22 nd 27 th August 2010 Longyearbyen, Svalbard Norway Hosted by Gas Technology Centre NTNU - SINTEF

Transcription

1 2010 IEAGHG International Interdisciplinary CCS Summer School 22 nd 27 th August 2010 Longyearbyen, Svalbard Norway Hosted by Gas Technology Centre NTNU - SINTEF

2

3 GROUP 3: CAN SCANDINAVIA SET UP AN INTEGRATED CO 2 CAPTURE, TRANSPORT AND STORAGE NETWORK? Chetana Chaudhuri (India) Mar Pérez Fortes (Spain) Frank Cabrera (Venezuela) Marjin Holwerda (The Netherlands) Mohammad Washim Uddin (Norway) Halvor Lund (Norway) Paloma Cortés (Spain) Chantsalmaa Dalkhaa (Turkey) Addisalem Bitew Mitiku (Germany)

4 OUTLINE Emissions sources Fig. 1: Scandinavian CCS researcher

5 Emissions sources SOURCES (I) () Scandinavian area is defined by Norway, Sweden, Finland and Denmark. Considered sources More than 1 Mt CO 2 per year. Power plants mostly located in Denmark; plants concentrated in coastal areas. The biggest contribution comes from the power plants, followed by paper mill industries. Power Plants Iron and Steel Paper Mills Refineries IEA GHG CO2 emissions database.

6 SOURCES (II) Emissions sources Considering i Scandinavian i countries, the CO 2 is mainly emitted by Denmark, followed by Sweden. Norway and Finland have the lowest emissions. i Comparing Scandinavia with Northen Europe, more than 58% of emitted CO 2 is from Germany. Scandinavia only emits 7% (the same as the Netherlands). IEA GHG CO2 emissions database.

7 STORAGE (I) () Emissions sources Capacity Injectivity Containment Source: EU GeoCapacity, 2006 Source: K. L. Anthonsen et al.,geological survey of Denmark and Greenland, GEUS

8 STORAGE (II) Norway: Storage Capacity of Entire Aquifer, Mt CO2 Emissions sources 33% 29% Denmark: Joule II report (Holloway et al., 1996) 47,000 Mt CO 2 in the unconfined 10% 6% onshore aquifer of Triassic and 6% 6% 10% Jurassic age. Utsira Skade Heimdal Brent Statfjord Grid Others Source: Joule II report (Holloway et al.., 1996) Source: NGU Report, , Geoligical Survety of Norway

9 STORAGE (III) Emissions sources SCANDINAVIA 61 Mt/year STORAGE CAPACITY (Norway & Denmark) SCANDINAVIA GERMANY, UK & NETHERLANDS Mt 61 Mt/year Mt/year IEA GHG CO2 emissions database.

10 TRANSPORT Emissions sources For short distances, pipeline is cheaper than shipping. For long distances, shipping is the most economical choice. By Pipeline Shipping i vessel Johansen Sleipner Source: Gestco & CO2 GEONET Source: Aage Stangeland, IEAGHG Summer School 2010, Svalbard, Norway

11 Emissions sources FINANCING CCS (I) ()

12 Emissions sources FINANCING CCS (II) All Scandinavian countries have a CO 2 tax No general subsidies Norway: specific project subsidies (Mongstad) Other incentives (e.g.): Norway: CCS obliged for gas-fired power plants Denmark: moratorium coal-fired power plants

13 PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE Norway: Exceptionally positive (Shackley et al.) Sweden: More positive and aware than UK and US (Reiner et al.) Emissions sources Denmark and Finland: Little knowledge or public discussion i (ZEP) Storage mostly in unpopulated areas Money to earn by importing CO 2 (Stangeland)

14 CONCLUSIONS Can Scandinavia set up an integrated CO 2 capture, transport t and storage network? Emissions sources / Overall

15 Supporters and Sponsors

16 Thank you very much! Questions?