Evapotranspiration Landfill Biocovers

Transcription

1 Evapotranspiration Landfill Biocovers

2 Why ET-LBC Biocovers? Alternative landfill closure system Addresses both infiltration and GHG emissions Active LFG systems can be costly to build and maintain, and may not be appropriate for some landfill sites.

3 CO e Reduction Opportunity CH₄ has 25 times Global Warming Potential of CO₂ ~25% of Canadian anthropogenic CH₄ emissions comes from landfills

4 Evapotranspiration

5 Evapotranspiration Cover Systems Store moisture in soil - evaporation and transpiration Effective at limiting infiltration and leachate generation Precipitation Occurs ET Cover Stores Infiltrated Water Evaporation and Transpiration Repeat

6 Methane Oxidation Naturally occurring, aerobic organisms Methanotrophs convert CH₄ to C0₂ WE LOVE METHANE!

7 What is an Evapotranspiration Landfill Biocover Evapo- Transporation Evapotranspiration Landfill Biocover Methane Oxidation

8 Methane Emission Mitigation Active System Passive ET-LBC ET-LBC technology can be an alternative or complementary to active LFG collection. Applicable to small landfill site where active collection either impractical or not feasible

9 Methane Emission Mitigation Flaring/Utilization CO 2 emission CH 4 & CO 2 emission Oxidation in Biocover (Methanotrophs) CH 4 & CO 2 Generation CH 4 & CO 2 migration

10 How do We Apply this to Landfill Covers? O₂ CH₄ CO₂ Topsoil Subsoil Barrier Clay ET-LBC Gas Distribution Layer Methane Oxidation Zone Gas Distribution Layer Solid Waste Clay Barrier Cover Solid Waste ET Cover/Biocover CH₄ CO₂ CH₄ Methane Oxidation

11 Where is it Applicable? Where potential evapotranspiration > precipitation Evapotranspiration = evaporation + transpiration PET rates in North America

12 U of C Material Study Focus on materials that were: Locally available Low cost Fulfill ET functions Yield high methane oxidation Methane Oxidation Column

13 Material Properties Main physical considerations: Organic content ph C/N ratio Field capacity FC (% of tw) 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

14 Results The most promising materials proved to be topsoil and soil amendments (compost) The chosen amendment was compost screenings Compost Screenings Topsoil

15 Hat-Trick! 1. Organics diversion 2. Use for previously landfilled byproduct 3. Reduces emissions

16 1. Organics Diversion Composting programs Reduce LFG emissions Reduce settlement, increase airspace opportunity

17 2. Previously Landfilled Byproduct Screenings from compost are usually landfilled Opportunity to use as soil amendment Nutrient supplement for methanotrophs

18 3. Reduced GHG Emissions Methanotrophic oxidation of methane Reduced GHG fugitive emissions Possible GHG credits?

19 Leduc Landfill ET-LBC Project Phase II of the landfill - surface area: 10.6 ha Estimated Waste Volume: 1.0M m 3

20 Test Plot Demonstration Two test plots installed in closed area of landfill Measured performance of methane oxidation, vegetation growth, soil moisture, and temperature Sensors installed to measure soil moisture and temperature Each ~30m x 30m

21 Test Plot Construction Material Placement Material Mixing

22 Test Plot Observations Moisture July 1, 2017 February 1, 2018 Clay Cover ET-LBC Cover

23 Test Plot Observations Temperature July 1, 2017 February 1, 2018 Clay Cover ET-LBC Cover

24 CO e Reduction Opportunity In situ observations of methane oxidation of 71-97% CO 2 e Methane Emission 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 Baseline Emission Project Emission Removal Efficiency 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% CH 4 Removal Efficiency (%) %

25 Test Plot Observations - Issues

26 Conclusions ET-LBC are low tech, and cost effective Can be applied at small landfill sites Performance meets requirements for clay covers (in certain environments) Low operations and maintenance costs Biological oxidation of methane reduce GHG emissions Constructed using composting byproducts Potential for offset emissions credits

27 To Be Continued!! Thank you to our project partners.