT L CONTD... PAGE 9 of MAY-16 09:59 (MT) Version: FINAL Sample ID Description Sampled Date Sampled Time Client ID L Water 26-APR-16 DUP #2 Grouping WATER Physical Tests Dissolved Metals Volatile Organic Compounds Analyte Hardness (as CaCO3) (ug/l) Dissolved Mercury Filtration Location Dissolved Metals Filtration Location Aluminum (Al)-Dissolved (ug/l) Antimony (Sb)-Dissolved (ug/l) Arsenic (As)-Dissolved (ug/l) Barium (Ba)-Dissolved (ug/l) Beryllium (Be)-Dissolved (ug/l) Boron (B)-Dissolved (ug/l) Cadmium (Cd)-Dissolved (ug/l) Calcium (Ca)-Dissolved (ug/l) Chromium (Cr)-Dissolved (ug/l) Cobalt (Co)-Dissolved (ug/l) Copper (Cu)-Dissolved (ug/l) Iron (Fe)-Dissolved (ug/l) Lead (Pb)-Dissolved (ug/l) Lithium (Li)-Dissolved (ug/l) Magnesium (Mg)-Dissolved (ug/l) Manganese (Mn)-Dissolved (ug/l) Mercury (Hg)-Dissolved (ug/l) Molybdenum (Mo)-Dissolved (ug/l) Nickel (Ni)-Dissolved (ug/l) Selenium (Se)-Dissolved (ug/l) Silver (Ag)-Dissolved (ug/l) Sodium (Na)-Dissolved (ug/l) Thallium (Tl)-Dissolved (ug/l) Titanium (Ti)-Dissolved (ug/l) Uranium (U)-Dissolved (ug/l) Vanadium (V)-Dissolved (ug/l) Zinc (Zn)-Dissolved (ug/l) Benzene (ug/l) Bromodichloromethane (ug/l) Bromoform (ug/l) Carbon Tetrachloride (ug/l) Chlorobenzene (ug/l) Dibromochloromethane (ug/l) Chloroethane (ug/l) FIELD <50 <0.50 * Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers detected.

119 ALS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL REPORT L CONTD... PAGE 10 of MAY-16 09:59 (MT) Version: FINAL Sample ID Description Sampled Date Sampled Time Client ID L L L L L Water Water Water Water Water 26-APR APR APR APR APR MW01 16 MW02 16 MW03 16 MW04 16 MW05 Grouping WATER Volatile Organic Compounds Hydrocarbons Analyte Chloroform (ug/l) Chloromethane (ug/l) 1,2-Dichlorobenzene (ug/l) 1,3-Dichlorobenzene (ug/l) 1,4-Dichlorobenzene (ug/l) 1,1-Dichloroethane (ug/l) 1,2-Dichloroethane (ug/l) 1,1-Dichloroethylene (ug/l) cis-1,2-dichloroethylene (ug/l) trans-1,2-dichloroethylene (ug/l) 1,3-Dichloropropene (cis & trans) (ug/l) Dichloromethane (ug/l) 1,2-Dichloropropane (ug/l) cis-1,3-dichloropropylene (ug/l) trans-1,3-dichloropropylene (ug/l) Ethylbenzene (ug/l) Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) (ug/l) Styrene (ug/l) 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane (ug/l) 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane (ug/l) Tetrachloroethylene (ug/l) Toluene (ug/l) 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (ug/l) 1,1,2-Trichloroethane (ug/l) Trichloroethylene (ug/l) Trichlorofluoromethane (ug/l) Vinyl Chloride (ug/l) ortho-xylene (ug/l) meta- & para-xylene (ug/l) Xylenes (ug/l) Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene (SS) (%) Surrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene (SS) (%) EPH10-19 (ug/l) EPH19-32 (ug/l) LEPH (ug/l) HEPH (ug/l) Volatile Hydrocarbons (VH6-10) (ug/l) <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <0.70 <0.70 <0.70 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 < <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 * Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers detected. <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 < <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 < <1.0 <1.0 < <1.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.75 <0.75 <0.75 <0.75 < <250 <250 <250 <250 <250 <250 <250 <250 <250 <250 <250 <250 <250 <250 <250 <250 <250 <250 <250 <250 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100

120 ALS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL REPORT L CONTD... PAGE 11 of MAY-16 09:59 (MT) Version: FINAL Sample ID Description Sampled Date Sampled Time Client ID L Water 26-APR-16 DUP #2 Grouping WATER Volatile Organic Compounds Hydrocarbons Analyte Chloroform (ug/l) Chloromethane (ug/l) 1,2-Dichlorobenzene (ug/l) 1,3-Dichlorobenzene (ug/l) 1,4-Dichlorobenzene (ug/l) 1,1-Dichloroethane (ug/l) 1,2-Dichloroethane (ug/l) 1,1-Dichloroethylene (ug/l) cis-1,2-dichloroethylene (ug/l) trans-1,2-dichloroethylene (ug/l) 1,3-Dichloropropene (cis & trans) (ug/l) Dichloromethane (ug/l) 1,2-Dichloropropane (ug/l) cis-1,3-dichloropropylene (ug/l) trans-1,3-dichloropropylene (ug/l) Ethylbenzene (ug/l) Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) (ug/l) Styrene (ug/l) 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane (ug/l) 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane (ug/l) Tetrachloroethylene (ug/l) Toluene (ug/l) 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (ug/l) 1,1,2-Trichloroethane (ug/l) Trichloroethylene (ug/l) Trichlorofluoromethane (ug/l) Vinyl Chloride (ug/l) ortho-xylene (ug/l) meta- & para-xylene (ug/l) Xylenes (ug/l) Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene (SS) (%) Surrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene (SS) (%) EPH10-19 (ug/l) EPH19-32 (ug/l) LEPH (ug/l) HEPH (ug/l) Volatile Hydrocarbons (VH6-10) (ug/l) <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 < <250 <250 <250 <250 <100 * Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers detected.

121 ALS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL REPORT L CONTD... PAGE 12 of MAY-16 09:59 (MT) Version: FINAL Sample ID Description Sampled Date Sampled Time Client ID L L L L L Water Water Water Water Water 26-APR APR APR APR APR MW01 16 MW02 16 MW03 16 MW04 16 MW05 Grouping WATER Hydrocarbons Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Analyte VPH (C6-C10) (ug/l) Surrogate: 2-Bromobenzotrifluoride (%) Surrogate: 3,4-Dichlorotoluene (SS) (%) Acenaphthene (ug/l) Acenaphthylene (ug/l) Acridine (ug/l) Anthracene (ug/l) Benz(a)anthracene (ug/l) Benzo(a)pyrene (ug/l) Benzo(b)fluoranthene (ug/l) Benzo(g,h,i)perylene (ug/l) Benzo(k)fluoranthene (ug/l) Chrysene (ug/l) Dibenz(a,h)anthracene (ug/l) Fluoranthene (ug/l) Fluorene (ug/l) Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene (ug/l) Naphthalene (ug/l) Phenanthrene (ug/l) Pyrene (ug/l) Quinoline (ug/l) Surrogate: Acridine d9 (%) Surrogate: Chrysene d12 (%) Surrogate: Naphthalene d8 (%) Surrogate: Phenanthrene d10 (%) <100 <100 <100 <100 < <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 < <0.010 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 DLCI <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.080 < * Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers detected.

122 ALS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL REPORT L CONTD... PAGE 13 of MAY-16 09:59 (MT) Version: FINAL Sample ID Description Sampled Date Sampled Time Client ID L Water 26-APR-16 DUP #2 Grouping WATER Hydrocarbons Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Analyte VPH (C6-C10) (ug/l) Surrogate: 2-Bromobenzotrifluoride (%) Surrogate: 3,4-Dichlorotoluene (SS) (%) Acenaphthene (ug/l) Acenaphthylene (ug/l) Acridine (ug/l) Anthracene (ug/l) Benz(a)anthracene (ug/l) Benzo(a)pyrene (ug/l) Benzo(b)fluoranthene (ug/l) Benzo(g,h,i)perylene (ug/l) Benzo(k)fluoranthene (ug/l) Chrysene (ug/l) Dibenz(a,h)anthracene (ug/l) Fluoranthene (ug/l) Fluorene (ug/l) Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene (ug/l) Naphthalene (ug/l) Phenanthrene (ug/l) Pyrene (ug/l) Quinoline (ug/l) Surrogate: Acridine d9 (%) Surrogate: Chrysene d12 (%) Surrogate: Naphthalene d8 (%) Surrogate: Phenanthrene d10 (%) < <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 < <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.080 <0.050 <0.050 < DLCI DLCI * Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers detected.

123 Reference Information L CONTD... PAGE 14 of MAY-16 09:59 (MT) Version: FINAL Qualifiers for Individual Samples Listed: Sample Number Client Sample ID Qualifier Description L MW02 WSMD Water sample(s) for dissolved mercury analysis was not submitted in glass or PTFE container with HCl preservative. Results may be biased low. QC Samples with Qualifiers & Comments: QC Type Description Parameter Qualifier Applies to Sample Number(s) Duplicate 1,2-Dichloroethane DLCI L , -9 Matrix Spike Arsenic (As)-Dissolved MS-B L Matrix Spike Aluminum (Al)-Dissolved MS-B L Matrix Spike Arsenic (As)-Dissolved MS-B L Matrix Spike Cadmium (Cd)-Dissolved MS-B L Matrix Spike Cobalt (Co)-Dissolved MS-B L Matrix Spike Copper (Cu)-Dissolved MS-B L Matrix Spike Lead (Pb)-Dissolved MS-B L Matrix Spike Silver (Ag)-Dissolved MS-B L Matrix Spike Uranium (U)-Dissolved MS-B L Matrix Spike Calcium (Ca)-Dissolved MS-B L Matrix Spike Manganese (Mn)-Dissolved MS-B L Matrix Spike Calcium (Ca)-Dissolved MS-B L Matrix Spike Iron (Fe)-Dissolved MS-B L Matrix Spike Manganese (Mn)-Dissolved MS-B L Matrix Spike Sodium (Na)-Dissolved MS-B L Matrix Spike Boron (B)-Dissolved MS-B L Matrix Spike Sodium (Na)-Dissolved MS-B L Qualifiers for Individual Parameters Listed: Qualifier Description DLCI MS-B SURR-ND Detection Limit Raised: Chromatographic Interference due to co-elution. Matrix Spike recovery could not be accurately calculated due to high analyte background in sample. Surrogate recovery marginally exceeded ALS DQO. Reported non-detect results for associated samples were deemed to be unaffected. Test Method References: ALS Test Code Matrix Test Description Method Reference** EPH-ME-FID-VA EPH-TUMB-FID-VA HARDNESS-CALC-VA HG CVAF-VA HG-DIS-CVAFS-VA LEPH/HEPH-CALC-VA Water EPH in Water EPH is extracted from water using a hexane micro-extraction technique, with analysis by GC-FID, as per the BC Lab Manual. EPH results include PAHs and are therefore not equivalent to LEPH or HEPH. Soil EPH in Solids by Tumbler and GCFID Analysis is in accordance with BC MOE Lab Manual method "Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Solids by GC/FID", v2.1, July Soil samples are extracted with a 1:1 mixture of hexane and acetone using a rotary extraction technique modified from EPA 3570 prior to gas chromatography with flame ionization detection (GC-FID). EPH results include Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) and are therefore not equivalent to Light and Heavy Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (LEPH/HEPH). Water Hardness Hardness (also known as Total Hardness) is calculated from the sum of Calcium and Magnesium concentrations, expressed in CaCO3 equivalents. Dissolved Calcium and Magnesium concentrations are preferentially used for the hardness calculation. Soil Mercury in Soil by CVAFS Soil samples are digested with nitric and hydrochloric acids, followed by analysis by CVAFS. Water Dissolved Hg in Water by CVAFS LOR=50ppt This analysis is carried out using procedures adapted from "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater" published by the American Public Health Association, and with procedures adapted from "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste" SW-846 published by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The procedures may involve preliminary sample treatment by filtration (EPA Method 3005A) and involves a cold-oxidation of the acidified sample using bromine monochloride prior to reduction of the sample with stannous chloride. Instrumental analysis is by cold vapour atomic fluorescence spectrophotometry or atomic absorption spectrophotometry (EPA Method 245.7). Water LEPHs and HEPHs BC Lab Manual BC MOE EPH GCFID APHA 2340B EPA 200.2/1631E (mod) APHA 3030B/EPA 1631E (mod) BC MOE LABORATORY MANUAL (2005) Light and Heavy Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons in water. These results are determined according to the British Columbia Ministry of Environment, Lands, and Parks Analytical Method for Contaminated Sites "Calculation of Light and Heavy Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons in

124 Reference Information L CONTD... PAGE 15 of MAY-16 09:59 (MT) Version: FINAL Solids or Water". According to this method, LEPH and HEPH are calculated by subtracting selected Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon results from Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbon results. To calculate LEPH, the individual results for Acenaphthene, Acridine, Anthracene, Fluorene, Naphthalene and Phenanthrene are subtracted from EPH(C10-19). To calculate HEPH, the individual results for Benz(a)anthracene, Benzo(a)pyrene, Fluoranthene, and Pyrene are subtracted from EPH(C19-32). Analysis of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons adheres to all prescribed elements of the BCMELP method "Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Water by GC/FID" (Version 2.1, July 20, 1999). LEPH/HEPH-CALC-VA MET CCMS-VA Soil LEPHs and HEPHs Light and Heavy Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Solids. These results are determined according to the British Columbia Ministry of Environment, Lands, and Parks Analytical Method for Contaminated Sites "Calculation of Light and Heavy Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Solids or Water". According to this method, LEPH and HEPH are calculated by subtracting selected Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon results from Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbon results. To calculate LEPH, the individual results for Naphthalene and Phenanthrene are subtracted from EPH(C10-19). To calculate HEPH, the individual results for Benz(a)anthracene, Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene, Benzo(a)pyrene, Dibenz(a,h)anthracene, Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene, and Pyrene are subtracted from EPH(C19-32). Analysis of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons adheres to all prescribed elements of the BCMELP method "Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Solids by GC/FID" (Version 2.1, July 20, 1999). Soil Metals in Soil by CRC ICPMS Soil samples are digested with nitric and hydrochloric acids, followed by analysis by CRC ICPMS. BC MOE LABORATORY MANUAL (2005) EPA 200.2/6020A (mod) Method Limitation: This method is not a total digestion technique. It is a very strong acid digestion that is intended to dissolve those metals that may be environmentally available. This method does not dissolve all silicate materials and may result in a partial extraction. depending on the sample matrix, for some metals, including, but not limited to Al, Ba, Be, Cr, Sr, Ti, Tl, and V. MET-D-CCMS-VA Water Dissolved Metals in Water by CRC ICPMS Water samples are filtered (0.45 um), preserved with nitric acid, and analyzed by CRC ICPMS. APHA 3030B/6020A (mod) Method Limitation (re: Sulfur): Sulfide and volatile sulfur species may not be recovered by this method. MET-DIS-ICP-VA MOISTURE-VA PAH-ME-MS-VA PAH-TMB-H/A-MS-VA PH-1:2-VA VH-HSFID-VA VH-HSFID-VA VH-SURR-FID-VA VH-SURR-FID-VA VOC-HSMS-VA Water Dissolved Metals in Water by ICPOES This analysis is carried out using procedures adapted from "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater" published by the American Public Health Association, and with procedures adapted from "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste" SW-846 published by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The procedure involves filtration (EPA Method 3005A) and analysis by inductively coupled plasma - optical emission spectrophotometry (EPA Method 6010B). Soil Moisture content This analysis is carried out gravimetrically by drying the sample at 105 C for a minimum of six hours. Water PAHs in Water PAHs are extracted from water using a hexane micro-extraction technique, with analysis by GC/MS. Because the two isomers cannot be readily separated chromatographically, benzo(j)fluoranthene is reported as part of the benzo(b)fluoranthene parameter. Soil PAH - Rotary Extraction (Hexane/Acetone) This analysis is carried out using procedures adapted from "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste" SW-846, Methods 3570 & 8270, published by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The procedure uses a mechanical shaking technique to extract a subsample of the sediment/soil with a 1:1 mixture of hexane and acetone. The extract is then solvent exchanged to toluene. The final extract is analysed by capillary column gas chromatography with mass spectrometric detection (GC/MS). Surrogate recoveries may not be reported in cases where interferences from the sample matrix prevent accurate quantitation. Because the two isomers cannot be readily chromatographically separated, benzo(j)fluoranthene is reported as part of the benzo(b)fluoranthene parameter. Soil ph in Soil (1:2 Soil:Water Extraction) This analysis is carried out in accordance with procedures described in the ph, Electrometric in Soil and Sediment method - Section B Physical/Inorganic and Misc. Constituents, BC Environmental Laboratory Manual The procedure involves mixing the dried (at <60 C) and sieved (No. 10 / 2mm) sample with deionized/distilled water at a 1:2 ratio of sediment to water. The ph of the solution is then measured using a standard ph probe. Water VH in Water by Headspace GCFID The water sample, with added reagents, is heated in a sealed vial to equilibrium. The headspace from the vial is transfered into a gas chromatograph. Compounds eluting between n-hexane and n-decane are measured and summed together using flame-ionization detection. Soil VH in soil by Headspace GCFID This analysis involves the extraction of a subsample of the sediment/soil with methanol. Aliquots of the methanol extract are then added to water and reagents, then heated in a sealed vial to equilibrium. The headspace from the vial is analyzed for Volatile Hydrocarbons (VH) by capillary column gas chromatography with flame-ionization detection (GC/FID). The methanol extraction and VH analysis are carried out in accordance with the British Columbia Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks (BCMELP) Analytical Method for Contaminated Sites "Volatile Hydrocarbons in Solids by GC/FID" (Version 2.1 July 1999). Water Soil Water VH Surrogates for Waters VH Surrogates for Soils VOCs in water by Headspace GCMS EPA SW A/6010B ASTM D Method A EPA 3511/8270D (mod) EPA 3570/8270 BC WLAP METHOD: PH, ELECTROMETRIC, SOIL B.C. MIN. OF ENV. LAB. MAN. (2009) EPA8260B, 5021, 5035, BC MOE B.C. MIN. OF ENV. LAB. MAN. (2009) BCMELP CSR ANALYTICAL METHOD 2 EPA8260B, 5021

125 Reference Information L CONTD... PAGE 16 of MAY-16 09:59 (MT) Version: FINAL The water sample, with added reagents, is heated in a sealed vial to equilibrium. The headspace from the vial is transferred into a gas chromatograph. Target compound concentrations are measured using mass spectrometry detection. VOC-HSMS-VA VOC7-HSMS-VA VOC7-L-HSMS-VA VOC7/VOC-SURR-MS-VA VOC7/VOC-SURR-MS-VA VPH-CALC-VA VPH-CALC-VA XYLENES-CALC-VA XYLENES-CALC-VA VOCs in soil by Headspace GCMS The soil methanol extract is added to water and reagents, then heated in a sealed vial to equilibrium. The headspace from the vial is transferred into a gas chromatograph. Target compound concentrations are measured using mass spectrometry detection. BTEX/MTBE/Styrene by Headspace GCMS The water sample, with added reagents, is heated in a sealed vial to equilibrium. The headspace from the vial is transfered into a gas chromatograph. Target compound concentrations are measured using mass spectrometry detection. VOCs in soil by Headspace GCMS The soil methanol extract is added to water and reagents, then heated in a sealed vial to equilibrium. The headspace from the vial is transferred into a gas chromatograph. Target compound concentrations are measured using mass spectrometry detection. VOC7 and/or VOC Surrogates for Waters VOC7 and/or VOC Surrogates for Soils VPH is VH minus select aromatics These results are determined according to the British Columbia Ministry of Environment Analytical Method for Contaminated Sites "Calculation of Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Solids or Water". The concentrations of specific Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Xylenes and, in solids, Styrene) are subtracted from the collective concentration of Volatile Hydrocarbons (VH) that elute between n- hexane (nc6) and n-decane (nc10). VPH is VH minus select aromatics These results are determined according to the British Columbia Ministry of Environment, Lands, and Parks Analytical Method for Contaminated Sites "Calculation of Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Solids or Water" (Version 2.1, July 20, 1999). According to this method, the concentrations of specific Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Xylenes and Styrene) are subtracted from the collective concentration of Volatile Hydrocarbons (VH) that elute between n-hexane (nc6) and n-decane (nc10). Analysis of Volatile Hydrocarbons adheres to all prescribed elements of BCMELP method "Volatile Hydrocarbons in Solids by GC/FID" (Version 2.1, July 20, 1999). Calculation of Total Xylenes Sum of Xylene Isomer Concentrations Total Xylenes is the sum of the concentrations of the ortho, meta, and para Xylene isomers. Results below detection limit (DL) are treated as zero. The DL for Total Xylenes is set to a value no less than the square root of the sum of the squares of the DLs of the individual Xylenes. Calculation of Total Xylenes Soil Water Soil Water Soil Water Soil Water Soil Sum of Xylene Isomer Concentrations EPA8260B, 5021, 5035, BC MOE EPA8260B, 5021 EPA8260B, 5021, 5035, BC MOE EPA8260B, 5021 EPA METHODS 8260B & BC MOE LABORATORY MANUAL (2005) BC MOE LABORATORY MANUAL (2005) CALCULATION EPA 8260B & Total Xylenes is the sum of the concentrations of the ortho, meta, and para Xylene isomers. Results below detection limit (DL) are treated as zero. The DL for Total Xylenes is set to a value no less than the square root of the sum of the squares of the DLs of the individual Xylenes. ** ALS test methods may incorporate modifications from specified reference methods to improve performance. The last two letters of the above test code(s) indicate the laboratory that performed analytical analysis for that test. Refer to the list below: Laboratory Definition Code VA Laboratory Location ALS ENVIRONMENTAL - VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CANADA Chain of Custody Numbers: GLOSSARY OF REPORT TERMS Surrogate - A compound that is similar in behaviour to target analyte(s), but that does not occur naturally in environmental samples. For applicable tests, surrogates are added to samples prior to analysis as a check on recovery. mg/kg - milligrams per kilogram based on dry weight of sample. mg/kg wwt - milligrams per kilogram based on wet weight of sample. mg/kg lwt - milligrams per kilogram based on lipid-adjusted weight of sample. mg/l - milligrams per litre. < - Less than. D.L. - The reported Detection Limit, also known as the Limit of Reporting (LOR). N/A - Result not available. Refer to qualifier code and definition for explanation. Test results reported relate only to the samples as received by the laboratory. UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED, ALL SAMPLES WERE RECEIVED IN ACCEPTABLE CONDITION. Analytical results in unsigned test reports with the DRAFT watermark are subject to change, pending final QC review.

126 ALS Sample ID: L Client Sample ID: 16 MW01 D=2 1/2' (0.76M) Response - MilliVolts Time - Minutes The EPH Hydrocarbon Distribution Report (HDR) is intended to assist you in characterizing hydrocarbon products that may be present in your sample. For further interpretation, a current library of reference products is available on or upon request. The scale at the bottom of the chromatogram indicates the approximate retention times of common petroleum products, and three n-alkane hydrocarbon marker compounds. Retention times may vary between samples by as much as 0.5 minutes. Peak heights in this report are a function of the sample concentration, the sample amount extracted, the sample dilution factor, and the response scale at the left. A "-L-" in the sample ID denotes a low level sample. A "-S-" denotes a silica gel cleaned sample. Printed on 5/3/ :00:29 AM Page 1 of 1

127 ALS Sample ID: L Client Sample ID: 16 MW01 D=7 1/2' (2.28M) Response - MilliVolts Time - Minutes The EPH Hydrocarbon Distribution Report (HDR) is intended to assist you in characterizing hydrocarbon products that may be present in your sample. For further interpretation, a current library of reference products is available on or upon request. The scale at the bottom of the chromatogram indicates the approximate retention times of common petroleum products, and three n-alkane hydrocarbon marker compounds. Retention times may vary between samples by as much as 0.5 minutes. Peak heights in this report are a function of the sample concentration, the sample amount extracted, the sample dilution factor, and the response scale at the left. A "-L-" in the sample ID denotes a low level sample. A "-S-" denotes a silica gel cleaned sample. Printed on 5/3/ :00:32 AM Page 1 of 1

128 ALS Sample ID: L Client Sample ID: 16 MW02 D=7 1/2' (2.28M) Response - MilliVolts Time - Minutes The EPH Hydrocarbon Distribution Report (HDR) is intended to assist you in characterizing hydrocarbon products that may be present in your sample. For further interpretation, a current library of reference products is available on or upon request. The scale at the bottom of the chromatogram indicates the approximate retention times of common petroleum products, and three n-alkane hydrocarbon marker compounds. Retention times may vary between samples by as much as 0.5 minutes. Peak heights in this report are a function of the sample concentration, the sample amount extracted, the sample dilution factor, and the response scale at the left. A "-L-" in the sample ID denotes a low level sample. A "-S-" denotes a silica gel cleaned sample. Printed on 5/3/ :00:42 AM Page 1 of 1

129 ALS Sample ID: L Client Sample ID: 16 MW03 D=7 1/2' (2.28M) Response - MilliVolts Time - Minutes The EPH Hydrocarbon Distribution Report (HDR) is intended to assist you in characterizing hydrocarbon products that may be present in your sample. For further interpretation, a current library of reference products is available on or upon request. The scale at the bottom of the chromatogram indicates the approximate retention times of common petroleum products, and three n-alkane hydrocarbon marker compounds. Retention times may vary between samples by as much as 0.5 minutes. Peak heights in this report are a function of the sample concentration, the sample amount extracted, the sample dilution factor, and the response scale at the left. A "-L-" in the sample ID denotes a low level sample. A "-S-" denotes a silica gel cleaned sample. Printed on 5/4/2016 2:06:06 PM Page 1 of 1

130 ALS Sample ID: Client Sample ID: WG #L MW03 D=7 1/2' (2.28M) Response - MilliVolts Time - Minutes The EPH Hydrocarbon Distribution Report (HDR) is intended to assist you in characterizing hydrocarbon products that may be present in your sample. For further interpretation, a current library of reference products is available on or upon request. The scale at the bottom of the chromatogram indicates the approximate retention times of common petroleum products, and three n-alkane hydrocarbon marker compounds. Retention times may vary between samples by as much as 0.5 minutes. Peak heights in this report are a function of the sample concentration, the sample amount extracted, the sample dilution factor, and the response scale at the left. A "-L-" in the sample ID denotes a low level sample. A "-S-" denotes a silica gel cleaned sample. Printed on 5/4/2016 2:06:10 PM Page 1 of 1

131 ALS Sample ID: L Client Sample ID: 16 MW04 D=7 1/2' (2.28M) Response - MilliVolts Time - Minutes The EPH Hydrocarbon Distribution Report (HDR) is intended to assist you in characterizing hydrocarbon products that may be present in your sample. For further interpretation, a current library of reference products is available on or upon request. The scale at the bottom of the chromatogram indicates the approximate retention times of common petroleum products, and three n-alkane hydrocarbon marker compounds. Retention times may vary between samples by as much as 0.5 minutes. Peak heights in this report are a function of the sample concentration, the sample amount extracted, the sample dilution factor, and the response scale at the left. A "-L-" in the sample ID denotes a low level sample. A "-S-" denotes a silica gel cleaned sample. Printed on 5/4/2016 2:06:13 PM Page 1 of 1

132 ALS Sample ID: L Client Sample ID: 16 MW05 D=7 1/2' (2.28M) Response - MilliVolts Time - Minutes The EPH Hydrocarbon Distribution Report (HDR) is intended to assist you in characterizing hydrocarbon products that may be present in your sample. For further interpretation, a current library of reference products is available on or upon request. The scale at the bottom of the chromatogram indicates the approximate retention times of common petroleum products, and three n-alkane hydrocarbon marker compounds. Retention times may vary between samples by as much as 0.5 minutes. Peak heights in this report are a function of the sample concentration, the sample amount extracted, the sample dilution factor, and the response scale at the left. A "-L-" in the sample ID denotes a low level sample. A "-S-" denotes a silica gel cleaned sample. Printed on 5/4/2016 2:06:17 PM Page 1 of 1

133 ALS Sample ID: L Client Sample ID: DUP Response - MilliVolts Time - Minutes The EPH Hydrocarbon Distribution Report (HDR) is intended to assist you in characterizing hydrocarbon products that may be present in your sample. For further interpretation, a current library of reference products is available on or upon request. The scale at the bottom of the chromatogram indicates the approximate retention times of common petroleum products, and three n-alkane hydrocarbon marker compounds. Retention times may vary between samples by as much as 0.5 minutes. Peak heights in this report are a function of the sample concentration, the sample amount extracted, the sample dilution factor, and the response scale at the left. A "-L-" in the sample ID denotes a low level sample. A "-S-" denotes a silica gel cleaned sample. Printed on 5/4/2016 2:06:21 PM Page 1 of 1

134 ALS Sample ID: L Client Sample ID: 16 MW Response - MilliVolts Time - Minutes The EPH Hydrocarbon Distribution Report (HDR) is intended to assist you in characterizing hydrocarbon products that may be present in your sample. For further interpretation, a current library of reference products is available on or upon request. The scale at the bottom of the chromatogram indicates the approximate retention times of common petroleum products, and three n-alkane hydrocarbon marker compounds. Retention times may vary between samples by as much as 0.5 minutes. Peak heights in this report are a function of the sample concentration, the sample amount extracted, the sample dilution factor, and the response scale at the left. A "-L-" in the sample ID denotes a low level sample. A "-S-" denotes a silica gel cleaned sample. Printed on 5/4/2016 2:14:54 PM Page 1 of 1

135 ALS Sample ID: L Client Sample ID: 16 MW Response - MilliVolts Time - Minutes The EPH Hydrocarbon Distribution Report (HDR) is intended to assist you in characterizing hydrocarbon products that may be present in your sample. For further interpretation, a current library of reference products is available on or upon request. The scale at the bottom of the chromatogram indicates the approximate retention times of common petroleum products, and three n-alkane hydrocarbon marker compounds. Retention times may vary between samples by as much as 0.5 minutes. Peak heights in this report are a function of the sample concentration, the sample amount extracted, the sample dilution factor, and the response scale at the left. A "-L-" in the sample ID denotes a low level sample. A "-S-" denotes a silica gel cleaned sample. Printed on 5/4/2016 2:14:57 PM Page 1 of 1

136 ALS Sample ID: L Client Sample ID: 16 MW Response - MilliVolts Time - Minutes The EPH Hydrocarbon Distribution Report (HDR) is intended to assist you in characterizing hydrocarbon products that may be present in your sample. For further interpretation, a current library of reference products is available on or upon request. The scale at the bottom of the chromatogram indicates the approximate retention times of common petroleum products, and three n-alkane hydrocarbon marker compounds. Retention times may vary between samples by as much as 0.5 minutes. Peak heights in this report are a function of the sample concentration, the sample amount extracted, the sample dilution factor, and the response scale at the left. A "-L-" in the sample ID denotes a low level sample. A "-S-" denotes a silica gel cleaned sample. Printed on 5/4/2016 2:15:01 PM Page 1 of 1

137 ALS Sample ID: L Client Sample ID: 16 MW Response - MilliVolts Time - Minutes The EPH Hydrocarbon Distribution Report (HDR) is intended to assist you in characterizing hydrocarbon products that may be present in your sample. For further interpretation, a current library of reference products is available on or upon request. The scale at the bottom of the chromatogram indicates the approximate retention times of common petroleum products, and three n-alkane hydrocarbon marker compounds. Retention times may vary between samples by as much as 0.5 minutes. Peak heights in this report are a function of the sample concentration, the sample amount extracted, the sample dilution factor, and the response scale at the left. A "-L-" in the sample ID denotes a low level sample. A "-S-" denotes a silica gel cleaned sample. Printed on 5/4/2016 2:15:04 PM Page 1 of 1

138 ALS Sample ID: L Client Sample ID: DUP # Response - MilliVolts Time - Minutes The EPH Hydrocarbon Distribution Report (HDR) is intended to assist you in characterizing hydrocarbon products that may be present in your sample. For further interpretation, a current library of reference products is available on or upon request. The scale at the bottom of the chromatogram indicates the approximate retention times of common petroleum products, and three n-alkane hydrocarbon marker compounds. Retention times may vary between samples by as much as 0.5 minutes. Peak heights in this report are a function of the sample concentration, the sample amount extracted, the sample dilution factor, and the response scale at the left. A "-L-" in the sample ID denotes a low level sample. A "-S-" denotes a silica gel cleaned sample. Printed on 5/4/2016 2:15:09 PM Page 1 of 1

139

140

141 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT FILE: ENG.KGEO JUNE, 2016 ISSUED FOR REVIEW APPENDIX D QA/QC PROGRAM SUMMARY ESA Report - Penticton, BC.docx

142 APPENDIX D FILE: 704.ENG.KGEO MAY 27, 2016 ISSUED FOR USE Appendix D - Quality Assurance/Quality Control Program Tetra Tech EBA Quality Assurance/Quality Control Program During the ESA, Tetra Tech EBA implemented a Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) program to ensure the integrity of the sampling methodology and analytical testing. The QA/QC program adhered to Tetra Tech EBA s inhouse Quality Management System (QMS), which was designed to generate representative samples, minimize the potential for cross contamination between sampling locations and samples, and reduce the potential for systematic bias. The QA/QC program included the following tasks: Logging subsurface conditions and sampling of environmental media; Recording the results of field activities in the field concurrently with the activities; Use of clean, new sampling gloves at each sampling location; Placing samples into new, labeled laboratory-supplied containers; Transporting temperature-sensitive samples to ALS in chilled coolers using chain-of-custody procedures; Using a Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation (CALA) accredited laboratory that is qualified to analyze the samples using CCME and MOE-approved procedures; Requiring that one person who did not compile the tables appearing in this report review the tables and compare the tabulated analytical results with the original information appearing on the laboratory certificates to verify the accuracy of the information in the tables; and Conducting a review of this report by a qualified senior Tetra Tech EBA professional to ensure that the report meets Tetra Tech EBA technical and reporting requirements. To assess for analytical accuracy, the MOE recommends that one in every ten samples be analyzed in duplicate at a duplicate frequency of 10%. The duplicate pairs submitted for laboratory testing are summarized in Tables 4 and 5. Tetra Tech EBA formed the duplicate samples by alternately placing approximately 10% of the sample volume into the original sample container and then placing the same amount into the duplicate sample container. Tetra Tech EBA continued placing additional aliquots of approximately 10% of the sample volume into each container until both containers were filled. Part of the QA/QC program involved calculating the relative percent difference (RPD) between sample concentrations of paired blind duplicates. Results were calculated as follows: RPD (%) = 2 x 100 x X Y / (X + Y) Where: X = the measured concentration in the original sample; and Y = the measured concentration in the duplicate sample. 1 Appendix D - QAQC Program Summary.docx

143 APPENDIX D FILE: 704.ENG.KGEO MAY 27, 2016 ISSUED FOR USE RPDs should only be calculated and assessed when both the sample and the duplicate concentration is greater than five times the reportable detection limit (RDL), referred to as the Practical Quantification Limit (PQL). When evaluating the RPDs for the duplicate samples, a different screening threshold was used for different parameters, as follows: Soil Metals: For high variability soil metals: Ag, Al, Ba, Hg, K, Mo, Na, Pb, Sn, Sr, To, a 60% screening threshold was adopted; and The remaining CSR soil metals were compared against a 45% screening threshold. Water Metals: Groundwater metals were compared against a 30% screening threshold. Soil Organics: PAHs were compared against a 75% screening threshold; and VOCs, EPH and other organics were compared to a 60% screening threshold. Water Organics: Groundwater VOCs and other organics were compared to a 45% screening threshold. Both threshold values were recommended in the MOE Q&A, and British Columbia Laboratory Sampling Manual. Should the RPD exceed the recommended value, an explanation for the variation is required. The RPD calculations are included in Tables 4 and 5, and discussed in Section 7.2. Laboratory Quality Assurance / Quality Control Program Soil, groundwater and sediment samples were submitted to ALS, a CALA accredited laboratory. Laboratory testing was conducted using methods outlined in the British Columbia Environmental Laboratory Manual. Laboratory QA/QC reports are attached to the laboratory reports presented in Appendix C. Samples included in the QA/QC reports consist of laboratory batches and will include random samples from the lab report and potentially other projects to complete a batch. Tetra Tech EBA notes that the RDL is often raised during the analytical process, typically due to sample dilution due to high levels of contamination or from sample matrix interferences such as the presence of non-target compounds. Raised RDLs due to sample dilution or sample matrix interference are not discussed within the QA/QC review unless they raise the RDL to less than one order of magnitude below the numerical CSR standard. The Laboratories will note any sample deficiencies, such as unacceptable headspace, broken jars or bottles, etc. As well, the laboratory will measure the temperature of samples received by the laboratory in Burnaby. Additionally, the laboratory will use five different methods for checking the quality of sample analytical results, these include: Laboratory Duplicate (RPD) A second aliquot is obtained from a randomly chosen sample. The aliquot is processed and the results expressed as the RPD between the two results. The purpose of the laboratory duplicate is to evaluate analytical precision and sample homogeneity. A laboratory duplicate is performed for every 20 samples analyzed. 2 Appendix D - QAQC Program Summary.docx

144 APPENDIX D FILE: 704.ENG.KGEO MAY 27, 2016 ISSUED FOR USE Surrogate Recovery A compound that behaves similar to the analytes of interest in the analysis is added to samples prior to analysis. Recoveries calculated are expressed as a percentage. The purpose of the surrogate recovery is to monitor the efficiency of organic extraction instruments performance and the result must be within acceptable laboratory recovery limits. A surrogate recovery is performed for every organic analysis. Matrix Spike A second aliquot is obtained from a randomly chosen sample and seeded with a known concentration of target analytes. The sample is processed and results are expressed as a percentage recovery and must be within acceptable laboratory recovery limits. The purpose of the Matrix Spike is to evaluate any matrix effects that may exist in a sample due to its composition that may affect recovery of analytes. A matrix spike is performed for every 20 samples analyzed. Blank Spike An uncontaminated sample free of the target analytes or interferences is seeded with a known concentration of target analytes. The blank spike is processed and results are expressed as a percentage recovery and must be within acceptable laboratory recovery limits. The purpose of the blank spike is to monitor analyte recovery and potential loss during the preparation procedures and to validate the calibration of the instrumentation or technique. A blank spike is performed for every 20 samples analyzed. Method Blank An uncontaminated sample is obtained that is free of the target parameters and of any substance which may interfere with that analysis. A method blank is processed to monitor laboratory background levels of target analytes and laboratory artifacts. A method blank is performed for every 20 samples analyzed. 3 Appendix D - QAQC Program Summary.docx

145 APPENDIX B LIST OF APPROVED MATERIALS AND PRODUCTS

146 LIST OF APPROVED MATERIALS & PRODUCTS SECTION SUB-SECTION ITEM APPROVED PRODUCTS COMMENTS Fittings/Restrainers Per MMCD All Cast or Ductile Iron Waterworks Couplings Saddles Per MMCD Stainless Steel Mainline Gate Valves Per MMCD All direct bury mainline valves resilient seal or solid wedge Butterfly valves to be Butterfly Valves Per MMCD approved by Engineer Air and Vacuum Release Valve Per MMCD End flange to ANSI A Mainline Valve Box S-W4 Cover marked Water Service Valve Box Per MMCD / S-W2 2.4 Valve Chamber, Frames and Cover Per MMCD Cover marked Water Services Type K Copper All 19mm, 25mm, & 50mm Services Terminal City Hydrants Mueller Canada Valve See S-W4 Clow Stortz Nozzle Ports Corporation Stops Per MMCD All Lead Free Brass 19mm/50mm All Lead Free Brass Curb Stops Per S-W2 Detail 19mm/50mm Ribs at right angles to PVC Ribbed Pipe Extruded Seamless Storm Sewers pipe access Manholes and Catchbasins Frame and Cover C-18 Adjustable Frame and Cover Concrete Bricks Not Permitted Pre-Benched Pipe rubber O rings Integral rubber gaskets Manhole Bases within pre-cast base within base Protection Pads Canada Safety Equipment or Equal With colour pigment

147

148 CycleGrip MMAX APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS CycleGrip MMAX Bike Lane Treatment System Overview: CycleGrip MMAX combines state-of-the-art Methyl Methacrylate resins with intermixed hardwearing aggregate and premium pigments to deliver an extremely durable, color stable lane delineation treatment system that meets non-slip requirements needed for cyclists. CycleGrip MMAX is mixed onsite and is distributed on to the pavement substrate using squeegees. CycleGrip MMAX cures in a wide range of temperatures with predictable back to traffic times of minutes. EQUIPMENT: The following items are needed during the different stages of application. Surface prep & layout Mixing Installation Clean up Stiff broom High speed / torque drill(with power source / spare batteries) Long handled squeegees Solvent resistant gloves Blower / compressed air Mixing paddles Spare rubber squeegee blades Safety glasses Measuring tape Measuring cup Straight hand trowels Acetone Chalk line Small tarp Long handled roller cages Large cleaning tub Marking crayons Screw driver/bucket opener Rollers - med. nap (5 per 1000 sqft) Solvent resistant brushes Duct tape Utility knife Cloth rags Roofing paper Misc tools Trash bags GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: SURFACE: CycleGrip MMAX can be applied on stable, well compacted asphalt or non-bituminous concrete surfaces, such as Portland cement concrete. New substrates should be allowed to age harden or cure for minimum 15 days (asphalt) to 30 days (concrete) before installation. Pavement surface must be completely free of dirt, debris, moisture, curing compounds and other contaminants that can affect adhesion. Chemical contaminants such as vehicle fluids must be removed well in advance using a degreasing solution and power washer, ensuring all residues are removed. Existing pavement markings within the application area may be removed by gently sandblasting, shot-blasting, water-blasting or grinding making sure that minimal damage is done to the substrate. Aged surfaces containing reflective cracking should be repaired, or reflective cracking should be expected to reappear after installation. MATERIAL: Avoid extreme storage temperatures. Keep materials in dry, protected areas, between 40 F 80 F. Keep out of direct sunlight and protected from open flame. Use within six months of receipt. TEMPERATURE: Ambient and surface temperatures for installation should be between F, and should be 5 F above the dew point temperature. There should also be less than 75% relative humidity when installing CycleGrip MMAX. SAFETY PRECAUTIONS: Review MSDS for CycleGrip MMAX before usage. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICATION: Surface Prep: Clean the intended application area thoroughly. All loose particles, dirt, sand dust, etc. must be removed. Concrete surfaces should be wire brushed, at minimum. Sweep completely. Use a power blower or compressed air. Clean areas containing chemical contaminants such as vehicle fluids, using a degreasing solution. Proper removal of contaminants and degreasing solution are necessary well in advance of the application. Ennis-Flint Page 1 of

149 CycleGrip MMAX APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS CycleGrip MMAX Bike Lane Treatment System Masking: Using duct tape and roofing paper, mask off perimeter of area to be colored, as well as any object not to be colored such as manhole covers, drains and existing markings. Mixing: Add the supplied 25.7 lbs of CycleGrip MMAX aggregate into the 2 gallons CycleGrip MMAX resin and mix with clean mixing paddle, using a high speed, high torque drill. Add the recommended amount of powder catalyst, based on ambient and pavement temperature (Table 1), and mix thoroughly. After adding the catalyst, CycleGrip MMAX will start curing and must be applied to the pavement immediately. There will be 4 to 10 minute working time, which is temperature dependent. Material will mix to approximately 2.79 gallons (10.55 liters), weigh 52 lbs and cover mils. Caution: Clean the mixing paddle between uses or understand that material will immediately initiate curing if previously exposed to catalyzed material (and not cleaned). Table 1: Recommended catalyst by temperature range: < 70 o F / 18 o C o F / o C > 90 o F / 32 o C lbs (kg).51 (.23) fl oz (liters) 12 (.365) lbs (kg) 0.26 (.12) fl oz (liters) 6 (.185) lbs (kg) 0.13 (.06) fl oz (liters) 3 (.09) Installation: Immediately, pour mixed material on to pavement to be treated and use a squeegee to evenly distribute at a coverage rate of sq. ft. per gallon, or sq. ft. per pail. Pre-measuring / pre-marking can assist to ensure proper coverage. Use trowel in small, tight areas where squeegee cannot effectively be used. After rough distribution with squeegee, back roll material (one direction only) to remove working lines created with squeegee and create a consistent, anti-slip texture. Roller will last longer during continuous usage when it remains wetted with new batches of MMA resin, but will need to be replaced when it starts pulling material or creating differences in texture. Stopping and starting will decrease the useful life of the roller. As material gels, but before it cures, remove masking. Clean up: Clean all tooling in acetone before material is cured. Clean in well ventilated areas to reduce fume build-up and worker exposure. Do not come into direct contact with solvents - use proper personal protective equipment. Acetone is extremely flammable; take proper handling measures to reduce static discharge and combustion. Dispose of all contaminated materials in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. Opening to traffic: CycleGrip MMAX must be 100% cured, which will be a hardened solid state, before traffic is permitted. Curing is based on temperatures and amount of catalyst added, but typically takes minutes. Ennis-Flint Page 2 of

150 MMA AREA MARKINGS MMA AREA MARKINGS SPECIFICATION Methyl Methacrylate Area Marking with Anti-Skid 1. USE: MMA AREA MARKINGS conveniently combine state-of-the-art Methyl Methacrylate resins with hardwearing aggregate and premium pigments to deliver an extremely durable, highly visible and color stable lane delineation treatment that meets the non-slip requirements needed for pedestrians, cyclists and vehicles MMA AREA MARKINGS are available in a variety of colors. 2. MATERIAL: Materials used to create MMA AREA MARKINGS shall consist of MMA AREA MARKING Pre-pigmented Resin, MMA AREA MARKING Hardwearing Aggregate and Catalyst MMA AREA MARKING Resin MMA AREA MARKING Resins shall have the following properties: Density 12.8+/ Lbs/Gal Tensile >2000 psi ASTM D638 Elongation >70% ASTM D638 Flash Point >50 F / 10 C ASTN D MMA AREA MARKING Aggregate shall be provided by the manufacturer and will have a hardness of 9 on the Mohs scale. Aggregate shall be a neutral, light color that will not affect the color of the finished product, and will have a mesh sizing of 24 Grit Catalyst shall come in a powder form and be supplied in bulk at the maximum usage rate of /- 0.2 lbs (.23 +/-.09 kg) per mixed pail of resin and aggregate. 3. APPLICATION EQUIPMENT: 3.1. Squeegees shall be designed for heavy duty usage and sourced locally Rollers shall be medium nap in texture and require a roller cage and handle Drill shall be high speed, high torque capable of supplying enough power to thoroughly mix MMA AREA MARKING additives when paired with a paint mixing paddle. 4. APPLICATION: 4.1. Pre-conditions. Aged surfaces containing reflective cracking should be repaired, or it should be expected that reflective cracking may re-appear Surface preparation. Clean the intended application area thoroughly. All loose particles, dirt, sand dust, etc. must be removed. Broom and use a power blower or compressed air. The surface must be clean, dry and free of all dust, oil, debris and any other material that might interfere with the bond between the product and the surface to be treated Concrete: All curing compounds shall be completely removed from concrete surfaces prior to installation by shot blasting or grinding. Existing concrete surfaces shall be wire brushed, but may require shot blasting or grinding dependent on condition Chemical contaminants: Clean areas containing chemical contaminants such as vehicle fluids, using a degreasing solution, and ensure removal of contaminants and degreasing solution well in advance of the application Obstacles: Pavement markings that are to be left in place, utilities, drainage structures, curbs and any other structure within or adjacent to the treatment location shall be masked to protect from application. Existing pavement markings conflicting with the surface treatment should be removed by grinding or water blasting. Extra care should be taken to thoroughly remove the dust and debris caused from grinding Mixing. Catalyst quantity shall be based on ambient and pavement temperature and must be mixed very thoroughly at specified rates and into materials listed in the materials mixing guide. Material shall mix to approximately 2.79 gallons (10.55 liters) and weigh approximately 52 lbs (23.6 kg). Ennis-Flint Page 1 of

151 MMA AREA MARKINGS MMA AREA MARKINGS SPECIFICATION Methyl Methacrylate Area Marking with Anti-Skid Materials Mixing Guide: MMA AREA MARKING Resin: 2 gallons (7.6 liters) MMA AREA MARKING Aggregate: 25.7 lbs (11.7 kg) CATALYST (temperature dependent): > 90 o F / 32 o C 3 fl. oz. (.09 liters) o F / o C 6 fl. oz. (.185 liters) < 70 o F / 18 o C 12 fl. oz. (.365 liters) 4.4. Installation. MMA AREA MARKINGS shall immediately be poured onto the pavement and distributed at sq. ft. per pail using a squeegee. Trowels can be used where a squeegee is not effective. Use roller to back roll MMA AREA MARKINGS to remove working lines and create a consistent, anti-slip texture. Remove masking as material gels, but before it cures Opening to traffic. MMA AREA MARKINGS must be 100% cured, which will be a hardened solid state, before traffic is permitted. Curing typically takes minutes and is based on temperature and amount of catalyst added. 5. PERFORMANCE PROPERTIES: 5.1. MMA AREA MARKINGS will have the following performance properties: Density /- 0.5 Lbs. / Gallon Solids >99% D2205 Build Thickness 90 +/-10 Mils VOC <100 Grams/Liter Pot Life ~15min AASHTO T237 Skid >60 ASTM E303 Hardness ASTM D2240 Water Absorption <0.25% ASTM D PACKAGING: 6.1. MMA AREA MARKING Resin must be supplied in compliant metal pails that have a UN1A2Y1.9/100 rating MMA AREA MARKING Aggregate must be supplied in /- 0.5 lbs. (11.7 +/-.23 kg) pre-packaged bags or pails. 7. TECHNICAL SERVICES: Shall be available from the manufacturer upon request. Ennis-Flint Page 2 of

152 CycleGrip MMAX Specialized Bike Lane Treatment System PRODUCT DATA Product Type: MMA Bike Lane Treatment Product Code: G-KIT Product Color: E-F Bike Lane Green Effective Date: March 2014 Product Description: CycleGrip MMAX specialized bike lane treatment system conveniently combines state-of-the-art Methyl Methacrylate resins with hardwearing aggregate and premium pigments to deliver an extremely durable, highly visible and color stable lane delineation treatment that meets the non-slip requirements needed for cyclists. CycleGrip MMAX can be used to delineate bike lanes and increase bicycle lane presence in applications such as, but not limited to, corridor treatment along the length of a bike lane or cycle track especially at areas where bicycle and vehicular conflict are expected and added safety is needed. Product Advantages: Durable Color stable Fast back to traffic Non-slip surface Easy to apply; pre-packaged for on-site mixing and convenience FHWA / MUTCD compliant bike lane green color Packaging: Each CycleGrip MMAX kit mixes to 2.79 gallons and covers approximately sq. 90 mils build thickness. It includes the following: CycleGrip MMAX Resin: 2 gallons / 7.57 liters Supplied in 5 gallon pail for easy mixing CycleGrip MMAX Aggregate: lbs / kg bag Catalyst*: fl. oz. / 365 ml (.51lbs /.23 kg) Storage: Keep in dry protected areas between 40 F 80 F, out of direct sunlight and protected from open flame. Use within six months of receipt. Other: *Amount of catalyst used is dependent on ambient and road temperatures. Each kit is supplied with the maximum amount of catalyst that would be required. Refer to Table in CycleGrip MMAX Application Instructions. Product Characteristics Test Binder Resin Density Lbs/Gal Tensile >2000 psi ASTM D638 Elongation >70% ASTM D638 Flash Point >10 C ASTM D1310 Aggregate Hardness 9 Mohs Scale Bike Lane Treatment Density /- 0.5 Lbs/Gal Build Thickness 90 +/- 10 Mils VOC <100 Grams/Liter Pot Life ~15min AASHTO T237 Solids 99% ASTM D1644 Skid >60 ASTM E303 Hardness ASTM D2240 Water Absorption <0.25% ASTM D570 The product data offered herein is, to the best of our knowledge, true and accurate, but all recommendations are made without warranty, expressed or implied. Because the conditions of use are beyond our control, neither Ennis-Flint nor its agents shall be liable for any injury, loss or damage, direct or consequential, arising from the use or the inability to use the product described herein. As Ennis-Flint has neither control over the installation of product described herein nor control of the environmental factors the installed markings are subjected to, there is no guarantee as to the durability or the retroreflective properties of any marking system applied. No person is authorized to make any statement or recommendation not contained in the Product Data, and any such statement or recommendation, if made, shall not bind the Corporation. Further, nothing contained herein shall be construed as a recommendation to use any product in conflict with existing patents, and no license under the claims of any patent is either implied or granted sales@ennisflint.com Ennis-Flint. All Rights Reserved

153 Lafrentz Road Marking a division of Canadian Road Builders Inc Ph: , Township Road 530 A Toll Free: Acheson AB T7X 5A7 Sample Specification MMA Skid Resistant Safety Surface for use in Vehicle Traffic Areas The finished product must provide a highly skid resistant surface with a consistent texture across the application that is bonded to the asphalt or concrete substrate. The material shall be comprised of a MMA (methyl methacrylate) resin pigmented base coat homogenously mixed with bauxite. Surface Preparation: The asphalt surface must be clean and dry, free of dust or compacted material. Any oil residue must be removed. Mechanical grinding or sandblasting is suggested for oil removal. Equipment Preparation: Inspect and clean all tools. The application tool(s) can be a gauge rake and/or drag box. Ensure they are set to ensure proper application. Typical clearance is 3.0 to 4.0mm. Color: Typical colors are close to the listed Pantone numbers. A color sample shall be provided and approved by the owner prior to application. Color Pantone Black Chrome Green 3415 Florescent Green 368 Brick Red 1807 Bright Red 185 Note: Slight variations in color can be expected. Substrate color, lighting, aggregate loading and other environmental conditions can affect color. Base Coat Physical Properties: Viscosity: Daniel Flow Gauge Between Haake VT 02, Spindle 2 Approx. 17,000 mpa Density kg/l Shore D Harness Boiling Point o C Flash Point 10 o C (closed cup) Freezing Point 48 o C Specific Gravity 2.0 g/ml Volatile Organic Compounds Zero

154 Page 2 of 2 Sample Specification Bauxite Physical Properties: Gradation 100% angular 1.0mm x 3.0mm Mixing Base Coat and Bauxite: Combine the base coat and bauxite using a poly drum mixer. The blending ratio of 30kg of base coat to 25kg of bauxite should be maintained. Mix for a minimum of 2 minutes to ensure a homogenous mix is attained. Catalyst Doping: Pour the blended base coat/bauxite mixture from the mixer into a pail. The catalyst BPO should be added gradually while mixing with a drill. Refer to the manufacturer s BPO doping chart for recommended ratio. Typically doping is 0.5% to 2.0% Material Application: Using the drag box and/or gauge rake apply the material evenly on the asphalt. As soon as the raking is completed a medium pile paint roller should be used to remove any rake marks and provide a consistent texture. Finished Product: The surface should be protected until cured. Material cure time should be under 1 hour with vehicle traffic allowed on it at that time. Testing and Verification: Each application location should be tested using a British Pendulum Tester to verify the skid resistant properties of surface using ASTM E test method to the following value. BPN (British Pendulum Number) ASTM E >70 BPN Warranty: Material and installation shall be warranted for 12 months. The material should not peel or debond from the asphalt surface. 100% of the installation shall be in place at 12 months. Any missing material shall be replaced using the original application process. Cracking or material loss due to asphalt deterioration are not covered under this warranty.

155 system 400 cold plastic Cold PlastiC series of ProduCts MORE INFO VISIT: CALL TOLL FREE: 1 (800) System 400 Cold Plastic is a flexible, UV-stable, ISO-certified methyl methacrylate (MMA) durable road marking material. This cost-effective solution has no Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) emissions and can be applied to new and aged asphalt as well as concrete. Lafrentz also uses System 400 Cold Plastic as the base for Pathfinder profiled markings, which provide additional safety in the dark and poor weather conditions. You can order System 400 Cold Plastic online and use it for your own projects. Visit store.lafrentz.ca and follow the instructions to set up an account. application & Maintenance Manufactured by Lafrentz Road Marking, System 400 Cold Plastic uses a chemical catalyst to create a strong bond to the aggregate in the road surface. Methyl methacrylate is the same hard resin compound as that used to make plexiglass and dentures meaning cold plastic markings are highly durable and very long-lasting. Helping to extend the construction season in Canada s cold climate, System 400 can be applied at lower temperatures than thermoplastic (as low as 0 C). The plastic is extruded in liquid form, with glass beads included in the mix and applied the surface for additional retro-reflectivity. The average maintenance schedule is 10 times longer than paint, and when repairs are necessary it can be overlaid on a previous System 400 Cold Plastic application to provide monolithic repairs (avoiding the need for complete line removal and reapplication). System 400 is fast-curing, meaning roadways can be opened to traffic soon after application. The plastic is usually ready for traffic in under one hour. chemical Resistance & durability System 400 is highly resistant to degradation. It s completely UVstable, meaning it won t deteriorate over time with exposure to the sun s UV rays. It s equally unaffected by sodium chloride, calcium chloride, or other chemicals used to prevent ice formation on roadways). It won t degrade due to oil content in pavement materials, or from oil dropped from traffic. Lafrentz road Marking Township Rd. 530A // Acheson, AB T7X 5A7 Phone: // fax: // info@lafrentz.ca // toll free: 1 (800)

156 system 400 cold plastic Cold Plastic Series of Products How to Install System 400 Cold Plastic: STEP 1 Markings are laid out prior to applying System 400 materials. STEP 4 Longitudinal markings are applied using a walk-behind applicator. STEP 2 Catalyst is added to the material on the jobsite immediately prior to application (see table on back page for pot life estimates). STEP 5 Complicated symbols are applied by using a template and a drawbar to produce a thick extrusion. STEP 1: Pre-marking the lines STEP 3 The catalyzed material is poured into draw boxes to produce a mm thick extrusion for crosswalk and stop bar lines. STEP 6 Glass bead application. STEP 4: Longitudinal line application Installation Tips Mixing Instructions Easy to apply, Lafrentz sells System 400 Cold Plastic to project managers to install themselves. The following information is critical for the successful application and durability of System 400 Cold Plastic. The information is based on careful study of the chemical ingredients of the resins and on almost 30 years of road marking application experience. Please note this list is not exhaustive. For more information about applying System 400 Cold Plastic, please contact Lafrentz Road Marking. Pre-mix the material thoroughly with a high-speed power drill mixer. Once the material has been thoroughly mixed, add the pre-determined amount of BPO Powder (the activator / catalyst). A guideline for determining the amount of BPO Powder required is:1% by weight at 10 C will give approximately minutes of pot life before hardening (Note that 1% of the 30 kilogram pail is 300 grams). Please use the temperature chart on the following page as a guide to have minutes to work with the material. STEP 2: Adding the catalyst Surface Conditions Surface conditions should be clean and dry. Fine dust, sand or clay must be removed before application of cold plastic materials. A sweeper, air equipment or broom will work in most situations. The surface temperature of the asphalt is also critical. For best results, the temperature should be above freezing if materials are surface laid. Note: DO NOT USE less than 0.5% or MORE than 3.0% BPO. The material does not polymerize properly outside of this range. The BPO should be added slowly and well mixed around the sides of the pail, up and down using the high-speed drill mixer for approximately one minute. Longer mixing means shorter pot life. * See temperature guide on back page for more information about adding BPO catalyst STEP 5: Installing complicated symbols Material Coverage Cleaning Equipment & tools Each 20-litre pail contains 30 kg. of material. If extruded at 2 mm thick, each pail should give metres of 10 cm line, or m². Estimate the amount of material required at a specific location to minimize the waste of excess material. It is good practice to keep tools and equipment in a clean state. While the material is soft, the tools and equipment can be cleaned with a scraper, rags and solvent. Acetone, Xylene or Toluene are types of solvent that work well. If the material hardens on tools and equipment, the material can be softened and released by heating with a propane tiger torch. STEP 3: Stop-bar application STEP 6: Glass bead application SYSTEM 400 COLD PLASTIC // COLD PLASTIC SERIES OF PRODUCTS FOR MORE INFO VISIT: CALL TOLL FREE: 1 (800)

157 system 400 cold plastic Cold PlastiC series of ProduCts Bead Usage For the best retro-reflectivity, it is recommended that the usage of drop-on bead be limited to 350gm / m². Excessive bead does not give better retro readings. Silane-coated glass bead is recommend and shows good overall results. compatibility Lafrentz Road Marking products are unique in their composition and should not be mixed with other plastic road marking materials. For more information, please contact Lafrentz at (780) or Toll-free at 1 (800) and ask for technical service regarding the use of our products. temperature guide for adding Bpo catalyst did you know? Temp 0 Maximum BPO % by Weight 2.0% 2.5% Maximum BPO Weight (based on 18.9 kg pail) 600g 750g Pot Life 20 minutes SyStem 400 is available in four different formulas: % 1.5% 300g 450g 15 minutes 01 ExtrudEd (summer) 02 ExtrudEd (cold weather) % 1.0% 150g 300g 10 minutes 03 trowel-on 04 roll-on % 150g 10 minutes features of system 400 cold plastic: Very durable Can be applied to asphalt (new or aged) and concrete Most cost-effective durable road marking product Completely UV-stable with no VOC emissions Flexible and solvent-free Maintains a smooth surface 10x more durable than paint (on average) Can be applied in temperatures as low as 0 C Highly retro-reflective Good for longitudinal and transverse markings Can be overlaid for easy maintenance Limited installation equipment required Lafrentz road Marking Township Rd. 530A // Acheson, AB T7X 5A7 Phone: // fax: // info@lafrentz.ca // toll free: 1 (800)

158 APPENDIX C CITY OF PENTICTON SAFETY PROGRAM CONFIRMATION OF WORKPLACE SAFETY RESPONSIBILITIES

159 CONFIRMATION OF RESPONSIBILITIES (Discussion with Contractor Supervisor/Coordinator) Date: Contractor: Contractor Rep.: City of Penticton Rep.: Meeting Location: First Aid on Site Supervisor: Job Title: Job Title: The Contractor acknowledges the appointment per MMCD, G.C. 4.2 yes no Understands that in any conflict of directions, WCB OHS Regulation and/or the Act shall yes no prevail Training and Instruction of Workers. Each contractor on site must provide workers the yes no information, instruction, training, and supervision necessary to ensure the safe performance of their work and other workers at the workplace (WCA115). This should include orientation in first aid provisions, emergency procedures, personal protective equipment, excavations, electrical hazards, fall protection, ladder safety, other safe work procedures and hazards of their work/worksite. Understands and will direct that all supervisors/coordinators must immediately report any yes no apparent conflict as described above The supervisor shall immediately notify the City of Penticton of any reported conflict. yes no Has requested and received information to eliminate or control hazards to the health and yes no safety of persons at the workplace Has conducted an inspection of the workplace to verify the presence of any hazards yes no Will communicate hazards to any persons who may be affected and ensure that appropriate yes no measures are taken to effectively control or eliminate the hazards Accepts that written documentation (e.g. notes, records, inspections, meetings etc.) on all yes no health and safety issues must be available upon request to the City of Penticton and/or to a Board officer at the workplace Will confirm that all workers are suitably trained and competent to perform the duties for yes no which they have been assigned Safety orientation of all new workers will be conducted yes no Contractor s written Safety Program has been provided yes no Meetings to exchange any safety issues, concerns, hazards or safety directives will be yes no conducted weekly (or more often if required) Before the commencement of work, crews will attend a daily crew safety meeting yes no The supervisor has assessed and will coordinate the first aid requirements yes no Transport of Injured Worker procedure is established yes no Electrical Safety. Overhead high-voltage electricity. Determine the voltage of any overhead yes no lines in the work area through the authority controlling the system (for example City Electrical or FortisBC) and the minimum distance of approach (OHS19.24). Review the general limits of approach with all workers in a pre-job safety meeting (OHS19.5). If the minimum distance from the electrical conductor cannot be maintained, and movement by a worker or equipment may result in entering these minimum distances call the power authority and get an assurance in writing (form 30M33) (OHS19.25). WCB Clearance Letter required prior to start of work (Good Standing) yes no Notes/Follow-up: Contractor Rep. City of Penticton Rep: Signature Signature

160 City of Penticton Contractor Coordination Contractor Sub- Contractor City of Penticton Prepared by: Human Resource Department 11/09/11 CC - 1

161 CONTRACTOR COORDINATION City of Penticton 11/09/11 Safety Programs CC - 2

162 CONTRACTOR COORDINATION City of Penticton Contractor Coordination Contents 1. Purpose Policy Scope Definitions Overview Regulation... 6 Responsibility of Owner... 6 Co-ordination - Overview Responsibilities... 8 i. Responsibilities on a Single Employer Workplace... 8 ii. Responsibilities on a Multiple Employer Workplace without Prime Contractor... 9 iii. Responsibilities on a Multiple Employer Workplace with a Prime Contractor Program Details Training Requirements Program Maintenance Documentation Appendices Appendix A - Overview of Occupational Health and Safety Program Content Appendix B - Records to be Maintained and Available Appendix C - Contract Language for Hiring Municipal Contractors Appendix D - Review of Contractor Safety Program Appendix E - Confirmation of Responsibilities /09/11 Safety Programs CC - 3

163 CONTRACTOR COORDINATION City of Penticton Contractor Coordination 1. Purpose To ensure that workers of other employers who are working on the City of Penticton workplaces are not placed at risk because of a lack of knowledge of workplace hazards or a lack of coordination of workplace safety. 2. Policy The City of Penticton will ensure that all employers and workers on City of Penticton workplaces are aware of any pre-existing workplace hazards. The City of Penticton will ensure coordination of occupational health and safety activities on all multiple employer workplaces or ensure that a prime contractor does so. The City of Penticton will ensure compliance with WCB OHS Regulations on all workplaces. 3. Scope This program applies in every situation where workers, other than the City of Penticton workers, are performing their job duties at a City of Penticton workplace. Exception for Short Term Workplace Visits The WCB Prevention Manual offers the following guidance on workplace visits: "Virtually all workplaces will be visited by workers of other employers. For example, workers may deliver or pick up mail, goods and materials or enter to inspect premises. Short term visits of this type, even if regular, do not make the workplace a "multiple-employer workplace" for the purposes of section 118(1)", note other persons per Workers Compensation safety and health regulations. 4. Definitions Construction Project Any erection, alteration, repair, dismantling, demolition, structural or routine maintenance, painting, land clearing, earth moving, grading, excavating, trenching, digging, boring, drilling, blasting, concreting, the installation of any machinery or any other work deemed to be construction by the WCB. (WCB OHS Regulation Section 20.1) 11/09/11 Safety Programs CC - 4

164 CONTRACTOR COORDINATION City of Penticton Contractor Includes a contractor, subcontractor, utility company, government agency or a service company providing/assigning workers and/or services/equipment within the workplace. Contractor Safety Program A contractor's Occupational Health and Safety program as required by WCB OHS Regulation. Multiple Employer Workplace Multiple employer workplaces are created when workers of two or more employers are working at the same location. In this type of workplace, workers of one employer do not actually have to come into contact with the workers of the other employer but they must communicate to coordinate their activities. They do not even have to be in the same place at the same time. What is important is whether or not the workers' activities could affect the health and safety of another employer's workers. This is true even if the workers on the workplace are workers of the City of Penticton and a contractor. Short-term visits by couriers, inspectors and suppliers etc. are not regarded as workers on the workplace. Notice of Project The Notice of Construction Project given by the prime contractor, or Owner, to the Workers' Compensation Board as defined in and required by Section 20.2 (2) and (3) of the WCB OHS Regulation. Prime Contractor In relation to a multiple-employer municipal workplace, the contractor, employer or other person who enters into a written agreement with the City of Penticton is to be the prime contractor Practicable Means that which is reasonably capable of being done Qualified Means being knowledgeable of the work, the hazards involved and the means to control the hazards, by reason of education, training, experience or a combination thereof Qualified Coordinator On a construction workplace, means the person appointed by a prime contractor to coordinate occupational health and safety activities within the workplace. Qualified Person On a construction workplace, means a person designated by a contractor (other than the prime contractor) to be responsible for that employer's health and safety activities and responsibilities. 11/09/11 Safety Programs CC - 5

165 CONTRACTOR COORDINATION City of Penticton Single Employer Workplace Workplace Safety Coordinator A defined area in which there are workers of only one employer The person designated in writing by the City of Penticton to coordinate workplace safety on multiple employer workplaces if there is no prime contractor, and to receive/review a contractor's safety program, records, documentation and safety performance. 5. Overview Regulation Responsibility of Owner Part 3 Section 118 and 119 of the Workers Compensation Act and Part 20 of the WCB OHS Regulation also applies and includes responsibilities on construction workplaces. The Workers Compensation Act requires the City of Penticton as owner of the workplace, to maintain the workplace in a safe manner. It requires the City of Penticton to give any other employers on the workplace all information about the workplace hazards, and it requires the City of Penticton to give other employers on the workplace the information they need to eliminate or control those hazards. The Workers Compensation Act also sets out the responsibilities when the City of Penticton has a multiple employer workplace. On multi-employer workplaces, there is a responsibility to coordinate the activities of the employers, workers and other persons at the workplace. There is also a responsibility to do everything that is practicable to establish and maintain a system or process to ensure that everyone on the workplace complies with the WCB OHS Regulation. Co-ordination - Overview The City of Penticton can decide either to perform the duties of safety coordination on a multiple employer workplace or designate, must agree in writing, a prime contractor to perform the duties of coordination. Construction Workplaces If there is no prime contractor, and there are more than 5 workers on the workplace, the City of Penticton must designate a coordinator to coordinate workplace safety. The coordinator is responsible for submitting the notice of project to the Workers Compensation Board where a Notice of Project is required. (See WCB OHS Regulation 20.2 for the general requirements of a Notice of Project. On a multiple employer workplace: The coordinator must also ensure that all of the workers on the workplace are aware of any preexisting hazards on the workplace. The coordinator must also identify any hazards on the workplace that are created by the work. 11/09/11 Safety Programs CC - 6

166 CONTRACTOR COORDINATION City of Penticton The coordinator must also have a workplace drawing. It will show where the various employers are working, where first aid is located, the emergency transportation system for injured workers, and the evacuation marshalling points. The coordinator must also have the written procedures to protect the health and safety of the workers on the workplace. If the City of Penticton does not want to take on these responsibilities, the City of Penticton can also designate, in writing, a prime contractor on the construction workplace. If the City of Penticton does designate a prime contractor, the prime contractor must designate a qualified coordinator. The City of Penticton must inform the prime contractor of pre-existing workplace hazards and the information on how to eliminate or control them. The prime contractor's qualified coordinator must then ensure that all of the delegates are informed; the delegates must inform all workers of these hazards, and of any hazards on the workplace that are created by the work. The prime contractor's qualified coordinator must also have the written procedures to protect the health and safety of the workers on the workplace, ensuring that the hazards are addressed throughout the duration of the work activity. The prime contractor's designated qualified coordinator must also have a workplace drawing. It will show where the various employers are working, where first aid is located, the emergency transportation system for injured workers, and the evacuation marshalling points. Non-construction workplaces: The City of Penticton must act as the prime contractor on a single employer workplace that involves workers of another employer, if there is no prime contractor designated in writing. The City of Penticton must act as the prime contractor and must ensure that occupational health and safety activities are coordinated on multiple employer workplaces, if there is no prime contractor designated in writing. The City of Penticton must establish and maintain a system to ensure compliance with the WCB OHS Regulation. The City of Penticton must ensure that it has the names of the persons who will supervise workers at the workplace. The City of Penticton has responsibility, as an owner, on non-construction workplaces if a prime contractor has been designated in writing. The City of Penticton must give the prime contractor at the workplace any available information that is necessary to identify and eliminate or to control hazards at the workplace. 11/09/11 Safety Programs CC - 7

167 CONTRACTOR COORDINATION City of Penticton 6. Responsibilities The City of Penticton is responsible to determine by definition of regulation (118) that the workplace includes the workers of other employers and whether this is a multiple employer workplace or a single employer workplace. The City of Penticton is also responsible for determining if the workplace is a construction workplace as outlined in the definition section. Note: For ease of reading, the rest of the responsibilities will be separated into the following three categories: i. Single Employer Workplace ii. Multiple Employer Workplace with a prime contractor iii. Multiple Employer Workplace Without a prime contractor. i. Responsibilities on a Single Employer Workplace The City of Penticton: The City of Penticton is responsible to ensure that the contractor on the workplace is aware of all pre-existing workplace hazards and has the information on how to eliminate or control the hazards. On a construction workplace, if the work requires a Notice of Project, the City of Penticton must submit the Notice of Project to the WCB or ensure that the prime contractor does so. Workplace Safety Coordinator: The Contract Administrator is responsible: To determine the boundaries of the workplace, and to ensure that only workers of one employer perform duties within those boundaries. To ensure all relevant information on workplace hazards is provided to the employer. To decide whether the contractor should be designated, in writing, as a prime contractor and to designate the prime contractor. Contractor: Note: Applies to a contractor to the City of Penticton and to service providers such as West Kootney Power. The contractor is responsible for obtaining information on workplace hazards from the City of Penticton and informing its workers on the workplace. The contractor is also responsible for ensuring compliance with the WCB OHS Regulation. If designated as the prime contractor, the contractor is responsible to ensure that all workers on the workplace, as well as its own workers, are aware of the pre-existing workplace hazards. The contractor is responsible to ensure that all work is performed without unnecessary risk and in compliance with the WCB OHS Regulation. The City of Penticton Supervisors: Supervisors must ensure that all workers know that a single employer workplace has been designated. They must ensure that they do not assign duties, which take the City of Penticton workers into the single employer workplace. If any worker reports that they must enter the single 11/09/11 Safety Programs CC - 8

168 CONTRACTOR COORDINATION City of Penticton employer workplace to do their job, the supervisor will contact the Division supervisor to determine if the work should go ahead. The City of Penticton Workers: All workers are responsible to ensure that their duties do not take them into the single employer workplace. If they must enter the workplace, they must inform their supervisor. ii. Responsibilities on a Multiple Employer Workplace without Prime Contractor The City of Penticton: The City of Penticton is responsible to designate the Division Supervisor to be responsible for coordinating workplace safety and ensure that all health and safety activities are coordinated and that all employers are in compliance with the WCB OHS Regulation. Workplace Safety Coordinator: The Division Supervisor or designate must ensure that all employers on the workplace are aware of pre-existing workplace hazards, that workplace safety meetings are held and documented, and all occupational health and safety activities are co-ordinated. If the workplace is a construction workplace and a Notice of Project is required, the Division Supervisor or designate is responsible to ensure that the Notice of Project is submitted to the Workers' Compensation Board. On construction workplaces, the Division Supervisor or designate must have the written procedures to protect the health and safety of all workers on the workplace. The Division Supervisor or designate must maintain a workplace map that shows where various employers are working, occupational first aid is located, and the evacuation marshalling points are located. It must also show the emergency transportation system for injured workers. Contractors: Contractors are responsible to comply with their contracted safety requirements and the directives of the Division Supervisor or designate regarding co-ordination of activities. They must tell the Division Supervisor or designate the name of the individual who supervises their workers. On a construction workplace they must give the Division Supervisor or designate the name of a Qualified Person who is responsible for their health and safety activities. Supervisors: All supervisors are responsible to check with the Division Supervisor or designate to ensure that the duties that they are assigning do not cause hazards for the workers of other employers on the workplace. Workers: All workers are responsible to follow safe work procedures and to alert their supervisor if the duties that they are performing will create a hazard to other workers. iii. Responsibilities on a Multiple Employer Workplace with a Prime Contractor The City of Penticton: 11/09/11 Safety Programs CC - 9

169 CONTRACTOR COORDINATION City of Penticton The City of Penticton is responsible to identify workplace hazards for the prime contractor and also to give the prime contractor information on how to eliminate or control the workplace hazards. Workplace Safety Coordinator: The Contact Administrator is responsible for designating a prime contractor, based on the complexity and risk of the work being performed. If a prime contractor is designated, the Contract Administrator is responsible to inform all other employers of the designation of prime contractor. Prime Contractor: The prime contractor must ensure that all occupational health and safety activities are coordinated, and that all employers on the workplace comply with the WCB OHS Regulation. If the workplace is a construction workplace, the prime contractor must, if the combined workforce is more than 5 workers, identify a qualified co-ordinator who must co-ordinate health and safety activities on the workplace. Prime Contractor's Qualified Coordinator on Construction Workplaces: The qualified co-ordinator must: ensure that all employers on the workplace are aware of pre-existing workplace hazards ensure that workplace safety meetings are held and documented co-ordinate all health and safety activities complete a Notice of Project and submit it to the Workers' Compensation Board maintain a workplace map that shows where various employers are working, where first aid is located, the emergency transportation system for injured workers, and the evacuation marshalling points have the written procedures to protect the health and safety of the workers on the workplace, ensuring that the hazards are addressed throughout the duration of the work activity Knowledgeable of Part (3) of Workers Compensation Occupational Health and Safety Regulations. Other Contractors: Other contractors are responsible to deliver to the prime contractor s qualified coordinator the name of the person who supervises their workers. On a construction workplace, the contractors must designate a Qualified Person to be responsible for the contractor's health and safety activities. The contractor must give the name of this Qualified Person to the prime contractor. The City of Penticton Supervisors: Supervisors are responsible to know the safety program that the prime contractor has in place to eliminate or control workplace hazards. The supervisors must ensure that all the City of Penticton workers comply with this plan. If supervisors become aware that the program is not controlling workplace hazards, they must remove the workers under their control from any danger and notify the Contract Administrator. The City of Penticton Workers: Workers must comply with the workplace safety program of the designated prime contractor. 11/09/11 Safety Programs CC - 10

170 CONTRACTOR COORDINATION City of Penticton 7. Program Details This program is designed to help ensure that when contractors are working on a municipal workplace, the work is performed safely and there is no unnecessary increase in liability for the City of Penticton as a result of their actions. Situation Identification There are two types of situations where workers of another employer are performing duties on the City of Penticton workplace. The first of these, and most difficult for the organization to control, are workers who are not performing contract work for the City of Penticton. They may include the workers of a utility company, a government agency or Service Company. The typical example might be workers of a gas utility company who have set up traffic control to do repair work on the gas distribution system. They are on a municipal workplace, and the City of Penticton workers may be working on the same workplace. It is the responsibility of the City of Penticton to ensure that the workplace is safe and that all workers, including contractors and their employees, are aware of the workplace hazards of which the organization has knowledge as owners of the workplace. As long as there are no interactions, or overlap between workplaces that would create hazards for the workers of the contractor or for the workers of the City of Penticton, there is no further action required The second situation is one that the organization is most familiar with. This is a situation where a contractor has come onto a municipal workplace to perform work for the City of Penticton. In this situation, there is still the responsibility to ensure that the workplace is safe, and that the contractor is aware of pre-existing hazards. The regulation (118) determine if this is a single employer workplace or a multiple employer workplace, and to decide whether or not there should be a prime contractor. Pre-contract Hazard Assessment Contractors must be made aware of all of the pre-existing workplace hazards that may affect their workers. Often this seems like common sense, but lack of documentation of the process of identifying workplace hazards can create problems. A workplace hazard identification must be completed prior to putting a project out to tender. This will be performed by the Contract Administrator. Hazard identification should include, but not be limited to, workplace access difficulties, confined spaces, chemical exposures, excavations, work at heights, lockout, electrical hazards, asbestos, temperature extremes, noise, workplace hazardous materials, and traffic. Any other workplace hazards must also be identified. Providing methods to eliminate or control workplace hazards will include providing the contractor with the City of Penticton safety program and procedures. If the contractor is going to do work that is not covered by the safety program, it is important that once the hazards are identified, the contractor provides the written procedures for the work. Day Labour On occasion, a contractor will come onto a municipal workplace and will perform work without subcontractors, in co-operation with workers of the City of Penticton. In the past there have even been some situations where workers of the City of Penticton supervised the contract workers. In other cases a supervisor has been hired on contract to oversee the activities of the 11/09/11 Safety Programs CC - 11

171 CONTRACTOR COORDINATION City of Penticton contractor. In both these situations the City of Penticton accepts a significant amount of liability. As a result of amendments to the WCB OHS Regulation, it is very important to determine whether or not these contractors should be designated as prime contractors. If they are not designated as prime contractors, the City of Penticton may be liable for violations of the WCB OHS Regulation by the contractors. Even if they are designated as prime contractors, supervision of the contract workers by a City of Penticton supervisor can make the City of Penticton liable for any violation of the WCB OHS Regulation. It is the policy of the City of Penticton that all day labour contracts will be reviewed by the Division Supervisor to determine how they will be supervised. Multiple Employer Workplaces Multiple employer workplaces are created when the workers of two or more employers are working at the same location. They do not have to both be working all of the time. If they are both at the workplace and the activities of either employer can affect the health and safety of workers of the other employer, then the workplace becomes a multiple employer workplace. This is true even if the workers on the workplace are workers of the contractor and the City of Penticton. When the City of Penticton has contractors on a multiple employer workplace, there is a requirement for coordination of activities. This coordination role can be fulfilled by the Division Supervisor, or it can be delegated to a contractor, who is designated as prime contractor in writing. Contractors must give the Division Supervisor or the prime contractor the names of the individuals who will be supervising their workers. On a construction workplace, contractors must also give the name of the Qualified Person who will be responsible for their health and safety program. Prime Contractor Designation In the past contracted work was much simpler than it is today. A project was developed and put out to bid. The successful bidder hired other contractors. These contractors were subcontractors to the successful bidder. In these cases the successful bidder was usually referred to as the principal or prime contractor. As a result of amendments to the WCB OHS Regulation, it is now very important that the City of Penticton makes a conscious decision whether or not to designate a contractor in writing as the prime contractor. The decision on whether or not to designate a prime contractor rests with the Contract Administrator who will maintain a corporate policy on the issue. 11/09/11 Safety Programs CC - 12

172 CONTRACTOR COORDINATION City of Penticton The responsibility for coordination of activities on the workplace, and for ensuring compliance with the WCB OHS Regulation will rest with the prime contractor. Typical contract language to designate a prime contractor is in Appendix C. It is also very important that these contractors are made aware of all of the pre-existing workplace hazards that might put their workers at risk. They must also be given the information that they need on how to eliminate or control those hazards. The City of Penticton may decide, at any time, to appoint a prime contractor on a single employer workplace. The City of Penticton can also appoint one contractor to be the prime contractor on a multiple employer workplace. If the City of Penticton appoints a prime contractor the affected contractor(s) will be given written notice. Workplace Safety Requirements of the Prime Contractor The prime (and other) contractor(s) has the responsibility to reduce incidents within its workplace. There is also a responsibility to make sure that everybody on the workplace obeys WCB OHS Regulations. The prime contractor must direct and co-ordinate the work activities related to the health and safety of all contractors and any other workers on the workplace. The prime contractor will have a supervisor readily available at the workplace. This supervisor will have the necessary skills, qualifications and experience to co-ordinate the health and safety activities of the workers. The prime contractor will obtain from the organization written information on hazards and conditions and the methods to address the hazards and conditions and will circulate this information. The prime contractor is responsible for ensuring first aid facilities are provided and maintained on the workplace in accordance with Part 33 of the WCB OHS Regulation. The prime contractor will take all reasonable steps to ensure that the occupational health and safety activities of all Contractors and their workers comply with the WCB OHS Regulation. The prime contractor will immediately give to the Contract Administrator, the name of any contractor who does not co-operate, assist or do what the qualified co-ordinator requires regarding co-ordination of health and safety activities within the workplace. Workplace Safety Requirements of All Contractors Prior to starting any work on the workplace, the Contractor must have its own Contractor Safety Program and must make sure the safety program meets the requirements of Part 3 of the Workers Compensation Act and Part 3 of the WCB OHS Regulation. On non-construction workplaces, the Contractor will make sure there is a supervisor on the workplace who has the necessary skills and experience to run the Contractor's Safety Program. At the start of work, the Contractor will provide the Contract Administrator in writing, the names of all supervisors. The Contract Administrator or prime contractor must be immediately informed of any changes. They must also be knowledgeable of Part 3 of the Workers Compensation regulations. 11/09/11 Safety Programs CC - 13

173 CONTRACTOR COORDINATION City of Penticton The Contractor must: Ensure that a Joint Committee is formed for the workplace if required by the WCB OHS Regulation, and that the activities of the Joint Committee meet the requirements of the WCB OHS Regulation. Advise the Contractor Administrator or Prime contractor, of any incidents that occur at the workplace that must be reported to the Workers' Compensation Board. Inform all persons working on the workplace of the health and safety requirements at the workplace. At all times the contractor will ensure that its workers and subcontractors, and all other workers coming onto the workplace comply with: The WCB OHS Regulation The contractor's safety program The Contract Administrator (or prime contractor's) safety requirements for the work activities within the workplace. The contractor will provide occupational health and safety records and documentation to the Contract Administrator or prime contractor. The contractor will follow the directions of the Contract Administrator or the prime contractor on all matters relating to occupational health and safety. The contractor will inform the Contract Administrator or the prime contractor of any information that they require to co-ordinate each employer's work activities within the workplace. Additional Requirements for Construction Workplaces (Required by WCB OHS Regulation Part 20) On construction workplaces the prime contractor will notify the Workers' Compensation Board by a Notice of Project that it is the prime contractor. On construction workplaces, the prime contractor will, at all times, have a qualified co-ordinator readily available at the workplace. This qualified co-ordinator will have the necessary skills, qualifications and experience to co-ordinate the occupational health and safety activities of every employer. Before the work begins, the prime contractor will provide the Contract Administrator with the following information: A copy of the Notice of Project (for construction projects) Written confirmation that the prime contractor's safety program is in place The name of the qualified co-ordinator Any changes of appointment. For construction projects, the prime contractor will post a copy of the Notice of Project in prominent locations within the workplace to ensure that all employers know that, as prime contractor, it has responsibility for co-ordinating the work activities related to occupational health and safety matters of all contractors. 11/09/11 Safety Programs CC - 14

174 CONTRACTOR COORDINATION City of Penticton Prime Contractor's Health and Safety Records The prime contractor must maintain all occupational health and safety documentation at one location at or near the workplace and make these documents available to the Contract Administrator. A listing of the required documents is given at Appendix B. The prime contractor will ensure that its qualified co-ordinator collects records of all Joint Committee proceedings at the workplace and distributes them to other qualified persons working within the workplace and to the WCB. In the event of an incident that requires notification to the Workers' Compensation Board, the prime contractor will, at the same time, notify the Contract Administrator about the incident. If requested, the prime contractor will provide information on the progress of the investigation and co-ordinate all responses to requests for information with the City of Penticton. Workplace Safety Coordinator If a prime contractor must agree in writing, the Contract Administer will be the City of Penticton workplace representative and have duties and responsibilities that include but are not limited to the following: To ensure all contractors are informed of appointment of the prime contractor To inform the prime contractor that they must be copied in all communications To monitor the prime contractor's compliance with the safety requirements of the contract To ensure that the City of Penticton workers do not direct or supervise any contractor's workers on the workplace To receive and/or distribute all necessary documentation To ensure that all pre-existing hazards of the workplace and procedures for addressing the hazards are conveyed to the prime contractor If there is no designated prime contractor on a multiple employer workplace the responsibility to coordinate the activities of the various employers lies with the Contract Administrator. The Contract Administrator will also watch for situations where the work of one contractor or a worker of the City of Penticton could cause a hazard to the workers of another contractor. It is the Contractor Administrator s responsibility to ensure that these situations are controlled. On construction workplaces, this includes maintaining the location of first aid and evacuation marshalling points. It also includes maintaining the written procedures that will be used to ensure the safety of workers on the workplace. The Contractor Administrator will ensure that contractors coming onto the workplace bring with them their written procedures. If the contractors do not bring written procedures, the Contract Administrator must develop those procedures. 8. Training Requirements Goal No workers will be put at risk, and no liability will accrue to the organization as a result of workers of another employer performing duties on a workplace owned by the organization. 11/09/11 Safety Programs CC - 15

175 CONTRACTOR COORDINATION City of Penticton Objectives As a result of this training, workers and supervisors will: Understand the organization s policy on contractor coordination. Understand the difference between a single employer workplace and a multiple employer workplace. Know what their responsibilities are, and understand the responsibilities of other people. Understand the components of the pre-job hazard assessment. Understand the requirements for coordination and supervision on day labor jobs. Summary of Training Why workplace safety coordination is necessary The responsibilities for workplace safety coordination How to determine if workplace coordination is required The effects of the Workers Compensation Amendment Act on contractor coordination The definitions used in the contractor coordination program When to designate a prime contractor The differences between construction workplaces and other workplaces for contractor coordination Typical hazards that must be addressed How to perform pre-job hazard assessment Definitions and concerns on day labour jobs How to complete forms and documentation Correct responses to typical situations 9. Program Maintenance Annual review of this program will focus on the number of situations when other employers were on the organization s workplace, and whether any liability accrued to the organization as a result. 10. Documentation The documentation for this program includes: Contract template that includes language concerning prime contractor Safety program with names or positions of those responsible for coordination Pre-job hazard assessments Completed reviews of contractor safety programs Documentation of discussions with contractors regarding supervision 11. Appendices (following pages) 11/09/11 Safety Programs CC - 16

176 CONTRACTOR COORDINATION City of Penticton Appendix A OVERVIEW OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY PROGRAM CONTENT WCB OHS Regulation 3.3 defines the contents of an Occupational Health and Safety Program. The program must include the following: Policy Inspection of Premises and Work Practices Written Instructions to Supplement the WCB OHS Regulation Management meetings Investigation of Incidents Maintenance of records and statistics Joint Committee Instruction and Supervision of Workers Occupational First Aid services and equipment Workplace Hazardous Materials Information System Policy The policy must define the employer's aims and clearly state the responsibilities of the employer, managers, supervisors and workers. Inspection of Premises and Work Practices Direction must be given for the provision regular inspection of the premises, equipment, work methods and work practices, including specific instruction that states the intent of inspections, who is to inspect, what is to be inspected, inspection frequency and who conducts the inspection. Written Instructions There must be appropriate written instructions to supplement the WCB s Occupational Health and Safety Regulation and copies of the instructions must be made available for reference by all employees. Management Meetings Provision must be made for holding periodic meetings for the purpose of reviewing safety and health activities and incident trends, and to determine necessary courses of action. Investigation of Incidents There must be direction for the prompt investigation of incidents. The instructions must state what to report to the WCB, which incidents to investigate, who is to investigate, the intent of the investigation, and the content, distribution and follow-up of reports. Maintenance of Records and Statistics Instruction must be given to maintain records and statistics that include reports of inspections and incident investigations. Provision must be made for making this information available to the Joint Committee, an officer of the WCB, the union representing the workers or where there are no union, workers at the place of employment. 11/09/11 Safety Programs CC - 17

177 CONTRACTOR COORDINATION City of Penticton Joint Committee Provisions must be made for the establishment and maintenance of a committee. The instructions must state committee membership, function and detailed duties. Instruction and Supervision of Workers Provision must be made for instruction and supervision of workers in the safe performance of their work. Of particular importance is new worker orientation, regular safety talks, addressing specific job/task hazards at all levels and ensuring supervisors are knowledgeable of their safety and health duties and responsibilities. Occupational First Aid Services and Equipment Written instruction must be provided that direct the occupational first aid services and equipment to be provided, requires a treatment record book to be maintained, and that states how to summon a first aid attendant and how to report injuries. Workplace Hazardous Materials Information System There must be written instructions that assign responsibility for the program, provide direction on maintaining material safety data sheets and labels, and detail the education and training to be provided. 11/09/11 Safety Programs CC - 18

178 CONTRACTOR COORDINATION City of Penticton Appendix B RECORDS TO BE MAINTAINED AND AVAILABLE The documents required to be maintained and available by the prime contractor will include, but will not be limited to: The prime contractor's safety program All notices which the prime contractor is required to provide to the Workers' Compensation Board by the WCB OHS Regulation Any written summary of remedial actions taken to reduce occupational safety and health hazards within the area of responsibility All directives and inspection reports issued by the Workers' Compensation Board Reports on incidents occurring within the prime contractor's area of responsibility for which notification to the Worker's Compensation Board is required Records of all safety meetings held between contractors and their workers Records of workplace safety and health orientation Written evidence of' inspections within the workplace Occupational first aid records Worker training records 11/09/11 Safety Programs CC - 19

179 CONTRACTOR COORDINATION City of Penticton Appendix C CONTRACT LANGUAGE FOR HIRING MUNICIPAL CONTRACTORS The following checklist should be used when designing contract language that outlines the responsibilities of prime contractors and other contractors on the organization s workplaces: 1. The contractor should be required to perform the services to a standard acceptable to the Municipality. 2. If a notice of project is required, the contractor should be required to send it to the Workers Compensation Board. 3. The contractor should be required to ensure compliance with the WCB OHS Regulation and Workers Compensation Act. 4. The contract should note that any failure to meet the safety requirements of the contract would result in cancellation of the contract. 5. The contractor must be required to have in place a written safety program and written safe work procedures specific to the work being performed. 6. There should be a requirement that the safety program and all written safe work procedures are available at the workplace prior to the commencement of the work. 7. The contractor must be a registered firm with the WCB and in good standing. 8. The contract should require that the contractor provide occupational first aid services. 9. If a contractor is designated and must agree to be prime contractor, the workplace safety requirements for the prime contractor from this program should be part of the contract. 10. If a contractor is designated prime contractor, the requirements for the designated qualified safety co-ordinator, from this program, should be part of the contract. 11. There should be a requirement that the contractor have toolbox safety meetings at least weekly and formal safety meetings monthly, with minutes forwarded to the Corporation. 11/09/11 Safety Programs CC - 20

180 CONTRACTOR COORDINATION City of Penticton Appendix D REVIEW OF CONTRACTOR SAFETY PROGRAM Date: Contractor: Reviewed by: Job Title: To comply with WCB OHS Regulation the following elements of a basic Contractor s Safety Program must be present and functioning: Policy statement Inspection of premises Supplementary instructions Management meetings Investigation of incidents Records and statistics Joint Committee Instruction and supervision of workers First Aid WHMIS Confirmation of elements Element Policy The policy clearly states the employer's aims and the responsibilities of the employer, managers, supervisors and workers. Inspection of Premises Provision for Regular inspection of the premises, equipment, work methods and work practices, including specific instruction that states the intent of inspections, who is to inspect, what is to be inspected and inspection frequency Written Instructions Appropriate written instructions to supplement the WCB Occupational Health and Safety Regulation. Copies of the instructions must be made available for reference by all employees. Management Meetings Provision for holding periodic meetings for the purpose of reviewing health and safety activities and accident trends, and for determining necessary action. Investigation of Incidents Provision for the prompt investigation of accidents including what to report to the WCB, which accidents to investigate, the intent of the investigation, and the content, distribution and follow-up of reports. Confirmed present present present present present 11/09/11 Safety Programs CC - 21

181 CONTRACTOR COORDINATION City of Penticton Element Records and Statistics Instruction is given to maintain records and statistics that include reports of inspections and incident investigations, and making this information available to the Joint Committee and workers. Joint Committee Provisions is made for establishing and maintaining a committee including membership, function and detailed duties Instruction of Workers Provision is made for instruction and supervision of workers in the safe performance of their work. Occupational First Aid Services and Equipment Written instructions directing the services and equipment to be provided, the maintenance of a treatment record book, the procedure to follow to summon a first aid attendant and the reporting of injuries. Workplace Hazardous Materials Information System Written instructions that assign responsibility for the program, provide direction on maintaining material safety data sheets and labels, and detail the education and training. Confirmed present present present present present Notes/Follow-up: 11/09/11 Safety Programs CC - 22

182 CONTRACTOR COORDINATION City of Penticton Appendix E CONFIRMATION OF RESPONSIBILITIES (Discussion with Contractor Supervisor/Coordinator) Date: Meeting Location: Contractor: Contractor Rep.: Job Title: City of Penticton Rep.: Job Title: Acknowledges the appointment yes no Understands that in any conflict of directions, WCB OHS Regulation and/or the yes no Act shall prevail Understands and will direct that all supervisors/coordinators must immediately yes no report any apparent conflict as described above The supervisor shall immediately notify the City of Penticton of any reported yes no conflict. Has requested and received information to eliminate or control hazards to the yes no health and safety of persons at the workplace Has conducted an inspection of the workplace to verify the presence of any yes no hazards Will communicate hazards to any persons who may be affected and ensure yes no that appropriate measures are taken to effectively control or eliminate the hazards Accepts that written documentation (e.g. notes, records, inspections, meetings yes no etc.) on all health and safety issues must be available upon request to the City of Penticton and/or to a Board officer at the workplace Will confirm that all workers are suitably trained and competent to perform the yes no duties for which they have been assigned Safety orientation of all new workers will be conducted yes no Contractor s written Safety Program has been provided yes no Meetings to exchange any safety issues, concerns, hazards or safety directives yes no will be conducted weekly (or more often if required) Before the commencement of work, crews will attend a daily crew safety yes no meeting The supervisor has assessed and will coordinate the first aid requirements yes no Transport of Injured Worker procedure is established yes no WCB Clearance Letter required prior to start of work (Good Standing) yes no Notes/Follow-up: Contractor Rep. City of Penticton Rep: Signature Signature 11/09/11 Safety Programs CC - 23

183 APPENDIX D Traffic Management Plan

184 City of Penticton Traffic Management Plan Page 1 of 8 Traffic Management Plan: 1.0 General Requirements: 1.1 The contractor shall submit and maintain a Traffic Management Plan (TMP) to minimize inconvenience and maximize safety for local residents, business operators, emergency services, and institutional properties. The TMP must meet all the guidelines as described in the Ministry of Transportation (MoT) Traffic Control for Work in Roadways (Latest Edition). The TMP shall ensure commercial and private driveway accesses are maintained and safe travel lanes are available at all times. 1.2 The Contractor shall be responsible for protecting and/or removing and returning to the City Yards, all existing street signage except stop signs. The Contractor will ensure that stop signs remain visible at all times. Damage to existing signage will be at Contractor s cost. The City will be responsible for the re-installation, as necessary, of all signage with a minimum 3 days of notice from the Contractor. 1.3 Dust control will be done at regular intervals to minimize the impacts of dust in the air. Dust control shall be done during work hours, after work hours, on weekends, and on holidays. The Contract Administrator or Site Inspector can direct, at any time, the Contractor to perform dust control measures if they deem level of current dust control to be inadequate. Failure by the Contractor to provide acceptable dust control measures will result in correction by City forces at the Contractors cost. 1.4 Traffic control devices deployed overnight must have high intensity or diamond grade reflective qualities and flashing beacons. Traffic Control Persons shall be used where equipment enters or exits the work area. 2.0 Traffic Control Supervisor: 2.1 The Contractor shall designate a Traffic Control Supervisor responsible for site safety (pedestrian, and vehicular) with specific training as identified in the MoT Traffic Control Manual. The Traffic Control Supervisor and Site Inspector will review signage identified in the Contractor s TMP prior to construction at each work zone and then on a daily basis at the start and end of each work day. The Traffic Control Supervisor shall maintain a Traffic Control Log Book as required by the MoT Manual to facilitate a safe traffic control system for dynamic and static construction zone operation. 3.0 Access: 3.1 The Contractor shall not close roads any roads unless approval in writing is given by the Contract Administrator. 3.2 The Contractor shall not obstruct or close roads on bus routes within the City unless approved by the Contract Administrator. The Contract Administrator must be notified one week prior to any pending closures by the Contractor. No BCTransit bus shall be delayed more than 5 minutes in its movements through any construction zone. A copy of the Bus routes has been included in this document. The contractor is required to obtain scheduling for each route affected. If it is required that BCTransit busses be diverted around construction zones, than the Contractor shall provide the Contract Administrator a plan of the temporary bus route. 3.3 The Contractor shall not delay school busses in their movements through any construction zone. 3.4 The Contractor shall retain 2 1.5m x 3.0m, H-20 Traffic Load related steel plates on site for any emergency or other immediate trench or excavation crossing for access needs.

185 City of Penticton Traffic Management Plan Page 2 of Access for local traffic shall be maintained at all times except when work is proceeding directly adjacent to a property and access disruption is unavoidable. Suitable access shall be defined as a bladed surface that provides a comfortable ride sufficient to accommodate a standard two-wheel drive vehicle at a speed of 20 km/h. Failure by the Contractor to provide an acceptable surface will result in correction by City forces at the Contractors cost. 3.6 Sidewalks must be kept in a safe, clean condition and open to pedestrian, scooter and wheelchair traffic. The Contractor will make provision at all times for adequate separation between the public and work area hazards, whether active or inactive, such as construction equipment, excavations and materials by means of delineation, barricades and fencing. 3.7 If a sidewalk must be closed due to required works in the sidewalk, then sidewalk closed signs shall be installed at the next nearest crossing points indicating that the sidewalk is closed due to construction and pedestrian traffic can be diverted. If there are business on the sidewalk that is being closed it must be made clear on all signs that business are still open and safe access must be provided during business hours. 4.0 Construction Signage: 4.1 The Contractor shall install construction signage to notify residents and businesses one week prior to the start of construction. The following is an example of what is required to be included on the signs. The signs must include the Street Name, what is being completed (water main, paving etc.), the expected duration of construction, the Contractors contact phone number and the City s contact phone number. The Contractor shall submit proofs of each sign to the Contract Administrator for approval prior to manufacture and installation of each sign. The Contractor shall install one sign at the beginning and end of each project.

186 City of Penticton Traffic Management Plan Page 3 of Access Disruptions and Notifications: 5.1 The Contractor shall be responsible for hand delivery of any notices required for utility shut downs, road closures, access disruptions, and scheduling. The Contract Administrator will be responsible for Radio and newspaper ads. 5.2 The content and form of any written notifications shall be reviewed and approved by the Contract Administrator prior to delivery. Notifications shall be submitted to the Contract Administrator one week in advance for review and approval. 5.3 Hand delivered public notifications/communications related to the implementation of the TMP, any service shut down or access disruption notifications, all specified temporary traffic control signage, barriers, and flag persons are the responsibility of the Contractor and are to be included within the payment item for traffic regulation. 5.4 The Contractor shall provide residents and business one week notice in advance of any construction on any street. 5.5 The Contractor shall provide residents and businesses 48 hours of notice in advance of any planned disruption to vehicular and/or pedestrian property access. 5.6 The Contractor shall provide residents and businesses on streets that will be used as detour routes 48 hours of notice in advance. 5.7 The Contractor shall provide daily notifications and coordination as required with all emergency services (Police, Fire, Ambulance) and public services including Transit, garbage collection, Canada Post, etc. 6.0 Special Events: 6.1 A list of special events has been included in this document. All known events, their tentative dates, and primary contact info has been listed for use by the Contractor. These events will be incorporated into the construction schedule and TMP. The special events listed, event road closures, and routing map of events are subject to change. The Contractor will be responsible to liaise with the City and event organizers concerning each event and accommodate any changes that may arise. 7.0 Road, Lane, & Intersection Closure General Requirements: All road, lane, and intersection closures must meet the following requirements. Exceptions to these requirements for specific streets and intersections are listed in The Instructions to Tenderer 4.4. Any time there are lane or intersection closures Traffic Control Personnel 7.1 The Contractor shall maintain one lane of alternating traffic on all two lane roadways at all times. The maximum delay time shall be limited to 5 minutes. 7.2 All two lane roads shall be opened for two way traffic at the end of each work day, overnight, on weekends, and during holidays. The condition of the travel lanes at the end of the day will be a bladed surface that is free of potholes, ruts, washboarding and bumps. The road surface shall provide a comfortable ride sufficient to accommodate a standard two wheel drive vehicle at a speed of 30 km/h.

187 City of Penticton Traffic Management Plan Page 4 of The Contractor shall maintain two lanes of traffic (one in each direction) on all four lane roadways at all times. The maximum delay time shall be limited to 5 minutes. 7.4 All four lane roads shall be opened for all travel lanes at the end of each work day, overnight, on weekends, and during holidays. The condition of the travel lanes at the end of the day will be a bladed surface that is free of potholes, ruts, washboarding and bumps. The road surface shall provide a comfortable ride sufficient to accommodate a standard two wheel drive vehicle at a speed of 30 km/h. 7.5 The Contractor shall maintain one lane of traffic in all directions in all intersections. The maximum delay time shall be limited to 5 minutes. 7.6 The Contractor can, upon written request and approval by the Contract Administrator, close a road or intersection to through traffic for construction. Written requests for closures must be submitted one week in advance for review and approval by the Contract Administrator. Local and emergency access on all closed roads shall be maintained at all times. The condition for access for the local traffic shall be bladed surface that is free of potholes, ruts, washboarding and bumps. The road surface shall provide a comfortable ride sufficient to accommodate a standard two wheel drive vehicle at a speed of 20 km/h. Roads that have been permitted to be closed shall be opened at the end of each work day and safely passible for two lanes of traffic. 7.7 The Contractor shall provide descriptions and maps of planned road and intersection closures, detours, and signage. All signage and required detours are to be in place prior to approval of a road closure.

188 City of Penticton Traffic Management Plan Page 5 of 8 City of Penticton Truck Routes

189 City of Penticton Traffic Management Plan Page 6 of 8 City of Penticton Bus Routes (Daytimes)

190 City of Penticton Traffic Management Plan Page 7 of 8 City of Penticton Bus Routes (Nighttime Route 15)

191 City of Penticton Traffic Management Plan Page 8 of 8 City of Penticton Bus Routes (Naramata Route 10)