CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM SMALL-SCALE PROGRAMME OF ACTIVITIES DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-VPoA-DD) Version 01 CONTENTS

Transcription

1 CDM Executive Board page 1 CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM SMALL-SCALE PROGRAMME OF ACTIVITIES DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-VPoA-DD) Version 01 CONTENTS A. General description of small-scale programme of activities (SSC-VPoA) B. Duration of the small-scale programme of activities C. Environmental Analysis D. Stakeholder comments E. Application of a baseline and monitoring methodology to a typical small-scale CDM Programme Activity (SSC-VPA) Annexes Annex 1: Contact information on Coordinating/managing entity and participants of SSC-VPoA Annex 2: Information regarding public funding Annex 3: Baseline information Annex 4: Monitoring plan Annex 5: Information regarding the additionality of the VPoA NOTE: (i) This form is for the submission of a CDM VPoA whose VPAs apply a small scale approved methodology. (ii) At the time of requesting registration this form must be accompanied by a CDM-SSC- VPA-DD form that has been specified for the proposed VPoA, as well as by one completed CDM-SSC-VPA-DD (using a real case).

2 CDM Executive Board page 2 SECTION A. General description of small-scale programme of activities (VPoA) A.1 Title of the small-scale programme of activities (VPoA): >>Title: The Turkish programme of activities relating to run of river hydro projects managed by Suen Ltd. Version number of the document: 5 Date: 20 / 03 / 2013 Start date of VPoA: 01/12/ Entity in charge of preparation of the document: Mrs.Aynur Sezer, SUEN Ltd. A.2. Description of the small-scale programme of activities (VPoA): The Turkish Small Hydro Programme of Activities involves the implementation of a series of run of river hydro projects [under 15MW] in Turkey. The coordinating body is a Turkish engineering company, SUEN Ltd. SUEN MÜHENDİSLİK İNŞ.DAN.HİZ.YEN.EN.ÜRT.PAZ.SAN. VE TİC.LTD.ŞTİ (Suen Engineering Construction, Consultancy Services, Renewable Energy Marketing and Trading Ltd), which is facilitating and coordinating the programme of activities. Suen Ltd will be responsible for acting as the management entity, drafting VPA documents and ensuring that all the projects meet their milestones under the Gold Standard. The VPOA will involve a number of engineering companies as implementing entities which will construct the underlying projects. The programme is intended to provide a clean source of electricity from the use of hydroelectric power plants under 15MW in remote areas and to contribute to the decentralisation of energy production in Turkey. Currently two project activities are included in the VPoA; Cevher I Diversion Weir and with an installed capacity of 9.28 MW and output of GWh per year and Cevher II Diversion Weir and with an installed capacity of 7.08 MW and with output of GWh per year. The two project activities are run-of-river type s with no water storage. Both projects are located in Maçka Town of Trabzon Province, Turkey. The VPoA will contribute to sustainable development of the Host Country. Specifically: - Increase employment opportunities in the area where the Project is located, thereby contributing to poverty alleviation in the villages surrounding the project site - Enhance the local investment environment, thereby improving the local economy; - Diversify the sources of electricity generation, which is important for meeting growing energy demands, and complements the transition away from fossil fuel supplied electricity generation; - Decrease Turkey s dependence on foreign energy sources with a simultaneous strengthening of the country s energy security and self sufficiency. - Makes greater use of renewable hydroelectric resources. General Operating and implementing framework of VPOA The Turkish parliament voted to accede to the Kyoto Protocol in February It is understood that no obligations will be placed on Turkey to reduce its emissions until after This date reflects the contract date of the first PAs between the coordinating entity and project implementers

3 CDM Executive Board page 3 According to World Bank documents, 2 since 2001, the Turkish economy has gone through significant structural changes which were initiated to restore macroeconomic stability and to ensure that the economy is more efficient and productive. An important part of this programme has been ensuring efficiency of the supply and consumption of electricity. The Turkish electricity sector has undergone extensive reforms to encourage private sector investment. However, due to a number of factors, Turkey has not succeeded in attracting sufficient private sector investment. The report acknowledges that Turkey is likely to face shortages of electricity starting in the near future due to growing demand generated by strong economic growth and rising social standards. These shortages are likely to disproportionately affect the poor and the schools and health facilities used by the poor. Sectors of society that are wealthier will be able to afford to switch to diesel generators when there are shortages of electricity supply but these more expensive options are not affordable in the poorer areas. Therefore it is important that clean supplies of energy are implemented to reduce the use of off-grid diesel generators and improve the access of the poor to emission free sources of energy. The aim of the VPOA is to bring clean emission free sources of electricity to those areas where it is needed. Over the last decade, electricity supply in Turkey has increased from 111TWH in 1998 to 190TWh in 2007 which is an increase of 71%. During the period from 1998 to 2006 atmospheric emissions from thermal power generation increased at a rate of 45%. 3 There is clearly a need to increase the proportion of hydropower in the electricity mix and the VPOA will have the purpose of improving that proportion. The VPOA will also ensure that all projects are implemented in accordance with environmental laws. To mitigate the environmental impact of meeting the increasing electricity demand the Government has taken the following steps: implementation of the Renewable Energy law in May 2005 ; the enactment of the Energy Efficiency law in 2007; the construction of new thermal power plants; conversion of oil-fired plants to gas fired plants; the issuance of a large number of licences for wind energy generation. Environmental laws have also been revised and amended in 2007 to include: significantly large administrative fines against non-compliance; the inclusion of the requirements in the EU Directive on Environmental Impact Assessment, a bylaw on Strategic Environmental Assessment; and a bylaw mirroring the EU Directive on Large Combustion Plants. Turkey s Integrated EU Environmental Compliance Strategy (2006) 4 also recognises the need to enact a bylaw on the right to access environmental information. The EU is providing assistance to Turkey to build capacity for environmental management, regulation, enforcement and monitoring as well as 2 World Bank report no Programme information document appraisal stage for the programmatic electricity sector development policy loan approved by the board on 14 October Turkey - Programmatic Electricity Sector Development Policy Loan Project nupk=641875&searchmenupk= &thesitepk=361712&entityid= _ &searchme nupk= &thesitepk=361712

4 CDM Executive Board page 4 developing revised measures for nature conservation. The managing entity will act as a source of information and a monitoring entity in relation to ensuring the projects under the VPOA meet these changing environmental requirements. Turkey has fairly robust requirements for environmental assessment of energy projects. Environmental management plans are required to cover an assessment of all environmental impacts that would occur during construction and operation, the measures to be taken to mitigate these impacts and the monitoring procedures to be followed. There are specific requirements for public consultation and for maintaining records of such consultations. It should be noted that small scale run of river projects under 25 MW are not required to undergo EIAs. However, there will be included in the annex of each VPA a description of the environmental and social impacts of each of the projects. Policy /measure of stated goal of VPOA The goal of the VPOA is to have one coordinating entity based in Turkey with the experience of drafting emission reduction documentation that will assist other local Turkish engineers to efficiently implement clean energy projects in a sustainable and socially responsible manner. Hydroelectric projects will benefit Turkey by reducing its dependence on fossil fuel and also to assist with the reduction of emissions of carbon dioxide generated by Turkey. It will also assist in relation to the current shortage of electricity supply in the country through the implementation of projects that do not generate greenhouse gases. It will also have a capacity building effect as the managing entity is Turkish and relevant information and skills will be transferred to any participating entities. The implementation of the projects will serve the purpose of improving employment opportunites directly related to the construction and operation of the electricity plants but also provide a stable and reliable source of energy in the local areas so that industries can be developed. Confirmation that the proposed VPOA is a voluntary action by the coordinating/managing entity It is confirmed that the proposed VPoA is a voluntary action by the private initiative coordinated by Suen Ltd. A.3. Coordinating/managing entity and participants of SSC-VPOA: Coordinating entity The coordinating/managing entity is Suen Ltd. Suen Ltd. is authorized by the project owner to develop carbon projects and manage all rights of developed credits. Suen Ltd. Will be the coordinating/managing entity for the future VPAs which will take place under this VPoA. Project participants Currently there are two PAs under the VPoA. The Project Participant for Cevher I and Cevher II is Özcevher Enerji Elektrik Üretim A.Ş. ( Özcevher Energy Electricity Inc..) which is controlled by a prominent construction firm YAPITEK Construction. Özcevher Enerji Elektrik Üretim A.Ş. may not be the PP for future VPAs under this VPoA.

5 CDM Executive Board page 5 A.4. Technical description of the small-scale programme of activities: >> All VPAs under the VPoA will be run-of-river hydro power plants connecting to the national Turkish electricity grid. The small scale methodology AMS ID v13 (as amended and in force at the time of the project implementation) will be used for all projects under this VPOA. Although the technical specifications for each project may differ, the following general characteristics will apply for all VPAs: water will be diverted from the water inlet in the river through a penstock to the power plant; diverted water turns the turbines in the power plant and electricity is generated; water then flows out along a discharge channel and is returned to the river through the water outlet; electricity generated travels along transmission lines to the nearest substation and is then fed into the Turkish national grid. Measures will be taken to ensure that there is a sufficient flow of water left in the river between the water inlet and the outlet to support the riverine ecosystems downstream of the water intake. All projects will meet with any requirements under environmental laws. However, it should be noted that hydro projects under 25 MW 5 are not required to undergo an environmental impact assessment under Turkish environmental law. 6 A.4.1. Location of the programme of activities: >>There will be a number of run of river hydro projects implemented in various regions of Turkey. The first projects will be implemented in the region of the Blacksea >>Turkey A A Host Party(ies): Physical/ Geographical boundary: The geographical border of Turkey A.4.2. Description of a typical programme activity (PA): >> A VPA to be included under this VPoA shall: Be a run-of-river hydro power plant, Have an installed capacity of 15 MWs Be connected to the national Turkish electricity grid. require the private entity constructing the projects to have transferred all rights and title to VERs generated by the projects under the Gold Standard to the managing entity of the VPoA (Suen Ltd) Previous EIA regulation dated 16/12/2003 numbered did not require EIA for run of river type s under MW. However the latest regulation which took effect on 17/07/20 amended this limit as 25 MW for run-of-river s.

6 CDM Executive Board page 6 A Technology or measures to be employed by the SSC-PA: >>Run of river Hydro projects under 15MW. There may be a variety of types of generators or other equipment used. A full description of the specific technology used for each project will be described under the VPA. Current project ativities in the VPoA Cevher I and Cevher II s each have 2 horizontal pelton type turbines. They are provided from a Chinese Turbine manufacturer;chongqing Lisong Electromechanical Equipment Co., LTD. A Eligibility criteria for inclusion of a SSC-PA in the VPoA: The managing entity will ensure that all projects: are new build run of river hydro project; are privately funded are new built and will not include retrofits or upgrading of existing renewable energy facilities are small scale projects with a capacity under 15MW; will connect to the Turkish national electricity grid; involve Turkish labour wherever possible during the construction of the projects. are situated within the borders of Turkey; have not been registered with any other standard as an individual project; have applied Gold Standard to be certified. comply with all relevant environmental laws and have all relevant licences issued. are situated within the Turkish border. meet the additionality criteria set out under the VPoA; and the implementing entity has transferred title to the VERs to the managing entity. A.4.3. Description of how the anthropogenic emissions of GHG by sources are reduced by a SSC-VPA below those that would have occurred in the absence of the registered VPoA (assessment and demonstration of additionality): Step 1: Identification of alternatives to the project activity consistent with current laws and regulations Under this step realistic and credible alternatives to the PoA are defined through the following Sub-steps: Sub-step 1a: Define alternatives to the project activity: The alternatives that are identified are listed below: Alternative 1: The proposed PoA undertaken without being registered as a VER project activity; This alternative can be considered as the second option of project owners in case the project does not receive VER support, however whether this alternative is feasible will be discussed in detail under Step 3 of this VPA-DD. Alternative 2: Continuation of the current situation, i.e: VPAs under this PoA is not built and same amount of electricity is generated by other plants supplying electicity to the Turkish grid; If VPAs are not built, the same amount of electricity will be supplied from the grid. As the Turkish grid is dominated by thermal power plants, this alternative means that the same amount of electricity will be supplied from the thermal power plants supplying the Turkish grid. Although this alternative is a realistic alternative, it will definitely cause significantly more CO 2 emissions than the proposed

7 CDM Executive Board page 7 project activity. Further analysis on this alternative will be made under Step 3 Barrier Analysis section of the VPAs. Alternative 3: Building wind Power plants with the same output capacity in the PoA concept ; The location of the proposed project activity, is not suitable for building a WPP, as Trabzon is one of the cities with the lowest wind speed in Turkey. 7 Hence the alternative can not be considered as a realistic alternative. Outcome of Sub-step 1a: Alternative 1 and Alternative 2 are identified as the only realistic and credible alternatives to the proposed PoA. Sub-step 1b: Consistency with mandatory laws and regulations: All of the alternatives defined above are practices that are currently operational in the host country, therefore all of the alternatives are in compliance with the mandatory laws and regulations. Outcome of Sub-step 1a: Alternative 1 and Alternative 2 are consistent with the mandatory laws and regulations. Step 2: Investment analysis According to the Tool for the demonstration and assessment of additionality version 05.2, the application of an investment analysis is optional, hence the Step 3: Barrier Analysis is selected to be the means for demonstrating the additionality of the proposed project activity. Step 3: Barrier analysis Sub-step 3a: Identify barriers that would prevent the implementation of the proposed CDM project activity: Implementing a Hydropower project in Turkey takes a long time because of the existing regulations. Construction period changes up to the size of the project but the legal procedure before the construction is working same for all sizes of the projects. Suen has a remarkable portfolio as a small scale hydropower plants.therefore; - If we consider that some of the project owners have more than one small scale project VPoA seemed like good opportunity to put all these projects under one frame. So we discussed on VPoA with project owners too. But there were some risks and barriers : - When we decided to develop a VPoA we couldn t see any PoA sample is similar with our VPoA. And there were very limited sources that we can obtain information. And as we learnt there were very limitied DOE who was experienced on VPoA. - So this VPoA path was looking more struggling and unknown rather than the individual PDD elaboration. So it is more risky to develop VPoA rather than developing those projects with individual Project activities by considering that the lack of experience of all actors involved into the VPoA process. 7

8 CDM Executive Board page 8 - The process would be end in a shorter term If we would prefer to develop individualproject activities. And this would be safer way for us to develop carbon commodities for the projects. - Also this VPoA is the first hydro PoA in Turkey and the region. We also wanted this VPoA to be a sample and beneficial for other future VPoAs. Outcome of Step 3a: Proposed PoA faces some barriers in terms of developing and implementing process. But Individual project owners could go for carbon credits without the proposed VPoA. But VPoA would be more eligible by considering that they have more than one or two projects. Once the VPoA is validated and initial barriers which mentioned above are achieved other projects could go for carbon credits and could be developed in a shorter term. Developing VPoA would allow a time for the project owner. So this will also more financially attractive for the project owners. So Project owners could assest their portfolio more efficiently. Step 4: Common practice analysis There is not any other PoA in the host country and region. Proposed PoA is first of its kind. It is first of its kind by being PoA and by being Hydro PoA. So common practice analysis is not relevant. A.4.4. Operational, management and monitoring plan for the programme of activities (VPoA): A Operational and management plan:. The managing entity will use best endeavours to run a check on all available databases and by questioning the implementing entity to ensure that the VPA has not previously been included in another VPOA or included in a bundled CDM or any other voluntary emission reduction activity. Based on the information provided in Appendix C of the Simplified Modalities and Procedures for Small-Scale CDM project activities 8, the Project is not a part of any large-scale project or program, and is not a debundled component of a large project activity. The project participants have not registered or are not applying to register any other small-scale CDM project activity With the same project participants; In the same project category and technology/measure; and Registered within the previous 2 years; and Whose project boundary is within 1 km of the project boundary of the Project at the closest point. The Project complies with the above conditions, and hence cannot be considered a debundled component of a larger project. 9 The managing entity will require the implementing entity to provide a written statement that: the PA has not previously been registered as either a CDM project activity or as a PA under another VPoA; A declaration by project owners regarding debundling issue shall be sent to DOE.

9 CDM Executive Board page 9 the implementing entity has been advised that it may not at a later date re-submit the activity concerned as a VPA under another VPoA; the implementing entity has been advised that the PA will be included under the VPOA; all rights and title to the VERs have been transferred by contract to the managing entity of this VPOA. Coordinating entity does not have access to the PMUM webpage of individual VPA. However project owner will take the picture of the web page and will send to the coordinating entity. Coordinating entity will manage the emission reductions in each VPA. And coordinating entity will be charge in ER data management. PMUM webpage datas and invoices will be cross checked. A Monitoring plan: For the first verification, the managing entity will commission an accredited verifier to verify the monitoring reports for each VPA and for as many verification periods that is required to be sure that the results are reliable. For run-of-river hydro the main measurement is the amount of electricity supplied to the grid. This measurement is dependant on meters which are periodically checked by government entities to ensure that they are accurate. The only required data to demonstrate emission reduction is the amount of electricity generated by the VPAs. The amount of electricity will be measured and recorded by the meters which are installed, and sealed by Teiaş. The net generation will be checked by authorized personnel of Teiaş accompanied by a relevant staff from each VPA. Plant manager or the responsible staff will be responsible for gathering all relevant data and keeping the records. The management will be informed about VER procedure and that the monitored generation amount will also be used for emission reduction calculations. All data collected within a crediting period will be submitted to Suen Ltd. for further calculations. These reports will be submitted to DOE before each verification period. Electricity recorded by the meters sealed by Teiaş will also provide the data for the monthly invoicing by Teiaş. Each month meters will be checked by personnel from Teiaş and a staff from the plant, technician, or engineer, will perform the monthly reading. This record will form the basis for monthly invoicing. Maintenance and calibration of meters will be performed by Teiaş. The best means of carrying out verification will be decided in consultation with the verifier. The validation and verification status of each VPA will be recorded electronically by the managing entity. An individual monitoring plan will be set out for each VPA and the managing entity will ensure that the implementing entity complies with the monitoring plan. All primary information required to be recorded by the monitoring plan shall be collected and stored by the implementing entity. Each implementing entity will be required to transmit reports setting out required information in a set format to the managing entity on a regular basis. Any such information sent to the managing entity will be stored on an electronic database for a period of two years after the verification has been completed.

10 CDM Executive Board page A.4.5. Public funding of the programme of activities (VPoA): >>There is no public funding being used for the management of the POA and all PA selected will be privately funded. SECTION B. Duration of the programme of activities (VPoA) B.1. Starting date of the programme of activities (VPoA): >>The construction of the first project started on 05/06/2009 and it will take about a year and a half for the projects to be completed. Therefore construction should be completed in the first half of The commissioning date of the project under the first VPA is expected to be around late 20 or early Therefore, unless another project is added to the VPOA that has an earlier starting date, the starting date of the VPOA will be the commissioning of the first project around December 20 or January Starting date of the the VPAs, Cevher I and Cevher II, under VPoA is 1 April 2009 which is the electromechanical contract date with the manufacturer. Important Milestones of thev PoA 28/11/2008 Company board meeting regarding benefitting from carbon credits for the current VPAs. 01/12/2008 Contract between project owner and carbon consultant firm to include Cevher I and Cevher II into VPoA. 05/06/2009 Construction of the first VPAs started December 20- January 2011 Estimated commencement of operation for Cevher I and Cevher II B.2. Length of the programme of activities (VPoA): >>The VPOA will be carried out over 28 years SECTION C. Environmental Analysis >> C.1. Please indicate the level at which environmental analysis as per requirements of the CDM modalities and procedures is undertaken. Justify the choice of level at which the environmental analysis is undertaken:

11 CDM Executive Board page Environmental Analysis is done at VPoA level 2. Environmental Analysis is done at SSC-VPA level An environmental analysis will be carried out for each PA. This is because environmental legislative requirements may change over time and each PA should be assessed in relation to the current environmental legislative requirements. C.2. Documentation on the analysis of the environmental impacts, including transboundary impacts: >>Even though an environmental assessment is not required by the Turkish Government for run-of-river hydro projects under 25MW, the engineering documents for each project have an analysis of the likelihood of the project causing any impact on environmental or culturally significant areas. There are no emissions from a run of river hydro project and no net changes in water levels and so there are no foreseeable transboundary impacts. C.3. Please state whether in accordance with the host Party laws/regulations, an environmental impact assessment is required for a typical VPA, included in the programme of activities (VPoA),: >> An EIA is not required by the Turkish authorities for run of river projects that are under 25 MW. The EIA will only be required if the installed capacity of the projects is greater than 25 MW or the conveyance canal is longer than 20 km. If the projects under this VPoA fall outside these criteria then an EIA will be required. A summary of the likely environmental and social impacts of a project will be included in the Annex of the VPA. SECTION D. Stakeholders comments >> D.1. Please indicate the level at which local stakeholder comments are invited. Justify the choice: 1. Local stakeholder consultation is done at VPoA level 2. Local stakeholder consultation is done at SSC-VPA level Local stakeholder consultations will be carried out at the PA level for all projects. The various sociological and environmental impacts and the sustainability criteria to be met by each PA will depend on the remoteness of the projects, the degree of need and level of education of the local population, the sensitivity of the local ecosystems and the degree to which each PA will affect such ecosystems and the activities of local populations. There will also be a variation in types of land ownership. Any compulsory purchase of private land is likely to be a sensitive issue in some communities. Initial Local Stakeholder Consultation Meeting for Cehber I and Cevher II was held on 27/02/2009 and the report was completed and uploaded to GS Registry page on 24 April 2009 D.2. Brief description how comments by local stakeholders have been invited and compiled: >>see VPA documents D.3. Summary of the comments received: >>see VPA documents

12 CDM Executive Board page 12 D.4. Report on how due account was taken of any comments received: >> see VPA documents SECTION E. Application of a baseline and monitoring methodology E.1. Title and reference of the approved SSC baseline and monitoring methodology applied to a SSC-PA included in thev PoA: >> If the capacity of the run of river hydro unit is under 15MW, the approved SSC baseline and monitoring methodology is AMS I.D. Grid connected renewable electricity generation (I.D/Version 13, Sectoral Scope: 01, EB 36) The baseline for all small scale VPAs will be calculated using the formula under 9(a) which involves using a combined margin (CM), consisting of the combination of operating margin (OM) and build margin (BM) according to the procedures prescribed in the Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system Vervion 01.1 (Simple OM) See E.6 for general calculations of the baseline emissions. Specific calaculations for each project will be set out under the VPA. E.2. >> Justification of the choice of the methodology and why it is applicable to a SSC-VPA: For each project under the VPOA, Methodology AMS ID (version 13) is applicable because: 1. Each PA is a newly constructed renewable energy generation unit (hydro) with a capacity under 15MW that supplies electricity to the Turkish national grid and displaces electricity from an electricity system that is supplied by at least one fossil fuel plant. 2. The geographic and system boundaries for the Turkish electricity grid can be clearly identified and information on the characteristics of the grid is available. The Turkish electricity system is an interconnected one and there are no separate regional supply systems. There are also negligible electricity imports from neighbouring countries; 3. Prior to the implementation of the PA no power was generated at the project site. 4. The site preparation does not cause longer term net emissions from soil carbon. 5. There are no reservoirs involved for any of the small scale projects under this VPOA. E.3. Description of the sources and gases included in the SSC-VPA boundary >>The hydro plants for each PA do not produce any greenhouse gases. The main sources of carbon dioxide within the project boundary are generated by the fossil fuel powered electricity generation power plants supplying electricity to the Turkish national electricity grid.

13 CDM Executive Board page 13 E.4. Description of how the baseline scenario is identified and description of the identified baseline scenario: >>The baseline scenario is the emissions of greenhouse gases by the power plants that are currently part of the existing Turkish national electricity grid. E.5. Description of how the anthropogenic emissions of GHG by sources are reduced below those that would have occurred in the absence of the SSC-VPA being included as registered VPoA (assessment and demonstration of additionality of SSC-VPA): >> E.5.1. Assessment and demonstration of additionality for a typical SSC-VPA: Additionality of each VPA will be demonstrated using the latest version of the Tool for the assessment and demonstration of additionality which is available. Latest tool will be applied at the time of submission of each VPA will take place under this VPoA DD. The application of the additionality tool is given in detail in Section A.4.3 of this document. The PP may use barrier analysis or investment analysis or may use both of them. Application of the tool can be seen at the VPA level.. E.5.2. Key criteria and data for assessing additionality of a SSC-VPA: Key criteria for assessing the additionality of a SSC-VPA is identified as follows: The additionality of a VPA shall be demonstrated using the latest version of the Tool for the assessment and demonstration of additionality in the VPA-DD, a demonstration on the application of the additionality tool is given under section A.4.3 of this document on the PoA level. The implementing entity may use investment analysis or barrier analysis or both to prove additionality The implementation of the VPA shall be financed by a financing instution on the basis that the VPA will be registered as a VER project A proof of prior consideration of the VER income shall be given as a part of the VPA-DD The additionality section of the VPA-DD for each VPA shall consist the latest information available at the time of submission of VPA-DD to the DOE E.6. Estimation of Emission reductions of a VPA: E.6.1. Explanation of methodological choices, provided in the approved baseline and monitoring methodology applied, selected for a typical SSC-VPA: >>All plants are run-of-river hydro under 15MW and so the relevant methodology is AMS ID (version 13) E.6.2. Equations, including fixed parametric values, to be used for calculation of emission reductions of a SSC-VPA: Calculation of emission reductions

14 CDM Executive Board page 14 The total emission reductions of the VPA are calculated on the basis of the equations and parameters Set out in section E.6.1 of the VPoA DD and B.5.1 of this document. Baseline information for the combined margin emission factor is set out in Annex 3 of this document. The emissions reductions resulting from each of the projects under the VPOA is calculated using the baseline methodology AMS I.D. Grid connected renewable electricity generation (Baseline Methodology). The emission reductions generated by any project under the Baseline Methodology can be calculated using the following equations: Equation 1: Where: Equation 2: BE y = EG y xef grid,cm,y Where: BE y = baseline emissions in a year y (tco 2 e/yr); EGy = Electricity supplied by the project activity to the grid (MWh) EF grid,cm,y =Combined margin CO2 emission factor for grid connected power generation in year y calculated using the Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system. (Version 01.1) Baseline emissions The baseline emissions are calculated in accordance with the Baseline Methodology which sets out the options for calculating baseline emissions. The baseline emission calculation depends on the type of generation equipment being used. The method that most suits a run of river hydro project is set out under section 9. Section 9 provides two options (a) and (b). Option 9(b) cannot be used because it relies on having dispatch data available for the Turkish power grid and this information is not available. Therefore option 9(a) is selected which involves calculating the baseline emissions using a combined margin (CM), consisting of the combination of operating margin (OM) and build margin (BM) according to the procedures prescribed in the CDM Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system. Version 01.1 According to the Emission Factor Tool project participants must apply the following six steps: Step 1: Identify the relevant electric power system; Step 2: Select an operating margin (OM) method; Step 3: Calculate the operating margin factor according to the selected method; Step 4: Identify the cohort of power units to be used in the build margin;

15 CDM Executive Board page 15 Step 5: Calculate the build margin emission factor; Step 6: Calculate the combined margin (CM) emission factor. Step 1 Identify the relevant electric power system According to the Electricity Tool an electricity system needs to be defined by the spatial extent of the of the power plants that are physically connected through transmission lines to the project activity. For this programme of activities all the run of river hydro projects are connected to the Turkish Electricity Grid. Step 2 Select an operating margin method In accordance with the Emission Factor Tool, there are four potential methods that can be selected: a) Simple OM; or b) Simple adjusted OM; or c) Dispatch data analysis; or d) Average OM. Any of the four methods may be used. For the purpose of this programme of activities the simple OM method has been selected. The simple OM method can be used if the low cost/must run resources comprise less than 50% of the total generation capacity of the Turkish Grid. Low cost/ must run resources comprise resources such as hydro, geothermal, wind, low cost biomass, nuclear and solar generation. It can be seen from the table below that the share of generation by low cost/must run resources is under 50%. Statistics for the most recent available year has been used THERMAL (GWh) LOW COST/MUST RUN (GWh) TOTAL (GWh) LOW COST/MUST RUN PROPORTION ( %) Simple OM method Under the Simple OM method, there are two choices for calculating the emissions factor: Ex ante option which required using a 3-year generated-weighted average CO 2 emissions data per unit net electricity generation (tco2/mwh) available at the date of submission of the document (not including low cost/must run power units)., based on the most recent data available; or Ex post option which uses data from the year in which the project activity displaces grid electricity Table Table Table 7

16 CDM Executive Board page 16 Fuel consumption data and net electricity generation data is available for Turkish generating plants and so the ex ante has been selected. For the purpose of these calculations the most recent data for the years [insert years] can be found in Annex 3 Baseline information. Step 3: calculating the operating margin emission factor according to the selected method Where the ex-ante method is used, the simple OM emission factor is calculated as the generationweighted average CO 2 emissions per unit net electricity generation (tco 2 /MWh) of all generating plants serving the system, not including low-cost/must-run power plants. It may be calculated: Based on data fuel consumption and net electricity generation of each poer plant/unit (Option A); Based on data on net electricity generation, the average efficiency of each power unit and the fuel type(s) used in each power unit (option B); or Based on data on the total net electricity generation of all power plants serving the system and the fuel types and total fuel consumption of the project electricity system (option C). As the information for Option A & B are not available, Option C has been selected. Using Option C, the simple OM emission factor is calculated using the net electricity supplied to the grid by all power plants serving the system, not including low-cost/must run power plants and based on the fuel types and total fuel consumption of the project electricity systems as follows: (3) Where: EF grid,omsimple,y = Simple operating margin CO2 emission factor in year y (tco2/mwh) FC i,y = Amount of fossil fuel type i consumed by power plant / unit m in year y (mass or volume unit) NCV i,y = Net calorific value (energy content) of fossil fuel type i in year y (GJ / mass or volume unit) EF CO2, i,y = CO 2 emission factor of fossil fuel type i in year y (tco 2 /GJ) EG y = Net electricity generated and delivered to the grid by power plant / unit m in year y (MWh) m = All power plants / units serving the grid in year y except low-cost / must-run power plants / units i = All fossil fuel types combusted in power plant / unit m in year y y = The three most recent years for which data is available at the time of submission of the PDD to the DOE for validation (ex ante option). Step 4. Identifying the cohort of the power units to be included in the build margin The sample group of power units m used to calculate the build margin consists of either: a) The set of five power units that have been built most recently; or b) The set of power capacity additions in the electricity system that comprises 20% of the system generation (in MWh) and that have been built most recently.

17 CDM Executive Board page 17 Option b) has been selected as it comprises the larger annual generation. Annex 3 lists the power plants that are used to calculate the build margin. Step 5 Calculation of the build margin emission factor (4) Where: EF grid,bmsimple,y = Build margin CO 2 emissions factor in year y (tco 2 /GWh) EG m,y = Net quantity of electricity generated and delivered to the grid by power unit m in year y (GWh) EF EL,m,y = CO 2 emission factor In accordance with the Emission Factor Tool, the CO 2 emission factor of each power unit m (EF EL,m,y ) should be determined by the guidance in step 3a) for the simple OM. Using options B1,B2 or B3, using for y the most recent historical year for which power generation data is available, where m is the power units included in the build margin. As plant specific fuel consumption data is not available for Turkey, Option B2 has been selected has been selected for the calculation of the CO 2 emission factor of each power unit where: Where: EF EL,m,y = CO 2 emission factor of the power unit in year y (tco 2 /MWh) EF CO2m,i,y = Average CO 2 emission factor of fuel type i used in power unit m in year y (tco 2 /GJ) η m,y = Average net energy conversion efficiency of power unit m in year y (%) Step 6 calculate the combined margin emission factor The combined margin emission factor is calculated as follows: EF grid,cm,y = EF grid,om,y x w OM + EF grid,bm,y x w BM( (6) Where: EF grid,bm,y = Build margin CO2 emission factor in year y (tco 2 /MWh) EF grid,om,y = Operating margin emission factor in year y (tco 2 /GWh) w OM = Weighting of operating margins emissions factor (%) w BM = weighting of build margin emission factor (%) (w om and w bm are the default values stated in the Emission Factor Tool and are both 0.5 for the first crediting period)

18 CDM Executive Board page 18 E.6.3. Data and parameters that are to be reported in CDM-SSC-VPA-DD form: The data and parameters that will need to be checked for the calculations for all VPAs include Data / Parameter: Data unit: Description: Source of data used: Value applied: Justification of the choice of data or description of measurement methods and procedures actually applied : Any comment: Data / Parameter: Data unit: Description: Source of data used: Value applied: Justification of the choice of data or description of measurement methods and procedures actually applied : Any comment: Data / Parameter: Data unit: Description: Source of data used: ID.1 / EG gross,y GWh Gross electricity production by fossil fuel power sources TEIAS (Turkish Electricity Transmission Company) The distribution of gross electricity generation by primary energy resources and the electricity utilities in Turkey (2005, 2006, 2007). Please refer to Table 5 of section B.5.2. According to Turkish Statistics Law and Official Statistics Program 38 TEIAS, Turkish Electricity Transmission Company is the official source for the related data, hence providing the most up-to-date and accurate information available. ID.2 / FC i, y m 3 or tons (m 3 for gaseous fuels) Amount of fossil fuel consumed in the project electricity system by generation sources TEIAS (Turkish Electricity Transmission Company) Fuels consumed in thermal power plants in Turkey by the electric utilities ( , 2007) for 2005 and 2006 data for 2007 data Please refer to Table 3 of section B.5.2 According to Turkish Statistics Law and Official Statistics Program TEIAS, Turkish Electricity Transmission Company is the official source for the related data, hence providing the most up-to-date and accurate information available ID.4 / NCV TJ/Gg Net calorific value (energy content) of fossil fuel type TEIAS (Turkish Electricity Transmission Company) Heating values of fuels consumed in thermal plants in Turkey by the electricity utilities ( , 2007) for 2005 and 2006 data for 2007data

19 CDM Executive Board page 19 Value applied: Justification of the choice of data or description of measurement methods and procedures actually applied : Any comment: Please refer to Table 4 of section B.5.2 According to Turkish Statistics Law and Official Statistics Program TEIAS, Turkish Electricity Transmission Company is the official source for the related data, hence providing the most up-to-date and accurate information available In order to convert the data source units to the required units; 1cal is considered to be joules and the density of natural gas is considered to be 0.695kg/m3 40. Data / Parameter: Data unit: Description: Source of data used: Value applied: Justification of the choice of data or description of measurement methods and procedures actually applied : Any comment: ID.5 / EFC02 kg/tj Default CO2 emission factor of fossil fuel type IPCC default values at the lower limit of the uncertainty at a 95% confidence interval as provided in table 1.4 of Chapter 1 of Volume 2 (Energy) of the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Please refer to table 4 of sectionb.5.2 There is no information on the fuel specific default emission factor in Turkey, hence, IPCC values has been used as referred in the Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system (version 1). Data / Parameter: Data unit: Description: Source of data used: Value applied: Justification of the choice of data or description of measurement methods and procedures actually applied : Any comment: ID.3 / Electricity Imports GWh Electricity transfers from connected electricity systems to the project electricity system by years ( ) TEIAS (Turkish Electrical Transmission Company) Monthly distribution of imported electrical energy by years (2005, 2006, 2007) Please refer to table 5 of section B.5.2 According to Turkish Statistics Law and Official Statistics Program TEIAS, Turkish Electricity Transmission Company is the official source for the related data, hence providing the most up-to-date and accurate information available. Data / Parameter: ID.6 / η Data unit: %

20 CDM Executive Board page 20 Description: Source of data used: Value applied: Justification of the choice of data or description of measurement methods and procedures actually applied : Any comment: Plant specific generation efficiency for type of fuel Environmental Map published by Environmental Inventory Head Department under Ministry of Environment and Forestry / or (p.197 table X.3.1; Thermal Plants and Environment) Please refer to table 6 of section B.5.2 The average values of thermal plants in Turkey are taken from the report Environmental Map published by the Ministry of Environment and Forestry. Data in the Evironmental Map is from 2004 but is the most recent data available Data / Parameter: ID.7 / Capacity additions Data unit: Name of the plant; Installed capacity (MW); Fuel type; Generation (GWh); Commissionary date Description: Capacity additions to the grid that comprises 20% of the total generation ( ) Source of data used: TEIAS (Turkish Electricity Transmission Company) Generation units put into operation in 2003; 2004; 2005; 2006 and for 2003 data for 2004 data for 2005 data for 2006 data for 2007 data (see Annex II (Ek II) on the web page) Value applied: Please refer to table 7 of section B.5.2 Justification of the choice of data or description of measurement methods According to Turkish Statistics Law and Official Statistics Program TEIAS, Turkish Electricity Transmission Company is the official source for the related data, hence providing the most up-to-date and accurate information available. and procedures actually applied : Any comment: E.7. Application of the monitoring methodology and description of the monitoring plan: E.7.1. Data and parameters to be monitored by each SSC-VPA: (Copy this table for each data and parameter) Data / Parameter: EGy

21 CDM Executive Board page 21 Data unit: Description: Source of data to be used: Value of data applied for the purpose of calculating expected emission reductions in section B.5 Description of measurement methods and procedures to be applied: QA/QC procedures to be applied: Any comment: MWh Electricity supplied to the grid by the project Metering devices used in power plants, monthly records signed by TEIAS and plants manager and invoices will be used. n/a This information will be recorded using metering devices and all information will be kept for two years after each verification report is produced. This information will be recorded by the company implementing the projects and provided on a regular basis to the managing entity before each verification report is produced. Net electricity generation will be measured and recorded by both TEIAS and project owner in order to use billing and accounting (TEIAS 14 template forms will be used). TEIAS will perform reading of the meters every month and issue an invoice to projecr owners. Manager of the Power Plant will be responsible for the electricity generated, gathering needed data and keeping their records. Installation of meter and data monitoring will be carried out according to the regulations by TEIAS. Furthermore, electricity generation of the projects can be cross checked from TEIAS PMUM web site ( It is possible to access by a password which is provided to generation companies. In case of using the data from PMUM, Transmission lost factor must be considered. If there is a failure to measure (i.e. failure at devices) electricity generation, it is possible to use the metering device at the inlet of the substation belongs to TEIAS. If devices need any calibration or maintenance TEIAS will perform it. Measuring devices will be sealed by TEIAS 15 therefore project developer or any other persons can not intervene with devices. All relevant data collected will be kept by TEIAS and Project Owner and will be assured it is complete and of appropriate quality Specifications related with measuring devices are in accordance with the measurement communiqué of Turkey. 16 E.7.2. Description of the monitoring plan for a SSC-VPA: MP will be implemented by project implementers. During all stages of the project activity, the plant manager or the electrical engineer will be responsible for monitoring the generation in the plant. The meters installed and sealed by TEIAS will be used as primary source of generation data. This will also be (Article ) 16

22 CDM Executive Board page 22 monitored by the headquarters of each implementiny entity of each PA. Generation can be checked with the invoices and the software used for turbines which shows the actual generation by each turbine. Plant manager and the engineers will be informed about the VER concepts and mechanisms and how to monitor and collect data that will be used for emission reduction calculations. Generated data during the crediting period will be submitted to Suen Ltd. who is responsible for calculating emission reductions. These data will be used to prepare monitoring reports and all these data will be submitted to DOE at each verification period. Accuracy of the meters is checked by government authorities. VER monitoring team members: Plant manager: Will be responsible for the general aspects of the plant and VER monitoring plan. Electrical Engineer: Will be responsible for the electrical matters and from the recording and monitoring of relevant data. Account manager: Will be responsible for data keeping on electricity sales, invoicing and purchasing. Suen Ltd.: Responsible for emission reduction calculations, monitoring repots verification process. Monitoring of sustainable development factors The main environmental factors in relation to this plant are: the removal and replanting of any trees during construction; the management of construction waste; and

23 CDM Executive Board page 23 the maintenance of levels of water in the river between the water inlet and the water outlet in the Acısu Creek (tributary of the Maçka Creek). At the relevant time, evidence will be supplied to the validator to demonstrate that all environmental licences are being complied with in relation to the construction and maintenance of the plant, including all correspondence with the ministry of forestry in relation to the replanting of trees. Information about other relevant social factors will be collected during construction and once the plant commences operation. The factors that will be monitored and recorded will be: numbers of local people employed during the construction phase; numbers of local people employed to run the plant and carry out maintenance; training records for employees. Impact on the local community. This information will be gathered through reviewing relevant employment contracts, training records and from information that the implementing entity will be required to collect by the managing entity. The system of records and monitoring reports will be made available to the validators and the verifiers as, and when, required. See each VPA for a list of indicators being recorded. Training of Monitoring Personnel For the training of the personnel a weeklong course will be organized by the turbine manufacturer. All technical staff in the plant will be trained to be eligible to work in high voltage environment, as required by TEİAŞ. Emission Reductions A spreadsheet prepared in excel will be used in order to calculate the emission reductions. The project owner will collect data for EG y, net electricity supplied to the grid. Generation will be measured and recorded monthly through high precision measuring devices sealed and controlled by TEİAŞ according to the regulations issued by the TEİAŞ. Data can also be checked from electricity sales invoices and records kept by Project implementers for cross-checking. Data Management System Under the monitoring system, a data management system should be set up for keeping data and information, and tracking information from the primary source to data calculation, in paper format. It is the responsibility of the owner to provide additional necessary data, information and document for validation and verification requirements of respective DOE. Paper documentation such as maps, diagrams and environmental assessment will be collected in a central place, together with this monitoring plan. All paper-based information will be stored by the owner and kept at least one copy. Whatever occurs later, the monitored data for verification and issuance should be kept for two years by the end of the crediting period or the last issuance of VERs for the project activity. Verification

24 CDM Executive Board page 24 A DOE will be selected and engaged for the verification. The owner will make the arrangements for the verification to the best of its abilities. The owner will facilitate the verification by providing the DOE all required necessary information before, during and after the verification. E.8 Date of completion of the application of the baseline study and monitoring methodology and the name of the responsible person(s)/entity(ies) The baseline study and monitoring methodology was completed on 02/06/2009 by: Christine Lancaster Calcarbon Ltd Union Road New Mills High Peak United Kingdom SK22 3EL christine@calcarbonltd.com Ph: Mobile:

25 CDM Executive Board page 25 Annex 1 CONTACT INFORMATION ON COORDINATING/MANAGING ENTITY and PARTICIPANTS IN THE PROGRAMME of ACTIVITIES Organization: SUEN LTD. Street/P.O.Box: Altınkum Mahallesi Atatürk Bulvarı Building: Nadir Apt. No: 239 K/1 D/4 City: Antalya State/Region: Postfix/ZIP: Country: Turkey Telephone: FAX: aynur@suenltd.com URL: Represented by: Title: Project coordinator Salutation: Mrs. Last Name: SEZER Middle Name: First Name: Aynur Department: Co2 Emission Mobile: Direct FAX: Direct tel: Personal

26 CDM Executive Board page 26 Annex 2 INFORMATION REGARDING PUBLIC FUNDING None of the projects under the VPOA will use public funding. Each VPA-DD will include a declaration from the entity implementing the project.

27 CDM Executive Board page 27 Annex 3 BASELINE INFORMATION 17 AUTOPRODUCERS 144,6 N.GAS 864, FREE PRODUCTION 0,9 N.GAS 3390, , ,5 FREE PRODUCTION 87,3 Wind , ,6 RUN OF RIVER FREE PRODUCTION 36,1 RUN OF RIVER 82, ,7 682, TOTAL 1.059, ,

28 CDM Executive Board page 28

29 CDM Executive Board page 29

30 CDM Executive Board page 30 Table 1: Most recent list of hydro projects implemented in Turkey 18 This information was accessed May 2009 and was been obtained from EPDK, Capacity Company Name Type Place of Facility Installed Installed Facility Capacity Capacity Licensing Type (MWm) (MWe) Date No. Period (year) Company Address Under Constructio n Capacity In Constructio n (Mwe) (Mwe) Alp Elektrik Üretim A.Ş. Antalya 7,68 7, EÜ/439-1/515 Bomonti Fırın Sokak No: 55 Şişli-İstanbul 7,5 Ar-Es Harita Pr. Müh. İnş. En. Taah. Dan. İth. İhr. Tic. Ve San Şti. Nevşehir Hasankale Diversion Weir and 6,1 5, EÜ/ /1299 Çetin Emeç Blv. Hürriyet cad. No:1/6 Dikmen Ankara 5,83 0 Dragos Mevkii Arsan Enerji A.Ş. Giresun Ezbiye 9,32 8, EÜ/ /1360 Cumhuriyet Mah. Piri Reis Cad. No:3 8,9 0 Maltepe/İSTANBUL Bağcı Balık Gıda ve Enerji Üretimi San. ve Tic. A.Ş. Autoproduce r Muğla 0,34 0, EO/364-5/ Organize Sanayi Bölgesi Umurlu/AYDIN 0,34 Atatürk Bulvarı 75.Yıl Bereket Enerji Üretim A.Ş. Nazilli-Aydın 9,47 8, EÜ/386-5/2 40 Esnaf Sarayı Gürcan Mahallesi No:171 Kat: ,84 DENİZLİ Bozat Elektrik Üretim A.Ş. Giresun 3, EÜ/1856-8/ Cadde 37.Sok. No: 44/ Bahcelievler/ANKARA 3 0 Kurbağalı Dere Cad. Cansu Elektrik Üretim A.Ş. Murgul-Artvin 9,46 9, EÜ/373-2/483 No:80/1 Hasanpaşa Kadıköy- 9,18 İSTANBUL Rasimpaşa Mah. Çaldere Elektrik Üretim A.Ş. Dalaman-Muğla 8,91 8, EÜ/341-2/466 Rıhtım Cad. Çelik İş Hanı No:60/4 8,74 Kadıköy/İSTANBUL Konak Mahallesi Dr. Ekin Hidro Elektrik Üretim Ltd. Şti. Nazilli-Aydın 0,65 0, EÜ/439-2/ Ali Aydoğan Sokak Yavuz İş Merkezi No: 0,6 1/17 Söke-Aydın Elestaş Elektrik Üretim A.Ş. Suşehri, Sivas 2,35 2, EÜ/2041-9/1454 Eğitim Mah. Poyraz sok. No:9/A Kadıköy İstanbul 2, This information was accessed May 2009 and was obtained from EPDK,

31 CDM Executive Board page 31 Elhes Elektrik Üretim Ltd. Şti. Tunceli Gökçeköy HES 6, EÜ/1820-4/1282 İlkbahar mah sok No:23 Çankaya ANKARA 6 0 Elta Elektrik Üretim Limited Şirketi Denizli 4,14 4, Acıpayam- EÜ/336-4/ Cad. 34. Sokak No:7/4 Balgat/ANKARA 4,14 Ere Hidroelektrik Üretim ve Tic. A.Ş. Antalya EÜ/216-3/358 Sabancı Center, Kule 2 Kat:5 4. Levent/İSTANBUL 14 Ergöz Elektrik Üretim İnşaat Sanayi ve Ticaret Ltd. Şti. Ankara-Bolu 2,4 2, Hanımeli Sokak EÜ/1845- Until No:20/18 Sıhhiye- 6/ Çankaya/ANKARA 2,14 0 Eti Bakır A.Ş. Artvin 4,7 4, EÜ/39-6/ years months 17 Küre/KASTAMONU days 4,6 Dereiçi 0,4 0, /8 0,4 Dere 0,6 0, /7 0,6 Derme 4,5 4, EÜ/341-1/465 4,5 Değirmendere 0,5 0, /4 0,5 Çemişgezek 0,12 0, /2 0,11 Zeyne 0,33 0, /72 0,32 Durucasu 0,8 0, /111 0,8 Engil 4,59 4, /112 4,59 Erciş 0,8 0, /113 0,8 Erkenek 0,32 0, /114 0,32 Ermenek 1,12 1, /115 1,12 Esendal 0,3 0, /80 0,3 Girlevik 3,04 3, /82 3,04 Kernek Kepez 2 Kayaköy Kayadibi 0,83 0, ,56 2, ,46 0, /62 EÜ/318- /4 89/131 88/130 0,83 6 2,56 0,46

32 CDM Executive Board page 32 Karaçay Koçköprü İznik - Dereköy İvriz İnegöl - Cerrah Işıklar (Visera) Hoşap Haraklı - Hendek Göksu Mut-Derinçay 0,4 0, ,8 8, ,24 0, ,04 1, ,27 0, ,04 1, ,45 3, ,26 0, ,8, ,88 0, /127 92/134 51/93 50/92 48/90 /91 46/88 43/85 42/84 82/124 0,4 8,8 0,24 1,04 0,27 1,04 3,45 0,26,8 0,88 Varto - Sönmez 0,29 0, /70 0,29 Uludere 0,64 0, /69 0,64 Finike 0,55 0, Turunçova- 26/68 0,55 Silifke 0,4 0, /77 0,4 Seyhan 2 7,5 7, EÜ/318-9/448 7,5 Pınarbaşı 0,1 0, /75 0,09 Pazarköy - Akyazı 0,18 0, /74 0,17 Otluca 1,28 1, /125 1,28 Kiti 2,76 2, /133 2,76 Malazgirt 1,22 1, /122 1,21 M. Kemalpaşa - Suuçtu 0,47 0, /121 0,47 Ladik - Büyükkızoğlu 0,4 0, /120 0,4 Kuzuculu 0,27 0, /119 0,27 Kovada I 8,25 8, /79 Yüreğir EÜ/ ,25

33 CDM Executive Board page 33 11/450 Arpaçay - Telek 0,06 0, /50 0,06 Çamardı 0,07 0, /99 0,06 Sivas Sızır HES 6,78 5, EÜ/2070-2/ ,763 Kayseri Bünyan HES 1,36 1, EÜ/2070-3/ ,156 Adilcevaz 0,39 0, /45 0,39 Ahlat 1,07 1, /46 1,06 Anamur 0,84 0, / 0,84 Bozkır 0,08 0, /58 0,07 Bayburt 0,4 0, /54 0,4 Çağ Çağ 14,4 14, /98 14,4 Besni 0,27 0, /55 0,27 Botan 1,58 1, /57 1,58 Ceyhan 3,6 3, /97 3,6 Bozüyük 0,36 0, /59 0,36 Fetaş Fethiye Enerji ve Ticaret A.Ş. Hameka Hidro Elektrik Enerji Üretim A.Ş. IC İçtaş Elektrik Üretim A.Ş. İÇ-EN Elektrik Üretim Ticaret A.Ş. Bozyazı Trabzon Amasya Erzincan Erzincan 0,42 0, ,46 21, , , ,83 7, /96 EÜ/630-1/604 EÜ/799-1/650 EÜ/480-1/542 EÜ/704-2/629 Tahran Caddesi No: Kavaklıdere/ANKARA Sanayi Sitesi 13. Blok No:2/3 Taşova/AMASYA Çetin Emeç Bulvarı sok. no: Balgat Ankara Mebusevleri Şerefli Sok. No: Tandoğan/ANKARA 43 (kırküç) İSKUR-2 İplik 0,42 21,04 1, ,66 İskur Tekstil Tic. ve San. A.Ş. 4,6 4, Süleymanlı- Kahramanmara ş EÜ/ /865 yıl, 6 (altı) Fabrikası Gaziantep ay, 20 Yolu Üzeri 4.km (yirmi) PK.120 4,6 Karel Elektrik Üretim A.Ş. gün KAHRAMANMARAŞ Sakarya 9,3 9, EÜ/ Cumhuriyet Cad. 9,3

34 CDM Executive Board page 34 14/ / Karsu Tekstil Sanayii ve Ticaret A.Ş. Kayseri 3,33 3, EO/472-4/ Harbiye-İSTANBUL Ankara Yolu 23. km P.K. 174 Kayseri Uğur Mumcu'nun 3,25 Kartal Elektrik Üretim A.Ş. Gürpınar-Van 3 2, EÜ/373-1/482 Sokağı No:20 G.O.P.- 2,16 Kızkale Elektrik Üretim San. ve Tic. Ltd. Şti. Kocaeli 0,4 0, Örnekköy- EÜ/332-2/461 Çankaya/ANKARA 40 Örnekköy / İZMİT 0,4 Dragos Mevkii Köprübaşı Enerji Elektrik Üretim A.Ş. Gümüşhane 16,5 15, EÜ/ /1419 Cumhuriyet Mah. Piri Reis Cad. No:3 15,84 0 Kurteks Tekstil Ticaret ve Sanayi A.Ş. Maraş Enerji Yatırımları San. ve Tic. A.Ş. Kahramanmara ş Kahramanmara ş 2,57 2, ,3 7, EÜ/658-1/612 EÜ/627-3/ Maltepe/İSTANBUL Kayseri Yolu Üzeri 6. km Kahramanmaraş Reşit Galip Cad. No:126/6 G.O.P./ANKARA Konak Mah. Hastane 2,4 7,22 Maraton Enerji ve Elektrik Sistemleri ve Tic. A.Ş. Maraton HES ISPARTA 3,84 3, EÜ/1946-1/1381 Cad. Maraton İş Merkezi Kat:1 No:2 3,65 0 Bucak/BURDUR Cumhuriyet Mah. Molu Enerji Üretim A.Ş. Kayseri 4,22 4, Pınarbaşı- EÜ/6-5/ Serdar Cad. No:14/2 PK: ,17 KAYSERİ Cumhuriyet Mah. Molu Enerji Üretim A.Ş. Kayseri ili Çamlıca II HES 15,85 15, EÜ/2064-1/1457 Serdar Cad. No:14/2 PK: ,4 0 Övünç Enerji ve Elektrik Üretim A.Ş. Özgür Elektrik Üretim A.Ş. Park Enerji Ekipmanları Madencilik Elektrik Üretim Sanayi ve Ticaret Anonim Şirketi Sivas ili Çermikler Barajı ve HES Osmaniye, Kahramanmara ş Adana Maran HES 16,32 14, ,14 12, ,58 12, EÜ/ /1392 EÜ/472-2/537 EÜ/2001-1/1409 KAYSERİ Paris Cad. 76/1 Kavaklıdere/ANKARA Mustafa Kemal Mah. Eskişehir Yolu Bilkent Kavşağı Yanı No: ANKARA Paşalimanı cad. No:73 Üsküdar İstanbul 1380 Sok. Alyans 14, ,3 12,33 0 Su Enerji Elektrik San. A.Ş. Balıkesir 4,6 4, Sındırgı- EÜ/205-3/ Apt. B Blok No: 2/1 Kat: 3 Daire: 5, 4,6 Sunel Enerji Üretim A.Ş. Erzurum Hunut I II III HES 20,897 20, EÜ/2012-5/1426 Alsancak/İZMİR Turan Güneş Bulvarı No:50/7 Yıldızevler Çankaya/Ankara 20,375 0

35 CDM Executive Board page 35 Atatürk Bulvarı Tektuğ Elektrik Üretim Anonim Şirketi Adıyaman 13, Gölbaşı- EÜ/162-38/305 No:89/3 270 Şahinbey/GAZİANTE 12 P Atatürk Bulvarı Tektuğ Elektrik Üretim Anonim Şirketi Osmaniye 15, Kadirli- EÜ/162-9/276 No:89/3 270 Şahinbey/GAZİANTE 15 P Atatürk Bulvarı Tektuğ Elektrik Üretim Anonim Şirketi Keban-Elazığ 5, EÜ/386-1/ No:89/3 270 Şahinbey/GAZİANTE 5 P Hacılar Mah. Atatürk Temsa Enerji İnşaat San. Ltd. Şti. Bursa 2,66 2, EÜ/517-3/ Cad. Kültür Sok. Kardeşlar Han No:4 2,4 Heykel/BURSA Turan Güneş Bulvarı TG Elektrik Üretim A.Ş. Artvin İli, Borçka İlçesi 11,58, / Cadde No:11 EÜ/1856- Yıldız-,5 0 Çankaya/ANKARA Ugur Mumcu Cad. Turkon-MNG Elektrik Üretimi ve Ticaret A.Ş. Kırıkkale 17 16, EÜ/579-1/585 No: Gaziosmanpaşa- 16,7 Yapısan Elektrik Üretim A.Ş. Yeşil Enerji Elektrik Üretim San. Tic. A.Ş. Yıldızlar Enerji Elektrik Üretim A.Ş. 13,34 13, ,86 0, ,68 12, Tohma Çayı- Malatya Kahramanmara ş Kulp-Diyarbakır EÜ/321-2/456 EÜ/1275-2/917 EÜ/376-3/486 Ankara Kuleli Sok. No:87/ G.O.P./ANKARA Sedef Cad. Ata 4-5A D.45 Ataşehir Kadıköy/İSTANBUL Abdullah Cevdet Sokak No:39/13 Çankaya/ANKARA Selahattin Pınar Cad. 13,34 0 0,82 12,29 YPM Elektrik Üretim A.Ş. 19,13 19, Kelkit Çayı- Suşehri-Sivas EÜ/416-1/507 Dere Sok. No:4 Mecidiyeköy- 7,39 11,62 Zorlu Doğal Elektrik Üretimi A.Ş. Zorlu Doğal Elektrik Üretimi A.Ş. Zorlu Doğal Elektrik Üretimi A.Ş. Zorlu Doğal Elektrik Üretimi A.Ş. Tokat Kars Erzincan Rize 5,53 5, ,36 15, ,6 18, EÜ/ /1246 EÜ/ /1241 EÜ/ /1243 EÜ/ / İSTANBUL Zorlu Holding Zorlu Plaza 343 Avcılar İstanbul Zorlu Holding Zorlu Plaza 343 Avcılar İstanbul Zorlu Holding Zorlu Plaza 343 Avcılar İstanbul Zorlu Holding Zorlu Plaza 343 Avcılar İstanbul 5,52 15, ,6

36 CDM Executive Board page 36 Zorlu Doğal Elektrik Üretimi A.Ş. Zorlu Doğal Elektrik Üretimi A.Ş. Zorlu Doğal Elektrik Üretimi A.Ş. Eskişehir Erzurum Tunceli 16,8 16, ,9 20, ,4 20, EÜ/ /1248 EÜ/ /1242 EÜ/ / Zorlu Holding Zorlu Plaza 343 Avcılar İstanbul Zorlu Holding Zorlu Plaza 343 Avcılar İstanbul Zorlu Holding Zorlu Plaza 343 Avcılar İstanbul 16,8 20,9 20,4 Table 2 and 3: General statistics relating to projects 19 Current Situation relating to s In Operation DSİ Others Under Construction DSİ Others Developing To be built by the private sector in accordance with Laws # 4628 or 3096 Binary cooperation projects in accordance with Laws # 4628 or 5625 TOTAL POTENTIAL 13,700 MW (172 ),700 MW (57 s) 3,000 MW (115 s) 8,600 MW 3,600 MW ( 23 s) 5,000 MW ( 125 s) 22,700 MW (1,418 s) MW (1 401 s) MW (17 s) 45,000 MW (1,738 s) The situation of economically feasible projects Number of Total Installed Capacity (MW) Average Annual (GWh/year) Ratio (%) In Operation ,700 48, Under Construction 148 8,600 20, Preconstruction Stage 1,418 22,700 72, Total Potential 1,738 45, ,000 0 Table 4: Hydroelectric projects known to have been developed under the Build-operate-transfer model DSİ, see 20 EİE, see:

37 With Water Canal Diversion Weir Lake Dam SMALL-SCALE CDM PROGRAMME OF ACTIVITIES DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM CDM Executive Board page 37 FACILITY NO NAME INSTALLED POWER CITY DATE OF OPERATION DEVELOPED AS OPERATING MW COMPANY December 1 BERDAN DAM AND,20 İçel 1996 BOT Alarko-Altek October 2 BİRECİK DAM AND 672,00 Ş.Urfa 2001 BOT Birecik A.Ş. 3 GÖNEN DAM AND,60 Çanakkale March 1998 BOT Gönen A.Ş. HASANLAR DAM AND 4 9,35 Düzce May 1991 BOT Alarko-Altek January 5 SUÇATI DAM AND 7,00 K.Maraş 2000 BOT Ere 6 YAMULA DAM AND 0,00 Kayseri July 2005 BOT Kayseri Electricity Bilgin Elk. Ür.İl.Dağ.ve 7 HAZAR I *** 20,00 Elazığ 1996 BOT Tic.A.Ş. Bilgin Elk. Ür.İl.Dağ.ve 8 HAZAR II ***,00 Elazığ 1996 BOT Tic.A.Ş. February 9 ÇAMLICA I 84,00 Kayseri 1999 BOT Ayen Energy A.Ş. November Gaziler Energy GAZİLER,15 Iğdır 2002 BOT A.Ş. January 11 KISIK 9,60 K.Maraş 1994 BOT Ayen Energy A.Ş. Sütçüler Energy 12 SÜTÇÜLER 2,20 Isparta June 1998 BOT A.Ş. November Aksu Energy and 13 AKSU 13,00 Isparta 1989 BOT Trading.A.Ş. Pelka Electricity 14 AHİKÖY I 2, Sivas April 1999 BOT A.Ş. Pelka Electricity 15 AHİKÖY II 2,50 Sivas April 1999 BOT A.Ş. January Limak Energy 16 ÇAL 2,50 Denizli 2001 BOT Pro.Dist. A.Ş. December Metak Energy and 17 DİNAR II 3,00 Afyon 2000 BOT Trading. A.Ş. November 18 FETHİYE 16,50 Muğla 1999 BOT Fetaş A.Ş. İçtaş Energy GİRLEVİK II - MERCAN Pro.and Trading. 19 ** 12,33 Erzincan March 2001 BOT A.Ş. December 20 TOHMA 12,50 Malatya 1998 BOT Alarko-Altek T OTAL 1.009,53 Table 5: Recently built power plants under 15MW in Turkey which have sought registration under a carbon standard See

38 CDM Executive Board page 38 NO PROJECT NAME PLANT TYPE INSTALLED CAPACITY (MW) ESTIMATED GHG REDUCTIONS (tonnes Co2E/year) INTERNATIONAL STANDARD APPLICATION 1 Karakurt WIND 24,381 VER+ 2 Tuzla GEOTHERMAL ,000 GS 3 Düzlen 15 29,000 GS 4 XXX 6 9,900 GS 5 Burgaz WIND ,847 GS 6 Mamak BIOGAS ,340 GS 7 Dora-II GEOTHERMAL ,750 GS 8 Firnis ,200 VER+ 9 İstaç BIOGAS 11 1,137,719 GS Kozdere ,500 GS 11 Çayağzı ,500 GS TOTAL 2 WIND, 2 GEOTHERMAL, 2 BIOGAS, Table 6: Transmission tariffs according to regions 22 GENERATION (*) CONSUMPTION (*) Region USE OF SYSTEM TARIFF TL/MW-Year SYSTEM OPERATION TARIFF TL/MW- Year USE OF SYSTEM TARIFF TL/MW-Year SYSTEM OPERATION TARIFF TL/MW-Year See:

39 CDM Executive Board page (*) Tariffs include transmission surcharge

40 CDM Executive Board page 40 Annex 4 Monitoring Plan Monitoring of technical data As the baseline emission factors under AMD ID are all defined ex ante, the only technical information that needs to be recorded during the operation of the plant will be the amount of electricity fed back into the grid. This information will be recorded using metering devices and all information will be kept for two years after each verification report is produced. This information will be recorded by the company implementing the projects and provided on a regular basis to the managing entity before each verification report is produced. The accuracy of the meters is checked by government authorities. Monitoring of sustainable development factors The main environmental factors in relation to this plant are: the removal and replanting of any trees during construction; the management of construction waste; and the maintenance of levels of water in the river between the water inlet and the water outlet in the Acısu Creek (tributary of the Maçka Creek). At the relevant time, evidence will be supplied to the validator to demonstrate that all environmental licences are being complied with in relation to the construction and maintenance of the plant, including all correspondence with the ministry of forestry in relation to the replanting of trees. Information about other relevant social factors will be collected during construction and once the plant commences operation. The factors that will be monitored and recorded will be: numbers of local people employed during the construction phase; numbers of local people employed to run the plant and carry out maintenance; training records for employees. Impact on the local community. This information will be gathered through reviewing relevant employment contracts, training records and from information that the implementing entity will be required to collect by the managing entity. The system of records and monitoring reports will be made available to the validators and the verifiers as, and when, required. See each VPA for a list of indicators being recorded.

41 CDM Executive Board page 41 Annex 5 Information regarding the additionality of the VPoA

42 CDM Executive Board page 42

43 CDM Executive Board page 43 Data Used for Common Practice Analysis:

44 CDM Executive Board page 44