TR MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND URBANIZATION. Pollution Monitoring and Assessment Advisory Group (PMA AG) 24th Meeting

Transcription

1 TR MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND URBANIZATION Pollution Monitoring and Assessment Advisory Group (PMA AG) 24th Meeting Hacer SELAMOĞLU ÇAĞLAYAN Environment and Urbanization Exp./Chemist

2 CONTENT 2013 Black Sea Monitoring General Information Eutrophication parameters Biota Sediment Biological monitoring Black Sea Monitoring

3 Integrated Marine Pollution Monitoring/ 2013 Monitoring «Integrated Pollution Monitoring in Seas» Aims to provide information for marine and coastal water management strategies. Black Sea; Mediterrenian Sea, Marmara Sea are involved. Developed according to Regional Conventions, WFD, MFSD, National Legislation.

4 Two sampling periods: July-August and October-November, Monitoring in coastal, transition, marine water, sediment, biota matrices and biological monitoring were done With the monitoring data; Assessment of status and quality classification (coastal water) Assessment of sensitive areas (acc. to national legislation), Determination risky areas of eutrophication and mucilage, Trend analysis, Assessment of land based pollutants (river basins) Assessment according the bathing water data (from MoH) Observing new and foreign species in trawl stations, Microplastic research, Pollution mapping. Integrated Marine Pollution Monitoring/Scope

5 Black Sea Monitoring Network 70 stations from İğneada to Hopa has been monitored in 2013 along the Black Sea coast of Turkey. Classified as: 26 coastal water, 5 transition water, 40 marine water. There are 4 trawl stations. 2 microplastic stations.

6 General Information BLACK SEA Physicochemical parameters STATION NUMBER 70 Sediment 16 Trend analysis in sediment 17 Biota 4 Trawl (fish, algae, macrozoobenthic, Secchi depth, CTD, %dissolved oxygen) 4 Phytoplankton, 25 Macrozoobenthic 20 Algae 17 (4 from trawl)=21 Corporations and institutions (laboratories) involved: - Private Company (Hydrographic and oceanographic experts, geographical information system experts) - Private Laboratory (Authorized, acrredidated) (marine water, sediment, biota analysis) - Ankara University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences (biological search) - Rize University, Faculty of Aquaculture (microplastic survey) Data reported to: - Ministry of Environment and Urbanization - Black Sea Commission - European Environment Agency (EEA) Financing assured by: Ministry of Environment and Urbanization QA/QC assurance obtained by intercalibration tests, accreditation, inspection of the Ministry and the laboratory attended to Quasimeme intercalibraion tests (heavy metals in biota, chlorophyl-a in marine water and passed the tests)

7 Monitored parameters Marine Water Sediment Biota Biological Temperature, Metals Metals Phytoplancton Salinity, PCB PCB Macrozoobenthic Conductivity, Pesticide Pesticide Fish Secchi depth, PAH PAH Macro algae Dissolved O 2 Oxygen Saturation % o-po + 4 TOC TON Microplastic EOM (extractable organic matter) Chlorophyll-a (species, size, abundance, variety ) Total P, SiO 2, NO 3 +NO 2 +NH 4 -N Microplastic

8 Eutrophication Parameters- Dissolved Inorganic Nitrogen 1st and 2nd monitoring periods of Dissolved Inorganic Nitrogen eutrophication levels (DIN= NO3-NO2-NH4-N). All of the stations are oligtotrophic in all monitoring seasons.

9 Eutrophication parameters-total phosphorus 1st and 2nd monitoring periods of TP change and trophic level graph. In the 1st period hypertrophic stations were observed, but in the second period phosphorus levels were decreased.

10 Eutrophication parameters-chlorophyl a 1st and 2nd monitoring periods of chlorophyll-a change and trophic level graph. According to chlorophyl-a assesment there is not an eutrophication risk along the coast.

11 Eutrophication Parameters-Secchi depth 1st and 2nd observation term for change of flocculation and trophic level graph. In the 1st period there are not any hypertorphic and eutrophic stations. In the 2nd period TRK 10 (Sakarya Control) and Bartın Control (TRK 16) eutrophic and the stations of Sakarya River mouth (TRK 10A) and Bartın River mouths are hypereutrophic.

12 Eutrophication assessment Assesment shows; potential gray areas as; Sakarya River Mouth, (TRK10A), Filyos River Mouth (TRK13A), stations near Sinop (TRK26, TRK27, TRK28, TRK29) Along Ünye-Samsun-Bafra coast is sensitive area.

13 Biota stations In 7 stations M.barbatus species were sampled and analysed as triple replicates for the assesments of pollution in biota.

14 Biota-metals Heavy metal values are high in trawl 3 and trawl 4 stations.

15 Biota-metals

16 Biota-Total PAH 15 PAH parameters and TPAH were studied in fish filet.. 3 replicates were collected from each stations All results are smaller than detection limits.

17 Biota-pesticide Pesticide-filet

18 Biota-PCB PCB-Filet

19 Sediment Monitoring- Metals 33 stations were monitored, in 17 stations trend analysis were done. To assess the pollution EF- Enrcihment Factor were calculated. no antropogenic pollution for Chromium, Cadmium, Zinc and Copper There are pollutions in TRK 22 İnebolu Control and TRK 44 Ordu Control points for lead. Mercury pollution in TRK 52 (Samsun Control)

20 Sediment-Pesticide and TPAH Classification of shores of Black Sea Region with respect to total pesticide and TPAH pollution in the sediment according to WFD

21 Sediment-TOC and TKN

22 Water chemical status (WFD) NOT POLLUTED LOW POLLUTED MEDIUM POLLUTED POLLUTED HİGHLY POLLUTED

23 Ecological Conditions acc. To Biologic parameters- benthic species High Quality () Good (İ) Moderate (O) Poor (K) Bad (ÇK)

24 Phytoplankton S N*10 4 H TRK ,54 TRK ,8 4,773 TRK ,3 4,692 TRK ,4 4,519 TRK10A ,2 4,501 TRKE ,3 5,053 TRK ,3 4,978 TRK13A ,6 4,767 TRK ,1 5,108 TRK ,4 5,082 TRK19A ,457 TRK ,6 3,941 TRK ,6 3,971 TRK ,17 TRK31A ,088 TRK ,9 4,271 TRK34Y ,5 5,053 TRK ,6 4,228 TRK37A ,377 TRK ,9 4,054 TRK ,9 4,488 TRK ,5 3,812 TRK ,2 4,201 TRK ,8 4,253 TRK ,5 3,621 EKD-H ** İ İ İ İ J 1-S d 0,944 0,951 1,953 0,955 0,964 2,082 0,956 0,956 2,091 0,962 0,951 1,804 0,936 0,950 1,894 0,937 0,967 2,722 0,963 0,964 2,503 0,945 0,960 2,222 0,981 0,969 2,424 0,976 0,969 2,411 0,948 0,948 1,834 0,928 0,926 1,363 0,919 0,929 1,440 0,950 0,940 1,536 0,962 0,936 1,281 0,944 0,941 1,699 0,931 0,964 1,699 0,922 0,938 1,615 0,954 0,936 1,312 0,968 0,947 1,658 0,967 0,952 1,658 0,869 0,921 1,683 0,942 0,939 1,456 0,954 0,940 1,504 0,927 0,906 1,086 S: species number, N: Number of individuals, H: dominancy Simpson ispecies variety index Shannon-Wiener, J : Pielou's evenness index, 1-S: species ndex, d:species richness Margalef index First term phytoplankton assessment at 25 points. High Quality () Good (İ) Moderate (O) Poor (K) Bad (ÇK)

25 Phytoplankton S N H EKD-H ** J 1-S d TRK ,7 4,44 0,981 0,950 1,849 TRK ,46 4,412 0,975 0,949 1,841 TRK ,321 0,955 0,943 1,895 TRK ,53 3,633 İ 0,782 0,782 2,044 TRK10A 28 17,25 3,43 İ 0,713 0,838 2,239 TRKE ,29 4,717 0,927 0,955 2,614 TRK ,3 4,196 0,940 0,937 1,749 TRK13A 23 16,84 4,229 0,935 0,939 1,828 TRK ,09 4,33 0,921 0,941 2,010 TRK ,69 4,817 0,972 0,947 2,380 TRK19A 34 32,46 4,858 0,954 0,962 2,600 TRK ,9 4,229 0,937 0,940 1,968 TRK ,2 4,33 0,970 0,946 1,806 TRK ,7 4,858 0,970 0,880 1,713 TRK31A 25 35,4 4,421 1,115 0,958 1,878 TRK ,6 4,394 0,952 0,947 1,958 TRK34Y 33 33,9 4,727 0,958 0,956 2,519 TRK ,4 4,399 0,937 0,964 1,906 TRK37A 21 28,9 4,222 0,947 0,941 1,590 TRK ,1 4,453 0,961 0,949 2,036 TRK ,2 4,561 0,958 0,955 1,852 TRK ,5 3,948 0,982 0,912 1,870 TRK ,4 4,434 0,885 0,951 1,767 TRK ,3 4,448 0,970 0,950 1,813 TRK ,1 4,08 0,978 0,938 1,463 Second term phytoplankton assessment S: species number, N: Number of individuals, H: species variety index Shannon-Wiener, J : Pielou's evenness index, 1- S: species dominancy Simpson index, d:species richness Margalef index High Quality () Good (İ) Moderate (O) Poor (K) Bad (ÇK)

26 Macroalgae H EKD-H ** J D TRK 1 2,103 O 0,701 1,843 TRAWL1 2,477 O 0,826 1,756 TRK 7 2,477 O 0,746 2,370 TRAWL2 1,968 K 0,592 2,287 TRK 10A 3,119 İ 0,780 2,975 TRK E1 2,638 O 0,660 3,241 TRK 13 2,600 O 0,703 2,582 TRK 13A 2,518 O 0,728 2,344 TRK 19A 2,347 O 0,655 2,461 TRK 22 2,368 O 0,685 2,454 TRK 28 2,881 O 0,705 3,010 TRAWL3 1,769 K 0,630 1,394 TRK 31A 2,454 O 0,739 2,196 TRK 34Y 2,572 O 0,811 1,787 TRK 37A 2,958 O 0,799 2,658 TRK 43 2,020 O 0,637 2,131 TRAWL4 2,542 O 0,735 2,373 TRK 46 2,703 O 0,814 2,223 TRK 53 2,180 O 0,727 1,719 TRK 55 2,084 O 0,742 1,590 TRK 61 2,215 O 0,699 2,262 High Quality () Good (İ) Moderate (O) Poor (K) Bad (ÇK) Ecological quality index w/t macroalgae; in 21 stations. Generally all of the stations are in moderate quality Percentage rates of macro algae groups detected in Black Sea shores. the most dominant group is RHODOPHYTA(50%). **H, BAD (1-2), Middle (O)2-3, Good (İ) 3-4 H: species variety index Shannon-Wiener, J Pielou's evenness index, 1-S: species dominancy Simpson index, d:species richness Margalef index

27 Microplastic TRK 31 A TRK 46 Microplastic in the Sea Water Plancton net size (μm) Microplastic amount (particle/m 3 ) Massive amount (mg/l) 0,54 0,87 Microplastic in Sediment Microplastic amount (particle/m 3 ) Massive amount (mg/kg wet sediment) 1,05 0,72

28 Thank you for your attention

29 REVISION OF NATIONAL MONITORING Black Sea Monitoring For MSFD-Good Ecological Status evaluations; 5 marine sub-evaluation areas and 16 water management units were desginated by considering hyrdomorphology, pressures, and the conditions. Sub evaluation marine areas; West Black Sea, Middle-West Black Sea, Sinop, Yeşilırmak-Kızılırmak Region, and East Black Sea.

30 General Information This programme has already been started and wil be achieved in the coordination of the Ministry of Environment and Urbanization and TUBITAK, 6 universities and Turkish Atomic Energy Authority will be involved (for all of the seas around Turkey) This programme is an interim programme, after 2016 it will be updated ac.to more MSFD relevant indicators (like D1, D3, D4

31 PARAMETERS Physicochemical parameters (CTD, ph, in situ floresans, SDD, ÇO, % Oxygen saturation, TP, DIN (NO 3 -N+NO 2 -N+NH 4 -N), DIP (PO 4 -P), Si) and Chlorophyl-a in water column Sediment (heavy metals, PCB, Pesticide, PAH, %org-c, %N) Sediment trend analysis (heavy metals, PCB, Pesticide, PAH,%org-C, %N) Biota (Heavy metals, PCB, Pesticide, PAH, EOM) (trend analysis) Year Black Sea Station Frequency Number (*3) (*3) (*3) (*3) (*3) (*3) 1 Phytoplancton Macrozoobenthic

32 PARAMETERS Year Black Sea Station Number Macroaalgae Microplastic (further methods; FTIR, organic analysis) Radioactivity (in water column and sediment) (for some of basic radionucleids; 90Sr, 137Cs, 226Ra, 238U, 239,240Pu.. Monitoring acc to MSFD (stock limits of fish, marine litter and pollution levels with concerning human health, biodiversity ind.) area area area Ind.chosen open waters monitoring (5 transects up to 20 nm) area area area 2 Frequency «Marine Environmental Status Assessment Report» will be prepared at the end of this 3 years. (as a summary report) 1. National Marine Monitoring and Assessment Symposium» will be held in 2016.