SEAC-AGENDA

Transcription

1 158th (A) Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC-1) SEAC Meeting number: 158th A,Day -1 Meeting Date December 11, 2018 Subject: Environment Clearance for Proposed Expansion of Existing Industrial Activity of M/s. Hemmo Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. Is a Violation Case: No 1.Name of Project 2.Type of institution 3.Name of Project Proponent 4.Name of Consultant 5.Type of project 6.New project/expansion in existing project/modernization/diversification in existing project 7.If expansion/diversification, whether environmental clearance has been obtained for existing project 8.Location of the project 9.Taluka 10.Village Correspondence Name: Room : Floor: Building Name: Road/Street Name: Locality: City: 11.Area of the project 12.IOD/IOA/Concession/Plan Approval 13.Note on the initiated work (If applicable) 14.LOI / NOC / IOD from MHADA/ Other approvals (If applicable) Proposed Expansion of Existing Industrial Activity of M/s. Hemmo Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. Private Mr. Haresh Ahuja Building Environment (India) Pvt. Ltd. Industrial Estate - Industry 5(f) Category B Expansion in existing project No, PP has not obtained Environmental Clearance for existing project C-43, Off Thane Belapur Road TTC MIDC, Near NOCIL RCD Square Thane Pawane Village Mr. Haresh Ahuja C-43, Off Thane Belapur road TTC MIDC Pawane Village, Near NOCIL RCD Square, Maharashtra Pawane Thane Industry is located in Turbhe MIDC IOD/IOA/Concession/Plan Approval : Approved Built-up Area: Existing Industry is already in operation & no work related to proposed expansion has been initiated. 15.Total Plot Area (sq. m.) Deductions 17.Net Plot area (a).proposed Built-up Area (FSI & Non-FSI) a) FSI area (sq. m.): b) Non FSI area (sq. m.): 18 (b).approved Built up area as per DCR 19.Total ground coverage (m2) Ground-coverage Percentage (%) (Note: Percentage of plot not open to sky) c) Total BUA area (sq. m.): Approved FSI area (sq. m.): Approved Non FSI area (sq. m.): Date of Approval: 21.Estimated cost of the project of buildings & its configuration Page 1 of 81

2 number Building Name & number of floors Height of the building (Mtrs) 1 Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable 23. of tenants and shops 24. of expected residents / users 25.Tenant density per hectare 26.Height of the building(s) 27.Right of way (Width of the road from the nearest fire station to the proposed building(s) 28.Turning radius for easy access of fire tender movement from all around the building excluding the width for the plantation 29.Existing structure (s) if any 30.Details of the demolition with disposal (If applicable) 1 2 as it is an industry This is an industry and Total expected population shall be 180 (Existing 140 and Proposed 40) as it is an industry 9 12 Admin Building, ETP, Electrical & AHU Room, DG Room, Boiler Room, Lab 31.Production Details Product Existing (/M) Proposed (/M) Total (/M) Oxytocin Bulk Drugs (In solution and Powder form) Other Peptides (Leuprorelin, Desmopressin, Somatostatin, Tetracosactide,Gonadorelin, Calcitonin, Terlipressin, Octreotide, Buserelin, Decapeptide, Cetrorelix, Carbetocin, Bivalirudin, Goserelin, Triptorelin, Glatiramer, Linaclotide, Eptifibatide, Vasopressin Page 2 of 81

3 3 Dry season: Other Peptides (Leuprorelin, Desmopressin, Somatostatin, Tetracosactide,Gonadorelin, Calcitonin, Terlipressin, Octreotide, Buserelin, Decapeptide, Cetrorelix, Carbetocin, Bivalirudin, Goserelin, Triptorelin, Glatiramer, Linaclotide, Eptifibatide, Vasopressin. Other Peptides: Salmon GnRH A, Atosiban, Degarelix, Exenatide, MBP Peptides, ACTH (Corticotropin), Glucagon, GL Peptide, Custom Peptides, Peptides/Amino Acid based peptides, Liraglutide, Abaloparatide, Teriparatide Source of water Total Water Requirement MIDC Fresh water (CMD): Recycled water - Flushing (CMD): Recycled water - Gardening (CMD): Swimming pool make up (Cum): Total Water Requirement (CMD) : Fire fighting - Underground water tank(cmd): Fire fighting - Overhead water tank(cmd): Excess treated water Page 3 of 81

4 Wet season: Details of Swimming pool (If any) Particula rs Water Require ment Source of water MIDC Fresh water (CMD): Recycled water - Flushing (CMD): Recycled water - Gardening (CMD): Swimming pool make up (Cum): Total Water Requirement (CMD) : Fire fighting - Underground water tank(cmd): Fire fighting - Overhead water tank(cmd): Excess treated water 33.Details of Total water consumed Consumption (CMD) Loss (CMD) Effluent (CMD) Existing Proposed Total Existing Proposed Total Existing Proposed Total Domestic Industrial Process Cooling tower & thermopa ck Gardening Fresh water requireme nt Page 4 of 81

5 34.Rain Water Harvesting (RWH) 35.Storm water drainage Sewage and Waste water Waste generation in the Pre Construction and Construction phase: Waste generation in the operation Phase: Level of the Ground water table: Size and no of RWH tank(s) and Quantity: Location of the RWH tank(s): Quantity of recharge pits: Size of recharge pits : Budgetary allocation (Capital cost) : Budgetary allocation (O & M cost) : Details of UGT tanks if any : Natural water drainage pattern: Quantity of storm water: Size of SWD: Sewage generation in KLD: STP technology: Capacity of STP (CMD): Location & area of the STP: Budgetary allocation (Capital cost): Budgetary allocation (O & M cost): Waste generation: 5-10 m UGT having 2 Lakh Liters capacity is provided. Yes mm * 260 mm 14.5 KLD Septic Tank Septic Tank - 20 CMD Location of Septic tank is Next to ETP on West side of Plot 36.Solid waste Management Disposal of the construction waste debris: Construction Debris The construction debris will be collected and suitably used on site as sub base of internal road and drive ways. Also it will be used for leveling low laying areas. Dry waste: Wet waste: Hazardous waste: Biomedical waste (If applicable): STP Sludge (Dry sludge): Others if any: Non-Biodegradable waste & Inert waste = 29.7 kg/day Biodegradable waste = 24.3 kg/day Spent Solvent = 75 m3/month, Process waste & residue = 137 kg/month, ETP sludge = kg/month 1200 Kg/year Septic Tank Sludge = 78 kg/month Containers = Nos./Year Page 5 of 81

6 Mode of Disposal of waste: Area requirement: Budgetary allocation (Capital cost and O&M cost): Parameters Dry waste: Wet waste: Hazardous waste: Biomedical waste (If applicable): STP Sludge (Dry sludge): Others if any: Location(s): Area for the storage of waste & other material: Area for machinery: Capital cost: O & M cost: Sent to Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation Sent to Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation CHWTSDF and Sold to authorized Recycler/reprocessor CHWTSDF and Sold to authorized Recycler/reprocessor Containers sold to authorized Recycler/ re-processor South West Corner of the plot Solvent Drum Storage = sq.m m2 37.Effluent Charecterestics Unit Inlet Effluent Charecterestics Outlet Effluent Charecterestics Effluent discharge standards (MPCB) 1 TDS mg/l ph BOD (3 Days 27 0C) mg/l Suspended Solids mg/l COD mg/l Amount of effluent generation (CMD): Capacity of the ETP: Amount of treated effluent recycled : Existing = 50 CMD, Proposed = 25 CMD 37.5 CMD Amount of water send to the CETP: Membership of CETP (if require): Note on ETP technology to be used Disposal of the ETP sludge Receipt No dated 27/07/2001 under SSI user Member Category Fenton's Technology CHWTSDF 38.Hazardous Waste Details Description Cat UOM Existing Proposed Total Method of Disposal 1 Spent Solvent 20.2 m3/month Process waste & residue Authorize recycler/reprocessor 28.1 kg/month CHWTSDF 3 ETP Sludge 34.3 kg/month CHWTSDF Section & units 39.Stacks emission Details Fuel Used with Quantity Stack No. Height from ground level (m) Internal diameter (m) Temp. of Exhaust Gases 1 DG Set 500 KVA*2 HSD = 200 lit/hr C 2 Boiler (850 kg/hr*2) PNG = 750 SCM/Day C Page 6 of 81

7 3 Process Reactor (150 litres) Details of Fuel to be used Type of Fuel Existing Proposed Total 1 HSD lit/hr lit/hr lit/hr 2 PNG 245 SCM/Day 505 SCM/Day 750 SCM/Day 41.Source of Fuel 42.Mode of Transportation of fuel to site Market and local Vendor Truck and Tanker 43.Green Belt Development Total RG area : No of trees to be cut : of trees to be planted : List of proposed native trees : Timeline for completion of plantation : and list of trees species to be planted in the ground Name of the plant Common Name Quantity Characteristics & ecological importance 1 45.Total quantity of plants on ground 46. and list of shrubs and bushes species to be planted in the podium RG: Name C/C Distance Area m Energy Page 7 of 81

8 Power requirement: Source of power supply : During Construction Phase: (Demand Load) DG set as Power back-up during construction phase During Operation phase (Connected load): During Operation phase (Demand load): Transformer: DG set as Power back-up during operation phase: Fuel used: Details of high tension line passing through the plot if any: MSEDCL 950 KVA 1400 KW 950 KVA 1200 KVA 500 KVA * 2 Diesel 48.Energy saving by non-conventional method: 49.Detail calculations & % of saving: Energy Conservation Measures Saving % 1 50.Details of pollution control Systems Source Existing pollution control system Proposed to be installed Process Reactor Budgetary allocation (Capital cost and O&M cost): Ammonia Scrubber Capital cost: O & M cost: 51.Environmental Management plan Budgetary Allocation a) Construction phase (with Break-up): Attributes Parameter Total Cost per annum (Rs. In Lacs) Component Air Pollution Control System Water pollution Control System (ETP) b) Operation Phase (with Break-up): Description Capital cost Rs. In Lacs Operational and Maintenance cost (Rs. in Lacs/yr) Scrubber Nil 0.63 ETP 11.0 Nil Page 8 of 81

9 3 Solid waste Management SWM Nil Storage of chemicals (inflamable/explosive/hazardous/toxic substances) Description Status Location Amino Acid Resin Crystalline Solid Solid and highly viscous Storage Capacity in Maximum Quantity of Storage at any point of time in Consumption / Month in Source of Supply Means of transportatio n Solvent Drum Store Vendor By Sea/ Air Solvent Drum Store Vendor By Sea/ Air Reagents Liquid Solvent Drum Store Vendor By Sea/ Air Solvent+ Water Liquid Solvent Drum Store 200 Lit 200 Lit No Information Available Parking details: Nos. of the junction to the main road & design of confluence: and area of basement: and area of podia: 52.Any Other Information 53.Traffic Management 2 Total Parking area: Area per car: 30.0 Area per car: 30.0 of 2- Wheelers as approved by competent authority: of 4- Wheelers as approved by competent authority: Lit Vendor Public Transport: 0 Width of all Internal roads (m): CRZ/ RRZ clearance obtain, if any: 5.5 By Sea/ Air Page 9 of 81

10 Environmental Impacts of the project Water Budget Waste Water Treatment Drainage pattern of the project Ground water parameters Solid Waste Management Air Quality & Noise Level issues Distance from Protected Areas / Critically Polluted areas / Eco-sensitive areas/ inter-state boundaries Category as per schedule of EIA Notification sheet Court cases pending if any Other Relevant Informations Have you previously submitted Application online on MOEF Website. Date of online submission Yes SEAC DISCUSSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Energy Management Not Applicable Traffic circulation system and risk assessment Landscape Plan Disaster management system and risk assessment Socioeconomic impact assessment Environmental Management Plan Any other issues related to environmental sustainability Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Brief information of the project by SEAC Page 10

11 PP submitted their application for the grant of TOR under category 5(f)B1 as per EIA Notification, PP presented draft TOR based on standard TOR issued by MoEF& CC published in April, 2015 in 148th meeting of SEAC-1 held on where in ToR was granted. As the industry is located in the notified industrial area/estate (MIDC), Public Hearing is exempted under the provisions as per para 7 III Stage (3) (b) of the EIA Notification, 2006 Based on the presentation made by PP; committee decided to approve the TOR for the preparation of EIA/EMP report as per standard TOR and additional TOR points mentioned below. 1. PP to submit history about transfer of the proposed plot from time to time till date. PP to submit certificate of incorporation of the company, list of directors and memorandum of articles. 2. PP to submit lay out plan showing entry/exit gates, internal road width of six meters, turning radius of nine meters, location of pollution control equipment, parking areas, waste storage areas,33% green belt, rain water harvesting etc. PP to ensure all construction on site are as per National Building Code. 3. PP to provide revised product list in the consolidated statement with maximum capping quantity for each product. 4. PP to submit copies of all the consents along with their manufacturing quantities.pp to submit details in the tabular format. 5. PP to include detailed material balance charts for each product showing consumption of raw material, sources of pollution and mitigation measures to control the pollution and justified use of resources along with quantities in the EIA report. 6. PP to submit product wise water balance along with quantities of effluent generation, design of effluent treatment plant and disposal of treated effluent. 7. PP to provide packaged STP for the treatment of domestic sewage. 8. PP to carry out additional surface water sampling of the three lakes in the study area and include in the EIA report. 9. PP to carry out HAZOP and QRA and submit report 10. PP to submit hazardous chemical handling protocol 11. PP to provide lightening arrestor. 12. PP to submit CETP NOC for additional effluent load to be discharged to the CETP. 13. PP to ensure 2.5 % funds for CSR and submit detailed CSR plan to be prepared in consultation with the District Collector along with implementation schedule. Now PP submitted EIA/EMP report for appraisal. Page 11

12 DECISION OF SEAC After detailed deliberations with the PP and their accredited consultant SEAC decided to defer the proposal till PP submits compliance of following points. Specific Conditions by SEAC: 1) PP to make changes in the consolidated statement w.r.t water consumption, green belt area, rain water harvesting, use of solar energy, sewage treatment plant, list of trees and project cost in consonance with the EIA Reprot. 2) PP to submit an affidavit for not violating any requirements of EIA Notification, 2006 amended from time to time. 3) PP to submit structural stability certificate with respect to the proposed BUA of Sq.m. in the existing building considering load of proposed equipments to be installed. 4) PP to explore possibility to optimise the process to reduce water consumption. 5) PP to submit revised material balance for each product showing consumption of raw material, water, sources of pollution, proposed mitigation measures to control the pollution alongwith justified use of resources. 6) PP to include reasons for the parameters exceeding standard limits shown in the base line data monitoring. 7) PP to submit their plan to utilize CER (Corporate Environment Responsibility) along with timelines as per OM issued by MoEF&CC dated ) PP to inlcude water foot and carbon foot print monitoring in the EMP. 9) PP to include above points in the EIA report and submit revised EIA/EMP report. FIL RECOMMENDATION SEAC-I decided to defer the proposal.kindly find SEAC decision above. Page 12

13 158th (A) Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC-1) SEAC Meeting number: 158th A,Day -1 Meeting Date December 11, 2018 Subject: Environment Clearance for Proposed Expansion of Synthetic Organic Chemicals Manufacturing Facility At Plot No. 19-A/1+2, MIDC Mahad, District Raigad by Sudarshan Chemical Industries Ltd. Is a Violation Case: No 1.Name of Project 2.Type of institution 3.Name of Project Proponent 4.Name of Consultant Proposed Expansion of Synthetic Organic Chemicals Manufacturing Facility At Plot No. 19- A/1+2, MIDC Mahad, District Raigad by Sudarshan Chemical Industries Ltd. Private Sudarshan Chemical Industries Ltd. Aditya Environmental Services Pvt. Ltd. 5.Type of project Industrial Project, Category 5 (f)- B as per EIA notification New project/expansion in existing project/modernization/diversification in existing project 7.If expansion/diversification, whether environmental clearance has been obtained for existing project 8.Location of the project 9.Taluka 10.Village Correspondence Name: Room : Floor: Building Name: Road/Street Name: Locality: City: 11.Area of the project 12.IOD/IOA/Concession/Plan Approval 13.Note on the initiated work (If applicable) 14.LOI / NOC / IOD from MHADA/ Other approvals (If applicable) 15.Total Plot Area (sq. m.) 16.Deductions 17.Net Plot area 18 (a).proposed Built-up Area (FSI & Non-FSI) 18 (b).approved Built up area as per DCR 19.Total ground coverage (m2) New project. Expansion within existing manufacturing facility Plot No. 19-A/1+2, MIDC Mahad, District Raigad Mahad Nangalwadi (Nadgaon,Kambale) Mr. Nagesh Kamat MIDC Mahad IOD/IOA/Concession/Plan Approval : MIDC approved plot plan Approved Built-up Area: Proposed expansion is within existing manufacturing facility. MIDC approved plot plan sq.m. a) FSI area (sq. m.): b) Non FSI area (sq. m.): 20.Ground-coverage Percentage (%) (Note: Percentage of plot not open to sky) c) Total BUA area (sq. m.): Approved FSI area (sq. m.): Approved Non FSI area (sq. m.): Date of Approval: Estimated cost of the project of buildings & its configuration Page 13

14 number Building Name & number of floors Height of the building (Mtrs) of tenants and shops 24. of expected residents / users 25.Tenant density per hectare 26.Height of the building(s) 27.Right of way (Width of the road from the nearest fire station to the proposed building(s) 28.Turning radius for easy access of fire tender movement from all around the building excluding the width for the plantation 29.Existing structure (s) if any 30.Details of the demolition with disposal (If applicable) 1 Minimum 6 m Minimum 9 m Existing facility is for manufacturing of pigments. Proposed expansion is within existing manufacturing facility. 31.Production Details Product Existing (/M) Proposed (/M) Total (/M) HETEROCYCLIC PIGMENTS AND DYES (COPPER PHTHALOCYANINE BLUE, ALPHA BLUE, BETA BLUE, PIGMENT GREEN, Etc...) 2 QUICRIDONE 264 TPA 3 MICA PEARL PIGMENTS 6360 TPA TPA TPA -264 TPA (Downward revision) 0 TPA 2136 TPA 864 TPA 3000 TPA 4 Cogen Power 0 MW 10 MW 10 MW Sulphuric Acid (15-25%) (Byproduct) Ammonium sulphate (Wet-30%) (Byproduct) Di Calcium Phopshate (Dry) (Byproduct) Phosphoric acid (Byproduct) TPA TPA TPA 0 TPA TPA TPA 0 TPA 4672 TPA 4672 TPA 0 TPA 4672 TPA 4672 TPA Page 14

15 9 Single Super Phosphate (Dry) (Byproduct) 0 TPA 7291 TPA 7291 TPA 10 BaSO4 (Byproduct) 0 TPA TPA TPA Phospho Gypsum (Wet-25%) (Byproduct) Aluminum Chloride (5-15%) (Byproduct) Aluminium hydroxide (Dry) Copper sulphate (Dry) (Byproduct) Chemical Gypsum (Byproduct) Recovered pigments (Byproduct) 0 TPA TPA TPA TPA TPA TPA 0 TPA 4275 TPA 4275 TPA 0 TPA 664 TPA 664 TPA 7200 TPA 9669 TPA TPA 300 TPA 563 TPA 863 TPA 17 Hypochlorite (<10%) 0 TPA TPA TPA Dry season: Hydrochloric Acid (25%-30%) Phosphoric Acid (12-15%) (Byproduct) Phosphoric Acid (30-35%) (Byproduct) Recovered Solvents (Byproduct) Source of water 0 TPA 7830 TPA 7830 TPA 7200 TPA TPA 0 TPA 2400 TPA TPA 0 TPA 1200 TPA TPA 0 TPA 32.Total Water Requirement Fresh water (CMD): Recycled water - Flushing (CMD): Recycled water - Gardening (CMD): Swimming pool make up (Cum): Total Water Requirement (CMD) : Fire fighting - Underground water tank(cmd): MIDC 9961 (existing & proposed) (existing & proposed) Fire fighting - Overhead water tank(cmd): Excess treated water Page 15

16 Wet season: Details of Swimming pool (If any) Particula rs Water Require ment Source of water Fresh water (CMD): Recycled water - Flushing (CMD): Recycled water - Gardening (CMD): Swimming pool make up (Cum): Total Water Requirement (CMD) : Fire fighting - Underground water tank(cmd): Fire fighting - Overhead water tank(cmd): Excess treated water 33.Details of Total water consumed Consumption (CMD) Loss (CMD) Effluent (CMD) Existing Proposed Total Existing Proposed Total Existing Proposed Total Domestic Industrial Process Cooling tower & thermopa ck Gardening Rain Water Harvesting (RWH) Level of the Ground water table: Size and no of RWH tank(s) and Quantity: Location of the RWH tank(s): Quantity of recharge pits: Size of recharge pits : Budgetary allocation (Capital cost) : Budgetary allocation (O & M cost) : Details of UGT tanks if any : Page 16

17 35.Storm water drainage Natural water drainage pattern: Quantity of storm water: Size of SWD: Sewage and Waste water Waste generation in the Pre Construction and Construction phase: Waste generation in the operation Phase: Mode of Disposal of waste: Area requirement: Sewage generation in KLD: STP technology: Capacity of STP (CMD): Location & area of the STP: Budgetary allocation (Capital cost): Budgetary allocation (O & M cost): Waste generation: 234 (existing & proposed) Sewage will be treated suitably in upgraded ETP. 36.Solid waste Management Disposal of the construction waste debris: Dry waste: Wet waste: Hazardous waste: Biomedical waste (If applicable): STP Sludge (Dry sludge): Minor quantity of construction debris will be generated. Construction debris will be dispose as per norms. MICA Waste-1800 PM, Fly Ash PA, Paper/Canteen Waste-18 PA, Rubber hand gloves, PVC shoes, Tarpoulien, Paper bags-5 PA, Broken discarded glass-2.5 PA, Insulating Material-5 PA, Excess Biomass from ETP-1 PA Sludge from WWT, Chemical Containing Residue, Used/Spent oil, Contaminated oil soaked cotton, Discarded Asbestos, Spent Solvent, Discarded containers/ liners, Filter & Filter Material, Spent Carbon 15 Kg/Year Others if any: Dry waste: Wet waste: Dry waste will be dispose as per Norms Hazardous waste: Hazardous waste will be dispose as per Hazardous waste Rule 2016 Biomedical waste (If applicable): STP Sludge (Dry sludge): As Per Biomedical Waste Rule Others if any: Location(s): Area for the storage of waste & other material: Area for machinery: within plot within plot Page 17

18 Budgetary allocation (Capital cost and O&M cost): Parameters Capital cost: O & M cost: 37.Effluent Charecterestics Unit Inlet Effluent Charecterestics Outlet Effluent Charecterestics Effluent discharge standards (MPCB) 1 ph 1 to to to Total Suspended solids mg/l < 100 < Total Dissolved solids mg/l < Chemical oxygen demand mg/l < 250 < Ammonical nitrogen mg/l < 100 < 50 < 50 Amount of effluent generation (CMD): Capacity of the ETP: Amount of treated effluent recycled : CMD (Existing+ proposed) 9.5 MLD (Existing + proposed) 3400 CMD (Existing + proposed) Amount of water send to the CETP: 7494 CMD (Existing + proposed) Membership of CETP (if require): Note on ETP technology to be used Disposal of the ETP sludge 1 2 Yes, Unit is member of CETP Mahad Effluent from Plant > Filtration > Neutralization > Flocculation >Primary Clarifier > Sludge Removal > Aeration Tank > Sludge Removal > Secondary Clarifier > Treated Effluent ETP Sludge will be disposed to CHWTSDF 38.Hazardous Waste Details Description Cat UOM Existing Proposed Total Method of Disposal Sludge from waste water treatment Chemical Containing Residue 35.3 /A Disposal to CHWTSDF 34.1 /A Used/ Spent oil 5.1 Ltr/A Contaminated oil soaked cotton Disposal by send it to authorized decontamination facility/recycler or reuse send back to supplier. disposal by selling to Register Re-refiner or lubrication for nut bolt kg/a CHWTSDF 5 Discarded Asbestos 15.2 /A to CHWTSDF 6 Spent Solvent 20.2 Ltr/A Discarded containers/ liners Filter & Filter Material 33.1 Nos./A Sale to authorized party/chwtsdf Sale to authorized party/chwtsdf 36.2 /A to CHWTSDF 9 Spent carbon 36.2 Kg/ A to CHWTSDF 39.Stacks emission Details Page 18

19 Section & units Stack attached to Boiler (7.5T & 10T) ( Existing ) Stack attached to HCl scrubber ( Existing ) Stack attached to Calciner/Blender- Mica Plant ( Existing ) Stack attached to chlorine scrubber ( Existing ) Stack attached to Dryer Mica ( Existing ) Stack attached to Scrubber Mica Reactor ( Existing ) Stack attached to D G Set (1000 KVA) ( Existing ) Stack attached to Hot air generator ( Existing ) Stack attached to Calciner Crude Mica (Proposed) Stack attached to Green drowning vessel (Proposed) Stack attached to Wet Scrubbing system (Green charging Vessel) (Proposed) Stack attached to Emergency Chlorine Scrubbing System (Proposed) Stack attached to Continues Dryer (Proposed) Stack attached to Continues Dryer (Proposed) Fuel Used with Quantity Coal/ Briquette/ FO -34 PD Stack No. Height from ground level (m) Internal diameter (m) Temp. of Exhaust Gases Diesel- 2.5 KLPM LDO-1 PD Stack attached to Spin Flash dryer (P/A) (Proposed) Stack attached to 30 ACM DC (Proposed) Stack attached to 60 ACM DC (Proposed) Stack attached to Spin Flash dryer (Green SD plant) (Proposed) Page 19

20 Stack attached to Spray Dryer (Green SD Plant) (Proposed) Stack attached to CPC reaction vessel (Proposed) Stack attached to Co- Gen plant (Proposed) Stack attached to Thermopac hot Oil System (Proposed) Stack Attached to CPC SFD (Proposed) Stack Attached to DCP SFD (Proposed) Stack attached to Calciner Crude Mica (Proposed) Stack attached to Calciner/Blender- Mica Plant (Proposed) Stack attached to Scrubber Mica Reactor (Proposed) Stack attached to D G Set (3500 KVA) ( Proposed ) Coal-258 PD Coal-28 PD Diesel-15 KLPM Details of Fuel to be used Type of Fuel Existing Proposed Total 1 Coal 34 PD 252 PD 286 PD 2 Briquette 54 PD 0 PD 54 PD 3 LDO 1 PD 1 PD 2 PD 4 Diesel 2.5 KLPM 15 KLPM 18 KLPM 41.Source of Fuel 42.Mode of Transportation of fuel to site 43.Green Belt Development Total RG area : from nearby source By road No of trees to be cut : as per MIDC DC rule of trees to be planted : List of proposed native trees : Timeline for completion of plantation : as per green belt development as per project development phase 44. and list of trees species to be planted in the ground Name of the plant Common Name Quantity Characteristics & ecological importance 1 Page 20

21 45.Total quantity of plants on ground 46. and list of shrubs and bushes species to be planted in the podium RG: Name C/C Distance Area m2 1 Power requirement: Source of power supply : During Construction Phase: (Demand Load) DG set as Power back-up during construction phase During Operation phase (Connected load): During Operation phase (Demand load): Transformer: DG set as Power back-up during operation phase: Fuel used: Details of high tension line passing through the plot if any: 47.Energy Partly From Inhouse Cogen & partly from MSEDCL from MSEDCL from existing 1000 KVA DG set Partly From Inhouse Cogen & partly from MSEDCL existing- 2.5 MW & Add. proposed MW Existing DG set KVA & Add. proposed DG set KVA HSD 48.Energy saving by non-conventional method: 49.Detail calculations & % of saving: Energy Conservation Measures Saving % 1 50.Details of pollution control Systems Source Existing pollution control system Proposed to be installed Air Pollution FROM Utilities, process, DG sets Effluent from Utilities, Process Noise pollution Hazardous waste Stack, bag filter, Cyclone, Process scrubber ETP PPE, Acoustic enclosure Disposal to CHWTSDF, Authorized recycler Stack, ESP, cyclone Process scrubber ETP, RO, MEE PPE, Acoustic enclosure Disposal to CHWTSDF, Authorized recycler Page 21

22 Budgetary allocation (Capital cost and O&M cost): Capital cost: O & M cost: 51.Environmental Management plan Budgetary Allocation a) Construction phase (with Break-up): Attributes Parameter Total Cost per annum (Rs. In Lacs) 1 Component 1 Air Pollution Control Environmental Monitoring Water Pollution Control Hazardous waste & Solid Waste management Green Build Development 6 Green Initiative 7 8 Occupational Health & Safety Social welfare & upliftment b) Operation Phase (with Break-up): Description From Utilities, Process, DG Set Capital cost Rs. In Lacs Operational and Maintenance cost (Rs. in Lacs/yr) Regular Monitoring ETP, RO, MEE Storage & Disposal Of Hazardous Waste & Non Hazardous Waste Development & maintenance Of Green belt Installation & maintenance of Windmill PPE, Safety Training ESC budget Storage of chemicals (inflamable/explosive/hazardous/toxic substances) Description Status Location Sulphuric Acid (15-30%) Aluminum Chloride(5-15%) Hypochlorite (<10%) DCT/ONT/Naptha (C10) Sulphuric Acid 98% Existing / Proposed Within Plot Storage Capacity in 190 /239 Maximum Quantity of Consumption Storage / Month in at any point of time in 190 /239 As per Requirement Source of Supply Existing / Proposed Existing / Proposed Existing / Proposed Existing / Proposed Within Plot Within Plot Within Plot Within Plot 140 /93 30 /170 0 /12 90 / /93 30 /170 0 /12 90 /305 As per Requirement As per Requirement As per Requirement As per Requirement Nearby Source Nearby Source Nearby Source Nearby Source Nearby Source Means of transportation By road By road By road By road By road Page 22

23 Ammonium Carbonate Solution (10 to 20%) Caustic (48%) Hydrochloric acid (HCl) IBN MCB Chlorine No Information Available Parking details: Existing / Proposed Existing / Proposed Existing / Proposed Existing / Proposed Existing / Proposed Existing / Proposed Within Plot Within Plot Within Plot Within Plot Within Plot Within Plot Nos. of the junction to the main road & design of confluence: and area of basement: and area of podia: Total Parking area: 0 / /92 25 /0 0 /15 0 /8 40 /92 0 / /92 25 /0 0 /15 0 /8 40 /92 52.Any Other Information 53.Traffic Management Area per car: Area per car: of 2- Wheelers as approved by competent authority: of 4- Wheelers as approved by competent authority: sq.m. Public Transport: Width of all Internal roads (m): CRZ/ RRZ clearance obtain, if any: Distance from Protected Areas / Critically Polluted areas / Eco-sensitive areas/ inter-state boundaries Min. 6 m As per Requirement As per Requirement As per Requirement As per Requirement As per Requirement As per Requirement Nearby Source Nearby Source Nearby Source Nearby Source Nearby Source Nearby Source Category as per schedule of EIA Notification sheet Court cases pending if any Other Relevant Informations 5 (f), category B By road By road By road By road By road By road Page 23

24 Consolidated Statement Point Project cost Air Pollution Control (From Utilities, Process, DG Set Environmental Monitoring (Regular Monitoring) Water Pollution Control (ETP, RO, MEE) Hazardous waste & Solid Waste management (Storage & Disposal) Green Belt Development (Development & Maintenance of Green belt) Green Initiative (Installation & maintenance of windmill) Occupational Health & Safety (PPE, Safety Training) Social welfare & upliftment (CER Budget) Total EMP budget Environmental Impacts of the project Water Budget Waste Water Treatment Drainage pattern of the project Have you previously submitted Application online on MOEF Website. Date of online submission Yes TOR Suggested Changes Original Remarks Project cost submitted during TOR application- Rs. 480 Crores Submitted Changes Revised Project cost: Rs Crores Capital cost: 500 Lacs, O & M cost: 300 Lacs/Yr Capital cost: 275 Lacs, O & M cost: 165 Lacs/Yr Capital cost: 50 Lacs, O & M cost: 10 Lacs/Yr Capital cost: 2300 Lacs, O & M cost: 100 Lacs/Yr Capital cost: 28 Lacs, O & M cost: 6 Lacs/Yr Capital cost: 1267 Lacs, O & M cost: 55 Lacs/Yr Capital cost: 200 Lacs, O & M cost: 300 Lacs/Yr Capital cost: 110 Lacs, O & M cost: 165 Lacs/Yr Capital cost: 50 Lacs, O & M cost: 10 Lacs/Yr Capital cost: 9000 Lacs, O & M cost: 150 Lacs/Yr Capital cost: 2000 Lacs, O & M cost: 120 Lacs/Yr Capital cost: 100 Lacs, O & M cost: 0 Lacs/Yr EMP Budget proposed during TOR: Capital cost: Lacs, O & M cost: 990 Lacs/Yr Capital cost: 28 Lacs, O & M cost: 6 Lacs/Yr Capital cost: 4958 Lacs, O & M cost: 83 Lacs/Yr Capital cost: 1102 Lacs, O & M cost: 66 Lacs/Yr Capital cost: 198 Lacs Revised EMP Budget: Capital cost: 7966 Lacs, O & M cost: 545 Lacs/Yr SEAC DISCUSSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS PP submitted EIA report to the committee. Various aspects of the Environment are discussed in the report. PP has conducted base line data collection for Air, Water, Soil & Noise parameters as per EIA Notification, 2006 amended from time to time. As per data submitted by the PP in the EIA report environmental parameters are found within the prescribed limits at site. PP submitted water budget calculations in the EIA report and also indicated water requirement at Sr. No 33 of the Consolidated Statement. PP to provide ZLD if not obtianed NOC from MPCB and CETP as required vide letter from MIDC dated PP provided srorm water drains as per contour on the site. Page 24

25 Ground water parameters Solid Waste Management Air Quality & Noise Level issues Energy Management Traffic circulation system and risk assessment Landscape Plan Disaster management system and risk assessment Socioeconomic impact assessment Environmental Management Plan Any other issues related to environmental sustainability As per data submitted by PP ground water parameters are within the prescribed limits at project site. PP proposes to dispose hazardous waste either at CHWTSDF site or sale to Authorized vedors. As per data submitted by PP Air Quality and Noise parameters are within the prescribed limits at project site. The electrical demand for proposed project is 14 MW which will be supplied by MSEDCL and inhouse cogen. PP proposes3500 KVA DG Sets. PP provided all internal roads with minimum six meter width and nine meter turning radius. PP proposes to provide 33% green belt within the plot area. PP has carried out HAZOP/Risk Assessment and prepared Disaster Management Plan. PP has carried out socio economic impact study and included in the EIA report. PP proposed EMP cost of Rs Lakhs as capital cost and Rs. 990 Lakh as O & M cost to maintain environmental parameters. PP to submit an adffidavit for providing ZLD if MPCB doesnot give NOC to discharge effluent directly at the out let point of CETP. Brief information of the project by SEAC Page 25

26 PP submitted their application for the grant of TOR under category 5(f)B1 as per EIA Notification, PP presented draft TOR based on standard TOR issued by MoEF & CC published in April, 2015 in 146th meeting of SEAC-1 held on 31st January, 2018 where in ToR was grnated along with following additional ToR points, 1. PP to submit certificate of incorporation of the company, list of directors and memorandum of articles. 2. PP to submit lay out plan showing entry/exit gates, internal road width of six meters, turning radius of nine meters, location of pollution control equipment, parking areas, waste storage areas,33% green belt, rain water harvesting etc. 3. PP to include detailed material balance charts for each product showing consumption of raw material, sources of pollution and mitigation measures to control the pollution and justified use of resources along with quantities in the EIA report. 4. PP to carry out life cycle analysis of the activities carried out on site with respect to the sustainability index, green house and ozone depletion potential etc 5. PP to submit detailed water balance calculation showing water required for each activity, water required for domestic use, generation of waste water and its treatment and disposal mechanism along with design of Effluent Treatment Plant and commitment for achieving treated effluent parameters. 6. PP to obtain permission from MIDC to develop green belt around the boundary of the premises and submit details of green belt development including action plan for achieving 33% green belt area; PP to ensure land width not less than 1500 tress/ha, giving details of species, width of plantation, planning schedule etc. shall be included. The green belt shall be around the project boundary and scheme for greening of roads used for the project shall also be incorporated. PP to make necessary arrangement of drip irrigation in the green belt areas so as to ensure maximum survival of the plants/trees. 7. PP to submit copy of HAZOP and Quantitative Risk Assessment Report. 8. PP to submit specific CSR activities including funds allocated for CSR, activities to be involved with time lines for its implementation in consultation with the District Authorities. PP to maintain separate accounts for CSR/EMP funds. 9. PP to submit plan for byproduct storage, reuse and disposal along with names of vendors. 10. PP to copy of on site emergency plan. 11. PP to submit copy of permission obtained from CETP to discharge treated effluent in the existing CETP. 12. PP to explore possibility of heat integration across the process and submit report. 13. PP to include chemical handling protocol in the EIA report. 14. PP to submit structural stability certificate of existing buildings on the site. 15. PP to provide solar energy for the illumination of administrative building area and street lights. As the industry is located in the notified industrial area/estate (MIDC), Public Hearing is exempted under the provisions as per para 7 III Stage (3) (b) of the EIA Notification, 2006 PP to collect base line data as per Office Memorandum issued by MoEF&CC dated PP to carryout base line monitoring activity after grant of ToR and use the same of the preparation of the EIA/EMP report. PP submitted EIA/EMP report for appraisal in the 157th meeting held on where in the proposal was deferred for compliance of following points, 1. PP to submit revised layout as discussed in the meeting. 2. PP to provide ZLD for the effluent generates from the proposed expansion activities.pp to submit their plan along with design details of the ZLD plant. 3. PP to submit chemical compatibility chart storage and handling based on the chemical properties of the raw materials. 4. PP to submit detailed structural stability certificate from accredited certifying agency to accommodate proposed expansion in the existing plants. 5. PP to include water and carbon foot print monitoring in the Environment Management Plan, 6. PP to submit their plan for the CER approved by District Authorities. Now PP submitted compliance of above points. Page 26

27 DECISION OF SEAC After detailed deliberations with the PP and their accredited consultant, SEAC decided to recommend the proposal for prior Environment Clearance to the SEIAA. Specific Conditions by SEAC: 1) In last meeting PP was asked to provide ZLD for effluent treatment. Now PP submitted that they have obtained permission from MIDC vide letter dated to accept additional MLD effluent quantity which will be generated after proposed expansion in MIDC's disposal system at final dispsoal point subject to obtaining NOC from competent Authority such as MPCB etc. PP also informaed that, they have already submitted proposal to MPCB which is under process. PP stated that they will submit an affidavit mentionig if MPCB will not grant NOC they will implement ZLD. 2) PP to comply with the recommendations made vide structural stability certificate dated ) PP to explore possibility in consultaton with the District Collector to establish, operate and maintian STP for Mahad Nagar Palika out of their CER fund. 4) PP to include water and carbon foot print monitoring in the Environment Management Plan, FIL RECOMMENDATION SEAC-I decided to defer the proposal.kindly find SEAC decision above. Page 27

28 158th (A) Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC-1) SEAC Meeting number: 158th A,Day -1 Meeting Date December 11, 2018 Subject: Environment Clearance for Proposed Expansion of Synthetic Organic Chemicals Manufacturing Facility At Plot No. 19-A/1+2, MIDC Mahad, District Raigad by Sudarshan Chemical Industries Ltd. Is a Violation Case: No 1.Name of Project 2.Type of institution 3.Name of Project Proponent 4.Name of Consultant Proposed Expansion of Synthetic Organic Chemicals Manufacturing Facility At Plot No. 19- A/1+2, MIDC Mahad, District Raigad by Sudarshan Chemical Industries Ltd. Private Sudarshan Chemical Industries Ltd. Aditya Environmental Services Pvt. Ltd. 5.Type of project Industrial Project, Category 5 (f)- B as per EIA notification New project/expansion in existing project/modernization/diversification in existing project 7.If expansion/diversification, whether environmental clearance has been obtained for existing project 8.Location of the project 9.Taluka 10.Village Correspondence Name: Room : Floor: Building Name: Road/Street Name: Locality: City: 11.Area of the project 12.IOD/IOA/Concession/Plan Approval 13.Note on the initiated work (If applicable) 14.LOI / NOC / IOD from MHADA/ Other approvals (If applicable) 15.Total Plot Area (sq. m.) 16.Deductions 17.Net Plot area 18 (a).proposed Built-up Area (FSI & Non-FSI) 18 (b).approved Built up area as per DCR 19.Total ground coverage (m2) New project. Expansion within existing manufacturing facility Plot No. 19-A/1+2, MIDC Mahad, District Raigad Mahad Nangalwadi (Nadgaon,Kambale) Mr. Nagesh Kamat MIDC Mahad IOD/IOA/Concession/Plan Approval : MIDC approved plot plan Approved Built-up Area: Proposed expansion is within existing manufacturing facility. MIDC approved plot plan sq.m. a) FSI area (sq. m.): b) Non FSI area (sq. m.): 20.Ground-coverage Percentage (%) (Note: Percentage of plot not open to sky) c) Total BUA area (sq. m.): Approved FSI area (sq. m.): Approved Non FSI area (sq. m.): Date of Approval: Estimated cost of the project of buildings & its configuration Page 28

29 number Building Name & number of floors Height of the building (Mtrs) of tenants and shops 24. of expected residents / users 25.Tenant density per hectare 26.Height of the building(s) 27.Right of way (Width of the road from the nearest fire station to the proposed building(s) 28.Turning radius for easy access of fire tender movement from all around the building excluding the width for the plantation 29.Existing structure (s) if any 30.Details of the demolition with disposal (If applicable) 1 Minimum 6 m Minimum 9 m Existing facility is for manufacturing of pigments. Proposed expansion is within existing manufacturing facility. 31.Production Details Product Existing (/M) Proposed (/M) Total (/M) HETEROCYCLIC PIGMENTS AND DYES (COPPER PHTHALOCYANINE BLUE, ALPHA BLUE, BETA BLUE, PIGMENT GREEN, Etc...) 2 QUICRIDONE 264 TPA 3 MICA PEARL PIGMENTS 6360 TPA TPA TPA -264 TPA (Downward revision) 0 TPA 2136 TPA 864 TPA 3000 TPA 4 Cogen Power 0 MW 10 MW 10 MW Sulphuric Acid (15-25%) (Byproduct) Ammonium sulphate (Wet-30%) (Byproduct) Di Calcium Phopshate (Dry) (Byproduct) Phosphoric acid (Byproduct) TPA TPA TPA 0 TPA TPA TPA 0 TPA 4672 TPA 4672 TPA 0 TPA 4672 TPA 4672 TPA Page 29

30 9 Single Super Phosphate (Dry) (Byproduct) 0 TPA 7291 TPA 7291 TPA 10 BaSO4 (Byproduct) 0 TPA TPA TPA Phospho Gypsum (Wet-25%) (Byproduct) Aluminum Chloride (5-15%) (Byproduct) Aluminium hydroxide (Dry) Copper sulphate (Dry) (Byproduct) Chemical Gypsum (Byproduct) Recovered pigments (Byproduct) 0 TPA TPA TPA TPA TPA TPA 0 TPA 4275 TPA 4275 TPA 0 TPA 664 TPA 664 TPA 7200 TPA 9669 TPA TPA 300 TPA 563 TPA 863 TPA 17 Hypochlorite (<10%) 0 TPA TPA TPA Dry season: Hydrochloric Acid (25%-30%) Phosphoric Acid (12-15%) (Byproduct) Phosphoric Acid (30-35%) (Byproduct) Recovered Solvents (Byproduct) Source of water 0 TPA 7830 TPA 7830 TPA 7200 TPA TPA 0 TPA 2400 TPA TPA 0 TPA 1200 TPA TPA 0 TPA 32.Total Water Requirement Fresh water (CMD): Recycled water - Flushing (CMD): Recycled water - Gardening (CMD): Swimming pool make up (Cum): Total Water Requirement (CMD) : Fire fighting - Underground water tank(cmd): MIDC 9961 (existing & proposed) (existing & proposed) Fire fighting - Overhead water tank(cmd): Excess treated water Page 30

31 Wet season: Details of Swimming pool (If any) Particula rs Water Require ment Source of water Fresh water (CMD): Recycled water - Flushing (CMD): Recycled water - Gardening (CMD): Swimming pool make up (Cum): Total Water Requirement (CMD) : Fire fighting - Underground water tank(cmd): Fire fighting - Overhead water tank(cmd): Excess treated water 33.Details of Total water consumed Consumption (CMD) Loss (CMD) Effluent (CMD) Existing Proposed Total Existing Proposed Total Existing Proposed Total Domestic Industrial Process Cooling tower & thermopa ck Gardening Rain Water Harvesting (RWH) Level of the Ground water table: Size and no of RWH tank(s) and Quantity: Location of the RWH tank(s): Quantity of recharge pits: Size of recharge pits : Budgetary allocation (Capital cost) : Budgetary allocation (O & M cost) : Details of UGT tanks if any : Page 31

32 35.Storm water drainage Natural water drainage pattern: Quantity of storm water: Size of SWD: Sewage and Waste water Waste generation in the Pre Construction and Construction phase: Waste generation in the operation Phase: Mode of Disposal of waste: Area requirement: Sewage generation in KLD: STP technology: Capacity of STP (CMD): Location & area of the STP: Budgetary allocation (Capital cost): Budgetary allocation (O & M cost): Waste generation: 234 (existing & proposed) Sewage will be treated suitably in upgraded ETP. 36.Solid waste Management Disposal of the construction waste debris: Dry waste: Wet waste: Hazardous waste: Biomedical waste (If applicable): STP Sludge (Dry sludge): Minor quantity of construction debris will be generated. Construction debris will be dispose as per norms. MICA Waste-1800 PM, Fly Ash PA, Paper/Canteen Waste-18 PA, Rubber hand gloves, PVC shoes, Tarpoulien, Paper bags-5 PA, Broken discarded glass-2.5 PA, Insulating Material-5 PA, Excess Biomass from ETP-1 PA Sludge from WWT, Chemical Containing Residue, Used/Spent oil, Contaminated oil soaked cotton, Discarded Asbestos, Spent Solvent, Discarded containers/ liners, Filter & Filter Material, Spent Carbon 15 Kg/Year Others if any: Dry waste: Wet waste: Dry waste will be dispose as per Norms Hazardous waste: Hazardous waste will be dispose as per Hazardous waste Rule 2016 Biomedical waste (If applicable): STP Sludge (Dry sludge): As Per Biomedical Waste Rule Others if any: Location(s): Area for the storage of waste & other material: Area for machinery: within plot within plot Page 32

33 Budgetary allocation (Capital cost and O&M cost): Parameters Capital cost: O & M cost: 37.Effluent Charecterestics Unit Inlet Effluent Charecterestics Outlet Effluent Charecterestics Effluent discharge standards (MPCB) 1 ph 1 to to to Total Suspended solids mg/l < 100 < Total Dissolved solids mg/l < Chemical oxygen demand mg/l < 250 < Ammonical nitrogen mg/l < 100 < 50 < 50 Amount of effluent generation (CMD): Capacity of the ETP: Amount of treated effluent recycled : CMD (Existing+ proposed) 9.5 MLD (Existing + proposed) 3400 CMD (Existing + proposed) Amount of water send to the CETP: 7494 CMD (Existing + proposed) Membership of CETP (if require): Note on ETP technology to be used Disposal of the ETP sludge 1 2 Yes, Unit is member of CETP Mahad Effluent from Plant > Filtration > Neutralization > Flocculation >Primary Clarifier > Sludge Removal > Aeration Tank > Sludge Removal > Secondary Clarifier > Treated Effluent ETP Sludge will be disposed to CHWTSDF 38.Hazardous Waste Details Description Cat UOM Existing Proposed Total Method of Disposal Sludge from waste water treatment Chemical Containing Residue 35.3 /A Disposal to CHWTSDF 34.1 /A Used/ Spent oil 5.1 Ltr/A Contaminated oil soaked cotton Disposal by send it to authorized decontamination facility/recycler or reuse send back to supplier. disposal by selling to Register Re-refiner or lubrication for nut bolt kg/a CHWTSDF 5 Discarded Asbestos 15.2 /A to CHWTSDF 6 Spent Solvent 20.2 Ltr/A Discarded containers/ liners Filter & Filter Material 33.1 Nos./A Sale to authorized party/chwtsdf Sale to authorized party/chwtsdf 36.2 /A to CHWTSDF 9 Spent carbon 36.2 Kg/ A to CHWTSDF 39.Stacks emission Details Page 33