Zero Emission Power Production from gas and coal, today

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Zero Emission Power Production from gas and coal, today"

Transcription

1 Zero Emission Power Production from gas and coal, today Haugesund by Henrik Fleischer C.E.O. Sargas

2 The key challenge Breaking the link between energy growth and emission growth coal fired power plants globally, each emitting abt. 3 mill tons CO 2 p.a.

3 The Sargas vision Become the leading standard in Zero Emission Power Production by providing a systems solution for capture, storage, transportation and commercial use of CO 2, including deposit

4 What We Do Fuel Electricity Air Integrated Power and Capture Plant Contained CO 2 Near zero CO 2 emitted, 95% captured and 5 ppm NOx only Gas, Coal or Oil as Fuel

5 How - Re-configuring existing technology Steam turbine Steam Generator 80% Electricity Gas / Coal Air Pressurized combustion chamber and steam boiler Pump Condenser CO 2 and NOx scrubbing Heat exchanging Scrubbing system CO 2 removal Generator 20% Contained CO 2 clean waste gas Electricity Compressor Gas turbine Impact 46 times more efficient capture Compact plant

6 Proven Process verified by Siemens Power. Benchmarking based on MIT methodology shows best in class results. Mature technology components only, with vendors performance guarantees. Result : low technology and cost risk.

7 Benchmarking - Best in class

8 Practical Well functioning power plant and capture system in operation for years, integrated in an innovative, new configuration Sargas focus on high up-time, robustness and reliability.

9 Profitable Energy Cost Oil and Gas USD 6 12 / Mbtu Coal USD 1 2 / Mbtu In a Sargas plant w/capture, Investment cost increase by 25% only. Landed cost Norwegian continental shelf; Capture + transportation = 275 NOK/ton CO 2.

10 Sargas demo plant Purpose: 1. Demonstrate CO 2 capture from a coal fired power plant. 2. Demonstrate cleaning of flue-gas and process to avoid settlement of particles 3. Process fine-tuning for modular fabrication on global scale Q at Värtan, Stockholm

11 Contributors Alstom Reaction Systems Engineering Boston Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm Institute for Energy Technology Kjeller Siemens Power AG PsiPro Kristiansand

12 400 MW Clean Coal power plant At Husnes, Norway 4x100 MW Coal fired with CO2-capture Location: Next to SørAl Aluminum Works Industrial Ownership : SørAl 50/50 Alcan-Hydro Aluminium Eramet Norway Tinfos Group Sargas Target COE 6 US cents/kwh incl. capture Output per annum: 3,000 GWh Electricity 2.5 mill. ton CO 2 Investment Decision 2008 = Ready 2011

13 400 MW Clean Coal power plant at Husnes Clean Power Solut ions. Now. Prelim.layout : 4 x 100 MW Step One Further 4 x 100 MW in Step Two 5 mill tons CO2 p.a after Step Two

14 Clean Power Solut ions. Now. 400 MW Clean Coal power plant at Husnes Layout includes underground coal storage facility and Dust free ship-to-shore discharge system

15 Zero Emission Power off shore TRIPP EL Off shore units re-powered with 95 % CO 2 captured Compact plant; 200 MW = tons load Norwegian Sea Gas pipeline New Energy supplied to N, UK and EUR El. Cable North Sea CO2 used for EOR and later deposit Gas fired power Production Increased oil production, and longer field life UK El. Cable Gas pipeline Existing gas infrastructure El. Cable EUR

16 100 MW at Hammerfest - Zero Emission Power Gas fired Ton CO 2 /day pumped Into Snøhvit-field

17 Business in progress Husnes Hammerfest Värtan - Stockholm Offshore North sea Malta UAE USA Spain China fire brigade

18 Large scale logistics in 2012 A European scheme for capture, logistics and deposition of CO 2

19 Green Tanker CO 2 from Värtan to Sleipner

20 The First step in a Nordic Alliance Vârtan CO2 injected at Sleipner West, UK or Dutch fields

21 Summary A Proven and practical solution Low Cost Zero Emission Power coal 1,25-2,50 USD/MMbtu vs. Oil/Gas 6-12 USD/MMbtu Export Potential of pre-fabricated plants. CO 2 from Värtan to Sleipner 2009?

22 Too good to be true? No, but public sector sluggishness in establishing a CO 2 Deposit Regulatory Regime and technology neutral incentives may slow down large scale implementation

23 David vs. Goliath

24 David vs. Goliath

25 Welcome to Live Demo Stockholm November 2007 You may register at