Version 05.1 Page 1 of 25

Transcription

1 Monitoring report form (Version 05.1) Complete this form in accordance with the Attachment Instructions for filling out the monitoring report form at the end of this form. MONITORING REPORT Title of the project activity UNFCCC reference number of the project activity Koru Wind Power Plant, Turkey n/a Version number of the monitoring report 7.5 Completion date of the monitoring report 17/10/2017 Monitoring period number and duration of this monitoring period Period 1 (22/04/ /04/2017) Project participant(s) Host Party Fuatres Elektrik Üretim A.Ş. Turkey (Host Country) Sectoral scope(s) 01 Energy Industries (Renewable/non-renewable sources) Selected methodology(ies) ACM0002, v Selected standardized baseline(s) Estimated amount of GHG emission reductions or net GHG removals by sinks for this monitoring period in the registered PDD Grid-connected electricity generation from renewable sources 168,339 tco2e Total amount of GHG emission reductions or net GHG removals by sinks achieved in this monitoring period GHG emission reductions or net GHG removals by sinks reported up to 31 December 2012 GHG emission reductions or net GHG removals by sinks reported from 1 January 2013 onwards 0 176,625 tco2e Version 05.1 Page 1 of 25

2 SECTION A. Description of project activity A.1. Purpose and general description of project activity Fuatres Elektrik Üretim A.Ş. (hereafter referred to as Fuatres ), planned to invest in to a new power project called Koru Wind Power Plant, Turkey, GS2545, (hereafter referred to as the Project or Koru WPP ), Installed Capacity of Koru WPP is 52.8 MWm / 50 MWe with 16 turbines. Brand and name of the turbines are VESTAS V112/3.3 MW. The license of the project was issued by Energy Market Regulatory Authority (EMRA) in 22 December The generated electricity is fed to grid at Can Havza TM-1, 154 kv. As required by the Turkish Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regulation, Project Design Report (PDR) was prepared and EIA is not required decision was taken for 50 MW (16*3MW + 1*2MW) installed capacity in 26/10/2011. During the on-going feasibility study, since the number of the turbines had been decreased from 17 to 16 and the turbine coordinates was changed within the same project area, Provincial Directorate of Environment and Urbanism was notified about these revisions and an approval was obtained without preparation of a new PDR on 01/10/2013. Therefore with all changes whole permissions were granted for final figures. The estimated net electricity generation of the plant is GWh per year. By the efficient utilization of the available wind energy project activity replaces the grid electricity, which is constituted of different fuel sources, mainly fossil fuels. The electricity produced by project activity results in a total estimated emission reduction of 83,033 tonnes of CO 2e per year. Moreover, project activity contributes further dissemination of wind energy and extension of national power generation. Construction work had been started in May 2014, and first commissioning of the turbines occurred on 22/04/2015. The operation start date was mentioned as 23/05/2015 in the registered PDD. However, that was the planned commissioning date and the real commissioning took place earlier. Phased operation dates are 22/04/2015, 08/05/2015 and 22/05/2015 respectively. Thus, the crediting period start dates has been changed to 22/04/2015. The total real emission reduction occured in the first monitoring period (22/04/ /04/2017) is 176,625 tco2e and the total net electricity generation amount is 314,729.97MWh. The purpose of the project is to generate electricity and to feed it into the public grid. Koru WPP project registration was approved on 05/05/2016 by Gold Standard as a Voluntary Emission Reduction project in order to enable the project implementation by means of financial inflows coming from the credits sale. Because of its significant contribution to climate protection and to sustainable development in the region, this project is expected to fulfil the requirements of the Gold Standard. A.2. Location of project activity Location of the project is given below in the Map 1. The project site is located at Lapseki and Tahtagediği District and will be situated on several hills, between Dededağ, Kırılmış, Ramazan, Esebey, Deliklitaş and İncirlitaş Tepe villages.. The closest settlement is Karaömerler village by 1690m. Version 05.1 Page 2 of 25

3 Map 1: Location of Koru Wind Power Plant Project Wind Turbine No. Latitude (N) Longitude (E) 1 40⁰ 14 26, ⁰ 45 45, ⁰ 14 17, ⁰ 45 59, ⁰ 14 10, ⁰ 46 09, ⁰ 14 03, ⁰ 46 18, ⁰ 14 00, ⁰ 46 31, ⁰ 14 00, ⁰ 46 48, ⁰ 13 43, ⁰ 47 01, ⁰ 13 32, ⁰ 47 14, ⁰ 13 25, ⁰ 47 23, ⁰ 13 18, ⁰ 47 32, ⁰ 13 10, ⁰ 47 42, ⁰ 13 04, ⁰ 47 52, ⁰ 13 06, ⁰ 48 08, ⁰ 13 03, ⁰ 48 20, ⁰ 13 19, ⁰ 48 03, ⁰ 13 26, ⁰ 47 54,3318 Version 05.1 Page 3 of 25

4 A.3. Parties and project participant(s) Party involved ((host) indicates a host Party) Private and/or public entity(ies) project participants (as applicable) Turkey (host) Fuatres Elektrik Üretim A.Ş. / (Private entity) Indicate whether the Party involved wishes to be considered as project participant (yes/no) No Fuatres Elektrik Üretim A.Ş. is subsidiary of Borusan EnBW Enerji Yatırımları A.Ş.which is the developer and owner of the Project. Republic of Turkey: Host country. Turkey has ratified the Kyoto Protocol on 5 February Turkish National Focal Point to the UNFCCC is the Ministry of Environment and Forestry 1. A.4. Reference of applied methodology and standardized baseline For the determination of the baseline, the official methodology ACM0002 version , Large-scale Consolidated baseline methodology for grid-connected electricity generation from renewable sources, is applied, using conservative options and data as presented in the following section. This methodology refers to five Tools, which are: 1.Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system (Version ) ; 2.Tool for the demonstration and assessment of additionality (Version ) ; 3.Combined tool to identify the baseline scenario and demonstrate additionality (Version ) ; 4.Tool to calculate project or leakage CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion (Version ) ; 5.Tool to determine the remaining lifetime of the equipment For baseline calculation the first tool, for additionality assessment the second tool is used. As third tool is the combination of the first and second tool, it is not used. Since no project emission or leakage calculation is required for wind power project fourth tool is not used, and finally to determine the remaining lifetime of the equipment fifth tool is used. A.5. Crediting period of project activity 22/04/ /04/2022 (Crediting period of the project is 7 years which is twice renewable.) 2 A.6. Contact information of responsible persons/entities Contact person: Emel Yaşaroğlu (Fuatres Elektrik Üretim A.Ş.) Position: Investment Department eyasaroglu@borusanenbwenerji.com Tel: Fax: Address: Büyükdere Caddesi Nurol Plaza No.255 Kat: 19 Maslak Şişli- İstanbul Contact person: İklim Şahin Position: Project Consultant iklim.sahin@lifeenerji.com Tel: Fax: Address: Oğuzlar Mh Sok. No:19/9 Balgat, Çankaya/Ankara 1 UNFCCC, list of the National Focal Points (accessed in April 2010) 2 For the change of crediting period start date, please see Section A.1. Version 05.1 Page 4 of 25

5 SECTION B. Implementation of project activity CDM-MR-FORM B.1. Description of implemented registered project activity The project installation is completed according to the description in the PDD and completely operational. The project consists of only one site. The most important milestones are included in the following table: Date Activity (DD/MM/YYYY) 26/10/2011 EIA is not Required Certificate for 17 turbines (16*3mw+1*2mw) 22/12/2011 Issuance of the License 02/01/2013 Board Decision Date 29/07/2013 Agreement with Carbon consultant (Lifenerji) 06/09/2013 Local Stakeholder Meeting 01/10/2013 EIA Not Required Decision for 16 turbines 15/12/2013 Agreement with Equipment Provider 28/03/2014 Loan Proposal Date 15/04/2014 Date for start of construction 21/05/2014 Notice to Proceed of the Agreement with Equipment provider (project start date) 14/07/2014 Assessment of the Energy production of the Proposed Koru wind farm 27/11/2014 Amendment of the project owner form Eskoda to Fuatres 22/04/2015 Start date of operation (1 st provisional acceptance for 6 turbines)(crediting period start date) Start date of the first monitoring period 08/05/ nd provisional acceptance for 6 turbines 22/05/ rd provisional acceptance for 4 turbines 05/05/2016 Final registration feedback form and approval for registration from GS 30/04/2017 Completion of the 1 st monitoring period (22/04/ /04/2017) B.2. Post-registration changes B.2.1. Temporary deviations from registered monitoring plan, applied methodology or applied standardized baseline There is no revision in the monitoring plan of the project B.2.2. Corrections No deviation applied. B.2.3. Changes to start date of crediting period The start date of crediting period has been changed to 22/04/2015 from 23/05/2015. The operation start date was mentioned as 23/05/2015 in the registered PDD. However, that was the planned commissioning date and the real commissioning took place earlier. Phased operation dates are 22/04/2015, 08/05/2015 and 22/05/2015 respectively. Thus, the crediting period start dates has been changed to 22/04/2015. B.2.4. Inclusion of a monitoring plan to the registered PDD that was not included at registration N/A B.2.5. Permanent changes from registered monitoring plan, applied methodology or applied standardized baseline For biodiversity indicator, mitigation measure has been changed as Bird survey during migration periods (spring and autumn) will be performed and reported every 6 months for 2 years with start of construction. Version 05.1 Page 5 of 25

6 from An assessment report will be prepared by an ornithologist before the plant starts operation. Also project area will be monitored during the migration seasons of the birds. the reason is that the conditions have changed after the time of GS Passport preparation. Necessary monitoring has been conducted for 2 years and an opinion statement was given for the project by Directorate General for Nature Conservation and National Parks that they stopped surveys. Also, the When part has been changed as In the registered GS Passport, this parameter was said to be monitored every 2 years. However, according to survey result and decision of Directorate of Nature Conservation and National Parks, there is no need to continue for bird survey monitoring. Thus, this parameter will not be monitored continuously. 3 B.2.6. Changes to project design of registered project activity N/A B.2.7. Types of changes specific to afforestation or reforestation project activity N/A SECTION C. Description of monitoring system The crediting period starts with the commissioning of the plant, exactly with the first day of documented electricity supply to the grid. Data Processing and Archiving C.1 Data Processing and Archiving C.1.1. Data Processing As the necessary baseline emission factors are all defined ex ante (Operating and Build Margin, see baseline description), the most important information to be monitored is the amount of electricity fed into the grid by Koru WPP. This value will be monitored continuously by redundant metering devices, one of them being the main one in the substation, which provides the data for the monthly invoicing to TEİAŞ. The single line diagram for the project site is stated below. 3 The written opinion statement taken from the Directorate of Nature Conservation and National Parks has been provided to the verification team. Version 05.1 Page 6 of 25

7 The collected data will be kept by Fuatres during the crediting period and until two years after the last issuance of VERs for the Koru WPP activity for that crediting period. Given a data vintage based on ex ante monitoring and selection of a renewable 7 year crediting period, the Combined Margin will be recalculated at any renewal of the crediting period using the valid baseline methodology. Potential leakage emissions in the context of power sector projects are emissions arising due to activities such as power plant construction, fuel handling and land inundation. However, according to the methodology, those emission sources do not need to be taken into account. C.1.2. A Backup Unit for Systematic Storage The fact that two reliable best practice meters are installed in a redundant manner keeps the uncertainty level of the only parameter for baseline calculation low. High data quality of this parameter is not only in the interest of the emission reduction monitoring, but paramount for the business relation between the plant operator and the electricity buyer. Since the meters are reading electricity supplied to the system and withdrawn from the system separately, the net electricity amount supplied to the grid was calculated by electricity supplied minus electricity withdrawn which was taken from monthly settlement notifications. Monthly data from EPIAS are stored electronically on EPIAS website and this data can be accessed by login of Project Developer. Fuatres also stores a hardcopy of the monthly meter reading protocols for back up of systematic storage of data. Version 05.1 Page 7 of 25

8 C.1.3 Calibration Procedures: The calibration of the monitoring equipment was carried out according to the information provided in the GS- VER PDD. The GS-VER PDD mainly includes the following obligation for the calibration of the appropriate meters: According to the Article 2 of the Communiqué of Meters in Electricity Sector 4 : The meters to be used in the electricity market shall be compliant with the standards of Turkish Standards Institute or IEC and have obtained Type and System Approval certificate from the Ministry of Trade and Industry. Therefore, Ministry of Trade and Industry (Ministry) is responsible from control and calibration of the meters. Also according to Article 11 of this Communiqué, meters shall be in class of 0.5s, which means error interval for measuring is in +-0.5% range which is well acceptable according to rules. Paragraph b) of the Article 9 of the 'Regulation of Metering and Testing of Metering Systems' 5 (Regulation) of Ministry states that: b) Periodic tests of meters of electricity, water, coal gas, natural gas and current and voltage transformers are done every 10 years. Therefore periodic calibration of the meters will be done every 10 years. Also according to Article 67 (page 20) of this regulation, the calibration shall be done in calibration stations which have been tested and approved by Ministry of Trade and Industry. Article 10 d) of Communiqué requires the meters shall be three phase four wire and Article 64 of Regulation clearly states how calibration shall be performed for this kind of meters. As above mentioned, the data acquisition and management and quality assurance procedures that are anyway in place, no additional procedures have to be established for the monitoring plan. C.1.4. Troubleshooting Procedures As the measuring devices are sealed by TEIAŞ, Koru cannot intervene with the devices. In case of unforeseen problems or failures of the meters or if any differences occur between primary and secondary devices TEIAŞ has to be informed for necessary maintenance and calibration. There is an agreement between Fuatres and TEIAŞ that in case of problems or failures of the meters TEIAŞ reacts as fast as possible to solve the problem. SECTION D. Data and parameters D.1. Data and parameters fixed ex ante or at renewal of crediting period Data / Parameter: Gross electricity generation Unit: MWh Description: Gross Electricity supplied to the grid by relevant sources ( ) Source of Value(s) applied): Choice of data or Measuremen t methods and procedures Turkish Electricity Transmission Company (TEİAŞ), Annual Development of Turkey s Gross Electricity Generation of Primary Energy Resources ( ) TEİAŞ m(23-47)/37(06-13).xls Registered PDD TEIAS is the national electricity transmission company, which makes available the official data of all power plants in Turkey. 4 See, oc 5 See, Version 05.1 Page 8 of 25

9 Purpose of Additional comment: Data used for emission reduction calculation CDM-MR-FORM Data / Parameter: Unit: Description: EG m,y GWh Net electricity generated by power plant/unit m in year y Source of Value(s) applied): Choice of data or Measureme nt methods and procedures Purpose of Additional comment: Turkish Electricity Transmission Company (TEIAS), Annual Development of Electricity Generation- Consumption and Losses in Turkey ( ) TEIAS, see ketim(23-47)/34(84-13).xls Registered PDD This data is used to find relation between the gross and net electricity delivered to the grid by fossil fuel fired power plants. (reg d PDD) Import and Export data is used to identify total net electricity fed into the grid in the years of 2011, 2012 and (reg d PDD) TEIAS is the national electricity transmission company, which makes available the official data of all power plants in Turkey. Data used for emission reduction calculation Data / Parameter: Unit: Description: Source of Value(s) applied): Choice of data or Measureme nt methods and procedures Purpose of Additional comment: HVi,y Mass or volume unit Heating Values of fuel type i in year y fuels consumed for electricity generation in the years of 2011, 2012 and 2013 Net calorific value (energy content) of fuel type i in year y Heating Values Of Fuels Consumed In Thermal Power Plants In Turkey By The Electric Utilities, TEİAŞ. See: 1t48-53/51.xls Registered PDD There is no national NVC data in Turkey. However, TEİAŞ announces Heating values of fuels. This data is used to calculate annual NCVs for each fuel type TEİAŞ is the national electricity transmission company, which makes available the official data of all power plants in Turkey. Data used for emission reduction calculation Version 05.1 Page 9 of 25

10 Data / Parameter: Unit: Description: Source of Value(s) applied): Choice of data or Measureme nt methods and procedures Purpose of Additional comment: EG m,y GWh Net electricity generated by power plant/unit m in year y Turkish Electricity Transmission Company (TEIAS), Annual Development of Electricity Generation- Consumption and Losses in Turkey ( ) TEIAS, see ketim(23-47)/34(84-13).xls Registered PDD TEİAŞ is the national electricity transmission company, which makes available the official data of all power plants in Turkey. Data used for emission reduction calculation Data / Parameter: NCVi,y Unit: GJ/mass or volume unit Description: Net Calorific Value of fuel types in the years of 2011, 2012 and 2013 Source of Value(s) applied): Choice of data or Measurement methods and procedures Purpose of Additional comment: Calculated by using HVi,y to FCi,y as Net Calorific Values of fuel types are not directly available in Turkey. Registered PDD TEİAŞ is the national electricity transmission company, which makes available the official data of power plants in Turkey. Calculation of NCVs from national HVi,y and FCi,y data is preferred to default IPCC data as these are more reliable. Data / Parameter: Unit: Description: Source of Sample Group for BM emission factor Name of the plants, MW capacities, fuel types, annual electricity generations and dates of commissioning. Most recent power plants which compromise 20% of total generation Annual Development Of Fuels Consumed In Thermal Power Plants In Turkey By The Electric Utilities, TEIAS: Version 05.1 Page 10 of 25

11 Value(s) applied): Choice of data or Measurement methods and procedures Purpose of Additional comment: Registered PDD CDM-MR-FORM TEIAS is the national electricity transmission company, which makes available the official data of all power plants in Turkey. The latest data available during PDD preparation was for Data / Parameter: η m,y Unit: - Description: Source of Value(s) applied): Choice of data or Measurement methods and procedures Purpose of Additional comment: Average energy conversion efficiency of power unit m in year y Annex I the Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system (v.4) Registered PDD For efficiency rates of Coal and Lignite Power Plants See Annex-1 of the Tool (highest rate is applied to be conservative) For Natural Gas and Oil plants efficiencies, default value given in the tool is applied: Version 05.1 Page 11 of 25

12 Data / Parameter Unit Description Source of data Value(s) applied Choice of data or Measurement methods and procedures EF CO2,m,i,y tco2/gj CO2 emission factor of fuel type i in year y IPCC default values at the lower limit of the uncertainty at a 95% confidence interval as provided in table 1.4 of Chapter1 of Vol. 2 (Energy) of the IPCC Guidelines on National GHG Inventories. (reg d PDD) No plant specific and national emission factor data is available in Turkey. So, IPCC default data is used. For Fuel Oil Power Plants: 'Gas/Diesel Oil' data is used for conservativeness. For Coal Power Plants: In the 205 th page of official document given in the link below, it is stated that Çolakoğlu and İçdaş utilizes 'Taşkömürü' (Hardcoal). And at the Table-2 in page 157 of the same document, Taşkömürü is dived in two groups: Bituminous and Antharcite. Since Sub-Bituminous Coal is under Brown Coal in the same table and since Other Bituminous Coal has lower EF than Anthracite in 1.4 of IPCC Guidelines, EF for 'Other Bituminous Coal' is used. See: skömuru-jeotermal) Purpose of data Additional comment Data / Parameter Unit Description Source of data Value(s) applied Choice of data or Measurement methods and procedures Purpose of data Additional comment Data / Parameter Unit Description Source of data Value(s) applied Choice of data or Measurement methods and procedures Purpose of data Additional comment EF grid,cm,y tco2/mwh Combined margin CO2 emission factor for the project electricity system in year y As per Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system tco2/mwh Combined Margin Emission Factor (EFgrid,CM,y) is calculated ex ante as the weighted average CO2 of Operating Margin Emission Factor (EFgrid,OM,y) and Build Margin Emission Factor (EFgrid,BM,y) Calculation of baseline emissions EF grid,bm,y tco2/mwh Build margin CO2 emission factor for the project electricity system in year y As per Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system tco2/mwh Combined Margin Emission Factor (EFgrid,CM,y) is calculated ex ante in accordance with Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system by using TEIAS values Calculation of baseline emissions Version 05.1 Page 12 of 25

13 Data / Parameter Unit Description Source of data Value(s) applied Choice of data or Measurement methods and procedures Purpose of data Additional comment EF grid,om,y tco2/mwh Operating margin CO2 emission factor for the project electricity system in year y As per Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system tco2/mwh Operating Margin Emission Factor (EFgrid,OM,y) is calculated ex ante in accordance with Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system by using TEIAS values Calculation of baseline emissions Version 05.1 Page 13 of 25

14 D.2. Data and parameters monitored Data / Parameter Unit Description Measured/calculated/defa ult Source of data Value(s) of monitored parameter EGfacility,y MWh/yr CDM-MR-FORM Quantity of net electricity generation supplied by the project plant to the grid in year y Measured Electricity meter(s) 314, MWh Period electricity supplied to the grid (MWh) electricity consumed from the grid(mwh) Net Electricty generation (MW , , , , Monitoring equipment Measuring/reading/record ing frequency: , , Total 315, , Two electricity meters will be placed (one main and one reserve) at the substation. These meters are sealed by TEIAS and intervention by project proponent is not possible. The fact that two meters are installed in a redundant manner keeps the uncertainty level of the only parameter for baseline calculation low. High data quality of this parameter is not only in the interest of the emission reduction monitoring, but paramount for the business relation between the plant operator and the electricity buyers. Main meter Back-up meter Serial no Accuracy class 0.2S 0.2S Date of Calibration (Test Report) 21/03/ /03/ /04/ /03/ /03/ /04/2015 PMUM (Piyasa Mali Uzlaştırma Merkezi) readings will be used as a base. The above described measurement method follows Article 81 of the official regulation Electricity Market Balancing And Settlement Regulation 6 Continuous measurement and at least monthly recording 6 See, page 55 Version 05.1 Page 14 of 25

15 QA/QC procedures Purpose of data Additional comment CDM-MR-FORM According to the Article 2 of the Communiqué of Meters in Electricity Sector7: The meters to be used in the electricity market shall be compliant with the standards of Turkish Standards Institute or IEC and have obtained Type and System Approval certificate from the Ministry of Trade and Industry. Therefore, Ministry of Trade and Industry (Ministry) is responsible from control and calibration of the meters. Also according to Article 11 of this Communiqué, meters shall be in class of 0.5s, which means error interval for measuring is in +-0.5% range which is well acceptable according to rules. Paragraph b) of the Article 9 of the 'Regulation of Metering and Testing of Metering Systems'8 (Regulation) of Ministry states that: b) Periodic tests of meters of electricity, water, coal gas, natural gas and current and voltage transformers are done every 10 years. Therefore periodic calibration of the meters will be done every 10 years. Also according to Article 67 (page 20) of this regulation, the calibration shall be done in calibration stations which have been tested and approved by Ministry of Trade and Industry. Article 10 d) of Communiqué requires the meters shall be three phase four wire and Article 64 of Regulation clearly states how calibration shall be performed for this kind of meters. As above mentioned, the data acquisition and management and quality assurance procedures that are anyway in place, no additional procedures have to be established for the monitoring plan. Calculation of Baseline and Project Emission Plant Manager will be responsible for monitoring data. D.3. N/A Implementation of sampling plan SECTION E. Calculation of emission reductions or GHG removals by sinks E.1. Used Formulas: Calculation of baseline emissions or baseline net GHG removals by sinks The total emission reductions can be calculated with the results of the below described equations. The emission reduction is equal to the baseline emissions minus project emissions and leakage emissions. Leakage emissions in this project are considered to be negligible. There are no project emissions in this kind of project. The general equation is as follows: ER y BE y PE y L y (1) Where: ERy = Emission reduction BEy = Baseline emissions PEy = Project emissions Ly = Leakage y = Refers to a given period The electricity meters are measuring two parameters: The electricity supplied to the grid (EGexport) and the electricity consumption from the grid (EGimport). To achieve the net amount of supplied electricity, the difference has to be calculated: EG y = EGexport EGimport (2) 7 See, 8 See, Version 05.1 Page 15 of 25

16 Where: Ey = Net electricity supplied to the Grid in MWh (ID 1) EGexport = Electricity supplied to the Grid in MWh EGimport = Electricity consumption from the Grid in MWh According to the applied methodology version the emission reduction is the baseline emissions calculated as the net electricity supplied to the grid multiplied by the grid emission factor. BE y = EG y x EF grid,cm,y (3) Where: BEy = Baseline emissions in tonnes CO2e EFgrid, CM,y =Combined margin CO2 emission factor for grid connected power generation in year y calculated using the latest version of the Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system [tco2e/mwh]. EGy = Net electricity supplied to the Grid in MWh (ID 1) y = Refers to a given period For the detailed baseline calculations, please see excel file ER_Koru_WPP_v2_ E.2. Calculation of project emissions or actual net GHG removals by sinks The proposed project activity involves the generation of electricity by development of a wind farm. The generation of electricity does not result in greenhouse gas emissions and therefore is taken as 0 tco2/year. E.3. Calculation of leakage No leakage needs to be considered. E.4. Summary of calculation of emission reductions or net GHG removals by sinks Item Baseline emissions or baseline net GHG removals by sinks (t CO 2e) Project emissions or actual net GHG removals by sinks (t CO 2e) Leakage (t CO 2e) GHG emission reductions or net GHG removals by sinks (t CO 2e) achieved in the monitoring period Up to 31/12/2012 From 01/01/2013 April Total amount May'15 3, ,331 3,331 June'15 5, ,538 5,538 July'15 8, ,053 8,053 August'15 9, ,158 9,158 September'15 5, ,588 5,588 October'15 8, ,131 8,131 November'15 7, ,359 7,359 December'15 7, ,316 7,316 Sum of , ,919 54,919 Jan'16 7, ,106 7,106 Feb'16 8, ,095 8,095 March'16 7, ,512 7,512 9 Sum of 2015, 2016 and 2017 rounded down, and as a result the total sum is the rounded value. Version 05.1 Page 16 of 25

17 Item Baseline emissions or baseline net GHG removals by sinks (t CO 2e) Project emissions or actual net GHG removals by sinks (t CO 2e) Leakage (t CO 2e) CDM-MR-FORM GHG emission reductions or net GHG removals by sinks (t CO 2e) achieved in the monitoring period Up to 31/12/2012 From 01/01/2013 Total amount Apr'16 5, ,592 5,592 May'16 5, ,392 5,392 June'16 6, ,498 6,498 July'16 10, ,395 10,395 Aug'16 11, ,110 11,110 September'16 7, ,928 7,928 October'16 6, ,700 6,700 November'16 8, ,425 8,425 December'16 7, ,849 7,849 Sum of , ,601 92,601 Jan'17 8, ,457 8,457 Feb'17 9, ,060 9,060 March'17 7, ,750 7,750 April 17 3, ,838 3,838 Sum of , ,105 29,105 Total 176, , ,625 E.5. Comparison of actual emission reductions or net GHG removals by sinks with estimates in registered PDD Item Values estimated in ex ante calculation of registered PDD (rounded down) Actual values achieved during this monitoring period (rounded down) Emission reductions or GHG removals by sinks for 2015(t CO2e) Emission reductions or GHG removals by sinks for 2016(t CO2e) Emission reductions or GHG removals by sinks for 2017(t CO2e) Emission reductions or GHG removals by sinks in total (t CO2e) 57,781 tco2e 54,919 tco2e 83,260 tco2e 92,601 tco2e 27,298 tco2e 29,105 tco2e 168,339 tco 2e 176,625 tco 2e E.6. Remarks on difference from estimated value in registered PDD Vintage 2015: difference between actual and estimated values in that vintage is around 4.9% where actual reduction is lower. This may be caused due to the fact that commissioning of the turbines took place in a stepwise manner. Thus, not all of the turbines started operation at the same time. Another reason is that there were less wind than expected. Vintage 2016: difference between actual and estimated values in that vintage is around 11.2% where actual reduction is higher. The reason is that there had been more wind than expected. In addition to that, if the P50 value had been used during the registration, the estimated emission reduction would have been 91,351 t CO2e and according to this value, difference between actual and estimated values in that vintage would have been around %1.1 Version 05.1 Page 17 of 25

18 Vintage 2017: difference between actual and estimated values in that vintage is only around 6.6% where actual reduction is higher. The reason is that there had been more wind than expected. This is a very minor difference, which can be neglected. SECTION F. Sustainable Monitoring Report According to the requirements of Gold Standard, the project activity must be assessed against a matrix of sustainable development indicators. Project activity s contribution to sustainable development is based on indicators of; environmental sustainability, social sustainability & development economic & technological development The indicators that have to be monitored is defined in the Gold Standard Passport of Koru WPP under a monitoring plan. F.1. Sustainable Development Indicators that have to be monitored According to the Gold Standard Passport of Koru Wind Power Project, Turkey (here refers as Koru), six indicators were added to the monitoring plan. F.1.1: Air Quality No 1 Indicator Air Quality Mitigation measure Watering the ground in order to prevent the dust emission. Chosen parameter a) Amount of CO and NMVOC emissions b) Level of dust emissions during construction of the project activity Current situation of parameter Reg d GS Passport: a) According to latest official data CO and NMVOC emissions due to electricity generation in 2012 are: tons/gwh and tons/ GWh respectively 10. b) Dust caused by the wind Current Situation: a) 2015 CO: 15.7 tons/y ; NMVOC: 3.3 tons/y 2016 CO: 26.4 tons/y ; NMVOC: 5.6 tons/y 2017 CO: 8.3 tons/y ; NMVOC: 1.8 tons/y b) Interview was conducted on site visit and no negative comments were taken. Estimation of baseline situation of parameter a) Baseline parameters for CO is tons/gwh electricity generated and NMVOC is tons/gwh electricity generated 11. b) Dust emissions are case only during the construction stage. The calculated amount of dust emission during excavation is kg/hour 12, which is well below the regulatory emission limits (1 kg/h) See; PTD page See: For net electricity generation in 2013 see TEİAŞ Calculation is further substantiated in Monitoring Plan of CM Calculation Worksheet, which is available to DOE. 11 See, For CO and MNVOC emission amount see TUIK: ; For net electricity generation in 2013 see TEİAŞ: 12 See; PTD page 22 Version 05.1 Page 18 of 25

19 Future target for parameter a) Future target for CO is tons/year and for NMVOC is -5.0 tons/year avoidance with annual generation of the project. b) Future target for dust emission is continuation of baseline situation. Way of monitoring How a) Amount of annual net electricity generation, which is calculated by monthly settlement notifications of PMUM based on monthly meter readings, will be used to calculate estimated CO and NMVOC emission reductions by project activity b) Interviewing with the local people. When a) Annually b) Once during the verification period By who Assigned technician by Plant Manager or assigned carbon consultant F.1.2: Water Quality and Quantity No 2 Indicator Water Quality and Quantity Mitigation measure no mitigation measure Chosen parameter Current situation of parameter a)amount of avoided wastewater to be discharged to the environment by project activity. b) Disposal of wastewater Reg d GS Passport: a)+ 26,3 m3 of wastewater production with each GWh electricity generated. b) n.a. Estimation of baseline situation of parameter Future target for parameter Current Situation: a) 2015: 2,574.8 m3 wastewater avoided 2016: 4,341.8 m3 wastewater avoided 2017: 1,364.3 m3 wastewater avoided b) Waste water records have been provided to the DOE. a)in 2012; 26.3 m 3 wastewater is discharged the environment due to each GWh electricity produced 13. b) n.a a) thousand m3/year wastewater avoidance with annual generation of the project. b) All wastewater will be disposed in line with the regulation. Way of monitoring How a) Amount of annual net electricity generation, which is calculated by monthly settlement notifications of PMUM based on monthly meter readings, will be used to calculate estimated amount of avoided wastewater discharge by project activity. b) Records of transfer of waste water from power plant by sewage truck, if it was performed, will be used to demonstrate proper waste water management When By who a) Annually b) each verification period Assigned technician by Plant Manager or assigned carbon consultant 13 For Wastewater discharged in 2012 by thermal PPs see cell A5 of Table-2 from: (Below the page opened, Table-2 cell F10) Calculation is further substantiated in sheet of CM Calculation Worksheet, which is available to DOE. Version 05.1 Page 19 of 25

20 F.1.3: Other Pollutants No 3 Indicator Other Pollutants Mitigation measure All wastes are disposed in line with the regulations. 14 Chosen parameter a)noise level during construction period and operation of the project activity. b)solid/liquid wastes Current situation of parameter Reg d GS Passport: Not applicable. Estimation of baseline situation of parameter Future target for parameter Way of monitoring How a)interview with locals b)waste disposal invoices When a,b)each verification period By who Current Situation: a) Interview was conducted in the site visit by DOE. There was no negative feedback from the local. b) forms of waste transfers have been presented to the DOE. a) The noise measurement from the closest turbine to the nearest village (Cesnigir Village) is defined as 39 db and it is under the legal limits 15 b) n.a. a,b)continuation of current situation. Assigned technician by Plant Manager or assigned carbon consultant F.1.4: Quality of employment No 4 Indicator Quality of employment Mitigation measure Necessary health and safety measures will be taken during construction and operation phase, relevant staff will be trained to be able to work with high voltages. Chosen parameter Health & Safety conditions of employers Current situation of parameter Reg d GS Passport: Trainings will be given to the employees to raise their operational and knowledge level. Estimation of baseline situation of parameter Future target for parameter Current Situation: Detailed version showing each training along with the training certificates are submitted to DOE. All of the employees has completed their trainings related with their job. People are under-employed and have poor educational background Future target is training all employees on Occupational Health and Safety issue. Way of monitoring How Training attendance list and/or certificates. Safety measures and equipment will be shown to DOE. When Annually (Once at the end of the each monitoring period). After first verification period, only new cases will be reported. Safety measures and equipment will be shown to DOE during each site visit for verification. By who Assigned technician by Plant Manager or assigned carbon consultant. 14 See, PIF, page 29 and See, Fauna Report, page 14 Version 05.1 Page 20 of 25

21 F.1.5: Quantitative employment and income generation No 5 Indicator Quantitative employment and income generation Mitigation measure Project owner will employ workers from the local villages both during the construction and operation period. Chosen parameter Number of employment Current situation of parameter Reg d GS Passport: Number of employment from agriculture (15 local employee has worked during the construction period) Current Situation: Employment records are provided to the verification team. Out of 19 employees, 6 of them are local. Estimation of baseline situation of Continuation of current situation parameter Future target for parameter Project owner will provide job opportunities to locals as many as possible. In addition, at least one local will be employed in the plant. Way of monitoring How showing the social security registers of the employees When each verification period By who Assigned technician by Plant Manager or assigned carbon consultant. F.1.6: Biodiversity No 6 Indicator Biodiversity Mitigation measure Chosen parameter Current situation of parameter a) Turbines will be painted to darkish white. b) 1/3 of the wings of the turbines will be painted to a colour contrast to white. c) White and Red lights will be put to the turbines. d) Workers will be informed about the necessity of the protection of wild life. e) Bird survey during migration periods (spring and autumn) will be performed and reported every 6 months for 2 years with start of construction. number of bird strikes to the turbines. Reg d GS Passport: Not applicable Current Situation: All necessary evidence documents have been presented to the verification team in the on-site visit. a,b,c)turbines have been observed and photos were taken. d) Presentation and the attendance sheet have been provided. e) 2014 and 2015 spring and autumn bird survey report have been provided to DOE. Estimation of baseline situation of not applicable parameter Future target for parameter zero Way of monitoring How a,b,c) During the site visit DOE will report or proof with photographs d) Presentations which will be used to inform the workers about the necessity of the protection of wild life will be submitted to Gold Standard e) The assessment report which will be prepared by an ornithologist will be submitted to Gold Standard Version 05.1 Page 21 of 25

22 When By who CDM-MR-FORM a,b,c,d) Once at the verification site visit e) In the registered GS Passport, this parameter was said to be monitored every 2 years. However according to survey results and decision of Directorate of Nature Conservation and National Parks, there is no need to continue for bird survey monitoring. 16 Thus, this parameter will not be monitored in the following verifications. Assigned technician by Plant Manager or assigned carbon consultant. Forward Action Request #1 from Registration: During the first verification the verifying DOE shall verify if there has been an expropriation conducted due from the project activity. If yes, the DOE shall also verify the actions taken to mitigate the impact (if any). Response to FAR#1: Forest permits and related official letters have been provided in addition to official statement by Fuatres that the whole project site is under forestry and related permits were obtained The written opinion statement taken from the Directorate of Nature Conservation and National Parks has been provided to the verification team. Version 05.1 Page 22 of 25

23 Appendix 1. Contact information of project participants and responsible persons/entities Project participant and/or responsible person/ entity Project participant Person/entity responsible for completing the CDM-MR-FORM Organization name Fuatres Elektrik Üretim A.Ş. Street/P.O. Box Büyükdere Caddesi Nurol Plaza No.255 Kat: 19 Building - City Maslak Şişli- İstanbul State/region İstanbul Postcode Country Turkey Telephone Fax Website Contact person Emel Yaşaroğlu Title Salutation Ms Last name Emel Middle name First name Yaşaroğlu Department Mobile Direct fax Direct tel. Personal eyasaroglu@borusanenbwenerji.com Version 05.1 Page 23 of 25

24 Appendix 1. Project participant and/or responsible person/ entity Contact information of project participants and responsible persons/ entities Project participant Responsible person/ entity for completing the CDM-MR-FORM Organization name Life İklim ve Enerji Ltd. Şti. Street/P.O. Box Oğuzlar Mh Sk. No: 19/9 Balgat Building City Çankaya Ankara State/Region Postcode Country TURKEY Telephone Fax Website Contact person İklim Şahin Title Project Consultant Salutation Ms Last name Şahin Middle name First name İklim Department Mobile Direct fax Direct tel. Personal Version 05.1 Page 24 of 25

25 Document information Version Date Description May 2015 Editorial revision to correct version numbering April 2015 Revisions to: June 2014 Revisions to: Include provisions related to delayed submission of a monitoring plan; Provisions related to the Host Party; Remove reference to programme of activities; Overall editorial improvement. Include the Attachment: Instructions for filling out the monitoring report form (these instructions supersede the "Guideline: Completing the monitoring report form" (Version 04.0)); Include provisions related to standardized baselines; Add contact information on a responsible person(s)/ entity(ies) for completing the CDM-MR-FORM in A.6 and Appendix 1; Change the reference number from F-CDM-MR to CDM-MR- FORM; Editorial improvement November 2013 Editorial revision to correct table in page January 2013 Editorial revision to correct table in section E December 2012 Revision required to introduce a provision on reporting actual emission reductions or net GHG removals by sinks for the period up to 31 December 2012 and the period from 1 January 2013 onwards (EB70, Annex 11) March 2012 Revision required to ensure consistency with the "Guidelines for completing the monitoring report form" (EB 66, Annex 20) May 2010 EB 54, Annex 34. Initial adoption. Decision Class: Regulatory Document Type: Form Business Function: Issuance Keywords: monitoring report Version 05.1 Page 25 of 25