Alaska Wind Farm. Environmental Statement. Non Technical Summary. October Cover image for illustrative purpose only

Transcription

1 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary October 2009 Cover image for illustrative purpose only

2

3 Non Technical Summary 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purbeck Wind Farm LLP (Limited Liability Partnership), the Applicant, proposes to construct and operate a wind farm known as consisting of four wind turbines on land at Masters Pit, East Stoke, Wareham, Dorset. 1.2 Purbeck Wind Farm LLP is a joint venture company owned by Infinergy Ltd, a wind farm developer, and the landowner, Will Bond, Managing Director of Alaska Environmental Contracting Ltd. Infinergy started developing wind farms in the United Kingdom in 2003 and is based in Wimborne, Dorset. Alaska Environmental Contracting Ltd specialises in ecological restoration or management work on environmentally sensitive sites. 1.3 The Project is within an operational quarry located north and south of the Puddletown Road (the site ) approximately 5.5km to the west of Wareham. The site is in the Parish of East Stoke within the administrative borders of Purbeck District Council (PDC), Dorset. The site location within Dorset is shown on Figure 0.1 below. Figure 0.1 Location of the proposed within Dorset NOTE Reproduced from the Ordnance Survey Map with the permission of the Controller of H.M.Stationery Office. Crown copyright licence number

4 1.4 Once operational the wind farm would have a maximum generating capacity of up to 9.2 megawatts (MW). It is anticipated that the working life of the wind farm would be 25 years, after which point the wind turbines would be decommissioned. 1.5 The project would require planning consent from Purbeck District Council (PDC), under the Town and Country Planning Act An Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has been carried out in accordance with the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England and Wales) Regulations 1999 as amended. The results of this EIA have been reported in an Environmental Statement (ES). 1.6 This document is a non technical summary (NTS) of the ES. Details of how to view the full ES are given on the last page of this document. 2. Renewable Energy 2.1 In the Energy White Paper (Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), 2003) the UK Government set a target of a 60% reduction in carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions by 2050 in order to combat climate change. This target was reinforced in the recent Energy Review (DTI, 2006). For the Government, generation of electricity from renewable energy is an integral part of achieving this aim. The Government has set targets of 10% of the UK s electricity to be produced from renewable energy sources by 2010, with 20% by The UK s Renewable Energy Strategy (RES) published in 2009 sets out the path for the UK to meet the legally-binding target to ensure 15% of energy comes from renewable sources by The strategy for doing so sets out a lead scenario that could see: more than 30% of our electricity generated from renewables, up from about 5.5% today. Much of this will be from wind power, on and offshore, but biomass, hydro and wave and tidal will also play an important role. 2.3 The Draft Regional Spatial Strategy Policy RE1 sets agreed renewable energy targets to be met for each of the 7 counties in the South West. Dorset has a target of generating 64-84MW of renewable energy by Draft Policy RE1 also includes a 2020 minimum cumulative target of 850MW installed capacity from onshore renewable energy technologies. The proposed Alaska Wind Farm has a generating capacity of up to 9.2MW which equates to 14.3% of the 2010 Dorset target and which will now contribute to the cumulative 2020 target for the South West. This will provide a significant contribution to meeting Dorset s renewable energy sources. This is particularly important as it would provide Dorset s first wind farm and wind farm energy is seen as the principal renewable energy technology currently available to meet renewable energy targets. 2.4 Draft RSS paragraph notes that whilst the South West has made a good start and has a range of renewable energy installations, using wind, hydro, solar and biomass resources, in 2005 only 3% of the region s electricity demand was met by these methods. According to table 5.8 of the July 2009 Renewable Energy Capacity in Regional Spatial Strategies Final Report, Dorset produces GWh from renewable sources with only 0.10GWh produced by wind. According to the July 2009 Renewable Energy Capacity in Regional Spatial Strategies Final Report the South West is unlikely to meet its 2010 target and in their most recent document The Road to 2020, RegenSW have indicated that generating 15% and 20% of all energy consumed in the South West from renewables is possible by 2020 but stronger support is needed from decision makers at a local level. 2

5 3. Site and Surroundings 3.1 Figure 0.2 shows the site and its surroundings. 3.2 The site is currently an operational quarry under an existing planning permission granted in 1960 and modified in May There are areas of standing water in the site formed from previous gravel and sand extraction or currently in use for quarry silt disposal. Quarrying will continue on the site with or without the proposed wind farm development. E NW SW NW NE NE SE NOTE Reproduced from the Ordnance Survey Map with the permission of the Controller of H.M.Stationery Office. Crown copyright licence number Figure 0.2 The site and its surroundings 3

6 3.3 Overhead electricity lines run east-west less than 1km to the north of the site. 3.4 The site is on a ridge of land with the River Piddle to the north of the site and the River Frome to the south. Both rivers drain towards Poole Harbour to the east. 3.5 The site is bounded by agricultural land and heathland. The Dorset Golf Club, open access woodland and the Higher Hyde Heath Nature Reserve lie to the east of the site. A gliding club is situated 3km to the northwest of the site. Ministry of Defence ranges lie several kilometres to the south. 3.6 Buddens Camping and Activity Centre is adjacent to the existing quarry. This 95 acre camping and activity centre consists of individual campsites and is owned and operated by Dorset Scouts. It is used by the scouts, schools and other youth organisations for outdoor pursuits and camping. 3.7 A mainline railway line and the A352 lie approximately 1.5km to the south of the site. The site is dissected by the Puddletown Road and a bridleway lies north of the site. The Wareham Forest Way runs through Wareham Forest located several kilometres to the northeast of the site. 3.8 The construction area for this development is directly adjacent to a number of statutory designated sites, namely, the Dorset Heathlands Ramsar site, the Dorset Heathlands Special Protection Area (SPA), The Dorset Heaths Special Area of Conservation site (SAC) and Stokeford Heaths Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI). The Stokeford Heath Site of Nature Conservation Importance (SNCI), a nonstatutory and local level designation, falls within the construction footprint. The site at Masters Pit Masters Pit 4

7 4. Project Details 4.1 The wind farm would comprise four wind turbines, a permanent on-site anemometry mast, permanent access tracks and an onsite substation which would be linked to the national distribution network. The wind turbines have been referenced using the points of the compass southwest (SW), southeast (SE), northwest (NW) and northeast (NE). 4.2 The wind turbines would be three-bladed horizontal axis machines with a hub height of up to 89.5m and an overall maximum height of up to 125m. The wind turbine dimensions are shown in the picture adjacent. 4.3 The wind turbines would begin to operate at wind speeds of approximately 3 metres per second or 6.7 miles per hour (mph). Between 3 metres per second (a light to gentle breeze) and approximately 15 metres per second or 33.5 mph (a strong breeze) the power output would steadily increase. 4.4 The wind turbines would each consists of four components: rotor blades (three), nacelle or hub, tower and foundation. Given the rate of technological advances in wind turbine design the manufacturer has not been specified at this stage. For the purposes of the assessment the specifications of a typical and indicative wind turbine model has been assessed. Each wind turbine would take approximately one week to assemble and would require one large crane and an additional smaller crane. The construction phase is likely to be six months in total. Tip height: up to 125 metres Hub height: up to 89.5 metres Hub Proposed wind turbine dimensions Wind Turbine Foundations Turbine image not to scale 4.5 The wind turbines are located within quarried areas (pits). The bases of the wind turbines would be built up in the pits, as shown in Figure 0.3, in order to be level with the natural ground level before quarrying operations began. The wind turbine foundations would consist of disc shaped steel reinforced concrete bases and would measure 17m in diameter. Figure 0.3 Cross-Section of the southwest (SW) Wind Turbine 5

8 4.6 Piling would be required for some or all wind turbines depending on ground conditions (to be investigated during the physical works of the pre-construction phase). On-site Access Tracks 4.7 Site tracks currently in use for quarrying operations would be upgraded and used for access to wind turbines wherever possible. Where quarry tracks do not exist, sections of new site access tracks would need to be constructed in order for the wind turbines and associated equipment to be transported to the wind turbine positions. The stone required would be extracted from the site s quarry, thus reducing deliveries to site. The tracks would remain during operation of the wind farm to provide access for maintenance. On-site Substation and Cables 4.8 Buried electricity cables would connect each wind turbine to a substation within the site. They would be installed in trenches underground and run parallel, where practical, with the on-site access tracks. The substation would provide the point of connection for the wind farm to the regional electricity distribution network. 4.9 The substation would house switchgear, metering equipment and control equipment. The substation would be a single storey building. It is proposed to position the said building within a secure compound south of Puddletown Road as shown in figure Wind farm developments require consent for the necessary connections to the national electricity grid. Southern Electric (SSE) is the Distribution Network Operator and as such would be responsible for the grid connection application It is anticipated that the grid connection would comprise of underground electrical cabling positioned, where possible, parallel to Puddletown Road from the wind farm substation to the nearest grid point. The nearest grid point is currently the existing overhead lines on Puddletown Road approximately 1km north east of the proposed substation. However, SSE would determine the point of connection to the grid. Permanent Anemometry Mast 4.12 A permanent anemometry mast (met mast) would be installed to gather wind speed data for the site. The mast would be up to 89.5m high (height equivalent to the hub height of wind turbines) and its location is shown in figure 0.2. The mast would be of a metal lattice construction and would be freestanding. Typical anemometer mast to measure wind speeds and direction 6

9 Planting and Heathland Creation 4.13 Figure 0.4 shows proposed tree and hedge planting and heathland creation. These elements are part of the mitigation and enhancement proposed for the scheme. New heathland would be created off-site (13 hectares of heathland on adjacent farmland) along with natural regeneration of heathland habitat within the quarried area on-site. Improvement of habitat within the Special Protection Area (SPA) (shown on Figure 0.4) and creation of the new heathland would also be delivered. The new heathland created will be of benefit to a range of species groups, including heathland communities, invertebrates, reptiles, the local bird assemblage and mammals. NOTE Reproduced from the Ordnance Survey Map with the permission of the Controller of H.M.Stationery Office. Crown copyright licence number Figure 0.4 Proposed heathland creation and planting 7

10 4.14 Where there are gaps in the existing field boundary hedgerows within the developer s land ownership, new planting is proposed as shown on figure 0.4. Native tree species would be introduced to create an element of height in the landscape between close proximity properties and rights of way and the proposed wind farm. Temporary Construction Compound 4.15 A temporary construction compound would be located near the site entrance to the south of Puddletown Road during construction. The compound would include staff facilities and a storage area for plant and materials. Crane Hardstanding 4.16 Each wind turbine would require a 40m by 40m crane hardstanding area adjacent to the wind turbine location on which the main crane and auxiliary crane would be located whilst the wind turbine is being erected. NOTE Reproduced from the Ordnance Survey Map with the permission of the Controller of H.M.Stationery Office. Crown copyright licence number Figure 0.5 Construction Phase Elements 8

11 Site Access 4.17 Site access is required for the delivery of the wind turbine components, construction materials, plant and personnel. Through consultation with Dorset County Council (as the Local Highways Authority) and the Highways Agency, a construction access route has been agreed The delivery of each wind turbine would require seven abnormal load deliveries. The vehicles used to transport wind turbine components would constitute abnormal loads only on the delivery phase of the journey, as the trailers are retracted to the size of a standard articulated vehicle during the return leg. Each delivery of wind turbine components therefore consists of one abnormal load movement on the outbound journey and one heavy good vehicle (HGV) movement on the return journey. NOTE Reproduced from the Ordnance Survey Map with the permission of the Controller of H.M.Stationery Office. Crown copyright licence number Figure 0.6 Route for Abnormal Loads Vehicles and Construction Vehicles 9

12 Typical turbine delivery vehicle 4.19 The proposed route for the abnormal loads from Southampton Docks is shown in Figure 0.6 and described as follows: Depart Southampton Dock via Gate 10 or 20; Turn left (west) onto the A33; Turn right (north) onto the M271; Turn left (west) onto the M27; Continue west onto the A31; Turn left (south) onto the A35; Turn right (west) onto Southbrook/Rye Hill at Bere Regis; Turn left (east) onto Puddletown Road; and Turn right (south) into site The wind turbine components would be transported through Bere Regis along an established abnormal loads route which is currently used to move army tanks by the Ministry of Defence. Abnormal loads would be scheduled to occur during off-peak periods, at times to be agreed with the Police and the local authorities. Due to other geometric conditions and road congestion it would not be practical to deliver the wind turbines via other routes. The relevant abnormal loads authorities were contacted regarding the route and no objections to the use of this route were raised A number of minor upgrades to the road system would be required in order to accommodate access to the site by vehicles transporting wind turbine components (abnormal loads). Overhanging branches would need to be trimmed to allow a minimum envelope on the road of 5 metres wide by 5 metres high. The majority of the route is in excess of 5 metres wide and therefore the removal of street furniture and signs would be minimal. However, street furniture would need to be temporarily removed at Southern Road / A33 and temporary widening would be required at the proposed site accesses along Puddletown Road These road works would require separate consent under The Roads Act The roads would be reinstated once wind farm construction is complete A traffic management plan would be presented in advance of construction for agreement with the appropriate authorities to ensure safety for all road users is not compromised Concrete would be processed on-site and materials to be used for the access tracks would be sourced within the site. This would significantly minimise off-site construction vehicle movements Non-abnormal loads construction traffic would utilise routes that would merge on the A351 and A352, then travel north to the site via Puddletown Road and Tout Hill. The A351 and A352 form part of the overall access strategy for the existing sand quarrying operations and are suitable, in terms of highway geometry, in accommodating the expected construction vehicles without any further improvements. 10

13 Environmental Best Practice 4.26 Environmental best practice and pollution prevention measures would be followed during all construction activities related to the wind farm including decommissioning and maintenance. A construction environmental management plan (CEMP) would be prepared by the main contractor and include the mitigation measures committed to as part of the EIA. The CEMP would be produced following planning consent in order to incorporate all relevant planning conditions imposed by the local authority. Working Hours 4.27 Normal working hours during the construction phase would be between the hours of 0700 and 1900 Monday to Friday. Decommissioning 4.28 The wind farm is expected to be operational for 25 years. After this time the applicant has three options, as follows: Apply for consent (including any necessary environmental assessment) to extend the operation of the wind farm for an additional period; Decommission the wind farm and apply for consent (including any necessary environmental assessment) to install new wind turbines on the same site; or Decommission the wind farm and reinstate the land Twenty-five years is too far in advance for the applicant to make such a decision. Nevertheless, it is assumed that options (i) and (ii) would entail some form of environmental assessment, as appropriate, at that time. However, option (iii) would probably require neither consent nor environmental assessment, and as such the decommissioning of the wind farm after twenty-five years is assumed The decommissioning would involve the use of sizeable plant and other vehicles on site as the wind turbines are being dismantled. 11

14 5. Alternatives and Layout Design 5.1 The site selection process is the first stage in the wind farm project development cycle. This stage seeks to identify a site that achieves a balance between the twin objectives of (i) commercial viability; and (ii) avoiding or minimising potential impacts on the environment. Infinergy Ltd considered the County of Dorset as a search area for a potential wind farm development and prospective sites were sought in Constraints mapping was used to highlight suitable sites for wind farm development in Dorset. The requirements for a wind farm project, such as suitable wind speeds, were mapped alongside constraints such as designations and the proximity of residential properties. A constraints map is shown in figure Having plotted the wind speed requirement and environmental constraints for a wind farm site, several potential sites were identified as suitable. For Infinergy Ltd, the NOTE Reproduced from the Ordnance Survey Map with the permission of the Controller of H.M.Stationery Office. Crown copyright licence number Figure 0.7 Combined Constraints Map 12

15 next stage involved a vital requirement, that being landowner support. The Alaska Wind Farm site was considered suitable and the site landowner was supportive of such a development hence an agreement was made to proceed with the wind farm planning process. 5.4 The layout of the was designed through a detailed, iterative design process based on the objectives below: Siting of wind turbines to avoid interference between wind turbines, which may lead to a reduction of energy generation; Suitable gradients for wind turbine foundations; Avoid designated sites of ecological importance, known bird flight paths and minimise impacts on areas of high ecological importance; Siting of wind turbines to take into consideration landscape character and visual impact; Avoid designated sites of archaeological importance and minimise impacts on areas of archaeological interest and areas with archaeological potential; Avoid surface and groundwater resources and minimise indirect effects on these features; Utilise existing access and minimise lengths of new access tracks to reduce impacts and material requirements; Protect noise amenity of residential properties; and Avoid interference with aviation users and telecommunication links. 5.5 Site specific layout criteria were as follows: Wind turbines cannot be located on the areas designated under the Habitats Regulations (SPA/SAC), nor can any other ancillary development; Wind turbines should not be placed on or near unworked sand reserves in order to avoid sterilisation of a substantial quantity of sand; Underground cables and access tracks should ideally also be clear of any remaining sand reserves; Wind turbines must not go on areas required to be restored by 2010 under the Modification Order; and Wind turbine bases should be on the highest ground possible. 5.6 Design refinements were made following a detailed constraints mapping exercise based on environmental information obtained by desk and field-based research. Design Process Six Wind Turbine scheme 5.7 The layout of the was arrived at through a detailed, iterative design process based on the objectives above and resulted in a six wind turbine scheme for which a planning application was submitted to Purbeck District Council in March High ground in the area of the proposed wind farm is exclusively either virgin heath (designated under the Habitats Regulations), or unworked quarry reserves (to be protected to avoid sterilising minerals reserves). In order to avoid these areas but allow wind turbine bases to be located on high ground wind turbines were located in worked quarry areas that would be backfilled to meet the levels of adjoining undisturbed ground (thus allowing backfill against an edge). During August 2007 design refinements were made following a detailed constraints mapping exercise based on environmental information obtained by desk and field-based research. This resulted in the six wind turbine layout submitted in March Four Wind Turbine Scheme 5.9 Once submitted, the six wind turbine scheme raised an objection from the statutory consultee Natural England. The Applicant chose to pursue alternative layouts in order to resolve the objection The objection was related to the distance between wind turbines and the Special Protection Area (SPA) shown on Figure A series of post submission discussions and meetings resulted in a revised layout through the consideration of a 100 metre distance between wind turbines and SPA designated land. 13

16 5.12 The following section describes each chosen wind turbine location in the finalised layout: North West (NW) Location 5.13 This wind turbine location is in the base of a void where excavation has stopped at winter water level. The location of a turbine here and its associated backfilling would provide additional support to an adjacent area without sterilising workable mineral, or significant useable quarry floor space. North East (NE) Location 5.14 Although this location is on clay it is not of economically workable quality or quantity. South West (SW) Location 5.15 This area has been worked down leaving a void. South East (SE) Location 5.16 This wind turbine location is on the edge of the void excavated down to basal clay. The face is very steep and backfilling for the wind turbine would help support the surrounding ground levels and would sterilise no remaining sand. 14

17 6. Public Consultation 6.1 A public exhibition for the proposed revised four wind turbine scheme was held on Monday the 3rd of November 2008 at Springfield Country Hotel, Grange Road, Wareham. A full description of the public consultation process is outlined in the Statement of Community Consultation (SCC) appending the planning application. 6.2 Prior to the public exhibition over 6,000 copies of a general information booklet providing an introduction to the proposed draft application were distributed to households in and around the proposed site. The applicant launched a dedicated scheme website, which included a summary of the proposals, details of the public consultation process, images, news updates, contact details and other useful information. The applicant placed four adverts in local free press and press releases were issued to local media before, during and after the consultation period. Posters advertising the exhibitions were also sent to East Stoke, Wool and Wareham Parish/ Town Council clerks to display on their notice boards and websites. 6.3 Analysis of the quantifiable responses Infinergy had received by time of writing (see chart below) shows that the majority of people (69%) who responded to the public consultation stated they are supportive of the proposal. Public Exhibition Overall results pre-submission public consultation No comment: 4% Wind energy lessons for local school Opposed: 27% Support: 69% Bus trips to Burton Wold Wind Farm 15

18 7. Regulatory Requirements and the EIA Process Regulatory Consent 7.1 In order to construct and operate the proposed wind farm the Applicant must first apply for planning permission from the Local Authority, PDC, under the Town and Country Planning Act The project is also subject to an EIA in accordance with the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England and Wales) Regulations The EIA Process 7.3 Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is a process that must be followed for certain types of development before they can be granted development consent. The procedure is a means of drawing together an assessment of a project s likely significant environmental effects. The process takes into account each stage of the development, from construction through to operation and eventual decommissioning. 7.4 The following stages are those followed for the EIA: Scoping determination of the issues to be addressed by the EIA through consultation with the local authority and consultees Data collection and surveys Impact identification and evaluation of significance Identification of mitigation measures designed to reduce or prevent significant adverse environmental effects arising Identification of monitoring requirements if required Identification and evaluation of cumulative effects Submission of the ES to the relevant authorities 7.5 After submission the planning application is determined by the local planning authority (Purbeck District Council) and a decision on whether the development proposal should proceed is made. Scoping 7.6 Scoping is the process of identifying the issues to be addressed in the EIA. It aims to focus the EIA on the likely significant environmental effects that require further attention, whilst determining the effects that are unlikely to require additional study. The scoping of an EIA by which these main or significant effects are identified is an important preliminary procedure that sets the context for the study. 7.7 Following submission of a Scoping Report in July 2007 setting out the proposed scope for the EIA, PDC provided their Scoping Opinion in September 2007 having received responses from the following consultees: Natural England; RSPB; Dorset Wildlife Trust; English Heritage Environment Agency; Dorset County Archaeologist; and Dorset County Council as Highways Authority. 7.8 In general the proposed EIA scope was accepted by PDC. Consultation with the Local Authority, the consultees listed above and other stakeholders has been on-going throughout the EIA. 7.9 The scoping process carried out for the six wind turbine scheme in July 2008 is regarded as valid for the four wind turbine scheme as the scope of assessment is the same. However, further work has been carried out in some areas in order to respond to queries raised by consultees post 16

19 submission of the six wind turbine scheme. A letter stating this was sent to Purbeck District Council (12th of December 2008). Data collection and surveys 7.10 A series of detailed surveys, data collection exercises and desk-studies were undertaken as part of the EIA to collect site specific information. These are discussed in detail in the ES and include: An ecological survey programme to identify important habitats and any protected species; supplemented with ecological data searches to collate any previous records and a review of designed nature conservation sites Ornithological surveys including wintering bird and breeding bird surveys, in addition to a desk-based review of existing information Desk-based assessment and site reconnaissance visits to collate information on the geology, hydrogeology and hydrology of the area, as well as a flood risk assessment Identification of landscape designations and sensitive visual receptors in consultation with PDC and the production of photomontages and wireframes A review of existing historical and archaeological data A desk-based assessment with reference to local maps and data sources to identify features relating to the local community, including a review of socio-economics, land use, and recreation and access issues Consultation with Highways Authorities regarding traffic and access issues, calculation of traffic movements and vehicle types during construction and operational stages. Baselines noise surveys and a desk based assessment with reference to British Standards and other current relevant guidance. Quantitative assessment of shadow flicker undertaken using WindPro software. Consultation with organisation such as the Office of Communications (OfCom), the BBC and communication link operators to assess electromagnetic interference risk. Consultation with Ministry of Defence (MOD), the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), National Air Traffic Services (NATS) and Bournemouth Airport. Consultation with the local gliding club. Impact identification and evaluation 7.11 The EIA Regulations require the identification of the main and likely significant effects which the project is likely to have on the environment. This assessment was carried out by RPS Ltd, Environmental Consultants. Receptors are defined as the physical resource or user group that could be affected by the project or part of the project throughout its construction, operation or decommissioning. Some receptors will be more sensitive to certain environmental effects than others. The sensitivity or importance of a receptor may depend, for example, on its frequency 17

20 or extent of occurrence at an international, national, regional or local level. Effects are defined as the physical changes to the environment attributable to the project. For each topic, the likely environmental effects are identified and taken into account, including their magnitude and other dimensions of identified change in the environment with the project by comparison with the situation without the project. Effects are defined as either adverse or beneficial. Depending on discipline, they may also be described as: Direct: effects directly attributable to a project action/activity; or Indirect: effects not directly attributable to a project action/activity The magnitude of an effect does not directly translate into its significance. For example, a significant effect may arise as a result of a relatively modest effect on a resource of national value, or a large effect on a resource of local value. In broad terms, therefore, the significance of the effect can depend on both its magnitude and the sensitivity or importance of the receptor. The assessment of significance of an effect has generally taken account of the following criteria: Extent and magnitude; Duration (short-term and long-term); Reversibility and irreversibility; Performance against environmental quality standards; and Sensitivity of the receptor Levels of significance that are used in the assessment, in descending order, are: Substantial Major Moderate Minor Negligible 7.14 Where an effect is described as negligible this means that there is either no effect or that the significance of any effect is considered to be negligible. All other levels of significance apply to both adverse and beneficial effects. Identification of mitigation measures 7.15 The project includes a range of measures that have been designed to reduce or prevent significant adverse environmental effects arising. The assessment of effects has taken into account all mitigation measures that form part of the project and to which the applicant is committed. Identification of monitoring requirements 7.16 Where monitoring is required to ensure good practice is being followed or to monitor the success of mitigation measures these have been incorporated. Identification and evaluation of cumulative effects 7.17 It is usual for the cumulative effects assessment to include those developments that have planning permission, those where applications have been submitted and are considered likely to be approved in the near future and other projects planned in the area. Information on the developments considered within the cumulative effects assessment within the ES is provided below Binnegar Environmental Park was granted planning permission in April The site is on land to the north and east adjacent to the site. The scheme includes the provision of an integrated waste recovery and recycling facility, green waste composting, materials recovery, an integrated office, a new depot and an environmental education and visitor centre. 18

21 7.19 The proposed Silton Wind Farm scheme comprised six 120m high wind turbines northwest of Gillingham, near Silton in North Dorset District Council. The application has since been withdrawn. As the Silton site is within 70km of the proposed Alaska Wind Farm the cumulative landscape and visual effects of the Silton wind farm and Alaska Wind Farm have been assessed The Cheverton Down wind farm is located near Brightstone on the Isle of Wight. The previous application by National Wind Power was granted permission for three turbines measuring 52m to blade tip. The current application is for three turbines of 125m to blade tip, the application is yet to be decided The West Isle of Wight Round 3 offshore wind farm zone, is an area of the sea bed that has been identified by The Crown Estate as being suitable for a large-scale wind farm development. 8. The Environmental Statement (ES) 8.1 The results of the EIA process are documented within an ES which contains the following: A description of the development comprising information on the site, design and size of the development. A description of the measures envisaged in order to avoid, reduce and, if possible, remedy significant adverse effects. The data required to identify and assess the main effects which the development is likely to have on the environment. An outline of the main alternatives studied by the applicant and an indication of the main reasons for his choice, taking into account the environmental effects. 8.2 The following topics are assessed in the ES and are summarised in this NTS: Landscape and Visual; Ecology and Nature Conservation; Noise and Vibration; Historic Environment; Access and Traffic; Geology and Hydrogeology; Hydrology; Socio-Economics; Aviation, Telecommunications and Television; and Shadow Flicker. 19

22 Summary of Environmental Effects Landscape and Visual 8.3 The proposed wind farm would be apparent in the landscape, but given the scale and capacity of the wider landscape and the proposed mitigation planting in the immediate area, the is considered to be acceptable in this location. 8.4 The site is not located with any area designated for its landscape resource. The internationally designated Dorset and East Devon World Heritage site lies some 7.4km to the south of the Alaska Site. The Dorset Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) lies 870m to the south of the proposal site at its closest point. The Cranborne Chase and West Wiltshire Downs AONB lies 14.5km to the north of the site. The New Forest has National Park status and is 29.1km from the site. The Dorset Heritage Coast covers the seascape of Poole Harbour and the Purbeck coastline, extending to within 4.7km of the eastern edge of the site. 8.5 Published guidance recognises the site as an appropriate location for this type of development in landscape terms. Several national guidance papers (Planning Policy Statements (PPS) 1, 7 and 22) recognise landscape sensitivities in relation to development and regional guidance including Regional Renewable Energy Strategy for the South West of England ; REvision 2020 South West Renewable Electricity, Heat and On Site Generation Targets for 2020: Final Report, (June 2005) and Bournemouth, Dorset and Poole Renewable Energy Strategy and Action Plan: Final Version, (December 2005). 8.6 These documents recognise local targets to be met in the production of renewable energy from wind and the sensitivity of the landscape in which wind farms could be situated. 8.7 The study area for the landscape and visual assessment extended 35km from the site in all directions. An assessment of landscape and visual effects has been conducted within the study area based on computer models, site visits, existing character assessments and photographs. 8.8 Located in a gently rolling landscape within a greater river valley, the gravel workings are an identifiable feature in the landscape beyond the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) landscape. Wind turbines would be visible from the Purbeck ridge to the south. From more distant elevated areas such as Cranbourne Chase in the north, only the wind turbine blades would be visible in favourable conditions as a small element of a much wider landscape. The wind turbines would inevitably be viewed against the sky at lower level locations than the proposal. 8.9 Although the immediate area (up to 1km from the wind farm) would be characterised by the wind farm, it would not have a significant effect on the overall landscape character area The internationally designated Dorset and East Devon World Heritage site would not be affected from the proposal. Parts of the nationally designated landscapes would be affected to varying significance depending on proximity to the site A selection of viewpoints were chosen and agreed with Purbeck District Council and some local residents. The Alaska Wind Farm scheme was superimposed onto the photographs to aid visualisation of how the proposals would look from a range of distance from the site. These images are called photomontages. Three of the photomontages are provided at Figure 0.8, 0.9 and 0.10 (see next few pages). These are Figures 6.16, 6.20 and 6.30 in the ES. 20

23 Figure 0.8: Bridleway adjoining Buddens Camping and Activities Centre and Golf Course 21 Note: Horizontal field of view 75 degrees. Must be viewed at 300mm at A3.

24 Figure 0.9: Wareham Wall Walks public footpath, Dorset AONB 22 Note: Horizontal field of view 75 degrees. Must be viewed at 300mm at A3.

25 Figure 0.10: A35 junction near Tolpuddle (B3390) 23 Note: Horizontal field of view 75 degrees. Must be viewed at 300mm at A3.

26 8.12 The wind farm would have significant effects when viewed at close range. From the bridleway to the north of the site and the properties at East Stoke and Trigon Fisheries the changes in views would be of a major / moderate significance, where there are direct views from the properties. With the proposed mitigation shown adjacent to properties of East Stoke this would reduce to a moderate effect and would not be significant Medium range views of the turbines would be seen with a backdrop of vegetation and in some the wind turbines would be screened to a large extent. Views within this range would not experience effects that are significant The wider landscape is large in scale and simple in character and has the capacity to accommodate the wind farm successfully when viewed from long range, including areas of high ground as shown. From the majority of these locations, the wind turbines would be seen as simple, sculptural elements. There would be no effects that are significant in EIA terms for long range views The proposed development would be visible in the landscape. However, due to the scale of the wider landscape, its uniformity and strong character and its capacity to accommodate a wind farm, the only significant effects on landscape resources and visual receptors would be experienced by those landscape and visual receptors within a close range of the wind farm, the significance of which would be reduced by appropriate mitigation In terms of cumulative effects there are very small areas where both the Alaska Wind Farm and proposed Silton Wind Farm would be visible. These areas are mainly restricted to the high land between the two proposed sites. It would not be possible to view both wind farms within a person s field of view, meaning a person would have to turn through approximately 180 from looking towards the Silton Wind Farm, in order to have potential views of the proposed Alaska Wind Farm Due to the possible extent of the potential cumulative views of the West Isle of Wight and the significance of the cumulative impacts of and the West Isle of Wight wind farm are considered to be minor/moderate There are areas from which views of both Cheverton Down wind farm and Alaska Wind Farm would be available. A person would have to turn through approximately 110 to 170 from looking towards the Cheverton Down wind farm in order to have potential views of the proposed. The significance of cumulative effects is correspondingly considered to be minor. 24

27 Ecology and Nature Conservation 8.19 During the construction and operational phases of the project it envisaged that there will be no significant impacts to wildlife. It is not envisaged that the development would cause any significant ecological effects during any project phase Ecological designations are shown in Figure 0.4. and The site is adjacent to the Dorset Heathlands Ramsar site, the Dorset Heathlands Special Protection Area (SPA), The Dorset Heaths Special Area of Conservation site (SAC) and Stokeford Heaths Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI). The Dorset Heathlands Special Protection Area is designated for the protection of the three bird species: Nightjar, Dartford Warbler and Woodlark The Stokeford Heath Site of Nature Conservation Importance (SNCI), a nonstatutory and local level designation, falls within the construction footprint Habitats within the study area mainly comprise bare ground within recently quarried areas, with small patches of heathland, a patch of unimproved grassland and small areas of gorse scrub and woodland. The habitats within the study area are considered of low value in ecological terms Mitigation measures to avoid or reduce the potential impacts of the proposed development have been incorporated into the project. Enhancement measures to increase overall nature conservation value are also proposed as part of the Alaska Wind Farm scheme Mitigation and enhancement measures include creation of approximately 13 hectares of heathland on adjacent farmland (see figure 0.4) and restoration of areas of degraded heathland within the adjacent SSSI, SAC and SPA. Natural England have been and will continue to be consulted over suitable heathland creation and enhancement techniques for the site should planning permission be granted. A site specific plan would be developed in conjunction with Natural England and Alaska Environmental Contracting who have extensive experience of habitat creation 25 Bird surveys being conducted on site associated with sensitive heathland habitats. A management plan would be developed and implemented, including a programme of monitoring, to maintain and improve areas of new habitat in the medium and longterm Construction, operation and decommissioning of the wind farm would have no significant effects on habitats or species for which the sites listed above are designated Impacts on habitats would be limited to a small loss of heathland, unimproved grassland and woodland, where existing quarry tracks require widening. The track widening for access to the wind turbines would have a minor effect of habitats, however the mitigation measures, including natural regeneration on-site and creation of new heathland adjacent to the site, would mitigate these impacts No significant operational impacts to invertebrates, amphibians, reptiles or mammals are envisaged To eliminate the uncertainties over bird mortality due to collision with the wind turbine blades the possibility of such was modelled using a system advocated by Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) for the assessment of wind farm impacts. It was concluded that collision mortality for all species modelled is not significant The mortality of Nightjar due to collision was predicted to be zero based on the nocturnal surveys that were undertaken. The results of these surveys were that over the course of 134hrs of nocturnal data collection (a sample of 10% of the hours that Nightjar might be flying on site), 138 Nightjar observations were made, none of which were recorded flying at heights more than 20m above the ground. This is below the height of the moving wind

28 NOTE Reproduced from the Ordnance Survey Map with the permission of the Controller of H.M.Stationery Office. Crown copyright licence number Figure 0.11 Ecological Designations turbine blade and on this basis collision mortality is not considered to be significant Woodlark flights within the survey area were observed. All flights observed were no more than 25m in height. This is below the height of the moving wind turbine blade and on this basis collision mortality is not considered to be significant Dartford Warbler were also watched. All flights observed in both seasons were no more than 25m in height and all involved single birds. This is below the height of the moving wind turbine blade and on this basis collision mortality is not significant There is a possibility that birds may be displaced from their habitat around the wind turbines. Regardless to whether this may or may not occur the developer has committed to mitigate such by restoring areas of degraded heath and create new habitats shown in Figure Cumulative effects associated with the development of the adjacent Binnager Environmental Park have been assessed. No significant cumulative impacts are considered likely to occur. 26

29 Noise and Vibration 8.34 After conducting detailed noise assessment work using computer modelling and on site surveying it was concluded that any noise impacts associated with the Alaska Wind Farm would not be significant. This conclusion is explained below Existing noise levels were measured at the four locations at the nearest noise sensitive receptors and these are shown on Figure The assessment has been conducted in accordance with The Assessment and Rating of Noise from Wind Farms The Working Group on Noise from Wind Turbines (Report ETSU-R-97) and guidance on noise and vibration from construction projects. Typical noise measuring equipment Figure 0.12 Noise Survey and Prediction Locations NOTE Reproduced from the Ordnance Survey Map with the permission of the Controller of H.M.Stationery Office. Crown copyright licence number

30 8.37 During construction, effects at all nearby receptors are not considered to be significant Noise from operation of the proposed wind farm would comply with the requirements of ESTU-R-97 at all residential locations. Night time noise at the Buddens Camping and Activity Centre is predicted to be slightly above the proposed limits and therefore the proposal must ensure that the noise limits are met at all times. This would be done by automatically restricting the wind turbines at night. Historic Environment 8.39 It has been assessed that there would be no significant physical effects on any scheduled monument. There would be slight adverse effects on the settings of Scheduled Monuments and moderate adverse effects on the settings of listed buildings. The reasons for these conclusions are set out below The proposed locations of the access tracks, cables, temporary construction compound, wind turbines, permanent anemometry mast and control building/electricity substation are within areas that have already been subject to aggregate extraction, therefore there will be no surviving archaeological remains at these locations. NOTE Reproduced from the Ordnance Survey Map with the permission of the Controller of H.M.Stationery Office. Crown copyright licence number Figure 0.13 Local Scheduled Monuments 28

31 8.41 There are no known buried archaeological remains within the area of proposed heathland creation (as shown on Figure 0.4). However there is the potential for buried archaeological remains to be present within this area therefore the methodologies for the heathland creation would include the monitoring of any earthmoving activities by a suitably qualified archaeologist. This would be included in the Construction Environmental Management Plan and could be constrained through an appropriately worded condition attached to the planning consent One Scheduled Monument referred to as the Battery Bank (see Figure 0.13) is approximately 200 metres west of the proposed location of the southeast (SE) wind turbine. The Battery Bank is described as a linear bank, aligned east-west, composed of earth, sand and turf, with maximum dimensions of 180 metres in length, 10 metres in width and about 0.75 metres in height In summary, there would be no physical impacts on any Scheduled Monuments and the wind farm would not directly affect the physical fabric of any designated historic environment asset English Heritage define setting as an established concept that relates to the surroundings in which a place is experienced, its local context, embracing present and past relationships to the adjacent landscape Corfe Castle lies towards the 10 km limit of the defined study area but is a highly prominent feature within the landscape. The extent of the visual impact of the proposed wind farm from the castle is shown on photomontage viewpoint 11 (see Figure 0.14). From here the proposed wind turbines are only just visible due to the distance, lie of the land and vegetation There would be slight adverse effects on the settings of four Scheduled Monuments (one of which - Corfe Castle - is a Grade I listed building), on the setting of a Conservation Area at East Holme, on the settings of one Grade II listed building, and on two identified historical landscape character units There would be moderate adverse effects on the settings of one Grade I listed building and one Grade II* listed building, and on the setting of one Grade II* Registered Park and Garden of Special Historic Interest. All of these are located at Creech Grange, 6.9km to the south-east of the proposed wind farm. 29

32 Figure 0.14: Corfe Castle, Dorset AONB 30 Note: Horizontal field of view 75 degrees. Must be viewed at 300mm at A3.

33 Access and Traffic 8.48 The overall increase in heavy goods vehicles during construction is considered to be insignificant. The increase in operational traffic levels has also been assessed as insignificant. The reasons for these conclusions are discussed below The six month construction period would result in a short-term increase in traffic levels on the A351 and A352. The greatest increase in total vehicle movements would be a 0.15% increase along the A352 as shown in the table below. These increases are considered to be insignificant Increases in traffic during construction would be minimised through the processing of concrete and sourcing of materials on site and the implementation of a traffic management plan and routing strategy Although there would be an increase in heavy goods vehicle movements during construction, the overall impact of the total traffic movements is considered insignificant. During construction, general vehicles would not route through Bere Regis but utilise routes via the A351 and A352 as shown in Figure A suitable route for transporting abnormal loads (i.e. the wind turbine components and one heavy lift crane) is shown in Figure 0.6 and has not received any objections from the relevant abnormal loads authorities. Abnormal loads would be scheduled to occur during off-peak periods, at times to be agreed with the Police and the local authorities, in order to minimise delays to other road users Traffic generated during the operation and maintenance of the wind farm would be minimal and would not result in any significant effects Traffic generated during decommissioning of the wind farm is likely to be lower than the levels associated with its construction. It would be the subject of a further traffic assessment and management plan at the appropriate time. The effects are not expected to be significant. Location Daily Vehicle Flows (Base + Binnegar * proposals) HGVs Total Vehicles Peak Daily Construction Traffic for proposed Wind Farm Peak Percentage Increase (HGVs 1, Total vehicles 21) HGVs Total Vehicles C6 Rye Hill ** (abnormal loads) 0.3% 0.03% A % 0.15% Predicted Peak Increases in Traffic at Assessment Locations * Binnegar Environmental Park traffic would provide an additional 22 and 16 HGVs movements on the C6 and A352 respectively. ** construction traffic (22 total vehicles) would not route through Bere Regis. 31

34 Geology and Hydrogeology 8.55 The would have an insignificant impact on groundwater during both the construction and operational phases. This has been achieved through design and construction methodologies. In the absence of any designated geological exposures, the proposed wind farm will have an insignificant impact on the local geology The site is situated on an area of high ground which drains to two separate rivers: The River Piddle and the River Frome. The rock types at the site are sand and gravel deposits that are extensively mined in the local area. The site features a complex distribution of ponds and shallow groundwater, adjacent to the site are wetlands and marshy grasslands The construction of the wind turbine foundations will have the greatest direct impact on groundwater. Temporary dewatering would be required where wind turbines are situated near ponds in the quarry floor, although this would have an insignificant effect on the surrounding area. No impact on deeper groundwater is anticipated The accidental spillage of hazardous substances during all phases of the development has the potential to adversely impact groundwater quality and groundwater dependent features. However, few sensitive groundwater dependent features have been identified in the direction the water flows from the site. The risk of contamination occurring will be minimised by the development of a Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) for the site and adherence to relevant guidance documents. Temporary dewatering and construction of site infrastructure will have an insignificant impact on the resource potential of the local aquifer and pre-existing water users identified at a significant distance from the site In the absence of any designated geological exposures, the proposed wind farm will have an insignificant impact on the local geology. No areas of potentially contaminated land have been identified on the site, although this will be confirmed during geotechnical investigations required before construction. Hydrology 8.60 It is envisaged that through mitigation measures designed as part of the scheme there would be no significant effects on watercourses, water quality or flood risk as a result of the development There are a number of rivers outside the site boundary, the River Piddle to the north and the River Frome to the south. Both of these are classified as Main Rivers by the Environment Agency and contain water of good quality. The marshy grassland and heathland to the west of the site are saturated by shallow (perched) groundwater, together with the rain drainage from higher areas. There is a short drainage ditch located adjacent to the western boundary of the site, which has water flowing through it during periods of heavy rainfall During construction there is the potential for indirect contamination of local watercourses in relation to the use and storage of machinery, equipment and materials on site. Committed mitigation measures to protect surface water quality and surface water runoff, implemented through the Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP), would reduce the magnitude of the effect and would result in insignificant construction impacts The increase in impermeable area has the potential to increase surface water runoff rates and volumes and alter surface water drainage patterns. Some of the infrastructure would be underground (e.g. foundations and cables) with these having the potential to provide a preferential route and an altered rate of water movement on and near to the surface. Committed mitigation measures implemented through a drainage strategy would reduce the magnitude of the likely effects, resulting in insignificant operation impacts. 32

35 Socio-Economic 8.64 There would be no significant effects on employment, tourism or public rights of way as a result of the development One of the key issues raised by the construction phase of infrastructure projects is the extent to which contractors bring in labour from outside the region or attempt to recruit labour locally. Normally this is a combination of the two, with imported labour usually consisting of workers with specialist skills, and local recruitment usually consisting of unskilled and semi-skilled workers. Given that nearly 14,000 people are employed in the construction sector in Dorset alone, it is considered unlikely that the number of workers required for the proposed development, whatever level of skill is needed, would place pressure on the construction labour market. Employment in the operational phase is likely to consist of routine maintenance only. This will take place intermittently and will not provide continuous full-time employment in the locality Research by Dorset County Council shows the great extent to which the local economy (and employment) depends on tourism. The District s considerable natural attractions are concentrated on the coast and manmade attractions are located inland. It is considered unlikely that the proposed development would have any discernible impact on tourism in the area The nature of the existing rights of way in the area, the condition of the environment through which they pass and the distance between footpaths and proposed wind turbines suggest that the proposed development is likely to have a negligible impact on their current low levels of use The British Horse Society (BHS) Advisory Statement (2008) recommends that wind turbine developers maintain a minimum distance of 200m from bridleways and preferably three times the height of the wind turbine (to maximum blade tip height). The height of the wind turbines proposed is up to 125m, which multiplied by three equals a preferable radius of 375m. Neither the smaller nor the larger zones covers any part of the bridleway closest to the site. 33

36 Aviation, Telecommunications and Television 8.69 The development could have an impact on the TV reception in the immediate surroundings of wind farm. However, a more detailed on-site assessment would be undertaken pre-construction to more accurately determine the impact on television reception. An on-site survey would determine whether there is an impact and would identify suitable mitigation measures to be implemented by the Applicant Consultation with telecommunication operators has confirmed that the wind farm avoids areas with communication links Consultation with Ministry of Defence regarding the now withdrawn six turbine scheme resulted in the MoD stating that there were no concerns with the proposed wind turbine site. The four turbine layout has been forwarded to the MoD and an official response is currently pending. It is not expected that the MoD s position will change There will be no detection of the proposed wind turbines by the current primary Bournemouth International Airport radar system because high ground between the development site and Bournemouth Airport masks the primary radar system. Notification of the changes to layout and analysis have been forwarded to the Safeguarding Manager at the Airport but it is thought unlikely this will change their no objection position from the response received for the six turbine scheme Dorset Gliding Club was concerned that their aerotow operations may be affected by the wind turbines in certain wind conditions. The closest wind turbine is approximately 3km from the gliding club. At this point a glider being aerotowed by a tug aircraft would most certainly be above the height of the wind turbines (which are the equivalent of approximately 107m above the height of the airfield at the site). The presence of the proposed wind turbines at the Alaska site will not prevent the club from operating. Shadow Flicker 8.74 Shadow flicker may occur under certain combinations of geographical position and time of day, when the sun passes behind the rotors of a wind turbine and casts a shadow over neighbouring properties. As the blades rotate, the shadow flicks on and off, an effect known as shadow flicker. The effect occurs inside buildings, where the flicker appears through a window opening An assessment of potential shadow flicker effects resulting from the operation of the proposed wind farm has been carried out for properties within a distance of 710m (10 rotor diameters) from the proposed wind turbine locations. No significant effects have been identified as the turbines would be shut down at the times of day when an effect is predicted The assessment identified potential effects at several properties surrounding the wind farm site and a computer model was used to predict times of day and year, and duration of these effects. Mitigation has been identified and incorporate into the scheme in the form of a control system which would automatically shut down the wind turbines at times when it is predicted that shadow flicker could occur Following adoption of this mitigation it is unlikely that any property would experience shadow flicker effects and as such the effects are not considered to be significant. A programme of monitoring would be used to ensure the effectiveness of the proposed mitigation. 34

37 9. Conclusion 9.1 Through careful design and the commitment to mitigation and enhancement measures by the Applicant the environmental impact assessment has demonstrated that there would be limited environmental effects from the construction, operation and decommissioning of the. 9.2 The adjacent Special Protection Area is designated for the protection of Nightjar, Dartford Warbler and Woodlark. Extensive surveys have demonstrated that these species are not at risk from collision with turbine blades as they do not fly high enough to be struck by moving blades. Due to the scale of the wider landscape, its uniformity and strong character, the only significant effects on the landscape and views would be experienced by those within a close range of the wind farm, yet these effects would be reduced by appropriate mitigation planting. There would be no physical impacts on any Scheduled Ancient Monuments and the wind farm would not directly affect the physical fabric of any designated historic environment asset. Slight to moderate effects on the setting of some historic features have been identified. Nevertheless, the proposed wind turbines would only just be visible from Corfe Castle due to the distance, lie of the land and vegetation. 9.3 The wind turbines would comply with strict noise level thresholds set for both residential use and the amenity use of the adjacent Scout camp. The six month construction period would result in a small short-term increase in traffic levels on the A351 and A352, the greatest being a 0.15% increase along the A352. These increases are considered to be insignificant. The wind farm would have an insignificant impact on groundwater, geological features, watercourses, water quality or flood risk and the proposal meets the preferable criteria set out by the British Horse Society on the distance between wind turbines and bridleways. 9.4 Consultation with telecommunication operators and aviation consultees has confirmed no objection to a wind farm in this location. In addition, the presence of the proposed wind turbines at the Alaska site will not prevent the club from operating. In terms of TV reception suitable mitigation measures would also be implemented by the Applicant to ensure that local TV reception would not be effected. Furthermore, no significant shadow flicker effects have been identified as the turbines would be shut down at the times of day when an effect is predicted. 35

38 10. Further Information 10.1 This NTS has been prepared by RPS Planning and Development, Oxford. Further information on the proposal can be obtained from the project website at This Non-Technical Summary can be downloaded free of charge from the website. Copies of this NTS and DVD s containing the full application are available from Infinergy free of charge while stocks last Copies of the ES, including this NTS, can be viewed at the planning authority offices. The address of the planning authority is: Purbeck District Council, Westport House, Worgret Road, Wareham, Dorset, BH20 4PP Please note: If you wish to make any comment on the planning application, these must be made in writing directly to Purbeck District Council, using the address given above Copies of the full Environmental Statement are available from Infinergy Ltd and can be requested by post to FREEPOST Infinergy Ltd or by to info@alaskawindfarm. co.uk. A fee of 200 will be applicable For general enquiries please call Infinergy s freephone number Images used for illustrative purposes only. 36

39

40 For further information please contact: Herbert Lindlahr Project Director Freephone Printed on 100% recycled paper 16 West Borough Wimborne Dorset BH21 1NG