Submission. 1'1 ;IP.1.1i. i;160:k.)11. Pj 4 MAR 704

Transcription

1 1'1 ;IP.1.1i. i;160:k.)11. Pj 5 General Manager Blue Mountains City Council Locked Bag 1005 Katoomba, NSW 2780 submissiondlep2013@bmcc.nsw.gov.au 4 MAR 704 F08616 'Blue Mountains Draft Local Environmental Plan 2013' Dear Sir We live in Glenbrook in the Blue Mountains. One of the reasons I live in the Blue Mountains is because of the unique environment, including the beautiful bushland and the native flora and fauna. Glenbrook is especially important to me because of the lack of high density housing, the bushland reserves that are part of it, the proximity to the National Park, the large garden blocks and the small village atmosphere and sense of community. The Blue Mountains environment has been recognised internationally through declaration of the Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area. Conserving our environment is vital to ensuring the ongoing viability of our visitation and tourism economy. I believe that the Blue Mountains City Council and the NSW Government must ensure that we have a strong and legally defensible Local Environmental Plan (LEP) which protects the environment while facilitating ecologically sustainable development. I therefore strongly support the Blue Mountains Draft LEP 2013 (BM LEP 2013) currently on public exhibition. I believe the plan will protect the Blue Mountains environment because of the numerous localised provisions included in the draft LEP which were specifically developed for the Blue Mountains. The local provisions in draft BM LEP 2013 also reflect current LEP provisions. I have the following Submission comments the draft BM LEP I support the Aims of the Plan but believe that the the Aims should be amended to include the definition, principles and practices of Ecologically Sustainable Development as currently outlined in the Blue Mountains LEP The Aims should also be prioritised as follows: 1. Aim (b) To provide a clear framework for the development of land that is consistent with and promotes the principles and practices of ecologically sustainable development; 2. Aim (d) To conserve and enhance, for current and future generations, the ecological integrity, environmental heritage and environmental significance of the Blue Mountains; 3. Aim (f) To preserve and enhance watercourses, riparian habitats, wetlands and water quality within the Blue Mountains, the Hawkesbury Nepean River catchment and Sydney's drinking water catchments. I support Clauses 1.2A and 2.3A which includes the legally defensible requirement that new development 'complies with' the Aims and zone objectives within the plan. I support the proposed land use zones and objectives in the draft LEP, as well as what new developments are allowed or prohibited in each of the zones. I support the inclusion of the new zone 1W Residential Character Conservation as the appropriate replacement for the LEP 2005 Living Conservation zone, especially for the large lot leafy residential areas of our villages. However, the zone objectives should be amended to include protection of nearby bushland areas from the impact of invasive species. I believe Clause 3.3 should include additional areas that should be excluded from the state wide exempt and complying development code. These additional areas should include 'environmentally constrained lands' as defined in the Dictionary to the draft LEP. I believe that a 40 ha minimum lot size should be applied to all land E2 zoned areas on private property to prevent unsuitable and unsustainable subdivision proposals on these highly environmentally sensitive areas. I believe the draft LEP should be amended to place the largest minimum lot size possible on all crown lands and reserves.

2 I support Clauses 4.10 'Subdivision in the recreation zones for a public purpose' and 4.1E 'Subdivision of land in Environmental Protection zones'. These clauses retain current limits to subdivision on environmentally sensitive land. I support Clauses 4.1F 'Cluster Housing within certain environmental protection zones' and 4.1G 'Lot consolidation within certain environmental protection zones'. These clauses retain current provisions limiting the impact of housing development in environmentally sensitive areas. e I support Clauses 4.3A 'Flexibility in the height of buildings' and 4.4A 'Site coverage'. These clauses help ensure that new development in the Blue Mountains does not result in hard surfaces such as concrete over entire sites or take development above the tree line in visually sensitive areas. o I support sub Clauses (8)(d), (8)(e), (8)(f) to Clause 4.6 'Exceptions to development standards'. These subclauses stop development standards (e.g. building height and setback) being varied in E3 and E4 land use zones, and control the development of major supermarkets and drive through fast food outlets in the Blue Mountains. I support Clause 5.9 'Preservation of trees or vegetation' and subclause (9) under it because it prevents the clearing of trees and native vegetation in environmental zones that would otherwise be permitted through exemptions for rural activities under the Native Vegetation Act I would seek that the mapping of Protected Areas be applied to all land covered by the draft plan, including lands zoned for environmental protection (E2). I strongly support the inclusion of ALL of the Part 6 Local Provisions clauses and the supporting mapping, which have been specifically designed to protect and conserve our unique environment. I would like to see the following amendments made: o Clause 6.1 (2) be amended to read "Consent shall not be granted to development proposed on any land adjacent to, or nearby, the Blue Mountains National Park, unless the consent authority..." and that Clause 6.1 (5) be amended to add "(f) the Blue Mountains National Park". O The existing Blue Mountains Swamps mapping be overlaid onto the Groundwater Vulnerability map, and these swamp areas be designated high groundwater vulnerability. o Clause Submission 6.33 be amended to specifically prohibit hoofed animals, 221 regardless of stocking rates, from all E2 zoned land and environmentally sensitive areas (mapped or defined as Protected Areas). I strongly support that Schedule 6 Significant Vegetation Communities be included in the new LEP. I support the inclusion of 'environmentally constrained land', 'notional development area', 'rare species of flora' and 'Scenic and Landscape Values Map' in the DLEP 2013 Dictionary, and for the addition of a definition of 'invasive species' with a reference to Schedule F2 "Weeds List" in the Better Living Development Control Plan. I recognise considerable effort has been made by Council to translate all the existing land use zones and special environmental provisions into the draft BM LEP I understand that after the public exhibition period, Council staff will review all submissions before preparing a report and a finalised plan for approval by Councillors. The plan will then go to the Department of Planning and Infrastructure for review and then to the Minister for Planning for final adoption. The Department of Planning and Infrastructure can make major changes to the plan, with no guarantee of further public exhibition, and the final plan adopted by the Planning Minister could look very different to the draft plan. I am very concerned that there is a risk at any stage after the public exhibition that the draft BM LEP 2013 could be watered down and changed. I ask that if major changes are made to the draft Plan post exhibition, that the draft LEP is re exhibited. The City of Blue Mountains is in a unique situation in that is lies within a World Heritage Area. I am very concerned that the environmental values of this unique area be preserved now and into the future, and that the provisions for enabling this in the above document be enacted. Yours sincerely 1: P C cf) Date 3rd March, 2014 Name: Bob & Kathryn Chapman Address: 7 Clifton Ave, Glenbrook, 2773 (PO Box 97, Glenbrook, 2773)

3 11110 :111C r,' 4 MAR 7[114 Submission 222

4 69 Shortland Street WENTWORTH FALLS February 2014 General Manager Blue Mountains City Council Locked Bag 1005 KATOOMBA 2780 F08616 'Blue Mountains Draft Local Environmental Plan 2013' lin No Heed Record.: 4 MA.; f FP. 1 f inimiimnce Dear Mr Greenwood The main reason that I reside in the Blue Mountains is because of the unique environment and the cultural history, both European and Indigenous. I am fortunate to live in close proximity of natural areas, which support many species of local fauna. Wentworth Falls is especially important to me because it has a range of stunning vistas, cliffs, waterfalls, unusual geological features, a swathe of bushland, with some pockets of rainforest and hanging swamps, which feed the local creek systems. The Blue Mountains environment has been recognised internationally through declaration of the Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area. Conserving our environment is vital to ensuring the ongoing viability of our Submission 223 visitation and tourism economy. I believe that the Blue Mountains City Council and the NSW Government must ensure that we have a strong and legally defensible Local Environmental Plan (LEP) which protects the environment while facilitating ecologically sustainable development. I therefore strongly support the Blue Mountains Draft LEP 2013 (BM LEP 2013) currently on public exhibition. I believe the plan will protect the Blue Mountains environment because of the numerous localised provisions included in the draft LEP which were specifically developed for the Blue Mountains. The local provisions in draft BM LEP 2013 also reflect current LEP provisions. I have the following comments on the draft BM LEP I support the Aims of the Plan but believe that the the Aims should be amended to include the definition, principles and practices of Ecologically Sustainable Development as currently outlined in the Blue Mountains LEP The Aims should also be prioritised as follows: 1. Aim (b) To provide a clear framework for the development of land that is consistent with and promotes the principles and practices of ecologically sustainable development; 2. Aim (d) To conserve and enhance, for current and future generations, the ecological integrity, environmental heritage and environmental significance of the Blue Mountains; 3. Aim (f) To preserve and enhance watercourses, riparian habitats, wetlands and water quality within the Blue Mountains, the Hawkesbury Nepean River catchment and Sydney's drinking water catchments. I support Clauses 1.2A and 2.3A which includes the legally defensible requirement that new development 'complies with' the Aims and zone objectives within the plan. I support the proposed land use zones and objectives in the draft LEP, as well as what new developments are allowed or prohibited in each of the zones. I support the inclusion of the new zone R6 Residential Character Conservation as the appropriate replacement for the LEP 2005 Living Conservation zone, especially for the large lot leafy residential areas of our villages. However, the zone objectives should be amended to include protection of nearby bushland areas from the impact of invasive species.

5 3 impacts. There is already flexibility under Clause 5.3 allowing for some incursion into E2 zoned land. The DLEP should not open up all E2 zoned lands to inappropriate development. Request that Clause 6.26 be deleted. I recognise considerable effort has been made by Council to translate all the existing land use zones and special environmental provisions into the draft BM LEP I understand that after the public exhibition period, Council staff will review all submissions before preparing a report and a finalised plan for approval by Councillors. The plan will then go to the Department of Planning and Infrastructure for review and then to the Minister for Planning for final adoption. The Department of Planning and Infrastructure can make major changes to the plan, with no guarantee of further public exhibition, and the final plan adopted by the Planning Minister could look very different to the draft plan. I am very concerned that there is a risk at any stage after the public exhibition that the draft BM LEP 2013 could be watered down and changed. I ask that if major changes are made to the draft Plan post exhibition, that the draft LEP is re exhibited. The environment should be given all the protection that it deserves, considering that we are fortunate to live in such a unique environment. Regards, Karen Hising Submission 223

6 General Manager Blue Mountains City Council Locked Bag 1005 Katoomba, NSW ,, rip, `", I '11 F08616 'Blue Mountains Draft Local Environmental Plan 2013' Dear Sir I live in Blackheath in the Blue Mountains. One of the reasons I live in the Blue Mountains is because of the unique environment, including the beautiful bushland and the native flora and fauna. Blackheath is especially important to me because it has a unique, village character, with heritage buildings, in close proximity to wilderness of outstanding natural beauty. The Blue Mountains environment has been recognised internationally through declaration of the Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area. Conserving our environment is vital to ensuring the ongoing viability of our visitation and tourism economy. I believe that the Blue Mountains City Council and the NSW Government must ensure that we have a strong and legally defensible Local Environmental Plan (LEP) which protects the environment while facilitating ecologically sustainable development. I therefore strongly support the Blue Mountains Draft LEP 2013 (BM LEP 2013) currently on public exhibition. I believe the plan will protect the Blue Mountains environment because of the numerous localised provisions included in the draft LEP which were specifically developed for the Blue Mountains. The local provisions in draft BM LEP 2013 also reflect current LEP provisions. Submission 224 I have the following comments on the draft BM LEP I support the Aims of the Plan but believe that the the Aims should be amended to include the definition, principles and practices of Ecologically Sustainable Development as currently outlined in the Blue Mountains LEP The Aims should also be prioritised as follows: 1. Aim (b) To provide a clear framework for the development of land that is consistent with and promotes the principles and practices of ecologically sustainable development; 2. Aim (d) To conserve and enhance, for current and future generations, the ecological integrity, environmental heritage and environmental significance of the Blue Mountains; 3. Aim (f) To preserve and enhance watercourses, riparian habitats, wetlands and water quality within the Blue Mountains, the Hawkesbury Nepean River catchment and Sydney's drinking water catchments. I support Clauses 1.2A and 2.3A which includes the legally defensible requirement that new development 'complies with' the Aims and zone objectives within the plan. I support the proposed land use zones and objectives in the draft LEP, as well as what new developments are allowed or prohibited in each of the zones. I support the inclusion of the new zone R6 Residential Character Conservation as the appropriate replacement for the LEP 2005 Living Conservation zone, especially for the large lot leafy residential areas of our villages. However, the zone objectives should be amended to include protection of nearby bushland areas from the impact of invasive species. I believe Clause 3.3 should include additional areas that should be excluded from the state wide exempt and complying development code. These additional areas should include 'environmentally constrained lands' as defined in the Dictionary to the draft LEP. I believe that a 40 ha minimum lot size should be applied to all land E2 zoned areas on private property to prevent unsuitable and unsustainable subdivision proposals on these highly environmentally sensitive areas. I believe the draft LEP should be amended to place the largest minimum lot size possible on all crown lands and reserves. I support Clauses 4.1D 'Subdivision in the recreation zones for a public purpose' and 4.1E 'Subdivision of land in Environmental Protection zones'. These clauses retain current limits to subdivision on environmentally sensitive land.

7 * I support Clauses 4.1F 'Cluster Housing within certain environmental protection zones' and 4.1G 'Lot consolidation within certain environmental protection zones'. These clauses retain current provisions limiting the impact of housing development in environmentally sensitive areas. I support Clauses 4.3A 'Flexibility in the height of buildings' and 4.4A 'Site coverage'. These clauses help ensure that new development in the Blue Mountains does not result in hard surfaces such as concrete over entire sites or take development above the tree line in visually sensitive areas. I support sub Clauses (8)(d), (8)(e), (8)(f) to Clause 4.6 'Exceptions to development standards'. These subclauses stop development standards (e.g. building height and setback) being varied in E3 and E4 land use zones, and control the development of major supermarkets and drive through fast food outlets in the Blue Mountains. I support Clause 5.9 'Preservation of trees or vegetation' and subclause (9) under it because it prevents the clearing of trees and native vegetation in environmental zones that would otherwise be permitted through exemptions for rural activities under the Native Vegetation Act I would seek that the mapping of Protected Areas be applied to all land covered by the draft plan, including lands zoned for environmental protection (E2). * I strongly support the inclusion of ALL of the Part 6 Local Provisions clauses and the supporting mapping, which have been specifically designed to protect and conserve our unique environment. I would like to see the following amendments made: O Clause 6.1 (2) be amended to read "Consent shall not be granted to development proposed on any land adjacent to, or nearby, the Blue Mountains National Park, unless the consent authority..." and that Clause 6.1 (5) be amended to add "(1) the Blue Mountains National Park". o The existing Blue Mountains Swamps mapping be overlaid onto the Groundwater Vulnerability map, and these swamp areas be designated high groundwater vulnerability. o Clause 6.33 be amended to specifically prohibit hoofed animals, regardless of stocking rates, from all E2 zoned land and environmentally sensitive areas (mapped or defined as Protected Areas). Submission 224 I strongly support that Schedule 6 Significant Vegetation Communities be included in the new LEP. I support the inclusion of 'environmentally constrained land', 'notional development area', 'rare species of flora' and 'Scenic and Landscape Values Map' in the DLEP 2013 Dictionary, and for the addition of a definition of 'invasive species' with a reference to Schedule F2 "Weeds List" in the Better Living Development Control Plan. I recognise considerable effort has been made by Council to translate all the existing land use zones and special environmental provisions into the draft BM LEP I understand that after the public exhibition period, Council staff will review all submissions before preparing a report and a finalised plan for approval by Councillors. The plan will then go to the Department of Planning and Infrastructure for review and then to the Minister for Planning for final adoption. The Department of Planning and Infrastructure can make major changes to the plan, with no guarantee of further public exhibition, and the final plan adopted by the Planning Minister could look very different to the draft plan. I am very concerned that there is a risk at any stage after the public exhibition that the draft BM LEP 2013 could be watered down and changed. I ask that if major changes are made to the draft Plan post exhibition, that the draft LEP is re exhibited. Yours sincerely ( 02/ 03/ 14 Penelope Jean Park 88 Govetts Leap Road Blackheath r\jc\ai 77Sc

8 General Manager Blue Mountains City Council Locked Bag 1005 Katoomba, NSW 2780 F08616 'Blue Mountains Draft Local Environmental Plan 2013' Dear Sir /\. (A 4 13L (7L in the Blue Mountains. One of the reasons I live in the Blue Mountains is c I live in and fauna. because of the unique environment, including the beautiful bushland and the native flora :f7/ 4 My local area is especially important to me because tv r t P Y / Y t e 6 r 4 e` e l t, t h e Blue Mountain sienvironment has been recognised internationally through declaration of the Greater Blue viability of our Mountains World Heritage Area. Conserving our environment is vital to ensuring the ongoing visitation and tourism economy. I believe that the Blue Mountains City Council and the NSW Government must Local Environmental Plan (LEP) which protects the ensure that we have a strong and legally defensible environment while facilitating ecological sustainable development. 2013) currently on public I therefore strongly support the draft Blue Mountains Draft LEP 2013 (BM LEP of the numerous localised because environment Mountains Blue the will protect exhibition. I believe the plan Mountains. The local Blue the for developed specifically which draft LEP were provisions included in the provisions. L E P reflect current provisions in draft BM LEP 2013 also Submission 225 I have the following comments on the draft BM LEP 2013, amended to include in the I support the Aims of the Plan but believe that the the Aims should be Development Sustainable as currently outlined in definition, principles and practices of Ecologically follows prioritised as the Blue Mountains LEP The Aims should also be with and 1. Aim (b) To provide a clear framework for the development of land that is consistent development; promotes the principles and practices of ecologically sustainable (d) To conserve and enhance, for current and future generations, the ecological integrity, Aim 2. environmental heritage and environmental significance of the Blue Mountains; and water quality 3. Aim (f) To preserve and enhance watercourses, riparian habitats, wetlands within the Blue Mountains, the Hawkesbury Nepean River catchment and Sydney's drinking e O water catchments. that new I support Clauses 1.2A and 2.3A which includes the legally defensible requirement plan. the within objectives and development 'complies with' the Aims zone I support the proposed land use zones and objectives in the draft LEP, as well as what new developments are allowed or prohibited in each of the zones. the appropriate I support the inclusion of the new zone R6 Residential Character Conservation as leafy residential lot replacement for the LEP 2005 Living Conservation zone, especially for the large of protection should be amended to include areas of our villages. However, the zone objectives nearby bushland areas from the impact of invasive species. I believe Clause 3.3 should include additional areas that should be excluded from the state wide 'environmentally exempt and complying development code. These additional areas should include draft the LEP. defined the Dictionary in to constrained lands' as I believe that a 40 ha minimum lot size be applied to all land E2 zoned areas on private property to environmentally sensitive prevent unsuitable and unsustainable subdivision proposals on these highly areas. possible on all crown I believe the draft LEP should be amended to place the largest minimum lot size lands and reserves.

9 O O O O O O O I support Clauses 4.1D 'Subdivision in the recreation zones for a public purpose' and 4.1E 'Subdivision of land in Environmental Protection zones'. These clauses retain current limits to subdivision on environmentally sensitive land. I support Clauses 4.1F 'Cluster Housing within certain environmental protection zones' and 4.1G 'Lot consolidation within certain environmental protection zones'. These clauses retain current provisions limiting the impact of housing development in environmentally sensitive areas. I support Clauses 4.3A 'Flexibility in the height of buildings' and 4.4A 'Site coverage'. These clauses help ensure that new development in the Blue Mountains does not result in had surfaces such as concrete over entire sites or take development above the tree line in visually sensitive areas. I support Clauses (8)(d), (8)(e), (8)(f) to Clause 4.6 'Exceptions to development standards'. These subclauses stop development standards (e.g. building height and setback) being varied in E3 and E4 land use zones, and control the development of major supermarkets and drive through fast food outlets in the Blue Mountains. I support Clause 5.9 'Preservation of trees or vegetation' and subclause (9) under it because it prevents the clearing of trees and native vegetation in environmental zones that would otherwise be permitted through exemptions for rural activities under the Native Vegetation Act I would seek that the mapping of Protected Areas be applied to all land covered by the draft plan, including lands zoned for environmental protection (E2). I strongly support the inclusion of ALL of the Part 6 Local Provisions clauses and the supporting mapping, which have been specifically designed to protect and conserve our unique environment. I would like to see the following amendments made: o Clause 6.1 (2) be amended to read "Consent shall not be granted to development proposed land adjacent to, or nearby, the Blue Mountains National Park, unless the consent o o on any authority..." and that Clause 6.1 (5) be amended to add "(f) the Blue Mountains National Park". The existing Blue Mountains Swamps mapping be overlaid onto the Groundwater Vulnerability map, and these swamp areas be designated high groundwater vulnerability. Submission 225 Areas). Clause 6.33 be amended to specifically prohibit hoofed animals, regardless of stocking rates, from all E2 zoned land and environmentally sensitive areas (mapped or defined as Protected I strongly support that Schedule 6 Significant Vegetation Communities be included in the new LEP. O I support the inclusion of 'environmentally constrained land', 'notional development area', 'rare species of flora' and 'Scenic and Landscape Values Map' in the DLEP 2013 Dictionary, and for the addition of a definition of 'invasive species' with a reference to Schedule F2 "Weeds List" in the Better Living Development Control Plan. I recognise considerable effort has been made by Council to translate all the existing land use zones and special environmental provisions into the draft BM LEP I understand that after the public exhibition period, Council staff will review all submissions before preparing a report and a finalised plan for approval by Councillors. The plan will then go to the Department of Planning and Infrastructure for review and then to the Minister for Planning for final adoption. The Department of Planning and Infrastructure can make major changes to the plan, with no guarantee of further public exhibition, and that the final plan adopted by the Planning Minister could look very different to the draft plan. I am very concerned that there is a risk at any stage after the public exhibition that the draft BM LEP 2013 could be watered down and changed. I ask that if major changes are made to the draft Plan post exhibition, that the draft LEP is re exhibited. Yours sincerely4 Signature / r Date 72 T V ("1" Name: in(9 r," Address: T 7 1 GA/ I r2) 1 A C ( I ET

10 V J & L N MORGAN SPRINGWOOD P.O. Box 155 NSW TH February, 2014 The General Manager Blue Mountains City Council NSW 2780 KATOOMBA Dear Sir, RE: Draft LEP 2013 and Properties Nos 94 96, 98 and 100 (3) Macquarie Road Springwood (Adjoining Springwood Library) The proposed zoning of these properties is low density residential as R2 and we believe that the zoning should be R3 medium density residential for the following reasons: 1. The land is close to (a) Town Centre and shops, (b) Train Station, (c) Library (adjoining), (d) Civic Centre (when completed), (e) Sports Club and (f) Buses. 2. Due to the slope of the land future buildings could be located below and behind the Heritage buildings and trees along Macquarie Road. 3. All Services are available including water, gas, electricity and sewerage. 4. Stormwater could be detained (OSD) and discharged into the natural watercourse in the adjoining land. 5. Vehicle access would be from Macquarie Road using existing driveways. 6. The land is not bushfire prone. The heritage buildings have survived up to 120 years and there have been no major fires in the past 65 years whilst we have lived in Springwood. I also note that the adjoining owners have removed dangerous trees and cleared the undergrowth for approximately 50 metres with Council's approval. 7. This land has slopes generally, between 10 20% 8. The Biodiversity map appears to be out of date due to recent removal of trees and underscrubbing. 9. The proposed height control should be altered from 6.5m to 8m. and we note that all the existing Heritage buildings in this precinct exceed 6.5metres. 10.The FSR should be amended to 0.5:1 to enable a range of development for this land. Submission 226 In summary R3 Zoning would be more suitable to these Heritage properties thus enabling the existing buildings to be maintained in good condition in the future. Your acknowledgement of receipt of this submission would be appreciated

11 Submission Name: /WC/A:AV Address: Phone: Postal Address: /A/Cci& I have read and agree with Council's Privacy Statement (Tick one) 1 es No Type of Submission ['Support DLEP 2013 El Object to DLEP :oth support some elements of DLEP 2013 and not supportive of others Have you spoken to Council's planning staff before making this submission? (Tick one) 1 Q4.es Submission 226 No LII Have you reviewed the relevant supporting studies and maps before making this submission? NoLI Does your submission relate to: How the DLEP 2013 was developed (process) R<Decific issues/sections of the DLEP rA specific property L a b (Y PP civ Lot DP Z S / IP/9 9d Streea420 Town r/k/le/a/ejs).42p IMO r VIA w: bluemountainshaveyoursay.com.au/draftlep2013 e: enquirydlep2013@bmcc.nsw.gov.au p: (02) or (02)

12 My comments: 514( Submission 226 'LAO it 111/ A w: bluemountainshaveyoursay.com.au/draftlep2013 e: enquirydlep2013@bmcc.nsw.gov.au p: (02) or (02)

13 Submission 227

14 Submission 227

15 Submission 227

16 LA,L. (Name) (Address) (Phone) P ev 0 ( ) /1 5'\ To: The General Manager, Blue Mountains City Council Locked Bag 105, Katoomba NSW , G (Lo c. r I A_ & (Date) Reference no. F Blue Mountains Draft Local Environmental Plan 2013 SUBMISSION Mountains I support World the DLEP Heritage 2013's Area. aproach to protection of the Blue Mountains unique environment and the Greater B In particular I support: '1 0 7 t ckfid & atirc,)vv Submission 228 olv.e What I would like to se changed in the Plan: Yours sincerely, (Signature

17 B117. Pa_IPt.</_\ im g q(ctt OKIA sk,u ao s flo 1 1 kr G 1,)E C k 6 Lu NI 0 o K.E 0Bc W1 oof c,64 )0c,s s LA.) PRA rt Lc4 F.DsL 16 e LoE ok,k, ) Submission 229 )SSroAr r s '2'16 D Ep t v s (50\11U E A.) k t PC 6L U N\ 0 V bf<" )

18 (Name) Ce (Date) (Address) \ N A k k ) r (Phone) ( ) To: The General Manager, Blue Mountains City Council Locked Bag 1005, Katoomba NSW 2780 Reference no F Blue Mountains Draft Local Environmental Plan 2013 SUBMISSION I support the DLEP 2013's approach to protection of the Blue Mountains unique environment and the Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area. In particular I support: 1 tie c,4 0,44 fta Vl 5 3,2e vvozy, S " Submission 230 What I would like to see changed in the Plan: ( Yours sincerely, (Signature) t jr2r't/