ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

Transcription

1 ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Miloš Jokić Assistant Minister for Project Coordination and Development Ministry of Physical Planning, Civil Engineering and Ecology of Republic of Srpska, BiH Project co-financed by Partner: PREDA-PD PRIJEDOR BIH the European Regional Development Fund 1

2 Contents General Information Legal and Institutional Framework Energy Efficiency Potencial Building Tipology World Bank EE Project Public ESCO ESCO - Energy Performanc Contract 2

3 General Infromation Aera: km² Population: 3,5 million Entities: Two Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina; 50% Republika Srpska; 49% Project co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund Brčko DC; 1% Name of the partner

4 Institutional and Legal Framework Council of ministers BiH Government of Republic of Srpska Government of Federation of BiH Sate Level (BiH) International Cooperation Coordination Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Relations Law on Energy Efficiency Entity Level (Republic of Srpska) (Federation of BiH) Law on physical planning and construction Strategic documents Ministry of Physical Planing RS, FBiH Ministry of Energy RS, FBiH Financing Fund for Enviromental Protection and EE RS, FBiH 4

5 Energy Community Treaty BiH obligations under the Energy Community Treaty Transposition and implementation of the following directives: Directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings Directive 2010/30/EU on the indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy and other resources by energy-related products Directive 2006/32/EU on energy end-use efficiency and energy services Directive 2012/27/EU on energy efficiency, which obliges contracting parties to much more stringent requirements that must be met in the field of energy efficiency The development of the National Energy Efficiency Action Plan (NEEAP) Modes and mechanisms to achieve defined indicative targets on the reduction of final energy consumption Project co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund 5

6 Energy efficiency potential in BiH INCREASING FINAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION The average annual required energy for heating of typical public building is about 220 kwh/m 2 a The average annual required energy for heating of typical residential building is about 180 kwh/m2 FINAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION Significant conservation potentials Very high energy consumption and costs 6

7 Typology of public buildings in BiH Total number of public buildings estimated Total useful area of public buildings 9.1 milion m2 Final matrix of tipical buildings 7 typs / 6 time periods Preschool Education Health Sport Culture Administration Other education Useful area of public buildings in BiH by type 7

8 Typology of residential buildings in BiH Gross surface of residential buildings in BiH per type Single-family houses Individual terraced houses Multi-family houses Attached apartment building in urban blocks Apartment blocks High-rise buildings Total area: m² 2% 11% 1% 9% 3% 74% Number of residential buildings in BiH per type Single-family houses Individual terraced houses Multi-family houses Attached apartment building in urban blocks Apartment blocks High-rise buildings 1.39% 0.46% 0.5% 0.02% 3.72% % CONSTRUCTION TYPE Thermal insulation (λ=0,041 W/mK) thickness: IMPROVEMENT 1 Thermal insulation (λ=0,041 W/mK) thickness: IMPROVEMENT 2 exterior wall 10cm 20cm interior wall between heated and unheated space - 5cm ceiling toward non-heated attic 10cm 20cm ceiling toward non-heated basement 10cm 20cm Total number of buildings: flat roof 20cm 30cm sloped roof 20cm 30cm floor on the ground - 10cm windows 1,6 W/m K 1,0 W/m K 8 8

9 Typology of residential buildings in BiH Overview of Final Energy Consumption by Sectors for 2010, according to the First National Action Energy Efficiency Plan (NEEAP) Residential Services Industry Transport Comparison of energy required before and after EE measure 19,6 mil MWh/year 8,8 mil 55 % 6,1 mil 68 % BiH Energy need for heating of residential buildings in BiH (MWh/year) RS FBiH Energy need for heating of residential buildings on the territory of BiH after implementation of standard measures (MWh/year) Energy need for heating of residential buildings on the territory of BiH after implementation of improvement measures (MWh/year) Single-family houses Individual terraced houses Multi-family houses Attached apartment building in urban blocks Apartment blocks High-rise buildings BiH Significant potential for investments in millions of euros façade system only- 2 bilion EUR 9

10 World Bank EE BiH Project - BEEP Repayment period: 25 years, Grey period 5 years, Interest rate 1.25% Amount: USD Implemetation May 2015 December 2019 Components: Investments in Energy Efficiency of Public Buildings 86% Support for creating flexible financing mechanisms and capacity building 9% Project management - 5% Total number of buildings 85 Helth Education Project organization Ministry PIU Govermant PSC Project indicators for Republic of Srpska - Projected lifetime energy savings MWh - Projected lifetime fuel savings MJ - Lifetime GHG savings CO 2 - Direct project beneficiaries users - Number of trained municipal energy managers

11 Before After Elementary school Sveti Sava Bilića - Year of EE reconstruction 2016/17 - Contract ,50 BAM - Payback yeras - Energy Savings % yeras Before After 11

12 BEEP - Implementation Ministry PIU Entity Buildings EE Investment Other Buildings Building 1 Building 2 Building 3 Baseline Energy Cost Energy Cost Savings New Energy Cost 100% Baseline After retrofit Collection of Savings Remains with end-users 12

13 BEEP 2 Collection of Savings Ministry PIU Co-financing Ministry of Finance EE Investment Building 1 Building 2 Building 3 EE Fund Other Buildings Entity Buildings Baseline Energy Cost Energy Cost Savings New Energy Cost 50% 50% Baseline After retrofit Collection of Savings Collection and allocation of energy cost savings Remains with end-users 13

14 Public ESCO Collection of Savings EE Fund PIU EE Investment Building 1 Building 2 Building 3 Other Buildings Entity Buildings Baseline Energy Cost Energy Cost Savings New Energy Cost 50% 50% Baseline After retrofit Collection of Savings Collection and allocation of energy cost savings Remains with end-users 14

15 EE Fund Public ESCO Other suggested products for Public ESCO : Revolving Fund Risk reduction guarantees Forfaiting 15

16 Public ESCO Revolving Fund Additional capitalization Transfer of savings Soft loan Loan repayment Energy Performance Contract 16

17 Public ESCO Soft Loan Shortcomings of the suggested model: 17

18 Public ESCO - Risk Reduction Garantee Aplication for guarantee 1 Energy Performance Contract 4 Providing guarantee 2 Providing loan 3 Transfer of savings Loan repayment 18

19 Public ESCO - Risk Reduction Garantee Shortcomings of the suggested model: 19

20 Public ESCO Forfaiting (EPC) Loan approval Energy Performance Contract Loan repayment Discounted forfaiting amount Energy saving repayment years Transfer of savings Transfer of savings 20

21 Public ESCO - Forfaiting Barriers for the EPC implementation Legal Financial Technical Market 21

22 Public ESCO - Forfaiting Barriers for the EPC implementation PPP Law Private partner can t initiate the procedure Very long procedure There are no standard documents Companies lack own capital Bank borrowing necessary Banks have no knowledge of the EPC specifics Long Payback Period High Risk Higher Interest Rate Balance Sheet Debt 22

23 Public ESCO - Forfaiting Barriers for the EPC implementation Underdevelopment of the financial market Forfaiting not possible No multi-year budgeting Higher risk for collection of receivables Temporary budget illiquidity Insufficient capitalization of the Fund No possibility for new fees Lack of grant funds 23

24 Public ESCO - Forfaiting Barriers for the EPC implementation Underheated buildings Lack of information Lower temperature in buildings Lower energy cost then it should be Public partners lack sufficient capacity Private partners are not sufficiently informed 24

25 Thank you for your attention Miloš Jokić Assistant Minister for Project Coordination and Development Tel.: (0)

26 26

27 27

28 Public ESCO - Forfaiting PPP Law Companies lack own capital Long Payback Period Underdevelopment of the financial market No multi-year budgeting Insufficient capitalization of the Fund Insufficient communication Private partner can t initiate the procedure Very long procedure There are no standard documents Bank borrowing necessary Banks have no knowledge of the EPC specifics High Risk Higher Interest Rate Balance Sheet Debt Forfaiting not possible Higher risk for collection of receivables Budget illiquidity No possibility for new fees Lack of grant funds Banks have no knowledge of the EPC specifics Public partners lack sufficient capacity 28